3 March 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration -
Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias) Recovery Plan September 2003 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. i-vii + 38pp., A1-19, B- 1-8. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 1-301-492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 The fee for the Plan varies depending on the number of pages of the Plan. Recovery Plans can be downloaded from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website: http://endangered.fws.gov. -i- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express great appreciation to Ms. -
A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship Between Peyote (Lophophora Williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)
A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship between Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). 1 2 2 TERRY, M. , D. PRICE , AND J. POOLE. 1Sul Ross State University, Department of Biology, Alpine, Texas 79832. 2Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Wildlife Diversity Branch, 3000 S. IH-35, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78704. ABSTRACT Astrophytum asterias, commonly called star cactus, is a federally listed endangered cactus endemic to the Tamaulipan thornscrub ecoregion of extreme southern Texas, USA, and Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Only three metapopulations totaling less than 4000 plants are presently known in Texas. Star cactus, known locally as “star peyote”, is highly sought by collectors. This small, dome-shaped, spineless, eight- ribbed cactus is sometimes mistaken for peyote (Lophophora williamsii), which grows in the same or adjacent habitats. Peyote is harvested from native thornscrub habitats in Texas by local Hispanic people and sold to peyoteros, licensed distributors who sell the peyote to Native American Church members. Annual peyote harvests in Texas approach 2,000,000 “buttons” (crowns). Although the peyoteros do not buy star cactus from harvesters, they cultivate star cactus in peyote gardens at their places of business and give star cacti to their customers as lagniappe. If even 0.1% of harvested “peyote” is actually star cactus, the annual take of this endangered cactus approaches the total number of wild specimens known in the U.S. This real but unquantifiable take, together with information from interviews with local residents, suggests the existence of many more star cactus populations than have been documented. ASTROPHYTUM AND LOPHOPHORA – Poole 1990). -
The Wonderful World of Cacti. July 7, 2020
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulents part 1: The wonderful world of cacti. July 7, 2020 Betzy Rivera. Master Gardener Volunteer OSU Extension – Franklin County OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Succulent plants Are plants with parts that are thickened and fleshy, capacity that helps to retain water in arid climates. Over 25 families have species of succulents. The most representative families are: Crassulaceae, Agavaceae, Aizoaceae, Euphorbiacea and Cactaceae. 2 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family is endemic to America and the distribution extends throughout the continent from Canada to Argentina, in addition to the Galapagos Islands and Antilles Most important centers of diversification (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Arias-Montes, 1993; Anderson, 2001; Guzmán et al., 2003; Ortega- Baes & Godínez-Alvarez, 2006 3 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION There is an exception — one of the 1,800 species occurs naturally in Africa, Sri Lanka, and Madagascar Rhipsalis baccifera 4 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family includes between ~ 1,800 and 2,000 species whose life forms include climbing, epiphytic, shrubby, upright, creeping or decumbent plants, globose, cylindrical or columnar in shape (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 5 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Cacti are found in a wide variety of environments, however the greatest diversity of forms is found in arid and semi-arid areas, where they play an important role in maintaining the stability of ecosystems (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez-Mejorada, 1978; Hernández & Godínez, 1994; Guzmán et al., 2003). 6 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The Cactaceae family are dicotyledonous plants 2 cotyledons Astrophytum myriostigma (common names: Bishop´s cap cactus, bishop’s hat or miter cactus) 7 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION General Anatomy of a Cactus Cactus spines are produced from specialized structures called areoles, a kind of highly reduced branch. -
ON the TAXONOMY of CACTACEAE JUSS by the EVIDENCE of SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY and SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F
European Journal of Botany, Plant Sciences and Phytology Vol.2, No.3, pp.1-15, October 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) ON THE TAXONOMY OF CACTACEAE JUSS BY THE EVIDENCE OF SEED MICROMORPHOLOGY AND SDS-PAGE ANALYSIS Lamiaa F. Shalabi Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. ABSTRACT Numerical classification of 16 taxa of Cactaceae was studied using combination of micromorphological characters of seeds (using L.M and SEM) and SDS- PAGE analysis. Aspects of seed micromorphology and seed protein variation as defined were recorded and scored comparatively for the OTU's into a data matrix. Phenetic relationships of these taxa were established based on UPGMA-clustering method by using Jaccard coefficient of the NTSYS-pc 2.2 program. The results were compatible with the traditional relationships of some taxa as the split-off of Opuntia humifusa and Astrophytum myriostigma, at separate lines, these results are compatible with their placement in tribes Opuntieae (subfamily Opuntioideae) and Cacteae (Subfamily cactoideae) respectively, at the time, the placement of three taxa Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa, Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 1, and Rhipsalis baccifera Accession 2 together, the clustering of Hylocereus triangularis and Neobuxbaumia euphorbioides together at a unique tribe Phyllocacteae. The findings contradict in a number of cases the traditional studies, as the grouping of Trichocereus vasquezii with the two represents of genus Parodia despite of their placement in different tribes. KEYWORDS: Cactaceae, SDS-PAGE, Seed micromorpgology, SEM INTRODUCTION The Cactaceae are an exciting and problematic group of plants because of their varied morphology, succulence, and their showy flowers (Barthlott and Hunt 1993). -
Some Major Families and Genera of Succulent Plants
SOME MAJOR FAMILIES AND GENERA OF SUCCULENT PLANTS Including Natural Distribution, Growth Form, and Popularity as Container Plants Daniel L. Mahr There are 50-60 plant families that contain at least one species of succulent plant. By far the largest families are the Cactaceae (cactus family) and Aizoaceae (also known as the Mesembryanthemaceae, the ice plant family), each of which contains about 2000 species; together they total about 40% of all succulent plants. In addition to these two families there are 6-8 more that are commonly grown by home gardeners and succulent plant enthusiasts. The following list is in alphabetic order. The most popular genera for container culture are indicated by bold type. Taxonomic groupings are changed occasionally as new research information becomes available. But old names that have been in common usage are not easily cast aside. Significant name changes noted in parentheses ( ) are listed at the end of the table. Family Major Genera Natural Distribution Growth Form Agavaceae (1) Agave, Yucca New World; mostly Stemmed and stemless Century plant and U.S., Mexico, and rosette-forming leaf Spanish dagger Caribbean. succulents. Some family yuccas to tree size. Many are too big for container culture, but there are some nice small and miniature agaves. Aizoaceae (2) Argyroderma, Cheiridopsis, Mostly South Africa Highly succulent leaves. Iceplant, split-rock, Conophytum, Dactylopis, Many of these stay very mesemb family Faucaria, Fenestraria, small, with clumps up to Frithia, Glottiphyllum, a few inches. Lapidaria, Lithops, Nananthus, Pleisopilos, Titanopsis, others Delosperma; several other Africa Shrubs or ground- shrubby genera covers. Some marginally hardy. Mestoklema, Mostly South Africa Leaf, stem, and root Trichodiadema, succulents. -
(Cactaceae Juss.) Species
Acta Agrobotanica DOI: 10.5586/aa.1697 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-05-24 Accepted: 2016-10-03 Anatomical and morphological features Published: 2016-12-20 of seedlings of some Cactoideae Eaton Handling editor Barbara Łotocka, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw (Cactaceae Juss.) species University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Poland Halyna Kalashnyk1*, Nataliia Nuzhyna2, Maryna Gaidarzhy2 Authors’ contributions 1 HK: carried out the experiments Department of Botany, Educational and Scientific Center “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, and wrote the manuscript; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, S. Petlyury 1, Kyiv 01032, Ukraine 2 NN: designed the anatomical Scientific laboratory “Introduced and natural phytodiversity”, Educational and Scientific Center experiment and contributed “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, S. Petlyury 1, to data interpretation; MG: Kyiv 01032, Ukraine designed the experiment, * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] critically read the manuscript and contributed to data interpretation Abstract Funding Three-month-old seedlings of 11 species of the subfamily Cactoideae Melocac( - This study was financed from the research project tus bahiensis, Melocactus curvispinus, Echinopsis eyriesii, E. mirablis, E. peruviana, No. 14БП036-01 at the Taras Oreocereus celsianus, Rebutia flavistyla, Rebutia minuscula, Astrophytum myrios- Shevchenko National University tigma, Mamillaria columbiana, and M. prolifera) have been studied. These plants of Kyiv. exhibit a uniseriate epidermis, covered by a thin cuticle. Except for E. peruviana Competing interests and A. myriostigma, no hypodermis could be detected. The shoots of all studied No competing interests have specimens consist mainly of cortex parenchyma with large thin-walled cells. The been declared. -
Star Cactus Recovery Plan (Plan) Will Both Ensure the Species’ Survival and Provide the Information Necessary to Develop Delisting Criteria
D R A F T STAR CACTUS (Astrophytum asterias) RECOVERY PLAN Astrophytum asterias (Zuccarini-Lemaire). Photo courtesy of Charlie McDonald, USDA Forest Service Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico October 2002 Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 D R A F T STAR CACTUS (Astrophytum asterias) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by: Loretta Pressly U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Corpus Christi, Texas for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2 Albuquerque, New Mexico Approved:______________________ Regional Director, Region 2 Date: ______________________ Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 Acknowledgments The author wishes to express great appreciation to Ms. Angela Brooks for her work on this draft recovery plan. Without her devotion to endangered species protection with emphasis on plant conservation in South Texas, this recovery plan would not be complete. Additionally, the author appreciates the review and editing work performed by Robyn Cobb, Sharon Becton, Mary Orms, and Tracy Scheffler of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and thanks Ms. Jackie Poole, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, for her involvement in the development of this draft recovery plan, as well as her continued support for protecting endangered, threatened, and rare plant species in Texas. Star Cactus Draft Recovery Plan October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... -
From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. -
Astrophytum Ornatum
MARÍA LORAINE MATIAS-PALAFOX1,2*, CECILIA LEONOR JIMÉNEZ-SIERRA2, JORDAN GOLUBOV3 AND MARÍA C. MANDUJANO4 Botanical Sciences 95 (2): 245-258, 2017 Abstract Background: There are no previous studies on the reproductive biology of the endemic and endangered cactus species DOI: 10.17129/botsci.780 Astrophytum ornatum. Questions: Is fowering continuous or episodic? What are the breeding and mating systems and what foral visitors are Copyright: © 2017 Matias-Palafox associated? and Does the reproductive success change over time? et al. This is an open access article Study species: Astrophytum ornatum (Cactaceae). distributed under the terms of the Study site and years of study: Observations from 2010 to 2011, in the highest density population of A. ornatum in Creative Commons Attribution Li- cense, which permits unrestricted Metztitlán Canyon (Hgo. México). use, distribution, and reproduction Methods: Monthly surveys and monitoring of reproductive structures. Tracking fowers in anthesis. Controlled pol- in any medium, provided the original linations to determine the mating system and determination of the Outcrossing Index (OCI), the pollen /ovule ratio and author and source are credited. breeding system. Results: Astrophytum ornatum produced fower buds throughout the year, but 89.2% of them were aborted. Four events of ephemeral fowering population were presented per year. The species is self-incompatible and controlled pollinations indicated pollinator limitation of several bee species. The OCI indicates that the species is facultative xenogamous, and pollen/ovule ratio indicates obligate xenogamy. On average there were 54 seeds/fruit and individuals produced 4 Author Contributions. fruits/year. M. L. Matias-Palafox: conceived, Conclusions: The continuous production of buds had rarely been reported for cacti. -
Cold Hardy Landscape Cacti & Succulents for Central Texas Jeff
Cold Hardy Landscape Cacti & Succulents for Central Texas Jeff Pavlat 3/11 The following is a list of recommended landscape plants for Central Texas. Keep in mind that there is a great deal of temperature variation across the region. Temperatures in outlying areas are in some cases 10 to 15 degrees colder than those in town. The cold tolerances listed are approximate. It is important to recognize that there are a number of factors which determine hardiness. Plants placed on south facing slopes receive more solar heat and tend to have a better chance of being undamaged. Plants also fair better with some overhead protection from a tree or shrub. It also helps for them to be placed where they will not receive direct north wind. Generally, low-growing plants receive more ground heat than taller plants and are less likely to freeze. The state of the plant as it enters freezing temperatures is an important factor as well. For instance, many cacti and succulents will endure considerably colder temperatures when dry rather than wet (In fact, cold and wet is often a lethal combination for many cact i). Plants of the same species originating from different parts of the plant’s native range can also result in higher or lower tolerances. It is possible to have two plants of the same species placed side by side and have one freeze, while the other survives. Often some experimentation is necessary to determine what plants will work best for your garden. Cold Hardy Cacti Species (*Texas Native) Common Name Min. Temp. -
Micropropagation of Astrophytum Myriostigma Lem. Through Areoles Activation
Propagation of Ornamental Plants Vol. 20, № 4, 2020: 111-117 MICROPROPAGATION OF ASTROPHYTUM MYRIOSTIGMA LEM. THROUGH AREOLES ACTIVATION Kihwan Song1, Hyeonjeong Kang2, Doo Hwan Kim3, and Iyyakkannu Sivanesan3* 1Department of Bioindustry and Bioresource Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, 05006 Seoul, Republic of Korea 2 Babo Orchid Farm, Gyeonggi-do, 472-831 Namyangju-si, Republic of Korea 3Department of Bioresources and Food Science, Institute of Natural Science and Agriculture, Konkuk University, 1 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, 05029 Seoul, Republic of Korea *Fax: + 8224503310, *E-mail: [email protected] REFERENCES Castro-Gallo I. A., Meza-Rangel E., Pérez-Reyes M. E., Pérez-Molphe-Balch E. (2002). In vitro propagation of 10 Mexican cacti species. Scientiae Naturae, 4: 5-24 (in Spanish). Clayton P. W., Hubstenberger J. F., Phillips G. C. (1990). Micropropagation of members of the Cactaceae Subtribe Cactinae. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 115: 337-343. Das A. B. (2008). Assessment of genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of ‘Star Cactus’ (Astrophytum) through chromosome and RAPD markers. Cytologia, 73: 179-88. Erwin J., Altman K., Esqueda F. (2017). Temperature impacts cactus and succulent development rate. HortTechnology, 27: 65-68. García-Rubio O., Malda-Barrera G. (2010). Micropropagation and reintroduction of the endemic Mammillaria mathildae (Cac- taceae) to its natural habitat. HortScience, 45: 934-938. Giusti P., Vitti D., Fiocchetti F., Colla G., Saccardo F., Tucci M. (2002). In vitro propagation of three endangered cactus spe- cies. Scientia Horticulturae, 95: 319-332. Infante R. (1992). In vitro axillary shoot proliferation and somatic embryogenesis of yellow pitaya Mediocactus coccineus (Slam-Dy- ck).