TurkishJournalofEarthSciences (TurkishJ.EarthSci.),Vol.11, 2002,pp.217-229. Copyright©TÜB‹TAK

TheSilistarIntrusive,EasternSrednogorieZone,: StructuralDataandPotentialforPorphyryCopperand EpithermalSystems

RADOSLAVNAKOV1,THOMASKERESTEDJIAN&ANGELKUNOV

GeologicalInstitute,BulgarianAcademyofSciences,“Acad.G.Bonchev”,str.Bl.24,1113-Sofia,Bulgaria (e-mail:[email protected])

Abstract: TheLateCretaceousSilistarintrusioncomprisesofgabbros,gabbro-dioritestoquartz-dioritesand aplites,thatwereemplacedintoavolcano-sedimentarysuccessionofsimilarage.Structuraldatasuggestthatthis intrusionispartofalarger,partiallyexposedbody.Adensenetworkofprimaryandsecondaryjoints,inmany placesfilledwithvariousoreandgangueminerals,isaconspicuousfeatureoftheintrusion.Hydrothermal alterationaffectingtheintrusionandthewallrocksincludes:uralitization(amphibole±epidote),secondary biotitizationandpropylitization.Propyliticalterationoccurredintwostages:hightemperature(epidote-actinolite- chlorite)andmiddletolowtemperature(sericite-chlorite-carbonate-epidoteandchlorite-sericite-carbonate). Productsoflateralterationeventsincludequartz-adularia,quartz-carbonate,carbonate,quartz-zeolitesand zeolites. Apartfrompreviouslyrecognizedcontact-metasomaticmineralization,thepresenceofstockwork-typeand disseminatedpyriteandchalcopyritemineralization,hostedbyboththeintrusionandthehostrocks,is documentedhere.Twotypesofmagnetiteandpyrite(magmaticandmetasomatic)arerecognized. Baseduponthealterationproductsandoreminerals,thepresenceoftwodifferingzonesissuggested.The firstzone,whichcloselycoincideswiththeintrusion,ispotassicandhostspy-ma-cpy-hm-(ilm).Thesecondzone ispropyliticwithpy-ma-cpy-hm-(ilm)+(sph+ga)+(bo+hz).Cuisthemainoreelement;Mocontentsareverylow ornil. Thetypesoforemineralizationandalterationproducts,alongwithstructuraldata,showelementsofboth porphyrycopperandepithermalsystemsandsuggesttheiroccurrenceofsuch(andthefirstrecognitionofsuch) intheincipientriftzoneoftheEasternSrednogorieZone.

KeyWords: EasternSrednogorie,Bulgaria,Silistarintrusion,porphyrycopper,epithermal

SilistarSokulumu,Do¤uSrednogorieKufla¤›,Bulgaristan: Yap›salVerivePorfiriBak›rveEpitermalSistemPotansiyeli

Özet: Gabro,gabro-diyorit,kuvarsdiyoritveaplitlerdenoluflanGeçKrateseyafll›SilistarSokulumuayn›yafll› volkano-sedimanterbiristifiçineyerleflmifltir.Yap›salveriler,Silistarsokulumunungeniflbirsokulumunk›smen yüzeylemiflbirparças›oldu¤unaiflareteder. Ço¤unluklacevhervegankmineralleriiledoldurulanveyo¤unbira¤oluflturanbirincilveikincileklemlerbu sokulumunönemliyap›salunsurlar›d›r.Gereksokulumugereksekenarkayaçlar›etkileyenhidrotermal alterasyonlaruralitleflme(amfibol±epidot),ikincilbiyotitleflmeveprofilitleflmedir.Profilitikalterasyon,yüksek s›cakl›k(epidot-aktinolit-klorit)veorta-düflüks›cakl›k(serizit-klorit-karbonat-epidotveklorit-serizit-karbonat) koflullar›ndaolmaküzereikiaflamadageliflmifltir.Dahasonrakialterasyonolaylar›n›nürünleriaras›ndakuvars- adularya,kuvars-karbonat,karbonat,kuvars-zeolitvezeolitlersay›labilir. Dahaönceleritan›mlanankontak-metasomatikmineralleflmeninyan›s›ra,sokulumveyankayaçdageliflen stokwork-tipli(a¤s›)vedisseminepiritvekalkopiritmineralleflmesibuçal›flmadatan›mlanm›flt›r.Magmatikve metasomatikolmaküzereikitipmanyetitvepiritbelirlenmifltir. Alterasyonürünlerivecevherminerallerinegörebirbirindenfarkl›ikikufla¤›nvarl›¤›ilerisürülmüfltür. Sokulumiçindegeliflenbirincikuflakdahaçokpotasikolup,py-ma-cpy-hm-(ilm)mineralleflmesiiletan›mlan›rken; ikincikuflakpropilitikpy-ma-cpy-km-(ilm)+(sph+ga)+(bo+hz)parajeneziilekarakterizeolur.Cuanacevher elementiiken,Moiçeri¤iyaçokazd›ryadahiçyoktur. Cevherleflmevealterasyonürüntipleriileyap›salverilerporfiribak›rveepitermalsistemelamanlar›n›iflaret ederveoluflumlar›n›nDo¤uSrednogorieKufla¤›riftleflmesininilkaflamalar›ndagerçekleflti¤inigösterir.

AnahtarSözcükler:Do¤uSrednogorie,Bulgaristan,Silistarsokulumu,porfiribak›r,epitermal

217 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

Introduction distinguishedintheEasternSrednogorieZone(Dabovski Thestudyareaislocatedinthesouthernmostpartofthe etal.1991)(Figures1&3).Thesezonesinterpretedas EasternSrednogorieZone,ontheBlackSeacoastof theremnantsoftheaxial(Strandjavolcano-intrusive BulgarianeartheborderwithTurkey(Figures1&2). region),rear(Yambol-Bourgasvolcano-intrusiveregion) andback-arcrift(NorthBourgasvolcanicregion)partsof TheSrednogorieZoneofBulgariaisacceptedasthe aLateCretaceousisland-arcsystem(Georgiev etal. remainsofaLateCretaceousisland-arcsystem,partof 2001). theactiveAlpinemarginofEurasia,theextensiontothe eastofwhicharetheEasternPontidesofTurkey(e.g. Asametallogenicunit,theSrednogoriehasa Bergougnan&Fourquin1980;Okay&fiahintürk1997). dominantlyCuspecialization,beingpartoftheTethyan Theoriginofthisarc-systeminBulgariaisgenerally Eurasianmetallogenicbelt(Jankovic1977,1997; attributedtonorthwardsubduction(Boccaletti etal. Vassileff&Stanisheva-Vassileva1981).Numerous 1974)relatedtotheclosingoftheVardarOcean. depositsandprospectsofporphyryandepithermaltypes, relatedtotheLateCretaceousmagmatism,arepresent IntheSrednogorieZone,rocksofallmagmatic (Figure1).Thestudyareaiswithintheproposedback- groupsarefound,butbasicandintermediatevarieties arcriftzone(Dabovski etal. 1989,1991),fromwhich (mainlyofsubalkalinetrend)dominate(Dabovski etal. noevidenceforporphyry-typeorepithermal 1991).However,intheEasternSrednogorieZone,the mineralizationhavebeenpresentedtodate(e.g., rockshaveadissimilarpetrochemicalcharacter.Basalts, Bogdanov1987).Presently,therocksfromtheproposed (tholeiitic,calc-alkaline,subalkalineandalkaline) riftzonehavebeenthrustoverfromthesouthbythe dominate.Ultrabasicrocksaretypical,butacidicones island-arczone(Petrova etal. 1992).However,dueto occurlocally(Vassileff&Stanisheva-Vassileva1981).The pooroutcrop,thisrelationcannotbeobserveddirectly mainfeaturesoftheEasternSrednogorieZone, (Figure2).Thediversityanddensityofdifferent comparedtothezoneaswhole,arehighermagmatic magmaticproductsallowstheareatobedefinedasthe activityandthepresenceofhighlypotassicalkaline “Silistarvolcano-intrusivearea”.Thisareaisdominated magmatism.Basedespeciallyontheextremleyhigh-K mainlybytheLateCretaceousSilistarintrusion(Figures2 alkalinityoftherocksfromthenorthernEastern &4a). Srednogorie,aninitialepisodeofback-arcriftingduring thefinalstagesofisland-arcevolutionissuggested (Boccalettietal.1978;Stanisheva-Vassileva1980).This GeologicalSetting conceptisfurthersupportedbytheabundanceofhigh-K SilistarIntrusion pillowandmassivelavas,thehugethicknessofthe volcano-sedimentarysection(over4km),theoccurrence Thisvisiblysmallintrusivebodywasdescribedfirstby ofanover1300-m-thickhyaloclasticpalagonitictuffs,a Konstantinov(1947,unpublisheddata),andnamedfor regionallow-temperatureandlow-pressure theneighbouringvillageasthe“Pluton".Later, metamorphism,rapidthinningofthecrustinanarrow thesamebodywasnamedthe"Silistarintrusion",after zone,interpretedsedimentaryandmagmaticevolution, theneighbouringsmallriver(Stoinov etal. unpublished andseismicdata(Georgievetal.2001).Therefore,inthe data).Theintrusionhasbecomeknownbythisnamein EasternSrednogorieZone,fromsouthtonorth,anisland theBulgariangeologicalliterature. arc,aninitialback-arcriftandaback-arcflyschtrough Thepresent-dayexposureoftheSilistarintrusion havebeendistinguished(Dabovski etal. 1989,1991). occupiesanarrowbeltalongtheBlackSeacoastwitha Presently,theyaretectonicallysuperimposedalong N–Sdimensionofabout1km(Figures2&4a).Thisbelt north-vergentthrustzones,andtheback-arcflysch consistsofgabbros,gabbrodioritestoquartzdiorites, troughandthenorthernmarginoftheriftzonearenow porphyriticdioritesandaplites(Belivanov etal. 1992). involvedinthefrontalthrustsheetsoftheBalkanFold- Recentlygranodioritesandlow-alkalicgranitehavebeen ThrustBelt,andthesouthernmarginoftheriftispoorly recognizedthere(Malyakov&Belmustakova1999). exposedandnotimagedbyseismicprofiles(Georgiev et Petrochemically,therocksoftheintrusionhavebeen al. 2001)(Figures1&2).Basedonpetrographicand describedasintermediate,belongingtothegabbro- chemicalanalyses,threemainzoneshavebeen diorite-basicdioritefield(Malyakov&Belmustakova

218 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

Romania N Danube River

Moesian Foreland

Black 1 Yugoslavia 3 B a Sea 2 2 l k a 4 n F 3 o l d - T 1 Sofia 4 7 8 hru s t B e l t 5 9 6 11 10 5 6 YBVIR Bourgas Back-arc 7 8 Srednogorie 14 rift zone 13 Zone 9 (NBVR) 12 10 Romania Eastern Srednogorie SVIR 15 Black 16 Silistar Serbia Strandja Bulgaria Sea area FYRM Rhodopes Haskovo 17 Greece Turkey Aegean Turkey Sea

Greece 0 100 km

Figure1. Distributionofthemainporphyry(blackrectangle)andepithermal(blackrhomb)depositsandprospectsintheSrednogorieZone of BulgariaandnortheasternTurkey(depositsaregiveninmajorandprospectsinminorsymbol).Theextentofthemagmaticregion sand theback-arcriftzoneoftheEasternSrednogorieZoneareoutlinedafterDabovski etal. (1989,1991)andGeorgiev etal. (2001). Porphyrycopperprospectsanddeposits:1–Dragotintsi;2–Radulovtsi;3–Bratoushkovo;4–Gourgoulyatskikamuk;5–Choupetlovo;6– Studenets;7–Karlievo;8–Medet;9–Asarel;10–Orlovognezdo;11–Kominskochoukarche;12–Vlaikovvruh;13–TsarAssen;14– Prohorovo;15–Burdtseto;16–Silistar-porphyrycopper(?)andepithermal(?);17–Dereköy-DemirköyareaofTurkey.Epithermal prospectsanddeposits:1–Breznik;2–Zlatousha;3–Klisoura;4–Chelopech;5–Byalataprust;6–Petelovo;7–Pesovets;8–Che rvena mogila;9–Bakadzhik;10–Zidarovo.Magmaticregions:SVIR–Strandjavolcano-intrusiveregion;YBVIR–Yambol-Bourgasvolcano- intrusiveregion;NBVR–NorthBourgasvolcanicregion.

1999;Belmoustakova&Malyakov2001).BasedonK 2O thepost-intrusivedikes.Itissuggestedthatthisbodyis content,therocksoftheintrusionexhibitmainlyaCa- theyoungestmagmaticproductinthearea. alkalinetendency,buttholeiiticvarietiesarealsopresent, Baseduponmicroscopicstudiesoftherock-forming thuscorrespondingtotherocksoftheaxialpartofthe minerals,aswellasonfieldobservations,Belmustakova volcanicarc(StrandjaVolcanoIntrusiveRegiononFigure &Malyakov(2001)providedevidenceforthegenesisof 1)(Figure3).However,thehostrockstendtobe thisplutonthroughdifferentiationduringcrystallization enrichedinpotassium.Numerousporphyriticdikesof andthemixingoftwopartiallycrystallizedparent dioritic,quartz-dioritic,trachyticandandesitic magmas. compositioncuttheintrusionanditshostrocks(Figures 2,4a&5b).AsingleE–W-striking,dike-likebodyof Duetothelackofoutcroponshoreandwiththesea dacite(rhyodacite)about10mthickcutsthesouthern lyingtotheeast,thestructureoftheintrusionis partoftheintrusion,aswellastheaplitesandprobably ascertain.Basedonthethermalzonearoundthe

219 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

measured planar parallel structure 28º00’E after mafic minerals reconstructed planar parallel structure 42º02’N 35 after mafic minerals 35 inclined bedding 40 45 20 vertical bedding 30 30 mesoscopic folds 40 normal faults 40 thrust faults 50 30 30 dykes 35 25 45 50 50 40 35 Silistar River Black Sea 40 40 35 65 40 30 30 60 35 25 35 70 45 30 70 Silistar Intrusion

70 40 0 250 500 20 35 m 60 35 30 N

island-arc back-arc 20 zone rift zone 18 35 42º00’N 20

30

Quaternary Silistar intrusion: gabbros, gabbro-diorites to quartz-diorites, porphyritic diorites, aplites volcanics: trachyandesites (mainly), basaltic andesites, andesites, trachy-basaltic andesites volcano-sedimentary succession (Coniacian-Campanian) zone of thermal influence of the intrusion (hornfels)

Figure2. GeologicalmapoftheSilistarvolcano-intrusivearea(forlocation,seeFigure1).

220 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

K2O%

Back-arc rift zone 11 (Northern Bourgas volcanic region) 10 Yambol-Bourgas 9 volcano-intrusive region

8 BG 7 6.9 HKTR 6 6.0 SH 5 Strandja 4.8 volcano-intrusive region HKCA 4 3.6 3 CA 2 1.6 1 TH GD Ga D QzD G 38 43 48 52 57 63 68 73 78

SiO2% ultrabasic basic intermediate acid

Figure3. K2O/Si02 diagram(wt%)oftherocksfromtheEasternSrednogorieZone(contours)onthediagramofPeccerilo&Taylor (1976)extendedandmodifiedbyG.Stanisheva-Vassileva,Y.Yanev,A.Harkovska(modifiedfromDabovski etal. 1991) withadditionoftherocksfromtheSilistararea(insymbols).Therocksfromtheintrusionareshownbyheavydots(data fromMalyakov&Belmustakova1999).Thehostrocksoftheintrusionarevolcanics,shownbyasterisks(datafrom Coulacsasov etal. 1964;StanishevaandVassileff1966).ThelocationofthemagmaticregionsisshownonFigure1. Magmaticseries:TH–tholeiitic;CA–calc-alkaline;HKCA–high-Kcalc-alkaline;SH–Shoshonitic(K-transitional);HKTR– high-Ktransitional;BG–Bulgaritic(hyper-Ktransitionaltoalkaline).Ga–gabbro;D–diorite(andesite);QzD–quartzdiorite; GD–granodiorite;G–granite(rhyolite).

221 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

studiesofMalyakov&Belmustakova(1999)corroborate thisfinding.Apparently,asignificantpartofthebodyis offshore. Theintrusionismostprobablyastock-ordome-like body.Plotteddataofplanarstructures(dikesandplanar parallelstructuresandjoints;Figures5a,b)exhibita linearparallelismandaxialsymmetry,whichindicatethe dipdirectionoftheintrusion.Jointsarewelldeveloped, butstatisticallyonlygentlydominatingjointgroupsare expressed,suggestingastockwork-likefracturing.In manycases,thejointsarefilledwithquartz-calciteand quartz-epidotealongwithoreminerals(Figure4b).The jointfillingisconsistentandnotdependentonthestrike ofthejoints.PrimaryQ,SandLtypejointsarealso recognized(Malyakov&Belmustakova1999).Thestrike ofthedikescoincideswithstatisticallyexpressedjoint groups(Figures5b,c).

Hostrocks RocksthathosttheSilistarintrusionbelongtoaUpper Cretaceousvolcano-sedimentarysuccessionof Coniacian–Campanianageforwhichseveralcontradicting lithostratigraphicsubdivisionsexist(overviewgivenin Nachev&Dimitrova1995).Intheareaofinterest,the successionisrepresentedmainlybyvolcano-sedimentary rocksandtephroidsofvaryingextentandcomposition, amongwhichpsammitestendtodominate.Clastic sedimentaryrocksandcarbonaterocksarescarceor lacking.Thegeneraltrendoftherocksuccessionis NNW–SSE,dippingtotheeast,withfoldsobservedlocally (Figures2&5a).Volcanicrocks,mainlyof trachyandesiticcomposition,(Stanisheva&Vassileff 1966)areparticularlywidespreadandoccuraslava Figure4. (a) Silistarintrusion(1)andwallrocks-trachyandesiteflow flows,pillow-lavaflowsandpossiblyascross-cutting (2)cutbyporphyriticdioritedike(3).Viewfromnorthto south; (b) stockwork-typemineralizationintotheSilistar bodies. intrusion(pyrite,chalcopyrite)cutbylatecarbonate-zeolite Adiatremehasbeenrecognizedinthewallrocksof veinlets(light);(c)alteredexplosivebrecciainthecountry rocksoftheSilistarintrusion. theintrusion(Figure4c).Morphologically,thediatremeis aNE–SW-elongatedbody,about10mthick.Itsexplosive intrusion,aswellasonplanarparallelstructures,itis brecciaconsistsofdiverserockfragments,with suggestedthattheintrusionhasacircularform,notless trachybasalticandesites,basalticandesitesandandesites than1.5kmindiameter,orpossiblyslightlyelliptical, dominating.Fragmentsoftephroidsaresubordinate,and elongatedgenerallyinaN–Sdirection.Intheexposed onlyoneclastofintrusiverock(subvolcanicporphyritic partoftheintrusion,planarparallelstructures(Figure dioriteorfine-graineddiorite)hasbeenfound.Allrocks 5b)definedbytheaccumulationofmaficmaterial(mainly intheexplosivebrecciaarehydrothermallyaltered,with amphibolecrystals)indicateawestwarddip(250°–270°) groundmassvirtuallyabsent. fortheintrusionat70°-80°(Belivanovetal.1992).The

222 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

Figure5. Stereogramsofstructuralelements(Schmidtequalareanet, lowerhemisphere).(a) bedding(S)andaxesofmesoscopic folds(dots)fromthewallrocksofSilistarintrusion (beddingplottedasplanarelements,foldaxesaslinear elements); (b) dikes(dots),aplites(circles)andplanar parallelstructures(darktriangles)fromtheSilistarintrusion (polardiagramofplanarelements); (c) jointsfromthe Silistarintrusionwithmainstatisticallyexpressedjoint groups.

Uralitizationwastheearliestalterationtype,having resultedfromtheintrusionitself.Itwasfollowedby biotitization(Figure6a)andpropylitization.The propyliticalterationoftheplutonandhostrocksis expressedintwostages:hightemperature(epidote- actinolite-chlorite)andmiddletolowtemperature (sericite-chlorite-carbonate-epidoteandchlorite-sericite- carbonate).Latealterationproductsincludequartz- adularia(Figure6b),quartz-carbonate,carbonate, quartz-zeolites(Figure6c)andzeolites.Adulariais presentonlyinthevolcanicrocksoftrachyandesitic composition.MetasomaticK-feldspariswidespreadin theserocks,andhasbeensuggestedtobeof MetasomaticandOreProducts autometasomaticorigin(Stanisheva&Vassileff1966),as resultofamineral-formingprocessof“…relativelyhigh- Wall-rockAlteration– Theintrusionhasawell-developed temperatureK-alkalinecharacter”.However,our alterationaureole(300–400mwide)initsnorthernand discoveryofadulariasuggeststheexpressionofalater southernparts,wherehornfelsformedanduralitization lowertemperatureepithermalprocessprobablynot (amphibole±epidote)isnotable.Tothewestofthe relatedtotheprocessdescribedbyStanisheva&Vassileff intrusion,pooroutcropsandlackofcontacteffect (1966). suggestafaultboundarywiththehostrocks(Figure2).

223 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

porphyrysystem.Itispossiblethatalateretrograde overprint(highertemperaturepropylitic)hasaffectedthe potassiczone.Thesecond(northern)zoneprobably reflectsalower-temperaturepropyliticalterationevent.

Oremineralization– ThecurrentlyknownCu-mineral occurrencesoftheSilistarareahavebeendescribedas: (1)contact-metasomaticinoriginandveinin morphology,withpyrite,magnetite,chalcopyriteand hematite(unpublisheddata,formerCommitteeof GeologyofBulgaria),or(2)vein-liketyperepresenting“a rockblockof10x10m”andoremineralization “representedbyveinletsofmalachite,azurite, chalcopyriteandcolusite(?)”(Kovachev1994). Allciteddescriptionsrefertotheimmediatecontact zoneornarrowzonesintheintrusionitself.Ourdata showamuchlargermineralisedarea(Figure7),at distancesofupto1.5km(northandsouth)fromthe pluton.Farthertothesouthandnorth,mineralizationhas notbeenobserved.Thisfactclearlysuggestsacausal relationshipbetweentheintrusionandthemineralization. Thelackofoutcroptothewestdoesnotpermitatracing ofthemineralisedhaloonland.Inadditiontothe previouslyknowncontact-metasomaticmineralization, ourdataalsoshowthepresenceofstockwork-typeand disseminatedpyriteandchalcopyritemineralization, hostedbyboththeplutonandthehostrocks(Figures4b, 7&8). Themostabundantoremineralsintheintrusionand itshostrocksaremagnetite,pyriteandlesserilmenite. Thesethreemineralsdefineapervasiveaswellas fracture-controlled(Figures7,4b&8a)N–S-oriented mineralizedbeltalongfourkmofcoastline.Ilmenite occursassmallidiomorphictoxenomorphicinclusions. Magnetiteislocallystronglyinhomogeneous,mainlydue Figure6. (a) Secondarybiotiteandoremineralizationinquartz- toilmenitelamellae(titanomagnetite).However,notall diorite;parallelpolars,x150; (b) quartz-adularia oftheinhomogeneitiesarefromilmenite.ElevatedMn mineralization,superimposedonepidote-chlorite-sericite contents(1–2wt%MnO,bymicroprobe)inmanycases alteration;parallelpolars,x300; (c) quartz-sericite- carbonatemetasomaticrock;crossedpolars,x75. suggeststhepresenceofpyrophanite(MnTiO 3)or

jacobsite(MnFe 2O4).Thesmallsizeoftheinclusions, Baseduponthemineralassemblages,itispossibleto however,doesnotpermittheirprecisedetermination. suggesttwogeneralzonesofalteration(Figure7).The Asignificantpartofthemagnetite,especiallyinthe firstone(southern)ischaracterisedbyep-chl-car-ser-bio- hostrocks,ishomogeneous.Ramdohr(1962)suggested act±zeol,andthesecondone(northern)ischaracterised thatsuchmagnetiteisofmetasomaticorigin.This bychl-ep-Ser-car±zeol.Thefirstzone(wherebioandact magnetitecanberecognizedbyitsCrcontent(about1 occur)probablyrepresentsthepotassiccoreofa wt%Cr2O3).Thedevelopmentofmetasomaticmagnetite

224 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

Chl-Ca-Ep±Ser, Zl; 0 200 Ma, Py m

Chl-Ca-Ep; Py, Cpy, Sph, Ga N Ser-Ca±Chl±Ep; northern zone Ma, Py, Cpy, Hm (propylitic) Ep-Ca-Ser±Chl; Ma, Ilm Chl-Ca-Ser-Ep; Ma, Py Ca-Chl-Q; Chl-Ep-Ser; Chl-Ca-Ser±Ep; Py, Cpy, Bo, Chc Ep-Ca-Chl±Ser; Chl-Ep-Ser; Pr-Act; Chl-Ep-Ca; Ma, Py, Cpy, Hm Silistar River Chl-Ep-Ser-Bi; Chl-Ep-Act-Bi Ma, Py, Py-veinlets, Hm Ep-Chl-Ca±Ser Ep-Chl±Ser Ser-Ca±Chl; ±Ep±Ser±Chl Py-veinlets, Cpy Ser-Ca-Ep Ser-Ca-Chl-Ep; Chl-Ser-Ca-Ep; Py Q-Ep-Act Ma, Py; Ep-Chl-Ser-Ca; Py-veinlets, Cpy southern zone (potassic) Ser-Ca-Chl; Ma, Py-veinlets, Hm Ep-Chl-Ser-Ca; Sr-Ca; Ep-Ca±Ser; Ep-Ca; Ur-Bi; Ser-Ca±Ep; Zl; Ep-Ca±Act Ma, Py, Hm Ser-Ca-Chl-Ep; Bi; Bi±Chl; Ma, Py-veinlets, Cpy, Ilm Ma, Py

Ep-Chl-Ser-Ca

Figure7. TypesoforemineralizationandwallrockalterationintheSilistararea.(thefigurecoversthesameareaasFigure 2).Gangueminerals:Ser–sericite,Ca–carbonate,Chl–chlorite,Ep–epidote;Pr–prehnite,Ur–uralite,Act– actinolite,Bi–biotite,Zl–zeolite;Oreminerals:Ma–magnetite,Py–pyrite,Cpy–chalcopyrite,Hm–hematite, Ilm–ilmenite,Sph–sphalerite,Ga–galena,Bo–bornite,Chc–chalcocite.

225 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

isalsoobviousinthepresentcase.Therefore,we Locallychalcopyriteoccursasidiomorphiccrystalsupto8 distinguishtwotypesofmagnetite:magmaticand mminmaximumdimension.Inmostcases,theore metasomatictypes.Themetasomaticoriginofpyritein mineralsaresealedbyquartzandcarbonates.Inisolated themagmaticrocksisindicatedbythelargeamountof cases,borniteandchalcocite,aswellassphalerite,galena silicateinclusionswhicharerelictsofthereplacedmatrix andtetradymitehavealsobeenidentified.Itisnotable (Figures8b,c). thatpyritefromtheintrusioneverywherecontains Inmanycaseshematiteandlimonitedevelopedatthe roundedinclusionsofchalcopyriteandpyrrhotite.Such expenseofpyriteandmagnetitecrystals;theyoccuralso inclusionshavenotbeenobservedinpyriteofthehost asimpregnationsoverstronglyoxidizedmineralization. rocks.SecondaryCuminerals,mainlymalachiteand azurite,areabundant. Parallelingthedisseminatedmineralizationare numerousveinletsandmineralisedzonesalongzonesof Baseduponthetypesoforemineralization,twozones fracturingupto50cminwidth.Thesevein-likezones withdiffuseboundariesmaybeidentified:southernand consistmainlyofpyritethatoccursassmall,idiomorphic northernones(Figure7).Thesouthernoneis cubiccrystals,includedinsoft-fillingoxidizedmaterial. characterizedbypy-ma-cpy-hm-(ilm)andprobably Almostallofthemineralisedfracturesalsocontain coincidestothepotassiczoneofalteration.Typicalofthe chalcopyritethatoccursassmallxenomorphicgrains. northernzoneispy-pa-cpy-hm-(ilm)+(sph+ga)+(bo+hz).

Figure8. (a) Stockwork-typemineralizationdevelopedinthewallrocksoftheSilistarintrusion(pyrite,chalcopyrite,magnetite,malachite ); (band c) metasomaticpyritereplacingsilicategrains.Perthite-liketextureofpyriteisinheritedbythereplacedsilicates;reflected light,x300.

226 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

Asdescribedabove,pyritehasdifferentfeaturesineach intrusion,suggestsacoreofpotassicalteration,atypical oneofthesezones. elementofporphyrysystems.Propyliticalteration,and Themainoreminerals,aswellasspectralanalyses, stockwork-typeanddisseminatedpyrite-chalcopyrite defineCuasthemaineconomiccommodity(Table1).Our mineralization,andwidespreadhalosofpyriteand semi-quantitativeanalysesshowCucontentsinmany metasomaticmagnetitearealsocharacteristicelementsof casesexceeding0.1%andreachingupto1.1% porphyrycoppersystems.Porphyrydepositswithhigh (Kovachev1994).Molybdenumiseitherverylowor magnetitecontentsareusuallygold-rich(e.g.,Sillitoe absent.Silverispresentinabundancesupto1ppm,gold 1979,1996);suchapossibilityremainstobetestedin hasnotbeendetected,andtungstencontentsofupto3 theSilistararea.Furthermore,suchgold-richsystems ppmhavebeendeterminedinmanyplaces.Titaniumis tendtobeimpoverishedinmolybdenum(Sillitoe1996), permanentlypresented(1500–3000ppm)withcontents whichisthecaseinthestudyarea.Thehighmagnetite quiteoftenlyexceeding6000ppm.Metasomatic contentmayalsoindicatetherootsofaporphyrycopper processesseemtohaveplayedthedominantroleinore system(Sillitoe1973;Sawkins1990).Thepresenceof formation. latealterationproductswithmineralstypomorphicfor epithermalsystems(quartz-adularia),aswellassomelow temperaturePb-Znmineralizationmayindicatethe DiscussionandConclusions developmentofalow-sulfidationsystem. Ourdatashowamuchlargermineralizedareathan OurdatashowthatCusharplydominates,especially previouslyknown,andsuggestthepresenceofboth relativetoMobasemetals.Thissuggestspureporphyry porphyryandepithermalsystems.Theprocessof coppermineralization. biotitization,accompaniedbyactinoliteonlyinthe

Table1. Contents(inppm)ofsomeoreelementsinmineralizedandalteredrocksoftheSilistararea.

Cu Mo Pb Zn Ag

Contact-metasomaticzoneoftheSilistarintrusion hornfelswithsulfidesandmalachite >1000 0.1 5 60 0.3 hornfelswithsulfidesandmalachite >1000 - 0 250 1 hornfels 150 0.3 3 <30 <0.1 Zoneswithoremineralization sulfidezone(Py,Cpy)fromtheSilistar intrusionwithmalachite >1000 <0.1 5 100 0.3 stockworkmineralization(Ma,Py,Cpy,Ilm) inalteredgabbrodioritefromtheintrusion >1000 - 1 60 0.3 oxidizedsulfidezoneinthehostrocks, northernoftheintrusion 1200 3 25 120 0.3 stronglyfracturedorezone(Py,Cpy,Bo,Chc,Ma) inthehostrocks,northernoftheintrusion >>1000 9 8 - 1 RocksoftheSilistarintrusion gabbrodiorite 6 <0.1 4 - - gabbrodiorite <1 - 5 30 <0.1 alteredgabbrodiorite 90 - 4 100 - aplite 6 <0.1 2 - - hostrocksoftheSilistarintrusion alteredvolcanics 35 0.1 6 90 0.1 propyliticpsammitictephroid 35 - 6 - - trachyandesite 10 3 12 - <0.1 trachyandesitedyke 15 - 3 - <0.1 gabbrodioritedyke 3 - - 60 <0.1 trachyandesitelavaflow 15 3 6 60 - porphyriticdioritedyke 30 <0.1 3 150 0.2 porphyriticdioritedykewithpyrite 1 - 1 60 0.1 basalticandesite 30 - 15 100 -

Detectionlimitinppm:CuandPb-1;MoandAg-0.1;Zn-30;TheupperlimitforCuis1000ppm(semi-quantitativeanalyses )

227 SILISTARPORPHYRYCOPPER&EPITHERMALSYSTEMS

PorphyryCudepositsrelatedtoLateCretaceous knownfromriftareas(e.g.Sillitoe1972;Westra& subduction-relatedmagmatismarewellknownfromthe Keith1981;Sawkins1990).However,riftzonesarenot BulgarianaswellastheTurkishpartsoftheSrednogorie- thetypicalgeodynamicenvironmentfortheporphyry Strandjaintrusivechain(Figure1).InBulgarianterritory, copper-typedeposits.Itshouldbementionedthatthe theclosestdepositistheBurdzetooredepositofthe chemistryoftheSilistarintrusioncorrespondstotheaxial MalkoTurnovooredistrict(Bogdanov1987),andin partofthevolcanicarc,andtheintrusioncutstherift TurkeytheclosestdepositsarethoseoftheDereköy- filling.Thiscontradictionrequiresfurtherinvestigationsif Demirköyarea(Ohta etal. 1988;Gültekin1999).The acorrectexplanationistobesetforth.Oneofthemcould Silistaroreoccurrencehasmanysimilaritiestothose besituatedobliquetoarcextension.Thepresenceofsuch depositsbut,ingeneral,thosedepositshavehighMoand mineralizationinourcasecouldalsobeattributedtothe basemetalcontents;tungstenmaybepresentorabsent. initialstageofrifting,andthelocationoftheareaonthe Incomparison,theSilistararearockshavenegligibleMo marginofthesuggestedriftzone.Apureextensional andWcontents.Theaforementioneddepositsarelocated regimeprobablyneverdevelopedintheEastern intheaxialpartoftheLateCretaceousvolcanicarc.In SrednogorieZone. contrast,theSilistarprospectislocatedinthesuggested back-arczoneofinitialrifting(Boccaleti etal. 1978; Acknowledgements Dabovski etal. 1991;Georgiev etal. 2001).Ourdata suggest,forthefirsttime,thepresenceofelementsof WearedeeplythankfultoStevenMittwedeandMesut porphyryandepithermalsystemsinthearea,withinthe Soylufortheusefulcommentsandrecommendations anticipantriftzoneoftheLateCretaceousisland-arc concerningearlierversionofthemanuscript.Wewould system. especiallyliketoacknowledgeStevenMittwedeforhis effortstoimprovethelanguage.Thispaperispublished Ithasbeenlargelyacceptedthatporphyrycopperand intheframeworkofprojectABCD-GEODE(Geodynamics molybdenumdepositsarecharacteristicofthesubduction andOreDepositsEvolutionoftheAlpine-Balkan- zones,butporphyrymolybdenumdepositsarealso CarpathianDinarideProvince).

References

BELIVANOV,K.,NAKOV,R.,KERESTEDJIAN,T.&K UNOV, A.1992.Structure BOGDANOV, B.1987. TheCopperOreDepositsontheTerritoryof oftheSilistarvolcano-intrusivecentre(EasternSrednogorie). Bulgaria.Tehnika,Sofia[inBulgarianwithabstractsinRussian ScientificSession"AttemptsandobjectivesoftheBulgarian andEnglish].

mineralogyandpetrology",SofiaAbstracts,34. COULACSASOV,G.,S TANISHEVA,G.&V ASSILEV, L.1964.Etudes BELMOUSTAKOVA,H.&M ALYAKOV,Y.2001.LeploutontheSylistar Stratigraphiquesetpetrographiquesdesenoniendanslesparties (Strandja,Bulgariedusud-est) – Temoignagedumelangedes sud-estdeStrandja.BulletinNIGI 1,179–215.[inBulgarianwith magmasadifferentesstadesdecrystallization. ComptesRendues summaryinFrench]. deL'AcademiebulgaredesSciences 54,57–62. DABOVSKI,CH.,HARKOVSKA,A.,KAMENOV,B.,MAVRUDCHIEV,B.,STANISHEVA- ASSILEVA CHOUNEV ANEV BERGOUGNAN,H.&F OURQUIN,C.1980.Unensembled'elements V ,G.,T ,D.&Y ,Y.1989. MapoftheAlpine communsaunemargeactivealpinedesCarpathesmeridionalesa magmatisminBulgaria(geodynamicapproach) .CIPPinMap- l'IranCentral:ledomainirano-balkanique. BulletindelaSociete making,Sofia. geolgiquedeFrance 22,61–83. DABOVSKI,CH.,HARKOVSKA,A.,KAMENOV,B.,MAVRUDCHIEV,B.,STANISHEVA- VASSILEVA,G.&Y.YANEV.1991.AgeodynamicmodeloftheAlpine BOCCALETTI,M.,MANETTI,P.&PECCERILLO, A.1974.TheBalkanidesasan magmatisminBulgaria.GeologicaBalcanica21, 3–15. instanceofaback-arcthrustbelt:possiblerelationswiththe Hellenides. GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin 85, GEORGIEV,G.,D ABOVSKI,C H.&S TANISHEVA-VASSILEVA, G.2001.East 1077–1084. Srednogorie-BalkanRiftZone. In:Z IEGLER,P.A.,C AVAZZA,W., ROBERTSON,A.H.F.&C RASQUIN,S.(eds), Peri-TethysMemoir6: BOCCALETTI,M.,M ANETTI,P.,P ECCERILLO,A.&S TANISHEVA-VASSILEVA,G. Peri-TethyanRift/WrenchBasinsandPassiveMargines.Memoires 1978.LateCretaceoushigh-potassiumvolcanisminEastern duMuseumNationald’Histoirenaturelle,Paris, 186,259–293. Srednogorie,Bulgaria.GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin 89, 439–447. GÜLTEK‹N,A.H.1999.Geology,mineralogyandgeochemistryoftheCu- ModepositassociatedwiththeSukrupasaintrusion,Derekoy, Kirklareli. GeologicalBulletinofTurkey 42,29–45.

228 R.NAKOV,T.KERESTEDJIAN&A.KUNOV

JANKOVIC,S.1977.TheCopperDepositsandGeotectonicSettingofthe RAMDOHR, P.1962.OreMineralsandtheirsIntregrows .Innostrannaya TethyanEurasianMetallogenicBelt. MineraliumDeposita 12, literatura,Moscow[inRussian,translatedfromGerman]. 37–47. SILLITOE, R.H.1972.Aplatetectonicmodelfortheoriginofporphyry JANKOVIC,S.1997.TheCarpatho-Balkanidesandadjacentarea:asector copperdeposits.EconomicGeology 67,184–197. oftheTethyanEurasianmetallogenicbelt. MineraliumDeposita SILLITOE, R.H.1973.Thetopsandbottomsofporphyrycopper 32,426–433. deposits.EconomicGeology 68,799–815. KOVACHEV, V.1994.ThecopperdepositsinBulgariaandthe SILLITOE, R.H.1979.Somethoughtsongold-richporphyrycopper opportunitiesfortheirmininginantiquity. In:T ODOROVA,H.& deposits.MineraliumDeposita 14,161–174. POPOV, P.(eds),Problemsoftheearliestmetallurgy. MGU,Sofia, BulletinUniversityofMiningandgeology 4,90 –119[in SILLITOE,R.H.1990.Typesofporphyrymolybdenumdeposits. Bulgarian]. MineralogicalMagazine 142,550–553.

MALYAKOV,Y.&B ELMUSTAKOVA,H.1999.Petrologicalandstructural Sillitoe,R.H.1996.Gold-richPorhpyryCopperDeposits:Geological featuresoftheSylistarpluton,South-easternStrandzha ModelandExplorationImplications. In:KIRKHAM,R.V.,S INCLAIR, mountain.GeochemistryMineralogyandPetrology 36,29–44[in W.D.,T HORPE,R.I.&D UKE, J.M.(eds), MineralDeposit BulgarianwithabstractinEnglish]. Modeling.GeologicalAssociationofCanada,SpecialPaper 40, 465–478. NACHEV,I.&D IMITROVA,E.1995.UpperCretaceousstratigraphyofthe EasternSrednaGoraZone.GeologicaBalcanica25,3-26. SAWKINS,F.1990. MetalDepositsinRelationtoPlateTectonics. Springer-Verlag,Berlin. OKAY,A.‹.&fi AH‹NTÜRK,O.1997.GeologyoftheEasternPontides. In: ROBINSON,A.G.(ed).RegionalandPetroleumGeologyoftheBlack STANISHEVA,G.&V ASSILEFF, L.1966.Lestrachyandesitesdesenonien SeaandSurroundingRegions,AAPGMemoir 68,291–311. danslesenvironsdelavilleAchtopoletleursautometasomatose alcaline.BulletinNIGI III,284–310[inBulgarianwithsummaryin OHTA,E.,D O⁄AN,R.,B AT‹K,H.&A BE,M.1988.Geologyand French]. MineralizationofDerekoyPorphyryCopperDeposit,northern ,Turkey. BulletinoftheGeologicalSurveyofJapan 39, STANISHEVA-VASSILEVA,G.1980.TheUpperCretaceousmagmatismin 115–134. SrednogorieZone,Bulgaria:Aclassificationattemptandsome implications.GeologicaBalcanica 10,15–36. PECCERILO,A.&TAYLOR,S.R.1976.GeochemistryofEocenecalc-alkaline volcanicrocksinTurkey. ContributioninMineralogyand VASSILEFF,L.&S TANISHEVA-VASSILEVA, G.1981.Metallogenyofthe Petrology 68,63–81. EurasianCopperBelt.SectorBulgaria. GeologicaBalcanica 11, 73–87. PETROVA,A.,DABOVSKI,CH.,MIHAILOVA,L.,SAVOV,S.&CHATALOV, G.1992. GeologicalMapofBulgariaScale1:100,000,Sheet,Cap WESTRA,G.&KEITH, S.B.1981.Classificationandgenesisofstockwork Silistar,MalkoTurnovo,Rezovo .CommitteeofGeologyand molybdenumdeposits.EconomicGeology 76,844–873. MineralResources,andGeologyandGeophysics.

Received15August2001;revisedtypescriptaccepted22May2002

229