Hilton Design Competition Brief

HILTON 1 STAGE DESIGN COMPetition CONTENTS 1. Competition Callout 03 6.3 Conflict of Interest 14 6.4 Submission requirements for Stage 1 14 2. Background 04 6.5 Assessment process for Stage 1 14 2.1 The Location 04 6.6 Assessment process for Stage 2 14 2.2 A bout the Department of Communities (Housing) 05 6.7 Honorarium 14 2.3 Probity and Fairness 05 6.8 Budget 15 6.9 Builders and tender for building contract 15 00_ 2.4 Competition Governance 05 6.10 Participant Costs 15 3. Competition Brief 06 6.11 Intellectual property and Copyright 15 3.1 Objectives 06 6.12 Moral Rights 15 3.2 Competition Site 06 6.13 Disclosure of Information 15 Competition Sponsor 3.3 Design Quality Principles 07 6.14 Privacy 15 3.4 Project Budget 08 6.15 Release and Indemnity 15 3.5 Planning Policy 08 6.16 Changes to these conditions 15 4. The Program 09 6.17 Governing law and Jurisdiction 15 5. The Competition Requirements 10 7. Definitions 16 Endorsed by 5.1 Eligibility 10 Attachment 1 – Design Competition Jury 17 5.2 Registration 10 Attachment 2 – Competition Site 18 5.3 Stage 1 – Initial Concept 11 5.4 Stage 2 – Developed Concept 13 Attachment 3 – Development Sites 19

6. The Fine Print 14 Attachment 4 – Entry Form 21 Supported by 6.1 Agreement 14 6.2 Eligibility 14 design Competition 2017

hilton 02_ Competition Callout

This competition marks a search for a new kind of Small and emerging architectural practices are public housing, inviting novel typologies for infill STAGE 1 INITIAL CONCEPT encouraged to compete provided at least one development in Western Australia that can challenge Participant is a registered architect in Western expectations and generate variety, equity and Australia. The Competition is the first step in the This stage of the Competition requires the affordability. larger Hilton Revitalisation Project (Project) that submission of an Initial Concept design for two will contribute significantly and creatively to the Well-designed public housing promotes economic public housing units up to 80 square metres each evolution of Hilton’s unique character. and social diversity and improves the quality of on a rear battle-axe lot in Hilton. A maximum of four 01_ life for its residents. Without public housing, many short-listed entries will be invited to participate in This Competition is a fantastic opportunity to vulnerable Australians would be unable to access Stage 2. bring about positive change in Hilton as well accommodation, forcing them to make desperate as contributing new approaches to counteract choices about how they meet their need for shelter. unsustainable urban sprawl. Place-responsive infill housing can also create more sustainable cities by providing diversity in the STAGE 2 DEVELOPED CONCEPT housing market, by countering urban sprawl, by creating more opportunities for social engagement The second stage requires the submission and by consolidating services to deliver better public of a more detailed design proposal based on the infrastructure. Initial Concept that can be adapted to six other infill The Hilton Design Competition (Competition) will lots in Hilton. Upon submission, each short-listed tackle these challenges head-on by demonstrating entry will be entitled to receive $10,000 for design how design quality can be achieved through an services rendered. The winning entry will be offered “The power of architecture ‘economy of means’ to create public housing that a contract to apply their model to the design of is the power of synthesis, is modest, inclusive and ‘placeful.’ Restraint can 14 new public housing units on seven battle-axe engender clarity rather than paucity: as Alejandro lots in Hilton. to say what you want in two Aravena has it “The power of architecture is the words instead of three, to power of synthesis, to say what you want in two words instead of three, to achieve a solution in achieve a solution in as few as few moves as possible.” The Competition will moves as possible”. also demonstrate how infill development can be sensitively designed to retain the unique character of Alejandro Aravena an area. The Competition is divided into two stages. design Competition 2017

hilton 03_ BACK- GROUND 2.1 The Location

Hilton is located approximately five kilometres east A number of the original houses that were of the Fremantle town centre and was originally constructed in Hilton were prefabricated in Austria developed for state housing in the post-war period. at the end of World War II or were designed by Hilton’s design origins are found in the ‘Garden City’ notable Western Australian architects Krantz design philosophy, with curvilinear streets and single and Sheldon, which make a valuable contribution detached houses situated well back from the street to Hilton’s unique character. However, as these 02_ in generous landscape settings. homes do not meet current accessibility standards and require a high level of ongoing maintenance many older tenants have difficulty in maintaining independence in these homes.

FREMANTLE In recent times, Hilton has become a more desirable place to live due to its tree lined streets, its close proximity to public transport and the range of amenities on offer in nearby Fremantle. Its older homes have become particularly attractive to people interested in mid-century design and the typically large lots are popular for planting edible gardens and harnessing natural resources for power generation.

Unfortunately the lack of housing diversity combined HILTON with the gentrification of the area has contributed to Hilton’s rising unaffordability, making appropriate public housing more important than ever. New, well-designed one or two bedroom homes would be ideal to meet this demand but smaller, accessible dwellings are scarce in Hilton.

Google Earth design Competition 2017

hilton 04_ 02_BACKGROUND

2.2 About the Department of 2.3 Probity and Fairness 2.4 Competition Governance Communities (Housing) The Competition has been endorsed by the The Technical Adviser (Adviser) and Competition This Competition has been initiated by the Housing Australian Institute of Architects and has been Registrar (Registrar) are responsible for the division of the Department of Communities, acting developed in consultation with the Office of the governance of the Competition. Housing may through its legal entity, the Housing Authority Government Architect of Western Australia and appoint any suitably qualified person to act in the (Housing) which is a statutory body corporate the City of Fremantle. Housing has appointed an abovementioned positions. established by the Housing Act 1980 (WA). expert Design Competition Jury (Jury) to select The Adviser and Registrar must: the shortlisted entries at Stage 1 and to determine Housing operates across the land, housing, the winner of the Competition at Stage 2. • a ct in accordance and ensure compliance with property finance and human services sectors The Chair of the Jury is Geoffrey London, the Terms and Conditions of the Competition; to provide affordable housing opportunities for Professor of Architecture at The University people who would be otherwise unable to access • make no attempt to unfairly or inappropriately of Western Australia and former Government housing through the private market. Our focus influence the Jury process or any member of Architect for Western Australia and Victoria. is on innovation and working with and through the Jury; and Full details of the Jury are provided in the market to ensure that low to moderate income Attachment 1 – Design Competition Jury. • accept the decision of the Jury as final. households have access to safe, appropriate, secure and affordable housing in successful The Adviser and Registrar will use their reasonable inclusive communities. We facilitate social and endeavours to maintain anonymity of entries and economic outcomes for individuals, communities confidentiality throughout the Competition. The and the State to contribute to a better, stronger Registrar will ensure that all entries comply in all Western Australia. respects with the Terms and Conditions of this Competition and may disqualify any entry that does Housing has a longstanding interest in redeveloping not comply. land and demonstrating the opportunities for economic growth that can be provided to business, residents and the community as a whole. Housing is committed to ensuring the best outcomes for each area identified for infill or urban renewal, while taking into account that every area is unique.

design Competition 2017

hilton 05_ COMPETITION 3.1 Objectives BRIEF The objective of the Competition is to design an Two storey designs will be considered in order to affordable, adaptable and appropriate public housing facilitate tree retention and reduce site coverage, but concept that meets the needs and aspirations of at least one unit should meet the WA Liveable Homes both the future occupants and the local community. Essential Criteria. Each dwelling should include a As with all housing, it needs to be responsive to its single car port or garage, however second parking local context and function in a way that contributes bays that have the flexibility to be useable outdoor positively to the quality of life for its occupants. areas are encouraged. Like many of the pre-fabricated homes that were originally built in Hilton, the concept should be 3.2 Competition Site modest, functional and dignified. The Competition Site is a rear infill battle- 03_ This Competition requires the development of a axe lot in Hilton which has an effective area of unique concept design for 15A Harwood Street, approximately 380 square metres (refer Attachment Hilton (the ‘Competition Site’) that incorporates two 2 – Competition Site). There are two trees on dwellings that each have a minimum floor area of the property which have been identified by an 60 square metres and a maximum floor area of 80 arboriculturalist as having a high retention value square metres. The concept should be considered as and should be retained where possible. Details of a ‘design approach’ that is capable of being adapted the Competition Site and of the other six nominated to six other rear battle-axe lots owned by Housing in properties to be developed by Housing as part of Hilton, which have a range of site characteristics and this Project are attached (refer Attachment 3 – constraints. Development Sites.) Each home should contain two bedrooms and be There is also an existing timber framed, designed to accommodate two person households or weatherboard workers’ cottage with a pitched, gable more, in response to changing family circumstances tiled roof on the front property that was constructed and non-traditional household types. In some cases in 1953. This dwelling is a good example of post-war tenants may be elderly or have disabilities, so the government housing and will be restored by Housing concept should incorporate design features that as part of a demonstration project for this site, which help maintain the dignity and independence of the will include the development of public housing on the occupants. rear battle-axe lot. design Competition 2017

hilton 06_ 03_PROJECT BRIEF

3.3 Design Quality Principles

The Initial Concept must clearly address the provide good spatial efficiency, deliver value COMPETITION SITE following design quality principles: for money and offer a social benefit to the 15 HARWOOD STREET occupants are encouraged, however the 3.3.1 Occupant amenity – The proposal should management of these spaces must be clearly deliver high levels of occupant amenity and SOUTH STREET articulated. Private outdoor areas must also be be adaptable to meet the needs of a range provided for each occupant. Buildings should be of occupant groups, which typically are low designed based on whole-of-life cost principles income workers but in some cases may include using durable materials in a manner that single parents, the elderly and people with minimises maintenance. disabilities. Indoor and outdoor living spaces should be capable of being adapted for use by 3.3.4 Sustainability – Designs should incorporate people with different physical or mental health a cohesive, integrated approach to energy needs and household scenarios. Living spaces efficiency and generation, and water saving and should have the ability to be cost-effectively capture based on whole-of-life cost principles. HILTON personalised to suit each occupant. Designs must demonstrate a thoughtful PRIMARY approach to environmental sustainability CARRINGTON STREET CARRINGTON SCHOOL 3.3.2 Character and Context – Designs should D including passive solar design, cross ventilation, A

O exhibit a considered relationship with Hilton’s

R smart technologies and building performance in

unique cultural heritage and be responsive to terms of thermal comfort. K the site. The existing streetscape should be C

T preserved through the sensitive orientation and 3.3.5 Landscaping – Landscaping should be designed

S placement of new dwellings to allow freedom with an equivalent level of consideration for more contemporary design approaches. as the building and considered as part of a Designs should be simple, dignified and place holistic site response. The landscape should responsive. be an extension of the dwelling that allows occupants to use outdoor areas in a range of 3.3.3 Functionality and Build Quality – Designs ways. Landscaping must be water wise, low- should optimise the efficient use of space maintenance and should provide an appropriate for occupants and provide strong functional balance of plant types to provide summer relationships between indoor and outdoor WINT ERFOLD ROAD shading, ground cover and opportunities for areas. Communal spaces and facilities that occupants to create edible gardens. design Competition 2017

hilton 07_ 03_PROJECT BRIEF

3.4 Project Budget 3.5 Planning Policy Being selected as the Winning Entry does not confer any obligation upon the determining authorities The maximum construction budget for the project A 2011 Memorandum of Understanding between to approve the design. All planning approvals and is $200,000 per dwelling (inc. GST) plus an the City of Fremantle and Housing allows for the building permits will be required to be obtained from additional $20,000 per lot (inc. GST) for landscaping development of one additional dwelling on a rear the responsible authorities. and external works. Construction costs may be vacant “battle-axe’ lot over and above the dwelling averaged across the project, so that the total cost yield which would otherwise have been permitted The following state and local planning policies are of the delivery of 14 dwellings across 7 lots does under the zoning of the land at the time. However, relevant to this project: not exceed a budget of $2.94 million (inc. GST). This this density variation is contingent upon the following The City of Fremantle Planning Scheme No. 4 construction figure is the upper limit and is separate requirements being met: http://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/local-planning- from the budget for subdivision of the land and • All new dwellings shall be no greater than scheme-no-4 professional fees associated with delivery of the 80 square metres in floor area; Project. This figure excludes a provision of up to The Residential Resign Codes of Western Australia $205,800 for architectural fees. • Where practical, all mature trees on site shall https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/State_ be retained as part of the development, or suitable Planning_Policy_3.1-Residential_Design_Codes_.pdf Participants should be mindful that as this is a public replacement trees and vegetation are incorporated housing project designs should seek to minimise City of Fremantle Local Planning Policy 3.7 – as part of the development as appropriate; and costs and achieve value for money. This Competition Garden Suburb Precinct Heritage Area is an exercise in the economical use of space and • All other normal planning requirements are https://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/ resources while providing a high standard of living. satisfied. files/Local%20Planning%20Policy%203.7%20 %E2%80%93%20Local%20Planning%20Policy%20 Finding clever and innovative approaches to reduce All relevant state and local planning requirements 3.7%20-%20Hilton%20Garden%20Suburb%20 the project budget will provide Housing with greater apply. Variations from the planning framework may Precinct%20Heritage%20Area%20Local%20 capacity to deliver future public housing projects. be considered where justification is provided in Planning%20Policy%20%E2%80%93%20LPP3.7.pdf accordance with the relevant performance criteria. In particular, variations to the maximum roof ridge City of Fremantle Policy D.B.H12 - Energy height of 6.5m specified by Local Planning Policy Efficient Building Design 3.7 may only be considered by the City of Fremantle http://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/ where the Deemed to Comply Requirements of files/DBH12%20-%20Energy%20Efficient%20 the Residential Design Codes regarding building Building%20Design%20-%20D.B.H12.pdf setbacks, Open Space and Design for Climate are Participants should conduct the appropriate complied with. enquiries with the relevant authorities as required. design Competition 2017

hilton 08_ THE PROGRAM STAGE 1: INITIAL CONCEPT

Competition opens 31 July 2017

Site briefing at 15 Harwood Street, Hilton (non-compulsory) 11 August 2017 (10AM)

Closing date for questions and registration 25 August 2017

Initial concept submissions due 8 September 2017 04_ Shortlisted participants announced 5 October 2017 STAGE 2: DEVELOPED CONCEPT (for shortlisted participants only)

Detailed design brief issued 5 October 2017

Closing date for clarifications 20 October 2017

Developed concept submissions due 17 November 2017

Winner announced 14 December 2017

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WINNING DESIGN

Start of detailed design development and contract documentation Early 2018

Construction Mid 2018 design Competition 2017

hilton 09_ THE COMPETITION 5.1 Eligibility Upon confirmation by the Registrar that the eligibility requirements have been met each REQUIREMENTS The Competition is open to individuals or teams, Participant will be provided with a Competition comprising a registered Western Australian Registration Number which must be used to identify architect or architectural practice, or an architect- all competition material submitted. A Competition led multidisciplinary team of no more than five Kit will be provided to each Participant which will people. Assessors of the Competition, employees of include CAD files of the Competition Site and the the Department of Communities, Jury members or six development sites. any direct family members of these groups may not participate in the Competition.

05_ 5.2 Registration Individuals or teams must register their participation in the Hilton Design Competition by completing the entry form in Attachment 4 and submitting it to the Department of Communities by 5.00pm on 25 August 2017. The form can be lodged electronically or in person and must be addressed to:

Subject HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION – REGISTRATION

Competition Registrar Shane Downes (Project Delivery Manager)

Phone 08 9222 4762 or 0484 358 941

Email [email protected]

Department of Communities (Housing) Address 99 Plain Street EAST PERTH WA, 6004 design Competition 2017

hilton 010_ 05_the competition requirements

5.3 Site Briefing in the graphic presentation: • Indicative construction techniques including building fabric constructability, A non-compulsory briefing will be held at the Site and landscape assembly methodology, modularisation or Competition Site during the second week of the • Illustration of site opportunities and pre-fabrication and lifecycle maintenance/ Competition to allow entrants to become familiar constraints management with the property and to ask the Advisor any • Response to the site context questions. Questions may also be directed to • Pedestrian and vehicular movement and b. Written Design Statement the Advisor, David McLoughlin, no later than access The Written Design Statement should be 25 August 2017 on (08) 9222 4822 or by email • Delineation of land use including open submitted as a PDF file and hardcopy of no [email protected]. space, private and communal areas more than 500 words, in Arial font with single • Approach to overshadowing, solar access, line spacing. The purpose of the Written 5.4 Stage 1 – Initial Concept and overlooking (privacy) Design Statement is to further articulate:

Stage 1 requires the succinct communication of the • Landscaping, including both hardscape • T he manner in which the proposal Initial Concept for the Competition Site on a single, and softscape areas addresses the design principles vertical format A1 board. Floor plans and elevations Architecture • T he underlying architectural/organising are not required at this stage. All submissions must • The design approach and organising ideas idea and any underlying theoretical or ideological position comply with The Fine Print in Section 6. • Useful architectural precedents and how they apply (lessons learned) • The ability of the design to be adapted to 5.4.1 Stage 1 Submission requirements the other six development sites • Dwelling layout including size, sequence of Each competition entry must comprise: spaces, ceiling heights • Innovative approaches in relation to design constructability, materials or detailing a. Initial Concept • Internal arrangements that address orientation, cross ventilation, adaptability etc. • A statement that the concept could be T he Initial Concept for the Competition Site translated into a design that will not • Proposed palette of materials and colours must comprise of a single, A1 vertical format exceed the budgetary requirements graphic board, to be submitted both as a Construction • The level of compliance of the proposal hard copy and as an electronic PDF file. • Indicative building materials including with local planning policy requirements The A1 graphic board must communicate their technical and architectural qualities • Other aspects of the design that are not the design proposal and articulate its as they contribute to the design and an adequately communicated by the graphic performance against the design principles. appropriate response to the context presentation The following elements should be conveyed design Competition 2017

hilton 011_ 05_the competition requirements

. c Anonymity of submissions d. Stage 1 Format All submission materials must include the Participants must submit one (1) hard copy of competition registration number. No submission each of the following items as well as a digital material may be marked with the name of any copy of each item provided on a CD or USB. All individual team member or team name, or the of the items below are to be wrapped/packaged associated practices of the team members. together.

All submissions may only be identified as follows: Hard copy submissions by Participants for Stage 1 are to follow the requirements below: • T he A1 graphic board must include the Competition Registration Number in the Information to be marked on the REF: HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL bottom right hand corner. The team name submission package or any other reference to the architectural Submissions are to be received by 4.00pm Western Standard Time practice including logos, must not appear on Closing date and time the actual graphic board; and Friday 8 September 2017

• T he Written Design Statement must have Department of Communities (Housing), Tenders Office Ground floor, Address for submissions the PDF or Microsoft Word file named by 99 Plain Street East Perth the Competition Registration Number. The Access to the tender box 9:00am-4:00pm (WST) name of the individual, team, or architectural practice must not appear within the actual Stage 1 – submit one hard copy and one electronic copy on design statement. a CD or USB thumb drive of each item listed in 5.4.1(a) and 5.4.1(b). Other requirements The submission is to be packaged/wrapped together. Submissions must be sent by post or personal delivery and not by facsimile or electronically. No late submissions will be accepted.

design Competition 2017

hilton 012_ 05_the competition requirements

. e Stage 1 Evaluation and Notification 5.5 Stage 2 – Developed Concept • Information regarding the following: – Sustainable energy, water, waste A n internal Technical Advisory Panel will The shortlisted Participants from Stage 1 will be initiatives prepare an Evaluation Report which will invited to participate in Stage 2 and develop the Initial assess the Initial Concept submissions Concept into a Developed Concept proposal for the – Materials and colours palette against the design quality principles outlined Competition Site. On completion of Stage 1, a design – Building and landscape maintenance in Section 3.3 of the Competition Brief. brief for the Developed Concept will be issued to the requirements I n making its decision to select a maximum shortlisted Participants. The Stage 2 design brief will – Preliminary material specifications of four (4) shortlisted entries the Jury will contain quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria 5.5.2 Evaluation and Notification be informed by the Evaluation Report. for the Developed Concept. Shortlisted Participants from Stage 1 will The Developed Concept designs submitted by 5.5.1 Submission requirements be invited to participate in Stage 2 and will the shortlisted Participants will be assessed receive an honorarium of $10,000 upon Competition entries for Stage 2 must be by the Technical Advisory Panel against the submission of the Developed Concept for presented on a maximum of ten (10), A3 Stage 2 evaluation criteria and an Evaluation design consultancy services rendered. Sheets (landscape format), supported by Report will be provided to the Jury. The photographs, diagrams and text. All plans, Jury will select the final winner following A ll Participants will remain anonymous elevations and sections are to be at a scale consideration of the Evaluation Report. during the assessment process. Shortlisted of 1:100. Stage 2 submissions must include: Participants will be notified in writing on T he winning entry will be offered a contract • Ground floor plan confirmation of Housing’s decision. All to apply their model to the design of 14 Participants will be notified in writing of the • First floor plan (if applicable) new public housing units on seven infill lots results of the submissions. • Roof plan in Hilton. This contract includes but is not • Elevations limited to design development; approvals; • Building and site sections including that of and contract administration, including site the adjoining property inspections as required, and monitoring and reporting to Housing. The contract will • Site plan and landscape plan be subject to a 7% Architectural Services • Internal and external perspective views fee (including all sub-consultant fees) less • Schedule of costs as described in the $10,000 for design services rendered. Stage 2 design brief design Competition 2017

hilton 013_ THE FINE PRINT

6.1 Agreement 6.4 Submission requirements for Stage 1 Competition, the Jury is under no obligation to pick any winners as part of the Competition if it considers the 6.4.1 A ll submissions must comply with the requirements 6.1.1 By agreeing to participate in this Competition, Participants Competition cannot continue or the submissions are not outlined in the Competition Brief. agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and the of a standard acceptable to Housing (acting reasonably). Competition Brief. Each Participant must sign the Entry 6.4.2 Participants are advised to retain copies of their entries 6.6.5 The Jury’s decision will be at its absolute discretion and Form (Attachment 4). as submissions will not be returned. will be final, binding and no objections will be considered. I f there is any inconsistency between the Competition Brief 6.4.3 Any submissions that do not conform with the entry 6.6.6 Housing reserves the right to decide whether to use the and the Terms and Conditions, these Terms and Conditions requirements in the Competition Brief will be deemed Winning Entry for the Hilton Revitalisation Project or not. will prevail to the extent of any inconsistency. non-complying and may be disqualified. 6.6.7 Housing reserves the right to decide whether to use the Winning Entry for the Hilton Revitalisation Project or not. 6.2 Eligibility 6.5 Assessment process for Stage 1 6.6.7.1 the Winning Entry does not complete the contract 6.2.1 A Registered West Australian Architect or an architectural 6.5.1 The Technical Advisory Panel will prepare an Evaluation documentation in the time allowed; 06_ practice or multidisciplinary team of no more than five (5) Report which assesses the Stage 1 submissions against 6.6.7.2 the winning Developed Concept cannot be people led by an architect registered in Western Australia. the Design Quality Principles in Section 3.3. constructed for a maximum average cost of 6.2.2 The following persons are ineligible to enter the Competition 6.5.2 Upon receiving the Evaluation Report from the Technical $200,000 per unit plus $20,000 per lot for and must not assist any Participant: Advisory Panel, the Jury will shortlist a maximum of four (4) landscaping (inc. GST); • A ny employee of Housing or any of their direct family submissions which will be invited to participate in Stage 2. 6.6.7.3 Or if there is any other dispute between Housing members. 6.5.3 The assessments of submissions for Stage 1 will be and the Winning Entry that cannot be resolved. • A ny assessor of the Competition or their employees or undertaken in accordance with Housing’s probity process. direct family members. 6.5.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms 6.7 Honorarium and Conditions, while Housing is committed to run the • A ny Jury members or any employee or direct family 6.7.1 U pon submission of the Developed Concept Housing will Competition it may, at its discretion, elect not to select members of the group they represent. pay a fee/prize of $10,000 to each of the shortlisted entries a winner if it considers the Competition cannot continue to contribute to participation costs and for design services or the submissions are not of a standard acceptable to rendered. All other expenses will be the responsibility 6.3 Conflict of Interest Housing (acting reasonably). of the Participants. Only one payment will be made for 6.3.1 For the purpose of this Competition, a ‘conflict of interest’ 6.5.5 Housing’s decision will be at its absolute discretion and each shortlisted submission regardless of the number of will occur where a Participant or any associate has any will be final, binding and no objections will be considered. Participants. business, personal or other relationship that could result in, or could reasonably be perceived to result in, the Participant 6.7.2 At the end of Stage 2, the Winning Entry will be offered a gaining a benefit not available to all other Participants in the 6.6 Assessment process for Stage 2 contract to design 14 dwellings on 7 rear infill “battle-axe” Competition. 6.6.1 T he Hilton Design Competition concepts will be assessed in blocks based on the application of their winning design proposal. Subject to the offer being accepted, the architect 6.3.2 A benefit for the purpose of this clause includes non- two phases as follows: will be required to enter into an agreement (Client and financial benefits or relationships that might not be 6.6.1.1 Housing’s Technical Advisory Panel will prepare Architect Agreement) with Housing to design and manage considered material at law. an Evaluation Report which assesses the the construction of the Developed Concept for a maximum submissions against the Stage 2 Evaluation 6.3.3 An actual or potential conflict of interest may be declared by sum of $205,800 (calculated as 7% of the maximum Criteria stipulated in the Stage 2 Brief and the affected Participant, any other Participant, the Adviser, construction costs which includes GST and $10,000 for recommends a winner of the Competition. the Registrar or Housing. design services rendered), which is to include all: 6.6.1.2 The Jury will consider the Evaluation Report in 6.3.4 O n becoming aware of any actual or potential conflict of 6.7.2.1 D esign services (concept design finalisation, design making its final decision to select a winner of the interest, the relevant person must immediately notify the development and construction documentation) Registrar in writing. The Registrar will then determine Competition. 6.7.2.2 Approvals (excluding application fees) whether: 6.6.2 The assessment of submissions from Stage 2 will be 6.7.2.3 Contract administration including site inspections • the Participant will be required to withdraw from the undertaken in accordance with Housing’s probity process as required Competition; or and will be overseen by the Jury and probity officer. 6.7.2.4 A llowance for appointment of sub-consultants • th e Participant may continue in the Competition, subject 6.6.3 H ousing reserves the right to communicate with any or all of as approved, but excluding the fees of sub- to the Jury being advised of the relevant circumstances the shortlisted Participants prior to the announcement of a consultants of the conflict; or winner to clarify, amend and finalise any Stage 2 submissions. 6.7.2.5 Monitoring and reporting to Housing of progress • further actions are required to deal with the conflict. 6.6.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms and Conditions, while Housing is committed to running the and compliance . design Competition 2017

hilton 014_ 06_the fine print

6.8 Budget 6.9 Builders and tender for building contract any information, ideas and designs in the Department of 6.14 Privacy Communities’ promotional materials. 6.8.1 T he maximum budget for the Development has been set 6.9.1 Shortlisted Participants may nominate a preferred builder 6.14.1 The Participants agree to comply with the Information as follows, with further details provided to the Shortlisted including the Builder’s registration number with their Stage 6.11.3 The Participants agree that Housing may use the identity Privacy Principles set out in section 14 of the Privacy Act Participants in the Stage 2 Design Brief: 2 submission. of Participants and details of their designs for publicity, 1988 in respect of personal information received, created marketing and any other purposes. 6.9.2 Housing may invite the Winning Entry’s preferred builders or held by parties in connection with the Competition. up to $200,000 6.11.4 All Participants must promptly inform Housing if, as a Construction Costs to tender for the contract to build the development but is (inclusive of GST) per unit not obliged to do so. Housing reserves the right to nominate result of the Competition, material submitted as part of 6.15 Release and Indemnity additional builders or to substitute builders for those the Competition is used (in whole or part) in any proposed Landscaping up to $20,0000 per lot 6.15.1 Each Participant will indemnify Housing, the Adviser, nominated by the architect. development or if the Participant received any commercial benefit from any design or idea submitted as part of the Registrar and Jury members and all their respective 6.9.3 O nce the tender process is complete, Housing will up to $205,800 Competition. officers, employees, contractors, agents and associates Architects Fees enter into a contract (in a form required by Housing with and keep them indemnified in respect of any loss suffered (inclusive of GST) 6.11.5 The Participants of all Teams that receive an honorarium a builder determined by Housing to build the winning as a result of: concept design(s). as part of the Competition must be available for publicity up to $3,145,800m • b reach of these Terms and Conditions by each Participant Total opportunities as required by Housing for a period of 12 6.9.4 Parties related to the Participant or the Participant’s (inclusive of GST) months following the announcement of the Winning Entry. or any associate; firm are not eligible to tender for the contract to build the • n egligence of each Participant or any associate, and winning concept design. 6.11.6 The Winning Entry may use the winning concept design in 6.8.2 A maximum budget of $3,145,800 (inc. GST) has been other locations, providing the work is acknowledged as a • a ny unlawful act, omission or fraud of each Participant set to cover the total cost of the development which design that was developed through this Competition. or any associate. 6.10 Participant Costs includes $10,000 for design services rendered. All 6.11.7 The Winning Entry must obtain Housing’s prior written 6.15.2 S uch indemnity does not apply to the extent that the loss submissions in the Competition must ensure that the 6.10.1 Housing accepts no responsibility for any costs incurred approval for all advertising, marketing and promotion of the is caused or contributed to by any act of Housing, the average cost of the construction of each unit as part by a Participant arising from their participation in the winning concept design other than through the website of Adviser or a Jury member. Competition. of the development is no more than $200,000 and that the Winning Entry’s firm. All costs associated with the preparation and submission landscaping does not exceed $20,000 per lot (inc. GST). 6.10.2 6.16 Changes to these Conditions of an entry in the Competition including labour, materials, 6.12 Moral Rights 6.16.1 T he Registrar will promptly notify all Participants of any 6.8.3 Housing reserves the right to have any of the and any indirect costs such as photography, travel and sub-consultant costs must be met by the Participant. 6.12.1 In relation to any publication, exhibition or public material change in the Competition Brief, the timetable, shortlisted designs costed by a quantity surveyor dissemination of design concepts and other submitted the Fine Print, timetable, or the constitution or identity 6.10.3 Each Participant will be responsible for any tax implications to determine if the Developed Concept (including materials, Housing and the Adviser will take all reasonable of the Adviser, Registrar or Jury members. in Australia or any other jurisdiction arising from the hard and soft landscaping) can be constructed for action to preserve the moral rights of the Participant. payment of honorarium or any other payment relating up to $420,000 per lot (inc. GST). If the shortlisted to the Competition. 6.17 Governing law and Jurisdiction Participant’s proposed design cannot be built within 6.13 Disclosure of Information 6.17.1 These Competition Conditions are governed by the the budget, Housing reserves the right to contact 6.11 Intellectual property and Copyright 6.13.1 T he Participants agree and acknowledge that the laws applying in the State of Western Australia. the relevant Participant and ask for modifications information and material submitted as part of the 6.11.1 Each Participant warrants that in preparing their entry: 6.17.2 T he parties submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction Competition is subject to the Freedom of Information Act to the Developed Concept so that the dwelling can a. there has been no infringement of the intellectual of the courts of Western Australia. 1992 (WA) and may also be disclosed by Housing under a be constructed for an average cost of $200,000 per property rights and copyright of others; and 6.17.3 The Participants must comply with all relevant law court order or upon request of Parliament or any committee in preparing and submitting their entry and participating unit (inc. GST) or less and a maximum of $20,000 b. they have obtained any necessary licences or of Parliament or if otherwise required by law. for landscaping for each lot. Nothing in the clause assignments from third parties. in the Competition. 6.13.2 By submitting an entry into the Competition, each obligates the Department of Communities to cost any 6.11.2 Each Participant grants, and must ensure that any other Participant releases Housing from all liability whatsoever submission or allow any submitted concept designs owner of any Intellectual Property Rights grant, to Housing for any loss, injury, damage, liability, costs, or expense to be amended once submitted. an irrevocable, perpetual, royalty-free, non-exclusive resulting from the disclosure of information or material licence in any material submitted by the Team or the under this clause by Housing. Participants as part of the Competition to use and display 6.13.3 Subject to this clause, any personal information collected all or any information, ideas and designs submitted by the by Housing as part of this Competition will be used in Participant including (without limitation) the right to display accordance with its Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty of Care all or any information, ideas and designs submitted by a Policy. Participant on Housing’s website and other websites relating to the Competition and in any exhibition and to use all or design Competition 2017

hilton 015_ DEFINITIONS

Competition means the ‘Hilton Design Competition’ Moral Rights has the same meaning as in the as outlined in these Terms and Conditions and the Copyright Act 1968. Competition Brief. Participant means each individual or team who Competition Brief means the Hilton Design submits an entry to the Competition. Competition Brief. Stage 2 Design Brief means the detailed design brief Competition Registrar means Housing’s issued to the Shortlisted Participants following the representative appointed to coordinate the assessment of the Stage 1 submissions. 07_ Hilton Design Competition and to ensure that the Submissions means all submissions to the Competition is run in a fair and equitable manner. Competition. Intellectual Property Rights means patents, Technical Advisor means an expert adviser, copyright, registered designs, trademarks and appointed by Housing to provide detailed advice and the right to have confidential information (being evaluation of particular aspects of submitted entries information which is capable of being protected and to respond to any technical enquiry from any by way of an action for breach of confidence) kept Participant. confidential; and any application or right to apply for registration of any of those rights, but does not Technical Advisory Panel means a Panel appointed include Moral Rights. by Housing to assess competition entries against the evaluation criteria at each stage. The Panel will Jury means the expert Design Competition Jury comprise of staff from Housing that specialise in appointed by Housing to select the shortlisted entries planning, architecture, design and construction. at Stage 1 and to determine the Winning Entry of the Competition. Full details of the Jury are provided as Terms and Conditions means the Competition Attachment 1. requirements outlined in The Fine Print.

Law includes any constitution or provision, treaty, Winning Entry means the architect or team decree, convention, statute, Act, Regulation, rule, selected by the Jury as the winner of Stage 2 of the ordinance, proclamation, subordinate legislation, Competition. delegated legislation, by law, judgment, rule of common law or equity, rule, ruling or guideline by a competent entity exercising jurisdiction in the relevant matter, including a rule, ruling, by-law, town planning

design Competition 2017 scheme or guideline of any Government Agency.

hilton 016_ Design Competition Jury

Dr Geoffrey London Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the UniversityDesign Competition Jury of Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of Dr Geoffrey London architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee Western Australia. He is a former government architect of for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority. Design Competition JuryVictoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high Drquality Geoffrey infill London housing and is on the design advisory committee Geoffrey is Professor of Architecture at the University of for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority. Western Australia. He is a former government architect of

Dr Brad Petit Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high ATTACHMENT 1 climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and forDr the Brad Metropolitan Petit Redevelopment Authority. was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in Design Competition Juryhas chaired a broad range of working groups and committees climate change and sustainability planning. He was previously Design Competition Jury including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, Dean of the School of Sustainability at Murdoch University and Dr Brad Petit TransportDr Geoffrey Committee, London Climate Change Adaption working group was appointed to the heritage Council of WA in 2014. Brad Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in DrGeoffrey Geoffrey is Professor London of Architecture at the University of Dr Brad Pettitt and the City Centre Strategic Sites working group. climatehas chaired change aand broad sustainability range of planning. working He groups was previously and committees Western Australia. He is a former government architect of Geoffrey London is Professor of Architecture at The DeanBradincluding of is the the School Mayorthe ofUrban of Sustainability the CityDevelopment of Fremantle at Murdoch andAdvisory University has andCommi ttee, Victoria and Western Australia and a past dean and head of wasTransport appointed Committee, to the heritage Climate Council Change of WA Adaption in 2014. working Brad group University of Western Australia and a Professorial expertise in climate change and sustainability planning. architecture at UWA. Geoffrey is a strong advocate of high hasand chaired the City a broad Centre range Strategic of working Sites groups working and group.committees Fellow at the University of Melbourne. He was, until He was previously Dean of the School of Sustainability quality infill housing and is on the design advisory committee including the Urban Development Advisory Committee, lateJoshfor 2014,the Byrne Metropolitan the Victorian Redevelopment Government Architect, Authority. having Transportat Murdoch Committee, University Climate and wasChange appointed Adaption to working the group previouslyJosh is a heldwidely the respectedposition of sustainabilityWestern Australian practitioner with over andHeritage the City Council Centre ofStrategic WA in 2014.Sites working group.

Government20 years’ experience Architect. In in these sustainability roles he was and involved landscape in desig n. advisingJosh is thean advisertwo state to governments the Water Corporation, on a wide range Landcorp of and the Josh Byrne

projectsMetropolitanDr Brad and Petit on Redevelopment issues such as design Authority quality, on projectmatters relating to JoshJosh is Byrne a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over Brad is the Mayor of the City of Fremantle and has expertise in procurement,urban water heritage, management, master planning,environmental sustainability, technology and Josh20 Byrneyears’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. design.climate change He is andwell sustainabilityregarded by planning.the local HeHilton was community previously JoshJoshJosh is is isa an widelyan environmental adviser respected to the sustainability scientist, Water Corporation, author, practitioner television Landcorp with over and the and development strategies. He has a long-term whereDean of he the has School const ofructed Sustainability two 10 star at Murdochenergy efficient University homes and 20presenterMetropolitan years’ experience and Redevelopmentresearch in sustainability academic. Authority Heand is landscape a Researchon matters desig n.relating to professional and research interest in medium density usingwas appointed conventional to the heritagebuilding Councilmaterials of WAand in 2014.construction Brad Joshurban is an water adviser management,to the Water Corporation, environmental Landcorp technology and the and MetropolitanFellow with Redevelopment Curtin University’s Authority Sustainability on matters Policy relating to housingmethods.has chaired and forms a broad of delivery range ofthat working provide groups more and committees design. He is well regarded by the local Hilton community urbanInstitute water and management,the CRC for Low environmental Carbon Living technology and an and affordabilityincluding theand betterUrban design.Development Advisory Committee, design.where heHe hasis well const regardedructed by two the 10 local star Hilton energy community efficient homes Transport Committee, Climate Change Adaption working group Adjunct Associate Professor with the School of Civil Melinda Payne whereusing he hasconventional constructed twobuilding 10 star materialsenergy efficient and homes construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of andMelinda the CityPayne Centre is Principal Strategic Policy Sites workingOfficer ofgroup. the Office of the usingmethods. conventional building materials and construction Melinda Payne methods.New South Wales. His research interests span high Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Melinda Payne is the Associate in the WA Office of the performance housing, water sensitive design and Design Advisory Committee. Melinda Payne Government Architect. In this capacity she has provided MelindasustainableMelinda Payne Payne urban is developments. Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the strategic design advice on major state projects and Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle Josh Byrne Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle has led several significant design and planning policy Design Advisory Committee. Josh is a widely respected sustainability practitioner with over DesignWill CarrollAdvisory Committee. initiatives. A dedicated advocate for the value of good 20 years’ experience in sustainability and landscape design. Will is the Manager Development at the Housing design,Josh is she an hasadviser served to onthe judging Water panelsCorporation, for a number Landcorp and the Authority of Western Australia. He has worked across ofMetropolitan international Redevelopmentdesign competitions, Authority has been on anmatters relating to all aspects of housing delivery that has seen him head InstituteurbanWill Carroll awardwater juror,management, and has sat environmental on academic boards technology and anddesign. institutional He is design well regardedadvisory committees.by the local Hilton community up regional services across WA, undertake the role

of Director Built Form and Civil Construction and was where he has constructed two 10 star energy efficient homes Will Carroll using conventional building materials and construction askedWill Carroll to take on the inaugural position of Director methods. Business Development for the WA Housing Authority.

Melinda Payne Melinda Payne is Principal Policy Officer of the Office of the design Competition 2017 Government Architect and member pf the City of Fremantle

hilton Design Advisory Committee. 017_

Will Carroll ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN SINGLE STOREY TILE HARWOOD STREET ROOF, TIMBER & FIBRO HOUSE TBM - SPRING HEAD S P S NAIL & PLATE P S P S P S P S P S P

P S

RL: 32.57 S P

P S

P ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO REMAIN S P S

P S

P LAWN P P SINGLE STOREY TILE P P

P HARWOODP STREET P

DBYD SEWER ROOF, TIMBER & P DRIVEWAY P

FIBRO HOUSE P

P P TBM - SPRING HEAD P

C P

P P NAIL & PLATE P

P W P P

P RL: 32.57

P IO P

P 4 P 17.88 ALLALL BUILDINGS BUILDINGS ARE ARE TO REMAINTO REMAIN P ATTACHMENT 2 P

P LAWN P P

SINGLESINGLE STOREY STOREY TILE TILE P

P HARWOODHARWOOD P STREET STREET P

P DBYD SEWER P

ROOF,ROOF, TIMBER TIMBER & & DRIVEWAY P

8.15 P

P LAWN P P

LAWN P FIBROFIBRO HOUSE HOUSE P P

P TBMTBM - SPRING - SPRING HEAD HEAD

P FOOT PATH P

P NAILNAIL & PLATE & PLATE

P /

/ C / P / / P /

/ RL: 32.57RL: 32.57

/ P /

/ P COMPETITION SITE /

/ P / /

P / / / P / /

P PROPOSED LOT 51 / / P / W /

/ P / / / 21.1

/ P / / / P / - C LAWNLAWN / / /

C P / /

/ P / TIN FENCE

371m² / IO / P / / / P / /

4 /

PROPOSED / P 17.88 / / G / P / / /

P / / / / P / / / P DBYD SEWER DBYD SEWER / / DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY / P /

PARKING / /

/ P / / / P / / /

P / / / P / / / / P / /

/ P / / /

P / / /

P / / / / P / 18.3 / / P / / / P / / /

8.15 P / / / / P

VERANDAH / / /

P / / /

P / LAWN / / / C C LAWN P 5023.63 / / /

P / / /

P / / / / P / / 21.31 / P / / W W / P / / / P / / / P FOOT PATH / / / /

P / / / IO P IO / / /

P / / 4 4 / /

P 17.8817.88 / / /

P / / /

P / / / / P / / / P / / /

/ / / / P / / / P / / /

P / PROPOSED LOT 51 / /

PROPOSED / P / /

/ P / /

15 HARWOOD STREET / 21.1 P / / / P / / LEGEND /

/ - C 8.15 8.15 C / / /

OUTDOOR / / TIN FENCE No.15 / 371m² / /

LAWNLAWN / /

LAWNLAWN / / / / PROPOSED / / G / / / / / LIVING AREA / / / / / / / FOOT PATH FOOT PATH

Symbol Description / / /

/ PARKING / / / / / / / / / / / / /

44m² / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /

PROPOSEDPROPOSED LOT LOT 51 51 / 18.3 / / / / / 21.1 21.1 FL: 33.61 / C TELSTRA PIT / / / /

/ - C - C

/ C C

/ VERANDAH / / TIN FENCE TIN FENCE

371m²371m² / / / 2.39 / / /

PROPOSEDPROPOSED / 5023.63 /

G G / / / / / / / FL / / / 21.31 ELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTION / /

PARKINGPARKING/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / /

/ / / / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / 18.3 18.3 / / / / 34 3995. / /

ELEC CONSUMER POLE / / / / VERANDAHVERANDAH / / / / / / / / LEGEND 5023.63 5023.63 / / / 1143 / / / / / / 21.31 21.31 / PROPOSED / / / / / / / G 4.24 /

GAS METER / / / / / / / /

/ OUTDOOR / /

14.36 / No.15

Symbol Description / / / / / LEGEND / / / / / / / / / / / LIVING AREA GATE / / / / PROPOSEDPROPOSED / / / / / C TELSTRA PIT / / / / LEGENDLEGEND / / / / /

OUTDOOROUTDOOR/ / No.15No.15 / /

/ 44m² / / / / / / IO / / SEWER IO FIBRO SHED / LIVINGLIVING AREA AREA / / / / /

SymbolSymbolDescriptionDescription / / /

ELEC HOUSEHOLD / / / FL: 33.61 / / / / / / /

/ 44m²44m² / / / /

TO BE REMOVED / 2.39 / / / / / / / TREE / / / / CONNECTION C C FL: 33.61FL: 33.61 /

TELSTRATELSTRA PIT PIT / FL / / / / / / / / 2.39 2.39 / / / / / / / / / /

FL FL / / ELEC CONSUMER POLE /

ELECELEC HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD CONNECTION CONNECTION / W / / WATER METER / / / / / / / / / 34 399 5. / / / / / / / G / /

GAS METER / 34 34 399 5. 399 5. / /

ELECELEC CONSUMER CONSUMER POLE POLE / / / / / 1143 / / / / / / / / CLOTHESLINES / 11431143 / / / /

GATE / 4.24 / / / / G GGASGAS METER METER / 4.244.24 / / / / / / TIN FENCE / 14.36 14.3614.36 / / / / /

IO / / / /

PROPOSED LOT 52 SEWER IO / / / /

OVERHEAD POWER LINE / / TO BE REMOVED

GATEGATE / / / / 39.04 / / / / / / / / / / / 380m² / / /

TREE / / / /

IO IO / FIBROFIBRO SHED SHED /

SEWERSEWER IO IO / / / /

SEWER PIPE / / / / / FIBRO SHED / / / / /

W / /

WATER METER / /

AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m² / TO BETO REMOVED BE REMOVED / / / / / TREETREE / / / / / /

P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P / /

/ TO BE REMOVED / / / EDGE OF GUTTER / / / / / / OVERHEAD POWER LINE / /

TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m² / /

W W / /

WATERWATER METER METER / / / / / / / S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S / / / / / /

/ / / /

SEWER PIPE / / / / / / / / 17.94 / /

CLOTHESLINESCLOTHESLINES / / / /

/ / / / 18.26 / / / / / TIN FENCE TIN FENCE / / EDGE OF GUTTER / / / / / / / PROPOSEDPROPOSED LOT LOT 52 52 / /

OVERHEADOVERHEAD POWER POWER LINE LINE / / TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED / / / 39.04 39.04 BITUMEN / LAWN / / / / / / /

/ 380m²380m² / / / / / / / / / TIN FENCE /

SEWERSEWER PIPE PIPE / / / / / / / FIBRO FENCE / / / PROPOSED LOT 52 /

/ AREAAREA OF ACCESS OF ACCESS LEG: LEG: 90m² 90m² / / / TO BE REMOVED / / / / 39.04 / / / / / /

EDGEEDGE OF GUTTER OF GUTTER / / / / / 380m²TOTALTOTAL AREA AREA INCLUDE INCLUDE ACCESS ACCESS LEG: / LEG: 470m² 470m² / / / BITUMEN / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 17.94 17.94 /

/ / CLOTHESLINES AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 90m² / / / / / / 18.26 18.26 / / / / / / / / / / /

CONCRETE / / / / / BITUMENBITUMEN /

/ LAWNLAWN 3 / / TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 470m²/ / / / /

3 / / / / / / / / / / / FIBRO FENCE FIBRO FENCE / / / / / / / / / / / / / 17.94 / / / / /

FIBRO FENCE20.91 / / / / / / 18.26 / / / /

CONCRETE / / / / / / / / / / / / CLOTHESLINESCLOTHESLINES / / / /

/ LAWN / / /

/ /

CONCRETECONCRETE / / / /

/ / 3 3 / / / / / / 3 3 / / / / / / / FIBRO FENCE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ 20.9120.91

FIBROFIBRO FENCE FENCE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / CLOTHESLINES/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

1132 / / / / /

/ 3 / / / / / / 1131 3 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ / /

/ / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / /

1132/ / / 1132/

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ 20.91 /

FIBRO FENCE/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

SCALE / / / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

11311131 / / / /

S S S S

/ /

S S S

/ /

S S S

/ / /

/ / / / /

S S S S

/ / / /

S S S

/ / /

/ / / /

S S S

/ / / /

/ / / / /

S S S

/ / /

/ / / / /

S S S

/ / /

/ / / / /

S S S

/ /

/ / / / /

S S S

/ / / / / / / /

S S S

/ / / S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S

S S S S

S S

S S S S

S S

S S S S

S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S

S S S

S S S S 1:300 @ A3 5 0 5 10 1:3001:300 @ @A3 A3 1131 1132 5 5 0 0 5 5 10 10 PROPOSED GREEN TITLE AMENDMENTS Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AMENDMENTSAMENDMENTS PROPOSEDPROPOSED GREEN GREEN TITLE TITLE PreparedPrepared for forDEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF OF HOUSING HOUSING SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1144, 1145 & PROPOSEDPROPOSED LOTS: LOTS: 2 2 SUBDIVISIONSUBDIVISION OF OFLOTS LOTS 1144, 1144, 1145 1145 & & PROPOSED LOTS: 2 VERVER DATUM DATUM : AHD71 : AHD71 HORIZHORIZ DATUM DATUM : LOCAL : LOCAL VER DATUM : AHD71ORIGINALORIGINAL LOTS:HORIZ LOTS: 1 DATUM 1 : LOCAL 11461146 ON ON P6343(1). P6343(1). No. No. 15, 15,17 &17 19 & 19 ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 1146 ON P6343(1). No. 15, 17 & 19 REVREV 0 - INITIAL 0 - INITIAL RELEASE RELEASE ORIGINORIGIN 1:300: SEWER : SEWER MH@ MHW8772 A3 W8772 -ORIGIN LID -ORIGIN LID : : REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE ORIGIN : SEWERTOTAL MHTOTAL W8772 AREA: AREA: -ORIGIN LID 841m² 841m² : HARWOODHARWOOD STREET, STREET, HILTON. HILTON. 5 0 5 10 HARWOOD STREET, HILTON. C/T:C/T: 2181-110, 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-111, 2181-112 2181-112 TOTAL AREA: 841m² LOCALLOCAL AUTHORITY: AUTHORITY: CITY CITY OF OFFREMANTLE FREMANTLE REV AREV - SCALE A - SCALE CHANGED CHANGED AND SUBDIVISIONAND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY BOUNDARY ADDED ADDED REV A - SCALE CHANGED AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112 CADCAD 8209-01 8209-01 WAPC.DWG WAPC.DWG REVREV B - CLOTHESLINES B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED ADDED C ROSSLANDC ROSSLAND & H & ARDY H ARDY PTY PTY LTD LTD

LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE design Competition 2017 R-CODE:R-CODE: R20/R25 R20/R25 PROPOSED GREEN TITLE CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG AMENDMENTS CONSULTINGCONSULTING LICENSED LICENSED SURVEYORS SURVEYORS F.B F.B1232/34 1232/34 Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD PROPOSED LOTS: 2 SUBJECTSUBJECT TO TO CHANGE CHANGE PENDING PENDING W.A.P.C W.A.P.C REV REV C - PROPOSED C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR OUTDOOR LIVING, LIVING,SUBDIVISION PARKING PARKING AREAS 177AREAS RAILWAYAND177 RAILWAYANDOF PARADE, LOTS PARADE, MAYLANDS 1144, MAYLANDS 6051 1145 6051 REF &REF 8209, 8209, 8210, 8210, 8211 8211 DATE DATE 12/06/2015 12/06/2015 R-CODE: R20/R25 TRUNCATIONTRUNCATION ADDED ADDED TEL 08TEL 9272 08 92722214 2214 FAX FAX08 9370 08 93703547 3547 hilton CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS F.B 1232/34 018_ VER DATUM : AHD71PLANPLAN HORIZ8209-01 8209-01 DATUM : LOCAL CONDITIONSCONDITIONS AND AND SURVEY SURVEY 1146 ON P6343(1).EMAILEMAIL [email protected] [email protected]. 15, 17 & 19 SURVEYORSURVEYOR VU VU REV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS177 RAILWAYAND PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 ORIGINAL DATELOTS: 12/06/2015 1 REVREV D - PROPOSED D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY BOUNDARY LAYOUT LAYOUT REVISED REVISED LOTS LOTS 51-54 51-54 SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C REF 8209, 8210, 8211 REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE A.B.N.A.B.N. 46 008 46 745008 542745 542 DWGDWG SIZE SIZE A3 A3 SCALEORIGINSCALE : SEWER 1:300 1:300 MHREVISION W8772REVISION D-ORIGIN LID12/10/2016 D 12/10/2016 : TRUNCATION ADDED TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLAN 8209-01 HARWOOD STREET, HILTON. CONDITIONS AND SURVEY SURVEYORTOTAL VU AREA: 841m² REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54EMAIL [email protected] C/T: 2181-110, 2181-111, 2181-112 REVISION REV DScale: 12/10/2016 AScale: - SCALE 1:300 1:300 CHANGED@ A3 @ A3 AND SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED 1515 Harwood Harwood Street, Street, Hilton Hilton A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZELOCAL A3 AUTHORITY:1 16.02.171 CITY16.02.17ISSUED ISSUEDOF FOR FREMANTLEFORINFORMATION INFORMATION SCALE 1:300 Drawn:Drawn: J.K. J.K. SUBDIVISONSUBDIVISON PLAN PLAN Rev DateRev DateNote Note CAD 8209-01 WAPC.DWG R-CODE: R20/R25 REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS F.B 1232/34 Scale: 1:300 @ A3 15 Harwood Street, Hilton DATE 12/06/2015 1 16.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C REV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING AREAS177 RAILWAYAND PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 REF 8209, 8210, 8211 Drawn: J.K. SUBDIVISONTRUNCATION ADDED PLAN TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLAN 8209-01 Rev Date Note SURVEYOR VU CONDITIONS AND SURVEY REV D - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LAYOUT REVISED LOTS 51-54EMAIL [email protected] A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:300 REVISION D 12/10/2016

2 31.08.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Scale: 1:300 @ A3 15 Harwood Street, Hilton 16.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION 1 Drawn: J.K. SUBDIVISON PLAN Rev Date Note ATTACHMENT 3 DEVELOPMENT SITEs

57 PAGET STREET 14 JOSLIN STREET SNOOK CRESCENT

309 100 36 1012 DBYD SEWER DBYD SEWER TIN FENCE 20.92 TIN FENCE18.21 20.12 FIBRO FENCE SEWER 1.5 BGL

TO BE REMOVED

TIN SHED TIMBER FENCE TIMBER TO BE REMOVED SHED

17.91 Proposed Lot 2 34 TIN FENCE TIN Total - 478m² NURSERY Access Leg - 103m² TIN FENCE ZINC SHED TO BE REMOVED FOOTPATH PROPOSED LOT 82 429m 2 TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED LOTS: 2 TO BE REMOVED AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 68m² ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 TOTAL AREA: 905m² TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 497m² 23.59 LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE NURSERY 28 PROPOSED LOT 92 R-CODE: R20/R25 811 613m² SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C LAWN FIBRO FENCE AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 109m² CONDITIONS AND SURVEY 14.13 1132LEGEND TIN FENCE TIN LAWN TIN CLOTHESLINES TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 722m² SHED Symbol Description 4.24 HOUSE WALL 1130 C TELSTRA PIT ELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTION 1395

10 STAIRS ELEC CONSUMER POLE CONC. PAD TO BE REMOVED LAWN 6.22 43.25 12.21 Outdoor Living E ELECT DOME G GAS METER 30.45 Space TIN FENCE 36m² IS SEWER IS 4.24 TAP TIMBER FENCE

11.68 PROPOSED FIBRO + BRICK & TREE 2 LAWN LEGEND 25.34 OUTDOOR TILE ROOF HOUSE W WATER METER TIN FENCE LIVING AREA

60.35 Symbol Description TIN 30m CLOTHES LINE Proposed SHED PROPOSED LOT 81 2 TIN FENCE FIBRO FENCE 1. 00 C TELSTRA PIT TIN FENCE Lot 1 320m TO BE REMOVED 4 ELEC ANCHOR SINGLE STOREY EA 427m²

CLOTHESLINES EP ELEC. POWER POLE 44.9 TILE ROOF & TIMBER HOUSE GATE TIN FENCE 18.31 TO BE REMOVED PROPOSEDGATE OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO REMAIN 13.62 OUTDOORPALM 1066 VERANDAH SEWER PIPE

1m Setback to contain TIN FENCE LIVING AREA VERANDAH G IO SEWER IO EDGE OF EAVES TO REMAIN roof eaves within front 32m²S SEWER PIT FENCE TIN 4.24 GARDEN BED DRIVEWAY RETAINING WALL PATIO SHRUB

lot and comply with FOOTPATH

FOOT PATH TO REMAIN BASKETBALL HOOP 35 21.31 Building Codes of TREE Proposed 29.9 Parking Area - FIBRO FENCE LAWN H WATER HYDRANT LAWN 11.02 BITUMEN Australia for fire 46m² PROPOSED WM WATER METER LAWN PARKING separation BRICK PAVING

GARDEN BED 9.15 SINGLE STOREY CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED FENCELINE TIMBER FENCE TILE ROOF & FIBRO HOUSE O/HEAD POWER LINE TREE TO REMAIN 15.42 5.5 E W 3 IS 15.21 TELSTRA CABLE TO REMAIN LAWN SEWER PIPE WM EDGE OF GUTTER FOOTPATH C C 36 FOOT PATH 26.9 BRICK PAVING PROPOSED NEW L.C.R.W. - LOW CONC RETAINING WALL PROPOSED LOT 91 X-OVER 492m² EP LAWN L.B.P. - LOW BRICK PILLAR EA LEGEND G

SymbolDescription LAWN PROPOSED LOTS: 2 DRIVEWAY DBYD SEWER C ELECTELSTRA HOUSEHOLD PIT VERANDAH CONCRETE ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 TOTAL AREA: 817m²

CONNECTION TIN FENCE ELEC CONSUMER POLE LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE

BED Proposed New G GAS METER WALLS R-CODE: R20/R25 SNOOK CRESCENT GARDEN Crossover JOSLIN STREET IO SEWER IO SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C

TREE FIBRO FENCE PROPOSED PROPOSED SURVEY STRATA CONDITIONS AND SURVEY W WATER METER PARKING AMENDMENTS Prepared for HOUSING AUTHORITY 1:200 @ A3 SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1143 AND 1131 5 0 5 LAWN VER DATUM : AHD 71 HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE ON P6343(1). No. 13 HARWOOD STREET & No.14 JOSLIN STREET, ORIGIN : ORIGIN : PROPOSED GREEN TITLE Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING 3.5 LOT 1143 - SEWER MH W8772 - LID AMENDMENTS OVERHEAD POWER LINE IO HILTON. C/T: 2181-109, 1575-293 LOT 1131 - SEWER MH W8758 - LID SUBDIVISION OF W W VER DATUM : AHD71 HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL 16.62 REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8731 -ORIGIN LID : EDGE OF EAVES C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD F.B 1237/57 CAD 8213-04 WAPC.DWG LOT 1396 ON P6341. No. 93 SNOOK FOOTPATH C CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS L.B 567/13 REV A - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED CRESCENT, HILTON. 177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 REF 8213 DATE 21/12/2016 TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLANREV 8213-04 B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARYC/T: 2176-842 CAD 8203-01 WAPC.DWG C SURVEYOR VU C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD EMAIL [email protected] AMENDED CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS F.B 1232/41 BITUMEN LAWN A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 REVISION 0 SCALE 1:200 REV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING & 177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 REF 8203 DATE 29/06/2015 EXISTING X-OVER PARKING AREAS ADDED TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLAN 8203-01 . 00 SURVEYOR VU 39 REV D - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED EMAIL [email protected] DRIVEWAY ROAD SIGN A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:200 REV D - 9/2/17 CONCRETE 14 Joslin Street, Hilton North DBYD SEWER Scale: 1:200 @ A3 SUBDIVISION PLAN 1 20.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Drawn: J.K. 4 17.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION North 93 Snook Crescent, Hilton DateRev Note 3 06.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION PROPOSED SUBDIVISION X-OVER EXTENSION 2 11.11.16 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Scale: 1:200 @ A3 1 10.11.16 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Drawn: J.K. FOR DISCUSSION ONLY PROPOSED LOTS: 2 DateRev Note ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 PAGET STREET TOTAL AREA: 1214m² design Competition 2017 LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE R-CODE: R20 E hilton SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C 019_ CONDITIONS AND SURVEY 1:300 @ A3 5 0 5 10

AMENDMENTS PROPOSED GREEN TITLE Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1023 ON VER DATUM : AHD71 HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE P6342(1). No. 57 PAGET STREET, ORIGIN : SEWER MH V8120 - ORIGINLID : REV A - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARY AMENDED HILTON. REV B - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, CC/T: ROSSLAND 2180/447 & H ARDY PTY LTD CAD 8204-01 WAPC.DWG PARKING CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS F.B 1232/50 DATE 20/07/2015 REV AREAS C - BOUNDARIESAND TRUNCATION AMENDED ADDED 177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 REF 8204 TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLAN 8204-01 EMAIL [email protected] SURVEYOR VU A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:300 REV C - 31-01-2017 57 Paget Street, Hilton North 2 17.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Scale: 1:300 @ A3 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 1 30.01.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Drawn: J.K. DateRev Note ATTACHMENT 3_DEVELOPMENT SITES

28 HARWOOD STREET 26 GRIGG PLACE 16 NICHOLAS CRESCENT

1478

1638

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / / /

/ / /

/ / / 1637 / / / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ FIBRO FENCE

/ / /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ 1636 /

/ /

/ / 12.1226 / /

/ / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / 1480 / DBYD SEWER /

/ / LEGEND / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / / / / / /

/ /

IO / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / / / / / /

/ /

TIMBER FENCE / / Symbol Description

/ /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / /

20.16 / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / TELSTRA PIT / / / / / / /

/ /

/ C /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ ELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTION /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / GAS METER / /

/ /

/ / G

/ /

/ / FIBRO FENCE

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ POWER POLE / / / /

/ E /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / IS / / / / / / /

/ / / SEWER IS / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / / / / PROPOSED LOT 34 / / / /

/ /

/ / SEWER PIT / /

/ /

/ / S

/ /

/ / / 2 / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / TREE 370m / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ LAWN /

/ / WATER METER

/ /

/ / / W / / TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

2 / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / / / / /

/ /

/ 451m / / / CLOTHESLINES / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / / FIBRO FENCE / / / / / /

/ /

24.8814 / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ 23.3814 / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / /

/ /

LAWN / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / BITUMEN

/ / / /

/ /

/ TIN FENCE / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / /

/ /

CLOTHESLINES / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ PROPOSED LOT 73 /

/ /

/ / 17.73

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / CONCRETE /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ 2 /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / 391m / / /

/ 3 / / / / /

/ /

/ 3 / / / / /

/ /

0 / / . / / /

/ /

0 / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 83m² /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ EDGE OF EAVES /

/ / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ TOTAL AREA INCLUDE ACCESS LEG: 474m² / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

/ / / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / SEWER PIPE /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / 4.24 /

/ /

/ / /

/ / / / / / 13.62 / /

/ /

/ / WATER PIPE

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ FIBRO / / /

/ / / / 1653 / / / / / / 40.6

1651 / / /

/ /

/ PROPOSED / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / /

/ /

/ SHED GAS PIPE /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

OUTDOOR / /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ TO BE REMOVED /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / O/H POWER LINES

/ / / /

/ / LIVING AREA / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ 14.5990 / / /

/ /

/ / / /

0.4 / /

/ /

/ 47.7 / / / / 30m² PROPOSED LOT 33 / / /

/ / TELSTRA CABLES / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ AREA OF ACCESS LEG: 81m² /

/ /

/ / 2 / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / 353m / /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

3 / / /

/ /

/ / SINGLE STOREY / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

4.1401 / /

/ /

/ / / / / / LEGEND / /

/ / / / / / / / 21.6 / /

/ /

/ / LIVING AREA 30m

/ /

TILE ROOF, TIMBER & FIBRO HOUSE PROPOSED OUTDOOR /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ 3.28 /

/ / / /

/ /

Symbol Description / /

/ / / / / /

/ /

TO REMAIN / / / / / / / / / / 0.50 /

/ /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ /

/ / / FL: 33.76 / / /

/ TELSTRA PIT / / /

/ PROPOSED LOT 72 / / /

/ / C / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / 2 / / /

FL / /

/ /

/ / /

/ / ELEC HOUSEHOLD CONNECTION / / /

/ / / / / / / 405m /

/ / VERANDAH / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / GAS METER TO REMAIN /

/ /

/ G / / /

/ /

/ SINGLE STOREY /

/ / / /

/ /

1.8m HIGH BRICK WALL / /

/ /

/ / 1481 / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

POWER POLE / /

/ /

/ E / / /

/ /

PROPOSED /

/ /

/ / / / /

/ TILE ROOF & FIBRO HOUSE

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ G / / IO / / /

SEWER IO / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

PARKING / /

/ / / / / / / / / / TO REMAIN / /

6.17 /

/ /

/ / FIBRO FENCE

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

TREE / /

/ / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

FL / /

FL: 34.1 / / / / / /

FIBRO FENCE / / / /

/ / / / / / WATER METER / / /

/ /

/ W / / /

/ 22.6142 / / /

/ /

/ VERANDAH /

/ /

/ / 3

/ /

/ 17.1 /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ G /

/ /

LAWN / /

/ /

3 / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / FIBRO FENCE / /

/ /

/ 21.1142 / /

/ /

/ . / / / / / / / / / / /

/ 17.2325 /

/ 00 /

/ /

/ / / / FOOT PATH / /

/ / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ LAWN / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / METAL FENCE

/ /

/ / LOW BRICK WALL

/ / / / / / / /

/ / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / 11.11 / / / / / / / /

/ / W / / / / / / /

/ /

/ 2.12 / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

15.12 / /

5 / /

/ /

/ LAWN / / /

/ /

OVERHEAD POWER LINE / / FOOTPATH / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

/ / /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / C / / / /

/ /

/ EDGE OF GUTTER / / /

/ FOOT PATH / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / /

/ /

/ 4.00 / / /

/ /

IS / / / / / / / / / / /

/ /

/ / / / E / /

/ /

BITUMEN / / / /

/ /

/ / W / /

/ /

/ / 1.7751 / / 5.6929 / /

/ / 20.7205 / / / /

/ / LAWN C CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 1.00 2.05 E TBM - DECK SPIKE LAWN PROPOSED LOTS: 2 RL: 32.57 TO REMAIN EXISTING DRIVEWAY

ALL TREES TO BE RETAINED PROPOSED ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 PROPOSED LOTS: 4 DRIVEWAY TOTAL AREA: 804m² ORIGINAL LOTS: 1 SHN LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE HARWOOD STREET TOTAL AREA: 1806m² R-CODE: R20/R25 LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF FREMANTLE GRIGG PLACE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C R-CODE:PROPOSED R20 CONDITIONS AND SURVEY 1:200 @ A3 SUBJECTPARKING TO CHANGE PENDING W.A.P.C 5 0 5 1:200 @ A3 CONDITIONS AND SURVEY 5 0 5 AMENDMENTS PROPOSED GREEN TITLE Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING REV A - SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY ADDED AMENDMENTS PROPOSED GREEN TITLE Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING REV B - CLOTHESLINES ADDED AND BOUNDARYSUBDIVISION OF VER DATUM : AHD 71 HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL SUBDIVISION OF LOT 48 ON DP 67762. VER DATUM : AHD 71 HORIZ DATUM : LOCAL AMENDED LOT 1652 ON P6341. No. 28 HARWOOD ORIGIN : SEWER MH W8772 -ORIGIN LID : REV C - PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIVING, PARKING REV 0 - INITIAL RELEASE No. 26 GRIGG PLACE, HILTON. ORIGIN : SEWER MH V8761 - LID ORIGIN : AREAS AND TRUNCATION ADDED STREET, HILTON. REV D - LOT SIZES AMENDED REV A - CLOTHESLINES ADDED C/T: 2763/834 REV E - LOT SIZES AMENDED & BUILDING OFFSETC/T: 2176-857 CAD 8206-01 WAPC.DWG ADDED C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD CAD 7935-01 WAPC.DWG CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS REV B - PROPOSED OUTDOOR C ROSSLAND & H ARDY PTY LTD REV F - CARRIAGEWAY EASEMENT EDITED F.B 1232/39 CONSULTING LICENSED SURVEYORS F.B 1232/65 177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 DATE 22/06/2015 REF 8206 177 RAILWAY PARADE, MAYLANDS 6051 DATE 22/07/2015 REV G - CARRIAGEWAY EASEMENT REMOVEDTEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PLAN 8206-01 REF 7935 PLAN 7935-01 SURVEYOR VU LIVING & PARKING AREAS ADDED TEL 08 9272 2214 FAX 08 9370 3547 PROPOSED PARKING MOVED EMAIL [email protected] SURVEYOR VU A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 REV G - 29/08/16 EMAIL [email protected] SCALE 1:200 REV C - LOT LAYOUT AMENDED A.B.N. 46 008 745 542 DWG SIZE A3 SCALE 1:200 REV C 23/01/2017

28 Harwood Street,4 20.02.17 ISSUED Hilton FOR INFORMATION North 26 Grigg Place, Hilton 3 21.12.16 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION North 2 09.09.16 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Scale: 1:200 @ A3 SUBDIVISION PLAN Scale: 1:200 @ A3 SUBDIVISION1 08.08.16 ISSUED FOR PLAN INFORMATION Drawn: J.K. 1 17.02.17 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION Drawn: J.K. DateRev Note DateRev Note design Competition 2017

hilton 020_ ATTACHMENT 4 entry form HILTON DESIGN COMPETITION ENTRY FORM

Company/Team Name:

Name of Registered West Australian Architect(s):

Registration Number(s):

Signature Confirming Acceptance of Names of team member(s) Qualification(s) Phone Email Competition Terms and Conditions

Contact Person Preferred Contact Method Date design Competition 2017

hilton 021_