DOCSLIB.ORG

In a Way, Communism Is an Extreme Form of Socialism. Many Countries Have Dominant Socialist Political Parties but Very Few Are Truly Communist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In a Way, Communism Is an Extreme Form of Socialism. Many Countries Have Dominant Socialist Political Parties but Very Few Are Truly Communist https://www.diffen.com/difference/Communism_vs_Socialism In a way, Communism is an extreme form of Socialism. Many countries have dominant socialist political parties but very few are truly communist. In fact, most countries - including staunch capitalist bastions like the U.S. and U.K. - have government programs that borrow from socialist principles. Socialism is sometimes used interchangeably with communism but the two philosophies have some stark differences. Most notably, while communism is a political system, socialism is primarily an economic system that can exist in various forms under a wide range of political systems. In this comparison we look at the differences between socialism and communism in detail. Comparison chart Communism Socialism Philosophy From each according to his ability, to From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. Free- each according to his contribution. access to the articles of consumption is Emphasis on profit being distributed made possible by advances in among the society or workforce to technology that allow for super- complement individual wages/salaries. abundance. Key Elements Centralized government, planned Calculation in kind, Collective economy, dictatorship of the ownership, Cooperative common "proletariat", common ownership of ownership, Economic democracy the tools of production, no private Economic planning, Equal opportunity, property. equality between genders Free association, Industrial democracy, and all people, international focus. Input–output model, Internationalism, Usually anti-democratic with a 1-party Labour voucher, Material balancing. system. Political A communist society is stateless, Can coexist with different political System classless and governed directly by the systems. Most socialists advocate people. This, however, has never been participatory democracy, some (Social achieved. In practice, they have been Democrats) advocate parliamentary totalitarian in nature, with a central democracy, and Marxist-Leninists party governing society. advocate "Democratic centralism." Ideas All people are the same and therefore All individuals should have access to classes make no sense. The basic articles of consumption and public government should own all means of goods to allow for self-actualization. production and land and also Large-scale industries are collective everything else. People should work efforts and thus the returns from these Communism Socialism for the government and the collective industries must benefit society as a output should be redistributed equally. whole. Private Abolished. The concept of property is Two kinds of property: Personal Property negated and replaced with the concept property, such as houses, clothing, etc. of commons and ownership with owned by the individual. Public property "usership". includes factories, and means of production owned by the State but with worker control. Key Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Peter Charles Hall, François-Noël Babeuf, Proponents Kropotkin, Rosa Luxemburg, Henri de Saint-Simon, Robert Owen, Vladimir Lenin, Emma Goldman, Charles Fourier, Louis Auguste Blanqui, Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin, Ho Chi William Thompson, Thomas Hodgskin, Minh, Mao Zedong, Josip Broz Tito, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Louis Blanc, Enver Hoxha, Che Guevara, Fidel Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Friedrich Castro. Engels, Mikhail Bukinin. Social All class distinctions are eliminated. A Class distinctions are diminished. Status Structure society in which everyone is both the derived more from political distinctions owners of the means of production and than class distinctions. Some mobility. their own employees. Religion Abolished - all religious and Freedom of religion, but usually metaphysics is rejected. Engels and promotes secularism. Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Economic Economic planning coordinates all Planned-socialism relies principally on Coordination decisions regarding investment, planning to determine investment and production and resource allocation. production decisions. Planning may be Planning is done in terms of physical centralized or decentralized. Market- units instead of money. socialism relies on markets for allocating capital to different socially- owned enterprises. Free Choice Either the collective "vote" or the Religion, jobs, & marriage are up to the state's rulers make economic and individual. Compulsory education. Free, political decisions for everyone else. equal access to healthcare & education In practice, rallies, force, propaganda provided through a socialized system etc. are used by the rulers to control funded by taxation. Production decisions the populace. driven more by State decision than consumer demand. Definition International theory or system of A theory or system of social Communism Socialism social organization based on the organization based on the holding of holding of all property in common, most property in common, with actual with actual ownership ascribed to the ownership ascribed to the workers. community or state. Rejection of free markets and extreme distrust of Capitalism in any form. Ownership The means of production are The means of production are socially- Structure commonly-owned, meaning no entity owned with the surplus value produced or individual owns productive accruing to either all of society (in property. Importance is ascribed to Public-ownership models) or to all the "usership" over "ownership". employee-members of the enterprise (in Cooperative-ownership models). Discrimination In theory, all members of the state are The people are considered equal; laws considered equal to one another. are made when necessary to protect people from discrimination. Immigration is often tightly controlled. Way of Government in a Communist-state is Workers in a socialist state are the Change the agent of change rather than any nominal agent of change rather than any market or desire on the part of market or desire on the part of consumers. Change by government consumers. Change by the State on can be swift or slow, depending on behalf of workers can be swift or slow, change in ideology or even whim. depending on change in ideology or even whim. Political Marxist Communism, Leninism and Democratic socialism, communism, Movements Marxism–Leninism, Stalinism, libertarian socialism, social anarchism, Trotskyism, Maoism, Dengism, and syndicalism. Prachanda Path, Hoxhaism, Titoism, Eurocommunism, Luxemburgism, Council communism, Left- Communism. Economic The means of production are held in The means of production are owned by System common, negating the concept of public enterprises or cooperatives, and ownership in capital goods. individuals are compensated based on Production is organized to provide for the principle of individual contribution. human needs directly without any use Production may variously be for money. Communism is predicated coordinated through either economic upon a condition of material planning or markets. abundance. Variations Left Anarchism, Council Market socialism, communism, state Communism, European Communism, socialism, social anarchism. Juche Communism, Marxism, National Communism, Pre-Marxist Communism Socialism Communism, Primitive Communism, Religious Communism, International Communism. Examples Ideally, there is no leader; the people Union of Soviet Socialist Republics govern directly. This has never been (USSR): although the actual actually practiced, and has just used a categorization of the USSR's economic one-party system. Examples 0f system is in dispute, it is often Communist states are the erstwhile considered to be a form of centrally- Soviet Union, Cuba and North Korea. planned socialism. Means of Theoretically there is no state control. Usage of a government. control Earliest Theorized by Karl Marx and Frederick In 1516, Thomas More write in "Utopia" Remnants Engels in the mid-19th century as an about a society based around common alternative to capitalism and ownership of property. In 1776, Adam feudalism, communism was not tried Smith advocated the labor theory of out until after the revolution in Russia value, ignoring the previous Cantillonian in the early 1910s. view that prices are derived from supply and demand. Modern Recent far-left dictatorships include Modern examples of socialist countries Examples the USSR (1922-1991) and its sphere include China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam. throughout eastern Europe. Only five Countries like India, North Korea and nations presently have Communist Sri Lanka also refer to themselves as governments: China, North Korea, socialist in their constitution. Cuba, Laos and Russia. History Major Communist parties include the Historic socialist examples include the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Paris Commune, the Strandha (1912-91), the Communist Party of Commune, Hungary, Romania and China (1921-ON), the Workers' Party Bulgaria; none continue to have of Korea (1949-ON), and the Communist governments. Communist Party of Cuba (1965-ON). View of war Communists believe that war is good Opinions range from prowar (Charles for the economy by spurring Edward Russell, Allan L. Benson) to production, but should be avoided. antiwar (Eugene V. Debs, Norman Thomas). Socialists tend to agree with Keynesians that war is good for the economy by spurring production. View of the Communism is an international Socialism is a movement of both the world movement; Communists
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anarchism in Four Parts (Video Series Transcript)
    Anarchism In Four Parts (Video Series Transcript) Libertarian Socialist Rants 2013 Contents The Case Against Hierarchy ................................ 3 Capitalism ....................................... 3 The State ........................................ 4 White Supremacy, Cisheteropatriarchy, and Ableism ................ 5 Concluding Thoughts ................................. 7 The Case For Liberty ..................................... 7 Socialism ........................................ 8 Statelessness ...................................... 9 Intersectional feminism, disability accommodation, liberation of oppressed racial groups ..................................... 10 Concluding Thoughts ................................. 11 The Case for Revolution ................................... 11 Prefiguration and Anarchist Organisations ..................... 12 Direct Action and the Culture of Resistance ..................... 13 Social Revolution ................................... 14 Internationalism .................................... 15 Concluding Thoughts ................................. 16 Arguments Against Anarchism ............................... 16 2 This is the transcript of a four-part video series by the YouTube user Libertarian Socialist Rants, which gives an introduction to the basic tenets of anarchism. These videos are updated versions of an old series which he did in 2013. The Case Against Hierarchy: www.youtube.com The Case For Liberty: www.youtube.com The Case For Revolution: www.youtube.com Arguments Against Anarchism:
    [Show full text]
  • Cockshott, W.P. and Cottrell, A. Towards a New Socialism., Nottingham: Spokesman (1993)
    Cockshott, W.P. and Cottrell, A. Towards a new socialism., Nottingham: Spokesman (1993) http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/4478/ 4th July 2008 Glasgow ePrints Service https://eprints.gla.ac.uk T O W A R D S A N E W S O C I A L I S M W. P A U L C O C K S H O T T A N D A L L I N C O T T R E L L ii About this book Towards a New Socialism was first published in 1993 by Spokesman, Bertrand Russell House, Gamble Street, Nottingham, England, and printed by the Russell Press, Nottingham. The text is copyright W. Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Paul Cockshott (wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk) currently works at the Turing Insti- tute of the University of Glasgow, and Allin Cottrell (cottrell@wfu.edu) in the Department of Economics at Wake Forest University, North Carolina. The authors wish to thank Maria Black, Ron Buchanan and Greg Michaelson for useful discussions of the ideas in this book. Allin Cottrell also wishes to acknowledge assistance in the form of research grants from Elon College, North Carolina, and the Kerr Bequest at the University of Edinburgh. Preface to the Swedish edition It is now ten years since most of Towards a New Socialism was written. The developments of the last decade|less dramatic than its predecessor|do not make us wish to revise the book's main thesis. We still believe that, the Soviet experience notwithstanding, an efficient, democratic socialism is both techni- cally feasible and desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism in Four Parts (Video Series Transcript)
    The Anarchist Library (Mirror) Anti-Copyright Anarchism In Four Parts (Video Series Transcript) Libertarian Socialist Rants Libertarian Socialist Rants Anarchism In Four Parts (Video Series Transcript) 2013 usa.anarchistlibraries.net 2013 Contents The Case Against Hierarchy ................ 5 Capitalism ....................... 6 The State ........................ 8 White Supremacy, Cisheteropatriarchy, and Ableism 9 Concluding Thoughts . 12 The Case For Liberty ..................... 13 Socialism ........................ 14 Statelessness ...................... 16 Intersectional feminism, disability accommo- dation, liberation of oppressed racial groups ..................... 18 Concluding Thoughts . 20 The Case for Revolution ................... 21 Prefiguration and Anarchist Organisations . 21 Direct Action and the Culture of Resistance . 23 Social Revolution ................... 26 Internationalism .................... 28 Concluding Thoughts . 28 Arguments Against Anarchism . 29 3 “The materialistic, realistic, and collectivist concep- tion of freedom, as opposed to the idealistic, is this: Man becomes conscious of himself and his humanity only in society and only by the collective action of the whole society. He frees himself from the yoke of external nature only by collective and social labor, which alone can transform the earth into an abode favorable to the development of humanity. Without such material emancipation the intellectual and moral emancipation of the individual is impossible.” We can of course disregard Bakunin’s typical
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a New Socialism
    TOWARDS ANEW SOCIALISM W.PAULCOCKSHOTT AND ALLINCOTTRELL ii About this book Towards a New Socialism was first published in 1993 by Spokesman, Bertrand Russell House, Gamble Street, Nottingham, England, and printed by the Russell Press, Nottingham. The text is copyright W. Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell. Paul Cockshott (wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk) currently works at the Turing Insti- tute of the University of Glasgow, and Allin Cottrell (cottrell@wfu.edu) in the Department of Economics at Wake Forest University, North Carolina. The authors wish to thank Maria Black, Ron Buchanan and Greg Michaelson for useful discussions of the ideas in this book. Allin Cottrell also wishes to acknowledge assistance in the form of research grants from Elon College, North Carolina, and the Kerr Bequest at the University of Edinburgh. Preface to the Swedish edition It is now ten years since most of Towards a New Socialism was written. The developments of the last decade|less dramatic than its predecessor|do not make us wish to revise the book's main thesis. We still believe that, the Soviet experience notwithstanding, an efficient, democratic socialism is both techni- cally feasible and desirable. We stand by our attempts to sketch in some detail what such a socialism might look like, while recognizing that they are but a contribution to discussion. In some ways, developments of the 1990s have brought our ideas closer to reality. We talk of planning the economy using a network of computers. When we first floated this idea the Internet was in its infancy; now it is a major fact of life and the technology needed to permit large scale sharing of information in real time is a commonplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx's Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism
    Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism Historical Materialism Book Series Editorial Board Sébastien Budgen, Paris – Steve Edwards, London Marcel van der Linden, Amsterdam – Peter Thomas, London VOLUME 36 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.nl/hm Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism By Peter Hudis LEIDEN •âbosN 2012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hudis, Peter. Marx’s concept of the alternative to capitalism / by Peter Hudis. â p. cm. — (Historical materialism book series ; 36) âncludes bibliographical references and index. âSBN 978-90-04-22197-0 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-22986-0 (ebook) 1. Capitalism. 2. Marxian economics. 3. Marx, Karl, 1818–1883. I. Title. HB501.H7835 2012 335.4’12—dc23 2012008823 ISSN 1570-1522 ISBN 978 90 04 22197 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 90 04 22986 0 (e-book) Copyright 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D8.2 Country Report Greece
    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649395. NEGOTIATE – Negotiating early job-insecurity and labour market exclusion in Europe Horizon 2020, Societal Challenge 6, H2020-YOUNG-SOCIETY-2014, YOUNG-1-2014, Research and Innovation Action (RIA) Duration: 01 March 2015 – 28 February 2018 Strategies to improve labour market integration of young people: Comparing policy coordination in nine European countries Country report Greece Deliverable type Report Dissemination level Public Month and date of Delivery Month 25, March 2017 WP8 - Policy coordination in a system of Associated Work Package (WP) multi-level governance Lead beneficiary for WP8 Universitaet Bremen (UB); Germany Irene Dingeldey, UB, WP Leader dingeldey@uni-bremen.de Korina Kominou, UPSPS korinakominou@yahoo.gr Authors Dimitris Parsanoglou, UPSPS parsanoglou@panteion.gr Project URL www.negotiate-research.eu 1 Table of Contents 1 Political discourse and process regarding Youth Guarantee in Greece ........................................ 3 2 Assessment of the implementation of the Youth Guarantee ...................................................... 10 3 Analysis of measures implemented within the framework of Youth Guarantee ........................ 19 3.1 Programme for the acquisition of work experience and insertion in the labour market for young 18-24 years of age ......................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Voucher
    [Show full text]
  • Parabe *F Reforms
    parabe f reforms * COOL - AID VERSES COOL PROFITS FAILINGS OF LABOR GOVERNMENT WHAT PRICE POLLUTION ??? STUPIDUS AND SAPIENS (1911) ™AT OLD MAGIC FROM POLAND A . * VERSES HOSPITALS *UlI°N ERODES PROFITS RESOLUTIONS FULCRUM JOURNAL of the VICTORIA LOCAL SOCIALIST PARTY of CANADA P.O. Box 237, VICTORIA, B.C. Fa hl lshed five times yearly I READERS iwtrep TO EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS Mfi OPINION^ SOAPBOX. FULCRUM tain social conditions labour produces not only products but also value, and Part of your reply to a letter from Jeff this value is measured by labour, it can Bernard of Scarborough, Ont. (FULCRUM as little have a particular value as Nov.-Deo./70) interested me. And that weight as such can have a special weight part is tne use of tae word value. or heat a special temperature. But it is the characteristic peculiarity of all Mr. Bernard, in his second paragraph social confusion that ruminates on ’’true says that under capitalism "the worker value’’ to imagine that in existing soc­ never receives sufficient wages to buy iety the worker does not receive the back the full product of his labour" and full ’’value” of his labour, and that in tne last that under Socialism "each socialism is destined to remedy this; worker gets tne full social value of his hence it is necessary in the first place labor”. I tnink, from tnese two state­ to discover what is the value of labour, ments we can assume that his "full soc­ and this is done by attempting to meas­ ial value of his labor" is identical to ure labour, not by its adequate measure his "full product of his labour".
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Party Programme
    SOCIETY HAS MOVED ON AND SO MUST OUR PROGRAMME. In this critique, all my comments are in red. This critique of the Socialist Party’s programme for socialism should not be compared to Marx’s Critique of the Gotha Programme. Marx had criticised and polemicized against Proudhon for decades. My criticism of the Socialist Party is new and its tone reflects this. If anything, their programme owes a lot of fidelity to previous writings from Marx to Lenin to Trotsky. The problem is that today’s capitalism is culturally, technically and politically distinct from the capitalist societies that populated the world 100 years ago. Programmes are like road maps. If in the space of a hundred years rural areas have been built upon, and new roads constructed to replace older byways, then a map drawn up a hundred years ago is bound to lead one astray. And so it is today. Our socialist programme must deal with the world as it is, especially following the collapse of the USSR, if it is to convince society there is a living alternative to contemporary capitalism. This critique should be read in conjunction with three documents found on this website. The first is the pamphlet titled Planning The Future. (http://theplanningmotive.com/2017/04/17/planning-the- future-3rd-edition/) This analyses what went wrong in the USSR and elaborates on Marx’s Critique of the Gotha Programme. The second document is the programme itself, titled Draft 21st Century Socialist Programme (http://theplanningmotive.com/2016/09/05/draft-21st-century- programme/). Finally, how to treat the Labour Party’s new Manifesto as a transitional programme can be found on http://theplanningmotive.com/2017/06/26/the-flaw-in-the-…-party-manifesto/ My criticisms and additions are inserted in the body of the programme which was originally written in 2004 but which is hosted as current on the Socialist Party’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism, Socialism: Any Difference?
    COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM: ANY DIFFERENCE? In this book, we, like Marx and Engels, have used the names “communism” and “socialism” to mean the same relation of production. Marx and Engels had used the two names alternately to signify the post-revolutionary democratic world system of “cooperative”, “communal”, or universal ownership. Why they preferred communist identity at the beginning of their studies and organization whilst socialist at the end remains well stated in Engels’s Preface to the English edition of 1888 as well as his Preface to the German edition of 1890 of the Communist Manifesto : “Nevertheless, when it appeared, we could not have called it a socialist manifesto. In 1847, two kinds of people were considered socialists. On the one hand were the adherents of the various utopian systems, notably the Owenites in England and the Fourierists in France, both of whom, at that date, had already dwindled to mere sects gradually dying out. On the other, the manifold types of social quacks who wanted to eliminate social abuses through their various universal panaceas and all kinds of patch-work, without hurting capital and profit in the least. In both cases, people who stood outside the labour movement and who looked for support rather to the “educated” classes. The section of the working class, however, which demanded a radical reconstruction of society, convinced that mere political revolutions were not enough, then called itself Communist . It was still a rough-hewn, only instinctive and frequently somewhat crude communism. Yet, it was powerful enough to bring into being two systems of utopian communism — in France, the “Icarian” communists of Cabet, and in Germany that of Weitling.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin Is Not What Socialism Needs
    Bitcoin is not what socialism needs. – Paul Cockshott's Blog file:///E:/blog/archive/Bitcoin is not what socialism needs. – Paul Cocksho... Paul Cockshott's Blog Comments on economics and politics POLITICAL ECONOMY, SOCIALISM Bitcoin is not what socialism needs. Date: November 23, 2017Author: Paul Cocksho 6 Comments Jan Philipp Dapprich, Paul Cockshot In a recent paper Huckle and White (2016) argue that, while Bitcoin is often associated with right-wing libertarian political philosophy, the underlying technology – Blockchain – has properties that also make it applicable in a socialist economic framework. They cite Marx’ concept of labour credits and argue that credits created by Blockchain may take on the role of representing labour time. In the Critique of the Gotha Programme (Marx 1999), Marx discusses the idea of a communist society awarding labour credits to workers in correspondence with the labour time contributed by them. One hour of labour would yield a labour voucher representing one hour of work, minus taxes. Taxes are to be used for public expenditure, such as investment, education or the consumption needs of those unable to work. A one hour labour voucher can in turn be used to buy a consumption good that takes one hour to produce. Huckle and White’s suggestion is that Bitcoins, created by blockchain cryptography could be used as digital labour vouchers. The price of consumption goods in Bitcoins, would be determined by their energy content, i.e. how much energy is needed to produce them: “According to life-cycle analysis conducted by Aguirre et al. [92], an electric vehicle (EV) uses, over its lifetime (manufacturing, transportation, use, and disposal), 506,988 MJ, or 140.83 MWh [92].
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Undertaking
    Copyright Undertaking This thesis is protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. By reading and using the thesis, the reader understands and agrees to the following terms: 1. The reader will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the thesis. 2. The reader will use the thesis for the purpose of research or private study only and not for distribution or further reproduction or any other purpose. 3. The reader agrees to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage. IMPORTANT If you have reasons to believe that any materials in this thesis are deemed not suitable to be distributed in this form, or a copyright owner having difficulty with the material being included in our database, please contact lbsys@polyu.edu.hk providing details. The Library will look into your claim and consider taking remedial action upon receipt of the written requests. Pao Yue-kong Library, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong http://www.lib.polyu.edu.hk Rural Participation for Equal Allocation and Economic Efficiency: Case Study of a Chinese Village in Guangdong, 1978-2011 Huaqi Wang Ph.D THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY 2014 Rural Participation for Equal Allocation and Economic Efficiency i The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Department of Applied Social Sciences Rural Participation for Equal Allocation and Economic Efficiency: Case Study of a Chinese Village in Guangdong, 1978-2011 Huaqi Wang A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June, 2013 Rural Participation for Equal Allocation and Economic Efficiency ii CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it reproduces no material previously published or written, nor material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Case for Liberty My Political Beliefs, Part Two
    The Anarchist Library Anti-Copyright The Case For Liberty My Political Beliefs, Part Two Libertarian Socialist Rants Libertarian Socialist Rants The Case For Liberty My Political Beliefs, Part Two https://anarchovideocollective.blogspot.com/2013/10/ the-case-for-liberty_12.html Libertarian Socialist Rants: https://www.youtube.com/electricunicyclecrew & video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQPJhIXEfjA theanarchistlibrary.org and distribution according to one’s contribution. But in all honesty, I’d take any of these. I’d be ecstatic if I got the chance to escape the terrible system we’re living in. I’d like to live in a world where peo- ple behave as human beings and not as cogs in the machine. I’d like to live in a world where rather than the economic system condition- Contents ing human behaviour; human behaviour conditions the economic system. I’d like to live in a world based on liberty, equality and sol- idarity - and by that I mean a world that is actually based on those Democracy Under Libertarian Socialism .......... 5 principles, and not simply a world in which these principles are Education Under Libertarian Socialism .......... 8 turned into tools for political and economic gain by bureaucrats The Workplace Under Libertarian Socialism . 11 and tyrants. If we apply this structure to all facets of life, we can create a soci- ety that is so much more humane, ethical, advanced, equitable, free and beautiful than the misery and bloodshed we have found our- selves settling for in this day and age. This isn’t something thatwe can vote for.
    [Show full text]