A Case-Based Comprehensive Guide Abha Agrawal Editor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Case-Based Comprehensive Guide Abha Agrawal Editor Abha Agrawal Editor Patient Safety A Case-Based Comprehensive Guide 123 Patient Safety Abha Agrawal Editor Patient Safety A Case-Based Comprehensive Guide Editor Abha Agrawal, M.D., F.A.C.P. Norwegian American Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago , IL , USA ISBN 978-1-4614-7418-0 ISBN 978-1-4614-7419-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7419-7 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013941354 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) To patients: they teach us everything. To Mummy and Papa: who made it possible to learn. Pref ace The fundamental premise of this book is the following: patient safety has always been at the core of medical professionals’ ethic and value since Hippocrates and Florence Nightingale implored us to “do no harm.” The newness in the patient safety movement of the last decade lies in a better understanding of the prevalence, causes, and potential solutions for medical errors. Why is learning about patient safety critical to all healthcare professionals? We don’t go to work to perform an operation or to administer medications; we go to work to treat, cure, and heal sick people. So of what value is the superb technical skill of a surgeon to a patient whose healthy leg gets amputated due to a trivial mistake in patient identifi cation by a team of surgeons and nurses in a hurry? What good is the advanced skill and training of a specialized physician if a patient dies after receiving 100 times the dose of an anticoagulant caused by a trivial error in labeling the bag of intravenous medication? How do you console the mother of a newborn baby who dies due to an unwarranted and inexplicable delay in performing a Cesarean section caused by a breakdown in teamwork and communication between the obstetrician and the nurse? Death is binary; your patient is either alive or dead. And once some- one is dead there is no coming back. Therefore, if delivering good outcomes for patients is at the heart of our profession, we have as much professional obligation to learn about the adverse events—the diseases of healthcare delivery system, as we have to learn about biological diseases—diseases of human body system. The purpose of this book is to engage front-line clinicians and move patient safety from the boardroom to the bedside because only by practicing patient safety, will we be able to make a difference in the lives of our patients and their families. Error in Medicine The evidence is now incontrovertible that many patients suffer serious harm due to avoidable adverse events in health care such as medication errors, hospital- acquired infections, surgical complications, and delays in necessary treatments. vii viii Preface These adverse events happen in every setting—clinic, hospital, emergency room, rural, urban, community center, academic hospital—across the globe to patients of all age groups, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. They could happen to your patients and mine. And this is not new. In 1964, Schimmel reported that 20 % of patients admitted to a university hospital suffered iatrogenic injury and that 20 % of those injuries were serious or fatal [1]. A 1981 report found that 36 % of patients admitted to the medical service in a teaching hospital suffered an iatrogenic event, of which 25 % were serious or life threatening [2]. In 1991, Leape et al. reported the results of a population-based study conducted in New York and found that 3.7 % of patients had “disabling” injuries as a result of medical treatment and that “negligent care” was responsible for 28 % of them [3]. Another 1991 study found that 64 % of cardiac arrests at a teaching hospital were preventable [4]. In spite of a multitude of reports, much of the discussion of error in medicine remained confi ned to the academic journals until the landmark 1999 report, “To Err is Human” catapulted the issue of preventable patient harm from academia into public discourse. The report estimated 48,000–98,000 deaths per year in US hospi- tals from medical errors and shocked the world by equating these deaths with the graphic analogy of one jumbo jet crashing per day [5]. More recently, a 2010 analysis of Medicare benefi ciaries found that at least 13.5 % of hospitalized patients suffer an adverse event and almost half of these are preventable. The report concluded that about 15,000 patients (from the Medicare population alone) die in US hospitals every month as a result of potentially prevent- able adverse events [6]. These fi ndings led healthcare experts to conclude that health care in the USA has an appalling problem of “waste, danger, and death”—words used to describe the grave condition of America’s highway systems by President Eisenhower in a 1954 speech.1 Although the aforementioned reports are from the USA, a similar concern about adverse events has been found in hospitals around the world. Two widely quoted studies based on retrospective review from British hospitals found that approxi- mately 10 % of patients experience adverse events; a third to half of these are pre- ventable and often lead to disability and death [7, 8]. Similar fi ndings have been reported from hospitals in Canada [9], Sweden [10], Brazil [11], Australia [12], and the Netherlands [13]. In a report from Israel, clinicians in a medical–surgical inten- sive care unit of a university hospital made 554 errors over 4 months or 1.7 errors per patient per day [14]. A recent 2012 report evaluating the extent of adverse events in developing countries (Egypt, Jordan, Kenya, Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, South Africa, and Yemen) found that 8.2 % of the medical records showed at least one adverse event. Of these events, 83 % were judged to be preventable, and about 30 % were associated with death of the patient [15]. The report concluded that “unsafe 1 President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1954 speech available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/interstate/ audiogallery.htm . Last accessed Dec 30 2012. Preface ix patient care represents a serious and considerable danger to patients in the hospitals that were studied, and hence should be a high priority public health problem.” This irrefutable evidence of error and harm has spurred the healthcare commu- nity to action and there is now a global conversation about patient safety. Over the last decade, patient safety has become a focus of attention of healthcare leaders, quality experts, journalists, and concerned citizens. The Federal Government of the USA passed the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 to create a network of patient safety organizations and to promote a culture of safety in health care. The World Health Organization created the World Alliance for Patient Safety to foster global awareness. The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill (ARRA) provides for approximately $36 billion in incentive payments to hospitals and offi ce practices who demonstrate “meaningful use” of electronic health records; improvement of quality and safety is a core component of the “meaningful use” criteria defi ned by the federal law. Patient safety is moving to the forefront of the strategic priorities agenda of most hospitals, regulatory agencies, improvement organizations, as well as legislative bodies. The Institute of Medicine defi nes patient safety simply as “freedom from acciden- tal injury [5].” Moreover, patient safety is also now an emerging scientifi c discipline— a fi eld of both inquiry and action. Experts have defi ned it as “ a discipline in the health care sector that applies safety science methods toward the goal of achieving a trust- worthy system of health care delivery. Patient safety is also an attribute of health care systems that minimizes the incidence and impact of, and maximizes recovery from, adverse events [16] . ” Implicit in this defi nition is the understanding that with con- certed systematic efforts, much of the harm from medical errors can be prevented. Why This Book? Despite a fl urry of activities in patient safety, many of my fellow practicing clini- cians on the front line—physicians, nurses, ancillary professionals—remain disen- gaged if not disenfranchised from this important conversation.
Recommended publications
  • Computed Tomography Findings of Gossypiboma
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector CASE REPORT Computed Tomography Findings of Gossypiboma Tzu-Chieh Cheng1, Andy Shau-Bin Chou2, Chin-Ming Jeng1, Pau-Yuan Chang2*, Chau-Chin Lee2 1Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, and 2Department of Radiology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Gossypiboma is composed of non-absorbable surgical material with a cotton matrix. Gossypiboma is usually under-reported and is a severe medicolegal issue. Thus, we describe the computed tomography (CT) findings of gossypiboma in our institution. From January 2003 to June 2006, gossypibomas diagnosed in our institution and their data regarding sex, age, previous operation, location, the interval between the operation and the diagnosis of gossypiboma, clinical presen- tation, indication of CT, CT findings and further management were collected. There were 6 cases of gossypiboma, 4 men and 2 women. Three of our cases had previous chest surgery and the other 3 cases had previous abdominal surgery. The locations of 3 (50%) cases were in the left anterior subphrenic space. The mean interval between original operation and diagnosis was 24.6 ± 33.4 months (range, 17 days to 8 years). With regard to CT findings, 3 (50%) cases had an isodense mass and 3 (50%) had a typical mass containing curvilinear opaque structures. The mean size of the gossypibomas was 62 × 62 × 67 mm. Because gossypiboma is due solely to human factors and is a severe medicolegal issue, continuous education should be considered. [J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70(12):565–569] Key Words: foreign bodies, spiral computed tomography, surgical sponge Introduction A total of 6 cases of gossypiboma were included in our study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Thinking Clearly
    For Sabine The Art of Thinking Clearly Rolf Dobelli www.sceptrebooks.co.uk First published in Great Britain in 2013 by Sceptre An imprint of Hodder & Stoughton An Hachette UK company 1 Copyright © Rolf Dobelli 2013 The right of Rolf Dobelli to be identified as the Author of the Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. A CIP catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. eBook ISBN 978 1 444 75955 6 Hardback ISBN 978 1 444 75954 9 Hodder & Stoughton Ltd 338 Euston Road London NW1 3BH www.sceptrebooks.co.uk CONTENTS Introduction 1 WHY YOU SHOULD VISIT CEMETERIES: Survivorship Bias 2 DOES HARVARD MAKE YOU SMARTER?: Swimmer’s Body Illusion 3 WHY YOU SEE SHAPES IN THE CLOUDS: Clustering Illusion 4 IF 50 MILLION PEOPLE SAY SOMETHING FOOLISH, IT IS STILL FOOLISH: Social Proof 5 WHY YOU SHOULD FORGET THE PAST: Sunk Cost Fallacy 6 DON’T ACCEPT FREE DRINKS: Reciprocity 7 BEWARE THE ‘SPECIAL CASE’: Confirmation Bias (Part 1) 8 MURDER YOUR DARLINGS: Confirmation Bias (Part 2) 9 DON’T BOW TO AUTHORITY: Authority Bias 10 LEAVE YOUR SUPERMODEL FRIENDS AT HOME: Contrast Effect 11 WHY WE PREFER A WRONG MAP TO NO
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Abdomen from Gossypiboma: Our Case Series and Review Of
    Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research Vol.8 No 3 – 4,2006 ;174 -176 Case Report Acute abdomen from gossypiboma: A Case series and review of literature M .E Asuquo, N Ogbu, J Udosen, R Ekpo, C Agbor, M Ozinko and K Emelike, Department of Surgery, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar. Request for Reprints to DR. M. E. Asuquo, C/O P. O. Box 1891 (GPO), Calabar, Nigeria. Email: [email protected] Abstract Gossypiboma though uncommon is under-reported. It is an infrequent but avoidable surgical error. The retained sponge induces two types of reactions, fibrinous response resulting in granuloma formation and exudative response leading to abscess formation. This serious medical condition may result in significant morbidity and mortality with serious medico legal implications. We present two cases of retained guaze(gossypiboma) seen in a busy surgical unit within three months. The pathogenesis is due to gauze induced adhesions that may cause intestinal obstruction and abscess formation resulting in peritonitis . The plain abdominal radiograph was very valuable in the first line investigation of these patients. It is possible that gossypiboma is underreported and standard protocols are not common except for routine concern for detail while doing laparotomy. Introduction The retention of surgical sponges in the peritoneal Fig 1 Sponge adhered to gut cavity otherwise called gossypiboma, is an infrequent but avoidable medical error1. This medical condition can result in significant morbidity and in some occasion’s mortality with serious medico legal implications2. This condition is generally under reported probably for medico legal reasons. The non- absorbable materials of the retained surgical foreign bodies induce principally two types of reactions, an aseptic fibrinous response resulting in adhesions and encapsulation (granuloma).
    [Show full text]
  • EORNA Best Practice for Perioperative Care
    EORNA Best Practice for perioperative care First edition March 2015 Second edition November 2020 ©The European Operating Room Nurses Association (EORNA) claims copyright ownership of all information in the EORNA Position statements and Guidelines for Perioperative Nursing Practice Part 1, unless stated otherwise. WWW.EORNA.EU 1 No responsibility is assumed by EORNA for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence, or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any standards, guidelines, recommendations, methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the health care sciences, independent verification of diagnoses, medication dosages, and individualized care and treatment should be made. The material contained herein is not intended to be a substitute for the exercise of professional medical or nursing judgment and should not be construed as offering any legal, medical, or risk management advice of any kind. The content in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EORNA, DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTIES’ RIGHTS, AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright information No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the copyright owner, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the author’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Gossypiboma CASE REPORT
    Agrawal N et al.: Gossypiboma CASE REPORT Gossypiboma: A Rare Case Report Neha Agrawal1, Manpreet Sodhi2, Neerja Malik3 1- Senior resident, Dr M C Saxena medical college and medical research centre, Correspondence to: Lucknow, U.P. Ex senior resident, HinduRao Hospital, Delhi. 2- Senior resident , Dr. Neha Agrawal, MD1/244, Sector D1,Kanpur Road, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. 3- Senior Lucknow, U.P. 226012. consultant, Department of obstetrics & Gynaecology, Batra Hospital & Medical Contact Us: www.ijohmr.com Research Centre, New Delhi. ABSTRACT Gossypiboma is the name to the tumour like structure within the body, composed of non-absorbable surgical material with a cotton matrix. Due to medico legal implications, cases of retained surgical sponges are rarely reported. Awareness of this problem among surgeons and radiologists is essential to avoid unnecessary morbidity. We present our experience with this entity. We report a case of 21 year old female who came to the OPD with off and on abdominal pain since 3 years with LMP 1 month back with regular normal flow, unmarried, sexually not active, with history of open appendicectomy 3 yrs back. USG report shows cholelithiasis with right sided complex ovarian cyst approximately 7cm and left ovarian simple cyst measuring 5.5 cm and CT SCAN shows Complex cystic mass in both adnexal region measuring 7cm and 5.5cm respectively, possibility of endometrial cyst. She was taken up for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy and cholecystectomy. Ovarian mass decompression with extraction of gauze piece from right cyst with puncturing of the haemorrhagic left cyst and cholecystectomy was performed.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Cost of Inaction How Retained Surgical Sponges Harm Hospital Finances and Reputations
    The High Cost of Inaction How retained surgical sponges harm hospital finances and reputations 1 Executive summary It’s not something that any healthcare leader or medical professional wants to see on local TV or splashed across a newspaper’s front page: A 38-year-old patient at a California hospital files a lawsuit following the grisly discovery of a large lap towel left in her abdomen two years after having had surgery at the hospital.1 The standard sponge count done after the surgery had been falsely reported as correct. A second surgery has had to be conducted to remove the mass, which involved severe bowel adhesions. Part of her uterus, including her fallopian tubes, was incorporated into the mass. Surgeons were able to free her small bowel and sigmoid colon from the lap pad, and she was treated with intravenous antibiotics for 48 hours. The patient lost a section of her colon. The woman’s insurance company, citing a policy in its contract with the hospital, refused to pay for the second surgery to remove the mass. The state swept in to investigate the incident and fined the hospital $100,000, providing the full documentation of its probe to the media. The case had to be reported as a sentinel event to the Joint Commission and a root cause analysis and report on corrective actions compiled. A financial settlement was reached with the patient. In the unique nomenclature of healthcare, surgical sponges mistakenly left inside patients following surgeries are called “retained surgical items” or “retained foreign objects.” Sponges make up about two-thirds of all objects left inside patients; the remainder are wires, pieces of surgical tools and sometimes full instruments.2 As the case above shows, for such benignly named events, retained sponges often have devastating results.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Health Care Safer: a Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CiteSeerX Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 43 Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2101 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-97-0013 Prepared by: University of California at San Francisco (UCSF)–Stanford University Evidence-based Practice Center Editorial Board Kaveh G. Shojania, M.D. (UCSF) Bradford W. Duncan, M.D. (Stanford) Kathryn M. McDonald, M.M. (Stanford) Robert M. Wachter, M.D. (UCSF) Managing Editor Amy J. Markowitz, JD Robert M. Wachter, MD Project Director Kathryn M. McDonald, MM UCSF–Stanford EPC Coordinator AHRQ Publication 01-E058 July 20, 2001 (Revised printing, indexed) ii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), through its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions and new health care technologies. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments. To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Mechanisms of Prejudice: Implicit Bias & Interpersonal Fluency
    The Hidden Mechanisms of Prejudice: Implicit Bias & Interpersonal Fluency Alex Madva Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Alex Madva All rights reserved Abstract The Hidden Mechanisms of Prejudice: Implicit Bias and Interpersonal Fluency Alex Madva This dissertation is about prejudice. In particular, it examines the theoretical and ethical questions raised by research on implicit social biases. Social biases are termed “implicit” when they are not reported, though they lie just beneath the surface of consciousness. Such biases are easy to adopt but very difficult to introspect and control. Despite this difficulty, I argue that we are personally responsible for our biases and obligated to overcome them if they can bring harm to ourselves or to others. My dissertation addresses the terms of their removal. It is grounded in a comprehensive examination of empirical research and, as such, is a contribution to social psychology. Although implicit social biases significantly influence our judgment and action, they are not reducible to beliefs or desires. Rather, they constitute a class of their own. Understanding their particular character is vital to determining how to replace them with more preferable habits of mind. I argue for a model of interpersonal fluency, a kind of ethical expertise that requires transforming our underlying dispositions of thought, feeling, and action. Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………..v Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………..vi Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………………x Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Chapter 1: The Structure of Implicit Social Attitudes…………………………………………...14 I. Introduction: Madeleine meets Bob…………………………………………………...14 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonspecific Computed Tomography Presentation of Gossypiboma 1Ashwini Sankhe, 2Tilik Dedhia, 3Vivek Ukirde, 4Maunil Bhuta, 5Jagir Yeshwante
    MGMJMS Nonspecific Computed Tomography10.5005/jp-journals-10036-1074 Presentation of Gossypiboma CASE REPORT Nonspecific Computed Tomography Presentation of Gossypiboma 1Ashwini Sankhe, 2Tilik Dedhia, 3Vivek Ukirde, 4Maunil Bhuta, 5Jagir Yeshwante ABSTRACT predominantly in the hypogastrium since 1 week. There A gossypiboma also known as ‘textiloma’ or ‘cottonoid’ is a was no history of fever, vomiting, diarrhea, bleeding or term used to describe a foreign object (nonabsorbable surgical white discharge PV. The patient had past history of ovar- material), that is left behind in a body cavity during an operation. ian cystectomy 2 months ago. The manifestations and complications of gossypiboma are so On examination, vital signs were normal and a round variable that diagnosis may be difficult and patient morbidity mobile mass was palpable in the hypogastrium. is thus significant. Moreover, such foreign bodies can often Ultrasonography of abdomen done outside suggested mimic tumors or abscesses. Here we discuss a case of pelvic gossypiboma that presented as a mass in the pelvis associated that the mobile mass could represent recurrent neoplastic with abdominal pain in a post ovarian cystectomy case. The lesion of ovary. diagnosis was suggested on computed tomography (CT). The Hence, the patient was referred for computed diagnosis was confirmed on surgery and the gossypiboma was tomography (CT) scan for further characterization of the retrieved successfully. lesion. Plain and contrast CT scan of the abdomen and Keywords: Foreign body granuloma, Gossypiboma, Hypodense pelvis was performed on 64 slice brilliance philips CT mass, Postovarian cystectomy, Retained sponge. scanner with 1 mm slice thickness which revealed a well- How to cite this article: Sankhe A, Dedhia T, Ukirde V, Bhuta M, defined hypodense mass in the hypogastrium with thin Yeshwante J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Biases in Design
    Cognitive Biases in Design The case of tropical architecture Cognitive Biases in Design The case of tropical architecture Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K. F. Wakker, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag, juni 11th, 2001 om 10:30 uur door Joo-Hwa BAY geboren te Singapore Bachelor of Architecture, National University of Singapore Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. A. Tzonis Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. A. Tzonis, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Prof. S. J. Doorman, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. ir. J. Kristinsson, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. K. P. Lam, National University of Singapore Prof. dr. W. L. Porter, MIT Cambridge, USA Prof. dr. D. Shefer, Technion Haifa, Israel Published by The Design Knowledge System Research Centre, Faculteit Bouwkunde Technische Universiteit Delft Berlageweg 1, 2628 CR Delft The Netherlands, Tel: 31 15 2784208 Webpage: http://www.bk.tudelft.nl/dks Copyright © 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photocopy, microfilm, or any other means without written permission from the author or the publisher. ISBN 90-9014859-0 NUGI 923 Printed in the Netherlands To Sher-Ni and Jo-Han ABSTRACT Summary of dissertation This dissertation investigates, i) How cognitive biases (or illusions) may lead to errors in design thinking, ii) Why architects use architectural precedents as heuristics despite such possible errors, and iii) Develops a design tool that can overcome this type of errors through the introduction of a rebuttal mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Health Care Safer: a Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices
    Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 43 Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2101 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-97-0013 Prepared by: University of California at San Francisco (UCSF)–Stanford University Evidence-based Practice Center Editorial Board Kaveh G. Shojania, M.D. (UCSF) Bradford W. Duncan, M.D. (Stanford) Kathryn M. McDonald, M.M. (Stanford) Robert M. Wachter, M.D. (UCSF) Managing Editor Amy J. Markowitz, JD Robert M. Wachter, MD Project Director Kathryn M. McDonald, MM UCSF–Stanford EPC Coordinator AHRQ Publication 01-E058 July 20, 2001 (Revised printing, indexed) ii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), through its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions and new health care technologies. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments. To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations. The EPCs work with these partner organizations to ensure that the evidence reports and technology assessments they produce will become building blocks for health care quality improvement projects throughout the Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 18.1 Acute Postoperative Complications M
    18 Postoperative Complications 18.1 Acute Postoperative Complications M. Seitz, B. Schlenker, Ch. Stief 18.1.1 Postoperative Bleeding 364 18.1.5 Abdominal Wound Dehiscence 403 18.1.1.1 Overview 364 18.1.5.1 Synonyms 403 18.1.1.2 Incidence and Risk Factors 365 18.1.5.2 Overview and Incidence 403 18.1.1.3 Detection and Clinical Signs 365 18.1.5.3 Risk Factors 404 18.1.1.4 Workup 366 18.1.5.4 Clinical Signs and Complications 404 18.1.1.5 Management 366 18.1.5.5 Prevention 405 18.1.1.6 Special Conditions 371 18.1.5.6 Management 405 18.1.2 Chest Pain and Dyspnea 373 18.1.6 Chylous Ascites 410 18.1.2.1 Overview 373 18.1.6.1 Overview 410 18.1.2.2 Cardiovascular System Disorders 373 18.1.6.2 Risk Factors and Pathogenesis 410 18.1.2.3 Postoperative Pulmonary Complications 373 18.1.6.3 Prevention 412 Pulmonary Embolism 373 18.1.6.4 Detection and Workup 413 Pleural Effusions 375 18.1.6.5 Management 413 Atelectasis 376 Infection/Pneumonia 376 18.1.7 Deep Venous Thrombosis 414 Tube Thoracostomy 376 18.1.7.1 Overview and Incidence 414 18.1.3 Acute Abdomen 377 18.1.7.2 Risk Factors 414 18.1.3.1 Initial Management 377 18.1.7.3 Detection and Clinical Findings 415 18.1.4 18.1.7.4 Management 415 Postoperative Fever 378 Unfractionated Heparin 415 18.1.4.1 Overview 378 Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin 415 18.1.4.2 Incidence 379 Long-Term Therapy 416 18.1.4.3 Definition 379 18.1.4.4 Risk Factors and Prevention 379 18.1.8 Lymphoceles 416 18.1.4.5 Detection and Work-Up 382 18.1.8.1 Anatomy and Physiology 416 Pulmonary 382 18.1.8.2 Overview 419 Urinary Tract 382
    [Show full text]