DOCSLIB.ORG

HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study A Snapshot of the Current Living Situation of Original Residents from Eight Sites November 2002 Prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public Housing Investments 451 Seventh St, SW Washington DC, 20410 Prepared by Larry Buron,a Susan Popkin,b Diane Levy,b Laura Harris,b Jill Khadduria With the Assistance of Jennifer Comey,b Satyendra Patrabansh,a Wenjing Song,a William Woodleyb aAbt Associates Inc. bUrban Institute Table of Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... i Chapter 1: Introduction.............................................................................................................1 1.1 The HOPE VI Program ..............................................................................................2 1.2 Study Background .....................................................................................................4 1.3 Research Objectives and Methods .............................................................................5 Chapter 2: Case Studies of Eight HOPE VI Sites ....................................................................11 2.1 Quigg Newton, Denver, Colorado (1994) ..................................................................11 2.2 Archbishop Walsh, Newark, New Jersey (1994) ........................................................17 2.3 John Hay Homes, Springfield, Illinois (1994) .............................................................24 2.4 Hayes Valley, San Francisco, California (1995).........................................................30 2.5 Cotter and Lang Homes, Louisville, Kentucky (1996) .................................................37 2.6 Connie Chambers, Tucson, Arizona (1996)...............................................................44 2.7 Christopher Columbus Homes, Paterson, New Jersey (1997) ....................................50 2.8 Edwin Corning, Albany, New York (1998)..................................................................56 Chapter 3: Housing Assistance and Housing Conditions.......................................................63 3.1 Housing Assistance Status after HOPE VI Award ......................................................63 3.2 Resident Characteristics..........................................................................................69 3.3 Housing Conditions .................................................................................................71 3.4 Conclusion..............................................................................................................76 Chapter 4: Neighborhood Poverty Rate and Resident Perceptions of their Current Neighborhood ...........................................................................................................................78 4.1 Poverty Rate and Race/Ethnic Composition of Current Neighborhood Compared to Original Neighborhood .............................................................................................78 4.2 Crime and Safety ....................................................................................................84 4.3 Collective Efficacy ...................................................................................................88 4.4 Interactions with Neighbors ......................................................................................90 4.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................92 Chapter 5: Employment, Hardship, and Health.......................................................................93 5.1 Employment and Other Sources of Income ...............................................................93 5.2 Material Hardship....................................................................................................98 5.3 Health .................................................................................................................. 104 5.4 Conclusion............................................................................................................ 106 Chapter 6: Summary and Conclusions................................................................................. 107 6.1 Summary of Major Findings ................................................................................... 107 6.2 Implications for Policy............................................................................................ 114 6.3 Future Research ................................................................................................... 115 References.............................................................................................................................. 119 Appendix A: Sample Selection and Data Collection Methodology Appendix B: Resident Survey for HOPE VI Tracking Study Table of Contents Executive Summary The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study represents the first systematic look at what has happened to original residents of distressed public housing developments targeted for revitalization under the HOPE VI program. It provides a snapshot of the living conditions and well-being of former residents of eight properties as of the spring of 2001—between two and seven years after the PHA was awarded a HOPE VI grant. At that time, the redevelopment process was still under way in six of the eight study sites, so the results describe a “work in progress.” Created by Congress in 1992, the HOPE VI Program represents the federal government’s most ambitious effort to date to address the problem of severely distressed public housing. The goals of the program are to improve the living environment for residents of distressed public housing, to revitalize the site and contribute to improvements in the surrounding neighborhood, to decrease (or avoid) the concentration of very low-income households, and to build sustainable communities. To achieve these goals, the program combines physical revitalization with management improvements and supportive services for the public housing residents. As the program has evolved, it has increased its emphasis on providing mixed- income housing, leveraging HOPE VI money to raise other funding, and broadening the focus of revitalization beyond the original public housing site to incorporate neighborhood revitalization goals. Between 1993 and 2001, a total of 165 revitalization grants were funded, representing $4.5 billion in HOPE VI funds for redevelopment and supportive service activities. This study focuses on a single aspect of the HOPE VI experience: What has happened to original residents of eight HOPE VI properties since revitalization got under way and how their living situations have changed. The study includes some residents who have returned to the HOPE VI sites and some who are living in other locations, either as a temporary or permanent relocation. The study findings are based on a survey of 818 residents who lived in one of eight study developments at the time of the HOPE VI award. While the eight study sites were selected to reflect a range of HOPE VI initiatives and relocation strategies, they are not expected to be representative of the program as a whole. Moreover, since each HOPE VI site is unique in some respects, a major focus of this report is on understanding the survey results in the context of the individual sites, their revitalization strategies, and the local housing market. Although this summary focuses on cross-site findings, readers are encouraged to delve into the individual case studies, which provide a rich source of information about the current situation of original HOPE VI residents at each site. Summary of Major Findings The findings of this study fall into three broad domains: the type and quality of housing now occupied by the original HOPE VI residents; their current neighborhood and social Executive Summary for Hope VI Resident Tracking Study i environments; and their employment, material hardship, and health. The living conditions of former HOPE VI residents are of interest because of the program’s goals of improving conditions for public housing residents of severely distressed public housing regardless of where they choose to relocate. Indeed, the results indicate that different housing environments offer relocatees different opportunities and challenges. Housing Type and Household Characteristics At the time of the resident survey in the spring of 2001, two of the eight study sites were completed and fully reoccupied, four of the sites were partially reoccupied, and two sites were in the midst of on-site construction and had not yet begun reocuppying the site. At this point, we do not know how many residents in the eight study sites may ultimately return to the HOPE VI property or what additional changes in their housing situation they may make before the redevelopment programs are completed. This study reflects their housing assistance status and living conditions as of the spring of 2001. · Of the 818 households in our sample, 19 percent now live in a revitalized HOPE VI development, 29 percent live in other public housing properties, 33 percent are renting units using housing vouchers, and 18 percent have left assisted housing altogether. Nationally, a larger share of original residents relocated to other public housing developments (37 percent) or are using a housing voucher (35 percent) than in this study sample, and a smaller share now live
Load more

Recommended publications
  • QUESTION 20 Despair We Next Have to Consider the Vices Opposed to Hope
    QUESTION 20 Despair We next have to consider the vices opposed to hope: first, despair (desperatio) (question 20) and, second, presumption (praesumptio) (question 21). On the first topic there are four questions: (1) Is despair a sin? (2) Can despair exist without unbelief? (3) Is despair the greatest of sins? (4) Does despair arise from listlessness (acedia)? Article 1 Is despair a sin? It seems that despair is not a sin (desperatio not sit peccatum): Objection 1: As is clear from Augustine in De Libero Arbitrio, every sin involves turning toward some changeable good, combined with turning away from the unchangeable good. But despair does not involve turning toward any changeable good. Therefore, it is not a sin. Objection 2: What arises from a good root does not seem to be a sin, since, as Matthew 7:18 says, “A good tree cannot bring produce bad fruits.” But despair seems to proceed from a good root, viz., fear of God, or horror at the magnitude of one’s sins. Therefore, despair is not a sin. Objection 3: If despair were a sin, then, in the case of the damned, their despairing would be a sin. But this is not imputed to them as a sin (non imputatur eis ad culpam); instead, it is imputed to their being damned. Therefore, it is not imputed as a sin to those who are in this life, either (neque viatoribus imputatur ad culpam). And so despair is not a sin. But contrary to this: That through which men are induced to sin seems to be not only a sin, but a principle of sins.
    [Show full text]
  • University Basic Needs Insecurity: a National #Realcollege Survey Report
    APRIL 2019 College and University Basic Needs Insecurity: A National #RealCollege Survey Report AUTHORS: Sara Goldrick-Rab, Christine Baker-Smith, Vanessa Coca, Elizabeth Looker and Tiffani Williams Executive Summary NEARLY 86,000 STUDENTS PARTICIPATED. THE RESULTS The #RealCollege survey is the nation’s largest annual INDICATE: assessment of basic needs security among college students. The survey, created by the Hope Center • 45% of respondents were food for College, Community, and Justice (Hope Center), insecure in the prior 30 days specifically evaluates access to affordable food and housing. This report describes the results of the • 56% of respondents were #RealCollege survey administered in the fall of 2018 at housing insecure in the previous year 123 two- and four-year institutions across the United States. • 17% of respondents were homeless in the previous year Rates of basic needs insecurity are higher for students attending two-year colleges compared to those attending four-year colleges. Rates of basic needs insecurity are higher for marginalized students, including African Americans, students identifying as LGBTQ, and students who are independent from The Hope Center thanks the their parents or guardians for financial aid purposes. Lumina Foundation, the Jewish Students who have served in the military, former foster Foundation for Education of youth, and students who were formerly convicted of a crime are all at greater risk of basic needs insecurity. Women, the City University Working during college is not associated with a lower of New York, the Chicago risk of basic needs insecurity, and neither is receiving City Colleges, the Institute for the federal Pell Grant; the latter is in fact associated with higher rates of basic needs insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Trust Funds: Barriers and Opportunities
    CitizensCitizens ResearResearchch CCouncilouncil ofof MichiganMichigan HousingHousing TrustTrust Funds:Funds: BarriersBarriers andand OppOpporortunitiestunities DecemberDecember 20092009 RepReporortt 358358 CCELEBRELEBRAATINGTING 9393 YYEARSEARS OFOF IINDEPENDENTNDEPENDENT,, NNONPONPARARTISANTISAN PPUBLICUBLIC PPOLICOLICYY RRESEARCHESEARCH ININ MMICHIGANICHIGAN Board of Directors Chairman Vice Chairman Treasurer Eugene A. Gargaro, Jr. Jeffrey D. Bergeron Nick A. Khouri Joseph R. Angileri Eugene A. Gargaro, Jr. Bryan Roosa Deloitte. Masco Corporation General Motors Corporation Jeffrey D. Bergeron Ingrid A. Gregg Lynda Rossi Ernst & Young LLP Earhart Foundation Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan John T. Bozzella Marybeth S. Howe Jerry E. Rush Chrysler Group LLC Wells Fargo Bank ArvinMeritor, Inc. Beth Chappell Nick A. Khouri Michael A. Semanco Detroit Economic Club DTE Energy Company Hennessey Capital LLC Rick DiBartolomeo Daniel T. Lis Terence A. Thomas, Sr. Rehmann Kelly Services, Inc. St. John Health Terence M. Donnelly Aleksandra A. Miziolek Amanda Van Dusen Dickinson Wright PLLC Dykema Gossett PLLC Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Randall W. Eberts Cathy H. Nash Stone PLC W. E. Upjohn Institute Citizens Bank Kent J. Vana David O. Egner Paul R. Obermeyer Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Hudson-Webber Foundation Comerica Bank Howlett LLP Advisory Director Louis Betanzos Board of Trustees Chairman Vice Chairman Patrick J. Ledwidge Mark A. Murray Terence E. Adderley Roderick D. Gillum William L. Matthews Irving Rose Kelly Services, Inc. General Motors Corporation Plante & Moran PLLC Edward Rose & Sons Jeffrey D. Bergeron Allan D. Gilmour Kenneth J. Matzick Gary D. Russi Ernst & Young LLP Alfred R. Glancy III Beaumont Hospitals Oakland University Stephanie W. Bergeron Unico Investment Group LLC Sarah L. McClelland Nancy M. Schlichting Walsh College Thomas J. Haas Chase Henry Ford Health System David P.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Status of Urban Empowerment Zones
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee GAO on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives December 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Status of Urban Empowerment Zones GOA years 1921 - 1996 GAO/RCED-97-21 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-275112 December 20, 1996 The Honorable Christopher Shays Chairman Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Committee on Government Reform and Oversight House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: For over 30 years, the nation has faced the challenge of revitalizing its deteriorating urban and rural communities. In the past, the federal government has tried to revive distressed areas by providing grants for activities ranging from job training and social services to the repair and replacement of aging infrastructure. The most recent effort to help distressed communities is called the Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community (EZ/EC) program. This 10-year program targets federal grants to distressed urban and rural communities for social services and community redevelopment and provides tax and regulatory relief to attract or retain businesses in distressed communities. In general, the same eligibility criteria and selection process apply to the EZs and the ECs. However, the EZs receive much larger grants than the ECs, and businesses located in the EZs are eligible for more tax incentives than businesses in the ECs. The enacting legislation designated 104 communities as either EZs or ECs. Federal funding for the EZs and ECs was made available through the title XX Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) program, which is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
    [Show full text]
  • Joy, Distress, Hope, and Fear in Reinforcement Learning (Extended Abstract)
    Joy, Distress, Hope, and Fear in Reinforcement Learning (Extended Abstract) Elmer Jacobs Joost Broekens Catholijn Jonker Interactive Intelligence, Interactive Intelligence, Interactive Intelligence, TU Delft TU Delft TU Delft Delft, The Netherlands Delft, The Netherlands Delft, The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT orbitofrontal cortex, reward representation, and (subjective) In this paper we present a mapping between joy, distress, affective value (see [14]). hope and fear, and Reinforcement Learning primitives. Joy While most research on computational modeling of emo- / distress is a signal that is derived from the RL update sig- tion is based on cognitive appraisal theory [9], our work is nal, while hope/fear is derived from the utility of the current different in that we aim to show a direct mapping between state. Agent-based simulation experiments replicate psycho- RL primitives and emotions, and assess the validity by repli- logical and behavioral dynamics of emotion including: joy cating psychological findings on emotion dynamics, the lat- and distress reactions that develop prior to hope and fear; ter being an essential difference with [5]. We believe that fear extinction; habituation of joy; and, task randomness before affectively labelling a particular RL-based signal, it that increases the intensity of joy and distress. This work is essential to investigate if that signal behaves according to distinguishes itself by assessing the dynamics of emotion in what is known in psychology and behavioral science. The an adaptive agent framework - coupling it to the literature extent to which a signal replicates emotion-related dynamics on habituation, development, and extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Supportive Services Beyond HOPE VI
    Successful Transitions Sustaining Supportive Services beyond HOPE VI HOPE VI is a unique program that has Overview of HOPE VI Program provided practitioners with a flexible tool In 1989, Congress authorized the for revitalizing distressed communities and establishment of a National Commission on improving the lives of public housing Severely Distressed Public Housing with a residents. A time -limited program, HOPE mandate to 1) identify those public housing VI may ultimately be judged more on how developments that are severely distressed; 2) successfully it helps to improve the lives of assess strategies to improve their conditions; public housing residents and less on its and 3) develop a National Action Plan. ability to construct and rehabilitate houses. Based on the Commission’s findings that As its “sunset” approaches in 2002, the about seven percent of the nation’s housing question of its sustainability looms large. In stock had to be replaced, HOPE VI was both theory and practice, HOPE VI grants created in 1993 through an Appropriations were intended to be seed funds and were Act, and with extensive bipartisan support. meant to act as a catalyst for change. This was a major HUD initiative with no Grantees must not only sustain the new real implementing regulations and with a focus estate portfolio that results from HOPE VI, on comprehensive and holistic approaches to they must also develop strategies for physical improvements, resident self- sustaining the innovative and successful sufficiency, management improvements and supportive services that are critical to local decision making. At the time, funding helping residents move toward greater self- for HOPE VI was roughly equivalent to sufficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Nurturing Hope, Resilience and Happiness Pasiàka Style
    I AM A guide for nurturing hope, resilience and happiness Pasi\ ka style. By Philip Siataga Acknowledgements Fakatu’amelie innovation fund Before anything else is said, sincere thanks are due to Manase Lua and Monique Faleafa and the awesome Le Va team, for inspiration, encouragement and support. Without which the I AM approach would not have developed to this point. I would like to thank my friends and colleagues Wiremu Gray Ngai Tahu, Ngati Porou (Mana Facilitation Ltd) and Paddy Pawson (Adventure Therapy) for invaluable support, insightful commentary and precious time spent sharing your hearts and minds. Special acknowledgement is due to Maui Paraki (Humble Enterprises) and to Andrew Smith (About Life ltd) whose lives are inspirational. To Alan and Alice Va’a, who continue to also serve so many in the true spirit of grace and humility – much respect. To my family, with mountains of love and gratitude, I can not thank you enough. And to, Sophia and Talia, wonderful daughters, thank you for making my journey one of enduring happiness. I am blessed with the joy of a fathers pride. Many thanks are due to Fuimaono Karl Pulotu-Endemann and Dr Francis Agnew, who inspire innovation and integrity from those of us privileged to have journeyed with them. I must also acknowledge the Occasional paper on negotiated space and thank Karlo Mila Schaaf and Maui Hudson for their insightful theorising which has boosted my own desire to plant this work in the va. To the fantastic crew at Waipuna Trust, my warmest thanks for your support and your many kindnesses along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Hope and Anger As Mediators Between Collective Action Frames and Participation in Collective Mobilization: the Case of 15-M
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports Hope and Anger as Mediators Between Collective Action Frames and Participation in Collective Mobilization: The Case of 15-M Anna Wlodarczyk* ab, Nekane Basabe c, Darío Páez b, Larraitz Zumeta b [a] Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile. [b] Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain. [c] Department of Social Psychology and Methodology of Behaviour Sciences, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain. Abstract The study set out to integrate collective action models and emphasize the role of emotions. Whereas the importance of anger is indisputable, relatively little attention has been paid to the role of positive emotions, such as hope, in collective action research. Hence, the aim of the study was to explore the role of hope and anger as drivers of participation and involvement in collective mobilizations. A cross-sectional field study (N = 638) conducted right after the emergence of the 15-M socio-political protest movement in Spain assessed the emotions and beliefs of both demonstrators and those who took no part in the active mobilization. We hypothesized that anger and hope would sequentially mediate the relationship between collective action frames and participation in collective action. Furthermore, to test this premise, we ran two alternative sequential mediation models based on the social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) and the encapsulated model of social identity in collective action (EMSICA), but with emotions as mediators between collective action frames and intensity of participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Hope Vi Terms
    HOPE VI Guidance November 2001 GLOSSARY OF HOPE VI TERMS ACC: Annual Contributions Contract. A contract between HUD and the PHA whereby HUD agrees to provide financial assistance, and the PHA agrees to comply with HUD requirements (including long-term low- income use restrictions) for the development, operation, and modernization of public housing units in a development. Accessibility: HOPE VI developments are subject to the accessibility requirements contained in several Federal laws. All applicable laws must be read together and followed. PIH Notice 99-52, available through HUDCLIPS (see below) provides an overview of all pertinent laws and implementing regulations pertaining to HOPE VI. Under the Fair Housing Act of 1988, all new construction of covered multifamily buildings must include certain features of accessible and adaptable design. Units covered are all those in buildings with four or more units and one or more elevators, and all ground floor units with living area located entirely on the ground floor in buildings without elevators. The accessible design requirements are: 1. Accessible entrance on an accessible route 2. Accessible public and common use areas 3. Accessible doorways 4. Accessible routes into and through the unit 5. Accessible light switches, electrical outlets, and environmental controls 6. Reinforced walls in bathrooms 7. Usable kitchens and bathrooms HUD encourages accessibility in for-sale units (5 percent for mobility impaired and 2 percent for hearing or vision disabilities). Accessibility at 5 percent/2 percent is required in multifamily rental units. More information on accessibility may be obtained from HUD's Fair Housing website: www.hud.gov/groups/fairhousing.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • New Schools on the Block Understanding and Expanding Community Developer Participation in Early Childhood Care and Education
    New Schools on the Block Understanding and Expanding Community Developer Participation in Early Childhood Care and Education Matthew Singh Edward M. Gramlich Fellow, 2012 NeighborWorks America / Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies Working Together for Strong Communities NEIGHBORWORKS AMERICA Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation dba NeighborWorks America was established by an Act of Congress in 1978 (Public Law 95-557). A primary objective of the Corporation is to increase the capacity of local, community-based organizations to revitalize their communities, particularly by expanding and improving housing opportunities. These local organizations, known as NeighborWorks organizations, are independent, resident-led, nonprofit partnerships that include business leaders and government officials. All together they make up the NeighborWorks network. JOINT CENTER FOR HOUSING STUDIES OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies advances understanding of housing issues and informs policy. Through its research, education, and public outreach programs, the center helps leaders in government, business, and the civic sectors make decisions that effectively address the needs of cities and communities. Through graduate and executive courses, as well as fellowships and internship opportunities, the Joint Center also trains and inspires the next generation of housing leaders. This paper was written with the support of the NeighborWorks’ America Edward M. Gramlich Fellowship in Community and Economic Development which provides
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Emotion Classification for Song Lyrics
    Multi-Emotion Classification for Song Lyrics Darren Edmonds João Sedoc Donald Bren School of ICS Stern School of Business University of California, Irvine New York University [email protected] [email protected] Abstract and Shamma, 2010; Bobicev and Sokolova, 2017; Takala et al., 2014). Building such a model is espe- Song lyrics convey a multitude of emotions to the listener and powerfully portray the emo- cially challenging in practice as there often exists tional state of the writer or singer. This considerable disagreement regarding the percep- paper examines a variety of modeling ap- tion and interpretation of the emotions of a song or proaches to the multi-emotion classification ambiguity within the song itself (Kim et al., 2010). problem for songs. We introduce the Edmonds There exist a variety of high-quality text datasets Dance dataset, a novel emotion-annotated for emotion classification, from social media lyrics dataset from the reader’s perspective, datasets such as CBET (Shahraki, 2015) and TEC and annotate the dataset of Mihalcea and Strapparava(2012) at the song level. We (Mohammad, 2012) to large dialog corpora such find that models trained on relatively small as the DailyDialog dataset (Li et al., 2017). How- song datasets achieve marginally better perfor- ever, there remains a lack of comparable emotion- mance than BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) fine- annotated song lyric datasets, and existing lyrical tuned on large social media or dialog datasets. datasets are often annotated for valence-arousal af- fect rather than distinct emotions (Çano and Mori- 1 Introduction sio, 2017). Consequently, we introduce the Ed- Text-based sentiment analysis has become increas- monds Dance Dataset1, a novel lyrical dataset that ingly popular in recent years, in part due to its was crowdsourced through Amazon Mechanical numerous applications in fields such as marketing, Turk.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Stop Lusting? That Lust Had Become a Bigger Problem Than the Problems We Were Trying to Avoid
    Why Stop Lusting? that lust had become a bigger problem than the problems we were trying to avoid. Many of us came to Sexaholics Anonymous (SA) driven to total despair by our The medicine became our poison. Our “solution” became the problem. We were destructive sexual thoughts and behaviors. Within the meeting rooms of SA we out of control. discovered, to our surprise, that lust was the driving force behind our acting out. Sexual Lusting, for us, is like riding a roller coaster. Once started, it is nearly im- Sexaholics lust is an inordinate thought or feeling that drives us to use ourselves, others, or things possible to stop. Therefore, lust must be for self-centered destructive purposes. The stopped where it begins, with the first Anonymous spiritual sickness of lust wants sexual drink. Getting out from under the influ- ence of lust, therefore, would require us to stimulation at that moment instead of what a Higher Power or God of our understanding avoid getting on board in the first place. That meant forsaking the thrill and the is offering us. Later we come to see that lust wants anything other than what is offered us risk-taking. But how could we turn our backs on something that we had allowed each moment. At first it was hard to believe. As we began to accept this fact, we won- to dominate our lives for so many years? How could we succeed now where we had Why dered how we could live without lust. It be- came clear that we had to give it up, yet we failed a thousand times before? doubted that life without lust was possible.
    [Show full text]