OLED Investor Presentation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OLED Investor Presentation Forward-Looking Statements All statements in this document that are not historical, such as those relating to Universal Display Corporation’s technologies and potential applications of those technologies, the Company’s expected results as well as the growth of the OLED market and the Company’s opportunities in that market, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this document, as they reflect Universal Display Corporation’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in greater detail in Universal Display Corporation’s periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, in particular, the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Universal Display Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Universal Display Corporation disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statement contained in this document. 2 Who We Are OLED IP Critical Licensor & OLED Material Innovator Supplier & Enabler Fabless 5,000+ Proprietary Global PHOLEDs Patents* *5000+ Pending and Issued Patents Worldwide as of as of February 10, 2019 3 What is an OLED? 30-40nm ▪ An Organic Light Emitting Diode is a series of organic thin films between two conductors ▪ When electrical current is applied, bright light is emitted ▪ OLEDs can be used for displays and lighting ▪ OLEDs are not just thin and efficient - they can also be made flexible and transparent 4 Business Model OLED Innovation & Revenues Enabler Invention License Patent Device & & Licensing Architecture Royalty IP Fees Composition Material PHOLED of Matter IP Sales Emitters & Hosts 5 OLED Display Market Potential Mobile Growth TV Growth IT/Wearables Growth Mobile TV IT/Wearables Other $45 $45.3 $41.3 $40 $37.5 $35 $33.0 $30 $25.5 $25 $23.6 $22.4 $billions $20 $15 $10 $5 398M* 408M* 456M* 558M* 632M* 687M* 735M* $0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 *Unit Numbers are for mobile phones only 6 Source: IHS OLED Display Market Tracker – Q1 2019 (July 2019) OLED Panel Area Demand Mobile Growth TV Growth IT/Wearables Growth Mobile TV IT/Wearables Other 21.5 20 12.1M* 18.1 10.0M* 15 14.7 7.7M* 12.0 6.2M* 10 8.5 millions of square meters of square millions 6.7 3.8M* 5.2 3.0M* 5 1.8M* 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 *Unit Numbers are for OLED TVs only 7 Source: IHS OLED Display Market Tracker – Q1 2019 (July 2019) Strong OLED Display Market Drivers • RED • Improved image • Fewer Phosphorescence quality manufacturing reduces power process steps • Thin and Light consumption by • Lower bill-of- • 180 degree viewing 25% materials angle • Add GREEN: 45% • No backlight • 2,000,000+: 1 cumulative required reduction contrast ratio – TRUE BLACK • No color filter • Add BLUE: 75% required cumulative • Real-time video • No liquid crystal Superior Aesthetics Superior reduction speeds – excellent for Cost Effective More Lower Power Usage Power Lower 3D required • Enabled by PHOLEDs • Self-emissive display • Reduced driver IC costs • Low UV output • Enables non-glass • Minimal Bezel substrates • Flexible 8 New OLED Smartphones LG V50 Samsung Google Pixel Xiaomi Black Infinix Note 6 Asus ROG Phone II ThinQ 5G Note 10 3a XL Shark 2 Pro Xiaomi Mi vivo Z5 Apple iPhone 9 A3 OnePlus 7 Pro Sony Xperia 1 Huawei P30 Pro XS Max More OLED Products Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Pimax 4K VR Headset Dell XPS 15 LG - C8 Series Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 LG’s Automotive Displays @ CES 2019 Sony - A8F BRAVIA Series Royole FlexPai Developer Apple Watch Huawei ZTE nubia LG Watch Style Alpha Series 4 Watch GT 10 LCD vs. OLED TFT+OLED+Refiner Diffuser Polarized Polarized Sheet Film Film Cell TFT Backlight Unit Polarized Film Color Prism Filter ✓ Lower BOM (bill of materials) ✓ Better Performance, More Efficient ✓ Thinner and Flexible Form Factor ✓ Vivid Colors and Superior Contrast Ratio Image source: LG 11 Strong OLED Lighting Market Drivers • Low drive • Wide range of • Thin and voltage CCT, high CRI lightweight • Low operating possible • Transparent temperatures, • Color tunable • Non-breakable, cool to touch • Instant “ON” , Conformable, • Long lifetime Dimmable Flexible, Foldable, • Easy to control without flicker Rollable • No glare, no noise efficient & efficient & • Scaling advantage - • Low UV content • Roll to roll process Cost Cost Potential Energy Novel form factor & Low Novel form factor environmentally friendly environmentally Highly desirable color quality Image source: LG Display 12 OLED Lighting Around the World Today PEW 13 Innovation: Future Revenue Streams Ink Jet Barrier Encapsulation Nozzle Liquid Solution Barrier Organic Vapor Jet Printing Encapsulation Printing (OVJP) P2OLED 14 Future Growth: Flexible New Form Factors Unbreakable Lighter Thinner Samsung Galaxy Fold Huawei Mate X 15 Strong, Broad and Deep Patent Portfolio Lighting Flexible Printable OLEDs Phosphorescent OLEDs Manufacturing Processes & Equipment Device Architectures Phosphorescent OLEDs Encapsulation (PHOLEDs) Light Out- Coupling 16 Patents are Universal China Europe (I-273 / P-235) (I- 726 / P-179) United States South Korea Japan (I-1088 / P-469) (I-306 / P-357) (I-774 / P-170) Taiwan (I-312 / P-57) Over 5,000 patents and pending applications* *as of February 10, 2019 17 Strategic Display & Lighting Partnerships Display Lighting • AU Optronics • Fraunhofer IPMS • BOE Technology • HotaluX • China Star Optoelectronics • Kaneka • EverDisplay Optronics • Konica Minolta • Innolux • LG Display • Japan Display • Lumiotec • LG Display • OLEDWorks • Pioneer • Sumitomo Chemical • Royole • Samsung Display • Seeya Technology • Sharp • Tianma Micro-electronics • Visionox 18 Historical Financial Performance Revenues Income ($ in millions) $130.5 $335.6 $326.3 $115.4(3) $247.4 $198.9 $191.0$191.0 $58.8 $146.6 $45.5(2) $44.8(2) $48.1 $32.6(1) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (1) Adjusted net income excludes the net benefit from release of the income ASC 605 Adjustment tax valuation allowances and its related impact on the effective tax rate. $- $- $- $- $- $78.9 (2) Adjusted net income excludes the inventory write-down and its related Hosts $34.2 $41.3 $12.5 $1.4 $1.6 $- impact on the effective tax rate. (3) Adjusted net income excludes the one-time charge due to the enactment Royalty & License $47.0 $63.2 $77.8 $96.1 $126.5 $80.6 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Emitters $61.6 $85.6 $100.6 $97.9 $198.7 $153.2 See "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures" for further discussion of these non-GAAP measures on slide 20. 19 Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures The following table details our reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures: (in thousands, except per share data) Year Ended December 31, (Unaudited) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Net income reconciliation Net income $ 103,885 $ 48,070 $ 14,678 $ 41,854 $ 74,052 $ 9,660 Net income per share: Basic $ 2.19 $ 1.02 $ 0.31 $ 0.90 $ 1.61 $ 0.21 Diluted $ 2.18 $ 1.02 $ 0.31 $ 0.90 $ 1.59 $ 0.21 Net income adjustments: Inventory write-down — — 33,000 3,918 — — Income tax effect of inventory write-down — — (2,836) (251) — — Deferred income tax expense — — — — 17,934 — Release of income tax valuation write-down — — — — (59,352) — Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 11,514 — — — — — Adjusted net income $ 115,399 (2) $ 48,070 $ 44,842 (3) $ 45,521 (3) $ 32,634 (4) $ 9,660 Adjusted net income per share: Basic (1) $ 2.43 $ 1.02 $ 0.96 $ 0.98 $ 0.71 $ 0.21 Diluted (1) $ 2.43 $ 1.02 $ 0.94 $ 0.98 $ 0.70 (5) $ 0.21 (1) The adjusted net income per common share, basic and diluted is derived from dividing adjusted net income by the number of weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net income per common share. (2) Adjusted net income is based on excluding the impact of the one-time charge due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for the year ended December 31, 2017. (3) Adjusted net income assumes an effective tax rate of 32% and 29% for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively and is based on excluding the impact of the inventory write down. (4) Adjusted net income is based on excluding the impact of the net benefit from release of the income tax valuation allowances and its related impact on the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2013. (5) The adjusted net income per common share, diluted for the year ended December 31, 2013, is derived from dividing adjusted net income by adjusted weighted average shares of 46,582,347, which excludes the amount of any excess tax benefits in assumed proceeds in calculating the weighted average shares using the treasury stock method. The exclusion is intended to present our diluted net income per common share for the year ended December 31, 2013 as if our assessment of the future realizability of our deferred tax assets did not change and the income tax valuation allowances were not reversed, consistent with prior periods. For the year ended December 31, 2014, there is no difference between net income per common share and adjusted net income per common share. Non-GAAP Measures - To supplement our selected financial data presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we use certain non-GAAP measures. These non- GAAP measures include adjusted net income (loss), adjusted net income (loss) per common share, basic and adjusted income (loss) per common share, diluted.