DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sweetwater Sea an International Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Huron

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sweetwater Sea an International Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Huron THE SWEETWATER SEA AN INTERNATIONAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR LAKE HURON TECHNICAL REPORT The Nature Conservancy Environment Canada Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan Sea Grant The Nature Conservancy of Canada Prepared by the Lake Huron Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Core Team in cooperation with the Lake Huron Binational Partnership June 2010 Recommended Citation Franks Taylor, Rachael, Amy Derosier, Keely Dinse, Patrick Doran, Dave Ewert, Kim Hall, Matt Herbert, Mary Khoury, Dan Kraus, Audrey Lapenna, Greg Mayne, Doug Pearsall, Jen Read, and Brandon Schroeder. 2010. The Sweetwater Sea: An International Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Huron - Technical Report. A joint publication of The Nature Conservancy, Environment Canada, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan Sea Grant, and The Nature Conservancy of Canada. 264 pp. with Appendices. Acknowledgements Funding for this initiative was provided by the Great Lakes National Program Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environment Canada, the Erb Foundation, the Chrysler Foundation, and the Mott Foundation. Project support was also provided by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources via the Canada Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem. The conservation strategy presented in this report reflects the input of over 200 experts representing over 100 agencies, conservation authorities, universities, and non-governmental organizations (see Appendix B). The project’s Core Team coordinated and documented the strategy’s development, including preparation of this report. Core Team members include: Rachael Franks Taylor, Patrick Doran, Doug Pearsall, Rebecca Hagerman, Matt Herbert, and Mary Khoury (The Nature Conservancy in Michigan); Amy Derosier (Department of Nature Resources); Barb Barton and John Paskus (Michigan Natural Features Inventory); Laura Kucey and Audrey Lapenna (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources); Jen Read, Keely Dinse, Mary Bohling, and Brandon Schroeder (Michigan Sea Grant); Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada); and Greg Mayne (Environment Canada). The project also benefited from the ongoing guidance and support of the project Steering Committee members: Janette Anderson and Greg Mayne (Environment Canada); Jim Bredin and Michelle Selzer (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality); Ted Briggs (Ontario Ministry of the Environment); Pat Carr (Michigan Conservation Districts); Patrick Doran and Rachael Franks Taylor (The Nature Conservancy in Michigan); Bonnie Fox (Conservation Ontario); James Johnson and Abigail Eaton (Michigan Department of Agriculture); Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada); Jason Laronde and Rhonda Gagnon (Anishinabek Nation); Mike McMurtry and Dave Reid (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources); Tammy Newcomb and Amy Derosier (Michigan Department of Natural Resources); Scott Parker (Parks Canada); Jennifer Read (Michigan Sea Grant); Mike Ripley (Chippewa/Ottawa Resource Authority); Peter Roberts (Ontario Ministry of Agriculture); Jamie Schardt (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency); and Brian Tucker (Métis Nation). NOTE: Two Michigan agencies, the Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Environmental Quality, have now merged to form the Department of Natural Resources and Environment; the Steering Committee members’ affiliation at the time of recruitment is included above. Disclaimer This report reflects the best efforts of the preparers to accurately represent the expertise and views expressed by project participants. The Conservation Action Planning process is iterative in nature and the Lake Huron Biodiversity Conservation Strategy should be revisited and updated periodically as conditions and available information change. Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................................................................II LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................... III APPENDICES......................................................................................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................V 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 THE SWEETWATER SEA......................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 WHY THE LAKE HURON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION STRATEGY? ................................................................................2 1.3 STRATEGY VISION AND SCOPE...........................................................................................................................................2 1.4 ADDRESSING REGIONAL HETEROGENEITY .........................................................................................................................3 1.5 ORIENTATION TO THE STRATEGY .......................................................................................................................................3 2. THE CONSERVATION ACTION PLANNING PROCESS.............................................................................................6 2.1 PROJECT COORDINATION ...................................................................................................................................................6 2.2 OVERVIEW OF CAP PROCESS .............................................................................................................................................7 2.2a Defining the Project....................................................................................................................................................7 2.2b Developing Strategies & Measures.............................................................................................................................7 2.3 STAKEHOLDER AND PARTNER ENGAGEMENT.....................................................................................................................9 2.3a Workshops...................................................................................................................................................................9 2.3b Working Groups..........................................................................................................................................................9 2.3c Regional Workshops..................................................................................................................................................10 2.3d Other Input Opportunities.........................................................................................................................................10 3. BIODIVERSITY FEATURES ...........................................................................................................................................11 3.1 IDENTIFICATION OF BIODIVERSITY FEATURES .................................................................................................................11 3.2 SUMMARY OF BIODIVERSITY FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................11 4. VIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY FEATURES....................................................................................14 4.1 METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................................................................................................14 4.2 SUMMARY OF CURRENT VIABILITY OF LAKE HURON ......................................................................................................19 4.3 DETAILED VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS FOR BIODIVERSITY FEATURES OF LAKE HURON.....................................................20 4.3a Open Water Benthic and Pelagic Ecosystem ............................................................................................................21 4.3b Nearshore..................................................................................................................................................................33 4.3c Islands.......................................................................................................................................................................51 4.3d Native Migratory Fish...............................................................................................................................................57 4.3e Coastal Wetlands ......................................................................................................................................................64 4.3f Coastal Terrestrial.....................................................................................................................................................75 4.3g Aerial Migrants.........................................................................................................................................................84
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orchids Orchids Are the Lady’S Slippers, So Named and Lake Huron
    By Tom Shields Photos by Kevin Tipson and Henry Glowka unless otherwise indicated jewels of the Biosphere res The Niagara Escarpment is justly famous as a uNESCo World Biosphere Reserve, one of Canada’s first. In Southern ontario, its tower - ing dolostone cliffs, formed in ancient seas more than 420 million years ago, rise dramatically along a jagged line that stretches 725 kilo - metres from the Niagara River to the tip of Tobermory. From these heights the Escarpment tilts down gently to the west. Rainfall and ground water seep gradually through its porous rocks, creating swamps, fens, bogs, marshes, valleys, caves, and microcli - mates across the meandering band that follows its length. 28 BRuCE TRAIL MAGAzINE SPRING 201 4 erve d n a l c A e c n e r u a L : o t o h P WWW.BRuCETRAIL.oRG BRuCE TRAIL MAGAzINE 29 Nowhere are these features more promi - LADY’S SLIPPERS (CYPRIPEDIUM) nent than in the Bruce Peninsula, Easiest to find and most familiar of our enrobed on either side by Georgian Bay distinguishing orchids orchids are the lady’s slippers, so named and Lake Huron. Here, jewel-like mem - All orchids have a highly modified, due to the fancied resemblance of their bers of one of the Escarpment’s other pouched lip to an old-fashioned slipper lavish petal called the lip. usually it claims to fame grow with an abundance or moccasin. The flowers are often large is held at the bottom of the flower, and diversity thought unequalled else - and showy. Four of the nine species but sometimes at the top.
    [Show full text]
  • St,=. Marys River Physical and Hydraulic Characteristics
    ST. MARYS RIVER PHYSICAL AND HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS 1 Jan A. Derecki GLERL Open File Report June 1984 1GLERL Contribution No. 418. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 1 2.1 The Upper Reach 1 2.2 The Rapids Reach 1 2.3 The Lower Reach 3 3. HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS 7 3.1 River Discharge 7 3.2 ~low Distribution 7 3.3 River Velocities 8 4. ICE EFFECTS 8 5. SUMMARY 9 it FIGURES Page 1. St. Marys River channel. 2 2. St. Marys Falls and the Soo Locks. 4 iii ST. MARYS RIVER PHYSICAL AND HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS Jan A. Derecki 1. INTRODUCTION The St. Marys River forms the outlet of Lake Superior, connecting Whitefish Bay with Lake Huron through De Tour Passage. Lake Superior and the St. Marys River are both highly regulated. The Soo Locks bypass the St. Marys River Rapids and make navigation possible between Lakes Superior and Huron. 2. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS From its nominal head at Point Iroquois, the river flows in a general southeasterly direction through several channels covering a distance of from 101 km to 121 km (63 mi to 75 mi), depending on the route taken, with a total fall of about 6.7 m (22 ft). Approximately 6.1 m (20 ft) of this fall occur in the St. Marys Rapids, which are less than 1.5 km (1 mi) long and form a very short middle reach with distinct hydraulic characteristics. Altogether, there are three different hydraulic reaches in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan
    STRATEGIC PLAN Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula June 2008 Revised July 2015 Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula Page 1 of 11 Strategic Plan Revised July 2015 MUNICIPALITY OF NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA STRATEGIC PLAN Northern Bruce Peninsula is a municipal corporation that commenced operations on January 1, 1999. It encompasses the former Townships of Eastnor, Lindsay and St. Edmunds and the Village of Lion’s Head. Many other hamlets within NBP are Tobermory, Stokes Bay, Pike Bay, Miller Lake, Barrow Bay, Ferndale, Dyers Bay and the Lindsay 20 communities. The Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula is the northerly neighbouring community to South Bruce Peninsula, Highway 6 traverses northerly through NBP. The peninsula itself is surrounded on the east by Georgian Bay and on the west by Lake Huron. We are home to Fathom Five National Marine Park, Bruce Peninsula National Park, the Bruce Trail, Niagara Escarpment, UNESCO World Biosphere, Cabot Head and Lion’s Head Nature Reserves, two First Nations Hunting Reserves and a large Bruce County Forest Tract. NBP covers an area of 781.51 square kilometers boasting a permanent population of 3,900 year round residents and just over 5000 households. The Public Works Department maintains 475 kilometres of roads and streets, some of which are paved, some gravelled. Some roads provide year round access while others enjoy only summer accessibility. In 2004, NBP was proclaimed as a “dark sky community” in the hope of preserving and protecting the night time environment and our heritage of dark skies through the use of quality outdoor lighting and goals established which are intended to stop the adverse effects of light pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • SNOW ISSUE Winter Maintenance on Island Roads
    Crossroads The Quarterly Journal of the County Road Association of Michigan Volume 2 | Issue 1 Fall 2016 SNOW ISSUE How do they do it? Winter maintenance on island roads Page 10 IN THIS ISSUE: g Living memorial doubles as snow fence g Member Profile: Keweenaw County clearing roads in Michigan's snowiest county Waterwind_FP-Crossroads.qxp 7/2/15 10:22 AM Page 1 Duro-Last ®; the most water, wind and worry-resistant roof in the business. Duro-Last’s industry leading warranties are supported by prefabrication of roof panels and membrane accessories in a factory quality controlled environment. This eliminates up to 85% of field welding. Our highly trained technical field team inspects the field welded seams. Once you put a Duro-Last roof on, you can put it out of your mind. Visit duro-last.com or call to find out more. Edge-to-Edge 800-248-0280 & Deck-to-Sky™ “Duro-Last” and the “World’s Best Roof” are registered marks owned by Duro-Last, Inc. WaterWind_E2E_11.19.13_1 The Quarterly Journal of the County Road Association of Michigan IN THIS ISSUE Crossroads Crossroads is the quarterly publication of the County Road Association (CRA) of Michigan. The 83 county members of CRA represent the unified, credible and 4 PRESIDENT’S CORNER effective voice for a safe and efficient local road system in Michigan. The Association, headquartered three blocks north of the State Capitol, is dedicated 6 MEMBER PROFILE to helping members promote and maintain a safe, efficient local road system in rural Keweenaw County implements and urban Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Upper Peninsula Transportation Authority
    Eastern Upper Peninsula Transportation Authority Request for Qualifications for Naval Engineering Services For the Design of a Double-Ended Car Ferry RFQ #1-2019 Section I Qualifications Cover Page Direct Questions To: Pete J. Paramski P.E. , EUPTA Executive Director at [email protected] Questions must be received by 03/01/19 Date Issued: 02/19/19 Qualifications Due: 03/08/19 @ 4:00 PM EST Firm Name: _______________________ Submit the original proposal and three (3) copies to: Pete J. Paramski, Executive Director EUPTA 4001 I-75 Business Spur Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783 SUBMITER READ AND COMPLETE The undersigned certifies that he/she offers to furnish the materials and services in strict accordance with the requirements of this solicitation including the scope of service, and all submission terms, conditions and requirements. Print Name and Title: ___________________________ _______________________________ _____________ Signature Date _________________________ ___________________ Federal Tax ID # 1 Eastern Upper Peninsula Transportation Authority Request for Qualifications for Naval Engineering Services Table of contents Section I • Qualifications Cover Page Section II • Scope Of Service Section III • Submission Content • Submission Conditions • Questions • Evaluation Criteria • Withdrawal Of Offers • Terms And Conditions • Oversight • Indemnification • Assignment Section IV • Attachment A – Federal Clauses Professional A&E Less Than $150,000 2 Section II Scope of Service: The Eastern Upper Peninsula Transportation Authority (hereafter referred to as the “agency” or “EUPTA”) is a two-county public transit system providing rural bus service in Chippewa and Luce Counties in Michigan’s Eastern Upper Peninsula. The agency also provides car ferry/passenger service to Sugar, Neebish, and Drummond Islands in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands
    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT 2D Session HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 103-621
    103D CONGRESS } { REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 103-621 LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS AND THE LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTrAWA INDIANS ACT JULY 25, 1994.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. MILLER of California, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following REPORT together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany S. 13571 [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the Act (S.1357) to reaffirm and clarify the Federal relationships of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians as distinct federally recognized In- dian tribes, and for other purposes, having considered the same, re- port favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the Act do pass. PURPOSE The purpose of S. 1357 is to reaffirm and clarify the Federal rela- tionships of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians as distinct federally recog- nized Indian tribes, and for other purposes. BACKGROUND 1. The Three Fires According to tradition, long before the Europeans came to North America, the Odawa (which was anglicized as Ottawa) and their kin the Ojibwa and Potawatomi migrated from the Northern Atlan- tic coast. The tribes formed an alliance known as the "Three Fires". 79-006 The Ottawa/Odawa settled on the eastern shore of Lake Huron at what are now called the Bruce Peninsula and Manitoulin Island. In 1615, the Ottawa/Odawa formed a fur trading alliance with the French.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Archaeology Within the Traditional Territory of the Saugeen Ojibway Nation
    Conducting Archaeology within the Traditional Territory of the Saugeen Ojibway Nation: Process and Standards for Approval Authorities, Development Proponents and Consultant Archaeologists a Environment Office Saugeen Ojibway Nation RR 5 Wiarton, Ontario N0H 2T0 (519) 534-5507 June 2011 Our people have been driven from their homes, and have been cajoled out of the few sacred spots where the bones of their ancestors and children lie; and where they themselves expected to lie, when released from the trials and troubles of life. Were it possible to reverse the order of things, by placing the whites in the same condition, how long would it be endured? There is not a white man, who deserves the name of man, that would not rather die, than be deprived of his home, and driven from the graves of his relatives. “Oh shame, where is thy blush!” Kahgegagahbowh Ojibway Methodist missionary Saugeen village 1843, 1845 The Life, History, and Travels of Kah-ge-ga-gah-bowh (George Copway), 1847 Cover illustration: Paul Kane Indian Wigwams Owens Sound June/July 1845 [Stark Museum of Art, Orange, Texas] Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Saugeen Ojibway Nation Traditional Territory .......................................................... 2 3.0 Current Archaeological Process and Practice .......................................................... 3 3.1 Ministry of Culture Standards and Guidelines .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Trail Guide to Exploring the Forests of the Niagara Escarpment
    Bruce Trail Guide to Exploring the Forests of the Niagara Escarpment Bruce Trail & Niagara Escarpment Forests Contents Map: Exploring Forests along the Bruce Trail . 3 Walking under the cool shade of a hundred foot high forest canopy Forest Regions . 5 is one of the many delights of the Bruce Trail. In fact, on almost Carolinian Forests . 7 any hike along the Bruce Trail, you will find yourself in a forest. Coniferous, Deciduous & Mixed Forests . 9 Treed Talus & Cliffs . 11 To the observant hiker, the wonderful treed oases of the Niagara Forest Layers . 13 Escarpment are a joy to explore. May this booklet help you become Forest Succession . 15 more familiar with diversity of forest life along the Bruce Trail. Stewarding Escarpment Forests . 17 Common Escarpment Trees . 21 Making the most of your forest hike: DECIDUOUS American Beech (Fagus grandifolia) . 25 • Take this booklet with you for handy reference. Black Walnut (Juglans nigra) . 27 Butternut (Juglans cinerea) . 29 • Slow down and look beyond your boots. There is much to see Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra) . 31 at every level of the forest. Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum) . 33 • Pick up a trail map at brucetrail.org Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides) . 35 White Ash (Fraxinus americana) . 37 • Head out on an organized Bruce Trail hike. White Oak (Quercus alba) . 39 • Seek out a Bruce Trail Heritage Tree (pg. 59-60). White Birch (Betula papyrifera) . 41 DECIDUOUS / CAROLINIAN Sassafras (Sassafras albidum) . 43 Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata) . 45 Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) . 47 CONIFERS Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea) . 49 Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) . 51 Eastern White Cedar (Thuja occidentalis) .
    [Show full text]
  • People of the Three Fires: the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan.[Workbook and Teacher's Guide]
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 321 956 RC 017 685 AUTHOR Clifton, James A.; And Other., TITLE People of the Three Fires: The Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan. Workbook and Teacher's Guide . INSTITUTION Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council, MI. SPONS AGENCY Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; Dyer-Ives Foundation, Grand Rapids, MI.; Michigan Council for the Humanities, East Lansing.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-9617707-0-8 PUB DATE 86 NOTE 225p.; Some photographs may not reproduce ;4011. AVAILABLE FROMMichigan Indian Press, 45 Lexington N. W., Grand Rapids, MI 49504. PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Guides '.For Teachers) (052) -- Guides - Classroom Use- Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MFU1 /PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian Culture; *American Indian History; American Indians; *American Indian Studies; Environmental Influences; Federal Indian Relationship; Political Influences; Secondary Education; *Sociix- Change; Sociocultural Patterns; Socioeconomic Influences IDENTIFIERS Chippewa (Tribe); *Michigan; Ojibway (Tribe); Ottawa (Tribe); Potawatomi (Tribe) ABSTRACT This book accompanied by a student workbook and teacher's guide, was written to help secondary school students to explore the history, culture, and dynamics of Michigan's indigenous peoples, the American Indians. Three chapters on the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway (or Chippewa) peoples follow an introduction on the prehistoric roots of Michigan Indians. Each chapter reflects the integration
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Dredging Proposal
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DETROIT DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS BOX 1027 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48231-1027 April 3, 2014 IN REPLY REFER TO: Planning Office Environmental Analysis Branch PUBLIC NOTICE 1. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Detroit District, proposes to place dredged material from the St. Marys River Federal navigation channel at Moon Island. Moon Island is located alongside the Federal navigation channel in Chippewa County, Michigan, about 22 miles south of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, near the southern end of Neebish Island. Only shoal material tested and found to be suitable for unrestricted placement would be placed at the island. The dredged material would be placed within a stone perimeter that will provide added erosion protection for the island. 2. Potential alternatives for handling dredged material from the Federal channel in the St. Marys River include: 1) No Action, 2) Upland Placement, and 3) Moon Island Placement. The proposed action is Alternative 3, Moon Island Placement. A stone perimeter would be constructed around the island and immediately adjacent shallow water area. To maximize fill capacity while avoiding scrub shrub wetlands on the island, approximately 6.1 acres of emergent vegetation (mainly common reed) would be filled, but 6.1 acres of the newly filled area that is currently open water will be left at a lower elevation to develop into replacement wetlands. 3. This Public Notice and the attached Environmental Assessment (EA)-Dredged Material Placement, Moon Island, Chippewa County, Michigan-are being issued for the purpose of providing information to various Government agencies and the general public and to solicit their comments and views relative to the proposed activity.
    [Show full text]