Teaching Excellence Framework: Provisional List of Eligible Providers – Year One 3 List of Eligible Providers for Year One 4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kent Service Report August 2019.Pdf
Kent Service Report August 2019 1 Kent Service Report August 2019 Service Availability The SLA target sets a minimum of 99.7% availability for each customer, averaged over a 12 month rolling period Periods of scheduled and emergency maintenance are discounted when calculating availability of services Monthly and annual availabilities falling below 99.7% are highlighted * Service has resilience - where an organisation retains connectivity during an outage period by means of a second connection, the outage is not counted against its availability figures 12 Month Service Sep 18 Oct 18 Nov 18 Dec 18 Jan 19 Feb 19 Mar 19 Apr 19 May 19 Jun 19 Jul 19 Aug 19 Rolling Availability Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury Campus 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Canterbury Christ Church University, Cornwallis Building 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Canterbury Christ Church University, Salomans Centre 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% 100% 100% 100% <12 Months East Kent College, Broadstairs Campus 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 79.86% 79.86% 96.64% East Kent College, Canterbury Campus 0.00% 0.00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% <12 Months East Kent College, Dover Campus 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% East Kent College, Folkestone Campus 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% East Kent College, Sheppy Campus 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% -
Teacher Ed Directory
South East Teacher Education Directory The following research was gathered by contacting, via email, all South East providers listed on the talent website at www.talent.ac.uk. Information was requested about generic teacher education programmes and specialist literacy, language and numeracy ( Additional Diploma courses and Level 3 specialist skills programmes). The table below contains information from the providers who responded to the email. Provider websites and online brochures were used to fill in any gaps. Overall responses ranged from 1 additional diplomas to around 50% for providers listed as offering PTLLS programmes. There was a nil return for L3 subject skills programmes. Preparing to Teach in the Lifelong Learning Sector (PTLLS) courses Provider Course Type Target Audience Duration Dates Times Location Modes of delivery Cost How to find out more Alton College PTLLSProspective Teachers. 8 sessionsThursdays 16.00-20.00Alton CollegeClassroom based£325 with 5% online Visit: In-post Teachers, Assessors etc. from discount www.altoncollege.ac.uk (Post-16 Sector) 13/01/2011 Amersham & PTLLS10 weeksJan 2011 Mon CheshamClassroom based£295Visit: Wycombe College 13.30-16.30 http://www.amersham.ac.uk/ Apr 2011 Tues or ring 01494 585406 17.30 – 20.30 Andover College PTLLSIn service local trainers & college staff10 weeksJan 2011 17.30- 20.30 Andover College30 hours contact time£184Visit: April 2011 www.andover.ac.uk or call Karen Smith on 01264 360016 Bracknell & PTLLSThis course is for pre-service, in- 11 weeksApril 2011Thurs 09.30 – 12.30Church -
Inspire Believe Achieve Succeed
Student Destinations 2018 Catrin Golley Molly Callaghan Matthew Heritage-Owen Yasmine Fletcher Jack Gamlin Valentin Grabner University of Sheffield University of Leads University of Newcastle Upon Nottingham Trent University Nottingham Trent University University in Austria Tyne Philosophy Human Resource Management Mathematics Psychology Criminology Nick Jones Molly Deer Jasmin King-Lewis Blake Wolsey-Cooper Charlotte Woodhams Harry Marchesi Sheffield Hallam University University of Leads University of Northumbria at Nottingham Trent University Nottingham Trent University Gap year - Travelling Newcastle Sport Coaching History Interior Architecture Business Management and Law with Criminology Marketing Rohan May-Smith Hamish Marr Sheffield Hallam University University of Nottingham Construction Project Philosophy Daniel Santos Tilly Jones Management University College London Imperial College London Astrophysics Biochemistry Charlotte Gale Joey Marriott Madelaine Bridges Oxford Brookes University London South Bank University King's College London Laura Stracey Unversity of Manchester Primary Teacher Education Digital Design Mental Health Nursing with registration as a nurse Medical Biochemistry Biochemistry Glenn Smeeth Jessica Hook Matthew Wooldridge Oxford Brookes University Royal Holloway University of Royal Holloway University of London London International Relations and History Electronic Engineering Politics Bethany Mellett University of Liverpool Joe Harvey Employed by Printing Company Anatomy and Human Biology Harry Welfare University -
The Further Education and Sixth-Form Colleges 16
Greater Manchester Area Review Final report November 2016 Contents Background 4 The needs of the Greater Manchester area 5 Demographics and the economy 5 Patterns of employment and future growth 10 Jobs growth to 2022 12 Feedback from LEPs, employers, local authorities and students 13 The quantity and quality of current provision 14 Performance of schools at Key Stage 4 15 Schools with sixth-forms 15 The further education and sixth-form colleges 16 The current offer in the colleges 18 Quality of provision and financial sustainability of colleges 20 Higher education in further education 22 Provision for students with Special Educational (SEN) and high needs 23 Apprenticeships and apprenticeship providers 24 The need for change 25 The key areas for change 26 Initial options raised during visits to colleges 27 Criteria for evaluating options and use of sector benchmarks 29 Assessment criteria 29 FE sector benchmarks 29 Recommendations agreed by the steering group 31 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside Colleges 32 Bolton College, Bury College and the University of Bolton 32 Trafford College 33 Hopwood Hall College 33 Salford City College 34 Wigan and Leigh College 34 Aquinas College 35 Cheadle and Marple College Network 35 2 Ashton Sixth Form College 35 Oldham Sixth Form College 36 Rochdale Sixth Form College 36 Holy Cross Catholic Sixth Form College 36 Bolton Sixth Form College 37 Winstanley Sixth Form College 37 St John Rigby Sixth Form College 37 Xaverian Sixth Form College 38 Loreto Sixth Form College 38 Formation of a strategic planning group for Manchester 38 Development of a proposal for an Institute of Technology 39 An apprenticeship delivery group 39 Conclusions from this review 40 Next steps 42 3 Background0B In July 2015, the government announced a rolling programme of around 40 local area reviews, to be completed by March 2017, covering all general further education colleges and sixth-form colleges in England. -
College Employer Satisfaction League Table
COLLEGE EMPLOYER SATISFACTION LEAGUE TABLE The figures on this table are taken from the FE Choices employer satisfaction survey taken between 2016 and 2017, published on October 13. The government says “the scores calculated for each college or training organisation enable comparisons about their performance to be made against other colleges and training organisations of the same organisation type”. Link to source data: http://bit.ly/2grX8hA * There was not enough data to award a score Employer Employer Satisfaction Employer Satisfaction COLLEGE Satisfaction COLLEGE COLLEGE responses % responses % responses % CITY COLLEGE PLYMOUTH 196 99.5SUSSEX DOWNS COLLEGE 79 88.5 SANDWELL COLLEGE 15678.5 BOLTON COLLEGE 165 99.4NEWHAM COLLEGE 16088.4BRIDGWATER COLLEGE 20678.4 EAST SURREY COLLEGE 123 99.2SALFORD CITY COLLEGE6888.2WAKEFIELD COLLEGE 78 78.4 GLOUCESTERSHIRE COLLEGE 205 99.0CITY COLLEGE BRIGHTON AND HOVE 15088.0CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE COLLEGE6178.3 NORTHBROOK COLLEGE SUSSEX 176 98.9NORTHAMPTON COLLEGE 17287.8HEREFORDSHIRE AND LUDLOW COLLEGE112 77.8 ABINGDON AND WITNEY COLLEGE 147 98.6RICHMOND UPON THAMES COLLEGE5087.8LINCOLN COLLEGE211 77.7 EXETER COLLEGE 201 98.5CHESTERFIELD COLLEGE 20687.7WEST NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COLLEGE242 77.4 SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE AND STROUD COLLEGE 215 98.1ACCRINGTON AND ROSSENDALE COLLEGE 14987.6BOSTON COLLEGE 61 77.0 TYNE METROPOLITAN COLLEGE 144 97.9NEW COLLEGE DURHAM 22387.5BURY COLLEGE121 76.9 LAKES COLLEGE WEST CUMBRIA 172 97.7SUNDERLAND COLLEGE 11487.5STRATFORD-UPON-AVON COLLEGE5376.9 SWINDON COLLEGE 172 97.7SOUTH -
Outcomes from IQER: 2010-11 the Student Voice
Outcomes from IQER: 2010-11 The student voice July 2012 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 2 Student engagement: context ................................................................................................. 3 Themes .................................................................................................................................. 6 Theme 1: Student submissions for the IQER reviews ......................................................... 6 Theme 2: Student representation in college management: extent of student representation, specific student-focused committees and contact with senior staff ............. 7 Theme 3: How colleges gather and use student feedback information ................................ 8 The themes in context ............................................................................................................ 9 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 10 Areas of strength as indicated by the evidence from the reports ....................................... 10 Areas where further work is required ................................................................................ 11 Appendix A: Good practice relating to student engagement ................................................ -
INFRASTRUCTURE Background Paper
Regulation 18 Stage 2 Consultation GRAVESHAM INFRASTRUCTURE Background paper OCTOBER 2020 Delivering a Gravesham to be proud of CONTENTS NATIONAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................ 4 National Planning Policy Framework ................................................................. 4 National Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2016-21 ................................................... 4 National Planning Practice Guidance ................................................................ 5 Digital Economy Act 2017 ................................................................................. 5 GRAVESHAM CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 6 Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy (2014) .................................................... 6 Gravesham Corporate Plan 2019-23................................................................. 6 Gravesham Vision ...................................................................................................... 6 Gravesham Vision: Objectives ................................................................................... 7 TRANSPORT .......................................................................................................... 8 Roads ............................................................................................................... 9 Lower Thames Crossing ........................................................................................... -
Strode College
REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Strode College February 1994 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council (FEFC) has a statutory duty to ensure that there are satisfactory arrangements to assess the quality of provision in the further education sector. It discharges the duty in part through its inspectorate, which reports on each college in the sector every four years. The Council’s inspectorate also assesses and reports on a national basis on specific curriculum areas and advises the Council’s quality assessment committee. College inspections involve both full-time inspectors and registered part- time inspectors who have specialist knowledge and experience in the areas they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member from outside the world of education and a nominated member of staff from the college being inspected. GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are described in Council Circular 93/28. In the course of inspecting colleges, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Assessments are set out in their reports. They also summarise their judgements on the balance between strengths and weaknesses using a five-point scale. Each grade on the scale has the following descriptor: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • -
The Further Education and Sixth-Form Colleges
Liverpool City Region Area Review Final Report January 2017 Contents Background 4 The needs of the Liverpool City Region area 5 Demographics and the economy 5 Patterns of employment and future growth 9 LEP priorities 12 Feedback from LEPs, employers, local authorities, students and staff 13 The quantity and quality of current provision 16 Performance of schools at Key Stage 4 17 Schools with sixth-forms 17 The further education and sixth-form colleges 18 The current offer in the colleges 20 Quality of provision and financial sustainability of colleges 21 Higher education in further education 22 Provision for students with special educational needs and disability (SEND) and high needs 23 Apprenticeships and apprenticeship providers 24 Land based provision 25 The need for change 26 The key areas for change 28 Initial options raised during visits to colleges 28 Criteria for evaluating options and use of sector benchmarks 30 Assessment criteria 30 FE sector benchmarks 30 Recommendations agreed by the steering group 32 Birkenhead Sixth Form College 33 Carmel College 34 Knowsley Community College and St Helens College 34 City of Liverpool College 35 Hugh Baird College, South Sefton College, Southport College and King George V Sixth Form College 36 Riverside College 38 2 Wirral Metropolitan College 38 Apprenticeship Growth Plan 39 Prospectus of advanced and higher level technical skills 40 Sector-facing provision that meets employer needs 40 Institute of Technology 40 Needs of SEND post-16 learners 41 Entry routes for learners with low level skills 42 Careers hub 42 Enhanced post-16 options 43 Strategic planning and oversight group 43 Conclusions from this review 44 Next steps 46 3 Background In July 2015, the government announced a rolling programme of around 40 local area reviews, to be completed by March 2017, covering all general further education and sixth- form colleges in England. -
Designation of a Body for English Higher Education Information Government Consultation Response
Designation of a body for English higher education information Government consultation response January 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of responses received 4 Main findings from the consultation 4 Question analysis 5 Questions 1-2 5 Question 3 6 Question 4 7 Next steps 8 Annex A: List of organisations that responded to the consultation 9 Annex B: HESA Expression of interest for the role of the DDB 13 2 Introduction In order to meet the relevant consultation requirements set out in the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 (HERA), the Department for Education, on behalf of the new Office for Students (OfS), sought views from respondents across the HE sector, including providers and students on the role of the Designated Data Body (DDB) and the functions that it must carry out. It followed an invitation for expressions of interest in the role which closed on 19 September, and to which one body, the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) provided a submission. The consultation, published 19 October 2017, therefore explored the views of respondents on the suitability of HESA to fulfil the role of the DDB, and on the suitability of any other organisation which consultees wished to suggest, but which had not expressed an interest. The responses to this consultation received both digitally and informal written responses are now informing the OfS’s recommendation to the Secretary of State on designating a data body and decision-making and design in relation to its regulatory framework, which will be published by the end of March 2018. 3 Summary of responses received Overall there was overwhelming support for the HESA as a body that is credible and suitable to fulfil the role of the DDB. -
Framework Users (Clients)
TC622 – NORTH WEST CONSTRUCTION HUB MEDIUM VALUE FRAMEWORK (2019 to 2023) Framework Users (Clients) Prospective Framework users are as follows: Local Authorities - Cheshire - Cheshire East Council - Cheshire West and Chester Council - Halton Borough Council - Warrington Borough Council; Cumbria - Allerdale Borough Council - Copeland Borough Council - Barrow in Furness Borough Council - Carlisle City Council - Cumbria County Council - Eden District Council - South Lakeland District Council; Greater Manchester - Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council - Bury Metropolitan Borough Council - Manchester City Council – Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council - Salford City Council – Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council - Trafford Metropolitan Borough - Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Lancashire - Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council – Blackpool Borough Council - Burnley Borough Council - Chorley Borough Council - Fylde Borough Council – Hyndburn Borough Council - Lancashire County Council - Lancaster City Council - Pendle Borough Council – Preston City Council - Ribble Valley Borough Council - Rossendale Borough Council - South Ribble Borough Council - West Lancashire Borough Council - Wyre Borough Council; Merseyside - Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council - Liverpool City Council - Sefton Council - St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council - Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council; Police Authorities - Cumbria Police Authority - Lancashire Police Authority - Merseyside -
Solent Skills Advisory Panel Local Skills and Labour Market Analysis
Solent Skills Advisory Panel Local Skills and Labour Market Analysis June 2020 1 2 Contents Foreword 1. Introduction 7 2. Economic & Labour Market Landscape in the Solent 10 2.1 Demographics 11 2.1.1 Population by Broad Age Group 11 2.1.2 Internal and International Migration 14 2.2 Labour Market 17 2.2.1 Economic Activity 17 2.2.2 Employment 20 2.2.3 Unemployment 21 2.2.4 Commuting 23 2.3 Solent Businesses 25 2.4 Economic Landscape 28 2.4.1 Gateway Economy 28 2.4.2 Economic Output 29 2.4.3 Economic Output by Sector 32 2.5 Productivity 35 3. The Demand for Skills in the Solent 39 3.1 Industrial Structure 41 3.2 Occupational Structure 46 3.3 Skills Demand by Industry and Occupation 49 3.4 Job Vacancies and Skills Demand 51 3.5 Future Skills Demand 52 3.5.1 Expansion Demand and Replacement Demand 53 3.5.2 Net Skills Requirement by Occupation & Qualification 54 3.6 4th Industrial Revolution and Skills 58 3.6.1 Automation and Future of Employment in Solent 60 3.7 Skills for the Future 64 3 4. The Supply of Skills in 66 Solent 4.1 Skills in the Workforce: 67 4.1.1 Advanced Skills 70 4.1.2 Intermediate Skills 73 4.1.3 Low Skills 76 4.2 Skills System 79 4.2.1 Secondary Education - Participation and Attainment 79 4.2.2 Further Education - Learning and Training 83 4.2.3 Further Education - Education and Training 85 4.2.4 Further Education - Apprenticeships 91 4.2.5 Higher Education 97 4.2.6 Employer Sponsored Training 103 4.3 Skills Deprivation and Inequality 105 4.3.1 Young People Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEETs) 105 4.3.2 Education and Skills Deprivation 106 5.