Neurodegeneration Product Guide | Edition 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neurodegeneration Product Guide | Edition 2 Neurodegeneration Product Guide | Edition 2 Passion Flower Passiflora caerulea A source of Harmane Contents by Research Area: • Neurodegeneration • Alzheimer’s Disease • Parkinson’s Disease • Huntington’s Disease Tocris Product Guide Series Neurodegeneration Research Contents Page Neurodegeneration 3 Alzheimer’s Disease 5 Parkinson’s Disease 12 Huntington’s Disease 17 List of Acronyms 23 Neurodegeneration Research Products 24 Further Reading 34 Introduction Neurodegenerative diseases are highly prevalent disorders for which the greatest risk factor is increasing age. The pathogenesis of these disorders is yet to be fully understood, and current research efforts are focused on elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible, with the hope that drugs that prevent or reverse disease progres- sion will be discovered. Three of the major neurodegenerative diseases are Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease, which are discussed in this product guide. Research into these disorders has so far yielded few drugs that have proven effective in clinical trials, and many current therapies are targeted at attenuating disease symptoms, rather than disease progression. Due to the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases, they constitute a significant human, societal and economic burden. The global financial cost far outweighs other disorders such as stroke, musculoskeletal disease, heart disease or cancer. Given the aging population, the incidence of neurodegenerative disorders is predicted to rise; early diagnosis and effec- tive treatment is of paramount importance, and these rely on a greater understanding of the mechanisms that underlie each disorder. Included in this guide are key compounds used in the study of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease, as well as illustrative schematics of the molecular mechanisms thought to contribute to each disease. The use of small molecule inhibitors and antagonists to facilitate such research has helped delineate the pathways involved in these diseases, as well as providing a solid foundation for the development of future targeted therapeutics. Tocris provides an innova- tive range of high performance life science reagents for use in neurodegeneration research, equipping researchers with selective pharmacological tools for studying these disease pathways. A full product listing can be found on pages 24-33. Key Neurodegeneration Research Products Box Number Title Page Box Number Title Page Box 1 Ab Aggregation 7 Box 6 Proteasome and PARP 15 Box 2 GSK-3b 8 Box 7 Dopaminergic Signaling 16 Box 3 Current Therapeutics for Alzheimer’s Disease 9 Box 8 Proteolysis 19 Box 4 Emerging Targets for Alzheimer’s Disease 11 Box 9 Excitotoxicity 20 Box 5 LRRK2 14 Box 10 Stem Cells 21 2 | NEURODEGENERATION RESEARCH Neurodegeneration Neurodegeneration is the progressive death of neurons in the candidates currently on the horizon. Alzheimer’s disease, the brain that leads to a loss of structure and function. Alzheimer’s, most prevalent neurodegenerative disease worldwide, was esti- Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease are the three major disor- mated to affect 35.6 million people in the world in 2010 and it is ders that develop as a result of neurodegeneration, and will be thought that the numbers of those affected will almost double discussed in this guide. Each disorder has characteristic symp- every 20 years*, in line with an aging population. toms in the early stages of the disease, such as the cognitive The mechanisms that lead to neuronal cell death in neuro- decline associated with the onset of Alzheimer’s; a loss of motor degenerative diseases are not well understood. However, it is control, which is often an early indicator of Parkinson’s disease; believed that neurodegenerative diseases have common cellu- or behavioral changes symptomatic of Huntington’s disease. lar and molecular mechanisms. Dysregulation of protein syn- As we age, our susceptibility to these diseases increase, and it thesis, degradation and transport, alongside hallmark features is thought that this may be due to an increased vulnerability such as protein misfolding, accumulation into aggregates as of particular neuronal populations within defined areas of the well as inclusion body formation, are characteristic of all three brain. It is worth noting that approximately 10% of neurons die diseases that will be covered in this guide. A recently identi- as a consequence of ‘healthy’, non-pathological aging; indeed, fied mechanism applicable to all neurodegenerative diseases protein aggregates synonymous with Alzheimer’s disease have describes how cell death may occur: a build-up of misfolded also been observed in asymptomatic patients. proteins in the brain over-activates a natural defensive mecha- As a population ages, the prevalence of neurodegeneration is nism – the unfolded protein response – which switches off the likely to increase. Effective treatments to prevent progression of production of new proteins. This effectively starves the neuron neurodegenerative disorders are notably absent with no strong of the proteins it needs for normal function and triggers cell Table 1 | Characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease Alzheimer’s Disease Parkinson’s Disease Huntington’s Disease Histopathological hallmarks Loss of neurons in temporal/frontal Loss of dopaminergic neurons Loss of medium spiny neurons in the lobes, neocortex and hippocampus in the substantia nigra striatum Neurofibrillary tangles Lewy bodies N-terminal toxic fragments of mutant Amyloid plaques huntingtin protein Hyperphosphorylated tau protein Intranuclear inclusion bodies Worldwide prevalence 200 per 100,000 160 per 100,000 4-10 per 100,000 Average age of onset 65 years 62 years 40 years (N.B. wide variation) Dyskinesia Absent Present Present Major brain areas affected Cortex, striatum and thalamus Substantia nigra, basal ganglia Striatum Oxidative stress? Yes Yes Yes Protein misfolding? Yes Yes Yes Disease-associated proteins Ab peptide α-Synuclein Mutant huntingtin Tau Established experimental models APP mutant mouse 6-OHDA lesions R6/2 transgenic fragment model 3xTg-AD mouse (Tg2576) MPTP treatment Quinolinic acid lesions YAC128 transgenic full-length model Number of current clinical trials† 533 494 159 Associated genes APP PINK1 IT15 PS1 DJ-1 PS2 Parkin ApoE4 SNCA LRRK2 ATP13A2 Causal factors Unknown Unknown PolyQ expansion resulting in generation of mutant protein Current therapeutics Memantine L-DOPA Tetrabenazine Cholinesterase inhibitors Antipsychotics *Statistics obtained from www.alz.co.uk/research/statistics on October 17, 2013 †Data obtained from www.clinicaltrials.gov on September 04, 2015 www.tocris.com | 3 Tocris Product Guide Series death. Researchers are targeting this mechanism by trying to Syndrome who have this extra gene copy almost universally block the ‘off’ switch in studies that may be a possible turning exhibit Alzheimer’s disease by 40 years of age. point for the treatment of all neurodegenerative diseases. Oxidative stress is another key characteristic that under- Neurons have machinery that helps defend against the build-up lies neurodegenerative diseases. Evidence of reactive oxygen of misfolded and aggregated proteins. If chaperone proteins fail species that are toxic to cells have been described in affected to induce proper folding, abnormal proteins can be targeted brain regions of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease patients. for degradation by attachment of polyubiquitin and targeting Oxidative stress not only damages cells but can trigger pro- to the proteasome for degradation. Similarly, the autophagy/ grammed cell death, leading to neurodegeneration. However it lysosomal pathways are known to arbitrate between neuronal is unknown whether the widespread neuronal cell death seen survival and death. When these processes are compromised, in neurodegenerative diseases is caused by oxidative stress, or however, they can play critical roles in the pathogenesis of is coincident with it; therefore, strategies to therapeutically neurodegenerative diseases. inhibit oxidative stress may help decrease cell death. A genetic component is evident in many neurodegenerative Although neurodegenerative diseases exhibit similarities in diseases. Huntington’s disease is a well-characterized poly- the cellular events which occur during the course of disease, glutamine disorder, in which a repeat of the CAG sequence there are substantive differences between each disorder which – which encodes the amino acid glutamine – generates a poly- necessitate tailored therapeutic strategies. An example of where glutamine tract. These extra glutamine residues induce irregu- this is evident is in the effects of L-DOPA – this drug allevi- lar protein folding and alter protein function, which is toxic ates motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease yet it exacerbates to the cell. Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease also have a motor dysfunction in Huntington’s disease, despite the two genetic component, with genetic analysis identifying numerous diseases sharing a common cause of protein misfolding. genes associated with each disorder, including ApoE4, PINK1 and LRRK2 (Table 1). A key example of the genetic element of Disease-specific mechanisms are outlined and discussed Alzheimer’s is evident in people with Down Syndrome who in more detail in the following sections: Alzheimer’s disease have a third copy of chromosome 21. The gene that is involved (p5), Parkinson’s disease (p12) and
Recommended publications
  • Neuroscience Product Handbook
    www.MedChemExpress.com MedChemExpressMedChemExpress Neuroscience Product Handbook Pain Biological Rhythms and Sleep Neuromuscular Diseases AutonomicNeuroendocrine Somatosensation metabolism Regulation Processes transduction Behavioral Neuroethology Neuroendocrin feature soding Food Intake oral and speech From the itineraries of and Energy Balance vocal/social 8,329 attendees Touch Thirst and communication Water Balance social behavior Development peptides at the 2018 SfN meeting Ion Channels and Evolution Stress and social cognition opiates the Brain monoamines Spinal Cord Adolescent Development PTSD Injury and Plasticity Postnatal autism Developmental fear Neurogenesis Disorders human social Mood cognition ADHD, Disorders Human dystexia Anxiety Cognition and Neurogenesis depression Appetitive Behavior and Gllogenesis bipolar and Aversive timing Development of Motor, Schizophrenia Learning perception Sensory,and Limbic Systems perceptual learning Other Psychiatric executive attention Stem Cells... mitochondria Emotionfunction human Parkinson's Glial Mechanisms biomarkers reinforcement long-term Disease Synaptogenesis human human memory Huntington's Transplant and ... Development Neurotransm., Motivation decisions working and Regen Axon and Transportors, memory PNS G-Protein...Signaling animal Dendrite reward decision visual Other Movement Development Receptors learning and memory model microglia making decisions Disorders Demyelinating NMDA dopamine ataxia Disorders place cells, GABA, LT P Synaptic grid cells gly... Plasticity striatum
    [Show full text]
  • Stems for Nonproprietary Drug Names
    USAN STEM LIST STEM DEFINITION EXAMPLES -abine (see -arabine, -citabine) -ac anti-inflammatory agents (acetic acid derivatives) bromfenac dexpemedolac -acetam (see -racetam) -adol or analgesics (mixed opiate receptor agonists/ tazadolene -adol- antagonists) spiradolene levonantradol -adox antibacterials (quinoline dioxide derivatives) carbadox -afenone antiarrhythmics (propafenone derivatives) alprafenone diprafenonex -afil PDE5 inhibitors tadalafil -aj- antiarrhythmics (ajmaline derivatives) lorajmine -aldrate antacid aluminum salts magaldrate -algron alpha1 - and alpha2 - adrenoreceptor agonists dabuzalgron -alol combined alpha and beta blockers labetalol medroxalol -amidis antimyloidotics tafamidis -amivir (see -vir) -ampa ionotropic non-NMDA glutamate receptors (AMPA and/or KA receptors) subgroup: -ampanel antagonists becampanel -ampator modulators forampator -anib angiogenesis inhibitors pegaptanib cediranib 1 subgroup: -siranib siRNA bevasiranib -andr- androgens nandrolone -anserin serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists altanserin tropanserin adatanserin -antel anthelmintics (undefined group) carbantel subgroup: -quantel 2-deoxoparaherquamide A derivatives derquantel -antrone antineoplastics; anthraquinone derivatives pixantrone -apsel P-selectin antagonists torapsel -arabine antineoplastics (arabinofuranosyl derivatives) fazarabine fludarabine aril-, -aril, -aril- antiviral (arildone derivatives) pleconaril arildone fosarilate -arit antirheumatics (lobenzarit type) lobenzarit clobuzarit -arol anticoagulants (dicumarol type) dicumarol
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: page numbers in italics refer to figures; those in bold to tables or boxes. abacavir 686 tolerability 536–537 children and adolescents 461 acamprosate vascular dementia 549 haematological 798, 805–807 alcohol dependence 397, 397, 402–403 see also donepezil; galantamine; hepatic impairment 636 eating disorders 669 rivastigmine HIV infection 680 re‐starting after non‐adherence 795 acetylcysteine (N‐acetylcysteine) learning disability 700 ACE inhibitors see angiotensin‐converting autism spectrum disorders 505 medication adherence and 788, 790 enzyme inhibitors obsessive compulsive disorder 364 Naranjo probability scale 811, 812 acetaldehyde 753 refractory schizophrenia 163 older people 525 acetaminophen, in dementia 564, 571 acetyl‐L‐carnitine 159 psychiatric see psychiatric adverse effects acetylcholinesterase (AChE) 529 activated partial thromboplastin time 805 renal impairment 647 acetylcholinesterase (AChE) acute intoxication see intoxication, acute see also teratogenicity inhibitors 529–543, 530–531 acute kidney injury 647 affective disorders adverse effects 537–538, 539 acutely disturbed behaviour 54–64 caffeine consumption 762 Alzheimer’s disease 529–543, 544, 576 intoxication with street drugs 56, 450 non‐psychotropics causing 808, atrial fibrillation 720 rapid tranquillisation 54–59 809, 810 clinical guidelines 544, 551, 551 acute mania see mania, acute stupor 107, 108, 109 combination therapy 536 addictions 385–457 see also bipolar disorder; depression; delirium 675 S‐adenosyl‐l‐methionine 275 mania dosing 535 ADHD
    [Show full text]
  • Endocrine Abstracts Vol 65
    Endocrine Abstracts November 2019 Volume 65 ISSN 1479-6848 (online) Society for Endocrinology BES 2019 11–13 November 2019, Brighton published by Online version available at bioscientifica www.endocrine-abstracts.org Volume 65 Endocrine Abstracts November 2019 Society for Endocrinology BES 2019 11–13 November 2019, Brighton VOLUME EDITORS The abstracts submitted were marked by the Abstract Marking panel, selected by the Programme Organising Committee. Programme Committee D Bassett (Programme Secretary) (London) Laura Matthews (Leeds) Andrew Childs (Programme Co-ordinator) (London) Carla Moran (Cambridge) Nils Krone (Programme Co-ordinator) (Sheffield) Annice Mukherjee (Salford) Helen Simpson (Programme Co-ordinator) (London) Francesca Spiga (Bristol) Davide Calebiro (Birmingham) Jeremy Tomlinson (Oxford) Ben Challis (Cambridge) Jennifer Walsh (Sheffield) Mandy Drake (Edinburgh) Abstract Marking Panel Ramzi Ajjan (Leeds) Neil Gittoes (Birmingham) John Newell-Price (Sheffield) Richard Anderson (Edinburgh) Helena Gleeson (Birmingham) Mark Nixon (Edinburgh) Ruth Andrew (Edinburgh) Philippa Hanson (London) Finbarr O’Harte (Ulster) Weibke Arlt (Birmingham) Martin Hewison (Birmingham) Adrian Park (Cambridge) Mo Aye (Hull) Claire Higham (Manchester) Simon Pearce (Newcastle) Tom Barber (Warwick) Steve Hillier (Edinburgh) Andrew Powlson (Cambridge) Duncan Bassett (London) Andy James (Newcastle) Teresa Rea (Belfast) Roger Brown (Edinburgh) Channa Jayasena (London) Martin Read (Birmingham) Paul Carroll (London) Niki Karavitaki (Oxford) Aled Rees (Cardiff)
    [Show full text]
  • Pridopidine for the Treatment of Motor Function in Patients with Huntington’S Disease (Mermaihd): a Phase 3, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Articles Pridopidine for the treatment of motor function in patients with Huntington’s disease (MermaiHD): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Justo Garcia de Yebenes, Bernhard Landwehrmeyer, Ferdinando Squitieri, Ralf Reilmann, Anne Rosser, Roger A Barker, Carsten Saft, Markus K Magnet, Alastair Sword, Åsa Rembratt, Joakim Tedroff, for the MermaiHD study investigators Summary Background Huntington’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterised by motor, cognitive, and Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 1049–57 behavioural deficits. Pridopidine belongs to a new class of compounds known as dopaminergic stabilisers, and results Published Online from a small phase 2 study in patients with Huntington’s disease suggested that this drug might improve voluntary November 8, 2011 motor function. We aimed to assess further the effects of pridopidine in patients with Huntington’s disease. DOI:10.1016/S1474- 4422(11)70233-2 See Comment page 1036 Methods We undertook a 6 month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of pridopidine Department of Neurology, in the treatment of motor deficits in patients with Huntington’s disease. Our primary endpoint was change in the Hospital Ramón y Cajal, modified motor score (mMS; derived from the unified Huntington’s disease rating scale) at 26 weeks. We recruited CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain patients with Huntington’s disease from 32 European centres; patients were aged 30 years or older and had an mMS of (J G de Yebenes MD); 10 points or greater at baseline. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 45 mg per day pridopidine, Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, or 90 mg per day pridopidine by use of centralised computer-generated codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Etiology and Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease
    Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: A consensus update. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Update on Dystonia, Mov Disord 2013;28:863-73 • Dystonia is defined as a movement disorder characterized Chorea, and Tics by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal, often repetitive, movements, postures, or both. Joseph Jankovic, MD • Dystonic movements are typically patterned and twisting. Professor of Neurology, Distinguished Chair in Movement Disorders, • Dystonia is often initiated or worsened by voluntary action Director, Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, and associated with overflow muscle activation. Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas • Some forms of dystonia, such as blepharospasm and laryngeal dystonia, are not associated with postures, but are characterized by focal involuntary contractions that interfere with physiological opening or closing of the eyelids or the larynx. • Dystonia is classified along two axes: 1. Clinical characteristics, including age at onset, body distribution, temporal pattern and associated features (additional movement disorders or neurological features) 2. Etiology, which includes nervous system pathology and inheritance. The prevalence of primary dystonia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Steeves et al. Mov Disord 2012;27:1789-96 Genetic Classification of Dystonias Genetic Classification of Dystonias Primary Dystonias
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary USP 40–NF 35
    Commentary USP 40–NF 35 November 1, 2016 In accordance with USP’s Rules and Procedures of the Council of Experts (“Rules”) and except as provided in Section 7.02 Accelerated Revision Processes, USP publishes proposed revisions to the United States Pharmacopeia and the National Formulary (USP–NF) for public review and comment in the Pharmacopeial Forum (PF), USP’s free bimonthly journal for public notice and comment. After comments are considered and incorporated as the Expert Committee deems appropriate, the proposal may advance to official status or be re-published in PF for further notice and comment, in accordance with the Rules. In cases when proposals advance to official status without re-publication in PF, a summary of comments received and the appropriate Expert Committee's responses are published in the Revisions and Commentary section of the USP website at the time the official revision is published. The Commentary is not part of the official text and is not intended to be enforceable by regulatory authorities. Rather, it explains the basis of Expert Committees’ responses to public comments on proposed revisions. If there is a difference between the contents of the Commentary and the official text, the official text prevails. In case of a dispute or question of interpretation, the language of the official text, alone and independent of the Commentary, shall prevail. For further information, contact: USP Executive Secretariat United States Pharmacopeia 12601 Twinbrook Parkway Rockville, MD 20852-1790 USA [email protected] Page 1
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of an Evolving Serotonin Transporter Computational Model Laura Marie Geffert
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2013 Characterization of an Evolving Serotonin Transporter Computational Model Laura Marie Geffert Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Geffert, L. (2013). Characterization of an Evolving Serotonin Transporter Computational Model (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/573 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION OF AN EVOLVING SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER COMPUTATIONAL MODEL A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Mylan School of Pharmacy Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By Laura M. Geffert May 2013 CHARACTERIZATION OF AN EVOLVING SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER COMPUTATIONAL MODEL By Laura M. Geffert Approved November 12, 2012 _______________________ ______________________ Christopher K. Surratt, Ph.D. Jeffry D. Madura, Ph.D. Professor of Pharmacology Professor of Chemistry and (Committee Chair) Biochemistry (Committee Member) ________________________ _______________________ Jane E. Cavanaugh, Ph.D. James K. Drennen, III, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Pharmacology Associate Dean, Research and Graduate (Committee Member) Programs Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences _______________________ J. Douglas Bricker, Ph.D. Dean, Mylan School of Pharmacy and the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences iii ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF AN EVOLVING SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER COMPUTATIONAL MODEL By Laura M. Geffert May 2013 Thesis supervised by Dr. Christopher K. Surratt A major obstacle for developing new antidepressants has been limited knowledge of the structure and function of a central target, the serotonin transporter (SERT).
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Comparisons of Three Glutamate Transporter Subtypes Cloned from Human Motor Cortex
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1994, 14(g): 5559-5569 Functional Comparisons of Three Glutamate Transporter Subtypes Cloned from Human Motor Cortex Jeffrey L. Arriza, Wendy A. Fairman, Jacques I. Wadiche, Geoffrey H. Murdoch, Michael P. Kavanaugh, and Susan G. Amara The Vellum Institute for Advanced Biomedical Research, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201 Reuptake plays an important role in regulating synaptic and peripheral tissues(Christensen, 1990) and in the nervous system extracellular concentrations of glutamate. Three glutamate (Kanner and Schuldiner, 1987; Nicholls and Attwell, 1990). transporters expressed in human motor cortex, termed Transport serves a special function in the brain by mediating EAATl , EAATP, and EAAT3 (for excitatory amino acid trans- the reuptake of glutamate releasedat excitatory synapses.Glu- porter), have been characterized by their molecular cloning tamate can be reaccumulated from the synaptic cleft by the and functional expression. Each EAAT subtype mRNA was presynaptic nerve terminal (Eliasof and Werblin, 1993) or by found in all human brain regions analyzed. The most prom- glial uptake of transmitter diffusing from the cleft (Nicholls and inent regional variation in message content was in cerebel- Attwell, 1990; Schwartz and Tachibana, 1990; Barbour et al., lum where EAATl expression predominated. EAATl and 199 1). The activities of neuronal and glial transporters influence EAAT3 mRNAs were also expressed in various non-nervous the temporal and spatial dynamics of the chemical signal in tissues, whereas expression of EAATS was largely restricted other neurotransmitter systems(Hille, 1992; Bruns et al., 1993; to brain. The kinetic parameters and pharmacological char- Isaacsonet al., 1993), but such effects have not yet been dem- acteristics of transport mediated by each EAAT subtype onstrated at glutamatergic synapses(Hestrin et al., 1990; Sar- were determined in transfected mammalian cells by radio- antis et al., 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • OCD Candidate Gene SLC1A1/EAAT3 Impacts Basal Ganglia-Mediated Activity and Stereotypic Behavior
    OCD candidate gene SLC1A1/EAAT3 impacts basal ganglia-mediated activity and stereotypic behavior Isaac D. Zikea, Muhammad O. Chohanb, Jared M. Kopelmanc,d,e, Emily N. Krasnowb, Daniel Flickerf,g,h,i, Katherine M. Nautiyalj,k, Michael Bubserl, Christoph Kellendonkm,n,o,p, Carrie K. Jonesa,l, Gregg Stanwoodq, Kenji Fransis Tanakar, Holly Mooreb, Susanne E. Ahmaric,d,e,1, and Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeeleb,m,n,1 aDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; bNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032; cDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; dCenter for Neuroscience Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; eCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; fHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; gCenter for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; hDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; iBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142; jDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032; kDivision of Integrative Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032; lVanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; mDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032; nSackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032; oDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032; pDivision of Molecular Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032; qDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL 32304; and rDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan Edited by Susan G.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford® Policy Update Bulletin: October 2015 Oxford
    Oxford October 2015 policy update bulletin Medical & Administrative Policy Updates UnitedHealthcare respects the expertise of the physicians, health care professionals, and their staff who participate in our network. Our goal is to support you and your patients in making the most informed decisions regarding the choice of quality and cost-effective care, and to support practice staff with a simple and predictable administrative experience. The Policy Update Bulletin was developed to share important information regarding Oxford® Medical and Administrative Policy updates.* *Where information in this bulletin conflicts with applicable state and/or federal law, Oxford® follows such applicable federal and/or state law Oxford Oxford® Medical and Administrative Policy Updates Overview This bulletin provides complete details on Oxford® Medical and Policy Update Classifications Administrative Policy updates. The appearance of a service or New procedure in this bulletin indicates only that Oxford® has recently New clinical coverage criteria and/or documentation review requirements adopted a new policy and/or updated, revised, replaced or have been adopted for a service, procedure, test, or device retired an existing policy; it does not imply that Oxford® provides Updated coverage for the service or procedure. In the event of an An existing policy has been reviewed and changes have not been made inconsistency or conflict between the information provided in this to the clinical coverage criteria or documentation review requirements; bulletin and the posted policy, the provisions of the posted policy however, items such as the clinical evidence, FDA information, and/or will prevail. Note that most benefit plan documents exclude from list(s) of applicable codes may have been updated benefit coverage health services identified as investigational or unproven/not medically necessary.
    [Show full text]