DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of Law at UWA a Message from the Dean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of Law at UWA a Message from the Dean Law School The Future of Law at UWA A message from the Dean performance is the quality of its new JD graduates will be even more graduates – their record of professional mature and better equipped to meet achievement and success. The UWA the many professional challenges Law School has been immensely well that they will inevitably face in the served by its graduates. On this basis, 21st century. The proposed changes and indeed with reference to every will also further enhance our present other relevant criterion, we enjoy an reputation and standing as a major enviable reputation. Competition for Go8 Law School. entry into the School’s LLB programme is intense. Only students who have In anticipation of this new era for demonstrated the highest standards of the Law School the Vice Chancellor, academic achievement are selected. Professor Alan Robson AM, approved We then require those students to enrol the creation of no less than six In recent years, increasing attention in an appropriate combined degree, new senior Professorial positions. has been given by governments for instance Law/Arts, Law/Commerce Appointments were made to these and various agencies to developing or Law/Science. Finally, we closely positions during 2009. All of the criteria for measuring the performance monitor and control the distribution of successful candidates have strong – learning and teaching, research academic grades. The result is that our national and international teaching and community engagement – of student body is universally regarded as and research reputations. The new universities. These metrics are to among the most talented in the nation. Professors are Michael Blakeney be used for a range of purposes, Our extraordinary record of scholarship (Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual including benchmarking institutions successes in the Rhodes, Menzies and Property Law, Queen Mary College, and ultimately funding. There have also Fulbright awards is testimony to this. London University), Stuart Kaye been suggestions that they could be (Professor of Law, University of used to produce a crude indicative A commitment to excellence, however, Melbourne, and formerly Dean of ranking of universities and faculties. necessarily entails a corresponding Law at Wollongong University), Mark Not surprisingly this proposal has commitment to ongoing review and Israel (Professor Law and Criminology, generated a great deal of debate and continuous improvement. This is Flinders University), Michael Gillooly criticism. The national tertiary education why UWA, including the Law School, (Dean and Professor of Law, Notre sector is now extremely diverse. has recently decided to restructure Dame University), Holly Cullen (Reader This is very evident with respect to and simplify its existing degree in Law, Durham University), and Law Schools. Currently there are 32 programmes. The new arrangements of course Christopher Steytler QC CALD recognised Law Schools in mean that from 2013 Law will be (formerly President of the WA Court Australia – all of them under-funded studied exclusively as a three year of Appeal). These appointments have and all conferring LLB degrees or their postgraduate coursework degree, resulted in the most radical expansion equivalent. The real issue is one of the JD (‘Juris Doctor’). There are many of the Faculty’s senior staff profile maintaining and improving academic good educational and social reasons in our 80 year history. They should standards rather than arguing about for this change. Some are explained consolidate our reputation as one of flawed league tables. A genuine in this booklet. Importantly, it will also the finest Law Schools in the country. reputation for quality has to be earned align legal education at this University We look forward to the future with over the long term; it is not won by with best practice elsewhere, including confidence and enthusiasm. pursuing transient educational in Canada and the United States. fashions and fads. Winthrop Professor William Ford This exciting development should be Dean of the Law School There is much to be said for the seen as part of UWA’s commitment Faculty of Law proposition that the best and most to international excellence in higher reliable measure of a law school’s education. We are confident that our The Law The first Law Summer School was held in 1961 and after that was an annual event for Summer about 30 years. It was revived as an annual event in 2006 through the joint initiative of The University of Western Australia Law School and The Law Society of Western School Australia. Throughout, it has offered an outstanding program of prominent and distinguished speakers on challenging and relevant topics. A profile of change – a new law degree UWA’s new courses What happens to the be offered guaranteed pathways to for a changing world Law Degree? A Juris enter the JD. Additional opportunities will be available for students to The shape of tertiary study is changing Doctor (JD) apply for the JD based on their rapidly. The University of Western undergraduate course results. Under the present degree structure, Australia is one of several leading the vast majority of students complete universities that are reshaping course The Law School will offer some a five year combined Law degree. structures to match the needs of ‘law and society’ units in relevant Students can enrol in a combined students in a changing world. undergraduate degrees at degree straight from secondary school. UWA. However, there will be no Only a small minority of students From 2012, the University will be prerequisite units for entering the complete a four year LLB or a three introducing a range of changes to its JD, nor will any credit be given year Graduate LLB. courses and enhancements to the towards the JD for completion of UWA student experience. The decision any law units in an undergraduate Integral to the UWA restructure is to change its courses was made after degree. the University’s commitment to a extensive public consultation and greater emphasis on professional international benchmarking. These It is anticipated that the first intake for degrees such as Law. Under the new changes will offer simpler, more flexible the JD will be in 2013. system, Law will become a three year study options for UWA students and postgraduate course and will be known provide the best possible student as a Juris Doctor (JD). This course What will the JD learning experience. The degrees will be available to students who have available to UWA undergraduate curriculum completed an undergraduate degree. students from 2012 will be: look like? • Bachelor of Arts • Bachelor of Commerce How will students be The JD will be a three year • Bachelor of Design selected for the JD? postgraduate coursework degree involving completion of 24 units, 8 per • Bachelor of Science To enter the JD, a student will first be year with a combination of compulsory • Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours) required to complete degree studies and option units. Compulsory units in one of the five broad undergraduate will be taught over 4 hours per week Current undergraduate courses – and courses listed above or an equivalent and option units will be 3 hours per the option of combined degrees – will qualification from another university. week. The model for the JD for 2013 be discontinued. However, all areas of is still being finalised, but the current study currently available will continue Outstanding Year 12 students with high provisional model is set out in the to be offered, though in different forms. Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank following table. Courses designed to meet professional (ATAR) or equivalent qualification may accreditation requirements (such as Law, Medicine, Dentistry, Architecture and Engineering) will be offered at the postgraduate level. All the new undergraduate courses will include a focus on developing communication skills and research skills, along with an increased opportunity to participate in study abroad and community engagement activities.1 1 For more information on the requirements of the undergraduate degrees visit www.newcourses2012. uwa.edu.au (from March 2010). 1 Law School Year of JD First Semester Second Semester Focus on Law – our students 1 Legal Process Dispute Resolution The current degree structure puts Criminal Law Torts significant pressure on students to Contract Introduction to Public Law choose a career path very early in their Introduction to Property Land Law post school life. Typically under the current Law course structure, most 2 Constitutional Law Evidence Law students commence Law straight Equity and Trusts Corporations from secondary school and complete a Administrative Law Remedies combined degree with both Law 1 Option Legal Theory and Ethics and non Law subjects. 3 Procedure I Procedure II • The new structure provides more Commercial Practice 3 Options preparatory time for students to 2 Options make a considered choice. By the Total: 12 units Total: 12 units time they enter the JD, students should be more committed to the study of Law, having had several The introduction of new units which are A postgraduate JD will help meet these years to consider and explore not currently part of the Law degree objectives. other areas. curriculum (such as Legal Theory and Ethics) will commence before 2013 Secondly, the relationship between • The JD degree will provide a more as part of a ‘phasing in’ process, with the undergraduate degree and the JD challenging, exciting and focused some starting in 2011. will provide significant benefits to our environment for students with the Law students by permitting breadth focus of all study being on Law Given the change in the requirements and depth of study, encouraging (not combined with other non Law for completing a Law degree, the UWA focus for students and teachers and units) in a more mature cohort which Law School will be consulting closely providing opportunities for improved has academic experience and is with State admitting authorities over future networks in the Australian and committed to the study of Law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the University of Western Australia International Law Society
    Proceedings of the UWA International Law Society PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA INTERNATIONAL LAW SOCIETY 2019 Academic Year ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The 4th Annual General Meeting was held on 24 October 2019 at the Guild Council Meeting Room, UWA Guild, The University of Western Australia. Ian Tan, the outgoing President of the Society, presided at the meeting. ELECTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICE BEARERS OF THE COMMITTEE The following Members of the Society, having been nominated under Article 11 of the Society’s Constitution, were elected to the Committee for the 2020 Academic Year on 24 October 2019: President Austen Mell, BA (W. Aust) elected Senior Vice-President Chelsea Francis, BCom (W. Aust) elected Publications Vice-President Ian Tan, BA (W. Aust) elected Secretary Riley Klug elected Treasurer Roberto Vitali-Lawn elected APPOINTMENT OF ORDINARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS The following Members of the Society were appointed to the Committee as Ordinary Committee Members on 15 April 2020 for the 2020 Academic Year: Lucas Roosendaal, DipModLang BA (W. Aust) appointed Jing Zhi Wong, BSc (W. Aust) appointed Vacant Vacant (2019) 4 Perth International Law Journal 173 UWA ILS APPOINTMENT OF FIRST YEAR REPRESENTATIVES The following Members of the Society were appointed to the Committee as First Year Representatives on 15 April 2020 for the 2020 Academic Year: Maxwell Hinch appointed Manev Patel appointed APPOINTMENT TO THE JOURNAL’S EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Mr Wygene Chong, JD BCom (W. Aust) DELF (France) was appointed to the Perth International Law Journal’s Editorial Advisory Board on 4 August 2019. Wygene is an Honorary Research Fellow at the UWA Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir R Wilson Lecture Single Space
    SIR RONALD WILSON LECTURE 19 MAY 2011 THE DELIVERY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE: BUILDING ON THE PAST TO MEET THE CHALLENGES OF THE FUTURE INTRODUCTION Mr President, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. It is a very great honour to have been asked to deliver the Sir Ronald Wilson Lecture this year, although I appreciate that I am very much the second choice, and that I only got the gig because his Honour the Chief Justice is in Europe, attending a Court of the Future Program on courthouse design in the perhaps over-optimistic expectation that what he learns will be useful when, or if, the Supreme Court is provided with new accommodation of an appropriate standard to go with the 1903 Courthouse and to replace our tenancy in the former Royal Commission into WA Incorporated premises in an office building in the city. Of course, the mention of those premises recalls another link to Sir Ronald Wilson who, with the Hon Justice Kennedy, seconded from the Court, and the then recently retired judge, the Hon Peter Brinsden QC, served on that Royal Commission, which made such momentous findings on a wide range of Government activities and the people involved in them. I feel particularly intimidated when I observe that previous presenters of this lecture include people such as Sir Ronald himself, the Rt Hon Lord MacKay of Clashfern, the Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen, the Rt Hon Sir Zelman Cowen, Justice Michael Kirby, as he then was, and others, including local luminaries, the Hon Justice Robert French, as he then was, the Hon Justice Carmel McLure, Chief Judge Antoinette Kennedy, and the Hon Justice Michael Barker.
    [Show full text]
  • Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?
    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts? Kcasey McLoughlin BA (Hons) LLB (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Newcastle January 2016 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University's Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Kcasey McLoughlin ii Acknowledgments I am most grateful to my principal supervisor, Jim Jose, for his unswerving patience, willingness to share his expertise and for the care and respect he has shown for my ideas. His belief in challenging disciplinary boundaries, and seemingly limitless generosity in mentoring others to do so has sustained me and this thesis. I am honoured to have been in receipt of his friendship, and owe him an enormous debt of gratitude for his unstinting support, assistance and encouragement. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor, Katherine Lindsay, for generously sharing her expertise in Constitutional Law and for fostering my interest in the High Court of Australia and the judges who sit on it. Her enthusiasm, very helpful advice and intellectual guidance were instrumental motivators in completing the thesis. The Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Newcastle has provided a supportive, collaborative and intellectual space to share and debate my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Eureka Street Is Published Fortnightly Online, a Minimum of 24 Times Per
    18 October 2007 Volume: 17 Issue: 20 Politics is a team sport John Warhurst ...........................................1 The human rights cost of intelligence activities Bill Calcutt ............................................. 4 A key role for Australia in Burma’s democratisation Tony Kevin .............................................8 Burma’s new generation political activists Carol Ransley and Toe Zaw Latt ............................. 11 Echoes of Calwell in Sudanese refugee cut David Holdcroft ......................................... 15 Building relationships settles refugees Michele Gierck .......................................... 18 Nothing new in cynicism towards politicians Brian Matthews ......................................... 21 Gutted kiwis eat humble pie Peter Matheson ......................................... 25 Kevin Rudd’s political cowardice Scott Stephenson ....................................... 29 Sir Ronald Wilson’s life in compartments Frank Brennan .......................................... 33 Playwrights finger reality missed by politicians Richard Flynn .......................................... 37 Death and birth set cerebral thriller in motion Tim Kroenert ........................................... 40 Perhaps dying isn’t hard after all Peter Matheson and Cassandra O’Loughlin ...................... 43 Keeping families safe from violence Trish McNamara ........................................ 45 Eureka Street is published fortnightly Responsibility for editorial content is online, a minimum of 24 times
    [Show full text]
  • The Accountability of the Courts Year 12 Teacher Resource
    Francis Burt Law Education Programme THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE COURTS YEAR 12 TEACHER RESOURCE This resource addresses the following Year 12 Stage 3 Politics and Law syllabus item: 3B: The accountability of the courts through the appeals process through parliamentary scrutiny and legislation through transparent processes and public confidence through the censure and removal of judges Part A: Introduction, Appeals and Legislation Possible Preliminary Discussion Points a) Discuss what the term ‘the accountability of the courts’ actually means. b) In what ways should judges be held accountable? c) What problems may occur if the accountability of the judiciary was the task of the executive arm of government? Introduction “The independence of the judiciary lies at the heart of the rule of law and hence of the administration of justice itself. The essence of judicial independence is that the judge in carrying out his judicial duties, and in particular in making judicial decisions, is subject to no other authority than the law.... In particular, the judiciary should be free from the control of the executive government or of any department or branch of it.”1 “No judge could be expected to carry out judicial tasks with impartiality if one side in the dispute had the power to dismiss that judge, move the judge out of office or reduce his or her salary or could cause its elected representatives to do so. The issue was put succinctly by Australia’s former Chief Justice, Murray Gleeson, in a Boyer Lecture in December 2000 when he declared: ‘The ultimate test of public confidence in the judiciary is whether people believe that in a contest between a citizen and government they can rely upon an Australian court to hold the scales of justice evenly.’”2 “That the purpose of judicial independence was not to provide a benefit to the judiciary but to enable the judicial system to function fairly with integrity and impartiality”3 was indicated by Western Australia’s Chief Justice, the Honourable Wayne Martin AC, at a conference in New Zealand in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia
    Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia Colloquium Chief Justice Robert French AC 7 October 2016, Canberra Thank you for inviting me to deliver the opening address at this Colloquium. It is the first and last time I will do so as Chief Justice. The soft pink tones of the constitutional sunset are deepening and the dusk of impending judicial irrelevance is advancing upon me. In a few weeks' time, on 25 November, it will have been thirty years to the day since I was commissioned as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The great Australian legal figures who sat on the Bench at my official welcome on 10 December 1986 have all gone from our midst — Sir Ronald Wilson, John Toohey, Sir Nigel Bowen and Sir Francis Burt. Two of my articled clerks from the 1970s are now on the Supreme Court of Western Australia. One of them has recently been appointed President of the Court of Appeal. They say you know you are getting old when policemen start looking young — a fortiori when the President of a Court of Appeal looks to you as though he has just emerged from Law School. The same trick of perspective leads me to see the Judicial Conference of Australia ('JCA') as a relatively recent innovation. Six years into my judicial career, in 1992, I attended a Supreme and Federal Courts Judges' Conference at which Justices Richard McGarvie and Ian Sheppard were talking about the establishment of a body to represent the common interests and concerns of judges, to defend the judiciary as an institution and, where appropriate, to defend individual judges who were the target of unfair and unwarranted criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • UWA DEGREE 2 the University of Western Australia | Uwa.Edu.Au/Study
    International Postgraduate Course Guide 2021 GET CAREER-READY WITH A UWA DEGREE 2 The University of Western Australia | uwa.edu.au/study Welcome to our community Welcome to The University of Western Australia (UWA), where you’ll join our accomplished graduates in becoming global professionals who drive change to shape the future. At UWA, we prepare our graduates to improve the lives of others. With the world – and the skills you need to succeed in it – changing all the time, our distinctive, experience-rich curriculum and outstanding learning experience will give you the knowledge and the adaptability to make a positive difference in society. We look forward to you joining our community and supporting you in shaping your future career goals. The University of Western Australia acknowledges that its campuses are situated on Noongar land and that Noongar people remain the spiritual and cultural custodians of their land and continue to practise their values, languages, beliefs and knowledge. 3 Contents Study at UWA Join UWA Why students love Perth 4 English language requirements 80 A unique campus 6 Help with English language skills 81 Our global reputation 8 How to apply – Postgraduate Coursework 82 Be part of something bigger with UWA 9 Postgraduate Coursework Scholarships 83 Career and industry experience 10 How to apply – Postgraduate Research 84 Postgraduate studies at UWA 11 Postgraduate Research Scholarships 85 Student life 12 Money matters 86 Support services 13 Index 87 Student Exchange and Useful links and important dates 94 Study
    [Show full text]
  • Postgraduate Law at UWA Accelerate Your Career with a World Class Degree Contents
    Faculty of Law Postgraduate Law at UWA Accelerate your career with a world class degree Contents The Law School ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 The UWA Law Student Experience .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Juris Doctor – professional qualification ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Commercial and Resources Law ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Mining and Energy Law .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Chinese Business Law ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 International Commercial Law ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 International Law ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    PREFACE EMERITUS PROFESSOR ERIC J. EDWARDS Professor Eric Edwards retired from the University of Western Australia Law School on 31 December 1980, after twenty-five years distinguished and loyal service. This volume of the Law Review is dedicated to him by his colleagues as a mark of profound respect and admiration. Professor Edwards was born in Burma in 1915. He attended the Uni- versity of Rangoon, graduating BA with a distinction in economics in 1936 and LL.B in 1939. With the outbreak of war, he volunteered for officer training; he then spent the duration of the war fighting with the British Army in the Burma and India theatres. This is a period of his life about which, being a gentle and modest man, he has always been reticent; suffice it to say that by the time he was discharged he had risen to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. For his return to civilian life he chose to be repatriated to Australia. Passing through Fremantle en route to Sydney in 1947, he came up to the University and met Professor Frank Beasley, foundation Professor and first Dean of the Law School. Beasley encouraged him to enrol here to recommence his legal career. Thus there began the long association with the Law School which was to culrninate'in his election to the Dean- ship and appointment to a Chair. His period at the Law School was a vintage one; his contemporaries included such luminaries as Sir Ronald Wilson, Sir Billy Sneddon, Mr Bob Hawke, Mr Justice Bob Jones and Mr Justice John Toohey.
    [Show full text]
  • Judges and Retirement Ages
    JUDGES AND RETIREMENT AGES ALYSIA B LACKHAM* All Commonwealth, state and territory judges in Australia are subject to mandatory retirement ages. While the 1977 referendum, which introduced judicial retirement ages for the Australian federal judiciary, commanded broad public support, this article argues that the aims of judicial retirement ages are no longer valid in a modern society. Judicial retirement ages may be causing undue expense to the public purse and depriving the judiciary of skilled adjudicators. They are also contrary to contemporary notions of age equality. Therefore, demographic change warrants a reconsideration of s 72 of the Constitution and other statutes setting judicial retirement ages. This article sets out three alternatives to the current system of judicial retirement ages. It concludes that the best option is to remove age-based limitations on judicial tenure. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 739 II Judicial Retirement Ages in Australia ................................................................... 740 A Federal Judiciary .......................................................................................... 740 B Australian States and Territories ............................................................... 745 III Criticism of Judicial Retirement Ages ................................................................... 752 A Critiques of Arguments in Favour of Retirement Ages ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act 2000 (WA)
    Review of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act 2000 (WA) Report of the Honourable Wayne Martin AC QC May 2019 The Hon W Martin AC QC 8 May 2019 The Hon. John Quigley MLA Attorney General of Western Australia 5th Floor, Dumas House 2 Havelock Street West Perth Western Australia 6005 Dear Attorney General, Review of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act 2000 (WA) I refer to your request that I undertake a re iew of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act 2000 (WA). I ha e now completed that review and attach a copy of my report. Yours sincerely, The Hon. Wayne Martin AC QC (i) Contents Parti: DEFINITIONS 1 Part II: INTRODUCTION 2 Purpose of the review 2 Terms of Reference 2 Part III: METHODOLOGY OF THE REVIEW 4 Identification and consideration of research materials 4 Development of an Issues Paper 6 Public call for submissions 6 Publication of submissions, and further targeted call 7 Consideration of submissions 8 Part IV: REVIEW OF THE ACT 9 An incoherent and inconsistent Act 9 An unjust Act 12 No necessary proportion between the value of the property confiscated and the criminality involved 14 Undue hardship 16 Judicial discretion 20 Drug traffickers 23 Offences to which the Act applies 26 Confiscable property 28 Crime-used property 31 Unexplained wealth 34 Deemed guilt 37 Third parties 42 Freezing notices 55 The provision of information by financial institutions 59 Statutory declarations 62 Objections 66 Examinations 71 Administration 75 Miscellaneous 77 Part V: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 81 (ii) APPENDICES 88 Appendix 1 - Terms of Reference 88 Appendix 2 - Screenshot of <www.justice.wa.gov.au/cpcar> as at November 2018 89 Appendix 3 - Issues Paper 90 Appendix 4 - Advertisement of the review in the edition of The West Australian newspaper dated 26 September 2018 94 Appendix 5 - List of individuals and representative bodies to whom an invitation was extended to make a submission to the review 95 Appendix 6 - Screenshot of <www.justice.wa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toohey Legacy: Rights and Freedoms, Compassion and Honour
    57 THE TOOHEY LEGACY: RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, COMPASSION AND HONOUR GREG MCINTYRE* I INTRODUCTION John Toohey is a person whom I have admired as a model of how to behave as a lawyer, since my first years in practice. A fundamental theme of John Toohey’s approach to life and the law, which shines through, is that he remained keenly aware of the fact that there are groups and individuals within our society who are vulnerable to the exercise of power and that the law has a role in ensuring that they are not disadvantaged by its exercise. A group who clearly fit within that category, and upon whom a lot of John’s work focussed, were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In 1987, in a speech to the Student Law Reform Society of Western Australia Toohey said: Complex though it may be, the relation between Aborigines and the law is an important issue and one that will remain with us;1 and in Western Australia v Commonwealth (Native Title Act Case)2 he reaffirmed what was said in the Tasmanian Dam Case,3 that ‘[t]he relationship between the Aboriginal people and the lands which they occupy lies at the heart of traditional Aboriginal culture and traditional Aboriginal life’. A University of Western Australia John Toohey had a long-standing relationship with the University of Western Australia, having graduated in 1950 in Law and in 1956 in Arts and winning the F E Parsons (outstanding graduate) and HCF Keall (best fourth year student) prizes. He was a Senior Lecturer at the Law School from 1957 to 1958, and a Visiting Lecturer from 1958 to 1965.
    [Show full text]