DOCSLIB.ORG

UGANDA About CAO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UGANDA About CAO A Journey Toward Solutions A STORY OF COMMUNITY-COMPANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UGANDA About CAO The Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) is the independent accountability and recourse mechanism for the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), the private sector lending and insurance arms of the World Bank Group. CAO addresses complaints from people affected by IFC and MIGA projects with the goal of improving social and environmental outcomes on the ground and fostering greater public accountability of IFC and MIGA. CAO reports directly to the President of the World Bank Group. For more information about CAO, please visit www.cao-ombudsman.org Cover photo: Rural landscape in the Mubende district, Uganda (Felix Davey/CAO). A Journey Toward Solutions A STORY OF COMMUNITY-COMPANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UGANDA © 2015 Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) All rights reserved. Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) World Bank Group Rights and Permissions 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20433 USA The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or Telephone: + 1 (202) 458-1973 transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be Web site: www.cao-ombudsman.org a violation of applicable law. CAO encourages dissemination of its e-mail: [email protected] work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments send a request with complete information to the Office of the they represent. Compliance Advisor Ombudsman, 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA; fax: +1 (202) 522-7400; e-mail: cao@ CAO does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this worldbankgroup.org. work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, the part of CAO concerning the legal status of any territory or the should also be addressed to the Office of the CAO at the above endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. address. CONTENTS Case Timeline .................................................................................................... iv FIGURES Overview ..............................................................................................................1 Figure 1. The Stakeholders ............ 5 The Complaints ...............................................................................................2 Figure 2. The Dispute Assessment .........................................................................................................6 Resolution Process ................... 12 Listening to Local Voices .................................................................................6 Supporting Informed Decision Making for Dispute Resolution..........................7 BOXES Determining Community Representation .........................................................8 Box 1. Ensuring Broad Dispute Resolution ..............................................................................................9 Community Representation ........ 7 Establishing Ground Rules ..............................................................................9 Box 2. Respecting Confidentiality .. 9 Defining the Issues ........................................................................................10 Box 3. Establishing Legitimacy Building Community Capacity .......................................................................11 and Sharing Information with Role of Observers and Advisors ....................................................................13 the Broader Constituency ......... 13 Building the Mediation Team .........................................................................14 Box 4. Measuring Success .......... 23 Forming Community Cooperatives ................................................................15 Settlement and Outcomes ................................................................................16 MAP Reaching Agreement ....................................................................................16 The Kiboga and Mubende Implementation .............................................................................................18 Districts in Uganda ..................... 3 Outcomes: Resettlement ..............................................................................19 Outcomes: Agriculture ..................................................................................20 Outcomes: Local Development Initiatives ......................................................21 Outcomes: Sustainability ...............................................................................22 Conclusion .........................................................................................................25 Reflections on the Process ............................................................................25 In Memorium ......................................................................................................27 CASE TIMELINE APRIL 2012 MAY 2014 CAO assessment report JULY 2013 Kiboga community and released, outlining the Mubende the New Forests Company parties’ decision to community and sign final agreement. Full address issues through the New Forests and final settlement of dispute resolution. Company sign final MARCH 2013 agreement. Full the complaint to CAO. Mubende APRIL 2013 and final settlement CAO starts monitoring community and Kiboga of the complaint implementation of the the New Forests Twegatte to CAO. CAO agreed actions. Community JANUARY 2012 Company sign Cooperative starts monitoring Development Coordinator CAO finds the framework Society implementation of starts working with both complaints eligible. agreement. registered. the agreed actions. communities. 2011 2012 2013 2014 DECEMBER 2011 FEBRUARY–MARCH 2012 APRIL 2012–MARCH 2013 MAY 2014–PRESENT CAO receives two CAO team travels to Uganda CAO facilitates extensive bilateral and plenary CAO continues complaints from to meet with community sessions between the New Forests Company monitoring the Mubende members, the New Forests and the Kiboga and Mubende communities, implementation of and Kiboga Company, Oxfam, the as well as their advisors (Oxfam) and legal agreements. Mubende communities in Uganda Land Alliance, representatives. Representation of parties community resettle Uganda supported government representatives, established. Two separate mediation processes onto land, harvest by Oxfam and the National Forestry are initiated between the New Forests Company first crops, and build the Uganda Land Authority, and Uganda and the Mubende and Kiboga communities, homes. Community Alliance. Investment Authority as part respectively. Informational meetings held with development projects of the CAO assessment. government representatives, where relevant. underway. Kiboga community acquires JUNE 2013 land for resettlement. Mubende Bukakikama Cooperative Society registered. iv “Life is changing and I am humbled by the tireless efforts of CAO, Oxfam, and NFC.” Mrs. Tumuhirwe Khedris, Member of the Mubende Bukakikama Co-operative Society Local children run past the New Forests Company plantations in Uganda (Felix Davey/CAO). OVERVIEW As Uganda has sought growth in investment in the forestry sector This case study tells the story of what happened next. CAO through public-private partnerships, changes in land use in some provided a neutral, impartial process for the company and affected instances have caused frictions to flare between stakeholders. communities to jointly explore resolution of the issues—a process In 2011, the government of Uganda claimed responsibility for the that moved beyond judgment and finding fault to focus on practical, eviction of community members from Central Forest Reserves in effective, and sustainable solutions for all involved. As part of the Uganda, stating that the land had been demarcated for commercial process, the focus shifted from rights violations and reparations forestry plantations and had been illegally occupied. The company to a forward-looking focus on sustainable financial benefits and operating the plantations, the New Forests Company, is an investee collective development for the community. Today, the agreements of the Agri-Vie Agribusiness Fund, a private equity fund supported by reached between the parties have started a process through which the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector arm of community livelihoods are being enhanced and restored, and the World Bank Group. In December 2011, two affected communities more broadly, have helped build community capacity, foster social lodged complaints to IFC’s independent recourse mechanism, the cohesion, and promote economic independence. Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO). 1 THE COMPLAINTS In December 2011, CAO received two complaints from communities is the Agri-Vie Agribusiness Fund, a private equity fund supported by in the Kiboga and Mubende districts of central Uganda. The IFC. The company claimed that it had identified two communities living community members filed their complaints with assistance from in the Namwasa and Luwunga Central Forest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kyankwanzi Survey Report 2017
    GROUND SURVEY FOR MEDIUM - LARGE MAMMALS IN KYANKWANZI CONCESSION AREA Report by F. E. Kisame, F. Wanyama, G. Basuta, I. Bwire and A. Rwetsiba, ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH UNIT UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY 2018 1 | P a g e Contents Summary.........................................................................................................................4 1.0. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................5 1.1. Survey Objectives.....................................................................................................6 2.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE SURVEY AREA ..........................................................6 2.2. Location and Size .....................................................................................................7 2.2. Climate.....................................................................................................................7 2.3 Relief and Vegetation ................................................................................................8 3.0. METHOD AND MATERIALS..............................................................................9 Plate 1. Team leader and GPS person recording observations in the field.........................9 3.1. Survey design .........................................................................................................10 4.0. RESULTS .............................................................................................................10 4.1. Fauna......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • PROMISING APPROACHES for WORK Final
    I C e Promising Approaches of work AMONG VOICE GRANTEES IN UGANDA September, 2019 CONTENTS Pg. 4 Introduction Community Participatory Pg. 5 Theatre Pg. 13 Using Social Media for Advocacy Triangulation Advocacy Pg. 15 Model Research Pg. 17 Validation workshops Village Savings Pg. 21 and Loan Associations 3 INTRODUCTION Voice is an innovative grant facility that supports the most marginalized and discriminated people in ten countries in Africa and Asia. It aims to amplify and connect the unheard voices with a principle of leaving no one behind. In Uganda, Voice is currently supporting various rights holders’ groups facing extreme marginalization through 32 grantees under the different categories; 01 Empowerment grant Influencing grant 02 03 Innovate and Learn Sudden opportunity grants 04 Why the promising approaches to work? During the last one year, Voice has through the various grantees supported implementation of a variety of interventions to empower vulnerable rightsholders (individuals and communities) facing extreme marginalization in different parts of Uganda. The Linking and Learning Facilitators have worked with and supported Voice grantees to document the most promising approaches and methodologies that the grantees are using to implement their project activities in order to disseminate them and scale them up within their organizations, the Voice family and beyond. 4 Featured Promising Approaches of work for Voice Grantees Community Using Social Media to Using the Participatory Theatre; engage Youth and “Triangulation a platform
    [Show full text]
  • (4) of the Constitution Providing for Creation of New Counties
    AMMENDED MOTTON FOR RESOLUTTON OF PARLTAMENT UNDER ARTTCLE 179 (4) OF THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW COUNTIES WHEREAS, Ariicle 179 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Ugondo (os omended) provides for the criterio for olterotion of boundories oflor creotion of Administrotive Units including new Counties; AND WHEREAS Section 7 (7) of the Locql Governments Act Cop. 243, (os omended) empowers Porlioment to opprove olternotion of Boundories of/or creotion of o new County; Honoroble Colleogues willTHUS, recoll thot on Tuesdoy 30rn June, 2020,1 moved o motion on the floor of Porlioment for creotion of I5 (Fitteen) Counties thot were opproved by Cobinet hoving received requests from the District Councils of; Kiboole, Kotokwi, Agogo, lsingiro, Kisoro, Nokoseke, Kibogo, Buhweju, Lomwo, Kokumiro, Nokopiripirit, Mubende, Kwonio, Tororo ond Jinjo to creote the following Counties: - l) Buyanja Eost County out of Buyanjo County in Kibaale Distric[ 2) Ngoriom Covnty out of Usuk County in Kotakwi; 3) Agago Wesf County out of Agogo County in Agogo District; 4) Bukonga Norfh County out of Bukongo County in lsingiro District; 5) Bukimbiri County out of Bufumbira County in Kisoro District; 6) Nokoseke Centrol County out of Nokoseke Norfh County in Nokoseke Disfricf 7) Kibogo Wesf County out of Kibogo Eost County in Kbogo District; B) Buhweju West County aut of Buhweju County in Buhweju District; 9) Palobek County out of Lamwo County in Lamwo District; lA)BugongoiziSouth County out of BugongoiziWest County in Kokumiro Districf; I l)Chekwi Eosf County out of Chekwi County in Nokopiripirit District; l2)Buweku/o Soufh County out of Buweku/o County in Mubende Disfricf, l3)Kwanio Norfh County out of Kwonio Counfy in Kwonio Dislricf l )West Budomo Central County out of Wesf Budomo County inTororo Districf; l5)Kogomo Norfh County out of Kogomo County in Jinjo Districf.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    FINAL Republic of Uganda MINISTRY OF HEALTH Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED RENOVATION AND EQUIPPING OF HEALTH FACILITIES IN UGANDA (Proj Ref: MoH/SEVCS/HI/08-09/00732) Volume 1 of 4: Central Region facilities Mityana Hospital Mityana Public Disclosure Authorized Kyantungo HC IV District Mwera HC IV Mubende Hospital Mubende Kasanda HC IV District Kiganda HC IV Nakaseke Hospital Nakaseke Ngoma HC IV District Kikamulo HC IV Bulisa Bulisa Health Center IV Masindi General Hospital Masindi Bwijanga Health Center IV District Kiryandongo Hospital Wakiso Entebbe General Hospital District Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared for MINISTRY OF HEALTH Ministry of Health Headquarters Room C107, Plot 6/7 Lourdel Road, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda Tel: +256-414-340872, Fax: 256-41-4231584 By AWE Environmental Engineers EIA partnership of: AIR WATER EARTH (AWE) Environmental, Civil Engineers & Project Management Consultants M1, Plot 27 Binayomba Road, Bugolobi P. O. Box 22428, Kampala, UGANDA. Tel: 041 - 4268466, Mob: 078-2580480/ 077-2496451 E: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized W: www.awe-engineers.com th Updated: 15 November 2013 Consultants: In conformity to NEMA (Uganda) requirements, this ESIA was prepared under Air Water Earth’s EIA partnership “AWE Environmental Engineers” by consultants below: Name and Qualifications Role Signature Lead Consultants: Eng. Lammeck KAJUBI; PE., CEnvP Team Leader BScEng(1.1 Hons) MAK, MEngSc(Env) (UQ-Queensland). Environmental NEMA Certified/Registered Environmental Practitioner Engineer Registered Professional Environmental Engineer Herbert Mpagi KALIBBALA, CEnvP Civil Engineer/ BSc (MAK), MSc (Env Eng), PhD (Cand) (Sweden). Infrastructure NEMA Certified/Registered Environmental Practitioner specialist Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda, Mubende District, Kiganda Sub-County, Kinoni Parish, Lwenyange Village
    Emerging practices from Agricultural Water Management in Africa and the Near East Thematic Workshop Theme 3 Water Harvesting Laura Guarnieri CBL 29 August 2017 Theme 3: Water Harvesting PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. PILOT AREA LOCATION 2. PILOT AREA OVERVIEW 3. OBJECTIVES – PILOT RELATED 4. PROJECT COMPONENTS – PILOT RELATED 5. MAIN FINDINGS IN FIGURES/FACTS 6. PILOT LAYOUT 7. EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS LEARNT 8. CHALLENGES AND THE WAY TO IMPROVE Theme 3: Water Harvesting PILOT AREA LOCATION The site is located in the Central Region of Uganda, Mubende District, Kiganda sub-county, Kinoni Parish, Lwenyange village. The site is 6 km off Kampala-Fort portal Road and 100 km off Kampala Kinoni site location relative to Mubende and Kampala cities and main roads (on the left); Valley tank and surrounding area (on the right) (Google Earth, 2017) Theme 3: Water Harvesting PILOT AREA OVERVIEW Kinoni basin elevation Statistics [m]: Great variability in land morphology • STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=1283 Undulating hills [5-15%] • STATISTICS_MEAN= 1214 Soil fertility good to moderate • STATISTICS_MINIMUM=1192 • STATISTICS_STDDEV=17.7 Annual (bimodal) rainfall [1100-1300] mm/y Big potential for Rainfall uncertainty is critical increasing agricultural Smallholder farmers dependSeasons on rainD1-fed R1 D2 productionR2 through Months D J F M A M J J A S O N agricultural production for their livelihoods IRWM Water Soil Soil Crop yields below the achievablesupply potentialIrrigation Rainfall Irrigation Rainfall (ASDSIP) mode moisture moisture Kinoni basin Slope Statistics [%]: • STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=17 • STATISTICS_MEAN=5.07 • STATISTICS_MINIMUM=0 • STATISTICS_STDDEV=3.12 Theme 3: Water Harvesting OBJECTIVES – PILOT RELATED Main objectives of the pilot 1. Providing different uses of water from the macro- catchment system 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Strengthen the Quality of Public Service Delivery in Uganda Barazas As Community-Based Monitoring and Accountability Forums
    BARAZA PROJECT POLICY NOTE 01 OCTOBER 2019 Pathways to strengthen the quality of public service delivery in Uganda Barazas as community-based monitoring and accountability forums Bjorn van Campenhout, Leocardia Nabwire, Wilberforce Walukano, Nassul Kabunga, Emmanuel Bizimungu, and Jennifer Smart Key policy messages: • Despite reforms such as decentralization, local-level public empowerment and involvement in project monitoring remains a key hindrance to quality public service delivery in Uganda. • A qualitative impact assessment of barazas, which are local-level community-based monitoring and accountability forums for information sharing and deliberation, show that such initiatives increase public involvement in monitoring of public service delivery. • Barazas were found to directly contribute to the finishing or resumption of local projects that previously were dragging; redoing sub-standard work; recovering stolen goods; reducing absenteeism by staff at public agencies; and realigning priorities to better align with the needs of local citizens and communities. • The benefits of a baraza can be enhanced by organizing follow-up barazas in a relatively short period, as failure to do so may demoralize local stakeholders. • Increased citizen education and a good working relationship between the political and technical leadership in government are also important to barazas’ success. Studies on governance show that the provision of information and the involvement of beneficiaries in project monitoring can significantly improve both the quantity and the quality of local public service delivery.1 Drawing on findings from a qualitative impact assessment of barazas,2 this policy note provides evidence on the impact pathways through which beneficiary involvement in project monitoring improves public service delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Toward Solutions a STORY of COMMUNITY-COMPANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION in UGANDA About CAO
    A Journey Toward Solutions A STORY OF COMMUNITY-COMPANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UGANDA About CAO The Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) is the independent accountability and recourse mechanism for the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), the private sector lending and insurance arms of the World Bank Group. CAO addresses complaints from people affected by IFC and MIGA projects with the goal of improving social and environmental outcomes on the ground and fostering greater public accountability of IFC and MIGA. CAO reports directly to the President of the World Bank Group. For more information about CAO, please visit www.cao-ombudsman.org Cover photo: Rural landscape in the Mubende district, Uganda (Felix Davy/CAO). A Journey Toward Solutions A STORY OF COMMUNITY-COMPANY DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UGANDA © 2015 Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) All rights reserved. Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) World Bank Group 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20433 USA Telephone: + 1 (202) 458-1973 Web site: www.cao-ombudsman.org e-mail: [email protected] The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. CAO does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of CAO concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Free Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets in Nine UPHOLD-Supported Districts in Uganda
    Distribution of Free Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets in Nine UPHOLD-Supported Districts in Uganda March 2007 Recommended Citation: B. Mpeka, E. Quinto, J. Tumwesigye, J. Senfuka, K. Mulondo, M. Kyenkya (2007): Distribution of free long-lasting insecticidal nets in nine UPHOLD-supported districts in Uganda Edited by: S. Kironde, E. Ekochu, X. Nsabagasani This report was made possible by the UPHOLD is implemented by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., under Cooperative generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for Agreement number 617-A-00-02-00012-00 in International Development (USAID). The collaboration with Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC). The Futures Group contents are the responsibility of UPHOLD International, The Malaria Consortium, The and do not necessarily reflect the views of Manoff Group, Inc., and World Education, Inc. USAID or the United States Government i Acknowledgement First and foremost we thank Dr. Nosa Orobaton, former Chief of Party UPHOLD, who inspired us to make a difference in the lives of Ugandans and was at the forefront of this innovative approach of mass distribution of nets for rapid scale up. We thank all those, who in one way or another contributed to this exercise. They include the District Directors of Health Services (DDHS’) of the districts that received the nets; Bushenyi, Bugiri, Gulu, Katakwi, Kitgum, Mayuge, Lira, Mubende and Rukungiri. The in-put of the malaria focal point persons and the sub-county supervisors for Home-Based Management of Fever is highly appreciated. These district health teams did a great job of mobilizing district, sub-county and community leaders to enable them understand the exercise and accord it maximum support.
    [Show full text]
  • Nception Report
    STUDY REPORT Enhancing indigenous practices in climate change adaptation among small scale farmers Soroti and Mubende district ESAFF Uganda 2015 Report Enhancing indigenous practices in climate change adaptation among small scale farmers Soroti and Mubende district UGANDA Published by: Supported by: CONTENTS List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgement .............................................................................................................v Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1. Brief on the Study .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Background of the Study ...................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Objective of the study ............................................................................................ 1 1.1.3 Scope of work ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2. Context Analysis ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MUBENDE DLG BFP.Pdf
    Local Government Budget Framework Paper Vote: 541 Mubende District Structure of Budget Framework Paper Foreword Executive Summary A: Revenue Performance and Plans B: Summary of Department Performance and Plans by Workplan C: Draft Annual Workplan Outputs for 2013/14 Page 1 Local Government Budget Framework Paper Vote: 541 Mubende District Foreword The Local Governments Act, CAP 243 (as amended) devolves planning powers to Local Councils in their areas of jurisdiction. The Local Government Planning cycle also requires every Higher Local Governments to prepare a Budget Framework Paper on an annual basis and submit it to the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development with a copy to the Local Governments Finance Commission and the Ministry of Local Government by 30th January of every year. It is in accordance with these requirements that this Budget Framework Paper has been prepared. Mubende District Local Government Budget Framework Paper for FY 2013/2014 has been compiled to comply with Output Oriented Budgeting Principles. Mubende district is located in the South West of Uganda bordering Kyegegwa, Ggomba, Mityana, Kiboga and Kibaale Districts. It is comprised of three counties namely; Buwekula, Kassanda and Kasambya all together constituting 19 LLGs with a population of over 640,000 people. Some of the areas in the district are hard to reach and hard to stay. Ministry of public service needs to consider staffs serving in these areas for hardship allowance. The general social –economic situation for the District is characterized by high infant mortality rate, low safe water coverage, high drop rate at primary school level, and predominant peasant /subsistence mode of agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018/19 Vote:541 Mubende District
    LG WorkPlan Vote:541 Mubende District FY 2018/19 Foreword Mubende District Local Government Budget 2018/2019 provides detailed information on the financial situation of the District performance of various sectors in delivering mandated services. The Budget has been prepared through wide consultations with the stakeholders including CSO's, private sector and FBOs members in local government structures(Women, Youth, PWDs and the Elderly) were represented. A Budget Conference was held on 15/11/2017 and views of various stakeholders have been incorperated in this budget. Mubende District is Located in the Central Region of Uganda bordering Kyegegwa, Sembabule, Gomba, Kassanda, Kiboga, Kakumiro, and Kibale Districts. It is comprised of Two Councils and 1 Municipality namely; Kasambya and Buwekula County plus Mubende Municipal Council. Mubende District had a population of 688,819 persons (Male=346,525 and Female= 342,294) according to National Population Housing Census 2014. Some of the areas in the district are hard to reach and others hard to stay. They include areas in Butoloogo,Madudu, Nabingoola (lubimbiri and Kafundeezi), Kasambya (Kashenyi), Kiyuni (Katente), Kitenga (butayunja). Ministry of Public Services need to consider staff serving in these areas for hard to reach allowance. The General Social Economic situation for the District is characterized by high infant mortality rate, Low safe water coverage, high dropout rate at both and also lack the necessary facilities like Transport to be able to fully implement council programs. Many areas do not have access to hydroelectricity (Main Grid) and the road networks are poor. There is therefore need for the central Government to highly consider Mubende District under various Government Programs like Rural Electrification and road unit equipment.
    [Show full text]