DOCSLIB.ORG

Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1694 County Rd Minden, NV 89423 2019 This page left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... ES-1 Section 1 Official Record of Adoption ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 .............................................................. 1-1 1.2 Adoption by the Local Governing Body and Supporting Document ...... 1-1 Section 2 Background ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Plan Purpose and Authority ..................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stafford Act Grant Programs ................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Plan Organization..................................................................................... 2-3 Section 3 Community Description ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 History, Location, and Geography ........................................................... 3-1 3.2 Government.............................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 Demographics .......................................................................................... 3-7 3.4 Land Use and Development Trends ....................................................... 3-11 Section 4 Planning Process ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Overview of Planning Process ................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee .................................................. 4-4 4.2.1 Formation of the Planning Committee ......................................... 4-4 4.2.2 Planning Committee Meetings & Monthly Progress ................... 4-5 4.3 Public Involvement .................................................................................. 4-6 4.4 Incorporation of Existing Plans and Other Relevant Information ........... 4-8 Section 5 Hazard Analysis .............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Hazard identification and screening ......................................................... 5-2 5.2 Hazard Profile .......................................................................................... 5-6 5.2.1 Drought ........................................................................................ 5-7 5.2.2 Earthquake ................................................................................. 5-10 5.2.3 Epidemic .................................................................................... 5-24 5.2.4 Floods ......................................................................................... 5-34 5.2.5 Seiche ......................................................................................... 5-53 5.2.6 Severe Weather .......................................................................... 5-57 5.2.7 Volcanic Activity ....................................................................... 5-61 5.2.8 Wildland Fire ............................................................................. 5-65 Section 6 Vulnerability Analysis .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Asset inventory ........................................................................................ 6-1 6.1.1 Population and Building Stock .................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................ 6-2 6.2 Methodology ............................................................................................ 6-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.3 Data Limitations ....................................................................................... 6-4 6.4 Exposure Analysis ................................................................................... 6-5 6.4.1 Drought ........................................................................................ 6-8 6.4.2 Earthquakes .................................................................................. 6-8 6.4.3 Epidemics ..................................................................................... 6-8 6.4.4 Floods ........................................................................................... 6-9 6.4.5 Seiche ........................................................................................... 6-9 6.4.6 Severe Weather ............................................................................ 6-9 6.4.7 Volcanic Activity ......................................................................... 6-9 6.4.8 Wildland Fires ............................................................................ 6-10 6.5 Repetitive Loss Properties ...................................................................... 6-10 Section 7 Capability Assessment .................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Legal and Regulatory Capabilities ...............................................................1 7.2 Administrative and Technical Capabilities ..................................................2 7.3 Financial Capabilities ...................................................................................2 7.4 Current Mitigation Capabilities & Analysis ................................................4 Section 8 Mitigation Strategy ......................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives ............................................................. 8-1 8.2 Identifying Mitigation Actions ................................................................ 8-2 8.3 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance ....................... 8-10 8.4 Evaluating and Prioritizing Mitigation Action ...................................... 8-11 8.5 Implementing a Mitigation Action Plan ................................................ 8-12 Section 9 Plan Maintenance ........................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the HMP ..................................... 9-1 9.2 Implementation through Existing Planning Mechanisms ........................ 9-3 9.3 Continued Public Involvement ................................................................ 9-4 Section 10 References .................................................................................................................... 10-1 Tables and Figures Tables Table 3-1 Census Data Table 3-2 Age Data Table 3-3 Total Area in Douglas County Table 3-4 Public Land Ownership Table 3-5 Future Land Use in Douglas County Table 3-6 Land Area by Zoning District Table 3-7 Population Density Table 4-1 Plan Outline and Update Effort Table 4-2 Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee & Participating Agencies Table 5-1 Identification and Screening of Hazards Table 5-2 Vulnerability Ratings Rubric Table 5-3 Hazards Rating Table 5-4 Recent Drought Periods Table 5-5 Historic Earthquakes in Douglas County Table 5-6 Major Late Quaternary Faults in Douglas County Table 5-7 Major Late Quaternary Faults Near Douglas County Table 5-8 Probability of Modified Mercalli Intensity Levels Occurring in Douglas County Communities Table 5-9 Historical Occurrences of Epidemics Registered in Nevada Table 5-10 Historic Floods in Douglas County Table 5-11 Carson River Transport Flows Table 5-12 Summary of Reported Fire History Table 5-13 Risk of Catastrophic Wildfire in Valley Portion of Douglas County Table 5-14 Risk of Catastrophic Wildfire in Lake Portion of Douglas County Table 5-15 Floor Area at Risk Table 6-1 Estimated Population and Building Inventory Table 6-2 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Table 6-3 Potential Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Population and Buildings Table 6-4 Potential Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Critical Facilities Table 7-1 Legal and Regulatory Resources Available for Hazard Mitigation Table 7-2 Administrative and Technical Resources for Hazard Mitigation Tables and Figures Table 7-3 Financial Resources for Hazard Mitigation Table 7-4 Douglas County Local Mitigation Capability Assessment Table 8-1 Mitigation Goals Table 8-2 Mitigation Goals and Potential Actions Table 8-3 STAPLE+E Evaluation Criteria for Mitigation Actions Table 8-4 Action Plan Matrix Figures Figure 3-1 Map of Douglas County Figure 3-2 Douglas County Population Projects Figure 3-3 Douglas County Building Permits and Values Figure 5-1 Comparison of the U.S. Drought Monitor Maps of Nevada Figure 5-2 Earthquakes Recorded in Douglas County for the 1840s to 2010 Figure 5-3 Map of 1932 Cedar Mountain Earthquake Figure 5-4 Schematic Map of the Eight Largest Faults in Douglas County Figure 5-5 Earthquake Hazard Curves for Five Douglas County Communities Figure 5-6 Earthquake Peak Ground Acceleration Map for Nevada and California Figure 5-7 Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Hazards Figure 5-8 Percentage of Visits for Influenza-like Illness Figure 5-9 Map of States Infected with the Outbreak Strain of E. coli Figure 5-10 Recent Fires in Douglas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Nevada Casino Gaming Market: a Summary of Statistics, Broken Down by Reporting Area
    2011 Nevada Gaming Market Summary of Statistics, Broken Down by Reporting Area From Wendover to Primm (and many points in between) the casino gaming landscape of Nevada covers a great deal of territory. Yet the revenues earned from the 344 or so locations scattered across the state are not evenly distributed; the vast majority of casino revenues for the state are generated in Clark County, Nevada, and the majority of them come from the Las Vegas Strip. The top four counties generating revenues were Clark (86.19% of the state total), Washoe (6.97%), Elko (2.49%), and Douglas (1.96%). Within Clark County, the Las Vegas Strip (56.71%), Balance of County (9.61%), Boulder Strip (7.28%), and Downtown Las Vegas (4.64%) were the top revenue earners. Perhaps not surprisingly, the top revenue-earning area out-performed the rest of the state on a per-table and per-device basis. The Las Vegas Strip, for example, has 29.63% of the state’s slot machines, but earned 42.87% of the state’s slot revenue for the year under study. With table games, the Strip had 51.60% of all games, but earned 80.90% of all table game revenue. For the most part, all other locations under-performed, earning less per machine and per table than they should, from a strictly numerical perspective. As a snapshot of where Nevada gaming revenues are generated, this summary is interesting, if only because it gives statistical meaning to the sense that Clark County, and the Las Vegas Strip in particular, are the drivers of Nevada’s gaming revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Subject: Monthly Win and Percentage Fee Tax Collections Release: August 26, 2021 July 2021 Nevada Gaming Revenues and Collections
    NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD 1919 College Parkway, P.O. Box 8003, Carson City, Nevada 89702 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 2600, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 J. BRIN GIBSON, Chair 3650 S. Pointe Circle, Suite 203, P.O. Box 31109, Laughlin, Nevada 89028 PHIL KATSAROS, Member 557 W. Silver Street, Suite 207, Elko, Nevada 89801 BRITTNIE WATKINS, Member 9790 Gateway Drive, Suite 100, Reno, Nevada 89521 750 Pilot Road, Suite I, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 STEVE SISOLAK Governor Press Release Subject: Monthly Win and Percentage Fee Tax Collections Release: August 26, 2021 July 2021 Nevada Gaming Revenues and Collections Win Revenue Summary – July 2021 Nevada’s nonrestricted gaming licensees reported a total “gaming win” of $1,359,876,493 for the month of July 2021. This amounts to a 79.69% increase compared to July 2020, when licensees reported a gaming win of $756,772,679. Current Period Fiscal Year-to Date Area 07/2021 07/2020 % Change 07/2021 - 07/2021 07/2020 - 07/2020 % Change Statewide 1,359,876,493 756,772,679 * 79.69% 1,359,876,493 756,772,679 79.69% Clark County 1,162,599,810 612,823,560 89.71% 1,162,599,810 612,823,560 89.71% LV Strip 793,666,935 330,054,069 140.47% 793,666,935 330,054,069 140.47% Downtown 71,151,896 41,684,845 70.69% 71,151,896 41,684,845 70.69% North Las Vegas 25,916,467 19,313,382 34.19% 25,916,467 19,313,382 34.19% Laughlin 42,831,475 36,351,937 17.82% 42,831,475 36,351,937 17.82% Boulder Strip 70,037,867 65,477,002 6.97% 70,037,867 65,477,002 6.97% Mesquite 14,178,999 9,979,853 42.08% 14,178,999 9,979,853 42.08% Balance
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming Revenue Report
    MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD GAMING REVENUE REPORT INTRODUCTION & INFORMATION This report is a summary of information provided by nonrestricted gaming licensees who file Monthly Gross Revenue Statistical Reports (Form NGC-31). Results are provided in a current one-month, three month, and twelve month format. Gaming results from restricted licensees are not included in this report. The data provided is subject to change due to late filings of reports, audits, and other adjustments occurring subsequent to the release date of this publication. All locations included in revenue range groups are based on the cumulative gaming win reported in the current twelve months covered by this report. Gaming win for locations that have changed ownership during the current twelve months is combined in order to establish proper placement for such locations in appropriate revenue range groups. Locations newly licensed during the current twelve months are included in revenue range groups based on each location's gaming win, beginning with the month in which gaming operations commenced and based on cumulative totals thereafter. Locations included in revenue range groups in the current periods are also included in the comparative year-ago groups regardless of the revenue produced in the year-ago periods. The minimum number of locations in any revenue range or area group is four. Additionally, if there are fewer than three locations reporting revenue for a specific gaming unit, the information for that gaming unit will be included in the "other" revenue categories. The "Win Percent" for games provides a ratio which has been adjusted for effects of credit play.
    [Show full text]
  • The Las Vegas Strip Experienced Another Double-Digit
    April 2018 Las Vegas Strip Gaming Revenue Analysis Brent Pirosch Director of Gaming Consulting CBRE T: 702.369.4803 [email protected] GGG has completed market studies and feasibility studies for casinos throughout the world. For additional research and information about our group’s global gaming consulting capabilities, please visit our website. As part of CBRE Hotels, we have a wealth of experience in hospitality and gaming consulting. CBRE Valuation and Advisory (VAS) is available for all your gaming valuation needs, anywhere in the world, including appraisals, appraisal review, portfolio valuations, and highest and best use studies. GGG works closely with CBRE VAS to provide gaming market experience, knowledge and data unmatched by any other valuation firm. For more information, please see the CBRE VAS Hospitality and Gaming Group website. I really wanted to go #nocaps for this newsletter, but it made the text even more painful to read than usual. And messing with the company logo is generally frowned upon. I’m keeping the upfront analysis shorter because nationwide quarterly numbers are finally available (Delaware was late posting some numbers). I’ve updated the format and expanded the coverage, so please take a look. April 2018 Las Vegas Strip Analysis April 2018 had one less weekend day compared to last year but may have benefited from some March collections. Unadjusted for luck factors and calendar issues, according to the Nevada Gaming Control Board, April 2018 revenue was as follows: • Las Vegas Strip gaming revenue was $499.5 million, up 5.1% for the month, and up 3.7% YTD.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVER the FACTS Governor Brian Sandoval Lt
    FOURTH QUARTER 2017 VOLUME XXV DISCOVER THE FACTS Governor Brian Sandoval Lt. Governor • Chair Mark A. Hutchison Nevada Commission on Tourism Commissioners* Cindy Carano, Vice Chair Julia Arger Bob Morse Richard Arnold Don Newman Bob Cashell Rossi Ralenkotter Phil DeLone Herb Santos, Jr. Brian Krolicki Bob Stoldal Denice Miller Mike Vaswani *Represents the commission as of December 31, 2017. Interim Director David Peterson A Quarterly Report Published by the Nevada Division of Tourism Research and Analysis Kyle Shulz Contact 401 North Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701 (p) 775.687.4322 (p) 800.237.0774 (f) 775.687.6779 TRAVELNEVADA.BIZ ROOM TAX COLLECTIONS Dollars shown represent 3/8 of 1 percent, the amount allocated to the state to promote tourism. MONTH 2016 2017 PERCENT CHANGE January $2,083,944 $2,204,500 5.8% February 1,713,562 1,695,164 (1.1%) March 1,975,897 2,401,257 21.5% April 2,021,460 2,112,894 4.5% May 1,954,631 2,069,839 5.9% June 1,955,041 1,998,646 2.2% July 2,024,080 2,188,672 8.1% August 1,919,808 2,013,408 4.9% September 2,162,786 2,212,541 2.3% October 2,230,199 2,269,363 1.8% November 1,846,970 1,814,893 (1.7%) December 1,570,239 1,506,741 (4.0%) TOTAL (Rolling 12 months) $23,458,616 $24,487,919 4.4% Fourth Quarter 2017 Area Highlights AREA 2016 2017 PERCENT CHANGE Clark County $5,190,420 $ 5,080,700 (2.1%) Washoe County 269,741 304,801 13.0% Douglas County* 70,421 75,381 7.0% Elko County 38,341 38,843 1.3% Carson City 15,664 20,341 29.9% All other counties 62,821 70,932 12.9% TOTAL (State) $5,647,408 $5,590,998 (1.0%) Note: The remaining 5/8 of 1 percent remains with the county in which it was collected.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVER the FACTS a Quarterly Report Published by the Nevada Division of Tourism SECOND QUARTER 2020 NEVADA COMMISSION on TOURISM
    DISCOVER THE FACTS A Quarterly Report Published by the Nevada Division of Tourism SECOND QUARTER 2020 NEVADA COMMISSION ON TOURISM GOVERNOR Steve Sisolak LT. GOVERNOR • CHAIR Kate Marshall COMMISSIONERS* Jennifer Cunningham Pam Robinson Edward Estipona Herb Santos, Jr. Steve Hill Bob Stodal Brian Wadsworth Mike Vaswani Cynthia Mun Brian Krolicki Julie Pazina Kristin Windbigler *Represents the commission as of June 30, 2020. ACTING DIRECTOR Brenda Nebesky RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS Kyle Shulz CONTACT 401 North Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701 775.687.4322 | Fax 775.687.6779 TRAVELNEVADA.BIZ TABLE OF CONTENTS Room Tax Collections . 1 Visitor Volume . 2 Occupancy Level . 3 Room Nights Occupied . .4 Room Inventory . .5 Gross Gaming Revenue. .6 Convention Attendance. .7 Airport Volume. 8 Vehicle Traffic Counts. 9 Park Usage. 10 Information Sources . 11 Map of Nevada by Territory. .12 Information contained throughout this publication is updated quarterly to reflect revisions to current and prior year’s monthly data. ROOM TAX COLLECTIONS Dollars shown represent 3/8 of 1 percent, the amount allocated to the state to promote tourism. MONTH 2018 2019 % CHANGE July $2,059,245 $2,208,371 7.2% August 1,986,619 2,115,204 6.5% September 2,037,126 2,156,648 5.9% October 2,369,634 2,257,754 (4.7%) November 1,982,535 2,120,382 7.0% December 1,584,975 1,952,643 23.2% MONTH 2019 2020 % CHANGE January $2,316,065 $2,407,993 4.0% February 1,909,334 1,979,898 3.7% March 2,225,075 1,099,572 (50.6%) April 2,221,931 194,839 (91.2%) May 2,331,435 133,336 (94.3%) June 2,055,088 461,494 (77.5%) TOTAL (Rolling 12 months) $25,079,061 $19,088,134 (23.9%) SECOND QUARTER 2020 AREA HIGHLIGHTS MONTH 2019 2020 % CHANGE Clark County $5,998,548 $575,217 (90.4%) Washoe County 391,365 116,318 (70.3%) Douglas County* 67,555 27,526 (59.3%) Elko County 45,460 23,133 (49.1%) Carson City 14,142 ** 5,676 ** (59.9%) All other counties 91,385 41,799 *** (54.3%) TOTAL (State) $6,608,454 $789,669 (88.1%) Note: The remaining 5/8 of 1 percent remains with the county in which it was collected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Las Vegas Strip Experienced Another Double-Digit
    July 2018 Las Vegas Strip Gaming Revenue Analysis And YTD June Nationwide Gaming Revenue Brent Pirosch Director of Gaming Consulting CBRE T: 702.369.4803 [email protected] GGG has completed market studies and feasibility studies for casinos throughout the world. For additional research and information about our group’s global gaming consulting capabilities, please visit our website. As part of CBRE Hotels, we have a wealth of experience in hospitality and gaming consulting. CBRE Valuation and Advisory (VAS) is available for all your gaming valuation needs, anywhere in the world, including appraisals, appraisal review, portfolio valuations, and highest and best use studies. GGG works closely with CBRE VAS to provide gaming market experience, knowledge and data unmatched by any other valuation firm. For more information, please see the CBRE VAS Hospitality and Gaming Group website. Revenue Reporting CBRE’s review of casino revenue by state and submarket began more than a decade ago, not long after the Global Gaming Group was formed. The number of states and submarkets with casinos has grown since then, and we added a regional outlook to the analysis a couple years ago, but the general format of our reporting has remained the same. We think it’s time for an update. Given the changes in the gaming landscape, we are updating our reporting to provide more clarity and context. For instance, we are adjusting our analysis of the regions to show how individual states perform within their region. Rankings by state and submarket remain, but we are expanding the number of submarkets. Nevada represents an outsized portion of the national commercial gaming market (currently 28.2% of the total and larger than any other single region), so our analysis also includes a view excluding this state.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Connector Opens to Traffic This Week
    cOmmuNITy SPARKS Star Spangled Sparks tonight YOUR COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER SINCE 1910 TribuneSERVING SPARKS SINCE 1910 Page 3 Volume 110, Number 27 Wednesday, July 4, 2018 $1.00 SPORTS cOvER story SouthEast Connector opens to traffic this week By Kayla Anderson Sparks Tribune Aces return to Thousands of people came Reno after 4-3 out Saturday to celebrate the week pre-grand opening of the SouthEast Connector, a safer Page 7 and more efficient way to get to and from South Reno and Sparks. This is a project that has been in the works for more than 50 years and has now come to life. The new roadway, for- mally known as Veterans Parkway, stretches 5.5 miles from the Greg Street/Sparks Boulevard intersection and ends at the South Meadows Parkway in Reno. The road is three lanes in each direc- tion with a multi-use path Courtesy photo Reno 1868 FC tops for pedestrians and bikers A Fun Run, Bike and Walk preview event drew around 4,000 people Saturday morning Portland to extend that also runs the length of on the new SouthEast Connector. The new road that connects Sparks and South Reno is the project. set to open to traffic on Friday. streak This idea was first pro- Page 7 posed in the 1950’s and 2015, however, heavy flood- available,” she added. in 1954 and approved in 1964 regained traction in 2007 ing and storms in January “Incredible job by RTC and I was part of the com- when Regional Trans- 2107 halted progress. When Washoe in opening up the mittee that spearheaded to portation Commission of the weather got better, the SouthEast Connector to the get this done,” says RTC INSIDE Washoe County and Stan- project continued on and public.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVER the FACTS Governor Brian Sandoval
    SECOND QUARTER 2015 VOLUME XXIII DISCOVER THE FACTS Governor Brian Sandoval Lt. Governor • Chair Mark A. Hutchison Nevada Commission on Tourism Commissioners Cindy L. Carano, Vice Chair Bob Ostrovsky Julia Arger Rossi Ralenkotter Richard Arnold Herb Santos, Jr. Brian Ayala Ryan Sheltra Christopher Baum Bob Stoldal Lorraine Hunt-Bono Mike Vaswani Don Newman John Wagnon Director Claudia Vecchio A Quarterly Report Published by the Nevada Division of Tourism Research and Analysis Jennifer Griswold Contact 401 North Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701 (p) 775.687.4322 (p) 800.237.0774 (f) 775.687.6779 TRAVELNEVADA.BIZ Second Quarter 2015 VOLUME XXIII 2 ROOM TAX COLLECTIONS Dollars shown represent 3/8 of 1 percent, the amount allocated to the state to promote tourism. MONTH 2013 2014 PERCENT CHANGE July $1,516,466 $1,623,779 7.1% August 1,521,004 1,699,565 11.7% September 1,530,232 1,642,800 7.4% October 1,704,145 1,846,946 8.4% November 1,424,781 1,531,700 7.5% December 1,160,680 1,303,813 12.3% MONTH 2014 2015 PERCENT CHANGE January 1,659,124 1,882,794 13.5% February 1,477,520 1,544,910 4.6% March 2,025,167 1,873,514 (7.5%) April 1,739,184 1,856,835 6.8% May 1,912,782 2,083,224 8.9% June 1,607,957 1,579,811 (1.8%) TOTAL (Rolling 12 months) $19,279,041 $20,469,690 6.2% Second Quarter 2015 Area Highlights AREA 2014 2015 PERCENT CHANGE Clark County $4,842,161 $5,079,210 4.9% Washoe County 259,707 272,033 4.7% Douglas County* 37,891 37,501 (1.0%) Elko County 50,385 48,870 (3.0%) Carson City 7,031 ** 15,723 123.6% All other counties 62,747 66,532 6.0% TOTAL (State) $5,259,923 $5,519,869 4.9% Note: The remaining 5/8 of 1 percent remains with the county in which it was collected.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada Reno » Scarp Degradation and Fault History
    University of Nevada Reno » Scarp Degradation and Fault History Sourh of Carson City, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Robert; Charles Pease i h February 1979 MINES 1 UfctvART The.-Sl S ] 3 Ab The thesis of Robert Charles Pease is approved: Thesis Advisor University of Nevada Reno February 1979 IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author is most grateful to J. W. Bell and D. T. Trexler of the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology for theii* advice and especially for field assistance during the trenching phase of the project. The author also wishes to express his gratitude to Dr. E. C. Bingler, Montana Bur­ eau of Mines and Geology, and Dr. D. B. Slemmons, University of Nevada, for their supervision in beginning this project. During the course of the study, discussions with Dr. F. F. Peterson, University of Nevada, concerning soils were most helpful. D. P. Bryan, of Pezcnella-Bryan Associates, Reno, Nevada, made available trench logs of the area, and Vic Cherven, of Woodward-Clyde Consultants, California, reviewed parts of the manuscript. Susan Nichols, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and Nancy A. Foster drafted the Final Trench Logs. Aerial photographs were provided by the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and trenches were financed by the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology under U.S. Geological Survey earthquake hazards reduction pro­ gram grant 14-08-0001-G-494. The project was also supported by Sigma XI grants-in-aid of research. Examination of faults south of Carson City indicates that scarps erode more rapidly in non-indurated alluvium and that Pleistocene soils, developed on older scarps, prevent scarp degradation and result in faults with steeper debris slopes than those proposed by Wallace (1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report
    STAFF REPORT Report To: Board of Supervisors Meeting Date: January 17, 2019 Staff Contact: Ann Bollinger, Open Space Administrator Agenda Title: For Possible Action: To authorize the fee title acquisition of 20 acres along the north side of U.S. Highway 50 West (APN 007-051-81) from Mr. W. Michael Fagen for open space and passive recreation purposes for $290,000 plus closing costs (funded by the Quality of Life fund - Open Space land acquisitions); and authorize the Mayor, or named designee, to execute all documents related to same on behalf of the City. (Ann Bollinger, [email protected]) Staff Summary: If approved, the property will be purchased at the fair market value of $290,000, plus closing costs, as determined by a certified appraiser and funded entirely from the Quality of Life - Open Space land acquisition account. The acquisition of this property will add to the scenic entrance into Carson City from Lake Tahoe, protect wildlife habitat, and potentially connect the City’s trail system from Clear Creek to King’s Canyon. The acquisition is identified on the Open Space Opportunities Map and the Open Space Advisory Committee recommended approval of the acquisition. Agenda Action: Formal Action/Motion Time Requested: 10 minutes Proposed Motion I move to authorize the fee title acquisition of the 20 acres of property described on the record and to authorize the Mayor or his designee to execute all related documents on behalf of the City. Board’s Strategic Goal Quality of Life Previous Action January 15, 2015: The Board of Supervisors (Board) directed staff to compile a list of appropriate trade parcels and continue a conversation with the owner (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Subject: Monthly Win and Percentage Fee Tax Collections Release: April 27, 2021 March 2021 Nevada Gaming Revenues and Collections
    NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD J.BRIN GIBSON, Chairman 1919 College Parkway, P.O. Box 8003, Carson City, Nevada 89702 TERRY JOHNSON, Member 555 E. Washington Ave., Suite 2600, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 PHIL KATSAROS, Member 3650 S. Pointe Circle, Suite 203, P.O. Box 31109, Laughlin, Nevada 89028 557 W. Silver Street, Suite 207, Elko, Nevada 89801 STEVE SISOLAK Governor 9790 Gateway Drive, Suite 100, Reno, Nevada 89521 750 Pilot Road, Suite I, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Press Release Subject: Monthly Win and Percentage Fee Tax Collections Release: April 27, 2021 March 2021 Nevada Gaming Revenues and Collections Win Revenue Summary – March 2021 Nevada’s nonrestricted gaming licensees reported a total “gaming win” of $1,066,979,987 for the month of March 2021. This amounts to a 72.66% increase compared to March 2020, when licensees reported a gaming win of $617,971,174. For the fiscal year (July 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021), gaming win has decreased 17.74%. Current Period Fiscal Year-to Date Area 03/2021 03/2020 % Change 07/2020 - 03/2021 07/2019 - 03/2020 % Change Statewide 1,066,979,987 617,971,174 72.66% 7,199,116,173 8,752,018,132 -17.74% Clark County 893,237,457 546,529,603 63.44% 5,884,005,259 7,516,106,275 -21.71% LV Strip 501,455,069 299,890,531 67.21% 3,190,923,848 4,764,078,729 -33.02% Downtown 70,988,476 43,447,171 63.39% 451,937,004 505,555,986 -10.61% North Las Vegas 26,315,499 22,485,709 17.03% 182,595,390 218,648,208 -16.49% Laughlin 47,749,935 30,648,628 55.80% 322,797,458 365,396,341 -11.66% Boulder Strip 96,557,104 71,669,354
    [Show full text]