0.9% Saline Versus Plasma-Lyte 148 for Intravenous Fluid Therapy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

0.9% SALINE VERSUS PLASMA-LYTE 148 FOR INTRAVENOUS FLUID THERAPY BY DR SUMEET KUMAR REDDY, MBCHB. A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2016 1 2 This thesis is dedicated to my parents (Dr C. K. Reddy and Dr Reeta Lochan Reddy) and my late grandparents (Mr D. L. Reddy, Mrs Rukhmani Reddy, Mr Ram Lochan and Mrs Padma Lochan) for their love and support. 3 1 Contents 2 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 13 3 List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 17 4 Preface ............................................................................................................................. 21 5 Personal contribution and acknowledgments ................................................................. 23 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 27 6.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 27 6.2 Crystalloid fluids ........................................................................................................ 27 6.3 Unbuffered/unbalanced crystalloids ........................................................................ 28 6.4 Buffered/balanced crystalloids ................................................................................. 31 6.5 Current literature that has compared 0.9% saline to buffered crystalloids in adult patients. ............................................................................................................................... 34 6.6 Evidence comparing the effects of renal function between unbuffered and buffered crystalloid fluid. .................................................................................................................... 35 6.7 Evidence comparing the influence on haemostasis and blood transfusion requirements between unbuffered and buffered crystalloid fluid ..................................... 45 6.8 Evidence comparing gastrointestinal effects of unbuffered and buffered crystalloid fluid ................................................................................................................................... 53 6.9 Current recommendations for the prescribing of intravenous fluids in hospitals ... 57 6.10 Summary of background information ................................................................... 57 7 Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................... 59 4 8 Study one: A multi-centre, cluster randomised, double cross over, feasibility trial investigating the effect of using 0.9% saline or Plasma-Lyte® 148 as fluid therapy in intensive care patients on the risk of developing acute kidney injury. .................................................. 61 8.1 Primary aim ............................................................................................................... 61 8.2 Secondary aims ......................................................................................................... 61 8.3 Tertiary aims .............................................................................................................. 62 8.4 Overview ................................................................................................................... 62 8.5 Study design .............................................................................................................. 62 8.6 Primary outcome ....................................................................................................... 63 8.6.1 Primary outcome justification ........................................................................... 65 8.7 Secondary outcomes ................................................................................................. 66 8.8 Study participants ..................................................................................................... 67 8.8.1 Inclusion criteria................................................................................................. 67 8.8.2 Exclusion criteria ................................................................................................ 67 8.9 Study treatments ....................................................................................................... 67 8.10 Data collection and Management ......................................................................... 69 8.11 Study medication and logistics .............................................................................. 72 8.12 Assessment of safety ............................................................................................. 72 8.13 Data safety monitoring board and monitoring ..................................................... 72 8.14 Ethical issues .......................................................................................................... 73 8.15 Process of obtaining opt-out consent ................................................................... 74 8.16 Data handling and confidentiality ......................................................................... 75 8.17 Sample size and power .......................................................................................... 75 5 8.18 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................. 76 8.19 Funding and support.............................................................................................. 77 8.20 Results .................................................................................................................... 78 8.20.1 Baseline characteristics ...................................................................................... 78 8.20.2 Fluid therapy ...................................................................................................... 84 8.20.3 Fluid therapy survey........................................................................................... 84 8.20.4 Primary outcome variable: the proportion of patients with either AKI or renal failure ............................................................................................................................ 88 8.20.5 Primary outcome variable: missing data sensitivity analysis ............................ 88 8.20.6 Secondary outcome variables: Renal outcomes ................................................ 90 8.20.7 Secondary outcome variables: Service utilisation ............................................. 92 8.20.8 Secondary outcome variables: Mortality ........................................................... 92 8.20.9 Primary and secondary outcomes variables: Adjusted analyses ....................... 94 8.20.10 Subgroup analyses: Renal outcomes ............................................................. 94 8.20.11 Subgroup analyses: In-hospital mortality ...................................................... 95 8.20.12 Protocol deviations ........................................................................................ 96 8.20.13 Adverse events ............................................................................................... 96 8.21 Discussion for study one ........................................................................................ 97 8.21.1 Statement of principal findings .......................................................................... 97 8.21.2 Significance of the findings ................................................................................ 97 8.21.3 Strengths and limitations ................................................................................... 98 8.21.4 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 101 6 9 Study two: A post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis and single centre pilot study nested cohort within study one to evaluate the effects of 0.9% saline and Plasma-Lyte-148 on blood product use and post-operative bleeding. ............................................................. 103 9.1 Rationale ................................................................................................................. 103 9.2 Primary aim ............................................................................................................. 104 9.3 Secondary aims ....................................................................................................... 105 9.4 Overview ................................................................................................................. 105 9.5 Study design and treatment allocation ................................................................... 106 9.5.1 Study design: Details of nested cohort ............................................................ 106 9.6 Primary outcome: Overall cohort ........................................................................... 107 9.7 Primary outcome: Nested cohort ........................................................................... 107 9.8 Secondary outcomes: Overall cohort ...................................................................... 108 9.9 Secondary outcomes: Nested cohort .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1949

    Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1949

    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly Washington University Publications 7-1949 Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1949 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/med_alumni_quarterly Recommended Citation Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1949. Bernard Becker Medical Library Archives. Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/med_alumni_quarterly/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington University Publications at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICERS OF THE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON UNrVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE President: Dr. Dalton K. Rose '15 Vice-President: Dr. James Barrett Brown '23 Vice-President: Dr. A. N. Arneson '28 Secretary-Treasurer: Dr. George W. Ittner '37 Executive Committee Term. Expires 1950 Term Expires 1951 Term Expires 1952 Dr. J. W. Thompson '23 Dr. Guy Magness '28 Dr. Walter Baumgarten, Jr. '39 Dr. Louis H. Jorstadt '24 Dr. Delevan Calkins '31 Dr. Joseph C. Jaudon '33 Dr. Oliver Abel, Jr. '23 Dr. Sim F. Beam '32 Dr. David N. Kerr '40 Dr. Samuel B. Grant '24 Dr. Oscar C. Zink '21 Dr. A. Victor Reese '28 EDITORIAL BOARD WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL ALUMNI QUARTERLY Representing the University: Representing the Alumni: Dr. Robert J. Terry '95 Dr. Louis Jorstad '24 Dr. Alexis Hartmann. '21 Dr. James W. Bagby '33 Dr. Paul Hageman '34 Dr. Leo Wade, '38 Dr. Robert A.
  • Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1947

    Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1947

    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly Washington University Publications 7-1947 Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1947 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/med_alumni_quarterly Recommended Citation Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly, July 1947. Bernard Becker Medical Library Archives. Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/med_alumni_quarterly/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington University Publications at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Medical Alumni Quarterly by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ' The WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL ALUMNI QUARTERLY PUBLISHED IN THE INTEREST OF THE UNIVERSITY AND THE ALUMNI ■i i i i i i Present and Future Financial Position of the School of Medicine Report on the Organization of the Clinic Enzymatic Reactions in Carbohydrate Metabolism New Officers Announced Vol. X JULY, 1947 No. 4 OFFICERS OF THE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE President: Dr. Kogers Deakin '22 Vice-President: Dr. Theodore Hanser '22 Vice-President: Dr. Sim F. Beam '32 Secretary-Treasurer: Dr. George W. Ittner, Jr. '37 Executive Committee Term Expires 1948 Term Expires 1949 Term Expires 1950 Dr. Robert Mueller, 17 Dr. A. N. Arneson, '28 Dr. J. W. Thompson, '23 Dr. Leo Gottlieb, '32 Dr. Richard Paddock, '21 Dr. Louis H. Jorstad, '24 Dr. Dudley Smith, '23 Dr. David Skilling, '28 Dr. Oliver Abel, Jr., '23 Dr. P. D. Stahl, '23 Dr. George Wulft, '33 Dr.
  • Intravenous Fluid Administration – a Short History………………….….….……

    Intravenous Fluid Administration – a Short History………………….….….……

    ...اورﮨﻢ ﻧﮯ ﮨﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﺪار ﭼﻴﺰ ﮐﻮ ﭘﺎﻧﯽ ﺳﮯ ﺑﻨﺎﻳﺎ ﮐﻴﺎ ﭘﻬﺮ ﺑﻬﯽ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﻧﮩﻴﮟ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ اور اﷲ ﻧﮯ ﮨﺮ ﭼﻠﻨﮯ ﭘﻬﺮﻧﮯ واﻟﮯ (ﺟﺎﻧﺪار) ﮐﯽ ﭘﻴﺪاﺋﺶ (ﮐﯽ ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﺋﯽ اﺑﺘﺪاء) ﭘﺎﻧﯽ ﺳﮯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﺋﯽ … DISCLAIMER This educational material has been developed as a service of Otsuka Pakistan Limited. It contains detailed information that has been compiled with professional diligence. Although Otsuka Pakistan strives to provide the latest scientific information related to its products and general medical conditions, the information may be limited and should not be taken as being comprehensive. Otsuka Pakistan does not warrant the accuracy, effectiveness or completeness of any information in this educational material. The information related to various medical conditions and their management is not meant to be a substitute for the advice of a healthcare professional. Advice from a professional healthcare provider must always be sought. Otsuka Pakistan makes no representations or warranties of any kind whether express or implied. In no event shall Otsuka Pakistan be held liable for damages or injury of any kind, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental, from access or the impossibility of access or with the use of this educational material. You assume total responsibility and risks for your use of this material. Index Preface…………….………………………………………………………………………….……………. 1 1. Intravenous Fluid Administration – A Short History………………….….….……. 2 2. Introduction to Body Fluids……………………………………………………….…..……….. 4 3. Osmosis……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 4. Water Balance………………………………………………………………………………..……….
  • Open This File in Your Browser

    Open This File in Your Browser

    therapy, the abdomen is the forgotten compartment in the ICU [1—4]. Methods Review of contemporary literature Results and main message There is a considerable body of evidence that IAH impairs abdominal and intestinal perfusion. This has been studied for the liver, GI tract and splanchnic organs with increased GI leakage and bacterial translocation demonstrated in animal studies. The abdominal perfusion pressu- re (APP) is the mean arterial pressure minus the intraabdominal pressure (MAP-IAP=APP) – a concept comparable to cerebral perfusion pressure in the intracranial cavity. Studies have identified low APP as associated with mortality – which in its end stage is of course to be expected. Whether APP can be a thera- peutic target remains to be demonstrated. In case of severe IAH, strategies to decrease IAP may prove better treatment options until the advantage of increasing MAP with vasoactive drugs has found to be beneficial. Surgical decompression in that respect is the most efficient way to increase APP by reducing IAP. When treating patients with an open abdomen, negative pressure therapy is increasingly used as it is a convenient method for open abdomen management with added advantages such as increased abdominal closure rates. In experimental studies, NPT has been found to dampen inflammation, a mechanisms that is incompletely been understood, but evacuation of ascites and reducing interstitial oedema are probably involved in this. Key messages IAH impairs abdominal perfusion. Low perfusion pressures are bad. APP as a therapeutic target is attractive but targets have not been established. Abdominal decompression improves abdominal perfusion. Negative pressure therapy, dampens inflammation in experimental settings.