DOCSLIB.ORG

S Months of Protest?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S Months of Protest? What remains of Israel’s months of protest? Faces of Daphni Leef & Stav Shafrir, protest leaders, held aloft Allow me to review what I’ve learned in recent months about Israel’s new movement for social justice, and project forward. As of this moment, street protests continue, including a clash in recent days with police over the removal of protest tents; but these current activists are in the hundreds rather than the tens and hundreds of thousands who rallied peaceably during the summer. Still, the structure I reported on for In These Times magazine, continues to operate, with the movement attempting “to carry itself beyond the streets.”: …. Alongside “general assembly” meetings in parks, neighborhood committees have been formed around the country, as well as advisory committees comprised of prominent personalities from Israel’s diverse ethnic and religious communities. By any estimation, Israel’s summer of protest was an impressive display of progressive social activism, rallying nearly half a million protesters (out of Israel’s seven million population) into the streets at its high-water mark on September 3rd. More than one hundred tent encampments for social justice dotted the entire country. It united (rhetorically at least) Arabs in Jaffa with traditional working class Likud and Shas supporters in the Tel Aviv neighborhood of Hatikva. (See the great liberal Orthodox activist, Leah Shakdiel, speaking with this unifying theme at the Yerucham protest: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVbW3ARsHLk.) The following is from a Dec. 25 news article in the Jerusalem Post: Leaders of the summer’s “J14” [July 14] protest movement for social justice announced Sunday what they called the formation of a political movement based on the protests that swept the country over the summer. Daphni Leef, the 26-year-old Tel Avivian who started the nationwide tent city protests against housing costs this July with a post on Facebook, said the movement “will forge an extra-parliamentary means to protest the cost of living, fight for Israeli democratic and cultural values and serve all branches of the protest that started this past summer.” One likely result of the movement is that it has helped catapult the Labor Party over Kadima as the number one opposition voice within the Knesset. In the national election to occur within the next year or so, Labor’s new female leader, Shelly Yachimovich, will probably displace Kadima’s Tzipi Livni as leader of the opposition. Yachimovich emphasizes a traditional Labor-Zionist social democratic agenda, whereas Livni remains an economic conservative. But the conflict with the Palestinians and the ongoing occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem remain a gaping wound that the social protest movement does not address. Progressives who embrace the movement hope that average Israelis will eventually connect the dots and come to agree that funding West Bank settlements has been at their expense; but so far, the movement as a whole has tried to soft-pedal this central political issue as too divisive. This is but one of a number of contradictions confronting Israeli society. For one thing, Israel’s economy is stronger than that of most other countries. Since its banks are not especially tied to international banks, it has avoided the mortgage crisis that has rocked most of the West, and its level of unemployment is not high. Still, as reported in a front-page article in the New York Times in August, Israel has undergone a high concentration of wealth with a consolidation of economic power in a handful of family-owned conglomerates. This is ascribed to the fire sale of state-owned assets to politically-connected “cronies” in the 1980s and ’90s, as occurred later in Russia and other socialistic economies that were privatized. The housing crisis that sparked Daphni Leef’s initial tent protest was caused by a rush of apartment purchases in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem by Jews from abroad who still live most of the year in France, the US or elsewhere in the West. This problem could be remedied by restricting foreign investment in the housing market within central Israel. Yet this would do little or nothing for the very different housing issue that confronts Israeli Arabs. Arab citizens of Israel mostly face a land problem: their towns and cities are unable to expand to meet their housing needs. While numerous new towns and cities have been built with Jewish Israelis in mind, hardly any such development has occurred for Palestinian Israelis. In his latest column for Jewish Currents magazine, Ron Skolnik tries to explain puzzling polling results which consistently show a majority of Israelis optimistic about their lives and satisfied with the direction of the country, despite their massive support for the social protests. The most reasonable answer he can find (borrowed from Yediot and Ynet columnist Yehuda Nuriel) is that the protests have revived a “familial sense of national solidarity” — primarily among Jews. Hopefully, this old Zionist tradition of Jewish solidarity can include their Arab fellow citizens as well, yet this will not be easy. It would mean reversing the anti-Arab reactions of the last few years, fueled by Jewish frustrations at Arab attacks from beyond Israel’s pre-’67 borders, despite several withdrawals since the 1990s from parts of the West Bank, all of Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, and two failed attempts at negotiating a final peace. As CUNY professor Dov Waxman pointed out at a Manhattan JCC panel discussion in October, Israeli “fatigue and fatalism” on the peace issue drove Israelis’ focus inward into a personal and depoliticized direction. The protests have reignited political and socially conscious passions, but not necessarily in a coherent way. In the end, Waxman concluded, the usual over-arching political concerns of the Arab-Israeli conflict and security may still trump social justice. One must hope that these objectives are somehow reconciled to allow the pursuit of social justice to facilitate the quest for peace (and vice versa), but this would be a new departure for Israeli society..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel's Go-Ahead on Natural Gas | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Policy Alert Israel's Go-Ahead on Natural Gas by Simon Henderson Jun 21, 2013 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simon Henderson Simon Henderson is the Baker fellow and director of the Bernstein Program on Gulf and Energy Policy at The Washington Institute, specializing in energy matters and the conservative Arab states of the Persian Gulf. Brief Analysis Israel's export decision should be welcomed, but domestic opposition could discourage necessary foreign investment. srael's decision to export natural gas, expected to be endorsed by the cabinet on Sunday, is a compromise that I leaves the country's energy debate unresolved. Although the long-awaited decision largely endorses the findings of a 2012 report by the government's so-called Zemach Committee, it also increases the amount of gas to be used domestically from 47 to 60 percent -- an apparent concession to local lobbies that believe exporting the gas would damage the environment and further enrich certain Israeli entrepreneurs. Yet this change is partly offset by another provision: any exports to the West Bank and Jordan will be categorized as part of the domestic allowance. The decision was delayed by Israel's January elections and the fact that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's new governing coalition wanted to reopen the debate. Even now, opposition leader Shelly Yachimovich has threatened to ask Israel's Supreme Court to intervene. Speaking on Wednesday, Netanyahu described the decision as being jointly made with Finance Minister Yair Lapid (who emerged as leader of the second-largest party in the Knesset after the elections), Energy and Water Minister Silvan Shalom, and Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae
    The College of Management-Academic Studies April 2008 Date: September 16, 2014 Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae Personal Details: Academic Degree: PhD Phone Number at: Mobile: 0546-665480 School/Department: School of Media Studies, The College of Management-Academic Studies Academic Education: Name of higher education Year degree Year/s institution Subject Degree or diploma received 1976-1979 Hebrew University of International Relations, BA 1980 Jerusalem History 1980-1983 Hebrew University of Communication MA (practical 1983 Jerusalem program) 1989-1994 Hebrew University of Communication Thesis (theory 1994 Jerusalem program) 1998-2005 University of Haifa Education, Communication PhD 2005 M.A. and Ph.D. Details: (Institution, Adviser/s, Title) Masters thesis: Media representation of women in politics: Are they still “Domineering dowagers and scheming concubines”? (1994) Adviser: Prof. Gadi Wolfsfeld Doctoral thesis: Sociocultural construction of gendered identity among girls attending dance classes in Israel (2004) Adviser: Tamar Katriel Further Studies: Teaching license program, Levinsky College of Education, Tel Aviv (1995-1996) Academic Experience – Teaching: Year/s Name of institution Department/program Rank/position 1980-1992 The Open University International relations, Social patterns Instructor in Israel, Mass media, and others 1993-1997 Levinsky College of Faculty of Education, Teacher Lecturer Education Training 2011-1989 Beit Berl Academic School of Education, Department of Lecturer College Social Sciences 1994-2004
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadima for Half Price? the Formation of a National Unity Government in Israel
    Israel Office_____________________________ Kadima for half price? The formation of a national unity government in Israel . The formation of a national unity government strengthens Prime Minister Netanyahu and gives him new leeway during negotiations. Kadima’s entry to the government strengthens moderate forces and weakens the hardliners. There will be no real change in policy. Kadima failed in opposition, and as a government party it will be even less able to push through a different policy. The agreement between Mofaz and Netanyahu was motivated in the main by domestic political reasons. This is the primary field in which moderate changes will take place rather than in foreign policy. There will be new Israeli offers of talks in the peace process, but no real progress should be expected, together with no surmounting of the present stalemate. It is not clear whether Mofaz will join the moderates or the hardliners in Netanyahu’s security cabinet over the Iran question. Dr. Ralf Hexel FES Israel, May 17, 2012 1 More political power for Netanyahu secure an influential ministerial position for himself? Or is he seeking a change in policy? In a surprise move on May 8, 2012, the opposi- tion Kadima party (28 seats), led by former No early elections - a national unity gov- army head and defense minister Shaul Mofaz, ernment instead joined prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right leaning-religious government coalition (66 When the Knesset convened on the morning of out of 120 seats). Netanyahu now has a gov- May 7, parliamentarians and public were abso- ernment comprising seven parties; this has a lutely sure that the votes needed to hold early parliamentary majority of 94 and can rightly be elections on September 4, 2012 and to dissolve called a national unity government.
    [Show full text]
  • SEMINAR PROGRAM Final
    Sunday, May 14 Striving For the Highest: From Ideals to Reality in Israel 4:00 ICJW Executive Meeting in Hannah Hall, Floor H, Herod’s Hotel 5:30 Bus leaves from entrance to Herod’s Hotel 6:00 Opening of the Seminar at the Diaspora Museum (Bet Hatfutsot) • Greetings from Museum Representative 14 MAY SUNDAY • Greetings from Galia Wolloch, Chair of the Council of Women’s Organizations in Israel • Greetings from Robyn Lenn OAM, President of ICJW 6:30 Buffet Dinner 7:30 Tour of 2 Exhibitions – Synagogues Around the World – 30 Years After Operation Moses 9:00 Bus back to Herod’s Hotel 1 INTRODUCING ICJW’S AFFILIATE IN ISRAEL: THE COUNCIL OF WOMEN'S ORGANIZATIONS IN ISRAEL The Council of Women’s Organizations in Israel (CWOI), founded in 1953, is the umbrella organization of the nine largest women’s organizations in Israel: Emunah, Naamat, WIZO, ORT Women, Soroptomists, Hadassah Women, the Association of University Women, Bnot Brit, and the Israel Women’s Lobby. The chairmanship of the CWOI rotates between Na’amat, WIZO and Emunah. CWOI is the official representative of Israeli women’s organizations to international women’s forums. CWOI is an affiliated member of the International Council of Jewish Women (ICJW), the International Council of Women (ICW- CIF), and the European Centre of the International Council of Women (ECICW). CWOI representatives have attended the CSW at the UN in New York as part of the official Israeli governmental delegations. The main issues dealt with in Israel by CWOI are raising awareness and lobbying for legislation concerning the rights and status of women and family, parity in decision-making bodies, balancing family and careers, gender equality, and the full participation of women in social, economic, and political spheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Elections 2019 Update
    Israel Elections 2019 Update September 10, 2019 With no party succeeding in forming a government following the elections that took place in Israel in April, 2019, a brand new election will now take place next week, on September 17. JFNA is pleased to present the following backgrounder summarizing what has occurred, and what may happen in the coming weeks and months. JFNA has also prepared a background briefing on why a second round of elections are taking place – which can be seen here, as well as a paper on how Israeli elections work. Elections: Round Two Perhaps the most crucial take away from the backgrounder papers (linked above) is that in practice, Israeli elections have two “stages.” The first - the actual elections - occurs when the population elects the 120-members of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset. Those are the national elections, but once the results of these elections are known, we don’t always have a clear picture of who will lead the country. This only occurs during what we can call a “second stage” when a potential prime minister seeks to form a governing majority coalition of at least 61, from among those 120 newly elected MKs (represented through their parties). September 2019’s theme: Mergers In the months that have passed since second elections were called, there has been little, if any, debate about policy or major issues of substance; or even discussions about personality. Instead, the focus has been on tactics, strategy and coalition building. So, in many ways, the September 2019 look like a redo of the elections that took place in April.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Debates No. 12
    Israel Debates No. 12 12 November 2012 What has been achieved? On the political balance of Israel’s social protest movement. There is an election campaign going on in Israel. On 22 January 2013, early elections for the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, will take place. The main reason to bring the date forward – regular elections were scheduled in the fall of 2013 – was the fact that Prime Minister Netanyahu was neither able nor apparently willing to approve the State budget for 2013. It had foreseen necessary cuts in government spending and significant tax increases, which would inevitably have led to losses at the ballot box for both him and his coalition partners. So it was in his electoral interest to reschedule the elections and postpone the approval of the budget until afterwards. It seems Netanyahu, who until recently dominated, almost unchallenged, the political scenery in Israel, meanwhile worries about securing re-election. One of the reasons for this is that, as an immediate conse- quence of the social protest movement last year, Israel experiences a new awareness of social and eco- nomic policy issues. The feeling of increasing social injustice, the dismantling of social state principles, a growing gap between rich and poor, housing rents that could no longer be paid and the rising costs of living brought hundreds of thousands of people onto the streets in the summer of 2011. Despite efforts by its leaders, the protests did not continue into the year 2012. Nonetheless, the movement and its demands for social justice and a functioning welfare state managed to significantly impact the country’s political dis- course.
    [Show full text]
  • The Increasingly Polarised and Fragmented Party System in Israel Will Make It Difficult for a Stable Government to Emerge from This Month’S Elections
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/01/14/israel-elections-2013-israeli-party-system/ The increasingly polarised and fragmented party system in Israel will make it difficult for a stable government to emerge from this month’s elections. Blog Admin Israel’s next parliamentary elections are due to be held on 22 January. As part of EUROPP’s coverage of the European neighbourhood, André Krouwel and Daniel Rajmil give an overview of the country’s highly fragmented party system, noting that the results are likely to be significantly different from those in the last election in 2009. New parties have emerged in the last four years, while the largest party in the current parliament, Kadima, could well lose all of its seats. Of all established democracies, Israel has the highest electoral change per election over the post-war period. Only new democracies in Eastern Europe are more electorally volatile. On average almost a quarter of the Israeli electorate shif ts party allegiance per election. One of the main reasons f or this exceptional electoral volatility is that Israeli elections are held under a system of proportional representation (PR). This means that many political parties will enter the f ray, as it is relatively easy to enter parliament compared to majoritarian electoral systems. Parties will gain a number of seats equal to the proportion of the vote they gained in the election, albeit that Israel has introduced a 2 per cent threshold to avoid too much parliamentary f ragmentation. Nevertheless, over the last decade between 12 and 15 parties entered the Knesset in each election.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern-Pandemics and Protests: COVID-19 As a Platform Scapegoating, Conspiracy and Authoritarian Narratives – the Cases of Germany and Israel
    Postmodern-Pandemics and Protests: COVID-19 as a platform Scapegoating, conspiracy and authoritarian narratives – The cases of Germany and Israel Jakob Andrae, Felix Kirchhof and Sophia Solomon Abstract The outbreak of a global post-modern pandemic in 2020, led to a variety of civic protests in different countries. This paper analyzes the protests within German and Israeli societies and thereby examines similarities and differences between the civic positions expressed in those countries. In the following we will focus on three main issues: 1. Xenophobia, scapegoating, conspiracy theories and authoritarian- ism as ideological reactions to post-modern pandemics. 2. COVID-19 related pro- tests in Israel and Germany 3. The relation between new social conditions which result from the pandemic and attempts to instrumentalize them and use the virus in order the spread of authoritarian ideologies and excluding actions. Introduction After the death of US-citizen George Floyd as a result of racist police violence, a global movement against racism emerged. The protests focused not only on ra- cially motivated police arrests, but also criticized structurally anchored, systemic and everyday ongoing racism. It is possible, that the coronavirus pandemic has not only led to a global wave of protests, but also changed the way how people protest around the world. Public protests during a pandemic have prompted the concern that close contact of participants could lead to a spike in case counts of infections. Even though being outdoors seems to decrease the risk of exposure, it still presents a dilemma be- cause staying home would be safer in many cases. Nevertheless, it would be hyp- ocritical to expect protesters to stay at home, while people have to attend to their work on a daily basis and risk their health even in industries which are not vital for society.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Israelis So Happy About?
    What Are Israelis So Happy About? Partners for Progressive Israel executive director Ron Skolnik, in his latest column for Jewish Currents magazine, tries to explain puzzling polling results which consistently show a majority of Israelis optimistic about their lives and satisfied with the direction of the country, despite their massive support for last summer’s social protest movement. The following are selected passages of Ron’s article: If things in Israel are so bad, how can they be so good? That’s the paradoxical question that formulated in my brain as I perused the surprising results of a string of public opinion polls commissioned and published by Israel’s newspapers on the eve of Rosh Hashanah. They found that the vast majority of Israelis are happy with their lot and generally pleased with the national situation. … In March of last year, I had written for my organization’s on-line publication that “Israel’s part-fence, part-wall barrier has not only added security . Psychologically, it has severed the average Israeli’s sense of responsibility for what goes on under the Occupation on the other side: Out of sight, out of mind, as it were — except when spasms of violence temporarily upset the general equilibrium.” The Rosh Hashanah poll results substantiated this analysis — that with terrorism down over the past years, thanks in large part to the improved security cooperation of the Palestinian Authority forces in the West Bank, Israelis are happy to push the difficult question of war and peace to the back burner. Pessimism about peace prospects therefore does not translate to pessimism overall because Israelis have essentially tuned out the “Palestinian problem” as a day-to-day concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Jim Zanotti Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 1, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to maintaining close U.S.-Israel defense, diplomatic, and economic cooperation. U.S. and Israeli leaders have developed close relations based on common perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities. U.S. policymakers often seek to determine how regional events and U.S. policy choices may affect Israel’s security, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and the broader Middle East. Some Members of Congress and some analysts criticize what they perceive as U.S. support for Israel without sufficient scrutiny of its actions. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and is a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. The United States and Israel maintain close security cooperation—predicated on a U.S. commitment to maintain Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. For more information, see CRS Report RL33222, U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel, by Jeremy M. Sharp. Israel has many regional security concerns. Israeli leaders calling for urgent international action against Iran’s nuclear program hint at the possibility of a unilateral military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Location Data from Mobile Phones to Study Participation In
    Research Article Sociological Methods & Research 1-56 Using Location Data ª The Author(s) 2020 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions From Mobile Phones DOI: 10.1177/0049124120914926 to Study Participation journals.sagepub.com/home/smr in Mass Protests Assaf Rotman1 and Michael Shalev2 Abstract Automatically collected behavioral data on the location of users of mobile phones offer an unprecedented opportunity to measure mobilization in mass protests, while simultaneously expanding the range of researchable ques- tions. Location data not only improve estimation of the number and com- position of participants in large demonstrations. Thanks to high spatial and temporal resolution they also reveal when, where, and with whom different sociopolitical sectors join a protest campaign. This article compares the features and advantages of this type of data with other methods of measuring who participates in street protests. The steps in preparing a usable data set are explained with reference to a six-week campaign of mass mobilization in Israel in 2011. Findings based on the Israeli data set illustrate a wide range of potential applications, pertaining to both the determinants and consequences of protest participation. Limitations of mobile location data and the privacy issues it raises are also discussed. Keywords social movements, mobile location data, mass protests, Israel, big data 1 Tel Aviv University, Israel 2 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel Corresponding Author: Michael Shalev, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. Email: [email protected] 2 Sociological Methods & Research XX(X) On January 20, 2017, masses of well-wishers gathered at the National Mall in Washington DC to be present at Donald Trump’s inauguration.
    [Show full text]