Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2014 The ES C Adds a New Weapon: How Does the New Admission Requirement Change the Landscape? Paul Radvany Fordham University School of Law,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul Radvany, The SEC Adds a New Weapon: How Does the New Admission Requirement Change the Landscape?, 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 665 (2014) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/534 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. THE SEC ADDS A NEW WEAPON: HOW DOES THE NEW ADMISSION REQUIREMENT CHANGE THE LANDSCAPE? Paul Radvany* I. INTRODUCTION Over the past several years, the Securities and Exchange Com- mission (the “SEC”) has settled the vast majority of the cases it has brought.1 By settling cases, the SEC is able to obtain enhanced cooperation from defendants, maximize its resources, and avoid the risks associated with taking a case to trial.2 Defendants benefit from settlement as well, because they can limit litigation risks and “mitigate[e] . any real reputational harm for either the corpora- tions or individuals involved.”3 Before 2013, the SEC had a “long- standing policy” of settling cases without requiring admissions or permitting defendants to deny the allegations brought by the SEC,4 and an “overwhelming majority of courts .