DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Fish and Wildlife Species Code List for Landing Fees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES LIST FOR LANDING FEES DECEMBER 2020 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LANDING FEE RATE PER LANDING FEE RATE PER POUND July 2017 to POUND 2021 December 2020 Abalone Haliotis spp. - 0.1031 Agar Gelidium spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Algae, marine Phycophyta 0.0067 0.0069 Anchovy, deepbody Anchoa compressa 0.0010 0.0010 Anchovy, northern Engraulis mordax 0.0010 0.0010 Anchovy, slough Anchoa delicatissima 0.0010 0.0010 Barnacle Cirripedia 0.0067 0.0069 Barracuda, California Sphyraena argentea 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, barred sand Paralabrax nebulifer 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, giant sea Stereolepis gigas 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, kelp Paralabrax clathratus 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, rock Paralabrax spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, spotted sand Paralabrax maculatofasciatus 0.0067 0.0069 Bass, striped Morone saxatilis 0.0067 0.0069 Bat star Patiria miniata 0.0067 0.0069 Blackfish, Sacramento Orthodon microlepidotus 0.0067 0.0069 Blacksmith Chromis punctipinnis 0.0067 0.0069 Bonefish Albula vulpes 0.0067 0.0069 Bonito, Pacific Sarda chiliensis 0.0027 0.0028 Bryozoan Ectoprocta 0.0067 0.0069 Bullhead, brown Ameiurus nebulosus 0.0067 0.0069 Butterfish (Pacific pompano) Peprilus simillimus 0.0067 0.0069 Cabezon Scorpaenichthys marmoratus 0.0067 0.0069 Cabrilla, spotted Epinephelus analogus 0.0067 0.0069 Carp Cyprinus carpio 0.0067 0.0069 Catfish, unspecified Siluriformes 0.0067 0.0069 Chiton, unspecified Polyplacophora 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, California littleneck Tagelus californianus 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, common littleneck Protothaca staminea 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, common Washington Saxidomus nuttalli 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, freshwater Corbicula fluminea 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, gaper Tresus nuttalli 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, northern quahog Mercenaria mercenaria 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, northern razor Siliqua patula 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, rosy razor Solen sicarius 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, softshell Mya arenaria 0.0067 0.0069 Clam, unspecified Bivalvia 0.0067 0.0069 Cod, Pacific Gadus macrocephalus 0.0067 0.0069 Corbina, California Menticirrhus undulatus 0.0067 0.0069 Corvina, shortfin Cynoscion parvipinnis 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, armed box Playmera gaudichaudi 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, box Lopholithodes foraminatus 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, brown rock Cancer antennarius 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, claws Cancer spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, Dungeness Cancer magister 0.0333 0.0343 Crab, hermit Paguristes sp. 0.0067 0.0069 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LANDING FEE RATE PER LANDING FEE RATE PER POUND July 2017 to POUND 2021 December 2020 Crab, king Paralithodes spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, pelagic red Pleuroncodes planipes 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, red rock Cancer productus 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, rock unspecified Cancer spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, sand Emerita analoga 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, shore Pachygrapsus crassipes 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, southern kelp Taliepus nuttallii 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, spider Loxorhynchus spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, spider/sheep claws Loxorhynchus spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Crab, tanner Chionoecetes tanneri 0.0097 0.0100 Crab, yellow rock Cancer anthonyi 0.0067 0.0069 Crayfish, red swamp Procambarus clarkii 0.0067 0.0069 Crayfish, signal Pacifastacus leniusculus 0.0067 0.0069 Crayfish, unspecified Astacidae 0.0067 0.0069 Croaker, black Cheilotrema saturnum 0.0067 0.0069 Croaker, spotfin Roncador stearnsii 0.0067 0.0069 Croaker, unspecifed Sciaenidae 0.0067 0.0069 Croaker, white Genyonemus lineatus 0.0067 0.0069 Croaker, yellowfin Umbrina roncador 0.0067 0.0069 Crustacean, unspecified Crustacea 0.0067 0.0069 Dolphin (fish) Coryphaena hippurus 0.0067 0.0069 Echinoderm, unspecified Echinodermata 0.0067 0.0069 Eel Osteichthyes 0.0067 0.0069 Eel, blenny Lumpenus anguillaris 0.0067 0.0069 Eel, California moray Gymnothorax mordax 0.0067 0.0069 Eel, spotted cusk- Chilara taylori 0.0067 0.0069 Eel, wolf (wolf-eel) Anarrhichthys ocellatus 0.0067 0.0069 Escolar Lepidocybium flavobrunneum 0.0067 0.0069 Eulachon Thaleichthys pacificus 0.0067 0.0069 Fish, unspecified Osteichthyes 0.0067 0.0069 Flounder, arrowtooth Atheresthes stomias 0.0027 0.0028 Flounder, starry Platichthys stellatus 0.0027 0.0028 Flounder, unspecified Pleuronectidae 0.0027 0.0028 Flyingfish Exocoetidae spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Frog Rana spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Frog, bull Rana catesbiana 0.0067 0.0069 Goby, bluebanded Lythrypnus dalli 0.0067 0.0069 Goby, yellowfin Acanthogobius flavimanus 0.0067 0.0069 Goby, zebra Lythrypnus zebra 0.0067 0.0069 Greenling, kelp Hexagrammos decagrammus 0.0067 0.0069 Greenling, rock Hexagrammos lagocephalus 0.0067 0.0069 Grenadier Macrouridae 0.0027 0.0028 Grouper Mycteroperca / Epinephelus 0.0067 0.0069 Grouper, broomtail Mycteroperca xenarcha 0.0067 0.0069 Grunion, California Leuresthes tenuis 0.0067 0.0069 Guitarfish, shovelnose Rhinobatos productus 0.0067 0.0069 Hagfishes Eptatretus spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Halfmoon Medialuna californiensis 0.0067 0.0069 Halibut, California Paralichthys californicus 0.0333 0.0343 Halibut, Pacific Hippoglossus stenolepis 0.0333 0.0343 Halibut, unspecified Pleuronectiformes 0.0333 0.0343 Hardhead (freshwater) Mylopharodon conocephalus 0.0067 0.0069 Herring, Pacific Clupea pallasi 0.0027 0.0028 Herring, Pacific - roe Clupea pallasi 0.0027 0.0028 Herring, Pacific - roe on kelp Clupea/algae 0.0027 0.0028 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LANDING FEE RATE PER LANDING FEE RATE PER POUND July 2017 to POUND 2021 December 2020 Herring, round Etrumeus teres 0.0027 0.0028 Hitch Lavinia exilicauda 0.0067 0.0069 Hornsnail Cerithidea spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Invertebrate Unspecified 0.0067 0.0069 Jack, almaco (amberjack) Seriola rivoliana 0.0067 0.0069 Jack, Pacific crevalle Caranx caninus 0.0067 0.0069 Jacks, unspecified Carangidae 0.0067 0.0069 Jacksmelt Atherinopsis californiensis 0.0047 0.0048 Jellyfish Hydrozoa 0.0067 0.0069 Kahawai Arripis trutta 0.0067 0.0069 Kelp, giant Macrocystis spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Kelpfish, giant Heterostichus rostratus 0.0067 0.0069 Kelpfishes Gibbonsia spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Killifish, California Fundulus parvipinnis 0.0067 0.0069 Lamprey, Pacific Lampetra tridentata 0.0067 0.0069 Lancelets, amphioxus Branchiostoma californiense 0.0067 0.0069 Limpet, keyhole Megathura crenulata 0.0067 0.0069 Limpet, unspecified Archaeogastropoda 0.0067 0.0069 Lingcod Ophiodon elongatus 0.0133 0.0137 Lizardfish, California Synodus lucioceps 0.0067 0.0069 Lobster, California spiny Panulirus interruptus 0.1333 0.1374 Louvar Luvarus imperialis 0.0067 0.0069 Mackerel, bullet Auxis rochei 0.0010 0.0010 Mackerel, jack Trachurus symmetricus 0.0010 0.0010 Mackerel, Pacific Scomber japonicus 0.0010 0.0010 Mackerel, unspecified Scomber / Trachurus 0.0010 0.0010 Midshipman, plainfin Porichthys notatus 0.0067 0.0069 Mollusk, unspecified Mollusca 0.0067 0.0069 Mudsucker, longjaw Gillichthys mirabilis 0.0067 0.0069 Mullet, striped Mugil cephalus 0.0067 0.0069 Mussel Mytilus spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Needlefish, California Strongylura exilis 0.0067 0.0069 Octopus, unspecified Octopus spp. 0.0067 0.0069 Oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus 0.0067 0.0069 Opah Lampris guttatus 0.0067 0.0069 Opaleye Girella nigricans 0.0067 0.0069 Oyster, California native Ostrea lurida 0.0067 0.0069 Oyster, eastern Crassostrea virginica 0.0067 0.0069 Oyster, european flat Ostrea edulis 0.0067 0.0069 Oyster, giant Pacific Crassostrea gigas 0.0067 0.0069 Oyster, unspecified Ostreidae 0.0067 0.0069 Perch-like, unspecified Kyphosidae/Pomacentridae 0.0067 0.0069 Pomfret, Pacific Brama japonica 0.0067 0.0069 Prawn, golden Penaeus californiensis 0.0133 0.0137 Prawn, ridgeback Eusicyonia ingentus 0.0133 0.0137 Prawn, spot Pandalus platyceros 0.1000 0.1031 Prickleback, monkeyface (eel) Cebidichthys violaceus 0.0067 0.0069 Queenfish Seriphus politus 0.0067 0.0069 Ratfish, spotted Hydrolagus colliei 0.0067 0.0069 Ray, bat Myliobatis californica 0.0067 0.0069 Ray, Pacific electric Torpedo californica 0.0067 0.0069 Ray, unspecified Rajiformes 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, aurora Sebastes aurora 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, bank Sebastes rufus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, black Sebastes melanops 0.0067 0.0069 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LANDING FEE RATE PER LANDING FEE RATE PER POUND July 2017 to POUND 2021 December 2020 Rockfish, black-and-yellow Sebastes chrysomelas 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, blackgill Sebastes melanostomus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, blackspotted Sebastes melanostictus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, blue Sebastes mystinus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, bocaccio Sebastes paucispinis 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, bronzespotted Sebastes gilli 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, brown Sebastes auriculatus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, calico Sebastes dallii 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, canary Sebastes pinniger 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, chameleon Sebastes phillipsi 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, chilipepper Sebastes goodei 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, China Sebastes nebulosus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, copper Sebastes caurinus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, copper (whitebelly) Sebastes caurinus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, cowcod Sebastes levis 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, darkblotched Sebastes crameri 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, flag Sebastes rubrivinctus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, gopher Sebastes carnatus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, grass Sebastes rastrelliger 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, greenblotched Sebastes rosenblatti 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, greenspotted Sebastes chlorostictus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, greenstriped Sebastes elongatus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, group Sebastes/group 0.0067 0.0069 rougheye/blackspotted Rockfish, group shelf Sebastes/group 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, group slope Sabastes/group 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, honeycomb Sebastes umbrosus 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, kelp Sebastes atrovirens 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, Mexican Sebastes macdonaldi 0.0067 0.0069 Rockfish, olive Sebastes
Recommended publications
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 477:177

    Marine Ecology Progress Series 477:177

    Vol. 477: 177–188, 2013 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 12 doi: 10.3354/meps10144 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Larval exposure to shared oceanography does not cause spatially correlated recruitment in kelp forest fishes Jenna M. Krug*, Mark A. Steele Department of Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA ABSTRACT: In organisms that have a life history phase whose dispersal is influenced by abiotic forcing, if individuals of different species are simultaneously exposed to the same forcing, spa- tially correlated settlement patterns may result. Such correlated recruitment patterns may affect population and community dynamics. The extent to which settlement or recruitment is spatially correlated among species, however, is not well known. We evaluated this phenomenon among 8 common kelp forest fishes at 8 large reefs spread over 30 km of the coast of Santa Catalina Island, California. In addition to testing for correlated recruitment, we also evaluated the influences of predation and habitat quality on spatial patterns of recruitment. Fish and habitat attributes were surveyed along transects 7 times during 2008. Using these repeated surveys, we also estimated the mortality rate of the prey species that settled most consistently (Oxyjulis californica) and evaluated if mortality was related to recruit density, predator density, or habitat attributes. Spatial patterns of recruitment of the 8 study species were seldom correlated. Recruitment of all species was related to one or more attributes of the habitat, with giant kelp abundance being the most widespread predictor of recruitment. Mortality of O. californica recruits was density-dependent and declined with increasing canopy cover of giant kelp, but was unrelated to predator density.
  • WDFW Washington State Status Report for the Bald Eagle

    WDFW Washington State Status Report for the Bald Eagle

    STATE OF WASHINGTON October 2001 WashingtonWashington StateState StatusStatus ReportReport forfor thethe BaldBald EagleEagle by Derek W. Stinson, James W. Watson and Kelly R. McAllister Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program WDFW 759 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011, Appendix I). In 1990, the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297, Appendix I). The procedures include how species listing will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, public review and recovery and management of listed species. The first step in the process is to develop a preliminary species status report. The report includes a review of information relevant to the species’ status in Washington and addresses factors affecting its status including, but not limited to: historic, current, and future species population trends, natural history including ecological relationships, historic and current habitat trends, population demographics and their relationship to long term sustainability, and historic and current species management activities. The procedures then provide for a 90-day public review opportunity for interested parties to submit new scientific data relevant to the draft status report and classification recommendation. During the 90-day review period, the Department held three public meetings to take comments and answer questions. The Department has now completed the final status report, listing recommendation and State Environmental Policy Act findings for presentation to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission.
  • Lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria: Structure and Role in a Trophic Cascade

    Lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria: Structure and Role in a Trophic Cascade

    Lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria : structure and role in a trophic cascade Louis Bornancin To cite this version: Louis Bornancin. Lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria : structure and role in a trophic cascade. Other. Université Montpellier, 2016. English. NNT : 2016MONTT202. tel-02478948 HAL Id: tel-02478948 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02478948 Submitted on 14 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Délivré par Université de Montpellier Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale Sciences Chimiques Balard Et de l’unité de recherche Centre de Recherche Insulaire et Observatoire de l’Environnement (USR CNRS-EPHE-UPVD 3278) Spécialité : Ingénierie des Biomolécules Présentée par Louis BORNANCIN Lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria : Structure and Role in a Trophic Cascade Soutenue le 11 octobre 2016 devant le jury composé de Monsieur Ali AL-MOURABIT, DR CNRS, Rapporteur Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles Monsieur Gérald CULIOLI, MCF, Rapporteur Université de Toulon Madame Martine HOSSAERT-MCKEY, DR CNRS, Examinatrice, Centre d’Écologie
  • A Very Long Term Tag Recovery of a California Scorpionfish (Scorpaena Guttata)

    A Very Long Term Tag Recovery of a California Scorpionfish (Scorpaena Guttata)

    California Fish and Game 105(1):8-9; 2019 A very long term tag recovery of a California Scorpionfish (Scorpaena guttata) EDGAR W. ROBERTS III* AND DOYLE A. HANAN, PHD California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Marine Region, 619 2nd Street Eureka, CA 95501, USA (EWR) Hanan and Associates, P.O. Box 8914 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067, USA (DAH) *Correspondent: [email protected] Key words: California scorpionfish, days at liberty, Floy FD-94,Scorpaena guttata, tag return During the four-year period from 21 November 2002 to 24 July 2006, we performed a mark-recapture study on nearshore groundfish off southern and central California (Hanan and Curry 2012). For the study, volunteer fishermen aboard chartered commercial passen- ger fishing vessels (CPFV) caught by hook and line, 32 species of groundfish (32,366 total fish), including 2,751 California Scorpionfish, Scorpaena guttata; these fish were marked with Floy FD-94 tags and released. As of the date of the Hanan and Curry paper, 257 scor- pionfish were reported as recaptured with an average days at liberty (DAL) of 408.8 days (431.6 SD; range 2 - 2,126 days). A total of 76 (33%) of these recaptured scorpionfish were recaptured within 1 km of their original tagging site, 155 (67%) were within 5 km, and 17 (1%) were recaptured at distances of 50 km or more from the original tagging site with a range of 68 to 1,788 DAL. On 21 November 2017, a tagged California scorpionfish was reported caught by Mr. Robert Rosenberg, a recreational angler, on a one-day trip aboard the CPFV New Del Mar out of Marina Del Rey, California.
  • Breeding in an Oceanic Population of Pleuroncodes Planipes (Crustacea, Galatheidae) 1 ALAN R

    Breeding in an Oceanic Population of Pleuroncodes Planipes (Crustacea, Galatheidae) 1 ALAN R

    Breeding in an Oceanic Population of Pleuroncodes planipes (Crustacea, Galatheidae) 1 ALAN R. LONGHURST2 AND DON L. R. SEIBERT'l ABSTRACT: The pelagic population of Pleuroncodes planipes known to occur in the California Current Extension is partly recruited by drift of megalopas from neritic regions and partly, as demonstrated by EASTROPAC samples, by breeding in situ , THE DISTRIBUTION of pelagic adults and larvae samples; only size frequencies of night samples of the galatheid crab Pleuroncodes planipes in are used here. the California Current has been described re­ Adults of Pleuroncodes planipes, none of cently (Boyd, 1963, 1967; Longhurst, 1967, which had carapace lengths exceeding 15 mm, 1968). These studies showed the regular occur­ were found early in the year in northern Area 1. rence of an oceanic population of small adults This population (carapace length 9 to 13 mm) far beyond the normal neritic habitat and indi­ shifted its locus in late summer until, at the end cated how this expatriate population might be of the year, all occurrences were south of 14° recruited from megalopas derived from the N ; the second winter cruise (February-March neritic population along the west coast of Baja 1968) showed that the population had shifted California. north again to a locus between 14° to 20° N. The Eastern Tropical Pacific (EASTROPAC) In Area 2, adults were present only after Au­ expeditions (February 1967 to March 1968 gust-September, when a population of very from 20° N to 20° S and from the American small (6 to 8 mm) . adults appeared in the sam­ continent out to 126° W) afforded an oppor­ ples and remained through the end of the year.
  • HMS App a August 2003

    HMS App a August 2003

    APPENDIX F U.S. WEST COAST HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES: LIFE HISTORY ACCOUNTS AND ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS (Originally Appendix A to the FMP) U.S. West Coast Highly Migratory Species Plan Development Team Pacific Fishery Management Council Originally Available January 16, 2003 HMS FMP - Appendix Fi June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS REVIEW OF METHODS AND DEFINITIONS.............................................F-1 1.0SHARKS ....................................................................F-1 1.1Common Thresher ...........................................................F-1 1.1.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Common Thresher ................................F-4 1.2Pelagic Thresher.............................................................F-5 1.2.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Pelagic Thresher..................................F-6 1.3Bigeye Thresher .............................................................F-7 1.3.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Bigeye Thresher ..................................F-9 1.4Shortfin Mako ...............................................................F-9 1.4.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Shortfin Mako ...................................F-12 1.5Blue Shark.................................................................F-12 1.5.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Blue Shark......................................F-16 2.0TUNAS.......................................................................F-16 2.1Albacore ..................................................................F-16 2.1.8 Essential Fish Habitat for Albacore .......................................F-20
  • Paralabrax Nebulifer) in Nearshore Waters Off Northern San Diego County

    Paralabrax Nebulifer) in Nearshore Waters Off Northern San Diego County

    ROBERTS ET AL.: FEEDING HABITS OF BARRED SAND BASS CalCOFI Rep., Vol. XXV, 1984 THE FEEDING HABITS OF JUVENILE-SMALL ADULT BARRED SAND BASS (PARALABRAX NEBULIFER) IN NEARSHORE WATERS OFF NORTHERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY DALE A. ROBERTS‘, EDWARD E. DeMARTINI’, AND KENNETH M. PLUMMER2 Marine Science Institute University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106 ABSTRACT pelecipodos y peces epibent6nicos. Estas observa- The feeding habits of juvenile-small adult barred ciones no concuerdan con estudios previos, 10s cuales sand bass (Purulubrax nebulifer) are described, based consideran a la anchoveta del norte, Engruulis mor- on 165 specimens 123-523 mm standard length (SL) dux, como el elemento mas importante en la dieta de collected between San Onofre and Oceanside, Califor- P. nebulifer de tallas similares a las analizadas durante nia, at depths ranging from 8 to 30 m. Collections esta estudio. La dieta de P. nebulifer pequeiios (< 240 were made during an annual cycle from March 1981 to mm de longitud esthndar) es distinta debido a la pre- March 1982. sencia de crustaceos (misidaceos y antipodos gamir- The diet of the barred sand bass indicates that it idos), mientras que 10s ejemplares grandes (> 320 forages in close proximity to the substrate. Brachyuran mm LE) consumieron presas grandes como Porich- crabs, mysids, pelecypods, and epibenthic fishes were thys notutus (80-160 mm LE) y Octopus. P. nebulifer the most important prey. These findings are contrary de talla mediana (240-320 mm LE) contenian en su to previous studies, which found northern anchovy est6mago presas similares a las consumidas por 10s (Engruulis mordux) to be of major importance in the ejemplares grandes y pequeiios.
  • Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A

    Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A

    Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 September 2015 Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 September 2015 II Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong This publication may be cited as: Giatas, G.C. and Ye, Q. (2015). Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 858. 81pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
  • Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Off Newfoundland and Labrador Determined from Genetic Variation

    Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Off Newfoundland and Labrador Determined from Genetic Variation

    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua Newfoundland and Labrador population Laurentian North population Maritimes population Arctic population in Canada Newfoundland and Labrador population - Endangered Laurentian North population - Threatened Maritimes population - Special Concern Arctic population - Special Concern 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 76 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jeffrey A. Hutchings for writing the update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Rapport du COSEPAC sur la situation de la morue franche (Gadus morhua) au Canada Cover illustration: Atlantic Cod — Line drawing of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua by H.L. Todd. Image reproduced with permission from the Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, Division of Fishes. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003 Catalogue No.CW69-14/311-2003-IN ISBN 0-662-34309-3 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment summary — May 2003 Common name Atlantic cod (Newfoundland and Labrador population) Scientific name Gadus morhua Status Endangered Reason for designation Cod in the inshore and offshore waters of Labrador and northeastern Newfoundland, including Grand Bank, having declined 97% since the early 1970s and more than 99% since the early 1960s, are now at historically low levels.
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis

    New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis

    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals

    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals

    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................