A-Frame Architecture in Boulder County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A-Frame Architecture in Boulder County Historic Context of A-frame Architecture in Boulder County Prepared for Boulder County Land Use Department Prepared by and www.meadhunt.com April 2018 CLG Grant Number CO-17-011 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 2. Project Area ......................................................................................... 3 3. Research Design and Methods .......................................................... 5 4. A-frame Architecture on a National Stage ........................................ 9 A. Historic antecedents ................................................................... 9 (1) Asian and Polynesian forms ............................................. 9 (2) European forms ................................................................ 9 (3) American forms .............................................................. 11 B. Vacation homes ........................................................................ 12 (1) Prewar vacation homes .................................................. 12 (2) Postwar vacation homes ................................................ 13 (3) Architect-designed A-frames .......................................... 17 (4) Plan books, A-frame kits, and prefabricated A-frames .. 19 (5) National typologies ......................................................... 21 C. Non-residential applications ..................................................... 23 (1) Backcountry/park architecture ........................................ 23 (2) Commercial buildings ..................................................... 24 (3) Religious buildings ......................................................... 28 D. National context conclusion ...................................................... 29 5. Tourism in Boulder County .............................................................. 31 6. Post-World War II Boulder County .................................................. 37 7. A-frame Architecture in Boulder County ........................................ 39 A. Church examples ...................................................................... 39 B. Commercial examples .............................................................. 40 C. Residential A-frame architecture .............................................. 43 D. A-frame architects in Boulder County ....................................... 44 E. Local kit/prefab providers ......................................................... 48 F. “Imagineered vacation homes”: Delta vacation homes ............ 55 G. The peak of the A-frame in Boulder County ............................. 70 H. Geographic concentrations ....................................................... 71 I. Boulder County’s unique/rare A-frames ................................... 82 J. Decline of A-frames in Boulder County .................................... 86 K. Lost A-frames ........................................................................... 88 Historic Context of A-frame Architecture in Boulder County i Table of Contents 8. A-frame Character-defining Features, Variations, and Subtypes in Boulder County ............................................................ 91 A. What is and is not an A-frame .................................................. 91 (1) Nuances of what is and is not an A-frame ..................... 91 (2) Examples ........................................................................ 91 B. Character-defining features and variations .............................. 97 (1) Discussion of primary character-defining features ......... 97 (2) Character-defining features – Exterior variations........... 98 (3) Character-defining features – Interior .......................... 103 (4) Outbuildings ................................................................. 104 C. Subtypes of the A-frame form ................................................. 106 (1) Arched (Gothic) A-frame .............................................. 106 (2) Gambrel roof A-frame .................................................. 107 (3) Flat-top A-frame ........................................................... 108 (4) Double A-frame ............................................................ 108 (5) A-frame with wings (modified A-frame) ........................ 109 (6) Nested A-frame ............................................................ 110 (7) Staggered A-frame ....................................................... 110 9. Evaluating and Determining Significance of A-frames in Boulder County ............................................................................... 111 A. Results of COMPASS database search for A-frames ............ 111 B. Evaluation ............................................................................... 111 C. National Register evaluation of individual properties ............. 112 (1) Period of significance and areas of significance .......... 113 D. Colorado State Register evaluation of individual properties .. 117 E. Applying Boulder County Landmarks Criteria to a property ... 117 (1) Criterion 4 ..................................................................... 118 (2) Criterion 5 ..................................................................... 118 (3) Criterion 7 ..................................................................... 119 (4) Criterion 8 ..................................................................... 119 F. Integrity ................................................................................... 119 (1) Location ........................................................................ 119 (2) Design .......................................................................... 119 (3) Setting .......................................................................... 119 (4) Materials ....................................................................... 120 (5) Workmanship ............................................................... 120 (6) Feeling .......................................................................... 120 (7) Association ................................................................... 120 (8) Alterations to individual A-frames................................. 120 G. National Register evaluation of Historic Districts .................... 121 Historic Context of A-frame Architecture in Boulder County ii Table of Contents (1) Period of significance and areas of significance .......... 122 (2) Alterations to potential historic districts ........................ 124 H. Defining historic boundaries ................................................... 125 I. Documentation that should be provided for A-frame nominations ............................................................................ 125 10. Recommendations .......................................................................... 127 Bibliography ............................................................................................... 129 Appendices A Compilation of Known A-frames within Boulder County: Spreadsheet B Compilation of Known A-frames within County: Assessor Records with Photographs C Responses to Boulder County A-frame Survey D Delta A-frame Brochures/Materials E Delta A-frame, List of Attributed Properties The activity that is the subject of this material has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for History Colorado. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or History Colorado, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Department of the Interior or History Colorado. This program received federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. Photo cover: A-frame at 833 Hemlock Drive, Unincorporated, Boulder County, provided by owner Catherine Faughnan. Historic Context of A-frame Architecture in Boulder County iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Section 1 Introduction 1. Introduction We have all seen them. Their distinctive roof line peaking over the evergreens and pines. Especially in Colorado, where their steep gable seems to mimic the shape of the mountains and the form sends connotations of cozy après ski fires. The A-frame. Most communities in Colorado can boast to having one, and everybody knows where it is, likely using it as a way-finding and orienting feature. These memorable forms dot the Colorado landscape, and not without reason. A-frames were a quick, easy, and affordable way for individuals to construct their own vacation home. The snow-sloughing roofs meant the buildings could withstand the heavy Colorado snowfall with minimal maintenance from their often- seasonal homeowners. In addition, the strong yet light-weight form was relatively easy to transport over mountain roads and build
Recommended publications
  • Cottage Life Fall 2013 Lindal.Pdf (4.05
    DIY PROJECT THE $10 WOODSHED EASY APPLE CIDER RECIPE RECREATIONAL LIVING IN WESTERN CANADA Fall 2013 $4.95 CABIN PROFILES SAME FOOTPRINT, SPECTACULAR REBUILD CABIN DELIVERY BY HELICOPTER WARM IT UP A Cedar Cottage Builder’s Legacy Are Oil Lamps the New Collectables? 8 Insulating Options www.cottagemagazine.com DISPLAY UNTIL OCTOBER 31, 2013 THE GREAT OUTDOORS * CATCH SALMON FROM THE BEACH AMAZING BIRD MIGRATIONS * PM40050643 R07643 COT_OCT13_01_COVER.indd 1 13-08-09 11:17 AM An award-winning Turkel Design Lindal Home on BC’s Gambier Island. The Turkel/ Lindal line of modern homes is the most successful product launch in recent history. LindaL cedar Homes a Visionary’s Legacy 38 www.cottagemagazine.com October 2013 COT_OCT13_38-42_LINDAL CEDAR.indd 38 13-08-09 10:59 AM Sir Walter Lindal, 1934 50,000 Homes and cottages and stiLL going strong By Toby Welsh lmost 70 years ago, in toronto, Sir Walter Lindal founded what would become Lindal Homes. His story reads like a best-selling novel and would make an Oscar-worthy movie, perhaps starring Robert Redford or Clint East- awood in the lead role. What sets Lindal Cedar Homes apart from the rest of the home-building companies out there? Not only is it the world’s largest provider of custom cedar homes, the company has brag- ging rights to having built over 50,000 cedar homes. The actual figure surpasses that because records from the late 1940s and 1950s aren’t as complete as documents kept today. Classic Lindal Homes are earmarked by patented post and beam engineering strengths, which lend to long expanses of glass and wide spans.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings 2017
    Erie, CO Key Findings 2017 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA About National Research Center . Over 20 years conducting survey research for local government . Wrote the books on citizen surveying . Industry pioneers . Long-term partnership with . ICMA Charter members of AAPOR Transparency Initiative About The NCS . Community Livability Residents . Community Characteristics . Governance Private Communities Community- are partnerships based sector . Participation among... organizations Govern- ment Facets of Community Livability Quality of Community Overall Recreation Safety Mobility Economy and Wellness Education Natural Built Community and Environment Environment Engagement Enrichment The NCS & Erie . 3rd iteration of The NCS (2013 and 2015) . Random scientific sample of 3,000 households . 1,100 completed surveys; 37% response rate . ±3% margin of error; statistically valid Expanded Geographic Demographic Open-ended sample comparisons comparisons question Custom Presentation Opt-in Web benchmarks Scientific Survey Methods Surveys mailed to 3,000 households 3 points of contact 1,100 completed (37% response rate; ±3% margin of error) Results weighted to reflect community © 2001-2017 National Research Center, Inc. 6 National Benchmark Comparisons 2017 National Benchmark Comparisons 18 received higher 88 18 received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings 2017 Mountain Region Benchmark Comparisons 20 received higher 89 15 received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings 2017 Ratings Compared to 2015 33 received
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Issued BL 11192018 by DATE
    2018 Issued Tukwila Business Licenses Sorted by Date of Application DBA Name Full Name Full Primary Address UBC # NAICS Creation NAICS Description Code Date TROYS ELECTRIC EDWARDS TROY A 2308 S L ST 602712157 238210 11/13/2018 Electrical Contractors TACOMA WA 98405 and Oth OLD MACK LLC OLD MACK LLC 2063 RYAN RD 604216260 423320 11/13/2018 Brick, Stone, and BUCKLEY WA 98321 Related Cons DRAGONS BREATH CREAMERY NITRO SNACK LLC 1027 SOUTHCENTER MALL 604290130 445299 11/9/2018 All Other Specialty Food TUKWILA WA 98188 Store NASH ELECTRIC LLC NASH ELECTRIC LLC 8316 71ST ST NE 603493097 238210 11/8/2018 Electrical Contractors MARYSVILLE WA 98270 and Oth BUDGET WIRING BUDGET WIRING 12612 23RD AVE S 601322435 238210 11/7/2018 Electrical Contractors BURIEN WA 98168 and Oth MATRIX ELECTRIC LLC MATRIX ELECTRIC LLC 15419 24TH AVE E 603032786 238210 11/7/2018 Electrical Contractors TACOMA WA 98445-4711 and Oth SOUNDBUILT HOMES LLC SOUNDBUILT HOMES LLC 12815 CANYON RD E 602883361 236115 11/7/2018 General Contractor M PUYALLUP WA 98373 1ST FIRE SOLUTIONS LLC 1ST FIRE SOLUTIONS LLC 4210 AUBURN WAY N 603380886 238220 11/6/2018 Plumbing, Heating, and 7 Air-Con AUBURN WA 98002 BJ'S CONSTRUCTION & BJ'S CONSTRUCTION & 609 26TH ST SE 601930579 236115 11/6/2018 General Contractor LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING AUBURN WA 98002 CONSTRUCTION BROKERS INC CONSTRUCTION BROKERS INC 3500 DR GREAVES RD 604200594 236115 11/6/2018 General Contractor GRANDVIEW MO 64030 OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4041 B ST 604305691 541330 11/6/2018 Engineering Services
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton, Colorado Historic Resources Survey: Phase I
    Brighton Historic Resources Survey: Phase I SURVEY REPORT June 2014 Deon Wolfenbarger Three Gables Preservation Nederland, Colorado Brighton, Colorado Historic Resources Survey: Phase I Brighton, Colorado Historic Resource Survey: Phase I 2013-2014 Survey Report May 2014 Prepared for: City of Brighton Brighton Historic Preservation Commission Prepared by: Deon Wolfenbarger Three Gables Preservation Nederland, CO Funded by: History Colorado Certified Local Government Grant CO-13-012 i Three Gables Preservation Brighton, Colorado Historic Resources Survey: Phase I The activity that is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for the State Historical Society of Colorado. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Society. This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Service; Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20240. ii Three Gables Preservation Brighton, Colorado Historic Resources Survey: Phase I Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonneville Power Administration Fish & Wildlife Implementation Plan
    Fish & WildlifeBonneville Implementation Power Administration Plan Final EIS “Piecing The Puzzle Together” Tr ib P al la P ns ow e r C State Lower P o la un Plans Volume 2: Snake n cil Appendices Feasibility S tudy EIS M W g at S mt. er SOR EI Wy-Kan-Ush- m Operations l sh (Syste cia P e Review) mer Mi Wa- E rogr d om IS C ts Kush-Wit am C eres a Int A I n um s a MOand mor nt) su d (Me me i B gree e a iolo of A n Opin ICBEMP EIS s gi c (Interior Columbia Basin io al Ecosystem Mgmt. Project) ns Governance Fe Cauc Structure Wildlife Program Bas der S i al work EIS t nw Frame r r us Rive a mbia t er Colu eg ide Pap ry Fishe y ement BPA Manag Business n Pla Plan EIS P A Pa P r rt ci u o if Sa fic B b p ic lm e lic a ia Tr o n B g l n ?? ef . a e its A tio aty . n e ivat Pr s rest Inte DOE/EIS-0312 April 2003 Appendix A Fish and Wildlife Funding Principles for Bonneville Power Administration Rates and Contracts Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan EIS Appendix A: Fish and Wildlife Funding Principles Appendix A FISH AND WILDLIFE FUNDING PRINCIPLES FOR BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION RATES AND CONTRACTS September 16, 1998 Preamble The purpose of these principles is to conclude the fish and wildlife funding process in which Bonneville has been engaged with various interests in the Region, and provide a set of guidelines for structuring Bonneville's subscription and power rate processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Interface Communities Within the Vicinity of Federal Lands That Are at High Risk from Wildfire; Notice
    Friday, August 17, 2001 Part III Department of Agriculture Forest Service Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Bureau of Land Management Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service Urban Wildland Interface Communities Within the Vicinity of Federal Lands That Are at High Risk From Wildfire; Notice VerDate 11<MAY>2000 17:38 Aug 16, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\17AUN2.SGM pfrm07 PsN: 17AUN2 43384 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Tribes and was prepared for publication opportunities. Although this State-level by the Secretaries of Agriculture and the flexibility has resulted in some variance Forest Service Interior. The information in the updated among State submissions, the list set out at the end of this notice was Secretaries feel the application of a DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR compiled at the State and/or Tribal level standardized process has resulted in by collaborative interagency groups. As greater nationwide consistency for the Bureau of Indian Affairs a result of this collaborative effort, the revised lists. Secretaries have prepared a more The information contained in the list Bureau of Land Management complete list that better reflects the set out at the end of this notice will be relationship between Federal lands and used by interagency groups of land Fish and Wildlife Service the urban wildland interface problem in managers at the State and/or Tribal level the United States. This annotated list to collaboratively identify priority areas National Park Service supersedes the list published in the within their jurisdictions that would Federal Register on January 4, 2001 (66 benefit from hazard reduction activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Alder Mutual Light Utility Fuel Mix Fuel Percent Total Mwh
    Washington Department of Commerce Report Year: 2019; Customer Served State: WA Alder Mutual Light Utility Fuel Mix Fuel Percent Total MWh Biogas 0.00 % 0 Biomass 0.00 % 0 Coal 0.00 % 0 Geothermal 0.00 % 0 Hydro 83.16 % 4,229 Natural Gas 0.00 % 0 Nuclear 11.45 % 582 Other Biogenic 0.00 % 0 Other Non-Biogenic 0.00 % 0 Petroleum 0.00 % 0 Solar 0.00 % 0 Unknown 0.00 % 0 Waste 0.00 % 0 Wind 0.00 % 0 Unspecified 5.39 % 274 Total 100.00 % 5,085 BPA Claims Fuel MWh Hydro 4,229 Nuclear 582 SubTotal 4,811 BPA Unspecified Purchase 274 BPA Total 5,085 Page 1 of 76 Asotin County PUD #1 Utility Fuel Mix Fuel Percent Total MWh Biogas 0.00 % 0 Biomass 0.00 % 0 Coal 0.00 % 0 Geothermal 0.00 % 0 Hydro 83.16 % 4,040 Natural Gas 0.00 % 0 Nuclear 11.45 % 556 Other Biogenic 0.00 % 0 Other Non-Biogenic 0.00 % 0 Petroleum 0.00 % 0 Solar 0.00 % 0 Unknown 0.00 % 0 Waste 0.00 % 0 Wind 0.00 % 0 Unspecified 5.39 % 262 Total 100.00 % 4,858 BPA Claims Fuel MWh Hydro 4,040 Nuclear 556 SubTotal 4,596 BPA Unspecified Purchase 261 BPA Total 4,857 Page 2 of 76 Avangrid (WA) Utility Fuel Mix Fuel Percent Total MWh Biogas 0 Biomass 0 Coal 0 Geothermal 0 Hydro 0 Natural Gas 0 Nuclear 0 Other Biogenic 0 Other Non-Biogenic 0 Petroleum 0 Solar 0 Unknown 0 Waste 0 Wind 0 Unspecified 0 Total 0 Page 3 of 76 Avista (WA) Utility Fuel Mix Fuel Percent Total MWh Biogas 0.00 % 0 Biomass 4.86 % 294,725 Coal 15.02 % 910,161 Geothermal 0.00 % 0 Hydro 37.83 % 2,293,318 Natural Gas 37.97 % 2,301,131 Nuclear 0.00 % 0 Other Biogenic 0.52 % 31,364 Other Non-Biogenic 0.00 % 0 Petroleum 0.01 %
    [Show full text]
  • Softwood Sawmills in the United States and Canada
    United States Department of Agriculture Profile 2001: Forest Service Forest Softwood Sawmills Products Laboratory in the United States Research Paper FPL−RP−594 and Canada Henry Spelter Tim McKeever Abstract Preface More than 1,200 sawmills produce the bulk of U.S. and This report updates Profile 1999: Softwood Sawmills in the Canadian softwood lumber. The maps and tables in this United States and Canada, which was published in October report show the location and size of these mills by State and 1999. Profile 2001 provides current information on the more Province. Analysis of timber inventories in relation to use than 1,200 sawmills in the United States and Canada that are shows a close correspondence between pricing and use primarily engaged in the sawing of softwood lumber. The intensity. In some Southern States, the intensity of use is mills are characterized by location, ownership, and approxi- approaching recent growth levels. Lumber capacity grew by mate capacity. 13% between 1995 and 2000. The fastest growth occurred in some Canadian regions, while the least growth took place in A data gathering effort of this size on an activity of private the western parts of the United States and Canada. In 2001, commerce so widely dispersed in ownership and geography capacity appears headed for a decline as at least 18 sawmills is virtually impossible to accomplish error-free. We are closed as a result of poor market conditions. indebted to many individuals for bringing to our attention outdated or incorrect data and informing us of changes that Keywords: softwood sawmill capacity, timber costs, Market have occurred since the original report.
    [Show full text]
  • BOULDER PARK PROJECT 2019 Annual Report
    BOULDER PARK PROJECT 2019 Annual Report Department of Natural Resources and Parks Photo by J. Finlinson BOULDER PARK PROJECT Beneficial Use Facility DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Est. 1992 28th ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2019 Prepared by: King County Dept. Natural Resources and Parks 201 S. Jackson, M.S. KSC-NR-0512 Seattle, WA 98104 And Boulder Park, Inc. Box 285 Mansfield, WA 98830 March 2020 Department of Natural Resources and Parks TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................5 Why Biosolids? ..................................................................................................6 2.0 2019 PROJECT SUMMARY ..............................................................................7 Biosolids Delivery and Storage .......................................................................7 The Right Amount of Nitrogen (and Phosphorus) ........................................7 Project Operations ............................................................................................8 Research and Innovation .................................................................................9 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ...................................................................12 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNICATION .......................................13 5.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION AND PERMITS ...........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Tent with a View Zen and the Art of Orchard Maintenance Mountain Town, Penthouse Living
    sheltertelluride’s home & living magazine inside TENT WITH A VIEW ZEN AND THE ART OF ORCHARD MAINTENANCE MOUNTAIN TOWN, PENTHOUSE LIVING A Watch Newspaper publication cover.indd 7 6/21/10 9:00:05 AM Peter B. Lundeen, Architect 164M Society Drive Telluride, Colorado 81435 970.728.0841 [email protected] Shelter_summer_2010_ar.indd 2 6/21/10 9:03:04 AM contents 3 features departments THE ACCIDENTAL ORCHARDISTS PRODUCTS Falling in Love (With a Piece of Land) Love Objects By Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer By Anne Reeser Page 12 Page 10 LINDAL HOMES GO MODERN GREENHOUSE Good Design With a Minimalist Flavor The Latest in Green By Jessica Newens By Jessica Newens Page 24 Page 21 LIFE IN A TENT FOOD AND WINE A Summer on Hastings Mesa Ode to a Tomato By Karen James By Diana Conovitz Page 30 Page 40 SMALL-TOWN PENTHOUSE LIVING Living Vetically Parties to Remember By Deb Dion By Marta Tarbell Page 37 Page 46 COME VISIT masthead shelter PUBLISHER WWW.SCHILLINGSTUDIOGALLERY.COM Seth Cagin EDITOR Marta Tarbell ART COPY EDITOR Jessica Newens CREATIVE DIRECTOR Anne Reeser DESIGNERS Cecily Bryson, Barbara Kondracki PHOTO EDITOR Brett Schreckengost CONTRIBUTORS Dianna Conovitz, Deb Dion, Karen James, Jessica Newens, Anne Reeser, Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer ADVERTISING DIRECTOR Patrick Nicklaus OURAY & MONTROSE COUNTIES SALES 4 Peggy Kiniston CIRCULATION Scott Nuechterlein ON THE COVER Watch Newspapers Senior Reporter Karen James and her husband, Trevor, own four dwellings. “I guess you could call us the king and queen of small,” jokes Trevor about the couple’s holdings – a 475 square-foot apartment in Manhattan; a 350-square-foot cabin in upstate New York with a wood-burning stove and no plumbing; a 378-square-foot Telluride condo- hotel room and now their campsite on Hastings Mesa, with its new190-square-foot cabin, designed and built by Trevor, an INTRODUCING NEW ARTISTS: architectural designer.
    [Show full text]