DOCSLIB.ORG

COUNTY of BERKS Purchasing Department Berks County Services Center, 633 Court Street, Reading, PA 19601 Tel: 610-478-6168 Fax: 610-898-7404

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COUNTY of BERKS Purchasing Department Berks County Services Center, 633 Court Street, Reading, PA 19601 Tel: 610-478-6168 Fax: 610-898-7404 COUNTY OF BERKS Purchasing Department Berks County Services Center, 633 Court Street, Reading, PA 19601 Tel: 610-478-6168 Fax: 610-898-7404 Kelly A. Laubach, CPPB, Director of Contracts and Procurement NOTICE TO PROPOSERS Addendum #1 - Issued on August 23, 2017 Re: Request for Proposal #17-29-KL, Purchasing Card & ePayables Program This Addendum should consist of a total of 94 pages. If you have not received this Addendum in its entirety, please contact the County of Berks Purchasing Department at (610) 478-6168. The County hereby amends the above noted Request for Proposal (RFP) as indicated herein. All other details of the RFP remain unchanged. A pre-proposal conference was held on August 16, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. via teleconference. The following firms/agencies were represented at the meeting: Name Company Andrew Seroka County of Berks Ron Rutkowski County of Berks Kelly Laubach County of Berks Kelly Okken County of Berks Linda Weaver County of Berks Todd Balfaser BB&T Sue Gluszynski BB&T Tom Bittenbinder BB&T Susie Parker BB&T Carlo Borgia Wells Fargo Beverly Wright Wells Fargo Rachel Wright Wells Fargo Mary Johnston Wells Fargo Shane Southwell Wells Fargo Ryan McGowan M&T Joann Smith M&T Trish Kieffer M&T Kimberly Alzono Bank of America Jennifer Tanseco CitiBank Kimberley Stedman CitiBank Valeria Cappucci JP Morgan Chase Maggie Miller JP Morgan Chase Robin Daly JP Morgan Chase Jean Taplett JP Morgan Chase Chad Benson Commerce Bank Rob Dindak Commerce Bank 1 Following is a list of questions asked at the pre-proposal conference or submitted in writing and the County’s response to each question. The responses to these questions form an integral part of the RFP package and these responses may alter a Proposer’s responsibilities in submitting a proposal. Where conflict exists between these responses and information in the original RFP package, the responses shall prevail. The following statements were made at the start of the pre-proposal meeting: • In accordance with Section One, Clause 1.5, Proposers shall carefully review this RFP for defects, inconsistencies or ambiguities. Comments concerning defects, inconsistencies or ambiguities must be made in writing and received by the RFP’s point-of-contact (see cover page), at least seven (7) business days prior to the Proposal Deadline. This will allow for the issuance of any necessary addenda. All questions must be in writing and directed to the RFP’s point-of-contact. This RFP cannot be modified except by a written addenda issued by the County. The decision on whether an addendum is required shall be made by the County in its sole discretion. If an addendum is issued, it will be provided to all parties who were provided a copy of the RFP by the County’s Purchasing Department. • An addendum will be issued to respond to any and all questions and clarifications submitted and/or identified as needed by the County. • Follow the instructions in Section 5, which will identify all the proposal submission requirements. Remember that requested changes to the terms and conditions are considered within the evaluation committee members scoring during the evaluation process. • Attachment A, Clause 9 Insurance – Please review carefully with your agency/broker to ensure that you meet or exceed all the limits and the endorsements identified therein. • Proposal deadline is Tuesday, September 26, 2:00 p.m. • Section 4 – Specifications, Clause 4.1.2 – The County currently utilizes Oracle E- Business Suite for its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems and is operating on version 12.1.3. The County hereby amends the above noted Request for Proposal (RFP) as indicated herein. All other details of the RFP remain unchanged. Language that is underlined denotes that which has been added. Language that has been stricken denotes that which is hereby removed. CLARIFICATION 1: REVISION OF TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS One Introduction and Instructions Two Method of Vendor Selection Three Standard Contract Information Four Specifications 2 Five Proposal Format and Content Six Evaluation Criteria and Process ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Proposed Form of Agreement and General Conditions Attachment B Non-Collusion Affidavit Form Attachment C Rebate & Cost Proposal Form Attachment D County Expense Report – 2016 Attachment D1 Detailed County Expense Report Attachment E Piggyback Form SECTION 4 - SPECIFICATIONS, CLAUSE 4.1.4 AND 4.3.2 Q2. Is the County looking for a “One-Card” solution (travel and pcard combination)? A2. Refer to Section 4, Clauses 4.1.4 and 4.3.2. The need will still exist to limit certain cards solely for travel related expenditures. SECTION 4 - SPECIFICATIONS, CLAUSE 4.1.4 Q3. Who is the County’s current provider? A3. Refer to Section 4, Clause 4.1.4 for details. SECTION 4 - SPECIFICATIONS, CLAUSE 4.1.5 Q4. Will the travel spend be part of this project? A4. Yes, refer to Section 4, Clause 4.1.5 for details. SECTION 4 - SPECIFICATIONS, CLAUSE 4.1.5 Q5. What is the amount of spend on travel cards (individual and/or group cards)? What is the travel expenditures for the County? A5. Refer to Section 4, Clause 4.1.5 for details. SECTION 4 – SPECIFICATIONS, CLAUSE 4.2.8 Q6. Will County provide file for vendors electronically? Specifically looking for payment date, payment number, amount, payment type, supplier id, supplier name, supplier address, city, state, ZIP, country, current payment terms. A6. Yes, Attachment D1 – Detailed County Expense Report is included with this addendum. SECTION 4 – SPECIFICATIONS AND SECTION 5 – PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT Q7. There seems to be redundancy in Section 5 and Section 4.4. Do vendors need to address both separately? A7. Section 4 lays out the scope of work. Section 5 identifies the format and all the information that must be addressed in your proposal. Vendors must meet the minimum qualification requirements as listed in Clause 4.5, in order to proceed to evaluation by committee. If there are exceptions or pieces that you don’t feel you can meet, these must be addressed during the Q&A period. 3 CLARIFICATION 8: SECTION 5 – PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT, CLAUSE 5.1 Proposals shall be submitted with one (1) original and four five (5) copies printed on 8 ½” x 11” paper, and one (1) word searchable electronic copy to: County of Berks, c/o County Controller, Berks County Services Center, 633 Court Street, 12th Floor, Reading, PA, 19601. SECTION 6 – EVALUATION CRITERIA AND EVALUATION Q9. Will there be specific points assigned to the criteria? A9. No points will be published. CLARIFICATION 10: SECTION 6 – EVALUATION CRITERIA AND EVALUATION SECTION 6 - Evaluation Criteria and Process A committee of County personnel representing the functions of [list dept disciplines] will review and evaluate Proposals submitted in response to this RFP (“Evaluation Committee”). The proceedings of the Evaluation Committee are confidential. Members of the Evaluation Committee are not to be contacted by the Proposers. All communication between a Proposer and the County shall be through Kelly Laubach, Director of Contracts and Procurement. Proposals will be evaluated against the following criteria using a pass/fail determination. • Financial stability of the Proposer (based on our examination of the required financial statements). • Compliance with the essential minimum experience and qualifications of the Proposer. • Compliance with the essential minimum experience and qualifications of the project team members. • Evidence of sufficient levels of insurance coverage. Proposals must pass this first tier evaluation to move on to the second tier evaluation described below. Proposals will be evaluated against the following criteria using point-rated scoring. • Price – The proposed fees associated with the program as well as the rebate and incentive structures. • Ability (Resource Commitment) – The Proposer’s ability to perform the required service expeditiously. The Proposer must have the resources to be capable of meeting the required project completion schedule. • Competence (Qualifications of Personnel) – The Proposer’s competence in performing the required service as indicated by the training, education and experience of the personnel assigned to the project team. The Proposer must have in their possession all appropriate and required certifications, permits, and licenses. • Past Performance – The Proposer’s past performance on similar projects. If the County cannot verify references based on the information provided in the Proposal, the scoring for this criteria factor may be affected. • Quality and Feasibility (Technical & Organizational Approach) – The quality and feasibility of the Technical Proposal and the Proposer’s 4 understanding of the project’s requirements and the overall goals and objectives of the project. • Proposal Content/Format – The Proposal’s compliance with the content and format requirements of the RFP. Prioritized Criteria: • Quality and Feasibility (Technical & Organizational Approach) – The quality and feasibility of the Technical Proposal and the Proposer’s understanding of the project’s requirements and the overall goals and objectives of the project. • Ability (Resource Commitment) – The Proposer’s ability to perform the required service expeditiously. The Proposer must have the resources to be capable of meeting the required project completion schedule. • Competence (Qualifications of Personnel) – The Proposer’s competence in performing the required service as indicated by the training, education and experience of the personnel assigned to the project team. The Proposer must have in their possession all appropriate and required certifications, permits, and licenses. • Past Performance – The Proposer’s past performance on similar projects. If the County cannot verify references based on the information provided in the Proposal, the scoring for this criteria factor may be affected. • Proposal Content/Format – The Proposal’s compliance with the content and format requirements of the RFP. • Price – The proposed fees associated with the program as well as the rebate and incentive structures. ATTACHMENT A – PROPOSED FORM OF AGREEMENT AND GENERAL CONDITIONS Q11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire and Warrington
    Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasvegasadvisor Issue 3
    $5 ANTHONY CURTIS’ March 2018 Vol. 35 LasVegasAdvisor Issue 3 INFERNO AT PARIS It’s on fire … pg. 8 WYNN (LESS) RESORTS What’s next? … pg. 1 THE NEW TAX LAW How does it affect gamblers? … pg. 3 EATING LAS VEGAS ON THE CHEAP 25 top restaurants with bargain pricing … pg. 4 TWO INSTA- COMPS Play … Eat … pgs. 8, 11 CASINOS Local (702) Toll Free • 2018 LVA MEMBER REWARDS • Numbers (800) († 855) (††866) (* 877) (**888) Local Toll Free ALL-PURPOSE COMP DRINKS Aliante Casino+Hotel+Spa ........692-7777 ............477-7627* †† 50% off up to $50 (Palms) Free Drink Brewers, Kixx, or Havana Bar (Boulder Station); 3 Free Aria ............................................590-7111 ............359-7757 Rounds (Ellis Island); Free Margarita or Beer (Fiesta Rancho); Free Mar- Arizona Charlie’s Boulder ..........951-5800 ............362-4040 ACCOMMODATIONS Arizona Charlie’s Decatur ..........258-5200 ............342-2695 garita (Sunset Station) Bally’s ........................................739-4111 ............603-4390* 2-For-1 Room (El Cortez) Bellagio ......................................693-7111 ............987-7111** SHOWS Binion’s ......................................382-1600 ............937-6537 BUFFETS 2-For-1 Hypnosis Unleashed (Binion’s), Show in the Cabaret (Westgate Boulder Station ..........................432-7777 ............683-7777 2-For-1 Buffet (Aliante Casino+Hotel, Arizona Charlie’s Boulder, Arizona Las Vegas); 2-For-1 or 50% off Beatleshow (Saxe Theater), Nathan Bur- Caesars Palace..........................731-7110 ............227-5938††
    [Show full text]
  • Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs Between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948
    [Intelligence Service (Arab Section)] June 30, 1948 Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948 Contents 1. General introduction. 2. Basic figures on Arab migration 3. National phases of evacuation and migration 4. Causes of Arab migration 5. Arab migration trajectories and absorption issues Annexes 1. Regional reviews analyzing migration issues in each area [Missing from document] 2. Charts of villages evacuated by area, noting the causes for migration and migration trajectories for every village General introduction The purpose of this overview is to attempt to evaluate the intensity of the migration and its various development phases, elucidate the different factors that impacted population movement directly and assess the main migration trajectories. Of course, given the nature of statistical figures in Eretz Yisrael in general, which are, in themselves, deficient, it would be difficult to determine with certainty absolute numbers regarding the migration movement, but it appears that the figures provided herein, even if not certain, are close to the truth. Hence, a margin of error of ten to fifteen percent needs to be taken into account. The figures on the population in the area that lies outside the State of Israel are less accurate, and the margin of error is greater. This review summarizes the situation up until June 1st, 1948 (only in one case – the evacuation of Jenin, does it include a later occurrence). Basic figures on Arab population movement in Eretz Yisrael a. At the time of the UN declaration [resolution] regarding the division of Eretz Yisrael, the following figures applied within the borders of the Hebrew state: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Paper Title the Marcan Concept of Discipleship: An
    Introduction Paper title The Marcan concept of discipleship: An exegesis of Mark 8.27-10.52. Focal theory The concept of discipleship which involves ‘taking up one’s cross’ within the daily Christian experience remains a challenging and often distant concept for modern Christians within affluent communities. Purpose of the paper The purpose of the paper is to explore the Marcan concept of discipleship through an exegesis of Mark 8.27-10.52. The paper’s hypothesis is that whilst recognizing that Mark provides a complex soteriology’,1 and a multi-faceted Christology, the evn th/| o`dw/| motif contained within the focus passage, understood in the light of the Son of Man’s earthly and eschatological roles, incorporates key Marcan theology that directly addresses the understanding of discipleship within the modern context. 1 The complex soteriology within Mark has attracted much debate, particularly focusing on the so-called ‘ransom saying’ of 10.45, a debate that can be traced back to the subjective and objective view of the atonement as classically understood by Abelhard (subjective) and Anselm (objective). Stott provides an excellent overview of the history of the debate between the objective and the subjective views of the atonement (see John R.W. Stott, The Cross of Christ (Leicester, UK: Inter-Varsity Press, 1986), pp. 17-351). Within modern scholarship, some such as Allison opting for a more ‘Jewish’ understanding of Jesus’ death (partly as a result of the understandings gained in the so-called ‘Third Quest’ for the historical Jesus), and others such as Hengel opting for an approach based on an understanding of the early kerygmatic preaching of the apostles.
    [Show full text]
  • Deric Hettinger's Portfolio
    Deric Hettinger Reading, Pennsylvania 610.413.5681 - [email protected] www.hettinger-rebel-lion.com www. Root222.com Exhibitions (* denotes solo exhibitions) (*** denotes "Root 222 crew" exhibitions) 2011 *** Glamtaskik x Root 222, Art show / Fashion show, The Candy Factory, Lancaster PA ***Art of the Park, West Chester NY */*** Root 222, The Antagonist Movement, Niagara NYC ***Pancakes and Booze, Plan B art show, The Lucid Gallery, Philadelphia PA ***Root 222, The Antagonist Movement, Niagara NYC 2010 ***Live Nude art, nudity not included, The Antagonist Movement, Niagara, NYC ***12/11/10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 222 1 Art show !, Reading River Tribe Studios, Reading PA ***Violence & Glitter: an exploration of dichotomy in art, Indoor Rooftop Studios, Philadelphia PA *** Art on the Farm, Chiques Creek Farm, Manheim PA *** The Occident Express, Progressive Gallery, Lancaster PA *** Rockin the Halls/Spread Some Bread, Chameleon club, Lancaster PA 2009 *** The New Black Friday (Root 222), Anthony Mark / Schon Wanner / Myself. (Group show) Progressive Gallery, Lancaster PA ***Art fest on Market, Main Street, Wilmington DE ***First Friday, Melloy Galleria Pr. DE., Wilmington DE *** I & I & I (Root 222), Anthony Mark /Schon Wanner /Myself (group paintings), Progressive Gallery, Lancaster PA Grand Opening Art Explosion, Progressive Gallery, Lancaster PA Soft Opening, Progressive Gallery, Lancaster PA Grand Opening show, The Local Beat, New Cumberland PA 2008 Thanksgiving, Dermaennerchor, Harrisburg PA Canvas Clash, BS Shirts Gallery, Old City Philadelphia PA *The Love between Oil & Water, the Dada Art Gallery, Pottstown PA Design, Drink, & be Merry (the craft brew art movement), The Goggle Works, Reading PA Gravity, the Gravity book store, Reading PA Berks Art Alliance Membership Show, the Institute of the Arts, Wyomissing PA 2007 *Giftmas, Die Gallerie / the Alpenhof, Reading, PA LIFE & the Horrible Beauty, Gallerie Icosahedron, New York, NYC.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Rockies
    COLORADO ROCKIES Minor League Report Friday, July 14, 2017 Team Level Regular Season Record Yesterday’s Scores Last 10 Albuquerque Triple-A 45-45, 4.5 GB W, 8-5 at Las Vegas 6-4 Isotopes 2nd in PCL Pacific Southern W1 Albuquerque (45-45) recorded five runs in the third inning and recorded 13 hits en route to a 8-5 win at Las Vegas. • RHP Antonio Senzatela made his first start since being optioned on July 8 … pitched 3.2 innings, allowing one run on four hits with one walk and two strikeouts. • CF Mike Tauchman went 3-for-5 with one run and one RBI … is batting .667 (8-for-12) with two doubles, one home run and six RBI in three games since being optioned to Albuquerque on July 7. • 1B Jordan Patterson went 3-for-4 with two home runs, his second multi-home run game of the season … recorded a season-high tying five RBI (also: June 24 vs. El Paso) … is batting .421 (16-for-38) over his last 10 games. Team Level Regular Season Record Yesterday’s Scores Last 10 Hartford Double-A 38-50, 22.5 GB L, 5-7 vs. Trenton 4-6 Yard Goats 5th in Eastern League Eastern L1 Hartford (38-50) made three errors and allowed four runs in the fifth en route to a 7-5 loss against the Thunder. • RHP Chad Bettis made his first start of his rehab assignment … pitched two innings, allowed one run (unearned) on no hits with no walks and three strikeouts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four-Fold Gospel
    The Four-Fold Gospel Author(s): McGarvey, J. W. Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: This mixture of gospel harmony (a comparison of identical stories from each of the gospels, placed in chronological or- der) and commentary (a verse-by-verse analysis of a pas- sage) by John William McGarvey is a highly technical but incomparably useful guide to the biblical Gospels. McGarvey, a serious student of the Bible and author of many other commentaries, is at his best here in the unique blend. Users should be sure to read the introductory sections in order to understand the abbreviations, symbols, and set-up of the volume to avoid confusion and to get optimal use from the source. This reference is a wonderful expansion of Gospel commentaries, and is one of the only books of its kind. Abby Zwart CCEL Staff Writer Subjects: The Bible New Testament Special parts of the New Testament i Contents A Harmony of the Gospels 1 Introduction. 2 Preserving the Text. 3 To Distinguish the Gospels. 4 Combination Illustrated. 5 Lesser and Fuller Forms. 6 Sections and Subdivisions. 7 Four Points of Economy. 8 Care in Preparing this Work. 9 An Object in View. 10 The Period of Christ's Life Prior to His Ministry. 11 Luke I. 1-4. 12 John I. 1-18. 13 Matt. I. 1-17. 15 Luke III. 23-38. 17 Luke I. 5-25. 18 Luke I. 26-38. 22 Luke I. 39-56. 24 Luke I. 57-80. 26 Matt. I. 18-25. 28 Luke II.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Board of Pharmacy Wholesale Distributors; Active, in Good Standing As of October 5, 2018 This Document May Be Used As a Primary Source Verification
    South Dakota Board of Pharmacy Wholesale Distributors; Active, in good standing as of October 5, 2018 This document may be used as a Primary Source Verification Full License Firm Name DBA Address 1 Address 2 City State ZIP Code Expiration Issued 600-2353 3M COMPANY dba 3M ESPE DENTAL PRODUCTS 2111 MCGAW AVE IRVINE CA 92614 12/31/2018 11/10/2014 3M COMPANY-CRITICAL & CHRONIC 600-1277 CARE SOLUTIONS DIVISION dba 3M 601 22ND AVE S BROOKINGS SD 57006 12/31/2018 03/19/2007 600-0107 A & B WELDING SUPPLY CO INC 914 E CHICAGO ST RAPID CITY SD 57701 12/31/2018 01/28/1992 600-1251 A.F. HAUSER INC 4401 E US HWY 30 VALPARAISO IN 46383 12/31/2018 01/03/2007 600-2272 A.P.I. SOLUTIONS INC 25309 FRIENDSHIP RD DAPHNE AL 36526 12/31/2018 03/06/2014 ABBVIE PATIENT ASSISTANCE 600-1372 FOUNDATION 1 N WAUKEGAN RD D-ZZ22, BLDG AP34 NORTH CHICAGO IL 60064 12/31/2018 11/20/2007 600-2058 ABBVIE US LLC 1 N WAUKEGAN RD D-GS02 BLDG AP5 NORTH CHICAGO IL 60064 12/31/2018 07/19/2012 600-2299 ABRAXIS BIOSCIENCE LLC 86 MORRIS AVE SUMMIT NJ 07901 12/31/2018 05/22/2014 600-2952 ACACIA PHARMA INC 440 STEVENS AVE, SUITE 200 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 12/31/2019 09/27/2018 600-2358 ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC 3611 VALLEY CENTRE DR STE 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92130 12/31/2018 11/19/2014 600-2409 ACARIAHEALTH SOLUTIONS INC 6610 W SAM HOUSTON PKWY N#330 HOUSTON TX 77041 12/31/2018 04/06/2015 600-1552 ACCERA INC 3005 CENTER GREEN DR #205 BOULDER CO 80301 12/31/2018 01/08/2009 600-2657 ACCORD BIOPHARMA INC 1009 SLATER RD STE 210-B DURHAM NC 27703 12/31/2018 11/07/2016 600-1472 ACCORD HEALTHCARE
    [Show full text]
  • Report Title Election Report for Cases Closed Region(S) (Report Defaults
    Report Title Election Report for Cases Closed Region(s) Election Held Date Closed Date (Report Defaults) Between (Report Defaults) and (Report Defaults) Between 10/1/2016 and 9/30/2017 12:00:00 AM Case Type Case Name Labor Org 1 Name State City (Report Defaults) (All Choices) (All Choices) (Report Defaults) (Report Defaults) Election Report for Cases Closed NLRB Elections - Summary Time run: 10/16/2017 8:16:17 AM Case Type No. of Elections Percent Won by Union Total Employees Eligible to Vote Total Valid Votes for Total Valid Votes Against Total Elections 1391 65.0% 92,653 43,607 31,642 RC 1193 71.0% 79,750 37,631 26,806 RD 172 32.0% 12,319 5,757 4,573 RM 26 30.0% 584 219 263 NLRB Elections with 1 Labor Organization Time run: 10/16/2017 8:16:17 AM Region Case Number Case Name Case City State Election Number Valid Votes Labor Org 1 Name Stipulated Certification of Certification Case Closed Type Held Date of Votes for / Consent Representative of Results Closed Reason Eligible Against Labor / Directed Date (Win) Date (Loss) Date Voters Org 1 01, 34 01-RC-181492 GREEN LINE GROUP INC. RC DEDHAM 9/30/2016 211 57 93 INTERNATIONAL Directed WON 12/21/2016 Certific. of BROTHERHOOD OF Representative MA ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 1228, AFL-CIO 01, 34 01-RC-182252 RENZENBERGER, INC. RC WORCHESTER 9/12/2016 26 2 7 UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND Stipulated WON 10/6/2016 Certific. of FORESTRY, RUBBER, Representative MA MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKE 01, 34 01-RC-182433 J's Associates, LLC RC Springfield 9/8/2016 12 2 8 Area Trades Council of New Stipulated WON 10/3/2016 Certific.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1989 The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Stuart William Wells University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wells, Stuart William, "The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal" (1989). Theses (Historic Preservation). 350. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYLVANIA. LIBRARIES THE SCHUYLKILL NAVIGATION AND THE GIRARD CANAL Stuart William
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES (71-91) Fourth Place, National League East Division, -24.0 Games Manager: Pete Mackanin, 2Nd Season
    2016 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES (71-91) Fourth Place, National League East Division, -24.0 Games Manager: Pete Mackanin, 2nd season 2016 SEASON RECAP: Philadelphia went 71-91 (.438) in 2016, an eight-win improvement from the previous year (63 W, .388 win %) … It marked the Phillies fourth consecutive season under .500 (73- PHILLIES PHACTS 89 in both 2013 & 2014, 63-99 in 2015), which is their longest streak since they posted seven consecutive Record: 71-91 (.438) losing seasons from 1994 to 2000 ... The Phillies finished in 4th place in the NL East, 24.0 games behind Home: 37-44 the Washington Nationals, and posted 90 or more losses in a season for the 39th time in club history … Road: 34-47 Philadelphia had 99 losses in 2015, marking the first time they have had 90+ losses in back-to-back Current Streak: Won 1 Last 5 Games: 1-4 seasons since 1996-97 (95, 94) … Overall, the club batted .240 this year with a .301 OBP, .384 SLG, Last 10 Games: 2-8 .685 OPS, 427 extra-base hits (231 2B, 35 3B, 161 HR) and a ML-low 610 runs scored (3.77 RPG) … Series Record: 18-28-6 Phillies pitchers combined for a 4.63 ERA (739 ER, 1437.0 IP), which included a 4.41 ERA for the starters Sweeps/Swept: 6/9 and a 5.01 mark for the pen. PHILLIES AT HOME HOT START, COOL FINISH: Philadelphia began the season with a 24-17 record over their first 41 th Games Played: 81 games … Their .585 winning percentage over that period (4/4-5/18) was the 6 -best in MLB, trailing Record: 37-44 (.457) only the Chicago Cubs (.718, 28-11), Baltimore Orioles (.615, 24-15), Boston Red Sox (.610, 25-16), CBP (est.
    [Show full text]