DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Impact Analysis of Gdot's Short Line Railroads

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Impact Analysis of Gdot's Short Line Railroads GEORGIA DOT RESEARCH PROJECT 16-08 FINAL REPORT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF GDOT’S SHORT LINE RAILROADS OFFICE OF PERFORMANCE-BASED MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH 15 KENNEDY DRIVE FOREST PARK, GA 30297-2534 1.Report No.: 2. Government Accession No.: 3. Recipient's Catalog No.: FHWA-GA-18-1608 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date: Economic Impact of GDOT’s Short Line April 2018 Railroads 6. Performing Organization Code: 7. Author(s): 8. Performing Organ. Report No.: Patrick McCarthy, Zhe Zhai 9. Performing Organization Name and Address: 10. Work Unit No.: Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 11. Contract or Grant No.: PI No. 0014918 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address: 13. Type of Report and Period Covered: Georgia Department of Transportation Final; April 2016 – April 2018 Office of Performance-Based Management and Research 14. Sponsoring Agency Code: 15 Kennedy Drive Forest Park, GA 30297-2534 15. Supplementary Notes: Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract: Short line railroads are critical to Georgia’s transportation infrastructure and support the efficient movement of goods into and out of the State. Twenty-nine short line railroads operate in Georgia, six of which operate either partially or totally on 596 miles of rail track that the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) owns. Based on the Bureau of Economic Analysis RIMS II backward-linkage model, this study estimates under different sets of assumptions the economic impacts associated with short line railroad revenues and with GDOT infrastructure spending on these six short line systems. Among the economic impacts, and depending on the assumptions, the study finds that the cumulative impact of the six systems increases annual output in the range of $2.8-$14.5 million, increases annual earnings in the range of $0.7-$4.1 million, and generates annual value-added in the range of $1.4-$7.5 million. Cumulatively, these systems annually add 10 - 93 jobs on average. 17. Key Words: 18. Distribution Statement: Short Line, Railroad, Economic Impact, Infrastructure, RIMS II 19. Security 20. Security 21. Number of 22. Price: Classification (of this Classification (of Pages: report): this page): 102 Unclassified Unclassified ii GDOT Research Project No. 16-08 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF GDOT’S SHORT LINE RAILROADS Final Report By Patrick McCarthy Professor Zhe Zhai Assistant Professor Georgia Tech Research Institute Contract with Georgia Department of Transportation In cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration April 2018 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Georgia Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. xi I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 II LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 6 A. Deregulation and the Rail Industry ...................................................................................... 6 B. Short Line Railroads ............................................................................................................ 8 C. Employment and Spending Impacts .................................................................................. 13 D. Operational and Shipping Impact ...................................................................................... 14 E. Mode Diversion Impact ..................................................................................................... 14 F. Community Effects ............................................................................................................ 15 III GEORGIA’S SHORT LINE RAIL SYSTEM .................................................................. 17 A. Industry Overview ............................................................................................................. 17 B. GDOT and Non-GDOT SLRs ........................................................................................... 20 C. GDOT SLR Operating Statistics ....................................................................................... 26 D. Financial Data .................................................................................................................... 30 IV RIMS II – ECONOMIC IMPACT METHODOLOGY .................................................... 32 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 32 B. RIMS II Methodology ....................................................................................................... 32 C. Multiplier Effect ................................................................................................................ 34 D. RIMS II Application – Additional Considerations ............................................................ 37 E. Methods of Estimation of Impacts .................................................................................... 39 F. Final Comments ................................................................................................................ 46 V GDOT SHORT LINE RAIL ECONOMIC IMPACT ........................................................... 47 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 47 B. GDOT SLR Track Infrastructure – Descriptive Statistics ................................................. 48 C. Statewide and Local Area Economic Impact Multipliers .................................................. 50 D. Economic Impact – Industry Contribution and Departure Approach ................................ 52 E. Economic Impact – Project Spending Approach ............................................................... 56 iv F. Economic Impact – Bill of Goods (BOG) Approach ........................................................ 58 G. Economic Impact of GDOT’s SLR System – A Consolidation ........................................ 63 H. GDOT Short Line Railroads and Tourism ........................................................................ 65 VI COMMUNITY IMPACT .................................................................................................. 67 A. Environmental Impact ....................................................................................................... 67 B. Safety Impact ..................................................................................................................... 69 C. Fiscal Impact ..................................................................................................................... 71 D. Business Development ...................................................................................................... 71 E. State Industry Support ....................................................................................................... 76 VII CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 78 VIII REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 80 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 86 APPENDIX A – Academic Literature Related to Short Line Railroad Systems .......................... 87 APPENDIX B – Short Line Rail State Department of Transportation (DOT) Reports ................ 92 APPENDIX C – Short Line Railroad Systems .............................................................................. 94 APPENDIX D – Statewide Economic Impact Multipliers ............................................................ 96 APPENDIX E – Local Area Economic Impact Multipliers .......................................................... 97 APPENDIX F – Statewide Detailed Impact, 2015 Project Spending with Leakage ..................... 99 APPENDIX G – Statewide Detailed Impact, 2015 Project Spending with Leakage .................. 100 APPENDIX H – Short Line Railroads and Business Development ............................................ 101 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1 U.S. Railroad System Characteristics ................................................................................. 2 Table 2 U.S. Class II and III Railroads ........................................................................................... 3 Table 3 U.S. SLR Ownership .......................................................................................................... 9 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Jumbo Covered Hopper Cars on Kansas Shortline Railroads
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-04-3 FINAL REPORT THE IMPACT OF JUMBO COVERED HOPPER CARS ON KANSAS SHORTLINE RAILROADS Michael W. Babcock James Sanderson Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas SEPTEMBER 2004 K-TRAN A COOPERATIVE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROGRAM BETWEEN: KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-04-3 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date THE IMPACT OF JUMBO COVERED HOPPER CARS ON KANSAS September 2004 SHORTLINE RAILROADS 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 8 Performing Organization Report Michael W. Babcock and James Sanderson No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Department of Economics; 317 Waters Hall 11 Contract or Grant No. Manhattan, Kansas 66506-4001 C1401 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Materials and Research Final Report 700 SW Harrison Street June 2003 - July 2004 Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0338-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. 16 Abstract Class I railroads have been replacing 263,000-pound (loaded weight) covered hopper cars capable of handling 100 tons of grain with 286,000-pound covered hopper cars that can handle 111 tons. While these heavier cars provide a decrease in railroad cost per ton-mile for the Class I (Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe) Railroads; they will cause a significant increase in operating and maintenance costs for the shortline railroads in the state of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • General Freight Tariff 5000
    GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 NAMING RULES AND CHARGES GOVERNING DEMURRAGE, SWITCHING AND OTHER ACCESSORIAL AND TERMINAL SERVICES For the following Subscribing Carriers: Railroad Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC ATN Brownsville & Rio Grande International Railroad BRG Cleveland & Cuyohoga Railway, LLC CCRL Chicago Rail Link, LLC CRL Cleveland Harbor Belt Railroad, LLC CHB Central Texas & Colorado River Railway, LLC CTXR Decatur Central Railway, LLC DCC Fulton County Railway, LLC FCR Georgia & Florida Railway, LLC GFRR Georgia Woodlands Railway, LLC GWRC Great Western Railway of Colorado, LLC GWR Illinois Railway, LLC IR Kettle Falls International Railway, LLC KFR Manufacturers' Junction Railway, LLC MJ Nebraska, Kansas, & Colorado Railway, LLC NKCR Newburgh & South Shore Railroad, LLC NSR Northern Ohio & Western Railway, LLC NOW Panhandle Northern Railroad, LLC PNR Peru Industrial Railroad, LLC PIR Sand Springs Railway Company SS Stockton Terminal and Eastern Railroad STE Winchester & Western Railroad, LLC WW This Tariff is also applicable on intrastate traffic, except where expressly provided to the contrary in connection with particular rates and provisions contained herein. ISSUED: December 10, 2019 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2020 ISSUED BY: OmniTRAX Commercial Department Acting as Agent for Subscribing Carriers GENERAL FREIGHT TARIFF 5000 Check Sheet for Page Revisions Revision 17 Except as otherwise provided, Title Page and through Page 29, inclusive, are effective as of the date shown. Original and revised
    [Show full text]
  • INRD's Major Moves
    Entrepreneurial Railroading SM Vol. 28 No. 2 Summer 2014 "New" INRD INRD’s Major Moves: Key White River Ballast Cars Add Bridge Replacement Gets Underway Safety, Speed to The year that Indiana Rail Trackwork Road’s bridge over the White River near Elnora, Ind., was Indiana Rail Road’s Engi- constructed, the following hap- neering department has scored a pened: The U.S.S. Maine mys- “win-win-win” with a new and teriously exploded in Havana heavily-rebuilt fleet of ballast cars (Cuba) Harbor, a catalyst for the in use across the system this year. Spanish-American War; jockey Not only do the bright-yellow cars Willie Simms won the 24th(!) distribute rock-ballast along the Kentucky Derby aboard Plaudit; right-of-way faster than ever be- and on December 18, in France, fore, but their air-actuated control the world’s first automobile land system is much safer and easier for speed record – 39 mph – was re- employees to use. corded. (Some background: Well That was 1898, and back at over a century ago, railroads dis- Elnora, crews built a 450-foot covered that rock ballast is the best Pratt-style pin-connected steel The INRD is replacing the 1898 White River Bridge with a new structure, way to keep the wooden crossties truss bridge to carry the Southern allowing for greater train capacity and speed. (or in some cases today, more ex- Indiana Railway across the White pensive concrete ties) in place. The River, eventually reaching Terre Haute. Through more to 263,000 pounds. Since the rail industry standard steel rails are firmly connected to than a century and thousands of train movements car- maximum weight is 286,000 pounds, the bridge puts the crossties with steel spikes or rying millions of tons of Indiana commerce, this rail southern Indiana businesses at a competitive disad- other fasteners; rock ballast poured line changed hands several times until 2006, when vantage.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnitrax Holdings Combined, Inc., and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc.—Control
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/27/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-11235, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36490] OmniTRAX Holdings Combined, Inc., and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc.—Control Exemption—Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC OmniTRAX Holdings Combined, Inc. (OmniTRAX), and HGS Railway Holdings, Inc. (HGS) (collectively, Applicants), both noncarriers, filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to control Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC (SIT), a noncarrier currently controlled by OmniTRAX, once SIT is authorized to commence common carrier operations. This notice of exemption is related to a concurrently filed petition for exemption in Savannah Industrial Transportation, LLC—Operation Exemption—in Effingham County, Ga., Docket No. FD 36489. In that proceeding, SIT seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a) to commence common carrier operations on certain trackage that it leased from the track owner, Savannah Industrial Logistics, LLC, another noncarrier holding of OmniTRAX.1 If that petition is approved, SIT will operate as a common carrier over certain trackage in Rincon, Effingham County, Ga., extending from a connection with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) near NSR milepost 16.6 to a connection with CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), near CSXT milepost S484.0, a distance of approximately 11,404 feet. Applicants state that they will control SIT upon SIT’s becoming a Class III rail carrier. According to Applicants, OmniTRAX and HGS are under joint managerial and 1 According to the verified notice, while SIT is currently controlled solely by OmniTRAX, if SIT’s petition to commence common carrier operations in Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report
    Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2017 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2017 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2017 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2017 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Job Vacancies Reported to the RRB 844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701 July 3, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275 Website
    U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Toll Free: (877) 772-5772 Railroad Job Vacancies Reported to the RRB 844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701 July 3, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275 Website: https://www.rrb.gov The RRB routinely maintains a job vacancy list as openings are reported by hiring railroad employers. The following list includes job postings (order nos.) that are not expected to be filled locally. The date of the vacancy list reflects RRB records regarding the status of open/closed positions. Individuals interested in a particular vacancy should contact their local RRB field office at (877) 772-5772 for more information. An RRB representative will verify if the job is still open and refer the applicant to the appropriate hiring official. Attendants, On-Board Services Closing Order Occupation Railroad Job Location Date No. No Open Orders Executives, Professionals, Clerks Closing Order Occupation Railroad Job Location Date No. Assistant Chief Mechanical Northern Indiana Commuter 08/16/19 296-8119 Michigan City, IN Officer Transportation District Assistant Manager, Tank Car 373-8510 Association of American Railroads Washington, DC Safety Director of Business 07/12/19 373-8515 Transportation Technology Center Pueblo, CO Development Field Auditor – Bureau of Canada (Various 07/21/19 373-8511 Transportation Technology Center Explosives Locations) Field Auditor – Bureau of USA (Various 07/21/19 373-8512 Transportation Technology Center Explosives Locations) General Manager – Bureau 07/05/19 373-8514 Transportation Technology Center Pueblo, CO of Explosives General Yardmaster, Shift 12/31/19 296-8100 Mittal Steel USA – Railway, Inc. Burns Harbor, IN Supervisor (LMI) Manager Internal Audit 04/02/20 372-8131 Montana Rail Link, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Georgia State Rail Plan
    State Rail Plan Georgia State Rail Plan Final Report Master Contract #: TOOIP1900173 PI # 0015886 State Rail Plan Update – FY 2018 4/6/2021 State Rail Plan Contents 1. The Role of Rail in Statewide Transportation ......................................................................................... 1-7 1.1. Purpose and Content ...................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.2. Multimodal Transportation System Goals ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.3. Role of Rail in Georgia’s Transportation Network .......................................................................... 1-8 1.4. Role of Passenger Rail in Georgia Transportation Network ......................................................... 1-16 1.5. Institutional Governance Structure of Rail in Georgia ................................................................. 1-19 1.6. Role of Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................. 1-29 2. Georgia’s Existing Rail System ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1. Description and Inventory .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2. Trends and Forecasts ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Csx Transportation Contract Summary
    The Surface Transportation Board (STB) received the Contract Summaries contained in this .pdf document on July 9, 2021. Shippers desiring to file complaint and discovery petitions must do so within the time period allowed under 49 C.F.R. § 1313.10(a). STB-CSXT 58868 Amendment 165 CSX TRANSPORTATION AMENDED CONTRACT SUMMARY CONTRACT DATE May 28, 2021 EFFECTIVE DATE May 28, 2021 ISSUED BY MARKETING SERVICES-J865 500 WATER STREET JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202 Amendment 165 to Contract Summary STB-CSXT 58868 Effective May 28, 2021, this Amendment is all inclusive of the provisions and changes to the original Contract Summary and any prior Amendments. Additions, deletions and cancellations to this contract Summary can be determined by comparing this Amendment to the prior Amendments, and if none, the original Contract Summary. ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATION 1 Participating CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Carrier(s) Marketing Services-J865 500 Water Street Jacksonville, FL 32202 Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway Co; Decatur & Eastern Railroad Llc; Durbin & Greenbrier Valley Railroad Inc; Evansville Western Railway Inc; Georgia Central Railway L P; Great Lakes Central Railroad; Heart Of Georgia Railroad Inc; Paducah & Louisville Railway; South Branch Valley Rail Road; Tennessee Southern Railroad Co Inc; York Railway Company 2 Commodity Flour Or Other Grain Mill Products,Nec; Prepared Feed,Animal,Fish Or Poultry,; Barley , Feed, Nec; Corn (Not Popcorn) Or Maize (Not Popcorn), Shelled, Dried, Organically Grown Free Of Fertilizer And Or Pesticide Applications; Wheat
    [Show full text]
  • Public Utility and Flight Equipment Ad Valorem Tax Digest 2015
    Georgia Department of Revenue Prepared October 2015 Local Government Services Division Public Utility and Airline Flight Equipment Valuation for 2015 Public Utility Section Changes From Previous Year Type of Company Electric EMC Flight Gas Gas Pipeline Railroads Telephones Total Equipment Municipal Private PY Number of Companies 7 49 32 23 4 9 28 72 224 CY Number of Companies 7 49 31 23 3 9 27 68 217 PY Unit Value 48,950,000,000 12,811,187,809 64,120,130,852 24,553,680 1,602,800,000 10,368,000,000 32,150,986,260 30,148,631,901 200,176,290,501 CY Unit Value 51,850,000,000 13,379,434,393 68,905,426,563 24,855,950 1,652,800,000 10,738,000,000 35,260,086,260 31,066,573,609 212,877,176,776 % Change 5.92% 4.44% 7.46% 1.23% 3.12% 3.57% 9.67% 3.04% 6.34% PY Georgia FMV Operating 14,697,025,514 9,678,333,634 1,648,054,153 25,059,840 1,447,611,744 1,429,453,118 2,325,974,002 4,353,532,609 35,605,044,614 CY Georgia FMV Operating 15,478,375,119 10,008,123,101 1,261,013,097 24,852,641 1,508,383,612 1,447,570,758 2,591,045,933 4,181,996,069 36,501,360,330 % Change 5.32% 3.41% -23.48% -0.83% 4.20% 1.27% 11.40% -3.94% 2.52% PY Georgia FMV Non-OP 1,378,063,438 27,260,749 0 39,304 692,489 7,712,106 45,825,487 4,660,870 1,464,254,443 CY Georgia FMV Non-OP 1,377,784,780 27,789,278 0 39,304 692,489 7,745,763 45,779,699 3,456,906 1,463,288,219 % Change -0.02% 1.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.44% -0.10% -25.83% -0.07% PY Georgia FMV Total 16,075,088,952 9,705,594,383 1,648,054,153 25,060,740 1,448,304,233 1,437,165,224 2,371,799,489 4,358,193,479 37,069,260,653 CY
    [Show full text]