DOCSLIB.ORG

In Re Carrier Iq, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Re Carrier Iq, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation Case3:12-md-02330-EMC Document339 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 96 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 IN RE No. C-12-md-2330 EMC 9 CARRIER IQ, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ ___________________________________/ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND 11 CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 (Docket No. 304) 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation – eighteen (18) individuals from thirteen different 16 states – have filed a second consolidated amended complaint (“SCAC” or “Complaint”) against For the Northern District of California 17 Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc. and a number of manufacturers of mobile devices. The Complaint alleges 18 that Defendants have violated the Federal Wiretap Act as well as a number of state’s privacy and United States District Court 19 consumer protection statutes through the creation and use of Carrier IQ’s software on Plaintiffs’ 20 mobile devices. Plaintiffs allege that Carrier IQ designed, and the Device Manufacturers Defendants 21 embedded, the Carrier IQ Software on their mobile devices and, once embedded, this software 22 surreptitiously intercepted personal data and communications and transmitted this data to Carrier IQ 23 and its customers. Pending before the Court is Defendants’1 joint motion to dismiss the SCAC in its 24 entirety. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ 25 joint motion, and will afford Plaintiffs leave to file a third consolidated amended complaint. 26 1 27 Originally, all the Defendants moved to dismiss the SCAC. After the hearing on the motions to dismiss, Carrier IQ, Inc. reached a settlement with Plaintiffs and subsequently withdrew 28 their motion to dismiss. See Docket Nos. 322, 334. The remaining Defendants are referred to either as “Defendants” or as “Device Manufacturers” throughout this order. Case3:12-md-02330-EMC Document339 Filed01/21/15 Page2 of 96 1 II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 A. Plaintiffs 3 There are 18 plaintiffs in this action, from 13 different states. Below is a chart that identifies 4 the Plaintiff, the state in which each resided during the relevant period, and which mobile device 5 each Plaintiff had with the Carrier IQ Software installed: 6 Plaintiff State Device 7 Patrick Kenny Arizona Samsung Galaxy S 4G HTC Touch 8 Daniel Pipkin California Samsung Galaxy SII 4G LTE 9 Jennifer Patrick California Motorola Bravo 10 Dao Phong California HTC EVO 11 Ryan McKeen Connecticut Samsung Epic Touch 4G 12 Leron Levy Florida Samsung Moment 13 Matthew Hiles Iowa LG Marquee 14 Luke Szulczewski Illinois HTC EVO 4G Michael Allan Kentucky HTC EVO 4G 15 Gary Cribbs Maryland Samsung Galaxy S2 16 Shawn Grisham Mississippi Samsung Epic 4G For the Northern District of California 17 Bobby Cline Michigan2 LG LS670 Optimus S 18 United States District Court Mark Laning Texas Pantech P5000 19 Clarissa Portales Texas HTC EVO 20 Douglas White Texas Huawei Ascend II m865 21 Eric Thomas Texas Samsung Replenish Brian Sandstrom Washington3 HTC EVO 22 Colleen Fischer Wisconsin LG LS670 Optimus S 23 24 25 2 26 Mr. Cline resides in New Hampshire, but the SCAC alleges that “at pertinent times to this matter, he resided in Oakland County, Michigan.” SCAC ¶ 19. Accordingly, for purposes of this 27 order, Mr. Cline will be treated as a resident of Michigan. 3 28 Mr. Sandstrom is a resident of California, but the SCAC alleges that “at pertinent times to this matter, he resided in Seattle, Washington.” SCAC ¶ 24. 2 Case3:12-md-02330-EMC Document339 Filed01/21/15 Page3 of 96 1 In describing each Plaintiff, the SCAC provides that “[u]pon information and belief, [the 2 Plaintiff’s] mobile device came with the Carrier IQ Software and implementing or porting software 3 pre-installed. In addition to using his devices to make phone calls, [the Plaintiff] has used it for web 4 browsing and text messaging, including accessing, inputting, and transmitting personal, private, 5 confidential, and sensitive information. [The Plaintiff] would not have purchased his mobile device 6 had he known that the Carrier IQ Software and related implementing or porting software was 7 installed and operating on his device, and taxing his device’s battery, processor, and memory, as 8 alleged herein.” See SCAC ¶¶ 8-25. 9 B. Defendants 10 The remaining defendants in this action are a number of mobile device manufacturers. 11 Plaintiffs allege that Carrier IQ is the “designer, author, programmer, and vendor” of the IQ Agent 12 software and provided the mobile device manufacturers the “guide or template” needed for the 13 “related implementing or porting software known as the CIQ Interface.” Id. ¶ 26. The IQ Agent and 14 CIQ Interface software forms the basis of Plaintiffs’ claims, as described infra. 15 The remaining Defendants are: (1) HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corporation (collectively 16 “HTC”); (2) Huawei Device USA, Inc. (“Huawei”), (3) LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. For the Northern District of California 17 and LG Electronics, Inc. (collectively “LG”); (4) Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”); (5) Pantech 18 Wireless, Inc. (“Pantech”); (6) Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc. and Samsung United States District Court 19 Electronics Co., Ltd. (collectively “Samsung”). Each Defendant is alleged to have installed the 20 Carrier IQ Software and CIQ Interface software on at least some of their mobile device models. 21 C. Asserted Causes of Action 22 The SCAC alleges five causes of action: 23 • Count 1: Violation of the Federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. § 2551) 24 • Count 2: Violation of State Privacy Laws: Plaintiffs assert their claims on behalf of all residents of the United States under Cal. Penal Code § 502 and on behalf of 25 citizens of the following 35 states under those states’ respective privacy laws: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, 26 Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, 27 Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. 28 3 Case3:12-md-02330-EMC Document339 Filed01/21/15 Page4 of 96 1 • Count 3: Violation of State Consumer Protection Acts: Asserted on behalf of residents of the following 21 states under those states’ respective consumer protection 2 statutes: Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, 3 Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia. 4 • Count 4: Violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301- 5 2312): Asserted on behalf of the residents of the following 34 states (and the District of Columbia): Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of 6 Columbia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New 7 Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, 8 West Virginia, and Wyoming. 9 • Count 5: Violation of the Implied Warranty of Merchantability: asserted on behalf of residents of the states enumerated under Count 4. 10 11 D. Carrier IQ Software Background 12 Carrier IQ “designed, authored, programmed, and caused the installation and activation of 13 the Carrier IQ Software, including the so-called IQ Agent, on the devices at issue in this case.” Id. ¶ 14 62. It also “designed, authored, and provided guides to the Device Manufacturers for designing, 15 authoring, programming, installing, and activating the CIQ Interface in deployments” through the 16 “embedded” method of installation. Id. For the Northern District of California 17 Carrier IQ represents that its software is a “network diagnostics tool” for cell phone service 18 providers. Id. ¶ 40. It is alleged that in reality, the software collects, and transfers, sensitive United States District Court 19 personal data off of a user’s mobile device. See id. ¶¶ 1-2. Specifically, the CIQ Interface software 20 is alleged to be a “wrapping or porting layer of code designed to see recognize and intercept a host 21 of data and content, including SMS text message content and URLs containing search terms, user 22 names, and passwords . and to send that material down to the IQ Agent further processing and 23 possible transmittals.” Id. ¶ 63. The SCAC alleges that the Device Manufacturers “design and 24 program” the CIQ Interface (with Carrier IQ’s aid) and then install the CIQ Interface and IQ Agent 25 software on their mobile devices. Id. Once installed, the software “operates in the background,” 26 such that the typical user has no idea that it is running and cannot turn it off. Id. ¶ 64.4 Users are 27 4 28 It is alleged that even users with advanced technical skills can only remove the Carrier IQ Software by “rooting” their devices and voiding the warranties of their devices. Id. ¶ 64. 4 Case3:12-md-02330-EMC Document339 Filed01/21/15 Page5 of 96 1 never given the choice of opting into or out of the Carrier IQ Software’s functionality. Id. Because 2 it is always running, the Plaintiffs allege that it “taxes the device’s battery power, processor 3 functions, and system memory.” Id. 4 Plaintiffs allege that the data intercepted by the Carrier IQ Software includes the following: 5 (1) URLs (including those which contain query strings with embedded information such as search 6 terms, user names, passwords, and GPS-based geo-location information); (2) GPS-location 7 information; (3) SMS text messages; (4) telephone numbers dialed and received; (5) the user’s 8 keypad presses/keystrokes; and (6) application purchases and uses. Id. ¶ 65. This information is 9 intercepted as part of the Carrier IQ Software’s “calls” on the device operating system for “metrics.” 10 Id.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Android OS Security: Risks and Limitations a Practical Evaluation
    FRAUNHOFER RESEARCH INSTITUTION FOR APPLIED AND INTEGRATED SECURITY ANDROID OS SECURITY: RISKS AND LIMITATIONS A PRACTICAL EVALUATION RAFAEL FEDLER, CHRISTIAN BANSE, CHRISTOPH KRAUSS, AND VOLKER FUSENIG 5/2012 Android OS Security: Risks and Limitations A Practical Evaluation Version 1.0 Rafael Fedler, Christian Banse, Christoph Krauß, and Volker Fusenig Contact: [email protected] AISEC Technical Reports AISEC-TR-2012-001 May 2012 Fraunhofer Research Institution AISEC Parkring 4 85748 Garching Abstract The number of Android-based smartphones is growing rapidly. They are increas- ingly used for security-critical private and business applications, such as online banking or to access corporate networks. This makes them a very valuable tar- get for an adversary. Up to date, significant or large-scale attacks have failed, but attacks are becoming more sophisticated and successful. Thus, security is of paramount importance for both private and corporate users. In this paper, we give an overview of the current state of the art of Android security and present our extensible automated exploit execution framework. First, we provide a sum- mary of the Android platform, current attack techniques, and publicly known exploits. Then, we introduce our extensible exploit execution framework which is capable of performing automated vulnerability tests of Android smartphones. It incorporates currently known exploits, but can be easily extended to integrate future exploits. Finally, we discuss how malware can propagate to Android smart- phones today and in the future, and which possible threats arise. For example, device-to-device infections are possible if physical access is given. NES Research Department at Fraunhofer AISEC The Fraunhofer Research Institution for Applied and Integrated Security AISEC1 is one leading expert for applied IT security and develops solutions for immediate use, tailored to the customer’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy and Data Protection in Mobile Applications a Study on the App Development Ecosystem and the Technical Implementation of GDPR
    Privacy and data protection in mobile applications A study on the app development ecosystem and the technical implementation of GDPR NOVEMBER 2017 www.enisa.europa.eu European Union Agency For Network and Information Security Privacy and data protection in mobile applications November 2017 About ENISA The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) is a centre of network and information security expertise for the EU, its member states, the private sector and EU citizens. ENISA works with these groups to develop advice and recommendations on good practice in information security. It assists member states in implementing relevant EU legislation and works to improve the resilience of Europe’s critical information infrastructure and networks. ENISA seeks to enhance existing expertise in member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at www.enisa.europa.eu. Contact For queries in relation to this paper, please use [email protected] For media enquires about this paper, please use [email protected]. Legal notice Notice must be taken that this publication represents the views and interpretations of ENISA, unless stated otherwise. This publication should not be construed to be a legal action of ENISA or the ENISA bodies unless adopted pursuant to the Regulation (EU) No 526/2013. This publication does not necessarily represent state-of the-art and ENISA may update it from time to time. Third-party sources are quoted as appropriate. ENISA is not responsible for the content of the external sources including external websites referenced in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Sally Springett\My Documents\Oct 13
    Alternative Streaming Video Sources by Ira Wilsker sn’t rapidly evolving technology wonderful? While we can still watch a handful of free TV channels over the air with a simple antenna, relatively few people still do. Stores that rent DVDs still exist in relatively Ismall numbers compared to just a few years ago, and VHS rentals have just about gone the way of the dinosaur. There are still thousands of limited selection kiosk type vending machine video rental boxes, typically adjacent to supermarkets, convenience stores, and fast food restaurants, but they still require time The Rochester Computer Society, Inc. Monitor / October 2013 1 and mileage to rent and return videos. Most cable and satellite TV providers offer some form of video streaming on demand at varying prices, but they are now facing significant competition from alternative streaming video services that send TV and movies over the internet directly to the consumer. On a recent visit to see my grandkids in Georgia, my daughter had full length movies from Netflix streaming on her internet connected flat screen TV in her living room; my three year old granddaughter had an inexpensive Android tablet connected to the home Wi-Fi, and expertly manipulated the screen selecting movies and cartoons on the child-safe “Kids Netflix.” For the few who may be totally unaware, Netflix (netflix.com) is currently the industry leader in streaming movies and TV to computers, smart devices (phones and tablets), TVs, and other network connected devices. According to the Netflix website, “For only $7.99 a month, you get unlimited movies and TV episodes instantly over the Internet to your TV or computer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis on Carrier IQ
    Antiy Labs A Comprehensive Analysis on Carrier IQ Antiy Cert Antiy Labs (December 2011) Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 1 About This Report ..................................................................................... 2 Spreading Channels .................................................................................. 2 Static Analysis on Samples ........................................................................ 4 Software Components ............................................................................... 4 APK Installation File .................................................................................. 5 IQRD.apk ............................................................................................... 5 HtcIQAgent.apk ..................................................................................... 6 SO DLL ....................................................................................................... 9 Configuration Files .................................................................................... 9 ELF Executable File .................................................................................. 10 Dynamic Analysis on Samples ................................................................. 10 Analysis on Trial Version Software .......................................................... 13
    [Show full text]
  • 74 Regulating Data Privacy of Connected Vehicles: How
    Regulating Data Privacy of Connected Vehicles: How Automotive Giants Can Protect Themselves and Their Golden Goose Halie B. Peacher* Abstract The growth of automotive technology and data privacy are fundamentally intertwined. Auto manufacturers can collect 25 GB of data from vehicles at the rate of 2 GB per hour. At that rate, automotive manufacturers may increase profits, enhance driving experiences, and make driving safer. Companies that own and sell the data from these vehicles are expected to gain a thirty-five percent increase in revenue. With this great monetary benefit, comes the decrease in consumer privacy and the increase in the exploitation of a consumer’s everyday life. This exploitation ranges from a company’s access to everything from text messages to driving history. Thus, as the rat race for profits speeds up and becomes more competitive, companies will have to maintain compliance with regulations such as the Global Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the California Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”). These regulations are put into place to stifle the exploitation of consumer data and to ensure the protection of consumers. Additionally, as companies gain more access to consumer data, companies will likely face great liability any time there is a data breach or a hack that leads to stolen consumer data. This article looks at the history of automobiles, privacy laws, and data breaches, and explores how the future of automobiles is impacted by the increase in consumer data consumption. Specifically, this article analyzes: (1) how manufacturers can maintain compliance with the GDPR and the CCPA to protect all consumers who encounter a connected vehicle; and (2) whether the consumer or the automobile company is liable for a potential data breach.
    [Show full text]
  • Ddaymag 37.Pdf
    n. 37 / 5 dicembre 20 estratto da www.dday.it p. EDITORIALE GAME & MOVIE / Un’offerta che si affianca ai decoder Mediaset I negozi di elettronica DDAY.it magazine 37 sono il termometro Mediaset Premium Play In questo fascicolo della crisi tra le altre cose... Nel sentire comune, la crisi che arriva anche su Xbox 360 PEOPLE & MARKET attanaglia i mercati ha una genesi finanziaria, legata a qualche Per accedere basta un abbonamento a Mediaset Premium e Xbox Live Gold 02 SIAE, ma quanto acrobazia delle banche e alla mi costi? folta schiera degli speculatori. di R. Pezzali Di certo, però, la crisi si è ora Ormai era il segreto di Pulcinella, e un abbonamento Xbox Live Gold e 05 Sky si ritira trasferita sull’economia reale e dal beauty contest sulla capacità di spesa. In fasi qualcosa si era capito già quando uno a Mediaset Premium con opzione come queste l’elettronica di Mediaset era stata scelta da Microsoft Play, anche se - ricordiamo - con gli ulti- consumo vive di sentimenti come partner di contenuti per la sua mi profili tariffari Mediaset, se si prende TV & VIDEO contrastanti: da un lato i budget piattaforma Xbox TV. Con l’aggiorna- l’opzione Play si ha diritto anche ad un familiari si sono inevitabilmente mento della dashboard, i possessori di decoder TS7500. Dove sta allora il van- 03 IGNIS produrrà OLED contratti; dall’altro la spesa una Xbox 360 con abbonamento Live taggio di avere Premium Play anche da 300 dpi in beni semidurevoli è vista Gold potranno accedere al servizio di su Xbox se già viene dato un decoder? sicuramente come più consona a VOD di Mediaset usando la console.
    [Show full text]
  • Patents and Small Participants in the Smartphone Industry
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2015 Patents and Small Participants in the Smartphone Industry Joel R. Reidenberg Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] N. Cameron Russell Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Maxim Price Fordham University School of Law Anand Mohand Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Joel R. Reidenberg, N. Cameron Russell, Maxim Price, and Anand Mohand, Patents and Small Participants in the Smartphone Industry, 18 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 375 (2015) Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/640 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PATENTS AND SMALL PARTICIPANTS IN THE SMARTPHONE INDUSTRY Joel R. Reidenberg, N. Cameron Russell, Maxim Price & Anand Mohan* CITE AS: 18 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 375 (2015) http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/smartphones.pdf ABSTRACT For intellectual property law and policy, the impact that patent rights may have on the ability of small companies to compete in the smartphone market is a critically important issue for continued robust innovation. Open and competitive markets provide vitality for the development of smartphone technologies. Nevertheless, the impact of patent rights on the smartphone industry is an unexplored area of empirical research.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF, Patents and Small Participants in the Smartphone Industry
    PATENTS AND SMALL PARTICIPANTS IN THE SMARTPHONE INDUSTRY January 15, 2015 Research Team Joel R. Reidenberg Stanley D. and Nikki Waxberg Chair, Fordham Academic Director, Fordham CLIP N. Cameron Russell Executive Director, Fordham CLIP Maxim Price Patent Research Fellow, Fordham CLIP Anand Mohan ProJect Fellow, Fordham CLIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was funded by the World Intellectual Property Organization pursuant to the memorandum of understanding between Fordham CLIP and WIPO, dated April 11, 2014. The authors would like to thank Nuno Carvalho, Carsten Fink and Julio Raffo from WIPO and the participants in the CLIP-WIPO workshop for comments on an earlier draft. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and are not presented as those of any of the sponsoring organizations or financial supporters of those organizations. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. © 2014. Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy and the World Intellectual Property Organization.. This study may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for educational and non- commercial purposes provided that attribution to Fordham CLIP and WIPO is included. i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 II. DEFINING THE MARKET AND PATENT DATABASE ...........................................................2 III. SMALL PARTICIPANTS IN THE SMARTPHONE MARKET AND DATA COLLECTION5 A. Identification of the
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier IQ: Another Silly Privacy Panic December 2, 2011 Paul Rubin
    Carrier IQ: Another Silly Privacy Panic December 2, 2011 Paul Rubin By now everyone is probably aware of the “tracking” of certain cellphones (Sprint, iPhone, T-Mobile, AT&T perhaps others) by a company called Carrier IQ. There are lots of discussions available; a good summary is on one of my favorite websites, Lifehacker; also here from CNET. Apparently the program gathers lots of anonymous data mainly for the purpose of helping carriers improve their service. Nonetheless, there are lawsuits and calls for the FTC to investigate. Aside from the fact that the data is used only to improve service, it is also useful to ask just what people are afraid of. Clearly the phone companies already have access to SMS messages if they want it since these go through the phone system anyway. Moreover, of course, no person would see the data even if it were somehow collected. The fear is perhaps that “… marketers can use that data to sell you more stuff or send targeted ads…” (from the Lifehacker site) but even if so, so what? If apps are using data to try to sell you stuff that they think that you want, what is the harm? If you do want it, then the app has done you a service. If you don’t want it, then you don’t buy it. Ads tailored to your behavior are likely to be more useful than ads randomly assigned. The Lifehacker story does use phrases like “freak people out” and “scary” and “creepy.” But except for the possibility of being sold stuff, the story never explains what is harmful about the behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for the Integration of Mobile Device Features in PLM
    Reihe Informationsmanagement im Engineering Karlsruhe Jens Michael Hopf Framework for the Integration of Mobile Device Features in PLM Band 2 – 2016 Jens Michael Hopf Framework for the Integration of Mobile Device Features in PLM Reihe Informationsmanagement im Engineering Karlsruhe Band 2 – 2016 Herausgeber Karlsruher Institut für Technologie Institut für Informationsmanagement im Ingenieurwesen (IMI) o. Prof. Dr. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. Jivka Ovtcharova Eine Übersicht aller bisher in dieser Schriftenreihe erschienenen Bände finden Sie am Ende des Buchs. Framework for the Integration of Mobile Device Features in PLM by Jens Michael Hopf Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Fakultät für Maschinenbau Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 2. März 2016 Referenten: Prof. Dr. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h. c. Jivka Ovtcharova Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil Ralph Stelzer Impressum Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) KIT Scientific Publishing Straße am Forum 2 D-76131 Karlsruhe KIT Scientific Publishing is a registered trademark of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Reprint using the book cover is not allowed. www.ksp.kit.edu This document – excluding the cover, pictures and graphs – is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 DE License (CC BY-SA 3.0 DE): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/ The cover page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 3.0 DE License (CC BY-ND 3.0 DE): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/de/ Print on Demand 2016 ISSN 1860-5990 ISBN 978-3-7315-0498-6 DOI: 10.5445/KSP/1000053093 Framework for the Integration of Mobile Device Features in PLM Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften von der Fakultät für Maschinenbau des Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Jens Michael Hopf Diplôme d’Ingénieur du Cnam, spécialité informatique Grade de Master - Master’s Degree Hauptreferent: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone-Equipped Floating Robots Transmit Water Data in Real-Time | the Verge 16/05/12 4:06 PM
    Smartphone-equipped floating robots transmit water data in real-time | The Verge 16/05/12 4:06 PM Log In or Join Breaking: Damon Lindelof, Masi Oka, Marco Arment: On The Verge, Thursday! Compare (0) Clear FLASH DANCE! Products Cellphones Tablets Laptops All-in-ones Desktops Cameras E-readers Gaming Television Home Theater Headphones / Headsets Speakers / Docks PMPs Displays Storage Modems Input Devices Misc. Recent Cellphones Eluga V P-06D Desire C 113 112 111 110 Arrows Z ISW13F Urbano Progresso Medias BR IS11N http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/10/3012143/smartphone-equipped-floating-robots-water-testing Page 1 of 20 Smartphone-equipped floating robots transmit water data in real-time | The Verge 16/05/12 4:06 PM Medias CH 101N See All Recent Tablets MarquisPad MP977 Regza AT830 Regza AT570 Regza AT500 eGlide XL Pro 2 Eee Pad MeMO ME171 MID7035 Studybook Excite 13 Excite 10 See All Recent Laptops 14-inch Thin + Light Notebook ThinkPad L530 ThinkPad L430 VAIO E Series 17 VAIO E Series 15 VAIO S Series 13 VAIO S Series 15 ThinkPad T530 ThinkPad T430s ThinkPad T430 See All Recent All-in-ones t410 ThinkCentre Edge M72z ThinkCentre M92z (23-inch) ThinkCentre M92z (20-inch) Alto Lisa TouchSmart 520xt Omni 27qd Omni 220qd LX815 See All Recent Desktops http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/10/3012143/smartphone-equipped-floating-robots-water-testing Page 2 of 20 Smartphone-equipped floating robots transmit water data in real-time | The Verge 16/05/12 4:06 PM ROG CG8580 ThinkCentre M72e ThinkCentre M92p Pavilion HPE h9 Phoenix (mid 2012) Pavilion HPE h8
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone Sensor Data As Digital Evidence
    Smartphone Sensor Data as Digital Evidence Alexios Mylonas , Vasilis Meletiadis , Lilian Mitrou , Dimitris Gritzalis Information Security and Critical Infrastructure Protection Research Laboratory Dept. of Informatics, Athens University of Economics & Business (AUEB) 76 Patission Ave., Athens, GR-10434, Greece {amylonas, meletiadisv, l.mitrou, dgrit}@aueb.gr Abstract . The proliferation of smartphones introduces new opportunities in digital forensics. One of the reasons is that smartphones are usually equipped with sensors (e.g. accelerometer, pro- ximity sensor, etc.), hardware which can be used to infer the user’s context. This context may be useful in a digital investigation, as it can aid in the rejection or acceptance of an alibi, or even reve- al a suspect’s actions or activities. Nonetheless, sensor data are volatile, thus are not available in post-mortem analysis. Thus, the only way to timely acquire them, in case such a need arises during a digital investigation, is by software that collects them when they are generated by the suspect’s actions. In this paper we examine the feasibility of ad-hoc data acquisition from smartphone sen- sors by implementing a device agent for their collection in Android, as well as a protocol for their transfer. Then, we discuss our experience regarding the data collection of smartphone sensors, as well as legal and ethical issues that arises from their collection. Finally, we describe scenarios re- garding the agent’s preparation and use in a digital investigation. Keywords: Smartphones, Digital Forensics, Investigation Models, Sensor, Sensor Data, Informati- on Gathering, Android. 1 Introduction The proliferation of smartphones 1 - devices with increasing popularity due to their proces- sing and network capabilities, low cost, and dimensions - introduces new challenges to digital forensics.
    [Show full text]