DOCSLIB.ORG

Valerio-Horatian Laws

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valerio-Horatian Laws Valerio-Horatian Laws The Valerio-Horatian Laws (leges Valeriae Horatiae) the plebeians, were sent to Mons Sacer negotiate. The were three laws which were passed by the consuls of negotiations were successful, the decemviri resigned and Rome for 449 BC, Lucius Valerius Potitus and Marcus the secession was called off. Lucius Valerius and Marcus Horatius Barbatus. They restored the right of ap- Horatius were elected as the consuls for the year. They peal to the people and introduced measures which were restored the right to appeal to the people and passed mea- favourable to the plebeians. The consuls’ actions came sures which were favourable to the plebeians to address after a plebeian rebellion, the second plebeian seces- their grievances which had emerged during the rebellion. sion, which overthrew the second decemvirate, which had ruled tyrannically. The two consuls had shown sympathy towards the plebeians and, as a result, had been chosen to negotiate the resolution of the rebellion. Their new laws 2 The laws quelled the plebeian unrest. Lex Valeria Horatia de plebiscitis. This established that the resolutions passed by the Plebeian Council were binding on all. The plebeians had created this body as 1 Background their own assembly where they could debate their own issues during their first rebellion, the first plebeian se- In 454 BC, during what was to be the 200-year Conflict cession (494 BC). The patricians were excluded from of the Orders between the patricians and the plebeians, the Plebeian Council. The Council could also vote on the patricians gave “consent to the appointment of a body laws which concerned the plebeians. It was convened of legislators, chosen in equal numbers from plebeians and presided over by the plebeian tribunes, positions and patricians to enact what would be useful to both or- which had been created during the first plebeian rebel- ders and secure equal liberty for each.” [1] The plebeians lion. These tribunes proposed resolutions to the vote of wanted a published set of laws so that there were clear the Council. These plebeian institutions were created for and known rules and protections as well as punishments. the self-defence of the plebeians against abuse by the con- Up until that time, the laws were unwritten and open to suls and the Roman aristocracy and were separate from arbitrary use and, at times, abuse. A ten-man commis- the institutions of the patrician-controlled Roman senate. sion was appointed to develop the laws, the Decemviri The patricians refused to recognise the Council’s resolu- Legibus Scribundis Consulari Imperio (decemviri means tions as laws binding on the whole people and therefore on ten men). The consulship (the office of the two annually the patricians as well. Livy wrote that as “it was as it were elected heads of the republic) and the plebeian tribunes a point in controversy, whether patricians were bound by (the representatives of the plebeians) were suspended. regulations enacted in an assembly of the commons, they The decemviri were also to act as a government exempt [the consuls] proposed a law in the assembly of the cen- from the right to appeal to the people against arbitrary ac- turies [the Assembly of the Soldiers, which voted on laws tions on their part. The conduct of the first decemvirate proposed by the consuls], that whatever the commons or- was exemplary and it drew up ten bronze tablets of laws. dered collectively, should bind the entire people; by which law a most keen-edged weapon was given to motions in- It was felt that two more laws were needed to complete the [2] legislation. A new decemvirate was elected. According troduced by tribunes.” to Livy, the second decemvirate was despotic and abused Lex Valeria Horatia de provocatione. This was restora- the people, taking advantage of their exemption from the tion of the right of appeal to the people (provocatio ad right to appeal. This eventually led to the plebeian rebel- populum), which means calling out to the people. A citi- lion known as the second plebeian secession. The ple- zen could call out to the people against the summary use beians seceded to Mons Sacer (Sacred Mount) outside of power against him by the consuls or officials. With this the city and pledged to remain there until their demands type of appeal the summary action undertaken would be were met. Their demands were the resignation of the de- stopped. This law also forbade the creation of any of- cemviri, the restoration of the right to appeal to the peo- ficial positions that were exempt from the people’s right ple and the restoration of the plebeian tribunes and their of appeal. Livy stated that through this law the right of powers. Lucius Valerius and Marcus Horatius, two patri- appeal to the people “was not only restored but strength- cians who had stood up to one instance of abuse of a ple- ened for the future by a fresh enactment. This forbade beian by the decemviri and had shown sympathy towards the appointment of any magistrate from whom there was 1 2 4 REFERENCES no right of appeal, and provided that anyone who did so Publilius Philo in 339 BC and one by Quintus Hortensius appoint might be rightly and lawfully put to death, nor in 287 BC. This has led some historians to argue that in should the man who put him to death be held guilty of both cases the first and second laws are unhistorical and murder.” [3] that only the third one is historical.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Lex Valeria Horatia de tribunicia potestate. This Cornell disputes the above view. He points out that Ro- law restored the potestas tribunicia, the powers of the man legislators repeatedly dealt with the same subject and plebeian tribunes (often referred to as tribunician pow- incorporated the provisions of the existing law into the ers). It also put in place the principle of the inviolabil- amendments or the new provisions of a new law. He ar- ity (sacrosanctitas) of the plebeian tribunes, the aediles gues that it cannot be proved that the three laws on appeal (the assistants of the tribunes) and the decemviri into law. were identical, that the purpose of the Valerio-Horatian This principle was based on the lex sacrata (sacred law), Law was “not to grant the right of appeal per se [in fact, which was a religious sanction according to which a tem- it was a restoration], but to prohibit the creation of mag- ple, sacred object or person could be declared physically istracies not subject to appeal,” and that we do not know inviolable (sacrosanct). According to Festus “Sacred laws anything about the content of the law of 300 BC. He notes are laws which have the sanction that anyone who broke that Livy said that Marcus Valerius Corvus’ law of ap- them becomes accursed to one of the gods, together with peal had was ‘more carefully set down’ and that this must his family and property”.[4] The violator became sacer be in comparison with previous laws on appeal.[14] Livy (accursed), was considered as having harmed a god or also wrote “this was the third time since the expulsion the gods in addition to the sacrosanct object or person, of the kings that such a law had been introduced, by the became forfeit to the god(s), anyone who killed him/her same family in every instance” He specified that the sec- was performing sacred duty and would not be punished ond and third laws were renewals and said that he thought and the dead violator was surrendered to the god(s) in that the reason for this was that the wealth of a few car- question. ried more power than the liberty of the plebs. He added The principle of the inviolability of the plebeian tribunes that the law forbade the scourging or execution of those had been established following the first plebeian rebellion. who appealed, but merely provided that if anyone should disregard [its] injunctions it should be deemed a wicked Besides being the leaders of the plebeians, the plebeian [15] tribunes were the protectors of the plebeians. They had act. the power to stop actions by the consuls or officials which Regarding the law on plebiscites constituting laws binding they deemed as summary and harmful to individual ple- the whole people, Cornell, again, thinks that the record of beians. This power rested on the principle that the person three subsequent laws on the same subject need not im- of the plebeian tribune was sacrosanct. Anyone who hurt ply that the first two were unhistorical. He notes that be- him would be declared sacer. In effect this meant that the tween 449 BC (the year of the Lex Valeria-Horatia) and plebeians swore to kill whoever hurt their tribunes and 287 BC (the year of the Lex Hortensia) there were thirty- this was given a religious basis.[5] The plebeians under- five plebiscites which had the force of law. He argues took to protect their protectors. that the law of 449 BC probably established the general Livy said that the consuls renewed the potestas tribuni- principle, “but in some way restricted its freedom to do cia “with certain sacred rites revived from a distant past, so, for instance, by making the plebiscites subject to the and in addition to securing their inviolability by the sanc- auctoritas partum or to the subsequent vote of the comitia tions of religion, they enacted a law that whoever of- populi, or indeed both.” Auctoritas patrum meant author- ity of the fathers (the patricians) through the patrician- fered violence to the magistrates of the plebs, whether [16] tribunes, aediles [the assistants of the tribunes], or de- controlled senate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Triumvirate and Rise of Octavian BY: Jake, Eliza and Maheen First Triumvirate
    First Triumvirate and Rise of Octavian BY: Jake, Eliza and Maheen First Triumvirate • An alliance of the three most powerful men in Rome, Marcus Licinus Crassus, Gaius Julius Caesar, and Gneaus Pompey Magnus. Rome was in chaos and the 3 seized control of the Republic. • The three would dominate Roman politics for personal gains throughout the territories of the Republic. Julius Caesar • In Rome, Julius Caesar was elected as the tribune of the Plebs, military tribune, and governor of many provinces throughout the Republic. • Believed Crassus helped Julius Caesar win the election to become the Propraetor or governor of Hispania in 63 B.C.E. • Julius returned to Rome after his term as governor. Caesar had a business or political agreement with Pompey and Crassus in 60 B.C.E. Caesar was the consul while Pompey and Crassus were in the senate. • Created the First Triumvirate • After his term, Julius was in deeply in debt politically and financially to Crassus and desperately needed to raise money. Marcus Crassus • Crassus was the richest man in all the Roman Republic. He was sharp and clever in Roman politics. He would be a senator and even become consul a few times. • He was a mentor to Julius Caesar in his early career. • Gained much fame during the Spartacus rebellion but much of it was stolen by Pompey. • He was a longtime rival to Pompey Magnus and this would be his eventually downfall. He would ally with Caesar and Pompey, but strived for military victory over Pompey. He went to Parthia where he was defeated at Carrhae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Republic – Crises and Civil Wars a Society Falls Apart in Italy
    The Late Republic – Crises and Civil Wars A Society Falls Apart In Italy, much had changed after Rome rose to a world power. In the long wars, many peasants and their sons had died. Others had not been able to properly cultivate their farms for years. More and more small farmers left the countryside. In their place, many large farms arose, because large landowners had bought up the land of indebted peasants, forcibly driven some farmers out, and laid claim to large portions of state-owned land for themselves. Their standard of living rose, because they specialized themselves in certain products. They grew wine-grapes and olives on a grand scale, or reorganized themselves toward livestock. Around the cities, there were large landowners who obtained high profits by raising poultry and fish. Such large landowners usually owned several farms, which were managed by administrators, while they themselves pursued political business in Rome. On their estates, slaves worked, who were obtained either as prisoners of war or on the slave markets. According to careful analysis, in the time between 200 B.C. and 150 B.C., approximately 250,000 prisoners of war were brought to Italy as slaves. In the following 100 years, more than 500,000 slaves – mainly from Asia Minor – came to Rome. Especially the small farmers suffered in this situation. Earlier, they had gotten for themselves additional income as daily workers on the estates, but now they were needed there, at most, only for harvest. So many had to give up their farms, and moved with their families to Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristocratic Identities in the Roman Senate from the Social War to the Flavian Dynasty
    Aristocratic Identities in the Roman Senate From the Social War to the Flavian Dynasty By Jessica J. Stephens A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor David Potter, chair Professor Bruce W. Frier Professor Richard Janko Professor Nicola Terrenato [Type text] [Type text] © Jessica J. Stephens 2016 Dedication To those of us who do not hesitate to take the long and winding road, who are stars in someone else’s sky, and who walk the hillside in the sweet summer sun. ii [Type text] [Type text] Acknowledgements I owe my deep gratitude to many people whose intellectual, emotional, and financial support made my journey possible. Without Dr. T., Eric, Jay, and Maryanne, my academic career would have never begun and I will forever be grateful for the opportunities they gave me. At Michigan, guidance in negotiating the administrative side of the PhD given by Kathleen and Michelle has been invaluable, and I have treasured the conversations I have had with them and Terre, Diana, and Molly about gardening and travelling. The network of gardeners at Project Grow has provided me with hundreds of hours of joy and a respite from the stress of the academy. I owe many thanks to my fellow graduate students, not only for attending the brown bags and Three Field Talks I gave that helped shape this project, but also for their astute feedback, wonderful camaraderie, and constant support over our many years together. Due particular recognition for reading chapters, lengthy discussions, office friendships, and hours of good company are the following: Michael McOsker, Karen Acton, Beth Platte, Trevor Kilgore, Patrick Parker, Anna Whittington, Gene Cassedy, Ryan Hughes, Ananda Burra, Tim Hart, Matt Naglak, Garrett Ryan, and Ellen Cole Lee.
    [Show full text]
  • Kappa Delta Rho Chapter Operations Manual
    Kappa Delta Rho Chapter Operations Manual 1 The National Fraternity of Kappa Delta Rho This past year at the Kappa Delta Rho Fraternity’s National Headquarters we have worked hard to identify common needs among our chapters. As we continually search for new ways to add value to our organization and to make KDR the best that it can be, we’ve found among all of our chapters one common truth: Even though all of our chapters are comprised of members from diverse demographic backgrounds and located in various geographical regions on campuses with different community cultures; all of our groups struggle each year with management issues regarding membership, money, organizational image, and basic chapter maintenance. We have found that regardless of the size of your chapter’s membership or budget, if these four issues of membership, money, image, and maintenance are not properly addressed by your chapter, that within a semester a strong chapter at the top of their campus’ food chain can suddenly find themselves located near the bottom. It is in response to this need that the National Headquarters has put together this tremendous resource for your members, The Chapter Operations Manual. Our primary goal at the National Headquarters is to help make all of our chapters number one on their respective campuses. By following the suggestions in each of the 16 different sections of this manual you will help move your chapter forward in such a positive direction that you will see dramatic improvements in chapter morale and campus image the very first semester! None of us are perfect nor do any of us claim to be, but by working hard together as a group, striving to reach those dreams that seem just beyond your chapter’s reach, your chapter will evolve in to something great.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Triumphs
    chapter 1 Triumphal Decision Making and the SPQR Tacitus’s Annales opens: “From the beginning kings held the city of Rome.”1 If indeed, as both Livy and the Fasti would have it, Romulus and his regal successors also celebrated the earliest triumphs,2 then they did so presum- ably on their own merits and by their own sovereign proclamation, needing no further sanction from anyone else. But under the Republic the situation grew far more complex, as command of Roman armies, and hence the opportunity to become the focus of a victory celebration, passed from the kings to the consuls and dictatores, later joined also by promagistrates and eventually praetors too.3 How then was it determined who deserved to triumph? The answer to this question turns out to be as subtle and multi- layered as the Republican constitution itself. For each recorded triumph, the Fasti Triumphales include the follow- ing: the name of the triumphator (including patronymics and cognomen); the offi ce that he held at the time; a Roman numeral, where appropriate, to mark a second triumph (or third, or fourth, etc.) by the same individ- ual; the name of the enemy over whom he celebrated his victory (marked by de plus the ablative case); and the year (from the founding of the city), the month, and the date when the triumph took place. Although a special 1. Tac. Ann. 1.1: “urbem Romam a principio reges habuere.” 2. For the earliest entries in the Fasti, see Degrassi 1947, 64 – 65, 534 – 35. Livy describes Romulus’s procession to the Capitoline with the spoils of his victory at 1.10.5 but does not call it a triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Republic S
    P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 The Cambridge Companion to THE ROMAN REPUBLIC S Edited by Harriet I. Flower Princeton University iii P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2004 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2004 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Bembo 11/13 pt. System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic / edited by Harriet I. Flower. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-521-80794-8 – isbn 0-521-00390-3 (pb.) 1. Rome – History – Republic, 510–30 b.c. I. Flower, Harriet I. dg235.c36 2003 937.02 – dc21 2003048572 isbn 0 521 80794 8 hardback isbn 0 521 00390 3 paperback iv P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 Contents S List of Illustrations and Maps page vii List of Contributors ix Preface xv Introduction 1 HARRIET I.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the ROMAN ARMY Edited By
    ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page iii A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Edited by Paul Erdkamp ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page i A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page ii BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical lit- erature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty-five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. Ancient History Published A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to the Classical Greek World Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to the Ancient Near East Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Edited by Daniel C. Snell Robert Morstein-Marx A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Roman Empire Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by David S. Potter In preparation A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Late Antiquity Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Philip Rousseau A Companion to Archaic Greece A Companion to Byzantium Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees Edited by Elizabeth James A Companion to Julius Caesar Edited by Miriam Griffin Literature and Culture Published A Companion to Catullus A Companion to Greek Rhetoric Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to Greek Religion A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Daniel Ogden Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to Classical Tradition A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman History the LEGENDARY PERIOD of the KINGS (753
    Roman History THE LEGENDARY PERIOD OF THE KINGS (753 - 510 B.C.) Rome was said to have been founded by Latin colonists from Alba Longa, a nearby city in ancient Latium. The legendary date of the founding was 753 B.C.; it was ascribed to Romulus and Remus, the twin sons of the daughter of the king of Alba Longa. Later legend carried the ancestry of the Romans back to the Trojans and their leader Aeneas, whose son Ascanius, or Iulus, was the founder and first king of Alba Longa. The tales concerning Romulus’s rule, notably the rape of the Sabine women and the war with the Sabines, point to an early infiltration of Sabine peoples or to a union of Latin and Sabine elements at the beginning. The three tribes that appear in the legend of Romulus as the parts of the new commonwealth suggest that Rome arose from the amalgamation of three stocks, thought to be Latin, Sabine, and Etruscan. The seven kings of the regal period begin with Romulus, from 753 to 715 B.C.; Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, from 534 to 510 B.C., the seventh and last king, whose tyrannical rule was overthrown when his son ravished Lucretia, the wife of a kinsman. Tarquinius was banished, and attempts by Etruscan or Latin cities to reinstate him on the throne at Rome were unavailing. Although the names, dates, and events of the regal period are considered as belonging to the realm of fiction and myth rather than to that of factual history, certain facts seem well attested: the existence of an early rule by kings; the growth of the city and its struggles with neighboring peoples; the conquest of Rome by Etruria and the establishment of a dynasty of Etruscan princes, symbolized by the rule of the Tarquins; the overthrow of this alien control; and the abolition of the kingship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Republic
    1 The Roman Republic MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES POWER AND AUTHORITY The Some of the most fundamental • republic • senate early Romans established a values and institutions of • patrician •dictator republic, which grew powerful Western civilization began in the •plebeian •legion and spread its influence. Roman Republic. • tribune • Punic Wars •consul • Hannibal SETTING THE STAGE While the great civilization of Greece was in decline, a new city to the west was developing and increasing its power. Rome grew from a small settlement to a mighty civilization that eventually conquered the Mediterranean world. In time, the Romans would build one of the most famous and influential empires in history. The Origins of Rome TAKING NOTES Outlining Use an outline According to legend, the city of Rome was founded in 753 B.C.by Romulus and to organize the main Remus, twin sons of the god Mars and a Latin princess. The twins were aban- ideas and details. doned on the Tiber River as infants and raised by a she-wolf. The twins decided to build a city near the spot. In reality, it was men not immortals who built the I. The Origins of Rome A. city, and they chose the spot largely for its strategic location and fertile soil. B. Rome’s Geography Rome was built on seven rolling hills at a curve on the II. The Early Republic Tiber River, near the center of the Italian peninsula. It was midway between the A. B. Alps and Italy’s southern tip. Rome also was near the midpoint of the III.
    [Show full text]
  • Book IX, Chapters 1-19;
    BELL'S ILLUSTRATED CLASSICS LIVY BOOK IX CHAPS. I -XIX W.C.FLAMSTEAD WALTERS, M.A. Hillllllllllll lilt Bell's Illustrated Classical Series Edited by E. C. MARCHANT, M.A. Classical MasUr ai St. Pauls School LIVY: BOOK IX CHAPS. I-XIX LT888 Wa LIVY, BOOK IX Chapters 1-19 WITH INTRODUCTION, NOTES, GRAMMATICAL APPENDIX, AND VOCABULARY BT W. C. FLAMSTEAD WALTERS, M.A. SOMETIME SCHOLAR OF PEMBROKE COLLEGE, OXFORD, AND FORMERLY COMPOSITION MASTER AT CHRIST's COLLEGE, NEW ZEALAND LONDON: GEORGE BELL & SONS YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN 1899 0;ffor5 HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY CONTENTS PAGE Iktroduction : Livy and his Work ...... i Outline of Samnite History to the beginning of Livy IX 5 Text 9 Notes .......... 65 Gkammab and Metaphors . - • • 93 Technical Terms loi Index of Proper Names ...... 107 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Map of Italy To face p. i A LiCTOR. (From a bas-relief in the Vatican) . Frontispiece Cots of Capua 7 A EoMAN Trophy. (From Trajan's Column) . 8 A General addresslng his Soldiers. (From a coin) lo A Light-armed Romax Soldier and a Shepherd. (The soldier from Trajan's Column, and the shepherd from a bas-relief on a sarcophagus in the Cata- combs) . 12 Soldiers maklng a Camp. (From different sources, mostly from Trajan's Column) . 14 Sam>tte Warrior. (From a painted vase in the Louvre^ ........ 15 Bringing Herennius to the War-Council in a Waggon. (From a sepulchral marble in the Museum at Baden) 17 The Forum Romanum and the Capitoline Hill in THE Time of the Empire 20 The City of Veii, restored by Canina.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon Constitutional History
    Outline Wed., 8 Sep. ROMAN LAW INTRODUCTION, REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTIONAL OUTLINE I. INTRODUCTION 1. If you don’t know Latin, that’s just fine, but we are going to ask you to learn about 100 Latin words because you should not translate technical legal terms from one language to another. 2. Please fill out the Sign-up sheets that are included in the syllabus and were sent to you by email. When you click on ‘Submit’, they will be sent to us by email. We need these before the class next week because we are going to make up the small groups on the basis of them. 3. Why study Roman law? a. Diachronic reasons b. Synchronic reasons 4. These reasons lead to the four parts of the course (roughly three weeks each) a. External history – chronology, institutions, procedure, sources of law. b. Internal history – a survey of Roman private law based on the institutional treatises of Gaius (c. 160 AD) and, to a lesser extent, that of Justinian (533 AD) c. The XII Tables of c. 450 BC d. Juristic method – selected topics in society and ideas as seen through the eyes the jurists from roughly 100 BC to roughly 240 AD 5. Mechanics a. The Syllabus b. The Readings c. The Class Outlines d. Requirements for Credit i. Post a comment or a question about the assignment before each class. ii. Write a five-page paper on on one of the topics in the third or fourth parts of the course, drafts to be turned into us the day of the class and rewritten on the basis of the class and our comments iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Killing in Ancient Rome: Homicide and Roman Superiority Dawn F Carver, Jasmine Watson, Jason Curtiss Jr
    EL RIO: A STUDENT RESEARCH JOURNAL HUMANITIES Ritual Killing in Ancient Rome: Homicide and Roman Superiority Dawn F Carver, Jasmine Watson, Jason Curtiss Jr. Colorado State University-Pueblo ABSTRACT The ancient Romans outlawed human sacrifice in 97 BCE after increasing discomfort with the practice, but ritual killing still occurred because it was justified in a way that preserved Roman superiority. The ancient Romans interpreted the favor of the gods as justification to perform ritual killings. This paper explains the difference between human sacrifice and ritual killing using a wide collection of primary source documents to explain how the Romans felt that their supe- riority depended on the continued practice of ritual killing. The ancient Romans had to differ- entiate between ritual killings and human sacrifice to maintain their superiority over other soci- eties, but to maintain the favor of the many Roman gods, they needed to perform ritual killings. CC-BY Dawn F Carver, Jasmine Watson, Jason Curtiss Jr. Published by the Colorado State University Library, Pueb- lo, CO, 81001. 3 SPRING 2018 Aelia was exhausted, she had been in labor all night and into the following day, but the baby would not come. She was worried, she had heard the slaves talking about two wolves that had come into Rome last night right around the time her pains had started. Such a bad omen, her baby must be alright, but the signs were worrisome. There is a commotion outside, people are shouting. What are they saying about the sun? Oh no, the baby is coming! Where is the midwife? She is still outside; please come back! Moments later, a baby’s wail breaks through to the midwife who rushes back in to find that Aelia has had her baby.
    [Show full text]