National Household Income and Expenditure Survey Methodology (ENIGH) 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Household Income and Expenditure Survey Methodology (ENIGH) 2013 National Household Income and Expenditure Survey Methodology (ENIGH) 2013 Continuous Statistics Office This document puts forth the objectives of the survey and details aspects that need to be considered before using the data produced by it. 2014 Contents I Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 II Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 General Objective ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Specific Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 3 III Background ...................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Legal basis ................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 National Household Income and Expenditure surveys conducted in Costa Rica ...................... 4 IV Reference Framework ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Supporting documents .............................................................................................................. 6 4.1.1 Household income and expenditure statistics .................................................................... 6 4.1.2 Expert group on household income statistics ..................................................................... 6 4.1.3 Household income and expenditures within the framework of the SNA and the household surveys ......................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1.4 System of National Accounts Manual 2008 ....................................................................... 7 V Limits ................................................................................................................................................ 9 5.1 Geographic scope ...................................................................................................................... 9 5.1.1 Central Region .................................................................................................................... 9 5.1.2 Chorotega Region ............................................................................................................. 10 5.1.3 Central Pacific Region ....................................................................................................... 10 5.1.4 Brunca Region .................................................................................................................. 10 5.1.5 Huetar Caribbean Region ................................................................................................. 10 5.1.6 Huetar North Region ........................................................................................................ 10 5.2 Temporal scope ....................................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Population scope ..................................................................................................................... 12 VI Objects of study ............................................................................................................................ 13 6.1 Housing unit ............................................................................................................................ 13 6.1.1 Individual housing unit ..................................................................................................... 13 6.1.2 Collective housing unit ..................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Household ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2.1 Housing units with more than one household ................................................................. 14 I 6.3 Usual resident ......................................................................................................................... 14 6.3.1 Household member .......................................................................................................... 15 VII Conceptual framework ................................................................................................................ 16 7.1 Occupation and employment .................................................................................................. 16 7.1.1 Economic activity ............................................................................................................. 16 7.1.2 Activity condition ............................................................................................................. 16 7.1.3 Type of employment ........................................................................................................ 18 7.1.3.2 Independent work ......................................................................................................... 19 7.1.4 Employment situation ...................................................................................................... 20 7.1.5 Amount of jobs ................................................................................................................. 22 7.1.6 Other employment characteristics................................................................................... 22 7.2 Household income .................................................................................................................. 23 7.2.1 Current income ................................................................................................................ 24 7.2.1 Imputed cost of housing unit ........................................................................................... 32 7.2.2 Capital transactions .......................................................................................................... 33 7.3 Household expenditure ........................................................................................................... 34 7.3.1 Current expenditure ......................................................................................................... 35 7.3.2 Capital transactions .......................................................................................................... 41 7.3.3 Special considerations on goods and services expenditure ............................................. 43 VIII Main changes in ENIGH 2013 with regards to ENIG 2004 .......................................................... 47 8.1 Changes made to data collection tools ................................................................................... 47 8.1.1 Access to goods and services ........................................................................................... 47 8.1.2 Employment ..................................................................................................................... 48 8.1.3 Income .............................................................................................................................. 48 8.1.4 Expenditure ...................................................................................................................... 49 8.2 Operational changes ............................................................................................................... 53 8.2 Collection of supermarket invoices to record expenditure digitally ................................... 53 8.2.8.2 Field work data entry .................................................................................................... 54 IX General considerations and uses .................................................................................................. 55 9.1 General Considerations ........................................................................................................... 55 9.1.1 Approximate wellbeing by household income and expenditure ..................................... 55 9.1.2 Information bias ............................................................................................................... 55 9.2 Uses ......................................................................................................................................... 57 X Sample design ................................................................................................................................ 59 II 10.1 Population and coverage ...................................................................................................... 59 10.2 Sampling frame ..................................................................................................................... 59 10.3 Study domains ....................................................................................................................... 59 10.4 Sample size, distribution and selection ................................................................................. 60 10.5 Expansion factors .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • University of California Santa Cruz Restoring Birds, Bats
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RESTORING BIRDS, BATS, AND DISPERSAL MUTUALISMS IN A TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by John Leighton Reid June 2013 The dissertation of John Leighton Reid is approved: __________________________________ Professor Karen Holl, chair __________________________________ Professor Gregory Gilbert __________________________________ Associate professor Flora Lu __________________________________ Rakan Zahawi, Ph.D. __________________________________ Professor emeritus Theodore Fleming _________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by John Leighton Reid 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Landscape context mediates avian habitat choice in tropical forest 8 restoration 3. Artificial bat roosts did not accelerate forest regeneration in abandoned 31 pastures in southern Costa Rica 4. Conservation psychology of bat killing in southern Costa Rica 61 5. Appendices 125 6. Supplementary Files 137 7. Bibliography 138 iii Illustrations 2.1 Local restoration treatments 11 2.2 Scaling of landscape effects 20 2.3 Compositional and functional attributes of bird communities predicted by 21 local restoration treatments and landscape-scale tree cover 3.1 Artificial bat roosts and experimental treatments 38 3.2 Glossophaga and Carollia bats resting in an artificial roost 48 3.3 Bat detections in artificial roosts during two years of monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper
    WATER account WORKING PAPER MAY 2016 Acknowledgement This publication is the result of coordinated work between the Central Bank of Costa Rica (BCCR) and the Ministry of the Environment and Energy (MINAE), with support from the Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) initiative. WAVES is a World Bank-led global partnership that aims to promote sustainable development by ensuring that natural resources are mainstreamed in development planning and national economic accounts. This global partnership brings together a broad coalition of United Nations agencies, governments, international institutes, nongovernmental organizations and academics to implement Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) and develop approaches for other ecosystem service accounts. Costa Rica is one of the initial core implementing countries that embarked on programs for NCA endorsed at the highest level of their governments, with extensive technical support from WAVES. The technical guidance and advice from Ricardo Martínez-Lagunes (WAVES consultant) were key inputs for the compilation of the account. Suggestions from Michael Vardon (WAVES consultant) contributed to the final version. Country Steering Committee Costa Rica established a National Steering Committee (NSC), in order to mainstream NCA into policy making and support Environmental Accounts development. The technical advice, data and information provision by representatives of Ministries and government agencies under the Committee´s direction, is gratefully acknowledged through its members: Mr. Edgar Gutiérrez (Chair), Minister, Ministry of the Environment and Energy (MINAE) Mr. José Francisco Pacheco, Vice Minister, Ministry of Finance (MH) Mr. Luis Fallas, Vice Minister, Ministry of National Planning and Economic Policy (MIDEPLAN) Ms. Floribel Méndez, Manager, National Institute of Statistics and Census (INEC) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Policies in Costa Rica
    OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews Agricultural Policies in Costa Rica These reviews provide comprehensive assessments, according to different angles, of countries’ agricultural policies, including OECD estimates of the level of support; major reform efforts and their potential impacts; OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews or conduciveness of the broad policy framework to generating the innovation that will improve agricultural productivity sustainably. Costa Rica’s strong agricultural sector is underpinned by the country’s political stability, robust economic Agricultural Policies growth and high levels of human development. The sector has achieved signifi cant export success, yet raising productivity and staying competitive in world markets will require efforts to address bottlenecks in infrastructure, innovation and access to fi nancial services. Maximising Costa Rica’s comparative advantage in Costa Rica in higher-value niche products will depend upon more effi cient services to agriculture, including better implementation of programmes, improved co-ordination among institutions, and reduced bureaucracy. While overall protection for agriculture is relatively low compared to OECD countries, it is nonetheless highly distorting to production and trade. Managing the transition to scheduled liberalisation presents an opportunity to reform costly policies, and to implement an alternative policy package with new investments in innovation, productivity and diversifi cation, supported by transition assistance where needed. Costa Rican agriculture’s vulnerability to extreme weather events is expected to worsen with climate change, and even while the country is among global leaders in environmental protection, sustainable development and climate change mitigation, further adaptation efforts will be necessary. Agricultural Policies in Costa Rica Costa in Policies Agricultural Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264269125-en.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Plants, Diet and Local Perceptions of Change in a Costa Rican Ngäbe Community Ugo D’Ambrosio1,2* and Rajindra K
    D’Ambrosio and Puri Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:3 DOI 10.1186/s13002-015-0071-x RESEARCH Open Access Foodways in transition: food plants, diet and local perceptions of change in a Costa Rican Ngäbe community Ugo D’Ambrosio1,2* and Rajindra K. Puri3 Abstract Background: Indigenous populations are undergoing rapid ethnobiological, nutritional and socioeconomic transitions while being increasingly integrated into modernizing societies. To better understand the dynamics of these transitions, this article aims to characterize the cultural domain of food plants and analyze its relation with current day diets, and the local perceptions of changes given amongst the Ngäbe people of Southern Conte-Burica, Costa Rica, as production of food plants by its residents is hypothesized to be drastically in recession with an decreased local production in the area and new conservation and development paradigms being implemented. Methods: Extensive freelisting, interviews and workshops were used to collect the data from 72 participants on their knowledge of food plants, their current dietary practices and their perceptions of change in local foodways, while cultural domain analysis, descriptive statistical analyses and development of fundamental explanatory themes were employed to analyze the data. Results: Results show a food plants domain composed of 140 species, of which 85 % grow in the area, with a medium level of cultural consensus, and some age-based variation. Although many plants still grow in the area, in many key species a decrease on local production–even abandonment–was found, with much reduced cultivation areas. Yet, the domain appears to be largely theoretical, with little evidence of use; and the diet today is predominantly dependent on foods bought from the store (more than 50 % of basic ingredients), many of which were not salient or not even recognized as ‘food plants’ in freelists exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluación Del Estado Socioeconómico Del Cantón De San
    Universidad de Costa Rica - Sede de Occidente Revista Pensamiento Actual - Vol. 15 - No. 24, 2015 ISSN impreso: 1409-0112 / ISSN electrónico: 2215-3586 73 - 81 Ciencias Naturales 73 Evaluación del estado socioeconómico del cantón de San Ramón: una aplicación del Método HJ-Biplot Evaluation of the socioeconomic status of the canton of San Ramon: an application of the method HJ-Biplot Carlomagno Araya Alpízar1 Recibido 6-10-2014 / Aprobado: 16-06-2015 Resumen A partir de los datos del Censo de Población de Costa Rica de 2011, el presente trabajo es una evaluación estadística del estado socioeconómico del cantón de San Ramón (Alajuela), con la utilización el método HJ-Biplot. El lugar tiene una población de 80566 habitantes con una densidad de 79 habitante/km². El análisis HJ-Biplot permitió identificar dos grupos distritos en función de su comportamiento en las variables de estudio. Las variables que presentaron mayor nivel de correlación entre ellas son: la población de habitantes, número de hogares y número de estudiantes de los distritos. Palabras claves: San Ramón; población; HJ-Biplot. Abstract Based on the data from the 2011 Costa Rican Population Census, this research study is a statistical evaluation of the socioeconomic status of the canton of San Ramon in the province of Alajuela, using HJ-Biplot. This canton has a population of 80566 inhabitants with a density of 79 inhabitants / km². The HJ-Biplot analysis identified two district groups based on their behavior of the study variables. The variables that show a higher level of correlation among them are: population, number of households and number of students in the districts.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Death Register
    Costa Rica National Institute of Statistics and Censuses Department of Continuous Statistics Demographic Statistics Unit 2010 Death Register Study Documentation July 28, 2015 Metadata Production Metadata Producer(s) Olga Martha Araya Umaña (OMAU), INEC, Demographic Statistics Unit Coordinator Production Date July 28, 2012 Version Identification CRI-INEC-DEF 2010 Table of Contents Overview............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Scope & Coverage.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Producers & Sponsors.........................................................................................................................................5 Data Collection....................................................................................................................................................5 Data Processing & Appraisal..............................................................................................................................6 Accessibility........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Rights & Disclaimer........................................................................................................................................... 8 Files Description................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DIAGNÓSTICO CANTONAL Resumen Elaborado Y Compilado Por: Departamento De Observatorio Municipal
    OBSERVATORIO MUNICIPAL DIRECCIÓN DE PLANIFICACIÓN Y EVALUACIÓN DIAGNÓSTICO CANTONAL Resumen elaborado y compilado por: Departamento de Observatorio Municipal AGOSTO 2011 MUNICIPALIDAD DE SAN JOSÉ DIRECCIÒN DE PLANIFICACIÒN Y EVALUACION DIAGNÓSTICO CANTONAL Resumen elaborado y compilado por: Departamento de Observatorio Municipal AGOSTO 2011 01/08/20111 Tabla de Contenidos I. Introducción I. Aspectos Generales del Desarrollo del Cantón 1. Reseña histórica 2. Datos Geográficos y territoriales (Extensión, Posición y Ubicación Geográfica, Superficie, Relieve, Altitud, Geología, Geomorfología, Hidrología, Clima, Usos del suelo. 3. División Administrativa II. Características sociodemográficas y culturales 1. Características demográficas 2. Vivienda 3. Indicadores sociales, Educación, salud y seguridad 4. Desarrollo Cultural III. Características Económicas IV. Características de desarrollo urbano de San José V. Características Medioambientales 2 I. Introducción Este documento constituye una compilación realizada por el Departamento de Observatorio Municipal de los aspectos generales del Cantón con base en el documento Información básica del cantón de San José, elaborada por ese Departamento y en los resultados del diagnóstico cantonal, el cual fue elaborado por los Departamentos de la dirección de Planificación y Evaluación: Gestión Urbana, Gestión Ambiental y de Desarrollo Económico, Social y Cultural. fundamentalmente se utilizaron fuentes secundarias, en algunos casos fuentes primarias y la participación de algunos actores, esto con el propósito de actualizar la información que se tiene sobre el cantón de San José. I. Aspectos Generales del Cantón 1. Reseña Histórica El territorio que hoy corresponde al cantón de San José, estuvo habitado por indígenas del llamado Reino Huetar de Occidente, que a inicios de la colonización eran dominios del cacique Garabito, el cual comenzó a ser poblado por colonizadores españoles a finales del siglo XVI.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Ecotourism in Costa Rica: a Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Tourism
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Pell Scholars and Senior Theses Salve's Dissertations and Theses Spring 2016 Impacts of Ecotourism in Costa Rica: A Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Tourism Kimberly A. Kleszczynski Salve Regina University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Economics Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Tourism and Travel Commons Kleszczynski, Kimberly A., "Impacts of Ecotourism in Costa Rica: A Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Tourism" (2016). Pell Scholars and Senior Theses. 106. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses/106 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Salve's Dissertations and Theses at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pell Scholars and Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Impacts of Ecotourism in Costa Rica A Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Tourism Kimberly Kleszczynski Salve Regina University Jameson Chace PhD & Laura O’Toole PhD Spring 2015 Kleszczynski 2 Aim and Scope of Project: Costa Rica’s landscape has fascinated travelers for centuries, establishing Costa Rica as a popular tourist destination (Hintzen 2014). Costa Rica is known as one of the premier sites to study and experience high-altitude tropical cloud forests and nature conservation (Forsyth, 1988; Caufield, 1991; Budowski, 1992; Morrison, 1994; Aylward et al., 1996; Baez, 1996; Honey, 1999; Burlingame, 2000; Nadarni & Wheelwright, 2000; as cited in Vivanco, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Crecimiento Urbano En La Región Metropolitana De San José, Costa Rica
    Crecimiento urbano en la región metropolitana de San José, Costa Rica. Una exploración espacial y temporal de los determinantes del cambio de uso del suelo, 1986–2010 Rosendo Pujol M. y Eduardo Pérez M. © 2012 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Documento de Trabajo del Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Los resultados y conclusiones de este documento de trabajo reflejan la opinión de los autores y no han sido sometidos a una revisión detallada por el personal de Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Si tiene alguna pregunta o quiere reproducir este documento, póngase en contacto con el Instituto Lincoln. [email protected] Lincoln Institute Product Code: WP13RP1SP Resumen Se generaron mapas consistentes de área construida en la región metropolitana de San José para los años 1986, 1997 y 2010 utilizando métodos de clasificación supervisada y no supervisada a imágenes satelitales del proyecto Landsat. A partir de ellos, los patrones regionales y municipales de área construida fueron descritos para la estructura y cambio de dichas áreas. La descripción se realizó por medio de índices que describen los niveles de dispersión del área construida (Angel et al., 2005; Burchfield, 2006). Los resultados revelaron que la región es más dispersa y menos densa que otras ciudades latinoamericanas, aunque el crecimiento del área construida ha sido más compacto que el conjunto del área construida del periodo inicial. Los niveles de dispersión del área construida y su crecimiento, por municipio, fueron relacionados, a través de un análisis econométrico, con potenciales determinantes explicativos. Se encontraron asociaciones estadísticamente significativas y consistentes con la teoría, entre distintos índices de dispersión y accesibilidad, existencia de recursos hidrogeológicos y población, así como con los cultivos predominantes.
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Rica's Development
    Costa Rica’s Development Costa Rica’s Costa Rica’s Development From Good to Better Systematic Country Diagnostic Ana Maria Oviedo Susana M. Sanchez Kathy A. Lindert J. Humberto Lopez Costa Rica’s Development From Good to Better Ana Maria Oviedo, Susana M. Sanchez, Kathy A. Lindert, J. Humberto Lopez © 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 18 17 16 15 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the follow- ing conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Oviedo, Ana Maria, Susana M.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 ISSN: 0034-7744 Universidad de Costa Rica Acosta-Chaves, Víctor J.; Madrigal-Elizondo, Víctor; Chaves, Gerardo; Morera-Chacón, Brayan; García-Rodríguez, Adrián; Bolaños, Federico Shifts in the diversity of an amphibian community from a premontane forest of San Ramón, Costa Rica Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 67, no. 2, 2019, pp. 259-273 Universidad de Costa Rica DOI: DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67I2SUPL.37240 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44965759019 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67I2SUPL.37240 Artículo Shifts in the diversity of an amphibian community from a premontane forest of San Ramón, Costa Rica Cambios en la diversidad de una comunidad de anfibios en un bosque premontano de San Ramón, Costa Rica Víctor J. Acosta-Chaves1, 2* Víctor Madrigal-Elizondo3 Gerardo Chaves4 Brayan Morera-Chacón5 Adrián García-Rodríguez 4, 6 Federico Bolaños 4 1 Carrera de Turismo Ecológico, Universidad de Costa Rica Sede Atlántico, Recinto de Paraíso, Cartago, Costa Rica; [email protected]* 2 Red Mesoamericana y del Caribe para la Conservación de Anfibios y Reptiles. 3 Red de Áreas Protegidas, Universidad de Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro, Costa Rica; [email protected] 4 Escuela de Biología,
    [Show full text]
  • Resultados Generales Censo Nacional De Población Y Vivienda
    X Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda 2011 Resultados Generales San José, Costa Rica MAYO, 2012 X Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda 2011 Resultados Generales Censo 2011 Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC) Área de Censos de Población y Vivienda Se permite la reproducción total o parcial con propósitos educativos y sin fines de lucro, con la condición de que se indique la fuente. El INEC agradece se le remita un ejemplar de cualquier documento elaborado con base en la siguiente publicación. Consejo Directivo: Jacqueline Castillo Rivas. Presidenta Fernando Ramírez Hernández. Vicepresidente Raquel Barrientos Cordero. Secretaria de actas Irma Sandoval Carvajal. Directiva Patricia Delvó Gutiérrez. Directiva Gerencia, Subgerencia y Coordinación del Área: Jaime Vaglio Muñoz. Gerente María Elena González Quesada. Subgerente Elizabeth Solano Salazar. Coordinadora del Área de Censos de Población y Vivienda Aporte de Información: Unidad de Diseño, Procesamiento y Análisis, Unidad Técnica de Sistemas de Información, Unidad de Operaciones de Campo, Unidad de Cartografía Elaboración: Unidad de Diseño, Procesamiento y Análisis Colaboración: Centro Centroamericano de Población Producción Gráfica: Marcela Fernández Ramírez 317.286 I-59-d Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (Costa Rica) X Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda: Resultados Generales / Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. --1 ed.-- San José, C.R. : INEC; 2011. 140 p. il. : 28 cm. Nota: Contiene cuadros, mapas y gráficos estadísticos ISBN: 978-9968-921-92-3 1. CENSOS DE POBLACIÓN. 2. CENSOS DE VIVIENDAS. 3. MIGRACIÓN. 4. DISCAPACIDAD. 5. EDUCACIÓN. 6. GUARDERÍAS INFANTILES. 7. GRUPOS ETNICOS. 8. INEC. I. TÍTULO. Impreso en GEDI - Gerencia de Logística y Recursos Institucionales / ICE - 200 ejemplares - 1 Edición RESULTADOS GENERALES INEC CENSO 2011 3 “In memoriam” El Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC) dedica el X Censo Nacional de Población y VI Censo Nacional de Vivienda a la memoria de Don Miguel Gómez Barrantes (q.d.D.g.).
    [Show full text]