DOCSLIB.ORG

Direct Fusion Drive: Enabling Rapid Deep Space Propulsion Presented By: Stephanie Thomas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Direct Fusion Drive: Enabling Rapid Deep Space Propulsion Presented By: Stephanie Thomas Direct Fusion Drive: Enabling Rapid Deep Space Propulsion Presented by: Stephanie Thomas DIRECT FUSION DRIVE FISO Telecon 05-29-19 ‹#› Team Members Stephanie Thomas Michael Paluszek PrincetonFUSION Charles Swanson SYSTEMS Princeton Satellite Systems 6 Market St. Suite 926 Plainsboro, NJ 08536 http://www.psatellite.com Dr. Samuel Cohen Princeton Plasma Physics Lab Plainsboro, NJ This material is based upon work supported by NASA under award No. NNX16AK28G and 80NSSC18K0040 2 DFD Vs. PFRC Field Shaping RF Heating Field Shaping RF Heating Coils Fuel Antenna Coils Fuel Antenna Mirror Coil Nozzle Coil D-3He D-3HeD-3He Fusion FusionFusion Exhaust Plume Coolant Exhaust Propellant Cool Plasma Energy Absorbed Heat and Ash Extraction Cool Energy Absorbed Ion Acceleration Plasma PFRC: Princeton Field-ReVersed DFD: Direct Fusion DriVe Configuration • PFRC with an open end • Compact toroid configuration • SOL flow rate adjusted to produce • RF heating desired thrust and Isp • FRC “in a mirror” • “thrust augmentation” • SOL flow remoVes fusion exhaust • Power AND Propulsion in one deVice 3 Why Build a Small, Clean, Fusion Reactor? PFRC will produce 1-10 MWe per mini-van size reactor, with almost no radiation. Civilian NASA and DoD Space DoD Terrestrial Distributed and remote power Deep space robotic missions The electric battlefield ⁃ Villages in Alaska Lunar/Mars settlements Small NaVal combatants Mobile and emergency power Asteroid/comet interVention Forward power ⁃ Hurricane damage, Space platform power Fusion powered drones for ex. Puerto Rico High power communications boost phase missile defense Modular power satellites ⁃ Low capital cost power plants 4 PFRC Technology: Simple, Small, Clean FRC: Field-ReVersed Configuration Enabled by new magnetic plasma heating method ⁃ Steady-state operation Simple linear array of PFRC-2 in operation at PPPL Field Shaping RF Heating magnetic coils Coils Fuel Antenna Nozzle Coil Small size permits clean operation D-3He Fusion (ultra low radioactiVity) Exhaust Plume Easily direct flow for rocket Propellant Cool engine mode Plasma Energy Absorbed Ion Acceleration Schematic of Rocket Configuration 5 5/27/19 PFRC Programmatic Support to Date MNX PFRC-1 PFRC-2 DOE 1998-2015 DOE FES 2002-2009 DOE FES 2010-2016 NIAC STTRs ARPA-E OPEN NASA 2016-2019 NASA 2017-2020 2019-2020 6 NASA Has an Interest in Small Fusion NASA Power & Propulsion Needs Deep Space Gateway in cislunar space Manned surface bases on High Power Interplanetary moon, Mars Communication missions Orbital platforms Fusion Plant Outer planet and moon missions ⁃ Landers and submarines to explore geology and search for 550 AU life Orbital Platforms observatory Near interstellar telescopes, solar graVitational lens Surface Bases Interstellar asteroid intercept Communications 3He mining & transport 7 5/27/19 Why Fusion Propulsion: Deep Space Rapid Transit What can you do with a 1-2 MW fusion engine and a 10,000 kg mission? 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 1 AU 5 AU 10 AU 20 AU 30 AU 40 AU 2 MW 1 MW 0.6 MW 8 Advanced Propulsion Big Picture Theoretical Maximum Delta-V 300 DFD Isp: 10198 s Structural Fraction (F): 0.02 ∆ V = u log( (1+F)/F ) max e 250 200 Nuclear Electric VASIMR Isp: 4997 s V (km/s) ∆ 150 Lambert 100 Nuclear Electric Hall Isp: 2040 s 50 Nuclear Thermal Isp: 900 s Chemical Isp: 462 s 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pluto Transfer Time (yrs) AchieVable delta-V is fundamentally limited by the structural fraction and exhaust Velocity… 9 DFD Technical & Team Videos on Website https://youtu.be/hggqVB5I95I https://youtu.be/VS4o7W3UP4M 10 DFD: Propulsion and Power in One Compact Device The engine uses RF heating to create a Field Shaping RF Heating Coils Fuel Antenna CLOSED field lines, Nozzle Coil Field-ReVersed Configuration (FRC) D-3He inside a Fusion 1-2 m magnetic mirror, producing power AND thrust Propulsion and Power in One Device The fusing plasma acts as the heating source Field Shaping Coils Nozzle Coil for cool propellant flowing outside the confinement region. This D-3He process of Fusion Exhaust thrust augmentation Plume Propellant giVes us substantial thrust Cool Energy Absorbed Ion Acceleration with high exhaust Plasma velocity! Thrust: ~5-10 N/MWf Impulse: ~10,000-20,000 s ‹#› Power and Propulsion in One Device Producing power: • Fusion deposits heat in Radiation the walls (x-rays and microwaVes) • Brayton cycle engine conVerts heat to electricity • Excess heat rejected to Heat space Brayton Engine ~60% Fraction of fusion power: Electricity Radiation Exhaust Radiation 45% 55% Exhaust Radiator ~40% 13 NIAC: Pluto Explorer Mission with DFD SingLe Launch from Earth, fly directly to Pluto with constant thrust Engine 1100 kg Radiator Area 120 m2 Radiators 250 kg FueL (D2) 7250 kg HeLium-3 0.5 kg Liquid D2 tank 2.6 m radius Gas 3He tank 0.95 m radius FueL Tanks 400 kg Put a 1000 kg spacecraft in orbit around Pluto, Lander 200 kg beam power to a Lander using opticaL transmission, Structure 300 kg return high-definition video – Orbiter 500 kg and get there in Less than 5 years! payLoad Launch Mass 10000 kg 14 NIAC Pluto Explorer Vehicle Design D, 3He Tanks under Sun Shield Lander Solar Array Optical DFD Engines Comm Radiator 15 STOP RIGHT THERE. How is a fusion drive suddenly achieVable? ‹#› DFD is DIFFERENT from other fusion reactor concepts 1. Unique heating method 2. SIMPLE configuration 3. SMALL size 4. CLEAN operation – low radiation à FRC has 10x better confinement than tokamak à FRC has 20x higher ! à FRC can contain 5x higher density These features make it uniquely suited for use in space! Unique Heating: RMF Current DriVe • Antenna currents creating rotating magnetic & electric field • Current is driven • Very efficient driVe at magnet null • Closed field lines “odd-parity” -- fields are in opposite directions on either side of machine midplane “eVen-parity” – single antenna loop; open field lines (still from an animation) 18 Simple: Linear Array of Coils Propellant Addition Electron Heating Ion Acceleration Axial Field Coils Box Coil Nozzle Gas Box Coil Exhaust Closed Field Region Open Field Open Field Region Region Separatrix SOL heating section Ash Coolant The Linear configuration means the reactor couLd be assembLed in segments and simpLy pulled apart as needed. 19 Small: DFD is REALLY small Typical tokamak reactor: • 1000-4000 MW • 60 m tall • DeVelopment in 30-50 years PFRC reactor: • 1-10 MW • 2 m diameter • DeVelopment in 5-10 years • SmaLL enough to fit on a singLe Launch vehicLe ITER research reactor Person for scale 20 Clean: D-3He can burn Aneutronic fuels Main Fusion Reaction Power ⁃ D + 3He ® 4He (3.6 MeV) + p (14.7 MeV) 98.4% + ® + Side reactions ⁃ D + D ® T (1.01 MeV) + p (3.02 MeV) 0.88% ⁃ D + D ® 3He (0.82 MeV) + n (2.45 MeV) 0.72% ⁃ D + T ®4He (3.5 MeV) + n (14.1 MeV) <0.05% T ® cooled and exhausted before it can fuse 3He ® exhausted 4He ® exhausted p ® exhausted n ® deposit energy in waLLs as heat 21 Tritium Ash RemoVal In actuality, hundreds of orbits occur before the tritium is captured on a SOL field line – time < 20 ms! In the aboVe graph, just a few orbits of each type are shown. An animation is included in our technical Video. 22 CLEAN: Ultra low radiation 23 DFD is DIFFERENT than other fusion concepts Simple Small Clean • Linear array of • Plasma radius • D-3He fuel magnets ~25 cm • Exhaust tritium • EasiLy directed • Engine is 1-2 m before it can fuse plume diameter • <1% power in neutrons 24 Why now? Its Faster and Cheaper to DeVelop a Small Machine Size Radioactivity AvaiLabLe FueL Complexity SmaLL FRC < 10 MW Time Cost : <$100M : < 5 years : >$10B : > 20 years Cost Time Tokamaks > 200 MW Size Radioactivity T Breeding CompLexity 25 Summary of Key Physics Points Hamiltonian code (“RMF”) showed current driVe and rapid ion and electron heating. ! PFRC-1 demonstrated rapid electron heating, stability 103 x better than predicted by MHD, and, indirectly, FRC formation PFRC-2 thus far has demonstrated 100x improVed particle confinement and stability 105x better than predicted by MHD PIC model demonstrated current driVe, field reVersal by RMFo, and excellent agreement with full x-ray EEDF 26 Computational Tools Applied Expanding plume; leading edge of the D+ plume is getting to 900 eV, Isp = 30,000 s Orbit of ion heated by RMF LSP: particle in cell; RMF: single particle; kinetic Hamiltonian Model of plasma heating and flow in SOL UEDGE: multi-species fluid model 27 Experimental Apparatus Concluded PFRC-1 a, b, c in 2011; breakthrough achieVed in FRC electron heating methods ⁃ Electron heating to > 200 eV PFRC-2 operating now ⁃ Goal is to demonstrate keV plasmas with pulse lengths to 0.3 s § Electron heating to > 500 eV ⁃ Operated with up to 40 kW power ⁃ MNX computational studies on plasma detachment Via magnetic nozzle (LSP) Major upgrades taking place under new ARPA-E OPEN grant ⁃ Higher RF and magnet power ⁃ Lower frequency to heat ions 28 Cohen/Swanson, Compact Toroid & FIF, 2017 5/27/19 PFRC-2 Experiment 29 TWO NASA PROJECTS: 1. NASA NIAC STUDY 2. NASA PHASE II STTR ‹#›30 Questions to Answer 1. Can PFRC really produce (net power from) fusion? 2. Can DFD be made to operate for long durations in space? 3. Can DFD achieVe the necessary specific power for the desired mission parameters? Our NASA work is primarily addressing questions 2 and 3; continuing work at PPPL, and our new ARPA-E OPEN grant, address question 1. 31 NIAC: Systems Analysis of the DFD Engine Electrolysis D2O Auxiliary Power O2 Unit Startup RF Generator Coil Radiator Refrigerator Gas D Box Plasma HTS Coil Blanket Coil Cooling 3He Space Thermal Conversion neutrons Bremsstrahlung Generator Synchotron Brayton Shielding Coolant Radiator Heat Engine 32 5/27/19 Typical Reactor Parameters Parameter Value The fuel ratio sacrifices some power density Fuel D-3He for lower radiation (less D-D fusion).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magnetic Nozzle Plasma Plume: Review of Crucial Physical Phenomena
    48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit AIAA 2012-4274 30 July - 01 August 2012, Atlanta, Georgia Magnetic Nozzle Plasma Plume: Review of Crucial Physical Phenomena Frans H. Ebersohn∗, Sharath S. Girimaji y, and David Staack z Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA John V. Shebalinx Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058 Benjamin Longmier{ University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA Chris Olsenk Ad Astra Rocket Company, Webster, Texas 77598 This paper presents a review of the current understanding of magnetic nozzle physics. The crucial steps necessary for thrust generation in magnetic nozzles are energy conver- sion, plasma detachment, and momentum transfer. The currently considered mechanisms by which to extract kinetic energy from the plasma include the conservation of the mag- netic moment adiabatic invariant, electric field forces, thermal energy directionalization, and Joule heating. Plasma detachment mechanisms discussed include resistive diffusion, recombination, magnetic reconnection, loss of adiabaticity, inertial forces, and self-field detachment. Momentum transfer from the plasma to the spacecraft occurs due to the interaction between the applied field currents and induced currents which are formed due to the magnetic pressure. These three physical phenomena are crucial to thrust generation and must be understood to optimize magnetic nozzle design. The operating dimension- less parameter ranges of six prominent experiments
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Nozzle Simulation Studies for Electric Propulsion
    Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture 1 2 3 A. G. Tarditi , G. H. Miley and J. H. Scott 1University of Houston – Clear Lake, Houston, TX 2University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 3NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX NIAC 2012 – Spring Meeting, Pasadena, CA Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture 1 2 3 A. G. Tarditi , G. H. Miley and J. H. Scott 1University of Houston – Clear Lake, Houston, TX 2University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 3NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX NIAC 2012 – Spring Meeting, Pasadena, CA Summary • Exploration of a new concept for space propulsion suitable for aneutronic fusion • Fusion energy-to-thrust direct conversion: turn fusion products kinetic energy into thrust • Fusion products beam conditioning: specific impulse and thrust compatible with needs practical mission Where all this fits: the Big Picture • “Big time” space travel needs advanced propulsion at the 100-MW level • This really means electric propulsion • Electric propulsion needs fusion Electric Space Propulsion Plasma Advanced Electric Fusion Research Propulsion Utility Technology Fusion Propulsion Introduction - Space Exploration Needs ? ? “Game changers” in the evolution of human transportation Introduction - Space Exploration Needs • Incremental modifications of existing space transportation ? designs can only go so far… • Aerospace needs new propulsion technologies Introduction - Priorities • A new propulsion paradigm that enables faster and longer distance space travel is arguably the technology development that could have the largest impact on the overall scope of the NASA mission • In comparison, every other space technology development would probably look merely incremental • Investing in R&D on new, advanced space propulsion architectures could have the largest impact on the overall scope of the NASA mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall2de Simulations of a Magnetic Nozzle
    AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum 10.2514/6.2020-3642 August 24-28, 2020, VIRTUAL EVENT AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum Hall2De Simulations of a Magnetic Nozzle Thomas A. Marks∗ University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 Alejandro Lopez-Ortega † and Ioannis G. Mikellides ‡ Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 Benjamin A. Jorns§ University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 The two-dimensional, fluid-based Hall thruster code Hall2De is adapted to simulate a low temperature propulsive magnetic nozzle. Electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) thrusters developed at the Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches Aérospatiales (ONERA) in France and the University of Michigan are investigated. For each device, the simulated domain is defined from the nozzle throat to a location 10 thruster radii downstream. A numerical mesh is defined based on the measured magnetic field, and the governing fluid equations for singly- charge ions, electrons, and neutrals are solved. The boundary conditions for the throat of the magnetic nozzle are based on measured values of electron temperature and ion velocity. Multiple boundary conditions for the electron temperature in the downstream regions of the domain are considered. The simulated ion velocity and potential agrees well with experiment, while the simulated current densities and therefore thrusts are 50-75% higher than experiment. When a Neumann boundary condition for electron temperature is applied to the far-plume boundaries, the nozzle was seen to be purely isothermal. This suggests that the thermal conductivity along field lines in real devices is much lower than classical simulations predict, and anomalous resistivity may be needed to reproduce the temperature distribution observed in experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Axial Momentum Gains of Ions and Electrons in Magnetic Nozzle Acceleration
    Axial momentum gains of ions and electrons in magnetic nozzle acceleration Kazuma Emoto,1,a) Kazunori Takahashi,2 and Yoshinori Takao3,b) 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, and Ocean Engineering, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan 3Division of Systems Research, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan a)E-mail: kazuma-emoto-vh@ynu.jp b)E-mail: takao@ynu.ac.jp Abstract The fully kinetic simulations of magnetic nozzle acceleration are conducted to investigate the axial momentum gains of ions and electrons with the electrostatic and Lorentz forces. Axial momentum gains per ion and electron are directly calculated from the kinetics of charged particles, indicating that electrons in the magnetic nozzle obtain the net axial momentum by the Lorentz force even though they are decelerated by the electrostatic force. Whereas ions are also accelerated by the electrostatic force, the axial momentum gain of electrons increases significantly with increasing the magnetic field strength and becomes dominant in the magnetic nozzle. In addition, it is clearly shown that the axial momentum gain of electrons is due to the electron momentum conversion from the radial to axial direction, resulting in the significant increase in the thrust and the exhaust velocity. 1 Introduction Electric propulsion systems are recognized as important devices to carry out space missions because of the advantage of the high specific impulse [1–4]. In electric propulsion systems, ion thrusters and Hall thrusters are successfully operated in space [5–7]. However, those lifetime is limited by the wear of cathodes and neutralizers since they are damaged by ion sputtering [8, 9].
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Nozzles for Electric Propulsion
    Magnetic nozzles for electric propulsion Mario Merino Equipo de Propulsión Espacial y Plasmas (EP2) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) EPIC lecture series 2017, Madrid Contents ➢ What is a magnetic nozzle (MN)? Principles of operation Plasma thrusters using MNs ➢ Acceleration and magnetic thrust generation Ambipolar electric field, electric currents, and thrust gain ➢ Plasma detachment How does the plasma separate from the closed magnetic lines? Plume divergence ➢ Conclusions Lecture notes: M. Merino, E. Ahedo, “Magnetic Nozzles for Space Plasma Thrusters” Encyclopedia of Plasma Technology, 2016. Downloadable at: http://mariomerino.uc3m.es Magnetic nozzles for electric propulsion Mario Merino 2 What is a magnetic nozzle? ➢ A magnetic nozzle (MN) is a convergent-divergent magnetic field created by coils or permanent magnets to guide the expansion of a hot plasma, accelerating it supersonically and generating thrust ➢ The MN works in a similar way to a traditional “de Laval” nozzle with a neutral gas, except that: The nozzle walls (and its reaction force on the expanding gas) are substituted by magnetic lines (and a magnetic force on the charged particles that compose the plasma) solenoids Supersonic Hot plasma plasma expansion Magnetic tubes AF-MPD (IRS) RL-10 rocket “de Laval” nozzle A magnetic nozzle in operation Magnetic nozzles for electric propulsion Mario Merino 3 What is a magnetic nozzle? ➢ The MN has the following advantages: It operates contactlessly: we avoid touching the hot plasma ❖ No erosion of the walls, no heat
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2002.12686V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph] 28 Feb 2020 SOI Sphere of Influence VEV Variable Ejection Velocity
    Achieving the required mobility in the solar system through Direct Fusion Drive Giancarlo Genta1 and Roman Ya. Kezerashvili2;3;4, 1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy 2Physics Department, New York City College of Technology, The City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA 3The Graduate School and University Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA 4Samara National Research University, Samara, Russian Federation (Dated: March 2, 2020) To develop a spacefaring civilization, humankind must develop technologies which enable safe, affordable and repeatable mobility through the solar system. One such technology is nuclear fusion propulsion which is at present under study mostly as a breakthrough toward the first interstellar probes. The aim of the present paper is to show that fusion drive is even more important in human planetary exploration and constitutes the natural solution to the problem of exploring and colonizing the solar system. Nomenclature Is specific impulse m mass mi initial mass ml mass of payload mp mass of propellant ms structural mass mt mass of the thruster mtank mass of tanks t time td departure time ve ejection velocity F thrust J cost function P power of the jet α specific mass of the generator γ optimization parameter ∆V velocity increment DFD Direct Fusion Drive IMLEO Initial Mass in Low Earth Orbit LEO Low Earth Orbit LMO Low Mars Orbit NEP Nuclear Electric Propulsion NTP Nuclear Thermal Propulsion SEP Solar Electric Propulsion arXiv:2002.12686v1 [physics.pop-ph] 28 Feb 2020 SOI Sphere of Influence VEV Variable Ejection Velocity I.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT FUSION DRIVE for Interstellar Exploration S.A
    Journal of the British Interplanetary Society VOLUME 72 NO.2 FEBRUARY 2019 General interstellar issue DIRECT FUSION DRIVE for Interstellar Exploration S.A. Cohen et al. INTERMEDIATE BEAMERS FOR STARSHOT: Probes to the Sun’s Inner Gravity Focus James Benford & Gregory Matloff REALITY, THE BREAKTHROUGH INITIATIVES and Prospects for Colonization of Space Edd Wheeler A GRAVITATIONAL WAVE TRANSMITTER A.A. Jackson and Gregory Benford CORRESPONDENCE www.bis-space.com ISSN 0007-084X PUBLICATION DATE: 29 APRIL 2019 Submitting papers International Advisory Board to JBIS JBIS welcomes the submission of technical Rachel Armstrong, Newcastle University, UK papers for publication dealing with technical Peter Bainum, Howard University, USA reviews, research, technology and engineering in astronautics and related fields. Stephen Baxter, Science & Science Fiction Writer, UK James Benford, Microwave Sciences, California, USA Text should be: James Biggs, The University of Strathclyde, UK ■ As concise as the content allows – typically 5,000 to 6,000 words. Shorter papers (Technical Notes) Anu Bowman, Foundation for Enterprise Development, California, USA will also be considered; longer papers will only Gerald Cleaver, Baylor University, USA be considered in exceptional circumstances – for Charles Cockell, University of Edinburgh, UK example, in the case of a major subject review. Ian A. Crawford, Birkbeck College London, UK ■ Source references should be inserted in the text in square brackets – [1] – and then listed at the Adam Crowl, Icarus Interstellar, Australia end of the paper. Eric W. Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, USA ■ Illustration references should be cited in Kathryn Denning, York University, Toronto, Canada numerical order in the text; those not cited in the Martyn Fogg, Probability Research Group, UK text risk omission.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Nozzle Design for High-Power MPD Thrusters
    Magnetic Nozzle Design for High-Power MPD Thrusters IEPC-2005-230 Presented at the 29th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Princeton University, October 31 – November 4, 2005 Robert P. Hoyt* Tethers Unlimited, Inc., Bothell, WA, 98011, USA Abstract: Magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters can provide the high-specific impulse, high-power propulsion required to enable ambitious Human and Robotic Exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and outer planets. MPD thrusters, however, have traditionally been plagued by poor thrust efficiencies. In most operating modes, these inefficiencies are caused primarily by deposition of power into the anode due to the anode fall voltage. Prior investigations have indicated that the Hall Effect term in Ohm’s law causes depletion of the plasma near the anode surface, which in turn results in the anode fall and onset behavior contributing to rapid electrode erosion. Under a NASA/GRC Phase I SBIR Phase I effort, we have used analytical methods and the MACH2 code to first investigate the impacts of the Hall term on the behavior of MPD thrusters and then to evaluate several magnetic nozzle concepts for their ability to counter the Hall-induced starvation effects. Through a process of iteration between custom magnetic field design tools and the plasma simulations, developed new magnetic nozzle designs for both the GRC Benchmark MPD thruster. We then designed and fabricated a prototype suitable for testing on the GRC Benchmark thruster in a vacuum chamber facility. If these magnetic nozzles prove successful in minimizing anode fall losses, they could result in dramatic improvements in the thrust efficiency of MPD devices. I.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Ion Propulsion Systems For
    PRINCIPIUM The Newsletter of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies Issue 17 | May 2017 ISSN 2397-9127 ■ Advanced Ion Propulsion Systems for Interstellar Precursor Probes ■ Interstellar News ■ News Feature: TRAPPIST-1 ■ Is the Alcubierre Drive the answer to Interstellar Travel? ■ Album Review: Infinity of Space ■ Book Review: Starlight, Starbright: Are Stars Conscious? R O F ■ Engineering New Worlds: Creating the Future E V I ■ Poster Feature: Space Resource Law T A I T I N I S T U D I E S www.i4is.org Scientia ad sidera Knowledge to the stars Principium | Issue 17 | May 2017 1 If we are to build a space-based economy and culture then our resources need to be regulated by Editorial law. Sam Harrison of i4is and the International Space University (ISU) and Linda Dao of the Welcome to Principium, the quarterly newsletter ISU summarise a poster session, Ensuring Equal about all things interstellar from i4is, the Initiative Global Economic Opportunity and Security through for Interstellar Studies - and now our US-based Space Resource Law, which they delivered during Institute for Interstellar Studies. the United Nations / International Astronautical Our Guest Introduction for Principium 17 is Federation Workshop on Space Technology for Advanced Ion Propulsion Systems for Interstellar Socio-Economic Benefits in September 2016. Precursor Probes by Angelo Genovese. Angelo is a Our front and back covers this time reflect very propulsion engineer with many years of experience different aspects of the outward urge of our and he specialises in these very high specific- species. You may have heard of the multi-planet impulse reaction propulsion systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Field Effects on Plasma Plumes
    39th EPS Conference & 16th Int. Congress on Plasma Physics O2.404 Magnetic Field Effects on Plasma Plumes F. Ebersohn1,2, J. Shebalin1, S. Girimaji2, D. Staack2 1 NASA, Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA 2 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA Space plasma propulsion systems currently being developed require strong guiding magnetic fields known as magnetic nozzles to control plasma flow and produce thrust. Among these propulsion methods are the VAriable Specifc Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR)[1], magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters (MPDs), and helicon thrusters. Magnetic nozzles are func- tionally similar to de Laval nozzles, but are inherently more complex systems due to the plas- madynamics resulting from the magnetic field effects on the plasma plume. Here, we perform a preliminary study of numerical magnetic nozzle experiments. The crucial physical phenomenon of magnetic nozzles are thrust production and plasma de- tachment. The physics of thrust production encompasses conversion of magnetoplasma energy into directed kinetic energy as well as the mechanisms for transferring momentum to the space- craft. The physics of plasma detachment governs the separation of plasma from the spacecraft and must be understood to optimize nozzle design for maximum efficiency. The mechanisms for inducing efficient detachment are an active research topic. The goal of this research is to perform numerical experiments in the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) regime observing which physical phenomena occur and optimizing magnetic nozzle design accordingly. To perform numerical experiments a novel, hybrid kinetic theory and single fluid MHD solver known as the Magneto-Gas Kinetic Method (MGKM) was developed[2]. The solver is com- prised of a "fluid" portion that finds solutions to the Navier Stokes equations through the Gas Ki- netic Method (GKM)[3] and "magnetic" portion that incorporates MHD physics through source terms to the conserved fluid variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Nozzle Efficiency in a Low Power Inductive Plasma Source
    Plasma Sources Science and Technology PAPER Magnetic nozzle efficiency in a low power inductive plasma source To cite this article: T A Collard and B A Jorns 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 105019 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 141.213.172.164 on 31/10/2019 at 17:55 Plasma Sources Science and Technology Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 (2019) 105019 (18pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ab2d7d Magnetic nozzle efficiency in a low power inductive plasma source T A Collard and B A Jorns University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America E-mail: collardt@umich.edu Received 23 February 2019, revised 4 June 2019 Accepted for publication 27 June 2019 Published 29 October 2019 Abstract The nozzle efficiency and performance of a magnetic nozzle operating at low power (<200 W) are experimentally and analytically characterized. A suite of diagnostics including Langmuir probes, emissive probes, Faraday probes, and laser induced fluorescence are employed to map the spatial distribution of the plasma properties in the near-field of a nozzle operated with xenon and peak magnetic field strengths ranging from 100 to 600 G. The nozzle efficiency is found to be <10% with plasma thrust contributions <120 μN and specific impulse <35 s. These performance measurements are compared with predictions from quasi-1D idealized nozzle theory and found to be 50%–70% of the model predictions. It is shown that the reason for this discrepancy stems from the fact that the underlying assumption of the idealized model—that ions are sonic at the throat of the nozzle—is violated at low power operation.
    [Show full text]