DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents GENERAL INTRODUCTION JUDAISM 53

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents GENERAL INTRODUCTION JUDAISM 53 Contents LIST OF MAPS xlvii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xlviii PREFACE li ACKNOWLEDGMENTS lxiii GENERAL INTRODUCTION Art, Play, and the Comparative Study of Religion 1 JACK MILES JUDAISM 53 Introduction: Israel among the Nations 55 DAVID BIALE First Temple Literature, 2500 B.C.E-586 B.C.E. 69 CHRONOLOGY 74 BEFORE THE BIBLE 78 ENUMA ELISH 78 Tablet V [The Creation of the World] 78 Tablet VI [The Creation of Mankind] 79 THE LEGEND OF SARGON 81 I CONTENTS THE BIBLE 82 TORAH 82 Genesis 82 1 [God's Work of Creation] 84 2 [Adam and Eve in Eden] 85 12:1-3 [God's Promise to Abram] 86 17 [The Rite of Circumcision Instituted] 86 22:1-19 [The Birth of Isaac; the Expulsion of Hagar] 88 38 [Judah's Household Troubles] 89 Exodus 90 1 [The Oppression of Israel's Descendants] 91 2 [The Birth of Moses; Moses Flees Egypt] 92 3 [Moses Is Charged by God to Deliver Israel out of Bondage] 93 13:1-10 [The Exodus from Egypt] 95 15:1-21 [A Song of the Sea] 95 19 [God Speaks to Moses on Mount Sinai] 97 20 [The Ten Commandments] 98 Leviticus 99 9 [Aaron Offers Sacrifices to God] 100 23 [Holiday Laws] 101 Deuteronomy 103 6 [Exhortation to Keep the Commandments] 105 12:1—12 [Moses Proclaims a Code of Special Laws] 106 2 Kings 107 23:1-25 [Josiah Restores True Worship] 107 PSALMS 109 1 ["Happy is the man"] 110 2 ["Why do nations assemble"] 110 19 ["The heavens declare the glory of God"] 111 139 ["O Lord, You have examined me and know me"] 112 PROPHETS 113 Hosea 114 2 [The Unfaithfulness of Hosea's Wife; the Idolatry of the Nation] 114 Amos 117 5:21-27 [A Warning to the Israelites] 117 9:11-15 [The Restoration of Israel] 118 Isaiah 119 1:1-28 [On the Wickedness and Redemption of Israel] 119 2:1-5 [A Prophecy of Peace] 122 6:1-8 [Isaiah's Calling] 122 40:1-26 [Peace; the Greatness of God] 123 Jeremiah 125 1:4-10 [Jeremiah's Calling] 126 31:31-34 [A New Covenant] 126 CONTENTS I vii Ezekiel 127 1 [The Vision of Ezekiel] 127 37:1-14 [Ezekiel in the Valley of Bones] 129 Second Temple Literature, 538 B.C.E-70 C.E. 131 CHRONOLOGY 135 THE BIBLE 137 CANONICAL WRITINGS 137 The Song of Songs 137 2:1-14 ["I am a rose of Sharon"] 138 8:6—7 ["Let me be a seal upon your heart"] 139 Job 139 1 [About Job; Satan's Wager with God] 140 3 [Job Curses His Birth] 141 38:1-18 [The Lord As Creator] 143 Ecclesiastes 144 1 [The Vanity of Life] 144 3 [Everything Has Its Time] 145 Daniel 147 7 [The Vision of the Four Beasts] 147 12:1-4 [Prophecy of the End of Time] 149 AFTER THE BIBLE 150 EXTRACANONICAL WRITINGS 150 Ben Sira (Ecclesiasticus) 150 1:1-20 ["All wisdom is from the Lord"] 150 39:1-11 [Wisdom and the Law of Moses] 151 2 Maccabees 152 6 [Desecration of the Temple; Martyrdom of Eleazar] 153 7 [The Martyrdom of the Mother and Her Seven Sons] 155 10:1-8 [Restoration of the Temple] 157 1 Enoch 158 1 [Enoch's Vision] 158 10 [The Apocalypse] 159 12 [The Origin of Evil] 160 14 [Chastising the Watchers; Enoch Ascends to Heaven] 161 15 [God Instructs Enoch; the Origin of Evil, Continued] 162 16 [Some Consequences of Judgment Day] 163 Jubilees 163 1 [Moses, God, the Law, and Israel] 164 2:17-24 [The Sabbath] 167 6:32-38 [The Calendar] 167 50 [The Sabbath, Continued] 168 viii I CONTENTS DEAD SEA SCROLLS 169 Charter of Association 171 Column 1 [Goals of the Yahad's Rule] 171 Column 2 [The Priests, the Levites, and the Community] 172 Column 3 [The Prince of Light versus the Angel of Darkness] 173 Column 4 [The Spirits of Light and Darkness, Continued] 174 The Damascus Document 176 Column Al [Israel's Abandonment of God] 176 Column A2 [Consequences of Being Righteous or Wicked] 177 Habakkuk Commentary 178 Column 1:16-17 [Exhortation] 178 Column 2 [God's "Traitors"; the Kittim] 178 Column 3 [The Kittim, Continued] 179 Column 4 [The Kittim, Continued] 179 Column 5 [The Chosen Will Pass Judgment on the Gentiles] 180 Column 6 [The Kittim and Plunder] 180 Column 7 [On God's Prophecy] 181 Column 8 [God's Judgment on the Wicked Priest] 181 Column 9 [The Wicked Priest, Continued] 182 Column 10 [God's Judgment on the Spreader of Lies] 182 Column 11:1-17 [The Wicked Priest, Continued] 183 The War Scroll, Column 1:1-15 [Sons of Light versus Sons of Darkness] 184 JEWISH LITERATURE IN ANCIENT GREEK 185 Letter of Aristeas (to Philocrates) (second century B.C.E.) 186 Philo of Alexandria (20 B.C.E.-50 c.E.) 191 Soul and Body of the Divine Laws 192 "Know Thyself" 192 A Jewish Inscription from Roman Egypt (mid-second century B.c.E.-early second century c.E.) 194 Flavius Josephus (37-ca. 100 c.E.) 195 The Jewish War 196 Chapter 7. Judaea under Roman Rule 196 CONTENTS I Ix World of the Rabbis, First-Seventh Century C.E. 203 CHRONOLOGY 207 THE ORAL TORAH 209 Pirkei Avot (first—second century C.E.) 212 1 [The Chain of Oral Transmission from Sinai] 212 4 [Sayings of the Rabbis] 214 Babylonian Talmud: Menachot 214 29b [Moses Returns As a Yeshiva Boy] 214 ToseftaSotah 215 13:3-4 [The Decline of Prophecy] 215 Babylonian Talmud: Bava Batra 216 12a—b [Sage versus Prophet] 216 Babylonian Talmud: Sabbath 216 31a [Torah on One Foot] 216 Babylonian Talmud: Eruvin 217 13b [Contradictions for the Sake of Heaven] 217 Tosefta Eduyot 218 1:4 [Learning from the Losing Side in Debate] 218 Babylonian Talmud: Bava Metzia 218 59b [The Oven of 'Akhnai] 218 Song of Songs Rabbah 220 1.1.11 [The Hidden Glory of a Love Song] 220 Avot de-Rabbi Nathan 221 4 [Licensing the First Rabbinic Academy] 221 1.4 ["Mercy and not sacrifice"] 222 Babylonian Talmud: Sabbath 223 88a [A Midrash on Revelation] 223 LAW AND LEGEND 224 THE LAWS OF SABBATH OBSERVANCE AND WORK 224 Babylonian Talmud: Sabbath 226 49b [What Counts As Work?] 226 73a [The Primary Labours] 227 73b ["Why state the number?"] 227 74a [The Labours, Continued; the Sabbath and Food] 229 74b [The Sabbath and Food, Continued] 230 Genesis Rabbah: Sabbath 230 11.8 [Israel Married to the Sabbath] 231 LEGENDS ON THE CREATION OF THE WORLD 231 Genesis Rabbah 233 1.1 [The Act of Creation] 233 1.9 [God the Artist] 233 I CONTENTS 1.10 [Creation and the Hebrew Letter Beth] 234 2.5 [Creation and Deeds of Good and Evil] 234 3.4 [God's Robe of Light] 235 6.3 [Sun and Moon] 235 LEGENDS ON THE BINDING OF ISAAC 236 Pirkei de-Rabbi Eliezer 238 31 [The Death and Resurrection of Isaac] 238 Genesis Rabbah 238 55.2 [The Lord Tries the Righteous] 238 55.7 ["Take ... thy son"] 239 56.4 [Samael versus Abraham] 239 56.8 [Isaac Afraid] 240 56.9 [Redemption and the Binding of Isaac] 240 THE RABBIS AMONG PAGANS AND JEWS 242 THE RABBIS AND GREEK CULTURE 242 Mishnah: Avodah Zarah 243 3.4 [Aphrodite in the Bathhouse] 243 3.1 [Forbidden Images] 243 Jerusalem Talmud: Avodah Zarah 244 3 [Images Forbidden] 244 42d [Images Permitted] 244 WOMEN CHALLENGE THE RABBIS 244 Babylonian Talmud: Berachot 246 51b [Lady Yaltha's Shattering Dissent] 246 Babylonian Talmud: Eruvin 246 53b-54a [Lady Beruriah's Defiant Irony] 246 Jerusalem Talmud: Sotah 247 4:4 ["And didn't you enjoy it?"] 247 3:16 [Why Not Give Her a Proper Answer?] 247 SYNAGOGUE AND LITURGY 247 The Synagogue 247 Babylonian Talmud: Berachot 249 7b-8a [Rabbis Don't Pray in Synagogues] 249 Tosefta Megillah 250 2:18N [Proper Synagogue Comportment] 250 Inscription from Smyrna (second century B.C.E.) 250 [Epitaph for a Woman Who Led a Synagogue] 250 Daily Liturgy 250 Aleinu ["It is our duty to praise"] 252 Mourners' Kaddish ["Glorified and sanctified be God's great name"] 254 Passover 256 Haggadah shel Pesach [Script for Home Passover] 257 The Introduction 257 The Four Questions 257 CONTENTS I xi The Reply 258 [History of the Jews] 258 The Midrash on Deuteronomy 26:5—8: Introduction 258 The Midrash 259 Redemption 261 DREAMS OF REDEMPTION 262 Midrash: Lamentations Rabbah 263 Proem 24R [Shaming God into Mercy] 263 Babylonian Talmud: Sanhedrin 266 Chapter XI [When Will the Messiah Come?] 267 Sefer Zerubbabel 273 [A Vision of Two Future Messiahs] 274 VISIONS OF HEAVEN 278 Tosefta Hagiga 281 2:3-4 ["Four entered the pardes"] 281 Babylonian Talmud 282 [The Story of Aher] 282 Visions of Ezekiel 284 The Myth of Sar Torah 287 [The Prince of Torah] 287 Sefer Yetsirah [The Book of Formation] 291 Chapter I [Numerology and Gematria] 291 The Jewish Middle Ages. 637-1789 295 CHRONOLOGY 300 MEDIEVAL CURRICULUM 305 JOSEPH BEN JUDAH IBN AQNIN (ca. 1150-ca. 1220) 306 Tibb al-Nufus 306 A Course of Study 306 PHILOSOPHY 309 SAADYA GAON (881-942) 309 The Book of Beliefs and Opinions 311 Reason and Faith 311 Four Arguments for Creation 313 The Transcendence of the Creator; Arguments for the Creatio ex Nihilo 316 The Two Classes of Law: Laws of Reason and Laws of Revelation 318 The Resurrection of the Dead in the Present World 322 xii I CONTENTS SALOMON BEN JEROHAM (fl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benedict De Spinoza and EV Ramasamy
    ================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.comISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 21:6 June 2021 =============================================================== Benedict de Spinoza and E.V. Ramasamy Periyar: A Study Dr. S. Sridevi Professor of English CTTE College Chennai 11 [email protected] ==================================================================== Abstract This paper aims at studying how Benedict de Spinoza and E.V. Ramasamy Periyar have responded to their socio-economic-political environment, and have produced great thoughts of freedom, equality, and social justice. Both the thinkers were powerful rationalists who viewed religion only as a political power to oppress people. They seem to be responding to oppression created by religion’s social codes and have rebelled against the Establishment. Spinoza was writing against the system hiding his identity as repercussions were quite high in the Dutch Republic against texts that had content against the Establishment. Periyar was a reformer, thinker, and writer and hence, he boldly expressed his views and become the most controversial name during the twentieth century in Tamil Nadu, and his name continues to be used in controversies even now. Keywords: Spinoza, Periyar, religion, caste, rationalism Benedict de Spinoza (1632-1677) ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 21:6 June 2021 Dr. S. Sridevi Benedict de Spinoza and E.V. Ramasamy Periyar: A Study 162 Courtesy: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://iep.utm.edu/spinoza/ Benedict de Spinoza was born in 1632 in Amsterdam. In Hebrew, his first name was Baruch and in Latin it was Benedictus. The name means ‘blessed.’ He was from a middle class Portuguese-Jewish family. He studied in the congregation’s Talmud Torah school.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity, Islam & Atheism
    Christianity, Islam & Atheism Reflections on Religion, Society & Politics Michael Cooke 2 Christianity, Islam & Atheism About the author Michael Colin Cooke is a retired public servant and trade union activist who has a lifelong interest in South Asian history, politics and culture. He has served as an election monitor in Sri Lanka. Michael is the author of The Lionel Bopage Story: Rebellion, Repression and the Struggle for Justice in Sri Lanka (2011). He has also penned when the occasion demanded a number of articles and film reviews. He lives in Melbourne. Published 2014 ISBN 978-1-876646-15-8 Resistance Books: resistancebooks.com Contents 1.Genesis............................................................................................5 2.The Evolution of a Young Atheist .............................................13 India...................................................................................................................... 13 Living in the ’70s down under.............................................................................. 16 Religious fundamentalism rears its head............................................................. 20 3.Christianity: An Atheist’s Homily ................................................21 Introduction – the paradox that is Christianity................................................... 21 The argument....................................................................................................... 23 It ain’t necessarily so: Part 1................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • Why I Am Not a Christian: and Other Essays on Religion and Related
    Why I am not a Christian ‘What makes the book valuable is life-long uncomprom- ising intellectual honesty.’ The Times Literary Supplement ‘There is no one who uses English language more beguilingly than Russell, no one smoothes the kinks and creases more artfully out of the most crumpled weaves of thought.’ The Times Bertrand Russell Why I am not a Christian And other essays on religion and related subjects With a new preface by Simon Blackburn London and New York First published 1957 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London First published in Routledge Classics 2004 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1996 The Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd Preface to Routledge Classics edition © 2004 Simon Blackburn All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-203-49964-6 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-57427-3 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0–415–32510–2 (Print Edition) CONTENTS Preface to the Routledge Classics Edition vii Editor’s Introduction xvi Preface by Bertrand Russell xxii 1 Why I am not a Christian 1 2 Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilisation? 20 3 Do We Survive Death? 42 4 Seems, Madam? Nay, it is 48 5 On Catholic and Protestant Sceptics 57 6 Life in the Middle Ages 65 7 The Fate of Thomas Paine 70 8 Nice People 84 9 The New Generation 92 10 Our Sexual Ethics 102 11 Freedom and the Colleges 112 vi contents 12 The Existence of God—a Debate Between Bertrand Russell and Father F.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT on Science and Atheism: Whether Atheistic Belief Is
    ABSTRACT On Science and Atheism: Whether Atheistic Belief is Scientifically Motivated Charles L. Jester Director: Gerald Cleaver, Ph.D. The intent of this paper is to explore the motivation behind the rejection of theistic religious faiths by modern atheist scientists, and whether it is justified to claim that this rejection is scientifically motivated. First, a brief background of the development of the contemporary schism between faith and science is given, noting in particular changes in belief amongst the scientific community. Next, an exposition on the motivations for scientists’ convictions concerning God is laid out, followed by an address to the question of whether atheistic scientists reject all properties of God, or only certain of them. Based on analyses of personal statements, statistical data on beliefs, and developments in twentieth-century physics and mathematics, it is concluded that modern scientists who reject theism are not overwhelmingly motivated by science, and that they in fact do not reject all ideas of God. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Gerald B. Cleaver, Department of Physics APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: _____________________________________________________ Dr. Andrew Wisely, Director DATE: ___________________________ ON SCIENCE AND ATHEISM: WHETHER ATHEISTIC BELIEF IS SCIENTIFICALLY MOTIVATED A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Charles L. Jester Waco, Texas
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Perspectives and Re-Inventions of Spirituality
    chapter 11 Critical Perspectives and Re-Inventions of Spirituality Roderick Nicholls and Heather Salazar The Enlightenment critique of religion gave rise to an array of revisionary views. To some degree, they accepted major criticisms expressed by the likes of Voltaire and David Hume but did so with the expressed goal of saving reli- gion. In the process, spiritual experience became more prominent. For exam- ple, philosopher and theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher dissociated religion from both propositional beliefs and moral action, identifying it with an inborn spiritual sensibility. The emerging bourgeois culture, he alleges, undermined this sensibility from an early age, preventing an education of the whole self (self- formation or Bildung). This upbringing, argues Schleiermacher, cuts off our intuitive access to “the infinite;” and it encourages a “suicide of the spirit” that silences the “holy music” which ought to surround and elevate our feelings and emotions.1 In the twentieth-first century, we are well-positioned to cultivate the fer- tile philosophical ground inherited from over two centuries of valuable work performed by numerous post-Enlightenment figures. They were effectively disentangling life-enhancing spiritual potential from traditional religions and institutional structures. Often it was not “religion” but “spirituality” being rein- vented. The result is that we can now explore spiritualities with characteristics which no longer seem conceptually alien or contradictory, including: eroti- cism and embodiment by philosophical naturalists; existentialist and psycho- therapeutic responses to the meaning of life genealogically linked to Stoic, Epi- curean, or other pagan spiritualities; a deep involvement with the natural world and art that expands the aesthetic qualities of spirituality; scientific views (of cognitive scientists, physicists, and others) that re-enchant the world and reaf- firm the mystery of the universe.2 1 Friedrich Schleiermacher, On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI
    bs_bs_banner MIDWEST STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Midwest Studies In Philosophy, XXXVII (2013) New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI I The so-called “New Atheism” is a relatively well-defined, very recent, still unfold- ing cultural phenomenon with import for public understanding of both science and philosophy.Arguably, the opening salvo of the New Atheists was The End of Faith by Sam Harris, published in 2004, followed in rapid succession by a number of other titles penned by Harris himself, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Victor Stenger, and Christopher Hitchens.1 After this initial burst, which was triggered (according to Harris himself) by the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a number of other authors have been associated with the New Atheism, even though their contributions sometimes were in the form of newspapers and magazine articles or blog posts, perhaps most prominent among them evolutionary biologists and bloggers Jerry Coyne and P.Z. Myers. Still others have published and continue to publish books on atheism, some of which have had reasonable success, probably because of the interest generated by the first wave. This second wave, however, often includes authors that explicitly 1. Sam Harris, The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason (New York: W.W. Norton, 2004); Sam Harris, Letter to a Christian Nation (New York: Vintage, 2006); Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006); Daniel C. Dennett, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (New York: Viking Press, 2006); Victor J. Stenger, God:The Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist (Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2007); Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (New York: Twelve Books, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Plantinga-Reason and Belief in God-F&Rscan
    WARNING OF COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS1 The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, U.S. Code) governs the maKing of photocopies or other reproductions of the copyright materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, library and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than in private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user maKes a reQuest for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. The Yale University Library reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order, if, in its judgement fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. 137 C.F.R. §201.14 2018 „Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God ALVIN PLANTINGA AND NICHOLAS WOLTERSTORFF, EDITORS UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME PRESS NOTRE DAME LONDON Copyright ® 1983 by University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Faith and rationality. 1. Faith and reason—Addresses, essays, lectures. 2. Religion—Philosophy—Addresses, essays, lectures. I. Plantinga, Alvin. II. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. BT50.F34 1983 204.1 83-14843 ISBN 0-268-00964-3 ISBN 0-268-00965-1 (pbk.) Manufactured in the United States of America Contents Introduction • Nicholas Wolterstorff 1 Reason and Belief in God • Alvin Plantinga 16 The Stranger • George I. Mavrodes 94 Christian Experience and Christian Belief • William P Alston 103 - Can Belief in God Be Rational If It Has No Foundations? • Nicholas Wolterstorff 135 Turning • George I.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Atheism, Agnosticism and Humanism
    http://www.inosr.net/inosr-applied-sciences/ Tallulah and Mishka INOSR APPLIED SCIENCES 1(1): 14-20, 2015 ©INOSR PUBLICATIONS International Network Organization for Scientific Research ISSN: 2705-165X Comparison between Atheism, Agnosticism and Humanism Tallulah Rebecca and Mishka Joshua Department of religious studies, Faculty of Theology and Religion University of Pretoria, South Africa Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article reviews the Comparison thinking and evidence (rationalism and between Atheism, Agnosticism and empiricism) over acceptance of dogma or Humanism. Atheism is, in the broadest superstition. The words atheist and sense, an absence of belief in the existence agnostic conjure up a number of different of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a perceptions and meanings. When it comes rejection of the belief that any deities exist. to questioning the existence of gods, the Agnosticism is the view that the existence subject is a tricky one that is often of God, of the divine or the supernatural is misunderstood. No matter what their unknown or unknowable. Humanism is a reasons or how they approach the philosophical and ethical stance that question, agnostics and atheists are emphasizes the value and agency of fundamentally different, but also non- human beings, individually and exclusive. collectively, and generally prefers critical Keywords: Comparison, Atheism, Agnosticism Humanism INTRODUCTION Atheism is, in the broadest sense, an application of the term narrowed in absence of belief in the existence of scope. The first individuals to identify deities. Less broadly, atheism is a themselves using the word atheist lived in rejection of the belief that any deities the 18th century during the Age of exist.
    [Show full text]
  • How the New Atheists Are Reminding the Humanities of Their Place and Purpose in Society
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society. David Ira Buckner University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Buckner, David Ira, "The emperor's new clothes: how the new atheists are reminding the humanities of their place and purpose in society." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3112. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3112 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES: HOW THE NEW ATHEISTS ARE REMINDING THE HUMANITIES OF THEIR PLACE AND PURPOSE IN SOCIETY By David Ira Buckner B.S., East Tennessee State University, 2006 M.A., East Tennessee State University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITIQUE of BERTRAND RUSSELL's RELIGIOUS POSITION Arnold Daniel Weigel, B.D
    A CRITIQUE OF BERTRAND RUSSELL'S RELIGIOUS POSITION Arnold Daniel Weigel, B.D. (Honors) Russell is without question "one of the most productive and most brilliant thinkers of our age, mathematical logician, philosopher, journalist and libertar- ian.^1 There is probably "no figure [who] has . dominated the intellectual world so long, so contentiously, and so courageously as Bertrand Russell."2 In scholarly circles he has won great acclaim through his monumental publication (completed jointly with Alfred North Whitehead), Principia Mathematica, first published in 1910. This work conclusively demonstrated that mathematics was a special case of deductive logic, and, in the hands of Russell's pupil Ludwig Wittgenstein, it profoundly influenced the development of contemporary an- alytic philosophy.3 The "brilliant, crotchety, opinionated"4 Russell has also acquired great notoriety as a "Ban the Bomb'' man, especially through such statements as: "I deplore the Russian tests just as I deplored American tests."5 This venture for peace has given Russell an international popularity^ which has been enlarged further by his prolific writing. In 1950 he received the Nobel prize for Lit- erature.6 In America, however, Russell is perhaps most remembered for an incident which occurred in 1940 on the campus of the College of the City of New York. Russell, who had been hired to teach philosophy, was declared morally unfit by the College authorities because of certain of his educational views, of which the following is representative: "I am sure that university life would be better, both intellectually and morally ... if most university students had temporary, childless marriages."7 This incident proved to have damaging effects on the one hand, and limited positive results on the other, for Russell's acquired popularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Benedict De Spinoza
    Benedict de Spinoza by Tod E. Jones One of the arguments that Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) presents to his sympathetic audience in “Why I Am Not a Christian” is an appeal to the history of the wickedness of Christians: “The more intense has been the religion of any period and the more profound has been the dogmatic belief, the greater has been the cruelty and the worse has been the state of affairs. In the so-called ages of faith, when men really did believe the Christian religion in all its completeness, there was the Inquisition, with its tortures.” This reflection leads Russell to his impassioned conclusion: “I say quite deliberately that the Christian religion, as organized in its churches, has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world.”1 The argument is one that had been made in the early nineteenth century by Jeremy Bentham and George Grote,2 and it is of the school of moros sophoi. In response, we might simply note what should be obvious to any casual reader of the Gospels, that there is a place among the followers of Jesus neither for pre-eminence among themselves nor for sectarian intolerance toward others. More than one Broad Churchman has pointed to Luke 9:46-56 as confirmation of this point.3 Archbishop Whately saw the germ of persecution planted in the common soil of human selfishness: “There is a notion that persecution is connected with religion, but the fact is that it belongs to human nature. The majority of mankind have no real love of liberty, except that they are glad to have it themselves, and to keep it all for themselves.”4 Moses Mendelssohn (1729-86) more pertinently, for our purpose, laid the blame not on religion itself, but on a common error of organized religion— “excessive consistency.” It is this that “from time immemorial has spawned, or at least nourished, all the persecutions and religious hatred of the human race.”5 Both truth and tolerance are learned together by avoiding a forced and unnatural consistency in thought.
    [Show full text]