DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Organisations Who Responded to the Public Consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Organisations Who Responded to the Public Consultation on List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 15 Healthcare Ltd 2020health 5 Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Abbott Aberystwyth University Abies Ltd Academy of Medical Royal Colleges Academy of Medical Sciences Accenture ACT Action for Prisoners' Families Action on Rights for Children Agfa Healthcare, UK All Party Parliamentary group on skin Alliance Boots Allied Health Professions Federation Alzheimer's Society Anglian Support Partnership Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Alliance Arthritis Care Arthritis Research UK ASSIST National Council Association for Clinical Biochemistry Association of Anaesthetists of GB & Ireland Association of British Healthcare Industries (ABHI) Association of British Insurers List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Association of British Neurologists Association of Directors of Public Health (ADPH) Association of Optometrists Association of Public Health Observatories Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) Association of Clinical Pathologists Assura Medical Astellas Pharma Ltd. Asthma UK AstraZeneca PLC Atrial Fibrillation Association (AFA) Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust AxSys Technology Bayer (Women's Health Business Unit) BCS Primary Health Care Specialist Group Berkshire LPC BioIndustry Association (BIA) Birmingham Health and Wellbeing Birmingham Sandwell and Solihull Cardiac and Stroke Network ‐ Response framed by the networks patient and carer shadow board British In Vitro Diagnostics Association (BIVDA) Blackpool LINk Manager Blackpool Wyre and Fylde Hospitals NHS Trust Bliss, the special care baby charity Bolton Local Pharmaceutical Committee Borough of Poole Bounty parenting club List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Bournemouth University Bradford and Airedale Community Health Services Breakthrough Breast Cancer Breakthrough UK Breast Cancer Care Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust British Association of Art Therapists British Association of Dermatologists British Computer Society (BCS) British Dental Association British Dietetic Association British Heart Foundation British Liver Trust British Lung Foundation British Medical Association British Medical Association ‐ Medical Student Rep to IT group British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS) British Orthopaedic Directors Society British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) British Society of Hearing Aid Audiologists British Specialist Nutrition Association British Standards Institution British Thoracic Society Brook BUPA Bury Council List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Bury Local Involvement Network, Gtr Manchester CLAHRC Business IT Models Cambridge University Hospitals Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge Weight Plan Cambridgeshire ACRE / Cambridgeshire LINk Cancer Research UK Cancer Research, MacMillan, Prostate Cancer Charity & Breast Cancer Care Capita Health Care Quality Commission (CQC) Carefx Carers in Hertfordshire (Carers' Response) Carers in Hertfordshire (Organisational Response) Carers Together Carers UK Castle Consulting Ltd. Cegedim Rx Central Bedfordshire Council Cerner Limited Chartered Institute of Library & Information Professionals (CILIP) Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council Child Accident Prevention Trust CHILL: Connecting Independent Health Libraries Chipperfield Parish Council Citizens Advice List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust CLIC Sargent Clinical Solutions Ltd College of Occupational Therapists College of Optometrists Community Action on Health Compassion in Dying Council for Disabled Children Council of Deans of Health Council of Ethnic Minority Voluntary Sector Organisations Counsel and Care Coventry LINk CSSM Cystic Fibrosis trust Defence Medical Services Whittington Deloitte Diabetes UK DIPEx Directorate of Adult Care & Housing Services Dispensing Doctors Association Dorset Cancer Network Dr Foster Intelligence Dudley & Walsall MH Partnership NHS Trust Durham County Council Ealing Hospital NHS Trust East Riding & Hull Local Pharmaceutical Committee List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 East Sussex Seniors Association Eastern and Coastal Kent PCT English Community Care Association Enhancing Quality Programme, Kent Surrey and Sussex Epilepsy Action ESSA Information Services Essex Cancer Network Essex County Council European Medicines Group Evidence Adoption Centre (EoE) Experian Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons Faculty of General Dental Practice Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine Faculty of Public Health Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare of RCOG Federation of Irish Societies First DataBank Europe Ltd. Foundation for Genomics and Population Health (PHG Foundation) Foundation Trust Governor Foundation Trust Network FPA Gateshead Advocacy and Information Network Gateshead PCT, South Tyneside PCT and Sunderland TPCT General Dental Council General Practice Research Database (GPRD) at the MHRA List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Genetic Alliance UK Genzyme Therapeutics GGP Systems Glaxosmithkline Gloucestershire Local Involvement Network General Medical Council (GMC) Graphnet Health Ltd Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust Greater London Authority Griftech Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, NHS London Haltwhistle Town Council Hampshire Common Assessment Framework for Adults Project Hampshire County Council Harmoni (in partnership with Advanced Health and Care) Harrow LINk Healium IT Limited Health and Wellbeing Unit Health Experiences Research Group, University of Oxford Health Intelligence Team, Staffordshire Public Health Health Perspectives Ltd Health Service Ombudsman Health Statistics Users Group (HSUG) Health Systems Coordination Health Systems Coordination/EU Care Workflow: NE Pilot Site Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Healthcare Scientist Hearing Loss Alliance Heart of Birmingham TPCT Provider Arm Heart Of England NHS Trust HeLEX Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford Help the Hospices HL7 UK HL7 UK, IHE UK & British Computer Society – a hybrid response Holly Bank Trust/ Ehlers Danlos Support Group Homeless Link Hospedia Ltd Humberstone Networks IA (The ileostomy & internal pouch support group) IBM UK IMS Health IMS MAXIMS Independent Healthcare Advisory Services Independent Healthcare Advisory Services and the NHS Partners Network Independent Mental Health Services Alliance (A group of nine leading independent providers of mental health services) Infertility Network UK, More To Life & ACeBabes Informatics Community across Y&H SHA Informatics Professionals within the East of England Information Commissioners Office Institute of Commissioning Professionals Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Institute of Strategic Leadership & Service Improvement, Faculty of Health and Social Care, London Southbank University Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise UK Intellect Isles of Scilly Link iSoft Primary Care User Group Joseph Rowntree Foundation Kent Medway Health Informatics Service Kidney Alliance Kidney Research UK King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Kings College London Kingsbury Court Surgery Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council Knowsley Primary Care Trust Labour Councillors ‐ Leicester City Council Lambeth Community Health Leeds Adult Social Care Leeds Gypsy and Traveller Exchange Leeds Partnerships NHS Foundation Trust Leeds Teaching Hospitals Leeds, Bradford and Airedale, Calderdale and Kirklees LPCs Leicestershire LINk LighterLife LINk in Cornwall Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust Liverpool Mental Health Consortium List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 Liverpool Primary Care Trust / Liverpool City Council Lloydspharmacy London Acute Trust ICT Directors. London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and NHS Barking and Dagenham London Borough of Lambeth London Borough of Sutton London Borough of Tower Hamlets London Friend / National LGB&T Partnership London Health Libraries Council London Public Health Analysts Consultation Team Macmillan Cancer Support Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust Marie Curie Markyate Parish Council MedeAnalytics Medical Protection Society (MPS) Medway Local Health Community Board Medway PCT Men’s Health Forum Mencap Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland Community Services Milton Keynes PCT MND Association Moir Medical Centre Monitor Moorfields Eye Hospital List of organisations who responded to the public consultation on "An Information Revolution" October 2010 – January 2011 MS Society Muscular Dystrophy Campaign National Advisory Council to The Thalidomide Trust National AIDS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document – Liverpool City Council Consultation – Wirral Council Response ______
    WIRRAL COUNCIL CABINET – 9th April 2009 REPORT OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY WORLD HERITAGE SITE SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT – LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL CONSULTATION – WIRRAL COUNCIL RESPONSE _________________________________________________________________________ 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Liverpool City Council has issued a consultation draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site (WHS), which includes the Liverpool Waterfront and parts of Liverpool City Centre. The Liverpool Waterfront has a buffer zone extending to the centre of the River Mersey, with rigorous controls on development to be provided in that zone by policies in the emerging Liverpool Local Development Framework. The City Council’s draft SPD sets out a more detailed planning policy framework for the WHS, which has an overall aim of encouraging economic regeneration, whilst ensuring the protection of the outstanding universal value of the WHS. 1.2 Consultation responses are required by 14 th April and Cabinet is asked to agree that the comments of the Director of Corporate Services within this report form the response to Liverpool City Council on the Liverpool World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document. 2. The Consultation Supplementary Planning Document Outlined 2.1 The Liverpool WHS was defined by the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation (UNESCO) in 2004 as: ‘the supreme example of a commercial port at the time of Britain’s greatest global influence’ . Both the port and parts of the city centre were included to reflect the influence on the built environment of the early development of dock construction, port management and international trading systems in the 18 th and 19 th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Land Review Screening South Tyneside Local Plan
    South Tyneside Local Plan Habitat Regulation Assessment: Strategic Land Review Screening South Tyneside Local Plan Jul 2017 [Blank Page – inside front cover] Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. What is a Habitat Regulation Assessment (HRA)? 2 3. HRA Methodology Overview 5 4. Stage One – South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Introduction 7 5. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Identification of and Information Gathering for European 9 Sites 6. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Identification of Impact Pathways 15 7. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Analysis of SLR Options 21 8. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Analysis of Evidence Base 24 9. Stage One - South Tyneside HRA SLR Screening: Screening of SLR Sites 41 Page Appendices: A. Durham Coast SAC Citation, Conservation Objectives and Natura 2000 Single Data Form 20 B. Northumbria Coast SPA Citation, Conservation Objectives and Natura 2000 Single Data Form 24 C. APIS Data – Air pollution vulnerabilities: Durham Coast SAC and Northumbria Coast SPA 28 D. Other Plans and Projects – In combination assessment 31 E. Annex E -Survey Site Assessments – Visitor and Non-breeding Bird Survey Summaries 62 F. Preliminary Screening for Likely Significant Effects of the SLR (either alone or in-combination) – Site by Site 72 Analysis 1. Introduction 1.1 It is a requirement of Habitat Regulations that Local Plans are subject to a Habitat Regulations Assessment Local Plan -indicative structure and summary timetable: (HRA). The purpose of a HRA is to assess the potential impacts of a plan against the conservation objectives of South Tyneside Local Plan development plan European sites - Special Protection Areas (SPA), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Ramsar Sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Flood Resilience and Protection
    Household flood resilience and protection: a Defra consultation workshop (E8515) Manchester United Football Club, Sir Matt Busby Way, Old Trafford, Manchester - NAME POSITION ORGANISATION STATUS Mr Shaun Alexander Merseyside Waste & Disposal Delegate Mr Mark Bartlett Civil Contingencies Lancaster City Council Delegate Officer Mr Geoff Baslett Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Delegate Mr John Batty Director Bluejohn Marketing Chairman Mr David Beddoes Student University of Wolverhampton Delegate Mr David Bithell Public Health Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Services Manager Mr Rob Bromley Emergency Planning Trafford Metropolitan Borough Delegate Officer Mr Samuel Brougham Architect/Sustainabilit PRP Architects Delegate y Consultant Mr Mark Camborne Health,Safety & Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Resilience Manager Ms Rita Carletti Project Officer Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Mr Philip Charles Project Manager CIRIA CIRIA Staff Mr Ian Clark Principal Engineer RSK Group Ltd Delegate Mr Derek Cochrane Director Derek Cochrane Associates Delegate Ms Aimee Conroy Traniee Emergency Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Planning Officer Mr Stephen Corrigan Head of Emergency Liverpool Primary Care Trust Delegate Planning Mrs Maureen Denham Claims Handler RBS Delegate Mr Ian Dixon Watch Manager Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Delegate Mr Mark Ellis Regeneration Team Capita Symonds Ltd Delegate Leader Miss Emma-Jane Ellison Emergency Planning Shropshire County Council Delegate Officer Mr Glenn Finch Special
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • 191010-2019-Annual-Report-Final
    Chairman's Statement 2018-2019 The difficult trading conditions continued during the year and the effect of losing the South Tyneside contract is plain to see in the audited accounts. Fortunately, NECA was aware that this situation could develop so was able to successfully manage the resulting reduction in income, therefore to return a small surplus is a very satisfactory result. The withdrawal of support by South Tyneside Council meant Ambassador House could not continue nor the blue light café on Beach Road. Fortunately NECA was able to reach an agreement with Karbon Homes to transfer the lease of Ambassador House to The Key Project at no cost to the Charity. I’d like to thank Karbon Homes for their valued assistance in facilitating this arrangement. On a positive note NECA was delighted to be chosen to run the pilot scheme for Hungry Britain. This involved the NECA Community Garden providing lunch and activities for children in South Tyneside during the school holidays. The pilot scheme was extremely successful and the event was rolled-out across other areas of the country. Thank you to South Shields MP, Emma Lowell-Buck for her involvement and valued assistance with this project. The NECA Community Garden was also extremely proud to be invited to take part in the Queens Commonwealth Canopy project. This involved planting trees to commemorate Her Majesty The Queen’s 65 years on the throne. Two saplings were planted in the garden by the Lord Lieutenant of Tyne & Wear, Mrs. Susan Winfield ably assisted by local schoolchildren. The success of those two events has encouraged the Trustees to widen the organisation’s remit so that it can offer services to the wider community and not just to those affected by drug and alcohol misuse, and gambling.
    [Show full text]
  • DUTY to REFER North-East Housing Referral Form (S213b)
    DUTY TO REFER North-East Housing Referral Form (s213b) Please use this referral for any service users that may be homeless or threatened with homelessness within 56 days. If the referral is urgent, and/or the service user has no accommodation tonight, you may wish to make contact by telephone to the relevant authority. Referrer Details Name of person completing form Public Body (name of organisation) Section/department and location/base of referrer Referrer Telephone Referrer E-mail Service User Details Name D.O.B (dd/mm/yyyy) NI Number Current Address Tenancy Type Contact Telephone Contact Email Other person to call Other contact details Household Type (please tick ONE) Single (no children) Couple (no children) Single & Pregnant Couple & Pregnant Single Parent Couple with dependent children Single Parent with non-dependent children Couple with non-dependent children Reason for Homelessness/Threat of Homelessness (please tick no more than TWO) Domestic Abuse Left Institution End of Private Tenancy (AST) Non-racially motivated violence/harassment End of Private Tenancy (non-AST) Mortgage repossession End of Social Rented Tenancy Property disrepair Eviction from supported accommodation Racially motivated violence/harassment Family no longer willing to accommodate Relationship breakdown (non-violent) Fire, Flood, Emergency Required to leave by the Home Office Friends no longer willing to accommodate Other Left HM Forces Support Needs (please tick all that apply) Young person aged 16-17 Young person aged 18-25 Young parent Care leaver aged
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Differently About Commissioning Learning from New Approaches to Local Planning
    Ideas that change health and care Thinking differently about commissioning Learning from new approaches to local planning Ruth Robertson Leo Ewbank February 2020 Thinking differently about commissioning 1 2 3 4 5 Contents Key messages 4 1 Introduction 6 Our research 7 The structure of this report 8 2 Policy background 9 What is NHS commissioning and how is it changing? 9 How is broader public sector commissioning changing? 18 Conclusion 22 3 How some commissioners are thinking differently: three case studies 23 Case study 1: South Tyneside 24 Case study 2: Tameside and Glossop 36 Case study 3: Bradford district and Craven 47 4 Themes from the case studies 58 A new commissioning ethos 58 Changes to the mechanics of commissioning throughout the cycle 59 Contents 1 Thinking differently about commissioning 1 2 3 4 5 Risks and the enduring role of commissioning 60 Changes that echo developments in wider public sector commissioning 61 Collaborative working at place level 61 No single blueprint 62 A different relationship with the ICS 63 A mix of formal and informal structures 63 Staff working differently and culture change 64 A common set of enabling factors and challenges 65 Improved decision-making and more co-ordinated services 67 5 Implications for local systems and national policy and practice 68 What can other areas learn from these case studies? 68 What are the implications for national policy and practice? 71 Appendix A: Methodology 74 Appendix B: Background information on case study sites 76 Appendix C: A summary of key models of NHS commissioning since 1991 and evidence on their impact 79 Appendix D: Key points from the roundtable discussion 83 Contents 2 Thinking differently about commissioning 1 2 3 4 5 References 86 About the authors 98 Acknowledgements 99 Contents 3 Thinking differently about commissioning 1 2 3 4 5 Key messages • Big changes are taking place in national NHS policy in England, as collaboration replaces competition as the key tool for improving services.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Users (Clients)
    TC622 – NORTH WEST CONSTRUCTION HUB MEDIUM VALUE FRAMEWORK (2019 to 2023) Framework Users (Clients) Prospective Framework users are as follows: Local Authorities - Cheshire - Cheshire East Council - Cheshire West and Chester Council - Halton Borough Council - Warrington Borough Council; Cumbria - Allerdale Borough Council - Copeland Borough Council - Barrow in Furness Borough Council - Carlisle City Council - Cumbria County Council - Eden District Council - South Lakeland District Council; Greater Manchester - Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council - Bury Metropolitan Borough Council - Manchester City Council – Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council - Salford City Council – Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council - Trafford Metropolitan Borough - Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Lancashire - Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council – Blackpool Borough Council - Burnley Borough Council - Chorley Borough Council - Fylde Borough Council – Hyndburn Borough Council - Lancashire County Council - Lancaster City Council - Pendle Borough Council – Preston City Council - Ribble Valley Borough Council - Rossendale Borough Council - South Ribble Borough Council - West Lancashire Borough Council - Wyre Borough Council; Merseyside - Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council - Liverpool City Council - Sefton Council - St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council - Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council; Police Authorities - Cumbria Police Authority - Lancashire Police Authority - Merseyside
    [Show full text]
  • Merseyside Leaders and Chief Executives' Meeting
    Liverpool City Region Port Access Steering Group Terms of Reference 1. Introduction The Terms of Reference set out below outline context, governance, focus and responsibilities of the Liverpool City Region (LCR) Port Access Steering Group. The Group has been established to support the City Region Cabinet and Local Enterprise Partnership and the delivery of the LCR City Region Deal commitment to address transport access to the Port of Liverpool in support of the wider Superport proposals. 2. Terms of Reference Purpose . To deliver the commitments in the Liverpool City Region Deal relating to access to the Port of Liverpool. To facilitate the delivery of the packages of transport measures across all modes that will provide the required transport access improvements for the future of the Port of Liverpool through the development and implementation of an agreed work programme. Shared priority statement . To see the realisation of the economic benefits of SuperPort and the Port of Liverpool expansion for the wider City Region and for the local communities near the Port. To support interventions that will mitigate and manage the environmental impacts of port expansion and associated transport activity Accountability . The partners within the Group will be accountable to each other to ensure that partnership working is productive, sustainable and supportive. Partners responsible for specific interventions will be accountable to the Steering Group for ensuring the delivery those interventions. The Steering Group will be directly accountable to the Liverpool City Region Cabinet. Reports on progress will also be provided for information to and engagement with the Local Transport Plan Board, the Local Transport Body, the Local Enterprise Partnership Superport Committee and the City Region Deal Implementation group.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of SRB Programmes Scrutiny
    Scrutiny Report to City Council The Effectiveness of Birmingham SRB Programmes in Getting People into Work safeguarded’ be retained only as an ancillary outcome measure of the employment impact. 5. Thematic regeneration schemes such as Enterprise Link, Core Skills and the CEBP were designed to focus on one particular aspect of the problems facing the community or business. Arguably this single focus has enabled the schemes to have greater impact. The early programmes arose partly because the funding previously allocated to those types of actions was brought into the SRB. Many of the comments we received about the early rounds indicated concern because the various agencies “who were said to be trying to get their money back.” However the schemes in Birmingham such as the Core Skills Programme have been nationally recognised as innovative best practice and several comments were received on the positive impact the schemes have had on mainstream services. 6. The area-based schemes are all complex initiatives targeting large densely populated urban areas. Within the scope of the SRB the programmes have tried to create a balance between projects designed to address social, economic and physical issues. In SRB 1 for example the total grant was £12.8m and the key actions included commercial area improvements, housing and education and labour market initiatives. The nature of the market failure in these areas is so severe that the programmes are in danger of spreading themselves too thinly to achieve a significant impact. This point was made several times by programme managers and board members alike. 6.3 The Partnership Process and Management arrangements 6.3.1 The Partnership Process A central feature to the SRBCF has been the partnership approach to regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative & Public
    VINCENT FRASER QC Year of call: 1981 Year of silk: 2001 Clerked by: Gary Smith Mark Ronson AREAS OF EXPERTISE: Administrative & Public Law Environment Licensing Local Government Planning Administrative & Public Law Vincent is a leading practitioner in many aspects of Administrative, Public and Local Government Law, advising regularly on several areas which are closely associated with Vincent's other practice areas, including Education, Highways, and Licensing. Amongst other matters he has dealt with Byelaws and orders, Constitutional issues, Council finance including council Tax and domestic rating, Education, highways and public rights of way, ombudsman's powers and procedures, Road traffic regulations and Standards, conduct and probity of local government officials and boundary reviews. Significant Reported Cases Education Vincent advises on wide range of education issues, including special needs, education reorganisation and finance. Highways Vincent regularly advises on and appears in cases involving highways and rights of way including litigation and footpath and rights of way inquiries. He has appeared in cases addressing the existence, extent and status of highways. He has regularly appeared in court and at inquiries addressing stopping up and diversion of highways. He has advised on and promoted traffic regulation orders at inquiry. He has appeared in arbitration addressing utilities in the highway. Human Rights Vincent advises on and appears in litigation addressing human rights. Judicial Review Vincent has extensive experience advising on and appearing in judicial reviews. Local Government Vincent deals with local authority powers, administration and finance. Election law Vincent has experience of boundary reviews, for example successfully representing Wirral BC at the review into the Merseyside constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 42 Point Poppins Semi Bold
    Onstreet Residential Chargepoint Scheme Successful Applicants 18 / 19 Broadhembury Parish Council Buckinghamshire County Council Cardiff City Council Coventry City Council Cranbrook and Sissinghurst Parish Council Dundee City Council East Lindsey District Council East Lothian Council Lambeth Council Lancaster City Council Liverpool City Council London borough of Waltham Forest Luton Borough Council Nottingham City Council Portsmouth City Council South Norfolk Council South Tyneside Council ORCS resources 1 Stirling Council Tadley Town Council Welwyn Parish Council West Berkshire Council West Lindsey District Council West Suffolk Councils ORCS resources 2 19 / 20 Barnsley Council Boston Borough Council Breckland and South Holland Council Brent Council Brighton Council Calderdale Council Canterbury City Council Carmarthenshire County Council Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council Chichester District Council Coventry City Council Derbyshire County Council Dundee City Council East Lothian Council East Riding of Yorkshire Essex County Council Great Yarmouth Borough Council Gwent County Borough Council Halton Borough Council Hovingham Parish Council Isle of Wight ORCS resources 3 Kettering Borough Council Leicester City Council London Borough of Bexley London Borough of Camden London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough of Harrow London Borough of Islington North Norfolk Portsmouth City Council Powys County Council Reading Borough Council Richmond Council South Kesteven District Council South Tyneside Council Swansea Council
    [Show full text]