DOCSLIB.ORG

Back Matter (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Back Matter (PDF) Appendix: A list of common abbreviations AAI Absolute acoustic impedance LPG Liquified petroleum gas AI Acoustic impedance LST Lowstand system tract °API Oil gravity, American Petroleum Institute LWD Logging while drilling degrees LSW Lowstand wedge AFTA Apatite fission track analysis Ma million years AST Aggradational system tract mBRT Metres below rotary table AVO Amplitude versus offset (amplitude variation mD millidarcies with offset) mfs maximum flooding surface BBL Barrel MORB Mid-ocean ridge basalt BCPD Barrels of condensate per day MRIL Magnetic resonance imaging log BGS British Geological Survey ms milliseconds BHT Bottom hole temperature N: G (NG) Net to gross BIRPS British Institutions Reflection Profiling NGL Natural gas liquids Syndicate NMO Normal move out BKB Below Kelly bushing NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance BMSL Below mean sea-level NOCS Norwegian Continental Shelf BOPD Barrels of oil per day NPD Norwegian Petroleum Directorate BOE Barrels of oil equivalent NNS Northern North Sea BRT Below rotary table OBC Ocean bottom cable BWPD Barrels of water per day OBS Ocean bottom seismograph CDR Common depth ratio ODP Ocean Drilling Program CMP Common mid point ODT Oil-down-to CNS Central North Sea OMF Outer Moray Firth COG Common offset gather owe Oil water contact CRG Common receiver gather PCA Principal component analysis CSG Common slowness gather PBU Pressure build-up CSIA Compound specific isotope analysis PSDM Pre-stack depth migration ,5,3C Ratio of carbon-13 isotope to carbon-12 isotope psi Pounds per square inch measured in a sample relative to a standard PVT Pressure, volume, temperature <515N Ratio of nitrogen-15 isotope to nitrogen-14 RFT Repeat formation test isotope measured in a sample relative to a Ro Vitrinite reflectance measured using oil standard immersion objectives ,8 <5 0 Ratio of oxygen-18 isotope to oxyge-16 isotope ra Resistivity (oil) measured in a sample relative to a standard RSA Residual salt analysis DHI Direct hydrocarbon indicator Rw Resistivity (water) DMO Dip move out s, Yield during (RockEval) pyrolysis of DSDP Deep Sea Drilling Project petroleum-like material contained in sample DST Drill stem test Maximum petroleum yield from kerogen of s2 DTI UK Department of Trade and industry sample released during (RockEval) pyrolysis ERD Extended reach drilling of petroleum EWT Extended well test SB Sequence boundary FIT Formation interval test SCF Standard cubic feet FSB Faeroe-Shetland Basin SEM Scanning electron microscope FTSS Feet, subsea Sm3 Standard cubic metres GC Gas chromatography SNS Southern North Sea GC-MS Gas chromatography mass spectrometry SrRSA Strontium isotope residual salt analysis GEUS Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland ss Subsea GIIP Gas initially in place STB Stock tank barrel GOC Gas-oil contact STOIIP Oil initially in place GOR Gas-oil ratio ow Water saturation GRV Gross rock volume ^wirr Irreducible water saturation GWC Gas-water contact TD Total depth HDIL High definition induction log TDS Total dissolved solids HI Hydrogen index TOC Total organic carbon HP/HT High pressure/high temperature TSR Thermal sulphate reduction HST Highstand system tract TST Transgressive system tract HWC Hydrocarbon-water contact TVD True vertical depth IMF Inner Moray Firth TVDSS True vertical depth, subsea IOR Improved oil recovery TWT two-way time KCF Kimmeridge Clay Formation UKCS United Kingdom Continental Shelf Kh Horizontal permeability VCS Vertical cable seismic Kv Vertical permeability P-(compressional) wave velocity vv XVI APPENDIX: A LIST OF COMMON ABBREVIATIONS VR Vitrinite reflectance WAG Water-alternating-gas (oil recovery technique) Vs S-(shear) wave velocity WUT Water-up-to VSP Vertical seismic profile XRD X-ray diffraction Index Page numbers in bold refer to tables and page numbers in italics refer to figures Acadian orogeny 512 Cretaceous extension 49-51 Barra Fan 42 acoustic impedance (AI) 1047-1048 Eocene inversion 52-53 Barra Volcanic Complex 579 Adolphus Field 474 Jurassic uplift 47-49 Barra Volcanic Ridge 42 Aegean Sea, as structural model 147, 148 Neogene rifting 53-56 basalt Aegir Ridge 42 Paleocene magmatism 51-52 seismic imaging problems 1243 aeromagnetic data see magnetic data Permo-Triassic extension 46-47 relation to Iceland plume 1250-1251 AFTA see apatite fission track analysis thermal history reconstruction wide angle data Aghardfjellet Formation 252 methods 349-350 acquisition 1245-1246 AI (acoustic impedance) 1047-1048 results 351-354 interpretation 1247-1248 Albuskjell Field 912, 913 Atlantic Ocean (North) 1250 processing 1246-1247 Alder fan 854 Caledonian setting 8-11 Base Cretaceous Event (BCE) 829, 830, 831 Alexis Formation 510 Carboniferous setting 15-18 Base Cretaceous unconformity (BCU) Alleghenian orogeny 512, 513 Cretaceous setting 31-33 1014 Alpha Field 912 Devonian setting 12-15 basement Alpha Ridge 172, 174, 250 Jurassic setting 20-29 gravity anomaly 602 Alpine orogeny 137, 146, 915 Permian setting 19-20 highs and heat flow 1316 aluminium seafloor spreading 8 basin modelling export 1345-1347 Tertiary setting 33-35 charge model 1323-1324 mobilization 1340-1341 Auk Field 474 history of 1314-1315 amplitude studies, seismic resolution Auk Horst 75 pressure model 1320-1323 enhancement 1047 Avalon Formation 504, 506, 518 Rockall Trough 428-430 amplitude versus offset see AVO Avalon Uplift 492 thermal model 1317-1318 Amroth, sediment log 776 AVO basinal facies, NE Greenland 331, 333 analogue modelling A + B sections 1291 Bean Basin 410-411 strike-slip fault system A v. B crossplot 1291 Beatrice Field 474 method 216-217 case studies Ben Nevis Formation 504, 506, 518 results 217-220 Barents Sea 1295-1297 Beothuk Field 474, 475 results discussed 221-224 Brent Field 1047 Bernard parameter 802 Andrew tuff 651, 655 chalk 928, 943-944 Beryl Embayment 127 Anguille Group 513 Greenland West 1292-1295 seismic inversion Anticosti Basin 511-513 Tor Formation 945-947 method 1282-1284 Anton Dohrn Lineament 408 West Shetland modelling results 1284-1285 Anton Dohrn Seamount 42, 392, 401, 579, anisotropy 639-641 results discussed 1285-1287 586 conventional model compared 641 stratigraphy 1281-1282 Anton Dohrn Transfer 42, 46 pre-drill model 635-636 structure 1282 apatite fission track analysis (AFTA) walkaway vertical seismic profile Beryl Field 1187 349-350 638-639 Beryl Formation reservoir 1188-1189 Faeroe-Shetland Basin 588 well data 636-638 cross Field correlation 1192-1195 method 614-615 effect on well ties 1265, 1270 depositional model 1195-1197 North Atlantic margin studies 351-354 theory 1289-1290 engineering properties 1192 results 616-619 Aylesbeare Group 1157 facies analysis 1191-1192 Appalachian Basin, Namurian stratigraphy sedimentology 1189-1191 760-763 Beryl Formation 1053, 1054, 1281 Arbroath Field 1125, 1128, 1129 back basin problem see Strathmore Field also Beta North East Terrace 868 Are Formation 1209, 1210, 1213 Solan Field beta stretching facies analysis 1214 Bacton Group 203, 1300 Atlantic margin 1351 reservoir geometry modelling 1211-1216 Baikalian orogeny 248 Rockall Trough 429 Arenicolites 1034 Bakevellia Basin 204 Billefjorden Fault Zone 42 Argo Formation 504, 520 Balder Formation 1369, 1370 biomarkers, marine v. non-marine 480-483 Argyll Field 474 Balder Graben 386 biostratigraphy, chalk 916-917 Arkwright Field Balder tuff 650 BIRPS Westline 374, 410 coherency study 1302-1304 Banff Field 975 Biscay, Bay of 8 development 1128-1133 reservoir properties Bivrost Lineament 42 discovery 1125-1126 characterization 980-982 Bjarni Formation 510 reservoir characteristics 1126 development 979-980 Bjornoya Basin 42 volumetric predictions 1126-1128 fracturing 984-985 Bjornoya Fan 42 well testing 1126 lithofacies 984 Black Cove Formation 512 Asterosoma 1191, 1213 modelling development 986-987 Blackstones 581 Atlantic margin performance 980 Blodoks Formation 915, 919 basin modelling 1357-1359 stratigraphy 982 Boat Harbour Formation 513 hydrocarbon expulsion and migration seismic image 978-979 Bosies Bank Formation 179 1360-1361 structural development 977-978 Boss Point Formation 765 hydrocarbon maturation 1360 Banks Group 93, 103, 1235 Bothnian Senja Shear Zone 42 large igneous province (LIP) Barachois Group 513 Bothnian-Kvaenangen Fault Complex 42 flood basalts 574-578 Barents Sea (Norwegian Sector) 247 Bothnian-Senja Shear Zone 46 Iceland plume 573 margin areas Bouguer gravity sediment sill complexes 578-579 reservoirs and traps 256-257 Erris Trough 458 source rocks 1354-1357 source rocks 255-256 Faeroe-Shetland Basin 601-602 tectonic evolution 1351-1354 structure 254-255 Intra-Basin 602-603 volcaniclastics 581 platform areas Slyne Trough 450, 451 volcano complexes 579-581 evolution 249-250 see also gravity post-Triassic development 231-232 reservoirs and traps 252-254 Bowland Shale Formation 813 prospectivity 227-228 source rocks 250-252 Brae Field 1347 tectonic events structure 248-249 Brae Formation 855, 1200 Caledonian 42-46 see also Hammerfest Basin Brendan Complex 579 XV111 INDEX Brent Field 92-93, 1039-1040, 1235 Faeroe-Shetland Basin 661 Chanter Field 854, 865 development 1040-1041 Newfoundland West 514 charge modelling 1323-1324 fault scarp case study Southern Permian Basin 800 Charlie Gibbs Fracture Zone 392 degradation products 97-102 sediments Cheshire Basin 475 external geometry 95-96 Irish Rockall Trough 434-435 Chondrites 966, 968, 1142, 1191, 1213 internal structure 96-97 Slyne Trough 447 chromatograms, Jurassic oils 651 reservoir potential 103-104 source rocks chronostratigraphy v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Statement for the Bacchus Development
    APACHE NORTH SEA LIMITED Bacchus Production Increase Environmental Statement BEIS Project Reference: D/4256/2020 July 2020 Environmental Statement Apache North Sea Limited Bacchus Production Increase July 2020 This page is intentionally blank Environmental Statement Apache North Sea Limited Bacchus Production Increase July 2020 STANDARD INFORMATION SHEET Project name Bacchus Production Increase Project reference D/4256/2020 number Type of project Production increase Undertaker name Apache North Sea Limited Undertaker address Caledonia House Prime Four Business Park Kingswells Causeway, Aberdeen AB15 8PU Short description The assessment of the environmental impacts from an increase in production from the Bacchus Field in excess of 500 tonnes of oil per day over the current consent threshold, and the drilling of a new infill well. Dates Anticipated Q4 2020 commencement of works Date and reference D/4066/2009; December 2009 number of any earlier Statement related to this project Significant None environmental impacts identified Statement prepared Apache North Sea Limited by Hartley Anderson Limited Environmental Statement Apache North Sea Limited Bacchus Production Increase July 2020 This page is intentionally blank Environmental Statement Apache North Sea Limited Bacchus Production Increase July 2020 CONTENTS Glossary and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ i Non-Technical Summary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Seabed Survey of Turbot Bank Possible MPA
    JNCC/Cefas Partnership Report Series Report No. 20 Offshore seabed survey of Turbot Bank possible MPA Eggleton, J., Diesing, M. & Schinaia, S. July 2019 © JNCC, Cefas 2019 ISSN 2051-6711 Offshore seabed survey of Turbot Bank possible MPA Eggleton, J., Diesing, M. & Schinaia, S. Report completed 2013 and published July 2019 © JNCC, Cefas, 2019 ISSN 2051-6711 For further information, please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY http://jncc.defra.gov.uk This report is compliant with the JNCC Evidence Quality Assurance Policy http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/default.aspx?page=6675 and has been reviewed by Cefas and JNCC prior to publication. This report should be cited as: Eggleton, J., Diesing, M. & Schinaia, S. 2019. Offshore seabed survey of Turbot Bank possible MPA. JNCC/Cefas Partnership Report No. 20. JNCC, Peterborough, ISSN 2051- 6711. Summary This report presents the findings from analyses of the acoustic data and groundtruth samples gathered during the seabed survey of the Turbot Bank possible Marine Protected Area (pMPA). Turbot Bank lies within a coarse sandy sediment plain to the east of Scotland, approximately 65km east of Peterhead on the Aberdeenshire coast, south of the Fladen Ground, and comprises a shelf bank and mound feature. The report describes the presence, location and extent of broadscale habitats, biotopes and Scottish Marine Protected Area (SMPA) Priority Marine Features within the Turbot Bank pMPA. Full coverage multibeam echosounder data (bathymetry and backscatter) collected under the Civil Hydrography Programme were available for the western half of Turbot Bank pMPA. During a dedicated survey in December 2012, new acoustic data were collected in the eastern part of the bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Among Marine Protected Areas, Particularly Valuable and Vulnerable Areas in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Regions 2
    Connectivity among marine protected areas, particularly valuable and vulnerable areas in the greater North Sea and Celtic Seas regions 2 Introduction to the connectivity study The NorthSEE project is focusing on transnational coordination between plans and planning processes in the North Sea Region on three main topics: Energy, Shipping and Environment. For the environmental strand the partners have been researching the designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and other marine conservation measures, as well as the application of the Ecosystem Based Approach (EBA) in the planning processes. This report is part of WP3 environment and deals with the connectivity of MPAs in the North Sea. The reasons for this is that the North Sea ecosystem is interlinked and does not respect land borders. In MSP, it is important to understand the way in which a marine conservation site is relevant to areas elsewhere, and what significance different sites may have for the ecosystem as a whole. Another incentive for analyzing the ecological coherence, is that the OSPAR Recommendation 2003/31, amended by OSPAR Recommendation 2010/2, on a network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) sets out the goal of OSPAR Contracting Parties (CPs) to continue the establishment of the OSPAR Network of MPAs in the North-East Atlantic. In the status report of 2016, OSPAR identified the need to using case-studies of connectivity to illustrate how the use of life-history traits information in combination with oceanographic modelling products can improve confidence in MPA network connectivity assessments. This study meets the need described by OSPAR. In order to have a better understanding of ecological relationships and conditions, the connectivity between all marine protected areas (MPAs) and particularly valuable and vulnerable areas (as part of the Norwegian Management Plans), have been analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review
    Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Early and Middle Pleistocene environments, landforms and sediments in Scotland Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Journal: Edinburgh Manuscript ID TRE-2017-0031.R1 Manuscript Type: The Quaternary of Scotland Date Submitted by the Author: n/a Complete List of Authors: Hall, Adrian; Stockholms Universitet, Department of Physical Geography Merritt, Jon; British Geological Survey - Edinburgh Office, Lyell Centre ForConnell, Peer Rodger; University Review of Hull, Geography, Environment and Earth Science Scotland, erosion, stratigraphy, Early Pleistocene, Middle Pleistocene, Keywords: weathering, landform Cambridge University Press Page 1 of 83 Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Early and Middle Pleistocene environments, landforms and sediments in Scotland Adrian M. Hall1, Jon W. Merritt2 and E. Rodger Connell3 1 Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. 2The Lyell Centre, British Geological Survey, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK. 3Geology, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK. Running head abbreviation: Early Middle Pleistocene Scotland For Peer Review 1 Cambridge University Press Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Page 2 of 83 ABSTRACT: This paper reviews the changing environments, developing landforms and terrestrial stratigraphy during the Early and Middle Pleistocene stages in Scotland. Cold stages after 2.7 Ma brought mountain ice caps and lowland permafrost, but larger ice sheets were short-lived. The late Early and Middle Pleistocene sedimentary record found offshore indicates more than 10 advances of ice sheets from Scotland into the North Sea but only 4-5 advances have been identified from the terrestrial stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Baseline Report Scottish Sustainable Marine Environment Initiative
    State of the Clyde Environment Baseline Report Scottish Sustainable Marine Environment Initiative SSMEI Clyde Pilot State of the Clyde Environment Baseline Report March 2009 D Ross K Thompson J E Donnelly Contents 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 2 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT..............................................................................3 2.1 GEOLOGY....................................................................................................................3 2.2 THE SEALOCHS ...........................................................................................................6 2.3 THE ESTUARIES ..........................................................................................................9 2.4 THE INNER FIRTH......................................................................................................12 2.5 THE OUTER FIRTH ....................................................................................................14 2.6 COASTAL FLOODING .................................................................................................18 3 CLEAN AND SAFE SEAS............................................................................................19 3.1 THE CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................19 3.1.1 Dissolved Oxygen.............................................................................................19 3.1.2 Nutrients...........................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Strategic Environmental Assessment - SEA5 Technical Report for Department of Trade & Industry NORTHERN NORTH SEA SHELLFISH AND FISHERIES Prepared by: Colin J Chapman Bloomfield Milltimber Aberdeenshire AB13 0EQ 1 NORTHERN NORTH SEA SHELLFISH AND FISHERIES Prepared by: Colin J Chapman Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 10 2. Shellfish resources..................................................................................... 10 2.1 Fishery data ........................................................................................ 10 2.2 Crustacean species 2.2.1 Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (L.).............................. 11 2.2.2 European lobster, Homarus gammarus (L.)............................. 16 2.2.3 Edible crab, Cancer pagurus (L.)............................................. 20 2.2.4 Velvet swimming crab, Necora puber (L.) .............................. 23 2.2.5 Shore crab, Carcinus maenus (L.)............................................ 25 2.2.6 Pink shrimp, Pandalus borealis Kroyer................................... 26 2.2.7 Other species ............................................................................ 28 2.3 Bivalve molluscs 2.3.1 Scallop, Pecten maximus (L.)................................................... 29 2.3.2 Queen scallop, Aequipecten opercularis (L.)........................... 32 2.3.3 Cockle,
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Fishing Industry
    Inquiry into The Future of the Scottish Fishing Industry March 2004 Financial support for the RSE Inquiry into The Future of the Scottish Fishing Industry Aberdeenshire Council Scottish Enterprise Grampian Aberdeen City Council Shell U.K. Exploration and Production Clydesdale Bank Shetland Islands Council J Sainsbury plc Western Isles Council Highlands and Islands Enterprise Our visits were also facilitated by local authorities and other bodies in the fishing areas where we held meetings. The Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) is Scotland’s National Academy. Born out of the intellectual ferment of the Scottish Enlightenment, the RSE was founded in 1783 by Royal Charter for the “advancement of learning and useful knowledge”. As a wholly independent, non-party-political body with charitable status, the RSE is a forum for informed debate on issues of national and international importance and draws upon the expertise of its multidisciplinary Fellowship of men and women of international standing, to provide independent, expert advice to key decision-making bodies, including Government and Parliament. The multidisciplinary membership of the RSE makes it distinct amongst learned Societies in Great Britain and its peer-elected Fellowship encompasses excellence in the Sciences, Arts, Humanities, the Professions, Industry and Commerce. The Royal Society of Edinburgh is committed to the future of Scotland’s social, economic and cultural well-being. RSE Inquiry into The Future of the Scottish Fishing Industry i Foreword The fishing industry is of much greater social, economic and cultural importance to Scotland than to the rest of the UK. Scotland has just under 8.6 percent of the UK population but lands at its ports over 60 percent of the total UK catch of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
    Rev UKCS Decommissioning Project F 12.03.2018 Update after Consultation AMB AW MB E 12.12.2017 Issued for Consultation AMB LR MB D 05.12.2017 Re-issued as Final AMB LR MB C 06.11.2017 Re-issued as Final AMB KC MB B 24.08.2017 Re-issued as Final AMB KC MB A 11.07.2017 Issued as final AMB LF LF 03 07.06.2017 Issued for Review AMB LF PT 02 03.05.2017 Issued for Review AMB LF PT 01 22.01.2016 Outline Content for Review PT LF PT Rev. Date Description Prep. by Check. by Appr. by Facility: Rev Area: N/A System: N/A AFA: N/A Revision: Document Title: Rev UKCS Decommissioning Project EIA Report F Total Pages Document No.: Rev01-27388-S-RA-0002 118 Doc. Title: Rev UKCS Decommissioning Project EIA Report Document No.: REV01-27338-S-RA-0002 Rev.: F CONTENT Standard Information Sheet .................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 8 Non-Technical Summary ....................................................................................... 12 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 12 Scope of the Rev UKCS Decommissioning Project ............................................................. 13 Preparation for decommissioning ........................................................................................ 14 Options for decommissioning .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Haddock Are Bottom Feeding Fish and Occur Mainly in Waters from 40–200M Deep
    MOODY MARINE LTD Public Comment Draft Report for the: SFSAG NORTH SEA HADDOCK TRAWL & DANISH SEINE FISHERY Client: The Scottish Fisheries Sustainable Accreditation Group (SFSAG) Certification Body: Client Contact: Moody Marine Ltd Scottish Fisheries Sustainable Accreditation Group Moody International Certification (SFSAG) Merlin House c/o Scottish White Fish Producers Association Ltd Stanier Way North Lodge Wyvern Business Park Bath St Derby. DE21 6BF Stonehaven United Kingdom AB39 2DH United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1633 544663 Fax: +44 (0) 1633 675020 01569 767573 & 0771 0504773 FN 82040 Public Comment Draft Report 07 May 2010 Page 1 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 9 2.1 THE FISHERY PROPOSED FOR CERTIFICATION ..................................................................... 9 2.2 REPORT STRUCTURE AND ASSESSMENT PROCESS .............................................................. 10 2.3 STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS ATTENDED ................................................................................ 11 2.4 OTHER INFORMATION SOURCES ........................................................................................... 12 2.5 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED IN THE REPORT .................................................. 24 3 BACKGROUND TO THE FISHERY ................................................................. 26 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Nephrops Fisheries in European Waters
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 64 published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From: Anette Ungfors, Ewen Bell, Magnus L. Johnson, Daniel Cowing, Nicola C. Dobson, Ralf Bublitz, Jane Sandell, Nephrops Fisheries in European Waters. In Magnus L. Johnson and Mark P. Johnson, editors: Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 64, Burlington: Academic Press, 2013, pp. 247-314. ISBN: 978-0-12-410466-2 © Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd. Academic Press Author's personal copy CHAPTER SEVEN Nephrops Fisheries in European Waters Anette Ungfors*,1, Ewen Bell†, Magnus L. Johnson‡, Daniel Cowing‡, Nicola C. Dobson‡, Ralf Bublitz‡, Jane Sandell} *Department of Biological and Environmental Science Kristineberg, Gothenburg University, Fiskeba¨ckskil, Sweden †Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) Lowestoft, United Kingdom ‡Centre for Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Scarborough, United Kingdom } Scottish Fishermen’s Organisation Ltd., Peterhead, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Faroe Shetland Basin
    SPE “Seismic 2017” conference presentation – 11 May 2017, Aberdeen (UK) Deep frontier plays revealed by new 3D broadband dual-sensor seismic covering the East Shetland Platform StefanoStefano Patruno, Patruno* William, William Reid, Reid,Matt Whaley Matt Whaley First Quarter 2013 Results [email protected] The initial understanding A 5 km B 0.5 s (TWT)s 0.5 TWT (s) 1.2 4.0 A TWT Base Cretaceous B Near base-Paleocene = Top Chalk Gp. 50 km Base Cretaceous Unconformity The initial understanding A 5 km B 0.5 s (TWT)s 0.5 TWT (s) 1.2 4.0 A TWT Base Cretaceous B Near base-Paleocene = Top Chalk Gp. 50 km Base Cretaceous Unconformity Contents . Petroleum geology summary of the ESP . The Paleozoic on the ESP: Regional seismic-stratigraphic observations . The Paleozoic on the ESP: Reservoir-scale observations . Conclusions 4 Petroleum geology summary Proven and potential reservoir units on the ESP HC Fields (development / production) • Many other Paleozoic >1 main reservoir 1 main reservoir discoveries in CNS and WoS • E.g., Buchan, Sterling, Clair HC Discoveries • Clair is 6th largest oil field in (yet to be developed) whole UKCS >1 main reservoir 1 main reservoir Source and maturity on the ESP (1D burial history) MID DEVONIAN SOURCE ROCK • Penetrated by several Orcadia Basin wells • Inner Moray Firth: e.g., Beatrice • Secondary component for oils of large fields in Witch Case Worst Ground Graben / WoS area (incl. Clair, Claymore) (Cornford, 2009; Mark et al., 2008) • Worst case: areas subject to early generation (A) • Best case: areas with most of the HC expulsion after the end of Jurassic rifting (B) • Burial history modelling suggests late generation / expulsion over parts of the greater ESP region, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15: Fish and Shellfish Ecology
    Chapter 15: Fish and Shellfish Ecology NorthConnect KS Phone +47 38 60 70 00 Serviceboks 603, Lundsiden Mail: [email protected] N-4606 Kristiansand Web: www.northconnect.no Norway Chapter 15: Fish and Shellfish Ecology Contents 15 Fish and Shellfish Ecology ...................................................................................................... 15-1 15.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 15-1 15.2 Legislation, Policy and Guidance ............................................................................................ 15-1 15.2.1 Legislative Framework .................................................................................................... 15-1 15.2.2 Policy Framework ............................................................................................................ 15-2 15.2.3 Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 15-3 15.2.4 Consultation .................................................................................................................... 15-3 15.3 Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................................... 15-4 15.3.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................... 15-4 15.3.2 Desk Study ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]