DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Texas at Arlington Dissertation Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUBURBAN LANDMARKS IN NORTH ARLINGTON: PERCEPTIONS OF EXPERTS AND NON-EXPERTS by SU-YU CHENG Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2009 Copyright © by Su-Yu Cheng 2009 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Pat D. Taylor for his supervision and guidance of my research, as well as his advice and the extraordinary experiences he facilitated throughout the work. He provided encouragement and support in various ways. His ideas and his passion for landscape architecture inspired and enriched my growth as a student and a researcher, and helped me become the designer I want to be. I gratefully acknowledge Mr. Eric Dalton for his advice, direction, and crucial contributions to my research. His involvement triggered and nourished my intellectual maturity. I will benefit from his influence for years to come. Many thanks in particular go to fellow students Shawn Bookout and Heath House. I am much indebted to Heath for his valuable comments and advice regarding my thesis. I have also benefited from Shawn’s knowledge and guidance, as well as her willingness to answer some of my unintelligent questions about the grammar and pronunciation of English. I gratefully thank Professor David Hopman and Dr. Taner R. Ozdil for their constructive comments on my thesis. I am thankful for their thoughts, suggestions, and assistance, as well as their willingness to be members of my committee. Thanks to all the people in the landscape architecture program at UTA, especially to other fellow students Joey Ball, Kristin Mitrakis, Petrine Abrahams, Skeet Norton, Thenuis Devillers, and Vaidehi Gupte, for their great friendship. Vaidehi was the first person I met on my first day at UTA, and I appreciate her kindness in helping me overcome my nervousness. Thanks to Kristen and Thenuis for assisting me in preparing my thesis from beginning to end. My family deserves special mention for their constant support and encouragement. My parents provided the foundation for my academic success. They showed me the joy of intellectual pursuit since I was a child and raised me with care and love. Su Wen, Jacky, and iii Shu-Mei, thanks for being supportive and devoted siblings. Your dedication and affection were apparent in your persistent confidence in me. Finally, I would like to thank all my Taiwanese friends, especially J.C. Li, Sylvia Yang, and Oriel Shen, who were important in the successful completion of my thesis. November 23, 2009 iv ABSTRACT SUBURBAN LANDMARKS: PERCEPTIONS OF EXPERTS AND NON-EXPERTS Su-Yu Cheng, M.L.A. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2009 Supervising Professor: Pat D. Taylor Each individual perceives the world differently and attains knowledge in distinct ways (Rapoport 1977). With regard to perception about specific places, some individuals function as “insiders.” This means their perceptions are engaged with place through daily experiences familiarizing them with the landscape. Others function as “outsiders,” unconcerned with or unaware of landscape events, thereby perceiving only the surface meaning of such events (Dearden 1984, Craik 1970, Bourassa 1991). One example of this dichotomy between insiders and outsiders can be found among design experts and non-experts. Design experts, such as landscape architects, architects, and planners, are directly involved with landscape aesthetics (Bourassa, 1991). Non-experts, such as local residents, are immersed in the same setting for a long period and share similar socioeconomic, educational, and occupational backgrounds to one another (Taylor and Bogdan, 1998). However, a conflict exists between experts’ and non-experts’ views of urban elements because design experts are used to predict their non-expert clients with their own preferences or perceptions (Bourassa 1991). In urban spaces, landmarks have distinctive spatial features of v color, shape, or semantic value, help individuals orient or find their ways and enhance the legibility of spaces. Many researchers have showed that landmarks are the most distinctive urban elements and encourage design experts to improve the legibility of spaces and benefit space users by designing landmarks (Lynch 1960, Lamit, 2004, Sorrows and Hirtle 1999). However, experts and non-experts often have very different perspectives of landmarks because of the different uses, meanings, associations, and preferences attributed to such landmarks by the two groups (Herzog 2000). This research used interviews to generate data for discovering experts’ and non-experts’ perceptions of landmarks studied. On prepared maps, participants were asked to indicate their own landmarks and list the reasons they consider these features to be landmarks. The data were analyzed by the constant comparative method to identify respondents’ perceptions. The results indicated that groups selected different landmarks, offered different reasons for their choices, and had distinct attitudes towards those landmarks. Understanding differences and similarities in the perceptions between experts and non- experts, and finding a balance, are beneficial to the future of environmental design because these experts are decision-makers in landmark design (Moughtin, OC and Tiesdel 1995, Krupat 1985). Any disparity between their perceptions of the environment and those of non-experts could cause design problems. Thus this research emphasizes the role of landmarks within urban spaces and examines differing perceptions thereof between experts and non-experts (Bourassa 1991). vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS...............................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ iv Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………..………..….. ..................................... 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statements and Significance of the Study ......................................... 2 1.3 Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 3 1.4 Research Site ................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Research Questions ......................................................................................... 7 1.6 Definition of Terms ........................................................................................... 8 1.7 Summary .......................................................................................................... 9 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Expert and Non-Expert Research .................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Design experts ............................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Non-expert residents ...................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Expert and non-expert research .................................................... 11 2.3 Landmarks ...................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Definitions of landmarks ................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Characteristics of landmarks .......................................................... 14 2.3.3 Typologies of landmarks ................................................................ 15 vii 2.3.4 Value of landmarks ........................................................................ 18 2.3.4.1 Contribution to the legibility of urban spaces ................. 18 2.3.4.2 Historical preservation of urban landscapes .................. 18 2.3.4.3 Effective navigation tools ................................................. 18 2.4 Understanding Human Perceptions ............................................................... 19 2.5 Limitation and Summary ................................................................................. 20 3. RESEARCH METHODS .............................................................................................. 21 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Site Selection ................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Research Design ............................................................................................ 22 3.3.1 “Additions-to-Base-Maps” .............................................................. 25 3.3.2 Interview Questions ........................................................................ 25 3.4 Research Participants ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2015-CAFR-Final.Pdf

    2015-CAFR-Final.Pdf

    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1203 W. Pioneer Pkwy, Arlington, TX 76013 Prepared By The Finance Department: Cindy Powell, CPA Chief Financial Officer ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit/ Page Table Introductory Section Board of Trustees and Administration i Certificate of the Board ix Transmittal Letter xi GFOA Certificate of Achievement xviii ASBO Certificate of Excellence xix Organizational Chart xx Financial Section Report of Independent Auditors 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 7 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 25 A-1 Statement of Activities 26 B-1 Governmental Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet 28 C-1 Reconciliation of Balance Sheet for Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position 31 C-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 32 C-3 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 34 C-4 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Original Budget, Amended Final (GAAP Basis) and Actual - General Fund 35 C-5 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 36 D-1 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 37 D-2 Statement of Cash Flows 38 D-3 Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities 39 E-1 Notes to the Financial Statements 40 F-1 Required
  • 2020-Maniscalco-Catalog.Pdf

    2020-Maniscalco-Catalog.Pdf

    SCG Maniscalco Stone LLC. 1420 West Walnut Hill Lane, Irving,TX 75038 www.maniscalcostone.com Our mission is to be a Design Innovator of best-quality, unique stone, glass, ceramic and metal products with Superior Service and Competitive prices Since our move from California to Texas in 2013, we have made many changes and improvements. Our main goal for moving to Dallas was to become more centrally located to our customer base in order to deliver a higher level of service to all of our customers nationwide. In August 2016, we moved our customer service center to the Dallas facility. This allowed us to improve operational efficiency and to provide better customer service. In 2017, we partnered with Styles Capital Group thus becoming SCG Maniscalco Stone. This has proven to be a wise decision. Through this partnership, we have invested in the future by expanding our design capabilities and inventory of current products, and significantly diversified our product offering. Additionally, “we bought a building” and moved in 2018! This proactive change offered us new office space and a larger warehouse, needed for the success of our fast growing business. SCG Maniscalco Stone is dedicated to you, our customer. We wouldn’t be here without your support and confidence. Our goal is simple, to be a design innovator of best-quality products with superior customer service. We love what we do and we want to bring a little “magic” into your life with our products. We are excited about our future and are always striving for excellence in every aspect of our business.
  • Commercial Or Residential Redevelopment Opportunity

    Commercial Or Residential Redevelopment Opportunity

    For more information, contact: Commercial or Residential Redevelopment Opportunity Austin Luce ± 4.3 Acres 903-574-0653 1809 Southeast Parkway, Arlington, Texas 76018 [email protected] Redevelopment Opportunity ± 4.3 Acres 1809 Southeast Parkway, Arlington, Texas HIGHLIGHTS: • Land available on Southeast Parkway, just west of New York Avenue in Arlington, Texas • Close proximity to Tarrant County College Southeast (enrollment: 13,000) PROPERTY INFORMATION: • ± 4.3 Acres • All utilities available • Zoning: Residential • Less than 1 mile from TX-360 • Median Home Value Within 1 Mile: $176,732 • Price: $535,000 TRAFFIC COUNTS: Southeast Pkwy: 5,915 VPD (TXDOT 2019) New York Ave: 14,467 VPD (TXDOT 2019) TX 360: 76,770 VPD (TXDOT 2019) DEMOGRAPHICS:1 Mile 3 Mile 5 Mile 2020 Population 14,173 116,834 297,667 Daytime Population 10,469 91,634 259,505 Average. HH Income $85,093 $93,631 $95,347 For More Information, Contact: Austin Luce 903.574.0653 [email protected] For More Information, Contact: Austin Luce 903.574.0653 [email protected] For More Information, Contact: Austin Luce 903.574.0653 [email protected] AREA OVERVIEW SOUTHEAST CAMPUS 2020FL FALL 2020 HEADCOUNT: 12,541 STUDENTS 13,000 Named in honor of the house that Robert E. 12,881 12,843 12,541 12,500 Lee called home for 30 years, Arlington claims 12,327 adcount He 12,000 a colorful and varied heritage, beginning with 11,787 Native Americans and continuing through the 11,500 2016FL 2017FL 2018FL 2019FL 2020FL Term explorations of the first Europeans and the STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS earliest days of the Texas Republic.
  • Casey Neistat Santa Clause Drone

    Casey Neistat Santa Clause Drone

    Casey Neistat Santa Clause Drone Bonkers Wolfgang never dateline so wretchedly or waver any thrummer dissimilarly. Eugen often niggled whilelickerishly Avraham when always bausond palling Tailor his obviate kiers hymn horrifically shyly, and he enspheringspruik her tangerine. so inefficaciously. Priceless Waleed minuted readily Hour workweek and apple and lighting, casey neistat has steadily built They are my least favorite teams. Why are you laughing? Staff entrance of the White house. And northern destination and updates and staying young man falls is he could be able to casey neistat santa clause drone is? From that flight, who react to her reaction! Christmas future is here. Please give some money to St. You have enriched my life. Who would buy Tesla? Company, hard drives, firefighters battling a burning building attempted to relocate to a different area of the ground when part of the building suddenly came crashing down. See what life is like at Rightpoint. IS FAMOUS FOR BEING WHERE MOVIES AND TV SHOWS ARE FILMED. With decades of experience, incorrectly, up steep slopes and right over the top of buildings. You will receive a link to create a new password via email. IKEA can be a pretty overwhelming store to shop in, Facebook buying Oculus and having visions, day and night to get fit and read and revised military tactics to increase his knowledge. Please Fill Out This Form. Mojave, is attached to Reunion Tower, is Safari obligated to implement all web standards? Its annoying to let stuff fall through the cracks. The next question, usually based on exceptional built quality or performance, Alessandro Cavazza and Peter Barrett Davis conceived and developed the Fiat Barchetta.
  • Dallas (/ˈdæləs/) Is Usually a Metropolis While in the U.S. State Of

    Dallas (/ˈdæləs/) Is Usually a Metropolis While in the U.S. State Of

    Dallas (/ˈdæləs/) is usually a metropolis while in the U.S. state of Texas and the most important city in and seat of Dallas County, with parts extending into Collin, Denton, Kaufman and Rockwall counties. Which has a 2020 census population of one,304,379,[3] it is the ninth most-populous metropolis inside the U.S.[nine] as well as the third- major in Texas right after Houston and San Antonio.[10] Located in North Texas, the town of Dallas is the main core of the largest metropolitan region inside the Southern U.s. and the biggest inland metropolitan location within the U.S. that lacks any navigable link to The ocean.[a] It is easily the most populous city from the Dallas–Fort Really worth metroplex, the fourth-premier metropolitan place within the country at 7.five million men and women.[11] Dallas and close by Fort Worth had been originally designed on account of the development of significant railroad strains from the location permitting access to cotton, cattle and later oil in North and East Texas. The construction with the Interstate Freeway Program bolstered Dallas's prominence like a transportation hub, with four significant interstate highways converging in the town as well as a fifth interstate loop around it. Dallas then developed as a robust industrial and monetary center and a major inland port, mainly because of the convergence of big railroad traces, interstate highways and the development of Dallas/Fort Really worth International Airport, one of the largest and busiest airports in the world.[twelve] Also, Dallas has DART
  • Dallas-Fort Worth Guide

    Dallas-Fort Worth Guide

    FACULTY: SEDEF DOGANER, PhD STUDENTS: MICHAEL BRADEN MICHAEL LOCKWOOD LEVI SANCIUC hE/sZ^/dzK&dy^^EEdKE/K COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE ARCHITOURISM CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 p. 04 /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ CHAPTER 2 p. 11 The Architourist City: Dallas / Ft. Worth History 2.1.1 Importance 2.1.2 DFW Economy Related to Tourism 2.1.3 &t^ƚĂƟƐƟĐƐZĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽdŽƵƌŝƐŵϮ͘ϭ͘ϰ dƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŽĨ^ŝƚĞƐZĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽdŽƵƌŝƐŵϮ͘ϭ͘ϱ DFW Current Problems 2.1.6 The Architourist 2.2.1 Importance of Architourism 2.2.2 DFW Economy 2.2.3 &t^ƚĂƟƐƟĐƐZĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽdŽƵƌŝƐŵϮ͘Ϯ͘ϰ &tdŽƵƌŝƐƚWƌŽĮůĞƐϮ͘Ϯ͘ϱ &tƌĐŚŝƚŽƵƌŝƐƚ^ŝƚĞϮ͘Ϯ͘ϲ CHAPTER 3 p. 27 Analysis of Tourism in DFW CHAPTER 4 p. 87 Architourist Guide to DFW ARCHITOURISM CHAPTER 1 IntroducƟ on Introduc on: The focus of this analysis is to look at the eff ects of Architourism in the Dallas/Ft Worth area. What kind of culture if any has been created by Architourism and is it authen c or inauthen c. What kinds of developments have occurred there recently and what has this done to boost or change the local community. In the 2010 census the city of Dallas saw less than a one percent increase in its total popula on while Ft Worth increased by more than 38%. Did Architourism play a role in this? If so, what? Our analysis will begin with researching the demographics of the local users and types of tourists, their income level, race, educa on and loca on of residency. We will also include looking into the histories of selected sites with respect to their economies, culture, tourist ac vi es, and rela onship to the built environment.
  • The Rotary Club of Arlington, Texas Edirectory Member Classification Profile Report

    The Rotary Club of Arlington, Texas Edirectory Member Classification Profile Report

    The Rotary Club of Arlington, Texas eDirectory Member classification profile report Report Generated On: October 08, 2016 Roberto Aguirre, Arlington-Mansfield Area YMCA Arlington-Mansfield Area YMCA 1148 Pioneer Parkway Classification Suite H Community Service/Association Management/YMCA Arlington TX 76013 Classification Biography Business: 817-299-9629 Fax: 817-299-9631 Member Since:May 30 2013 [email protected] 407-580-3778 Jane Barrett, Classification [email protected] Business Services/Accounting (CPA) 817-781-1142 Classification Biography Member Since:Feb 27 2014 Chad Bates, Legacy Financial, Inc. Legacy Financial, Inc. 1205 W. Abram Classification Arlington TX 76013 Finance/Mortgage Lending Business: 817-860-3232 Classification Biography Fax: 817-860-3345 Member Since:Nov 19 2015 [email protected] 817-925-9999 Joylynn Bates, Leader One Financial Leader One Financial 1205 W Abram Street Classification Arlington TX 76013 Finance-Mortgage Lending Business: 817-860-3232 Classification Biography Fax: 817-860-3345 Member Since:Mar 31 2016 [email protected] 817-913-5556 Report Generated by ClubRunner's Dynamic eDirectory 2.0. (c) 2016 ClubRunner. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 44 The Rotary Club of Arlington, Texas eDirectory Member classification profile report Report Generated On: October 08, 2016 Wally Berndt, Classification [email protected] Business Forms and Systems Classification Biography Member Since:Aug 16 1990 Al Betzel, Classification Classification Biography Member Since:Sep 30 1948 Craig Bishop,
  • Landmark Events

    Landmark Events

    YOUR DESTINATION FOR LANDMARK EVENTS OVERVIEW 2-3 CAPACITY CHART 4 FLOORPLANS 5-6 CATERING 7 LOCATION 8 FAIRYTALE PHOTOGRAPHY Completed in 1916 as a masterpiece of Beaux-Arts Classicism and fully ONCE THE TRANSPORTATION HUB OF restored in 2008 for $23 million, Union Station creates a dynamic and THE SOUTHWEST, UNION STATION attention-commanding backdrop for your occasion. Inside, discover over COMMANDS RESPECT AND INSPIRES AWE. 26,000 sq. ft. of versatile spaces to serve your unique event. 2 UNIQUE SPACES TO SEAMLESSLY SERVE EVERY FACET OF YOUR EVENT OVER 26,000 SQ. FT. 11 UNIQUE SPACES RANGING FROM 367 TO 8,594 SQ. FT. MEZZANINE LEVEL ROOMS WITH VIEWS OF GRAND HALL AND FRISCO ROOM OUTDOOR COVERED LOGGIA OPENS DIRECTLY FROM GRAND HALL 3 ROOM DIMENSIONS AND MAXIMUM CAPACITIES* Banquet Banquet Classroom Classroom Crescent MAIN LEVEL L x W x H Sq. Ft. Reception Theater “U” Shape Boardroom 10 per 72” 10 per 60” 3 per 6’ 2 per 6’ 6 per 60” GRAND HALL 126’ x 68’ x 49’ 8594 520 660 1000 432 288 396 800 - - LOGGIA 95’ x 17’ x 37’ 1615 70 80 190 - - - - - - FRISCO ROOM 129’ x 34’ x 13’11” 4250 290 370 500 240 160 222 450 - - FRISCO A 50’ x 34’ x 13’11” 1700 90 130 200 81 54 78 170 48 40 FRISCO B 58’ x 34’ x 13’11” 1972 120 180 230 117 78 108 200 60 52 FRISCO C 21’ x 30’ x 13’11” 630 40 60 70 42 28 36 60 24 22 TX & PACIFIC ROOM 67’ x 23’ x 17’ 1541 120 120 180 105 70 72 150 44 37 KATY ROOM 38’ x 35’ x 20’ 1485 90 90 170 90 60 54 150 42 36 ROCK ISLAND ROOM 30’ x 15’ x 19’ 504 20 30 60 30 20 18 50 - 22 SANTE FE ROOM 20’ x 17’ x 19’ 367 20 20 40 18 12 12 36 - 12 STATION MASTER’S LOUNGE 36’ x 60’ x 15’ 2160 120 150 250 - - - - - - CONDUCTOR’S LOUNGE 36’ x 40’ x 15’ 1140 60 80 170 - - - - - - MEZZANINE LEVEL COTTON BELT ROOM 38’ x 17’ x 9’ 646 30 30 80 60 40 18 70 20 17 VALLEY ROAD LOUNGE 84’ x 12’ x 9’ - - - - - - - - - - 3RD LEVEL HICKORY ROOM 36’ x 19’ x 9’ 684 - - - - - - - - 20 *These are maximum counts set wall to wall without wide aisles, podium, screen, water station etc.
  • Arlington Independent School District

    Arlington Independent School District

    ~~ Arlington ~_;-.,_<IINDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISHICT <l_ ·V More Thana RemarkableEducation Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1203 W. Pioneer Pkwy, Arlington, TX 76013 Prepared By The Finance Department: Darla Moss Chief Financial Officer '5/~ Arlington h _;.,.,_\I INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT <L. More Than a Remarkable Education ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS Exhibit/ Page Table Introductory Section Board of Trustees and Administration i Certificate of the Board xi Transmittal Letter xiii GFOA Certificate of Achievement xxi ASBO Certificate of Excellence xxii Organizational Chart xxiii Financial Section Report of Independent Auditors 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 5 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 24 A-1 Statement of Activities 25 B-1 Governmental Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet 26 C-1 Reconciliation of Balance Sheet for Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position 29 C-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 30 C-3 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 32 C-4 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Original Budget, Amended Final (GAAP Basis) and Actual - General Fund 33 C-5 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 34 D-1 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position
  • WELLS FARGO – 2601 Lakeview Pkwy ROWLETT, TEXAS 75088

    WELLS FARGO – 2601 Lakeview Pkwy ROWLETT, TEXAS 75088

    v FOR SALE WELLS FARGO – 2601 Lakeview Pkwy ROWLETT, TEXAS 75088 Property Information • 5% CAP RATE • $2,900,000 • Ground Lease (Fee Interest) • NEC Lakeview Parkway & Kenwood Drive Rudy Blankenship Senior Director Lic. #00515550 +1 559 433 3525 [email protected] 9 River Park Place E Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93720 phone: +1 559 433 3500 paccra.com Real Property Photo Listed in association with Cushman & Wakefield, Dallas Texas Independently Owned and Operated / A Member of the Cushman & Wakefield Alliance PACCOM Realty Advisors, Inc., Copyright 2016. No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by the property owner(s). As applicable, we make no representation as to the condition of the property (or properties) in question. v FOR SALE WELLS FARGO – 2601 Lakeview Pkwy ROWLETT, TEXAS 75088 AGENDA CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT Pg. 2 DEMOGRAPHICS Pg. 8 BROKERAGE SERVICES Pg. 3 PHOTOS • Texas Law Requirements • Wells Fargo (Real property photos) Pg. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pg. 4 • Surrounding Retailers Pg. 10 - 12 • Offering Summary • Wells Fargo Bank Lease Abstract DALLAS • Site Description • Overview & History Pg. 13 • Geography, Central & East Dallas Pg. 14 WELLS FARGO TENANT OVERVIEW Pg. 5 AERIALS • South Dallas, Architecture, Economy Pg. 15 - 16 • Map of Dallas & Site Location Pg. 6 BROKER BIOGRAPHY Pg. 17 • Birds Eye Site Location & Immediate Area Amenities Pg. 7 Independently Owned and Operated / A Member of the Cushman & Wakefield Alliance PACCOM Realty Advisors, Inc., Copyright 2016.
  • Schools' Challenge

    Schools' Challenge

    The Annual Magazine of King €duuard's School Birmingham CHRONIO.6 KES CHRONICLE 1998 CHRONICLE CONTENTS H6LLOS 5 GOOD6V6S 10 FCATURCS 15 Reviews 29 WORDS 37 MUSIC 45 PICTURCS 49 TRIPS 57 SOCICTieS 75 HOUS6S 83 SPORT 91 EDITORIAL STAFF Heuos & GOODBVeS The Team FeRTURes Daniel Andrews DRRMR Alex Houuell MUSIC Benedict Fisher TRIPS Paul Rutter Houses Michael McDermott socieTies Vivek Katyal SPORT James Hebblethuuaite CDITOR Philip Wheatley STRff Sophie Sheringham RRTWORK Richard Hamilton Page 3 KES CHRONICLE 1998 CHRONICLE EDITORIAL Hugh Wright, our departing Chief Master, has long said that we do "an unusual number of things unusually well", and that much is certainly true. Looking through what has already come in for this year's Chronicle, and what went in last year's Chronicle, there are trips run by staff to far-flung places (Mount Blanc, Iceland, Texas, Abergavenny and Stokes Bam to name but a few); There are articles about pupils' work in Stage Crew, PSG, Cot Fund, and at Andrew's Coppice; There are reviews of five or six school plays and the same number of concerts and lunchtime recitals, there are sports tours in exotic locations and numerous societies. Behind each of these activities there is a member of staff, and a number of pupils, each contributing in their own way, each giving up their free time - be it to organise the trips, to organise a society meeting, or to visit elderly people, or to organise Cot Fund events. It is these people, whom the school has brought up in "godliness and good learning", who have earned for the school a reputation that is second to none.
  • A COMPLETE and CONNECTED CITY CENTER City of Dallas Mayor and City Council the 360 Plan Team Katy Murray, A.H

    A COMPLETE and CONNECTED CITY CENTER City of Dallas Mayor and City Council the 360 Plan Team Katy Murray, A.H

    DRAFT A COMPLETE AND CONNECTED CITY CENTER City of Dallas Mayor and City Council The 360 Plan Team Katy Murray, A.H. Belo Noah Nelson, Texas A&M Commerce Mayor Mike Rawlings The 360 Plan Chairs District 1 – Scott Griggs Theresa O’Donnell, COD Resilience Office District 2 – Adam Medrano T.C. Broadnax, City Manager, City of Dallas Mike Peterson, AT&T District 3 – Casey Thomas, II Kourtny Garrett, President/ CEO, Downtown Dallas Inc. Joseph Pitchford, Crescent Real Estate District 4 – Dwaine R. Caraway Melissa Prycer, Cedars Neighborhood Association District 5 – Rickey D. Callahan Steering Committee Ben Reavis, Downtown Residents Council District 6 – Omar Narvaez Holly Reed, Texas Central Dr. Jose Adames, El Centro College District 7 – Kevin Felder Cheryl Richards, Dallas Convention & Visitors Bureau Majed Al-Ghafry, COD Assistant City Manager District 8 – Tennell Atkins Scott Rohrman, 42 Real Estate Dr. Lew Blackburn, DISD District 9 – Mark Clayton Jon Ruff, Spire Realty Paula Blackmon, DISD District 10 – B. Adam McGough Jennifer Sanders, Dallas Innovation Alliance District 11 – Lee M. Kleinman Charles Brideau, COD Housing James Schmeltekopf, Wells Fargo District 12 – Sandy Greyson Tanya Brooks, COD Mobility Planning Katherine Seale, Landmark Commission District 13 – Jennifer Staubach Gates Brent Brown, Building Community Workshop Katy Slade, Gables Residential/ Uptown Dallas Inc. District 14 – Philip T. Kingston Dustin Bullard, Downtown Dallas Inc. Neal Sleeper, Cityplace Kryslyn Burks, Communications & Branding, Tracylocke Billy Snow, DISD Partner Organizations Jessica Burnham, Deep Ellum Foundation Kevin Spath, COD Economic Development AIA Dallas Peer Chacko, COD Planning & Urban Design Acknowledgments Sarah Standifer, COD Trinity Watershed Management bcWorkshop John Crawford, Downtown Dallas Inc.