CENSU,S OF 2001

SERIES-7

GENERAL POPULATION TABLES

(Tables A-1 to A-4)

~~~

C'II"'"I_"a ...... ~ ~ ~.. Ii' 1/8 ot \ ~ PEOPLE ORIENTED

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS, HARYANA Data Product Number 06-009-2001-Cen. Book

(ii) Contents

Pages Preface v Figures at a glance vii

Map relating to administrative divisions IX

SECTION-! General Note 3 Census Concepts and Definitions 12

SECTION-2 TABLE A -1 : NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA Fly Leaf 21 Diagram regarding Area and percentage to total Area 29 Statement 1-8 31

Map relating to Rural and Urban Population by Sex-200l 41 Map relating to Sex ratio-200l 42

Map relating to Rural Sex ratio-200 1 43 Map relating to Urban Sex ratio-200l 44 Diagram regarding Area, India and States-200l 45 Diagram regarding Population, India and States-200l 46 Diagram regarding Population, State and Districts-2001 47 Map relating to Density of Population 48 Table A-I Part-I 49

Table A-I Part-II 56 A-I Appendix 62

TABLE A-2 : DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULA'FION SINCE 1901 Fly Leaf 79 Statement 1-3 80 Table A-2 86 Diagram relating to Growth of Population 1901-2001 India and State 93 A-2 Appendix 95 (iii) TABLE A-3: VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS Fly Leaf 99 Statement 1-2 100 Table A-3 104 Appendix 113

TABLE A-4 : TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Fly Leaf 117 Statement 1-13 119 Diagram regarding Growth of Urban Population showing percentage (1901-2001) 149 Map showing Growth of Urban Centres in six size classes 2001 150 Map showing Urban Agglomerations 151 Alphabetical list of towns, 2001 153 Alphabetical list of Urban Agglomerations - 2001 155 Table A-4 156 Appendix - 1 181 Appendix - 2 182

(iv) Preface

n the earlier censuses, General Population Tables were presented in two Parts, viz., Part II-A and Part I II-B jointly. In Part II-A, the General Population Tables were presented, while the Primary Census Abstract was presented in Part II-B of this publication. During census 2001, this publication has been presented as a single volume "General Population Tables", in which data in the form of Tables A-I, A-2, A-3 and A-4 have been presented. In Table A-I, the number of Villages, Towns, Residential Houses, Households, Population and Area have been..presented for Rural and Urban areas separately. In A-2 Table, decadal variation in population since 1901 has been presented for the State as well as districts for both areas separately: Table A-3 gives the villages by population size classes, while in Table A-4, towns and urban agglomerations classified by population size class in 2001 with variation since 1901 have been presented. In the 1971 Census, the concept of Standard Urban Area (SUA) was introduced, which remained there as Constant Statistical Unit during the three successive Censuses of 1971, 1981 and 1991, but at 2001 Census, this concept has been dropped. The Houselisting and actual Census Enumeration of 2001 were carried out under the able guidance of Shri Sunil Gulati, lAS, the then Director and credit for the successful conduct of Census 2001 goes to him. Before the preparation of this volume, he left this Organization for taking over charge in Haryana Government. I am highly grateful to him for providing us the valuable guidance and inspiration at every step in the collection and presentation of data for this publication. Publication of this volume is the collective effort of the State Govt. as well as Directorate of Census Operations, Haryana. My thanks are due to the Enumerators, Circle Supervisors, Master Trainers, Charge Officers, Additional District Census Officers, District Census Officers, Principal Census Officers and Census Advisors, who took great pains to make the field operation a success. I would like to record great appreciation for the officers and officials of this Directorate, who supervised Field work very minutely at Division, District and Charge levels. In my own Directorate, I received maximum co-operation and assistance from the staff members of Tabulation Section, who worked very hard in the preparation of manuscript of this publication. I also record my gratitude for their painstaking and dedicated services in this regard. I am thankful to Sh. Vinod Babbar, Statistical Investigator Grade-I, presently working as Assistant Director in the Directorate of Census Operations, Himachal Pradesh; Sh. B.S. Rai, Sh. KK Khattar Statistical Investigators-Grade II and Sh. Surinder Verma, Statistical Investigator-III, who were very instrumental in the compilation and processing of data in the form of various tables and statements and preparation of the draft of this report. Names of officers and staff members of this Directorate, who were closely associated with this publication, are given separately. I must record my deepest sense of gratitude to Sh. J.K. Banthia, lAS, Ex-Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India and his worthy successor, Sh. D.K. Sikri, lAS, Additional Secretary, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India for affording us all along the valuable guidance and encouragement at every stage to bring out this publication. I am indebted to Sh. D. Roy Choudhary, Deputy Registrar General (Census & Tabulation), Sh. Jagan Lal, Assistant Director and the staff members of Census & Tabulation Division of the ORGI, New Delhi for providing the valuable guidance and all sorts of assistance in the presentation of this publication. I am grateful to Sh. Anand Kumar and Smt. Suman Prashar, both Joint Director of Census Division of ORGI and their team members for organizing the valuable training and the printing of this volume expeditiously. . (Karan Singh) Cqandigarh . Deputy Director, Census Operations, dated 21 st February, 2007 Haryana (v) Acknowledgement

OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, INDIA Sh. J.K. Banthia, LA.S Ex Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India Sh. D.K. Sikri, l.A.S Additional Secretary, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India Sh. D. Roy Choudhary Deputy Registrar General (Census & Tabulation) Sh. Anand Kumar Joint Director Sh. Jagan LAI Assistant Director

DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS, HARYANA

Sh. M.S. Bhatnagar Assistant Director Sh. Vinod Kumar Babbar Statistical Investigator Gr.-I (now Assistant Director in DCO Himachal Pradesh) Sh. B.S Rai Statistical Investigator Gr.-II Sh. K.K. Khattar Statistical Investigator Gr.-II Sh. Surrinder Kumar Verma Statistical Investigator Gr.-III Sh. V.K. Chodha Sr. Compiler Sh. Lalita Prasad Sharma Sr. Compiler Mrs. Promila Sharma Compiler Sh. Om Prakash Compiler Mrs. Raksha Devi Assistant Compiler Mrs. Neera Sharma D.E.O. Grade 'B' Mrs. Siloni Dhawan D.E.O. Grade 'B'

(vi) FIGURES AT A GLANCE

HARYANA STATE TOTAL POPillA TION Total Persons 21,144,564 Males 11,363,953 Females 9,780,611 Rural Persons 15,029,260 Males 8,052,988 Females 6,976,272 Urban Persons 6,115,304 Males 3,310,965 Females 2,804,339 DECENNIALPOPUIATION GROWTH RATE 1991-2001 28.43 AREAINKM2 44,212 DENSITY OF POPillA TION PER KM2 478 SEX RATIO (Number of females per 1,000 males) 861 LITERACYRA TE( Excluding children in the age-group 0-6) Persons 67.91 Males 78.49 Females 55.73 PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION TO TOAL POPillATION 28.92 (i) Main Workers Persons 74.50 Males 86.31 Females 49.15

(ii) Marginal Workers Persons 25.50 Males 13.69 Females 50.85

(iii) Non - Workers Persons 60.38 Males 49.70 Females 72.78 BREAK UP OF MAIN WORKERS PERCENTAGE AMONG MAIN WORKERS CULTIVATORS Persons 35.64 Males 33.39 Females 44.13

AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS Persons 9.74 Males 9.37 Females 11.11

HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRYWORKERS Persons 2.45 Males 2.33 Females 2.89

(vii) OTHER WORKERS Persons 52.16 Males 54.90 Females 41.84

PERCENT AGE OF SCHEDULED CASTES TO TOTAL POPULATION Persons 19.35 Males 19.26 Females 19.45

PERCENT AGE OF SCHEDULED TRIBES TO TOTAL POPULA TION Persons Males Females

TOT AL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 3,712,319

TOTAL NUMBER OF VilLAGES Total 6,955 Inhabited 6,764 Uninhabited 191

TOTAL NUMBER OF TOWNS 106

(viii) o 75

INDIA o o 31 HARYANA ~/.f, 31 AAII*1PtCf) ~ "\\I"l~ C" .... <. ~~ ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS • 0 ', O'T~ 2001 CHANDIGARJf"*1 ' 1al~~,.,..,. < .@.. - " "'Yo " "~-'9, KILOMETRES .J ·":'PANCH.~ ~ 105 0 10 20 30 40 50 ~ ?KULA./ ()~ I I I I I <. ;'..... ~ t,.,. : 0 J,._. . ~ /"_., iNaraingarho' '.:,.?'" \,(' BOUNDARIES : .@ • t, ~ " , l.i \.", '.. I • " STATE / UNION TERRI:roRY .. , .. , ,. , .. , .. , ,. ~", - , ; .\ 'Chha· I ,.. /' AMBALA .. ,/ __ .otlhrauIY' ~ DISTRICT .. ... , .. , .. , '" .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , ,.. , .. '" .. , .. , .. , :;:~ ,'\ ,:Barar&\.~J :" :2, .,. TAHSIL "' ''' '''''' '''''''''''' ''' ''' .. , .. , .. , ." .. , .. , .. , AMBALA " • -sttahb~si-~ 0 r, Uagadtin ~/ ~ )' "" k-1>. ,().. ,-=." '-(' @ • C, f~,.j\. \ ~;--"-.; " : •• .J (' :"' .....'·(KUflUKSHETRA) \NAGAp/ .Ii. o o , 0 I" '. V 30 Jl I Guh'a '. Pehowa '-. Thanesar }.., 30 .-...... \. t' '" 0 ',.@ ("'., 'r' () ·7'-.... .(6- -·Y... 0 "\ . ; ~: ~. "(;'" , ..... , Indri • " Dabwali ( ..... J \ U .) :~: ' ..' . ~ I. ',r"-- .. 0 ( _ ' " 0 , ' ,Nilokheri -' • "' O i~ " !'i \., ...... -. • ... .1; @ ;, ... -', 0'<",,_'· 1 , .. \ I ...... _,...... ,I \ I I \ \.--\ _ _ ' • I. . ",.~ , (.~. 0 : 0":-'''' (' KAITHAL .-:.', @ / cr /-- .- - -> ,, -~-< ~..' ...:. , : -~ Ratia .;' Tohana '/ \ ...... KARNAL I • ..... I ~..' 'I, \ .. ~ ,, _J .. ; - ~._ : 0 -, ~/.. :_--', __ ,I~"'~ ..... Ii ! Rania;, SIRSA " " : "' •..!. Narwana \,,_.-;;._ ...... Assandh ,:"Gharaun"da,' C. ) 0 ", o.:r • .. ", .. ... \ 0 ! @ ,.-I/ _:a...., ,,,,' 1".....: _ ..! ..' YI , ...... _,f' \./ .. : ...... _ ) .,' .. ' ... - ...... "', "1.. ~.,.,..~ . '__ ... \~ : Ellenabad ,/ \FATEHABAO, i .."', "'<_/ :' PANIPAT " " "'. 0 /',,_ "..-'". ('-"\., ,""'/-••. ' " ?.... .&; @ ~ • ct ~ ,-'_' \ , .... ' '.'1' " ,"; ,. \--. ,' \ -.I I ~, ,"~dampur : ...... / Nar- i I> ;. .. Israna \ _" -t, /' • '.,... \., 0 ' ,-' ' .',naund', ,"""." :':>_ ..r~ 0 ~amalkh~ c:( ,.,.."'.,.,.., ,.I', , 0 ). '-(:,_r '-. -~ 0 , • , • • ' .Q " ',' ",' " '. ,;,... , '.... • J . , _. .., , ,'. '._' • Julana/ 0 '. - --; ~:.' . ,' H~nsl )~ 0 ~ _, :" '~_, O ,_. ~ .... . " .... '" ,..- " ... .,.,~ - , -.. /' .... " - " .. -'" . o o ..... J ,...... ~ .-",,-~ ' : , /~ @ '. .... 29 29 ..... ) ...,. ' - - ,~!l~aniK~ra( 0 ;' :-.{ '···,.~ONIPAT~ t' 0 ''''...-.. ...1'' : 0 ; '_"'" ': ROHTAK "Kharkhcda 1 -"\

• I 0 ,t ... \ , ~ 1., 0 J "' _A " """ lSiwani,' :-:"-' 1& ,. - ' I!I.... ",., ~';J '-~ ; ~ ~-... \Sf , .. f" (~ '.. ,"""\_-( \ ,.. ) .. .. ,./ BHIWANI/ \~ ,...... _' ?/ .. ,I ~ • "', ' ,,-: t ' 0 : Bahadur - \

I I '-\' _ •• , • ""'Dadri l~ ~e~i , _:: · '. ~~rh :{ DELHI '(, 0 ,"' ,> .." , (' • "~' - ' '1, @ .. c ~ ~_.... , '\ ", ,j . JHAJJAR...... ~~..:\". .... s~."'. \,""\" d' ~~ro;_"T :/,... ·'..J_·\·':'~6 -.. ~C', l GURGA~.N :)'.~' ~ ~ ~ ,.-~ '.- " ~osli " , .. '-'- .s· .. ' /FARtDABAI1' " , '"' , _' f "" I .....' , I I " ,,_' v • Mahendragarh " .'-."" >Pataudl .,''T' l'--' 0 '. ..; l, 0 ,' : o . : .- ' Sohna • ·Ballabgarh ... -. " "'''-/'0. " /' •• , , ,,) REWARI ,<'laonr·<9. _.: --'.,. ,,"7 ~ ". , , @ ("~ 0,.. "J ',Yo> ''\'~ 0 ... " ..:\ .. '"...... ,_.._'to "''\...t .... , ~ I \' \ • '" • oJ '-'4 _7 '- - , j' ' ..J ... (Namaul .~ r: Bawal j- "NO h ~ 0' " ... " o .,... ta .J'>.. ' .,~ 0 • U I \ 0 ,) .., ~ t • .1 ""\: I ". 'tathin" " -.,, 28 28 "&" 1"'" • -- , , , ,;(MAH":,\.. ORA. \., Y ". : Hod I _.! ~ GARH) .. I '\. I a ,. I ~~unahao~ 0 ....' fto r::..\. • ~ 0 ,_.,. ~ STATE CAPITAL "' '''''''''''' ''' '''''' ''' ''' ''' ''' '''''' * ._.-'\ \ .JFe~e~ .J ~ DISTRICT HEADOUAR:rERS "' " ' ''' ''' ''' .. , .. , ...... , @ 'v' ,\ .' Jhirt{f" ..... "., "\ TAHSIL HEADQUARTERS "''''''' ''' '''''' .. , ... .. , ... .. , 0 1,0 i . . \) POCK!;'T OF TAHSIL PEHOWA "' "'''' '' ' '''''' ''' ''' ''' P POCKET OF :rAHSIL PANIPAT ... .. , ,...... , .. , .. , .. , .. , T A N \,.~ POCKET OFTAHSIL SOHNA "''''''' ''' ,.. .. , .. , .. , .. , S POCKET OF :rAHSIL KOSLI "' ''' '''''' '" '" ,.... , .. , .. , K POCKET OF TAHSIL THANESAR ,.... , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , C Where the district name differs from its headquarters' name, the former appears within brackets,

o o 75 77 EAST OF GREENWICH

(ix)

SECTION 1 - GENERAL NOTE

General Note

The first Census of the third millennium and twenty The enumeration of houseless population was carried first century conducted in 2001 has been the 141h out on the night of February, 28, 2001. continuous and uninterrupted Indian Census since 1872. This gigantic operation, (considered by many to Thus, 2001 Census ~hile providing data on population be the single largest and complex peace time and its characteristics'will also made a transition from administrative exercise in the world) was made possible one century and millennium to another. This data will due to the door to door universal canvassing of the form the benchmark for framing of the welfare and Household Schedule by about 2 million enUl.nerator's development policies for the human beings living in and supervisors covering 593 districts, 5464 Sub­ this Country. districts, 5161 towns and 638588 villages at the national Till 1931, Census was a one night affair which level. The comprehensive Household Schedule which mainly aimed at presenting a snapshot of the country's replaced the individual slip had three parts and two population. But since 1941 and upto 1991 Census, sides A and B. Part I contained the Location count was staggered and enumeration was being done Particulars; Part II related to the Individual Particulars on Individual Slips. However, in 2001 enumeration and Part III contained questions for Household engaged has been done on Household Sc~edules. The in CultivationIPlantation (Annexure-I). The Part II of questionnaire has thus gone on changing according to the Household Schedule had 39 columns and 23 the changing needs and requirements of the society questions all of which were universally canvassed and and the country. no sampling was resorted to during enumeration. To facilitate quick tabulation for bringing out Provisional As a general rule, every person has to be Population Totals, provision for page totalling was made enumerated at his normal place of residence, except in the schedule itself for a few items namely population those who are away from their normal places of , males, females, population aged 0-6 years by sex, residence through out the period of count. These literates and workers and their ?ategories by sex. The persons have been enumerated at the place where provisional population totals were put in the public they were first found by uli t11umerator during the domain on 30lh March, 2001 i.e. within-weeks of the enumeration period or during his revisional round. completion of the enumeration. Provisional Population Houseless persons have been to be enumerated at Paper-I of 2001 and Supplement to Provisional 1h the places they were found on the night of 28 Population paper-I of2001 provided the basic statistics February, 2001. of the population, literate's upto-district, sub-district The Census Act, 1948, forms the legal basis for and town level classified by sex. through the publication conduct of population Censuses in independent India. of Paper I, II and III of Provisional Population Totals. As in the past, the Census of India, 2001 has been Subsequently, the distribution of popUlation by rural and conducted in two phases. During the first phase, the urban areas and economic activity characteristics of Houselisting Operation was conducted between April the population by rural and urban areas at district/sub­ to September' 2000. The second phase of Census i.e. district/town level were also released in electronic Population Enumeration, was undertaken between format.. All the provisional population totals released February, 9th to 28 th February (both days inclusive) with so far are also available on Census websitei http:/ / a revisional round from 1sl to 5th March, 2001. The www.Censusindia.net. Census moment was 00.00 hours of 1st March, In Jammu & Kashmir and certain snoJ bound 2001, the referral time at which the snapshot of the areas of Himachal Pradesh dnd Uttaranchal the population of the country was taken. This was a population enumeration was conducted during 11 ih - departure from the earlier Census tradition, as until 30th September, 2002 with the revisional round from th ,the 1991 Census (except 1971), the sunrise of 1sl March 1sl to 5 October; 2000. In Kinnaur district of Himachal 'of the relevant Census year was the Census moment. Pradesh, the population enumeration had to be deferred due to flash floods in August 2000 and was conducted

3 from 121h to 31'1 May, 2001 with reference date as using specialized software so as to ensure uniformity, 1'1 June, 2001. which was an essential prerequisite for scanning. The In Jammu and Kashmir, due to certain constraints, selection of appropriate state-of-art technology in data processing has made it possible to produce all the the enumeration period was extended from 1st October, 2000 to 15th November, 2000 with the reference date Houselisting as well as population Enumeration tables of 16th November, 2000 in the six districts viz., Srinagar, on full count basis for the first time in the history of Badgam, Anantnag, Baramulla, Kupwara and Census. For Census 2001 , about 202 million Schedules Pulwama of Kashmir Valley and four blocks namely, consisting of about 1028 million records were scanned Banihal, Ramso, Marwa and Ward wan of Doda district and processed within a span of only 10 months starting in Jammu Division. It was further extended in Srinagar October, 2002. town and Pulwama districts until 15th December, 2000 After the data is processed, it is essential on the with reference date being 16th December, 2000. part of the data producing agency to satisfy itself about Further, due to the devastating earthquake in its quality before putting the same in public domain. Gujarat on 26th January, 2001 just two weeks prior to This has to be done mainly through the process of the commencement of the nation wide population internal consistency, comparison with similar data in enumeration, the canvassing of the schedule in the the past and als~ through validation with likewise data affected areas of Gujarat had to be postponed. The if available, from external sources. Quite often, the . affected areas included the entire district of Kachchh, local knowledge and perception has to be brought into the taluk of Morvi, Maliya-Miana and Wankaner in play to understand both the existing and the new Rajkot district and Jodiya taluka in Jamnagar district. emerging trends of population distribution and The population enumeration in these areas was characteristics. The other very important aspect of th th the data quality is to ensure complete coverage of all undertaken during 9 - 28 February, 2002 with 1sl March, 2002 as the reference date. geographical areas specially for the population enumeration phase where the data is disseminated right In addition to the provisional population totals, the up to the village level in the rural areas and the ward final results of the Houselisting Operations were level in the urban areas. Thus, ensuring the complete released in April, 2003 which provided valuable coverage and correct geographical linkage of each information on the housing stock, amenities and assets enumeration block has always beep. one of ihe major available to the household which is available in the planks of the quality control, especially for small area publication 'Tables on Houses, Household Amenities population statistics. and Assets by States/UTs. Similar publications are also A very comprehensive check and edit mechanism available for the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled was put in place to objectively examine the preliminary Tribe households separately. This data is also available Census 2001 population Enumeration results and fihally in printed form and electronic format for the states/ clear them for use. The responsibility for the final union territories at district, sub-district and town level. clearance of data was with the Task Force on Quality The Houselisting data can be immenseJy useful to the Assurance (TFQA), headed by the Registrar General policy makers, planners and administrators to improve and Census Commissioner, India. The other members the quality of life for countrymen as well as to the of the TFQA wen~ the Heads and senior officers of corporate sector for formulating marketing strategies the Census Division, Data Processing Division, Map in reaching the rural masses. Division, Demography Division and Social Studies A quantum leap has been made in the technology Division. The Directors and their senior officer,s were front while processing the Census 2001 data both for required to make detailed presentations of data for their Houselisting and population Enumeration. The co-opted as memberslwhenever the TFQA discussed Schedules for both the phases were scanned through the data for their states/union territories. The Directors high speed scanners in fifteen Data-centre and hand­ and their senior officers were required to make detailed written data from the schedules were converted into presentations of data for their own state both in respect digitized form through Intelligent Character Reading to the quality and coverage and only after the full (lCR) software for creation of ASCII records for possible satisfaction of the TFQA, the popUlation data further processing. The designing and formatting of has been cleared. the Household Schedule had to be done very carefully

4 The preparations for the 2001 Census of India had preparation of abridged houselist and publicity for commenced in 2000. First item of Preliminary work Census of India-200! were discussed. related to the preparation of up to date list of villages In third Directors Conference held at New Delhi and towns at state or union territory/districtltahsilltown on 26th & 27th May 2000, the format of household levels in view of the various jurisdictional changes that schedule to be canvassed during the Census, manual had taken place since 1991 Census. Draft for household schedule were discussed. Training questionnaires were developed based on past conducted during hous~listing Operations and training experience, the needs of the country to be served by strategies proposed to be adopted and publicity the Census data, willingness of the people and response measures to be taken to sensitize the public and to the topics and the ability of the enumerators in awareness about the importance of Census. understanding the ~finition and concepts. The questionnaires were presented at the first data users During fourth Conference, held on 13 th & 14th Nov, conference which was held during April, 1998 and 2000 at New Delhi, position of receipt of houselisting attended by the representatives of the important record and its safe storage. Creation of population Ministries of the Government of India, the Planning enumeration blocks & status of the work of preparation Commission, the CSO, the State Governments, of abridged houselist and training programme of Master Universities, Demographic and Population Institutes, Trainers etc., was discussed. Expert and Research institutions, and Individual experts During the fifth and last Conference of Directors and Scholars. Based on the deliberations in the was held at New Delhi on 18 th _20 th Dec, 2001 in Conference, the questionnaires were amended and which progress of preparation of Provisional Paper- placed before the Advisory Committee on Technical 2 and 3, Village/TQwn Directories, methodology for Issues Connected with holding the Census, which was checking of houselisting tables and finalization of appointed by the Government of India in February, PCA were discussed. Steps taken for pre-scanning 1998. The questionnaires were again considered by arrangements for houselist schedules and household the Action Committee and finalised by the Government. schedules were reviewed. The final questionnaires were again considered by the The following new questions were added in the ActionCommittee and finalised by the Government. Houselist Schedule of the Census 2001: The final questionnaires developed were (1) Houselist (i) The condition of residential or partly (2) the Household Schedule. residential houses was categorized as The first Directors Conference was held from 23 rd good, livable or dilapidated (Column September to 25 th September 1999 at Vigyan Bhawan, 8). (This was mainly based on New Delhi in which topics related to State hierarchy, perception of the respondents). Rural and Urban frame work, formation of Urban (ii) A question on the number of married Agglomeration, preparatory steps for conducting couple(s) living in the household was houselisting operation in the State, finalization of lists introduced (Column 18). of Districts and Tahsils, Allotment of Location Codes (iii) Information was sought on the to each village, delineation of houselisting Blocks, number of married c01;lple(s) having preparation of Charge Registers, Selection and independent rooms for sleeping appointment of Enumeratorsl Supervisorsl Charge (Column 19). Officers, arrangements for distribution of material for (iv) Information on whether wastewater houselisting, supervision during houselisting, pUblicity outlet was connected to closed measures for houselisting, etc, were discussed in detail. drainage or open drainage or no The second conference of Directors of Census drainage (Column 24). operations was held at New Delhi from 3rd to 5th (v) Availability of bathroom within the February 2000 to review the preparatory work and house (Column 2~). arrangements f<;>r houselisting operations, storing and distribution of schedulesl instructions for houselisting (vi) Availability ofkitahen within the house Operations, disposal of 1991 Census records, discussion (Column 26). on houselist schedule and instruction manual, (vii) Availability df certain assets to the delineation of popUlation enumeration b~ocks and households, namely, radio/transistor,

5 television, telephone, bicycle, scooter/ • Total number of persons normally motorcycle/ moped, carl jeep/ vans residing in the household (Column 28-33). • Name of the head of the household (viii) Availability of banking services (Column 34). • MaleIFemale Besides adding new questions, improvement • Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe was also made in the format of Houselist Schedule of or Other Census 2001 by modifying certain questions as shown • Ownership status of the house below: Number of dwelling rooms (i) For the first time, different uses of • Census houses were standardised and • Number of married couple( s) liying in grouped into ten main uses and the household assigned code numbers (Column 7). • Number of married couple(s) having (ii) PlasticlPolythene was added in the list independent room for sleeping of materials of wall and roof of a Census house (Columns 5 & 6). Household Amenities: (iii) 'Outside premises' as a category of • Drinking water source (Type) the location of ch:inking water source Drinking water source (Location) was further split up into two • categories, namely, 'near the (within the premises, near the premises' and away from the premises, away) premises' (Column 21). • Source of lighting (iv) 'No lighting' was included as a Availability of latrine within the house response to the question on source of • lighting along with other sources, • Waste water outlet connection namely, electricity, kerosene, solar, other oil and any other source (Column • Availability of bathroom within the 22). house (v) Specific information on availability of • Availability of Kitchen within the type oflatrine within the house by the house type of latrine was collected for all Fuel used for cooking areas (Column 23). • Availability of RadiolTransistor House Listing • Availability of Television The following details were canvassed by the • Census Enumerator during Houselisting. • Availability of Telephone Building particulars • A~ailability of Bicycle • Building Number (Municipal or local Availability of ScooterlMotor Cycle/ authority or Census number) • Moped • Census House Number • Avai{abilit~ of Car/JeepNan • Predominant material of the floor, wall and roof of the Census House • Availing B'anking Services • Use of the Census House Household Schedule • Condition of the Census House The Household Schedule adopted for the population Enumeration also primarily had pre-coded options for Household Particulars majority of the questions. The questions for each data • Household number item were made self-explanatory as far as possible

6 for easy understanding. The comprehensive Household 2. The type of educational institution attended by Schedule had three parts and two sides A and B. Part a person were school, college, vocational I contained the Location Particulars; Part II related to institute, other institute and literacy center in Individual particulars and Part III contained questions 2001 instead of school and college in 1991 for Households engaged in CultivationIPlantation. It Census. consisted of 39 columns as against 34 in 1991 Census 3. The scope of the definition of 'work' was and had been so designed as to record the data on expanded in the Census of India, 2001, to Mother tongue and Religion of each individual. This include production of milk for domestic was done for the expeditious computerised tabulation consumption. In the 1991 Census, cultivation for the following: of certain crops even for self-consumption (i) Prim~y Census Abstract with four was treated as economic activity. The scope fold industrial categories of both Main of the term 'Cultivation' was expanded in this Workers and Marginal Workers upto Census to include certain other crops such as village level or ward of a town. The tobacco, fruits, all types of flowers, roots and basic Census data to be presented for tubers, potatoes, chilies and turmeric, pepper, each CD Block in rural areas all over cardamom, all types of vegetables and fodder the country in addition to other level crops etc. This meant that activities related like Tahsil/TalukaiDistrict/State or to production of all the above mentioned crops including that for domestic consumption were UTs. treated as work. Only five crops viz. Tea, (li) The mother tongue and religion data coffee, rubber, coconut and betel nuts were upto TahsillTown level. This will help classified under 'plantation' in the Census of releasing these tables which are in India, 2001. great demand within a reasonable 4. At the 1991 Census, the question on seeking/ time after conducting the Census. available for work was canvassed for only non­ Three types of Households viz: Normal, Institutional workers. At the Census of India, 2001, this and Houseless household were recorded. Cols. 1 to 7 question was asked to the Marginal Workers of Household Schedule were to be filled up before the also. A question to elicit information on enumeration of individual was taken up. These related secondary work of Main Workers canvassed to Serial No., Name, Relationship to Head, Sex (M.P.), at the 1991 Census was dropped. Age and Marital Status of the member of the household. 5. From among the categories of non-workers This helped in counting all members of the Household adopted at the 1991 Census, the category without missing none and in recording the age of the 'Inmates of institutions' was dropped and individual more precisely. Cols. 8 to 39 of the Household 'Retired Persons and Rentiers' was replaced Scheduled pertained to General Social-cultural by the category 'Pensioners'. Characteristics, Characteristics of Workers and Non­ 6. A new response category 'Moved after birth' Workers, Migration Characteristics and Fertility was included in the question on 'reasons for particulars. The particulars entered into the Household migration'. Natural calamities as a reason for Schedule were to be treated as confidential. migration from last residence included in the 1991 Census was excluded. Most of the, questions canvassed during the 1991 Census, were retained for the 2001 Census, except 7. Number of children born alive to currently tile question on ex-serviceman. However, a number married women during last one year was of new questions were added in the Household collected with gender break up. Schedule in view of the suggestions from policy makers, Besides the above modifications, the following new data users and researchers, while the scope of certain questions were canvassed at the 2001 Census: existing questions was modified. These changes were:- 1. A question on total disability was canvassed 1. Age at marriage was collected for males also, in the 1981 Census. In the 1991 Census, no while it was collected for only ever-married question on disability was included. In 2001, a females until the 1991 Census. question to elicit information on total or partial

7 disability was canvassed. The five types of every household in his block and take note of additions disability on which information was collected that might have taken place after the preparation of were - in seeing, in hearing, in speech, in notional map. movement and mental. Unlike in 1981 Census The Census Hierarchy these questions were canvassed during population Census. The Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India is responsible for conducting the population 2. A new question on 'Travel to place of work' Census which is a union subject under the charge of was canvassed mainly for workers engaged the Ministry of Home Affairs. He is assisted by several in non-agricultural activities. Information on officers who look after the different branches of work distance from the residence to place of work within his office. Except Dadra & Nagar Haveli and and mqde of travel to place of work was Daman & Diu, every State and Union Territory has a collected under this section. permanent Directorate. 3. The Household Schedule had a new set of For each state and union territory an officer is questions for households engaged in cultivation! appointed as Director of Census operations. He is plantation- i) Net area ofland under cultivation! directly responsible to the Census Commissioner of India plantation, ii) Net area ofland irrigated and iii) for organising and supervising the Census operations Tenure status. This question was not within his area. For 200 1 Census, the Directors of canvassed at the 1991 Census but was Census Operations were in position by May, 2000. The canvassed in the 1981 Census in a slightly Directors were assisted by a number of D6.puty/ different form. Assistant Directors. Independent Census Directorates 4. The signature or thumb impression of the for three newly created States viz. Uttaranchal, respondent has been taken on the Household Iharkhand and Chhattisgarh were not 'established. The Schedule for the first time in the history of Director of Census Operations Uttar Pradesh, Bihar Census. This was not only aimed at obtaining and Madhya Pradesh were designated as Directors of correct and complete information but for giving Census Operations of Uttaranchal, Iharkhand and an opportul}ity to the respondents to Chhattisgarh respectively. authenticate the information provided by them. It has been the Indian tradition ,that in vi~w of the The relationship of the respondent with the national importance of the Census, the entire head of the household was also obtained. This administrative machinery of the state and local new feature will pave way in carrying out a government is also called upon to assist the state methodological study in future on the Director of Census Operations in 'Census work. The respondent profile in the Census. 200 1 Census hierarchy in the state or union territory Preparation of Maps followed the normal administrative set up. For each A Census must ensure that every person in the district, the administrative head of the district(the district country is enumerated only once and without any c@llector) was designated as the district Census officer omission. In order to achieve this, maps for all districts, who undertook the Census duties in addition to his taluks, tahsils, Community Development Blocks and normal duties. I,n certain cases, however, 'some senior ultimately for every village and town were prepared. officer of the district collector's establishment worked Taking all jurisdictional changes that occurred after as district Census officer, although the district officer himself remained responsible for the proper conduct 1991 Census into consideration all administrative \ boundaries were made up-to-date. After identifying of the Census operations. The district Census officer every village and town on a talukltahsil map/ was responsible for detnarcating the Census jurisoiction Community Development Block code numbers were within the district, appo!nting and training enumeration allotted to each of these units which were to be fully personnel and the executiort and supervision at' every accounted for at the Census. Notional maps of every stage of Census operations. The district was sub­ village and every wardlblock of a town were prepared, divided into tehsils, talukas, tpanas, sub-division., blocks, showing location of every house. The notional maps, police station etc., according to the administrative set proved extremely helpful at the time of enumeration. up obtaining in each state. The chief administrative They served as the frame for the clear demarcation of officer of each of the administrative divisions such as the enumerator's jurisdiction and enabled him to cover the tehsildar, block development 6fficer was appointed

8 ,as Census charge officer for his area. Large cities five or six enumerators. The supervisors were 'Yere treated as separate Census charge and the generally officials of the state or local bodies of a status executive officer of the civic body appointed as Census higher than those appointed as enumerators. The cqarge officer. For area such as military camps, project enumerators and supervisors were also basically part­ area" special industrial areas, railway colonies etc., time honorary workers who undertook the Census work sp,ecial charge officers from the organisations more out of a sense of duty and spirit to help a great concerned were appointed. All these officers were national task. There was a large number of Census required to attend to Census duties as part of his normal charge officers and district Census officers who were worlv. The smallest administrative unit was· the village all part-time worke~s. or town. For each village and each town, enumeration The Census operation was conducted essentially blocks were formed~n such a way that each block through the State Government hierarchy under the covered about 750 population in rural areas and 600 in overall supervision of the Directors of Census urban areas. For each of these enumeration blocks, a Operations in the StatelUnion Territories. The entire Census enumerator was appointed. Some reserve administrative machinery at the district level was called personnel were also appointed and trained. Normally, upon to assist the Director of the Census Operations. Ii primary school teacher or village patwari or some The Census hierarchy bf2001 Census is given below. odier village level official in rural areas and teachers Govt. of Haryana notified vide no. 39 (GOJ)-R-V-99/ or'clerical staff or other staff of local offices in urban 13818 dated 1'1/ 2nd December 1999, an

I'Director of Census Operations 2 By. Commissioners in Haryana Principal Census Officers 3 Additional Deputy Commissioners Additional Principal Census Officers 4 Commissioner Faridabad Municipal Corporation Principal Census Officer 5 Administrator Panchkula Urban Estate Principal Census Officer 6 City Magistrate District Census Officer 7 District Statistical OfficerslPlanning Officers/ Economists Additional District Census Officers 8 Sub-Divisional Officers (Civil) Sub-Divisional Census Officers 9 Tahsildars Charge Officers 10 Executive Officers/Secretaries of the local bodies Charge Officers 11 Joint Commi<;sioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Charge Officer 12 Estate Officer, Panchkula Urban Estate Charge Officer l3 Block Development Panchayat Officers Additional Charge Officers 14 Naib Tahsildars (Only incharge of sub-tahsils) Additional Charge Officers 15 Office Kanungos (posted in the tahsil offices Assistant Charge Officers 16 Assistant District Statistical Officers Assistant Charge Officers 17 Secretaries of Municipal Councils/ Cantonment Board Ambala Additional Charge Officers 18 Zonal Taxation Officers of Municipal Corporation,Faridabad Additional Charge Officers 19 Special Charges/ Sensitive area Charge Officers 20 District Revenue Officers Additional District Census Officers 21 Sadar Kanungo/ Naib Sadar Kanungo Assistant Charge Officer 22 Municipal Committee Clerk/Assistant Assistant Charge Officer

9 In most of the cases school teachers were existing at the present Census. The last two digits appointed as enumerators/supervisors. However, some being "00" are kept for accommodating future changes village Patwaries, employees of the Lot!tll Modies, State/ in case of split of an existing village or creation of new Central Government SeI'VIDlts and other field workers villages etc. Since the Permanent Location Codes were also engaged for the conduct of houselisting have been assigned to each village, theoretically tracing operation and actual enumeration. The senior Officials the precise location of village on account of future among these categories were appointed as supervisors, jurisdictional changes in the boundaries of various usually at the ratio of one each for five enumerators. administrative areas within the state should not pose a The enumeration staff performed their duties more problem. It is imperative that under this scheme, the as a labour of love. Till the 1951 Census the PLCN assigned to villages at the Census of India, 2001,· enumerators were not paid anything at all. From 1961 are adopted in future Censuses also to ensure the on wards a small honorarium to each enumerator and comparability of the data at the village and other supervisor was paid. This practice continued in 1971, administrative levels over a long time series. 1981, 1991 and 2001 Cen:S\1s"e's ~l~. Formation and Identification of Slum Et11.tmeration Block New hatures of th~ Census of India; 2001 Several new innovatfons haVe Seen introduced at The phenomenon of rapid urbanization coupled with industrialization and growth in manufacturing and almt)st aU the stage's 6'f~ansus of India 2001 right commercial centers leads to surfacing of slums. In from the preparattlY'Y ettorts to tile data processing various states, the slums are known by different local and di:s~~mihation state·. This includes certain names officially and unofficially but the basic fUndamental ~~tn the form and contents of the Houselist oo.d1iousehold schedules, while maintaining characteristics of slums remains the same such as inadequate lighting, lack of safe drinking water, absence tb~ eOnunuity and comparability of the basic housing of toilet facilities and non-availability of basic social and population characteristics with the earlier Census. and health services. Slum enumeration Blocks were Some of the new features introduced and innovations identified for the first time in Census, in each Municipal made in the Census of India 2001 are listed and discussed below. town having a population of 50,000. Instructions were issued that these Enumeration blocks do not cut across Permanent Location Code Number ward boundaries or non-slum area. It ~i1l thus be One of the imponlUit inputs ifi Census taking is possible to compile and tahulate special tables for assigning of the Location Code Numbers at various 'slums'. This will enable the planners and administrators administrative levels~ Tire Location Code Number is to visualize the impact and pressure on utban a simple device ~}7 Which every compact geographical infrastructure and amenities on one hand and graphically area in IDly administrative unit can be uniquely capture the housing and demographic conditions of slum identified. Each such administrative unit starting from dwellers on the other. State right down to the village/ward can be referred to . Training - Inputs by a combination of such unique numbers. Until the Training has always been recognized as one of 1991 Census, a hierarchical coding system was the most vital inputs for smooth and successful conduct followed, whereby each administrative unit was coded of Census. It is not a routine job, as it requires clear within the next higher administrative unit serially and understanding of several Census concepts. The systematically following a geographical order. enumerators are also to be reminded about the The frequeht chahges in district and sub-district sensitivity of the different questions that are canvassed administrative units during the inter-censal period posed and given tips on tile probing techniques. The training several problems of study in changes in growth and classes have to be properly structured with the right distribution of popUlation and their characteristics from emphasis on each of tl\e questions. The training one Census to another. For the Census of India, 2001, strategies were chalked out well ahead of time for the a system of Permanent Location Code Numbers Census of India, 2001. The Instruction Manuals for (PCLN) has been adopted by assigning to each village the Houselisting Operations and Population within the State/UT a continuous series from 1 to N. Enumeration were written up very elaborately, covering Each village has been assigned an eight digit code. every possible situation so that the enumerators and The first six digit represent the code of the village as supervisors can find solutions \0 all their problems that

10 may arise during the course of their fieldwork. The Population Enumeration which was conducted in Feb., Instruction Manuals also contained a number of 2001 were again called at the Divisional level, appropriate examples and illustrations including filled­ 6.11.2000 (Ambala), 7.11.2000 (Rohtak), 9.11.2000 in sample schedules and probing methods for guidance (Hisar) and 16.11.2000 (Gurgaon). Training for actual of the enumerators. Enumeration, the second step of Census taking, also The training of Census officers in the Directorate started with a training seminar at each district of Census Operations started very early with the headquarters from 8.11.2000 to 8.12.2000 for District formation of four Analytical Groups as early as level Officers, Charge Officers and their Assistants. October, 1999. These Analytical Group meetings Presentation made for sensitization was shown with provided a platform to the Census officers at all levels multi-media projector, T.VNCR setup. The training sessions continued for two days and were personally in the Directorate ~ analyse and review the several aspects of the quality and coverage of Census data on addressed by the Officers of this Directorate. Press Housing and population characteristics. The Director Notes too were given to various newspapers for and at least one senior officer from each Directorate sensitization and widespread media coverage for were trained in various Census concepts in great details Census 2001 including reserve for canvassing the at these meetings. The Directors and their senior Census schedules for actual enumeration was officers then took upon themselves the responsibility organized in three rounds. The first round from of training of other officials of her/his Directorate and 11.12.2000 to 22.12.2000, the second round from all other field Census functionaries starting from the 2.1.2001 to 13.1.2001 and third and final round from Principal Census Officer (District Collectors/Municipal 22.1.2001 to 2.2.2001. An officerlDistrict incharge Commissioners) to the Charge Officers (Tahsildars, from this Organization and that of District Statistical Block Development Officer, Executive Officer of Offices. participated in each training class. Municipalities etc.). It has been our experience in the previous In Haryana The divisional level training & Censuses that though the Charge Officers were mainly Sensitization Conferences were held at the Divisional entrusted with the duties of imparting training to headquarters on 6.3.2000 (Ambala), 7.3.2000 (Rohtak), enumerators and supervisors, yet its impact was not uniform. The Charge Officers who are mainly drawn 8.3.2000 (Gurgaon) and 9.3.2000 ~Hisar) which were presided over by the respective Divisional from Tahsildars, BDOs, Executive Officers of Commissioners. The district level training seminars for Municipal Council etc., were found to be largely pre­ intensive training of the Charge Officers and district occupied with day-to-day administrative work and in level officers/officials at district headquarters were held some parts of the country could hardly devote from 14.3.2000 to 1~.4.2000. One officer each from continuously the time required to conduct a complete this Directorate and from Economic and Statistical and proper training. Therefore, in a major departure Organization Haryana participated in each of these from the past, a separate well equipped team of trainers meetings. Power point presentation and Flip charts were called the 'Master Trainers' was created and engaged shown during the training. The enumerators/supervisors for training of enumerator and supervisor. These appointed for the Houselisting operations were imparted Master Trainers were mainly drawn from among intensive training in two rounds. First round was experienced Lecturers, Principals and other conducted from 17th April to 28th April,2000 and second Government officials with good oratory and training round from 1st May to 12th May 2000. One Official at skills. They were trained intensively at the district each district from this Directorate was deputed as level and in a few states at the state level. This District Incharge for effective supervision/monitoring enthusiastic brigade of Master Trainers in turn usually Census work for both the operations, Houselisting and imparted training to enumerators and supervisors in a Actual Enumeration. During 2001 Census first time phased manner. the Lecturers/Senior teachers from Senior Secondary The training classes were by and large restricted Schools were appointed as Master Trainers to help to 70-80 participants per class. The traditional mode and impart training to enumerators and supervisors at such as reading and explaining ftom the Instruction various training Centres in the District. This step proved Manual, the chalk and blackboard approach and flip to be useful at the extent. charts were also used in these training classes. To Divisional Training & Sensitization Conferences make the training sessions interactive and interesting for the Census work for the Second phase i.e. a number of training modules were conceived, devised

11 and some NGOS also chipped in by participating in the System (SRS) unlike the PES of the population training classes particularly for the questions on enumeration, where the Enumeration Blocks (EB) disability. In addition to the traditional approach this were used as the sampling frame. training was also supplemented with video films, In 1991 and earlier Censuses, the PES used to be audiocassettes, power point presentations, overhead conducted in certain selected states based on the slide projectors, question -answers, mock criteria of the size of the population. However, in this demonstrations etc. A combination of different Census , the PES was conducted in all the states and modules was used according to the local requirements. union territories of the country. In the 1991 Census, The practical training was made a compulsory part of for measuring the content error, a ten per cent sub. all training sessions. Each Census functionary was sample of households enumerated in Census was insisted upon to fill in five practice blue Household selected from each Enumeration Block and the usual Schedules as a part of the practical training. The residents in those households were listed along with supervisory officer/Master Trainer checked these certain particulars. But at the Census of India, 2001, practice schedules and common discrepancies and PES of all the households in the sampled EBs were mistakes were clarified on an individual basis as also listed along with certairi particulars. Since the PES in an open forum in the presence of all enumerators estimation methodology is based on the assumption of and supervisors before the final round of training. independence between the PES and the Census A team of dedicated and specially selected Census operations, wherever possible, the field work in the Advisors imparted special training to Enumerators/ states was carried out by the staff of the State Supervisors on gender related issues in Census of India, Governments, who were specially trained for the 200 1. In these training sessions correct capture of purpose. age data, female popUlation and their economic pursuits Post Enumeration Check was undertaken in 100 were emphasized with the help of Census data and selected enumeration blocks, (71) Rural and (29) Urban training modules. For each district, a group of very blocks in Haryana State communicated by the Registrar experienced and trained directorate officials was General India. Out of 100 blocks, 20 blocks were deputed to back-up these training efforts. The Director selected for estimating content error. The survey was and other senior officials undertook intensive training undertaken with the help of staff of Economic and to sort out all types of problems on the spot. The district Statistical Organization and district level officers of administration provided the necessary support through Director, Agriculture Department Haryana. There their active involvement during the two months long were three stages of work in Post Enumeration Check training period. i.e. listing and enumeration, desk matching and field Post Enumeration Survey (PES) reconciliation. For this purpose, detailed training was Post Enumeration Survey (PES), which was earlier imparted to the supervisory staff of this Directorate and field staff of State Govt. at the concerned district known as Post Enumeration Check (PEC) has become th an integral part of the Census operations in India since headquarters from 9 to 12th April,2001. Listing of 1951. Till the earlier Censuses, the Post Enumeration Enumeration blocks selected for Post Enumeration Survey used to be conducted only after the population Check was done by the field staff and desk matching enumeration but for the first time in the Census of of various filled in forms was done in this office and India, 200 1, a PES of the Houselisting Operations was finally the field reconcilhition was done, which was also conducted after the completion of the Houselisting supervised by the staff of this Directorate during the Operations in sixteen major states including Delhi. The month of June, 2001 main objectives of the PES for the Census of India, Basic Census COl1cepts and Definitions-Census 2001, were (i) to get an estimate, of under, coverage of 2001 Census houses, (ii) to get an estimate of under coverage It is important for the data users to familiarize of popUlation and (iii) to provide an estimate of the themselves with the concepts and the definitions of extent of the content error with respect to certain the terms used for proper appreciations of the data selected data items. contained in this publication. At the same time, it is all The sampling frame used for selection of samples the more important to understand the implications of for conducting the PES of the Houselisting Operations the terms used at the Census of India 200 1, for making were the sample units of the Sample Registration meaningful comparisons of the similar data generated

12 by various other agencies within the country and with statutory town or city but within the revenue limits of the data produced by other countries in the world. The a village or villages contiguous to the town or city. concepts and definitions adopted at the Census ofIndia, Each such individual area by itself may not satisfy 2001 are as given below: the demographic criteria laid down at (b) above to Generally speaking, persons who were present in qualify it to be treated as an independent urban unit but may deserve to be clubbed with the towns as a the household during the entire period of enumeration continuous urban spread. Thus, the town level data, or who were known to be usual residents of the household and have stayed there for part of the wherever presented, also includes the data for enumeration period or who were not present at the outgrowths of such towns. time of visit of the enumerator but were expected to The following 13 rural areas were treated as return by 28th Fenruar}, 2001 were eligible to be Census Towns for the purpose of 2001 Census:- enumerated. For the purpose of enumeration the Name of District Name of.Census Town following persons were enumerated in a household: Panchkula Raipur Rani Rural and Urban Areas: Ambala Kardhan Census data have always been presented for rural Kansepur and urban areas separately. The basic unit for rural Panipat Panipat Taraf Ansar areas is the revenue village which has definite surveyed Panipat Taraf Makhdum boundaries. The revenue village may comprise several Zadgan hamlets but the entire village has been treated as one Panipat Taraf Rajputan unit for presentation of data. In unsurveyed area, like Asan Khurd villages within forest areas, each habitation area with Jhajjar Ladrawan locally recognised boundaries within each forest range Sankhol officer's beat, was treated as one ,unit. In the Census Mahendragarh Nangal Chaudhry ofIndia 200 1, the definition of urban area adopted was Rewari RewariC Rural ) as follows :- Gurgaon Sukhrali (a) All places with a municipality, corporation, Faridabad Tilpat cantonment board or notified town area committee etc. The Total number of towns in 2001 Census has (b) A place satisfying the following three criteria thus risen to 106 as compared to 94 of 1991, 81 of simultaneously: 1981 and 65 in 1971 Census. (i) a minimum population of 5,000; City (ii) at least 75 per cent of male working Towns with population of 1,00,000 and above are popUlation engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and called cities. (iii) a density of population of at least 400 Urban Agglomerations per sq. km. (1,000 per sq. mile). At the 1961 Census, the concept of 'Town Group' For identification of places which would qualify to was adopted to obtain a broad picture relating to urban be classified as 'urban' all villages, which, as per the spread. This was refined in 1971 with the concept of 1991 Census had a population of 4,000 and above, a 'Urban Agglomeration' to obtain better feed back in population density of 400 persons per sq. km. and having regard to urban contiguity, processes and trends of at least 75 per cent of male working popUlation engaged urbanisation and other related matters. This concept in non-agricultural activity were considered. To work without any change or modification has remained out thy proportion of male working population referred to above against (b) (ii) the data relating to main operative in the 1981, 1991 and 2001 Censuses. An workers were taken into account. Urban Agglomeration forms a continuo~s urban spread and normally consists of a town and its ,adjoining urban Apart from t~ese, the outgrowths COGs) of cities and towns have also been treated as urban under outgrowths (OGs), or two or more physically 'Urban Agglomerations'. Examples of out-growths contiguous towns together with contiguous well are railway colonies, university campuses, port areas, recognised outgrowths, if any, or such towns. A place militaiy camps etc. that may have come up near a is identified as an out growth as follows:

13 In several areas around a core city or statutory 5. Bahadurgarh Urban Agglomeration town fairly large well recognised railway colony, (a) Bahadurgarh (MCL) university campus, port area, military camp etc. might (i) Pamala (OG) have come up. Even if such places are lying outside (ii) Bahadurgarh (Rural) (OG) the statutory limits of the corporation, municipality or (iii) Hasanpur (OG) cantonment etc. in most of the cases they fall within (b) Sankhol (CT) the revenue limit of the village or villages which is or 6. Gurgaon Urban Agglomeration are contiguous to the town. Since such areas are (a) Gurgaon (MCL) already urbanised it is not considered realistic to treat (i) Silokbra (OG) such areas lying outside the statutory limits of a town (ii) Jharsa (OG) as rural units, although a few of them may not satisfy (b) Gurgaon (Rural) (Cn some of the prescribed eligibility tests to qualify (c) Sukbrali (CT) themselves as independent urban units. Such areas B. Urban Agglomerations formed afresh in 2001 have been termed as outgrowths (OGs) and reckoned Census along with the town. Each such town together with 7. Urban Agglomeration its outgrowth(s) is treated as an integrated urban area (a) Pinjore (M.C) and is designated as an 'urban agglomeration'. An (i) HMT Pinjore (OG) urban agglomeration, therefore, constitutes: 8. Thanesar Urban Agglomeration (i) A city or a town with a continuous outgrowth, (a) Thanesar (MCL) the outgrowth being outside the statutory limits but (i) Ratgal (OG) falling within the boundaries of the adjoining village or 9. Panipat Urban Agglomeration villages; or (a) Panipat (MCL) (i) Panipat (MCL) (ii) Two or more adjoining towns with their (b) Panipat Taraf Ansar (CT) outgrowths, if any, as in (i) above; or (c) Panipat Taraf Makhdum zadgan (iii) A city and one or more adjoining towns with (CT) or without outgrowths all of which form a continuous Cd) Panipat Taraf Rajputan (CT) spread. 10. Sonipat Urban Agglomeration (a) Sonipat (MCL) In 2001, we received five proposals from the (i) Kabirpur (OG) municipal authorities which wer~ scrutinized in the (ii) Bandepur (OG) office, after verification following·\irban agglomerations (iii) Shadipur (OG) formed, which were approved by the Registrar General, (iv) Lahrara (OG) India on our recommendation. 11. Rohtak Urban Agglomeration A. Urban Agglomerations of 1991 Census (a) Rohtak (MCL) which continue in.2001 Census. (i) Sector 1 & Housing Board 1. Ambala Urban Agglomeration Colony (OG) (a) Ambala Sadar (MCL) Household (b) Ambala Cantt (C.B) A 'Household' is usually a' group of persons who 2. Yamunanagar Urban Agglomeration normally live together and take their ,meals from a (a) Yamunanagar (MCL) common kitchen unless the exigencies of work prevent (b) J agadhri (MCL) any of them from doing so. Persons in a household (c) (CT) may be related or unrelated or a mix of both. However, 3. Kamal Urban Agglomeration if a group of unrelated persons live in a Census house (i) Kamal (MCL) but do not take their meals from the common kitchen, (ii) Part of Sec-6 and Sec-7 & 8 then they are not constituent of a common household. (O.G) Each such person was to be treated as a separate 4.Hisar Urban Agglomeration household. The important link in finding out whether it (i) Hisar (MCL) was a household or not was a common kitchen. There (ii) CCS HAU Campus & Mini may be one member households, two member Secretariate (O.G) households or multi-member households.

14 A household with at least one Scheduled Caste are to be deemed for the purposes of the Constitution member is treated as Scheduled Caste Household. to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to the various States Similarly a household having at least one Scheduled and Union Territories. In pursuance of these provisions, Tribe member is treated as a Scheduled Tribe the list of Scheduled Castes and / or Scheduled Tribes Household. are notified for each State and Union Territory and Institutional Household are valid only within the jurisdiction of that State or Union Territory and not outside. A group of unrelated persons who live in an institution and take their meals from a common ki.tchen It is important to mention here that under the is called an Institutional Household. Examples of Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, no person who professed a religion different from Hinduism was Institutional Households ~e boarding houses, messes, hostels, hotels, rescue homes, jails, ashrams, deemed to be a member of a Scheduled Caste in orphanages, etc. To make the definition more clearly addition to every member of the Ramdasi, Kabirpanthi, perceptible to the Enumerators at the Census 2001, it Majhabi or Sikligar Caste, resident in Punjab or Patiala was specifically mentioned that this category of and East Punjab States Union in relation to that State households would cover only those households where whether they professed the Hindu or the Sikh religion. a group of unrelated persons live in an institution and Subsequently, in September 1956, by an amendment share a common kitchen. of the Presidential Order of 1950 and in all subsequent Presidential Orders relating to Scheduled Castes, the Houseless Household Hindu and the Sikh Religions were placed on the same footing with regard to the specification of Scheduled Households who do not live in buildings or Census Castes. Later on, as per the amendment made in the , houses but live in the open on roadside, pavements, in Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order 1990, the Hindu, hume pipes, under fly-overs and staircases or live in the Sikh and the Buddhist were placed on the same the open in places of worship, mandaps, railway footing with regard to the recognition of the Scheduled platforms, etc., are treated as Houseless Households. Castes. A member of Scheduled Tribe may belong to Head of the Household any religion. However, a person will be reckoned as belonging to Scheduled Tribe only if the name of the The head of the household for Census purpose is Tribe appears in the list of Scheduled Tribes applicable a person who is recognized as such by the household. to the State. ShelHe is generally the person who bears the chief responsibility for managing the affairs of the household Literates and takes decision on behalf of the household. The head of the household need not necessarily be the A person aged seven years and above who can eldest male member or an earning member, but may both read and write with understanding in any language be a female or a younger member of either sex. In has been taken as literate. A person who can only read case of an absentee de jure (head) who is not eligible but cannot write has not been taken as not literate. It to be enumerated in the household, the person on whom is not necessary that, to be considered as literate, a the responsibility of managing the affairs of household person should have received any formal education or rests has to be regarded as the head irrespective passed any minimum educational standard. Literacy whether the person is male or female. could also have been achieved through adult literacy classes or through any non-formal educational system. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes People who are blind and can read in Braille are treated Article 341 of the Constitution of India provides as literates. that the President may, with respect to any State or Work Union Territory, specify the Castes, Races or Tribes or parts of or groups within Castes, Races or Tribes Work is defined as particip~tion in any which shall, for the purposes of the Constitution, be economically productive activity ~ith or without deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State compensation, wages or profit. Such participation may or Union Territory. Similarly, Article 342 provides for be physical and/or mental in nature. Work involves not specification of Tribes or Tribal Communities or parts only actual work but also includes effective supervision of or groups within Tribes or Tribal Communities which and direction of work. It even includes part-time help

15 or unpaid work on farm, family enterprise or in any owned or held from Government or held from Private other economic activity. All persons engaged in 'work' persons or Institutions for payment in money, kind or as defined above are workers. Persons who are share. Cultivation includes effective supervision or engaged in cultivation or milk production even solely direction in cultivation. for domestic consumption are also treated as workers. A person who has given out her/his land to another Reference period for determining a person as person or persons or institution(s) for cultivation for worker or non-worker is one year prece'ding the date money, kind or share of crop and who does not even of enumeration. supervise or direct cultivation of land, is not treated as Cultivator. Similarly, a person working on another Main Worker person's land for wages in cash or kind or a combination A person who has worked for major part of the of both (agricultural labourer) is not treated as reference period (i.e., six months or more during the Cultivator. last one year preceding the date of enumeration) in Cultivation involves ploughing, sowing, harvesting any economically productive activity is termed as 'Main and production of cereals and millet crops such as Worker'. wheat, paddy, jowar, bajra, ragi, etc., and other crops such as sugarcane, tobacco, ground-nuts, tapioca, etc., Marginal Worker and pulses, raw jute and kindred fibre crop, cotton, A person who worked for less than six months of cinchona and other medicinal plants, fruit growing, the reference period (i.e., in the last one year preceding vegetable growing or keeping orchards or groves, etc. the date of enumeration) in any economic activity is Cultivation does not include the following plantation termed as 'Marginal Worker'. crops - tea, coffee, rubber, coconut and betel-nuts (areca). Non-Worker Agricultural Labourer A person who did not at all work during the reference period was treated as non-worker. The non­ A person who works on another person's land for workers broadly constitute. wages in money or kind or share is regarded as a1} Students who did not participate in any economic agricuIturallabourer. She/he has no risk in cultivation, activity paid or unpaid, household duties who were but merely works on another person's land for wages. attending to daily household chores like cooking, An agricultural labourer has no right of lease or contract cleaning utensils, looking after children, fetching water on land on which she/he works. etc. and are not even helping in the unpaid work in the Household Industry Worker family form or cultivation or milching, dependant such as infants or very elderly people not included in the Household Industry is defined as an Industry category of worker, pensioners those who are drawing conducted by the head of the household herself/himself pension after retirement and are not engaged in any and or by the members of the household at home or economic activity. Beggars, vagrants, prostitutes and within the Village in rural areas and only within the persons having unidentified source of income and with precincts of the house where the household lives in unspecified sources of subsistence and not engaged in urban areas. The larger proportion of workers in any economically productive work during the reference household industry should consist of members of the period. Others, this category includes all Non-workers household including the head. The industry should not who may not come under the above categories such be run on the scale of a registered factory which would as rentiers, persons living on remittances, agricultural or non-agricultural royalty, convicts in jails or inmates qualify or has to be registered under the Indian of penal, mental or charitable institutions doing no paid Factories Act and should be engaged in manufacturing, or unpaid work and persons who are seeking/available processing, servicing and repairs of goods. for work. It does not include professions such as a Pleader, Doctor, Musician, Dancer, Waterman, Cultivator Astrologer, Dhobi, Barber, etc., or merely trade or For purposes of Census, a person is classified as business, even if such professions, trade or services Cultivator if he or she is engaged in cultivation on land are run at home by members of the household.

16 Other Worker A person who has been engaged in some economic activity during the reference period but not as a Cultivator or Agricultural Labourer or in Household Industry is termed as 'Other Worker (OW)'. The type of workers that come under this category of 'OW' include all Government Servants, Municipal Employees, Teachers, Factory Workers, Plantation Workers, those engaged in trade, commerce, business, transport, banking, mining, construction, political or social work, priests, entertainment artists, etc. In effect, all those workers other than Cultivators or Agricultural Labourers or Household Industry Workers are 'Other Workers'.

Sex-ratio Sex-ratio has been defined as the number of females per 1000 males in the population. Number of females Sex-ratio = ______x 1000 Number of males Child Sex-ratio (0-6 years) Child Sex-ratio (0-6 years) has been defined as the number of females in age-group 0-6 years per 1000 males in the same age-group in the popUlation.

Number of females children (0-6 years)

Child Sex-ratio (0-6 years) = ______~x 1000 Number of males (0-6 years)

Literacy Rate Literacy rate is defmed as the percentage of literates to the total population aged seven years and above.

Number of literates Lletdcy rate =______x 100 Population aged 7+ Work Participation Rate It is the percentage of total workers (main + marginal) to the total population.

Total workers (Main + Marginal) Work participation rate = ______x 100 Total popUlation

Location Code structure adopted in 2001 Census In the Census 2001 the following location code structure has been adopted Area Number of digits State Two digits (within the country) District Two digits (within,the state) TalukfTahsil Four digits (within the district) Village Eight digits (within the state) Town Eight digits (within the district) Ward Four digits (within the town)

17 The general pattern followed in coding of any 40305000 represents the town serial number 5 of the geographical unit was a serpentine one, beginning from district number 03 in a State. the North-West corner and completing at the farthest The out-growths of towns have not been given any South-East corner within the State. independent location code numbers. These have been One of the major initiatives taken in the Census given notional ward codes after the last ward code of 2001 was the allotment of Permanent Location Code the respective towns to which these OGs relate to. Number (PLCN) to each and every village within the Present Volume State and not within a tahsil as in the earlier Censuses. The present volume on general population tables PLCN was thus assigned as one continuous number contains Tables A-I to A-4 from the fIrst village in the fIrst district to the last village in the last district. PLCN is an eight digit unique location A-I Number of Villages, Towns, Households, code number with the fIrst six digits representing the Population and Area. code number of the village and the last two digits A -2 Decadal variation in population since 190 I. depicting two zeros '00'. These zeros are reserved as A-3 Villages by population size Class. buffer to be used for coding any new viUage(s) that A-4 Towns and Urban Agglomerations classifIed may come up between two villages in future. For by Population size class in 2001 with variation example, if a new village comes up between two since 1901. villages with PLCNs 00154600 and 00154700, the new village will be allotted PLCN 00154601 and so on. Abbreviations Used The location code number for a town is also an Abbreviations of civic status of cities or towns: eight digit number starting with the digit 4 situated at the extreme left acting as the unique identifIer. The C.B. Cantonment Board/Cantonment next two digits depict the code number of the district E.O. Estate Office in which the town falls followed by two digits M.C. Municipal Committee representing the town serial number in the district. M.Cl. - Municipal Council There are three zeros at the end as buffer mainly to M.Corp.­ Municipal Corporation/Corporation meet the requirement of bringing the number of digits C.T. Census Town to eight to match the number of digits in the PLCN for U.A. Urban Agglomeration the villages.Thus a town location code number O.G. Out Growth

18 SECTION 2 - TABLES

A-1 NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS,POPULATION AND AREA. FLY-LEAF

Table A-I is the basic population table which revenue. In a few past Censuses only those revenue corresponds to the general population table A-I of 200 1 villages were considered which had some population Census. This table gives the statistics of number of ignoring the uninhabited revenue villages. But in 1961, inhabited and uninhabited villages, number of towns the revenue villages which did not have any residential ,number of households, population by sex according to population were also included in the definition of the 2001 Census for total ,rural and urban areas, area villages. In 1971 such villages were included in the in square km, and population per square krn .. The Census list but were described as 'uninhabited' villages. figures are given first for state followed by districts, The same practice continued in 1981 ,1991 and 2001. sub-districts, urban 'hgglomerations, cities and towns In 1991 village is thus a revenue village having defined .In 2001 Census slight modification has been made in boundaries and a separate set of land records the presentation of table A-l.This table has been irrespective of whether that defined area has any presented into two parts viz. table A-I ( part -1) and population or not and if it has some popUlation whether (part-ii). Table A-I part-1 is gives the statistics for that population resides in one residential locality or is StatelUnion Territory, Districts, and sub -districts for in addition, spread over one or more identifiable clusters total, rural and urban areas separately and A-I ( part­ of population known as hamlets. The hamlets do not ii) gives the figures of urban agglomerations, cities and have defined boundaries or areas distinctly marked or t?wnsonly. allotted to them. The hamlets are situated within the The density figures per sq. km. shown under areas earmarked for the village. column 11 for 'Urban' have been worked out using There are some villages the areas of which have the area figures corrected up to two places of decimal fully or partly been merged or included in the obtained by adding the area of individual towns in the neighbouring towns or in the towns growing after their respective units. For 'Totar and 'Rural' the density is names but they are recognised as such for land revenue worked out on area figures corrected up to two places purposes by the State Government. In such cases of decimal. there will be no population in the areas of such villages This basic table was renamed as Table A-I in 1951 and hence they have been shown as uninhabited. when 1sl Census of Independent India was conducted The entire revenue village is one unit but there and prior to this, it was numbered as Table-l right from 1881 when first synchronous Census of India was may be unsurveyed villages within forests, etc., which taken. The title of the table remained unaltered since mainly comprise forest labourers and their families. 1881, however, two additions and one deletion had been Such forest villages have also been treated as villages. made in the contents: These are, (1) in 1961 when the So the inhabited villages shown under col. of Table A­ Column "number of village" was bifurcated into two I includes not only revenue villages having residential Columns i.e. "No. of inhabited villages" and "number population but also inhabited forest villages. The of uninhabited villages" and (2) in 1971 when column uninhabited villages are shown under separate head "number of household" was added in the table (3) in which gives the number of described or uninhabited 2001 Census Column No.8. of occupied residential revenue villages. houses has been deleted from the table. The table has an appendix that gives the details of It is Census tradition to present the Census all the changes in the jurisdiction of various statistics by rural/urban break-up. By rural areas we administrative units up to Tehsil which have taken place mean the popUlation living in villages. The village during 1991-2001. generally follows the limits of revenue village which is recognised by the normal district administration. This appendix shows the 2001 territorial units upto The revenue village need not be a single tahsil level and their constituent units as at 1991 Census agglomerations of habitation, but the revenue village indicating the changes, viz., ~as added to and areas has definite surveyed boundaries. taken away from the corresponding 1991 jurisdiction For Census purpose the village is always the of the units. revenue village which is the ultimate unit of area into which the country is divided for purposes of land

21 Inter-State! Inter District Territorial Transfers one side and Uttar Pradesh on the other due to riverain The State of Haryana was carved out of the action. territories of the composite State of Punjab on 1sl 1921-1931 : There was no change in the boundaries November 1966 under the Punjab Reorganisation Act in the district during this decade and the difference, if 1966. The following areas of erstwhile Punjab State any area was due to revision of area figures supplied were taken out to form the new State of Ha,ryana under by the Surveyor General of India. the said Act:- 1931-1941 : During this decade, there were some (i) Hisar, Rohtak, Gurgaon, Kamal and minor changes between Gurgaon and Kamal districts Mahendragarh districts. on the one hand and Uttar Pradesh on the other, again eii) Narwana and Jind tahsils of Sangrur due to riverain action. district comprising the new district of Jind. 1941-1951 : It was during this decade that the then (iii) (a) Ambala, and Naraingarh tahsils State of Punjab was partitioned on the 15 1h August of Ambala district and 1947. Out of its 29 districts, the Punjab (India) got 12 (b) 153 villages and Kalka town ofKharar complete districts of Hisar, Rohtak, Gurgaon, Kamal, tahsil transferred to N araingarh tahsil. Ambala, Shimla, Kangra, Hoshiarpur, Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Firozpur and Amritsar, Gurdaspur district The areas mentioned at (iii) (a) and (iii) (b) above short of Shakargarh tahsil: and 186 villages of Lahore formed the district of Ambala in the new State of district which were merged with the Amritsar district. Haryana. At the time of formation of Haryana State, Thus, the new State of Punjab had 13 districts. there were 27 tahsils. Later on five new tahsils were th created, namely, Kalka, Guhla, Dabwali, Loham and Again on the 5 May, 1948, eight native States of Safidon after bifurcating the tahsils of Naraingarh, Patiala, Kapurthala, Jind, Nabha, Kaithal, Sirsa, Bhiwani and Jind respectively. At the Faridkot, Malerkotla, Nalagarh and Kalsia were time of 1971 Census. Haryana comprised of 7 districts amalgamated to form the State of Patiala and East and 32 tahsils. Five districts, namely, Ambala, Kamal, Punjab States Union ( PEPSU ). This State was then Rohtak Gurgaon and Hisar continue to enjoy the status divided into eight districts, namely, Patiala, Bamala, of districts since 1901, though they underwent some Bathinda, Kapurthala, Fatehgarh Sahib, Sangrur, changes in their areas from decade to decade. Mahendragarh and Kohistan. Mahendragarh district was formed in 1948 at the time Three native States ofDujana, Pataudi and Loham of formation of PEPSU and continues as district. Jind were merged with Rohtak, Gurgaon and Hisar districts district was created at the time of formation of the respectively. Gurgaon district gained two villages from new State of Haryana in 1966. During 1971-81 five Rajasthan also and lost to it nine Villages. Kamal district new district, were created, Bhiwani and Sonipat in lost six villages to Uttar Pradesh. There were some 1972, Kurukshetra in 1973, Sirsa in 1975 and transfers between the districts of Punjab and PEPSU Faridabad in 1979. also. lost 15 villages, Kamal 32 villages The changes in the areas from decade to decade and Ambala 17 villages to the districts then comprising are discussed below:- PEPSU State. 1901-1911: Hisar district lost two villages to the 1951-1961 : During this decade the two States of then Bikaner State and Kamal lost one village to Punjab and PEPSU were merged together to form a Muzaffamagar district of Uttar Pradesh and gained new State of Punjab on 1st November 1956. Before one village from Saharanpur district of U.P. this merger, the eight districts of PEPSU got reduced 1911-1921 : In pursuance of the decision to shift to five. Kaithal tahsil of Kamal district lost seven the Imperial Capital to Delhi, a new Province of Delhi villages to Ambala tahsil of Ambala district. Kharar was formed out of the then district of Delhi in Punjab tahsil of Ambala district gained Pinjore Kanungo circle State. As a result thereof, Sonipat tahsil of Delhi district of Kandaghat tahsil of Patiala district. was wholly transferred to Rohtak district and a portion 1961-1971 : Haryana was formed on 1st November, of Ballabgarh tahsil of Delhi district was merged with 1966. Ambala district, although it still enjoys the old Gurgaon district. Some small scale transfers also took name, was very much reduced in size by the place between Kamal and Gurgaon districts on the reorganisation. Out of its six tahsils, it lost Nalagarh

22 tahsil to Shimla district of Himachal Pradesh, Rupnagar (ii) Sonipat district was created vide Haryana tahsil and a major part of Kharar tahsil to the newly Government notification No. 6050-E (IV )-72 / 45724, constituted Rupnagar district in Punjab State and a few dated 22-12-72 . The said notification varied the limits villages including the Chandigarh Capital Project Area of Rohtak district so as to exclude the areas of Sonipat to the newly formed Union Territory of Chandigarh. and Gohana tahsils and to form a new district called " Thus the Ambala district after the reorganisation Sonipat district"comprising of Sonipat and Gohana comprised only the three tahsils of Ambala, Jagadhri tahsils with headquarters at Sonipat. and Naraingarh including 153 villages and Kalka town (iii) Kurukshetra district was created vide Haryana transferred from Kharar tahsil. There was no change Government Notification No.454-E (IV)-73 / 2212 in the districts of Kamal, Rohtak and Gurgaon. Dadri dated 23-1-73. The said notification varied the limits tahsil of Mahendr~arh district lost four villages to of Kamal district so as to exclude the areas of Bhiwani tahsil of Hisar district. Jind district was newly Thanesar, Guhla and Kaithal tahsils and to form a new formed at the time of reorganization with two tahsils, district called " Kurukshetra district" comprising namely, Narwana and Jind transferred from Sangrur Thanesar, Guhla and Kaithal tahsils with headquarters district of Punjab State. at Thanesar. At the time of formation of Haryana State, there (iv ) Sirsa district was created vide Haryana were 27 tahsils falling in the seven districts of Ambala Government notification No. 4130-E (IV) 75 /26094 (3 tahsils), Kamal (4 tahsils), Rohtak (4 tahsils), dated 26~8-75. The said notification varied the limits Gurgaon (6 tahsils), Mahendragarh (3 tahsils), Hisar of Hisar district so as to exclude the areas of Sirsa (5 tahsils) and Jind (2 tahsils). Each of the following and Dabwali tahsils and to form with effect from 1st five tahsils were then bifurcated which increased the September 1975, a new district called "Sirsa district" number of tahsils to 32 at the time of 1971 Census:- comprising Sirsa and Dabwali tahsils with headquarters (i) Naraingarh (Ambala district) into Kalka and at Sirsa. Naraingarh. (v) Faridabad district was created vide Haryana (ii) Kaithal (Kamal district) into Guhla and Kaithal Government notification No.3313-E-( IV) -79 / 32194, dated 2-8-79. The said notification varied the limits (iii) Sirsa (Hisar district) into Dabwali and Sirsa. of Gurgaon district so as to exclude the areas of Palwal ( (iv) Bhiwani (Hisar district) into Bhiwani and as changed vide Haryana Government notification No. Loham. 3313-E (IV )-79 / 32193, dated 2-8-79) and Ballabgarh (v) Jind (Jind district) into Jind and Safidon. tahsils and to form a new district with effect from 15- 8-79 called "Faridabad district" comprising the areas 1971-1981 :- The Haryana State was comprised of tahsils of Palwal and Ballabgarh with headquarters of twelve districts with thirty nine tahsils as on 31-12- at Faridabad. 79-the date on which the boundaries were frozen for the conduct of the 1981 Census. There were many (vi) Tohana tahsil was created vide Haryana changes in the district and tahsil boundaries caused by Government notification No. 536-E( 4 )-72 / 2959, dated the creation of five districts and seven new tahsils due 24-1-72. The said notification varied the limits of Hisar to transfer of villages from one tahsil/district to another tahsil so as to exclude the area comprising sub tahsil tahsil/district during the decade 1971-81.Details of new Tohana therefrom and to declare the area excluded to districts and tahsils are as under:- be a tahsil known as "Tohana tahsil ". ( i ) Bhiwani district was created vide Haryana (vii) Bawani Khera tahsil was created vide Government notification No. 6050-E ( IV)-72/45723, Haryana Government notification No. 5715-R -IV-72 / dated 22-12-72. The said notification varied the limits 45711, dated 21-12-72. The said notification varies the of Mahendragarh and Hisar districts so as to exclude limits of Bhiwani, and Hisar tahsils in Hisar the areas of Dadri tahsil of Mahendragarh district and district and alters the number of tahsils so as to create Loham, Bhiwani and Bawani Khera tahsils of Hisar a new tahsil Bawani Khera in Hi~ar district. Six villages district Ill1d to form a new district called Bhiwani district from Bhiwani tahsil, thirty two villages from Hansi and comprising of Dadri , Loham , Bhiwani and Bawani seventeen villages from Hisar tahsil were excluded to l

23 (viii) Bahadurgarh tahsil was created vide Haryana changes were not taken into account. There were Government notification No. 5935-E-4-73 1 32549, many changes in the district and tahsil boundaries dated 31-10-73. The said notification varied the limits caused by the creation of four new districts and of lhajjar tahsil so as to exclude the area comprising fourteen new tahsils due to transfer of villages from sub-tahsil Bahadurgarh therefrom and to declare the one tahsil 1district to another tahsil 1 district during the area so excluded to be a tahsil known as 'Bahadurgarh decade 1981-91. In other words the changes which tahsil' . had occurred during 31-12-79 to 1-1-90 i.e in between (ix ) Bawal tahsil was created vide Haryana the dates when the boundaries were frozen for the Government notification No. 1209-E-(IV)-77 18812, conduct of Censuses of 1981 and 1991 respectively dated 7-4-77. The said notification varied the limits of have been taken into account. Details of new districts Rewari tahsil so as to exclude the area comprising the and tahsils are as under:- sub-tahsil Bawal therefrom and to declare the area so (i) Panipat district was created vide Haryana excluded to be a tahsil known as ' Bawal tahsil. Government notification No. S.0.147/P.A.17/1887 (x) Maham tahsil was created vide Haryana / S. 5/89, dated 16-10-89. The said notification altered Government notification No. 7865-E(IV)-79 151035; the limits of the areas of Kamal district so as to form a dated 20-12-79. The said notification varied the limits new district to be called Panipat comprising Panipat of Rohtak tahsil so as to exclude the area comprising sub-division and Assandh tahsil of Kamal district with sub-tahsil Maham therefrom and to declare the area effect from the 1st day of Nov~mber, 1989. so excluded to be a tahsil known as "Maham tahsil". (ii) Kaithal district was created vide Haryana 1P.A.17 (xi) Assandh tahsil was created vide Haryana Government notification No.S.0.148 /1887 / Government notification No.7865-E(IV)-79 1 51034, S. 5/89, dated 16-10-89. The said notification altered dated 20-12-79. The said notification varied the limits the limits of areas of Kurukshetra and Jind districts so of Kamal tahsil so as to exclude the area comprising as to form a new district to be called Kaithal comprising sub-tahsil Assandh therefrom and to declare the area Kaithal and Guhla sub-divisions of Kurukshetra district so excluded to be a tahsil known as "Assandh tahsil". Kalayat sub-tahsil and six revenue estates of lind district as mentioned in the notification with effect from (xii) Pehowa tahsil was created vide Haryana the 1st day of November, 1989. Government notification No.7865-E(IV)-79 1 51423, dated 26-12-79. The said notification varied the limits (iii) was created vide 1 of Guhla, Thanesar and Kaithal tahsils in Kurukshetra Haryana Government notification No. S.0.149 P.A.17 118871 5/89, district and alters the number of tahsils so as to create S. dated 16-10-89. The said notification a new tahsil of Pehowa in Kurukshetra district. Fifty varied the limits of the areas of Ambala and six villages from Guhla tahsil, thirty three villages from Kurukshetra districts so as to form a new district to be Thanesar tahsil and nine villages from Kaithal tahsil called Yamunanagar comprising Jagadhri sub-division were excluded to form a new tahsH of Pehowa. and sub-tahsil of Naraingarh sub-division of Ambala district and sub-tahsil of Kurukshetra Out of 32 tahsils of 1971, only 7 tahsils, namely, district with effect from the 1st day of November, 1989. Kalka, Naraingarh, Ambala, lagadhri, Panipat, Ferozepur Thirka and Namaul did not experience any (iv) Rewari district was created vide Haryana change. All the rest were affected by the many Government notification No.S.O. 1501P.A. 17 11887 1 transfers and retransfers of villages from one tahsil to S.51 89 dated 16-10-89 . The said notification alered another during the decade. Kamal district lost one the limits of the areas of Mahendragarh and Rohtak village to and gained two villages from Uttar Pradesh districts so as to form a new district to be called Rewari due to riverain action. Ballabgarh tahsil of Faridabad comprising sub-division of Rewari of Mahendragarh district also gained four villages from Uttar Pradesh district and fifty two revenue estates of Kosli tahsil of by riverain action during 1971-81. Rohtak district and two revenue estates of Mahendragarh tahsil as mentioned in the notification 1981-91:- The Haryana State was comprised of with effect from the 1st day of November, 1989. 16 districts and 53 tahsils as on 1-1-1990-the date on which the boundaries had been frozen for the conduct (v) Hathin tahsil was created vide Haryana of 1991 Census. The data thus conformed to the Government notification No. 716-E(VI)-80/5163 dated position as on 1-1-1990 and subsequent territorial 11.2.80. The said notification varied the limits of the

24 areas of Palwal tahsil in Faridabad District, so as to (xii) Panchkula tahsil was created vide Haryana exclude the area comprising Hathin sub-tahsil Government notification No.S.01581P.A.l7/1887/S. 51 therefrom and to declare the area so excluded to be a 89 dated 17-10-89. The said notification varied the tahsil known as "Hathin tahsil". limits of the areas of Kalka and Naraingarh tahsils in (vi) Kosli tahsil was created vide Haryana Ambala district so as to exclude the areas comprising Government notification No. 716-E(VI)-80/5164 dated the 97 revenue estates as mentioned in the notification 11.2.80. The said notification varied the limits of the therefrom, so as to form a new Panchku1a tahsil with areas of Jhajjar tahsil in Rohtak district, so as to exclude effect from the 1st day of November, 1989. the areas comprising Nahar sub-tahsil therefrom and (xiii) Barara tahsil was created vide Haryana to declare the area so excluded to be a tahsil known as Government notification N o.S.O . 159/P.N17 /1887IS. "Kosli tahsil" with ~eadquarters at Kosli. Further it 5/89 dated 17.10.89. The said notification varied the excluded 48 revenue estates from Jhajjar tahsil and to limits of the areas of Ambala tahsil in Ambala district include the same in the newly created Kosli tahsil as by excluding the area comprising Barara sub-tahsil mentioned in the notification. therefrom so as to form a new tahsil known as "Barara (vii) Siwani tahsil was created vide Haryana tahsil" with effect from the )"1 day November, 1989. Government notification No. 6920-E(VI)-80/42748 (xiv) Faridabad tahsil was created vide Haryana dated 4.12.80. The said notification varied the limits of Government notification No.S.0.1631PA..17 1187 IS. 51 the areas ofBawani Khera, Bhiwani and Loham Tahsils 89 dated 17-10-89. The said notification varied the in Bhiwani district, so as to exclude 61 revenue estates limits of the areas of Ballabgarh tahsil in Faridabad as mentioned in the notification <;lnd to declare the area district by excluding the area comprising Faridabad sub­ so excluded to be a tahsil known as "Siwani tahsil". tahsil except 6 revenue estates as mentioned in the (viii) tahsil was created vide Haryana notification therefrom so as to form a new tahsil known Government notification No. 2668-E-(VI)-81/15670 as "Faridabad tahsil" with effect from the 1st day of dated 6.5.81. The said notification varied the limits of November, 1989. the areas of Jagadhri tahsil in Ambala district, so as to (xv) tahsil was created vide Haryana exclude the area comprising Chhachhrauli sub-tahsil Government notification No.S.0.1641PA. 17/1887/S. 51 therefrom and to declare the area so excluded to be a 89 dated 17-10-89. The said notification varied the limits tahsil known as "Chhachhrauli tahsil". of the areas of Hansi tahsil in Hisar district so as to (ix) Ratia tahsil was created vide Haryana exclude the area comprising 32 revenue estates of Government notification No.2668-E(VI)-81/15669 Hansi Tahsil as mentioned in the notification therefrom dated 6-5-81. The said notification varied the limits of so as to form a new tahsil to be known as "Narnaund the areas of Fatehabad tahsil in Hisar district, so as to tahsil" with effect from the 1st day of November, 1989. exclude the area comprising Ratia sub-tahsil therefrom (xvi) Tosham tahsil was created vide Haryana and to declare the area so excluded to be a tahsil known Government notification No.S.0.165/PA.17 /1887 IS. 51 as "Ratia tahsil". 89 dated 17-10-89. The said notification varied the (x) Pataudi tahsil was created vide Haryana limits of the areas of Bhiwani, Bawani. Khera and Government notification No.3025-E(VI)-81/17063 Siwani tahsils in Bhiwani district so as to exclude the dated 18-5-81. The said notification varied the limits areas comprising the 54 revenue estates as mentioned of the areas of Gurgaon tahsil in Gurgaon district, so in the notification therefrom so as to form a new tahsil as to exclude the area comprising Pataudi sub-tahsil to be known as "Tosham tahsil" with effect from the therefrom and further to declare the area so excluded 1st day of November, 1989. to be a tahsil known as Pataudi tahsil. (xvii) Ellenabad tahsil was created vide Haryana (xi) Ganaur tahsil was created vide Haryana Government notification No. S.0.166/P.A.17/1887/S. Government notification No. 2102-E(VI)82113162 5/89.17.10.89. The said notification varied the limits dated 19-4-82. The said notification varied the limits of the areas of Sirsa tahsil in Sirsa distrct, so as to of the areas of Sonipat tahsil in Sonipat district, so as exclude the area comprising the Ellenabad sub-tahsil to exclude 72 villages mentioned in the notification of therefrom so as to form a new tahsil to be known as Ganaur Sub-tahsil therefrom and to declare the area "Ellenabad tahsil" in Sirsa district with effect from the so excluded to be a tahsil known as "Ganaur tahsil". 1st day of November, 1989.

25 (xviii) Rania tahsil was created vide Haryana tahsil, known as "Shahbad Tahsil" with effect from Government notification No. S.O.1671P.AI7/1887/S. the 26th January, 1996. 5/89 dated 17-10-89. The said notification varied the (v) Nilokheri tahsil was created vide Haryana limits of the areas of Sirsa tahsil in Sirsa district by Government notification No.S.O.821P.A.17/1887/S. 51 excluding the area comprising Rania sub-tahsil 95 dated 16.8.1995. The said notification varied the therefrom so as to form a new tahsil known as Rania limits of areas of tahsil Kamal and altered the number tahsil in Sirsa District with effect from the Ist day of of tahsils by excluding the area of sub tahsil Nilokheri November, 1989. from tahsil Karnal, so as to form a new tahsil as . Out of 39 tahsils of 1981, only three tahsils, namely, "Nilokheri Tahsil". Ferozepur Jhirka, Bawal and Narnaul did not (v) Indri and Gharaunda, tahsils were created vide experience any change. All the rest were affected by Haryana Government notification No.S.O 351P.A.171 the many transfers and re-transfers of village(s) from 1887/S. 5/96 dated 19.3.1996. The said notification one tahsil to another during 1981-1991. varied the limits of areas of tahsil Kamal and alters Haryana lost 18 villages of Ballabgarh tahsil of the number of tahsils by excluding the areas of sub­ 1981 to U.P State and has also gained some villages tahsils Indri and Gharaunda from tahsil Kamal, so as and areas in Kamal, Sonipat and Faridabad districts to form a new tahsils as "Indri tahsil" and "Gharaunda which were already under the physical control of tahsil" with effect from Ist April, 1996. Haryana. (vi) Israna tahsil was created vide Haryana Inter-District Territorial Changes during 1991- Government notification No.S.O.341P.A.I7/1887/S. 51 2001 96 dated 19.3.1996. This notification varied the limits of the areas of tahsil Panipat and alters the number of (i) Panchkula district was created vide Haryana tahsils by excluding the area of sub-tahsil Israna from Government notification No.S.O.68JP.A.l17 11887 IS. 51 tahsil Panipat, so as to form a new tahsil known as 95 dated 21.7.1995. The said notification altered the "Israna Tahsil" with effect from Ist April 1996. number of districts and limits of the areas of Ambala District, by excluding the area of tahsils Panchkula (vii)Samalkha tahsil was created vide Haryana and Kalka and 45 revenue estates of Naraingarh tahsil, Government notification No. S.O.1561P.A.17/1887/S. so as to form a new district to be called "Panchkula" 5/91 dated 31.12.1991. The said notification varied the with effect from the 15th August, 1995. limits of areas of tahsil Panipat by excludings the area comprising sub-tahsil Sarpalkba therefrom so as (ii) was created vide Haryana to form a new tahsil to be known as Samalkha tahsil Government notification No.S,O.531P.A. 17/1887/S 51 with effect from the Ist day of January, 1992. 97 dated 25.6.1997.The said notification altered the limits of the areas of Risar district comprising the sub­ (viii) Kharkhoda tahsil was created vide Haryana divisions of "Fatehabad" and Tohana of Hisar Government notification No.S.O.931P.A.17/1887/S. 51 district,so as to form a new district to be called 94 dated 26. 10. 1994.The said notification varied the Fatehabad with effect from 15 th July, 1997. limits of areas of tahsil Sonipat and altered the number . of tahsils by excluding the area of sub-tahsil Kharkhoda (iii) Jhajjar district was created vide Haryana from tahsil Sonipat, so as to form a new tahsil with Government notification No. S.O.541P.A. 17/1887/S.51 effect from Ist November, 1994 to be known as 97 dated 25.6.1997. The said notification altered the "Kharkhoda tahsil". limits of the areas of Rohtak district comprising of the sub-divisions of Jhajjar and Bahadurgarh of Rohtak (ix) Julana tahsil was created vide Haryana District so as to form a new district to be called Government notification, No.S.O.2551P.A.17/1887/S. "Jhajjar" with effect from 15th July,1997. 5/99 dated 31.12.1999. The sai<;l notification varied the limits of the area of tahsil .Tind and altered the number (iv) Shahbad tahsil was created vide Haryana of tahsils by excluding the area of sub-tahsil Julana Government notification No. S.O. 181PA. 17/1887/S.51 from tahsil Jind , so as to form a new tahsil "Julana" 96 dated 25.1.1996. The said notification varied the limits of the areas of tahsil Thanesar and alterep the with effect from the 31'1 day of December1999. number of tahsils by excluding the areas of sub tahsil (x) Adampur Tahsil was created vide Haryana Shahbad from tahsil Thanesar, so as to form a new Government notification No. S.O. 1471P.A. 17/1887/S.51

26 91 dated 12.12.1991. The said notification varied the tahsils by excluding the area of sub-tahsil Taoru from limits of areas of tahsil and district Hisar by excluding tahsil Nuh, so as to form a new tahsil "Taoru" with the areas from tahsil Hisar and including the same in effect from 31 sl December, 1999. the limits of sub-tahsil Adampur so as to form a new (xv) Punahana tahsil was created vide Haryana tahsil to be known as "Adampur tahsil" in district Hisar Government notification No. S.0.401P.A.17 11887 IS. 51 with effect from the 12th December 1991. 94 dated 11 th May 1994. The said notification varied (xi) Beri Tahsil was created vide Haryana the limits of areas of tahsil Ferozepur Jhirka by Government notification No. S.O.741P.A.l17/1887/S.51 excluding the area comprising sub-tahsil Punahana 95 dated 27.7.1995. The said notification varied the therefrom", so as to form a new tahsil to be known as limits of areas of tahsil Jhajjar and altered the number "Punahana tahsil". of tahsils, so as to exdhde the areas from Jhajjar so as to form a new tahsil known as "Beri". (xvi) Hodal tahsil was created vide Haryana Government notification No.S.O.361P.A.17/1887/5. 51 (xii)Sohna tahsil was created vide Haryana 94 dated 22.4. 1994.The above notification varied the Government notification No. S.O.671P.A.17/1887/S.51 limits of areas of tahsil Palwal by excluding the area 95 dated 12.7.1995. The said notification varied the comprising sub-tahsil Hodal there from, so as to form limits of the areas of tahsil Gurgaon and alters the a new tahsil to be known as "Hodal tahsil". number of tahsils by excluding the area of sub-tahsil Sohna from tahsil Gurgaon so as to form a new tahsil, Out of 53 tahsils of 1991, twelve tahsils, namely, to be known as "Sohna tahsil". Kalka, Chhachhrauli, Hathin, Faridabad, Ballabgarh, (xiii) Taoru tahsil was created vide Haryana Pataudi, Bawal, Mahendragarh, Narnaul ,Dadri, Ratia Government notification No. S.O.2581P.A.17 11887 IS.51 and Tohana did not experience any change. All the 99 dated 31.12.1999. The said notification varied the rest were effected by many transfers and re-transfers limits of areas of tahsil Nuh and altered the number of of villages from one tahsil to another during 1991-2001.

27

ro 1ii -0..0 o..f'.. .- CO .-I:: co• I:: • roN O'V a.. CJ) .... w ro (/) C> ro o 1::0 roo -ro ~ I:: • ~ o ::J'V ro E a: ro to­ >- .;;::U (/) U5 is :c (5 (/) Q) ro C> cCcC "S .i9 -X:C') I:: z~ .r:.o Q) cCcC .... u . ~ eN Q) >u..8 ro 0.. ~ON a.. Q) 1ii :::J:W u !:::! :c (/) .S;; CJ) w Q) > E ro I:: ~ t5 a: .;;:: cC (i) 0.. . ;;:: :c :i: roT""" Q) ~(O .r:. o Q) • .r:. o a:C') .... -- ro ~ C> Q) ~O) ..x: ..c "ON I:: . roLO CJ) Q)'V .EO)o . ....Q) .r:. a:C') ::J ro .Ql ~ u.. I Q) o Z-

29

A-l NuMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA Statement 1 gives the total area of the State i.e. descending order according to their area sizes - Bhiwani 44212.00 Sq. Km. rural area of the State is 42931.63 ( 10.81 %), Sirsa (9.67%), Hisar(9.01 %), Gurgaon Sq. Km.s and urban area is 1280.37 Sq. Kms. (6.14%), Jind(6.11%) Fatehabad (5.74%), Kamal This Statement 1 of Table A-I shows that Bhiwani (5.70%), Kaithal (5.24%), Faridabad (4.86%), Sonipat is the biggest district claiming 10.81 per cent of the (4.80%), Mahendragarh (4.29%), Jhajjar (4.15%), total area of the State whereas Panchkula district with Yamunanagar(4.00%), Rohtak (3.95%), Rewari 2.03 per cent of the total area of the State is the (3.61 %), Ambala (3.56%), Kurukshetra (3.46%), smallest. The districts ~y be arranged in the following Panipat (2.87%) and Panchkula (2.03%)

Statement 1 Ranking ofStatelDistricts in terms of area State! Area in S q Km given Proportion to Ranking of District by Surveyor of India Total area of District Total State 2 3 4 HARYANA 44212.00 100.00 Panchkula 898.00 2.03 19 Ambala 1574.00 3.56 16 Yamunanagar 1768.00 4.00 13 Kurukshetra 1530.00 3.46 17 Kaithal 2317.00 5.24 '8 Kamal 2520.00 5.70 7 Panipat 1268.00 2.87 18 Sonipat 2122.00 4.80 10 Jind 2702.00 6.11 5 Fatehabad 2538.00 5.74 6 Sirsa 4277.00 9.67 2 . Hisar 3983.00 9.01 3 Bhiwani 4778.00 10.81 Rohtak 1745.00 3.95 14 Jha.ijar 1834.00 4.15 12 M ahendragarh 1899.00 4.29 11 Rewari 1594.00 3.61 15 Gurgaon 2714.00 6.14 4 Faridabad 2151.00 4.86 9

31 Statement - 2 continues the practice of pre­ ban Agglomeration has been dealt in detail in the senting urban statistics in the form of Urban Ag­ General Note. It may be reiterated that Urban glomeration which had been innovated and Agglomeration is treated as a single unit for all adopted since 1971 Census. The concept of Ur- practical purposes in Census. Statement-2 Criteria for Places to be treated as TomtS, 1891-2001 2001 1991 Municipal Corporation Complex Administration 2 Cantonment Board 2 Cantonment Board 3 M unicip al Committee 3 M unicip al Committee 4 M unicip al Council 4 Estate Office 5 Census Town 5 Census Town (a) A Density of population of atleast 400 per Sq. Km. i.e (a) A Density of population of atleast 400 per Sq. Km. i.e (1000 persons per sq. mile) (1000 persons per sq. mile) (b) A minimum population of 5,000 (b) A minimum population of 5,000 (c) At1east 75% of the male working population engaged (c) Atleast 75% of the male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits in non-agricultural pursuits

1981 1971 Camp lex Administration Cantonment Board 2 Cantonment Board 2 M unicip al Committee 3 M unicip al Committee 3 Notified Area Committee 4 Census Town 4 All other places satisfying the following criteria (a) A Density of popUlation of atleast 400 per Sq. Km. i.e (a) A minimum population of 5,000 ; (1000 persons per sq. mile) (b) A density of not less than 400 per sq. lan. (b) A minimum population of 5,000 (1,000 per sq. mile) ; (c) Atleast75% of the male working population engaged (c) At least 75% of the occupations of the male working in non-agricultural pursuits population should be outside agriculture and ; (d) The place should have according to the Director of Census Operations of the State, a few pronounced urban characterstics and amenities. Mere large sized fisherman's villages were not treated as urban areas if they had no other urban characters tics that generally go with a town such as existence of a shopping centre, educational institutions, hospital services, etc.

1961 1951 Cantonment Board Cantonment Board 2 Municipal Committee 2 Municipal Committee 3 Notified Area Committee 3 Notified Area Committee 4 All other places satisfying the following criteria 4 Small Town Committee (a) A density of not less than 1,000 per sq. mile; 5 In respect of other places a 'town' was regarded as a continuou: (b) A popUlation of 5,000 ; group of houses inhabited by usally not less than 5,000 persons, (c) Three-fourths of the occupations of the working population which having regard to the character of the popUlation, the relative should be unconnected with agriculture, and density of dwellings, the importance of the place as a centre of (d) The place should have, according to the Superintendent of trade and historic associations, the superintendent of Census Census Op erations of the State, a few pronounced urban Operations decided. The chief criterion however, was the Characters tics and amenities, the defmition of which, although character of the popUlation indicating whether the majority of leaving room for vagueness and discretion, was meant to cover residents were non-agricultural or non-pastoral by occupation. newly-founded industrial areas, large housing settlements, or There must also be the existence of distinct urban characterstics places of tourist importance which had been recently served such as facilities for higher education, public utility services, with all civil amenities. local body administration, urban diversions and recreations.

Contd ......

32 Statement-2 Criteria for Places to be treated as Towns, 1891-2001 1941 1931

1 Municipality 1 Municipality, Civil lines and Cantonment 2 Municipality and Civillines 2 Municipality 3 Civil lines 3 Civil lines 4 In other cases a town was defmed as the 'continuous 4 M unicip ality and Civil lines collection of houses inhabited by not less than 5,000 persons 5 In respect of other places the town was defmed as the possessing defmite urban characters tics which the Provincial continuous collection of houses inhabited by not less than 5,000 Superintendent of Census Operations decided. persons which the Provincial Superintendent of Census Operation .... decided. To avoid treating as towns overgrown villages without urban characters tics, consideration was given to :-- (a) the character of the popUlation; (b) relative density of the dwellings; and (c) importance in trade and historic associations.

1921 1911

1 Municipality, Civillines and Cantonment 1 Municipality, Civillines and Cantonment 2 M unicip ality 2 Municipality 3 Civil lines 3 Civil lines 4 All other places satisfying the following criteria 4 A few places were also treated as towns for special reasons. Every M unicip ality, all Civil Lines not included within Overgrown villages having no urban characterstics were not M unicipallirnits, every Cantonment and every other continuous treated as towns. In framing the defmition the object in view collection of houses inhabited by not less than 5,000 persons wa~, as far as possible to treat as towns only places which were which the Provincial Superintendent of Census Operations of a more or less urban character. In most provinces there was a decided was treated as a town for Census purposes. In provision of law which prohibited the creation of Municipalities Indian States, where there were no Municipalities, this in places which contained a large proportion of persons dependent defmition was extensively applied. In dealing with such on agriculture for their subsistnce. It may thus be assumed that problems the Provincial Superintendent took into consideration all places which were under Municipal Govt. possessed some the character of popUlation, the relative density of the dwellings, urban characterstics. the importance of the place as a centre of trade and its historic associations. He also bore in mind that it was undesirable to treat as towns, overgrown villages which had no urban characterstics.

1901 1891

M unicip ality , Civillines and Cantonment 1 Municipality 2 Municipality 2 Civil lines 3 Civil lines 4 All other places satisfying the following criteria 4 All other places satisfying the following criteria Towns included every Municipal Corporation, Municipal Area Towns included every M unicip al Corp oration, M unicip ality , All or any p lace brought under similar regulation for police or sanitary Civil lines not included within M unicipallirnits, every Cantonment purposes, every place where the proportion of the trading and and every other continuous collection of houses permanently industrial population to the total was equal to or greater than that inhabited by not less than 5,000 persons which the provincial of the agricultural population, and every other continuous group Superintendent decided. Many of the places treated as towns

33 Statement -3 reveals number of towns in i.e 54 towns. The number of towns became 61 in various districts of the State between 1901 and 2001. 1961,65 in 1971,81 in 1981,94 in 1991 and 106 in It is clear from the above statement that there were 2001. At the time of 2001 Census, the maximum 54 towns in 1901. Their strength was reduced to 36 number of towns (12) have been found in Gurgaon in 1911 due to change in the definition of town which district which is closely followed by Yamunanagar now excluded overgrown villages lacking urban 11 towns, Kamal 7 towns and 6 towns each in characteristics. Then again the number of towns Ambala, Panipat, Bhiwani and Faridabad districts, increased to 39 in 1921,41 in 1931,45 in 1941 and 5 each 1ll Jind, Sirs a, Hisar, Jhajj ar and 62 in 1951. It was only in 1951 when the strength of Mahendragarh districts, 4 each in Panchkula, towns was the highest (62) in the State because it Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Sonipat, Fatehabad and was higher than the strength of town as was in 1901 Rewari districts and 3 towns in Rohtak district. Staement·3 Progress in the Number of Towns 1901·2001 (excludes Towns declassified and includes Towns nemy added in a particular Census) State! 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 19S1 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 HARYANA 106 94 81 6S 61 62 4S 41 39 36 S4 Panchkula 4 4 3 1 Ambala 6 5 5 3 2 3 2 1 1 Yamunanagar 11 10 7 7 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 Kurukshetra 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 Kaithal 4 4 3 2 2 3 1 2 Kamal 7 7 6 3 3 4 2 2 1 Panipat 6 2 2 Sonipat 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Jind 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 2 1 2 Fatehabad 4 4 4 3 3 3 1 Sirsa 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 1 4 Hisar 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bhiwani 6 6 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 Rohtak 3 4 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 7 Jhajjar 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3- 3 3 M ahendragarh 5 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 Rewari 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gurgaon 12 11 10 7 7 7 5 4 4 4 5 Faridabad 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 Statement -4 reflects pattern of urbanization in (17.07%) in 1951; 1,307,680 (17.23%) in 1961; Haryana State since 1901. There were only 574,074 1,772,959 (17.67%) in 1971; 2,827,387 (21.88%) in persons (12.42%) living in urban area during 1901. The 1981; 4,054,744 (24.63%) in 1991; and 6,115,304 urban population decreased to 449,704 in 1911 because (28.92%) in 2001 Census. Surprisingly, 2,060,560 per- the number of towns was reduced from 54 to 36 in sons were added in the urban popUlation of the State 1911 due to change in the definition of urban areas. during the last decade (1991-2001) registering per The urban population increased to 481,195 (11.31 %) centage decadal variation of 50.82%. At the time of in 1921, Since then, it is increasing at faster rate, the 2001 Census, the highest urban population has been urban population of the State increased to 564,743 recorded in Faridabad district 1,221,344 (19.97%) and (12.38%) in 1931: 705,945 (13.39%) in 1941; 968,494 the lowest in Mahendragarh district 109,636 (1.79%)

S tatement-4 Progress in Urban Population of State, and Districts 1901-2001 State! 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 District 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HARYANA 6,115,304 4,054,744 2,827,387 1,772,959 1,307,680 968,494 705,945 564,743 481,195 449,704 574,074 Panchkula 208,395 111,185 38,344 17,711 18,068 14,058 9,766 7,937 7,635 4,532 7,045 Ambala 357,028 285,809 242,480 193,006 181,747 152,022 107,383 86,592 76,326 80,131 78,638 Yamunanagar 393,022 276,927 191,058 140,557 106,293 59,109 34,513 29,655 26,950 28,337 34,659 Kurukshetra 215,511 154,134 107,758 73,087 50,221 34,811 21,319 17,325 15,555 15,773 19,593 Kaithal 183,482 120,637 81,154 54,306 42,550 34,974 22,325 19,418 15,477 12,912 20,242 Kamal 337,842 260,032 194,833 115,186 90,640 74,709 44,731 32,341 22,845 21,961 23,559 Panipat 392,080 209,596 151,459 87,981 67,026 54,981 37,837 32,915 27,343 26,342 26,914 Sonipat 321,375 210,521 152,046 87,546 56,958 38,985 24,599 20,095 18,088 17,452 23,322 Jind 241,577 165,544 118,491 84,709 57,018 45,510 29,782 17,868 16,039 8,783 12,879 Fatehabad 142,157 102,958 76,210 43,338 27,993 12,963 8,950 7,519 2,786 Sirsa 293,465 191,200 144,496 76,260 52,863 37,982 27,373 18,909 16,241 14,629 25,122 Hisar 398,118 286,595 212,437 136,526 97,522 61,134 51,208 43,535 36,840 31,738 34,170 Bhiwani 270,393 196.568 147,369 103,188 76,498 64,416 56,656 46,082 42,191 39,156 51,550 Rohtak 329,604 253,541 190,869 135,296 97,493 80,438 63,571 45,875 37,187 20,361 59,701 Jhaiiar 195,097 99,436 75,225 57,095 40,056 31,636 31,910 27,072 24,209 23,405 27,924 M ahendragarh 109,636 84,644 66,053 51,183 39,133 30,613 32,834 31,099 28,990 31,111 29,473 Rewari 136,174 95,200 59,322 50,414 42,918 39,474 36,382 31,213 28,266 30,112 33,034 Gurgaon 369,004 232,704 169,189 92,402 65,223 41,068 31,064 21,932 17,749 19,476 28,374 Faridabad 1,221,344 717,513 408,594 173,168 97,460 59,611 33,742 27,361 23,264 23,493 35,089

35 The statement-5 gives the indices of growth of 1901 and followed by Faridabad district where the urban population taking 1901 as base for facilitating a urban population has recorded as 3480 in'relation to comparative study during the last ten decades while 100 in 1901. The urban population in Fatehabad district considering 1901 as the base year with urban population is not available for 1901, 1911 and 1921. There are as 100, then the urban population of Haryana in 2001 twelve districts, namely, Panchkula, Yamunanagar, has grown to 1065 revealing a 10 fold increase Kurukshetra, Kamal, Panipat, Sonipat, Jind, Fatehabad, approximately. The highest growth of Urban population Sirsa, Hisar, Gurgaon and Faridabad where the indices has been recorded in Fatehabad district where the urban of growth of urban population are more than 1000 in population has increased to 5102 in relation to 100 in 2001 in relation to 100 in 1901. S tatement-5 Indices in growth of Urban Population of S tate and Districts 1901-2001 (1901=100) State! 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 District 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HARYANA 1,065 706 493 309 228 169 123 98 84 78 100 Panchkula 2,858 1.578 544 251 256 200 139 113 108 64 100 Ambala 454 363 308 245 231 193 137 110 97 102 100 Yamunanagar 1,133 799 551 406 307 171 100 86 78 82 100 Kurukshetra 1,099 786 550 373 256 178 109 88 79 81 100 Kaithal 906 596 401 268 210 173 110 96 76 64 100 Kamal 1,434 1,104 827 489 385 317 190 137 97 93 100 Panipat 1,457 779 563 327 249 204 141 122 102 98 100 Sonipat 1,378 903 652 375 244 167 105 86 78 75 100 Jind 1,876 1,285 920 658 443 353 231 139 125 68 100 Fatehabad 5,103 3,695 2,735 1,556 1,005 465 321 270 100 Sirs a 1,168 761 575 304 210 151 109 75 65 58 100 Hisar 1,165 839 622 399 285 179 150 127 108 93 100 Bhiwani 525 381 286 200 148 125 110 89 82 76 100 Rohtak: 552 492 320 227 163 135 106 76 62 34 100 Jhajjar 583 356 269 204 143 113 114 96 103 84 100 M ahendragarh 372 287 224 174 133 104 111 106 98 106 100 Rewari 412 288 179 153 130 119 110 94 86 91 100 Gurgaon 1,300 820 596 326 230 145 109 77 62 69 100 Faridabad 3,480 2,045 1,164 494 278 170 96 78 66 67 100

36 The Statement -6 of Table-A-! indicates the treated as Census town. There are 67 tahsils, 114 district wise number of villages and towns in 2001. CD Blocks and 106 towns in Haryana as per 2001 There are 6,955 villages in 2001 as per revenue Census. The highest number of revenue villages records, of which 6764 are inhabited and 319 are are found in Gurgaon district (726) and the lowest either uninhabited or fully merged in town or in Rohtak district (147).

S tatement-6 State! District wise number of Villages and Towns in 2001 State/" Total No. of No. of Un inhabited Number of Villages included in towns No. of inhabited No. of District Villages Villages Fully Partialy Villages Towns 2 3 4 5 6 7 HARYANA 6,955 191 128 227 6,764 106 Panchkula 236 12 17 28 224 4 Ambala 493 11 6 26 482 6 Yamunanagar 639 26 16 15 613 11 Kurukshetra 416 9 3 23 407 4 Kaithal 270 6 6 270 4 Kamal 434 12 20 422 7 Panipat 192 13 6 6 179 6 Sonipat 336 13 11 10 323 4 Jind 307 12 306 5 Fatehabad 243 5 243 4 Sirs a 325 4 3 13 321 5 Hisar 275 3 11 272 5 Bhiwani 444 7 11 437 6 Rohtak 147 9 146 3 Jhaijar 260 13 5 3 247 5 M ahendragarh 310 2 2 11 368 5 Rewari 410 13 2 2 397 4 Gurgaon 726 32 8 10 694 12 Faridabad 432 19 42 6 413 6

37 The following Statement-7 indicates the number 1941; 6580 in 1951; 6669 in 1961; 6,731 in 1971,6,745 of inhabited villages at each Census since 1901 . In in 1981; 6,759 in 1991; and 6,764 in 2001. Districtwise Haryana, there were 6,783 inhabited villages in 1901; figures are also given since 1871. Data for the earlier 6811 in 1911; 6,739 in 1921; 6,743 in 1931; 6725 in Censuses is not available.

Statement-7 Number of Inhabited villages at each Census 1901-2001 State! Number of Inhabited Villages District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HARYANA 6,764 6,759 6,745 6,731 6,669 6,580 6,725 6,743 6,739 6,811 6,783 Panchkula 224 188 136 138 DATA NOT AVAILABLE Ambala 482 523 629 626 Yamunanagar 613 627 465 457 Kurukshetra 407 389 485 415 Kaithal 270 287 247 382 Kamal 422 423 429 399 Panipat 179 174 167 170 Sonipat 323 335 331 353 Jind 306 301 352 300 Fatehabad 243 233 238 179 Sirs a 321 319 317 317 Hisar 272 271 264 346 Bhiwani 437 433 424 394 Rohtak 146 139 133 128 Jhajiar 247 247 305 291 Mahendragarh 368 366 373 365 Rewari 397 402 352 405 Gurgaon 694 688 673 703 Faridabad 413 414 425 363

38 The statement-8 gives the information about the do not tally with the total population of the State growth of rural population in the district as per because the population for these Censuses are not jurisdiction of 2001 Census during the last ten decades available for Kaithal, Panipat, Jind, Fatehabad, Hisar, i.e 1901 -2001. Bhiwani, Mahendragarh and Rewari districts. In the year 1901, the rural population of Haryana Out of a total of 15,029,260 persons living in rural was 4,048,990 which decreased to 3,724,973 in 1911 area of Haryana in 200 1,as many as 1,291,285 persons and since then it had an increasing trend in the total are found in Gurgaon district which has the largest rural population of the State concentration of rural population in 2001 Census. The The totals of population for all the districts of lowest concentration of rural population has been found Haryanafor 190~1911, 1921, 1931 and 1941 Census in Panchkula district (260,016) in 2001.

Statement-8 Progress in Rural PoIDiation ofStatel Districts 1901-2001 State! 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 District 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HARYANA 15,029,260 12,408,904 10,094,732 8,263,472 6,282,8444,705,103 4,566,884 3,995,174 3,774,697 3,724,973 4,048,990 Panchkula 260,016 199,211 158,595 123,580 87,800 67,046 65,678 58,166 49,684 57,046 66,368 Ambala 657,383 520,673 416,905 346,291 271,834 213,361 232,499 211,250 181,903 197,286 252,097 Yamunanagar 648,608 529,352 441,762 337,926 263,931 203,797 209,290 183,352 187,477 170,312 199,944 Kurukshetra 609,943 515,212 434,665 392,135 291,685 184,644 175,838 151,677 149,005 143,034 156,142 Kaithal 762,649 661,177 565,412 407,591 292,254 192,194 NA NA NA NA NA Kamal 936,341 775,358 635,094 504,347 384,082 279,055 214,238 189,546 193,027 186,575 206,827 Panipat 575,369 488,507 355,705 294,464 231,206 183,853 NA NA NA NA NA Sonipat 957,800 834,637 687,252 592,288 489,915 393,297 355,199 300,745 289,003 267,404 306,886 Jind 948,250 814,890 678,411 551,719 410,398 306,141 NA NA NA NA NA Fatehabad 664,001 543,202 436,302 344,724 231,013 133,687 NA NA NA NA NA Sirsa 823,184 712,336 562,572 457,344 317,802 183,300 186,149 171,863 157,235 156,104 140,045 Hisar 1,138,999 922,643 773,332 637,739 480,365 362,256 NA NA NA NA NA Bhiwani 1,154,629 966,832 800,005 621,553 479,391 366,772 NA NA NA NA NA Rohtak 610,524 523,425 468;775 410,583 33-5,674 263,524 242,101 209,992 210,635 205,690 221,229 Jhllijar 684,975 615,700 .513,987 422,387 335,153 263,449 217,110 185,344 176,472 166,574 186,756 Mahendragarl 702,885 597,225 467,021 372,614 300,926 246,707 NA NA NA NA NA Rewari 629,177 515,411 426,762 339,937 271,875 220,373 NA NA NA NA NA Gurgaon 1,291,285 913,386 694,679 576,419 433,784 345,364 326,725 289,288 266,963 286,176 322,143 Faridabad 973,242 759,727 577,496 529,831 373,756 296,283 295,773 259,264 238,947 258,006 287,727

39

o o 75 76 INDIA

o HARYANA o 31 31 ~JIIj)f1I( !II 41 01 ~ ~PI{)!4 'JHfi{9q1 J$t/, RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION BY SEX ~\;, .."'4 t C'L 2001 ,VJ ... ~T4 KILOMETRES CHANDIG~H) 205f'84'1l, ' , ...fl7 11 '9® (NAGAR" J .. . o I I 14.13 39. ) ;,./ v o 30 30 ... "'"t /:) -'-; ~ 34.43 -- .Pv' Q -"t','" f "\ 1\ "._, 7_ ... Kr-URUKSHET~W-: I '\..., I U ) 946 131 - r '" -\ ... ,,.,...... ' .//l 04:~94 ' 1@1:74183 """,,-,J) 43.51 \ , - ... '\ 1116649 , ( """.I" 1'" ) 3710 , 14.24 39.39 I a: I ~' 806158 ) ,\ ' ) I 1 t 8~25 '- KAI THAL ... f 34.10 \ , 9.38 ( I D.. " ,-' .&8436 .... A \..I'( _, _ J KARNAL I SIRSA < .-- -' L 1 189827 ..r _ J\ .f... ~ \ , FATEHABAD I , ®937 /1' ) 967449 ~"'" f /" _ I - )_.....J0 93 . - J 1 8'~ 1 a: \ ,.- .. ""' l /' .... \...... r 1537117 I 43.05 J" . 32.38 , I _,. ,36.65 \ (.A J:I .., J.'l. :--:._" ~ 27. - '.r" ( \ JIND ,,() _,.. I PANIPAT, I \...... I _- .... , \ ( 1 27917S-.....J\ ~ ~ 11 .52 't H ISAR , _ -'" --...... " o o \ -.....l -...... r-J 940 1~ - ~ 13.6 40.78 ~ 29 29 ) _ \.,' 16 ' 2~ (34.09 ' "- ---' \ J 18.83 35.3 '1., SONIPAT ,::> 1 425022 ') 29.62 -,/ '" 1 102 ~877 ... ROHTAK/~ l \ \ _ ....I L-/ A..r . 43 00 '[ 880072 I l 38.02 f L, 1 2 ;~ro .. I DELHI 21 144564 \ BHIWANI J '/ ~ ( ,y\S' \ (.oK JHAJJA", ~,_._. !:".... '" ,.-, ~ .. _ ... _,.,.....JrJI "'-I \" d\ ~ I _f_....J (~ '"' 5"'\ \ 1 660289 r ) ~ -,\ 812521 I ( .... ~ '®2 " ... ~ .. 7 1~ I 96£Bi653S1 (~ ( 4145 (2194586) 0- HARYANA " ~ ( 430 ,""""" 36.33 /i 2514 2386 > (NOT TO SCALE) "'" ~ "!HENDR~' '('.:> .1 ,.r "\ \ 2049 c., GARH ~) ... REWARI( ,(,URGAOrt 30.51 . \ 0 o 28 ;S ,,_ c::., J ~ \ 28 ,< v' \ FARIDABAD ..J , -n.,. POPULATION BY SEX . 2 000 000 J$t .., 1 \.- ... .J " . 1 000 000 l--'\., l'\ ," (...... ~"',( -<..~~ A I¥ U URBAN FEMALE . ~U::LO:LE ~, URBAN MALE RURAL FEMALE FIGURES AT THE TOP OF THE CIRCLES INDICATE TOTAL POPULATION FIGURES INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THE SECTORS INDICATE POCKET OF DISTRICT PANIPAT .. . T PERCENTAGE OF RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION POCKET OF DISTRICT REWARI .. . . K

o o o 75 EAST OF GREENWICH 76 n

41 o o o 75 76 77

INDIA o o 31 31 HARYANA ffi-~~ SEX RATIO 2001 KILOMETRES 1050 10 20 30 40 50 I I I I I I I I

BOUNDARIES :

STATE I UNION TERRITORY ...... DISTRICT ...... TAHSIL ...... , ......

o o 30 30

o o 29 29

FEMALES PER 1000 MALES CJ 900 AND ABOVE CJ 875 - 899 STATE AVERAGE CJ 850 - 87 4 861 CJ 849 AND BELOW

POCKET OF TAHSil PEHOWA P POCKET OF TAHSil KOSLI K POCKET OF TAHSIL PANIPAT T POCKET OF TAHSIL THANESAR ... C POCKET OF TAHSIL SO HNA ... S

0 0 0 75 EAST OF GREENWICH 76 77

42 o o 75 76 INDIA o o 31 31 HARYANA ~ffi- ~~ RURAL SEX RATIO 2001

KILOMETRES

10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 I I I I I I I I

BOUNDARIES:

STATE I UNION TERRITORY ... DISTRICT

TAHSIL ... r:: o o Ir 30 30 1 GUHl.A u I Q

cr

, ,.-_'" ,.,... ,," ,; 1 o o '.., 29 29

FEMALES PER 1 000 MALES o 28 .. 900 AND ABOVE c:::::J 875 - 899 STATE AVERAGE CJ 850 - 874 866 A N CJ 849 AND BELOW

POCKET Of TAHSIL PEHOWA P POCKET OF TAHSIL KOSU K POCKET OF TAHSIL PANIPAT T POCKET OF TAHSIL THANESAR C POCKET OF TAHSIL SOHNA .. S o o o 75 EAST OF GREENWICH 76 n

43 o o 75 76

INDIA o o 31 31 HARYANA ... , • ..\ , 1""... \ ' .. - ''''' () f' U " ~ , ,,'\.: L"\. " -·r~:;.- ,...""':" ', IN DRI/ NILOKHERI . /, , ' ~...... I ;?' '" , , DABWAU ~ ' :... " f, ,.. -.",.. ,...". , r --"\ ,.. ... ; .. ,,- J -, 'J \ / ..... 1' • ., l."./ I KAITHAL ' .' '.. • ! ,,' j,,' , ,-'...... ::, KARNAL .' cr: ,'-.-. ~ -..'·.1:~, • ('I, , ' , RATIA < TOHANA ~', " """ { l.. (' '...~ \ ,...... "'~"""''-, . "', (" ""'-', ,. ... 1 ...' __ ; Q. i RANIA SIRSA \._.' "', ;', " " .J., NARWANA -. <;' ~., ...... (ASSANDH ..-:'GHARAUNDAi f '.'" "',' "'. FATEHABAD ,.."_,, ; ''-,... 1\ :: J , ~ " '- ~ _ l-, \ " /"" .. - ; .. ' .. - -. .. _ ). ... , ('ELLENABAD ';' .J ,- , ' ,',.r,~" _ ,, ;,~'.SAFIDON_"..l" PANIPAT ' i \ ,..."-. ' ' / " -," _. - ...... 4, ~ ...... I"'~ ""I JINO t I ~-_, •• \..- , " . - , , l ISRANA ,,' '- " I ' ". ( .( ADAMPUR " ' ' ~NAR·, ,", ' ""::" '_ 1- ' •

~rl'\_)J J~ E.A. ,._~, HISAA I '; ~AUND\J. ., ~:,/ ' -- ',~:)f!"A LKH~ r;- .," , ~ HA~S; ' \ - ; :~JU LANA ; GOHANA ~', _ GA:;U;' , r.J ",~ , ...... ~ ... ,," "_" ,./ '\.,.-~ , '- ... ,...... 't o o 1,,-,\ " ". I ",r \ \ \, > , 29 29 ...... " . 1'1 ' \..) MAHAM I, ", _, SONIPAT I ;-' ' ,- • ~.. }!~~~NI KHE~A \ ' 1.. ," \ , ';- " "'x, " ROHTAK , KHA~ " I I " : . ," . ,; " -' " ""HODA ~ :;,'" ,/. ;SIWANI ~ TOSHAM ,';, BHIWANI ,' '', /' ). ,'-,\-;,,,- \ ~ )_ :, ._--: ~,-v \ • / ':., " " . r SERI , BAHADUR·. I " I I' ,-' l , ,L " GARH • .J DELHI .. ... J I ... - ... "\ ., .rIIfIIII# : ...... 1'" , ' ~ r DADR I I \, " .... \.. ~ '...... JHAJJAR ,,....\, .. .,,,,. ... ~ , __ -"., .n ~ ' _'" (. U ' .;': '~,' ..\. '- - ). -, , .... "' •• .., " ' •• " ../ 1. - \ ~-..." GURGAON I'F'1R! DA~A~\ yo- I. \...... K~SLl EA " / },}- ... , \S:,,, J \ " 0 I .... "" ' \ I E. R. \/ c' • MAHENDRAOARH ( ,_ , - ~- ;" 'rATA~pl ,,,'-; "':SALLABG ARA ' ,," " , SOHNA -J.. '",_ , , J...... _ " \ ...... 4. ," (" REWARI •ATAOR} . , +'(,,-,,;/.... - ~ , ~• cc .1'."."'" ',\ ,,~ ' , .~ , ; PALWAL ( .. -".~ . -'. r , HUH • '~ .. FEMALES PER 1 000 MALES ( .NARNAUL ~; (,BAWALi r ( -" I 0 o ~s ~~:.... ~,,' ,, :.tATHIN" '-" \ 28 28 916 AND ABOVE ~ \ \/- ,.-' '\,l ; HODAL".' ~ J l,FERozePUA" • 891·915 ;:" I, ~JHIRt

STATE AVERAGE It A N I tI ~J . \} 841·865 847 .. _. oJ

840 AND BELOW

~ ENTIRELY RURAL POCKET OF TAHSIL PEHOWA .. P POCKET OF TAHSIL KOSLI K POCKET OF TAHSIL PANIPAT T POCKET OF TAHSIL THANESAR . C POCKET OF TAHSIL SOHNA .. o o o 75 EAST OF GREENWICH 76 77

44 :c 00 w 0 « 0: . ~ 0: => U a. a. C\I C13 0 ~ 0 a."? Q) z szgj « Z 0 "- « « ~C'") Z :) 0: C13 en z I a."? ~O => I- I «-.:t 1- ..... o:t- 00 0: « co W _.J >-C'") (f)""': « C13 0 Z~ zC'") Q) !:: « «0 «<0 ~ "- a:: 0: I 0:"': « C1:l a. en 0 « _.J ..... ~ Z<3 +-' ~ O C 0 a.. W Q) I Illt- (.) I-C\i "- Z 00 Q) :::l w 0.. 3: Q) en 0: -W « -C13 III . ~ l- Ol.{) u < o"!-0 .s I- Zoo (J) en ~O Q) - "- 0: ,j, < 0: ~ LL. w I ..... C 0 0 .Q 0 c W 0 0 Z _..:::J ~ O=> Q) en a.. 0 a. :c « W 00 -C13 W z ~ C'") _.J 0 0 ..... « « Cl' «0 0: 0 :c

45 I C/) W o o ...J -< -< I z 0: (5 C/) -<0) 0.... I W ...J ,- c:: -< 0 en o o <.')0 o w ~~ -< «co -< 0:0 Z 0: 0 ~ D....CO Z ~ :::J a:::- ;t:~ 0:'- -<0) a. O:N z 0: 0 o I ::>~ -< « o 0 a. e 0: I IO) ~ NO « « f-' ::E o ctl a: <.')0) C/) 0 (5 -0 «I{) +-' a: o 0 ~ ZO «~ w ~ I 0 .8 -< 0: <.')0 J- I c:: o UJ o Z ~ :.;:::::; Q co ctl «I"­ :::J """lC') a. z 0 z o ::::> ::>N a. 0...... -en o w CD l­ OJ e( ...J« ctl I­ <.') C en ZO) CD UJ ...... ~ LL co 0 CD f- ...... a. C/)o «0 0r- W CD -z o :s:«z ~ Co o IN (.) N "0 ZI- a::N::.:::~ c:: « I en :5 """l CD ::::> E a.. ctl « c:: o C/)oo (J) a.. (/)1{) CD 0: iIc;..-j 0>:: LL « co o o o OC') oC! "E- W - 0 zC/) 0.... I ~ ~ ~O UJ I c: en zZ « UJ C/) a::: ...J UJ « o -<<( O <.') ·c w ~...J «,­ ~,- CI a:: 0 U)C') «~ «C! « - 0 :::> > wC') IO 0: ...... Q) o ::.::: 0....00 ~C\i i= Z e( « ~ «tt) « -ctl «C') ::::; >- I a: ::s o or-: -< I I en e( <.')0 ::.::: I UJ CI o CD « (/) « > « ..c. Q.. f-'

46 ~-? 7'YV(,: ~ <>' . "'~-tt6) ,.... ' a: z!;: ~ «...J ,.... ~~ en~ 0 9~ >;:) 0 C") p" C a::Q. C'\I CJ) «~ ~ .....~ ::I: LL ~ CO v~ 0 C\I V-? W LO l'v19 ~.5' -;.y N ~~ en C'? w (0 2::: LO .¢ l- ~~ e:( C'? a:: 0 e:( cO /~ Q. t:v19 :=: LO ~ 0 0 0 cO ..I~ ~~ -.;t o~ t-- cO /,,~

t-- ~~ C\! 0> t-- .....~ ~{y LO CO r-..: "0~~ CO "'-? C'? 19 0 T""" ..o~ 9~ 0 0 0 0 o 0 .v19 C! 0 0 0 o 0 ..;y C\I 0 00 cO ~ 0 T""" T"""

NOIl.V,ndOd '''1.01. 01. 3~V1.N301:::13d

47 o nO 75 ° 76

INDIA o 31 31 ° HARVANA ~/4t ' ..\ ' \ .... \-'"f(\A ~ DENSITY OF POPULATION , ...... ',. KALt(). ~ 2001 CHANDIGA~ ~ '_,874,_':--" < ',' I ~_, • A~ KILOMETRES '"r\~rANCHKUL~ "7A i 527.J ...., () 105 0 10 20 30 4() 50 . ./, ~~ I I I I I I I I 1\-./ )" ~ r-' ~ARAINGARfl '-<.~'.r. ," BOUNDARIES : , I ,_ 432 1 ' _ " "'" '--"' "'" _ ..( , . STATE I UNION TERRITORY ,,, r 'AMBALA ,>"_',,' \ CijHACHH~ ./- 931 1~, (.1 , .. _./ RAULli· DISTRICT '" ,., ". , .. (,... / \ J:IARA!V\:.: :. -~.- " 331 • ~ AMBALA \ " , '54s'~ 461" ' ,/ TAHSIL '" '" '" ." " . '" '" " , '" ," '" .. , '" ," '" '" '" ~ b'A~ SHAHBAIJ-~' ,- JAGADHRI '( ,,_ ...... ,.,( , '\ "" :_ ,',_' , • ' ''\ 705 ' W'J ~ ...... " "I": ,_ ;, , .oJ :-- ) . - ~ \.r ,'r-'-~ "" J~~ : )AJ~~O~~~lNA.._l~~ ,: ~ ...... {'l,)ADAMPUR:, ,"-"' NAR. 1 ,,',368 ' "-: ' , ./ ...; /' 286 , '\NAUNO\ : ,_ j,,_\ ' _'_/\ ~AMALKH~ ...... • ( ~ ,-_ 309 ' ...... ' ~ • r- ' 552 .: ,.J" ,'",' , JULANA' GOHANA ~- " \ q ' ~ HISAR HANSI" ,-' , 395 / 424 ',-, GANAUFr: \ 408 , 372 .<, ' j-_, :' ~_ 560 ,_' ''\

" f , .. -...... _ ""\ ",J - _', ...._ __ -- ... , ' .. \ \- o 29 29° _. ,-' 1" - ,," \' , , \" r .. " : " _, '.' .' 652 ltHARK~OD",) :.. SlWANI ,-' TOSHAM, ,':"-'BHIWANI /'-- '550 ';/ ',.1\ , 171 , 218 476 ,-, ,1'\.... . \ I /- ~, .. ..._ I .. ~ , ~>, ,-' \ _.,./ ,~ ../ \ , . --'" ','.- BERI ~ BAHADUR·, , ,' , ',--' '( 380 1., GARH ) D \:: LOHAR~-'\ _ ""'- ~ADRI ; " _", . : '-. 708,.J ELHI '. 202 / - 329 r· ... / '~~;JJAR (, (' <, \. $ '.. ~ ,..: 371 'I"" • ..,..,...... ') ." ...... ,. .1\ " '} " , , ... ~ ....-- • ..);;'---K ~ .." _ K~ ' ,..... ,.GURGAON :, <• 2790 '-• v' • _. ;.- ; • .-! ',KOSLf-"",,, '. t. , 852 ,',,' I''''A~JDI'B~~" ~ , ...... 411 1 <-" ,..... \s, ,;"', ' \' '\ " ' J'.ATAUDI -, , ' 585 -_, (" "'- • MAHENDRAGARH I" ',,- ' 569 ' ,_.',,' 416 \.':QALLABGARR "'" PERSONS PER Km2 .... 358 L.;:' "' 560 \ SOHNA/ , __ , , -'l (( tP '. J REWARI ' ''_ TAORY--~, .. ,_, ~ " ___ ' ''':' \ " r 549 I' "'. J W ... 801 AND ABOVE .. \ t,#- .... to""", II '" I \, PAL AL """",. [J: CJ ,.. oJ ' .... ,_",,('-,__ .... \ I , 640 " • , .:/ ' ) NUH', ' CJ 501 - 800 :" NARNAUL., t: BAWA!i / 459 \ ~7 "" ( c.. 483 ,_.". :-' 449 \ ~ I \ ... \ '\ 0 O\·r HATHIN, ,- , 28° 26 STATE AVERAGE ( ,!.-...... , _' I __ ;-, " , .. " J 'HODAL 301 - 500 478 CJ •.), ., ~EROZE~UIit-, " 593 .I ~ ':'JHIRKA PUNA\_ ,:, 300 AND BELOW '\ t. r I CJ \ 1468 -.,HANA j... • ~ ._.-.'1..... J' (-~~t~· " HAN ~ ,J'~ \ U ~ '",.J

POCKET OF TAHSIL PEHOWA P POCKET OF TA HSIL KOSLI .. K

POCK ET OF TAHSIL PANIPAT ., T POCKET OF TAHSIL THANESAR n •• C POCKET OF TAHSIL SOHNA ._ S

o o 75 EAST OF GREENWICH 76 ° 77

48 Table A-I is the basic population table which cor­ of inhabited and uninhabited villages, nmnber of towns, responds to the general population table A-I of 2001 number of households, population by sex according to Census. This Table gives the statastics per of number 2001 census for total, rural and urban areas on sq. kms.

TABLEA-l(PART-l) NUMBER OFVILLAGFS, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA StatelDistrictsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population ------~------Tehsils RI Inhabited Un- Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS persq.km D Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Harayana T 6,764 191 106 3,712,319 21,144,564 11,363,953 9,780,611 44,212.00 478 R 6,764 191 2,541,980 15,029,260 8,052,988 6,976,272 42,931.63 350 U 106 1,170,339 6,115,304 3,310,965 2,804,339 1,280.37 4,776 Panchkula District* T 224 12 4 92,593 468,411 256,939 211,472 898.00 522 R 224 12 46,179 260,016 144,642 115,374 851.95 305 D o 4 46,414 208,395 112,297 96,098 46.05 4,525 Kalka Tehsil T 97 3 2 26,015 134,529 72,508 62,021 153.98 874 R 97 3 13,184 74,090 39,877 34,213 140.06 529 U 2 12,831 60,439 32,631 27,808 13.92 4,342 Panchkula Tehsil T 127 9 2 66,578 333,882 184,431 149,451 632.99 527 R 127 9 32,995 185,926 104,765 81,161 600.86 309 U 2 33,583 147,956 79,666 68,290 32.13 4,605 Ambala District T 482 11 6 184,319 1,014,411 542,977 471,434 1,574.00 644 R 482 11 114,125 657,383 349,932 307,451 1,504.87 437 U o 6 70,194 357,028 193,045 163,983 69.13 5,165 Naraingarh Tehsil T 168 4 35,727 206,592 110,280 96,312 477.67 432 R 168 4 32,254 188,382 100,715 87,667 469.74 401 U 1 3,473 18,2lO 9,565 8,645 7.93 2,296 Ambala Tehsil T 222 7 5 122,498 655,425 352,229 303,196 704.34 931 R 222 7 55,777 316,607 168,749 147,858 643.14 492 U 5 66,721 338,818 183,480 155,338 61.20 5,536 Barara lehsil T 92 26,094 152,394 80,468 71,926 330.28 461 R 92 26,094 152,394 80,468 71,926 330.28 461 U Yamunanagar District T 613 26 11 183,238 1,041,630 559,444 482,186 1,768.00 "- 589 R 613 26 107,918 648,608 347,540 301,068 1,682.74 385 U o 11 75,320 393,022 211,904 181,118 85.26 4,610 Jagadhri Tehsil T 472 16 10 158,136 890,817 478,783 412,034 1,264,07' 705 R 472 16 84,551 507,505 271,881 235,624 1,189.35 427 U 10 73,585 383,312 206,902 176,410 74.72 5,130 Chhachhrauli Tehsil T 141 10 25,102 150,813 80,661 70,152 455.59 331 R 141 lO 23,367 141,103 75,659 65,444 445.05 317 U 1 1,735 9,7l0 5,002 4,708 10.54 921 Kurukshetra District T 407 9 4 142,950 825,454 442,328 383,~26 1,530.00 540 R 407 9 102,663 609,943 325,726 284,217 1,468.80 415 U 4 40,287 215,511 116,602 98,909 61.20 3,521 Shahbad Tehsil T 79 26,222 150,967 80,401 70,566 277.13 545 R 79 19,151 113,678 60,621 53,057 261.13 435 U 7,071 37,289 19,780 17,509 16.00 2,331 Contd ......

49 TABLEA-l(PART-l) NUMBFR OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOlSEHOLDS, POPUATION AND ARFA StatelDistrictsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population RI-In-h-a-b-H-e-d-""::U::""n------~------Tehsils Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS per sq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pehowa Tehsil T 88 4 . 32,521 187,673 99,916 87,757 517.16 363 R 88 4 26,246 154,109 82,004 72,105 509.66 302 U 6,275 33,564 17,912 15,652 7.50 4,475 Thanesar Tehsil T 240 5 2 84,207 486,814 262,011 224,803 891.40 546 R 240 5 57,266 342,156 183,101 159,055 853.70 401 U 2 26,941 144,658 78,910 65,748 37.70 3,837 Kaithal District T 270 4 164,258 946,131 510,513 435,618 2,317.00 408 R 270 130,775 762,649 411,628 351,021 2,232.14 342 U 4 33,483 183,482 98,885 84,597 84.86 2,162 Guhla Tehsil T 100 1 31,548 185,120 99,017 86,103 575.06 322 R 100 25,910 152,992 81,487 71,505 544.34 281 U 5,638 32,128 17,530 14,598 30.72 1,046 Kaithal Tehsil T 170 3 132,710 761.011 411,496 349,515 1,695.34 449 R 170 104,865 609,657 330,141 279,516 1,641.20 371 U 3 27,845 151,354 81,355 69,999 54.14 2,796 Karnal District T 422 12 7 224,230 1,274,183 683,368 590,815 2,520.00 506 R 422 12 160,252 936,341 501,890 434,451 2,459.91 381 U o 7 63,978 337,842 181,478 156,364 60.09 5,622 Nilokheri Tehsil T 75 2 32,467 184,053 98,511 85,542 399.33 461 R 75 25,208 145,447 77,909 67,538 388.39 374 U 2 7,259 38,606 20,602 18,004 10.94 3,529 Indri Tehsil T 106 2 23,892 143,771 76,776 66,995 342.43 420 R 106 2 21,286 129,260 69,037 60,223 341.48 379 U 2,606 14,511 7,739 6,772 0.95 15,275 Kamal Tehsil T 135 6 2 105,026 579,485 311,756 267,729 864.09 671 R 135 6 60,300 347,639 186,999 160,640 832.82 417 U 2 44,726 231,846 124,757 107,089 31.27 7,414 Assandh Tehsil T 48 32,125 186,762 99,588 87,174 498.25 375 R 48 28,033 164,055 87,498 76,557 494.30 332 U 4,092 22,707 12,090 10,617 3.95 5,749 Gharaunda Tehsil T 58 3 30,720 180,112 96,737 83,375 349.90 515 R 58 3 25,425 149,940 80,447 69,493 336.92 445 U 1 5,295 30,172 16,290 13,882 12.98 2,324 Panipat District T 179 13 6 174,388 967,449 528,860 438,589 1,268.00 763 R 179 13 98,489 575,369 313,274 262,095 1,214.79 474 U 6 75,899 392,080 215,586 176,494 53.21 7,369 Panipat Tehsil T 70 4 5 112,138 597,382 327,822 269,560 521.10 1,146 R 70 4 41,456 235,168 128,576 106,592 472.37 498 U 5 70,682 362,214 199,246 162,968 48.73 7,433 Israna Tehsil T 35 20,830 122,006 65,760 56,246 331.41 368 R 35 20,830 122,006 65,760 56,246 331.41 368 U Contd ......

50 TABLEA-I(PART-I) NUMBER OF VILIAGES, TOWNS, HOlBEHOWS, POPULATION AND ARFA State/Districtsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population Tehsils RI Inhabited Un- Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS per sq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Samalkha Tehsil T 74 8 41,420 248,061 135,278 112,783 449.20 552 R 74 8 36,203 218,195 118,938 99,257 444.72 491 U 5,217 29,866 16,340 13,526 4.48 6,667 Sonipat District T 323 13 4 223,342 1,279,175 695,723 583,452 2,122.00 603 323 13 164,586 957,800 521,682 436,118 2,056.99 466 i 4 58,756 321,375 174,041 147,334 65.01 4,943 Gohana Tehsil T 80 3 58,202 339,902 183,103 156,799 802.14 424 R 80 3 49,597 291,370 157,178 134,192 795.57 366 U 8,605 48,532 25,925 22,607 6.57 7,387 Ganaur Tehsil T 60 3 29,454 175,787 95,364 80,423 313.97 560 R 60 3 24,315 146,781 79,762 67,019 304.91 481 U 5,139 29,006 15,602 13,404 9.06 3,202 Sonipat Tehsil T 139 6 107,735 602,896 329,672 273,224 755.42 798 R 139 6 65,901 377,822 207,192 170,630 707.67 534 U 41,834 225,074 122,480 102,594 47.75 4,714 Kharkhoda Tehsil T 44 27,951 160,590 87,584 73,006 291.92 550 R 44 24,773 141,827 77,550 64,277 290.29 489 U 1 3,178 18,763 lO,034 8,729 1.63 11,511 Jind District 'IT 306 1 5 204,942 1,189,827 642,282 547,545 2,702.00 440 R 306 1 161,289 948,250 512,205 436,045 2,669.43 355 U 5 43,653 241,577 130,077 111,500 32.57 7,417 Narwana Tehsil T 108 2 73,021 433,968 233,390 200,578 1,155.14 376 R 108 61,593 369,422 198,727 170,695 1,148.57 322 U 2 11,428 64,546 34,663 29,883 6.57 9,824 Jind Tehsil T 97 74,409 422,895 229,183 193,712 791.67 534 R 97 49,281 287,040 155,776 131,264 776.37 370 U 25,128 l35,855 73,407 62,448 15.30 8,879 Julana Tehsil T 30 18,271 106,509 57,268 49,241 269.48 395 R 30 15,927 92,874 50,031 42,843 268.26 346 U 2,344 13,635 7,237 6,398 1.22 11,176 Safidon Tehsil T 71 39,241 226,455 122,441 104,014 529.91 427 R 71 34,488 198,914 lO7,671 91,243 520.43 382 U 4,753 27,541 14,770 12,771 9.48 2,905 Fatehabad District* T\ 243. 4 1~2t017 806,158 427,862 378,296 2,538.00 318 R 243 115,860 664,001 352,216 311,785 2,508.46 265 U 4 26,157 142,157 75,646 66,511 ' 29.sfa.. 4,812 Ratia Tehsil T 64 27,113 153,822 81,024 72,798 510.7~ 301 R 64 22,756 129,996 68,351 61,645 506.77 257 U 4,357 23,826 12,673 11,153 4.00 5,rt' Contd ......

51 TABLEA-I(PART-I) NUMBER OF VILLAG~, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND ARFA S tatelDistrictsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population ------~------TehsiJs RI-m--ha-b-it-e-d--~U~n---- Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS per sq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Tohana Tehsil T 84 2 40,263 228,898 121,474 107,424 600.50 381 R 84 29,422 170,484 90,450 80,034 585.32 291 U 2 10,841 58,414 31,024 27,390 15.18 3,848 Fatehabad Tehsil T 95 74,641 423,438 225,364 19~,074 1,422.94 298 R 95 63,682 363,521 193,415 170,106 1,412.58 257 U 10,959 59,917 31,949 27,968 10.36 5,783 Sirsa District T 321 4 5 194,809 1,116,649 593,245 523,404 4,277.00 261 R 321 4 140,734 823,184 436,820 386,364 4,174.67 197 U 5 54,075 293,465 156,425 137,040 102.33 2,868 Dabwali Tehsil T 69 40,955 235,180 124,335 110,845 1,069.18 220 R 69 30,915 181,369 95,997 85,372 1,046.85 173 U 10,040 53,811 28,338 25,473 22.33 2,410 Sirsa Tehsil T 176 4 2 108,440 615,816 327,766 288,050 2,132.02 289 R 176 4 73,964 429,918 228,473 201,445 2,065.37 208 U 2 34,476 185,898 99,293 86,605 66.65 2,789 Rania Tehsil T 46 26,064 152,451 81,126 71,325 643.16 237 R 46 22,227 131,490 70,007 61,483 632.53 208 U 3,837 20,961 11,119 9,842 10.63 1,972 Ellenabad Tehsil' T 30 19,350 113,202 60,018 53,184 436.88 259 R 30 13,628 80,407 42,343 38,064 434.16 185 U 5,722 32,795 17,675 15,120 2.72 12,057 Hisar District T 272 3 5 272,738 1,537,117 830,520 706,597 3,983.00 386 R 272 3 196,821 1,138,999 614,605 524,394 3,919.88 291 U 5 75,917 398,118 215,915 182,203 63,12 6,307 Adampur Tehsil T 33 23,972 137,830 73,633 64,197 481.96 286 R 33 23,972 137,830 73,633 64,197 481.96 286 U HisarTehsil T 149 3 166,871 930,459 504,275 426,184 2,278.82 408 R 149 107,662 623,204 337,118 286,086 2,226.03 280 U 3 59,209 307,255 167,157 140,098 . 52.79 5,820 Narnaund Tehsil T 28 3 1 22,075 126,721 68,391 58,330 409.98 309 R 28 3 19,411 111,605 60,262 51,343 409.70 272 U 2,664 15,116 8,129 6,987 0.28 53,986

Hansi Tehsil T 62 59,820 342,107 184,221 157,886 919.64 372 R 62 45,776 266,360 143,592 122,768 909.59 293 U 1 14,044 75,747 40,629 35,118 10.05 7,537 Bhiwani District T 437 7 6 246,742 1,425,022 758,253 666,769 4,778.00 298 R 437 7 197,505 1,154,629 612,789 541,840 4,726.56 244 U 6 49,237 270,393 145,464 124,929 51.44 5,256 Contd......

52 TABLEA-l(PART-l) NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOlBNlOWS, POPUlATION M'D ARFA StatelDistrictsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population ------~------Tehsils RI Inhabited Un- Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS per sq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Bawani Khera Tehsil T 19 19,784 114,133 60,658 53,475 361.53 316 , R 19 16,710 96,709 51,385 45,324 355.53 272 U 3,074 17,424 9,273 8,151 6.00 2,904 Bhiwani Tehsil T 80 2 83,970 474,873 255,058 219,815 998.56 476 ~ 80 2 52,660 305,342 163,361 141,981 970.92 314 U 31,310 169,531 91,697 77,834 27.64 6,134 Tosham Tehsil T 58 2 27,843 162,484 86,494 75,990 744.68 218 R 58 2 25,828 151,212 80,513 70,699 739.77 204 U 2,q15 11,272 5,981 5,291 4.91 2,296 Siwani Tehsil T 33 14,667 84,926 44,935 39,991 496.71 171 R 33 11,822 69,076 36,472 32,604 491.83 140 U 2,845 15,850 8,463 7,387 4.88 3,248 Loharu Tehsil T 78 23,240 137,932 72,488 65,444 681.75 202 R 78 21,290 126,511 66,497 60,014 679.16 186 U 1,950 11,421 5,991 5,430 2.59 4,410 Dadri Tehsil T 169 3 77,238 450,674 238,620 212,054 1,370.59 329 R 169 3 69,195 405,779 214,561 191,218 1,365.17 297 U 1 8,043 44,895 24,059 20,836 5.42 8,283 Rohtak District T 146 1 3 167,593 940,128 509,038 431,090 1,745.00 539 R 146 1 106,632 610,524 332,044 278,480 1,706.37 358 U 3 60,961 329,604 176,994 152,610 38.63 8,532 Maham Tehsil T 31 1 31,988 181,346 98,519 82,827 510.76 355 R 31 28,665 163,172 88,757 74,415 507.41 322 U 3,323 18,174 9,762 8,412 3.35 5,425 Rohtak Tehsil T 115 2 135,605 758,782 410,519 348,263 1,164.51 652 R 115 77,967 447,352 243,287 204,065 1,129.23 396 U 2 57,638 311,430 167,232 144,198 35.28 8,827 ]haijar District* T 247 13 5 158,075 880,072 476,475 403,597 1,834.00 480 R 247 13 120,807 684,975 369,458 315,517 1,787.03 383 U 5 37,268 195,097 107,017 88,080 46.97 4,154 Beri Tehsil T 35 4 1 23,848 135,423 72,631 '62,792 355.99 380 R 35 4 20,990 119,261 63,908 55,353 353.40 337 U 1 2,858 16,162 8,723 7,439 2.59 6,240 Bahadurgarh Tehsil T 59 5 3 66,593 362,224 198,959 163,265 511.38 708 R 59 5 38,986 222,291 121,641 100,650 473.00 470 U 3 27,607 139,933 77,318 62,615 38.38 3,646 Jhajjar Tehsil T 153 ·4 67,634 382,425 204,885 177,540 1,030.78 371 R 153 4 60,831 343,423 183,909 159,514 1,024.78 335 U 6,803 39,002 20,976 18,026 6.00 6,500 Contd ......

53 TABLE-A-l(PART-l) NUMBER OF VILlAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOWS, POPUIATION AND AREA S tatelDistrictsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population ------~------TehsiIs RI-In-h-a-bl-'te-d--U~n--­ Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS per sq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Mahendragarh District T 368 2 5 135,218 812,521 423,578 388,943 1,899.00 428 R 368 2 116,570 702,885 365,343 337,542 1,869.02 376 U 5 18,648 109,636 58,235 51,401 29.98 3,657 Mahendragarh Tehsil T 148 2 60,079 352,665 184,022 168,643 986.17 358 R 148 54,165 318,147 165,780 152,367 973.21 327 U 2 5,914 34,518 18,242 16,276 12.96 2,663

Narnaul Tehsil T 220 3 75,139 459,856 239.556 220,300 952.61 483 R 220 62,405 384,738 199.563 185,175 935.59 411 U 3 12,734 75,118 39,993 35,125 17.02 4,414 Rewari District T 397 13 4 135,560 765,351 403,034 362,317 1,594.00 480 R 397 13 110,852 629,177 329,461 299,716 1,562.49 403 U 4 24,708 136,174 73,573 62,601 31.51 4,322 KosJi Tehsil T 52 2 20,011 110,965 57,105 53,860 270.18 411 R 52 2 20,011 110,965 57,105 53,860 270.18 411 U Rewari Tehsil T 265 10 3 97,598 543,710 287.758 255,952 990.91 549 R 265 10 74,835 419,680 220,679 199,001 959.76 437 U 3 22,763 124,030 67,079 56,951 ~1.l5 3,982 Bawal Tehsil T 80 17,951 110,676 58,171 52,505 246.71 449 R 80 16,006 98,532 51.677 46,855 246.35 400 U 1,945 12,144 6,494 5,650 0.36 33,733 Gurgaon District T 694 32 12 273,881 1,660,289 886,451 773,838 2,714.00 612 R 694 32 203,658 1,291,285 688,163 603,122 2,606.67 495 U 12 70,223 369,004 198,288 170,716 107.33 3,438 Pataudi Tehsil T 56 4 2 17,290 100,957 53,193 47,764 177.39 569 R 56 4 11,670 67,791 35,587 32,204 147.61 459 U 2 5,620 33,166 17,606 15,560 29.78 1,114 Gurgaon Tehsil T 147 2 5 119,778 629,508 342,527 286,981 738.82 852 R 147 2 69,574 380,541 207,862 172,679 . 688.15 553 U 5 50,204 248,967 134,665 114,302 50.67 4,913 Sohna Tehsil T 68 4 23,144 140,074 74,784 65,290 336.86 416 R 68 4 18,316 112,504 60,094 52,410 327.16 344 U 4,828 27,570 14,690 12,880 9.70 2,842 Taoru Tehsil T 82 2 19,320 126,169 67,072 59,097 225.19 560 R 82 2 16,319 108,841 57,762 51,079 220.67 493 U 3,001 17,328 9,310 8,018 4.52 3,834 Nuh Tehsil T 109 10 30,879 212,855 112,553 100,302 463.70 459 R 109 10 29,146 201,816 106,726 95,090 463.40 436 U 1,733 11,039 5,827 5,212 0.30 36,797

Contd ......

54 TABLE-A-l(PART-l) NUMBER OF VllLAGES, TOWNS, HOl.NEHOLDS, POPUATION AND ARFA S tate/Districtsl TI No. of Villages No. of No. of Population Area in Population Tehsils RI Inhabited Un- Towns Households Persons Males Females sq.kmS persq.km U Inhabited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Ferozepur lhirka Tehsil T 144 2 34,120 243,868 128,055 115,813 521.50 468 R 144 2 31,285 226,113 118,749 107,364 512.64 441 U 2,835 17,755 9,306 8,449 8.86 2,004 Punahana Tehsil T 88 8 29,350 206,858 108,267 98,591 290.15 713 ....R 88 8 27,348 193,679 101,383 92,296 286.65 676 U 1 2,002 13,179 6,884 6,295 3.50 3,765 Faridabad District T 413 19 6 391,426 2,194,586 1,193,063 1,001,523 2,151.00 1,020 R 413 19 146,265 973,242 523,570 449,672 1,928.86 505 U 6 245,161 1,221,344 669,493 551,851 222.14 5,498 Faridabad Tehsil T 60 3 2 235,959 1,178,007 646,425 531,582 422.25 2,790 R 60 3 17,074 115,700 61,867 53,833 213.58 542 U 2 218,885 1.062.307 584,558 477,749 208.67 5,091 Ballabgarh Tehsil T 83 4 29,391 187,458 101,248 86,210 320.65 585 R 83 . 4 29,391 187,458 101,248 86,210 320.65 585 U Pa,!wal Tehsil1 T 145 3 62,795 404,136 217,233 186.903 631.94 640 ..--. ',r , , '-. I R 145 3 45,621 303,414 163,585 139,829 623.64 487 , U 17,174 100,722 53,648 47,074 8.30 12,135

Hathin Tehsil T 80 6 29,153 2Q3;~67 108,925 94,942 359.34 567 /' R 80 6 27,481 192,951 103,036 89,915 357.35 540 U 1 1,672 10,916 5,889 5,027 1.99 5,485 Ho

55 TABLEA-l(pART-m NlJMBER OF TOWNS, HOUiEHOWS, POPULATION AND ARFA S tatelDistri ctlfahsilffown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HARYANA U 1,170,339 6,115,304 3,310,965 2,804,339 1,280.37 4,776 Panchkula * U 46,414 208,395 112,297 96,098 46.05 4,525 Kalka Tahsil U 12,831 60,439 32,631 27,808 13.92 4,342 Kalka(MC) U 6,586 30,830 16,794 14,036 3.39 9,094 Pinjore (M C+OG) U 6,245 29,609 15,837 13,772 10.53 2,812 (i) Pinjore (M C) U 5,296 25,410 13,631 11,779 7.09 3,584 Pinjore UA U 6,245 29,609 15,837 13,772 10.53 2,812 Panchkula Tahsil U 33,583 147,956 79,666 68,290 32.13 4,605 Panchkula Urban Estate (EO) U 32,301 140,925 75,897 65,028 25.50 5,526 Raipur Rani (CT) U 1,282 7,031 3,769 3,262 6.63 1,060 Ambala V 70,194 357,028 193,045 163,983 69.13 5,165 Naraingarh Tahsil U 3,473 18.210 9,565 8,645 7.93 2,296 N araingarh(M C) U 3,473 18.210 9,565 8,645 7.93 2,296 Ambala Tahsil U 66,721 338,818 183,480 155,338 61.20 5,536 Ambala (M CI ) U 28,135 139,279 74,016 . 65,263 16.94 8,222 (a) Ambala Sadar (M CI) U 20,600 106,568 55,750 50,818 6.33 16,835 (b) Ambala Canu. (CB) U 11,975 61,748 37,227 24,521 33.36 1.851 Babiyal (CT) U 4,183 21.644 11,360 10.284 2.21 9,794 Kardhan (CT) U 1,828 9.579 5,127 4,452 2.36 4,059 AmbalaUA U 32,575 168,316 92,977 75,339 39.69 4,241 Barara Tahsil U 0 0 0 0 0 Yamunanagar U 75,320 393,022 211,904 181,118 85.26 4,610 J agadhri Tahsil U 73.585 383,312 206,902 176,410 74.72 5,130 Sadaura (M C) U 2,398 13,176 6,936 6,240 6.75 1,952 Bila~pur (CT) U 1,714 9,621 5,102 4,519 8.51 1,131 M ustafabad (CT) U 1,578 8,516 4.494 4,022 7.16 1,189 Radaur(MC) U 2,155 11,737 6,170 5,567 2.59 4,532 Parakhpur (CT) U 1,761 8,740 4,702 4,038 1.35 6,474 (a) Yamunanagar (M Cl) U 36,652 189,696 101,782 87,914 16.32 11,624 (b) Jagadhri (M Cl ) U 19,601 101,290 55,844 45,446 24.80 4,084 (c) Sasauli (CT) U 3,269 15,754 8,511 7,243 2.88 5,470 Kansepur (CT) U 2,807 14.952 7.962 6,990 2.42 6.179 (MC) U 1,650 9,830 5,399 4,431 1.94 5,067 Yamunanagar UA U 59,522 306,740 166,137 140,603 44.00 6,971 Chhachhrauli Tahsil U 1,735 9.710 5,002 4,708 10.54 921 Chhachhrauli (M C) U 1,735 9,710 5,002 4,708 10.,54 921 Contd ......

56 TABLE-A-l(pART-m NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSFHOLDS, POPULATION AND ARFA S tate/Districttrahsilffown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kurukshetra U 40,287 215,511 116,602 98,909 61.20 3,521 Shahbad Tahsil U 7,071 37,289 19,780 17,509 16.00 2,331 Shahbad (M C) U 7,071 37,289 19,780 17509 16.00 2,331 Pehowa Tahsil U 6,275 33,564 17,912 15,652 7.50 4,475 Pehowa(MC) U 6,275 33,564 17,912 15,652 7.50 4,475 Thanesar Tahsil U 26,941 144,658 78,910 65,748 37.70 3,837 Thanesar (M CI+OG) U 22,939 122,319 66,978 55,341 35.7(1 3,426 (i) Thanesar (M CI) U 22,488 119,687 65,525 54,162 32.63 3,668 Ladwa(MC) U 4,002 22,339 11,932 10,407 2.00 11,170 ThanesarUA U 22,939 122,319 66,978 55,341 35.70 3,426 Kaithal U 33,483 183,482 98,885 84,597 84.86 2,162 Guhla Tahsil U 5,638 32,128 17,530 14,598 30.72 1,046 Cheeka(MC) U 5,638 32,128 17,530 14,598 30.72 1,046 Kaithal Tahsil U 27,845 151,354 81,355 69,999 54.14 2,796 Kaithal (M Cl ) U 21,914 117,285 63,098 54,187 43.75 2,681 Kalayat (MC) U 2,955 17,051 9,119 7,932 6.50 2,623 Pundri (MC) U 2,976 17,018 9,138 7,880 3.89 4,375 Kamal U 63,978 337,842 181,478 156,364 60.09 5,622 Nilokheri Tahsil U 7,259 38,606 20,602 18,004 10.94 3,529 Nilokheri (MC) U 3,144 16,405 8,599 7,806 4.69 3,498 Taraori (MC) U 4,1l5 22,201 12,003 10,198 6.25 3,552 Indri Tahsil U 2,606 14,511 7,739 6,772 0.95 15,275 Indri (MC) U 2,606 14,511 7,739 6,772 0.95 15,275 Kamal Tahsil U 44,726 231,846 124,757 107,089 31.27 7,414 Kamal (M CI+OG) U 43,044 221,236 117,875 103,361 25.10 8,814 (i) Kamal (M Cl) U 40,088 207,640 110,595 97,045 22.10 9,395 Uncha Siwana (CT) U 1,682 10,610 6,882 3,728 6.17 1,720 Kamal VA U 43,044 221,236 117,875 103.361 25.10 8,814 Assandh Tahsil U 4,092 22,707 12,090 10,617 3.95 5,749 Assandh (M C) U 4,092 22,707 12,090 10,617 3.95 5,749 Gharaunda Tahsil U 5,295 30,172 16,290 13,882 12.98 2,324 Gharaunda (M C) U 5,295 30,172 16,290 13,882 12.98 2,324 Panipat U 75,899 392,080 215,586 176,494 53.21 7,369 Panipat Tahsil U 70,682 362,214 199,246 162,968 48.73 7,433 (a) Panipat (M CI+OG) U 51,856 268,899 147,408 121,491 24.29 11,070 (i) Panipat (M Cl) U 50,428 261,740 143,644 118,096 21.70 12,062 (b) Panipat Taraf Ansar(CT) U 6,271 31,279 17,235 14,044 7.88 3,969 (c) Panipat Taraf Makhdurn Zadgan U 6,855 35,155 19,267 15,888 6.54 5,375 (CT) Contd ......

57 TABLEA-l(PART-II) NUMB~ OF TOWNS, HOlSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND ARFA S tatelDistrictlfahsilffown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (d) Panipat Taraf Rajputan (CT) U 3,918 18,815 10,940 7,815 5.10 3,689 Asankhurd (CT) U 1,182 8,066 4,396 3,670 4.92 1,639 Panipat UA U 68,900 354,148 194,850 159,298 43.81 8,084 Israna Tahsil U Sarnalkha Tahsil U 5,217 29,866 16,340 13,526 4.48 6,661 Samalkha (M C) U 5,211 29,866 16,340 13,526 4.48 6,667 Sonipat U 58,756 321,375 174,041 147,334 65.01 4,943 Gohana Tahsil U 8,605 48,532 25,925 22,601 6.57 7,381 Gohana(MC) U 8,605 48,532 25,925 22,607 6.51 7,381 Ganaur Tahsil U 5,139 29,006 15,602 13,404 9.06 3,202 Ganaur(MC) U 5,139 29,006 15,602 13,404 9.06 3,202 Sonipat Tahsil U 41,834 225,074 122,480 102,594 41.75 4,114 Sonipat (M Cl+0G) U 41,834 225,014 122,480 102,594 47.15 4,714 (i) Sonipat (M Cl) U 40,042 214,914 117,020 97,954 37.69 5,704 Sonipat VA U 41,834 225,074 122,480 102,594 47.75 4,714 Kharkhoda Tahsil U 3,178 18,763 IO,034 8,729 1.63 11,511 Kharkhoda (M C) U 3,178 18,163 IO,034 8,729 1.63 11,511 Jind U 43,653 241,577 130,077 111,500 32.57 7,417 Narwana Tahsil U 11,428 64,546 34,663 29,883 6.57 9,824 N arwana (M C) U 9,092 50,435 27,073 23,362 6.00 8,406 Uchana(MC) U 2,336 14,111 7,590 6,521 0.57 24,756 Jind Tahsil U 25,128 135,855 73,407 62,448 15.30 8,879 Jind (M Cl) U 25,128 135,855 73,407 62,448 15.30 8,879 Julana Tahsil U 2,344 13,635 7,237 6,398 1.22 11,176 Julana(MC) U 2,344 13,635 7,237 6,398 l.22 11,176 Safidon Tahsil U 4,753 27,541 14,770 12,771 9.48 2,905 Safidon (M C) U 4,753 27,541 14,770 12,771 9.48 2,905 Fatehabad * U 26,157 142,157 75,646 66,511 29.54 4,812 Ratia Tahsil U 4,357 23,826 12,673 11.153 4.00 5,957 Ratia(MC) U 4.357 23,826 12,673 11,153 4.00 5,957 Tohana Tahsil U 10,841 58,414 31,024 27,390 15.18 3,848 J akhalmandi (M C) U 1,270 6,895 3,748 3,147 1.42 4,856 Tohana (MC) U 9,571 51,519 27,276 24,243 13.76 3,744 Fatehabad Tahsil U 10,959 59,917 31,949 27,968 IO.36 5,783 FatetIabad (M C) U 10,959 59,917 31,949 27,968 10.36 5,783 Sirsa U 54,075 293,465 156,425 137,040 102.33 2,868 Dabwali Tahsil U 10,040 53,811 28,338 25,473 22.33 2,4IO M andi Dabwali (M C) U 10,040 53,811 28,338 25,473 22.33 2,410 Kalanwali (MC) U 4,395 25,163 13,300 11,863 40.22 626 Sirsa Tahsil U 34,476 185,898 99,293 86,605 66.65 2,789 Sirsa(M Cl) U 30,081 160,735 85,993 74,742 26.43 6,082 Contd ......

58 TABLE-A-l(pART-m NUMBER OF TOWNS , HOUSFHOWS, POPUATION AND ARFA S tatelDistrict!fahsilffown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rania Tahsil U 3,837 20,961 11,119 9,842 10.63 1,972 Rania (MC) U 3,837 20,961 11,119 9,842 10.63 1,972 Ellenabad (M C) U 5,722 32,795 17,675 15,120 2.72 12,057 Ellenabad (M C) U 5,722 32,795 17,675 15,120 2.72 12,057 Hisar U 75,917 398,118 215,915 182,203 63.12 6,307 Adampur Tahsil U Hisar Tahsil U 59,209 307,255 167,157 140,098 52.79 5,820 Uklanamandi (M C) U 1,960 10,937 5,862 5,075 1.86 5,880 Barwa1a (M C) U 5,847 33,132 17,500 15,632 1.50 22,088 Hisar (M CI+OG) U 51,402 263,186 143,795 119,391 49.44 5,324 (i) Hisar (M CI ) U 49,896 256,689 140,083 116,606 45.43 5,650 HisarUA U 51,402 263,186 143,795 119,391 49.43 5,324 Narnaund Tahsil U 2,664 15,116 8,129 6,987 53,986 Narnaund (MC) U 2,664 15,116 8,129 6,987 53,986 Hansi Tahsil U 14,044 75,747 40,629 35,118 10.05 7,537 Hansi (M CI) U 14,044 75,747 40,629 35,118 10.05 7,537 Bhiwani U 49,237 270,393 145,464 124,929 51.44 5,256 Bawani Khera Tahsil U 3,074 17,424 9,273 8,151 6.00 2,904 Bawani Khera (M C) U 3,074 17,424 9,273 8,151 6.00 2,904 Bhiwani Tahsil U 31,310 169,531 91,697 77,834 27.64 6,134 Bhiwani (M Cl ) U 31,310 169,531 91,697 77,834 27.64 6,134 Tosharn Tahsil U 2,015 11,272 5,981 5,291 4.91 2,296 Tosharn (MC) U 2,015 11,272 5,981 5,291 4.91 2,296 Siwani Tahsil U 2,845 15,850 8,463 7,387 4.88 3,248 Siwani (MC) U 2,845 15,850 8,463 7,387 4.88 3,248 Loham Tahsil U 1,950 11.421 5,991 5,430 2.59 4,410 Loham (MC) U 1,950 11,421 5,991 5,430 2.59 4,410 Dadri Tahsil U 8,043 44,895 24,059 20,836 5.42 8,283 Charkhi Dadri (MC) U 8,043 44,895 24,059 20,836 5.42 8,283 Rohtak U 60,961 329,604 176,994 152,610 38.63 8,532 Maharn Tahsil U 3,323 18,174 9,762 8,412 3.35 5,425 Maharn(MC) U 3,323 18,174 9,762 8,412 3.35 5,425 Rohtak Tahsil U 57,638 311,430 167,232 144,198 35.28 8,827 Ka1anaur (M C) U 3,045 16,853 8,945 7,908 5.70 2,957 Rohtak (M Cl+0G) U 54,593 294,577 158,287 136,290 29.58 9,959 (i) Rohtak (M Cl ) U 52,870 286,807 154,148 132,659 28.38 10,106 RohtakUA U 54,593 294,577 158,287 136,290 29.58 9,959 Jhaiiar * U 37,268 195,097 107,017 88,080 46.97 4,154 Beri Tahsil U 2,858 16,162 8,723 7,439 2.59 6,240 Contd ......

59 TABLE-A-l(PART-II) NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOUSEHOWS, POPUA1l0N AND ARE<\. StatelDistrict!fahsillfown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Beri (MC) U 2,858 16,162 8,723 7,439 2.59 6,240 Bahadurgarh Tahsil U 27,607 139,933 77,318 62,615 38.38 3,646 Ladrawan (CT) U 1,592 8,008 4,445 3,563 8.73 917 (a) Bahadurgarh (M CI+OG) U 25,024 126,746 70,057 56,689 28.81 4,399 (i) Bahadurgarh (M CI) U 23,595 119,846 65,859 53.987 21.00 5,707 (b) Sankhol (CT) U 991 5,179 2,816 2,363 0.84 6,165 Bahadurgarh UA U 26,015 131,925 72,873 59,052 29.65 4,449 Jhqjjar Tahsil U 6,803 39,002 20,976 18,026 6.00 6,500 Jhqjjar (M C) U 6,803 39,002 20,976 18,026 6.00 6,500 Mahendragarh U 18,648 109,636 58,235 51,401 29.98 3,657 M ahendragarh Tahsil U 5,914 34,518 18,242 16,276 12.96 2,663 Kanina(MC) U 1,773 10,195 5,298 4,897 2.36 4,320 M ahendragarh (M C) U 4,141 24,323 12,944 11,379 10.60 2,295 Namau! Tahsil U 12,734 75,118 39,993 35,125 17.02 4,414 Ateli (MC) U 978 5,673 3,051 2,622 1.65 3,438 N amaul (M CI) U 10,588 62,077 33,050 29,027 9.67 6,420 Nagal Chaudhry (CT) U 1,168 7,368 3,892 3,476 5.70 1,293 Rewari U 24,708 136,174 73,573 62,601 31.51 4,322 Kosli Tahsil U Rewari Tahsil U 22,763 124,030 67,079 56,951 31.15 3,982 Dharuhera (CT) U 4,057 18,892 10,749 8,143 11.49 1,644 Rewari (M Cl ) U 17,888 100,684 53,935 46,749 11.78 8,547 Rewari (Rural) (CT) U 818 4,454 2,395 2,059 7.88 565 Bawal Tahsil U 1,945 12,144 6,494 5,650 33,733 Bawal (MC) U 1,945 12,144 6,494 5,650 33,733 Gurgaon U 70,223 369,004 198,288 170,716 107.33 3,438 Pataudi Tahsil U 5,620 33,166 17,606 15,560 29.78 1,114 HaiIeymandi (MC) U 2,973 17,081 9,080 8,001 16.27 1,050 Pataudi (MC) U 2,647 16,085 8,526 7,559 13.51 1,191 Gurgaon Tahsil U 50,204 248,967 134,665 114,302 50.67 4,913 Farrukhnagar (MC) U 1,671 9,521 5,053 4,468 3.28 2,903 Dundahera (CT) U 2,382 10,626 6,235 4,391 5.75 1,848 (a) Gurgaon (M CI+OG) U 40,559 201,322 108,491 92,831 29.30 6,871 (i) Gurgaon (M CI ) U 34,501 172,955 92,934 80,021 16.57 10,438 (b) Gurgaon (Rural) (CT) U 3,282 17,110 9,282 7,828 7.56 2,263 (c) Sukhrali (CT) U 2,310 10,388 5,604 4,784 4.78 2,173 Gurgaon UA U 46,151 228,820 123,377 105,443 41.64 5,495 Sohna Tahsil U 4,828 27,570 14,690 12,880 9.70 2,842 Sohna(MC) U 4,828 27,570 14,690 12,880 9.70 2,842 Taoru Tahsil U 3,001 17,328 9,310 8,018 4.52 3,834 Taoru (MC) U 3,001 17,328 9,310 8,018 4.52 3,834 Contd ......

60 TABLE-A-l(pART-m NUMBER OF TOWNS, HOlBmOLDS, POPULATION AND ARFA S tatelDistricflfahsilffown Status No. of Persons Males Females Area in Sq. Population per Households Km Sq.Km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Nuh Tahsil U 1,733 11,039 5,827 5,212 36,797 Nuh (MC) U 1,733 11,039 5,827 5,212 36,797 Ferozepur Jhirka Tahsil U 2,835 17,755 9,306 8,449 8.86 2,004 Ferozepur Jhirka (MC) U 2,835 17,755 9,306 8,449 8.86 2,004 Punahana Tahsil U 2,002 13,179 6,884 6,295 3.50 3,765 Punahana (M C) U 2,002 13,179 6,884 6,295 3.50 3,765 Faridabad U 245,161 1,221,344 669,493 551,851 222.14 5,498 Faridabad Tahsil U 218,885 1,062,307 584,558 477,749 208.67 5,091 Tilpat (CT) U 1,238 6,369 3,489 2,880 9.92 642 Faridabad (M Corp.) U 217,647 1,055,938 581,069 474,869 198.75 5,313 Ballabgarh Tahsil U Palwal Tahsil U 17,174 100,722 53,648 47,074 8.30 12,135 Palwal (M CI) U 17,174 100,722 53,648 47,074 8.30 12,135 Hathin Tahsil U 1,672 10,916 5,889 5,027 1.99 5,485 Hathin (MC) U 1,672 10,916 5,889 5,027 1.99 5,485 Hodal Tahsil U 7,430 47,399 25,398 22,001 3.18 14,905 Hassanpur (MC) U 1,375 9,090 4,887 4,203 0.93 9,774 Hodal (MC) U 6,055 38,309 20,511 17,798 2.25 17,026

61 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TElUUTORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. State/ District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Tahsil at 2001 Territorial its area DistrictfThhsii its area DistrictfThhsii change in Sq. Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which Km. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Panchkula Newly (i) Entire Kalka 153.98 Kalka Tahsil of 786.95 District formed Tahsil (112 Ambala District Villages) including Kalka T O'Ml. Pinjore Census To'Ml and HMT Pinjore M.C

(ii) Entire 498.19 Panchkula Panchkula Tahsil- Tahsil of 96 Villages Ambala District

(iii) 45 Villages 134.78 Naraingarh from Naraingarh Tahsil of Tahsil of Ambala Ambala District District

(i) Kalka Tahsil Kalka Tahsil Entire Kalka 153.98 Kalka Tahsil of 153.98 Tahsil-I 12 Ambala District Villages including Kalka To'Ml, Pinjore Census To'Ml and HMT Pinjore M.C of Ambala District

(ii) Panchkula Panchkula (i) Entire 498.19 Panchula Tahsil 632.97 Tahsil Tahsil Panchkula Tahsil of Ambala (96 Villages) District

(ii) 45 Villages 134.78 Naraingarh from Naraingarh Tahsil of Tahsil of Ambala Ambala District District

2 Ambala (i) Entire Kalka 'is3.98 Kalka Tahsil of -786.95 District Tahsil (I 12 newly formed Villages) Panchkula District including Kalka TO'Ml,Pinjore Census To'Ml

Contd ......

62 A-I APPFNDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. S tate! District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Tahsil at 2001 Territorial its area DistrictlTahsil its area DistrictlTahsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq.Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (ii) Entire 498.19 Panchkula Tahsil Panchkula of newly formed Tahsil (96 Panchkula District Villages) including Panchkula Urban Estate

(iii) 45 Villages 134.78 Panchkula Tahsil from newly formed Naraingarh Panchkula District Tahsil

(i) Naraingarh Naraingarh 45 Villages from 134.78 Panchkula Tahsil -134.78 Tahsil Tahsil Naraingarh of newly formed Tahsil of Panchkula District Ambala District

(ii) Ambala Tahsil Ambala 5 Villages from 27.31 Barara Tahsil of -27.31 Tahsil Ambala Tahsil Ambala District of Ambala District (iii) Barara Tahsil Barara Tahsil 5 Villages from 27.31 Ambala Tahsil 27.31 Ambala Tahsil of of Ambala Ambala District District

3 Yamunanagar Yamunanagar 13 Villages from 45.09 Thanesar Tahsil of -45.09 District District Jagadhri Tahsil Kurukshetra of Yamunanagar District District

(i) Jagadhri Tahsil Jagadhri 13 Villages from '45.09 Thanesar Tahsil of -45.09 Tahsil Jagadhri T ahsi! Kurukshetra of Yamunanagar District District

(ii) Chhachharauli Chhachhrauli no change no change Tahsil Tahsil ,. 4 Kurukshetra Kurukshetra (i) 2 Villages from 5.32 Kamal Tahsil of 1 village from '10.95 Kaithal Tahsil of 84.87 District District Kamal Tahsil of District Kamal Pehowa Tahsil Kaithal District Kamal District of Kurukshetra District Contd ......

63 A-I APPENDIX CHANGEB IN'IERRIIORIAL l.NITS DURING 1991-2001 Sl. State/ District! 1991 Thrritory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area District!Ihhsil its area District!Ihhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (ii) 4 Villages 22.12 Kaithal Tahsil from Kaithal of District Tahsil of Kaithal Kaithal District

(iii) 13 Villages 45.09 Jagadhri Tahsil from Jagadhri of District Tahsil of Yamunanagar Yamunanagar District (iv) 3 Villages 23.29 G:Jhla Tahsil of from G:Jhla District Kaithal Tahsil of District Kaithal

(i) 9J.ahood Tahsil Ne\\ly 79 Villages from 277.22 Thanesar Tahsil 277.22 formed Thanesar Tahsil of District including 9J.ahood Kurukshetra to'Ml of Kurukshetra District

(ii) Pehow.l Tahsil Pehow.l i) Villages from 23.29 G:Jhla Tahsil of (i) 5 Villages '2.1.53 Thanesar Tahsil of -7.64 Tahsil G:Jhla Tahsil of District Kaithal from Pehow.l District District Kaithal Tahsil of Kurukshetra District Kurukshetra ii) 1 Villages from 1.55 Thanesar Tahsil (ii) 1 Village ''10.95 Kaithal Tahsil of Thanesar Tahsil of District from Pehow.l District Kaithal of District Kurkshetra Tahsil of Kurukshetra District District Kurukshetra

(iii) Thanesar Tahsil Thanesar i) 2 Villages from 5.32 Kamal Tahsil of (i) 79 Villages '2.77.22 9J.ahood Tahsil -184.71 Tahsil Kamal Tahsil of District Kamal from Thanesar Ne\\ly formed of Kamal District Tahsil including District S1ahOOd To'Ml Kurukshetra

(ii) 4 Villages 22.12 Kaithal Tahsil (ii) 1 village 'i.55 Pehow.l Tashil of from Kaithal of District from Thanesar District Tahsil of District Kaithal Tahsil of Kurukshetra Kaithal District Kurukshetra

Contd......

64 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 Sl. State! District! 1991 Thrritory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictlThhsii its area DistrictlThhsii change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) 5 Villages 21.53 PehoW

5 Kaithal Kaithal (i) 4 Villages fro m 30.20 Tahsil Nar\Wlla (i) 3 Villages ~3.29 PehoW

(ii) Kaithal Tahsil Kaithal (i)7 Villages of 45.85 'Guhla Tahsil of (i)4 Villages of 22.12 Thanesar Tahsil of -48.33 Tahsil Tahsil Guhla of District Kaithal Tahsil Kaithal District District Kaithal of District Kurukshetra Kaithal (ii)4 Villages from 30.20 Narwana Tahsil (ii) 1 0 Villages 93.31 Nar\Wlla Tahsil of Tahsil Nar\Wlla of of District Jind of Tahsil District Jind District Jind Kaithal of District Kaithal (iii) 1 Village from 4.52 Jind Tahsil of (iii) 1 Village of 24.42 Assanclh Tahsil of Tahsil Jind of District Jin d Tahsil Kaithal Karnal District District Jind of District

Contd ......

65 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 Sl. State! District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Tahsil at 2001 Territorial its area DistrictfThhsil its area DistrictfThhsil change Unit ---N-a-m-e---A-r-e-a-i-n etc., from ---N-a-m-e---A-r-e-a-i-n etc., from which in Sq. Sq. Km which this Sq. Km this" area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iv) 1 Village 10.95 Pehowa Tahsil from Tahsil of Kurukshetra Pehowa of District Districh Kurukshetra

6 Karnal District Kamal (i) 45 Villages 547.48 Assandh Tahsil (i) 9 Villages of 37.07 Panipat Tahsil of 560.37 District from Assandh of District Kamal Tahsil of District Panipat Tahsil of District Panipat District Kamal Panipat

(ii) I Village from 24.42 Kaithal Tahsil (ii) 2 Villages of 5.32 Thanesar Tahsil of Kaithal Tahsil of of District Kamal Tahsil of District District Kaithal Kaithal District Kamal Kurukshetra

(iii) 4 Villages 30.86 Safidon Tahsil from Safidon of District lind Tahsil of District Jind

(i) Nilokheri Tahsil Newly 76 Villages 391.58 Kamal Tahsil of 391.58 formed including District Kamal Nilokheri & Taraori Town

(ii) Indri Tahsil Newly 108 Villages from 350.37 Kamal Tahsil of 350.37 formed Kamal Tahsil District Kamal including Indri Town

(iii) Kamal Tahsil Kamal Tahsil 2 Villages from 31.20 Assandh Tahsil (i) 2 Villages of ~.32 Thanesar Tahsil of -1091.45 Assandh Tahsil of of District Kamal Tahsil of District District Kamal Kamal District Kamal Kurukshetra

(ii) 108 Villages ~50.37 Indri Tahsil Newly including Indri formed town of Karnal Tahsil of District Kamal Contd...... •

66 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TrnR1TORIAL UNITS DURlNG 1991-2001 SI. S tatel District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictlTahsil its area DistrictlThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) 76 Villages 391.58 Newly formed including Nilokheri Tahsil Taraori town of Karnal Tahsil of District Karnal

(iv) 60 Villages 338.31 Newly formed including Gharaunda Tahsil Gharaunda town of kamal Tahsil of District Karnal (v) 9 Villages of 37.07 Panipat Tahsil of Karnal Tahsil of District Panipat District Karnal

(iv) Assandh Tahsil Assandh (i) 42 Villages 547.48 Assandh Tahsil (i) 1 Village of 12.16 Gharaunda Tashil 559.40 Tahsil induding Assandh of District Assandh Tahsil newly formed transfer from town of District Panipat District Panipat Panipat (ii) I Village form 24.42 Kaithal Tahsil (iil 2 Villages of 31.20 Kamal Tahsil of Kaithal Tahsil of of District Assandh Tahsil District Kamal District Kaithal Kaithal (iii)4 Villages 30.86 Safidon Tahsil from Safidon of District lind Tahsil of District lind (v) Gharaunda Newly 60 Villages 338.31 Karnal Tahsil of 350.47 Tahsil Formed including District Kamal Gharaunda Town from Karnal Tahsil of District Karnal 1 Village of 12.16 Assandh Tahsil Assandh Tahsil of of District District Kamal Karnal 7 Panipat District Panipat 9 Villages of 37.07 Karnal Tahsil of 45 Villages and 547.48 Assandh Tahsil of -510.41 District Karnal Tahsil of District Karnal Assandh Town Kamal District District Kamal of District Panipat Contd ......

67 A-I APPFNDIX CHANGES IN TERRffORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. S tatel District! 1991 Thrritory added and Name ot Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area Dis tri ctlThhsil its area Distri ctfThhsii change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (i) Panipat Tahsil Panipat 9 Villages fro m 37.07 Karoal Tahsil of (i) 82 Villages '450.54 Newly formed -744.95 Tahsil Karoal Tahsil of District Kamal and Samalkha Samalkha Tahsil District Kamal Town of Tahsil Panipat of District Panipat (ii) 36 Villages ~31.48 Newly formed ofPanipat Israna Tashi! Tahsil of District Panipat (ii) Samalkha Tahsil Newly 82 Villagesand 450.54 Panipat Tahsil 450.54 formed Samalkha Town of District from Panipat Panipat Tahsil of District Panipat (iii) Israna Tahsil Newly 36 Villages from 331.48 Panipat Tahsil 331.48 formed Panipat Tahsil of of District District Panipat Panipat 8 Sonipat Sonipat 83 Villages from 802.47 Rohtak District 802.47 District District Gohana Tahsil including Gohana Town of District Rohtak (i) Gohana Tahsil Gohana 83 Villages from 802.47 Rohtak District 802.47 Tahsil Gohana Tahsil transferred including Gohana from District Town of District Rohtak Rohtak

(ii) Clanaur Tahsil Clanaur 2 Villages of 8.17 Sonipat Tashil of -8.17 Tahsil Clanaur Tahsil District Sonipat of District Sonipat (iii) Sonipat Tahsil Sonipat 2 Villages of 8.17 Clanaur Tahsil of 45 Villages of 308.91 Newly formed -300.74 Tahsil Clanaur Tahsil of District Sonipat Sonipat Tahsil Kharkhoda Tahsil District Sonipat of Sonipat of District Sonipat Tahsil of

(iv) Kharkhoda Newly 45 Villages from 308.91 Sonipat T ahsi! 308.91 Tahsil formed Sonipat Tahsil of of District District Sonipat Sonipat 9 Jind District lind District (j) 10 Villages 93.31 Kaithal Tahsil (i) 4 Villages of ~0.20 Kaithal Tahsil of 51.94 from Kaithal of District Narw.lna Tahsil District Kaithal Tahsil of District Kaithal of District lind Kaithal

Contd ......

68 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRIIORIAL UNJIS DURING 1991-2001 Sl. Statel District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictlThhsil its area DistrictlThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (ii) I Village from 24.21 Gohana Tahsil (ii) I Village of 4.52 Kaithal Tahsil of Gohana Tahsil of of District Jind Tahsil of District Kaithal District Rohtak Rohtak District lind

(iii) 4 Villages 30.86 Assandh Tahsil of of Safidon District Kamal Tahsil of District lind

(i) Narwana Tahsil Narw.ma 10 Villages of 93.31 Kaithal Tahsil 4 Villages of 30.20 Kaithal Tahsil of 63.11 Tahsil Kaithal tahsil of of District Narwana Tahsil District Kaithal District Kaithal Kaithal of District lind

(ii) lind Tahsil lind Tahsil (i) 30 Villages 269.49 Ne\\l.y formed -274.01 of lind Tahsil lulana Tahsil of including lulana District lind TOm!

(ii) 1 Village 4.52 Kaithal District transferred to Kaithal Tahsil of District Kaithal

(iii) Safidon Tahsil Safidon 1 Village from 24.21 Gohana Tahsil 4 Villages of 30.86 Assandh Tahsil of -6.65 Tahsil Gohana Tahsil of of District Safidon Tahsil District Kamal District Rohtak Rohtak of District lind

(iv) Julana Tahsil Ne"lry formed 30 Villages from 269.49 Jind Tahsil of 269.49 Tahsil Jmd along District lind \\-ith Julana tOm! of District Jind

10 Fatehabad Ne\\l.y (i) 64 Villages of 510.86 District Hisar 2526.72 District formed Entire Ratia Tahsil and Ratia TOm! from District Hisar

(ii) 84 Villages of 600.50 District Hisar entire Tohana Tahsil and Tohana town of District Hisar

Contd ......

69 A-1 APPENDlX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. Statel DistricU 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Territorial its area Distri cUThhsil its area Distri cUThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) 86 Villages of 1315.73 District Hisar entire Fatehabad Tahsil and Fatehabad Town from District Hisar

(iv) 6 Villages of 99.63 Hisar Tahsil of Hisar Tahsil of District Hisar Di ~trict Hisar

(i) Ratia Tahsil Transfered 64 Villages 510.86 District Hisar 510.86 from District including Ratia Hisar town from District Hisar

(ii) Tohana Tahsil Transferred Entire Tohana 600.50 District Hisar 600.50 fromDistrict Tahsil 84 Villages Hisar including Tohana and Jakhal Mandi town of District Hisar

(iii) Fatehabad Tahsil Transferred (i) 86 Villages of 1315.73 District Hisar 1415.36 from District Fatehabad Tahsil Hisar and Fatehabad Town of District Hisar

(ii) 6 Villages 99.63 Tahsil Hisar from Tahsil Hisar District Hisar of District Hisar

11 Sirsa District Sirsa District No Change No Change

(i) Dabwali Tahsil Dabwali (3 Villages from 38.88 Sirsa Tahsil 1) 3 Villages of '27.61 Sirsa Tahsil of 11.27 Tahsil Sirsa Tahsil of Dabwali Tahsil District Sirsa District Sirsa of Sirsa District

(ii) Sirsa Tahsil Sirsa Tahsil i) 8 Villages from 35.34 Rania Tahsil of 3 Villages of '38.88 Dabwali Tahsil of 24.07 Rania Tahsil of District Sirsa Sirsa Tahsil of District Sirsa District Sirsa District Sirsa ii) 3 Villages from 27.61 Dabwali Tahsil Dabwali Tahsil of of District Sirsa District Sirsa

Contd ...... •

70 A-1 APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRfIORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. State! District! 1991 Thrritory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictlThhsil its area DistrictlThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(iii) Rania Tahsil Rania Tahsil 1 Village from 5.01 Ellenabad Tahsil 8 Villages of "35.34 Sirsa Tahsil of -30.33 Ellenabad Tahsil Rania Tahsil of District Sirsa .... of District Sirsa District Sirsa (iii) (iv) Ellenabad Ellenabad 1 Village from '5.01 Rania Tahsil of -5.01 Tahsil Tahsil Ellenabad Tahsil District Sirsa of District Sirsa

12 Hisar District Hisar District (i) 2 Villages from 35.79 Maham Tahsil (i) 86 Villages "1315.73 Nemy formed -2481.07 Maham Tahsil of of District of entire Tahsil District Fatehabad District Rohtak Rohtak Fatehabad and Fatehabad town of District Hisar

(ii) 1 Village from 9.86 Ba\WIli Khera (ii) 6 Villages of 1fJ9.63 Tahsil Fatehabad of Ba\WIli khera Tahsil of Hisar Tahsil of Nemyformed Tahsil of District District Bhi\WIli District Hisar District Fatehabad Bhi\WIli

(iii) 64 Villages '510.86 Nemyformed of entire Ratia District Fatehabad Tahsil and Ratia town of District Hisar

(iv) 84 Villages "600.50 Nemy formed of entire District Fatehabad Tohana Tahsil and Tohana& Jakhal Mandi town

(i) Adampur Tahsil Nemy 33 Villages of 481.96 Hisar Tahsil of 481.96 formed Hisar Tahsil of District Hisar District Hisar

(ii) Hisar Tahsil Hisar Tahsil 12 Villages of 129.05 Hansi Tahsil of (i) 6 Villages of 1fJ9.63 Tahsil Fatehabad of -452.54 Hansi Tahsil of District Hisar Hisar Tahsil of Nemyformed District Hisar District Hisar District Fatehabad

(ii) 33 Villages '481.96 Nemy formed of Hisar Tahsil Adampur Tahsil of District Hisar

Contd ...... •

71 A-I APPFNDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. Statel DistricU 1991 Thrritory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictfThhsil its area DistrictfThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) Narnaund Tahsil Narnaund 1 Village of '22.56 Hansi Tahsil of -22.56 Tahsil NarnalIDd Tahsil District Hisar of District Hisar

(iv) Hansi Tahsil Hansi Tahsil (i) I Village from 9.86 Bawani Khera 12 Villages of 'i29.05 Hisar Tahsil of -60.84 Bawani Khera Tahsil of Hansi Tahsil of District Hisar Tashil of District District Bhiwani District Hisar Bhiwani

(ii) I village of 22.56 NarnalIDd Tahsil NarnalIDd Tahsil of Distraict of District Hisar Hisar (iii) 2 Villages of 35.79 Maham Tahsil Maham Tahsil of of District District Rohtak Rohtak

13 Bhiwani 3 Villages from 53.39 Rohtak Tahsil 1 Village of ~.86 Hansi Tahsil of 43.53 District Rohtak Tahsil of of District Tahsil Bawani District Hisar District Rohtak Rohtak Khera of District Bhiwani

(i) Bawani Khera Bawani (i) 1 Village of ~.86 Hansi Tahsil of -150.72 Tahsil Khera Tahsil Bawani Khera District Hisar Tahsil of District Bhiwani

(ii) 6 Villages of 'i 23.88 Bhiwani Tahsil of Bawani Khera District Bhiwani Tahsil of District Bhiwani

(iii) 2 Villages "16.98 Tosham Tahsil of of Bawani District Bhi wani Khera Tahsil of District Bhiwani

(ii) Bhiwani Tahsil Bhiwani (i) 6 Villages from 123.88 Bawani Khera 1 Village of 'i.57 Tosham Tahsil of 175.70 Tahsil Bawani Khera Tahsil of Tahsil Bhiwani District Bhiwani Tahsil of District District Bhiwani of District Bhiwani Bhiwani

(ii)3 Villages from 53.39 Rohtak Tahsil Rohtak Tahsil of of District District Rohtak Rohtak

Contd ......

72 A·l APPENDlX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991·2001 SI. Statel District! 1991 Thrritory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area DistrictlThhsii its area DistrictlThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) Tosham Tahsil Tosham (i) 8 Villages of 112.67 Siwani Tahsil of 131.22 Tahsil Siwani Tahsil of District Bhiwani District Bhiwani

(ii) 2 Villages of 16.98 Bawani Khera Bawani Khera Tahsil of Tahsil of District District Bhiwani Bhiwani (iii) 1 Village 1.57 Bhiwani Tahsil from Bhiwani of District Tahsil of District Bhiwani Bhiwani

(iv) Siwani Tahsil Siwani Tahsil (i) 5 Villages of "70.42 Loharu Tahsil of -183.09 Tahsil Siwani of District Bhiwani District Bhiwani

(ii) 8 Villages of "i 12.67 Tosham Tashil of Siwani Tahsil District Bhiwani

(v) Loharu Tahsil Loharu 5 Villages from 70.42 Siwani Tahsil of 70.42 Tahsil Siwani Tahsil of District Bhiwani District Bhimmi (vi) Dadri Tahsil Dadri Tahsil No Change

14 Rohtak Rohtak (i) 83 Villages 'li02.47 Gohana Tahsil of -2773.53 District District of entire District Sonipat Gohana Tahsil including GohanaMCof District Rohtak

(ii) 2 Villages of '35.79 Hansi Tahsil of Maham Tahsil District Hisar of District Rohtak (iii) 3 Villages '53.39 Bhiwani Tahsil of of Rohtak: District Bhiwani Tahsil of District Rohtak: (iv) 60 Villages '445.19 Bahadurgarh Tahsil of Bahadurgarh newly formed Tahsil including District Jhaijar Bahadurgarh town Contd ......

73 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRITORIAL UNIIS DURING 1991-2001 SI. State! District! 1991 Territory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Tahsil at 2001 Thrritorial its area Dis trictlTahsil its area DistrictlTahsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (v) 199 Villages 1412.48 Jhajjar Tahsil of of Jhajjar Tahsil newly formed including Jhajjar District Jhajjar town

(vi) 1 village of 24.21 Safidon Tahsil of Gohana Tahsil lind District transferred to Safidon Tahsil of lind District

(i) Maham Tahsil Maham 2 Villages of 35.79 Hansi Tahsil of -35.79 Tahsil Maham Tahsil District Risar of District Rohtak

(ii) Rohtak Tahsil Rohtak (i) 3 Villages of 53.39 Bhiwani Tahsil of -53.39 Tahsil Tahsil Rohtak District Bhiwani of District Rohtak

15 Jhajjar Newly (i) 60 Villages of 445.19 Bahadurgarh 1897.77 District formed Bahadurgarh Tahsil of Tahsil including District Rohtak Bahadurgarh Town

(ii) 199 Villages 1412.48 Jhajjar Tahsil of from Jhajjar District Rohtak Tahsil, including Jhajjar Town

(iii) 6 Villages 40.10 Kosli, Tahsil of from Kosli Tahsil District Rewari of District Rewari

(i) Beri Tahsil Newly 39 Villages from 355.99 Jhajjar Tahsil of 355.99 fromed Jhajjar Tahsil District Robtak including Beri Town of District Rohtak

(ii) Bahadurgarh Bahadurgarh (i) 60 Villages 445.19 Bahadurgarh 511.43 Tahsil Tahsil from Tahsil Tahsil of transferred Bahadurgarh and District Ro h t ak from District Bahadurgarh Rohtak T own of District Rohtak

Contd ...... •

74 A-I APPENDIX CHANGES IN TFRRITORIAL UNITS DURING 1991-2001 SI. State! DistricU 1991 Territory added and Name of Territory reduced and Name of Net area No. 'fuhsil at 2001 Territorial its area Distri cUThhsil its area Distri cUThhsii change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. Km this area is added Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (ii) 9 Villages 66.24 Jhajjar Tahsil of from Jhajjar District Rohtak Tahsil ..... (iii) Jhajjar Tahsil Jhalliar (i) 6 Villages from 40.10 Kosli Tahsil of (i) 9 Villages of '66.24 Bahadurgarh Tahsil 1030.35 Tahsil Kosli Tahsil of District Rew.rri Jhajjar Tahsil of District JhaDar transferred Dist rict Rew.rri from District Rohtak

(ii) 199 Villages 1412.48 Rohtak District (ii) 39 Villages '355.99 NeWly formed Beri from JhaDar of JhaDar Tahsil Tahsil of JhaDar Tahsil and Town and Beri Town District from District Rohtak

16 Mah en dragarh No Olange District (i) Mahendragarh No Olange Tahsil (ii) Narnaul Tahsil No Olange

lZ Rewari District Rew.rri 6 Villages of 40.10 Jhajjar Tahsil of -40.10 District Kosli Tahsil of District JhaDar District Rew.rri

(i) Baw.il Tahsil Baw.il Tahsil No Olange

(ii) Kosli Tahsil Kosli Tah

(iii) Rew.rri Tahsil Rewari Tahsil 6 Villages of 24.96 Kosli Tahsil of -24.96 Rewari Tahsil of District Rew.rri District Rewari

18 Gurgaon Gurgaon No Olange District District

(i) Pataudi Tahsil Pataudi No Olange Tahsil

(ii) Gurgaon Tahsil Gurgaon 72 Villages of 336.86 NeWly formed -336.86 Tahsil Gurgaon Tahsil Sohna Tahsil of including Sohna Guragon District Town

Contd ......

75 A-1 APPENDIX CHANGES IN TERRffORIAL UNTIS DURING 1991-2001 SI. State! DistricU 1991 Territory added and Name of Thrritory reduced and Name of Net area No. Thhsil at 2001 Thrri torial its area DistrictlThhsil its area DistrictlThhsil change Unit Name Area in etc., from Name Area in etc., from which in Sq. Sq.Km which this Sq. KIn this area is added' Km. area is reduced 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (iii) Sohna Tahsil Newly 72 Villages 336.86 Gurgaon Tahsil 336.86 formed including Sohna Town of Gurgaon Tahsil of District Gurgaon (iv) Taoru Tahsil Newly 84 Villages 225.19 Nub Tahsil of 225.19 formed including Taoru District Gurgaon town from Nub Tahsil of District Gurgaon

(v) Nub Tahsil Nuh Tahsil 84 Villages of '225.19 Newly formed -225.19 Nuh Tahsil Taoru Tahsil of including Taoru District Gurgaon Town

(vi) Ferozepur Jhirka Ferozepur 96 Villages of '290.15 Newly formed -290.15 Tahsil Jhirka Tahsil Ferozepur Punhana Tahsil of Jhirka Tahsil of District Gurgaon District Gurgaon including Punhana Town

(vii) Punhana Tahsil Newly 96 Villages of 290.15 Ferozepur Jhirka 290.15 formed Ferozepur Jhirka Tahsil of including Punhana District Gurgaon town of District Gurgaon 19 Faridabad No Change District

(i) Faridabad Tahsil Faridabad No Change' Tahsil (ii) 8allabgarh 8allabgarh No Change Tahsil Tahsil

(iii) Palwal Tahsil Palwal Tahsil 4'8 Villages of '369.57 Hodal T~hsil newly -369.57 Palwal Tahsil formed including Hodal Town of District Faridabad (iv) Hathin Tahsil Hathin No Change

(v) Hodal Tahsil Newly 48 Villages 369.57 Palwal Tahsil of 369.57 formed including HodaI District town from Palwai Faridabad Tahsil of District Faridabad

76 TABLE-A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901

A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 FLY-LEAF

This table furnishes statistics on adjusted population villages affected by reorganization, inter-state and inter for the eleven censuses from 1901 to 2001 for the district transfers as villagewise figures were available State and districts confirming to the present jurisdiction. in the District Census Handbooks of 1991, 1981, 1971, The table corresponds to tableA-20f 1991,1981,1971, 1961 and 1951 Censuses. The figures for earlier 1961 and 1951 Censuses. Decadal variation in Censuses have been worked out on prorata basis population is shown in 'rmsolute figures. The figures because villagewise statistics were not available for given in column for earlier decades have been adjusted those Censuses. The popUlation of an area transferred for the present boundaries for the State as well as for any particular Census prior to 1951 has been districts. The table, therefore, gives much needed estimated on the assumption that the proportion of the comparable data about growth of population during the population in the Area transferred to the total population last 100 years. of the district/tahsil in which it was situated at the time of transfer was the same in the particular previous - Decadal variation in population is shown in absolute Census as it was in 1951. The break -up of the figures in column 4 and in terms of percentage in popUlation by sex so estimated for a previous Census column 5. The figures given in column 3, 6 and 7 for has been worked out on the basis of male-female earlier decades have been adjusted for the present, distribution of population in that particular- previous boundaries for each State, Union Territory and district. Census of the district/tahsil in which it was situated at

Haryana State was formed on 1sl November, 1966 the time of transfer. The sum total of all the deductions on the reorganization of the composite Punjab State, made from the population of the State as well as from under the Punjab Reorganization Act 1966. The the population of the districts which have been reduced population of the State and its districts for 1991, 1981, in area will be equal to the sum total of the additions 1971, 1961 and 1951 as per 2001 jurisdiction have been made to the population of the state and population of worked out by taking into account the population of the districts which have been increased.

79 Statement 1 of table A-2 illustrates the method of Censuses for transferred territories as per 2001 estimation of population at the time of previous Census.

Statement-l Table illustrating the method of es timation of pre'\ious CellS us es Population for transferred Territories

Description Population 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 Remarks 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ambala District 404,148 338,995 315,548 363,905 415,326 446,487 559,449 680,588 856,324 1,116,878 Population as at

1. Deduct Population of 29,381 24,644 22,940 26,455 30,194 32,459 43,650 59,148 77,448 105,562 Entire Kalka Tahsil (112 Villages+ Urban) to newly formed Panchkula District. (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) 2. Deduct Population of 29,442 24,696 22,988 26,511 30,257 32,527 42,022 56,541 87,835 165,403 entire Panchkula Tah. (96 Villages+Vrban) to newly formed Panchkula District. (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) 3. Deduct Population of 14,590 12,238 11,391 13,137 14,993 16,118 20,196 25,602 31,656 39,431 45 Villages of Naraingarh Tahsil to Panchkula District (15) (14) (13) (12) (11) Total deduct population of 73,413 61,578 57,319 66,103 75,444 81,104 105,868 141,291 196,939 310,396 transferred to Newly - District Populat,ion of Ambala 330,735 277,417 258,229 297,802 339,882 365,383 453,581 539,297 659,385 806,482 should be in 2001 Census 32,459x415,32( 32,459x363,905 32,459x315,54: 32,459x338,99. 32,459x404,148 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 2 32,527x415,32( 32,527x363,905 32,527x315,54: 32,527x338,9S 32,527x404,148 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 3 16,118x415,32( 16,118x363,905 16,118x315,54: 16,118x338,9S 16,118x404,148 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 446,487 Formula for working out the deducted population from 1901 to 1941 Census. Deducted Population of 1951 Census x Population of concerned Census 1951 Census Population of bifurcated district

80 Statement 2 oftableA-2 reveals decadal variation followed by Panchkula (87.43 per cent), Panipat in population for each decade since 1901 by presenting (87.06per cent) and Faridabad (70.22 per cent) and percentage decadal variation from 1901 to 2001 for the lowest in Ambala district (24.92 per cent) followed rural and urban areas separately. The above statement by Mahendragarh district (29.56 per cent) and Kamal shows the percentage growth of population in the area district (29.92 per cent) respectively. now comprising Haryana State. between 1901 and 2001 Percentage decadaI variation of population in the was +357.37 in total popUlation +544.25 in rural State was -9.70 during 1901-1911; + 1.95 during 1911- population and +167.01 in urban popUlation. The 1921; +7.14 during 1921-1931; +15.63 during 1931- decennial growth rate of total population of Haryana 1941; and +7.60 during 1941-1951. Comparatively low State during 1991-20~1 is 28.43 per cent and among growth rate of population during 1941-1951 was the districts it is highest in the newly formed Panchkula attributed to the partition of the country by which district 50.91 percent followed by Faridabad district Muslim population out migrated to Pakistan. Per (48.56 per cent) and the lowest in Mahendragarh centage decadal variation was +33.79 during 1951- District (19.16 per cent). The growth rate of rural 1961; +32.22 during 1961-1971; +28.75 during 1971- population of the State as a whole during the last decade 1981; +27.41 during 1981-1991; and +28.43 during is 21.12 per cent and among the districts, it is highest 1991-200 1. The relatively low growth rate of population in Gurgaon district (41.37 per cent) and the lowest in during 1971-1981 onwards may be attributed to the Jhajjar district (11.25 per cent). The decennial growth impact of family welfare schemes in the State and rate of urban population in the State during 1991-2001 alertness of the people with the spread of education in is 50.82 per cent and among the districts, it is highest limiting their families. in newly formed Jhajjar district (96.20 per cent)

81 Statement-2 Statement showing the percentage of Decadal Variation of Population from 1901 to 2001 for total, rural and urban State/District T 1901 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 R to to to to to to to to to to to U 2001 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 19\1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Haryana T 357.37 28.43 27.41 28.75 32.22 33.79 7.60 15.63 7.14 1.95 -9.70 R 544.25 21.12 22.92 22.16 31.52 33.53 86.67 14.02 5.26 0.29 -10.23 U 167.01 50.82 43.41 59.47 35.58 35.02 -64.81 17.16 8.98 3.61 -9.16 Panchkula T 538.04 50.91 57.61 39.39 33.46 30.53 7.50 14.13 15.32 -6.92 -16.12 R 291.77 30.52 25.61 28.33 40.75 30.95 2.08 12.91 17.07 -12.91 -14.05 U 2858.05 87.43 189.97 116.50 -1.98 28.52 43.95 23.04 3.96 68.47 -35.67 Ambala T 206.71 25.78 22.31 22.27 18.90 24.14 7.50 14.13 15.32 -6.92 -16.12 R 160.76 26.26 24.89 20.39 27.39 27.41 -8.23 10.08 16.11 -7.80 -21.74 U 354.01 24.92 17.87 25.63 6.19 19.55 41.57 24.01 13.45 -4.75 1.90 Yamunanagar T 344.00 29.19 27.41 32.26 29.24 40.82 7.84 14.46 -0.66 7.94 -15.33 R 224.39 22.53 19.83 30.73 28.04 29.51 -2.62 14.15 -2.20 10.08 -14.82 U 1033.96 41.92 44.94 35.93 32.24 79.83 71.27 16.38 10.04 -4.89 -18.24 Kurukshetra T 369.71 23.32 23.40 16.59 36.07 55.80 11.31 16.66 2.70 3.62 -9.63 R 290.63 18.39 18.53 10.85 34.44 57.97 5.01 15.93 1.79 4.17 -8.39 U 999.93 39.82 43.03 47.44 45.53 44.27 63.29 23.05 11.38 -1.38 -19.50 Kaithal T NA 21.02 20.92 39.98 37.96 47.38 NA NA NA NA. NA R NA 15.35 16.94 38.72 39.46 52.06 NA NA NA NA NA U 806.44 52.09 48.65 49.44 27.63 21.66 56.66 13.02 25.46 19.87 -36.21 Kamal T 453.06 23.06 24.76 33.96 30.50 34.19 36.60 16.71 2.79 3.52 -9.48 R 352.71 20.76 22.09 25.92 31.31 37.64 30.25 13.03 -1.80 3.46 -9.79 U 1334.02 29.92 33.46 69.15 27.08 ·21.32 67.02 38.31 41.57 4.03 -6.78 Panipat T NA 38.58 37.65 32.61 28.24 24.87 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 17.78 37.33 20.80 27.36 25.76 NA NA NA NA NA U 1356.78 87.06 38.38 72.15 31.26 21.91 45.31 14.95 16.93 3.80 -2.13 Sonipat T 287.38 22.39 24.53 23.46 24.31 26.51 13.82 18.38 4.48 7.81 -13.73 R 226.29 14.76 21.45 16.03 20.90 24.57 10.73 18.11 4.06 8.08 -8.90 U 776.46 52.66 38.46 73.68 53.70 46.10 58.48 22.41 11.10 3.64 -52.40 lind T NA 21.36 23.03 25.21 36.16 32.92 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 16.37 20.12 22.96 34.44 34.06 NA NA NA NA NA U 1775.74 45.93 39.71 39.88 48.57 25.29 52.81 66.68 11.40 82.61 -31.80 Fatehabad T NA 24.76 26.08 32.07 49.83 76.62 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 22.24 24.50 26.57 49.22 72.80 NA NA NA NA NA U 5002.54 38.07 35.10 75.85 54.82 115.95 44.84 19.03 NA NA NA Sirs a T 576.07 23.59 27.79 32.51 43.96 67.51 3.63 11.93 9.97 1.61 3.37 R 487.79 15.56 26.62 23.01 43.91 73.38 -1.53 8.31 9.30 0.72 11.47 U 1068.15 53.49 32.32 89.48 44.26 39.18 38.76 44.76 16.43 11.02 -41.77 Contd ......

82 S tatement-2 Statement showing the percentage of Decadal Variation of Population from 1901 to 2001 for total, rural and urban State! District T 1901 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 R to to to to to to to to to to to U 2001 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Hisar T NA 27.11 22.67 27.32 33.98 36.49 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 23.45 19.31 21.26 32.76 32.60 NA NA NA NA NA U 1065.10 38.91 34.91 55.60 40.00 59.52 19.38 14.98 18.17 16.08 -7.12 Bhiwani T ~A 22.49 22.80 30.72 30.38 28.92 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 19.42 20.85 28.7l 29.65 30.71 NA NA NA NA NA U 424.52 37.56 33.38 42.82 34.89 18.76 13.70 22.95 9.22 7.75 -24.04 Rohtak T 258.77 21.00 17.79 20.84 26.02 25.93 14.12 18.38 4.48 7.81 -13.73 R 175.96 16.64 11.66 14.17 22.32 27.38 8.85 15.13 -0.16 2.40 -7.02 U 707.63 30.00 32.84 41.08 38.78 21.20 35.66 33.80 34.04 62.37 -50.11 Jhaijar T 299.62 23.06 21.37 22.89 27.79 27.15 16.50 18.38 4.48 7.81 -13.73 R 266.77 11.25 19.79 21.69 26.03 27.22 21.34 17.14 5.03 5.94 -10.81 U 482.91 96.20 32.18 31.75 42.54 26.62 -12.58 26.39 1.05 21.07 -30.07 M ahendragarh T NA 19.16 27.91 25.79 24.62 22.62 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 17.69 27.88 25.34 23.82 21.98 NA NA NA NA NA U 271.98 29.56 28.15 29.05 30.79 27.83 -6.76 5.58 7.27 -6.82 5.56 Rewari T NA 25.34 25.62 24.52 24.00 21.15 NA NA NA NA NA R NA 22.07 20.77 25.54 25.03 23.37 NA NA NA NA NA U 312.22 43.04 60.48 17.67 17.47 8.72 8.50 16.56 10.43 -6.13 -8.85 Gurgaon T 373.67 44.87 32.67 29.16 34.03 29.13 8.01 14.96 9.31 -6.85 -12.80 R 300.84 41.37 31.48 20.52 32.88 25.60 5.70 12.94 8.36 -6.71 -11.16 U 1200.50 58.57 37.54 83.10 41.67 58.82 32.20 41.64 23.57 -8.87 -31.36 Faridabad T 579.82 48.56 49.81 40.27 49.19 32.40 8.01 14.96 9.31 -6.85 -12.80 R 238.25 28.10 31.56 9.00 41.76 26.15 0.17 14.08 8.50 -7.39 -10.33 U 3380.70 70.22 75.61 135.95 77.68 63.49 76.67 23.32 17.61 -0.97 -33.05

83 The following Statement-3 of Table A-2 gives lower than that of 1991 Census (865) and among the the sex ratio (females per 1000 males) for each districts, it is highest in Mahendragarh district (918) Census since 1901 for the State and the districts followed by Rewari district (899). The rural sex ratio separately for rural and urban areas as per jurisdiction for the State is 866 while it is 847 for Urban areas. of 2001 Census. Although in number, the two sexes From 1921 to 1981 the sex ratio in urban areas was are not widely divergent, their disparity is of great comparatively lower than what was found in rural interest to social scientists because of the different areas but in 1991, the sex ratio becomes relatively roles of the sexes in society and its economy. Haryana higher in urban areas and it has gone down by 19 is a region with deficiency of females and this fact is points during 2001 Census. The highest rural sex ratio widely supported by the latest Census results. It is (924) has been recorded in Mahendragarh district clear from the above statement that the sex ratio for followed by Rewari district (910) and the lowest (798) the State as a whole is 861 in 2001 Census which is in Panchkula district during 2001 Census.

S tatement-3 Changes in the Sex Ratio (Females per 1000 Males) 1901-2001 State/District TI 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 RI U 2 3 4 5 6 . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Haryana T 867 835 844 844 869 871 868 867 870 865 861 R 861 837 842 848 879 877 874 870 876 864 866 U 873 833 846 840 859 845 842 853 849 868 847 Panchkula T 806 753 776 785 797 799 805 820 833 839 823 R 853 770 826 816 815 809 816 815 842 831 798 U 459 567 509 587 683 749 752 858 793 852 856 Ambala T 806 753 776 785 797 807 828 882 902 903 868 R 835 809 827 831 876 861 867 869 884 878 879 U 720 629 667 681 646 737 772 906 933 950 849 Yamunanagar T 811 762 783 789 802 841 836 848 855 883 862 R 799 749 774 786 798 853 851 852 859 884 866 U 881 847 841 802 826 800 801 837 844 880 858 Kurukshetra T 844 826 827 815 832 858 853 859 872 879 866 R 837 822 828 819 839 858 854 866 878 883 873 U 902 872 809 781 777 861 846 824 849 867 848 Kaithal T NA NA NA NA NA 849 837 843 848 "853 853 R NA NA NA NA NA 843 833 842 846 849 853 U NA NA NA NA NA 881 867 852 863 878 856 Kamal T 845 828 828 815 833 860 853 856 856 864 865 R 843 827 833 824 853 856 851 854 853 857 866 U 868 836 785 767 742 875 862 869 869 888 862 Panipat T NA NA NA NA NA 866 857 852 849 852 829 R NA NA NA NA NA 857 849 844 841 845 837 U NA NA NA NA NA 899 885 877 867 869 819 Sonipat T 881 856 852 864 915 886 886 867 866 840 839 R 872 851 851 866 921 888 891 868 869 832 836 U 964 951 871 831 831 872 839 854 851 875 847 Jind T NA NA NA NA NA 849 857 860 857 838 852 R NA NA NA NA NA 849 859 862 856 834 851 U NA NA NA NA NA 850 840 845 859 859 857 Contd ......

84 S tatement-3 Changes in the Sex Ratio (Females per 1000 Males) 1901-2001 StateIDistrict TI 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 RI U 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Fatehabad T NA NA NA NA NA 853 852 870 881 877 884 R NA NA NA NA NA 850 850 869 882 877 885 U NA NA NA NA NA 881 864 881 875 878 879 Sirs a T 871 837 877 855 878 843 845 865 877 885 882 R 869 839 885 865 888 842 846 867 887 887 884 U 880 818 795 766 817 846 842 850 841 876 876 Hisar T NA NA NA NA NA 871 866 " 859 859 853 851 R NA NA NA NA NA 877 876 868 866 851 853 U NA NA NA NA NA 834 817 817 835 859 844 Bhiwani T NA NA NA NA NA 880 880 878 897 878 879 R NA NA NA NA NA 880 882 885 906 879 884 U NA NA NA NA NA 884 868 839 849 875 859 Rohtak T 881 856 852 864 915 883 885 878 869 849 847 R 862 858 863 894 936 891 890 881 866 832 839 U 994 845 783 734 836 856 869 868 875 884 862 Jhajjar T 881 856 852 864 915 911 902 903 891 861 847 R 859 838 839 854 909 912 900 907 894 859 854 U 1017 997 940 932 952 904 920 876 871 871 823 M ahendragarh T NA NA NA NA NA 972 961 910 939 910 918 R NA NA NA NA NA 977 970 914 947 911 924 U NA NA NA NA NA 929 894 880 883 901 883 Rewari T NA NA NA NA NA 930 926 927 926 927 899 R NA NA NA NA NA 938 930 934 932 940 910 U NA NA NA NA NA 890 902 886 883 859 851 Gurgaon T 905 878 858 859 880 895 891 886 880 871 873 R 900 876 857 862 879 896 893 887 882 867 876 U 964 906 877 824 891 887 874 878 873 886 861 Faridabad T 905 878 858 859 880 854 848 810 811 828 839 R 903 878 859 862 880 845 847 819 848 842 859 U 919 879 852 830 882 898 855 782 762 813 824

85 A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 S tatelDistrict Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HARYANA 1901 4,623,064 2,476,390 2,146,674 1911 4,174,677 -448,387 -9.70 2,274,909 1,899,768 1921 4,255,892 81,215 1.95 2,307,985 1,947,907 1931 4,559,917 304,025 7.14 373,228 4,186,689 1941 5,272,829 712,912 15.63 2,821,783 2,451,046 1951 5,673,597 400,768 7.60 3,031,612 2,641,985 1961 7,590,524 1,916,927 33.79 4,062,787 3,527,737 1971 10,036,431 2,445,907 32.22 5,377,044 4,659,387 1981 12,922,119 2,885,688 28.75 6,909,679 6,012,440 1991 16,463,648 3,541,529 27.41 8,827,474 7,636,174 2001 21,144,564 4,680,916 28.43 11,363,953 9,780,611 Panchkula (a) 1901 73,413 40,646 32,767 1911 61,578 -11,835 -16.12 35,126 26,452 1921 57,319 -4,259 -6.92 32,267 25,052 1931 66,103 8,784 15.32 37,039 29,064 1941 75,444 9,341 14.13 41,981 33,463 1951 81,104 5,660 7.50 45,094 36,OlO 1961 lO5,868 24,764 30.53 58,651 47,217 1971 141,291 35,423 33.46 17,639 63,652 1981 196,939 55,648 39.39 107,465 89,474 1991 3lO,396 113,457 57.61 168,817 141,579 2001 468,411 158,015 50.91 256,939 211,472 Ambala 1901 330,735 183,117 147,618 1911 277,417 -53,318 -16.12 158,247 119,170 1921 258,229 -19,188 -6.92 145,369 112,860 1931 297,802 39,573 15.32 166,867 130,935 1941 339,882 42,080 14.13 189,129 150,753 1951 365,383 25,501 7.50 202,179 163,204 1961 453,581 88,198 24.14 248,197 205,384 1971 539,297 85,716 18.90 286,542 252,755 1981 659,385 120,088 22.27 346,763 312,622 1991 806,482 147,097 22.31 423,721 382,761 2001 1,014,411 207,929 25.78 542,977 471,434 Yamunanagar 1901 234,603 129,562 105,041 1911 198,649 -35,954 -15.33 112,719 85,930 1921 214,427 15,778 7.94 120,294 94,133 1931 213,007 -1,420 -0.66 119,098 93,909 1941 243,803 30,796 14.46 135,323 108,480 1951 262,906 19,103 7.84 142,824 120,082 1961 370,224 107,318 40.82 201,604 168,620 1971 478,483 108,259 29.24 258,988 219,495 1981 632,820 154,337 32.26 341,218 291,602 1991 806,279 173,459 27.41 428,232 378,047 2001 1,041,630 235,351 29.19 559,444 482,186 Contd......

86 A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 S tatelDistrict Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Kurukshetra 1901 175,735 95,287 80,448 1911 158,807 -16,928 -9.63 86,948 71,859 1921 164,560 5,753 3.62 90,090 74,470 1931 169,002 4,442 2.70 93,131 75,871 1941 197,157 28,155 16.66 107,616 89.541 1951 219,455 22,298 11.31 118,084 101,371 1961 341.906 122,451 55.80 184,489 157,417 1971 465.222 123,316 36.07 250,191 215,031 1981 542,423 77,201 16.59 289,759 252,664 1991 669.346 126.923 23.40 356,181 313.165 2001 825,454 156,108 23.32 442,328 383,126 Kaithal 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 227.1'68 0.00 122.887 104,281 1961 334,804 107,636 47.38 182,228 152,576 1971 461,897 127,093 37.96 250.559 211,338 1981 646,566 184,669 39.98 349,781 296,785 1991 781,814 135,248 20.92 421.894 359,920 2001 946,131 164,317 21.02 510,513 435,618 Kamal 1901 230.386 124,859 105,527 1911 208,536 -21,850 -9.48 114.074 94,462 1921 215.872 7,336 3.52 118,108 97,764 1931 221,887 6,015 2.79 122.233 99,654 1941 258,969 37,082 16.71 141.300 117,669 1951 353.764 94,795 36.60 190.221 163,543 1961 474,722 120,958 34.19 256.203 218,519 1971 619,533 144,811 30.50 333,714 285,819 1981 829,927 210,394 33.96 447.054 382,873 1991 1,035,390 205,463 24.76 555,322 480,068 2001 1,274,183 238,793 23.06 683.368 590,815 Panipat 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 238,834 127,978 110.856 1961 298,232 59,398 24.87 160,601 137,631 1971 382,445 84,213 28.24 206,550 175.895 1981 507,164 124,719 32.61 274,331 232,833 1991 698,103 190,939 37.65 376,991 321,112 2001 967,449 269,346 38.58 528,,860 438.589 Contd......

87 A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE1901 S tatelDistrict Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sonipat 1901 330,208 175,508 154,700 1911 284,856 -45,352 -13.73 153,444 131,412 1921 307,091 22,235 7.81 165,806 141,285 1931 320,840 13,749 4.48 172,145 148,695 1941 379,798 58,958 18.38 198,299 181,499 1951 432,282 52,484 13.82 229,191 203,091 1961 546,873 114,591 26.51 290,041 256,832 1971 679,834 132,961 24.31 364,220 315,614 1981 839,298 159,464 23.46 449,852 389,446 1991 1,045,158 205,860 24.53 567,901 477,257 2001 1,279,175 234,017 22.39 695,723 583,452 Jind 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 351,651 190,193 161,458 1961 467,416 115,765 32.92 251,722 215,694 1971 636,428 169,012 36.16 342,235 294,193 1981 796,902 160,474 25.21 429,247 367,655 1991 980,434 183,532 23.03 533,421 447,013 2001 1,189,827 209,393 21.36 642,282 547,545 Fatehabad (b) 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 146,650 79,145 67,505 1961 259,006 112,356 76.62 139,885 119,121 1971 388,062 129,056 49.83 207,514 180,548 1981 512,512 124,450 32.07 272,450 240,062 1991 646,160 133,648 26.08 344,193 301,967 2001 806,158 159,998 24.76 427,862 378,296 Sirsa 1901 165,167 88,290 76,877 1911 170,733 5,566 3.37 92,935 77,798 1921 173,476 2,743 1.61 92,441 81,035 1931 190,772 17,296 9.97 102,852 87,920 1941 213,522 22,750 11.93 113,673 99,849 1951 221,282 7,760 3.63 120,095 101,187 1961 370,665 149,383 67.51 200,901 169,764 1971 533,604 162,939 43.96 286,162 247,442 1981 707,068 173,464 32.51 >376,602 330,466 1991 903,536 196,468 27.79 479,407 424,129 2001 1,116,649 213,113 23.59 593,245 523,404

Contd ......

88 A-2 DECADAL VARIA nON IN POPULAnON SINCE 1901 S tatelDistrict Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Hisar 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 423,390 226,277 197,113 1961 577,887 154,497 36.49 309,721 268,166 1971 774,265 196,378 33.98 416,596 357,669 1981 985,769 211,504 27.32 530,262 455,507 1991 1,209,238 223,469 22.67 652,714 556,524 2001 1,537,117 327,879 27.11 830,520 706,597 Bhiwani 1901 19I1 1921 1931 1941 1951 431,188 229,295 201,893 1961 555,889 124,701 28.92 295,696 260,193 1971 724,741 168,852 30.38 385,888 338,853 1981 947,374 222,633 30.72 499,349 448,025 1991 1,163,400 216,026 22.80 619,362 544,038 2001 1,425,022 261,622 22.49 758,253 666,769 Rohtak 1901 262,040 139,276 122,764 1911 226,051 -35,989 -13.73 121,767 104,284 1921 243,695 17,644 7.81 131,577 112,118 1931 254,606 10,911 4.48 136,608 117,998 1941 301,394 46,788 18.38 157,363 144,031 1951 343,962 42,568 14.12 182,663 161,299 1961 433,167 89,205 25.93 229,777 203,390 1971 545,879 112,712 26.02 290,728 255,151 1981 659,644 113,765 20.84 352,959 306,685 1991 776,966 117,322 17.79 420,253 356,713 2001 940,128 163,162 • 21.00 509,038 431,090 Jhajjar (c) . 1901 220,225 117,051 103,174 1911 189,979 -30,246 -13.73 102,336 87,643 1921 204,808 14,829 7.81 110,581 94,227 1931 213,977 9,169 4.48 114,809 99,168 1941 253,298 39,321 18.38 132,252 121,046 1951 295,085 41,787 16.50 154,378 140,707 1961 375,209 80,124 27.15 197,297 177,912 1971 479,482 104,273 27.79 251,918 227,564 198J 589,212 109,730 22.89 3Jl,550 277,662 1991 715,136 125,924 21.37 384,364 330,772 2001 880,072 164,936 23.06 476,175 403,597 Contd ......

89 A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 S tate/Distri ct Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 M ahendragarh 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 277,320 140,650 136,670 1961 340,059 62,739 22.62 173,433 166,626 1971 423,797 83,738 24.62 221,918 201,879 1981 533,074 109,277 25.79 274,934 258,140 1991 681,869 148,795 27.91 357,004 324,865 2001 812,521 130,652 19.16 423,578 388,943

Rewari 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 259,847 134,617 125,230 1961 314,793 54,946 21.15 163,457 151,336 1971 390,351 75,558 24.00 202,542 187,809 1981 486,084 95,733 24.52 252,338 233,746 1991 610,611 124,527 25.62 316,854 293,757 2001 765,351 154,740 25.34 403,034 362,317

Gurgaon 1901 350,517 184,011 166,506 1911 305,652 -44.865 -12.80 162,768 142,884 1921 284,712 -20,940 -6.85 153,224 131,488 1931 311,220 26,508 9.31 167,403 143.817 1941 357,789 46,569 14.96 190,303 167,486 1951 386,432 28,643 8.01 203,870 182,562 1961 499,007 112,575 29.13 263,952 235.055 1971 668,821 169,814 34.03 354,640 314,181 1981 863,868 195,047 29.16 459,406 404,462 1991 1,146,090 282,222 32.67 612,620 533,470 2001 1,660,289 514,199 44.87 886,451 773,838

Contd ......

90 A-2 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE1901 S tate/District Census Persons Variation since the Males Females Year preceding census Absolute Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Faridabad 1901 322,816 169,470 153,346 1911 281,499 -41,317 -12.80 149,906 131,593 1921 262,211 -19,288 -6.85 141,114 121,097 1931 286,625 24,414 9.31 154,174 132,451 1941 329,515 42,890 14.96 175,265 154,250 1951 355,894 26,379 8.01 191,971 163,923 1961 471,216 115,322 32.40 254,932 216,284 1971 702,999 231,783 49.19 388,500 314,499 1981 986,090 283,091 40.27 544,359 441,731 1991 1,477,240 491,150 49.81 808,223 669,017 2001 2,194,586 717,346 48.56 1,193,063 1,001,523 * Population of 4 villages of Jind district, one village of Kaithal district and entire Assandh Thhsil of Panipat district except one village namely, Rair Kalan (H.B. No.29) transferred to Karnal district. These districts were shown (-) for the years 1941-1901 in 1991 Census. Due to this reason the population of above mentioned transferred villages has not been included in the population of Karnal district for the years1941-1901 Note:- (a) This district has been newly formed comprising tahsils of Kalka, Panchkula and 45 Villages from Naraingarh Tahsil with an area of 786.95 Km2 and popUlation 310,396 from Ambala District vide Haryana Govt. notification No. S.O. 681P N17/1887/S.5 dated 21. 7 .1995 (b) This district has been newly formed comprising the Fatehabad, Tohana, Ratia Tahsils and 6 villages of Tahsil Hisar of Hisar District with an area of 2526.72 Km2 and population 646,160 from Hisar District vide Haryana Govt. notification No. S.0.531P N171l887/s.5/97 dated 25.6.1997

( c) This district has been newly formed comprising of Tahsils Jhajjar and Bahadurgarh of Rohtak District with an area of 1887.74 Km2 and population of 715,136 from Rohtak district vide Haryana Govt. notification No. S n.54;1P N1711887/S.5/97. dated 25.6.1997

91

..-- o o C\J

lO,..... T""" CX) CX) (1) C\J

C\J ,..... ~ ,..... C\J (1) C")

Z 0 (1) ,..... I- ,..... c.o 0; (1) «_J C") ..-- ::::> a.. en 0 ~ ,.... w «a.. 0 > T""" c.o lO zu. C> (1) en ,.....: ,..... ;:) «0 C> C\I en >-I I Z a: I- T""" W C> (.) «$: 0> C") T""" ,.... :cO c.o "

lO ..-- (1) C\J ,....(1)

,.....o (1),

..-- o ,....(1)

lO o lO o lO o lO o lO o C") C") C\J C\J ,..... ,.... , ..­ I

.lN3~ 1:::13d NI

93

A-2 - APPENDIX STATEAND DISTRICTS AT THE2001 CENSIS SHOWING THE 1991 ARFA AND POPULATION ACCORDING TO TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN 1991, CHANGEIN POPULATION OF 1991 ADJISTED TO JURISDICTION 2001

State/District Area in 2001 2001 population Area in 1991 popUlation Population in Net increase or Census 1991Census according to 1991 adjusted to decrease between (Sq. Km.) (Sq. Km.) jurisdiction jurisdiction of Columns prevailing in 1991 2001

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HARYANA 44,212.00 21,144,564 44,212.00 16,463,648 16,463,648 1. Panchkula (m) ~98.00 468,411 310,396 310,396 2. Ambala (a) 1,574.00 1,014,411 2,385.00 1.116,878 806,482 -310,396 3. Yamunanag;rr (b) 1,768.00 1,041,630 1,756.00 821,880 806,279 -15,601 4. Kurukshetra (c) 1,530.00 825,454 1,217.00 641,943 669,346 27,403 5. Kaithal (d) 2,317.00 946,131 2,799.00 8,250,685 781,814 -38,871 6. Kamal (e) 2,520.00 1,274,183 1,967.00 885,797 1,035,390 149,593 7. Panip at (f) 1,268.00 967,449 1,754.00 833,501 698,103 -135,398 8. Sonipat (g) 2,122.00 1,279,175 1,385.00 754,866 1,045,158 290,292 9. Jind (h) 2,702.00 1,189,827 2,736.00 963,104 980,434 17,330 1O.Fatehabad (n) 2,538.00 806,158 646,160 646,160 11.Sirsa 4,277.00 1,116,649 4,276.00 903,536 903,536 12.Hisar (i) 3,983.00 1.537,117 6,279.00 1,844,634 1,209,238 -635,396 13.Bhiwani (j) 4,778.00 1,425,022 5,140.00 1,139,718 1,163,400 23,682 14. Rohtak (1<) 1,745.00 940,128 4,411.00 1,808,606 776,966 -1,031,640 15. Jhaijar (0) 1,834.00 880,072 715,136 715,136 16. Mahendrag;rrh 1,899.00 812,521 1,683.00 681,869 681,869 17. Rewari (1) 1,594.00 765,351 1,559.00 623,301 610,611 -12,690 18. Gurgaon 2,714.00 1,660,289 2,760.00 1,146,090 1,146,090 19, Faridabad 2,151.00 2,194,586 2,105.00 1,477,240 1,477,240 Note :- (a) Entire two tahsils Kalka, Panchkula and 45 villages of Naraingarh tahsil of Ambala district with an area of 786.95 Sq. Km and popUlation of 310,396 transferred to newly formed district Panchkula vide notification no. SO 68fPA/17/2887/S-5195 dt. 21.7.95 and S0731 CA. 16/1908/S-5199 dt. 17.2.99 respectively. (b) 8 villages of Jagadhri tahsil with an area of 36.25 Sq.Km and Population of 12,003 of Yamunanagar district and 5 villagesof same tahsil with an area of 8.84 Sq.Km and popUlation of 3,598 transferred to Thanesar tahsil of Kurukshetra district vide notification no. SO, 311 PA/171l887/S-5/92 dt. 27.2.92 and SO, 63 IPA/171l887/S-5192 dt. 30.4.92 respectively. (c) (i) One village with an area of 10.95 Sq. Km and population of 3,895 of Pehowa tahsil of Kurukshetra district transferred to Kaithal district vide notification no. SO 3I1PAIl71l887/S-5/92 dt. 27.2.92 (ii) Changes enumerated as against footnote e(i), d(i), b (d) (i) 4 villages of Kaithal tahsil and 3 villages of Guhla tahsil of Kaithal district with an area of 45.41 Sq.Km and Population of 13,601 Transferred to Kurukshetra District vide notification no SO 311PAl171l887/S-5192 dt. 27.2.92 (ii) One village of Kaithal tahsil with an area of 24.42 Sq.Km and population of 7,900 transferred to Kamal district vide notificatioOn no. SO 31/PA/17/1887/S-5192 dt. 27.2.92.

95 (iii) 10 villages of Kaithal tahsil with an area of 93.31 Sq.Km and population of 31,376 transferred to lind district vide notification no . SO 87/PA/17/1887/S-5/91 dt 24.7.91 (iv) Changes enumerated as against footnote c(i), h(i)

(a) (i) 2 villages of Kamal tahsil with an area of 5.32 Sq. Km and population of 2,096 transferred to Kurukshetra distri.ct vide notification no. SO. 3I/PAIl71l887/S-5/92 dt. 27.2 92 (ii) 8 villages of Kamal tahsil with an area of 28.74 Sq.Km and population of 14,835 and one village of Kamal tahsil with an area of 8.33 Sq.Km and population of 2,114 transferred to Panipat district vide notification No., SO.155/PN17/1887/S-5/91 dated 31.12.91 and SO/85/PAIl71l887/S-5196 dated 14.6.96 respectively

(iii) Ch~.mges enumerated as against foot note f(i) d(ii) h(ii)

(b) (i) Entire Assandh tahsil except one village of Panipat district with an area of 547.48 Sq.Km and popUlation of 152,347 transferred to Kamal district vide notification no. SO.88 /PAIl7/1887/S-5.91 dated 24.7.91 (ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note e(ii)

(c) Changes enumerated as against foot note k (v) (d) (i) 4 villages of Narwana tahsil of jind district and one village of lind tahsil of the same district with an area of 34.72 Sq.Km and population of 10,111 transferred to Kaithal distrit vide notification no. SO/87IPN1711887/S-5/91 dated 24.7.91 and S094/PA/1711887/S- 5/93 dated 12.11.93 respectively. (ii) 4 villages of Safidon tahsil of lind district with an area of 30.86 Sq.km and population of 8,391 transferred to Kamal district vide notification no. SO.92/PAI7/1887/S-5/95 dated 15.9.95 (iii) Changes enumerated as against foot note d(iii) k(ii)

(e) (i) Fatehabad tahsil with an area of 1315.73 Sq. Km and population of 314,782, Ratia tahsil with an area of 510.86 Sq.km and population of 125,647 and Tohana tahsil with an area of 600.50 Sq.Km and population of 184,813 and 6 villages of Hisar district with an area of 99.63 Sq.Km and popUlation 20,918 transferred to newly formed Fatehabad district vide notification number SO.53/PNI7/1887/S- 5/97 dated 25.6.97 and SO.36/CA-2/1974/S-7/96 dated 29.3.96' (ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note K(iii) , J(i) (f) (i) One village of Bawani Khera tahsil of Bhiwani district with an area of 9.86 Sq.Km and popUlation of 2,176 transferred to Hisar district vide notification no. SO.31IPAIl71l887/S-5 192 dated 27.2.92 (ii) Changes enumerated as against foot note K(iv)

(g) (i) Entire Jhajjar tahsil and Bahadurgarh tahsil (except two villages) of Rohtak district with an area of 1857.67 Sq.Km and population of 702,446 transferred to newly formed Jhajjar district vide Notification no. SO.S4/pa/17/1887/S-5/97 dated 25.6.97. (ii) I village of Gohana tahsil of Rohtak district with an area of 24.21.Sq.km and population of 4456 transferred to lind district vide notification no. S063/PAI171I887/S-5/92 dated 30.4.92 (iii) 2 villages of Maham tahsil of Rohtak district with an area of 35.79 Sq.Km and population of 8588 transferred to Hisar district vide notification no. S087/PAIl71!887/S-5/91 dated 24.7.91 (iv) 3 villages of Rohtak tahsil with an area of 53.39 Sq.km and popUlation of 25,858 transferred to Bhiwani district vide notification no. S063/PAIl7/1887/S-5/92 dated 30.4.92 (v) Entire Gohana tahsil except 7 villages of Rohtak district with an area of 802.47 Sq.Km and population of 290,292 transferred to Sonipat district vide notification no. SO.90/PAI1711887/S-5/9l dated 24.7.91

(I) 2 villages of Kosli tahsil of Rewari district with an area of 19.66 Sq.km and population of 6,107, three villages of same tahsil with an area of 16.59 Sq.Km and population of 5172 and one village of same tahsil with an are of 3.85 Sq.Km and population of 1,411 transferred two newly formed lhajjar district notification no. SO.7SIPN171l887/S-5/95 dated 31.7.95 and SO.99/PAIl7/l887/S-5/98 dated 29.5.98 and S063IPA/171l887/S-5/92 dated 30.4.92 respectively. (m) Changes enumerated as against foot note (a)

(n) Changes enumerated as against foot note i (i)

(0) Changes enumerated as against foot note k (i) and I

96 Table A-3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS

A-3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS

Fly-leaf

This table corresponds to table A -3 of 1991, 1981, The number of villages falling in each size group 1971,1961 and 1951 Census and gives the total number have also been given. The definition of the village has of inhabited villages classified by seven broad already been given in fly-leaf to TableA-l. In Haryana population ranges, vi~ (i) less than 200 (ii) 200-499 State, there are 6,764 inhabited villages at the time of (iii) 500 - 999) (iv) 100'0-1999 (v) 2000-4999 (vi) 5000 2001 Census, covering a popUlation of 15,029,260. In - 9999 and (vii) 10,000 and above indicating therein the State, 270 inhabited villages with population ofless the total rural population. than 200 persons claim a popUlation of 25,668 persons. The villages where the population ranges between 200- Seven broad popUlation ranges are as mentioned 499 person are 582 containing 211,673 persons while below:- 1205 villages are in the size group 500-999 persons (i) Less than 200 persons inhabiting 916,344 population. As many as 3,041,342 (ii) 200-499 persons persons are living in 2,091 villages of the size group 1,000-1,999 persons. There are 2,015 villages of the (iii) 500-999 persons size group 2,000-4,999 wherein 6,241,216 person (iv) 1000-1,999 persons reside. The number of villages in the size group 5,000- (v) 2000-4999 persons 9,999 persons is 504 having a population of 3,343,738. There are only 97 villages in the State each having a (vi) 5000-9999 persons population of 10,000 and above claiming 1,249,279 (vii) 10,000 and above persons persons.

99 Statement -1 of Table A-3 provides information i.e 1,000-1,999; 2,000-4,999 and 5,000-9,999 persons. about the per centage of population living in villages of Among the sixteen districts namely, Sirsa, Sonipat, Jind, various population sizes with reference to the total rurru Jhajjar, Mahendragarh, Fatehabad, Panipat, Rewari, population in 2001 Census: Hisar, Kamal, Bhiwani, Gurgaon, Kaithal, Faridabad, Ambala and Panchkula, the highest proportion of rural The proportion of popUlation living in villages in the of each district has been recorded in the State as a whole, is the highest (41.53 per cent) in the population size group of villages with 2,000-4,999 persons. This villages with size group 2,000-4,999 population. Only in proportion is followed by the size group of villages with one district i.e Rohtak, the highest proportion of rural 5,000-9,999 population (22.25 per cent); 20.24 per cent population has been found in the villages with size group 5,000-9,999 population. The villages of the size group in villages with 1,000-1,999 popUlation; 8.31 percent in of villages with 10,000 and above popUlation; 6.10 per cent 1,000-1,999 population, claim the highest proportion rural population in the remaining two districts of in villages with 500-999 population; 1.41 per cent in villages having population of 200-499; and 0.17 per cent Kurukshetra and Yamunanagar. The villages with the in villages with population less than 200 persons. It is size group ofless than 200 and 200-499 population have registered the lowest proportion of rural population in interesting in the State that 84.02 per cent of the rural of the State. population has been found in three size groups of villages each district

Statement-l Percentage of Population living in Villages of various Population Sizes with reference to the Total Rural Population in 2001 S tatelDistrict Percentage of population living in Villages of population Size Less than 200 200-499 500-999 1,000.1,999 2,000·4,999 5,000·9,999 10,000 and above 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Haryana 0.17 1.40 6.10 20.24 41.53 22.25 8.31 Panchkula 1.13 7.81 15.49 27.43 31.61 16.53 0.00 Ambala 0.44 4.12 17.13 30.56 33.09 9.54 5.12 Yamunanagar 0.79 6.95 23.06 35.64 28.72 4.84 0.00 Kurukshetra 0.27 2.35 15.34 36.66 30.64 12.73 2.01 Kaithal 0.09 0.80 4.27 14.03 36.48 25.52 18.81 Kamal 0.27 0.90 6.84 19.26 40.55 23.50 8.68 Panipat 0.00 0.50 2.21 11.18 42.25 36.06 7.80 Sonipat 0.07 0.35 1.52 13.93 53.09 26.07 4.97 Jind 0.03 0.19 1.64 13.02 51.57 25'.09 8.46 Fatehabad 0.00 1.10 4.02 13.61 45.87 22.35 13.05 Sirs a 0.12 0.46 2.24 18.43 53.72 21.83 3.20 Hisar 0.02 0.08 0.81 5.03 40.94 36.23 16.89 Bhiwani 0.03 0.64 3.26 20.23 40.54 23.33 11.97 Rohtak 0.01 0.31 0.56 5.02 35.52 45.16 13.42 Jhaiiar 0.03 0.42 2.08 16.70 51.15 20.73 8.89 M ahendragarh 0.05 1.20 5.64 37.06 47.82 8.23 0.00 Rewari 0.24 2.05 10.75 37.25 41.44 8.27 0.00 Gurgaon 0.30 2.04 8.88 25.18 37.71 15.37 10.52 Faridabad 0.15 1.09 5.06 21.34 34.67 29.08 8.61

100 Statement -2 of Table A-3 gives a comparative per centage of population have been recorded from picture of the proportion of number of inhabited villages 1991 to 2001 in the State. In all the districts, there is a and population by size classes of villages at 1991 and decline in the per centage of number of villages and 2001. In this statement, however, the two size groups per centage of population in the size group 'less than i.e villages with population of less than 200 and 200- 500 and 500-999' persons between 1991 and 2001. 499 persons have been grouped together and shown There is an increase in the proportion of number of under the he~ding , 'Less than 500'. villages in the size group 2,000 - 4,999 persons in all It is clear from the said Statement that there has the districts except Panipat, Hisar and Rohtak where been a decline in the per centage of population residing a marginal decrease in the per centage of number of therein the size group of villages with population less villages and per centage of population have been found than 500 and 500-91;)9 persons from 1991 to 2001 in between 1991 and 2001. Similarly, a gain in the per the State as a whole. The per centage of number of centage of number of villages and per centage of villages and per centage of population inhabited therein population have been recorded in all the districts in the have recorded a gain in the size group of villages with size group of villages with 5,000-9,999 persons during 2,000-4,999 persons, 5,000-9,999 persons and 10,000 the same period. A gain has been recorded in villages persons and above from 1991 to 2001 in Haryana with population 10,000 and above between 1991 and State. There is only one size group Of villages with 2001 in both the ratio of villages and population of 1,000-1,999 persons where an increase in the per villages in all the districts (except marginal decrease centage of number of villages and a decrease in the in both the proportions in Sirsa district) In other categories, mixed trends have been noticed.

101 Statenrnt-2 Percentage ohillages and)Xl}Dlation by class ohillages in 1991 and2001 Statel Census Less than 500 500-999 1000-1999 District Year Percentage of no. Percentage of Percentage of no. Percentage of Percentage of no. Percentage of of \illages in this )Xlpulation in of \illages in this population in of \illages in this population in range to total. no. this range to range to total. no. this range to range to total. no. this range to oflillages total population oflillages total population oflillages total population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HARYANA 1991 16.02 2.36 22.84 9.30 29.90 23.27 2001 12.60 1.58 17.82 6.10 30.91 20.23 Panchkula 1991 42.99 11.69 33.94 27.54 13.12 26.69 2001 36.16 8.94 24.11 15.49 24.11 27.43 Ambala 1991 25.51 7.16 36.12 24.68 27.55 33.32 2001 20.54 4.56 32.16 17.13 30.08 30.55 Yamunanagar 1991 34.03 11.08 35.34 28.86 24.92 39.47 2001 27.57 7.74 33.12 23.06 27.08 35.65 Kurukshetra 1991 18.58 4.09 33.74 20.26 33.01 35.87 2001 14.00 2.62 28.75 15.34 38.33 36.66 Kaithal 1991 11.27 1.12 19.64 6.19 28.72 16.86 2001 10.00 0.89 15.56 4.27 27.41 14.03 Kamal 1991 16.99 2.32 22.73 9.25 29.19 22.50 2001 12.80 1.17 19.91 6.84 29.38 19.26 Panipat 1991 7.65 0.85 12.57 3.53 21.86 11.79 2001 4.47 0.50 9.50 2.21 23.46 11.18 Sonipat 1991 6.12 0.64 10.09 3.13 29.36 17.10 2001 4.95 0.42 6.19 1.52 27.24 13.93 Jind 1991 2.97 0.31 10.56 3.04 30.69 17.17 2001 2.61 0.22 6.54 1.64 26.80 13.02 Fatehabad 1991 11.30 1.41 20.50 6.78 26.36 17.71 2001 10.29 1.10 13.99 4.02 25.51 13.61 Sirsa 1991 7.52 0.68 11.60 4.11 36.68 24.09 2001 7.48 0.58 7.48 2.24 31.46 18.43 Hisar 1991 3.36 0.18 6.72 1.58 15.67 . 6.87 2001 2.21 0.10 4.78 0.81 13.60 5.03 Bhiwani 1991 7.82 1.07 14.22 4.78 39.81 25.31 2001 5.49 0.67 11.21 3.26 35.01 20.23 Rohtak 1991 7.53 0.49 4.11 0.95 13.70 5.87 2001 5.48 0.32 2.74 0.56 13.70 5.02 Jhajjar 1991 5.58 0.50 12.35 4.17 32.27 18.89 2001 5.26 0.45 6.88 2.08 32.39 16.70 Mahendragart 1991 7.10 1.22 20.77 9.96 46.99 41.46 2001 7.07 1.25 13.04 5.64 47.01 37.06 Rewari 1991 15.92 3.57 30.85 18.12 37.56 39.81 2001 12.09 2.29 22.17 10.75 41.31 37.25 Gurg;lon 1991 22.82 4.58 29.36 16.13 28.78 30.50 2001 16.14 2.34 21.61 8.88 32.85 25.19 Faridabad 1991' 15.46 2.25 23.43 9.71 32.13 24.49 2001 11.38 1.24 15.98 5.06 34.38 21.34

102 Statement-2 Percentage of villages and population by class of villages in 1991 and2001 2000-4999 5000-9999 10000+ Percentage of no. Percentage of Percentage of no. Percentage of Percentage of no. Percentage of of villages in this population in of villages in this population in of villages in this population in range to total. no. this range to range to total. no. this range to range to total. no. this range to of villages total population of villages total population of villages total population 9 10 11 12 13 14 25.20 41.42 5.39 19.14 0.65 4.51 29.79 41.53 7.45 22.25 1.43 8.31 9.05 28.69 0.90 5.39 0.00 0.00 12.95 31.61 2.68 16.53 0.00 0.00 9.80 27.90 0.82 4.34 0.20 2.60 14.73 33.09 2.07 9.55 0.42 5.12 5.21 16.44 0.50 4.15 0.00 0.00 11.42 28.71 0.81 4.84 0.00 0.00 12.47 28.95 2.20 10.83 0.00 0.00 15.48 30.65 3.19 12.72 0.25 2.01 30.19 41.03 8.36 24.82 1.82 9.98 31.85 36.49 ILl 1 25.52 4.07 18.80 24.16 40.23 5.73 17.79 1.20 7.91 28.67 40.55 7.82 23.50 1.42 8.68 45.35 51.52 11.48 26.78 1.09 5.53 42.46 42.24 17.88 36.07 2.23 7.80 44.95 54.65 8.87 21.93 0.61 2.55 48.30 53.09 12.08 26.07 1.24 4.97 45.22 51.54 9.57 23.82 0.99 4.12 50.00 51.57 11.76 25.09 2.29 8.46 33.89 46.05 6.69 20.42 1.26 7.63 39.09 45.86 8.65 22.36 2.47 13.05 37.30 48.28 5.96 16.17 0.94 6.67 44.55 53.72 8.41 21.83 0.62 3.20 54.85 50.10 17.54 33.67 1.86 7.60 51.84 40.94 22.79 36.23 4.78 16.89 32.47 41.71 4.50 20.83 1.18 6.30 36.38 40.55 9.39 23.32 2.52 11.97 45.89 36.71 26.72 49.02 2.05 6.96 44.52 35.53 28.77 45.15 4.79 13.42 41.04 50.87 7.56 20.00 1.20 5.57 44.53 5Ll6 8.92 20.72 2.02 8.89 23.77 42.14 1.37 5.22 0.00 0.00 30.43 47.82 2.45 8.23 0.00 0.00 14.93 33.67 0.74 4.83 0.00 0.00 22.42 41.45 2.01 8.26 0.00 0.00 16.57 35.48 2.18 10.88 0.29 2.43 23.63 37.70 4.18 15.37 1.59 10.52 21.50 34.31 7.00 25.78 0.48 3.46 27.12 34.66 9.45 29.08 1.69 8.62

103 A-3 VillAGES BY POPUlATION SIZE CLASS Total no. Total Rural Population Less than 200 State/ of Number Population District/ Inhabited P M F P M F Tahsil Villages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HARYANA 6,764 15,029,260 8,052,988 6,976,272 270 25,668 14,151 11,517 Panchkula 224 260,016 144,642 115,314 25 2,935 1,632 1,303 Tahsil Kalka 97 74,090 39,877 34,2l3 19 2,454 1,366 1,088 Tahsil Panchkula 127 185,926 104,765 81,161 6 481 266 215 Ambala 482 657,383 349,932 307,451 26 2,917 1,569 1,348 Tahsil Naraingarh 168 188,382 100,715 87,667 11 1,092 588 504 Tahsil Ambala 222 316,607 168,749 147,858 13 1,456 780 676 Tahsil Earara 92 152,394 80,468 71,926 2 369 201 168 Yamunanagar 613 648,608 347,540 301,068 50 5,109 2,857 2,252 Tahsil J agadhri 472 507,505 271,881 235,624 34 3,718 2,071 1,647 Tahsil Chhachhrauli 141 141,103 75,659 65,444 16 1,391 786 605 Kurukshetra 407 609,943 325,726 284,217 17 1,634 880 754 Tahsil Shahbad 79 113,678 60,621 53,057 5 563 295 268 Tahsil Pehowa 88 154,109 82,004 72,105 2 197 111 86 Tahsil Thanesar 240 342,156 183,101 159,055 10 874 474 400 Kaithal 270 762,649 411,628 351,021 9 667 394 273 Tahsil Gulba 100 152,992 81,487 71,505 7 515 279 236 Tahsil Kaithal 170 609,657 330,141 279,516 2 152 115 37 Karual 422 936,341 501,890 434,451 30 2,499 1,408 1,091 Tahsil Nilokheri 75 145,447 77,909 67,538 3 407 213 194 Tahsil Indri 106 129,260 69,037 60,223 11 1,184 693 491 Tahsil Kamal 135 347,639 186,999 160,640 10 605 336 269 Tahsil Assandh 48 164,055 87,498 76,557 2 164 87 77 Tahsil Gharaunda 58 149,940 80,447 69,493 4 139 79 60 Panipat 179 575,369 313,274 262,095 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Panipat 70 235,168 128,576 106,592 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Israna 35 122,006 65,760 56,246 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Samalkha 74 218,195 118,938 99,257 0 0 0 Sonipat 2,063 5,828,670 3,124,164 2,704,506 41 3,343 1,859° 1,484 Tahsil Gohana 80 291,370 157,178 134,192 0 0 0 Tahsil Ganaur 60 146,781 79,762 67,019 2 266 142° 124 Tahsil Sonipat 139 377,822 207,192 170,630 5 425 261 164 Tahsil Kharkhoda 44 141,827 77,550 64,277 0 0 0 0 Jind 306 948,250 512,205 436,045 3 271 161 110 Tahsil Narwana 108 369,422 198,727 170,695 28 18 10 Tahsil Jind 97 287,040 155,776 131,264 2 243 143 100 Tahsil Julana 30 92,874 50,031 42,843 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Safidon 71 198,914 107,671 91,243 0 0 0 0 Fatehabad 243 664,001 352,216 311,785 3 27 17 10 Tahsil Ratia 64 129,996 68,351 61,645 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Tohana 84 170,484 90,450 80,034 3 27 17 10 Tahsil Fatehabad 95 363,521 193,415 170,106 0 0 0 0 Sirsa 321 823,184 436,820 386,364 11 1,028 550 478 Tahsil Dabwali 69 181,369 95,997 85,372 4 295 145 150 Tahsil Sirsa 176 429,918 228,473 201,445 6 540 304 236 Tahsil Rania 46 131,490 70,007 61,483 1 193 101 92 Tahsil Ellenabad 30 80,407 42,343 38,064 0 0 0 0 contd ...

104 A-3 VlLLAGFS BY PO PUIATION SIZE ClASS 200-499 500-999 Number Population Number Population p M F P M F

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 582 211,673 112,903 98,770 1,205 916,344 487,935 428,409 56 20,298 10,887 9,411 54 40,265 22,072 18,193 32 11,673 6,186 5,487 21 14,807 8,024 6,783 24 8,625 4,701 3,924 33 25,458 14,048 11,410 73 27~04 14,514 12,590 155 112,591 59,824 52,767 33 12,997 7,034 5,963 58 41,087 21,949 19,138 32 11,018 5,840 5,178 70 50,662 26,828 23,834 8 3,089 1,640 1,449 27 20,842 11,047 9,795 119 45,055 24,085 20,970 203 149,542 79,994 69,548 88 33,561 17,870 15,691 162 119,071 63,626 55,445 31 11,494 6,215 5,279 41 30,471 16,368 14,103 40 14,345 7,741 6,604 117 93,546 49,759 43,787 10 3,738 2,003 1,735 23 18,389 9,682 8,707 9 3,239 1,698 1,541 20 15,750 8,364 7,386 21 7,368 4,040 3,328 74 59,407 31,713 27,694 18 6,096 3,261 2,835 42 32,554 17,459 15,095 13 4,375 2,334 2,041 25 18,856 10,101 8,755 5 1,721 927 794 17 13,698 7,358 6,340 24 8,388 4,471 3,917 84 64,048 34,389 29,659 5 1,793 980 813 17 12,497 6,802 5,695 8 2,702 1,415 1,287 34 24,859 13,262 11,597 8 2,997 1,585 1,412 19 15,446 8,302 7,144 0 0 0 0 5 3,997 2,148 1,849 3 896 491 405 9 7,249 3,875 3,374 8 2,904 1,644 1,260 17 12,730 6,905 5,825 3 859 510 349 4 2,631 1,398 1,233 0 0 0 0 3 2,202 1,209 993 5 2,045 1,134 911 10 7,897 4,298 3,599 89 29,131 15,610 13,521 176 136,036 72,636 63,400 0 0 0 0 500 267 233 2 721 391 ·330 8 6,306 3,378 2,928 6 2,258 1,238 1,020 8 5,839 3,164 2,675 1 352 187 165 3 1,901 1,031 , .g'T(f 5 1,817 987 830 20 15,589 8,464 7,125 2 670 366 304 6 4,720 2,620 2,100 2 722 393 329 7 5,343 2,881 2,462 0 0 0 0 1 968 505 463 1 425 228 197 6 4,558 2,458 2,100 22 7,311 3,884 3,427 34 26,714 14,142 12,572 8 2,802 1,460 1,342 8 6,058 3,127 2,931 10 3,205 1,715 1,490 14 10,761 5,737 5,024 4 1,304 709 595 12 9,895 5,278 4,617 13 3,772 2,026 1,746 24 18,442 9,792 8,650 2 479 250 229 3 2,594 1,373 1,221 8 2,254 1,216 1,038 13 10,017 5,320 4,697 2 565 306 259 3 2,190 1,159 1,031 474 254 220 5 3,641 1,940 1,701 contd ...

105 A-3 VillAGFS BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS 1000-1999 2000-4999 Number Population Number Population P M F P M F

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2,091 3,041,342 1,617,655 1,423,687 2,015 6,241,216 3,336,917 2,904,299 54 71,315 38,450 32,865 29 82,191 46,000 36,191 16 22,382 12,078 10,304 9 22,774 12,223 I (l,55 I 38 48,933 26,372 22,561 20 59,417 33,777 25,640 145 200,861 106,779 94,082 71 217,537 116,018 101,519 47 63,089 33,468 29,621 17 56,341 30,069 26,272 65 93,419 49,912 43,507 36 113,250 60,576 52,674 33 44,353 23,399 20,954 18 47,946 25,373 22,573 166 231,231 124,107 107,124 70 186,294 99,513 86,781 129 178,147 95,454 82,693 55 147,335 78,879 68,456 37 53,084 28,653 24,431 15 38,959 20,634 18,325 156 223,605 119,610 103,995 63 186,947 99,712 87,235 28 38,185 20,438 17,747 10 28,422 15,122 13,300 33 48,871 26,095 22,776 21 66,170 35,091 31,079 95 136,549 73,077 .63,472 32 92,355 49,499 42,856 74 106,983 57,408 49,575 86 278,311 149,933 128,378 33 49,104 26,172 22,932 18 54,192 28,707 25,485 41 57,879 31,236 26,643 68 224,119 121,226 102,893 124 180,347 96,339 84,008 121 379,718 202,982 176,736 21 28,506 15,232 13,274 26 83,642 44,808 38,834 38 56,719 30,212 26,507 14 38,542 20,580 17,962 41 60,238 32,242 27,996 40 125,780 67,591 58,189 11 15,537 8,278 7,259 20 64,260 33,764 30,496 13 19,347 10,375 8,972 21 67,494 36,239 31,255 42 64,325 35,270 29,055 76 243,035 132,078 110,957 17 26,403 14,748 11,655 32 103,414 55,946 47,468 7 11,684 6,289 5,395 17 51,744 27,761 23,983 18 26,238 14,233 12,005 27 87,877 48,371 39,506 578 864,443 462,165 402,278 938 2,980,150 1,597,426 1,382,724 17 24,655 13,294 11,361 44 146,825 79,355 67,470 15 24,355 13,191 11,164 29 92,184 50,187 41,997 45 66,591 36,348 30,243 61 197,470 108,116 89,354 11 17,852 9,714 8,138 22 72,021 39,522 32,499 82 123,428 66,609 56,819 153 489,081 264,224 224,857 25 37,087 19,841 17,246 55 177,229 95,529 81,700 25 38,036 20,698 17,338 51 166,243 90,055 76,188 8 11,964 6,368 5,596 16 51,890 28,014 23,876 24 36,341 19,702 16,639 31 93,719 50,626 43,093 62 90,394 47,733 42,661 95 304,514 161,345 143,169 18 24,917 13,119 11,798 27 72,382 37,951 34,431 29 41,266 21,879 19,387 22 72,451 38,389 34,062 15 24,211 12,735 11,476 46 159,681 85,005 74,676 101 151,673 80,467 71,206 143 442,230 234,554 207,676 26 38,678 20,533 18,145 28 89,043 47,085 41,958 58 86,673 46,021 40,652 75 228,846 121,835 107,011 13 19,168 10,192 8,976 21 62,417 33,005 29,412 4 7,154 3,721 3,433 19 61,924 32,629 29,295 contd...

106 A-3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS

5000-9999 10000 and above Number Population Number Population P M F P M F

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 504 3,343,738 1,807,238 1,536,500 97 1,249,279 676,189 573,090 6 43,012 25,601 17,411 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 43,012 25,601 17,411 0 0 0 0 10 62,690 33,454 29,236 2 33,683 17,774 15,909 2 1~,776 7,607 6,169 0 0 0 0 5 31,338 16,580 14,758 15,464 8,233 7,231 3 17,576 9,267 8,309 1 18,219 9,541 8,678 5 31,377 16,984 14,393 0 0 0 0 4 25,673 13,981 11,692 0 0 0 0 1 5,704 3,003 2,701 0 0 0 0 13 77,630 41,426 36,204 1 12,236 6,598 5,638 2 12,145 6,483 5,662 1 12,236 6,598 5,638 3 19,882 10,645 9,237 0 0 0 0 8 45,603 24,298 21,305 0 0 0 0 30 194,605 105,524 89,081 11 143,433 77,649 65,784 4 25,950 13,894 12,056 0 0 0 0 26 168,655 91,630 77,025 11 143,433 77,649 65,784 33 220,080 118,212 101,868 6 81,261 44,089 37,172 3 18,602 9,874 8,728 0 0 0 0 5,254 2,875 2,379 0 0 0 0 13 92,586 49,729 42,857 4 49,987 27,214 22,773 8 48,823 26,346 22,477 2 31,274 16,875 14,399 8 54,815 29,388 25,427 0 0 0 0 32 207,494 112,657 94,837 4 44,881 24,720 20,161 11 67,259 36,805 30,454 3 34,602 19,169 15,433 8 56,376 30,501 25,875 0 0 0 0 13 83,859 45,351 38,508 10,279 5,551 4,728 207 1,381,681 741,809 639,872 34 433,886 232,659 201,227 17 108,325 59,300 49,025 1 11,065 4,962 6,103 4 22,949 12,473 10,476 0 0 0 0 12 79,592 43,962 35,630 2 25,647 14,103 11,544 6 38,855 21,216 17,639 10,846 5,880 4,966 36 237,869 128,151 109,718 7 80,195 43,609 36,586 15 106,350 56,616 49,734 4 43,338 23,737 19,601 8 52,527 28,739 23,788 2 23,926 12,867 11,059 5 28,052 15,144 12,908 0 0 0 0 8 50,940 27,652 23,288 12,931 7,005 5,926 21 148,409 78,939 69,470 6 86,632 46,156 40,476 3 23,837 12,694 11,143 0 0 0 0 6 42,774 22,713 20,061 0 0 0 0 12 81,798 43,532 38,266 6 86,632 46,156 40,476 27 179,702 95,339 84,363 2 26,337 14,092 12,245 5 36,909 19,525 17,384 1 13,371 7,086 6,285 16 101,588 53,777 47,811 0 0 0 0 5 33,991 18,238 15,753 12,966 7,006 5,960 7,214 3,799 3,415 0 0 0 0 contd...

107 A-3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZECIASS Total no. Total Rural Population Less than 200 State! of Number Population DistricU Inhabited P M F P M F Tahsil Villages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hisar 272 1,138,999 614,605 524,394 4 213 129 84 Tahsil Adampur 33 137,830 73,633 64,197 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Risar 149 623,204 337,118 286,086 2 178 107 71 Tahsil N arnaund 28 111,605 60,262 51,343 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Ransi 62 266,360 143,592 122,768 2 35 22 13 Bhiwani 437 1,154,629 612,789 541,840 4 295 149 146 Tahsil Bawani Khera 19 96,709 51,385 45,324 1 36 19 17 Tahsil Bhiwani 80 305,342 163,361 141,981 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Tosham 58 151,212 80,513 70,699 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Siwani 33 69,076 36,472 32,604 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Loharu 78 126,511 66,497 60,014 2 201 94 107 Tashil Dadri 169 405,779 214,561 191,218 58 36 22 Rohtak 146 610,524 332,044 278,480 3 35 22 13 TahsilMaham 31 163,172 88,757 74,415 0 .0 0 0 Tahsil Rohtak 115 447,352 243,287 204,065 3 35 22 13 Jhajjar 247 684,975 369,458 315,517 4 215 138 77 Tahsil Beri 35 119,261 63,908 55,353 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Bahadurgarh 59 222,291 121,641 100,650 0 0 0 0 Tahsil Jhajjar 153 343,423 183,909 159,514 4 215 138 77 Mahendragarh 368 702,885 365,343 337,542 4 317 188 129 Tahsil M ahendragarh 148 318,147 165,780 152,367 1 43 29 14 Tahsil N arnaul 220 384,738 199,563 185,175 3 274 159 115 Rewari 397 629,177 329,461 299,716 14 1,507 807 700 Tashil Kosli 52 ]10,965 57,105 53,860 0 0 0 0 Tashsil Rewari 265 419,680 220,679 199,001 11 1,177 635 542 Tahsil Bawal 80 98,532 51,677 46,855 3 330 172 158 Gurgaon 694 1,291,285 688,163 603,122 38 3,821 2,034 1,787 Tahsil Pataudi 56 67,791 35,587 32,204 4 252 137 115 Tahsil Gurgaon 147 380,541 207,862 172,679 7 771 409 362 Tahsil Sohna 68 112,504 60,094 52,410 3 390 201 189 Tahsil Taoru 82 108,841 57,762 51,079 13 1,256 666 590 TahsilNuh 109 201,816 106,726 95,090 6 341 177 164 Tahsil Ferozepur Jhirka 144 226,113 118,749 107,364 3 569 320 249 Tahsil Punhana 88 193,679 101,383 92,296 2 242 124 118 Faridabad 413 973,242 523,570 449,672 18 1,487 813 674 Tahsil Faridabad 60 115,700 61,867 53,833 2 272 140 132 Tahsil Ballabgarh 83 187,458 101,248 86,210 9 793 444 349 Tahsil Palwal 145 303,414 163,585 139,829 6 417 226 191 Tahsil Rathin 80 192,951 103,036 89,915 1 5 3 2 Tahsil Rodal 45 173,719 93,834 79,885 0 0 0 0

108 A-3 VILlAGES BY POPUlATION SIZECIASS

200-499 500-999 Number Population Number Population P M F P M F

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 2 865 450 415 13 9,229 4,994 4,235 0 0 0 0 3 2,006 1,061 945 0 0 0 0 6 4,523 2,427 2,096 0 0 0 0 1 788 439 349 2 865 450 415 3 1,912 1,067 845 20 7,3~ 3,887 3,468 49 37,596 19,645 17,951 356 193 163 2 1,460 759 701 0 0 0 0 9 6,102 3,269 2,833 2 736 388 348 2 1,768 946 822 2 746 431 315 3 2,584 1,364 1,220 9 3,285 1,708 1,577 19 14,165 7,403 6,762 6 2,232 1,167 1,065 14 11,517 5,904 5,613 5 1,890 1,015 875 4 3,415 1,826 1,589 1 317 164 153 1 890 469 421 4 1,573 851 722 3 2,525 1,357 1,168 9 2,849 1,639 1,210 17 14,265 7,578 6,687 0 0 0 0 1 828 454 374 371 204 167 3 2,302 1,266 1,036 8 2,478 1,435 1,043 13 11 ,135 5,858 5,277 22 8,404 4,337 4,067 48 39,674 20,590 19,084 7 2,748 1,423 1,325 19 15,328 8,064 7,264 15 5,656 2,914 2,742 29 24,346 12,526 11,820 34 12,874 6,698 6,176 88 67,609 35,425 32,184 2 733 387 346 8 6,506 3,384 3,122 23 8,335 4,329 4,006 57 42,743 22,399 20,344 9 3,806 1,982 1,824 23 . 18,360 9,642 8,718 74 26,372 13,868 12,504 150 114,730 60,707 54,023 4 1,430 735 695 21 16,114 8,466 7,648 6 1,890 1,037 853 22 17,934 9,746 8,188 8 2,841 1,529 1,312 16 10,384 5,497 4,887 8 2,507 1,301 1,206 20 14,952 7,941 7,011 17 6,132 3,244 2,888 24 18,250 9,705 8,545 19 6,831 3,547 3,284 34 26,807 14,002 12,805 12 4,741 2,475 2,266 13 10,289 5,350 4,939 29 10,643 5,693 4,950 66 49,259 26,530 22,729 11 4,070 2,142 1,928 11 7,590 4,054 3,536 2 633 339 294 10 7,989 4,308 3,681 9 3,365 1,797 1,568 26 19,364 10,485 8,879 6 2,129 1,193 936 14 10,862 5,789 5,073 446 222 224 5 3,454 1,894 1,560

109 A·3 VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS 1000-1999 2000-4999 Number Population Number Population P M F P M F

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 37 57,331 30,745 26,586 141 466,287 248,983 • 217,304 5 7,663 4.123 3,540 19 61,304 32,606 28,698 27 41,890 22,463 19,427 73 241,039 128,121 112,918 4 6,092 3,260 2,832 17 57,615 30,962 26,653 1 1,686 899 787 32 106,329 57,294 49,035 153 233,599 123,353 110,246 159 468,213 248,014 220,199 2 3,248 1,681 1.567 6 21,659 11,460 10,199 18 27,479 14,587 12,892 34 106,241 56,721 49,520 25 37,376 19,769 17,607 20 57,804 30,793 27,011 13 18,945 9.961 8,984 14 36,972 19,503 17,469 29 43,563 22,854 20,709 16 45.348 23,716 21.632 66 102,988 54,501 48,487 69 200,189 105,821 94.368 20 30,661 16,742 13,919 65 216,893 117,382 99,511 1,683 887 796 12 40,380 21,835 18,545 19 28,978 15,855 13,123 53 176,513 95.547 80.966 80 114,396 60,855 53,541 110 350,420 188,691 161,729 12 19,103 10,072 9,031 18 61,916 33,054 28,862 13 19,112 10.372 8,740 29 94,145 51,242 42,903 55 76.181 40,411 35,770 63 194,359 104,395 89.964 173 260,502 135,289 125,213 112 336,127 174,613 161,514 64 99,317 51,745 47,572 49 148,295 76,999 71,296 109 161,185 83,544 77,641 63 187,832 97,614 90,218 164 234,353 122,269 112,084 89 260,828 136,338 124,490 21 31,929 16,340 15,589 18 50,957 26,235 24,722 107 152,176 79,461 72,715 62 184,083 96,690 87,393 36 50,248 26,468 23,780 9 25,788 13.413 12,375 228 325,149 171,434 153,715 164 486,800 258,019 228,781 18 25,061 13,073 11,988 9 24,934 13.176 11 ,758 49 71,035 37,719 33,316 46 136,738 73.514 63,224 24 35,892 19,131 16,761 16 51,796 27,523 24,273 22 31,144 16,611 14,533 18 52,287 27,715 24.572 28 38,349 20,385 17,964 25 77,046 40,586 36,460 58 81,701 42,712 38.989 25 71,229 37.408 33,821 29 41,967 21,803 20,164 25 72.770 38,097 34.673 142 207,736 111,649 96,087 112 337,290 181,338 155,952 21 30,114 16,213 13,901 10 28,465 15,314 13,151 22 34,237 18.654 15,583 33 93,730 50.614 43,116 56 80,761 43,4Il 37,350 38 116,616 62,585 54,031 31 43,464 23,094 20,370 17 52,664 28.244 24,420 12 19,160 10.277 8.883 14 45,815 24.581 21,234

110 A-3VllLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS

5000-9999 10000 and above Number Population Number Population P M F P M F

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 62 412,673 224,506 188,167 13 192,401 104,798 87,603 3 23,282 12,503 10,779 3 43,575 23,340 20,235 33 219,098 119,881 99,217 8 116,476 64,119 52,357 6 47,110 25,601 21,509 0 0 0 0 20 1~,183 66,521 56,662 2 32,350 17,339 15,011 41 269,416 143,854 125,562 11 138,155 73,887 64,268 5 36,043 19,168 16,875 2 33,907 18,105 15,802 11 73,866 39,663 34,203 8 91,654 49,121 42,533 9 53,528 28,617 24,911 0 0 0 0 9,829 5,213 4,616 0 0 0 0 3 19,949 10,722 9,227 0 0 0 0 12 76,201 40,471 35,730 1 12,594 6,661 5,933 42 275,684 150,180 125,504 7 81,946 44,877 37,069 13 85,353 46,342 39,011 3 34,549 19,060 15,489 29 190,331 103,838 86,493 4 47,397 25,817 21,580 22 141,962 77,081 64,881 5 60,868 33,476 27,392 3 24,012 12,983 11,029 13,402 7,345 6,057 9 58,895 32,426 26,469 4 47,466 26,131 21,335 10 59,055 31,672 27,383 0 0 0 0 9 57,861 30,326 27,535 0 0 0 0 8 52,416 27,520 24,896 0 0 0 0 1 5,445 2,806 2,639 0 0 0 0 8 52,006 27,924 24,082 0 0 0 0 3 20,840 10,759 10,081 0 0 0 0 5 31,166 17,165 14,001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 198,529 107,836 90,693 11 135,884 74,265 61,619 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 74,986 42,516 32,470 6 77,187 42,921 34,266 0 0 0 0 1 11,201 6,213 4,988 1 6,695 3,528 3,167 0 0 0 0 8 50,491 26,697 23,794 11,207 5,932 5,275 4 27,768 14,806 12,962 1 11,208 5,954 5,254 5 38,589 20,289 18,300 2 25,081 13,245 11,836 39 283,018 152,293 130,725 7 83,809 45,254 38,555 4 27,121 14,315 12,806 1 18,068 9,689 8,379 7 50,076 26,889 23,187 0 0 0 0 7 49,567 26,969 22,598 3 33,324 18,112 15,212 10 72,106 38,469 33,637 11,721 6,244 5,477 11 84,148 45,651 38,497 2 20,696 11,209 9,487

111 Appendix

This appendix gives the number and population of per cent of the total rural population of Haryana. In villages with a population of 5,000 and over and of other words these 601 villages contain roughly one towns with a population under 5,000 for the State as a third of the total rural population of the State. Their whole and for each district and tahsil. Normally, the district wise concentration is 6 in Panchkula, 12 in places with a population of 5,000 and above; are Ambala, 5 in Yamunanagar, 14 in Kurukshetra, 41 declared as towns and places with less than 5,000 in Kaithal, 39 in Kamal, 36 in Panipat, 43 in Sonipat, population are treated as villages. However, certain 43 in Jind, 27 in Fatehabad" 29 in Sirsa, 75 in Hisar, places with a population below 5,000 have been treated 52 in Bhiwani, 49 in Rohtak, 27 in Jhajjar, 9 in . as town because these are either administered by Mahendragarh, 8 in Rewari, 40 in Gurgaon and 46 municipal committees or treated as Census towns. in Faridabad district. The highest number of villages There is only one such place which has been considered each having a popUlation of 5,000 and above in a as town i.e. Rewari (Rural) Census Town in Rewari tahsil has been recorded in Hisar tahsil (41) villages Tahsil of Rewari district. This places account for 0.07 whereas the tahsils of Kalka, Bawal and Pataudi per cent of the total urban population of the State in are such where there is no such large size village. 2001. The number of such villages is respectively high in There are 601 villages in the State with a Kaithal tahsil (37) villages while it is only 1 each in population of 5,000 and above claiming a total the tahsils of Chhachhrauli, Indri, Ellenabad, Siwani, population of 4,593,017 persons accounting for 30.56 Narnaul, Sohna and Taoru.

1,12 APPENDIX Number and population of lillage \lith population of 5000 and abow and TOm1S \lith population below 5000 Villages with population 5,000 and above Towns with population below 5,000 Name of State District/fahsil Percentage to total Percentage of total Population rural population Population urban population of Number of the State Number the State 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HARYANA 601 4,593,017 30.56 1 4454 0,07

Panchkula 6 43,012 0.29 Kalka 0 0 0.00 Panchkula 6 43,012 0.29 Ambala 12 96,373 0.64 Naraingarh 2 13,776 0.09 Ambala 6 46,802 0.31 Barara 4 35,795 0.24 Yamunanagar 5 31,377 0.21 Jagadhri 4 25,673 0.17 Chhachhrauli 5,704 0.04 Kurukshetra 14 89,866 0.60 Shahbad 3 24,381 0.16 Pehowa 3 19,882 0.14 Thanesar 8 45,603 0.30 Kaithal 41 338,038 2.25 Guhla 4 25,950 0.17 Kaithal 37 312,088 2.08 Kamal 39 301,341 2.01 Nilokheri 3 18,602 0.12 Indrl 5,254 0.03 Kamal 17 142,573 0.95 Assandh 10 80,097 0.53 Gharaunda 8 54,815 0.36 Panipat 36 252,375 1.68 Panipat 14 101,861 0.68 Israna 8 56,376 0.38 Samalkha 14 94,138 0.63 Sonipat 43 297,279 1.98 Gohana 18 119,390 0.79 Ganaur 4 22,949 0.15 Sonipat 14 105,239 0.70 Kharkhoda 7 49,701 0.33 Jind 43 318,064 2.12 Narwana 19 149,688 1.00 Jind 10 76,453 0.51 Julana 5 28,052 0.19 Safidon 9 63,871 0.42 Fatehabad 27 235,041 1.56 Ratia 3 23,837 0.16 Tohana 6 42,774 0.28 Fatehabad 18 168,430 1.12 coutd...

113 APPENDIX Number and poIIDation of "\illage mth poIIDation of 5000 and abo~ and Towns mth poIIDation below 5000 Villages with population 5,000 and above Towns with population below 5,000 Name of State Districttrahsil Percentage to total Percentage of total Population rural population Population urban population of Number ofthe State Number the State 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sirsa 29 206,039 1.37 Dabwali 6 50,280 0.33 Sirs a 16 101,588 0.68 Rania 6 46,957 0.31 Ellenabad 7,214 0.05 Hisar 75 605,074 4.03 Adampur 6 66,857 0.44 Hisar 41 335,574 2.23 Narnaund 6 47,110 0.31 Hansi 22 155,533 1.03 Bhiwani 52 407,571 2.71 Bawani Khera 7 69,950 0.47 Bhiwani 19 165,520 1.10 Tosham 9 53,528 0.36 Siwani 1 9,829 0.07 Loham 3 19,949 0.13 Dadri 13 88,795 0.59 Rohtak 49 357,630 2.38 Maham 16 119,902 0.80 Rohtak 33 237,728 1.58 Jhaiiar 27 202,830 1.35 Beri 4 37,414 0.25 Bahadurgarh 13 106,361 0.71 Jhaijar 10 59,055 0.39 Mahendragarh 9 57,861 0.38 M ahendragarh 8 52,416 0.35 Narnaul 5,445 0.04 Rewari 8 52,006 0.35 1 4454 0.07 Kosli 3 20,840 0.14 Rewari 5 31,166 0.21 4454 0.07 Bawal 0 0 0.00 Gurgaon 40 334,413 2.23 Pataudi 0 0 0.00 Gurgaon 17 152,173 1.01 Sohna 11,201 0.01 Taoru 1 6,695 0.04 Nuh 9 61,698 0.41 Ferozepur Jhirka 5 38,976 0.26 Punahana 7 63,670 0.42 Faridabad 46 366,827 2.44 Faridabad 5 45,189 0.30 Ballabgarh 7 50,076 0.33 Palwal 10 82,891 0.55 Hathin 11 83,827 0.56 Hodal 13 104,844 0.70

114 Table A-4 Towns And Urban Agglomerations Classified By Population Size Class In 2001 With Variation Since 1901

A-4: TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901

FLY - LEAF

This table corresponds to tableA-4 of 1951,1961, The total urban population of State/union Territories I 1971,1981,1991 and 2001 Censuses and Imperial table for each Census from 1901 to 2001 is given at the IV of earlier Censuses. It gives the variation in urban beginning of the table and is followed by similar figures population separately for mMes and females, decade for class I total and the towns included in class I variation and percentage decade variation for each arranged in the order of their population size. Similarly, town and urban agglomeration during the last hundred the total for class II followed by figures of each town years. In addition the status of the towns and the area included in that class arranged in the order of population figures of the towns and urban agglomerations are also and so on, are given. given in the table. The status and area figures are, Classification of towns given in this table is based however, confined to 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991 and 2001 on the 2001 population. As many towns have changed Censuses only. The area of each town/urban their class since 1901, the class totals shown in the agglomeration is given in square kilometres. table for previous Censuses are not the totals of This table give all the towns including urban respective population of all towns shown in that class agglomerations and their population by sex since 1901 in 2001. They are the totals of population of all towns and its decadal variation. .The towns/cities/urban which on the basis of population were included in that agglomerations have been arranged in the order of class in those Censuses except the towns which are population size and class of town. As in 1971, 1981 the constituents of urban agglomerations. Some of these and 1991, all towns and urban agglomerations have towns might have gone to higher or lower class and been grouped into the following six broad classes some might not have been treated as towns in later according to population size Censuses. Since this table shows the growth of urban Class I Population of 100,000 and above population alone, the figures of previous Censuses against towns which were not treated as towns in those Class II Population of 50,000 to 99,999 Censuses are not given. Their population in those Class III Population of 20,000 to 49,999 Censuses were treated as rural. They are also not included in the class totals for any Census. If any Class IV Population of 10,000 to 19,999 place was treated as town in some Census and Class V Population of 5,000 to 9,999 declassified as rural in subsequent Censuses and again Class VI Population of less than 5,000 classified as town, then in such cases the population particulars are given only for those Censuses in which According to the tradition of Indian Census any it was a town and the word 'declassified' is recorded place with a population of 100,000 and above is called against other Census years where it was declassified. a City. The definitions of town and urban agglomeration An alphabetical list of all towns and urban have already been given at length in the general agglomerations is given at the end of the general note descriptive note given at the beginning of this volume. which will help the readers for any reference to the As mentioned earlier, the concept of town group as entries given in the table. adopted in 1961 was given up in 1971 and 1981 mainly

117 on account of lack of uniformity in defining town group particular one, has been taken as the basis for that as applied in different States. In 1971 and 1981 single class. Censuses, the term town group was replaced by urban Wherever the population of a town in a previous agglomeration with an uniform definition throughout Census had to be adjusted with reference to 2001, a the country. The same concept of urban agglomeration foot note has been inserted explaining the procedure was also adopted for 1991 and 2001 Censuses. An and extent of such adjustment. urban agglomeration was formed by taking into account the continuous urban spread constituting a town and This table has been supplemented by the its adjoining urban outgrowths, or two or more physically following two appendices: contiguous towns together with continuous well Appendix-! : This appendix gives, the new towns recognised urban outgrowths, if any, of such towns. of 2001, which were not towns in 1991 and also the While presenting the data of urban agglomerations, towns of 1991 which have been declassified in 2001, its components have been depicted with lower case in their area and the 1991 and 2001 population. Roman serial like (i), (ii), (iii), etc. and the units treated Appendix- 2 : This appendix gives the towns which as urban outgrowth have been shown with a suffix have undergone changes between 1991and 2001, (O.G.) against each. Where an urban agglomeration the brief reasons for such changes and their consists of two or more towns, the core towns have population at the two Censuses been shown with prefix (a). (b), (c) etc. Mega City In striking class totals an urban agglomeration has been taken as unit not only for 2001, but also for The concept of 'Mega city' is a recent phenomenon previous Censuses. As mentioned earlier the total for in the Urban Sociology and is defined in term of any class in any previous Census has been worked out metropolitan city in the form of large size, problem of as the total of towns of that particular class in that management of civic amenities and capacity to absorb particular Census. They include towns which might the relatively high growth of population. Indian Census have been individually withdrawn from urban status in in 1991 treated the population size of 5 million and above a preceding or succeeding Census. But a constituent as the cut off point to identify a place as the mega city. of an urban agglomeration has been reckoned not Whereas, for the purpose of inclusion in Centrally according to its class in a particular Census but Sponsored Scheme for Infrastructure Development in according to the class of urban agglomeration as a Mega Cities the Ministry of Urban Affairs and whole in that Census. In case of merger of towns, the employment, Department of Urban Development merged units are considered as absorbed in the unit in adopted the criteria of 4 million and above population which it merged. So the unit and not the merged town as per 1991 Census for Mega Cities. In 2001 Census, has been presented according to its class in each cities with 10 millions and above population have been Census. Where, however, a rural area has been merged treated as Mega cities. with an urban area in a particular Census, the population In Haryana there is no Mega City as per 2001 of only the urban area in Censuses preceding that Census.

118 The statement-l of Table-A4 provides the growth 6,115,304 in 2001 registering more than 10 times in the number of cities and towns and their population increase in its urban population. There was no class I in the State between 1901 and 2001. In this statement, town in 190 I. Out of 54 towns of 1901, 1 town was in the constituents of an 'Urban Agglomeration' which Class-II, 5 in Class-III, 10 in Class IV, 24 in Class V reckoned as separate towns in their own right have and 14 in Class VI. It was only in 1961 when one town been classified according to their own population and was recognized as Class-I, namely, Ambala Cantt. not according to the population of the 'Urban According to the population of individual towns as per Agglomeration'. Where, however, an 'Urban Agglomeration' was formed with out-growths, the 2001 Census, there are 20 towns in Class-I, 7 in Class­ population of out growth(s) was added to the town II, 26 in Class-III, 36 in Class IV, 16 in Class V and whose outgrowth ~ey were. Thus, the combined only I in Class VI. population of the town and its outgrowths(s) has been The number of towns decreased to 36 in 1911 taken into account for the purpose of classification. from 54 in 1901 and again decreased to 39 in 1921,41 It is clear from the above statement that the Urban in 193 1, 45 in 1941 and than increased to 62 in 1951. population of the area which is now known as Haryana At the time of 1961 Census, the total number of towns decreased to 61 which again rose to 65 in 1971, 81 in State was only 574,074 in 1901 which has become 1981, 94 in 1991, and has become 106 in 2001.

StateIreut -1 Growth in the number of Cities and Towns and their Population in S tate and District 1901-2001* CENSl.N Year No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Haryana 1901 78,638 5 134,008 10 146,385 24 164,453 14 50,590 54 574,074 1911 80,131 6 145,894 8 105,009 12 81,870 9 36,800 36 449,704 1921 76,326 7 173,652 8 104,637 13 87,412 10 39,168 39 481,195 1931 86,592 7 203,979 9 132,032 18 121,356 6 20,784 41 564,743 1941 62,419 II 360,301 7 102,527 22 164,435 4 16,263 45 705,945 1951 6 383,700 8 223,185 12 170,905 18 135,090 18 55,614 62 968,494 1961 1 105,543 7 473,648 11 371,236 15 205,066 15 107,748 12 44,439 61 1,307,680 1971 2 227,248 9 704,821 14 462,074 15 222,344 20 138,989 5 17,483 65 1,772,959 1981 9 1,329,549 7 475,984 15 501,139 25 340,442 23 172,671 2 7,602 81 2,827,387 1991 11 2,145,973 11 769,719 18 532,705 31 437,247 21 159,783 2 9,317 94 4,054,744 2001 20 4,241,867 7 415,254 26 793,838 36 530,695 16 129,196 4,454 106 6,115,304 Panchkula 1901 7,045 7,045 1911 4,532 4,532 1921 7,635 7,635 1931 7,937 7,937 1941 9,766 9,766 1951 14,058 14,058 1961 18,068 18,068 1971 17,711 17,711 1981 21,359 11,239 5,746 3 38,344 1991 70,375 1 27,281 2 13,529 4 111,185 2001 140,925 2 60,439 7,031 4 208,395 contd.. _

119 Staterrent -1 Growth in the number of Cities and Towns and their Population in S tate and District 1901-2001* CFNSm Class I Classll Class ill ClassN ClassV Class VI All Classes Year No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Ambala 1901 78,638 78,638 1911 80,131 80,131 1921 76,326 76,326 1931 86,592 86,592 1941 1 62,419 44,964 2 107,383 1951 2 146,728 5,294 3 152,022 1961 105,543 1 76,204 2 181,747 1971 102,493 83,633 1 6,880 3 193,006 1981 104,565 80,741 40,462 2 16,712 5 242,480 1991 119,338 90,872 49,017 2 26,582 5 285,809 2001 2 245,847 61,748 21,644 18,210 9,579 6 357,028 Yamunanagar 1901 1 13,462 3 21,197 4 34,659 1911 12,045 1 7,774 2 8,518 4 28,337 1921 11,544 7,630 2 7,776 4 26,950 1931 13,268 2 12,893 3,494 4 29,655 1941 16,422 2 14,234 3,857 4 34,513 1951 23,943 15,684 1 7,566 3 11,916 6 59,109 1961 51,700 32,637 3 17,968 1 3,988 6 106,293 1971 72,594 35,094 4 28,224 4,645 7 140,557 1981 109,304 43,102 1 10,131 4 28,521 7 191,058 1991 144,346 67,386 2 21,983 6 43,212 10 276,927 2001 2 290,986 4 55,619 5 46,417 11 393,022 Kurukshetra 1901 1 11,009' 5,066 3,518 3 19,593 1911 1 11,054 4,719 2 15,773 1921 11,329 4,226 2 15,555 1931 12,293 5,032 2 17,325 1941 1 14,745 6,574 2 21,319 1951 2 28,574 1 6,237 3 34,811 1961 2 35,803 2 14,418 4 50,221 1971 2 51,055 2 22,032 4 73,087 1981 2 75,360 2 32,398 4 107,758 1991 81,255 2 53,438 19,441 4 154,134 2001 122,319 3 93,192 4 215,511 Kaithal 1901 14,408 5,834 2 20,242 1911 12,912 12,912 1921 15,477 15,477 1931 19,418 1 19,418 1941 22,325 1 22,325 1951 25,732 6,552 2,690 3 34,974' 1961 34,890 7,660 2 42,550 1971 45,199 9,107 2 54,306 1981 58,385 2 22,769 3 81,154 1991 71,142 21,089 2 28,406 4 120,637 2001 117,285 32,128 2 34,069 4 183,482

onld .....

120 Statement -1 Grolrth in the number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901-2001* CENSm Class I Classll ClassID Class IV ClassV Class VI All Classes Year No. Population No. PoJ:K1lation No. Population No. PoJ:K1lation No. Population No. PoJ:K1lation No. PoJ:K1lation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Kamal 1901 23,559 1 23,559 1911 21,961 1 21,961 1921 22,845 1 22,845 1931 26,610 5,731 2 32,341 1941 37,444 1 7,287 2 44,731 1951 \01 57,906 2 14,919 1,884 4 74,7CfJ 1961 72,ICfJ 1 10,496 8,035 3 90,640 1971 92,784 1 13,045 9,357 3 115,186 1981 132,107 3 41,213 8,304 5 181,624 1991 176,131 1 21,147 3 41,145 ~ 4,860 6 243,283 2001 221,236 3 75,080 3 41,526 7 337,842 PanilBt 1901 26,914 26,914 1911 26,342 26,342 1921 1 27,343 27,343 1931 32,915 32,915 1941 37,837 37,837 1951 54,981 1 54,981 1961 67,026 67,026 1971 87,981 1 87,981 1981 137,927 2 26,741 3 164,668 1991 191,212 2 35,133 3 226,345 2001 268,899' 3 96,300 18,815 8,066 6 392,080 SonilBt 1901 1 12,990 3,765 2 16,755 1911 12,014 12,014 1921 12,981 12,981 1931 15,050 1 15,050 1941 17,781 1 17,781 1951 30,189 30,189 1961 45,882 45,882 1971 62,393 8,399 2 70,792 1981 lCfJ,369 16,489 2 125,858 1991 143,922 1 20,952 1 13,151 3 178,025 2001 1 225,074 2 77,538 1 18,763 4 321,375 Jind 1901 8,047 4,832 2 12,879 1911 1 8,783 8,783 1921 10,840 5,199 2 16,039 1931 11,699 6,169 2 17,868 1941 1 14,9CfJ 2 14,873 3 29,782 1951 2 29,817 1 9,426 2 6,267 5 45,510 1961 24,216 14,037 2 14,378 1 4,387 5 57,018 1971 2 59,480 12,010 2 13,219 5 84,7CfJ 1981 56,748 1 29,242 1 15,116 2 17,385 5 118,491 1991 85,315 2 58,589 2 21,640 5 165,544 2001 135,855 50,435 27,541 2 27,746 5 241,577 Contd ....•

121 Statement -1 Growth in the nnmber of Cities and Towns and their Population in State and District 1901·2001* CENSUS Class I Classn Class ill Class IV Class V OassVI All Classes Year No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fatehabad 1901 2,786 2,786 1911 1921 1931 7,519 7,519 1941 8,950 I 8,950 1951 7,955 2 5,008 3 12,963 1961 2 24,855 1 3,138 3 27,993 1971 22,630 16,789 3,919 3 43,338 1981 2 58,536 13,065 4,609 4 76,210 1991 " 2 79,715 17,644 5,599 4 102,958 2001 2 111,436 23,826 6,895 4 142,157 Sirsa 1901 1 15,800 3 9,322 4 25,122 1911 1 14,629 1 14,629 1921 16,241 16,241 1931 18,909 1 18,909 1941 20,718 6,655 2 27,373 1951 24,980 10,380 2,622 3 37,982 1961 33,363 15,421 4,079 3 52,863 1971 2 69,729 6,531 3 76,260 1981 89,068 1 29,071 16,714 9,643 4 144,496 1991 112,841 2 58,509 19,850 4 191,200 2001 160,735 53,811 3 78,919 5 293,465 Hisar 1901 2 34,170 2 34,170 1911 2 31,738 2 31,738 1921 21,415 15,425 2 36,840 1931 1 25,179 18,356 2 43,535 1941 2 51,208 2 51,208 1951 2 61,134 2 61,134 1961 60,222 33,712 3,588 3 97,522 1971 89,437 41,108 5,981 3 136,526 1981 137,369 50,365 17,648 7,055 4 212,437 1991 181,255 59,653 24,891 12,197 8,599 5 286,595 2001 263,186 75,747 33,132 2 26,053 5 398,118 Bhiwani 1901 35,917 7,009 3 8,624 5 51,550 1911 31,100 5,713 2,343 3 39,156 1921 33,270 6,582 2,339 3 42,191 1931 35,866 7,260 2,956 3 46,082 1941 43,921 8,712 4,023 3 56,656 1951 52,183 8,795 3,438 3 64,416 1961 58.194 13,839 4,465 3 76,498 1971 73,086 19,484 2 10,618 4 103,188 1981 101,277 27,315 11,530 7,247 . 4 147,369 1991 121,629 32,253 2 25,268 2 17,418 6 196,568 2001 169,531 44,895 4 55,967 6 270,393 Contd....•

122 Statement -1 Growth in the number of Cities and Towns and their Population in State andDistrict 1901-2001* CENSUS Class I ClassIl Class ill Class IV Class V Class VI All Classes Year No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population No. Population 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Rohtak 1901 20,323 7 45,945 8 66,268 1911 20,361 5,438 2 25,799 1921 25,240 2 12,927 4,127 4 42,294 1931 35,235 2 14,124 1,561 4 50,920 1941 48,148 11,145 6,818 4,278 4 70,389 1951 71,902 2 17,332 3 89,234 1961 88,193 11,076 9,300 3 108,569 1971 124,755 2 27,295 3 152,050 1981 1 166,767 26,188 2 24,102 4 217,057 1991 216,096 32,496 2 29,607 7,838 5 286,037 2001 294,577 2 35,027 3 329,604 jbaiiar 1901 1 12,227 2 15,697 3 27,924 1911 10,617 7,798 4,990 3 23,405 1921 10,800 2 13,409 3 24,209 1931 12,232 2 14,840 3 27,072 1941 13,919 2 17,991 3 31,910 1951 2 21,684 9,952 3 31,636 1961 3 40,056 3 40,056 1971 25,812 2 31,283 3 57,095 1981 2 61,735 13,490 3 75,225 1991 57,235 27,693 14,508 3 99,436 2001 126,746 39,002. 1 16,162 2 13,187 5 195,097 Mabendragarll 1901 1 19,489 9,984 2 29,473 1911 21,350 9,761 2 31,111 1921 20,410 8,580 2 28,990 1931 21,905 9,194 2 31,099 1941 23,063 9,771 2 32,834 1951 18,180 7,961 2 4,472 4 30,613 1961 1 23,959 9,071 2 6,103 4 39,133 1971 1 31,875 11,496 5,875 1 1,937 4 51,183 1981 1 41,441 14,488 7,131 1 2,993 4 66,053 1991 51,976 19,610 1 8,601 4,457 4 84,644 2001 62,077 24,323 10,195 2 13,041 5 109,636 Remui 1901 27,295 5,739 2 33,034 1911 24,780 5,332 2 30,112 1921 23,129 5,137 2 28,266 1931 26,269 4,944 2 31,213 1941 30.673 5,709 2 36,382 1951 34,082 5,392 2 39,474 1961 36,994 5,924 2 42,918 1971 43,885 6,529 2 50,414 1981 51.562 7,760 2 59,322 1991 75,342 1 10,848 9,010 3 95,200 2001 100,684 2 31,036 4,454 4 136,174 Contd .....

123 StatellEnt -1 Growth in the number of Cities and To"\IDS and their PoJDlation in S tate and District 1901-2001 '" CENSUS Class I Classll Class m Class IV ClassY Class VI All Classes Year No. POJDlation No. PopIiation No. PoJDlation No. PoJDlation No. POJDlation No. Population No. POJDlation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Gurgaon 1901 3 19,438 2 8,936 5 28,374 1911 3 16,318 1 3,158 4 19,476 1921 1 5,107 3 12,642 4 17,749 1931 3 18,265 3,667 4 21,932 1941 4 26,959 1 4,105 5 31,064 1951 18,613 1 5,138 5 17,317 7 41,068 1961 37,868 2 12,664 4 14,691 7 65,223 1971 57,151 4 28,269 2 6,982 7 92,402 1981 89,115 3 34,569 6 45,505 10 169,189 1991 121,486 6 80,234 4 30,984 11 232.704 2001 201,322 27,570 9 130,591 9,521 12 369,004 Fariwood 1901 1 12,830 2 13452 2 8,807 5 35,089 1911 2 14,953 2 8,540 4 23,493 1921 2 15,206 2 8,058 4 23,264 1931 10,807 2 12,392 4,162 4 27,361 1941 13,606 3 20,136 4 33,742 1951 23,125 13,915 3 22,571 5 59,611 1961 2 67,715 2 21,415 8,330 5 97,460 1971 85,762 36,207 3 51,199 5 173,168 1981 330,864 47,328 18,740 2 11,662 5 408.594 1991 617,717 59,168 25,635 2 14,993 5 717,513 2001 2 1,156,660 38,309 10,916 2 15.459 6 1,221,344 N:>te:- The constituents of an urban agglomeration \\here the constituents \\ere reckoned as separate toVlnS in their OVln right have been classified according to their 0\\11 population and not according to the population of the urban agglomeration. Where hO\\ever UAs \\ere formed v.ith out- grov.ths. the population of the out-grov.ts(s) was added to the tOVln \\hose out-grov.th it was. The combined population of tOVlnS and out-grov.ths (s) was taken for determination of the class in the above statement.

124 The statement-2 clearly shows the growth in the As we go further in Class-III and Class-IV this number of cities and towns and their population percentage variation decreases and becomes expressed in indices with 1901 as base (1901=100). negative in Class-V and Class-VI towns over all

I Percentage variation in the Class-I towns and their percentage variation in all class is 96.29 percent in population in 2001 Census taking 1901 as 100 is towns and 965.25 percent in their population. 1900.00 percent and 3919.09 percent respectively, Percentage variation in towns and their population in percentage variation in Class-II towns and their terms of Class-III and IV towns increases as we go population is comparatively lower which is 600.00 from 1901 to 2001 whereas it has decreasing trend in percent in towns and 429.06 percent in popUlation. terms of Class V and VI towns.

StatellEnt 2 Gromh in the nun&r c:i Oties and TOmlS and their POJUation exp:essedin Indces wth 1901 a.. lBse (1901=100) Percentage Variation in Census Class I Classon Oass-ill Class-IV Class-V Class-VI All Classes Year PoiIDa- PoiIDa- PoiIDa- PoiIDa- PoiIDa- PoiIDa- PoiIDa- TOmlS tion TOmlS tion TOmlS tion TOmlS tion TOmlS tion TOmlS tion TOmlS tion 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1901 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1911 0.00 1.90 20.00 8.87 -20.00 -28.27 -50.00 -50.22 -35.71 -27.26 -33.33 -21.66 1921 0.00 -2.94 40.00 29.58 -20.00 -28.52 -45.83 -46.85 -28.57 -22.58 -27.78 -16.18 1931 0.00 10.11 40.00 52.21 -10.00 -9.80 -25.00 -26.21 -57.14 -58.92 -24.07 -1.63 1941 0.00 -20.62 120.00 168.87 -30.00 -29.96 -8.33 -0.01 -71.43 -67.85 -16.67 22.97 1951 500.00 387.93 60.00 66.55 20.00 16.75 -25.00 -17.85 28.57 9.93 14.81 68.71 1961 0.00 0.00 600.00 502.31 120.00 177.03 50.00 40.09 -37.50 -34.48 -14.29 -12.16 12.96 127.79 1971 100.00 115.31 800.00 796.29 180.00 244.81 50.00 51.89 -16.67 -15.48 -64.29 -65.44 20.37 208.84 1981 800.00 1159.72 600.00 505.28 200.00 273.96 150.00 132.57 -4.17 5.00 -85.71 -84.97 50.00 392.51 1991 1000.00 1933.27 1000.00 878.81 260.00 297.52 210.00 198.70 -12.50 -2.84 -85.71 -81.58 74.07 606.31 2001 1900.00 3919.09 600.00 428.06 420.00 492.38 260.00 262.53 -33.33 -21.44 -92.86 -91.20 96.30 965.25

Statement -3 Given on next page illustrates that N containing 8.68 per cent of total urban population of in 1901, the proportion of population residing in Class the State. Class V Towns with 15.09 per cent of the VI towns was 8.81 per cent of the Total urban State claimed 2.11 per cent of the urban population. population, while the propol tion of Class VI towns was Class VI towns are 0.94 per cent covering 0.07 per 25.93 per cent of the total number of towns in 1901. It cent of the State,s urban popUlation. . reflects that about one fourth of the towns were Class Among the Districts, it is observed that in 2001 VI towns. In 2001 Census, the proportion of class VI Census in three districts, namely, Ambala, Rohtak and towns comes down to 0.94 per cent and so contains Faridabad, the per centage of Class -I towns is 33.33 only 0.07 per cent of the total Urban population of the per cent covering 68.86, 89.37 and 94.70 per cent urban State. Broadly speaking, the proportion of Class VI population of the respective districts. In remaining towns to total number of Towns and proportion of districts per centage of Class 1 towns varies between urban population contained therein has decreased in 25 per cent and 8.33 per cent. The lowest coverage of the successive Censuses, except for the Censuses of towns is in district Gurgaon containing 54.56 per cent 1951 and 1961, when the proportion of smaller towns urban population of the district. The 2nd lowest district was comparatively higher which may be due to the is Kamal covering 14.28 per cent Class I towns with recognition of new Towns. 65.49 per cent urban population. In 2001 Census, the proportion of Class-I Towns is In other Classes, the per centage variation of towns 18.87, containing 69.37 per cent of the urban population and urban population from 1901 to 2001 isnormal,except of the State. In Class II, the per centage of Towns is in district Gurgaon, Class V town has relatively come 6.60 relatively low covering 6.79 per cent of urban down to 1 Town in 2001 as compared to 6 Towns in population. Class - III with 24.53 per cent of towns 1981 Census. This is due to popUlation increase resulting having 12.98 per cent urban population. The highest per in change of classes of Towns. centage of Towns (33.96) has been recorded in Class

125 State~nt-3 Percentage of ToWl'> in each Qa

126 StaenEm·3 Percentage dTOWIS in each Oass to TOOlI Nmrr d'TOWIS amPercenfage d'PqIlloom in each Oass to'llial tihnPqIlloomfmnl901·2001 inShte wdIlstrict 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of TOVIIIS Pop.dation ToWlS RlpJlation ToWlS Pop.dation TOVIIIS RlpJlation ToWlS Pop.dation TOWlS Pop.dation 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hny.ma

9.68 39.62 2.22 8.84 245 15.33 2,56 15.86 278 17.82 1.86 13.70 12'Xl 23m ~.44 51.04 .17JJ7 36.12 17.96 36.00 16.67 3244 9.26 23.34 19.35 17.65 15.56 14.52 21.95 23.38 20.51 21.74 2222 23.35 18.52 25.50 29.m 13.95 48.89 23.29 43.'Xl 21.49 33.33 18.17 33.33 18.21 44.44 28.65 29.04 5.74 8.89 231 14.63 3.68 25.64 8.14 25.00 8.18 25.92 8.81 P.md1kuIa

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 AnbIla

66.67 96.52 50.00 58.13 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 41.87

33.33 3.48

Ymmnanagar

16.67 40.51 16.67 26.53 25.00 47.58 25.00 44.74 25.00 4283 25.00 4251 25.00 38.84 16.66 12.80 50.00 41.24 50.00 43.48 25.00 28.31 25.00 27.43 75.00 61.16 so.oo 20.16 25.00 11.18 25.00 11.78 so.oo 28.86 so.oo 30.06 Kurukshetra

66.67 8208 50.00 69.16 50.00 70.96 so.oo 7283 50.00 70.08 33.33 56.19 33.33 17.92 50.00 30.84 50.00 29.04 33.33 25.86 sa.oo 27.17 so.oo 29.92 33.34 17.95 Kaithal

33.33 73.58 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 71.18 33.33 18.73 50.00 28.82 33.34 7.69 Kamal

25.00 77.51 50.00 83.71 50.00 8228 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

50.00 19.97 50.00 16.29 50.00 17.72 25.00 252 contd ..

127 S tatement-.3 Percentage of Towns in each Oass to Total Number ofTomJS andPerce~tage of Population in each Oass to Total Urhm Popdation from 1901-2001 in State and District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 Class Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Panipat I 16.67 68.58 33.33 84.48 33.33 83.76 IT 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 III 50.00 24.56 IV 16.67 4.80 66.67 15.52 66.67 16.24 V 16.66 2.06 VI Sonipat 25.00 70.03 33.34 80.84 50.00 86.90 IT 50.00 88.14 III 50.00 24.13 33.33 11.77 100.00 100.00 IV 25.00 5.84 33.33 7.39 50.00 13.10 V 50.00 11.86 VI Jind 1 20.00 56.24 II 20.00 20.88 20.00 51.54 20.00 47.89 III 20.00 11.40 40.00 35.39 20.00 24.68 40.00 70.22 20.00 42.47 IV 40.00 11.48 40.00 13.07 20.00 12.76 20.00 14.18 20.00 24.62 V 40.00 14.67 40.00 15.60 40.00 25.22 VI 20.00 7.69 Fatehabad I IT 50.00 78.39 III 25.00 16.76 50.00 77.42 50.00 76.81 33.33 52.22 IV 25.00 17.14 25.00 17.14 33.33 38.74 66.67 88.79 V 25.00 4.85 25.00 5.44 VI 25.00 6.05 33.34 9.04 33.33 11.21 Sirsa I 20.00 54.77 25.00 59.02 IT 20.00 18.34 25.00 61.64 m 60.00 26.89 50.00 30.60 25.00 20.12 66.67 91.44 33.33 63.11 IV 25.00 10.38 25.00 11.57 33.33 29.17 V 25.00 6.67 33.33 8.56 VI 33.34 7.72 Hisar . 20.00 66.11 20.00 63.24 20.00 61.81 II . 20.00 19.03 20.00 20.81 20.00 23.71 33.33 65.51 33.33 61.75 III 20.00 8.32 20.00 8.69 33.33 30.11 33.33 34.57 IV 40.00 6.54 20.00 4.26 20.00 8.31 V 20.00 3.00 40.00 6.17 33.34 4.38 VI 33.34 3.68 Bhiwani 16.67 62.70 16.67 61.88 25.00 68.72 II 25.00 70.83 33.33 76.07 III 16.67 16.60 16.67 16.41 25.00 18.54 IV 66.66 20.70 33.33 12.85 25.00 7.82 25.00 18.88 33.33 18.09 V 33.33 8.86 25.00 4.92 50.00 10.29 VI 33.34 5.84 contd....

128 StaeJrent-3 Percentage d'TOWl'l in ea:h QaiS to'lli:al 'l'IbIIhr d''IlMu; lUlPercenlage d'PqJ.Jlatim in ea:h QaiS to T

100.00 100.00 '" 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Soniplt

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 77.53

50.00 '22.47 lind

40.00 65.52 33.33 5O.

33.33 61.37 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 66.67 38.63 100.00 100.00 Sirsa

33.33 65.77 SO.OO 7S.ff) 33.33 27.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 62.89 50.00 24.31 33.34 6.W 75.00 37.l1 llsar

100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 SO.OO 57.84 50.00 58.l3 SO.OO 42.16 SO.OO 41.87 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Bbiwmi

33.33 81.01 33.33 77.52 33.33 77.83 33.33 78.86 33.33 79.43 20.00 W.Ol

33.33 13.65 33.33 lS.38 33.33 15.75 33.33 IS.ffi 33.33 14.59 20.00 13.00 33.34 5.34 33.34 7.10 33.34 6.42 33.34 5.54 33.34 5.98 00.00 16.73 contd ..

129 Statement-3 Percentage ofTollm in each Oass to Total NuniJer ofTollm and Percentage ofPOJDlation in each Oass to Total U'bm PoIDiation from 1901-2001 in State and District 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 Class Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of of No. of of oCNo.of of Towns Population Towns Population Towns Population To\mS Population Towns Population 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Rohtak 33.33 89.37 20.00 75.55 25.00 76.83 33.33 82.05 II 33.33 81.23 m 20.00 11.36 25.00 12.07 IV 66.67 10.63 40.00 10.35 50.00 11.10 66.67 17.95 33.33 10.20 V 20.00 2.74 33.34 8.57 VI Jhaiiar 20.00 64.97 II 33.33 57.56 m 20.00 19.99 33.33 27.85 66.67 82.07 33.33 45.21 IV 20.00 8.28 33.34 14.59 33.33 17.93 66.67 54.79 100.00 100.00 V 40.00 6.76 VI Mahendragarh I n 20.00 56.62 25.00 61.41 m 20.00 22.19 25.00 62.74 25.00 62.28 25.00 61.22 IV 20.00 9.30 25.00 23.17 25.00 21.93 25.00 22.46 V 40.00 11.89 25.00 10.16 25.00 10.80 25.00 11.48 25.00 23.18 VI 25.00 5.26 25.00 4.53 25.00 3.78 50.00 15.60 Rew.ui I 25.00 73.94 II 33.33 79.14 50.00 86.92 m 50.00 87.05 50.00 86.20 IV .50.00 22.79 33.33 11.40 50.00 12.95 V 33.34 9.46 50.00 13.08 50.00 13.80 VI 25.00 3.27 Gurgaon I 8.33 54.56 9.09 52.21 II 10.00 52.67 14.29 61.85 m 8.33 7.47 14.29 58.06 IV 54.55 34.48 30.00 20.43 V 8.34 35.39 36.36 13.31 60.00 26.90 57.14 30.59 28.57 19.42 VI 75.00 2.58 28.57 7.56 57.14 22.52 Faridabad I 33.33 94.70 20.00 86.09 20.00 80.98 II 20.00 8.25 20.00 49.53 m 16.67 3.14 20.00 3.57 20.00 11.58 20.00 20.91 IV 16.67 0.89 20.00 4.59 60.00 29.56 40.00 69.48 V 33.33 1.27 40.00 2.09 40.00 2.85 40.00 21.97 VI 20.00 8.55

130 Sutenm-3 J.>ercedage ci'lbwl> in eoch Oass to'rual N.nhr ci'lbwl> anPercemage ci~wm in ea:h Oass to'llial Uim~wmfron1901-2001 inStte IUIIlstrict 1951 J9:tl 1931 1921 1911 1W1 I\!rcentage I\!rcentage I\!rcentage I\!rcentage I\!rcentag\! R!rcentage I\!rcentage R!rcentage R!rcentage R!rcentage R!rcentage I\!rcentage d'~d' d' d'No.d' d IiNo. d' Ii d'No.d d' d'No.d' d' d'No.d' d' ToWl'l ~ation Tmms ~atim TOWlS ~ation Tmms ~ation Tmms ~ation TOWlS ~ation 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Rmtak

33.33 &>.59 25.00 68.40 25.00 (/).20 25.00 59.68 50.00 78.92 1250 ?IJ.01 25.00 15.83 (ij.01 19.31 25.00 9.(/) 50.00 Tl.74 50.00 30.56 50.00 21.00 87.50 (/).33 25.00 6.00 25.00 3. 25.00 9.76 .)bajjar

(ij.01 68.54 33.33 43.62 33.33 45.18 33.33 44.61 33.33 45.36 33.33 43.79 33.33 31.46 (ij.01 56.38 (ij.67 54.82 (ij.67 55.39 33.33 33.32 (ij.67 56.21 33.34 21.32 .MilielXbtgarlI

50.00 70.24 50.00 70.44 50.00 70.40 50.00 68.63 25.00 59.39 50.00 66.12 25.00 26.00 50.00 '19.76 50.00 29.56 50.00 29.ro 50.00 31.37 50.00 33.88 50.00 14.61 R!wni

50.00 86.34 50.00 84.31 50.00 84.16 50.00 81.83 50.00 8229 50.00 8263

50.00 13.(ij 50.00 15.(/) 50.00 18.17 50.00 17.71 50.00 17.37 50.00 15.84 ~

14.29 45.32 14.28 1251 80.00 86.79 75.00 83.28 25.00 28.77 75.00 83.79 ro.oo 68.51 71.43 4217 20.00 13.21 25.00 16.72 75.00 71.23 25.00 16.21 40.00 31.49 Nuicbl:lld

20.00 38.79 20.00 23.34 25.00 40.32 25.00 39.50 20.00 36.56 ffl.oo 37.87 75.00 59.68 50.00 45.29 50.00 65.36 50.00 63.65 40.00 38.34 25.00 15.21 50.00 34.64 50.00 36.35 40.00 25.10

131 The statement-4 presents per centage of area of per sq. km. in following 9 districts has considerably towns in each class to total urban area of the State increased during 1991 and 2001 Censuses. Increase and the districts and density of population per sq. kIn. in density of class III towns of six districts, namely, in each Class. Kurukshetra (2598) to (3655), Kamal (l057) to (3239), Hisar (16594) to (22088), Bhiwani (5951) to (8283), It is clear from the above statement that the highest urban density of population has been recorded in Class Jhajjar (4616) to (6500) and Faridabad (11393) to II towns in 1991 (5019) and 2001 (4898) Censuses. (17026) is noticed. In Class- IV towns of three districts Sonipat (8068) to (11511), Jind (12089) to (15501) and The lowest urban density of population has been Mahendragarh (1850) to (4320) is found. recorded in Class VI towns of 1991 Census (1191) and also in Class VI towns of 2001 Census (565). This trend shows that the pressure of popUlation has overpowered Class-III and IV towns of the above While going through the districts, it is observed mentioned districts. that out of 19 districts, the density of Urban population Statement-4 Percentage of Area of TOmlS in each class to Total Urhm area of S tate and Districts and Density ofPoJX1lation per Sq. KIn in each class 2001 1991 Class Percentage of Area Density per Km2 Percentage of Area Density per Km2 to Total Urban area to Total Urban area 2 3 4 5 Haryana 59.42 5,833 51.30 4,791 II 5.64 4,898 12.60 5,019 III 17.04 3,334 10.62 4,713 IV 11.43 3,201 18.12 2,413 V 5.86 1,653 6.55 2,397 VI 0.61 565 0.81 1,191 Panchkula I 55.37 5,526 II 64.99 4,618 III 30.23 4,342 14.46 8,047 IV V 14.40 1,060 20.55 2,807 VI Ambala I 81.92 5,432 88.05 4,761 II III 3.20 9,794 N 11.47 2,296 11.95 3,597 V 3.41 4,059 VI Yamunanagar I 51.61 6,971 61.94 5,286 II III N 13.79 3,390 7.88 4,156 V 34.60 1,573 30.18 1,738 VI Kurukshetra 58.33 3,426 II 57.64 2,646 III 41.67 3,655 38.61 2,598 N 3.75 9,721 V VI contd.....

132 Statement-4 Percentage of Area of Towns in each class to Total Urban area of State and Districts and Density of Population per Sq. Km in each class 2001 1991 Class Percentage of Area Density per Km2 Percentage of Area Density per Km2 to Total Urban area to Total Urban area 2 3 4 5 Kaithal 51.56 2,681 II 27.44 9,005 III 36.20 1,046 29.52 2,481 IV 12.24 3,279 43.04 2,293 V VI Kamal 41.77 8,814 49.57 7,463 II III 38.58 3,239 4.20 1,057 IV 19.65 3,516 33.27 3,655 V VI 12.96 788 Panipat 82.33 8,084 89.13 9,184 II III 8.42 6,667 IV 10.87 7,238 V 9.25 1,639 VI Sonipat 73.45 4,714 62.13 5,082 II III 24.04 4,961 34.29 3,420 IV 2.51 11,511 3.58 8,068 V VI Jind 46.98 8,879 II 18.42 8,406 51.74 5,576 III 29.11 29 42.20 4,695 IV 5.49 15,501 6.06 12,089 V VI Fatehabad

II 81.65 4,620 III 13.54 5,957 76.33 5,293 IV 20.27 4,411 V 4.81 4,856 3.40 8,357 VI Sirsa 25.83 6,082 27.86 5,838 II 21.82 2,410 ,- III 52.35 1,473 14.17 5,952 IV 57.97 494 V VI contd.....

133 134 Statement-4 Percentage of Area of Towns in each class to Total Urban area of State and Districts and Density of Population per Sq. Km in each class 2001 1991 Class Percentage of Area Density per Km2 Percentage of Area Density per Km2 to Total Urban area to Total Urban area 2 3 4 5 Gurgaon 38.80 5,495 32.52 5,631 II III 9.04 2,842 N 49.11 1,956 50.19 1,768 V 3.05 2,903 17.29 2,415 VI Faridabad 93.21 5,586 94.34 3,466 II 2.92 10,719 III 1.01 17,026 1.19 11,393 IV 0.90 5,485 V 4.88 1,425 1.55 5,135 VI It is clear from the statement-5 of table A-4 that towns claiming 415,254 population in 2001 Census in Faridabad Municipal Corporation has emerged as only comparison to 11 Class II towns with 769,719 one million plus city in Haryana State for the first population in 1991. There is an increase of 9 Class-I time as per 2001 Census. There are 20 Class-I cities towns, 8 Class III towns and 5 Class IV towns and a whose population ranges between 100,000 and decrease of 4 Class II towns, 5 Towns in Class V 499,999 in 2001 Census in comparison to 11 cities, at and only 1 town in Class VI as compared to 1991 the time of 1991 Census. Again there are 7 Class II Census. StatellEnt-5 Nwmer andPOJIIIation of Oties and Tol\DS of1991 and2001 Cemuses arranged in six a~ses I to VI State! 2001 1991 Percentage Increase & Percentage District Oass of Towns No.of Total No. of Total increase & decrease in increase or Towns PoIXllation TomLS PoIXllation decrease in poIXllation decrease No.ofTomLS ofOass 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Haryana All Classes 106 6,115,304 94 4,054,744 12.77 2,060,560 50.82 TotalGass I 20 4,241,867 11 2,145,973 81.82 2,095,894 97.67 (a) Cities with one million and above Pop. 1 1,055,938 100.00 1,055,938 100.00 (b) Cities with 500,000 to 999,999 Pop. 617,717 -100.00 -617,717 -100.00 (c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 19 ·3,185,929 10 1,528,256 90.00 1,657,673 108.47 Gass II 7 415,254 11 769,719 -36.36 -354,465 -46.05 Class III 26 793,838 18 532,705 44.44 261,133 49.02 ClassN 36 530,695 31 437,247 16.13 93,448 21.37 Class V 16 129,196 21 159,783 -23.81 -30,587 -19.14 Gass VI 1 4,454 2 9,317 -50.00 -4,863 -52.19

1. Panchkula Gass I 140,925 100.00 140,925 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 140,925 100.00 140,925 100.00 Class II 70,375 -100.00 -70,375 -100.00 Gass III 2 60,439 27,281 100.00' 33,158 121.54 GassN GassV 7,031 2 13,529 -50.00 ·6,498 -48.03 Gass VI contd ..•.

135 Statemmt-5 Nmmer andPop.dation ofOties and ToWJS of 1991 and2001 Censuses arranged in six Oasses I to VI State! 2001 1991 Percentage Increase & Percentage District Class of Towns No.of Total No. of Total increase & decrease in increase or Towns Population Towns Population decrease in population decrease No.ofTowns of Class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Arnbala Class I 2 245,847 119,338 50.00 126,509 106.01 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 2 245,847 119,338 50.00 126,509 106.01 Class n 1 61,748 90,872 -29,124 -32.05 Class III 21,644 1 49,017 -27,373 -55.84 ClassN 18,210 2 26,582 -50.00 -8,372 -31.49 Class V 9,579 100.00 -579 100.00 Class VI

3. Yamunan~h Class I 2 290,986 144,346 -100.00 146,640 101.59 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 2 290,986 144,346 -100.00 146,640 101.59 Class n 67,386 -100.00 -67,386 -100.00 Class III ClassN 4 55,619 2 21,983 100.00 33,636 153.01 Class V 5 46,417 6 43,212 -16.67 3,205 7.42 Class VI

4. Kurukshetra Class I 122,319 100.00 122,319 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 122,319 100.00 122,319 100.00 Class n 81,255 -100.00 -81,255 -100.00 Class III 3 93,192 2 53,438 50.00 39,754 74.39 ClassN 19,441 -100.00 -19,441 -100.00 Class V Class VI

5. Kaithal Class I 117,285 100.00 117,285 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 117,285 100.00 117,285 100.00 Class n 71,142 -100.00 -71,142 -100.00 Class III 32,128 I 21,089 11,039 52.34 ClassN 2 34,069 2 28,406 5,663 19.94 Class V Class VI

6. Kamal Class I 221,236 176,131 45,105 25.61 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 221,236 176,131 45,105 25.61 Class n Class III 3 75,080 1 21,147 200.00 53,933 255.04 Class N 3 41,526 3 41,145 381 0.93 Class V Class VI 4,860 -100.00 -4,860 -100.00 7. Panipat Class I 1 268,899 191,212 77,687 40.63 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 1 268,899 191,212 77,687 40.63 Class n Class III 3 96,300 ClassN 1 18,815 2 35,133 -50.00 -16,318 -46.45 GassV 8,066 100.00 8,066 100.00 Class VI

Contd ......

136 Statement-S Number andPopuiation of Cities andTowns of1991 and2001 Censnses arranged in six Classes Ito V1 State/ 2001 1991 Percentage Increase & Percentage District Class of To'Mls No.of Total No. of Total increase & decrease in increase or To'Mls Population Towns Population decrease in population decrease No.ofTowns of Class 1991-2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8. Sonipat Cla~s I 225,074 143,922 81,152 56.39 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 225,074 143,922 81,152 56.39 Class II Class III 2 77,538 20,952 100.00 56,586 270.07 Classzy 18,763 13,151 5,612 42.67 Class V Class VI

9. lind Class I 135,855 100.00 l35,855 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 135,855 100.00 135,855 100.00 Class II 50,435 1 85,315 -34,880 -40.88 Class III 27,541 2 58,589 -50.00 -31,048 -52.99 Class N 2 27,746 2 21,640 6,106 28.21 Class V Class VI

10. Fatehabad Class I (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. Class II 2 111,436 200.00 111,436 100.00 Class III 23,826 2 79,715 -50.00 -55,889 -70.11 Class N 17,644 -100.00 -17,644 -100.00 Class V 6,895 5,599 1,296 23.15 Class VI 11. Sirsa Class I 160,735 112,841 47,894 42.44 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 160,735 112,841 47,894 42.44 Class II 1 53,811 100.00 53,811 100.00 Class III 3 78,919 22,312 200.00 56,607 253.71 ClassN 2 56,047 -200.00 -56,047 -100.00 Class V Class VI

12. Hisar Class I 263,186 181,255 81,931 45.20 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 263,186 181,255 81,931 45.20 Class II 75,747 59,653 16,094 26.98 Class III 1 33,l32 24,891 8,241 33.11 ClassN 2 26,053 12,197 13,856 113.60 Class V 8,599 -100.00 8,599 -100.00 Class VI

13. Bhiwani Class I 169,531 121,629 47,902 39.38 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 169,531 121,629 47,902 39.38 Class II Class III 1 44,895 1 32,253 12,642 39.20 Class N 4 55,967 2 25,268 100.00 30,699 121.49 Class V 2 17,418 -200.00 -17,418 -100.00 Class VI Contd ......

137 Statement·S Nwnber and PoIDlation of Gties and TOmlS of 1991 and 2001 Censuses arranged in six Oasses I to V1 State! 2001 1991 Percentage Increase & Percentage District Class of Towns N~).Of Total No. of Total increase & decrease in increase or Towns Population Towns Population decrease in population decrease No.ofTowns of Class 1991·2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14. Rohtak Class I 1 294,577 216,096 78,481 36.32 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 294,577 216,096 78,481 36.32 Class IT Class III 32,496 -100.00 -32,496 -100.00 Class IV 2 35,027 2 29,607 5,420 18.31 Class V 7,838 -100.00 -7,838 -100.00 Class VI 15. Jhajjar Class I 126,746 100.00 126,746 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 126,746 100.00 126,746 100.00 Class IT 57,235 -100.00 57,235 -100.00 Class III 39,002 27,693 11,309 40.84 Class IV 1 16,162 14,508 1,654 11.40 Class V 2 13,187 200.00 13,187 100.00 Class VI 16. Mahendragarh Class I Class IT 62,077 51,976 10,101 19.43 Class III 24,323 100.00 24.323 100.00 Class IV 1 10,195 19,610 -9,415 -48.01 Class V 2 13,041 8,601 100.00 4,800 55.81 Class VI 4,457 -100.00 4,457 -100.00 17. Rewari Class I 100,684 100.00 100,684 100.00 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 100,684 100.00 100,684 100.00 Class IT 75,342 -100.00 75,342 -100.00 Class III Class IV 2 31,036 10,848 100.00 20,188 186.10 Class V 9,010 -100.00 9,010 -100.00 Class VI 4,454 100.00 4,454 100.00 18. Gurgaon Class I 201,322 121,486 79,836 65.72 (c) 100,000 to 499,999 Pop. 201,322 121,486 79,836 65.72 Class IT Class III 1 27,570 100.00 27,570 100.00 Class IV 9 130,591 6 80,234 50.00 50,357 62.76 ClassV 9,521 4 30,984 -75.00 -21,.463 -69.27 Class VI 19. Faridabad Class I 2 1,156,660 617,717 100.00 538,943 87.25 (a) Cities ith one million and above F 1,055,938 100.00 1,055,938 100.00 (b) cities with 500,000 to 999,999 P, 617,717 -100.00 617,717 -100.00 (c) Cities with 100,000 to 499,999 P 100,722 100.00 100,722 100.00 Class IT 59,168 -100.00 59,168 -100.00 Class III 38,309 1 25,635 12,674 49.44 Class IV . 1 10,916 2 14,993 -50.00 -4,077 -27.19 Class V 2 15,459 200.00 15,459 100.00 Class VI Note:* The constituents of an urban agglomeration have been classified according to their 0\\011 population and not according to the population of the urban agglomeration except in such cases \\here as urban agglomeration comprises a single to\\o11 along with its out growth.

138 This statement-6 shows the proportion of In 2001, Class I towns contains, 69.37 per cent population in each class of town to total urban urban population and in 1991, covered 52.92 per cent population in 1991- 2001 population to total urban population. The position shows that in 1991, Class II Towns shared 18.98 per cent In 2001, only one City with 17.27 per cent population, whereas in 2001 only 6.79 per cent population has come up having more than one million population appeared in this category. In Class ill Towns, population whereas in 1991 there was no such town in the proportion of population remains almost equal in this category. and there was one City in 1991 in the 1991and 2001. Under Class IV to VI in 2001, the category o~ 0.5 to 1 million population, under 0.1 to 0.5 proportion is 10.86 percent and in 1991 it was 14.96 per million population category. There were 10 Towns in cent population to total urban Population. This trend 1991 and 19 Towns ha~ng 52.10 per cent population shows that during the decade the towns have changed in 2001. their classes due to increase of population.

S tatement-6 Proportion of population in each Class of Town to Total Urban Population in 2001-1991

State Cities with population Cities with population Cities with population

over 1 million 0.5 to 1 million 0.1 to 0.5 million 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2 3 4 5 6 7 Haryana 17.27 15.23 52.10 37.69

State Class I Class n Class ill Class IV to VI 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Haryana 69.37 52.92 6.79 18.98 12.98 13.14 10.86 14.96 Note:- The constituents of an urban agglomeration have been classified according to their Olm Population and not according to Population of the urban agglomeration except in such cases \\here an urban agglomeration comprises a single tOIm along with its outgro\\1h

The following statement 7 on next psge gives infor­ ticular class of 1991 has received by a process of incre­ mation about the movement of cities and towns from one ment from the next lower or any other lower range of class to another during 1991-2001. In this statement (a) 1991 and (c) indicates number and population of towns indicates number and population of towns which a par~ which a particular class of 1991 has passed down by a ticular class of 2001 has received by the process of dec­ process of decrement to the next lower or any other lower rement from the next higher class range(s) of 1991. (b) range of 2001. Sonipat and Rohtak are the two districts indicates number and popUlation of towns which a par- where there is no such movement

139 Statement·7 Movement of Cities and Towns from one Class to another during 1991·2001 (a) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 2001 has received by a process of decrement from the next higher class range (s) of 1991 (b) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of2001 has received by a process of increment from the next lower or any other lower range of 1991 ( c) Indicates number and population of towns which a particular class of 1991 has passed down by a process of decrement to the next lower or any other lower range of 2001 (increment and decrement of towns in the statement relate to their territorial content in 2001) Category of I n ill movement Population Population Population Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 Class No. 1991 2001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I3 aryana a b II 9 658,090 1,052,394 III 5 203,462 277,430 IV(i) 9 156,879 219,639 N 2 27,031 66,434

c Panchkula

b II 70,375 140,925

Ambala b rr 90,872 106,568 III 1 49,017 61,748 IV 12,750 21,644 Yamunanagar b II 67,386 101,290

Kumkshetra b II 81,255 122,319 IV 19,441 22,339 Kaithal b. 'rr 71,142 117,285 Kamal b IV 2 32,852 44,908 Panipat b IV 1 18,384 29,866 N 2 27,031 66,434 Sonipat

Jind b II 85,315 135,855 III 1 38,533 50,435 Fatehabad b III 2 79,715 111,436 IV 17,644 23,826 Sirsa b III 1 36,197 53,811 IV 19,850 25,163 Hisar b

Bhiwani b Rohtak c Jhajjar b II 57,235 126,746 M ahendragarh b IV 19,610 24,323

Rewari b 75,342 100,684 Gurgaon b IV 16,348 27,570

Faridabad b II 59,168 100,722

140 N V VI W

A1IDatim A1IDatim ~atim ~ treated toWl in 1001

a~ Nl. 1991 1001 a~ Nl. 1991 1001 a~ Nl. 1991 1001 a~ N>. 1991 1001 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ana

V(l) 10 82,451 117,483 VI(l) 1 4,457 5,673 N 7,m 4,454 VI(ii) 1 4,sro 10,610 N 7 38,925 51,@) N(iii) 3 13,959 44,155 V 2 13,354 14,485 Parl1kula

N 5,153 7,ml V 5,516 4,199 Anhlla N 4,165 9,579 YIlllllIUlIIgIC V 8,022 15,754 N 4,CXi6 14,952 Kurukslma

Kaithal

Kana] VI 4,sro 10,610 P&lipa N 4,355 18,815 N 5,972 8,CXi6

&ripa

Juxl

Fadaxd

~

Hisa" V 8,599 10,937

Bhiwani V 2 17,418 22,ffE Rd1ak V 7,838 10,286 lli!i.iar N 2 13,285 13,187 MaInxIragIh V 8,ffll 10,195 VI 4,457 5,073 N 6,2XJ 7,?nI, Rew.ri V 9,010 12,144 N 7,m 4,454 Gurgm V 3 22,938 34,844 N 5,538 10,388 Faricbhrl V 7,&53 10,916 N 4,144 6,3(f) N:Jte: (a) The alx>ve &ateIrent reveals that one tOWl has OOIre mWl fromhi~ cia'>Sin 1991 to 10\\er cla<;S in 2001. QJe tOWl hac; rmved qJ fromloWT cla'iS to hi~er class (b) 13 new towns have come up in 2001.

141 The statement-8 shows the names of towns which have not changed its class. All the towns have shifted have not changed their size class between 1911 and their classes. Thus, the information in this regard be 2001. In Haryana State, there is no such town which treated as nil.

Statement -8 Name of Towns which have not changed their class between 1911 and 2001. (Name with in bracket indicates the District in which the town is situated No name is given with in bracket where the name of the town is the same as that of the district.) Size Class in 1911 and 2001 Name of Town Size Class in 1911 and 2001 Name of Town 1 2 1 2 Nil in Haryana State

Statement-9 of Table A-4 shows that there are district wise break up of towns in Haryana State is 13 towns having population 166,643, which were not like this: Jhajjar district have two towns. Ambala, treated as towns in 1991, but have been treated as Panchkula , Yamunanagar, Mahendragarh, Rewari, towns in 2001 Census arranged by StateIDistrict and Gurgaon and Faridabad has one town each and size Class. As per 2001 Census, There are 2 Towns District Panipat is having 4 towns. Surprisingly, in Class III, 3 towns in Class IV, 7 towns in Class V Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Karnal, Sonipat, Jind, and 1 town in Class VI which are having 664,34, Fatehabad, Hisar, Bhiwani and Rohtak districts are 441,55 ,51,600 and 4,454 population respectively. The not having any such new towns in 2001.

Statement 9 Number & Population of paces not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 arranged by StatelDistrict and Size Class State I Total Class I Class II Class m Class IV Class V Class VI District Popu- Popu- Popu- Popu- Popu- Popu- Popu- No. lation No. lation No. lation No. lation No. lation No. lation No. lation 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

HARYANA 13 166,643 2 66,434 3 44,155 7 51,600 4.454 PanchkuJa 7,031 7,031 Ambala 9,579 9,579 Yamunanagar 14,952 14,952 Kurukshetra Kaithal Kamal Panipat 4 93,315 2 66,434 18,815 8,066 Sonipat Jind Fatehabad Sirsa Hisar Bhiwani Rohtak ,'Jhaijar 2 13,187 2 13,187 M ahendragarh 7,368 7,368 Rewarl ' 4,454 4,454 Gurgaon 10,388 10,388 Faridabad 6,369 6,369

142 Statement-l0 of Table A-4 gives the number and treated as such in 1991. The 2 towns of Class III proportion of places which were not treated as urban registered a per centage increase of 145.77, while 3 in 1991, but treated as such in 2001. There are 13 such Class IV towns recorded a per centage increase of places in Haryana containing a total population of 216.77 and 7 Class V towns registered a per centage 166,643 at the time of 2001 Census. Out of 13 new increase of only 32.56 and only one town of Class VI Towns, 1 is found in Panchkula district. 1 in Ambala recorded a per centage decrease of 37.36 per cent in district, 1 in Yamunanagar, 2 in Jhajjar districts and 4 their population. The per centage variation in 2001 towns in Panipat district and 1 each in Mahendragarh, population over 1991 i.e 2001-1991xl00/1991. The Rewari, Gurgaon and Faridabad districts. No new town maximum increase of 332.03 per cent in Class IV town has been recorded in 2001 in the districts of of Panipat district has been registered in 2001 followed Kurukshetra, Kaithal, K~al, Sonipat, Jind, Fatehabad, by Class III town of Panipat district with 145.77 per Hisar, Bhiwani and Rohtak. Out of 13 towns, 2 in Class cent, while in Class VI town of Rewari district has III, 3 in Class IV, 7 in Class V and 1 in Class VI were recorded maximum decrease of -37.36 per cent in treated as towns in 2001 Census which were not 2001 population over 1991.

Statement 10 Percentage Variation ofPopuiation 1991-2001 of places \IDich ~re not treated as Towns in 1991 but treated as such in 2001 classified by State/District audsize class S tatelDistrict Class Number of Population Population Percentage variation in 2001 Town in 1991 in 2001 . population over 1991 i.e. 2001-1991 XI00 1991 2 3 4 5 Haryana I II III 2 27,031 66,434 145.77 IV 3 13,939 44,155 216.77 V 7 38,925 51,600 32.56 VI 1 7,111 4,454 -37.36 I-VI 13 87,006 166,643 91.53 v 5,153 7,031 36.44 Ambala V 4,165 9,579 129.99 Yamunanagar V 1 9,076 14,952 64.74 Panipat III 2 27,031 66,434 145.77 Panipat IV 4,355 18,815 332.03 Panipat V 1 5,972 8,066 35.06 Jhajjar V 2 13,285 13,187 -0.74 M ahendragarh V 6,206 7,368 18.72 Rewari VI 7,111 4,454 -37.36 Gurgaon IV 5,538 10,388 87.58 Faridabad V 4,144 6,369 53.69

143 Statement 11 of Table A-4 gives the per centage was declassified in 2001 . The population of HMT variation of population during 1991-2001 of places Pinjore had gone down from 5,516 in 1991 to 4,199 in treated as towns in 1991, but removed from the list of 2001 recording per centage decadal decrease of23.88. towns in 2001 classified by size class. Only two towns, The population of Kheri Sampla Census Town has in­ namely, HMT Pinjore MC of Panchkula district and creased from 7838 in 1991 to 10286 in 2001 Census Kheri Sampla of Rohtak District of Class-V in 199] recording an percentage increase of 31.25 percent.

STATEMENT-ll Percentage Variation ofPoIXllation 1991-2001 of paces treated as Towns in 1991 but remo~d from the list of Towns in 2001 classified by State/District and size class. Class No. of Towns Population Population Percentage Variation in in 1991 in 2001 2001 population over 1991 i.e. 2001-1991 xl00 1991 2 3 4 5

V (1). *H.M.T .Pinjore (M .C.) District Panchkula 5,516 4,199 -23.88 V (2). ** .Kheri Sampla( CT) District Rohtak 7,838 10286 31.23 Total 13354 14485 8.47 Notes:· (I) * H.M. T. Pinjore M.C. in 1991 has been treated as outgrowth of Pinjore M.C. during 200 I Census. (2) ** Kheri Sampla cr 'MlS removed from the list of to\\o11S in 2001

Statement-12 on next page gives the number of 2001 Census there are 19 Class I, 6 Class II, of towns of each class in each Census since 1901. 24 Class III, 32 Class IV, 15 Class V, and only 1 In this statement, an 'Urban Agglomeration has in Class VI towns as per their size class of been considered as single Urban Unit even if it population. The maximum increase of a number contains more than 1 town, and for classification of towns from 12 in 1991 to 19 in 2001 has been into size class of towns, the total population of reported in Class I, whereas decrease of 5 towns the 'Urban Agglomeration' has been considered has been recorded in Class V towns from 20 in in determining its class. In this way, at the time 1991 to 15 in 2001 in numbers.

144 Statement-12 Number of Towns of each class during 1901-2001 (Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population)

Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Haryana All Classes 97 90 77 61 58 56 44 40 38 35 53 Class I 19 12 11 4 1 Class IT 6 9 5 7 8 6 1 1 1 1 I Class ill 24 17 13 13 9 8 11 7 7 6 5 Class IV 32 30 24 13 14 11 8 9 8 8 10 Class V 15 " 20 22 19 14 15 20 18 14 13 24 Class VI 2 2 5 12 16 4 5 8 7 13 Panchkula All Classes 4 4 3 1 Class I Class II Class ill 2 Class IV Class V 2 Class VI Ambala All Classes 5 4 4 3 2 2 2 Class I 2 2 2 I 1 Class IT 2 Class ill Class N 2 Class V 2 Class VI Yamunanagar All Classes 9 8 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 Class I 1 1 1 1 Class IT 1 Class ill Class N 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Class V 5 5 3 3 3 1 2 2 1 1 3 Class VI 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 Kurukshetra All Classes 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 Class I 1 Class IT 1 Class ill 3 2 2 2 Class N 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 Class V 2 1 1 1 Class VI 1 Kaithal All Classes 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 Class I Class IT 1 Class ill 1 1 Class N 2 2 2 Class V Class VI Kamal All Classes 7 6 5 3 3 3 2 2 Class I Class II Class ill 3 1 Class N 3 3 3 Class V 1 2 Class VI

145 Statement-12 Number of To'Mls of each class during 1901-2001 (Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population)

Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 am pat All Classes 3 3 3 I Class I I I I Class II Class ill Class IV 2 2 Class V Class VI Sonipat All Classes 4 3 2 2 2 Class I I 1 I Class II Class ill 2 Class IV I Class V Class VI Jind All Classes 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 2 2 Class I 1 Class II I 1 1 Class ill 1 2 I '. 2 I Class IV 2 2 1 1 I 2 1 Class V 2 2 2 1 2 Class VI 1 2 Fatehabad All Classes 4 4 4 3 3 3 Class I Class II 2 Class ill 1 2 2 1 Class IV 1 I 2 Class V 1 Class VI 2 Sirsa All Classes 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 Class I 1 1 Class II I . Class ill 3 2 2 Class IV Class V Class VI 3 Insar All Classes 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Class I 1 1 Class II 1 1 Class ill 1 2 2 Class IV 2 2 2 Class V Class VI Bhiwani All Classes 6 6 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 Class I 1 Class II Class ill 1 1 Class IV 4 2 1 Class V 2 2 I Class VI 3

146 Statement-12 Number of TOmls of each class during 1901-2001 (Urban Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population) Class 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -10 11 12

All Classes 3 5 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 8 Class I 1 1 1 1 Class II Class III 1 1 Class IV 2 2 2 2 Class V \.- 2 2 2 7 Class VI I I Jhajjar All Classes 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Class I 1 Class II Class III 2 1 Class IV 1 2 3 2 1 I I I Class V 1 2 2 2 2 Class VI Mahendragarb All Classes 5 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 Class I Class II I Class III 1 Class IV 1 I Class V 2 I 1 Class VI 2 2 Rewari All Classes 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Class I Class II Class III Class IV 2 Class V Class VI Gurgaon All Classes 10 10 9 7 7 7 5 4 4 4 5 Class I I 1 Class II Class III 1 Class IV 7 5 2 1 Class V 1 4 6 4 2 1 4 3 1 3 3 Class VI 2 4 5 1 1 3 1 2 Faridabad " All Classes 6 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Class I 2 I 1 Class IT I Class III I 1 1 Class IV 1 1 2 1 1 Class V 2 2 2 I 2 3 3 2 Class VI 1

147 It is clear from the statement 13 of Table A-4 that and containing only 1190 and 7.66 per cent of the total in 2001 Census the proportion of Class I towns urban population respectively. Class V towns with 15.46 becomes 19.59 per cent and so contain 72.56 per cent per cent contain 2.03 per cent of the total urban population to total urban population (Urban population. The proportion of Class VI towns is 1.03 Agglomeration has been classified according to total per cent and contain only 0.07 per cent to total urban population) of the State, whereas with 6.19 per cent population. Similar trends was observed in 1991, 1981 towns in Class II, we find 5.78 per cent of total Urban and 1971. But the percentage of towns and Population. Interestingly, the proportion of Class III concentration of population increased in C1ass-V and and Class IV towns becomes 24.74 and 32.99 per cent Class-VI during 1961 to 1901.

Statement-13 Percentage of Towns in each Class to Total No. of Towns and Percentage of Population in each class to Total ll-hm (Urhm Agglomeration has been classified according to Total Population) Percentage of 2001 1991 1981 1971 1961 1951 ClASS Popula- Popula- Popula- Popula- Popula- Popula. Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19.59 72.56 13.33 58.59 14.29 56.69 6.56 26.23 1.72 8.07 II 6.19 5.78 10.00 15.08 6.49 10.83 11.47 30.82 13.79 43.23 10.71 40.36 III 24.74 11.90 18.89 11.93 16.88 14.77 21.31 24.08 15.52 22.85 14.29 26.41 IV 32.99 7.66 33.34 10.43 31.17 11.62 21.31 10.45 24.14 14.85 19.64 16.03 V 15.46 2.03 22.22 3.74 28.57 5.82 31.15 7.43 24.14 7.6 26.79 11.93 VI 1.03 0.07 2.22 0.23 2.6 0.27 8.2 0.99 20.69 3.40 28.57 5.27

Percentage of 1941 1931 1921 1911 1901 Popula- Popula- Popula- Popula- Popula- Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion Towns tion 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

2.27 8.84 2.50 15.33 2.63 15.86 2.86 17.82 1.89 13.70 25.00 51.04 17.50 36.12 18.42 36.09 17.14 32.44 9.43 23.34 18.18 16.15 22.50 23.38 21.05 21.75 22.86 23.35 18.87 25.50 45.45 21.67 45.00 22.23 36.84 19.84 37.14 20.11 45.28 29.43 9.1 2.3 12.50 2.94 21.06 6.46 20.00 6.28 24.53 8.03

148 C\J co o~ c5 o LO C\J

~ CO CJ)

~

co LO I.{j C")

en ~ W ...-- LO >­ CJ) en ...-- ::::> enz w (J o o LO C\J

o o ,....:

r0- O CJ)

LO LO LO LO LO LO o LO c.o LO C") C\J r0- o .LN33 l:I3d NI

149 o 77 INDIA HARYANA ;pRf ~ \il1~&41 ~ o o 31 GROWTH OF URBAN CENTRES ,y/~ 31 -../' "f 1991 - 2001 ~~'0 "_,y KILOM ETRES ...... ,j Kal~a . "f< 1050 10 20 30 40 50 CHANDIGAR{i . ~~~~. ~~ '" Estate ~ ~T...... , • " • Ralpu r Rani \ -,()

BOUNDARIES : / ~ ,_,<: ", ~~ .I'",,' j' " _,y STATE I UNION TERRITORY ." ." n . ''''. /:, DISTRICT ,,_ ,,_ ." ." ." ." ____ _ W. :,I\sadauht·.. ,: · \(~ Am~la Y Bilaspur .I .r Kardhan _r' • I:~ /' ~A;sep+ur Chhac~ raUli ~BAl.A • ' ) '-~-O''"M~stafa_~ /' ~ ),. ... 1 '" > / "- -, -... ~ " Buna "'- p " (,. ,,:• .,; \. ~"Shahbad '") .A...... ) r_ .01 Ladw 'yFarakh(;IU r ~J o " 'I ' '-Peho_' wa a 0 ~\ ~.... 11'\0". lJ i Cheeka (,.._., _ ,U-' ~/ur I ' :... 11-, ,__,r,,-, _)'~" __ " " 0 :.. _, \ '--'",' ,Ganaur \ . 29 ~ • \- _ " /Sawani Khera '; ...Maham '- I _,' J;,. \-, _._)' + '. Y ",Kharkhoda ' "" V ', ,, .&. Bhiwani ')/\ , _ . ( ' i Siwani "" "VKalanaur"5'l,,,, _,'",- • ..1 ""'c SIZE OF POPULATION ',\ Tosham , __ -~ 1.--- ladrawan OF URBAN CENTRES " i, Charkhi Dadri \. ;Beri 0 Jhajjar : DEL H I CLASS I (100 000 AND ABOVE) \,. "' , ) # .,; 0 " ,I \' . J ' ''', loharu ,--.: " ~,,,, . ~, ...A. ' IiPat CLASS II (50 000 . 99 999) "f . ._'l_,--.., rl<,\_ ;~ . Far[ukhnap?\ Dundahera~ ,'" "\" D cP • ,_..J" (,) '(- .-~-....~ '\ , • J ..... • - •.J Kanina " )" Haileymandi Y J CLASS III (20000· 49999) ' \ Mahendragarh 0 \ :1 Pataudi (Faridabad ,; 0 " _ : , _ '.~ M_Co rp. ;1 CLASS IV (10 000 · 19 999) \.. _ ,.I ~~a.oru _ (' Palwal \. .~ 0 /~ Atali ( ~' ~wari Y , /,' . ~j c:r CLASS V & VI (BELOW 10000) D. ,, ' Narnaul "'c>...... ~ •..1 Dharuhera , C'." Q. • ",r. I '--, 0 q • . \" ,., ~ (,', 1 0::", B

150 I " 77 INDIA HARYANA

o ~~c6T~ - 31 31° - GROWTH OF URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS /y/~ 1991 - 2001 ~\..... ~C'L '- \ ~T KILOMETRES ...... ;e ~ '1< 1050 10 20 30 40 50 CHANDIGA~ ~PinjO(e ~;)'. .,().t\ " t\. '\ ~T...... '-. \ -..,() ., . ~ BOUNDARIES: <:', ,-~... ~(\ .J, -' ...., Q~ • . ,,' j' ~T STATE / UNION TERRITORY . ... _._._. .,... I: I ' I : I. ••:. ',f DISTRICT ...... , ...... _ •• ___ _ \ ) • 1. ..., • .rAmbala (UA) _.-' , • .J .~ , AMBALA /."', ,/\ --.__ ,1 \ ;'1 /-~- '--~_,:- c, ~"";', ,- "\ p .~4" . ~ ./' " i : - Thanesar (UA) \ ..- 1--30° lJ . ( • ', 1 «, 30° _ --...... "--"-,,,. N! '.,"- ,_ ...... __ 0./ ,_ - \_.\ \ ,. I () • I '_'./--1..-- _./ • • ...... -.. I ',-' , .. -" , .. r" • ( •.... r \ J ...... _ _, I ') ~ I , ..... ~ ~ '"'- ... _ ,_.J ',' ( "" .... _r.~, J I - ~ ~ # ! ,l ,( .~.".. (' /' . / a: .' " \ ('I, ___ - - Karnal (UA) ~ \,. ~,,:,' I'"'-~~-u. \;-~ .. _-. / t"~ c.. I -( __ .. :.-.. ~'_ ,' \[t~ ...... )' (' /' ,_.J '-/,,--, - '-'--f \. .-' \ -" , ',_. ,...... (- r"/\.... / '-' .,---(: ,_.J "....--' • \,( ct .. '--, \ ... • .._) J I \ • \, ..... '. .of ,,)'''::''' /" Panipat (UA) _/ \._.\ ...... :.:i Hisar(UA) ,~",-" ~ ,', '> ",. ~

<• . r-...__ ,..-1'\;: .. - ...... -_ J"'''\ ...... ' '_...... Sonipat (UA)\ _ 29° .... \- ----, _r-'\ ...... "\'/\' \ . !. 29°_ Rohtak (UA) _ \ - ,,.....- .. ) .": , .r, '" '. / ~ \ .-. (' , '\ _,_ .... oJ ..... t , \ ,J, I SIZE OF POPULATION OF URBAN CENTRES " \ \~.'~' ~_-'v' .. o CLASS I (100 000 AND ABOVE) I,... , !' \> BahadUr~~ ) DEL H I ',\ ' "... "- CLASS II (50000 - 99 999) ',\. ,_" ,.._, :x" _ '-'. '\ ..... -:s:. D cP ) ,'../ ' I - 'w-'- ~_,.--~ ,_;_ '\ )'~.'' • \ """.~._ (J) ...... _ ). ~,- '-, Y (,j Gurgaon )". i \)) CLASS III (20000 - 49 999) o \,_ :\ ': (UA) (, ':','J 0 . I ''''', '-, CLASS IV (10 000 • 19 999) \., .' ... ~ ( "! II(( o ... ( !.. ' « ." _/. ." .) '.. /' "',:1 a:: # \,; ",-1".-.. J " ..1 CLASS V & VI (BELOW 10000) ;' , ~,.," (,.7 Q. t6. .~r. C: '- I "" ~ (' ..... 1 ~ 1 • '\ ( 0 - 28" , ,'_, \.. _, I • 28 - \!, ". \ I' • , \ "" POPULATION GROWTH IN PER CENT .) • I -.., S' ..... "I . , ' & ') I r' '"., (,J_.t 'f 50.01 AND ABOVE .. ,... • .,f" - ~ ",...... -, "" r i ,.. -"I' •. ~ -- ~ 30 .01 - 50.00 A • I ':",'_'" ,,~ . • ,--' • NEW URBAN CENTRE ~ • ...... V • 20 .01 - 30.00 .'\ I U.A. URBAN AGGLOMERATION \J'~ 20.00 AND BELOW • PART OF DISTRICT PANIPAT ...... T 76° ° EAST OF GREENWICH PART OF DISTRICT REWARI ...... K I r

151

Alphabetical List of Town-2001 S.No Name of Town NBme of District ClasslSl. !tio. of Page No, Table A-4 1 2 3 4 5 1 Ambala (M Cl) AMBALA 1/13 174 2 Ambala Canlt. (CB) AMBALA 1110 (b) 174 3 Ambala Sadar eM CI ) AMBALA 1I10(a) 174 4 Asankhurd ~GTL ,PANIPAT V/9 191 5 Assandh eM c) KARNAL HIJ2D 183 6 Ateli (M q_).. MAHENDRAGARH V/15 191 7 Babiyar~'Ft UfBALA III123 183 8 Bahadurgru.h (M Cl ) JHAJJAR IllS (a) (i) 175 9 Barwala (MC) HISAR III17 181 10 Bawal (MC) REWARI IVJ23 188 11 Bawani Khera (M C) BHIWANI' IV/6 185 12 Beri (MC) JHAJJAR IVI13 186 13 Bhiwani (M CI) BHIWANI 1/(9) 173 14 Bilaspur (CT) YAMUNANAGAR VIs 190 15 Buria (MC) YAMUNANA~AR VII 190 16 Charkhi Dadri.{M'C) BHIWANl' IIl!2 179 17 Cheeka (Me) KAITli.A~ ·Ul/9 181 18 ChhachhrauJi (M Cl YAMUNAN~GAR V/2 190 19 Dharuhera (CT) REWARI IV/I 184 20 Dundahera (CT) GURGAON IV/3D 189 21 Ellenabad eM C) SIRSA IIII8 181 22 (CT) YAMUNANAGAR vn 191 23 Faridabad-:{M Corp.) FARIDABAD III 168 ~ 24 Farrukhnagar eM C) GURGAON VIS 190 25 Fatehabad eM C) FATEHABAD II/3 178 26 Ferozepur Jhirka eM C) GURGAON' IV/5 185 27 Ganaur (MC) SONIPAT' 1II1l4 182 28 Gharaunda (M C) KA:RN,AL IIIlll 181 29 Gohana(MC) SONIP,I\T III/l 179 30 Gurgaon (M Cl ) GURGAON lIS (a) (i) 173 31 Ourgaon (Rural) (t;T) GURGAON 1/8 (b) 173 32 Haileymandi (M C) GURG,AON IV/8 185 33 Hansi (M Cl) HISAR JIll 177 34 Hassanpur (M C) FARIDABAD V/6 171 35 Hathin (MC) FARIDABAD IV129 1S9 36 Hisar (M Cl) HISAR 115 (i) 171 37 Rodal (Me\ FARIDABAI> Ull4 180 38 lndri (Me:) KARNAl' IVfl8 187 39 "fagadhri (M CI) YAMUNANAGAR 1/3 (b) .170 40 Iakhalmandi (M C) FATEHABAD V/13 191 41 Ihajjar (M C) JHAJJAR IIl!3 18G 42 Jind (M Cl) JIND 1/14 175 43 Julana (:vi C) JIND JVl20 187 44 Kaithal eM CU KAITHAL VI7 176 45 ·Kalanaur (M C) ROHTAK IV/II 186 46 Kalanwali (M C) SIRSA 1II!17 182 47 Ka1a~at (MC) KAI1"HAL IVI9 185 4& Kalka (Me) PANCHKULA IIII1 D 181 49 KaniI_la (MC) M AH"ENDRAG ARH 1'//32 189 50 Kansepur (CT) YAMUNANAGAR IV/17 187 51 Kardhan (CT) AMBALA V/4 190 52 Karnal (M Cl) KARNAL 117 (i) 172 53 Kharkhoda eM C) SONIPAT IV/(2) 184 Contd......

153 Alphabetical List of Town-200 1 S.No Name of Town Name of District Class/Sl. No. of Page No, Table A-4 1 2 3 4 5 54 Ladrawan (CT) JHAJJAR VIlO 191 55 Ladwa (MC) KURUKSHETRA II1121 183 56 Loham (MC) BHIWANI IV/25 188 57 Maham(MC) ROHTAK IV/4 185 58 M ahendragarh (M C) MAHENDRAGARH II1/18 183 59 M andi Dabwali (M C) SIRSA 1II4 178 60 M ustafabad (CT) YAMUNANAGAR V/8 191 61 Nagai Chaudhry (CT) MAHENDRAGARH VI 11 191 62 ~araingarh(M C) AMBALA IV/3 184 63 Narnaul (M CI). "M'AHENDRAGARH II12 178 64 N arnaund (M q ~AR IVIl6 187 65 Narwana (MC) JIND II16 179 66 N ilokheri (M C) KARNAL IV/12 186 67 Nuh (MC) GURGAON IV/27 189 68 Palwal (M CI) FARIDABAD 1118 177 69 Panchkula Urban Estate (EO) . PANCHKULJI 1112 174 70 Panip at (M CI ) PANIPAT 112 (a) i 169 71 Panipat Taraf Ansar(CT~ PANIfAT 112 (b) 169 72 Panipat Taraf M akhdum .£.adgan.iCT) PANIPAT 112 ( c) 169 73 Panipat Taraf Rajputan (CT~ . PANIPAT 1/2 (d) 169 74 Pataudi (M C) GURGAON IVII4 187 75 Pehowa (MC) KURUKSHETP, A, IlI/6 181 76 Pinjore (M C) PANCHKULA. 111113, (i) 182 77 Punahana (M C) GURGA9N, JV/21 187 78 Pundri (M C) KAIT~is" IV/I0 186 79 Radaur (MC) YAMUNANAGkR IV/24 188 80 Raipur Rani (CT) PANCHKULA> VI12 191 81 Rania (MC) SIRSA II1/24 184 82 Ratia (M C) FATEHABAD III/19 183 83 Rewari (M CI) REWARI 1119 177 84 Rewari (Rural) (CT) REWARI VIII 192 85 Rohtak (M C1 ) ROHTAK, 1/4 (i) 170 86 Sadaura (M C) YAMUNANAGAR IV/22 187 87 Safidon (MC) JIND III/16 182 88 Samalkha (M C) PANI~AT III/12 182 89 Sankhol (CT) ( JHAJJAR 1/15 (b) 176 90 Sasauli (CT) YAMUNANAGAR II3 ( c) 170 91 Shahbad (M C) KURUKSHETRA III15 180 92 Sirsa (M CI) SIRSA 1/11 174 93 Siwani (MC) BHIWANf IV/I 5 187 94 Sohna (MC) GURGAON III/I 5 182 95 Sonipat (M

154 Alphabetical List ofUrabn Agglomerations-2001 S.No Name ofU.A District ClasslSl. No. of istri Page No, Table A-4 1 2 3 4 5 Ambala U.A Ambala II 10 174 2 Bahadurgarh U.A Jhaiiar II15 175 3 Gurgaon U.A Gurgaon II8 173 4 HisarU.A Hisar II5 171 5 Kamal U.A Kamal ' II7 172 6 Panipat U.A Panipat II2 168 7 Pinjore U .A. Panchkula IIII13 182 8 RohtakU.A ..R.ohtak II4 170 9 Sonipat U.A Sonipat II6 171 10 Thanesar U.A Kurukshetra II16 176 11 Yamunanagar U.A Yamunanagar II3 169

155 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASSIFJIID BY POPULATION SIZECIASS IN 2001 wrm VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

AIL CIASSFS-86 TOWNS/ll URBAN AGGWMERATIONS

HARYANA 1901 574,074 300,922 273,152 1911 449,704 -124,370 -21.66 244,090 205,614 1921 481,195 31,491 7.00 265,668 215,527 1931 564,743 83,548 17.36 315,182 249,561 1941 705,945 141,202 25.00 390,881 315,064 1951 968,494 262,549 37.19 524,789 443,705 1961 375.92 1,307,680 339,186 35.02 710,065 597,615 1971 451.36 1,772,959 465,279 35.58 957,033 815,926 1981 763.77 2,827,387 1,054,428 59.47 1,528,972 1,298,415 1991 966.73 4,054,744 1,227,357 43.41 2,170,140 1,884,604 2001 1280.37 6,115,304 2,060,560 50.82 3,310,965 2,804,339

CIASS -1(100,000 & ABOVE) 9 TOWNS /10 URBAN AGGWMERATIONS

1961 36.26 105,543 61,103 44,440 1971 116.72 465,085 359,542 340.66 253,373 211,712 1981 441.86 1,602,749 1,137,664 244.61 872,952 729,797 1991 495.91 2,375,668 772,919 48.22 1,275,022 1,100,646 2001 760.74 4,437,295 2,061,627 86.78 2,412,389 2,024,906

1 Faridabad Faridabad 1901 9,816 5,140 4,676 1911 8,540 -1,276 -13.00 4,560 3,980 1921 8,058 -482 -5.64 4,323 3,735 1931 9,296 1,238 15.36 5,173 4,123 1941 11,475 2,179 23.44 6,024 5,451 1951 37,393 25,918 225.86 19,692 17,701 1961 25.75 59,039 21,646 57.89 32,285 26,754 1971 25.75 122,817 63,778 108.03 70,030 52,787 1981 FCA 178.24 330,864 208,047 169.40 190,183 140,681 1991 FCA 178.24 617,717 286,853 86.70 342,481 275,236 2001 M.Corp. 198.75 1,055,938 438,221 70.94 581,069 474,869

2 Panipat (VA) Panipat 1901 26,914 13,516 13,398 1911 26,342 -572 -2.13 13,554 12,788 1921 27,343 1,001 3.80 14,666 12,677 1931 32,915 5,572 20.38 18,010 14,905 1941 37,837 4,922 14.95 20,257 17,580

156 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASSIFIED.BYPOPlLATION SIZECIASS IN 2001 wrm VARIATION SINCE 1991

S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11

1951 54,981 17,144 45.31 28,950 26,031 1961 7.77 67,026 12,045 21.91 35,566 31,460 1971 7.77 87,981 20,955 31.26 46,861 41,120 1981 20.82 137,927 49,946 56.77 73,851 64,076 1991 20.82 191,212 53,285 38.63 102,261 88,951 2001 43.81 354,148 162,936 85.21 194,850 159,298

(a) Panipat Panipat 1901 26,914 13,516 13,398 1911 26,342 -572 -2.13 13,554 12,788 1921 27,343 1,001 3.80 14,666 12,677 1931 32,915 5,572 20.38 18,010 14,905 1941 37,837 4,922 14.95 20,257 17,580 1951 54,981 17,144 45.31 28,950 26,031 1961 7.77 67,026 12,045 21.91 35,566 31,460 1971 7.77 87,981 20,955 31.26 46,861 41,120 1981 20.82 137,927 49,946 56.77 73,851 64,076 1991 20.82 191,212 53,285 38.63 102,261 88,951 2001 24.29 268,899 77,687 40.63 147,408 121,491

(i) Panipat Panipat 1901 26,914 13,516 13,398 1911 26,342 -572 -2.13 13,554 12,788 1921 27,343 1,001 3.80 14,666 12,677 1931 32,915 5,572 20.38 18,010 14,905 1941 37,837 4,922 14.95 20,257 17,580 1951 54,981 17,144 45.31 28,950 26,031 1961 MC 7.77 67,026 12,045 21.91 35,566 31,460 1971 MC 7.77 87,981 20,955 31.26 46,861 41,120 1981 MC 20.82 137,927 49,946 56.77 73,851 64,076 1991 MC 20.82 191,212 53,285 38.63 102,261 88,951 2001 MCL 21.70 261,740 70,528 36.88 143,644 118,096

(ii)Sector 11 & Sector 12 Panipat 2001 2.59 7,159 3,764 3,395 Part I1eO.G.) (b) Panipat Tarafansar Panipat 2001 cr 7.88 31,279 17,235 14,044

(c) Pani'pat Taraf Panipat 2001 cr 6.54 35,155 19,267 15,888 Makhdum Zadgan (d) Panipat Taraf Panipat 2001 CT 5.10 18,815 10,940 7,875 Rajputan 3 Yamunanagar U.A. Yamunanagar 1901 13,462 7,206 6,256 1911 12,045 -1,417 -10.53 6,691 5,354 1921 11,544 -501 -4.16 6,272 5,272 1931 13,268 1,724 14.93 7,450 5,818

157 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERAnONS CLASSIFIID BYPOPUAnON SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIAnON SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (a) Yamunana~ Yamunana~ 1951 15,684 9,431 6,253 1961 MC 10.36 51.700 36,016 229.64 29,470 22,230 1971 MC 23.31 72,594 20,894 40.41 40,253 32,341 1981 Me 15.88 109,304 36,710 50.57 59,484 49,820 1991 Me 15.88 144,346 35,042 32.06 76,810 67,536 2001 MCL 16.32 189,696 45,350 31.42 101,782 87,914

(b) J agadhri Yamunana~ 1901 M 13,462 7,206 6,256 1911 M 12,045 -1,417 -10.53 6,691 5,354 1921 M 11,544 -501 -4.16 6,272 5,272 1931 M 13,268 1,724 14.93 7,450 5,818 1941 M 16,422 3,154 23.77 9,102 7,320 1951 Me 23,943 7,521 45.80 12,944 10,999 1961 Me 3.52 32,637 8,694 36.31 17,920 14,717 1971 Me 10.83 35,094 2,457 7.53 18,936 16,158 1981 Me 10.83 43,102 8,008 22.82 23,641 19,461 1991 Me 24.80 67,386 24,284 56.34 36,172 31,214 2001 MCL 24.80 101,290 33,904 50.31 55,844 45,446

(c)SASAUU Yamunana~ 2001 cr 2.88 15,754 8,511 7,243

4 RohtakU.A. Rohtak 1901 20,323 10,724 9,599 1911 20,361 38 0.19 11,035 9,326 1921 25,240 4,879 23.96 14,636 10,604 1931 35,235 9,995 39.60 20,838 14,397 1941 48,148 12,913 36.65 26,236 21,912 1951 71,902 23,754 49.34 38,913 32,989 1961 11.66 88,193 16,291 22.66 47,345 40,848 1971 11.66 124,755 36,562 41.46 66,933 57,822 1981 22.03 166,767 42,012 33.68 89,300 77,467 1991 28.38 216,096 49,329 29.58 U4,728 101,368 2001 29.58 294.577 78,481 36.32 158,287 136,290

(i) Rohtak Rohtak 1901 20,323 10,724 9,599 1911 20,361 38 0.19 11,035 9,326 1921 25,240 4,879 23.96 14,636 10,604 1931 35,235 9,995 39.60 20,838 14,397 1941 48,148 12,913 36.65 26,236 21,912 1951 71,902 23,754 49.34 38,913 32,989 1961 Me 11.66 88,193 16,291 22.66 47,345 40,848 1971 Me 11.66 124,755 36,562 41.46 66,933 57,822 1981 Me 22.03 166,767 42,012 33:68 89,300 77,467 1991 Me 28.38 216,096 49,329 29.58 114,728 101,368 2001 MeL 28.38 286,807 70,711 32.72 154,148 132,659

158 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFJED BYPOPUATION SIZECIASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

(ii) Sector 1& Rohtak 2001 1.20 7,770 4,139 3,631 Housing Board Colony (0.0.) 5 HisarU.A. ~ar 1901 17,647 9,555 8,092 1911 17,162 -485 -2.75 9,710 7,452 1921 21,415 4,253 24.78 12,326 9,089 1931 25,179 3,764 17.58 15,065 10,114 1941 28,618 3,439 13.66 16,357 12,261 1951 35,297 6,679 23.34 19,849 15,448 1961 17.53 60,222 24,925 70.62 33,849 26,373 1971 31.34 89,437 29,215 48.51 50,303 39,134 1981 41.38 137,369 47,932 53.59 76,162 61,207 1991 49.43 181,255 43,886 31.95 98,425 82,830 2001 49.43 263,186 81,931 45.20 143,795 119,391

(i) Hisar Hisar 1901 17,647 9,555 8,092 1911 17,162 -485 -2.75 9,710 7,452 1921 21,415 4,253 24.78 12,326 9,089 1931 25,179 3,764 17.58 15,065 10,114 1941 28,618 3,439 13.66 16,357 12,261 1951 35,297 6,679 23.34 19,849 15,448 1961 MC 17.53 60,222 24,925 70.62 33,849 26,373 1971 Me 31.34 89,437 29,215 48.51 50,303 39,134 1981 Me 37.38 131,309 41,872 46.82 72.877 58,432 1991 Me 45.43 172,677 41,368 31.50 93,432 79,245 2001 MCL 45.43 256,689 84,012 48.65 140,083 116,606

(ii) CCS Hau Campur Hisar 1981 4.00 6,060 3,285 2,775 & Mini Secretariate 1991 4.00 8,578 2,518 41.55- 4,993 3,585 (0.0.) 2001 4.00 6,497 -2,081 -24.26 3,712 2,785

6 Sanipat U.A. Sonipat 1901 12,990 6,389 6,601 1911 12,014 -976 -7.51 6,192 5,822 1921 12,981 967 8.05 7,002 5,979 1931 15,050 2,069 15.94 8,274 6,776 1941 17,781 2,731 18.15 9,641 8,140 1951 30,189 12,408 69.78 16,072 14,117 1961 4.38 45,882 15,693 51.98 25,119 20,763 1971 21.37 62,393 16,511 35.99 33,750 28,643 1981 21.37 109,369 46,976 75.29 59,300 50,069 1991 28.32 143,922 34,553 31.59 76,899 67,023 2001 47.75 225,074 81,152 56.39 122,480 102,594

159 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 wrm VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census . Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomemtionl District Year Status Square preceding,census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (i) Sonipat Sonipat 1901 12,990 6,389 6,601 1911 12,014 -976 -7.51 6,192 5,822 1921 12,981 967 8.05 7,002 5,979 1931 15,050 2,069 15.94 8,274 6,776 1941 17,781 2,731 18.15 9,641 8,140 1951 30,189 12,408 69.78 16,072 14,117 1961 MC 4.38 45,882 15,693 51.98 25,119 20,763 1971 Me 21.37 62,393 16,511 35.99 33,750 28,643 1981 MC 21.37 109,369 46,976 75.29 59,300 50,069 1991 Me 28.32 143,922 34,553 31.59 76,899 67,023 2001 MCL 37.69 214,974 71,052 49.37 117,020 97,954

(ii) Kabirpur (0.0.) Sonipat 2001 5.70 3,986 2,161 1,825

(iii) Bandepur (0.0.) Sonipat 2001 1.59 988 539 449

(iv) Shadipur (0.0.) Sonipat 2001 1.38 2,740 1,482 1,258

(v) Lahrara (0.0.) Sonipat 2001 1.39 2,386 1,278 1,108

7 Kamal U.A. Kamal 1901 23,559 12,613 10,946 1911 21,961 -1,598 -6.78 11,959 10,002 1921 22,845 884 4.03 12,798 10,047 1931 26,610 3,765 16.48 15,241 11,369 1941 37,444 10,834 40.71 21,731 15,713 1951 59,790 22,346 59.68 31,235 28,555 1961 9.84 72,109 12,319 20.60 38,415 33,694 1971 18.57 92,784 20,675 28.67 49,575 43,209 1981 22.10 132,107 39,323 42.38 70,680 61,427 1991 23.60 176,1:31 44,024 33.32 93,042 83,089 2001 25.10 221,236 45,105 25.61 117,875 103,361

(i) Kamal Kamal 1901 23,559 12,613 10,946 1911 21,961 -1,598 -6.78 11,959 10,002 1921 22,845 884 4.03 12,798 10,047 1931 26,610 3,765 16.48 15,241 11,369 1941 37,444 10,834 40.71 21,731 15,713 1951 59,790 22,346 59.68 31,235 28,555 1961 Me 9.84 72,109 12,319 20.60 38,415 33,694 1971 Me 18.57 92,784 20,675 28.67 49,575 43,209 1981 Me 22.10 132,107 39,323 42.38 70,680 61,427 1991 Me 22.10 173,751 41,644 3l.52 91,740 82,011 2001 MeL 22.10 207,640 33,889 19.50 110,595 97,045 (ii) Part of Sector-6 Kamal 1991 1.50 2,380 1,302 1,078 & Sector -7 & 8 (O.G.) 2001 3.00 13,596 11,216 471.26 7,280 6,316

8 Gur1?flOn V.A. .Gur1?flOn 1901 4,765 2,669 2,096 1911 5,461 696 14.61 3,084 2,377 1921 5,107 -354 -6.48 2,906 2,201 1931 7,208 2,101 4l.l4 4,212 2,996

160 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS UASSIFIED BYPOPUATION SIZEUASS IN 2001 wrrn VARIATION SlNCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Ah

(a) Gurgaon Gurgaon 1901 4,765 2,669 2,096 1911 5,461 696 14.61 3,084 2,377 1921 5,107 -354 -6.48 2,906 2,201 1931 7,208 2,101 41.14 4,212 2,996 1941 9,935 2,727 37.83 5,593 4,342 1951 18,613 8,678 87.35 9,962 8,651 1961 5.18 37,868 19,255 103.45 20,269 17,599 1971 15.33 57,151 19,283 50.92 30,481 26,670 1981 15.33 89,115 31,964 55.93 47,662 41,453 1991 15.33 121,486 32,371 36.32 64,006 57,480 2001 29.3 201,322 79,836 65.72 108.491 92,831

(i) Gurgaon Gurgaon 1901 4765 2669.00 2,096 1911 5461 696 15 3084.00 2,377 1921 5107 -354 -6 2906.00 2,201 1931 7208 2,101 41 4212.00 2,996 1941 9935 2,727 38 5593.00 4,342 1951 18,613 8,678 87.35 9,962 8.651 1961 Me 5.18 37,868 19,255 103.45 20,269 17,599 1971 Me 15.33 57.151 19,283 50.92 30,481 26.670 1981 Me 15.33 89,115 31,964 55.93 47,662 41,453 1991 Me 15.33 121,486 32,371 36.32 64,006 57,480 2001 MeL 16.57 172,955 51,469 42.37 92,934 80,021

(li) Silokhra (O.G.) Gurgaon 2001 2.74 6,709 3,842 2,867

(ili)Jharsa (O.G.) Gurgaon 2001 9.99 21,658 11,715 9,943

(b) Gurgaon Gurgaon 1981 cr 8.80 11,762 6,315 5,447 Rural 1991 cr 8.80 14.398 2,636 22.41 7,633 6,765 2001 cr 7.56 17,110 2,712 18.84 9,282 7,828

(c) Sukhrali Gurgaon 2001 cr 4.78 10,388 , 5,604 4,784 9 Bhiwani Bhiwani 1901 35,917 18,388 17,529 1911 31,100 -4,817 -13.41 16,249 14,851 1921 33,270 2,170 6.98 17,746 15,524 1931 35,866 2,596 7.80 19,135 16,731 1941 43,921 8,055 22.46 23,581 20,340 1951 52,183 8,262 18.81 27,841 24,342 1961 Me 12.95 58,194- 6,011 11.52 .30,982 27,212

161 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZECIASS IN 2001 wnn VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1971 MC 9.07 73,086 14,892 25.59 39,957 33,129 1981 MC 29.74 101,277 28,191 38.57 55,172 46,105 1991 MC 27.64 121,629 20,352 20.10 64,977 56,652 2001 MCL 27.64 169,531 47,902 39.38 91,697 77,834

10 Ambala U.A. Ambala 1941 62,419 39,687 22,732 1951 94,043 31,624 50.66 55,605 38,438 1961 36.26 105,543 11,500 12.23 61,103 44,440 1971 36.26 102,493 -3,050 -2.89 53,202 49,291 1981 37.51 121,203 18,710 18.25 61,529 59,674 1991 37.51 139,889 18,686 15.42 70,792 69,097 2001 39.69 168,316 28,427 20.32 92,977 75,339

(a)Ambala Sadar Ambala 1981 MC 6.33 80,741 42,291 38,450 1991 MC 6.33 90,872 10,131 12.55 47,309 43,563 2001 MCL 6.33 106,568 15,696 17.27 55,750 50,818

(b)Ambala Cantt. Ambala 1941 62,419 39,687 22,732 1951 94,043 31,624 50.66 55,605 38,438 1961 CB 36.26 105,543 11,500 12.23 61,103 44,440 1971 CB 36.26 102,493 -3,050 -2.89 53,202 49,291 1981 CB 31.18 40,462 -62,031 -60.52 19,238 21,224 1991 CB 31.18 49,017 8,555 21.14 23,483 25,534 2001 CB 33.36 61,748 12,731 25.97 37,227 24,521

11 Sirsa Sirsa 1901 15,800 8,410 7,390 1911 14,629 -1,171 -7.41 8,047 6,582 1921 16,241 1,612 11.02 9,049 7,192 1931 18,909 2,668 16.43 10,710 8,199 1941 20,718 1,809 9.57 11,331 9,387 1951 24,980 4,262 20.57 13,599 11,381 1961 MC 5.18 33,363 8,383 33.56 18,181 15,182 1971 MC 5.18 48,808 15,445 46.29 26,522 22,286 1981 MC 19.33 89,068 40,260 82.49 49,011 40,057 1991 MC I~U3 112,841 23,773 26.69 60,573 52,268 2001 MCL 26.43 160,735 47,894 42.44 85,993 74,742

12 Panchkula Urban Panchkula 1981 10.37 11,239 6,709 4,530 &tate 1991 EO 15.24 70,375 59,136 526.17 38,074 32,301 2001 EO 25.50 140,925 70,550 100.25 75,897 65,028

13 Ambala Ambala 1901 78,638 45,729 32,909 1911 80,131 1,493 1.90 49,204 30,927 1921 76,326 -3,805 -4.75 45,795 30,531 1931 86,592 10,266 13.45 51,523 35,069 1941 44,964 -41,628 -48.07 25,532 19,432 1951 57,979 13,015 28.95 31,928 26,051 l%lMC 8.70 76,2rn 18,225 31.43 41,462 34,742

162 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIID BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. ilggl ome ration/ District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1971 Me 8.70 83,633 7,429 9.75 44,469 39,164 1981 MC 16.94 104,565 20,932 25.03 55,193 49,372 1991 Me 16.94 119,338 14,773 14.13 61,852 57,486 2001 MeL 16.94 139,279 19,941 16.71 74.016 65,263

14 Jind HRd 1901 8,047 4,179 3,868 1911 8,783 736 9.15 4,805 3,978 1921 10,840 2,057 23.42 6,367 4,473 1931 11,699 859 7.92 6,610 5,089 1941 14,909 3,210 27.44 8,415 6,494 1951 19,449 4,540 30.45 9,912 9,537 1961 Me 24.27 24,216 4,767 24.51 13,067 11,149 1971 Me 10.36 38,161 13,945 57.59 20,811 17,350 1981 MC 15.30 56,748 18,587 48.71 30,567 26,181 1991 Me 15.30 85,315 28,567 50.34 45,972 39,343 2001 MeL 15.30 135,855 50,540 59.24 73,407 62,448

15 Bahadurgarh U.A. Jhajjar 1901 5,974 3,028 2,946 1911 4,990 -984 -16.47 2,579 2,411 1921 5,955 965 19.34 3,306 2,649 1931 6,963 1,008 16.93 3,736 3,227 1941 8,206 1,243 17.85 4,226 3,980 1951 11,170 2,964 36.12 6,058 5,112 1961 2.59 14,982 3,812 34.13 8,001 6,981 1971 1.30 25,812 10,830 72.29 14,155 11,657 1981 9.00 37,488 11,676 45.23 20,262 17,226 1991 10.00 57,235 19,747 52.68 30,757 26,478 2001 29.65 131.925 74,690 130.50 72,873 59,052

(a) Bahadurgarh Jhajjar 1901 5,974 3,028 2,946 1911 4,990 -984 -16,47 2,579 2,411 1921 5,955 965 19.34 3,306 2,649 1931 6,963 1,008 16.93 3,736 3,227 1941 8,206 1,243 17.85 4,226 3,980 1951 11 ,170 2,964 36.12 6,058 5,112 1961 M.e. 2.59 14,982 3,812 34.13 8,001 6,981 1971 M.e. 1.30 25,812 10,830 72.29 14,155 11,657 1981 M.e. 9.00 37,488 11,676 45.23 20,262 17,226 1991 M.e. 10.00 57,235 19,747 52.68 30,757 26,478 2001 Mel. 28.81 126,746 69,511 121.45 70,057 56,689

(i)Bahadurgarh Jhl\i_jar 1901 5,974 3,028 2,946 1911 4,990 -984 -16.47 2,579 2,411 1921 5,955 965 19.34 3,306 2,649 1931 6,963 1,008 16.93 3,736 3,227 1941 8,206 1,243 17.85 4,226 3,980 1951 11,170 2,964 36.12 6,058 5,112 1961 Me 2.59 14,982 3,812 34.13 8,001 6,981 1971 Me 1.30 25,812 10,830 72.29 14,155 11,657 1981 Me 9.00 37,488 11,676- 45.23 20,262 17,226 1991 Me 9.00 56,524 19,036 50.78 30,358 26,166

163 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFlID BYPOPlLATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Amolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 200} MCL 21.00 119,846 63,322 112.03 65,859 53,987

(ii)Parnala (O.G.) Jhajjar 2001 2.82 2,987 1,658 1,329

(ili)Bahadurgarh Thajjar 2001 4.06 1,238 806 432 Rural (O.G.)

(iv)Hasanpur (O.G.) Jhajjar 2001 0.93 2,675 1,734 941

(b)Sankhol Jhajjar 2001 CT 0.84 5,179 2,816 2,363

16 Thanesar U.A. Kurukshetra 1901 5,066 2,828 2,238 1911 4,719 -347 -6.85 2,692 2,027 1921 4,226 -493 -10.45 2,392 1,834 1931 5,032 806 19.07 2,990 2,042 1941 6,574 1,542 30.64 3,983 2,591 1951 11,273 4,699 71.48 6,227 5,046 1961 15.54 16,828 5,555 49.28 9,223 7,605 1971 16.58 29,555 12,727 75.63 16,888 12,667 1981 20.00 49,052 19,497 65.97 27,175 21,877 1991 30.71 81,255 32,203 65.65 44,156 37,099 2001 35.70 122,319 41,064 50.54 66,978 55,341

(i)Thanesar Kurukshetra 1901 5,066 2,828 2,238 1911 4,719 -347 -6.85 2,692 2,027 1921 4,226 -493 -10.45 2,392 1,834 1931 5,032 806 19.07 2,990 2,042 1941 6,574 },542 30.64 3,983 2,591 1951 11,273 4,699 71.48 6,227 5,046 1961 MC 15.54 16,828 5,555 49.28 9,223 7,605 1971 MC 16.58 29,555 12,727 75.63 16,888 12,667 1981 MC 20.00 49,052 19,497 65.97 27,175 21 .. 877 1991 MC 30.71 81,255 32,203 65.65 44,156 37,099 2001 MCL 32.63 119,687 38,432 47.30 65,525 54,162

(ii)Ratg;il (O.G.) Kurukshetra 2001 3.07 2,632 1,453 1,179

17 Kaithal Kaithal 1901 14,408 7,250 7,158 1911 12,912 -1,496 -10.38 6,552 6,360 1921 15,477 2,565 19.87 8,113 7,364 1931 19,418 3,941 25.46 10,745 8,673 1941 22,325 2,907 14.97 12,160 10,165 1951 28,422 6,097 27.31 15,088 13,334 1961 MC 5.44 34,890 6,468 22.76 18,657 16,233

164 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN'AGGLOMERAnONS CLASSIF1ED BYPOPUAnON SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIAnON SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1971 Me 7.90 45,199 10,309 29.55 24,359 20,840 1981 Me 7.90 58,385 13,186 29.17 31,311 27,074 1991 Me 7.90 71,142 12,757 21.85 37,669 33,473 2001 MCL 43.75 117,285 46,143 64.86 63,098 54,187

18 Palwal Ftlridabad 1901 12,830 6,710 6,120 1911 9,485 -3,345 -26.07 5,044 4,441 1921 9,352 -133 -1.40 5,049 4,303 1931 10,807 1,455 15.56 5,893 4,914 1941 13,606 2,799 25.90 7,260 6,346 1951 13,915 309 2.27 7,318 6,597 1961 Me 5.18 27,863 13,948 100.24 14,657 13,206 1971 Me 5.52 36,207 8,344 29.95 19,538 16,669 1981 Me 5.52 47,328 11,121 30.72 25,303 22,025 1991 Me 5.52 59,168 11,840 25.02 31,371 27,797 2001 MeL 8.30 100,722 41,554 70.23 53,648 47,074

19 Rewari Rewari 1901 27,295 13,939 13,356 1911 24,780 -2,515 -9.21 12,885 11,895 1921 23,129 -1,651 -6.66 12,586 10,543 1931 26,269 3,140 13.58 14,383 11,886 1941 30,673 4.404 16.77 16,569 14,104 1951 34,082 3,409 11.11 18,106 15,976 1961 Me 6.06 36,994 2,912 8.54 19,445 17,549 1971 Me 6.06 43,885 6,891 18.63 23,327 20,558 1981 Me 6.06 51,562 7,677 17.49 27,405 24,157 1991 Me 18.43 75,342 23,780 46.12 39,826 35,516 2001 MeL 11.78 100,684 25,342 33.64 53,935 46,749

CIASS-ll.(SO,OOO to 99,999) 6 TOWNS

1901 78,638 45,729 32,909 1911 80,131 1,493 1.90 49,204 30,927 1921 76,326 -3,805 -4.75 45,795 30,531 1931 86,592 10,266 13.45 51,523 35,069 1941 62,419 -24,173 -27.92 39,687 22,732 1951 390,878 328,459 526.22 214,472 176,406 1961 108.08 565,324 174,446 44.63 307,294 258,030 1971 112.15 546,465 -18,859 -3.34 295,396 251,069 1981 57.66 306,128 -240,337 -43.98 164,923 141,205 1991 121.84 611,461 305,333 99.74 326,773 284,688 2001 72.17 353,506 -257,955 -42.19 188,315 165,191

1 Hansi Hansi 1901 16,523 . 8,717 7,806

165 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BYPOPUIATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WTIH VARIATION SINCE1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1911 14,576 -1,947 -11.78 7,585 6,991 1921 15,425 849 5.82 8,157 7,268 1931 18,356 2,931 19.00 9,943 8,413 1941 22,590 4,234 23.07 12,463 10,127 1951 25,837 3,247 14.37 13,476 12,361 1961 Me 14.50 33,712 7,875 30.48 17,817 15,895 1971 Me 9.07 41,108 7,396 21.94 21,645 19,463 1981 Me 9.07 50,365 9,257 22.52 26,629 23,736 1991 Me 9.07 59,653 9,288 18.44 31,579 28,074 2001 MCL 10.05 75,747 16,094 26.98 40,629 35,118

2 Narnaul M ahendragarh 1901 19,489 9,466 10,023 1911 21,350 1,861 9.55 10,985 10,365 1921 20,410 -940 -4.40 10,536 9,874 1931 21,905 1,495 7.32 11,270 10,635 1941 23,063 1,158 5.29 11,889 11,174 1951 18,180 -4,883 -21.17 9,430 8,750 1961 Me 6.48 23,959 5,779 31.79 12,724 11,235 1971 Me 6.48 31,875 7,916 33.04 16,977 14,898 1981 Me 9.67 41,441 9,566 30.01 22,088 19,353 1991 Me 9.67 51,976 10,535 25.42 27,369 24,607 2001 MeL 9.67 62,077 10,101 19.43 33,050 29,027

3 Fatehabad Fatehabad 1901 2,786 1,582 1,204 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 2,968 1,566 1,402 1961 Me 10.36 12,461 9,493 319.85 6,651 5,810 1971 Me 10.36 22,630 to, 169 81.61 12,077 to,553 1981 Me 10.36 33,049 10,419 46.04 17,655 15,394 1991 Me 10.36 45,500 12,451 37.67 24,264 21,236 2001 Me 10.36 59,917 14,417 31.69 31,949 27,968

4 M andi Dabwali Sirsa 1941 6,655 3,734 2,921 1951 10,380 3,725 55.97 5,587 4,793 1961 Me 1.35 15,421 5,041 48.56 8,323 7,098 1971 Me 2.98 20,921 5,500 35.67 11,247 9,674 1981 Me 7.11 29,071 8,150 38.96 15,424 13,647 1991 Me 7.11 36,197 7,126 24.51 18,927 17,270 2001 Me 22.33 53,811 17,614 48.66 28,338 25,473

5 Tohana Fatehabad 1931 7,519 3,969 3,550

166 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIAnONSINCE1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. ~lomerationl District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 1941 8,950 1,431 19.03 4,684 4,266 1951 7,955 -995 -11.12 4,215 3,740 1961 MC 10.36 12,394 4,439 55.80 6,629 5,765 1971 MC 4.53 16,789 4,395 35.46 8,908 7,881 1981 MC 4.70 25,487 8,698 51.81 13,494 11,993 1991 MC 4.70 34,215 8,728 34.24 18,275 15,940 2001 MC 13.76 51,519 17,304 50.57 27,276 24,243

6 Narwana Jind 1941 7,066 3,938 3,128 1951 10,368 3,302 46.73 5,785 4,583 1961 MC 2.20 14,037 3,669 35.39 7,675 6,362 1971 MC 5.18 21,319 7,282 51.88 11.573 9,746 1981 MC 6.00 29,242 7,923 37.16 15,715 13,527 1991 MC 6.00 38,533 9,291 31.77 20,588 17,945 2001 MC 6.00 50,435 11,902 30.89 27,073 23,362

ClASS - ill (20,000 to 49,999 )23 TOWNS I! URBAN AGGLOMERATION

1901 134,008 69,180 64.828 1911 145,894 11,886 8.87 76,667 69,227 1921 173,652 27,758 19.03 95,294 78,358 1931 203,979 30,327 17.46 113,942 90.037 1941 360,301 156,322 76.64 198,106 162.195 1951 255,827 -104,474 -29 138,257 117,570 1961 76.67 298,747 42,920 16.78 159,936 138,811 1971 94.74 426,980 128,233 42.92 230,488 196,492 1981 97.58 417,575 -9,405 -2.2 224,237 193,338 1991 102.63 483,688 66,113 15.83 257,512 226.176 2001 221.70 727,404 243,716 50.39 389,6IL 337,792

1 Gohana Sonipat 1901 6,567 3,257 3,310 1911 5,438 -1,129 -17.19 2,752 2.686 1921 5,107 -331 -6.09 2,665 2,442 1931 5,045 -62 -1.21 2,699 2,346 1941 6,818 1,773 35.14 3,792 3,026 1951 8,796 1,978 29.01 4,754 4,042 1961 MC 1.42 11,076 2,280 25.92 5,859 5,217 1971 MC 2.59 16,754 5,678 51.26 8,923 7,831 1981 MC 6.57 26,188 9,434 56.31 13,993 12,195 1991 MC 6.57 32,496 6,308 24.09 17,222 15,274 2~dl MC 6.57 48,532 16,036 49.35 25,925 22,607

2 Charkhi Dadri Bhiwani 190~ 7,009 3,360 3,649 1911 5,713 -1,296 -18.49 2,833 2,880 1921 6,582 869 15.21 3,370 3,212 1931 7,260 678 10.30 3,815 3,445

167 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BYPOPUATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1941 8,712 1,452 20.00 4,549 4,163 1951 8,795 83 0.95 4,522 4,273 1961 MC 22.02 l3,839 5,044 57.35 7,583 6,256 1971 Me 4.51 19,484 5,645 40.79 to,521 8,963 1981 Me 5.42 27,315 7,831 40.19 14,618 12,697 1991 Me 5.42 32,253 4,938 18.08 17,253 15,000 2001 Me 5.42 44,895 12,642 39.20 24,059 20,836

3 Jhajiar Jhajiar 1901 12,227 5,955 6,272 1911 10,617 -1,610 -13.17 5,182 5,435 1921 10,800 183 1.72 5,364 5,436 1931 12,232 1,432 13.26 6,266 5,966 1941 13,919 1,687 13.79 6,967 6,952 1951 10,514 -3,405 -24.46 5,447 5,067 1961 MC 1.68 14,234 3,720 35.28 7,391 6,843 1971 Me 5.18 18,947 4,713 33.11 10,029 8.918 1981 MC 6.00 24,247 5,300 27.97 l3,031 11.216 1991 Me 6.00 27,693 3,446 14.21 14,746 12,947 2001 Me 6.00 39,002 11,309 40.84 20,976 18,026

4 Hodal Faridabad 1901 8,142 4,172 3,970 1911 5,468 -2,674 -32.84 2,898 2,570 1921 5,854 386 7.06 3,189 2,665 1931 7,258 1,404 23.98 3,883 3,375 1941 8,661 1,403 19.33 4,643 4,018 1951 8,303 -358 -4.13 4,399 3,904 1961 Me 2.59 10,558 2,255 27.16 5,609 4,949 1971 Me 2.59 14,144 3,586 33.96 7,608 6,536 1981 Me 2.25 18,740 4,596 32.49 10,159 8,581 1991 Me 2.25 25,635 6,895 36.79 l3,810 11,825 2001 Me 2.25 38,309 12,674 49.44 20,511 17,798

5 Shahbad Kurukshetra 1901 11,009 5,605 5,494 1911 11,054 45 0.41 5,735 5,319 1921 11,329 275 2.49 6,207 5,122 1931 12,293 964 8.51 6,736 5,557 1941 14,745 2,452 19.95 8,015 6,730 1951 17,301 2,556 17.33 9,079 8,222 1961 Me 1.76 18,975 1,674 9.68 10,165 8,810 1971 Me 7.77 21,500 2,525 13.31 11,369 10,131 1981 MC 3.84 26,308 4,808 22.36 l3,830 12,478 1991 Me 16.00 31,452 5,144 19.55 16,5l3 14,939 2001 Me 16.00 37,289 5,837 18.56 19,780 17,509

168 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BYPOPUATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WTIH VARIATION SINCE1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Ailsolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 Pehowa Kurukshetra 1961 MC 1.35 6,159 3,395 2,764 1971 MC 7.77 11,366 5,207 84.54 6,126 5,240 1981 Me 4.57 17,279 5,913 52.02 9,250 8,029 1991 Me 4.57 21,986 4,707 27.24 11,656 10,330 2001 Me 7.50 33,564 11,578 52.66 17,912 15,652

7 Barwala Hisar 1981 Me 1.50 17,648 9,281 8,367 1991 Me 1.50 24,891 7,243 41.04 13,148 11,743 2001 Me 1.50 33,132 8,241 33.11 17,500 15,632

8 Ellenabad Sirs a 1901 1,624 854 770 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Declassified 1991 Me 2.72 22,312 11,876 10,436 2001 Me 2.72 32,795 10,483 46.98 17,675 15,120

9 *Cheeka Kaithal 1991 Me 8.50 21,089 11,316 9,773 2001 Me 30.72 32,128 11,039 52.34 17,530 14,598

10 Kalka Panchkula 1901 7,045 4,827 2,218 1911 4,532 -2,513 -35.67 2,893 1,639 1921 7,635 3,103 68.47 5,060 2,575 1931 7,937 302 3.96 5,002 2,935 1941 9,766 1,829 23.04 5,802 3,964 1951 14,058 4,292 43.95 8,038 6,020 1961 Me 2.85 18,068 4,010 28.52 10,311 7,757 1971 Me 2.85 17,711 -357 -1.98 9,533 8,178 1981 Me 3.39 21,359 3,648 20.60 11,649 9,710 1991 Me 3.39 27,281 5,922 27.73 14,794 12,487 2001 Me 3.39 30,830 3,549 13.01 16,794 14,036

11 Gharaunda Kamal 1931 5,731 3,059 2,672 1941 7,287 1,556 27.15 3,953 3,334 1951 8,632 1,345 18.46 4,799 3,833 1961 Me 0.93 10,496 1,864 21.59 5,638 4,858 1971 Me 1.55 13,045 2,549 24.29 6,980 6,065 1981 Me 2.00 17,332 4,287 32.86 9,303 8,029 1991 Me 2.00 21,147 3,815 22.01 11,288 9,859

169 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASS1FIID BYPOPUATION SlZECIASS IN 2001 Wl1H VARIATION SlNCE1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2001 MC 12.98 30,172 9,025 42.68 16,290 13,882

12 SamaIkha Pampat 1981 cr 6.09 13,532 7,257 6,275 1991 MC 2.54 18,384 4,852 35.86 9,905 8,479 2001 MC 4.48 29,866 11,482 62.46 16,340 13,526

13 Pinjore U.A. Panchkula 2001 10.53 29,609 15,837 13,772

(i)Pinjore Panchkula 2001 MC 7.09 25,410 13,631 11,779

(ii)HMT Pinjore Panchkula 1981 MC 3.44 5,746 3,029 2,717 (O.G.) 1991 MC 3.44 5,516 -230 -4.00 2,910 2,606 2001 3.44 4,199 -1,317 -23.88 2,206 1,993

14 Ganaur Sonipat 1971 NAC 9.06 8,399 4,542 3,857 1981 MC 9.06 16,489 8,090 96.32 8,868 7,621 1991 MC 9.06 20,952 4,463 27.07 11,112 9,840 2001 MC 9.06 29,006 8,054 38.44 15,602 13,404

15 Sohna Gurl.'fl()fl 1901 6,024 3,056 2,968 1911 5,138 -886 -14.71 2,618 2,520 1921 4,758 -380 -7.40 2,491 2,267 1931 5,667 909 19.10 3,052 2,615 1941 5,710 43 0.76 2,936 2,774 1951 5,138 -572 -10.02 2,681 2,457 1961 MC 0.36 6,889 1,751 34.08 3,637 3,252 1971 Me 3.24 8,775 1,886 27.38 4,669 4,106 1981 MC 3.70 12,667 3,892 44.35 6,701 5,966 1991 MC 3.70 16,348 3,681 29.06 8,633 7,715 2001 Me 9.70 27,570 11,222 68.64 14,690 12,880

16 Safidon Jind 1901 4,832 2,514 2,318 1911 Declassified 1921 5,199 2,964 2,t35 1931 6,169 970 18.66 3,631 2,538 1941 7,807 1,638 26.55 4,727 3,080 1951 9,426 1,619 20.74 5,331 4,095 1961 MC 6.48 9,223 -203 -2.15 4,941 4,282 1971 Me 6.48 12,010 2,787 30.22 6,321 5,689 1981 MC 6.48 15,116 3,106 25.86 8,051 7,065 1991 MC 6.48 20,056 4,940 32.68 10,724 9,332 2001 MC 9.48 27,541 7,485 37.32 14,770 12,771

17 Kalanwali Sirsa 1951 2,622 1,387 1,235

170 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASSIFIED BYPOPUATION SlZECIASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Ahclolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 1961 Me 2.59 4,079 1,457 55.57 2,199 1,880 1971 Me 2.59 6,531 2,452 60.11 3,454 3,077 1981 Me 2.59 9,643 3,112 47.65 5,191 4,452 1991 Me 40.22 19,850 10,207 105.85 10,521 9,329 2001 Me 40.22 25,163 5,313 26.77 13,300 11,863

18 M ahendragarh Mahendragarh 1901 9,984 4,812 5,172 1911 9,761 -223 -2.23 4,754 5,007 1921 8,580 -1,181 -12.10 4,194 4,386 1931 9,194 614 7.16 4,552 4,642 1941 9,771 577 6.28 4,995 4,776 1951 7,961 -1,810 -18.52 4,121 3,840 1961 Me 9.71 9,071 1,110 13.94 4,772 4,299 1971 Me 9.07 11,496 2,425 26.73 6,147 5,349 1981 Me 9.07 14,488 2,992 26.03 7,684 6,804 1991 Me 10.60 19,610 5,122 35.35 10,399 9,211 2001 Me 10.60 24,323 4,713 24.03 12,944 11,379

19 Ratia Fatehabad 1981 Me 4.00 13,065 7,074 5,991 1991 Me 4.00 17,644 4,579 35.05 9,349 8,295 2001 Me 4.00 23,826 6,182 35.04 12,673 11,153

20 Assandh Kamal 1981 Me 3.95 13,209 7,031 6,178 1991 Me 3.95 16,749 3,540 26.80 8,825 7,924 2001 Me 3.95 22,707 5,958 35.57 12,090 10,617

21 Ladwa Kurukshetra 1901 3,518 1,866 1,652 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 6,237 3,399 2,838 1961 Me 0.65 8,259 2,022 32.42 4,417 3,842 1971 Me 0.65 10,666 2,407 29.14 5,682 4,984 1981 Me 2.00 15,119 4,453 41.75 8,021 7,098 1991 Me 2.00 19,441 4,322 28.59 10,224 9,217 2001 Me 2.00 22,339 2,898 14.91 11,932 10,407

22 Taraori Kamal 1981 Me 3.69 12,803 6,841 5,962 1991 Me 6.25 16,103 3,300 25.78 8,482 7,621 2001 Me 6.25 22,201 6,098 37.87 12,003 10,198

23 Babiyal Ambala 1981 CT 2.21 7,342 3,860 3,482 1991 CT 2.21 12,750 5,408 73.66 6,674 6,076

171 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 wrrn VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census To'lm Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2001 cr 2.21 21,644 8,894 69.76 11,360 10,284

24 Rania Sirsa 1901 4,384 2,307 2,077 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 MC 2.93 16,714 8,846 7,868 1991 Declassified 2001 MC 10.63 20,961 1l,119 9,842

ClASS-IV (10,000 to 19,999) 32 TOWNS

1901 146,385 75,263 71,122 1911 105,009 -41,376 -28.27 55,694 49,315 1921 104,637 -372 -0.35 56,531 48,106 1931 132,032 27,395 26.18 72,627 59,405 1941 114,002 -18,030 -13.66 61,476 52,526 1951 155,221 41,219 36.16 82,843 72,378 1961 78.24 194,209 38,988 25.12 104,525 89,684 1971 51.89 185,289 -8,920 -4.59 98,526 86,763 1981 109.81 328,680 143,391 77.39 175,343 153,337 1991 175.22 422,849 94,169 28.65 224,936 197,913 2001 146.38 468,628 45,779 10.83 251,698 216,930

1 *Dharuhera Rewari 1991 cr 11.49 10,848 6,585 4,263 2001 cr 11.49 18,892 8,044 74.15 10,749 8,143

2 Kharkhoda Sonipat 1901 3,765 1,876 1,889 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Declassified 1991 MC 1.63 13,151 7,031 6,120 2001 MC 1.63 18,763 5,612 42.67 10,034 8,729

3 Naraingarh Ambala 1971 NAC 5.18 6,880 3,571 3,309 1981 Me 1.35 9,370 2,4~ 36.19 4,869 4,501

172 A-4 IDWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CIASSIFIlID BYPOPUATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 Wl1H VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1991 Me 5.18 13,832 4,462 47.62 7,224 6,608 2001 Me 7.93 18,210 4,378 31.65 9,565 8,645

4 Maham Rohtak 1901 7,824 3,752 4,072 1911 Declassified 1921 7,820 3,906 3,914 1931 9,079 1,259 16.10 4,718 4,361 1941 11,145 2,066 22.76 6,052 5,093 1951 8,536 -2,609 -23.41 4,427 4,109 1961 MC 3.55 9,300 764 8.95 4,824 4,476 1971 Me 1.53 10,541 1,241 13.34 5,492 5,049 1981 MC 3.49 11,722 1,181 11.20 6,174 5,548 1991 MC 3.35 15,083 3,361 28.67 8,026 7,057 2001 MC 3.35 18,174 3,091 20.49 9,762 8,412

5 Ferozepur Gurgaon 1901 7,278 3,608 3,670 Jhirka 1911 5,719 -1,559 -21.42 2,918 2,801 1921 4,542 -1,177 20.58 2,353 2,189 1931 5,390 848 18.67 2,875 2,515 1941 6,192 802 14.88 3,289 2,903 1951 4,444 -1,748 -28.23 2,373 2,071 1961 MC 3.42 5,775 1,331 29.95 3,058 2,717 1971 Me 3.42 7,962 2,187 37.87 4,222 3,740 1981 Me 8.86 9,400 1,438 18.06 5,031 4,369 1991 Me 8.86 12,413 3,013 32.05 6,599 5,814 2001 Me 8.86 17,755 5,342 43.04 9,306 8,449

6 Bawani Khera Bhiwani 1981 Me 6.00 11,530 6,080 5,450 1991 Me 6.00 14,159 2,629 22.80 7,527 6,632 2001 Me 6.00 17,424 3,265 23.06 9,273 8,151

7 Taoru Gurgaon 1981 Me 0.35 6,912 3,665 3,247 1991 Me 4.52 12,534 5,622 81.34 6,796 5,738 2001 Me 4.52 17,328 4,794 38.25 9,310 8,018

8 Haileymandi Gurgaon 1951 1,346 719 627 1961 Me 2.59 1,728 382 28.38 950 778 1971 Me 2.59 2,252 524 30.32 . 1,223 1,029 1981 Me 2.59 10,140 7,888 350.27 5,413 4,727 1991 Me 16.27 13,263 3,123 30.80 6,964 6,299 2001 Me 16.27 17,081 3,818 28.79 9,080 8,001

9 Kalayat Kaithal 1981 Me 6.50 10,965 5,941 5,024 1991 Me 6.50 12,872 1,907 17.39 6,897 5,975

173 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZECLASS IN 2001 WIIH VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 2001 Me 6.50 17,051 4,179 32.47 9,119 7,932

10 Pundri Kaithal 1901 5,834 2,893 2,941 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 6,552 3,507 3,045 1961 Me 3.88 7,660 1,108 16.91 4,137 3,523 1971 Me 3.89 9,107 1,447 18.89 4,959 4,148 1981 Me 3.89 11,804 2,697 29.61 6,315 5,489 1991 Me 3.89 14,311 2,507 21.24 7,674 6,637 2001 Me 3.89 17,018 2,707 18.92 9,138 7,880

11 Kalanaur Rohtak 1901 7,640 3,648 3,992 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 Me 5.70 12,380 6,327 6,053 1991 Me 5.70 14,524 2,144 17.32 7,656 6,868 2001 MC 5.70 16,853 2,329 16.04 8,945 7,908

12 Nilokheri Kamal 1951 6,287 3,801 2,486 1961 NAC 4.69 8,035 1,748 27.80 4,625 3,410 1971 NAC 4.69 9,357 1,322 16.45 5,066 4,291 1981 MC 4.69 11,078 1,721 18.39 5,843 5,235 1991 MC 4.69 13,911 2,833 25.57 7,254 6,657 2001 MC 4.69 16,405 2,494 17.93 8,599 7,806

13 Beri Jhaijar 1901 9,723 4,891 4,832 1911 7,798 -1,925 -19.80 3,958 3,840 1921 7,454 -344 t -4.41 3,875 3,579 1931 7,877 423 5.67 4,001 3,876 1941 9,785 1,908 24.22 5,176 4,609 1951 9,952 167 1.71 5,111 4,841 1961 Me 2.59 10,840 888 8.92 5,467 5,373 1971 Me 2.59 12,336 1,496 ,13.80 6,256 6,080 1981 Me ·2.59 13,490 1,154 9.35 6,922 6,568 1991 MC 2.59 14,508 1,018 7.55 7,643 6,865 2001 MC 2.59 16,162 1,654 11.40 8,723 7,439

174 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BYPOPUATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 wnn VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State/ Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

14 Pataudi Gurgpon 1901 4,171 2,121 2,050 1911 Declassified 1921 3,342 1,708 1,634 1931 3,667 325 9:72 1,882 1,785 1941 4,105 438 11.94 2,065 2,040 1951 3,688 -417 -10.16 1,923 1,765 1961 Me 5.18 4,243 555 15.05 2,245 1,998 1971 Me 3.89 6,045 1,802 42.47 3,121 2,924 1981 Me 3.89 8,422 2,377 39.32 4,431 3,991 1991 Me 3.89 11,278 2,856 33.91 5,972 5,306 2001 Me 13.51 16,085 4,807 42.62 8,526 7,559

15 *Siwani Bhiwani 1991 Me 4.88 11,109 5,942 5167.00 2001 Me 4.88 15,850 4,741 42.68 8,463 7,387

16 *Namaund Hisar 1991 Me 0.28 12,197 6,474 5,723 2001 Me 0.28 15,116 2,919 23.93 8,129 6,987

17 Kansepur Yamunanagflf 2001 CT 2.42 14,952 7,962 6,990

18 Indri Kamal 1981 Me 0.95 8,304 4,543 3,761 1991 Me 0.95 11,131 2,827 34.04 5,834 5,297 2001 Me 0.95 14,511 3,380 30.37 7,739 6,772

19 Uchana Jind 1951 2,745 1,571 1,174 1961 MC 0.57 4,387 1,642 59.82 2,445 1,942 1971 Me 0.57 6,329 1,942 44.27 3,433 2,896 1981 Me 0.57 8,091 1,762 27.84 4,349 3,742 1991 Me 0.57 10,216 2,125 26.26 5,608 4,608 2001 Me 0.57 14,111 3,895 38.13 7,590 6,521

20 Julana lind 1951 3,522 2,005 1,517 1961 Me 1.22 5,155 1,633 46.37 2,864 2,291 1971 Me 1.22 6,890 1,735 33.66 3,768 3,122 1981 Me 1.22 9,294 2,404 34.89 5,055 4,239 1991 Me 1.22 11,424 2,130 22.92 6,176 5,248 2001 Me 1.22 13,635 2,211 19.35 7,237 6,398

21 Punahana Gurgaon 1991 Me 3.50 8,679 4,616 4,063 2001 Me 3.50 13,179 4,500 51.85 6,884 6,295

22 Sadaura Yamunanagflf 1901 9,812 5,140 4,672 1911 7,774 -2,038 -20.77 4,107 3,667

175 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIIID BYPOPUATION SlZECLASS IN 2001 WfIH VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Ab>olute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1921 7,630 -144 -1.85 4,058 3,572 1931 7,769 139 1.82 4,171 3,598 1941 8,815 1,046 13.46 4,747 4,068 1951 7,566 -1,249 -14.17 3,991 3,575 1961 MC 11.81 7,775 209 2.76 4,007 3,768 1971 MC 11.66 8,971 1,196 15.38 4,641 4,330 1981 MC 2.70 10,131 1,160 12.93 5,252 4,879 1991 MC 2.70 11,818 1,687 16.65 6,130 5,688 2001 MC 6.75 13,176 1,358 11.49 6,936 6,240

23 Bawal Rewari 1901 5,739 2,933 2,806 1911 5,332 -407 -7.09 2,669 2,663 1921 5,137 -195 -3.66 2,669 2,468 1931 4,944 -193 -3.76 2,448 2,496 1941 5,709 765 15.47 2,862 2,847 1951 5,392 -317 -5.55 2,781 2,611 1961 MC 0.41 5,924 532 9.87 3,118 2,806 1971 MC 0.36 6,529 605 10.21 3,408 3,121 1981 MC 0.36 7,760 1,231 18.85 4,094 3,666 1991 MC 0.36 9,010 1,250 16.11 4,787 4,223 2001 MC 0.36 12,144 3,134 34.78 6,494 5,650

24 Radaur YamunanallfU" 1951 3,837 2,023 1,814 1961 MC 2.59 5,155 1,318 34.35 2,752 2,403 1971 MC 2.59 6,539 1,384 26.85 3,441 3,098 1981 MC 2.59 8,105 1,566 23.95 4,185 3,920 1991 MC 2.59 10,165 2,060 25.42 5,239 4,926 2001 MC 2.59 11,737 1,572 15.46 6,170 5,567

25 Loharu Bhiwani 1901 2,175 1,117 1,058 1911 2,343 168 7.72 1,217 1,126 1921 2,339 -4 -0.17 1,205 1,134 1931 2,956 617 26.38 1,572 1,384 1941 4,023 1,067 36.10 2.146 1,877 1951 3,438 -585 -14.54 1,834 1,604 1961 MC 2.02 4,465 1,027 29.87 2,392 2,073 1971 MC 2.59 5,579 1,114 24.95 2,934 2,645 1981 MC 2.59 7,247 1,668 29.90 3,831 3,416 1991 MC 2.59 9,031 1,784 24.62 4,745 4,286 2001 MC 2.59 11,421 2,390 26.46 5,991 5,430

26 Tosham Bhiwani 1971 NAC 2.59 5,039 2,711 2,328 1981 Declassified 1991 MC 4.91 8,387 4412 3,975

176 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIID BYPOPUATIONSIZECLASS IN 2001 WTIlI VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2001 MC 4.91 11,272 2,885 34.40 5,981 5,291

27 Nuh Gurgaon 1951 2,892 1,533 1,359 1961 MC 6.71 3,772 880 30.43 2,024 1,748 1971 MC 5.67 4,730 958 25.40 2,596 2,134 1981 MC 0.30 5,992 1,262 26.68 3,266 2,726 1991 MC 0.30 7,492 1,500 25.03 4,061 3,431 2001 MC 0.30 11,039 3,547 47.34 5,827 5,212

28 Uklanamandi Hisar 1961 MC 0.78 3,588 1,998 1,590 1971 MC 0.78 5,981 2,393 66.69 3-;204 2,777 1981 Me 1.86 7,055 1,074 17.96 3,677 3,378 1991 MC 1.86 8,599 1,544 21.89 4,516 4,083 2001 MC 1.86 10,937 2,338 27.19 5,862 5,075

29 Hathin Faridabad 1901 4,301 NA NA 1911 Declassified 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 Declassified 1951 Declassified 1961 Declassified 1971 Declassified 1981 MC 1.99 6,553 3,59Y- 2,962 1991 MC 1.99 7,863 1,310 19.99 4,241 3,622 2001 MC 1.99 10,916 3,053 38.83 5,889 5,027

30 *Dundahera Gurgaon 1991 cr 5.75 6,767 3,833 2,934 2001 cr 5.75 10,626 3,859 57.03 6,235 4,391 .- 31 *UnchaSiwana Kamal 1991 cr 6.17 4,860 3,025 1,835 2001 cr 6.17 10,610 5,750 118.31 6,882 3,728

32 Kanina M ahendragarh 1951 3,457 1,734 1,723 1961 MC 2.36 4,582 1,125 32.54 2,322 2,260 1971 MC 2.36 5,875 1,293 28.22 3,042 2,833 1981 MC 2.36 7,131 1,256 21.38 3,663 3,468 1991 MC 2.36 8,601 1,470 20.61 4,429 4,172 2001 MC 2.36 10,195 1,594 18.53 5,298 4,897

CIASS-V (5,000 to 9,999) 15 TOWNS 1901 145,045 74,599 70,446 1911 90,410 -54,635 -37.67 47,000 43,410 1921 95,470 5,060 5.60 51,534 43,936

177 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMFllATIONS CLASSIF1ED BYPOPlLATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 wrm VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1931 125,518 30,048 31.47 68,524 56,994 1941 152,960 27,442 21.86 83,149 69,811 1951 115,528 -37,432 -24.47 61,839 53,689 1961 50.66 99,418 -16,110 -13.94 53,262 46,156 1971 64.88 131,657 32,239 32.43 69,841 61,816 1981 54.54 164,653 32,996 25.06 87,440 77,213 1991 63.31 151,761 -12,892 -7.83 80,546 71,215 2001 75.04 124,017 -27,744 -18.28 66,556 57,461

1 Buria Yamunanagar 1901 5,865 3,054 2,811 1911 4,272 -1,593 -27.16 2,261 2,011 1921 3,574 -698 -16.34 1,878 1,696 1931 3,494 -80 -2.24 1,848 1,646 1941 3,857 363 10.39 2,083 1,774 1951 3,635 -222 -5.76 1,991 1,644 1961 Me 1.94 3,988 353 9.71 2,166 1,822 1971 Me 1.94 4,645 657 16.77 2,469 2,176 1981 Me l.94 6,258 1,613 34.73 3,350 2,908 1991 Me 1.94 ·7,850 1,592 25.44 4,261 3,589 2001 Me 1.94 9,830 1,980 25.22 5,399 4,431

2 Chhachhrauli Yamunanagar 1901 5,520 3,025 2,495 1911 4,246 -1,274 -23.08 2,285 1,961 1921 4,202 -44 1.04 2,427 1,775 1931 5,124 922 21.94 2,986 2,138 1941 5,419 295 5.76 2,972 2,447 1951 4,444 -975 -17.99 2,453 1,991 1961 Me 0.54 5,038 594 13.37 2,715 2,323 1971 Me 1.29 5,382 344 6.83 2,769 2,613 1981 Me 1.29 6,140 758 14.08 3,214 2,926 1991 Me 1.29 7,330 1,190 19.38 3,795 3,535 2001 Me 10.54 9,710 2,380 32.47 5,000 4,708

3 *Bilaspur Yamunanagar 1991 cr 8.51 7,130 3,778 3,352 2001 cr 8.51 9,621 2,491 34.94 5,102 4,519

4 Kardhan Ambala 2001 cr 2.36 9,579 5,127 4,452

5 Fanukhnagar Gurgaon 1901 6,136 2,9% 3,140 1911 3,158 -2,978 -48.53 1,598 1,560 1921 Declassified 1931 Declassified 1941 5,122 2,548 2,574 1951 4,947 -175 3.42 2,569 2,378

178 A4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMFRAll0NS CIASSIF1ED BYPOPUAll0N SlZECLASS IN 2001 wrrn VARIATION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban Statel Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1961 Me 0.49 4,948 1 0.02 2,626 2,322 1971 Me 2.91 5,487 539 10.89 2,886 2.601 1981 Me 2.91 6,367 880 16.04 3,374 2,993 1991 Me 3.28 8,046 1,679 26.37 4,244 3,802 2001 Me 3.28 9,521 1,475 J8.33 5,053 4,468

6 Hassanpur Faridabad 1981 Me 0.93 5,109 2,699 2,410 1991 Me 0.93 7,130 2,021 39.56 3,764 3,366 2001 Me 0.93 9,090 1,960 27.49 4,887 4,203

7 *Farrukhpur Yamunanl§ll' 1991 cr 1.35 5,579 2,984 2,595 2001 cr 1.35 8,740 3,161 56.66 4,702 4,038

8 *M ustafabad Yamunana~ 1991 cr 7.16 7,301 3,789 3,512 2001 cr 7.16 8,516 1215 16.64 4,494 4,022

9 AsanKhurd Panipat 2001 cr 4.92 8,066 4,396 3,670

10 Ladrawan Jhajjar 2001 cr 8.73 8,008 4,445 3,563

11 Nangal Chaudhary Mahendra~h 2001 cr 5.70 7,368 3,892 3,476

12 Raipur Rani Panchkula 2001 cr 6.63 7,031 3,769 3,262

13 Jakhahnandi Falehabad 1951 2,040 1,110 930 1961 Me 0.13 3,138 1098 53.82 1,735 1,403 1971 Me 0.13 3,919 781 24.89 2,059 1,860 1981 Me 0.67 4,609 690 17.61 2,429 2,180 1991 Me 0.67 5,599 990 21.48 2,932 2,667 2001 Me 1.42 6,895 1296 23.15 3,748 3,147

14 Tilpat Faridabad 2001 cr 9.92 6,369 3,489 2,880

15 Ateli Mahendragarh 1951 1,015 587 428 1961 Me 0.65 1,521 506 49.85 843 678 1971 Me 0.65 1,937 416 27.35 1,062 875 1981 Me 1.65 2,993 1,056 54.52 1,648 1,345 1991 MC 1.65 4,457 1,464 48.91 2,326 2,131 2001 Me 1.65 5,673 1,216 27.28 3,051 2,622 ClASS·VI (llBS THAN 5,000) 1 TOWN 1901 36,321 16,906 15,114

179 A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BYPOPUA.TION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIAlION SINCE 1991 S. Name of Urban State! Census Urban Area in Persons Variation since the Males Females No. Agglomeration! District Year Status Square preceding census Town Kilometre Absolute Percentage 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1911 28,260 -8,061 -22.19 15.525 12,735 1921 26,983 -1,277 -4.52 14.454 12.529 1931 15,061 -11,922 -44.18 7,750 7,311 1941 11,985 -3,076 -20.42 6,294 5,691 1951 51,040 39,055 325.86 27,378 23,662 1961 44,439 -6,601 -12.93 23,945 20,494 1971 17,483 -26,956 -60.66 9,409 8,074 1981 7,602 -9,881 -56.52 4,077 3,525 1991 9,317 1,715 22.56 5.351 3,966 2001 7.88 4,454 -4,863 -52.19 2,395 2,059

Rewari Rural Rewari 2001 CT 7.88 .4,454 2,395 2,059 Note:- 1. Towns treated as such for the frrst time in 1991 census which continued as town for 2001 census are shown asteric (*) on the left. 2. Town treated frrst time in 200 1 census given in Italics

The following abbreviations have been used for the status of a tov.n. M.C.- Mtmicipal Cotmcil C.B.- Cantonment Board N.A.C.- Notified Area Committee c.L.- Civil Lines M.- Mtmicipality S.T.C.- Small Tov.n Committee M.and C.L.-Mtmicipality and civillines. M.C.L.&Cantt.-Mtmicipality, Civil lines and Cantonernent C.T.- Census Town F.C.A.­ Faridabad Complex Administration E.O.­ Estate Office O.G­ Out Gro\\-th U.A.- Urban Agglomeration N.A.­ Stands for not available (i) Faridabad Newtov.nship with a population of 23,125 (12,133 M; 10,992 F) in 1951 ; P 39,852 (21,990 M; 17,862 F) in 1961 andP.85,762 (49,164 M,36,598 F) in 1971; (ii) Faridabad (M.C) with a population of 5,310 (2,768M; 2,542F) in 1901; P. 4,487 (2,384M; 2,103F) in 1911; ~,337 (2,310 , P M,2,027F) in 1921;P.5,134 (2,880M;2,254F) in 1931; P.6,367 (3,135M.,3,232F)in 1941; P.8,341 (4,331 M;4,010 F) in 1951; P 10,857 (5,791M., 5,066 F) in 1961 andP. 19,644 (10,956 M.,8,688 F) in 1971. (iii) Ballabgarh (M.C.) with a population of 4,506 (2,372 M; 2,134 F) in 1901 ; P 4,053 (2,176 M.,1,877 F) in 1911 : P 3,721 (2,013 M; 1,708 F) in 1921; P 4,162 (2,293 M; 1,869 F) in 1931 : P.5,108 (2,889 M., 2,219 F) in 1941; P. 5,927 (3,228 M., 2,669 F) in 1951; P 8,330 (4,504 M; 3,826 F) in 1961 andp 17,411 (9,910 M; 7,501 F) in 1971. (iv) Census Tov.n Khera Sarnpla of District Rohtak of 1991 census have been declassified in 2001 Census.

180 A-4 APPENDIX-l NEWTOWNS ADDED IN 2001 AND TOWNS OF 1991 DECLASSIFIED IN 2001 State! New Towns Added in 2001 Name of Town District Name of Town Urban Area in Population Declassified in Urban Area in Population StatusSq.Kms 2001 1991 2001 Statu: S q.KIru 2001 1991 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Haryana Panchkula Raipur Rani CT 6.63 7,031 5,153 HMT Pinjore MC 3.44 4,199 5,516 Ambala Kardhan CT 2.36 9,579 4,165

Yamunanagar Kansepur CT 2.42 14,952 4,066 Panipat Pan~at Taraf Ansar CT 7.88 31,279 14,953 Panipat Taraf M akhdum Zadgan CT 6.54 35,155 12,078 Panipat TarafRajputan CT 5.10 18,815 4,355 AsanKhurd CT 4.92 8,066 5,972

Rohtak Kheri Sampla CT 10 10,286 7,838 Jhajjar Ladrawan CT 8.73 8,008 9,108 Sankhol CT 0.84 5,179 4,177 Mahendragarh Nangal Chaudhry CT 5.70 7,368 6,206 Rewari Rewari (Rural) CT 7.88 4,454 7,111 Gurg;:ton Sukhrali CT 4.78 10,388 5,538 Faridabad Tilpat CT 9.92 6,369 4,144

181 A4 APPENDIX·2 CHANGES IN AREA OF TOWNS BEIWEEN 1991·2001 AND REASONS THEREOF SNo District Name of Town Area in SqKm Reasons for the change in area 2001 1991 2 3 4 5 6 Panchkula I.Panchkula Urban Estate (E.O) 25.50 15.24 Change in Jurisdiction. 2. Pinjore (M.C) 7.09 Change in Jurisdiction 2 Ambala 3. N araingarh (M. C) 7.93 5.18 Change in Jurisdiction 4. Ambala Cantt (C.B) 33.36 31.18 Change in Jurisdiction 3 Yamunanagar 5. Yamunanagar (M.Cl) 16.32 15.88 Change in Jurisdiction 6. Sadaura(M.C) 6.75 2.70 Change in Jurisdiction 7. Chhachhrauli (M. C) 10.54 1.29 Change in Jurisdiction 4 Kurukshetra 8. Thanesar (M .Cl) 32.63 30.71 Change in Jurisdiction 9. Pehowa (M.C) 7.50 4.57 Change in Jurisdiction 5 Kaithal 10. Kaithal (M.Cl) 43.75 7.90 Change in Jurisdiction 11. Cheeka (M C) 30.72 8.50 Change in Jurisdiction 6 Kamal 12. Gharaunda (M.C) 12.98 2.00 Change in Jurisdiction 7 Panipat 13. Panipat (M.Cl) 21.70 20.82 Change in Jurisdiction 14. Samalkha (M . C) 4.48 2.54 Change in Jurisdiction 8 Sonipat 15. Sonipat (M.C) 37.69 28.32 Change in Jurisdiction 9 Jind 16. Safidon (M.C) 9.48 6.48 Change in Jurisdiction 10 Fatehabad 17. Jakhalmandi (M.C) 1.420 0.67 Change in Jurisdiction 18. Tohana (M.C) 13.76 4.70 Change in Jurisdiction 11 Sirs a 19. Sirs a (M.Cl) 26.43 19.33 Change in Jurisdiction 20.M andi Dabwali (M.C) 22.33 7.11 Change in Jurisdiction 21. Rania (M . C) 10.63 Change in Jurisdiction 12 Risar 22. Ransi (M .C!) 10.05 9.07 Change in Jurisdiction 13 Jhajjar 23. Bahadurgarh (M .Cl) 21.00 9.00 Change in Jurisdiction 14 Rewari 24. Rewari (M .C!) 11.78 18.43 Revised Computation 15 Gurgaon 25. Gurgaon (M .Cl) 16.57 15.33 Change in Jurisdiction 26. Pataudi (M.C) 13.51 3.89 Change in Jurisdiction 27. Gurgaon (Rural) (CT) 7.56 8.80 Change in Jurisdiction 28. Sohna (M C) 9.70 3.70 Change in Jurisdiction 16 Faridabad 29. Faridabad (M.Corp) 198.75 178.24 Change in Jurisdiction 30. Palwal (m.C!) 8.30 5.52 Change in Jurisdiction

182