DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT of OMBUDSMAN (AKYIKATCHY) of the Kyrgyz Republic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT of OMBUDSMAN (AKYIKATCHY) of the Kyrgyz Republic REPORT OF OMBUDSMAN (AKYIKATCHY) OF THE Kyrgyz Republic “The state of the human rights and freedoms of citizen in the Kyrgyz Republic in 2005” BISHKEK – 2006 Address to Deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic «All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood». ARTICLE 1. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. In accordance with standards general recognized by world community in the sphere of human rights and freedoms and point 1.1 “Plan of actions of National program “Human rights” for the period 2002- 2010, June 25, 2002 Legislative Assembly of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic adopted the law “About the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic.” November 25, 2002 deputies of the Parliament choose the first Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic, and December 13 at the joint session of Legislative Assembly and Assembly of Public Representatives of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic he solemnly sworn and assumed in his position. The Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic defines the mandate of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic: “The control over execution of human and civil rights and freedoms in the Kyrgyz Republic imposed on the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic.” Activity of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic does not substitute or replace the activity of other state bodies, providing protection and recovering civil rights and freedoms in the frames of their powers. It promotes the improvement their work in this field, indicates at drawbacks and problems, including that are connected with actions or inaction one or another bodies and officials and thus, promotes for perfect civil rights realization. Ombudsman acts as the direct representative of the government in the contact with population, assisting to the increasing of the general prestige of the authority and rendering free legal aid to all needy. The main goal of human rights ad freedoms protection may be achieved only by attentive investigation each petition, legal acts, regulating the investigating issues and experience. Aims and goals of Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic in details are stated in the special Law. Summing up the activity for last three years, probably it may be said that despite the ambiguous perception of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) Institution of the Kyrgyz Republic by governmental and non- governmental structures of the society he proved in deed his extremely necessity and ability to execute the most elevated and noble mission — to assert the rights and freedoms, that were given to him from birth. If states, mostly, provided in the protection of their interests by internetional and legal basis, so individual, mostly, is deprived the possibility to protect his rights by himself. Even his fundamental rights, given to him and pertaining to him from the birth, he gives as “deign” of government. It is easy to excuse the human rights abridgement as states needs. And there appears the necessity to withstand to lawlessness, arbitrariness and absence of rights on the state level in the country, which is in searching for ways and forms of democracy building. The fact that for three years from the day of election of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic 92 thousand of people applied to him for, speaks for importance of establishment and necessity of function such state body in the country with incomplete transitional period. Naturally, that not all who came to (Akyikatchy) or wrote about their troubles, muddles were satisfied with the results of their complaints investigation: one third of the complains and petitions were arranged in favour of complainants. The reason of why other complains and petitions were declined or uninvestigated in the favour of complainants stated in the annual report of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic in details. And in order to judge objectively whether it is few or a lot, it is necessary to come into contact with each of them, to understand the background of each certain situation. The example is penetrate with pain and sorrow petition of the mother, who lost her only son — breadwinner during the war in Afganistan. Having stayed alone in old ages, in bad physical condition gets for him only 200 soms, 50 soms as a social grant and 50% benefit for public utilities. “How can I live for 800 soms — she asked, - when prices for goods and rates for utilities are growing extraordinary.” In other wretched, poor peasants call for help, leaving alone with giving allotment without any elementary agriculture machinery, without means for fertilizing, sabadilla and other needs, but other complaints did not have even the land. In search of daily bread there desperate apply of Kyrgyzstan citizens, who appeared outside the motherland, as fate has willed. Compatriots are have to work on the tobacco plantation of Kazakhstan, building work and markets of the Russian Federation, wandering labor migrants on the territory of Europe, Asia, reached Africa, America and Australia — all of them are needed in the support of the home government (special report of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) would be separately presented to the deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament). Different in subjects, content, character of the trouble — all of them are full of hopes and expectations. Despite the Ombudsman is not omnipotent due to the powers given by the law, I may say with sincere heart, that none of them was left without attention, even those that are outside the competence of the Akyikatchy (Ombudsman). Despite the impartial reasons far from all petitions we managed to solve, but the trust to Ombudsman did not changed and assurance of people in the primary value of rights and freedoms and necessity of their protection is increased. Dear Mr. Toraga (Speaker), deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament)! In ue course you, elected by people, have pay high reliance choose me alternatively as the first Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic. Former and present chamber (composition) of deputies have approved two annual reports of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) about state of the human and civil rights and freedoms in the Kyrgyz Republic in 2003 and 2004 and actively support our activity. Here you may see the annual report about situation in the country in the sphere of human and civil rights and freedoms protection in 2005, presented to you in accordance with p. 29 p. 1 art. 58 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic. Employees of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) Institution have already got necessary skills for work and you have elected all my deputies (that are three), the trust of citizens, foreigners and people without citizenship is increasing. However, there are some questions that can not be solved without you. Still did not executed the p.3 of art.17 of the Law of the “Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic” obliging the Government in three months provide Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic with proposals about adjustment of legislation in accordance with this Law and decide technical issues, connected with creating Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) Institution in the Kyrgyz Republic. But it have passed four years yet! Does not executes the demand of the p.2 art. 16 of that law, regarding that Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) defines the amount of means, necessary for activity of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) and his office. The government financed not sufficiently us from the approved by Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) republic budget for 2005 on the sum more than five million soms, and in 2006 they reserve only two third of the means amount, that are so necessary for our efficient activity. According to the p.3 of art.16 of mentioned Law Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) creates and executed the estimate of expenditures by himself. However, due to the indecision of the Government technical issues and shorten financing we can not fulfill many points of this estimate of expenditures. By then, despite the independence of the Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) from any state bodies and officials, prohibition of interaction in his activity and influence on him in any way stated in p. 1 of art. 6 of the mentioned Law we have got “recommendations” to shorten the number of civil servants till 79, technical servants till 25%, and abolish the departments etc. however, in accordance with p. 2 of art. 14 of the same Law Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) defines the structure, order and organization of work of the Institution by himself. Does not executes the commissions, recommendation of deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) that they have accepted in regulations after hearing of annual reports of Ombudsman. I dare assure you, dear Toraga (Speaker) and deputies of Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) that during solving of issues mentioned above and your support we will be able to execute our constitutional activity of control over human rights and freedoms observance in the country. I think that your constituencies needs in it in the first place. Sincerely yours, Trsunbay Bakir uulu INTRODUCTION There have been passed one more stage in the activity of Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) of the Kyrgyz Republic. This stage as two previous promoted for further statement of the priority of the human and civil rights and freedoms in the life of state and society. Experience, that was got during two years significantly enriched and filled with new matter the style, forms and methods of his work. If at the stage of formation one of the important tasks, besides self-assertion of new state body at the jural field of the country and disposal of befallen stream of petitions and complaints, was the distribution of information among wide range of population and community about newly created constitutional remedial institution, so now the main efforts of Ombudsman (Akyikatchy) were directed at fixing and development of positive tendencies of his activity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Cross-Border Conflict in Post-Soviet Central Asia: the Case of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
    Connections: The Quarterly Journal ISSN 1812-1098, e-ISSN 1812-2973 Toktomushev, Connections QJ 17, no. 1 (2018): 21-41 https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.17.1.02 Research Article Understanding Cross-Border Conflict in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Kemel Toktomushev University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, http://www.ucentralasia.org Abstract: Despite the prevalence of works on the ‘discourses of danger’ in the Ferghana Valley, which re-invented post-Soviet Central Asia as a site of intervention, the literature on the conflict potential in the cross-border areas of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan is fairly limited. Yet, the number of small-scale clashes and tensions on the borders of the Batken and Isfara regions has been growing steadily. Accordingly, this work seeks to con- tribute to the understanding of the conflict escalations in the area and identify factors that aggravate tensions between the communities. In par- ticular, this article focuses on four variables, which exacerbate tensions and hinder the restoration of a peaceful social fabric in the Batken-Isfara region: the unresolved legacies of the Soviet past, inefficient use of natu- ral resources, militarization of borders, and lack of evidence-based poli- cymaking. Keywords: Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Ferghana, conflict, bor- ders. Introduction The significance and magnitude of violence and conflict potential in the con- temporary Ferghana Valley has been identified as one of the most prevalent themes in the study of post-Soviet Central Asia. This densely populated region has been long portrayed as a site of latent inter-ethnic conflict. Not only is the Ferghana Valley a region, where three major ethnic groups—Kyrgyz, Uzbeks and Tajiks—co-exist in a network of interdependent communities, sharing buri- Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Creative Commons Academies and Security Studies Institutes BY-NC-SA 4.0 Kemel Toktomushev, Connections QJ 17, no.
    [Show full text]
  • In Kyrgyzstan Agricultural Products
    The Possibility of “Six Sector Industrialization” in Kyrgyzstan Agricultural Products ■Profile of Kyrgyz Republic The Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan) is a state in Central Asia. Located in the western and central part of the Tien Shan mountain system. In the north it borders with Kazakhstan, in the west - with Uzbekistan, in the south-west - with Tajikistan, in the east and southeast - with China. The Kyrgyz Republic is a sovereign, democratic, legal, secular, unitary, social state. Independence Date - August 31, 1991. The state language is Kyrgyz; the official language is Russian. The territory is 199.9 thousand km2 (5.8% - forests, 4.4% - water, 53.3% - agricultural land, 36.5% - other lands). Almost 90% of which is located 1,500 m above sea level. The capital is Bishkek (859.8 thousand people). Big cities include Osh (255.8 thousand), Jalal-Abad (98.4 thousand), Karakol (68.0 thousand). Kyrgyzstan consists of 9 administrative-territorial units - Chui oblast, Talas oblast, Issyk-Kul oblast, Naryn oblast, Jalal-Abad oblast, Osh oblast, Batken oblast, Osh city and Bishkek city. Its key regional centers are Talas, Karakol, Naryn, Jalal-Abad, Osh, Batken. ■Overview of Agriculture Industry in Kyrgyzstan Republic The Kyrgyz Republic began implementing agrarian reforms after the collapse of the This case material, which is a product of the Joint Research Project of Case Writing by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the International University of Japan (IUJ), is subject to copyright protection. Tsutomu Yokose, Professor of Graduate School of International Management, International University of Japan (IUJ) and student Kubanychbek Isabekov had prepared this case document.
    [Show full text]
  • DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 Response
    DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 response Weekly situation update Date: 22 May 2020 Key statistics As of 22 May 2020 Total cases Total number of 1350 1600 confirmed cases of 1400 1350 COVID-19 1200 1111 1000 The number of new 37 906 cases from total 800 756 656 600 554 The number of human 14 400 419 losses 200 147216 0 The number of 949 recovered cases On 18 March 2020 the first three cases were recorded in the Kyrgyz Republic that were detected among those, who returned from Umra pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Kyrgyzstan’s Security Council recommended the state of emergency on 22 March, and the Government subsequently imposed stricter measures, placing checkpoints in every region and city, and shutting down facilities (cafes, cinemas, shopping malls, and other entertainment places), leaving only grocery stores, food markets, pharmacies, and medical Daily trend of COVID-19 new Confirmed cases facilities. as of 22 May 2020 As of 22 May 2020, 1,350 cases of COVID-19 100 have been confirmed in the Kyrgyz Republic 80 and 14 deaths. Please also see in the table age disaggregation among the confirmed 60 cases as of 15 May 2020. Out of total 40 confirmed cases: cases among women- 685 (51%), cases among men – 665 (49%). 20 Number of laboratory test in the last day - 2 . 0 The number of contacts with laboratory- confirmed patients with covid-19 is 6,600 and 2,150 people are on observation. The emergency state was expired on 10 May, but it was decided to leave the emergency regime and quarantine in Bishkek and Osh cities, in At-Bashi district of the Naryn region and in the rural district of Kanysh-Kiya Chatkal district of the Jalal-Abad region.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulzana KURMANALIEVA
    Gulzana KURMANALIEVA E-mail: [email protected] Work experience Part Time Teaching Assistant (2013 – present) Naryn State University named after S.Naamatov (Naryn/Kyrgyzstan) Focus on land management and agriculture economics Manager/Director (2013 – 2015) EDU – Education Centre (Naryn/Kyrgyzstan) Management of academic affairs Marketing of EDU academic programs Assistant to Manager of Academic Affairs (2011 – 2013) University of Central Asia (Naryn/Kyrgyzstan) General management of the educational process Preparation of reports on academic programs Outreach Coordinator (2008 – 2011) University of Central Asia (Naryn/Kyrgyzstan) General management of outreach of academic programs Coordination and monitoring of the Program activities in Naryn region Education Doctoral Studies, Naryn State University, Kyrgyzstan (2013 December – present) Economics and Natural Resource Management Title of the doctoral thesis: ‘Pasture Resource Conflict and Cooperation: Explaining the Coexistence of Conflict and Cooperation in Pastoral Border South Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan’ Diploma, Kyrgyz National University n.a. J.Balasagyn (2007 – 2009) Economics and Management Diploma, Kyrgyz National University n.a. J.Balasagyn (2000 – 2005) Linguistics Language skills Kyrgyz (native) Russian (fluent) English (fluent) German (basic) Fellowships and awards Fellow of the EUCACIS PhD Support Programme since October 2016; Visiting researcher within Designing Social Institutions in Transition: Promotion of Institutional Development for Common Pool Resource
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic
    ADBI Working Paper Series MEASURING THE IMPACT AND FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Kamalbek Karymshakov and Burulcha Sulaimanova No. 988 August 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute Kamalbek Karymshakov is an assistant professor at the Finance and Banking Department, Central Asian Research Center of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University in Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic. Burulcha Sulaimanova is an assistant professor at the Economics Department also of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. The Asian Development Bank refers to “Kyrgyzstan” as the Kyrgyz Republic. Suggested citation: Karymshakov, K. and B. Sulaimanova. 2019. Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic. ADBI Working Paper 988. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/measuring-impact-and-financing- infrastructure-kyrgyz-republic Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editorial Board
    https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2019.76.kazakh FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD KAZAKH DIASPORA IN KYRGYZSTAN: HISTORY OF SETTLEMENT AND ETHNOGRAPHIC PECULIARITIES Bibiziya Kalshabayeva Professor, Department of History, Archeology and Ethnology Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Gulnara Dadabayeva Associate Professor, KIMEP University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Dauren Eskekbaev Associate Professor, Almaty University of Management Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Abstract: The article focuses on the most significant stages of the formation of the Kazakh diaspora in the Kyrgyz Republic, to point out what reasons contributed to the rugged Kazakh migration process in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and how it affected the forms and types of their settlements (compact or disperse). The researched issues also include the identification of factors provoked by humans and the state to launch these migrations. Surprisingly enough, opposite to the claims made by independent Kazakhstan leadership in the early 2000s, the number of Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan wishing to become repatriates to their native country is still far from the desired. Thus the article is an attempt to find out what reasons and factors influence the Kazakh residents’ desire to stay in the neighboring country as a minority. To provide the answer, the authors analyzed the dynamics of statistical variations in the number of migrants and the reasons of these changes. The other key point in tracing what characteristic features separate Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan and their kinsmen in Kazakhstan is the archival data, statistical, historical, and field sources, which provide a systematic overview of the largely unstudied pages of the history of the Kazakh diaspora.
    [Show full text]
  • Jehovah's Witnesses Respectfully Request the Government of Kyrgyzstan To
    Enclosed information material is submitted by the European Association of Jehovah's Witnesses European Association of Jehovah's Witnesses KYRGYZSTAN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ISSUES STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES O S C E H u m a n Dimension Implementation M e e t i n g , W a r s a w 16–27 SEPTEMBER 2019 K y r g y z s t a n There are some 5,300 of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Kyrgyzstan, and they are generally free to meet for worship and to share their faith with others. They obtained national registration in August 1998. However, Jehovah’s Witnesses have two prinCipal ongoing ConCerns: Problems with registering loCal religious organisations (LROs) in the southern regions of the country. Without registration of LROs, local authorities view the Witnesses’ religious activity as illegal, thus leaving them vulnerable to police harassment. Draft amendments to the 2008 Law on Freedom of Religion and Religious Organizations (Religion Law) that if enacted would severely restrict religious freedom. Jehovah’s Witnesses have met with government ofcials in Kyrgyzstan 3 to address these concerns and to express appreciation to the govern- ment for being open to dialogue. Abuses and Restrictions of Religious Freedom RESTRICTIVE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE RELIGION LAW On 27 June 2018, the State Commission on Religious Afairs (SCRA) pre­ sented draft amendments to the current law “On Freedom of Worship and Religious Associations.” While some provisions were less restrictive than in earlier drafts, two proposed amendments are of serious concern to Jeho- vah’s Witnesses: A ban on “house to house dissemination of religious conviCtions.” —Proposed amendment to Article 5 (4).
    [Show full text]
  • 42399-023: CAREC Transport Corridor I (Bishkek-Torugart Road
    Completion Report Project Number: 42399-023 Loan Number: 2755 Loan Number: 3204 Grant Number: 0418 March 2019 Kyrgyz Republic: CAREC Corridor 1 (Bishkek– Torugart Road) Project 3 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB's Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – som (Som) At Appraisal Additional Financing At Project Completion (25 April 2011) (30 October 2014) (31 December 2017) Som1.00 = $0.0213 $0.0177 $0.0145 $1.00 = Som46.916 Som56.508 Som69.140 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CAREC – Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CPS – country partnership strategy EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return EMP – environment management plan ICB – international competitive bidding ICS – individual consultant selection IPIG – Investment Projects Implementation Group IRI – international roughness index KJSNR – Karatal-Japaryk State Nature Reserve LARP – land acquisition and resettlement plan MOTR – Ministry of Transport and Roads NLA – normative legal act PBM – performance-based maintenance PCR – project completion review PRC – People’s Republic of China SDR – special drawing right TOR – terms of reference VOC – vehicle operating cost NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2017 ends on 31 December 2017. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. Vice-President S. Chen, Operations 1 Director General W. E. Liepach, Central and West Asia Regional Department (CWRD) Director C. McDeigan, Kyrgyz Resident Mission, CWRD Sector Director D. S. Pyo, Transport and Communications Division, CWRD Team leader M.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz-Tajik Border Conflict: Mutual Concessions Needed
    Kyrgyz-Tajik Border Conflict: Mutual Concessions Needed Residents of border areas of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are doomed to live in an atmosphere of onerous conflicts unless the leaders of the two countries have political will to finally settle this issue, according to experts. Follow us on Facebook The conflict in the village of Maksat in Leilek district of Batken region, Kyrgyzstan, occurred yesterday, September 16. According to official reports, border services of both countries agree only in that the incident was triggered by construction works at the undocumented location. As for the rest, the versions of the agencies vary. The conflict occurred in the border village of Maksat that belongs to the aiyl district of Kulundu, Leilek district Kyrgyz-Tajik Border Conflict: Mutual Concessions Needed of Batken region. According to the Kyrgyz party, the citizens of Tajikistan launched construction works, and “in response, a citizen of Kyrgyzstan also started construction of the fence around his house that is located in that area.” The border service of Tajikistan claims the conflict was caused “by construction of an unknown structure by citizens of the Kyrgyz Republic.” Village of Maksat. Photo: ru.sputnik.kg / Emil Sadyrov The demands to suspend construction turned into cross talks and then exchange of gunfire. The versions of official agencies about who opened the fire also vary. “The Kyrgyz party was acting against bilateral treaties that delimit the frontiers of disputed territories and mobilised additional military forces of 250-300 officers. Then they committed acts of provocation and at 19:00 they opened fire on the unarmed citizens of mahalla Bahor,” according to the statement of the Border Troops of the State Committee for National Security of Tajikistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan Climate Risk Profile
    PROJECT: Enabling Integrated Climate Risk Assessment for CCD planning in Central Asia Kyrgyzstan Climate Risk Profile August 2013 CAMP Alatoo 26 Oshkaya St., Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic http://camp/kg In collaboration with UNDP Central Asia Climate Risk Management Program 67 Tole bi St., Almaty, Kazakhstan http://www.ca-crm.info This publication was funded by The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (www.cdkn.org) Prepared by C. Kelly, Disaster Management Specialist, CAMP Alatoo, Chinara Biyalieva, “EcoPartner” Company, Kyrgyzstan, Svetlana Dolgikh, KazHydromet, Kazakhstan, Sergey Erokhin, Geology Expert, State Agency of Geology and Mineral Resources, Kyrgyzstan, Alexander Fedorenko, Disaster Risk Reduction Expert, Kazakhstan, Aida Gareeva, Project Coordinator, CAMP Alatoo, Kyrgyzstan, YannGarcin, MA Candidate, Disaster Risk Management (GIS specialization), Aliya Ibraimova, Assistant to the Project Coordinator, CAMP Alatoo, Kyrgyzstan, Shamil Iliasov, Ph.D, Associate Professor, KirghizRussianSlavic University, Kyrgyzstan, Iren Mastre, PhD, CAMP Alatoo, Kyrgyzstan, Andrey Podrezov, Chair, Climatology, Hydrology, Meteorology Department, Kygyz- Russian University, Yegor Volovik, Regional Programme Coordinator, UNDP Central Asia Climate Risk Management Project, Kazakhstan, Jyldyz Uzakbaeva, Project Coordinator, UNDP Central Asia Climate Risk Management Project, Kyrgyzstan, and Andrey Sidorin, Communications Specialist, UNDP Central Asia Climate Risk Management Project, Kazakhstan. Contents 1. Summary .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (DREF) Kyrgyzstan: Floods and Mudflows
    Disaster relief emergency fund (DREF) Kyrgyzstan: Floods and mudflows DREF operation n° MDRKG008 GLIDE n° FL-2012-000043-KGZ 4th May 2012 The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent emergency response. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. CHF 110,430 has been allocated from the IFRC’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the National Society in delivering immediate assistance to some 1,001 families (approximately 5,005 beneficiaries). Unearmarked funds to repay DREF are encouraged. Summary: Kyrgyzstan experienced the harshest winter with unusually low temperatures, heavy snowfalls throughout 2011 and 2012 and high precipitation, which exceeded the annual average by 2 – 2,5 times according to the Hydro Meteo Service of Kyrgyzstan. Snow melting and heavy rains caused mudflows and flash floods across Kyrgyzstan. Food stocks, home properties, livelihoods and Kulundu village of Leilek district, Batken oblast. Photo made by RCSK infrastructure have been heavily damaged. Series of mudflows occurred on the territory of Naryn, Osh, Jalalabad and Batken regions including remote districts throughout April. The most destructive flash floods were in Osh, Batken and Jalalbad during the period of April 23 to April 29, 2012. According to the Ministry of Emergency Situations a total of more than 2,300 households were affected in Osh, Batken, Jalalabad and Naryn1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Situation of Children's Residential Institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic
    ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION OF CHILDREN'S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION OF CHILDREN’S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Analysis of the situation of children’s residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic – B.: 2012. – p.115 This publication is a product of a national study on children in child care residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic, which was carried out by Public Fund “My Family” upon the initiative and support of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Science of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Ministry of Social Development of the Kyrgyz Republic during the period from September 2010 to January 2012. This research report fills current gaps in national data on children in child care residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic and provides an analysis of the situation in the institutions. It sheds light on the perspectives of children and caregivers and provides recommendations for improving the situation of these children. The findings of the report provide a foundation for the elaboration of further strategic programmes and action plans on child care system reform in the Kyrgyz Republic. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the United Nations Children’s Fund and the organization does not bear any responsibility. ©UNICEF, 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGMENTS…………………………………………………………………………. 4 ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………..………………… 4 GLOSSARY…………………………………………………………………………….……… 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………… 7 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………..……… 10 2. AIMS AND TASKS OF THE RESEARCH……………………………………………….. 14 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………….. 15 4. CLARIFYING THE DATA ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN’S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN OPERATION IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC…………….…………….
    [Show full text]