Interior of the Earth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interior of the Earth CHAPTER INTERIOR OF THE EARTH hat do you imagine about the nature SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE INTERIOR of the earth? Do you imagine it to be The earth’s radius is 6,370 km. No one can Wa solid ball like cricket ball or a reach the centre of the earth and make hollow ball with a thick cover of rocks i.e. observations or collect samples of the material. lithosphere? Have you ever seen photographs Under such conditions, you may wonder how or images of a volcanic eruption on the scientists tell us about the earth’s interior and television screen? Can you recollect the the type of materials that exist at such depths. emergence of hot molten lava, dust, smoke, fire Most of our knowledge about the interior of and magma flowing out of the volcanic crater? the earth is largely based on estimates and The interior of the earth can be understood only inferences. Yet, a part of the information is obtained through direct observations and by indirect evidences as neither any one has nor analysis of materials. any one can reach the interior of the earth. The configuration of the surface of the earth Direct Sources is largely a product of the processes operating The most easily available solid earth material in the interior of the earth. Exogenic as well as is surface rock or the rocks we get from mining endogenic processes are constantly shaping areas. Gold mines in South Africa are as deep the landscape. A proper understanding of the as 3 - 4 km. Going beyond this depth is not physiographic character of a region remains possible as it is very hot at this depth. Besides mining, scientists have taken up a number of incomplete if the effects of endogenic processes projects to penetrate deeper depths to explore are ignored. Human life is largely influenced the conditions in the crustal portions. Scientists by the physiography of the region. Therefore, world over are working on two major projects it is necessary that one gets acquainted with such as “Deep Ocean Drilling Project” and the forces that influence landscape “Integrated Ocean Drilling Project”. The development. To understand why the earth deepest drill at Kola, in Arctic Ocean, has so shakes or how a tsunami wave is generated, it far reached a depth of 12 km. This and many is necessary that we know certain details of the deep drilling projects have provided large interior of the earth. In the previous chapter, volume of information through the analysis of you have noted that the earth-forming materials collected at different depths. materials have been distributed in the form of Volcanic eruption forms another source of obtaining direct information. As and when the layers from the crust to the core. It is interesting molten material (magma) is thrown onto the to know how scientists have gathered surface of the earth, during volcanic eruption information about these layers and what are it becomes available for laboratory analysis. the characteristics of each of these layers. This However, it is difficult to ascertain the depth of is exactly what this chapter deals with. the source of such magma. 2021-22 22 FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY Indirect Sources information about the interior of the earth. Hence, we shall discuss it in some detail. Analysis of properties of matter indirectly provides information about the interior. We Earthquake know through the mining activity that temperature and pressure increase with the The study of seismic waves provides a complete increasing distance from the surface towards picture of the layered interior. An earthquake the interior in deeper depths. Moreover, it is in simple words is shaking of the earth. It is a also known that the density of the material also natural event. It is caused due to release of increases with depth. It is possible to find the energy, which generates waves that travel in rate of change of these characteristics. Knowing all directions. the total thickness of the earth, scientists have estimated the values of temperature, pressure Why does the earth shake? and the density of materials at different depths. The release of energy occurs along a fault. A The details of these characteristics with fault is a sharp break in the crustal rocks. reference to each layer of the interior are Rocks along a fault tend to move in opposite discussed later in this chapter. directions. As the overlying rock strata press Another source of information are the them, the friction locks them together. However, meteors that at times reach the earth. However, their tendency to move apart at some point of it may be noted that the material that becomes time overcomes the friction. As a result, the available for analysis from meteors, is not from blocks get deformed and eventually, they slide the interior of the earth. The material and the past one another abruptly. This causes a structure observed in the meteors are similar release of energy, and the energy waves travel to that of the earth. They are solid bodies in all directions. The point where the energy is developed out of materials same as, or similar released is called the focus of an earthquake, to, our planet. Hence, this becomes yet another alternatively, it is called the hypocentre. The source of information about the interior of the energy waves travelling in different directions earth. reach the surface. The point on the surface, The other indirect sources include nearest to the focus, is called epicentre. It is gravitation, magnetic field, and seismic activity. the first one to experience the waves. It is a point The gravitation force (g) is not the same at directly above the focus. different latitudes on the surface. It is greater near the poles and less at the equator. This is Earthquake Waves because of the distance from the centre at the equator being greater than that at the poles. All natural earthquakes take place in the The gravity values also differ according to the lithosphere. You will learn about different mass of material. The uneven distribution of layers of the earth later in this chapter. It is mass of material within the earth influences sufficient to note here that the lithosphere refers this value. The reading of the gravity at different to the portion of depth up to 200 km from the places is influenced by many other factors. surface of the earth. An instrument called These readings differ from the expected values. ‘seismograph’ records the waves reaching the Such a difference is called gravity anomaly. surface. A curve of earthquake waves recorded Gravity anomalies give us information about on the seismograph is given in Figure 3.1. Note the distribution of mass of the material in the that the curve shows three distinct sections crust of the earth. Magnetic surveys also each representing different types of wave provide information about the distribution of patterns. Earthquake waves are basically of two magnetic materials in the crustal portion, and types — body waves and surface waves. Body thus, provide information about the waves are generated due to the release of energy distribution of materials in this part. Seismic at the focus and move in all directions travelling activity is one of the most important sources of through the body of the earth. Hence, the name 2021-22 INTERIOR OF THE EARTH 23 body waves. The body waves interact with the propagation. As a result, it creates density surface rocks and generate new set of waves differences in the material leading to stretching called surface waves. These waves move along and squeezing of the material. Other three the surface. The velocity of waves changes as waves vibrate perpendicular to the direction of they travel through materials with different propagation. The direction of vibrations of densities. The denser the material, the higher S-waves is perpendicular to the wave direction is the velocity. Their direction also changes as in the vertical plane. Hence, they create troughs they reflect or refract when coming across and crests in the material through which they materials with different densities. pass. Surface waves are considered to be the most damaging waves. Emergence of Shadow Zone Earthquake waves get recorded in seismo- graphs located at far off locations. However, there exist some specific areas where the waves are not reported. Such a zone is called the ‘shadow zone’. The study of different events reveals that for each earthquake, there exists Figure 3.1 : Earthquake Waves an altogether different shadow zone. Figure 3.2 There are two types of body waves. They (a) and (b) show the shadow zones of P and are called P and S-waves. P-waves move faster S-waves. It was observed that seismographs and are the first to arrive at the surface. These located at any distance within 105° from the are also called ‘primary waves’. The P-waves epicentre, recorded the arrival of both P and are similar to sound waves. They travel S-waves. However, the seismographs located through gaseous, liquid and solid materials. beyond 145° from epicentre, record the arrival S-waves arrive at the surface with some time of P-waves, but not that of S-waves. Thus, a lag. These are called secondary waves. An zone between 105° and 145° from epicentre was important fact about S-waves is that they can identified as the shadow zone for both the types travel only through solid materials. This of waves. The entire zone beyond 105° does not characteristic of the S-waves is quite receive S-waves. The shadow zone of S-wave is important.
Recommended publications
  • COV4 Meeting Schedule Monday, 23 January, 2006
    COV4 Meeting Schedule Monday, 23 January, 2006 Sala 1 (large)† 8H15 Welcoming Statements 8H30 Invited Speaker M. Hall: LIVING WITH VOLCANOES 9H00 - 9H30 Invited Speaker A. Lavell: SOCIETY AND RISK: RISK MANAGEMENT AND VOLCANIC HAZARDS 9H30 - 10H00 Plenary Symposium IV-B: Monitoring Volcanoes J. EWERT: ASSESSING VOLCANIC THREAT AND PRIORITIZING VOLCANO MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES 10H00 - Plenary Symposium II: Ash Falls and Aerosols 10H30 W. Rose: ASH-FALL AND AEROSOLS, AN OVERVIEW 10H30 - 11H00 Coffee Break Sala 1 (large) Sala 2 (medium) IV-B: Monitoring Volcanoes II: Ash Falls and Aerosols Chairs: J. Ewert, A. García, H. Kumagai & J. Chairs: J.-L. Le Pennec, C. Connor, T. Johnson Casadevall, D. Johnston & D. Schneider 11H00 - S. Carn: MONITORING GLOBAL VOLCANIC A. Neri: ASSESSING ASH FALL HAZARD 11H20 DEGASSING WITH OMI FROM WEAK EXPLOSIVE PLUMES 11H20 - C. Oppenheimer: NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN C. Bonadonna: PROBABILISTIC MODELLING 11H40 VOLCANIC GAS SURVEILLANCE OF TEPHRA DISPERSON 11H40 - B. Galle: DEVELOPMENT OF OPTICAL B. Houghton: PROXIMAL TEPHRA HAZARDS: 12H00 REMOTE SENSING INSTRUMENTS FOR RECENT ERUPTION STUDIES APPLIED TO VOLCANOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS VOLCANIC RISK IN THE AUCKLAND VOLCANIC FIELD, NEW ZEALAND 12H00-12H20 F. Donnadieu: ERUPTION DYNAMICS OF P. Baxter: GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF ARENAL VOLCANO, COSTA RICA: INSIGHTS VOLCANIC ASH FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF FROM DOPPLER RADAR AND SEISMIC HEALTH HAZARD MEASUREMENTS 12H20 - 14H00 Lunch in the Centro Cultural Metropolitano- Plaza Grande IV-B: Monitoring-Cont. II: Ash- Cont. 14H00- A. Gerst: REAL-TIME 4D MONITORING OF D. Andronico: ASH EMISSIONS AT THE 14H20 ERUPTIVE PROCESSES WITH DOPPLER SUMMIT OF ETNA DURING THE 2004-05 RADARS- A NEW TOOL FOR HAZARDS FLANK ERUPTION MITIGATION AND VOLCANO SCIENCE 14H20-14H40 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Magnetotelluric and Petrologic Constrains for the Nature
    Our reference: VOLGEO 5460 P-authorquery-v11 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: VOLGEO Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: Sundarababu, Anitha E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +1 619 699 6721 Article Number: 5460 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return your corrections within 48 hours. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. We were unable to process your file(s) fully electronically and have proceeded by Scanning (parts of) your Rekeying (parts of) your article Scanning the article artwork Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof. Click on the ‘Q’ link to go to the location in the proof. Location in article Query / Remark: click on the Q link to go Please insert your reply or correction at the corresponding line in the proof Q1 The citation “Blundy and Cashmann (2001)” has been changed to match the author name/date in the reference list. Please check here and in subsequent occurrences, and correct if necessary. Q2 Please check the layout and table header in Table 1 and amend if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Alaska's Volcanic Landforms and Features
    Chapter 4 Alaska's Volcanic Landforms and Features Resources • Alaska Volcano Observatory website. (Available at http://www.avo.alaska.edu.) • Brantley, S.R., 1999, Volcanoes of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey General Interest Publication. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/volcus/index.html.) • Miller, T.P., McGimsey, R.G., Richter, D.H., Riehle, J.R., Nye, C.J., Yount, M.E., and Dumoulin, J.A., 1998, Catalog of the historically active volcanoes of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-0582, 104 p. (Also available at http://www.avo.alaska.edu/downloads/classresults.php?citid=645.) • Nye, C.J., and others, 1998, Volcanoes of Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Information Circular IC 0038, accessed June 1, 2010, at . PDF Front (6.4 MB) http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us/webpubs/dggs/ic/oversized/ic038_sh001.PDF and . PDF Back (6.6 MB) http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us/webpubs/dggs/ic/oversized/ic038_sh002.PDF. • Smithsonian Institution, [n.d.], Global volcanism program—Augustine: Smithsonian Institution web page, accessed June 1, 2010, at http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1103-01- &volpage=photos&phoyo=026071. • Tilling, R.I., 1997, Volcanoes—On-line edition: U.S. Geological Survey General Interest Product. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/volc/.) • U.S. Geological Survey, 1997 [2007], Volcanoes teacher’s guide: U.S. Geological Survey website. (Available at http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/teachers- packets/volcanoes/. • U.S. Geological Survey, 2010, Volcano Hazards Program—USGS photo glossary of volcanic terms: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanoes and Deep Carbon Global CO2 Emissions from Subaerial Volcanism— Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Is the Second Most Abundant Volcanic Gas After Water (W.F
    COMMISSIONED AGU Centennial Grand Challenge: Volcanoes and Deep MANUSCRIPT Carbon Global CO2 Emissions From Subaerial 10.1029/2019GC008690 Volcanism—Recent Progress and Future Challenges Tobias P. Fischer1 and Alessandro Aiuppa2 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2Dipartimento DiSTeM, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy Key Points: Abstract Quantifying the global volcanic CO2 output from subaerial volcanism is key for a better • Progress in determining subaerial understanding of rates and mechanisms of carbon cycling in and out of our planet and their volcanic CO2 flux has been significant consequences for the long‐term evolution of Earth's climate over geological timescales. Although having • Challenges remain with regard to been the focus of intense research since the early 1990s, and in spite of recent progress, the global volcanic extrapolations through time and global coverage of measurements CO2 output remains inaccurately known. Here we review past developments and recent progress and and with regard to diffuse tectonic examine limits and caveats of our current understanding and challenges for future research. We show that degassing and dynamic nature of CO2 flux measurements are today only available for ~100 volcanoes (cumulative measured flux, 44 Tg CO2/ volcanic degassing • Volcanic and tectonic contributions year), implying that extrapolation is required to account for the emissions of the several hundred degassing are <2% of current anthropogenic volcanoes worldwide. Recent extrapolation attempts converge to indicate that persistent degassing through contributions active crater fumaroles and plumes releases ~53–88 Tg CO2/year, about half of which is released from the 125 most actively degassing subaerial volcanoes (36.4 ± 2.4 Tg CO2/year from strong volcanic gas emitters, Svge).
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Sulfur Dioxide Flux Monitoring at Asama Volcano, Japan
    IAVCEI 2013 Scientific Assembly - July 20 - 24, Kagoshima, Japan Forecasting Volcanic Activity - Reading and translating the messages of nature for society 3P2_2E-O1 Room A3 Date/Time: July 23 17:00-17:15 Automated sulfur dioxide flux monitoring at Asama volcano, Japan Toshiya Mori1, Masaaki Morita1, Minoru Takeo2, Taku Urabe2, Jun Oikawa2 1Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Japan, 2Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Asama volcano located in central part of Japan is one of the active volcanoes continuously emitting volcanic plume. Sulfur dioxide flux of the volcano has been measured using COSPEC (Correlation Spectrometer) since 1970s, and recently using COMPUSS (Compact UV spectrometer system). The volcano emit a few hundred ton/day of SO2 during the quiescent period and several thousand ton/day during active period (e.g., JMA web * page ).Because, the past SO2 flux measurements were carried out intermittently on an irregular base, it is not well constrained when and how the flux increased at the beginning of the active periods. We need to have more frequent measurements to relate the SO2 flux with other geophysical observation data and to understand the degassing activities during the changes of the activity of the volcano. We installed automated scanning system with a USB2000+ spectrometer (Ocean Optics Inc.) for SO2 flux measurement in the end of July 2011 at Asama volcano observatory (Earthquake Research Institute, the Univ. of Tokyo) located about 4 km east of the summit crater. The scanning system used at the volcano is 45 degrees forward looking system which intended to cover relatively wide wind direction range with one instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiant Flux from Earth's Subaerially Erupting Volcanoes
    International Journal of Remote Sensing Vol. 29, No. 22, 20 November 2008, 6443–6466 Radiant flux from Earth’s subaerially erupting volcanoes R. WRIGHT* and E. PILGER Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA During the past decade an average of 60 volcanoes erupted each year, around 20 of which were erupting on any given day. Some of these, such as Erta Ale in Ethiopia, are persistently active, whereas others, such as Bezymianny in Russia, erupt more sporadically. Satellite remote sensing offers a convenient way to monitor changes in the thermal budgets of these volcanoes from space. Using data acquired by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor, we show how the amount of heat radiated into the Earth’s atmosphere by 65 active volcanoes has varied between 26 February 2000 and 31 December 2006. We find that the radiant volcanic heat flux into the atmosphere occurs at a relatively steady-state baseline level, superimposed on which are large thermal emission ‘spikes’. These anomalous emission events are associated with the emplacement of basaltic ‘a’a lava flows at volcanoes such as Mount Etna, Italy, and Nyamuragira, in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We also demonstrate how these data can be used to estimate lava effusion rates during effusive eruptions, and magma flux rates at persistently active volcanoes that host active lava lakes. 1. Introduction In addition to the eruption of lava and volatiles, active volcanoes emit copious amounts of thermal energy. A volcano that becomes active after a period of quiescence invariably exhibits an increase in geothermal heat flux, during either the emplacement of shallow intrusions (which increase in the vigour of pre-existing hydrothermal systems) or the actual eruption of lava.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Maar Crater Size and Shape Using the Global Maar Volcano Location and 1 Shape
    1 Title: Trends in maar crater size and shape using the global Maar Volcano Location and 2 Shape (MaarVLS) database 3 Authors: Graettinger, A.H. 1 4 Affiliation: 1Department of Geosciences, 5110 Rockhill Road, Flarsheim Hall 420, University of 5 Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, USA 6 [email protected] 7 8 Abstract 9 A maar crater is the top of a much larger subsurface diatreme structure produced by 10 phreatomagmatic explosions and the size and shape of the crater reflects the growth history of 11 that structure during an eruption. Recent experimental and geophysical research has shown 12 that crater complexity can reflect subsurface complexity. Morphometry provides a means of 13 characterizing a global population of maar craters in order to establish the typical size and 14 shape of features. A global database of Quaternary maar crater planform morphometry 15 indicates that maar craters are typically not circular and frequently have compound shapes 16 resembling overlapping circles. Maar craters occur in volcanic fields that contain both small 17 volume and complex volcanoes. The global perspective provided by the database shows that 18 maars are common in many volcanic and tectonic settings producing a similar diversity of size 19 and shape within and between volcanic fields. A few exceptional populations of maars were 20 revealed by the database, highlighting directions of future research to improve our 21 understanding on the geometry and spacing of subsurface explosions that produce maars. 22 These outlying populations, such as anomalously large craters (> 3000 m), chains of maars, 23 and volcanic fields composed of mostly maar craters each represent a small portion of the 24 database, but provide opportunities to reinvestigate fundamental questions on maar formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on August 1, 2011 Field Guides Fire and water: Volcanology, geomorphology, and hydrogeology of the Cascade Range, central Oregon Katharine V. Cashman, Natalia I. Deligne, Marshall W. Gannett, Gordon E. Grant and Anne Jefferson Field Guides 2009;15;539-582 doi: 10.1130/2009.fld015(26) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2009 Geological Society of America Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on August 1, 2011 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 15 2009 Fire and water: Volcanology, geomorphology, and hydrogeology of the Cascade Range, central Oregon Katharine V.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for a Lava Lake on Mt. Michael Volcano, Saunders Island (South Sandwich Islands) from Landsat, Sentinel-2 and ASTER Satellite Imagery
    Accepted Manuscript Evidence for a lava lake on Mt. Michael volcano, Saunders Island (South Sandwich Islands) from Landsat, Sentinel-2 and ASTER satellite imagery D.M. Gray, A. Burton-Johnson, P.T. Fretwell PII: S0377-0273(18)30574-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.05.002 Reference: VOLGEO 6603 To appear in: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research Received date: 19 December 2018 Revised date: 1 May 2019 Accepted date: 2 May 2019 Please cite this article as: D.M. Gray, A. Burton-Johnson and P.T. Fretwell, Evidence for a lava lake on Mt. Michael volcano, Saunders Island (South Sandwich Islands) from Landsat, Sentinel-2 and ASTER satellite imagery, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.05.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Evidence for a lava lake on Mt Michael volcano, Saunders Island (South Sandwich Islands) from Landsat, Sentinel-2 and ASTER satellite imagery Gray, D.M.a, Burton-Johnson, A.b*, Fretwell, P.T.b aDepartment of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. bBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK *Author for correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Remote sensing, volcanology, SWIR, dual-band, Scotia Sea, Antarctica Highlights (3 points, 85 characters each inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Iavcei International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’S Interior Association Symposia and Workshops
    IAVCEI INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VOLCANOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH’S INTERIOR ASSOCIATION SYMPOSIA AND WORKSHOPS Excerpt of “Earth: Our Changing Planet. Proceedings of IUGG XXIV General Assembly Perugia, Italy 2007” Compiled by Lucio Ubertini, Piergiorgio Manciola, Stefano Casadei, Salvatore Grimaldi Published on website: www.iugg2007perugia.it ISBN : 978-88-95852-24-6 Organized by IRPI High Patronage of the President of the Republic of Italy Patronage of Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri Ministero degli Affari Esteri Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare Ministero della Difesa Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca IUGG XXIV General Assembly July 2-13, 2007 Perugia, Italy SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM COMMITTEE Paola Rizzoli Chairperson Usa President of the Scientific Program Committee Uri Shamir President of International Union of Geodesy and Israel Geophysics, IUGG Jo Ann Joselyn Secretary General of International Union of Usa Geodesy and Geophysics, IUGG Carl Christian Tscherning Secretary-General IAG International Association of Denmark Geodesy Bengt Hultqvist Secretary-General IAGA International Association Sweden of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Pierre Hubert Secretary-General IAHS International Association France of Hydrological Sciences Roland List Secretary-General IAMAS International Association Canada of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences Fred E. Camfield Secretary-General IAPSO International Association Usa for the Physical Sciences of the Oceans Peter Suhadolc Secretary-General IASPEI International
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal
    The ORE BIN Volume 27, No.1 January, 1965 OREGON'S MINERAL INDUSTRY IN 1964 By Ralph S. Mason* Oregon mines and metallurgical plants continued to pump large quan­ tities of primary wealth into the state's economy in 1964. Indications are that the value produced during the past year wi II probably equal that of the record-shatteri ng total turned in for 1963. Soari ng metal prices on world markets, particularly for mercury, saw the reopening of six cinnabar mines and activity at several antimony properties which have been idle for many years. Production of aggregate, which ac­ counts for approximately two-thirds of the total value of all minerals produced in the state, was close to that of last year, in spite of a lessened demand by large federal construction projects. The disas­ trous Christmas-week floods across the state temporari Iy paralyzed nearly all of the sand and gravel producers, who suffered high Josses to stocks and equipment. The need for aggregate and stone of all types for the coming year will probably set new records as the state rebuilds its highways, jetties, dikes, plants, homes, and bridges. Offshore oi I and gas leases for federal and state lands lying off the Oregon coast were granted to major oi I companies last fall. The action marks an important milestone in the state's long search for petroleum. Metals Mercury A continuing imbalance in the international mercury supply and demand forced prices up to all-time highs in 1964. As a direct result, interest in several Oregon mercury properties developed and at year's end activitywas reported at six mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Features of New Mexico Analogous to Volcanic Features on Mars
    Volcanic features of New Mexico analogous to volcanic features on Mars Larry S. Crumpler. Jayne C. Aubele New Mexico Museum of Naniral History and Science. Albuquerque and James R. Zimbelnian Center for Earlh and Plunctury Studies, national Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Insiiiuiion. Wasliington 4.1 Introduction The arid climate, extensional rift setting, range in type and age of volcanic eruptions, and generally widespread and geologically youthful volcanism in New Mexico contribute to an environment rich in geologic processes and landforms analogous to many of those on Mars. Young (<5 Ma) volcanoes and associated volcanic rocks are more widely distributed throughout the state than in many other volcanic localities on the North American continent. All of the principal volcanic landforms occur including long lava flows, viscous domes, calderas, composite volcanoes, monogenetic scoria cones, small shield volcanoes, and numerous hydromagmatic vents. The morphol- ogies, volcanic emplacement processes, and dissected structures, and the arid environment, result in many volcanic landforms analogous to those on Mars. These features provide some clues to the details of geologic processes respon- sible for their Martian counterparts that are uncommon in areas where volcanism is less abundant and where the environments are less arid. The largest young caldera (Valles Caldera), largest young lava flows (McCartys and Carrizozo), abundance of Quaternary volcanic fields, volatile-rich magmatism, including non-juvenile (maars) and juvenile types (Shiprock-Narbona Pass), spring deposits, and one of the great modern rift valleys on Earth (Rio Grande rift) occur in an arid setting where annual precipitation is between 8 and 15 inches (20-40 cm) per year.
    [Show full text]