DOCSLIB.ORG

Listing Ipomopsis Polyantha Is an Herbaceous Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Listing Ipomopsis Polyantha Is an Herbaceous Proposal Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 35721 For further information on how to DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office, 764 Horizon Drive, Building B, submit comments, please see today’s Grand Junction, CO 81506-3946; immediate final rule published in the Fish and Wildlife Service telephone 970-243-2778, extension 26; ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this fax 970-245-6933. If you use a Federal Register. 50 CFR Part 17 telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2010-0015] [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339. Robin Biscaia, RCRA Waste SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Management Section, Office of Site RIN 1018-AV83 Remediation and Restoration (OSRR 07– Public Comments 1), EPA New England—Region 1, 5 Post Endangered and Threatened Wildlife We intend that any final action Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA and Plants; Listing Ipomopsis resulting from this proposed rule will be 02109–3912, telephone number: (617) polyantha (Pagosa Skyrocket) as based on the best scientific and Endangered Throughout Its Range, 918–1642; fax number: (617) 918–0642, commercial data available and be as and Listing Penstemon debilis e-mail address: [email protected]. accurate and as effective as possible. (Parachute Beardtongue) and Phacelia Therefore, we request comments or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the submutica (DeBeque Phacelia) as information from the public, other ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this Threatened Throughout Their Range government agencies, the scientific Federal Register, EPA is authorizing AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, community, industry, or any other these changes by an immediate final Interior. interested party concerning this rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior ACTION: Proposed rule. proposed rule. We particularly seek to the immediate final rule because we comments concerning: believe this action is not controversial SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and (1) Biological, commercial trade, or and do not expect adverse comments Wildlife Service (Service), propose to other relevant data concerning any that oppose it. We have explained the list Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa threats (or lack thereof) to these species reasons for this authorization in the skyrocket), a plant species from and regulations that may be addressing preamble to the immediate final rule. southwestern Colorado, as endangered those threats; Unless we get written adverse throughout its range, and Penstemon (2) Additional information concerning comments which oppose this debilis (Parachute beardtongue) and the range, distribution, and population authorization during the comment Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia), sizes of these species, including the period, the immediate final rule will two plant species from western locations of any additional occurrences become effective on the date it Colorado, as threatened throughout their of these species; (3) Any information on the biological establishes, and we will not take further ranges under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This or ecological requirements of these action on this proposal. If we get species; comments that oppose this action, we proposal, if made final, would extend the Act’s protections to these species (4) Current or planned activities in the will withdraw the immediate final rule areas occupied by these species and and it will not take immediate effect. throughout their ranges. The Service seeks data and comments from the possible impacts of these activities on We will then respond to public public on this proposal. these species; comments in a later final rule based on (5) Which areas would be appropriate this proposal. You may not have another DATES: We will consider comments as critical habitat for these species and opportunity for comment. If you want to received or postmarked on or before why they should be proposed for August 23, 2010. We must receive comment on this action, you should do designation as critical habitat; and requests for public hearings, in writing, so at this time. (6) The reasons why areas should or at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER should not be designated as critical Dated: June 8, 2010. INFORMATION CONTACT section by August habitat as provided by section 4 of the Ira W. Leighton, 9, 2010. Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New ADDRESSES: You may submit comments whether the benefits of designation England. by one of the following methods: would outweigh threats to these species • [FR Doc. 2010–15256 Filed 6–22–10; 8:45 am] Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// that designation could cause, such that BILLING CODE 6560–50–P www.regulations.gov. Follow the the designation of critical habitat is instructions for submitting comments prudent. on Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2010-0015. You may submit your comments and • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public materials concerning this proposed rule Comments Processing, Attn: [FWS-R6- by one of the methods listed in the ES-2010-0015]; Division of Policy and ADDRESSES section. We will not Directives Management; U.S. Fish and consider comments sent by e-mail or fax Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, or to an address not listed in the Suite 222, Arlington, VA 22203. ADDRESSES section. We will post all comments on http:// We will post your entire comment— www.regulations.gov. This generally including your personal identifying means that we will post any personal information—on http:// information you provide us (see the www.regulations.gov. If you provide Public Comments section below for personal identifying information in your more information). hardcopy comments, you may request at FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the top of your document that we Patty Gelatt, Acting Western Colorado withhold this information from public Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife review. However, we cannot guarantee Service, Ecological Services Field that we will be able to do so. We will VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:05 Jun 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 35722 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules post all hardcopy comments on http:// candidate categories and to restrict originally described by Rydberg (1904, www.regulations.gov. candidate status to those taxa for which p. 634) as Gilia polyantha. Grant (1956, Comments and materials we receive, we have sufficient information to p. 353) moved the species into the genus as well as supporting documentation we support issuance of a proposed rule on Ipomopsis. Two varieties,G. polyantha used in preparing this proposed rule, December 5, 1996 (61 FR 64481), This var. brachysiphon and G. polyantha var. will be available for public inspection resulted in the deletion of Ipomopsis whitingii, were recognized by Kearney on http://www.regulations.gov, or by polyantha from the list of candidate taxa and Peebles (1943, p. 59). Currently appointment, during normal business for listing. Since 1996, threats to the available information indicates that I. hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife species have become more numerous polyantha is a distinct species (Porter Service, Western Colorado Ecological and more widespread. We added the and Johnson 2000; Porter et al. 2003 in Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER species to the list of candidates again in Anderson 2004, p. 11). It is treated as INFORMATION CONTACT section). the 2005Candidate Notice of Review such in the PLANTS database (United Final promulgation of the regulations (CNOR) (70 FR 24873, May 11, 2005) States Department of Agriculture concerning the listing of these species with a listing priority number (LPN) of (USDA)/Natural Resource Conservation will take into consideration all 2. Candidates are taxa for which we Service (NRCS) 2003), and in the comments and additional information have sufficient information on Integrated Taxonomic Information that we receive, and may lead to a final biological vulnerability and threats to System (2001). regulation that differs from this support preparation of a listing Ipomopsis polyantha is an herbaceous proposal. proposal, but for which development of biennial 12 to 24 inches (in.) (30 to 60 a listing regulation is precluded by other centimeters (cm)) tall, branched from Species Information and Factors higher priority listing activities. near the base above the basal rosette of Affecting the Species Candidate species are assigned an LPN leaves. Deeply divided leaves with Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) (1-12, with 1 being the highest priority) linear segments are scattered up the and implementing regulations (50 CFR based on magnitude and immediacy of stem. Stems and flower clusters are 424) set forth the procedures for adding threats and taxonomic status. A listing covered with glandular hairs. Flower species to the Federal Lists of priority of 2 reflects threats that are clusters are along the stem in the axils Endangered and Threatened Wildlife imminent and high in magnitude, as of the leaves as well as at the top of the and Plants. Under section 4(a)(1) of the well as the taxonomic classification of I. stem. The white flowers are 0.4 in. (1 Act, a species may be determined to be polyantha as a full species. We cm) long, with short corolla tubes 0.18 endangered or threatened based on any published a complete description of our to 0.26 in. (0.45 to 0.65 cm) long, and of the following five factors: (A) The listing priority system in the Federal flaring corolla lobes flecked with purple present or threatened destruction, Register (48 FR 43098, September 21, dots (Anderson 1988, p. 3). These dots modification, or curtailment of its 1983). are often so dense that they give the flower a pinkish or purplish hue. The habitat or range; (B) overutilization for Species Information commercial, recreational, scientific, or stamens extend noticeably beyond the educational purposes; (C) disease or Ipomopsis polyantha is a rare plant flower tube, and the pollen is blue predation; (D) the inadequacy of endemic to shale outcrops in and (Grant 1956, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • Pagosa Skyrocket), Penstemon Debilis (Parachute Beardtongue), and Phacelia Submutica (Debeque Phacelia); Proposed Rule
    Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 144 July 27, 2011 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis (Parachute beardtongue), and Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia); Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Jul 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27JYP3.SGM 27JYP3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3 45078 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife and their possible impacts on proposed Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS critical habitat. Fish and Wildlife Service 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. (4) Information on the projected and We will not accept e-mail or faxed reasonably likely impacts of climate 50 CFR Part 17 comments. We will post all comments change on Ipomopsis polyantha, [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0040; MO on http://www.regulations.gov. This Penstemon debilis, and Phacelia 92210–0–0009] generally means that we will post any submutica and proposed critical habitat. personal information you provide us (5) Any probable economic, national RIN 1018–AX75 (see the Public Comments section below security, or other relevant impacts of for more information). designating any area that may be Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: included in the final designation; in and Plants; Designation of Critical Allan Pfister, Western Colorado particular, any impacts on small entities Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha Supervisor, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipomopsis Polyantha (Rydberg) V
    Ipomopsis polyantha (Rydberg) V. Grant (Pagosa ipomopsis): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 21, 2004 David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Anderson, D.G. (2004, December 21). Ipomopsis polyantha (Rydberg) V. Grant (Pagosa ipomopsis): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/ipomopsispolyantha.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Tamara Allen, John Anderson, Sara Brinton, Barry Johnston, Eugene Jones, Peggy Lyon, Ellen Mayo, Jim Miller, Al Pfister, J. Mark Porter, Phil Tonne, and Dieter Wilken. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, taxonomy, and ecology of Ipomopsis polyantha were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Beth Burkhart, Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Peggy Lyon’s experience with this species and her excellent field documentation and synthesis were indispensable. J. Mark Porter provided critical literature on the taxonomic relationships of I. polyantha. Phil Tonne, botanist with the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, provided expertise and assistance. John Anderson provided valuable insights based on his experience with I. polyantha. Ken Heil provided invaluable contact information. Annette Miller provided information for the report on seed storage status.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited for Critical Habitat Designation
    LITERATURE CITED FOR THE CRITICAL HABITAT FINAL DESIGNATION RULE FOR IPOMOPSIS POLYANTHA (PAGOSA SKYROCKET), PENSTEMON DEBILIS (PARACHUTE PENSTEMON), AND PHACELIA SUBMUTICA (DEBEQUE PHACELIA) Aguilar, R., L. Ashworth, L. Galetto and M.A. Aizen. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta- analysis. Ecology Letters 9(8): 968-980. Aguilar, R., M. Quesada, L. Ashworth, Y. Herrerias-Diego and J. Lobo. 2008. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Molecular Ecology 17(24): 5177- 5188. Anderson, D.G. 2004. Ipomopsis polyantha (Rydberg) V. Grant (Pagosa ipomopsis): A technical conservation assessment. Unpublished work prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO for USA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region on 21 December 2004. 58 pp. + appendix. Bannister, P., T. Maegli, K.J.M. Dickinson, S.R.P. Halloy, A. Knight, J.M. Lord, A.F. Mark and K.L. Spencer. 2005. Will loss of snow cover during climatic warming expose New Zealand alpine plants to increased frost damage? Oecologia 144(2): 245-256. Barrett, S.C.H. and J.R. Kohn. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holdinger. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press: 3-30. BIO-Logic. 2010. Proposal for the DNR DQ# PJA-1055. Proposal prepared to study the effects of dispersed development to Physaria congesta and P. obcordata. 9 pp. BIO-Logic. 2011. Research Proposal. Proposal prepared to study the effects of diesperesed development to Phacelia submutica, Sclerocactus brevispinus, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis Polyantha
    Vol. 77 Monday, No. 156 August 13, 2012 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis (Parachute beardtongue), and Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia); Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:27 Aug 10, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13AUR3.SGM 13AUR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 48368 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD), call the Federal Information and are completed the final Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. environmental assessment concurrently Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: with this final determination. Peer reviewers support our methods. 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary We obtained opinions from four Why we need to publish a rule and knowledgeable individuals with [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0040: the basis for our action. Under the Act, scientific expertise to review our 4500030114] any species that is determined to be technical assumptions, analysis, RIN 1018–AX75 threatened or endangered shall, to the adherence to regulations, and whether maximum extent prudent and or not we had used the best available Endangered and Threatened Wildlife determinable, have habitat designated information. These peer reviewers and Plants; Designation of Critical that is considered to be critical habitat. generally concurred with our methods Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha We listed these three plant species on and conclusions and provided (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis July 27, 2011 (76 FR 45054).
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy
    Plants have too long been hidden in plain sight. The prospect of continued threats to the nation’s plant life, coupled with the large proportion of the flora already at risk, argues that now is the time to bring plants out from COLO R A D O RA R E P L A nt the background, and to put the conservation needs of our nation’s flora COnsERVATION StrATEgy squarely into view. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 Printed on recycled paper. BY: THE RARE PLAnt COnsERVATION InITIATIVE | MAY 2009 Plants are essential to both wildlife and humans through provision of key services such as food, shelter, fiber, and medicine ... protecting our wild flora goes to the heart of the human condition. Yet without focused conservation attention to the growing plight of the nation’s plant species, we are at risk of losing significant portions of our wild heritage, and the ecological resilience that comes with that diversity. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 North Park phacelia © Frank Weston RECOMMENDED CITATION Neely, B., S. Panjabi, E. Lane, P. Lewis, C. Dawson, A. Kratz, B. Kurzel, T. Hogan, J. Handwerk, S. Krishnan, J. Neale, and N. Ripley. 2009. Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy. Developed by the Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative. The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado. 117 pp. AUTHORS Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society and Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Nicola Ripley, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens COLORADO RARE PLANT CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MEMBERS David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesquerella Pruinosa Greene (Pagosa Bladderpod): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Lesquerella pruinosa Greene (Pagosa bladderpod): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project August 29, 2006 David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Anderson, D.G. (2006, August 29). Lesquerella pruinosa Greene (Pagosa bladderpod): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/lesquerellapruinosa.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Sara Brinton, Ellen Mayo, Peggy Lyon, Jeff Redders, Bob Sivinski, and Phil Tonne, is gratefully acknowledged. Sara Brinton and Jeff Redders with the San Juan National Forest generously assisted through their insights and observations, and provided data and literature for this assessment. Tamara Allen provided information on land use planning in Archuleta County. Annette Miller provided information for the report on seed storage status. Thanks also to Janet Coles, Richard Vacirca, Kathy Roche, Beth Burkhart, Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Thanks to Kimberly Nguyen for the work on the layout and for bringing this assessment to Web publication. Jane Nusbaum, Mary Olivas, and Carmen Morales provided financial oversight. Karin Decker and Michael Menefee offered advice and technical assistance on map production for this assessment. Jill Handwerk assisted with data acquisition from Colorado Natural Heritage Program files. Shannon Gilpin and Michael Stephens assisted with literature acquisition. Ron Hartman, Ernie Nelson, and Joy Handley provided assistance and specimen label data from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • <PRORULE> DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service
    <PRORULE> DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2010-0015] [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] RIN 1018-AV83 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing <E T="0714">Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa Skyrocket) as Endangered Throughout Its Range, and Listing <E T="0714">Penstemon debilis (Parachute Beardtongue) and <E T="0714">Phacelia submutica (DeBeque Phacelia) as Threatened Throughout Their Range AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to list Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket), a plant species from southwestern Colorado, as endangered throughout its range, and Penstemon debilis (Parachute beardtongue) and Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia), two plant species from western Colorado, as threatened throughout their ranges under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This proposal, if made final, would extend the Act's protections to these species throughout their ranges. The Service seeks data and comments from the public on this proposal. DATES: We will consider comments received or postmarked on or before [insert date 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by [insert date 45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: &sbull;Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2010-0015. &sbull;U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing, Attn: [FWS-R6-ES- 2010-0015]; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PAGOSA: Rare Plant Conservation
    PAGOSA SPRINGS Conservation Action Plan 2011 Update Pagosa skyrocket roadside habitat © B. Neely Pagosa skyrocket © B. Clearwater Plant Species of Focus: Pagosa skyrocket (Ipomopsis polyantha) Sponsored by the Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Workshop Dates: June 12, 2008 and August 19, 2010 Report Date: August 25, 2011 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. Map ........................................................................................................................................... 4 III. Pagosa Springs Park Priority Action Area and Associated Rare Plants .......................... 4 IV. About the Workshop .............................................................................................................. 8 V. Workshop Results ................................................................................................................... 9 A. Conservation Targets ............................................................................................................ 9 B. Vision and Goals .................................................................................................................. 11 C. Viability ................................................................................................................................ 11 D. Threats ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving North America's Threatened Plants
    Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Andrea Kramer, Abby Hird, Kirsty Shaw, Michael Dosmann, and Ray Mims January 2011 Recommended ciTaTion: Kramer, A., A. Hird, K. Shaw, M. Dosmann, and R. Mims. 2011. Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants: Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation . BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. Published by BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, IL 60022 USA www.bgci.org/usa Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Contents Acknowledgements . .3 Foreword . .4 Executive Summary . .5 Chapter 1. The North American Flora . .6 1.1 North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.2 Threats to North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.3 Conservation status and protection of North America’s plants . .8 1.3.1 Regional conservaTion sTaTus and naTional proTecTion . .9 1.3.2 Global conservaTion sTaTus and proTecTion . .10 1.4 Integrated plant conservation . .11 1.4.1 In situ conservaTion . .11 1.4.2 Ex situ collecTions and conservaTion applicaTions . .12 1.4.3 ParameTers of ex situ collecTions for conservaTion . .16 1.5 Global perspective and work on ex situ conservation . .18 1.5.1 Global STraTegy for PlanT ConservaTion, TargeT 8 . .18 Chapter 2. North American Collections Assessment . .19 2.1 Background . .19 2.2 Methodology . .19 2.2.1 Compiling lisTs of ThreaTened NorTh American Taxa .
    [Show full text]
  • Fws–R6–Es–2020–N131; Fxes11140600000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/29/2021 and available online at Billing Code 4333–15 federalregister.gov/d/2021-13827, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R6–ES–2020–N131; FXES11140600000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for Pagosa Skyrocket AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability of a draft recovery plan for Pagosa skyrocket, a plant listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. We are requesting review and comment from the public on this draft plan. DATES: We must receive any comments on the draft recovery plan on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Document availability: Copies of the draft recovery plan are available at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html. Alternatively, you may request a copy by U.S. mail from the Western Colorado Field Office; 445 W. Gunnison Ave. #240; Grand Junction, CO 81501; or by telephone at 970–243–2778. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call the Federal Relay Service at 800– 877–8339. Submitting comments: If you wish to comment on the draft recovery plan, you may submit your comments in writing by email to Ann Timberman, at [email protected], or by U.S. mail to Ann Timberman, Western Slope Field Supervisor, at the above U.S. mail address.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Biology for Sexual Reproduction in Plants - Unlike for Animals • Rely on Movement of (1) Pollen,(2) Young Embryo Encased
    Sexual Reproduction in Plants • Movement onto land is an issue Pollination Biology for sexual reproduction in plants - unlike for animals • rely on movement of (1) pollen,(2) young embryo encased . real story of the birds & bees . in a seed (or fruit), or (3) spores and beetles, bugs, butterflies, bats pollination biology seed dispersal Sexual Reproduction in Plants Coevolution Pollination and seed/spore dispersal important Coevolution – interactions between two different clades as aspects of biosystematics in plants: selective forces on each other, resulting in adaptations that • Gene flow increase their interdependency • Outcrossing vs. inbreeding • Reproductive isolation Animal-flowering plant interaction is a classic example of coevolution: • Speciation spore dispersal • Co-speciation (coevolution) pollination biology seed dispersal • Plants evolve elaborate methods to attract animal pollinators • Animals evolve specialized body parts and behaviors that aid plant pollination 1 Coevolution Divergence vs. Convergence • classic example of both divergence and convergence in • insect lineages diversified prior to angiosperms, but co- pollination is the family Polemoniaceae opted by and responded to by angiosperms • frequent shifts to different “pollination syndromes” from ancestral bee pollination V. Grant hummingbird bat Polemoniaceae Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. attenuata tip color = Phlox subulata subsp. subulata Linanthus californicus Ipomopsis arizonica Linanthus dichotomus Ipomopsis congesta Linanthus dianthiflorus Ipomopsis pumila spiritus − DNA tree with Linanthus parryae Phlox oklahomensis Phlox stansburyi Phlox drummondii subsp.Phlox glaberrimadrummondii subsp. interior Phlox maculata subsp. maculata pollinator Phlox condensata Divergence vs. Convergence Phlox multiflora pollinators Phlox diffusa Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. formosissima Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. Ipomopsis tenuituba subsp. latiloba Phlox bryoides Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. candida Ipomopsis polyantha Ipomopsis sancti Ipomopsis multiflora subsp.
    [Show full text]