DR14-8 314/274014-008

Open 9

Report and recommendations on submissions to the City District Plan: Islands Section – Proposed 2006 Topic: Landforms 1 - 7 (General)

Report to: The council From: The chairperson, hearings panel Date: 27 March 2009 Group file: 314/274014-008

1.0 Introduction This report considers submissions and further submissions (‘submissions’) that were received by the council in relation to landforms 1-7 (General)of the Auckland City District Plan: Hauraki Gulf Islands Section - Proposed 2006 (‘the Plan’).

This report provides an analysis of the decisions requested in submissions and the supporting evidence presented at the hearings on this matter. The report recommends whether each submission should be accepted or rejected (in full or in part) and what amendments (if any) should be made to the Plan to address matters raised in submissions. Further submissions are not specifically addressed but are dealt with in conjunction with the submissions to which they relate.

2.0 Statutory framework This section of the report briefly sets out the statutory framework within which the council must consider the submissions. In preparing this report the submissions and, in particular, the decisions requested in the submissions, together with the supporting evidence presented at the hearing, have been considered in light of the relevant statutory matters. These were summarised by the Environment Court in Eldamos Investments Limited v Gisborne District Council W047/05 where the court set out the following measures for evaluating objectives, policies, rules and other methods in district plans:

1. The objectives of the Plan are to be evaluated by the extent to which they: a. Are the most appropriate way to achieve the purpose of the RMA (s32(3)(a)); and b. Assist the council to carry out its functions in order to achieve the purpose of the RMA (s72); and c. Are in accordance with the provisions of part 2 of the RMA (s74(1)).

2. The policies, rules, or other methods in the Plan are to be evaluated by the extent to which they:

Page 1

DR14-8 314/274014-008 a. Are the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the Plan (s32(3)(b)); and b. Assist the council to carry out its functions in order to achieve the purpose of the RMA (s72); and c. Are in accordance with the provisions of part 2 of the RMA (s74(1)); and d. (If a rule) achieve the objectives and policies of the Plan (s76(1)(b)).

The purpose of the RMA is “to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources”, and “sustainable management” is defined in section 5(2) as meaning:

“… managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources in a way, or at a rate, which enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing and for their health and safety while— (a) Sustaining the potential of natural and physical resources (excluding minerals) to meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations; and (b) Safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of air, water, soil, and ecosystems; and (c) Avoiding, remedying, or mitigating any adverse effects of activities on the environment.”

Along with section 5, part 2 of the RMA includes sections 6 (matters of national importance), 7 (other matters) and 8 (Treaty of Waitangi), which set out a range of matters that the council needs to recognise and provide for in achieving the purpose of the RMA. Those matters are also relevant when considering submissions.

The Plan must assist the council to carry out its functions under section 31 of the RMA. These functions are:

“(a) The establishment, implementation, and review of objectives, policies, and methods to achieve integrated management of the effects of the use, development, or protection of land and associated natural and physical resources of the district: (b) the control of any actual or potential effects of the use, development, or protection of land, including for the purpose of— (i) the avoidance or mitigation of natural hazards; and (ii) the prevention or mitigation of any adverse effects of the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances; and (iia) the prevention or mitigation of any adverse effects of the development, subdivision, or use of contaminated land: (iii) the maintenance of indigenous biological diversity: (c) … (d) The control of the emission of noise and the mitigation of the effects of noise: (e) The control of any actual or potential effects of activities in relation to the surface of water in rivers and lakes.”

In addition to the matters listed above from the Eldamos decision: 1. The Plan must “give effect to” any national policy statement and any coastal policy statement (s75(3)(a) and (b)). 2. The Plan must “give effect to” the regional policy statement (made operative after 10 August 2005) (s75(3)(c)). 3. The Plan must be “not inconsistent with” any regional plan (s75(4)). 4. The council must ensure that that the Plan does not conflict with sections 7 and 8 of the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 (“the HGMPA”). Section 10 of the HGMPA requires that sections 7 and 8 of that Act be treated as a New Zealand coastal policy statement under the RMA.

3.0 Background This section of the report sets out background information about the topic under consideration. It identifies how the Plan deals with landforms 1-7 (General).

Page 2

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Landforms 1-7 apply to particular types of landform, ranging from coastal cliffs and slopes, to forest and bush. The landform land units apply to Waiheke, Great Barrier, Ponui, Pakihi, and Rakino.

4.0 Analysis of submissions

4.1 Introduction This section of the report discusses the decisions requested in submissions about landforms 1-7 (General) and recommends how the council should respond to the matters raised and decisions requested in submissions. The submissions are addressed under subject headings. While the relevant statutory matters (identified in section 2.0 of this report) will not necessarily be referred to directly, the discussion and recommendations have given appropriate consideration to these and any other relevant matters.

Evidence presented at the hearing is directly referred to in this report where the panel believes it is of particular assistance in understanding the decision requested or the reasons for the panel’s recommendation. These references are not intended to be exhaustive, and some evidence presented at the hearing may not be directly referred to in this report. However in reaching its recommendations the panel has considered all submissions, any written or verbal evidence presented in support of those submissions and the council planner’s report.

A list of the submissions considered in this report together with the related further submissions is contained in appendix 1 of this report. Any amendments to the Plan recommended in response to submissions are identified in this section of the report and are further detailed in appendix 2 of this report.

4.2 Submissions about the introduction of density controls Submissions dealt with in this section: 526/4, 526/5, 527/4, 527/5, 528/4, 528/5, 529/4, 529/5, 539/4, 539/5, 1091/6, 1091/7, 1091/8

4.2.1 Decisions requested Submissions 526/4, 527/4, 528/4, 529/4, 539/4, 1091/6, 1091/7 seek to establish density limits commensurate with the purpose of the landforms, for residential dwellings. The density limits should be the same as the provisions for subdivision in each relevant landform. It should be a permitted activity or at worst a controlled activity to establish residential dwellings that are consistent with a density limit, thereby avoiding subdivision or application for multiple dwellings.

Submissions 526/5, 527/5, 528/5, 529/5, 1091/8 seek that there should be a provision as a discretionary activity to increase density using clusters of dwellings or similar which should be measured against appropriate assessment criteria related to the land capability of the relevant catchment. 4.2.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The submitters seek that a density provision be included in each landform, as either a permitted, controlled or discretionary activity, to provide for the same number of dwellings as is currently provided for within Part 12 – subdivision. The submitters state that the current provisions of one dwelling per site are too restrictive and that a density provision provides an alternative for landowners who do not wish to subdivide their properties.

Page 3

DR14-8 314/274014-008 As defined in part 14 of the Plan, ‘multiple dwellings means more than one dwelling on a site’. The table below sets out the way in which multiple dwellings are provided for in the landform land units:

Land unit or settlement Status Limitations area Landform 2 (sand flats Discretionary An application for multiple dwellings will only be area only) considered as a discretionary activity where one Landforms 3, 5, 6, 7 or more of the following criteria are met: 1. The resulting number of dwellings on the site will be no more than that which would occur if the site were subdivided in accordance with the rules in part 12 - Subdivision applying to this land unit (with one dwelling per site). 2. An application is made at the same time for subdivision resulting in the amalgamation of sites such that the number of dwellings on the new site created would be no greater than that which could be achieved through locating a dwelling on each of the original sites. 3. The dwellings are for papakainga housing. 4. The land has been owned co-operatively by a number of individuals since prior to 29 September 1992. Proposals which do not meet these standards are a non-complying activity

The panel acknowledge that the approach taken in the Plan, with the exception of papakainga housing and land communally owned prior to 29 September 1991, means that the multiple dwelling provisions should are tied to the number of dwellings that would be permitted if the site were subdivided in accordance with the rules in part 12 of the Plan. As set out in clause 12.10(3), any subdivision, which does not meet the minimum site sizes, specified in tables 12:1, 12:2 and 12:3, is a non-complying activity.

Providing for more than one dwelling per site in the landforms is likely to lead to subsequent pressure for subdivision as separate titles are sought for each dwelling. This may change the pattern and intensity of development and lead to adverse effects on the landform. It is for this reason that, in general, the multiple dwelling provisions seek to ensure that no more dwellings are provided for than would occur if the site were subdivided in accordance with the minimum site areas set out in table 12.1 and one dwelling was located on each site.

The panel consider that the Plan makes suitable allowance for multiple dwellings within the landforms as a discretionary activity. This activity status allows the Council to control the types of development being undertaken to ensure that the natural characteristics of each landform are maintained and any adverse effects are avoided, remedied or mitigated.

The panel conclude that the provision of a density control is unnecessary for residential dwellings into the landforms and it is recommended that the submissions be rejected.

Page 4

DR14-8 314/274014-008 4.3 Submissions relating to activities Submissions dealt with in this section: 284/3, 526/6, 527/6, 528/6, 529/6, 539/6, 526/9, 527/9, 528/9, 529/9, 539/9, 1288/135, 1288/136, 1288/137, 1288/138, 1288/140

4.3.1 Decisions requested Submission 284/3 seeks that the provisions for landform 5 (productive land) and landform 6 (regenerating slopes), in relation to land use activities, be amended so that a more proactive approach to sustainable development is encouraged and facilitated.

Submissions 526/6, 527/6, 528/6, 529/6, 539/6 seek to extend the new winery activity, which has been introduced to the Plan in other landforms. This activity is only provided in landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land) and commercial 5 (industrial). Allow this activity as a restricted discretionary activity in other non-residential landforms.

Submissions 526/9, 527/9, 528/9, 529/9, 539/9 seeks to extend the rural property management plan provision to additional landforms including landforms 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes), 2 (dune systems and sand flats) and 4 (wetland systems) to recognise large lots which cover multiple landforms and which require an integrated and cohesive management plan for the entire property.

Submission 1288/135 seeks that the activity table be amended to provide for rural activities and buildings such as farm buildings and drainage activities within specified thresholds.

Submission 1288/136 seeks to include outdoor adventure activities as a restricted discretionary activity where they involve buildings or structures.

Submission 1288/137 seeks to include management and enhancement activities that facilitate wetland management

Submission 1288/138 seeks that farming related buildings be included as a controlled activity.

Submission 1288/140 seeks to include the following activities in all rural land units on Great Barrier:

Activity Status Cafes/restaurants RD Outdoor recreation/adventure activities RD Residential use P Wineries RD Farm buildings C Art galleries and museums RD Care centres RD Educational facilities D Function facilities D Integrated visitor development D Open air markets RD Comprehensive management plans D Tourist complexes D Helipads D Windmill towers to 15m for generation of electricity RD Churches and places of worship, and church towers RD Disposal of treated wastewater RD Clustered residential developments RD Minor dwellings RD Forest harvesting D Management and enhancement activities that facilitate RD wetland management.

Page 5

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Sustainable farming and land management# P

4.3.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations

4.3.2.1 Submission 284/3 – proactive approach to sustainable development The submissions seek that the land unit take a more proactive approach to sustainable development through amendments to the land use activities. The submissions state that the land unit does not allow a sustainable approach to the management and enhancement of the land and it is suggested that a comprehensive management plan could be adopted.

The panel note that the purpose of the RMA is to promote sustainable management of natural and physical resources. Sustainable management is a complex concept, which involves a range of considerations, including the following; • Managing the adverse effects of human activities on the environment • Considering the natural environment • Enabling people to meet their needs • Considering future generations

The panel recognise that the Plan is one of the tools which the council uses to promote sustainable management and is most effective when used together with other council regulatory and non-regulatory methods and initiatives.

The Plan encourages, and in some cases requires that particular methods be used as part of development to promote sustainable management. One example of this, in relation to landform 5 (productive land) and landform 6 (regenerating slopes) is the controlling of the type, scale and location of activities and development in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment.

The submitter suggests that a comprehensive management plan could be adopted as a way of achieving a more proactive approach to sustainable development. The panel recognise that a comprehensive management plan is a means of providing for integrated land use and subdivision proposals that relate to the whole of a property and include land management, enhancement and environmental protection outcomes.

The topic of comprehensive management plans has been addressed in the decision report for text – general, land units and settlement areas – general, and part 12 subdivision. The panel’s recommendation is to provide for rural property management plans in all land units where the activity is not currently provided for as detailed in section 4.3.2.3 of this report

Rural property management plans are currently provided for as a permitted activity within the land unit. Provision of these management plans within the land unit allows property owners to plan the land use of their property is a holistic way.

The panel consider that part 12 – Subdivision, of the Plan already appropriately recognises the relationship between subdivision and the effects on landscape character from built forms (such as dwellings) that may arise from subsequent land use activities on any new sites created.

As discussed in the above mentioned decision reports, comprehensive management plan type provisions are sometimes used in district plans to secure replanting or protection of existing bush or other features in return for allowing smaller site sizes than would otherwise be permitted. However the panel consider that the Plan already provides appropriately for this by

Page 6

DR14-8 314/274014-008 means of the subdivision provisions (in clauses 12.9.3 and 12.9.4) relating to the protection of significant environmental features, and associated cluster subdivision.

It is considered by the panel that rural property management plans provide a holistic approach to land use which promotes sustainable development. Therefore it is recommended that the submission be rejected.

4.3.2.2 Submissions 526/6, 527/6, 528/6, 529/6, 539/6 – winery activity

Winery is defined in Part 14 of the Plan as:

“Winery means land or buildings used for the processing, and fermentation of grapes into wine, and may include bottling facilities, wine-tasting and ancillary wine retailing.

It does not include any of the following: • visitor accommodation • restaurants, cafes or other eating places • function facilities.”

The panel notes that the decision report for part 14 – Definitions has recommended that the definition for winery to amended to the following:

“Winery means land or buildings used for any of the following: • the processing and, if required, fermentation of grapes into wine or juice. • the storage, blending, or mixing of a wine or wines • the bottling or otherwise packaging of wine • the labelling of wine. • It may include wine-tasting and ancillary wine retailing.

It does not include any of the following: • visitor accommodation • restaurants, cafes or other eating places • function facilities.”

The Plan as notified provided for winery as a discretionary activity in landform 3 (alluvial flats), landform 5 (productive land), commercial 5 (industrial) and rural 1(Onetangi Road area only). The panel notes that the decision reports for landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land) recommend that winery be a permitted activity within these land units.

The panel consider that landform 6 (regenerating slopes) would not be a suitable location to provide for wineries as the area has high ecological values and high visual amenity due to its visual prominence in both coastal locations and as a backdrop to settlement areas. There are generally few, small scattered buildings within the land unit. The Plan currently limits activities that can occur within the land unit to avoid activities which could adversely effect the important natural features of the land unit.

Similarly, the panel consider that landform 7 (forest and bush areas) is another landform which makes a significant contribution to the natural character, conservation, ecological and visual amenity values of the islands. Landform 7 includes areas of extensive podocarp and broadleaf forest areas, along with areas of secondary regenerating forest and some isolated areas of manuka and kanuka. These areas are recognised by the panel to have survived or significantly recovered from milling activity in the past and there is generally an absence of built structures.

The resource management strategy for landform 7 is to limit activities to those of a low intensity and to require any new buildings to be assessed to ensure that there will be no

Page 7

DR14-8 314/274014-008 adverse effects on the natural character and conservation, ecological and visual amenity value of the land unit.

It is considered that the Plan adequately provides for wineries in the landforms where the activity is appropriate. It is recommended that the submissions be rejected.

4.3.2.3 Submissions 526/9, 527/9, 528/9, 529/9, 539/9 – rural property management plan Rural property management plan is defined in part 14 of the Plan (as notified) as:

“Rural property management plan means a long term management plan which comprehensively details all land use activities proposed to be undertaken on a site, including the location of buildings and activities, and the mitigation of effects proposed to manage adverse effects from those buildings and activities.”

The Plan as notified provides for rural property management plans as a separately listed activity in the following land units:

Activity status for rural property Land unit management plans Landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) - Discretionary sand flats area only Landform 3 (alluvial flats) Landform 5 (productive land) Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) Landform 7 (forest and bush areas)

The panel acknowledge that rural property management plans are intended to provide a means by which a landowner or occupier can plan comprehensively, and on a long term basis, for the use of a site, and obtain a consent for a range of buildings and activities which may otherwise require a succession of separate consents on an ad hoc basis.

The panel recognise, particularly on Great Barrier, that some sites are made up of a number of landforms. For example, a site may include landform 1 at the cliff and then move to landforms 6 and 7 as it rises up the slope. In a similar way, sites at sea level may include landforms 2 and 3 and move to landforms 5 and 6 as they rise away from the sea.

The rural property management plan is intended to apply to a site as a whole but currently the sensitive landforms 1, 2 (dune systems) and 4 are not included. While the panel consider that activity and development should be avoided in these environments, the provisions of the rural property management plan would provide an opportunity to further protect and even enhance these environments while providing for development on the other, less sensitive areas of the site. The panel are concerned to ensure that the provisions and explanation ensure that the sensitive landforms are protected within a rural property management plan and that the provision is not used to develop these areas.

The panel consider that the following amendment to the definition of rural property management plan is appropriate:

“Rural property management plan means a long term management plan which comprehensively details all land use activities proposed to be undertaken on a site. It includes:, including • the location of buildings and activities, and • the mitigation of effects proposed to manage adverse effects from those buildings and activities

Page 8

DR14-8 314/274014-008 • methods for protecting and, where practicable, enhancing any parts of the site classified as landform 1, 2 or 4.”

The panel consider that rural property management plans should therefore be included as discretionary activities in the activity tables for landforms 1, 2 (dune systems) and 4. The panel also consider that it is important to include wording in the resource management strategy for land units 1, 2 and 4 to explain the intent of including the rural property management plan in these land units. Without an explanation, the panel consider that inclusion of this activity in the land unit would appear to allow for development within the land unit where it is actually considered only that opportunities for protection and enhancement of the land unit, for example planting, fencing and pest eradication, can be secured through a holistic plan for a site.

It is therefore recommended that the following wording be included in clauses 10a.2.4, 10a.3.5.1 and 10a.5.4:

“…Rural property management plans are provided for as a discretionary activity in recognition of the long term management approach to development for a whole site that is expected from these plans. Some sites contain a range of different landform land units. It is therefore appropriate for a rural property management plan to include methods for protecting and enhancing any parts of the site which are classified as [relevant landform name]”

Therefore, it is recommended that the submission be accepted. 4.3.2.4 Submissions 1288/135, 1288/136, 1288/137, 1288/138, 1288/140 – activities to be included The submitter seeks that a number of new activities be included in the activity tables for all the rural land units on Great Barrier as follows:

Activity Status sought Cafés/restaurants RD Outdoor recreation/adventure activities RD Residential use P Wineries RD Farm buildings C Art galleries and museums RD Care centres RD Educational facilities D Function facilities D Integrated visitor development D Open air markets RD Comprehensive management plans D Tourist complexes D Helipads D Windmill towers to 15m for generation of electricity RD Churches and places of worship, and church towers RD Disposal of treated wastewater RD Clustered residential developments RD Minor dwellings RD Forest harvesting D Management and enhancement activities that facilitate wetland management. RD Sustainable farming and land management P

The panel assume that the rural land units that the submitter is referring to are the landform land units as these are the only ‘rural’ type land units on Great Barrier. Each landform land unit contains an individual activity table indicating the activities that could be appropriate for inclusion within that land unit. The landform land units are reflective of the natural character and environment contained in that land unit and the intention of the land units is to protect

Page 9

DR14-8 314/274014-008 this natural character, while allowing some activities that are considered not to result in adverse effects.

In order to manage growth on Great Barrier, settlement areas have been established. The settlement areas are areas of historic settlement and are important centres for the community on the island. It is intended that growth and development on Great Barrier be focussed in the settlement areas in order for the community to undertake activities that assist with the economy of the island, while also recognising the key asset to the island is the natural environment.

The panel have identified several of the activities requested by the submitter have been provided for (to some extent) within these designated settlement areas including: • Cafés/Restaurants • Residential Use (provided for as dwellings (one per site)) (this activity is also provided for in the landforms) • Art galleries and museums • Care centres • Educational facilities • Function facilities • Open air markets • Tourist complexes • Churches and places of worship, and church towers (provided for as community facilities)

As discussed above, it is intended that growth and development on Great Barrier be focussed within the settlement areas. The panel consider that the above activities are more intensive in nature and therefore are appropriately included in the settlement areas for the island. It is not considered appropriate to include such activities in the landform land units.

Of the activities requested by the submitter, the following activities are not provided for within the settlement areas: • Comprehensive management plans • Clustered residential development • Disposal of treated wastewater • Farm buildings • Forest harvesting • Helipads • Integrated visitor development • Management and enhancement activities that facilitate wetland management. • Minor dwellings • Outdoor recreation/adventure activities • Sustainable farming and land management • Windmill towers • Wineries

Comprehensive management plans

As described in other subparts of the submission, a comprehensive management plan is a means of providing for integrated land use and subdivision proposals that relate to the whole of a property and include land management, enhancement, and environmental protection

Page 10

DR14-8 314/274014-008 outcomes. The submissions suggest that comprehensive management plans should be provided for as a discretionary activity in the landform land units (with the exception of landforms 1-4). The submitter suggests that the Plan should also be amended to include allied assessment criteria and an appendix containing environmental and design principles.

The panel acknowledge that the topic of comprehensive management plans has been addressed in the decision report for text – general, land units and settlement areas – general, part 10 and 10a – general and part 12 - subdivision.

The panel consider that part 12 – Subdivision, of the Plan already appropriately recognises the relationship between subdivision and the effects on landscape character from built forms (such as dwellings) that may arise from subsequent land use activities on any new sites created.

As discussed in the above mentioned decision reports, comprehensive management plan type provisions are sometimes used in district plans to secure replanting or protection of existing bush or other features in return for allowing smaller site sizes than would otherwise be permitted. However it is considered by the panel that the Plan already provides appropriately for this by means of the subdivision provisions (in clauses 12.9.3 and 12.9.4) relating to the protection of significant environmental features, and associated cluster subdivision.

The panel do not recommend that comprehensive management plans be included in all the landform land units.

Clustered residential development

Clustered residential development is provided for in rural 1 through part 12 of the Plan. Part 12- subdivision provides for clustered residential development associated with the protection of significant environmental features. It is therefore considered by the panel that adequate provision has been made in rural 1 for this type of subdivision and no amendments to the Plan are required.

Disposal of treated wastewater

The submitter did not attend the hearing to speak further to this submission and therefore the panel is still unclear as to the relief sought by this submitter. The panel therefore recommends that this part of the submission be rejected.

Farm buildings

The submitter seeks that farm buildings be provided for as a controlled activity within the landform land units. The panel recognise that farm buildings could be more adequately provided for within the Plan. This matter has been addressed in the decision report for part 14 – definitions under the definition of pastoral farming where the following amendment to the definition has been recommended:

“Pastoral farming means the growing of grass and fodder crops on which stock are grazed. It includes the associated use of land and buildings. It does not include the grazing of deer or goats.”

Pastoral farming is provided for as a permitted activity in landform 2 (sand flats area), landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land) and the panel consider that these land units adequately provide for farming activities, and with the amended definition, farming buildings within the landform land units.

Page 11

DR14-8 314/274014-008 The panel do not consider that there is a need for farm buildings outside of the land units that provide for pastoral farming and therefore it is not considered necessary to include farm buildings as a separate activity. The panel consider that farm buildings are adequately provided for in the landform land units through the definition of pastoral farming.

Forest harvesting

The submitter seeks that forest harvesting be provided for as a discretionary activity within the landform land units. Forestry is currently provided for as a discretionary activity in landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land). The panel consider that these two land units are the most appropriate location for forestry to be provided so that the impacts on indigenous vegetation, such as that contained in landforms 6 and 7, and sensitive natural environments, such as landforms 1, 2 and 4 can be avoided.

The panel note that “continuous canopy native forestry” activity is likely to be provided for, through the decision report for landforms and settlement areas (general), in landforms 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7.

The panel consider that there is adequate provision within the landform land units for forestry and no additional provisions are recommended.

Helipads

The submitter seeks that helipads be provided for as a restricted discretionary activity in all landform land units. The panel note that helipads are dealt with in part 13 of the Plan and in particular, clause 13.8 refers to the rules in relation to helipads and airstrips. Clause 13.8.2 – permitted activities (as notified) includes the following rule:

“For Great Barrier only, helipads and airstrips are permitted in landform 1-7, where: 1. No more than three inward and three outward movements occur in a seven day period; and 2. The noise from any landing area does not exceed an Lmax of 85dBA measured at any adjacent notional boundary with a residential use on an adjacent site.”

If the helipad does not comply with the criteria above, it is classed as a discretionary activity in landforms 1-7.

Other submissions on helipads were considered in the decision report on part 13 and it is therefore considered by the panel that helipads are adequately provided for in the landform land units and there is no requirement to include them as a separate activity in the activity tables.

Integrated visitor development

The submitter seeks that integrated visitor development be provided for as a discretionary activity within the land unit.

Integrated visitor development is defined in part 14 of the Plan as:

“Integrated visitor development means a comprehensive proposal for all buildings and activities associated with a visitor development. It may include one or more of the following: • visitor accommodation • restaurants, café and other eating places • tourist complex • visitor information centre • dairy

Page 12

DR14-8 314/274014-008 • management and maintenance facilities and service infrastructure.”

Currently this activity is only provided in visitor areas A and B within the Rotoroa land unit, as a discretionary activity.

The activities included in the integrated visitor development definition are not considered by the panel as appropriate for inclusion in the landform land units. The panel acknowledge that this is because the Plan aims to focus growth and development on Great Barrier to the settlement areas and most of the activities, which make up integrated visitor development are already provided for within the settlement areas.

Management and enhancement activities that facilitate wetland management

The submitter seeks that management and enhancement activities that facilitate wetland management be included as a restricted discretionary activity within the landform land units. Landform 4 (wetland systems) is a land unit devoted to the protection of the natural character and the ecological and hydrological value of wetland systems.

As stated in the introductory paragraph of the land unit, landform 4 is applied to fresh water wetlands that drain to rivers, streams or estuaries and to areas of land that support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The panel consider that it is not practicable for the council to map and identify all watercourses and wetlands or to attempt to show on the planning maps all the minor stream and wetland systems and major ephemeral watercourses that feed into them. This would require a considerable amount of additional mapping work and would affect the legibility of the maps.

The panel consider that wetlands of particular ecological significance are protected through the site of ecological significant (SES) provisions. SES provisions are provided for within part 7 – Heritage of the Plan and reference to this relationship is stated in clause 10a.5.7 Relationship with rules in other parts of the Plan, as it is done so for all parts of the Plan where a specific relationship is identified. The Plan also specifies protection yards for wetland and water bodies which protects streams and wetlands which are not identified as landform 4 or as being a site of ecological significance. Ecosourced planting is a permitted activity within landform 4 and assists with enhancement of the land unit.

Planning maps are another important reference which allows users to clearly identify the relevant land unit/s (Map 1) and any scheduled items, natural hazards, roading and other additional limitations (Map 2) which could apply to a property.

It is not clear from the submission what management and enhancement activities the submitter seeks to be included in the land units and as the submitter did not attend the hearing, the panel are still unclear what activities the submitter is referring to. The panel therefore recommend that the submission be rejected.

Minor dwellings

The term minor dwellings is not defined in the Plan or provided for in any other land units or settlement areas. The topic of minor dwellings is addressed in the decision report for the island residential land units. The report considers that the rationale for providing minor dwellings or ‘granny flats’ is that the family member can lead an independent life while being close to family for support. Usually these 'granny flats' are situated on the same site as the main dwelling.

Page 13

DR14-8 314/274014-008 The panel acknowledge that the issues that are associated with providing for this type of accommodation have in the past included:

• How is the council able to determine that this type of accommodation will be used for the purpose it is intended (e.g. not rented out privately)? • What should happen to the accommodation when the family member does not require the unit anymore? • What relationship should this type of accommodation have to the main dwelling in terms of size, proximity to main dwelling and parking provision? • What will be the potential effects of providing for this type of accommodation in these locations?

The panel’s recommendation in the island residential hearing report is to decline requests for the inclusion of minor dwellings in the Plan due to the issues identified above and this recommendation is adopted for the above submissions which request that minor dwellings be provided for within the landform land units on Great Barrier.

Outdoor recreation/adventure activities

Part 14 of the Plan provides:

“Outdoor adventure activities means an adventure sport undertaken outdoors. It includes paintball, mountain biking and associated tracks, bungy jumping, kayaking, and other outdoor pursuits. It does not include motorised activities such as motorcross or go- karting.”

The panel note that outdoor adventure activities are currently provided for as a discretionary activity within landform 3 (alluvial flats). The submitter seeks a restricted discretionary status for the activity in all landform land units. The panel consider that this activity could be provided for in other landform land units such as landforms 5 and 6. However, in the most sensitive landforms (landforms 1, 2, 4 and 7) the panel consider that such activities could result in significant adverse effects on the natural character and high amenity value of these areas.

Landform 5 (productive land) could be a suitable location for outdoor adventure activities. The land unit provides for large scale rural activities on the islands and it is recognised that outdoor adventure activities could provide an additional source of income to landowners, therefore contributing to their social and economic wellbeing, while maintaining the rural character of the land unit. This is in line with the objectives and policies for the land unit.

The panel considers that a restricted discretionary activity status for outdoor adventure activities could be appropriate in this land unit if the potential adverse effects could be narrowed down as matters over which council restricts its discretion. Matters such as noise, hours of operation, scale of activity and buildings, parking and traffic generation are all factors, which would need to be considered to ensure that the activity will not detract from the rural character of the land unit.

The panel also consider that a discretionary activity status could be applied in the landform 5 land unit and to landform 2 (sand flats area only), as there could be a number of factors, depending on the nature of the activity, that could result in adverse effects on the natural environment.

Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) could also be a suitable location for outdoor adventure activities. The panel consider however that the activity could result in adverse effects on the

Page 14

DR14-8 314/274014-008 natural character, ecological and visual amenity value of the land unit, which would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the land unit.

On balance, the activity should be included in landforms 2 (sand flats only), 5 and 6 as a discretionary activity as the extent of potential adverse effects on the environment cannot be restricted.

Sustainable farming and land management

It is not clear to the panel from the submission exactly what relief is sought by the submitter. The panel note that the Plan addresses sustainable management in part 2. It recognises that the purpose of the RMA is ‘to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources’ and that the Plan is one of the tools used by the Council to promote sustainable management

Sustainable management is a complex matter that involves a range of considerations including the following: • managing the adverse effects of human activities on the environment • considering the natural environment • enabling people to meet their needs • considering future generations

All of these factors have been considered with respect to farming and land uses on the islands. The panel consider that farming activities are most sustainable on landforms 3 (alluvial flats) and 5 (productive land). Therefore, pastoral farming is a permitted activity in landform 3 (alluvial flats), landform 5 (productive land) and landform 2 (sand flats area only). It is also recognised by the panel that farming sometimes requires ancillary activities in order to make the use of the whole property sustainable. This is why a number of non-rural activities have been provided for in landforms 3 and 5.

It is therefore considered by the panel that the Plan makes adequate provision for sustainable farming and land management.

Windmill towers (to 15m)

Windmills are not currently provided for as a specified activity within the Plan. The panel note that a windmill falls within the definition of a building in the Plan and therefore each application will be subject to any controls within the individual land unit and any development controls in part 10c. The standard height limit for landforms 1-7 is 6m however it is recognised that extra height may be warranted for some types of windmill. Additional height can be considered as a development control modification under clause 10c.3.

The submitter is seeking a restricted discretionary status for this activity in all landform land units and the panel consider that this status is appropriate for those land units where the construction and relocation of buildings is currently provided for as a restricted discretionary activity. The panel do not consider it appropriate however, to alter the activity status for this activity, in any of the land units where the construction and relocation of buildings is either a permitted or non-complying activity. The panel acknowledge that most windmills will exceed the permitted height of 8m in the development controls. Therefore, an application for a windmill over 8m in height will be assessed as a discretionary activity and all environmental effects such as visual amenity can be considered.

Page 15

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Wineries

The Plan as notified, provides for wineries as a discretionary activity within landforms 3 (alluvial flats) and 5 (productive land) however, it has been recommended in the decision reports for these land units that this status be amended to a permitted activity. The panel consider that a permitted status more adequately represents the objectives and policies of the land unit and recognises that wineries provide for the economic and social wellbeing of the community by encouraging tourists and visitors to the island.

The panel do not consider it appropriate to provide for wineries in other landform land units as it is recognised that wineries can result in substantial modification and adverse effects on the natural environment. It is also for this reason that the panel do not consider it appropriate to alter the status of the activity to restricted discretionary as suggested by the submitter.

The panel consider that wineries are adequately provided for in the landform land units.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that that submissions 1288/135, 1288/136 and 1288/140 be accepted in part with the amendments recommended above being included in the Plan and the panel recommend that submissions 1288/137 and 1288/138 be rejected.

4.4 Submissions about the Waiheke Airfield, 171 Carsons Road. Submissions dealt with in this section: 1100/2, 1100/3

4.4.1 Decisions requested Submission 1100/2 seeks that a separate special purpose zone or landform for Waiheke Airfield at 171 Carsons Road should incorporate the relevant conditions of the original consent as set out in Appendix H of the Operative Plan.

Submission 1100/3 seeks that the separate special purpose zone or landform for Waiheke Airfield at 171 Carsons Road should provide for visitor accommodation, dwellings, offices workshops, and hangars (which are associated with the airfield and which support the airfield activity), as controlled activities or restricted discretionary activities. Criteria should include the visibility and visual appearance of the buildings, materials and colour, noise attenuation, vegetation management, earthworks, stormwater management and effluent treatment and disposal. 4.4.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations

The panel note that most of the property at 171 Carsons Road is classified landform 5 (productive land) with the rest of the property being made up of small areas of both landform 7 (forest and bush areas) and landform 6 (regenerating slopes). The property contains a site of ecological significance (SES) containing complex regenerating kanuka with mature forest remnants.

The submitter, Airpark Resort Ltd, seeks that several activities be included in the special purpose zone proposed. The panel notes that dwellings and visitor accommodation have already been provided for within landform 5. Offices, workshops and hangars are not generally considered appropriate for inclusion within this land unit, however the panel notes that resource consent has been previously granted for a hangar at the address.

Existing activities being undertaken on the property are covered by current resource consents and it is therefore not considered necessary to create a unique land unit for these activities.

Page 16

DR14-8 314/274014-008 The panel notes that since the hearing, a resource consent to expand the operations at the property has been declined by the Auckland City Council and the matter has been appealed to the Environment Court.

The submitter did not attend the hearings and has not provided sufficient analysis of the effects that this special purpose zone would have on the surrounding environment. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

4.5 Submissions about forestry, firewood harvesting and vegetation clearance Submissions dealt with in this section: 22/1, 129/4, 130/4, 132/4, 172/4, 176/2, 237/4, 241/4, 242/4, 243/4, 244/4, 270/4, 271/4, 272/4, 274/4, 275/4, 1528/4, 1543/4, 1967/1, 2380/1, 3036/1, 3425/4, 3426/4, 3427/4, 3428/4, 3429/4, 3430/4, 3431/4, 3432/4, 3433/4, 3434/4, 3435/4, 3436/4, 3437/4, 3438/4, 3439/4, 3440/4, 3441/4, 3442/4, 3443/4, 3444/4, 3445/4, 3446/4, 3447/4, 3448/4, 3449/4, 3450/4, 3451/4, 3452/4, 3453/4, 3454/4, 3455/4, 3456/4, 3457/4, 3458/4, 3459/4, 3460/4, 3461/4, 3462/4, 3463/4, 3464/4, 3465/4, 3466/4, 3467/4, 3468/4, 3469/4, 3470/4, 3471/4, 3472/4, 3473/4, 3474/4, 3475/4, 3476/4, 3477/4, 3478/4, 3479/4, 3480/4, 3481/4, 3482/4, 3483/4, 3484/4, 3485/4, 3486/4, 3487/2, 3488/4, 3488/6, 3489/4, 3490/4, 3491/4, 3492/4, 3493/4, 3494/4, 3495/4, 3496/4, 3497/4, 3498/4, 3499/4, 3500/4, 3501/4, 3502/4, 3503/4, 3504/4, 3505/4, 3507/4, 3511/4, 3581/5, 3851/4, 3852/2, 3857/4

4.5.1 Decisions requested Submission 22/1 seeks the farming of kanuka and manuka up to any height and size for firewood, oil or bio-fuel production on Great Barrier.

Submissions 129/4, 130/4, 132/4, 172/4, 237/4, 241/4, 242/4, 243/4, 244/4, 270/4, 271/4, 272/4, 274/4, 275/4, 3425/4, 3426/4, 3427/4, 3428/4, 3429/4, 3430/4, 3431/4, 3432/4, 3433/4, 3434/4, 3435/4, 3436/4, 3437/4, 3438/4, 3439/4, 3440/4, 3441/4, 3442/4, 3443/4, 3444/4, 3445/4, 3446/4, 3447/4, 3448/4, 3449/4, 3450/4, 3451/4, 3452/4, 3453/4, 3454/4, 3455/4, 3456/4, 3457/4, 3458/4, 3459/4, 3460/4, 3461/4, 3462/4, 3463/4, 3464/4, 3465/4, 3466/4, 3467/4, 3468/4, 3469/4, 3470/4, 3471/4, 3472/4, 3473/4, 3474/4, 3475/4, 3476/4, 3477/4, 3478/4, 3479/4, 3480/4, 3481/4, 3482/4, 3483/4, 3484/4, 3485/4, 3486/4, 3487/2, 3488/4, 3489/4, 3490/4, 3491/4, 3492/4, 3493/4, 3494/4, 3495/4, 3496/4, 3497/4, 3498/4, 3499/4, 3500/4, 3501/4, 3502/4, 3503/4, 3504/4, 3505/4, 3507/4, 3511/4, 3581/5, 3851/4, 3852/2, 3857/4 would like to see a sensible, practical solution to clearance of vegetation/bush and selected firewood harvesting on Great Barrier and provision for commercial/personal domestic firewood harvesting and provision for sustainable foresting and firewood harvesting as a discretionary activity on certain block sizes throughout the island subject to owners signing up to one range of management plans which would be included in the Plan.

Submission 176/2 seeks the addition of firewood harvesting of manuka and kanuka on landform 3, 5, 6, 7.

Submission 1967/1 seeks that the private or commercial harvesting of kanuka/manuka for firewood be permitted activity in any area..

Submission 2380/1 seeks that provision be made for cutting firewood commercially as a permitted activity.

Submission 3036/1 seeks to provide for the sustainable harvesting of firewood (manuka, kanuka) as a permitted activity.

Page 17

DR14-8 314/274014-008

Submission 3488/6 seeks provision to be made for areas specifically identified for the tree cropping of kanuka/manuka. These areas to be cleared, as in rotational grazing, and reseeded from the spreading of the cut canopy over the cleared areas from which it was obtained. 4.5.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations

4.5.2.1 Submission 22/1 – farming of kanuka and manuka The submitter seeks the farming of kanuka and manuka up to any height and size for firewood, oil or bio-fuel production on Great Barrier.

The panel have considered firewood in later sections of this report as it is recognised that the Plan could make more adequate provision for the firewood needs of residents on Great Barrier.

Currently the Plan, as notified, provides for kanuka up to 6m to be removed as a permitted activity (with manuka removal being permitted up to 3m in height). Other than this, the felling of kanuka and manuka, other than for domestic firewood (within the criteria detailed in sections of the report below) or for commercial firewood harvesting (with the relevant resource consent) the activity would be considered as forestry. Forestry is provided for within certain landform land units.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

4.5.2.2 Submissions 129/4, 130/4, 132/4, 172/4, 176/2, 237/4, 241/4, 242/4, 243/4, 244/4, 270/4, 271/4, 272/4, 274/4, 275/4, 1528/4, 1543/4, 1967/1, 2380/1, 3036/1, 3425/4, 3426/4, 3427/4, 3428/4, 3429/4, 3430/4, 3431/4, 3432/4, 3433/4, 3434/4, 3435/4, 3436/4, 3437/4, 3438/4, 3439/4, 3440/4, 3441/4, 3442/4, 3443/4, 3444/4, 3445/4, 3446/4, 3447/4, 3448/4, 3449/4, 3450/4, 3451/4, 3452/4, 3453/4, 3454/4, 3455/4, 3456/4, 3457/4, 3458/4, 3459/4, 3460/4, 3461/4, 3462/4, 3463/4, 3464/4, 3465/4, 3466/4, 3467/4, 3468/4, 3469/4, 3470/4, 3471/4, 3472/4, 3473/4, 3474/4, 3475/4, 3476/4, 3477/4, 3478/4, 3479/4, 3480/4, 3481/4, 3482/4, 3483/4, 3484/4, 3485/4, 3486/4, 3487/2, 3488/4, 3489/4, 3490/4, 3491/4, 3492/4, 3493/4, 3494/4, 3495/4, 3496/4, 3497/4, 3498/4, 3499/4, 3500/4, 3501/4, 3502/4, 3503/4, 3504/4, 3505/4, 3507/4, 3511/4, 3581/5, 3851/4, 3852/2, 3857/4 – forestry, firewood harvesting and vegetation clearance.

Forestry

Forestry is defined in Part 14 of the Plan as:

“Forestry means the management of land for commercial wood production including the extraction of timber.

It does not include any of the following: • the milling or processing of timber • commercial firewood harvesting.”

It is noted by the panel that forestry is currently provided for as a discretionary activity within landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land). As discussed in section 4.3.2.4 above, these two land units are considered the most appropriate land units to provide for forestry. Landforms 3 and 5 are both, in the majority, covered in pasture and therefore there is limited interference with indigenous vegetation such as the vegetation found on landforms

Page 18

DR14-8 314/274014-008 6 and 7. Forestry usually involves the planting of exotic species and the panel do not consider it appropriate to introduce exotic species, at a scale for forestry activities, into the landform 6 land unit. The panel also consider that in land units made up of sensitive natural areas, such as landforms 1, 2, and 4, it is not appropriate to include such activities as the potential for adverse effects on the natural environment is high.

Forestry activities are not expected to comply with any other vegetation clearance controls set out in part 10c of the Plan. The panel consider that the discretionary status of the activity allows the Council to assess the suitability of each application for forestry on a case by case basis.

Therefore the panel do not recommend that forestry be included anywhere else in the Plan.

Firewood harvesting The panel recognise that the Plan could better acknowledge the needs of residents in relation to the harvesting of firewood.

Currently commercial firewood harvesting is defined in part 14 of the Plan as:

“Commercial firewood harvesting means the harvesting of manuka, kanuka or any exotic species for the production and sale of firewood. It does not include other activities associated with the milling or processing of trees.”

Commercial firewood harvesting is provided for as a discretionary activity in landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 5 (productive land). The panel notes that commercial firewood harvesting is not required to comply with any other vegetation controls contained in part 10c of the Plan.

It is considered by the panel that a management plan should be required with each application for commercial firewood harvesting so that matters such as the phasing and amounts of felling are addressed and can be considered by the council. The panel recommend that the definition of commercial firewood harvesting be amended to read as follows:

“Commercial firewood harvesting means the harvesting of manuka, kanuka or any exotic species for the production and sale of firewood. The harvesting must occur in accordance with a management plan.

It does not include other activities associated with the milling or processing of trees”

The panel considers that commercial firewood harvesting could be provided for within landform 6 (regenerating slopes). This land unit contains extensive areas of bush in varying rates of regeneration. The panel consider that it is suitable to include commercial firewood harvesting in this land unit, as this is where vegetation is most abundant and therefore the impacts of managed vegetation removal would be less.

The panel therefore recommends that commercial firewood harvesting be included in landform 6 (regenerating slopes) as a discretionary activity.

The discretionary status of the activity allows the Council to assess each application for commercial firewood harvesting on a case by case basis. The panel consider that the most efficient way of ensuring that firewood harvesting is sustainable is to ensure that all commercial operations are required to obtain resource consent and operated under an approved management plan. This way, the Council is able to monitor the total quantity of firewood being harvested and ensure that harvesting is kept to a sustainable level.

Page 19

DR14-8 314/274014-008 The panel recognise that the Plan does not currently make specific allowance for domestic firewood harvesting on Great Barrier and it is considered that this activity should provided for.

As a result of the hearings and deliberations, a number of changes have been recommended by the panel in relation to vegetation on the islands. These include provisions for domestic firewood harvesting, the removal of the exotic tree protection controls from Waiheke, provisions for clearance around habitable buildings, fencelines and lawfully existing accessways on Great Barrier and a number of additional provisions in sites of ecological significance (SES) and sensitive areas (SA). These topics are addressed in detail in the decision reports for part 10c – development controls and part 7 – heritage.

Vegetation clearance

It is recognised that the rules relating to vegetation clearance in the Plan could be amended to be made clearer and easier to interpret for Plan users. This topic is addressed in more detail in the hearing report for part 10c – development controls and for SES’s, in part 7 - heritage and therefore no recommendations on this matter will be made in this report.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submissions be accepted in part and that the recommended amendments above be adopted in the relevant land units.

4.5.2.3 Submission 3488/6 – cropping of kanuka/manuka The submission seeks provision to be made for areas specifically identified for the tree cropping of kanuka/manuka. These areas to be cleared, as in rotational grazing, and reseeded from the spreading of the cut canopy over the cleared areas from which it was obtained.

It is not clear to the panel where in the Plan the submitter seeks for the requested activity to be included and the submitter did not attend the hearing to expand on this further.

The panel consider that the activity described by the submitter would fall within the definition of forestry. Forestry is currently provided in landforms 3 (alluvial flats) and 5 (productive land) as discussed in section 4.5.2.2 above.

The panel consider that forestry activity is appropriately provided for within the Plan and therefore it is recommended by the panel that this submission be accepted in part in that it appears to support the inclusion of forestry in the Plan.

4.6 Submissions about the inclusion of a new land unit Submissions dealt with in this section: 1340/1, 1584/1, 1588/1, 2146/1, 2152/1, 2177/4, 2214/1, 2216/1

4.6.1 Decisions requested Submissions 1340/1, 1584/1, 1588/1, 2146/1, 2152/1, 2177/4, 2214/1, 2216/1 seek to include a new land unit, “Land Unit – Landform 20 (farming and agriculture)” to the Plan. 4.6.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The submissions seek to include a new ‘farming’ land unit to the Plan specifically for small lots (up to 4ha) on Great Barrier. The submitters are concerned that the controls on land use activities within the Plan are too restrictive for small blocks of land.

Page 20

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Pastoral farming is defined in Part 14 of the Plan as:

“Pastoral farming means the growing of grass and fodder crops on which stock are grazed. It does not include the grazing of deer or goats.”

The panel note that this definition has been amended in the decision report for part 14 - definitions

Currently the plan provides for pastoral farming in the following land units:

Land Unit Status Landform 2 (sand flats area only) P Landform 3 (alluvial flats) P Landform 5 (productive land) P Rural 1 (rural amenity) P Rural 2 (western landscape) P

A number of the submitters on this topic attended the hearings and spoke further on this matter. The panel acknowledge that farming activities do not always provide completely for the economic and social wellbeing of landowners, especially on small scale land holdings. In recognition of this, the appropriate land units provide for alternative activities to pastoral farming to be undertaken within the land unit. These activities include provisions for horticulture, visitor accommodation and wineries.

It is therefore considered by the panel that farming is adequately provided for within the Plan through its inclusion as a permitted activity in all appropriate land units and the provision for a range of activities which could be run in conjunction with the farm in order to provide additional income to landowners. The panel do not consider that a new land unit is necessary.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

4.7 Submissions about visitor facilities Submission dealt with in this section: 1596/13

4.7.1 Decisions requested Submission 1596/13 seeks that all visitor facilities (other than those established within a visitor-specific land unit) should be discretionary, and those for more than 10 persons should be non-complying.

4.7.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations Currently the Plan provides for visitor accommodation in the following land units:

Activity status Activity status for for the Activity status for visitor Land unit construction visitor accommodation accommodation for and relocation for up to 10 people over 10 people of buildings Commercial 1 RD D D (Oneroa Village) Commercial 2 RD D D

Page 21

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Activity status Activity status for for the Activity status for visitor Land unit construction visitor accommodation accommodation for and relocation for up to 10 people over 10 people of buildings (Ostend Village) Matiatia RD P P Landform 3 P P D (alluvial flats) Landform 5 P P D (productive land) Landform 6 RD P D (regenerating slopes) Landform 7 RD P D (forest and bush areas) Settlement Areas D D D (residential amenity areas) Settlement Areas RD P P (local retailing areas) Settlement Areas RD D D (local retailing areas) Rural 1 (rural RD P D amenity) Rural 2 (western RD P D landscape)

The panel note that where visitor accommodation (for up to 10 people) is provided within the landforms, it holds a permitted activity status. In most cases, with the exception of landforms 3 and 5, a restricted discretionary resource consent is still required for the construction of any new building.

The panel consider that the effects of the use of a dwelling compared with a visitor accommodation facility (for up to 10 people) are barely distinguishable and therefore it is considered that these activities are relatively interchangeable between one another.

The panel also consider that the permitted activity status of visitor accommodation (for up to 10 people) is appropriate for inclusion within the above land units.

The panel note that visitor accommodation (for more than 10 people) is provided for as a discretionary activity in the landforms, where appropriate. A discretionary status means that a resource consent must be obtained prior to the establishment of the activity and it provide the Council with the option to impose conditions on the consent, or to decline the consent completely should it be found inappropriate. The discretionary activity status indicates that the suitability of the activity needs to be considered on a case by case basis.

A non-complying activity, whilst still requiring a resource consent, indicates that the Council general believes that the activity is not suitable anywhere within the land unit. Whilst the submitter may take this view, the panel consider that with growth in visitor and tourist

Page 22

DR14-8 314/274014-008 numbers to the islands, provision should be made, where appropriate, to provide for larger scale accommodation facilities.

It is therefore considered by the panel that the activity status for both visitor accommodation (for up to 10 people) and visitor accommodation (for more than 10 people) are appropriate within the landform land units and it is recommended that the submission be rejected.

4.8 Submissions about designation of land at 29 Maungatawhiri Road, Great Barrier Submission dealt with in this section: 2355/1

4.8.1 Decisions requested Submission 2355/1 seeks that the land comprising the north-eastern corner of 29 Maungatawhiri Road, Great Barrier be designated for the establishment of a synagogue and yeshiva with associated facilities – the land area occupying approximately one hectare.

4.8.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The panel note that currently the property which is subject to the submission is classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and it is considered that this landform accurately represents the natural character and vegetation cover of the property.

In order to designate land a requiring authority must apply for the designation. Ministries of the Crown, local authorities and approved network utility operators can all be requiring authorities, but the general public cannot. It is therefore not possible for the submitters, the owners of the property, to request that this land be designated.

The submitter can instead apply for resource consent or private plan change to establish both the synagogue and yeshiva in this land unit. It is noted by the panel however that neither community facilities nor educational facilities are provided for within the activity table for landform 6, which means that both are considered non-complying activities.

The submitter attended the hearing and further described the site and his plans for the future. While the panel has no particular knowledge of this site, it is considered that community facilities and educational facilities are not appropriate on all sites within landform 6 and this is represented by the exclusion of these activities from the activity table. A change to the activity tables specifically for this property would effectively result in ‘spot zoning’ and there is no compelling reason for this. The panel consider that an application for resource consent for these activities would be the most appropriate approach and could be assessed on a case by case basis and the individual characteristics of the property can then be assessed for the suitability of the activities requested.

The submitter also raised at the hearing the lack of recognition of the Jewish community of the islands in the Plan. The panel do not consider that the Plan is the most appropriate place for this recognition but instead suggest that a community notice board, newsletter or tourist maps would be a more appropriate place to recognise the Jewish community.

The panel therefore recommend that the submission be rejected.

Page 23

DR14-8 314/274014-008 4.9 Submissions about a blanket ‘farm zone’ Submissions dealt with in this section: 2510/1, 2728/1

4.9.1 Decisions requested Submission 2510/1 seeks that all farms be given a blanket zone that specifically deals with farming activities.

Submission 2728/1 seeks a farm zone (land unit) which relates to all pasture land or grazing land like open space. 4.9.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The submitters seeks that farms be given a blanket zone, rather than the way the classification of the property is done currently where each separate landform is represented.

The submitters attended the hearing and spoke further to this submission. The panel recognise that it could be more simple for landowners and particularly farmers to have a ‘farm zone’ to cover their entire farm. However the panel consider that this approach would not take into account significant natural landscapes which need protection.

Without the necessary protection, natural features such as vegetation, wetlands, coastal cliffs could be sacrificed, resulting in a potential loss of valuable habitats, natural character and amenity.

It is therefore considered by the panel that the landforms are the most accurate way to represent the composition of land on the islands. Landform 5 (productive land) and landform 3 (alluvial flats) are two areas where it is recognised that farming practices are suitable and pastoral farming has been provided for as a permitted activity. The panel consider however that in other landforms, farming practices may not be appropriate as they may result in significant adverse effects on the environment and as a result, farming has not been provided for as a permitted activity.

Therefore the panel recommend that the submissions be rejected.

4.10 Submissions about the provision of multiple dwellings at 255 & 230 Gray Road, Great Barrier.

Submission dealt with in this section: 2555/6

4.10.1 Decisions requested Submission 2555/6 seeks that provision be made on the submitter’s land (Lots 1 (#255) and 3 (#320) Gray Road, Palmers Beach, Great Barrier) for multiple dwellings as a controlled activity. 4.10.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations As noted by the submitter, currently the properties subject to the submission are classified as: Lot 1 - #255 landform 2 (sand flats), landform 5 (productive land), landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas) Lot 2 - #320 landform 3 (alluvial flats), landform 4 (wetland systems), landform 5 (productive land), landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas).

Page 24

DR14-8 314/274014-008 The panel consider that it is inappropriate to provide an exemption from the landform rules for certain activities on specific properties as the classification of the land carries with it the activity status which outlines the suitability of each activity on that land.

It is not stated in the submission where on the submitter’s properties the multiple dwellings would be located. The following table identifies the status of multiple dwellings on each of the land units.

Land Unit Activity Status of Multiple Dwellings Landform 2 (sand flats) D Landform 3 (alluvial flats) D Landform 4 (wetland systems) NC Landform 5 (productive land) D Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) D Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) D

The majority of the land units hold a discretionary activity status however this discretionary status is only considered where one or more of the following criteria are met:

“1. The resulting number of dwellings on the site will be no more than that which would occur if the site were subdivided in accordance with the rules in part 12 - Subdivision applying to this land unit (with one dwelling per site).

2. An application is made at the same time for subdivision resulting in the amalgamation of sites such that the number of dwellings on the new site created would be no greater than that which could be achieved through locating a dwelling on each of the original sites.

3. The dwellings are for papakainga housing.

4. The land has been owned co-operatively by a number of individuals since prior to 29 September 1992.

Proposals which do not meet these standards are a non-complying activity.”

The panel note that controlled activities do require a resource consent, however the Council must grant the consent and may only impose conditions on the aspects to which it has reserved control in the Plan.

Altering the activity status of multiple dwellings to a controlled activity would mean that the Council would be required to grant all resource consent application for multiple dwellings. It is recognised that multiple dwellings may not be appropriate for every property and as such the discretionary status has been applied.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

4.11 Submission about the inclusion of mechanisms for restoration and enhancement Submission dealt with in this section: 3521/84

4.11.1 Decisions requested Submission 3521/84 seeks to amend the objectives and policies for landforms 1-7 to include mechanisms for restoration and enhancement.

Page 25

DR14-8 314/274014-008 4.11.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The submitter, Auckland Regional Council, generally supports the objectives and policies relating to the landform land units but suggests that mechanisms for the restoration and enhancement of these landform areas also be developed. ARC seeks that the objectives and policies for landforms 1 to 7 be amended to include mechanisms for restoration and enhancement.

The activities provided for in each individual landform have been considered for their suitability and with any potential adverse effects on the character and amenity of the landform in mind. The activities provided for in each land take into account the sensitive and unique characteristics of each of the land units and this encourages the preservation of those characteristics.

The thrust of the controls seek to allow for development while maintaining or protecting the natural environment however through further discussion with the submitter in the hearing, the panel recognise that the possible enhancement and restoration on sites in some of the land units has the potential to achieve more than just protection in the sensitive landforms.

The panel therefore recommends that the wording “enhancement and restoration” be included in the objectives and policies for landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes), landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats), landform 4 (wetland systems) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas).

The following amendments to the Plan are therefore recommended:

• Clause 10a.2.3 of landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and visual prominence of the coastal cliffs and slopes from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

• Clause 10a.3.3 of landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and visual amenity value of the dune systems and sand flats from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

• Clause 10a.5.3 of landform 4 (wetland systems)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and the ecological and hydrological value of the wetland systems from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

• Clause 10a.5.3 of landform 7 (forest and bush areas)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and the conservation, ecological and visual amenity values of the forest and bush areas from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part and that amendments to the Plan be made as detailed above.

Page 26

DR14-8 314/274014-008 4.12 Submission about the reclassification of 32 Man O’War Bay Road, Waiheke Submission dealt with in this section: 1324/1, 1324/2, 1324/3, 1324/4

4.12.1 Decisions requested Submission 1324/1 seeks to reclassify Ngati Paoa Station (32 Man O'War Bay Road, eastern Waiheke) from various landform land units to a Special Purposes/Papakainga zoning.

Submission 1324/2 seeks that the Special Purposes/Papakainga zoning requested for Ngati Paoa Station (32 Man O' War Bay Road, eastern Waiheke) has at its foundation the existing rural style land uses but provides for community housing, a marae complex, cultural and educational facilities and visitor and tourist facilities as permitted activities.

Submission 1324/3 seeks that the content and details of this special purposes/Papakainga zoning and its structuring be agreed and finalised with Ngati Paoa. That an indicative model that might be applied for this purpose is that applied to Ngati Whatua lands at Orakei, and that in this regard specific reference should be had to Section 34 of the Orakei Act 1991

Submission 1324/4 seeks that in designing the special purposes/Papakainga zoning package specific regard be had to the intent by Mana Whenua that these lands will ultimately become self governed via Section 33 RMA or like mechanism.

4.12.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The property at 32 Man O'War Bay Road, which is approximately 966ha, consists of landform 4 (wetland systems), landform 5 (productive land), landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas). The intention of the landform land units is to represent the natural character and amenity of the land.

The submitter seeks that a special purpose/papakainga be established for the property. The submitter suggests that this would be based on the existing rural use of the land and would incorporate provision for community housing, a marae complex, cultural and educational facilities and visitor and tourist facilities.

The panel acknowledge that many of the activities sought by the submitter are already provided for in some of the land units on the property as detailed in the table below:

Activities Multiple Visitor Visitor Community Educational dwellings Accommodation Accommodation facilities (marae facilities (papakainga/ (up to 10 people) (more than 10 complex and community people) cultural facilities) housing) Land Units Landform 4 (wetland NC NC NC NC NC systems) Landform 5 (productive D P D NC NC land) Landform 6 (regenerating D P D NC NC slopes) Landform 7 (forest and D P D NC NC bush areas)

Page 27

DR14-8 314/274014-008

The panel also acknowledges that papakainga housing has been specifically provided for within the Plan and it allows more dwellings per site, as a discretionary activity in landforms 5- 7 because they are not required to meet the subdivision requirements like standard multiple dwellings.

The panel recognise that community and educational facilities are not provided for in any of the land units, and it is also noted that the use of land classified as landform 4 (wetland systems) restricted to all activities except eco-sourced planting due to the sensitive nature of this land unit.

The panel notes that a rural property management plan could be used to holistically plan for land use activities on the property. The panel have considered rural property management plans in other sections of this report and have recommended that all landform land units have provision for rural property management plans as a discretionary activity.

The submitter also seeks specific reference to section 34 of the Orakei Act 1991, which states:

“34. Exemption from payment of rates and other charges The whenua rangatira, the hapu reservation, and, to the extent that it remains undeveloped, the balance of the development land shall— (a) not be rateable under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002; and (b) Be exempt from all other taxes and charges from time to time imposed by the Auckland City Council or the Auckland Regional Council.”

The panel notes that this is not an issue which can be addressed through the Plan.

The panel also notes that the Piritahi Marae has been discussed in the decision report for the recreation 2 (community facilities and sports parks) land unit. Submissions for this land unit request that the marae be provided with its own land unit. Due to the sensitive nature of some of the land units contained on the property at 32 Man O’ War Bay Road, the panel do not consider it appropriate that a ‘blanket’ land unit be applied to the whole property. The panel recognise however that the Panel may wish to reclassify a part of the site to a marae-type classification, similar to that which is proposed for Piritahi Marae.

The property is located on the eastern end of the island, where the emphasis is on low intensity development, compared with the high intensity of the western end. The submitter did not attend the hearing to discuss this proposal in further detail and while the panel consider that the submitters proposal could be suitable in some areas of the property, the panel recognise that the landform classification of the property are the most representative ways to protect the various special features on the land.

The panel recommend that the submission be rejected due to a lack of information about the location of proposed activities on the property but invite the submitters to approach the council outside of the Plan review process to discuss development potential and options for the property.

4.13 Submissions about the miscellaneous matters Submissions dealt with in this section: 62/1, 93/1, 97/2, 2846/2, 3574/12, 3574/14

4.13.1 Decisions requested Submission 3574/12 supports the proposal to retain the foothills of Great Barrier Island as farms.

Page 28

DR14-8 314/274014-008

Submission 3574/14 supports the proposal to allow tourism development on larger blocks for up to 10 people, with consent required for larger numbers.

Submission 62/1 seeks to allow the continuation of the Kaitoke Links course at 67B Gray Road, Kaitoke by including the land unit

Submission 97/2 seeks that the Plan recognise the workshop and engineering shop at the front of 29 Maungatawhiri Road (Block M112), Tryphena as a commercial entity.

Submission 2846/2 seeks that the Orama Christian Fellowship Trust complex at 300 Karaka Bay Rd be listed as a scheduled activity.

Submission 93/1 seeks a total rethink on wetland systems and dune systems and a more practical commonsense approach to the rules governing private titles. 4.13.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations

4.13.2.1 Submissions 3574/12 and 3574/14 – supportive of the Plan The panel recommend that the submissions be accepted to the extent that it is supportive of specific areas of the Plan in relation to the landforms.

4.13.2.2 Submissions 62/1 – Kaitoke Links – 67B Gray Road, Kaitoke The submitter seeks that the provision be made within the Plan for the continuation of the links golf course at the above address.

The panel note that subdivision consent was granted for the subdivision of 67 Gray Road, Kaitoke in July 2005. The golf course was present on the property at the time of subdivision and the consent was granted to allow the golf course to be retained on Lot 2 of the subdivision.

Currently the property contains landform 2 (sand flats), landform 4 (wetland systems) and landform 6 (regenerating slopes). This is equivalent to the land units on the property in the Operative Plan. It is considered that these landforms accurately represent the composition of the land at the property.

Under the Operative Plan, the permitted activity rules would apply to the golf course activity, as it is not specifically listed as a listed discretionary activity. The activity would only be permitted under the Operative Plan if it complied with part 6B standards and terms, if it did not meet this, it would be discretionary. In the Proposed Plan, a golf course has not been provided for within the landform activity tables and therefore it would default to a non- complying activity. This would therefore mean that any alterations to the existing golf course not covered by the subdivision consent would require a resource consent.

The panel recognise that the Plan does not remove any rights to continue to use the land as a golf course. However, neither is it considered appropriate to allow a blanket provision for golf courses in all landform 2, 4 and 6 land units. Given that the Plan does not affect the use of the golf course the panel recommend that the submission be rejected.

Page 29

DR14-8 314/274014-008 4.13.2.3 Submissions 97/2 – 29 Maungatawhiri Road, Tryphena The submitter seeks recognition for a commercial workshop and engineering shop contained on the property. Currently the property is made up of landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas).

The submitter attended the hearing but not speak specifically in relation to this part of the submission. The panel recognise that the Plan does not remove any rights that the submitter may have to operate the engineering shop, regardless of the land unit in which it sits. Therefore the panel do not consider that it is necessary to amend the Plan in any way and therefore it is recommended that the submission be rejected.

4.13.2.4 Submission 2846/2 – 300 Karaka Bay Road The submitter has lodged a number of submissions which relate to this property, the majority of which have been addressed in the decision report for settlement areas. The settlement areas report acknowledges that the existing landform land units that apply to the Trust’s property do not reflect the land uses that have been established over a number of years and may inhibit sustainable land uses in the future.

The recommendation of the panel in this report that that council staff work with the Trust and its representatives with a view to creating a concept plan for Orama that recognises and provides for a range of existing and future land uses.

It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission requesting that the activity be listed as a scheduled activity be rejected.

4.13.2.5 Submission 93/1 – rethink of wetland systems and dune systems The submitter states that wetland systems and dune systems should not be applied to private land as they are “anti private enterprise”. The submitter attended the hearing to speak further to this submission and the panel acknowledge that the relief sought by the submitter is for a total rethink of both the wetland systems and dune systems.

Landform 4 (wetland systems) and landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) both comprise sensitive natural environments. Both land units require strong restrictions on the use and development provided for within the land units in order to protect the high natural character and amenity values of the land units.

The panel notes that in both landform 4 (wetland systems) and landform 2 (dune systems area only), the construction or relocation of buildings and exterior additions and alterations to buildings is a non-complying activity and the only activity specifically provided for within the land units is ecosourced planting. The resource management strategies for both land units is to specifically not provide for buildings or activities to occur at all within the land units due to the high natural character and ecological and amenity values.

The panel recognise that these land units are restrictive on landowners but it is considered essential to provide such strict control on these areas to ensure that the sensitive character of the land units is maintained and protected. The submission does not raise any specific areas where it is considered that these land units have been incorrectly applied. The panel notes however that there are a number of submissions which request specific reclassification of land and these matters have been addressed in the table in Appendix 2.

Page 30

DR14-8 314/274014-008 It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected to the extent it is recommended to retain both landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) and landform 4 (wetland systems) in the Plan.

4.14 Submissions relating to the reclassification of properties containing landform land units Submissions dealt with in this section: Group 1 Inner Islands: 535/1, 919/1, 1013/1, 1013/2, 1100/1, 1041/1, 1230/1, 1273/1, 1273/2, 1278/1, 1278/2, 1279/1, 1279/2, 1324/1, 1331/2, 1331/4, 2103/8, 2103/11, 2649/4, 3221/2, 3221/4, 3593/1, 3657/1, 3380/1

Group 2 Outer Islands: 32/1, 32/2, 73/1, 74/1, 75/1, 75/2, 94/1, 97/1, 100/1, 109/1, 108/1, 108/2, 110/1, 110/2, 112/1, 135/1,135/2, 135/3, 177/1, 259/1, 260/1, 266/1, 273/1, 276/1, 277/1, 332/1, 356/1, 357/1, 877/2, 1252/1, 1251/2, 1253/1, 1261/1, 1262/1, 1262/2, 1262/3, 1297/1, 1302/1, 1305/1, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1320/1, 1337/1, 1358/1, 1367/1, 1379/2, 1405/4, 1406/4, 1416/2, 1423/1, 1461/2, 1474/1, 1480/1, 1486/1, 1468/1, 1515/1, 1518/1, 1518/2, 1518/3, 1522/2, 1529/2, 1529/3, 1544/3, 1551/1, 1563/1, 1563/2, 1563/3, 1563/4, 1563/5, 1567/1, 1579/1, 1580/1, 1581/1, 1582/1, 1593/2, 1594/1, 1602/1, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1953/1, 1961/1, 1968/1, 1978/1, 1979/1, 1988/2, 1990/1, 2005/1, 2006/1, 2049/1, 2063/1, 2104/4, 2139/2, 2151/1, 2162/2, 2168/1, 2172/1, 2180/1, 2190/1, 2212/2, 2237/1, 2238/2, 2259/1, 2260/1, 2271/2, 2313/1, 2334/1, 2340/1, 2352/1, 2365/1, 2368/2, 2408/1, 2440/1, 2480/1, 2489/2, 2508/1, 2508/2, 2511/1, 2512/1, 2513/2, 2529/1, 2531/1, 2533/1, 2537/1, 2547/4, 2554/1, 2554/2, 2554/3, 2555/1, 2555/2, 2555/3, 2555/4, 2555/5, 2719/1, 2719/2, 2719/3, 2727/1, 2742/1, 3744/1, 2753/1,2753/2, 2753/3, 2852/1, 2858/2, 2858/3, 2864/2, 2866/1, 2867/1, 2868/1, 2870/1, 2873/1, 3000/1, 3052/1, 3052/2, 3086/1, 3088/1, 3090/3, 3139/2, 3501/6, 3501/7, 3501/9, 3521/87, 3677/1, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3769/1, 3785/1, 3798/2, 3826/1, 3827/2, 3858/1

4.14.1 Decisions requested The submissions request the reclassification of specific areas and properties on the Islands. Details of the decision requested by each submission are contained in Appendix 2. 4.14.2 Panel’s analysis and recommendations The analysis and recommendations in relation to these submissions are detailed in Appendix 2.

5.0 Conclusion This report has considered the decisions requested in submissions lodged regarding landforms 1-7 (General) of the Proposed Auckland City District Plan: Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2006. The report recommends whether submissions should be accepted or rejected and how associated further submissions should be dealt with, and how the Plan should be modified as a result. It is concluded that the recommendations set out in section 6.0 below should be implemented for the reasons set out in section 4.0 of this report. This includes amendments to the Plan as outlined in appendix 2 of this report.

6.0 Recommendations

For the reasons set out in section 4.0 of this report:

Page 31

DR14-8 314/274014-008 1. Reject submissions 32/1, 32/2, 62/1, 73/1, 93/1, 94/1, 97/1, 97/2 , 100/1, 109/1, 108/1, 108/2, 110/1, 110/2, 112/1, 135/2, 135/3, 260/1, 284/3, 332/1, 526/4, 526/5, 526/6, 527/4, 527/5, 527/6, 528/4, 528/5, 528/6, 529/4, 529/5, 529/6, 535/1, 539/4, 539/5, 539/6, 1091/6, 1091/7, 1091/8, 1100/1, 1100/2, 1100/3, 1273/1, 1273/2, 1288/137, 1288/138, 1297/1, 1324/1, 1324/2, 1324/3, 1324/4, 1340/1, 1405/4, 1406/4, 1529/2, 1544/3, 1563/5, 1580/1, 1582/1, 1584/1, 1588/1, 1593/2, 1594/1, 1596/13, 1979/1, 2005/1, 2006/1, 2146/1, 2152/1, 2177/4, 2214/1, 2216/1, 2352/1, 2355/1, 2440/1, 2510/1, 2513/2, 2533/1, 2537/1, 2547/4, 2554/1, 2554/2, 2554/3, 2555/1, 2555/2, 2555/3, 2555/4, 2555/5, 2555/6, 2728/1, 2753/1, 2753/2, 2753/3, 2846/2, 2852/1, 2858/2, 2858/3, 2867/1, 2868/1, 2870/1, 3000/1, 3052/2, 3139/2, 3501/6, 3501/7, 3501/9, 3521/87, 3826/1, 3827/2, 3858/1. 2. Accept submission 22/1, 74/1, 75/1, 75/2, 129/4, 130/4, 132/4, 172/4, 176/2, 237/4, 241/4, 242/4, 243/4, 244/4, 259/1, 270/4, 271/4, 272/4, 273/1, 274/4, 275/4, 877/2, 1013/1, 1013/2, 1041/1, 1237/1, 1237/2, 1252/1, 1251/2, 1261/1, 1262/1, 1262/3, 1278/1, 1278/2, 1279/1, 1288/135, 1288/136, 1288/140, 1302/1, 1305/1, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1320/1, 1331/2, 1331/4, 1337/1, 1358/1, 1367/1, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1423/1, 1461/2, 1474/1, 1480/1, 1515/1, 1518/1, 1518/2, 1518/3, 1522/2, 1528/4, 1543/4, 1563/2, 1567/1, 1581/1, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1953/1, 1961/1, 1967/1, 1968/1, 1978/1, 1988/2, 1990/1, 2063/1, 2139/2, 2151/1, 2162/2, 2168/1, 2172/1, 2180/1, 2190/1, 2212/2, 2237/1, 2238/2, 2260/1, 2271/2, 2313/1, 2334/1, 2340/1, 2365/1, 2368/2, 2380/1, 2408/1, 2480/1, 2489/2, 2508/1, 2508/2, 2511/1, 2512/1, 2529/1, 2531/1, 2649/4, 2719/1, 2719/2, 2727/1, 2742/1, 2864/2, 2873/1, 3036/1, 3088/1, 3090/3, 3221/2, 3221/4, 3380/1, 3425/4, 3426/4, 3427/4, 3428/4, 3429/4, 3430/4, 3431/4, 3432/4, 3433/4, 3434/4, 3435/4, 3436/4, 3437/4, 3438/4, 3439/4, 3440/4, 3441/4, 3442/4, 3443/4, 3444/4, 3445/4, 3446/4, 3447/4, 3448/4, 3449/4, 3450/4, 3451/4, 3452/4, 3453/4, 3454/4, 3455/4, 3456/4, 3457/4, 3458/4, 3459/4, 3460/4, 3461/4, 3462/4, 3463/4, 3464/4, 3465/4, 3466/4, 3467/4, 3468/4, 3469/4, 3470/4, 3471/4, 3472/4, 3473/4, 3474/4, 3475/4, 3476/4, 3477/4, 3478/4, 3479/4, 3480/4, 3481/4, 3482/4, 3483/4, 3484/4, 3485/4, 3486/4, 3487/2, 3488/4, 3488/6, 3489/4, 3490/4, 3491/4, 3492/4, 3493/4, 3494/4, 3495/4, 3496/4, 3497/4, 3498/4, 3499/4, 3500/4, 3501/4, 3502/4, 3503/4, 3504/4, 3505/4, 3507/4, 3511/4, 3521/84, 3581/5, 3677/1, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3744/1, 3768/2, 3769/1, 3785/1, 3798/2 3851/4, 3852/2, 3857/4 in part and amend the Plan accordingly as set out in appendix 2 of this report.

3. Accept submissions 135/1, 177/1, 266/1, 276/1, 277/1, 356/1, 357/1, 526/9, 527/9, 528/9, 529/9, 539/9, 919/1, 1230/1, 1253/1, 1262/2, 1279/2, 1468/1, 1486/1, 1529/3, 1551/1, 1563/1, 1563/3, 1563/4, 1579/1, 1602/1, 2049/1, 2103/8, 2103/11, 2104/4, 2259/1, 2719/3, 2866/1, 3052/1, 3086/1, 3574/12, 3574/14, 3593/1, 3657/1 and amend the Plan accordingly as set out in appendix 2 of this report.

4. Accept in full or in part, or reject accordingly further submissions made in support or opposition to the primary submissions listed above.

6. Amend the Proposed Auckland City District Plan: Hauraki Gulf Islands Section as set out in appendix 2 of this report.

Name and title of signatories Signature Councillor Graeme Mulholland Chairperson, hearings panel

Page 32

DR14-8 314/274014-008 Appendix 1 List of submissions and further submissions

G:\Planning\City Planning\data\District Plan Islands\HGI 1st Review\Decision reports (final only)\HPanel2\14-8DecisionReportLandform1- 7General.doc

314/274014-008

List of submissions and further submissions for landform 1-7 general (314/274014-008) Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 22/1 George S H Medland 947 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 2863 Support Michael P J O'Shea 32/1 Kevin Smith and Susan Smith 2489 Oppose Tom Waterer 382 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2945 Oppose Helen O'Shea 383 Oppose Sean and Colleen O'Shea 955 Oppose Mickey O'Shea 32/2 Kevin Smith and Susan Smith 2489 Oppose Tom Waterer 382 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2945 Oppose Helen O'Shea 963 Oppose Michael O'Shea 962 Oppose John Scott 961 Oppose Kristin Lowe 960 Oppose Conan F Flinn 959 Oppose Arthur Davies 958 Oppose Dennis C Robertson 957 Oppose Maurice Ngatai 956 Oppose Michael P J O'Shea 954 Oppose Helen O'Shea 953 Oppose Brian R Williams 964 Oppose The Estate of Graham C Wratt 383 Oppose Sean and Colleen O'Shea 956 Oppose Mickey O'Shea 62/1 Murray G Young 391 Support Sean O'Shea 73/1 Michael O'Shea 395 Support Sean O'Shea 74/1 Michael O'Shea 395 Support Sean O'Shea 75/1 Michael O'Shea 395 Support Sean O'Shea 75/2 Michael O'Shea 395 Support Sean O'Shea 94/1 Michael P J O'Shea 93/1 Michael P J O'Shea 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 97/1 Edward A Scott 97/2 Edward A Scott 100/1 Edward A Scott 108/1 Malcolm Harre and Wayne Ashton 402 Support Sean O'Shea 989 Support Michael P J O'Shea 988 Support Helen O'Shea

Page 1 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2864 Support Michael P J O'Shea 2857 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 108/2 Malcolm Harre and Wayne Ashton 402 Support Sean O'Shea 990 Support Michael P J O'Shea 2857 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2864 Support Michael P J O'Shea 109/1 William F Carlin 403 Support Sean O'Shea 993 Support Michael P J O'Shea 992 Support Michael O'Shea 991 Support Helen O'Shea 110/1 Malcolm Harre and Wayne Ashton 2857 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2864 Support Michael P J O'Shea 110/2 Malcolm Harre and Wayne Ashton 2857 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2864 Support Michael P J O'Shea 112/1 Michael P J O'Shea 129/4 Dorothy M White 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 130/4 Diana V Simpson 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 132/4 John Kjargaard 2494 Support Nicola A Wimsett 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 135/1 Michael P J O'Shea 135/2 Michael P J O'Shea 135/3 Michael P J O'Shea 172/4 Sylvia K Roberts 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 176/2 Michael W Boyd 177/1 Michael W Boyd 237/4 Doreen J Scott 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 241/4 Arthur Reid 556 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 2944 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 995 Support MPJ O’Shea 242/4 Aleshia Reid 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 243/4 Freda L Reid 557 Support Sean O’Shea 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 244/4 Sharon H Reid 558 Support Sean O’Shea 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 259/1 Peter Jemmett and Margaret Jemmett 260/1 Peter Jemmett and Margaret Jemmett 561 Support Sean O'Shea 266/1 Anthony S Jury and Gendie M Jury 270/4 Stephanie A Guthrie 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc.

Page 2 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 271/4 Mrs Rebecca Park 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 272/4 Buster P Park 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 273/1 R B and G K Somerville-Ryan and K J H Wang 274/4 Gael Johnson 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 275/4 Judy Gilbert 563 Support Kevin Burke 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 276/1 J Anne Smith 564 Support Sean O'Shea 997 Support Helen O'Shea 277/1 John G Sutton 284/3 Peter T Blackwell 2865 Support Michael P J O'Shea 332/1 David G Dodd 356/1 Gwenda R Burke and Kevin R Burke 357/1 Gwenda R Burke and Kevin R Burke 526/4 Thumb Point Station Limited 727 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 726 Oppose Carol Weitzel 725 Oppose Debra M Bray 724 Oppose Ian M Burrows 723 Oppose Marlene Gray 722 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 721 Oppose Susan Washington 720 Oppose Diana Worthy 719 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 718 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 717 Oppose Christopher Wragge 716 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 715 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 714 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 713 Oppose Trix Bradley 712 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 711 Oppose Lynette Reed 710 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 709 Oppose Susi Newborn 708 Oppose Pania Witoko 707 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 706 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 705 Oppose Pita Rikys 704 Oppose Peter Gray 703 Oppose Leith Duncan 702 Oppose Ross Gillespie

Page 3 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 701 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 700 Oppose Ann Stevenson 699 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 698 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 697 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 696 Oppose Carla Jehle 695 Oppose Janet Hunt 694 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 693 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 692 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 526/5 Thumb Point Station Limited 727 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 726 Oppose Carol Weitzel 725 Oppose Debra M Bray 724 Oppose Ian M Burrows 723 Oppose Marlene Gray 722 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 721 Oppose Susan Washington 720 Oppose Diana Worthy 719 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 718 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 717 Oppose Christopher Wragge 716 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 715 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 714 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 713 Oppose Trix Bradley 712 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 711 Oppose Lynette Reed 710 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 709 Oppose Susi Newborn 708 Oppose Pania Witoko 707 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 706 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 705 Oppose Pita Rikys 704 Oppose Peter Gray 703 Oppose Leith Duncan 702 Oppose Ross Gillespie 701 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 700 Oppose Ann Stevenson

Page 4 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 699 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 698 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 697 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 696 Oppose Carla Jehle 695 Oppose Janet Hunt 694 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 693 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 692 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 526/6 Thumb Point Station Limited 727 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 726 Oppose Carol Weitzel 725 Oppose Debra M Bray 724 Oppose Ian M Burrows 723 Oppose Marlene Gray 722 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 721 Oppose Susan Washington 720 Oppose Diana Worthy 719 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 718 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 717 Oppose Christopher Wragge 716 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 715 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 714 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 713 Oppose Trix Bradley 712 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 711 Oppose Lynette Reed 710 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 709 Oppose Susi Newborn 708 Oppose Pania Witoko 707 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 706 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 705 Oppose Pita Rikys 704 Oppose Peter Gray 703 Oppose Leith Duncan 702 Oppose Ross Gillespie 701 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 700 Oppose Ann Stevenson 699 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 698 Oppose Roberta C Pereira

Page 5 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 697 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 696 Oppose Carla Jehle 695 Oppose Janet Hunt 694 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 693 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 692 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 526/9 Thumb Point Station Limited 727 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 726 Oppose Carol Weitzel 725 Oppose Debra M Bray 724 Oppose Ian M Burrows 723 Oppose Marlene Gray 722 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 721 Oppose Susan Washington 720 Oppose Diana Worthy 719 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 718 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 717 Oppose Christopher Wragge 716 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 715 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 714 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 713 Oppose Trix Bradley 712 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 711 Oppose Lynette Reed 710 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 709 Oppose Susi Newborn 708 Oppose Pania Witoko 707 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 706 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 705 Oppose Pita Rikys 704 Oppose Peter Gray 703 Oppose Leith Duncan 702 Oppose Ross Gillespie 701 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 700 Oppose Ann Stevenson 699 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 698 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 697 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 696 Oppose Carla Jehle

Page 6 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 695 Oppose Janet Hunt 694 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 693 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 692 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 527/4 Man O'War Farm Limited 785 Oppose Carol Weitzel 784 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 783 Oppose Ian M Burrows 782 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 781 Oppose Marlene Gray 780 Oppose Diana Worthy 779 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 778 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 777 Oppose Susan Washington 776 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 775 Oppose Debra M Bray 774 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 773 Oppose Christopher Wragge 772 Oppose Janet Hunt 771 Oppose Ann Stevenson 770 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 769 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 768 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 767 Oppose Ross Gillespie 766 Oppose Leith Duncan 765 Oppose Peter Gray 764 Oppose Pita Rikys 763 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 762 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 761 Oppose Pania Witoko 760 Oppose Susi Newborn 759 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 758 Oppose Lynette Reed 757 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 756 Oppose Trix Bradley 755 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 754 Oppose Carla Jehle 753 Oppose Lloyd R Canham

Page 7 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 752 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 751 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 527/5 Man O'War Farm Limited 785 Oppose Carol Weitzel 784 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 783 Oppose Ian M Burrows 782 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 781 Oppose Marlene Gray 780 Oppose Diana Worthy 779 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 778 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 777 Oppose Susan Washington 776 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 775 Oppose Debra M Bray 774 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 773 Oppose Christopher Wragge 772 Oppose Janet Hunt 771 Oppose Ann Stevenson 770 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 769 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 768 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 767 Oppose Ross Gillespie 766 Oppose Leith Duncan 765 Oppose Peter Gray 764 Oppose Pita Rikys 763 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 762 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 761 Oppose Pania Witoko 760 Oppose Susi Newborn 759 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 758 Oppose Lynette Reed 757 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 756 Oppose Trix Bradley 755 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 754 Oppose Carla Jehle 753 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 752 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 751 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc.

Page 8 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 527/6 Man O'War Farm Limited 785 Oppose Carol Weitzel 784 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 783 Oppose Ian M Burrows 782 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 781 Oppose Marlene Gray 780 Oppose Diana Worthy 779 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 778 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 777 Oppose Susan Washington 776 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 775 Oppose Debra M Bray 774 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 773 Oppose Christopher Wragge 772 Oppose Janet Hunt 771 Oppose Ann Stevenson 770 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 769 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 768 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 767 Oppose Ross Gillespie 766 Oppose Leith Duncan 765 Oppose Peter Gray 764 Oppose Pita Rikys 763 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 762 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 761 Oppose Pania Witoko 760 Oppose Susi Newborn 759 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 758 Oppose Lynette Reed 757 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 756 Oppose Trix Bradley 755 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 754 Oppose Carla Jehle 753 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 752 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 751 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 527/9 Man O'War Farm Limited 785 Oppose Carol Weitzel 784 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 783 Oppose Ian M Burrows

Page 9 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 782 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 781 Oppose Marlene Gray 780 Oppose Diana Worthy 779 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 778 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 777 Oppose Susan Washington 776 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 775 Oppose Debra M Bray 774 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 773 Oppose Christopher Wragge 772 Oppose Janet Hunt 771 Oppose Ann Stevenson 770 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 769 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 768 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 767 Oppose Ross Gillespie 766 Oppose Leith Duncan 765 Oppose Peter Gray 764 Oppose Pita Rikys 763 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 762 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 761 Oppose Pania Witoko 760 Oppose Susi Newborn 759 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 758 Oppose Lynette Reed 757 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 756 Oppose Trix Bradley 755 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 754 Oppose Carla Jehle 753 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 752 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 751 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 528/4 Huruhe Station Limited 837 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 836 Oppose Carol Weitzel 835 Oppose Debra M Bray 834 Oppose Marlene Gray 832 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer

Page 10 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 831 Oppose Ian M Burrows 830 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 829 Oppose Christopher Wragge 828 Oppose Janet Hunt 827 Oppose Trix Bradley 826 Oppose Sarah Codling 528 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 833 Oppose Diana Worthy 824 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 823 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 822 Oppose Lynette Reed 821 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 820 Oppose Susi Newborn 819 Oppose Basil Holmes 818 Oppose Pania Witoko 817 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 816 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 815 Oppose Pita Rikys 814 Oppose Peter Gray 813 Oppose Leith Duncan 812 Oppose Ross Gillespie 811 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 810 Oppose Ann Stevenson 809 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 808 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 807 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 806 Oppose Carla Jehle 805 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 804 Oppose Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 803 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 802 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 801 Oppose Susan Washington 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 825 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 826 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 528/5 Huruhe Station Limited 837 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 836 Oppose Carol Weitzel 835 Oppose Debra M Bray 834 Oppose Marlene Gray

Page 11 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 832 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 831 Oppose Ian M Burrows 830 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 829 Oppose Christopher Wragge 828 Oppose Janet Hunt 827 Oppose Trix Bradley 826 Oppose Sarah Codling 528 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 833 Oppose Diana Worthy 824 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 823 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 822 Oppose Lynette Reed 821 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 820 Oppose Susi Newborn 819 Oppose Basil Holmes 818 Oppose Pania Witoko 817 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 816 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 815 Oppose Pita Rikys 814 Oppose Peter Gray 813 Oppose Leith Duncan 812 Oppose Ross Gillespie 811 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 810 Oppose Ann Stevenson 809 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 808 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 807 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 806 Oppose Carla Jehle 805 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 804 Oppose Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 803 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 802 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 801 Oppose Susan Washington 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 825 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 826 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 528/6 Huruhe Station Limited 837 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 836 Oppose Carol Weitzel 835 Oppose Debra M Bray

Page 12 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 834 Oppose Marlene Gray 832 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 831 Oppose Ian M Burrows 830 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 829 Oppose Christopher Wragge 828 Oppose Janet Hunt 827 Oppose Trix Bradley 826 Oppose Sarah Codling 528 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 833 Oppose Diana Worthy 824 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 823 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 822 Oppose Lynette Reed 821 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 820 Oppose Susi Newborn 819 Oppose Basil Holmes 818 Oppose Pania Witoko 817 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 816 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 815 Oppose Pita Rikys 814 Oppose Peter Gray 813 Oppose Leith Duncan 812 Oppose Ross Gillespie 811 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 810 Oppose Ann Stevenson 809 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 808 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 807 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 806 Oppose Carla Jehle 805 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 804 Oppose Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 803 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 802 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 801 Oppose Susan Washington 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 825 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 826 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 528/9 Huruhe Station Limited 837 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 836 Oppose Carol Weitzel

Page 13 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 835 Oppose Debra M Bray 834 Oppose Marlene Gray 832 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 831 Oppose Ian M Burrows 830 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 829 Oppose Christopher Wragge 828 Oppose Janet Hunt 827 Oppose Trix Bradley 826 Oppose Sarah Codling 528 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 833 Oppose Diana Worthy 824 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 823 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 822 Oppose Lynette Reed 821 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 820 Oppose Susi Newborn 819 Oppose Basil Holmes 818 Oppose Pania Witoko 817 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 816 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 815 Oppose Pita Rikys 814 Oppose Peter Gray 813 Oppose Leith Duncan 812 Oppose Ross Gillespie 811 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 810 Oppose Ann Stevenson 809 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 808 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 807 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 806 Oppose Carla Jehle 805 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 804 Oppose Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 803 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 802 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 801 Oppose Susan Washington 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 825 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 826 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem

Page 14 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 529/4 Man O' War Station Limited 529/5 Man O' War Station Limited 529/6 Man O' War Station Limited 529/9 Man O' War Station Limited 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 535/1 Samark Holdings Limited 539/4 South Coast Station Limited 845 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 844 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 843 Oppose Janet Hunt 842 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 841 Oppose Carla Jehle 840 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 839 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 838 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 790 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 871 Oppose Debra M Bray 870 Oppose Ian M Burrows 869 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 868 Oppose Carol Weitzel 867 Oppose Susi Newborn 866 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 865 Oppose Marion Bridge 864 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 863 Oppose Susan Washington 862 Oppose Christopher Wragge 861 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 860 Oppose Marlene Gray 859 Oppose Pania Witoko 858 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 857 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 856 Oppose Pita Rikys 855 Oppose Peter Gray 854 Oppose Leith Duncan 853 Oppose Ross Gillespie 852 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 851 Oppose Ann Stevenson 850 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 849 Oppose Trix Bradley 848 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber

Page 15 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 847 Oppose Lynette Reed 846 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 539/5 South Coast Station Limited 845 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 844 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 843 Oppose Janet Hunt 842 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 841 Oppose Carla Jehle 840 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 839 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 838 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 790 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 871 Oppose Debra M Bray 870 Oppose Ian M Burrows 869 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 868 Oppose Carol Weitzel 867 Oppose Susi Newborn 866 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 865 Oppose Marion Bridge 864 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 863 Oppose Susan Washington 862 Oppose Christopher Wragge 861 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 860 Oppose Marlene Gray 859 Oppose Pania Witoko 858 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 857 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 856 Oppose Pita Rikys 855 Oppose Peter Gray 854 Oppose Leith Duncan 853 Oppose Ross Gillespie 852 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 851 Oppose Ann Stevenson 850 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 849 Oppose Trix Bradley 848 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 847 Oppose Lynette Reed 846 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 539/6 South Coast Station Limited 845 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts

Page 16 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 844 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 843 Oppose Janet Hunt 842 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 841 Oppose Carla Jehle 840 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 839 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 838 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 790 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 871 Oppose Debra M Bray 870 Oppose Ian M Burrows 869 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 868 Oppose Carol Weitzel 867 Oppose Susi Newborn 866 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 865 Oppose Marion Bridge 864 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 863 Oppose Susan Washington 862 Oppose Christopher Wragge 861 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 860 Oppose Marlene Gray 859 Oppose Pania Witoko 858 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 857 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 856 Oppose Pita Rikys 855 Oppose Peter Gray 854 Oppose Leith Duncan 853 Oppose Ross Gillespie 852 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 851 Oppose Ann Stevenson 850 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 849 Oppose Trix Bradley 848 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 847 Oppose Lynette Reed 539/9 South Coast Station Limited 845 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 844 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 843 Oppose Janet Hunt 842 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 841 Oppose Carla Jehle

Page 17 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 840 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 839 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 838 Oppose Pirihira Kaio 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 790 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 871 Oppose Debra M Bray 870 Oppose Ian M Burrows 869 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 868 Oppose Carol Weitzel 867 Oppose Susi Newborn 866 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 865 Oppose Marion Bridge 864 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 863 Oppose Susan Washington 862 Oppose Christopher Wragge 861 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 860 Oppose Marlene Gray 859 Oppose Pania Witoko 858 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 857 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 856 Oppose Pita Rikys 855 Oppose Peter Gray 854 Oppose Leith Duncan 853 Oppose Ross Gillespie 852 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 851 Oppose Ann Stevenson 850 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 849 Oppose Trix Bradley 848 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 847 Oppose Lynette Reed 846 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 877/2 Helmut Bender 919/1 Inga Muller 1013/1 Lynette Reed 1013/2 Lynette Reed 1041/1 Moira Waite 1301 Support Robert Hillebrand 1091/6 Orapiu Lodge Limited 2892 Oppose In Part Peter Dew 2891 Oppose In Part Iain Bremner, Joanne Bremner and The Bremner Family Trust

Page 18 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1305 Oppose D and J Grayson 1304 Oppose Mike Brennan and Jennifer Town 2907 Oppose In Part John S Morton 2895 Oppose In Part Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 2894 Oppose In Part Scott and Kelly Diener 1091/7 Orapiu Lodge Limited 2892 Oppose In Part Peter Dew 2891 Oppose In Part Iain Bremner, Joanne Bremner and The Bremner Family Trust 1305 Oppose D and J Grayson 1304 Oppose Mike Brennan and Jennifer Town 1303 Oppose In Part David Simcock, Timothy Crick, Judith Yeoman and Michael Brockie 2907 Oppose In Part John S Morton 2895 Oppose In Part Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 2894 Oppose In Part Scott and Kelly Diener 1091/8 Orapiu Lodge Limited 2892 Oppose Peter Dew 2891 Oppose Iain Bremner, Joanne Bremner and The Bremner Family Trust 1305 Oppose D and J Grayson 1304 Oppose Mike Brennan and Jennifer Town 2907 Oppose John S Morton 2895 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 2894 Oppose Scott and Kelly Diener 1100/1 Waiheke Island Airpark Resort Limited 324 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 316 Oppose Dee Austring 192 Oppose Moana Waiheke Trust 70 Support David S Jennings 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 1421 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 1420 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1419 Oppose Peter Lumsden 1418 Oppose Lauren Maser 1417 Oppose Leith Duncan 1416 Oppose P W Gray 64 Support Dennis J Eckhoff 1415 Oppose Pita Rikys 1414 Oppose Carol Weitzel 1413 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 1412 Oppose Lynette Reed 1411 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 1410 Oppose Debra M Bray 1409 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem

Page 19 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1408 Oppose Pania Witoko 1407 Oppose Penny Vos 1406 Support David Horton 1405 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 1404 Oppose Rev.Dick Thompson 1403 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 1402 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 1401 Oppose Donald McGilvray 1400 Oppose Timothy Moon 1399 Oppose Dr.Peter C.B Phillips and Dr.Deborah Blood 1391 Support Ridgeview Estate Limited 1399 Oppose Dr Peter Phillips and Dr Deborah Blood 1390 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1389 Oppose Christopher Wragge 1388 Oppose Vickie Worthington 1398 Oppose J R and S E Ewer - Peacock Ridge 1387 Oppose S.Brown 1386 Oppose Phyllis N Crist 1385 Oppose Basil Holmes 1384 Oppose Susan Washington 1383 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1382 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 1381 Oppose Ian M Burrows 1380 Oppose Trix Bradley 1379 Oppose Ann Stevenson 1378 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 1377 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1376 Oppose Susi Newborn 1375 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 1374 Oppose Ross Gillespie 1373 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 1372 Oppose Marlene Gray 1371 Oppose Phee Phanshell 1370 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1369 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 1368 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1367 Oppose Carla Jehle 1366 Oppose Diana Worthy 1365 Oppose Janet Hunt

Page 20 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1364 Oppose Inga Muller 2910 Oppose Auckland Regional Council 1100/2 Waiheke Island Airpark Resort Limited 324 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 316 Oppose Dee Austring 192 Oppose Moana Waiheke Trust 70 Support David S Jennings 64 Support Dennis J Eckhoff 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 1421 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 1420 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1419 Oppose Peter Lumsden 1418 Oppose Lauren Maser 1417 Oppose Leith Duncan 1416 Oppose P W Gray 1415 Oppose Pita Rikys 1414 Oppose Carol Weitzel 1413 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 1412 Oppose Lynette Reed 1411 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 1410 Oppose Debra M Bray 1409 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 1408 Oppose Pania Witoko 1407 Oppose Penny Vos 1406 Support David Horton 1405 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 1404 Oppose Rev.Dick Thompson 1403 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 1402 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 1401 Oppose Donald McGilvray 1400 Oppose Timothy Moon 1399 Oppose Dr.Peter C.B Phillips and Dr.Deborah Blood 1391 Support Ridgeview Estate Limited 1399 Oppose Dr Peter Phillips and Dr Deborah Blood 1390 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1389 Oppose Christopher Wragge 1388 Oppose Vickie Worthington 1387 Oppose S.Brown 1386 Oppose Phyllis N Crist 1385 Oppose Basil Holmes

Page 21 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1384 Oppose Susan Washington 1383 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1382 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 1381 Oppose Ian M Burrows 1380 Oppose Trix Bradley 1379 Oppose Ann Stevenson 1378 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 1377 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1376 Oppose Susi Newborn 1375 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 1374 Oppose Ross Gillespie 1373 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 1372 Oppose Marlene Gray 1371 Oppose Phee Phanshell 1370 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1369 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 1368 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1367 Oppose Carla Jehle 1366 Oppose Diana Worthy 1365 Oppose Janet Hunt 1364 Oppose Inga Muller 1392 Oppose J R and S E Ewer - Peacock Ridge 2910 Oppose Auckland Regional Council 1100/3 Waiheke Island Airpark Resort Limited 324 Oppose Mrs J M Coutts 316 Oppose Dee Austring 192 Oppose Moana Waiheke Trust 70 Support David S Jennings 64 Support Dennis J Eckhoff 2885 Oppose The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 1421 Oppose Chris and Josephine Orange 1420 Oppose Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1419 Oppose Peter Lumsden 1418 Oppose Lauren Maser 1417 Oppose Leith Duncan 1416 Oppose P W Gray 1415 Oppose Pita Rikys 1414 Oppose Carol Weitzel 1413 Oppose Roberta C Pereira 1412 Oppose Lynette Reed

Page 22 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1411 Oppose Dr.Lorna Dyall 1410 Oppose Debra M Bray 1409 Oppose Richard Wedekind and Sharon Adrichem 1408 Oppose Pania Witoko 1407 Oppose Penny Vos 1406 Support David Horton 1405 Oppose Eileen Boghurst 1404 Oppose Rev.Dick Thompson 1403 Oppose Patsy Blackstock 1402 Oppose Lloyd R Canham 1401 Oppose Donald McGilvray 1400 Oppose Timothy Moon 1399 Oppose Dr.Peter C.B Phillips and Dr.Deborah Blood 1391 Support Ridgeview Estate Limited 1399 Oppose Dr Peter Phillips and Dr Deborah Blood 1390 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1389 Oppose Christopher Wragge 1388 Oppose Vickie Worthington 1387 Oppose S.Brown 1386 Oppose Phyllis N Crist 1385 Oppose Basil Holmes 1384 Oppose Susan Washington 1383 Oppose Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1382 Oppose Lyndsay L Meager 1381 Oppose Ian M Burrows 1380 Oppose Trix Bradley 1379 Oppose Ann Stevenson 1378 Oppose Jennifer W Wagner 1377 Oppose Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1376 Oppose Susi Newborn 1375 Oppose Ulrich Rambeck 1374 Oppose Ross Gillespie 1373 Oppose Ralph M.Spencer 1372 Oppose Marlene Gray 1371 Oppose Phee Phanshell 1370 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1369 Oppose Ping Chuen Lee 1368 Oppose Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1367 Oppose Carla Jehle

Page 23 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1366 Oppose Diana Worthy 1365 Oppose Janet Hunt 1364 Oppose Inga Muller 1393 Oppose J R and S E Ewer - Peacock Ridge 2910 Oppose Auckland Regional Council 1230/1 Hutcheson Family Trust 1237/1 Phee Phanshell 1237/2 Phee Phanshell 1251/2 Michael P J O'Shea 1584 Support Sean O'Shea 2912 Support Sean O'Shea 1252/1 Michael P J O'Shea 1585 Support Sean O'Shea 2491 Support Tom Waterer 1253/1 Roger Guthrie and Hilde Hoven 1261/1 Michael P J O'Shea 1590 Support Sean O'Shea 2491 Support Tom Waterer 1262/1 M O'Shea 1598 Support Jennifer Napier 1597 Support Maire Burns 1596 Support Paul Whaanga 1595 Support Mrs.Rene H.Martin 1594 Support Ben W R Sanderson 1593 Support Michael P J O'Shea 1592 Support Neil C Sanderson 1591 Support Sean and Colleen O'Shea 2801 Support Ben W R Sanderson 1908 Support Sean O'Shea 1262/2 M O'Shea 1598 Support Jennifer Napier 1593 Support Michael P J O'Shea 1591 Support Sean and Colleen O'Shea 1908 Support Sean O'Shea 1593 Support Mickey O'Shea 1262/3 M O'Shea 1598 Support Jennifer Napier 1593 Support Michael P J O'Shea 1591 Support Sean and Colleen O'Shea 1908 Support Sean O'Shea 1273/1 BAYMI and Flinch Trusts 1273/2 BAYMI and Flinch Trusts 1278/1 BAYMI and Flinch Trusts 1278/2 BAYMI and Flinch Trusts 1279/1 Robert Hillebrand 1600 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills

Page 24 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1599 Support Sylvia K Hubbard 1279/2 Robert Hillebrand 1600 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1599 Support Sylvia K Hubbard 1288/135 David Hill Estate 1288/136 David Hill Estate 1288/137 David Hill Estate 1288/138 David Hill Estate 1288/140 David Hill Estate 1297/1 Bewdley Family Trust 1302/1 Leeann Sanderson 108 Support Ben W R Sanderson 1611 Support Mickey O'Shea 1607 Support Sean O'Shea 1612 Support Neil C Sanderson 2488 Support Beverley Blackwell 1643 Support Michael O'Shea 1642 Support Martin P Mitchener 1644 Support Ellen M Curreen 1740 Support Mickey O'Shea 1305/1 Kylie F Robbins 1608 Support Sean O'Shea 2498 Support Sean O'Shea 1307/2 Kylie F Robbins 1319/2 Helen M Hill 1320/1 Helen M Hill 1324/1 Pirihira Kaio 328 Support Mrs J M Coutts 314 Support Diana Worthy 307 Support Robyne B M.Winton 1682 Support Chris and Josephine Orange 1681 Support Carol Weitzel 1680 Support Dr.Lorna Dyall 1679 Support Lynette Reed 1678 Support Carla Jehle 1677 Support Debra M Bray 1676 Support Pirihira Kaio 1675 Support Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1674 Support Pita Rikys 1673 Support Ping Chuen Lee 1672 Support Leith Duncan 1671 Support Lloyd R Canham 1670 Support Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson

Page 25 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1669 Support Patsy Blackstock 1668 Support Julia Meek 1667 Support S and J M.Johannessen 1666 Support Susi Newborn 1665 Support Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1664 Support Lyndsay L Meager 1663 Support Paul Gilligan 1662 Support Roberta C Pereira 1661 Support Ann Stevenson 1660 Support Pania Witoko 1659 Support Ross Gillespie 1658 Support Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1657 Support Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1656 Support Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1655 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1654 Support Peter Gray 1653 Support Marlene Gray 1652 Support Janet Hunt 1651 Support Basil Holmes 1650 Support Susan Washington 1649 Support Christopher Wragge 1648 Support Trix Bradley 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2848 Support Paul Gilligan 1324/2 Pirihira Kaio 328 Support Mrs J M Coutts 314 Support Diana Worthy 307 Support Robyne B M.Winton 1682 Support Chris and Josephine Orange 1681 Support Carol Weitzel 1680 Support Dr.Lorna Dyall 1679 Support Lynette Reed 1678 Support Carla Jehle 1677 Support Debra M Bray 1676 Support Pirihira Kaio 1675 Support Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1674 Support Pita Rikys 1673 Support Ping Chuen Lee 1672 Support Leith Duncan 1671 Support Lloyd R Canham

Page 26 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1670 Support Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 1669 Support Patsy Blackstock 1668 Support Julia Meek 1667 Support S and J M.Johannessen 1666 Support Susi Newborn 1665 Support Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1664 Support Lyndsay L Meager 1663 Support Paul Gilligan 1662 Support Roberta C Pereira 1661 Support Ann Stevenson 1660 Support Pania Witoko 1659 Support Ross Gillespie 1658 Support Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1657 Support Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1656 Support Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1655 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1654 Support Peter Gray 1653 Support Marlene Gray 1652 Support Janet Hunt 1651 Support Basil Holmes 1650 Support Susan Washington 1649 Support Christopher Wragge 1648 Support Trix Bradley 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2848 Support Paul Gilligan 1324/3 Pirihira Kaio 328 Support Mrs J M Coutts 314 Support Diana Worthy 307 Support Robyne B M.Winton 1682 Support Chris and Josephine Orange 1681 Support Carol Weitzel 1680 Support Dr.Lorna Dyall 1679 Support Lynette Reed 1678 Support Carla Jehle 1677 Support Debra M Bray 1676 Support Pirihira Kaio 1675 Support Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1674 Support Pita Rikys 1673 Support Ping Chuen Lee 1672 Support Leith Duncan

Page 27 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1671 Support Lloyd R Canham 1670 Support Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 1669 Support Patsy Blackstock 1668 Support Julia Meek 1667 Support S and J M.Johannessen 1666 Support Susi Newborn 1665 Support Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1664 Support Lyndsay L Meager 1663 Support Paul Gilligan 1662 Support Roberta C Pereira 1661 Support Ann Stevenson 1660 Support Pania Witoko 1659 Support Ross Gillespie 1658 Support Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1657 Support Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1656 Support Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1655 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1654 Support Peter Gray 1653 Support Marlene Gray 1652 Support Janet Hunt 1651 Support Basil Holmes 1650 Support Susan Washington 1649 Support Christopher Wragge 1648 Support Trix Bradley 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2848 Support Paul Gilligan 1324/4 Pirihira Kaio 328 Support Mrs J M Coutts 314 Support Diana Worthy 307 Support Robyne B M.Winton 1682 Support Chris and Josephine Orange 1681 Support Carol Weitzel 1680 Support Dr.Lorna Dyall 1679 Support Lynette Reed 1678 Support Carla Jehle 1677 Support Debra M Bray 1676 Support Pirihira Kaio 1675 Support Gulf District Plan Association Inc. 1674 Support Pita Rikys 1673 Support Ping Chuen Lee

Page 28 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1672 Support Leith Duncan 1671 Support Lloyd R Canham 1670 Support Rev Richard Thompson and Lorraine D Thompson 1669 Support Patsy Blackstock 1668 Support Julia Meek 1667 Support S and J M.Johannessen 1666 Support Susi Newborn 1665 Support Judith Madarasz and Lynne Gilmore 1664 Support Lyndsay L Meager 1663 Support Paul Gilligan 1662 Support Roberta C Pereira 1661 Support Ann Stevenson 1660 Support Pania Witoko 1659 Support Ross Gillespie 1658 Support Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1657 Support Bevan Kaan and Sabina Chiquet 1656 Support Mark W Parisian and Kahmeelah M Herber 1655 Support Trevor Darvill and Margaret Mills 1654 Support Peter Gray 1653 Support Marlene Gray 1652 Support Janet Hunt 1651 Support Basil Holmes 1650 Support Susan Washington 1649 Support Christopher Wragge 1648 Support Trix Bradley 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2848 Support Paul Gilligan 1331/2 WOW 1331/4 WOW 1337/1 Nicola A Wimsett 1340/1 Paul Downie 175 Support Gordon Barrett 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 1358/1 John Frieswijk 1367/1 Roger Bright 1379/2 J Anne Smith 1405/4 Great Barrier Island Community Board 210 Support Mrs Geraldine Downie 209 Support John G Sutton 208 Support Ben W R Sanderson 207 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener

Page 29 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 206 Support Paul Downie 205 Support Ellen M Curreen 204 Support Graeme Sharp 85 Support Doreen J Scott 1773 Support David Hope 1772 Support Brian G.Overton 1771 Support Jude McGeady 1769 Support Richard B Somerville-Ryan 1768 Oppose Wendy Johnson 1767 Oppose John Thompson 1766 Oppose J B F Connelly 1764 Support Grey Power Waiheke and Gulf Islands Association Inc. 1763 Support John H Gray and Shirley R Gray 1762 Oppose Janet Hunt 1761 Oppose Ann Stevenson 1760 Oppose Ian Anderson and Vivienne Anderson 1759 Oppose Rosemary Adler 1758 Oppose Brian Griffiths 1757 Oppose Susan Washington 1756 Support Colleen A O'Shea 1755 Support Carole Wright 1754 Support Neil Wright 1753 Support John and Christine Erkkila 1752 Support Susan Eagar 1751 Support Ryan Eagar 1750 Support Kevin Burke 1749 Support Trevor M Newman 1748 Support Anthony S Jury and Gendie M Jury 1747 Support Caroline de Latour 1746 Support Helen O'Shea 1745 Support Nicola A Wimsett 1744 Support James W Robertson and Elizabeth A Robertson 1743 Support Carol A F Rendle 1742 Oppose Simon Griffiths 2761 Support Keith and Diana Simpson 2776 Support Christina Spence 2777 Support John Blackwell 1406/4 John R Mellars 2493 Support Nicola A Wimsett 1416/2 Ken Fortzer and N Ngawaka-Fortzer

Page 30 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1423/1 N Ngawaka-Fortzer 1461/2 Arthur Reid 1468/1 Leslie V C and Beverley M Blackwell 1360 Support Michael P J O'Shea 1474/1 Christina Spence 1480/1 Leslie V C and Beverley M Blackwell 1840 Support Ellen M Curreen 1360 Support Michael P J O'Shea 1486/1 Christina Spence 1841 Support Ellen M Curreen 1515/1 Michael O'Shea 2517 Support Sean O'Shea 1518/1 Tim Higham 2789 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 1518/2 Tim Higham 1518/3 Tim Higham 1522/2 David F and Patricia A McCrary 1528/4 John Frieswijk 2910 Oppose Auckland Regional Council 1529/2 John Frieswijk 1529/3 John Frieswijk 1543/4 David F and Patricia A McCrary 2910 Oppose Auckland Regional Council 1544/3 David F and Patricia A McCrary 1551/1 Eddie H Pedersen and Christine J Pedersen 1563/1 Peter D Sporle 1563/2 Peter D Sporle 1563/3 Peter D Sporle 1563/4 Peter D Sporle 1563/5 Peter D Sporle 1567/1 Diana V Simpson 1579/1 Roger Guthrie and Hilde Hoven 1580/1 Leeann Sanderson 110 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2522 Support Sean O’Shea 2521 Support Sean O’Shea 1740 Support Mickey O’Shea 1581/1 Leeann Sanderson 111 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2523 Support Sean O’Shea 1740 Support Mickey O’Shea 1582/1 Leeann Sanderson 1740 Support Mickey O’Shea 1584/1 Diana V Simpson 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Inc. 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 1588/1 Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2486 Support Nicola Wimsett 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 1593/2 Leeann Sanderson 1740 Support Mickey O’Shea

Page 31 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1594/1 Malcolm Harre 2789 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2864 Support Mickey O’Shea 1596/13 Gulf Vision Limited 267 Oppose John G Sutton 266 Oppose Geraldine Downie 265 Oppose Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 264 Oppose Paul Downie 263 Oppose Ellen Curreen 262 Oppose Angela Wright 261 Oppose Monique van Ditzhuyzen 260 Oppose Graeme Sharp 82 Oppose Doreen Scott 2504 Oppose Huruhe Station Limited 2505 Oppose South Coast Station Limited 2507 Oppose Man O War Station Limited 2511 Oppose Thumb Point Station Limited 2506 Oppose Man O War Farm Limited 1513 Oppose Richard Somerville-Ryan 2529 Oppose Ryan Eager 2526 Oppose Sean and Colleen O’Shea 2525 Support Inga Muller 2298 Oppose Neil Wright 2297 Oppose Carol Wright 2291 Oppose Jude McGeady 2724 Oppose Ryan Eagar 2749 Oppose Kevin Burke 2756 Oppose Stephen Jury and Gendie Jury 2757 Oppose Michael O’Shea Snr 2763 Oppose Keith Simpson and Diana Simpson 2766 Oppose Caroline de Latour 2738 Oppose Susan Eagar 2744 Oppose Trevor Newman 2238 Oppose Susan Eagar 2169 Oppose David Hope 2151 Oppose Carol Rendle 2783 Oppose Christina Spence 2782 Oppose John Blackwell 2803 Oppose Nicola Wimsett 2811 Oppose James Robertson and Elizabeth Robertson 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Incorporated

Page 32 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 1602/1 Nigel W Marshall 1913/2 Anthony J Hughes 1915/2 Anthony J Walker 1922/2 E A Robertson 1953/1 Gregory Laird 1961/1 James W Robertson 1967/1 Martin P Mitchener 1968/1 Martin P Mitchener 2792 Support Ben W R Sanderson 676 Support Michael P J O’Shea 2705 Support Ellen M Curreen 1978/1 Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2540 Support Anne Whittaker 1979/1 Martin P Mitchener 2791 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2917 Support Sean O’Shea 2835 Support Michael P J O’Shea 737 Support Ellen M Curreen 2835 Support Mickey O’Shea 1988/2 Shirley Gray 1990/1 John H Gray and Shirley R Gray 2005/1 Trevor and Carol Rendle 2006/1 Wayne P Ashton 2049/1 R H and L Cawson Family Trust 2908 Support Housing New Zealand Corporation 2063/1 Anne Whittaker 2240 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2170 Support Winnie Blackwell 2167 Support Brian G.Overton 2166 Support Leeann Sanderson 2165 Support Ellen M Curreen 2162 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2784 Support Christina Spence 2842 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2104/4 Auckland City Council 2149 Support Trevor and Carol Rendle 2103/8 Auckland City Council 2103/11 Auckland City Council 2139/2 James W Robertson 2553 Support Sean O’Shea 2146/1 D E McGregor 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 2151/1 Michael P J O’Shea 2566 Support Sean O’Shea 2152/1 Helen and Michael O’Shea 2568 Support Sean O’Shea 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 2162/2 Helen O’Shea 2579 Support Sean O’Shea

Page 33 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2168/1 Helen O’Shea 136 Support Graeme Sharp 2585 Support Sean O’Shea 2172/1 Helen O’Shea 2588 Support Sean O’Shea 2177/1 Ben W R Sanderson 2290 Support Mickey O’Shea 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 2180/1 Ben W R Sanderson 2190/1 Barbara Sanderson 2212/2 John H Gray 2837 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2214/1 John H Gray and Shirley R Gray 2239 Support Alan Gray and Doreta Gray 2164 Support Ellen M Curreen 2799 Support Michael O’Shea 2798 Support Helen O’Shea 2797 Support Mickey O’Shea 2837 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 2216/1 F J and C N Medland 2163 Oppose Mickey O’Shea 2901 Support Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated 2948 Support In Part New Zealand Fire Service Commission 2237/1 Richard B Somerville-Ryan 2238/2 Richard B Somerville-Ryan 2259/1 Ken Fortzer and N Ngawaka-Fortzer 2592 Support Sean O’Shea 2260/1 John G Sutton 2271/2 John G Sutton 2313/1 Dorothy M White 2334/1 Shirley Gray 2340/1 James W Robertson 2352/1 Edward A D and Anne R Scott 2355/1 Edward A D and Anne R Scott 2365/1 Gendie M Jury 2368/2 John Frieswijk 2380/1 Helen M Hill 2408/1 Kylie F Robbins 2440/1 Gerard J Rea 2480/1 Jenepher B Frost 2489/2 Dorothy M White 2508/1 Helen O'Shea 2607 Support Sean O'Shea 2508/2 Helen O'Shea 195 Support Ben W R Sanderson

Page 34 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 144 Support Martin P Mitchener 142 Support Ellen M Curreen 140 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 139 Support Monique Van Ditzhuyzen 123 Support Josh Jacobi 121 Support Sally Goodwin 120 Support Lewis Rae 119 Support E A Robertson 100 Support Mrs Geraldine Downie 99 Support James W Robertson 2607 Support Sean O'Shea 2510/1 Helen O'Shea 2511/1 Helen O'Shea 2512/1 Michael O'Shea 143 Support Martin P Mitchener 141 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 138 Support Christina Spence 137 Support Ellen M Curreen 135 Support Monique Van Ditzhuyzen 126 Support Doreen J Scott 125 Support Patricia Sanderson 124 Support Sally Goodwin 122 Support Josh Jacobi 118 Support James W Robertson 97 Support Paul Downie 96 Support Graeme Sharp 95 Support Angela Wright 2608 Support Sean O'Shea 2810 Support E A Robertson 134 Support Monique Van Ditzhuyzen 2513/2 John H Gray and Shirley R Gray 2529/1 Helen O'Shea 2531/1 Michael O'Shea 2533/1 John H Gray and Shirley R Gray 2537/1 Bruce M Langford 2547/4 William M McCandless 2916 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2831 Oppose Michael P J O'Shea 1850 Oppose Helen O'Shea 1844 Oppose Michael O'Shea 2831 Oppose Mickey O'Shea

Page 35 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2554/1 A and J Mitchell 2839 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2554/2 A and J Mitchell 2839 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2554/3 A and J Mitchell 2839 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2555/1 Sportways United Limited 2555/2 Sportways United Limited 2555/3 Sportways United Limited 2555/4 Sportways United Limited 2555/5 Sportways United Limited 2555/6 Sportways United Limited 2910 Oppose Auckland Rregional Council 2649/4 Greenacres Waiheke Limited 2715/1 Sean J M O'Shea 1931 Support Sean O'Shea 2908 Support Housing New Zealand Corporation 2719/1 Sean J M O'Shea 2719/2 Sean J M O'Shea 2719/3 Sean J M O'Shea 2727/1 Sean J M O'Shea 2014 Support Colleen A O'Shea 2728/1 Sean J M O'Shea 2015 Support Sean O'Shea 2814 Support Colleen A O'Shea 2745 Support Tom Waterer 2742/1 John A Cran and Gillian M Cran 2753/1 Sean J M O'Shea 2721 Support Malcolm Harre 2047 Support Sean O'Shea 2753/2 Sean J M O'Shea 2721 Support Malcolm Harre 2047 Support Sean O'Shea 2753/3 Sean J M O'Shea 2721 Support Malcolm Harre 2047 Support Sean O'Shea 2846/2 Orama Christian Fellowship Trust 2852/1 Gregory R Penton 2858/2 Christina Spence 2816 Support Ellen M Curreen 2858/3 Christina Spence 2864/2 Ellen M Curreen 2866 Support Mickey O'Shea 2866/1 Ellen M Curreen 2285 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2280 Support Winnie Blackwell 2252 Support David Hope 2264 Support Leeann Sanderson 2249 Support Brian G.Overton 2160 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2781 Support Christina Spence 2844 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener

Page 36 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 2867/1 Ellen M Curreen 2283 Support Christina Spence 2273 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2272 Support Winnie Blackwell 2253 Support David Hope 2703 Support Sean O'Shea 2269 Support Leeann Sanderson 2247 Support Brian G.Overton 2155 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2847 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 2868/1 Ellen M Curreen 2289 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2277 Support Winnie Blackwell 2260 Support David Hope 2703 Support Sean O'Shea 2267 Support Leeann Sanderson 2245 Support Brian G.Overton 2241 Support Christina Spence 2161 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2847 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 2870/1 Ellen M Curreen 20 Support Sean O'Shea 2287 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2284 Support Christina Spence 2275 Support Winnie Blackwell 2257 Support David Hope 2704 Support Anne Whittaker 2703 Support Sean O'Shea 2265 Support Leeann Sanderson 2244 Support Brian G.Overton 2846 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 2873/1 Ellen M Curreen 21 Support Sean O'Shea 2288 Support Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 2281 Support Winnie Blackwell 2254 Support David Hope 2703 Support Sean O'Shea 2261 Support Leeann Sanderson 2250 Support Brian G.Overton

Page 37 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2236 Support William M.McCandless 2159 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2788 Support Ben W R Sanderson 2780 Support Christina Spence 2843 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 3000/1 C Blackwell and C Spence 1843 Support Sean O'Shea 3036/1 Gordon Barrett 3052/1 John Ogden and Jenni Ogden 1615 Oppose Malcolm Harre 2139 Oppose Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 2135 Oppose Helen O'Shea 2133 Oppose Ben W R Sanderson 2108 Oppose David Hope 2107 Oppose Brian G.Overton 2101 Oppose Ellen M Curreen 2100 Oppose Tom Waterer 2058 Oppose Andrew and Gaye Oxborough 2017 Oppose Michael P J O'Shea 1985 Oppose Michael O'Shea 1858 Oppose Helen O'Shea 1855 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2046 Oppose Sean and Colleen O'Shea 2017 Oppose Mickey O'Shea 3052/2 John Ogden and Jenni Ogden 1615 Oppose Malcolm Harre 2138 Oppose Jennifer Napier 2137 Oppose Peter Adams 2134 Oppose Helen O'Shea 2132 Oppose David C.Watson 2131 Oppose Maxwell G.Howard 2128 Oppose Louie R.Burton 2127 Oppose Michael J Gardiner 2126 Oppose Adele Edmonds 2129 Oppose James Iremonger 2125 Oppose John M. Tuohey 2124 Oppose Ben W R Sanderson 2123 Oppose Alison J.Cookson 2121 Oppose Adrienne Hodgetts 2109 Oppose Richard Spence and Patti Gardiner 2106 Oppose Michael O'Shea

Page 38 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 2104 Oppose The Estate of Graham C Wratt 2100 Oppose Tom Waterer 2070 Oppose Linda Whitmore 2069 Oppose Kristin Lowe 2067 Oppose Conan F Flinn 2066 Oppose Brian R.William 2064 Oppose Arthur Davies 2062 Oppose Dennis C Robertson 2060 Oppose Maurice Ngatai 2058 Oppose Andrew and Gaye Oxborough 2057 Oppose Louie R.Burton 2056 Oppose Adrienne Hodgetts 2055 Oppose Winnie Blackwell 2054 Oppose Michael J Gardiner 2052 Oppose Maxwell G.Howard 2051 Oppose James Iremonger 2049 Oppose David C.Watson 2048 Oppose Ben W R Sanderson 2046 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2017 Oppose Michael P J O'Shea 2013 Oppose Joan E Wright 2012 Oppose Ellen M Curreen 2011 Oppose Jacquie Hardinge 2010 Oppose O'Grady's Limited 1976 Oppose The Estate of Graham C Wratt 1974 Oppose John Scott 1858 Oppose Helen O'Shea 1855 Oppose Sean O'Shea 2046 Oppose Sean and Colleen O'Shea 2017 Oppose Mickey O'Shea 3086/1 Christina Spence 3088/1 Christina Spence 3090/3 Christina Spence 23 Support Sean O'Shea 3139/2 David F and Patricia A McCrary 3221/2 Charles and Ann Stevenson 3221/4 Charles and Ann Stevenson 3380/1 JS Clarke 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Incorporated 3425/4 Nicola A Wimsett 3426/4 Geoff Jewitt

Page 39 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 3427/4 Brent M Baker 3428/4 Gerard J Rea 3429/4 Andy L Hulme 3430/4 Bruce Strickett 3431/4 D E McGregor 3432/4 Dean A Storey 3433/4 Paul Toseland 3434/4 Peter Gibbens 3435/4 E A Robertson 3436/4 Alan H Gray and Doreta JA Gray 3437/4 George S H Medland 2883 Support Michael P J O'Shea 2883 Support Mickey O'Shea 3438/4 Paul T Medland 2881 Support Michael P J O'Shea 2881 Support Mickey O'Shea 3439/4 Barry Mount 3440/4 Helmut Bender 3441/4 Mabey Family Trust 3442/4 Marlena Soma 3443/4 Neil R Somerville 3444/4 Bruce J Rattray 3445/4 Mount St Paul Lodge 3446/4 Adele M Robertson 3447/4 Jacquie Hardinge 2312 Support Sean O'Shea 3448/4 Shannon N Robertson 3449/4 Leeann Sanderson 3450/4 Roger Guthrie 3451/4 Deborah K Mayston 3452/4 Wayne P Ashton 2794 Support Martin P Mitchener and Anne M Mitchener 3453/4 Paul Downie and Geraldine Downie 3454/4 Margaret Goodman 3455/4 Sarah K Matheson 3456/4 Brownie NgawakaTangata Whenua 3457/4 Emma Pratt 3458/4 Anae Swan 3459/4 Chris and Julie Stansfield 3460/4 Anthony S Jury 3461/4 James B White 3462/4 Priscilla White 3463/4 Ngati Rehua

Page 40 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 3464/4 Ngati Rehua 3465/4 Daphne I Clarke 3466/4 Tangata Whenua 3467/4 Ngati Rehua-Ngati Wai Ki Aotea 3468/4 Tangata Whenua of Te Motu-O-Aotea 3469/4 Cheryl Jones 3470/4 Faith M Ngawaka 3471/4 Dennis C Robertson 3472/4 Charles D White 3473/4 Richard B Somerville-Ryan 3474/4 Gregory Laird 3475/4 Michael P J O'Shea 1616 Support Malcolm Harre 2313 Support Sean O'Shea 3476/4 Gendie M Jury 3477/4 Helen M Hill 3478/4 John A Cran and Gillian M Cran 3479/4 Anne R Scott 3480/4 Edward A Scott 3481/4 Ken Fortzer and N Ngawaka-Fortzer 3482/4 Marion Davison 3483/4 Historic Village and Art Centre 3484/4 Bruce M Langford 3485/4 Maureen A McLean 3486/4 John R Mellars 2314 Support Sean O'Shea 3487/2 Iain Newton 3488/4 James M Crawford 3488/6 James M Crawford 3489/4 Ellen M Curreen 2315 Support Sean O'Shea 2873 Support Michael P J O'Shea 2873 Support Mickey O'Shea 3490/4 Hilde Hoven 3491/4 Bruce C Smith 3492/4 Richard J.P Anderson 3493/4 Barrier Residents and Rate Payers 3494/4 Margaret Cran # 1 Trust 3495/4 Monique Van Ditzhuyzen 3496/4 Arthur C Frost 3497/4 Jenepher B Frost 3498/4 Walter and Tessa Glass

Page 41 314/274014-008

Submission/ Further Support/ Further Submitter Name Sub Part Submission Oppose 3499/4 Pam Anderson 3500/4 John W Anderson 3501/4 Kim Watts 3501/6 Kim Watts 3501/7 Kim Watts 3501/9 Kim Watts 3502/4 Paula J Mouat 3503/4 Michael J Gardiner 3504/4 Peter and Kurt Schmidt 3505/4 Okiwi School 3507/4 Tangata Whenua 3511/4 Carole Wright 3521/84 Auckland Regional Council 2320 Oppose Answer Services Holdings Limited 2322 Oppose Santa Monica Investments Limited 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2321 Oppose David Hill Estate 3521/87 Auckland Regional Council 2320 Oppose Answer Services Holdings Limited 2322 Oppose Santa Monica Investments Limited 2885 Support The Waiheke Island Community Planning Group Inc. 2321 Oppose David Hill Estate 3574/12 Auckland Conservation Board 2328 Support David Hill Estate 3574/14 Auckland Conservation Board 2328 Support David Hill Estate 3581/5 Gillian Mullins 3593/1 John Stensfield 3657/1 Dr.Peter C.B Phillips and Dr.Deborah Blood 3677/1 Carole and Neil Wright 3679/2 Carole and Neil Wright 3743/2 Robert and Carol Comer 3744/1 Robert and Carol Comer 3768/2 Maree Stanway 3769/1 Maree Stanway 3785/1 Maree Stanway 3798/2 Neil R Somerville 2425 Support Sean O'Shea 3826/1 Grant M MacRae 3827/2 Grant M MacRae 3851/4 I Manson 3852/2 R H and L Cawson Family Trust 3857/4 R H and L Cawson Family Trust 3858/1 Sir Edmond Hillary Outdoor Pursuits Centre of NZ 2484 Support Sean O'Shea

Page 42 314/274014-008

Page 43 DR14-8 314/274014-008

Appendix 2 Amendments to the Plan

G:\Planning\City Planning\data\District Plan Islands\HGI 1st Review\Decision reports (final only)\HPanel2\14-8DecisionReportLandform1- 7General.doc

Appendix 2 314/274014-008

Decision report Auckland City District Plan (Proposed Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2006) alteration under clause 10 of schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991

1. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Allots 232-235 Aotea Parish SO 13162 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island Submission Numbers: 1474/1, 3090/3

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

W AL TE R BL AC KW EL L RO AD

NE LA KE ITO KA af

af

ws

af Not to scale

Legend D OA x Current land unDit R AN DL ME Page 1 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

2. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 131 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 3052/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 4 (wetland slopes) ("ws")

Scale 1:5,000

A O T E A R O A D

rs

rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 2 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

3. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 49, 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 219 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2866/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

CU RR EEN RO AD

af

A O T E A R O A D Not to scale

af

Legend x Current land unit

Page 3 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

4. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 49 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 219 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2873/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

af

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 4 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

5. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 219 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2063/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

CU ws RR EEN RO AD ws

af

Not to scale af

A O T E A R O A D Legend x Current land unit

Page 5 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

6. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 49, 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 339 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 74/1, 75/1, 1252/1, 1262/3, 2508/1, 2512/1, 2529/1, 2531/1, 2719/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:6,000

af

af

A O T E A

R O A Not to scale D

Legend x Current land unit

Page 6 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

7. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 49 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 339 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 75/2, 1262/1, 2508/2, 2511/1, 2719/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

fb

rs

Not to scale

D A O R

A E T O A Legend x Current land unit

Page 7 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

8. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 339 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 1262/2, 2719/3

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

D

A

O

R

A

E

T

O

A

rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 8 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

9. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 49 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 380 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2508/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

D A O R

A E T O A

pl

fb

Not to scale

pl

Legend x Current land unit

Page 9 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

10. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 42 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 1320 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 356/1, 357/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

A O T E A R O pl A D

Not to scale pl

Legend x Current land unit

Page 10 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

11. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 329 Cape Barrier Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1529/3

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

Not to scale pl

C AP E B A R rs R IE R R Legend O A D x Current land unit

Page 11 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

12. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 54, 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 25 Hector Sanderson Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 3088/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

ws

WA LT ER B LA CK WE Not to scale LL RO AD

NE af LA KE ITO KA Legend x Current land unit

Page 12 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

13. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 54 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 143 Hector Sanderson Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1580/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

H E C T O R S A N D E R S O N R O A D

ws

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 13 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

14. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 54 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 143 Hector Sanderson Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1581/1

The land shown to be reclassifed from Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

H EC TO R S AN DE RSO N R OAD

af

Not to scale pl

Legend x Current land unit

Page 14 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

15. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 47 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 215 Kaiaraara Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2259/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:8,000

D A O Y R BA RA AA R IA KA

rs

K A IA R A A Not toR scale A BA Y R O A D

Legend x Current land unit

Page 15 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

16. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 54, 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 57 Kaitoke Lane, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 1518/1, 1518/2, 1518/3

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws")

Scale 1:6,000

NE LA KE ITO KA

ws

Not to scale

rs

Legend x Current land unit

Page 16 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

17. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 11 Mason Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2049/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

af

D OA N R SO MA Not to scale

pl

Legend x Current land unit

Page 17 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

18. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 50 Mason Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 1251/2, 1261/1, 2727/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

af af

D A O R Not to scale N O S A M af

D OA N R SO MA

Legend x Current land unit

Page 18 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

19. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 135 Mason Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 259/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:3,000

D A O R N O af S A M

Not to scale rs

Legend x Current land unit

Page 19 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

20. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 37 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 277/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

pl

rs

Not to scale

D A O R

D N A L D E M

AD RO AY I B Legend RIR PU x Current land unit

Page 20 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

21. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 38 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2005/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:4,000

rs

pl

Not to scale

pl

Legend x Current land unit

Page 21 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

22. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 84 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1297/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:3,000

rs

pl Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 22 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

23. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Pt Allot M7 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 273/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

M E D L AN D R O AD

rs

Not to scale fb

Legend x Current land unit

Page 23 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

24. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Allots 232-235 Aotea Parish SO13162, Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1486/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 2 (sand flats) ("sf") to Landform 3 alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:5,000

Kaitoke Beach

W A L T E R B L A C K W E L L R O af A D

S

U

G

A

R

L

O Not to scale A F

R

O

A

D

D

A O R

D N DLA ME Legend x Current land unit

Page 24 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

25. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Allots 232-235 Aotea Parish SO13162, Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 2104/4, 3086/1

The land annotated as 'c' to be relabelled as 'cc'.

The offshore islands to be annotated as 'c'.

Scale 1:3,000

c

c

c

c

Not to scale

S

U

G

A

R

L

O

A

F

R O Legend A D x Current land unit

Page 25 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

26. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Lot 1 DP 71990 Medland Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 266/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:4,000

fb

M E D L A N D R O A D

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 26 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

27. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 112 Mitchener Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1968/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:4,000

P RI MR OS E H IL L RO AD

K O W

H A I

V A L L E Y

T R A C rs K

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 27 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

28. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 45 O'Shea Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:3,000

rs

cc

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 28 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

29. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 131 Rosalie Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1602/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:4,000

rs

AD O R Y BA E pl LI SA O R Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 29 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

30. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Allot SW15 Aotea Parish, Rosalie Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 332/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

fb

rs

Not to scale

Y RO BA AD

E I

L

A Legend

S O x Current land unit R

Page 30 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

31. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57, 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Pt. Allot 33 DP70254, Lots 1 & 2, Ross Bay, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1551/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) ("cs") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

Ross rs Bay

cs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 31 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

32. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 80 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 3501/6

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

D

A

O

R

I

R

I

H

W

A

T

A

G

N

U

A

M rs

SCHOONE R BAY ROAD Not to scale

e

n

o

N Legend x Current land unit

Page 32 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

33. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 411 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 276/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

pl

rs

cc

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 33 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

34. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 419 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1579/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

pl

rs Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 34 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

35. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 421 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1253/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

cc

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 35 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

36. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Pt. SE112 Sec1 S.O 65057 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 3826/1, 3827/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

fb

Not to scale

D OA R AY B ER ON HO SC

Legend x Current land unit

Page 36 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

37. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Pt. Allotment 111, Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 177/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

cc rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 37 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

38. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57,60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Lot 1 & 3 DP 104323 Shoal Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 1563/1, 1653/2, 1563/3, 1563/4

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af") Scale 1:5,000

af

rs

cc

Not to scale

Ross Bay Legend x Current land unit

Page 38 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

39. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 55 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 131 Walter Blackwell Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Number: 1468/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 3 (alluvial flats) ("af")

Scale 1:3,000

W

A

L T

E

R

B

L A

C

K ws W E

L L

R

O

A

D

Not to scale

af

Legend x Current land unit

Page 39 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

40. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 61 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: PS Aotea Rosalie Bay Road (Allots NE44, SE47, SW46), Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb")

Scale 1:5,000

fb

cc Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 40 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

41. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 259 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

cc

Not to scale

Shag

Schooner Bay Harbour

Legend x Current land unit

Page 41 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

42. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 57 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Lot 1 DP 105887 Shoal Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

Tryphena Point

cc

S

H

O

A

L

B

A

Y

Taylors Bay R O

A

D

rs Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 42 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

43. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 59, 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Lots 3 & 4 DP 70254 Ross Bay, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

Ross Bay

cc

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 43 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

44. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: Lot 10 DP 70255 Cecilia Sudden Bay & Allots E35 37 192 W35 Aotea Parish S) 2497A Shoal Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

Cecilia Sudden Bay rs

cc Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 44 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

45. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: SECS 1-2 SO 64532 Cape Barrier Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

Sandy Bay

Not to scale cc

Legend x Current land unit

Page 45 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

46. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 60 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 350 Cape Barrier Road & Lot 5 DP 75038 Cape Barrier Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

cc

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 46 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

47. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 56 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 395 Schooner Bay Road, Great Barrier Island

Submission Numbers: 877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 1 (coastal cliffs) ("cc") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

rs

cs

Not to scale

Shag Harbour

Legend x Current land unit

Page 47 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

48. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 17 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 205 Awaawaroa Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 2103/8

The land shown to be reclassified as Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:3,000

D A O R A O R A W A A W A

Awaawaroa Bay

pl Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 48 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

49. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 17 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 215c Awaawaroa Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Numbers: 1230/1

The land shown reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws")

The land shown reclassified from Landform 4 (wetland systems) ("ws") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

ws

rs

Awaawaroa Bay Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 49 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

50. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 16 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 129B Carsons Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 919/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

fb

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 50 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

51. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 11, 16 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 129G Carsons Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 3657/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

C A R S pl O

N

S

R

O

A

D

fb

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 51 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

52. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 12 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 1 Fisher Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 2649/4

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

pl

D OA R R HE FIS pl

D

A

O

R

E

K

E

H I

A

W rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 52 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

53. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 25 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: Lots 1 & 2 DP 194989, Orapiu Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 1278/1, 1278/2

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 7 (forest and bush areas) ("fb") to Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs")

Scale 1:5,000

Omaru Bay

fb

O

R

A

Not to scale P

I U

R

O

A

D

Legend x Current land unit

Page 53 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

54. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 11 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 99, 101 & 103 Trig Hill Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Numbers: 1041/1, 1279/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:5,000

HOBSON TERRACE

pl

W OO LLA MS RO AD rs

D A O R L L I H

IG R T

rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 54 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

55. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 12 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: 324 Waiheke Road, Waiheke Island

Submission Number: 3593/1

The land shown to be reclassified from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) ("rs") to Landform 5 (productive land) ("pl")

Scale 1:7,000

AD RO E EK IH WA

pl

rs

Not to scale

Legend x Current land unit

Page 55 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

56. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 27 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: Ponui Island

Submission Number: 2103/11

The labels shown as underlined should be added to the map.

Scale 1:24,945

Apuapu Bay

Ponui Island

Green Bay

Nora Bay

Omega Bay

Not to scale

Motunau Bay

Page 56 Appendix 2 314/274014-008

57. Amendment to planning map no. 1 sheet no. 27 (Maps volume 1 - Inner Islands) Location: Pakihi Island (Sandspit Island)

Submission Number: 2103/11

The labels with a strikethrough should be removed from the map.

Scale 1:15,000

Koiroraki Point Haraki Point

pl

Puketoka Point fb Te Tamuiti Point

Pakihi Island

(Sandspit Island) fb

Aotearoa Point

McCallum Bay pl

Not to scale

Page 57 DR14-8 314/314/274014-008

Inner Islands Submission Street Map Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Number Reference Amend sheet 17, map no.1, by deleting the surplus The submitter, Auckland City Council, identifies that the area subject to the land unit boundary shown in the area identified as submission is an error in the mapping for Sheet 17. The panel recognise that 2103/8 205 Awaawaroa Road landform 3 (alluvial flats 'af'), in the northeastern Accept 48 the area should be classified as landform 5 (productive land) and it is therefore quadrant of the map (immediately east of recommended that the submission be accepted. Awaawaroa Road). Realign the boundary of the wetland system The panel recognise that the mapping of the landform 4 (wetland systems) (landform 4) on 215C Awaawaroa Road. This area of the submitters property could be more accurately represented. As a requires some land to be reclassified from landform 4 result, the panel consider it necessary to reclassify part of the area currently 1230/1 215c Awaawaroa Road (wetland systems) to landform 6 (regenerating Accept 49 classified as landform 4 to landform 6 and part of the area currently classified slopes), and other land to be reclassified from landform 6 to landform 4. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 4 submission be accepted. (wetland systems).

The panel do not consider it appropriate for the land at 171 Carsons Road to be reclassified to a special purpose zone. Therecognised that the majority of the property is classified landform 5 (productive land) with the rest of the Reclassify 171 Carsons Road, Waiheke ("Waiheke property being made up of small areas of both landform 7 (forest and bush Airfield") from landform 5 (productive land), landform areas) and landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It should also be noted that the 1100/1 171 Carsons Road 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and Reject n/a property contains a site of ecological significance (SES) for its complex bush areas) to a separate special purpose zone or regenerating kanuka with mature forest remnants. It is considered that the landform, providing for airfield activity classification of the land accurately represents the character and nature of the land at the property. It is therefore recommended that the submission be rejected.

The panel recognise that the classification of the land at 129B Carsons Road does not accurately represent the character or use of the land. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendations Reclassify part of 129B Carsons Road, Waiheke for reclassification however the submitter also pointed out to the panel, 919/1 129B Carsons Road (Lot2, DP 191497) from landform 7 (forest and bush additional areas of land which would be suitable for reclassification from Accept 50 areas) to landform 5 (productive land). landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive land). It is therefore recommended that the submission be accepted and that the areas of land that are cleared and grazed be reclassified from landform 7 (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land).

Reclassify part of 129G Carsons Rd, Waiheke (lot 4 DP 191497) from landform 7 (forest and bush) to The panel recognise that the classification of the land at 129G Carsons Road landform 5 (productive land) so that there is 5 ha of does not accurately represent the natural character or use of the land. It is 3657/1 129G Carsons Road landform 5 (applying to cleared land for productive therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted and Accept 51 land use and containing the present designated that the areas of land that are cleared and grazed be reclassified from house site of 1000m2) and 6.7 ha of landform 7 landform 7 (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land). (applying to forest and bush) DR14-8 314/314/274014-008

Inner Islands Submission Street Map Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Number Reference

The submission states that the classification of part of the property as landform 7 (forest and bush areas) is unreasonably restrictive on the use of the property. The panel consider that the vegetation contained within the landform 7 area of the property is characteristic of the type of vegetation Lot 1 & Lot Reclassify Lot 5, DP168989 and Lot1, DP168989 considered 'forest and bush'. The panel also consider that the natural 535/1 5 DP Cowes Bay Road (Cowes Bay Road) from landform 7 (forest and bush Reject n/a character of forest and bush areas needs to be protected from the adverse 168989 areas) to landform 5 (productive land effects of activities and buildings which is why the activities within the land unit are restricted to those of low intensity. The panel therefore considers that the classification of part of the property as landform 7 (forest and bush areas) is accurate and therefore is it recommended that the submission be rejected.

It is recognised by the panel that the land at 1 Fisher Road could be reclassified in order to more accurately represent the nature and character of Reclassify Greenacres Site at 1 Fisher Rd, Onetangi the land. The panel also recognises that the cleared land on the property from Landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to Landform 5 2649/4 1 Fisher Road should be reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 Accept in Part 52 (productive land), as existing use rights for disposal (productive land). The change in the classification of part of the property of septic tank settled solid represents the characteristics of the landform and does not relate to any issues of exisiting use rights.

The submitter attended the hearing and identified an error made in the officer's report. The panel recognise that the officer made an error on map 49 of the Reclassify Lot 2, DP 194989 Orapiu Road, Omaru hearings report when recommending the reclassification of land to landform 6 Lot 2 DP 1273/1, 1273/2 Orapiu Road Bay from landform 7 (forest and bush) to landform 6 (regnerating slopes). As such, the panel have reassessed the submitters Reject n/a 194989 (regenerating slopes) request but have recommended that the submission be rejected as it is considered that the property has been accurately classified as landform 7 (forest and bush areas).

It is recognised by the panel that the area of land surrounding the dwelling at 677 Orapiu Road could be more suitably classified from the current landform 7 (forest and bush areas) land unit, to landform 6 (regenerating slopes). The Reclassify 677 Orapiu Road, Orapiu (Lot 1 submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's 1278/1, 1278/2 677 Orapiu Road DP194989) from landform 7 (forest and bush areas) recommendation. It is considered by the panel that the vegetation in the area Accept in Part 53 to landform 6 (regenerating slopes surrounding the house does not support classification as forest and bush however the rest of the property is considered appropriately classified as forest and bush and therefore it is recommended that the submission be accepted in part.

The panel recognise that the Plan does not accurately represent the composition of the land at 99,101 and 103 Trig Hill Road. It is therefore Reclassify 99 and 101 Trig Hill Road from landform 6 1041/1, 1279/1 99-103 Trig Hill Road considered necessary to reclassify the cleared land on the properties from Accept in Part 54 (regenerating slopes) landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive land). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part.

The submission supports the classification of land at 101 & 103 Trig Hill Road Support covenanted area of 101 and 103 Trig Hill 1279/2 101-103 Trig Hill Road as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and it is therefore recommended by the Accept n/a Road being landform 6 (regenerating slopes). panel that the submission be accepted. DR14-8 314/314/274014-008

Inner Islands Submission Street Map Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Number Reference

The panel acknowledge that the classification of the land at 324 Waiheke Road would be more accurate if the land used for productive purposes was Reclassify parts of the property at 324 Waiheke distinguished from the rest of the property which is landform 6 (regenerating 3593/1 324 Waiheke Road Road, Waiheke from landform 6 (regenerating Accept 55 slopes). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be slopes) to landform 5 (productive land) accepted and that the areas of the property which meet the character of landform 5 (productive land) be reclassified as such

The submissions raise issues with some of the land units boundaries being drawn incorrectly. The example given for this is the former Land unit 20 area in the Erua/Tahi Road area which has been reduced. The island residential 1 (tradtional residential) land unit has been extended to the south to connect with Ostend Rd. This area is outside the metropolitan urban limits (MUL) which are set out by the ARC and it is considered that the extension should 1013/1, 1013/2, therefore be removed. The panel note that this matter has been addressed in 1331/2, 1331/4, None That the current planning maps be scrapped and all None Given detail in the hearing report for island residential 1. No other specific examples Accept in Part n/a 3221/2, 3221/4, Given land units be double checked throughout. are included in the submissions and therefore it is difficult to determine the 3380/1 extent of the submitter's dissatisfaction with the land unit boundaries. The panel consider that there have been a number of alterations to the maps made as a result of other submissions and it is considered that these alterations are intended to more accurately represent the boundaries of the land units. It is recommended by the panel that the submissions be accepted in part in that they identify the need to alter the area of island residential 1 near Erua/Tahi Ro

Amend sheet 27, map no 1 by: Removing the land It is recognised by the panel that the submitter, Auckland City Council, is unit labels, bay names, and place names from the wishing to correct the mapping on Map 27, sheet 1 in order to maintain Various Pakihi Island and 2103/11 Pakihi Island inset (so it is identical to the inset on consistency and clarity throughout the maps for the inner islands. The panel Accept 56 labels Ponui Island sheet 27, map no. 2) Adding the bay names (as therefore recommend that the suggested changes be made and that the shown on sheet 27, map no. 2) to Ponui Island. submission be accepted. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The submitter states that the land use of the land is currently over 50% productive and therefore worthy for inclusions within the landform 5 Reclassify part of Lot 10 DP 68556, Blind Bay Rd, (productive land) land unit. The panel notes that part of the property, which is Okupu from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to pasture cover, has been included within landform 5 and it is considered that 2554/3 Lot 10 DP 68556 Blind Bay Road Reject n/a landform 5 (productive land ) so that 50% of the this is the correct extent of the productive land on the property. The majority land is in landform 5 consistent with current use. of the property is covered by regenerating vegetation and therefore has been correctly classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel recommend that the submission be accepted in that it supports Supports landform 5 (productive land) at Lot 5 2554/1 Lot 5 DP68556 Blind Bay Road the classification of Lot 5 DP68556 Blind Bay Rd as landform 5 (productive Accept n/a DP68556, Blind Bay Road, Okupu land)

It is noted by the panel that there are a number of land units which make up the property subject to the submission. The submission requests that all the land units be replaced by a 'blanket' landform 5 (productive land) Reclassify Lot 6 DP 68556, Blind Bay Rd, Okupu classification over the entire property. The panel consider that while there 2554/2 Lot 6 DP 68556 Blind Bay Road from landforms 1, 2, 3 and 6 to landform 5 may be areas of the property that could be more accurately classified, it is Reject n/a (productive land). not considered that a 'blanket' landform 5 classification is appropriate and it is considered that the current classifications of the land better represent the natural character of the land. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel consider that the wetland area (landform 4) of the property could be more accurately represented in the maps. The panel note that the area Reclassify part of the area of landform 4 (wetland has been assessed by the Council's ecologist and a new boundary for the ALLOTS 232-235 systems) on the Blackwell farm adjoining Walter wetland system recommended. All of the areas from which the wetland has 1474/1, 3090/3 AOTEA PARISH Medland Road Blackwell Road (between Kaitoke Lane and Accept in Part 1 been removed should be reclassified to landform 3 (alluvial flats). The SO 13162 Medland Road) to landform 3 (alluvial flats) or submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officers landform 5 (productive land). recommendation. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part. Reclassify two areas (with combined area of less It is considered by the panel that the classification of the land subject to this than two acres) that have been growing submission accurately represents the character and composition of passionfruit and an area around the existing vegetation on the property. The panel note that the vegetation cover of the Schooner Bay dwelling (approximately ½ acre) of a sixty acre 2852/1 Block NW 11 property is largely varying states of regenerating bush with pockets of mature Reject n/a Road property at Schooner Bay Road (Block NW117) forest and it is not considered necessary to alter any of the classification of from landforms 6 (regenerating slopes) and 7 the land and therefore the panel recommends that the submission be (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 (productive rejected. land) It is considered by the panel that the classification of the land subject to this Reclassify parts of Lots 1-4, and 6 DP 136276 at submission accurately represents the character and composition of the Lots 1,2,3,4 and 6 Schooner Bay Schooner Bay Rd, Tryphena from landform 6 1544/3, 3139/2 property. The panel does not consider it necessary to alter any of the Reject n/a DP136276 Road (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and classification of the land and therefore it is recommended that the bush) to landform 5 (productive land) submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation to accept this submission. The panel recognise that based Identify a significant wetland in the area currently on the recommendation from the Council's ecologist, it is considered that the 3052/1 131 Aotea Road labelled "Awana settlement area" (below the 'pl' Accept 2 area subject to the submission should be reclassified as landform 4 (wetland area) on sheet 50(1) systems) from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) as requested in the submission.

The panel notes that the Council's ecologist has recommended that the land Reclassify part of the Curreen family farm at Aotea be reclassified to landform 3 (alluvial flats) due to the area being dominated 2866/1 219 Aotea Road Road, Awana from landform 4 (wetland systems) to Accept 3 by grazed pasture with a few small pockets of degraded wetland vegetation. landform 3 (Alluvial flats) It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted.

1302/1, 1305/1, 1320/1, 1337/1, 1358/1, 1367/1, 1423/1, 1480/1, The submissions request that all landform 4 (wetland systems) boundaries 1515/1, 1567/1, be reclassified or redrawn to more accurately represent the extent of the land 1953/1, 1961/1, unit. The panel note that all the submissions are from property owners on Reclassify land from landform 4 (wetland systems) 1978/1, 1990/1, Great Barrier Island. Other submissions, namely 74/1, 75/1, 356/1, 357/1, in collaboration with the owners and 2151/1, 2168/1, 1252/1, 1261/1, 1263/3, 1468/1, 1474/1, 1518/1, 1518/2, 1518/3, 2063/1, representatives of affected properties. Redraw 2172/1, 2180/1, Not given Not given 2508/1, 2512/1, 2719/1, 2727/1, 2866/1, 3088/4 have requested Accept in Part 4 landform 4 boundaries to show wet areas only 2190/1, 2237/1, reclassification of specific areas of land from landform 4 (wetland systems) rather than including large swathes of surrounding 2260/1, 2313/1, to landforms 3 or 5 and these submissions have been accepted or accepted property. 2334/1, 2340/1, in part. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be 2365/1, 2408/1, accepted in part as it is recognised some, but not all of the landform 4 2480/1, 2742/1, boundaries should be altered. 2873/1, 3677/1, 3744/1, 3769/1, 3785/1 On advice from the Council's ecologist the panel recognise that parts of this area classified as landform 4 (wetland systems) more strongly meet the definitions of landform 3 (alluvial flats), but a small area is correctly classified Reclassify part of a property at Aotea Road, Great as wetland as evidenced by the native saltmarsh plants present. It is 2063/1 219 Aotea Road Barrier from landform 4 (wetland systems) to therefore recommended by the panel that the submission should be Accept in Part 5 landform 3 (alluvial flats). accepted in part and that the small area to the north of the currently classified landform 4 (wetland system) should remain classified as wetland systems and the rest of the area should be reclassified to landform 3 (alluvial flats). It is not considered appropriate to change to the boundaries of the areas Redraw and extend the productive land boundaries classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) as the areas are in at the Curreen family farm, Aotea Road, Awana . regenerating vegetation. Some areas of the property are under grazed 2867/1 219 Aotea Road Ensure that GBI farmers are able to clear and Reject n/a kanuka of little ecological value but these are on land classified as landform utilise regenerating scrubland that was once fertile 5 (productive land). The panel therefore recommend that the submission be pasture. rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference Reclassify part of the Curreen family farm at Aotea The panel consider that the landform 2 (dune systems) classification of the Road, Awana from landform 2 (dune systems and land subject to the submission accurately identifies the natural 2868/1 219 Aotea Road Reject n/a sand flats) to landform 5 (productive land) (plan characteristics of the land as a dune system. It is therefore recommended by attached to submission) the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel do not consider it appropriate to reclassify the landform 2 (dune Reclassify part of the Curreen family farm, Awana systems) areas of the site to landform 2 (sand flats) as the topography of the 2870/1 219 Aotea Road from landform 2 (dune systems) to landform 2 areas and natural characteristics clearly indicate that the area consists of Reject n/a (sand flats) (plan attached to submission) raised dunes and not sand flats. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation to accept this submission. The panel consider that the area Reclassify the area of land identified as landform 6 subject to the submission has approximately equal amounts of cleared land (regenerating slopes) in the Petrie Valley on the and regenerating bush. It is noted by the panel that it is likely that the bush 1262/2, 2719/3 339 Aotea Road Accept 8 O'Shea property, Aotea Road, Awana to landform 5 areas could be cleared under the indigenous vegetation clearance (productive land). (Plan attached to submission) provisions for landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and therefore it is considered appropriate to reclassify the land as landform 5 (productive land). The panel recommend that the submission be accepted.

The panel recognise that the large area of wetland subject to this submission is no longer a wetland due to draining of the land. It is therefore 74/1, 75/1, 1252/1, recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part and that Reclassify land on the O'Shea property (Awana) 1262/3, 2508/1, the classification of wetland system (landform 4 classification) be removed 339 Aotea Road from landform 4 (wetland systems) to landform 3 Accept in Part 6 2512/1, 2529/1, and reclassified to landform 3 (alluvial flats). It is noted by the panel that the (alluvial flats) 2531/1, 2719/1 smaller area of wetland contained within the submitter's land should be retained as wetland. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation on this submission.

It is recognised by the panel that some of the land subject to the submission has been incorrectly classified as landform 7 (forest and bush). The panel 75/2, 1262/1, Reclassify land on the O'Shea property (Awana) recommends that the submission be accepted in part and that the maps be 2508/2, 2511/1, 339 Aotea Road from landform 7 (forest and bush areas) to Accept in Part 7 & 9 amended to accurately represent the areas of landform 6 (regenerating 2719/2 landform 6 (regenerating slopes) slopes) within the property. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation on this submission.

The panel consider that although the area in question may have once been a wetland, it is drained, grazed pasture with a few native wetland plants. Identify a significant wetland north of the Awana Therefore it is recommended by the panel that the landform 3 (alluvial flats) campground on the northern side of the Awana classification of the area remain and the submission be rejected. The 3052/2 339 Aotea Road Reject n/a creek, currently labelled 'af' and shown as a submitter attended the hearing and spoke further on this submission. The roughly triangular area on sheet 50 (1) panel also note that the owners of the property, who are further submitters on this submission attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation to reject this submission. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference Reclassify part of 339 Aotea Road (O'Shea The panel consider that although the area subject to the submission may property), adjacent to the Awana Stream, from have once been a wetland, it is now drained, grazed pasture with a few 32/2, 2547/4 339 Aotea Road landform 3 (alluvial flats) and landform 6 native wetland plants. Therefore it is recommended by the panel that the Reject n/a (regenerating slopes) to landform 4 (wetland landform 3 (alluvial flats) classification of the area be retained and that the systems) submission be rejected.

The submitter presented evidence in the hearing further to this submission. The panel notes that a large area of the property which is subject to a covenant under the Reserves Act. This area of the property is classified as Reclassify part of property at 375 Aotea Road landform 6 (regenerating slopes) under the Plan. The non-covenanted area outside of covenanted area (plan attached to of the site is currently made up of landforms 4 (wetland systems), 5 109/1 375 Aotea Road submission) from landform 4 (wetland systems) Reject n/a (productive land) and 6 (regenerating slopes). The panel consider that these and landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 landforms accurately represent the character and vegetation cover of the (productive land) land and it is not considered appropriate that this non-covenanted area be reclassified to a blanket landform 5 (productive land) classification. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel consider that the land subject to the submission does not contain the natural characteristics expected of the landform 4 (wetland systems) land unit. The panel notes that the land is grazed pasture and it is therefore considered that the area would be more accurately classified as landform 5 Reclassify part of a property at Aotea Road from (productive land). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the 356/1, 357/1 1320 Aotea Road Accept 10 landform 4 (wetland systems) submissions be accepted. The panel note that an error was made in the hearings report in relation to this property and that not all of the areas which are to be reclassified were accurately represented on the map. The map has been amended for this decision version and now accurately represents all the changes requested by the submitter.

The submission requests an area of land at the property to be reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive land) however the panel consider that all of the land classified landform 6 accurately represents the natural character and vegetation cover of the regenerating slopes of this land unit.Therefore the panel do not Reclassify part of a property at Cape Barrier Road recommended that any changes be made to the land currently classified as 1529/3 329 Cape Barrier Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform regenerating slopes. It is noted by the panel however that the submitter Accept in Part 11 5 (productive land). requests a small area of the property be reclassified from landform 5 (productive land) to landform 6 (regnerating slopes). The land is covered in regenerating vegetation and is not pasture. The panel therefore consider it appropriate to reclassify this small area of regenerating bush into the landform 6 land unit. The panel therefore recommend that the submission be accepted in part. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The submitter seeks that an area to the rear of the property be reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 7 (forest and bush areas). The panel recognise that the area of the site in question joins an area of land Reclassify part of a property at Cape Barrier Road which is classified as landform 7 however it is noted by the panel that there 1529/2 329 Cape Barrier Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform Reject n/a is a ridgeline which separates the two land units. The panel consider that the 7 (forest and bush areas). area of land on the submitters property which is subject to this submission is regnerating vegetation and therefore is accurately represented on the map. The panel recommend that this submission be rejected.

This property is the subject to a number of submissions which seek several areas of reclassification. The panel note that it is difficult to determine the exact extent of the land the submitters seeks to change through this Reclassify land on Lot 1 DP211223 (Gray Rd, submission as the term 'currently and previously farmed' could apply to a Palmers Beach, Great Barrier) so that landform 5 2555/1 255 Gray Road vast area on the site due to varying levels of regenerating vegetation. The Reject n/a (productive land) applies to all of the land currently panel consider that the classification of areas of the property as landform 6 and previously farmed (regenerating slopes) is representative of these varying levels of vegetation cover and it is therefore considered that this classification is accurate. It is recommended that this submission be rejected.

As stated in 2555/1 above, the submitter seeks a number of reclassifications for this property. The panel notes that the area of wetland located on the Reclassify land on Lot 1 DP211223 (Gray Rd, property is part of the larger Kaitoke wetland (and is contained within the 2555/2 255 Gray Road Palmers Beach, Great Barrier) from landform 4 Reject n/a SES 54-1). The panel consider that the classification of this area accurately (wetland systems) to landform 5 (productive land) represents the nature of the land and it is therefore recommended that this submission be rejected.

As stated in 2555/1 above, the submitter seeks a number of reclassifications for this property. The panel notes that there is currently a small area of landform 7 (forest and bush areas) located near the northern boundary of the Classify significant stands on native bush on Lot 1 property. It is also noted by the panel that the landform 6 (regenerating DP211223 (Gray Rd, Palmers Beach, Great slopes) land unit covers vegetation of varying rates of regenerating and 2555/3 255 Gray Road Barrier) as landform 7 (forest and bush areas), but Reject n/a therefore it is recognised that some areas will contain more mature not those portions of the property that are or have vegetation than others. It is therefore considered by the panel that the been used for farming purposes. landform 6 (regenerating slopes) classification of the majority of the property accurately represents the various stages of regenerating vegetation of the property and it is recommended that the submission be rejected.

The submission requests that all the land units be replaced by a 'blanket' Reclassify land on Lot 3 DP211223 (Gray Rd, landform 5 (productive land) classification over the entire property. The panel Palmers Beach, Great Barrier) from landform 6 consider that a 'blanket' landform 5 classification is not considered 2555/4 320 Gray Road (regenerating slopes) and landform 2 (dune Reject n/a appropriate as the current classifications of the land best represent the systems and sand flats) to landform 5 (productive natural character and vegetation cover of the land. It is therefore land) recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference Classify only that land on Lot 3 DP211223 (Gray The panel consider that the topography of the landform 2 land identified in Rd, Palmers Beach, Great Barrier) which is the property fits within the characteristics of the dunes systems area of the 2555/5 320 Gray Road Reject n/a completely within the dune system as landform 2 land unit. It is therefore considered by the panel that the classification of this (dune systems and sand flats) land is accurate and the submission is rejected.

Reclassify part of the Gray property (allotment 199, The panel consider that the classification of the submitter's property Allot 199 Parish of Aotea Parish) Claris from landform 2 (dune 2533/1 Gray Road accurately represents the natural characteristics of the land. It is Reject n/a Aotea 14D/1252 systems and sand flats) and landform 4 (wetland recommended by the panel that the submission should therefore be rejected. systems) to landform 3 (alluvial flats). The panel considers that the zoning of the land at Gray Road subject to the submission has been correctly classified. It is recognised by the panel that Reclassify Allot 199 Aotea Parish, Gray Road, the area of the property designated as landform 4 (wetland systems) is Claris from landform 2 (sand flats and dune Allott 199 CT Gray Road, dominated by native wetland vegetation and that this area is part of the 2513/2 systems) and landform 4 (wetland systems) to a Reject n/a 14D/1252 Tryphena larger Kaitoke wetland which is located to the north of the north-west of the majority of landform 3 (alluvial flats) and leaving a property. It is considered by the panel that the area of sand flats is accurately small amount of landform 4 (wetland systems) classified as such and therefore it is recommended that the submission be rejected.

The Council's ecologist has investigated the submission and considers most of the area is correctly classified as landform 4 (wetland systems). The panel Reclassify part of the Blackwell property (west of note that areas that have been cleared and are not dominated by Hector Sanderson Walter Blackwell Road) from landform 4 (wetland 3088/1 25 regenerating wetland species would be more accurately classified as Accept in Part 12 Road systems) to landform 3 (Alluvial flats). (Plan landform 3 (alluvial flats). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the attached to submission) submission should be accepted in part. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation on this matter.

The panel consider that the classification of land as landform 2 (dune systems) at 25 Hector Sanderson Road correctly describes the nature of the Reclassify part of the Blackwell property to the east land. The area, adjacent to Kaitoke beach, is undulating and rises towards Hector Sanderson 3000/1 25 of Walter Blackwell Drive from landform 2 (dune Hector Sanderson Road. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke Reject n/a Road systems) to landform 2 (sand flats) further to this submission. The panel consider that this topography and the vicinity to the beach are characteristics of dune systems and therefore it is recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The submitter seeks reclassification of an area of land adjacent to Kaitoke Reclassify Blackwell farm to the east of Walter Beach be reclassified from landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) to Blackwell Road and out to the existing fence line landform 5 (productive land). The panel acknowledge that the Council's Hector Sanderson from landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats) to ecologist notes that the site area of land subject to the submission has a 2858/2, 2858/3 25 Reject n/a Road landform 5 (productive land) or any other landform largely sandy substrate which is, in places, covered by pasture and for the that is less restrictive. This will coincide with the most part, is very flat . It is considered by the panel that the classification of existing pasture consistent with Medlands beach this property is accurately represented by the landform 2 classification applied and it is recommended that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

On recommendation from the Council's ecologist, the panel consider that this submission should be accepted in part and that some of the area, currently classified as landform 4 (wetland systems) be reclassified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is noted by the panel that the submission requests Reclassify parts of a property on Hector Sanderson Hector Sanderson that reclassification be made to landform 5 (productive land) however it is 1580/1 143 Road, Great Barrier from landform 4 (wetland Accept in Part 13 Road considered that the vegetation contained within the areas to be reclassified is systems) to landform 5 (productive land). representative of landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is also noted by the panel that landform 6, although it does not provide for as many activities as landform 5, it is less restrictive than landform 4 and therefore this reclassification still provides benefit to the land owner.

The submitter seeks that land currently zoned landform 3 (alluvial flats) be reclassified to landform 5 (productive land). The submitter explains that the land is productively used and in areas, is not completely flat. Landform 3 Reclassify part of a property at Hector Sanderson represents low-lying pasture land and the panel consider that the majority of Hector Sanderson 1581/1 143 Road, Great Barrier from landform 3 (alluvial flats) the landform 3 land on the property is accurately represented. It is Accept in Part 14 Road to landform 5 (productive land). recognised however that there is an area of the site which would be more appropriately represented as landform 5 (productive land) due to the fact that it is more rolling in contour. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part.

It is considered by the panel that the areas of land classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) on the property accurately represent the natural Reclassify part of a property at Hector Sanderson character and vegetation cover of the land. The panel note that the area Hector Sanderson 1582/1 143 Road, Great Barrier from landform 6 (regenerating subject to the submission is, in the majority, covered in regenerating Reject n/a Road slopes ) to landform 5 (productive land). vegetation and it is therefore considered appropriate to retain this area as landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. The panel considers that the areas of land classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) on the property accurately represent the natural That some land under the significant ridgeline on a character of the land. The panel notes that the area subject to the Hector Sanderson property at Hector Sanderson Road, Claris, be 1593/2 143 submission is, in the majority, covered in regenerating vegetation and it is Reject n/a Road reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) therefore considered appropriate to retain this area as landform 6 to landform 5 (productive land). (regenerating slopes). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. The panel considers that the classification of the property at 215 Kaiaraara Reclassify part of a property at Kaiaraara Bay Bay Road would be more accurately represented if a larger area of the site 2259/1 215 Kaiaraara Bay Road Road, Port Fitzroy from landform 7 (forest and was classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) from landform 7 (forest Accept 15 bush) to landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and bush areas). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted. It is recognised by the panel that the land subject to the submission could be Reclassify hillside areas at Lot 2 DP 202216 (57 more accurately classified to represent the natural character of the land.The 1518/1, 1518/2, 57 Kaitoke Lane Kaitoke Lane, GBI) from landform 4 (wetland panel therefore recommends that the submission be accepted in part and Accept in Part 16 1518/3 systems) to landform 5 (productive land). that the areas of wetland be significantly reduced but not completely removed from the property. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The panel considers that whilst the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) classifcation on part of the site may not be the most appropriate land unit to apply, it is not appropriate to reclassify the land to landform 3 (alluvial flats) Reclassify part of the site of the Sir Edmund Hillary as suggested in the submission as the land does not fall within the Outdoor Pursuits Centre of New Zealand at Karaka description of the natural character of alluvial flats. It is recognised by the 3858/1 300 Karaka Bay Road Reject n/a Bay, Great Barrier from landform 1 (coastal cliffs panel however that the property subject to this submission has specific and slopes) to landform 3 (alluvial flats). needs with respect to future use and development. It is considered that concept plan and 'bigger picture' approach could be the most appropriate way to address the submitters concerns and it is this basis that the recommendation is made to reject the submission.

It is considered by the panel that the nature and land use of both landform 5 (productive land) and landform 3 (alluvial flats) are similar but the topography of the property indicates that the whole property would be more accurately classified as landform 5 (productive land). The panel therefore recommends Reclassify part of a property at Mason Road, that the submission be accepted. The submitter attended the hearing and 2049/1 11 Mason Road Medlands from landform 3 (alluvial flats) to Accept 17 spoke in support of the submission. The panel note that the submitter landform 5 (productive land). requested at the hearing that additional reclassification of the property be made to include the property in the Medlands settlement area. As this request was not made through the original written submission, the panel cannot explore this matter further.

It is noted by the Council's ecologist that the area on the property at 50 Mason Road classified as wetland (landform 4) is actually rough pasture land that would be more accurately represented if classified as landform 3 1251/2, 1261/1, Remove the wetland classification off Lot 6 DP (alluvial flats). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission 50 Mason Road Accept in Part 18 2727/1 24139, 50 Mason Road, Medlands be accepted in part. It should be noted that the submission is accepted in part as it is not recommended that all the areas classified as wetland are removed from the submitters land. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation on this submission.

The panel considers that the property has been accurately classified as Reclassify part of 118 Mason Rd, Medlands, from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush areas). It landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 is noted by the panel that landform 5 (productive land) is generally cleared, 2537/1 118 Mason Road Reject n/a (forest and bush) to landform 5 (productive land) to pastoral land and as the property is dominated by regenerating and mature reflect existing use including forestry bush, it is not considered that a reclassification to landform 5 is appropriate. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference The submitter seeks that a small area of the property be reclassified from landform 7 (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land). It appears to the panel that the area identified in the submission is not Reclassify part of 130 Mason Road, Medlands from classified as landform 7 as the submitter suggests and is already classified 135/1, 2753/2 130 Mason Road landform 7 (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 as landform 5 (productive land). It is therefore recommended by the panel Accept n/a (productive land). that the submission be accepted in that it appears to support the classification of the area of land in question. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation on this submission.

The panel consider that the area of landform 5 (productive land) is already Reclassify part of 130 Mason Road (on the accurately represented on the property as it incorporates all land that is northern boundary), Medlands from land unit 8 [i.e. 135/2, 2753/3 130 Mason Road cleared and covered in pasture. The panel notes that the area of productive Reject n/a landform 6 (regenerating slopes)] because it is in land extends over the northern boundary of the submitters property. It is pastured area. recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel considers that the character and composition of the areas of land Reclassify part of 130 Mason Road, Medlands - the classified as landform 7 (forest and bush areas) accurately represents the large forest and bush area at the top to be changed vegetation cover of the area. It is not considered necessary to alter the 135/3, 2753/1 130 Mason Road for regenerating scrub and it should only be in the ti Reject n/a classification of these areas at all and it is therefore recommended that the tree area, not the pasture. 30% of the area in the submission be rejected. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke zone is pasture. It is farm land not bush. further to this submission. The submitter seeks extension to the area of landform 3 (alluvial flats) Reclassify part of 135 Mason Road (Lot 5 located on the property. The panel recognise that the topography and 259/1 135 Mason Road DP72031) from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to composition of the small area behind the house qualifies for inclusion within Accept in Part 19 landform 3 (alluvial flats). the landform 3 (alluvial flats) land unit. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part

The panel notes that the submitter has also presented submission 259/1 relating to the same property but requesting a slightly different classification.The panel had recommended that submission 259/1 be accepted in part and that a small area around the dwelling on the property be included within the landform 3 (alluvial flats) land unit. The panel do not Reclassify part of 135 Mason Road (Lot 5 consider it appropriate to include any other areas within this land unit, nor it 260/1 135 Mason Road DP72031) from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to Reject n/a is considered appropriate to include areas of the property within the landform landform 5 (productive land). 5 (productive land) land unit. The majority of the property, with the exception of the area immediately in front of the house, is regenerating vegetation and it is considered that the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) land unit is appropriately applied. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The panel note that the majority of this area is indigenous vegetation, either mature or advanced regenerating vegetation, and does not meet the definition of productive land in the Plan. Both landforms 6 & 7 provide for Reclassify part of 139 Mason Road (Lot 9 dwellings as a permitted activity within the land unit and it is therefore DP24139), Medlands, from landform 6 considered appropriate to retain the current classifications of the property. (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and 110/1, 1594/1 139 Mason Road The submitter did not attend the hearing but made contact with the officer Reject n/a bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land). after the hearing to discuss this matter further. The panel acknowledge that Landform 5 is to include the Ashton home, gardens there are small cleared areas around the submitters dwelling however the and access. panel does not consider that these areas meet the defnition of productive land. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

As discussed in 110/1 above, the panel note that the majority of this area is indigenous vegetation, either mature or advanced regenerating vegetation, Reclassify part of 139 Mason Road (Lot 9 and does not meet the definition of productive land in the Plan. Both 108/1 139 Mason Road DP24139), Medlands, from landform 7 (forest and landforms 6 & 7 provide for dwellings as a permitted activity within the land Reject n/a bush areas) to landform 6 (regenerating slopes). unit and it is therefore considered appropriate to retain the current classifications of the property. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel note that the majority of this area is indigenous vegetation, either mature or advanced regenerating vegetation, and does not meet the Reclassify part of 140 Mason Road (Lot 1 definition of productive land in the Plan. Both landforms 6 & 7 provide for DP72031), Medlands, from landform 7 (forest and dwellings as a permitted activity within the land unit and it is therefore bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land). 94/1, 108/2, 110/2, considered appropriate to retain the current classifications of the property. 140 Mason Road Landform 5 is to include the pasture area and flat Reject n/a 2006/1 The panel note that the submitter contacted the officer after the hearing to land on the Harre property in front of the Ashton discuss this matter further and the panel acknowledge that there are small home, bounded by the stream and common legal cleared areas around the submitters dwelling however the panel does not boundary. consider that these areas meet the defnition of productive land, therefore the panel recommends that the submission be rejected.

At Mason Road, Medlands Valley move landform 7 As discussed in various other submissions relating to these two properties, (forest and bush areas) boundary to match middle the panel consider that the current classification of land is appropriate due to 112/1 139 & 140 Mason Road Reject n/a ridgeline, and reclassify areas that were this land the nature of the indigenous vegetation present and therefore it is unit onto a more productive land use. recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected.

The panel considers that the classification of the property at 29 Reclassify part of 29 Maungatawhiri Road (Block Maungatawhiri Road has been correctly established and it is therefore M112), Tryphena, by returning the boundary 97/1, 100/1, recommended that the areas of landform 7 (forest and bush) and landform 6 29 Maungatawhiri Road between landform 7 (forest and bush areas) and Reject n/a 2352/1, 3501/7 (regenerating slopes) remain as mapped. The submitter attended the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to that shown in hearing to speak further on this submission. It is therefore recommended by the previous [operative] Plan the panel that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference Reclassify the macadamia orchard at 37 Medland The panel considers that the current natural character and use of the Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to property at 37 Medland Road could be better represented through the landform 5 (productive land). This area can be reclassification of the land. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the 277/1 37 Medland Road defined by the driveway that intersects an area of Accept 20 submission be accepted and that the area of productive land contained regenerating slopes to the north from productive within the property be extended to encompass the orchard on the submitters land to the south. This area would include existing land. water tanks

It is recognised by the panel that the mapping of the landforms for this property could be amended to more accurately represent the boundaries Reclassify part of 38 Medland Rd, Tryphena (lot 7 between the productive land (landform 5) and the regenerating slopes 2005/1 38 Medland Road DP 72728) from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) Accept 21 (landform 6). The panel therefore recommends that this submission be to landform 5 (productive land). accepted and that the relevant changes to the maps be made in order to show the correct representation of land on the property.

The panel recognise that the mapping of the landforms for this property could be amended to more accurately represent the boundaries between the productive land (landform 5) and the regenerating slopes (landform 6). It is Reclassify part of 84 Medland Road (lot 3 DP therefore recommended by the panel that this submission be accepted and 1297/1 84 Medland Road 72728) from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to that the relevant changes to the maps be made in order to show the correct Accept 22 landform 5 (productive land). representation of land on the property. The submitter attended the hearing seeking further reclassifcation of land within the landform 6 land unit however the panel consider that the changes made in the officer's report accurately represent the reclassification needed.

The panel considers that an area of land classified landform 7 (forest and bush areas) would be more accurately classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) due to the character and composition of the vegetation present. The Reclassify part of the western portion of a property submitter attended the hearing and spoke further to this submission. The at Medland Road (Part Allotment M7 Aotea Parish) 273/1 Pt Allot M7 Medland Road submitter requested that a larger area of the property be reclassified from Accept in Part 23 from landform 7 (forest and bush) to landform 6 landform 7 (forest and bush areas) however the panel consider that the (regenerating slopes). amendment made in the officer's report accurately represents the extent of reclassification suitable for the property. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part.

The submitter seeks that the property be classified as it was in the Operative Plan. It is noted by the panel that the classification currently applied to the Reclassify the areas of landform 2 (dune systems property is equivalent to that of the Operative Plan. The panel consider Allot 232-235 and sand flats) off Sugarloaf Road, Kaitoke however that the the submitter's land would be more accurately classified as 1486/1 AOTEA PARISH Medland Road Accept in part 24 (Blackwell property) to landform 3 (alluvial flats) as landform 3 (alluvial flats) than the current classification of landform 2 (dune SO 13162 it was in the operative plan. systems and sand flats). The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendations in relation to this submission. Therefore it is recommended that the submission be accepted in part. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The panel recognise that this submission, from the Auckland City Council, identifies an error in the annotation of an area of land at the southern end of Amend sheet 55, map no. 1 so that the north- Kaitoke Beach. The panel acknowledge that the land in question is not eastern most portion of the property at the southern owned by the Department of Conservation and therefore has been ALLOTS 232-235 end of Kaitoke Beach (the Sugar Loaf) (Allots 232- incorrectly labelled as the conservation land unit when it should be classified 2104/4, 3086/1 AOTEA PARISH Medland Road Accept 25 235, Aotea Parish, SO13162) is annotated with 'cs' as part of the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) land unit. The SO 13162 (coastal cliffs and slopes-landform 1) and that the conservation land unit is reserved for land owned by DOC and it is therefore existing 'c' (conservation) annotation is removed recommended by the panel that this submission be accepted and that the area which is currently classified as conservation land unit be correctly annotated as the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes).

The panel notes that the Council's ecologist has recommended that the small area around the submitters house should be reclassified from landform 7 Reclassify part of Lot 1 DP71990 (Medland Road) (forest and bush areas) to landform 5 (productive land) in order to more 266/1 Lot 1 DP 71990 Medland Road from landform 7 (forest and bush) to landform 5 accurately represent the natural character and current use of the land. The Accept 26 (productive land) submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation. It is therefore recommended that the submission be accepted.

The panel consider that the majority of the land at 112 Mitchener Road is correctly classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes) however it is Reclassify part of the Mitchener property at Pt Allot recognised that a small area of the property would be more accurately NW 74, M76, SE 76 (Mitchener Road, Medlands) classified as landform 5 (productive land) and therefore it is recommended from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform that the submission be accepted in part. The submitter attended the hearing 1968/1 112 Mitchner Road Accept in Part 27 5 (productive land) or that some zoning be and sought further reclassification of land at the property. The panel note introduced to allow full productive use of that which that the Council's ecologist considers the area requested to be reclassified is suitable as landform 3 (alluvial flats) by the submitter would be more suitably classified as landform 4 (wetland systems). The panel therefore recommend that no further changes

The panel note that the land that the submitter is referring to is not actually contained within 200 Omata Rd, but is actually 339 Aotea Rd. Submission Reclassify part of 200 Omata Road (Lot 5 3052/2 seeks that the same area be reclassified to landform 4. As discussed 32/1 200 Omata Road DP144904), Awana from landform 6 (regenerating in 3052/2, although the area in question may have once been a wetland, it is Reject n/a slopes) to landform 4 (wetland systems drained, grazed pasture with a few native wetland plants. Therefore it is recommended by the panel that the landform 3 (alluvial flats) classification of the area remain and the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The panel note that the area subject to the submission is flat and wet and mostly dominated by native wetland plants. The Council's ecologist acknowledges that this area would be more accurately represented as landform 4 (wetland systems) than the current classification as landform 6 (regenerating slopes). Although this may be the case it is recognised by the Reclassify flat land on the eastern side of PT Allott NW74 panel that as the submitter requests reclassification of the area from 1979/1 Primrose Hill Oruawharo Stream from landform 6 (regenerating Reject n/a M76 SE 76 landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 3 (alluvial flats), a slopes) to landform 3 (alluvial flats) reclassification to landform 4 is not within scope of the submission. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke further to this submission. However it is recommended by the Council's ecologist in this case to retain the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) land unit and it is therefore recommended by the panel that this submission be rejected.

The panel considers it appropriate to reclassify the cleared areas of land Reclassify the cleared land at 131 Rosalie Bay located at 131 Rosalie Bay Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to Road, Tryphena (Lot 17, DP207570) from landform 1602/1 131 Rosalie Bay Road landform 5 (productive land) as this more accurately represents the use of Accept 29 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive the land. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be land). (Plan attached to submission.) accepted. Reclassify part of three blocks of land at Rosalie The panel recognises that the boundary between the landform 6 Bay Road (Allot SW15 Aotea Parish, Allot NE16 Allot SW15 Aotea (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and bush) areas on the property 332/1 Rosalie Bay Road Aotea Parish) and Allot NE 16 from landform 7 Accept in Part 30 Parish could be more accurately defined. The panel therefore recommend that this (Forest and Bush) to landform 6 (regenerating submission be accepted in part. slopes).

The panel recognise that the application of the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) land unit does not accurately represent the natural character of the Reclassify part of two properties at Ross Bay, submitter's properties.The panel agree that a significant reduction in the Tryphena (DP70254, CT49c/265, CT100c/300) landform is needed and it is recommended that the submission be accepted. Pt Allot 33 from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) to It is also noted by the panel that properties either side of those subject to this 1551/1 DP70254, Lots Ross Bay, Tryphena Accept 31 landform 6 (regenerating slopes). Apply landform 1 submission should also have the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) 1&2 to the portion which is land unit 1 in the current boundary reduced, this matter will be addressed through submissions 877/2, (operative) Plan 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, 1416/2, 1461/2, 1522/2, 1913/2, 1915/2, 1922/2, 1988/2, 2139/2, 2162/2, 2212/2, 2238/2, 2271/2, 2368/2, 2489/2, 2864/2, 3679/2, 3743/2, 3768/2, 3798/2.

The submitter seeks that the property be reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive land) as the property contains an avocado orchard. While the panel recognise that an avocado orchard is a 'productive use' of the land, it is also recognised that horticulture Reclassify part of 24 Schooner Bay Great Barrier is provided for as a permitted activity within landform 6 and therefore the 2440/1 24 Schooner Bay Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform Reject n/a avocado orchard is already provided for on the property. The majority of the 5 (productive land) property, with the exception of a small area around the dwelling, consists of regenerating indigenous vegetation and therefore fits the current classification of landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The submission request that properties at 24 & 40, lots 6 & & DP69696 Schooner Bay Road and 50 Maungatawhiri Road be reclassified to residential from landform 6 (regenerating slopes). It is noted by the panel that landform 6 provides for one dwelling per site as a permitted activity and also provides for multiple dwellings as a discretionary activity. It is considered by Reclassify 24 Schooner Bay Rd, pt lot 7 DP 69696 te panel that the classification of the properties accurately represents the 3501/9 24 Schooner Bay Road and the property(s) owned by D.Buhler to Reject n/a physical characteristics of the land and as both the properties are located residential outside of settlement areas, it is not considered that a residential classification is appropriate. Settlement areas on the island have been established in area that are historically centres for community on the island and it is not considered that these properties fall within this category. The panel therefore recommend that the submission be rejected.

It is noted by the panel that currently the property at 80 Schooner Bay Road is currently classified as landform 6 (regenerating slopes). The panel consider that an area of cleared land at the property would be more accurately classified as landform 5 (productive land). The panel notes that the property is located outside a settlement area and is therefore not Reclassify 80 Schooner Bay, Tryphena Road from considered appropriate to be classed as a residential or industrial area. It is landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to agricultural, 3501/6 80 Schooner Bay Road also noted by the panel that landforms 5 & 6 both provide for one dwelling Accept in Part 32 industrial (with residential accommodation per site as a permitted activity and for multiple dwellings as a discretionary permitted) and residential activity and it is considered that this provides a level of development that is appropriate for the site. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted in part and that the cleared area of land be reclassified from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to landform 5 (productive land).

Reclassify part of Lot 1 DP68039 Schooner Bay It is recognised by the panel that the Plan could more accurately represent Road from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) and the character and use of the land at 411 Schooner Bay Road. The panel 276/1 411 Schooner Bay Road Accept 33 landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) to landform 5 therefore recommends that the submission be accepted and that the (productive land) landform 5 (productive land) area be increased. The panel recognises that the Plan could more accurately represent the Reclassify land at Schooner Bay Rd, (pt SE 16 character and use of the land at 419 Schooner Bay Road. It is therefore 1579/1 419 Schooner Bay Road Aotea Parish) from landform 6 (regenerating Accept 34 recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted and that the slopes) to landform 5 (productive land). landform 5 (productive land) area be increased.

It is considered by the panel that the extent of the landform 1 (coastal cliffs Reclassify part of 421 Schooner Bay Road (Lot 7 and slopes) classification on the submitters land does not accurately DP208484) from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and represent the natural character of the land. The panel therefore consider that 1253/1 421 Schooner Bay Road Accept 35 slopes) to landform 6 (regenerating slopes) so that it is appropriate to realign the boundary between the landform 1 (coastal it is consistent with the Operative Plan. cliffs and slopes) land and the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) land and it is recommended that the submission be accepted. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

It is recognised by the panel that some of the land classified as landform 7 Objects to the landform land units (i.e. landform 6 (forest and bush areas) would be more accurately represented if it was (regenerating slopes) and landform 7 (forest and P.T SE 112 Sec1 reclassified to landform 6 (regenerating slopes) although the panel do not 3826/1, 3827/2 Schooner Bay Road bush areas)) on sheet 56 map 1 and in particular Accept in part 36 S.O 65057 consider that all the land, as suggested by the submitter, currently classified on Pt allot SE 112 sec 1 SO65057 (Schooner Bay as landform 7 land, be reclassified. It is therefore recommended by the panel Rd that the submission be accepted in part.

It is recognised by the panel that the Plan does not accurately represent the Reclassify part of a property at Schooner Bay Road extent of landform1 (coastal cliffs and slopes). The panel therefore 177/1 PT Allotment 111 Schooner Bay Road (Pt Allotment 111) from landform 1 (coastal cliffs recommends that the submission be accepted and that the landform 6 Accept 37 and slopes) to landform 6 (regenerating slopes). (regenerating slopes) area be extended to represent the true character of the land.

The submitter seeks that part of the property be reclassified from landform 3 (alluvial flats) to landform 5 (productive land). The submitter attended the hearing and spoke further to this submission. The submitter was wishing to seek correction to the description of the land through landform reclassification however the panel notes that the use of the land area as Reclassify part of a property at Shoal Bay Road, Lot 1 & 3, DP result of this reclassification is unlikely to change and it is considered that the 1563/5 Shoal Bay Road Tryphena (Lot 1 & 3, DP 104323), from landform 3 Reject n/a 104323 topography of the area of the land in question is more suitably classified, as it (alluvial flats) to landform 5 (productive land). is, as landform 3 (alluvial flats). It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be rejected. The panel note that the hearing report and this appendix provided conflicting information in regard to the submissions received by the submitter and this matter has been rectified in this decision report.

The panel consider that the classification of landform 1 (coastal cliffs and Reclassify part of a property at Shoal Bay slopes) on the submitters property should be refined to more accurately Lot 1 & 3, DP Road, Tryphena (Lot 1 & 3, DP 104323), represent the nature of the coastal character of the property. It is therefore 1563/1 Shoal Bay Road Accept 38 104323 from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) to recommended that the submission be accepted and that the appropriate landform 5 (productive land). changes to the mapping be made in order to accurately represent the landform make-up of the property.

The panel consider that the extent of the landform 6 (regenerating slopes) landform on the property includes some land which would be more Reclassify part of a property at Shoal Bay accurately represented as landform 5 (productive land). The submitter Lot 1 & 3, DP Road, Tryphena (Lot 1 & 3, DP 104323), 1563/2 Shoal Bay Road attended the hearing and sought that an area larger than what the officer had Accept in Part 38 104323 from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to recommended be included in the landform 5 (productive land) classification landform 5 (productive land). however the panel consider that the officer's recommendation is accurate. It is therefore recommended that the submission be accepted in part.

The panel recognise that the a small area of landform 6 (regenerating Reclassify part of a property at Shoal Bay slopes) would be more accurately classified as landform 3 (alluvial flats). The Lot 1 & 3, DP Road, Tryphena (Lot 1 & 3, DP 104323), 1563/3 Shoal Bay Road submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's Accept 38 104323 from landform 6 (regenerating slopes) to recommendation. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the landform 3 (alluvial flats). submission be accepted. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference

The panel consider that the classification of landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) on the submitters property should be refined to more accurately Reclassify part of a property at Shoal Bay represent the nature of the coastal character of the property. It is therefore Lot 1 & 3, DP Road, Tryphena (Lot 1 & 3, DP 104323), recommended that the landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) land unit be 1563/4 Shoal Bay Road Accept 38 104323 from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) to reduced and that a portion of this be reclassified as landform 6 (regenerating landform 6 (regenerating slopes). slopes) in accordance with the officer's recommendations. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted. The submitter attended the hearing and spoke in support of the officer's recommendation.

It is considered by the panel that the classification of landform 4 (wetland systems) on the submitters property does not accurately represent the Reclassify the area of landform 4 (wetland current use or character of the land. The panel consider that the area is very Walter Blackwell systems) on the property at 130-131 Walter 1468/1 131 small in relation to the full extent of the adjacent wetland system and Accept 39 Road Blackwell Road, Claris (Lots 1 and 2 DP 51506), so therefore the reclassification of this area will result in great benefit to the that the submitter can tend the orchard and garden landowner while resulting in little or no effect to the overall wetland system. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be accepted.

The panel note that the submission does not make reference to specific properties or areas where the submitter feels that the representation of forest and bush areas (landform 7) are incorrect and instead the submission refers to all of the land classified as landform 7 on both maps 49 and 50. The submitter attended the hearing but did not identify any specific sites for which reclassification was sought. While it is considered by the panel that some of Change all of the areas now in landform 7 (forest Maps 49 & 50, the land subject to the submission is incorrectly classified as landform 7 73/1 and bush areas) to landform 6 (regenerating Accept in Part n/a Sheet 1 (forest and bush) it is considered that the majority of the landform 7 land has slopes) (with specific reference to maps 49 and 50) been accurately identified. There are other submissions which identify specific areas where the landform 7 classification has been incorrectly applied and these areas have been reclassified landform 6 (regenerating slopes) as appropriate. It is therefore recommended by the panel that this submission be accepted in part as there have been changes made to areas of landform 7 within maps 49 and 50 under other submissions.

877/2, 1307/2, 1319/2, 1379/2, These submissions raise concern about the extent of land classified as 1416/2, 1461/2, landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes). The panel note that there were no 1522/2, 1913/2, specific examples given in the written submissions however it is noted that 1915/2, 1922/2, the specific properties were identified by submitters in the hearings where Reclassify land from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and 28, 37, 38, 39, 1988/2, 2139/2, reclassification from landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes) was sought. The None given None given slopes). Reduce landform 1 boundaries to coastal Accept in Part 40, 41, 42, 43, 2162/2, 2212/2, panel also note that some specific properties had been identified at previous cliff and esplanade coastal margins only. 44, 45, 46, 47 2238/2, 2271/2, hearings.Other submissions namely 1563/1, 1563/4, 1253/1 and 177/1 have 2368/2, 2489/2, requested reclassification of specific areas of land from landform 1 (coastal 2864/2, 3679/2, cliffs and slopes) to landforms 5 or 6 and these submissions have been 3743/2, 3768/2, accepted. 3798/2 DR14-8 314/274014-008

Outer Islands Submission Map Street Number Site Address Decisions Requested Panel's Analysis Recommendation Number Reference 1302/1, 1305/1, 1320/1, 1337/1, 1358/1, 1367/1, 1423/1, 1480/1, The submissions request that all landform 4 (wetland systems) boundaries 1515/1, 1567/1, be reclassified or redrawn to more accurately represent the extent of the land 1953/1, 1961/1, unit. The panel note that all the submissions are from property owners on Reclassify land from landform 4 (wetland systems) 1978/1, 1990/1, Great Barrier Island. Other submissions, namely 74/1, 75/1, 356/1, 357/1, in collaboration with the owners and 2151/1, 2168/1, 1252/1, 1261/1, 1263/3, 1468/1, 1474/1, 1518/1, 1518/2, 1518/3, 2063/1, representatives of affected properties. Redraw 2172/1, 2180/1, Not given Not given 2508/1, 2512/1, 2719/1, 2727/1, 2866/1, 3088/4 have requested Accept in Part 4 landform 4 boundaries to show wet areas only 2190/1, 2237/1, reclassification of specific areas of land from landform 4 (wetland systems) rather than including large swathes of surrounding 2260/1, 2313/1, to landforms 3 or 5 and these submissions have been accepted or accepted property. 2334/1, 2340/1, in part. It is therefore recommended by the panel that the submission be 2365/1, 2408/1, accepted in part as it is recognised some, but not all of the landform 4 2480/1, 2742/1, boundaries should be altered. 2873/1, 3677/1, 3744/1, 3769/1, 3785/1

It is recognised by the panel that the mapping of the landforms for the outer islands could be amended in some places to more accurately represent the A comprehensive audit of, and where applicable composition of the land. The submissions do not identify specific areas of amendment to outer island planning maps to inaccuracy on the maps but it is recognised that, through a number of other 1405/4, 1406/4 Not given Not given correct significant inaccuracies. In particular the Accept in Part n/a submissions, a large number of mapping inaccuracies have been corrected. land unit overlays do not reflect the actual physical The panel recommends therefore that this submission should be accepted in landforms part as it is recognised that through other submissions, specific mapping inaccuracies have been addressed.

This submission, from the Auckland Regional Council, seeks to identify areas of wetland which have not been correctly identified in the Plan. The panel note that the submission does not provide specific examples of where wetland areas have been overlooked and therefore it is difficult to ascertain Review areas that could be included as landform 4 the extent of the submitters concern. The submitter attended the hearing and 3521/87 Not given Not given Accept in Part n/a (wetland systems) to identify more areas agreed with the officer that it is difficult to accurately identify every wetland. It is noted by the panel that submission 3052/1 specifically addresses an area where a wetland system was overlooked. This submission has been accepted and a new wetland area created.The panel therefore recommend that submission 3521/87 be accepted in part. DR14-8 314/274014-008

Schedule of amendments

1. Amend the definition of rural property management plan in Part 14 of the plan as follows:

“Rural property management plan means a long term management plan which comprehensively details all land use activities proposed to be undertaken on a site. It includes:, including • the location of buildings and activities, and • the mitigation of effects proposed to manage adverse effects from those buildings and activities • methods for protecting and enhancing any parts of the site classified as landform 1, 2 or 4.”

2. Insert the following wording into clause 10a.2.4:

“Rural property management plans are provided for as a discretionary activity in recognition of the long term management approach to development for a whole site that is expected from these plans. Some sites contain a range of different landform land units. It is therefore appropriate for a rural property management plan to include methods for protecting and enhancing any parts of the site which are classified as landform 1.”

3. Insert the following wording into clause 10a.3.4:

“Rural property management plans are provided for as a discretionary activity in recognition of the long term management approach to development for a whole site that is expected from these plans. Some sites contain a range of different landform land units. It is therefore appropriate for a rural property management plan to include methods for protecting and enhancing any parts of the site which are classified as landform 2.”

4. Insert the following wording into clause 10a.5.4:

“Rural property management plans are provided for as a discretionary activity in recognition of the long term management approach to development for a whole site that is expected from these plans. Some sites contain a range of different landform land units. It is therefore appropriate for a rural property management plan to include methods for protecting and enhancing any parts of the site which are classified as landform 4.”

5. Amend clause 10a.2.5 (landform 1 – coastal cliffs) to include the following activities:

Activity Status Rural property management plan D

6. Amend clause 10a.3.5.1 (landform 2 – dune systems area only) to include the following activities:

Activity Status Rural property management plan D

7. Amend clause 10a.5.5 (landform 4 – wetland systems) to include the following activity:

Activity Status Rural property management plan D

Page 1 DR14-8 314/274014-008

8. Amend clause 10a.3.5.2 (landform 2 – sand flats area only) to include the following activity:

Activity Status Outdoor adventure activities D

9. Amend clause 10a.6.5 (landform 5 – productive land) to include the following activity:

Activity Status Outdoor adventure activities D

10. Amend clause 10a.7.5 (landform 6 – regenerating slopes) to include the following activity:

Activity Status Outdoor adventure activities D

11. Amend the definition of commercial firewood harvesting in part 14 as follows:

“Commercial firewood harvesting means the harvesting of manuka, kanuka or any exotic species for the production and sale of firewood. The harvesting must occur in accordance with a management plan.

It does not include other activities associated with the milling or processing of trees.”

12. Insert the following wording into note 2, beneath the activity table in landform 2 (sand flats area only):

“The activities of earthworks and vegetation clearance (including domestic firewood harvesting) are treated as development controls and are therefore not listed in this table”.

13. Insert the following wording into note 3, in landform 3:

“The activities of earthworks and vegetation clearance (other than for commercial firewood harvesting and forestryincluding domestic firewood harvesting) are treated as development controls and are therefore not listed in this table”.

14. Insert the following wording into note 3, in landform 5:

“The activities of earthworks and vegetation clearance (other than for commercial firewood harvesting and forestryincluding domestic firewood harvesting) are treated as development controls and are therefore not listed in this table”.

15. Insert the following wording into note 2 and insert a new note 3, beneath the activity table in landform 6:

“2. The activities of earthworks and vegetation clearance (including domestic firewood harvesting) are treated as development controls and are therefore not listed in this table. 3. Commercial firewood harvesting is not expected to comply with the vegetation clearance controls set out in part 10c - Development controls for land units and settlement areas for landform 6.”

16. Insert the following note wording into note 2, beneath the activity table in landform 7:

“The activities of earthworks and vegetation clearance (including domestic firewood harvesting) are treated as development controls and are therefore not listed in this table”.

Page 2 DR14-8 314/274014-008

17. Insert the following wording into Clause 10a.2.3 of landform 1 (coastal cliffs and slopes)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and visual prominence of the coastal cliffs and slopes from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

18. Insert the following wording into Clause 10a.3.3 of landform 2 (dune systems and sand flats)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and visual amenity value of the dune systems and sand flats from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

19. Insert the following wording into Clause 10a.5.3 of landform 4 (wetland systems)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and the ecological and hydrological value of the wetland systems from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

20. Insert the following wording into Clause 10a.8.3 of landform 7 (forest and bush areas)

“Objective To protect, and where possible, enhance or restore, the natural character and the conservation, ecological and visual amenity values of the forest and bush areas from the adverse effects of activities and buildings.”

21. Amend the planning maps in accordance with the attached diagrams.

Page 3