Inhibition and Executive Functioning in Trichotillomania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inhibition and Executive Functioning in Trichotillomania INHIBITION AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING IN TRICHOTILLOMANIA A Comparison With an Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Group and a Healthy Control Group Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) dem Fachbereich Psychologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg vorgelegt von Antje Bohne aus Gütersloh Marburg/Lahn 2003 1 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures .............................................................................................................5 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................................................6 Zusammenfassung.........................................................................................................................7 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................15 1 General Introduction...............................................................................................................22 1.1 Trichotillomania: Clinical Picture, Etiology, and Treatment........................................22 1.2 Impulse-Control Disorder or Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorder? ..................25 1.3 Rationale for the Current Investigation.........................................................................27 2 General Methods.....................................................................................................................30 2.1 Participants....................................................................................................................30 2.2 Measures .......................................................................................................................31 2.3 Materials........................................................................................................................34 2.4 Procedures.....................................................................................................................34 3 Study 1: Motor Inhibition in Trichotillomania and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder ...........37 3.1 Abstract .........................................................................................................................38 3.2 Introduction...................................................................................................................39 3.3 Methods.........................................................................................................................43 3.3.1 Participants........................................................................................................43 3.3.2 Measures............................................................................................................45 3.3.3 Procedure...........................................................................................................46 3.3.4 Statistics ............................................................................................................47 3.4 Results...........................................................................................................................48 2 3.4.1 Symptom Severity, Verbal Intellectual Abilities, and Attention Span..............48 3.4.2 Motor Inhibition ................................................................................................49 3.5 Discussion .....................................................................................................................52 4 Study 2: Cognitive Inhibition in Trichotillomania and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder......62 4.1 Abstract .........................................................................................................................63 4.2 Introduction...................................................................................................................64 4.3 Methods.........................................................................................................................70 4.3.1 Participants........................................................................................................70 4.3.2 Measures............................................................................................................72 4.3.3 Procedure...........................................................................................................72 4.3.4 Statistics ............................................................................................................74 4.4 Results...........................................................................................................................74 4.4.1 Symptom Severity, Verbal Intellectual Abilities, and Attention Span..............74 4.4.2 Free Recall.........................................................................................................75 4.4.3 Recognition .......................................................................................................77 4.4.4 Emotionality Rating..........................................................................................79 4.5 Discussion .....................................................................................................................81 5 Study 3: Executive Functioning in Trichotillomania and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder..93 5.1 Abstract .........................................................................................................................94 5.2 Introduction...................................................................................................................95 5.3 Methods.........................................................................................................................98 5.3.1 Participants........................................................................................................98 5.3.2 Measures..........................................................................................................100 5.3.3 Neuropsychological Test Battery ....................................................................101 5.3.4 Procedure.........................................................................................................103 3 5.3.5 Statistics ..........................................................................................................104 5.4 Results.........................................................................................................................104 5.4.1 Symptom Severity, Verbal Intellectual Abilities, and Attention Span............104 5.4.2 Visuospatial Ability and Memory ...................................................................105 5.4.3 Executive Functioning.....................................................................................106 5.4.4 Post Hoc Analyses in OCD .............................................................................108 5.5 Discussion ...................................................................................................................109 6 General Discussion...............................................................................................................119 6.1 Etiology and Maintenance of TTM.............................................................................120 6.2 Classification of TTM.................................................................................................122 6.3 Conclusions on Treatment ..........................................................................................124 6.4 Limitations ..................................................................................................................126 6.5 Concluding Remarks...................................................................................................126 7 References ............................................................................................................................128 8 Appendix ..............................................................................................................................146 8.1 Appendix A: Recruitment Information Used..............................................................147 8.2 Appendix B: The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HS) ....148 8.3 Appendix C: Test Sequences Used .............................................................................150 8.4 Appendix D: Instruction Used in the GoNogo Experiment........................................151 8.5 Appendix E: Word Lists Used in the Directed Forgetting Experiment ......................152 8.6 Appendix F: Instruction Used in the Directed Forgetting Experiment .......................153 9 Curriculum Vitae..................................................................................................................155 4 List of Tables and Figures Tables 2.1 Overview of the Potential Course of a Test Session ............................................................36 3.1 GoNogo Errors as a Function of Group and Error Type......................................................59 3.2 GoNogo Errors and Demographic Variables as a Function of Trichotillomania Subtype...60 4.1 Correct Free Recall of Words as a Function of Group, Instruction and Word Type............89 4.2 Correct Recognition of Words as a Function of Group, Instruction and Word Type ..........90 4.3 Emotionality Rating of Words as a Function of Group, Instruction and Word Type ..........91 5.1 Group Means and Standard Deviations in Visuospatial and Memory Tasks.....................116
Recommended publications
  • THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT of the PATIENT with EARLY DEMENTIA S Cooper, J D W Greene V15
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2005.081133 on 16 November 2005. Downloaded from THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH EARLY DEMENTIA S Cooper, J D W Greene v15 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76(Suppl V):v15–v24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.081133 ementia is a clinical state characterised by a loss of function in at least two cognitive domains. When making a diagnosis of dementia, features to look for include memory Dimpairment and at least one of the following: aphasia, apraxia, agnosia and/or disturbances in executive functioning. To be significant the impairments should be severe enough to cause problems with social and occupational functioning and the decline must have occurred from a previously higher level. It is important to exclude delirium when considering such a diagnosis. When approaching the patient with a possible dementia, taking a careful history is paramount. Clues to the nature and aetiology of the disorder are often found following careful consultation with the patient and carer. A focused cognitive and physical examination is useful and the presence of specific features may aid in diagnosis. Certain investigations are mandatory and additional tests are recommended if the history and examination indicate particular aetiologies. It is useful when assessing a patient with cognitive impairment in the clinic to consider the following straightforward questions: c Is the patient demented? c If so, does the loss of function conform to a characteristic pattern? c Does the pattern of dementia conform to a particular pattern? c What is the likely disease process responsible for the dementia? An understanding of cognitive function and its anatomical correlates is necessary in order to ascertain which brain areas are affected.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neuropsychological Comparison of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder and Trichotillomania Samuel R
    Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 654–662 A neuropsychological comparison of obsessive–compulsive disorder and trichotillomania Samuel R. Chamberlain a,b,d,∗, Naomi A. Fineberg a,b,c, Andrew D. Blackwell a,b,d, Luke Clark d, Trevor W. Robbins d, Barbara J. Sahakian a,d a Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK b Department of Psychiatry, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK c Postgraduate Medical School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK d Behavioural and Clinical Neurosciences Institute (BCNI), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK1 Received 8 February 2006; received in revised form 21 July 2006; accepted 23 July 2006 Available online 26 September 2006 Abstract Background: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling) share overlapping co-morbidity, familial transmission, and phenomenology. However, the extent to which these disorders share a common cognitive phenotype has yet to be elucidated using patients without confounding co-morbidities. Aim: To compare neurocognitive functioning in co-morbidity-free patients with OCD and trichotillomania, focusing on domains of learning and memory, executive function, affective processing, reflection-impulsivity and decision- making. Method: Twenty patients with OCD, 20 patients with trichotillomania, and 20 matched controls undertook neuropsychological assessment after meeting stringent inclusion criteria. Results: Groups were matched for age, education, verbal IQ, and gender. The OCD and trichotillomania groups were impaired on spatial working memory. Only OCD patients showed additional impairments on executive planning and visual pattern recognition memory, and missed more responses to sad target words than other groups on an affective go/no-go task.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Trichotillomania in a Dementia Case
    Dementia & Neuropsychologia ISSN: 1980-5764 [email protected] Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento Brasil Caixeta, Leonardo; Bandeira Lopes, Danielly Trichotillomania in a dementia case Dementia & Neuropsychologia, vol. 5, núm. 1, enero-marzo, 2011, pp. 58-60 Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339529026011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Dement Neuropsychol 2011 March;5(1):58-60 Case Report Trichotillomania in a dementia case Leonardo Caixeta1, Danielly Bandeira Lopes2 Abstract – We report an 87-year-old male case of hair pulling associated with a white-matter vascular dementia (Binswanger’s disease). Trichotillomania in our case did not resolve using mirtazapine or anticholinesterasic medication. Trichotillomania seems to be related to a form of perseveration associated with dementia. The findings in this case suggest the abnormality involving white matter in the pathogenesis of trichotillomania, may constitute a defect in connectivity in the right frontal-subcortical circuit. Key words: Trichotillomania, impulse-control disorder, dementia, Binswanger’s disease, perseveration. Tricotilomania em um caso de demência Resumo – Relatamos o caso de um homem de 87 anos com tricotilomania associada com uma demência vascular da substância branca (doença de Binswanger). Tricotilomania no nosso caso não se resolveu com mirtazapina nem com medicação anticolinesterásica. Tricotilomania parece se relacionar a uma forma de perseveração associada à demência. Podemos sugerir com este caso que a alteração que envolve a substância branca na patogênese da tricotilomania pode ser uma falha na conectividade no circuito fronto-subcortical direito.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Compare and Contrast with Alzheimer Disease
    Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Compare and contrast with Alzheimer disease • Most common cause of dementia by far ‐70% • More common with advancing age ≥ 65 YO 7 % ≥ 85 YO 30‐47 % • Insidious onset, slowly progressive course • Earliest manifestation usually STM (short term memory loss) • Other early cognitive deficits – Executive function (abstract thinking, planning, organizing) – Language ( forget words, verbal expression, comprehension of reading) • Middle‐to‐late stage manifestations – Gait instability / falls – Incontinence – BPSD ( Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia ) – Personality changes – At best, modest / temporary improvement with CEI ( cholinesterase inhibitors ) FTD • Pathologically / clinically heterogeneous disorder with focal degeneration of frontal and/or temporal lobes • Onset typically late 50’s‐ early 60’s; mean age 58 – Onset 20‐80; unusual 40 or 75 • Earliest manifestations – Personality changes / social behavior changes (behavior variant) – Language deficits • Slowly progressive to more global dementia • Some with extrapyramidal or motor symptoms • 1/3 with FH • Pick disease behavioral variant with Pick bodies ( intracellular inclusions) • Other terms – Frontal lobe dementia – Frontal lobe degeneration – Frontotemporal lobar degeneration – Pick complex FTD Subtypes • Behavioral variant ( BV ) • Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia ( PNFA ) • Semantic Dementia ( SD ) progressive fluent aphasia • Motor Syndromes ‐ Motor Neuron Disease ( MND ) ‐ Corticobasilar Degeneration ( CBD ) ‐ Progressive Supranuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Major Depression Resistant to ≥ 8 Weeks of SSRI Treatment
    Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents John T. Walkup, MD Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department of Psychiatry Weill Cornell Medical College and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York, NY Disclosure: John T. Walkup, MD Advisory Speaker’s Research Consultant Royalties Board Bureau Contract X Pfizer Drug and PBO X Abbott Drug X Lilly Drug and PBO Tourette Syndrome X X X Assoc. Oxford Press X Guilford Press Off Label Use Should consider all medication uses discussed as off label unless specifically noted otherwise Case example – details changed for confidentiality purposes Introduction The issue of refractory anxiety Problems with assessment Problems with treatment implementation Lack of adequate family preparation and involvement Augmentation strategies The treatment of depression in teens Anxiety, OCD and PTSD General changes Anxiety Disorders, OCDR, and Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders Anxiety need not be experienced as excessive or unreasonable, just out of proportion (“All my patients with ……”) Duration criteria increased to 6 months Some anxiety disorders removed from “Disorders First Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence” OCD and Related Disorders OCD Body Dysmorphic Disorder Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Disorder) Hoarding disorder Excoriation (Skin-Picking) disorder Substance- or Medication-Induced Due to Another Medical Condition Other OCRD Unspecified OCRD Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents Specific Phobia Separation Anxiety Disorder Generalized Anxiety Disorder Social Anxiety Disorder OCD Acute Stress Disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder Panic Disorder Ages of (Onset) Risk ASDs – 0-3 years or later for mild ADHD - 4-7 or later for mild, but differential is broader Anxiety – 6-12 years Depression – 13-16 years Bipolar and psychosis - > 16 years Disruptive behavior – almost anytime Specific Phobia Animals, insects etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Stereotypies in the Autism Spectrum Disorder: Can We Rely on an Ethological Model?
    brain sciences Review Stereotypies in the Autism Spectrum Disorder: Can We Rely on an Ethological Model? Roberto Keller 1 , Tatiana Costa 1, Daniele Imperiale 2, Annamaria Bianco 3 , Elisa Rondini 3, Angela Hassiotis 4 and Marco O. Bertelli 3,* 1 Adult Autism Centre, Mental Health Department, ASL Città di Torino, 10138 Turin, Italy; [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (T.C.) 2 Neurology Unit, Maria Vittoria Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10144 Turin, Italy; [email protected] 3 CREA (Research and Clinical Centre), San Sebastiano Foundation, Misericordia di Firenze, 50142 Florence, Italy; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (E.R.) 4 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London W1T 7NF, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-055-708880 Abstract: Background: Stereotypic behaviour can be defined as a clear behavioural pattern where a specific function or target cannot be identified, although it delays on time. Nonetheless, repetitive and stereotypical behaviours play a key role in both animal and human behaviour. Similar behaviours are observed across species, in typical human developmental phases, and in some neuropsychiatric conditions, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Intellectual Disability. This evidence led to the spread of animal models of repetitive behaviours to better understand the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these dysfunctional behaviours and to gain better insight into their role and Citation: Keller, R.; Costa, T.; origin within ASD and other disorders. This, in turn, could lead to new treatments of those disorders Imperiale, D.; Bianco, A.; Rondini, E.; in humans. Method: This paper maps the literature on repetitive behaviours in animal models of ASD, Hassiotis, A.; Bertelli, M.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10. Delirium, Dementia, and Amnestic and Other Cognitive Disorders
    CHAPTER 10. DELIRIUM, DEMENTIA, AND AMNESTIC AND OTHER COGNITIVE DISORDERS Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry CHAPTER 10. DELIRIUM, DEMENTIA, AND AMNESTIC AND OTHER COGNITIVE DISORDERS ERIC D. CAINE, M.D. AND JEFFREY M. LYNESS, M.D. Definition History Comparative Nosology Diagnosis Pathology and Laboratory Examination Etiology and Differential Diagnosis Cognitive Disorders Diagnosis and Clinical Features Diagnosis and Clinical Features Psychiatry is in the midst of a profound transformation, at once struggling to incorporate a dynamic understanding of neuroscience and molecular biology while maintaining a view of unique persons or individuals as the central focus of therapeutic intervention. To date it has been beyond the scope of knowledge to effectively integrate research data regarding individual differences with more abstract findings regarding fundamental aspects of brain development or aging-related neurodegeneration. Discovering the bases for the major neuropsychiatric diseases can be expected to provide powerful clues for defining the nature of how neurobiological processes are expressed as emotions, thoughts, or actions, or how life events and daily experiences alter and shape brain growth and development. Since the late 1980s, a major conceptual transition has occurred in the way clinicians and researchers view the relation between mental disorders and brain function. For much of the past century psychiatry was trapped in an either-or dilemma—either a condition was viewed as a symptomatic manifestation of structural cerebral or systemic pathology (organic), or it was considered psychological or emotional in nature (functional). However, clinicians recognized that there are no behaviors that do not involve the brain, and that the transmission of culturally derived processes from individual to individual is influenced by each person's central nervous system (CNS).
    [Show full text]
  • THE MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION.Pdf
    THE MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION Robert M. House M.D. 1. What is the mental status examination? induced mania. The patient denied drug abuse. However, questioning his wife uncovered a history of substance abuse, and laboratory evaluation revealed the presence of The mental status examination (MSE) is a component of all amphetamine metabolites. The correct diagnosis was medical exams and may be viewed as the psychological amphetamine-induced mood disorder. equivalent of the physical exam. It is especially important in neurologic and psychiatric evaluations. The purpose is to evaluate, quantitatively and qualitatively, a range of mental 3. What key factors should be considered along with the functions and behaviors at a specific point in time. The MSE MSE? provides important information for diagnosis and for assessment of the disorder’s course and response to To assess properly the patient’s mental status, it is important treatment. Observations noted throughout the interview to have some understanding of the patient’s social, cultural, become part of the MSE, which begins when the clinician and educational background. What may be abnormal for first meets the patient. Information is gathered about the someone with more intellectual ability may be normal for patient’s behaviors, thinking, and mood. someone with less intellectual ability. Patients for whom English is a second language may have difficulty At an appropriate point in the evaluation the formal MSE is understanding various components of the MSE, such as the undertaken to compile specific data about the patient’s proverbs. Age may be a factor. In general, patients over the cognitive functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders in the ICD-11
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Psychology Faculty Research and Publications Psychology, Department of 1-15-2016 The lC assification of Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders in the ICD-11 D. J. Stein University of Cape Town C. S. Kogan University of Ottawa M. Atmaca Firat (Euphrates) University N. A. Fineberg University of Cambridge L. F. Fontenelle Monash University See next page for additional authors Accepted version. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 190 (January 15, 2016): 663-674. DOI. © 2016 Elsevier. Used with permission. Douglas W. Woods was affiliated with Texas A&M University at time of publication. Authors D. J. Stein, C. S. Kogan, M. Atmaca, N. A. Fineberg, L. F. Fontenelle, J. E. Grant, H. Matsunaga, Y. C.J. Reddy, H. B. Simpson, P. H. Thomsen, O. A. van den Heuvel, D. Veale, Douglas W. Woods, and G. M. Reed This article is available at e-Publications@Marquette: https://epublications.marquette.edu/psych_fac/237 Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Psychology Faculty Research and Publications/College of Arts and Sciences This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; but the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation below. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 190, (2016): 663-674. DOI. This article is © Elsevier and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. Elsevier does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperfocus: the Forgotten Frontier of Attention
    Psychological Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01245-8 REVIEW Hyperfocus: the forgotten frontier of attention Brandon K. Ashinof1,3 · Ahmad Abu‑Akel2 Received: 24 January 2019 / Accepted: 9 September 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract ‘Hyperfocus’ is a phenomenon that refects one’s complete absorption in a task, to a point where a person appears to com- pletely ignore or ‘tune out’ everything else. Hyperfocus is most often mentioned in the context of autism, schizophrenia, and attention defcit hyperactivity disorder, but research into its efect on cognitive and neural functioning is limited. We propose that hyperfocus is a critically important aspect of cognition, particularly with regard to clinical populations, and that it warrants signifcant investigation. Hyperfocus, though ostensibly self-explanatory, is poorly defned within the literature. In many cases, hyperfocus goes undefned, relying on the assumption that the reader inherently knows what it entails. Thus, there is no single consensus to what constitutes hyperfocus. Moreover, some studies do not refer to hyperfocus by name, but describe processes that may be related. In this paper, we review how hyperfocus (as well as possibly related phenomena) has been defned and measured, the challenges associated with hyperfocus research, and assess how hyperfocus afects both neurotypical and clinical populations. Using this foundation, we provide constructive criticism about previously used methods and analyses. We also propose an operational defnition of hyperfocus for researchers to use moving forward. What is hyperfocus? and psychiatric populations, there is very limited explicit academic research into its efect on cognitive and neural Hyperfocus, broadly and anecdotally speaking, is a phenom- functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsive and Impulsive Aspects of Self-Injurious Behavior (PDF)
    121 COMPULSIVE AND IMPULSIVE ASPECTS OF SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR DAN J. STEIN JOSEPH ZOHAR DAPHNE SIMEON Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is seen in a range of different disordered patients, can plausibly be described as ‘‘impul- psychiatric disorders, including stereotypic movement dis- sive’’ in nature. This phenomenologic distinction between order, Tourette’s disorder, borderline personality disorder, ‘‘compulsive’’ and ‘‘impulsive’’ is intended only to be heu- and psychotic disorders. An immediate question is to what ristic; clinically, there may be significant overlap, with the extent similar psychobiological mechanisms mediate SIB impulsive wrist-cutter, for example, going on to develop across so diverse a spectrum of conditions. It has been ar- apparently compulsive repetitive SIB. gued that specific neurobiological mechanisms may be re- This chapter briefly reviews work from animal studies of sponsible for various symptoms across diagnostic categories; SIB, including animal stereotypies and veterinary behavioral could the same hold true for self-injurious behaviors? disorders, before going on to consider the neuropsychophar- Acloser exploration of the phenomenology of SIB sug- macology of a range of clinical disorders characterized by gests that there are a number of distinct types of self-mutila- SIB. These include SMD in developmentally disabled pa- tion (1). ‘‘Compulsive’’ self-injurious behavior is arguably tients, specific syndromes characterized by stereotypic SIB, exemplified by the stereotypic self-injurious behavior of ster- SMD in intellectually normal patients (e.g., skin picking, eotypic movement disorder (SMD). By definition, such be- nail biting, etc.), Tourette’s disorder, autistic disorder, tri- havior is composed of repetitive, seemingly driven, but non- chotillomania, and impulsive SIB in predominantly person- functional motor behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichotillomania in a Dementia Case
    Dement Neuropsychol 2011 March;5(1):58-60 Case Report Trichotillomania in a dementia case Leonardo Caixeta1, Danielly Bandeira Lopes2 Abstract – We report an 87-year-old male case of hair pulling associated with a white-matter vascular dementia (Binswanger’s disease). Trichotillomania in our case did not resolve using mirtazapine or anticholinesterasic medication. Trichotillomania seems to be related to a form of perseveration associated with dementia. The findings in this case suggest the abnormality involving white matter in the pathogenesis of trichotillomania, may constitute a defect in connectivity in the right frontal-subcortical circuit. Key words: Trichotillomania, impulse-control disorder, dementia, Binswanger’s disease, perseveration. Tricotilomania em um caso de demência Resumo – Relatamos o caso de um homem de 87 anos com tricotilomania associada com uma demência vascular da substância branca (doença de Binswanger). Tricotilomania no nosso caso não se resolveu com mirtazapina nem com medicação anticolinesterásica. Tricotilomania parece se relacionar a uma forma de perseveração associada à demência. Podemos sugerir com este caso que a alteração que envolve a substância branca na patogênese da tricotilomania pode ser uma falha na conectividade no circuito fronto-subcortical direito. Palavras-chave: Tricotilomania, distúrbio de controle do impulso, demência, doença de Binswanger, perseveração. Although several studies have revealed the role of im- Case report pulsivity in mental disorders, few studies have investigated An 87-year-old right-handed Afro-Brazilian male with its variants in dementia.1 Impulsivity is defined as the fail- four years of schooling, was first referred to the dementia ure to resist a drive or stimulus, or in a personality dimen- outpatient division of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Fed- sion as the inability to resist the desire to harm one’s self or eral University of Goiás in December 2006.
    [Show full text]