This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the Official Statement is delivered in final form. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. assessments intheStateofColorado.See“TAXMATTERS”herein. pursuant totheTax Code. The Bonds,the transfer thereof, and the income therefromareexempt from all taxation and income ofcorporations.InterestontheSeries2017BBondsisincludedingrossforfederaltaxpurposes current earnings”adjustmentapplicabletocorporationsforpurposesofcomputingthealternativeminimumtaxable oftheTaxCodeexceptthatsuchinterestisrequiredtobeincludedincalculating“adjusted in Section 55(b)(2) “Tax Code”),andinterestontheSeries2017ABondsisexcludedfromalternativeminimumtaxableincomeasdefined oftheInternalRevenueCode1986,asamendedtodatedeliverySeries2017ABonds(the Section 103 herein, interestontheSeries2017ABondsisexcludedfromgrossincomeunderfederaltaxlawspursuantto delivery throughthefacilities ofDTConoraboutJune27,2017. to theAuthority.KutakRock LLPisactingascounseltotheUnderwriter.Itexpected thattheBondswillbeavailablefor as municipal advisorto the Universityand PFM Financial AdvisorsLLC, Denver, Colorado isacting as the financial advisor by itscounsel,Hoffman,Crews, Nies,Waggener&FosterLLP.NorthSlopeCapital Advisors,Denver,Coloradoisacting by Sherman&HowardL.L.C, generalcounseltotheAuthority.Certainlegalmatterswill bepasseduponfortheUniversity in connectionwiththepreparationofthisOfficialStatement. CertainlegalmatterswillbepasseduponfortheAuthority of Sherman & HowardL.L.C.,asbondcounsel. Sherman&HowardL.L.C.alsohasactedasspecialcounseltotheUniversity investment decision,givingparticularattentionto the sectionentitled“INVESTMENTCONSIDERATIONS.” Investors mustreadtheentireOfficialStatementto obtaininformationessentialtothemakingofaninformed or taxingpowersoftheAuthorityState.The Authorityisnotauthorizedtolevytaxesorassessments. of theStateandshallnotconstituteorgiveriseto apecuniaryliability,orchargeagainstthegeneralcredit “State”) or any political subdivision thereof within the meaning of any provision ofthe Constitution and laws shall never constitute the general obligation debt or indebtedness of the Authority, the State of Colorado (the and theUniversity.TheBondsarenotgeneralobligationsofAuthority.interest thereon revenues andotheramountsderivedbytheAuthoritypursuanttoaLoanAgreementbetween in thisOfficialStatement.See“THEBONDS–RedemptionProvisions.” associated withtheissuanceofBonds.See“SOURCESANDUSESOFFUNDS.” commons, andothercampusimprovements;(ii)paycertaincapitalizedinterestontheBonds;(iii) costs campus careercenter,asubstantialdemolition,renovationandexpansionofthestudentcentertobecomecommunity improvement, renovation,andequippingofcertaincampusimprovementsincludingafreshmanresidentialdormitory, the University ofDenver(the“University”).TheproceedstheBondswillbeusedto:(i)financeaportionconstruction, surrender thereofatUMBBank,n.a.,Denver,Colorado(the“Trustee”),oritssuccessorastrustee.See“THEBONDS.” registered owner of the Bonds. The principal and premium, if any, of the Bonds shall be payable uponpresentation and Co.asthe March 1andSeptemberofeachyear,commencingon1,2017,bycheckordraftmailedtoCede & Only System.”TheBondswillbearinterestattheratessetforthoninsidefrontcoverhereof,payablesemiannually on will notreceivecertificatesrepresentingtheirbeneficialownershipinterestintheBonds.See“THEBONDS--Book-Entry (“DTC”), securitiesdepositoryfortheBonds.PurchasesofBondsaretobemadeinbook-entryformonly.Purchasers initially willberegisteredinthenameofCede & Co.,asnomineeofTheDepositoryTrustCompany,NewYork,York Dated: DateofDelivery FULL BOOKENTRY NEW ISSUE * Preliminary; subjectto change. In theopinionofSherman&Howard,L.L.C.,assumingcontinuouscompliancewithcertaincovenantsdescribed The Bondsareofferedwhen,as,andifissuedbytheAuthority andacceptedbytheUnderwritersubjecttoapproval This cover page contains certain information for quickreference only. It is notasummaryof the issue. The Bondsconstitutespecial,limitedobligationsoftheAuthority,andarepayablesolelyfrompayments, The Bondsaresubjecttooptional,extraordinaryandmandatorysinkingfundredemptionpriormaturityasset forth The proceedsfromthesaleofBondswillbeloanedtoColoradoSeminary,morecommonlyknownas the The Bondsareissuedasfullyregisteredbondsindenominationsof$5,000,oranyintegralmultiplethereof. COLORADO EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY
RBC Capital Markets
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 11, 2017 TAX-EXEMPT SERIES2017A
REVENUE BONDS $123,835,000* (UNIVERSITY OFDENVERPROJECT) Official Statement datedMay__,2017.
TAXABLE SERIES2017B REVENUE BONDS $24,295,000* Wells Fargo Securities Due: March1,asshownherein RATINGS: Moody’s:“A1” See “RATINGS” Fitch: “AA-” MATURITY SCHEDULES*
SERIES 2017A TAX-EXEMPT BONDS
Maturity Maturity Date Principal Interest Date Principal Interest (March 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP1© (March 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP1© 2031 $4,815,000 % % 2035 $5,850,000 % % 2032 5,055,000 2036 6,145,000 2033 5,310,000 2037 6,450,000 2034 5,575,000 $21,360,000* ___% Term Bond due March 1, 2040 Price: _____% CUSIP: [______] 1© $24,725,000* ___% Term Bond due March 1, 2043 Price: _____% CUSIP: [______] 1© $38,550,000* ___% Term Bond due March 1, 2047 Price: _____% CUSIP: [______] 1©
SERIES 2017B TAXABLE BONDS
Maturity Maturity Date Principal Interest Date Principal Interest (March 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP1© (March 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP1© 2021 $3,685,000 % % 2026 $2,120,000 % % 2022 1,625,000 2027 2,285,000 2023 1,755,000 2028 2,910,000 2024 1,815,000 2029 3,015,000 2025 1,960,000 2030 3,125,000
* Preliminary; subject to change. © 2017, CUSIP Global Services. CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. The CUSIP data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services which is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. The CUSIP numbers are not intended to create a database and do not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP Service. 1 The Authority and University take no responsibility for the accuracy of the CUSIP numbers, which are included solely for the convenience of owners of the Bonds.
USE OF INFORMATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
This Official Statement, which includes the cover page, the inside cover page and the appendices, does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any of the Bonds in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation, or sale. No dealer, salesperson, or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this Official Statement in connection with the offering of the Bonds, and if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Authority or the University. The University and the Authority each maintain an internet website; however, the information presented there is not a part of this Official Statement and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision with respect to the Bonds.
The information set forth in this Official Statement has been obtained from the University and from the sources referenced throughout this Official Statement, which the University believes to be reliable. No representation is made by the University, however, as to the accuracy or completeness of information provided from sources other than the University. This Official Statement contains, in part, estimates and matters of opinion which are not intended as statements of fact, and no representation or warranty is made as to the correctness of such estimates and opinions, or that they will be realized.
The Underwriter has provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement. The Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, its responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriter does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
The information, estimates, and expressions of opinion contained in this Official Statement are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale of the Bonds shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the University, or in the information, estimates, or opinions set forth herein, since the date of this Official Statement.
This Official Statement has been prepared only in connection with the original offering of the Bonds and may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part for any other purpose.
The Bonds have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission due to certain exemptions contained in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Bonds have not been recommended by any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority, and the foregoing authorities have neither reviewed nor confirmed the accuracy of this document.
THE PRICES AT WHICH THE BONDS ARE OFFERED TO THE PUBLIC BY THE UNDERWRITER (AND THE YIELDS RESULTING THEREFROM) MAY VARY FROM THE INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES OR YIELDS APPEARING ON THE INSIDE COVER PAGE HEREOF. IN ADDITION, THE UNDERWRITER MAY ALLOW CONCESSIONS OR DISCOUNTS FROM SUCH INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES TO DEALERS AND OTHERS. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE DISTRIBUTION OF THE BONDS, THE UNDERWRITER MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS INTENDED TO STABILIZE THE PRICE OF THE BONDS AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
The Authority has not prepared or assisted in the preparation of this Official Statement except for statements relating to the Authority under the sections captioned - “INTRODUCTION--The Authority,” “THE AUTHORITY” and “LEGAL MATTERS--Absence of Litigation - The Authority” and, except for those sections, the Authority is not responsible for any statements made in this Official Statement. Except for the execution and delivery of documents required to effect the issuance of the Bonds, the Authority has not otherwise assisted in the public offer, sale or distribution of the Bonds. Accordingly, except as specified above, the Authority disclaims responsibility for the disclosures set forth in this Official Statement or otherwise made in connection with the offer, sale and distribution of the Bonds.
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER OFFICIALS
Chancellor: Rebecca S. Chopp Provost: Gregg Kvistad Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs and Treasurer: Craig Woody Vice Chancellor for University Advancement: Armin Afsahi Vice Chancellor for University Communications and Marketing: Renell Wynn Vice Chancellor for University Technology: Don Harris Vice Chancellor for Enrollment: Thomas Willoughby Vice Chancellor for Athletics and Recreation: Peg Bradley-Doppes Associate Vice Chancellor for Finance, Controller, and Assistant Treasurer: Andrew Cullen Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs and General Counsel: Paul Chan Vice Chancellor for Institutional Partnerships: David Greenberg Vice Chancellor for Human Resources: Laura Maresca Vice Chancellor for Campus Life and Inclusive Excellence: Liliana Rodriguez Senior Advisor to the Chancellor and Provost on Diversity and Inclusion: Frank Tuitt
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Chairman: Douglas G. Scrivner Vice Chairman: John W. Low Vice Chairman: James R. Griesemer Vice Chairman: Catherine C. Shopneck Secretary: Margot Gilbert Frank
Edward T. Anderson John A. Miller
Katherine Archuleta Trygve E. Myhren
Joy S. Burns Denise O'Leary Rebecca S. Chopp* Scott J. Reiman
Mary Sue Coleman Mary K. Rhinehart Navin Dimond Joseph W. Saunders Kevin C. Gallagher Otto Tschudi Peter A. Gilbertson Clara Villarosa Craig Harrison Frederick T. Waldeck Brandon Johnson
*Ex-officio member of the Board
Underwriters RBC Capital Markets, LLC Denver, Colorado
Wells Fargo Securities Denver, Colorado
Trustee and Paying Agent UMB Bank, n.a. Denver, Colorado
Bond Counsel Sherman & Howard L.L.C. Denver, Colorado
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page INTRODUCTION ...... 1 General ...... 1 The Authority ...... 1 The University ...... 2 Purpose of the Issue ...... 2 Authority for Issuance ...... 2 The Bonds; Redemption Provisions ...... 2 Security for the Bonds ...... 3 Prior Parity Bond Additional Indebtedness Limitations ...... 4 Professionals ...... 4 Tax Status of Interest on the Bonds ...... 4 Continuing Disclosure Undertaking ...... 5 Additional Information ...... 6 INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS ...... 7 No Mortgage or Lien Interests Secure the Bonds ...... 7 No Debt Service Reserve Fund Secures the Bonds ...... 7 Risks Related to University Operations ...... 7 Contributions ...... 8 Dependence Upon Tax-Exempt Status ...... 8 Limitations on Enforcement of Remedies; Bankruptcy Proceedings ...... 9 Potential Environmental Risks ...... 9 Construction of Improvements ...... 10 Forward-Looking Statements ...... 10 Secondary Market ...... 10 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ...... 11 Sources and Uses of Funds ...... 11 The Financed Facilities ...... 11 THE BONDS ...... 13 Payment of Principal and Interest; Record Date ...... 13 Redemption Provisions ...... 14 Extraordinary Prior Redemption...... 16 Book-Entry Only System ...... 17 DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS...... 18 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS ...... 19 Existing Liens on Gross Revenues ...... 19 Historical Net Income Available for Debt Service; Pro-Forma Debt Service Coverage Ratio ...... 19 The Loan Agreement ...... 20 The Indenture ...... 21 THE AUTHORITY ...... 22 THE UNIVERSITY ...... 23 Organization ...... 23 -i-
Page Accreditation ...... 23 Board of Trustees ...... 23 Administration ...... 26 Strategic Planning Overseen by the Chancellor and Provost ...... 30 Academic Programs ...... 30 Enrollment ...... 32 Admission ...... 36 Financial Aid ...... 38 Institutional Profile - Tuition ...... 39 Faculty ...... 40 Employees ...... 41 Retirement Plans and Other Post-retirement Benefits ...... 42 Facilities ...... 42 Capital Planning and Maintenance Planning ...... 45 Risk Management Activities ...... 46 University Contracts and Agreements ...... 47 Zoning ...... 47 UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION ...... 49 Introduction ...... 49 Sources of Revenues ...... 49 Financial Statements ...... 52 Summary of Certain Historical Financial Information ...... 52 Management Discussion of Financial Results ...... 54 Budget Process ...... 57 The Fiscal Year 2017 Budget ...... 58 LEGAL MATTERS ...... 61 Absence of Litigation - The Authority ...... 61 Absence of Litigation - The University ...... 61 Approval of Legal Proceedings ...... 61 TAX MATTERS ...... 62 Series 2017A Bonds ...... 62 Series 2017B Bonds ...... 64 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS...... 64 RATINGS ...... 64 UNDERWRITING ...... 65 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR...... 66 CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT ...... 67
-ii-
Page APPENDIX A - Audited Financial Statements of the University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 ...... A-1
APPENDIX B - Certain Definitions and Summaries of Certain Provisions of the Indenture and the Loan Agreement ...... B-1
APPENDIX C - Book-Entry Only System ...... C-1
APPENDIX D - Form of Continuing Disclosure Agreement ...... D-1
APPENDIX E - Form of Opinion of Bond Counsel ...... E-1
-iii-
INDEX OF TABLES
NOTE: Tables marked with an (*) indicate Annual Financial Information to be updated pursuant to SEC Rule 15c2-12, as amended. See Appendix D - Form of Continuing Disclosure Agreement. Page
Sources and Uses of Funds ...... 11 Debt Service Requirements ...... 18 *Net Income Available for Debt Service and Pro-Forma Debt Service Coverage ...... 20 *Historical Fall-Term Enrollment by Home Unit ...... 34 *Traditional Undergraduate New Enrollment ...... 35 *Historical Admission Activity Data ...... 36 *Historical College Entrance Exam Scores ...... 37 Preliminary Admission Activity Data, Fall 2017 ...... 38 Preliminary Fall 2017 College Entrance Exam Scores ...... 38 Comparison of General Tuition and Fee Rates - Colorado Institutions ...... 40 Comparison of Tuition and Fee Rates - Peer Institutions ...... 40 *Full-Time Faculty and Tenure Trends ...... 41 *Historical Student/Faculty Ratios ...... 41 *Total Development Activity ...... 50 *Endowment Fund Summary ...... 51 *Statement of Activities ...... 53 *Current Funds Unrestricted ...... 57
-iv-
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
COLORADO EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY (UNIVERSITY OF DENVER PROJECT)
$123,835,000* $24,295,000* REVENUE BONDS REVENUE BONDS TAX-EXEMPT SERIES 2017A TAXABLE SERIES 2017B
INTRODUCTION
General
This Official Statement, including the cover page, the inside cover page and the appendices, provides certain information concerning the issuance and sale by the Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority (the “Authority”) of its $123,835,000* in aggregate principal amount of Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Tax-Exempt Series 2017A (the “Series 2017A Bonds”) and its $24,295,000* in aggregate principal amount of Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Taxable Series 2017B” (the “Series 2017B Taxable Bonds,” also referred to as the “Series 2017B Bonds,” and together with the Series 2017A Bonds, the “Bonds”). The Bonds will be issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of June 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”) between the Authority and UMB Bank, n.a., Denver, Colorado, as trustee (the “Trustee”). Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used herein are defined in Appendix B.
The offering of the Bonds is made only by way of this Official Statement, which supersedes any other information or materials used in connection with the offer or sale of the Bonds. The following introductory material is only a brief description of and is qualified by the more complete information contained throughout this Official Statement. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement and the documents summarized or described herein, particularly the section entitled “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.” Detachment or other use of this “INTRODUCTION” without the entire Official Statement, including the cover page, the inside cover page and the appendices, is unauthorized.
The Authority
The Authority is an independent public body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Colorado (the “State”). The Authority was created in 1981 pursuant to Title 23, Article 15, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended (the “Act”). The Authority is not an agency of the State government and is not subject to administrative direction by any department, commission, board or agency of the State. The Authority is authorized by the Act to provide financing for educational institutions and cultural institutions and to acquire, construct, reconstruct, repair, alter, improve, extend, own, lease and dispose of properties to the end that the Authority may be able to promote the welfare of the people of the State. See “THE AUTHORITY.”
* Preliminary, subject to change.
The University
The Colorado Seminary, known as the University of Denver (the “University”), located on its University Park Campus in Denver, Colorado (the “City”), is one of the largest and oldest independent institutions of higher education in the Rocky Mountain region. The University currently offers 10 bachelor degree programs and 22 advanced degree programs. The University is composed of Undergraduate Studies (the locus of the undergraduate Core Curriculum), Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences, Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Engineering and Computer Science, the Daniels College of Business, the Sturm College of Law, the Morgridge College of Education, the Graduate School of Professional Psychology, the Korbel School of International Studies, the Graduate School of Social Work and the University College. See “THE UNIVERSITY.”
The University’s student body is comprised of students from all 50 states and 78 foreign countries. For Fiscal Year 2017 (represented by enrollment in the fall quarter 2016), the University enrolled 12,217 (headcount) students, of whom 5,754 were undergraduates. Included in the total headcount were 601 students enrolled in non-collegiate programs (including the Fisher Early Learning Center, Ricks Center for Gifted Children, and the English Language Center). For a discussion of fall 2012-2016 enrollment trends, see “THE UNIVERSITY-- Enrollment” and “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION--Sources of Revenue.”
Purpose of the Issue
The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be loaned to the University pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017 (the “Loan Agreement”), between the Authority and the University. The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to: (i) finance a portion of the construction, improvement, renovation, and equipping of certain campus improvements including a freshman residential dormitory, the campus career center, a substantial demolition, renovation and expansion of the student center to become a community commons, and other campus improvements (the “Improvements”); (ii) pay certain capitalized interest on the Bonds; and (iii) pay certain costs associated with the issuance of the Bonds. See “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS.”
Authority for Issuance
The Bonds are issued pursuant to the Act, the Indenture and a Resolution adopted by the Authority on April 26, 2017.
The Bonds; Redemption Provisions
General. The Bonds are issued solely as fully registered certificates in the denomination of $5,000, or any integral multiple thereof. The Bonds initially will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”), the securities depository for the Bonds. Purchases of the Bonds are to be made in book-entry form only. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds. See “THE BONDS--Book-Entry Only System.” The Bonds are dated as of the date of their delivery and mature and bear interest (calculated based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as set forth on the inside cover page of this Official
2
Statement. The payment of principal and interest on the Bonds is described in “THE BONDS-- Payment of Principal and Interest; Record Date.”
Prior Redemption. The Bonds are subject to optional, extraordinary and mandatory sinking fund redemption. The terms and provisions regarding such prior redemption are set forth in “THE BONDS--Redemption Provisions.”
Security for the Bonds
Special, Limited Obligations of the Authority. The Bonds are special, limited obligations of the Authority and, except to the extent payable from Bond proceeds, are payable solely from payments, revenues and other amounts derived by the Authority pursuant to the Loan Agreement. The Bonds do not constitute the general obligation debt or indebtedness of the Authority within the meaning of any provision or limitation of the constitution or statutes of the State, and shall never constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Authority or the State, or a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the Authority or the State. The Authority is not authorized to levy taxes or assessments.
Gross Revenues of the University. Under the Loan Agreement, the University is unconditionally obligated to pay amounts sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The obligation of the University to make such payments under the Loan Agreement is secured only by a security interest in the Gross Revenues of the University (defined herein) and all of the University’s right, title and interest, if any, in the funds and accounts referred to in the Loan Agreement or the Indenture (other than the Rebate Fund), all of which security is assigned to the Trustee for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds.
The Loan Agreement defines “Gross Revenues” to mean all revenues of the University (except as described below) including, but not limited to:
• Income from tuition, fees, charges (whether such tuition, fees and charges are paid by or on behalf of students or by any other party) and quasi- endowments;
• Gifts, donations, pledges, grants, legacies, bequests, devises and contributions heretofore or hereafter made, and the income derived therefrom (collectively, “Donated Property”), but only to the extent that the Donated Property is not specifically restricted by the donor or grantor to a particular purpose inconsistent with its use for payment of Loan Payments;
• Income from the operations of the Facilities (as defined in the Loan Agreement (see Appendix B));
• Rental income;
• Investment income (excluding income from Irrevocable Deposits, as defined in the Loan Agreement);
• Net proceeds of business interruption insurance, if any; and
3
• All other accounts receivable, revenues, profits and receipts derived by or on behalf of the University from any source.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the definition of “Gross Revenues” does not include rental income, income from operations, insurance proceeds, accounts receivable, revenues, profits and receipts relating to, or derived from, Property not included within the Facilities. As indicated by the above definition, the University’s endowment funds and investments thereon do not constitute Gross Revenues. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS--The Loan Agreement.”
Prior Parity Bond Additional Indebtedness Limitations
The University has entered into separate loan agreements with the Authority in connection with several series of Prior Parity Bonds (as defined herein). All of the Prior Loan Agreements (as defined herein) contain tests limiting the issuance of Additional Parity Indebtedness. The Loan Agreement does not contain any limitation on the issuance of any additional Indebtedness, including Additional Parity Indebtedness. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS - Additional Indebtedness Limitations and Expendable Resources Test.”
Professionals
Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Denver, Colorado, has acted as Bond Counsel and also has acted as special counsel to the University in connection with the preparation of this Official Statement. Sherman & Howard L.L.C. also serves as General Counsel to the Authority. The fees of Sherman & Howard L.L.C. will be paid only upon delivery of the Bonds. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the University by its counsel, Hoffman, Crews, Nies, Waggener & Foster LLP. North Slope Capital Advisors, Denver, Colorado is acting as municipal advisor to the University and PFM Financial Advisors LLC, Denver, Colorado is acting as the financial advisor to the Authority. Kutak Rock LLP is acting as counsel to the Underwriter. UMB Bank, n.a., Denver, Colorado, will serve as the Trustee. RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Wells Fargo Securities will serve as the Underwriters of the Bonds. See “UNDERWRITING.” Certain legal matters will be passed on for the Underwriter by its counsel, Kutak Rock LLP, Denver, Colorado. The University’s financial statements in Appendix A of this Official Statement include the report of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, certified public accountants, Greenwood Village, Colorado. See “INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.” Several of the professionals involved in this transaction are associated with the University. See “THE UNIVERSITY--Board of Trustees - Conflicts of Interest.”
Tax Status of Interest on the Bonds
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming continuous compliance with certain covenants described herein, interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excluded from gross income under federal income tax laws pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of delivery of the Series 2017A Bonds (the “Tax Code”), and interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excluded from alternative minimum taxable income as defined in Section 55(b)(2) of the Tax Code except that such interest is required to be included in calculating the “adjusted current earnings” adjustment applicable to corporations for purposes of computing the alternative minimum taxable income of corporations. The Bonds, the transfer thereof, and the income therefrom are exempt from all taxation and assessments in the State of
4
Colorado. Interest on the Series 2017B Taxable Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the Tax Code. See “TAX MATTERS”.
Continuing Disclosure Undertaking
The University will execute a continuing disclosure agreement (the “Disclosure Agreement”) at the time of the closing for the Bonds. The Disclosure Agreement will be executed for the benefit of the beneficial owners (the “Beneficial Owners”) of the Bonds and the University will covenant in the Loan Agreement to comply with its terms. The Disclosure Agreement will provide that so long as the Bonds remain outstanding, the University will provide the following information to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, acting through its Electronic Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) system: (i) annually, certain financial information and operating data; and (ii) notice of the occurrence of certain material events; all as specified in the Disclosure Agreement. The form of the Disclosure Agreement is attached hereto as Appendix D. The University did not timely file certain of its previous continuing disclosure undertakings under Rule 15c2-12 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Rule”) during the past five years. The University failed to file its 2012 annual financial statement and operating data, reportable on December 7, 2012, until July 11, 2014. The University self-reported this issue to the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in December 2014 pursuant to the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation initiative (“MCDC”). On March 3, 2017, the SEC notified the University that based on information it had received as of that date, it did not intend to recommend enforcement action. The University has taken remedial action to bring the University into compliance with its continuing disclosure obligations. The University’s management believes that it has appropriate staffing levels and adequate policies and associated procedures to assure post issuance compliance with future continuing disclosure filings under the Rule.
No financial or operating data concerning the Authority is material (as interpreted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) to an evaluation of the Bonds or any decision to purchase, hold or sell the Bonds, and the Authority will not provide any such information. The University will undertake all responsibilities for any continuing disclosure to the Beneficial Owners as described in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and the Authority will have no liability to such Registered Owners of the Bonds or any other person with respect to such disclosures.
The continuing disclosure undertaking described above and in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement has been entered into for the benefit of the Registered Owners of the Bonds. The undertaking provides that such Registered Owners may enforce specific performance thereof by any judicial proceeding available, and that such action to compel specific performance is the sole remedy in the event of failure by the University to comply with the undertaking. No other party has any power or duty to enforce the undertaking. Failure to comply with the undertaking does not constitute a default or event of default under the Loan Agreement or the Indenture. Failure of the University to provide such information may materially and adversely affect any secondary market trading in the Bonds, but such failure will not cause a default under the Indenture or the Loan Agreement.
5
Additional Information
This introduction is only a brief summary of the provisions of the Bonds, the Indenture, and the Loan Agreement. A full review of the entire Official Statement should be made by potential investors. Brief descriptions of the Authority, the University, the Bonds, the Loan Agreement and the Indenture are included in this Official Statement and the appendices hereto. The descriptions herein of the Bonds, the Loan Agreement and the Indenture are qualified in their entirety by reference to each such document and the information contained therein. All such descriptions are further qualified in their entirety by reference to bankruptcy laws and principles of equity relating to or affecting generally the enforcement of creditors’ rights. This Official Statement speaks only as of its date; the information contained herein is subject to change.
Copies of the above-referenced documents are available for inspection and additional information is available during the initial offering period from the Underwriters:
RBC Capital Markets, LLC Attention: Nate Eckloff 1801 California Street, Suite 3840 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 778-5555
Copies of the above-reference documents and additional information also may be obtained at the University’s Business and Financial Affairs Office:
University of Denver The Mary Reed Building, Room 103 2199 S. University Blvd. Denver, Colorado 80208 Telephone: (303) 871-3588
6
INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS
No Mortgage or Lien Interests Secure the Bonds
The Bonds are not secured by a mortgage, lien or security interest on or in any of the funds or other assets of the University other than the Gross Revenues of the University and the Funds (other than the Rebate Fund) established under the Indenture. For a discussion of existing liens on Gross Revenues, see “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS--Existing Liens on Gross Revenues.” Under the Loan Agreement, the University is permitted to have and incur debt other than Additional Parity Indebtedness (as defined in Appendix B). To the extent that any other debt of the University is secured by a pledge, mortgage, lien or security interest, the owners thereof would have priority as to payment from the property subject thereto over owners of the Bonds. Furthermore, the assets comprising the Facilities, and many of the other assets of the University included in its educational plant, are specialized facilities which may not be suitable for alternative uses. No assurance can be given that any other educational or similar institution would be able or willing at any particular time to acquire or otherwise use such facilities even for the purposes for which they are intended to be used.
No Debt Service Reserve Fund Secures the Bonds
The Bonds are not secured by a debt service reserve fund and debt service reserve funds established for Prior Parity Bonds will not secure the Bonds.
Risks Related to University Operations
The ability of the University to meet its payment obligations under the Loan Agreement will depend upon the continued availability to the University of revenue from a variety of sources sufficient to meet such obligations, the University’s operating expenses, debt service on other debt, extraordinary costs or expenses which may occur and other costs and expenses. Revenues and expenses of the University will be affected by future events and conditions relating generally to, among other things: the ability of the University to provide educational programs to attract and retain sufficient numbers of students during the time that the Bonds remain outstanding; demographic changes that may affect the number of students, particularly traditional undergraduate students, who will be attracted to and enroll at the University; the abilities of the University’s Board of Trustees to direct and the University’s administration to manage and operate the University; the University’s ability to control expenses, including (but not limited to) operation and maintenance of its physical plant; the University’s ability to maintain or increase rates for tuition and other fees without adversely affecting enrollment; the ability of the University to attract and retain quality faculty members for its educational programs; the investment of the University’s endowment and other funds; the ability of the University to solicit and obtain future gifts and bequests; the availability of governmental assistance for student financial aid; changes to laws or regulations related to federal student loan programs; and grants and contracts from governmental bodies, agencies and others. No assurances can be given that these or other sources of revenues will be adequate to meet the expenses of the University in the future.
The University operates in a competitive market for students with other educational institutions. As tuition costs increase, so does the demand for financial aid. The University expects that potential students will require more financial aid than past student 7
populations. The University staff expects that it will continue to have to balance its rate of increase in tuition and financial aid needs in the future in order to attract sufficient numbers of qualified students. See “THE UNIVERSITY--Admission,” “Financial Aid” and “Institutional Profile - Tuition.”
The University has experienced steady enrollment numbers over the last several years, maintaining enrollment changes within a 1-2% range of each prior fiscal year. Enrollment for fall 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017) is down slightly. See “THE UNIVERSITY--Enrollment” and “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION--The Fiscal Year 2017 Budget” for more information. The University's long-term goal is to achieve overall stable enrollment through effective marketing and strategic use of financial aid and strategic growth in certain graduate units with capacity. There is no guarantee as to whether overall enrollment numbers will grow or decrease in the future.
Future revenues and expenses of the University will be subject to conditions which may differ from current conditions to an extent that cannot be determined at this time. Descriptions of the University’s operations and other factors that will affect the University’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the Loan Agreement are contained in “THE UNIVERSITY.”
Contributions
The University relies upon income sources other than undergraduate and graduate tuition and fees, including: contributions by private individuals and entities (including alumni); federal and state grants and loans for student financial assistance; endowment income; sales of auxiliary services; and interest and income from other sources. See “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION.” The University relies on contributions to fund many activities. There can be no assurance that contributions or revenues from any of these sources of funding will continue at levels sufficient to meet the financial requirements of the University.
Various factors could affect individuals’ continued contributions. Federal legislation is adopted from time to time that changes or limits the tax value of deductions. For example, a change in marginal income tax rates or estate tax laws could reduce the tax advantages of charitable contributions for many taxpayers. Donations of stock and other appreciated property may result in tax liability under the Tax Code’s alternative minimum tax provisions, thereby discouraging contributions of such property. In addition, taxpayers who do not itemize deductions are not able to deduct charitable contributions. Such factors could adversely affect contributions to organizations such as the University.
Dependence Upon Tax-Exempt Status
The University generally is not subject to income and property tax in Colorado. This treatment affects the revenues available to the University to meet financial obligations, including the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds. While the University has covenanted in the Loan Agreement to maintain its tax-exempt status for federal tax purposes and the tax-exempt status of the Series 2017A Bonds, there can be no assurance that such tax-exempt status will be maintained.
8
The University also generally is not subject to sales taxes imposed by the State or the City and County of Denver. This treatment also affects the revenues available to the University to meet financial obligations. There is no assurance that current sales tax laws, or the interpretation thereof, will not change in the future. Should that occur, the University may be required to pay sales taxes on some items that currently are exempt. It is not possible to predict what the financial impact to the University would be if any change in current sales tax laws or administrative interpretations thereof should occur in the future.
Limitations on Enforcement of Remedies; Bankruptcy Proceedings
General. The remedies available to the Trustee or the Owners of the Bonds upon an Event of Default under the Indenture or the Loan Agreement are in many respects dependent upon judicial actions which are often subject to discretion and delay. Under existing constitutional and statutory law and judicial decisions, the remedies provided in the Indenture and the Loan Agreement may not be readily available or may be limited.
Bankruptcy proceedings or the exercise of powers by the federal or State government, if initiated, could subject the owners of the Bonds to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or otherwise, and consequently may entail risks of delay, limitation or modification of their rights. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds will be qualified as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments by limitations imposed by the valid exercise of the sovereign powers of the State, and the constitutional powers of the United States of America, bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally.
Bankruptcy Matters. In the event the University were to become a debtor under the Federal Bankruptcy Code, payments of Gross Revenues (or portions thereof) to the Trustee to pay debt service on the Bonds may be stayed or, under certain circumstances, subject to avoidance. Further, the Trustee’s lien on the Gross Revenues (or portions thereof) may not extend to or be enforceable against Gross Revenues after the commencement of such a bankruptcy case.
Other Potential Limitations on Rights of Bond Owners. The Bonds are secured by a security interest in the Gross Revenues on a parity with the lien thereon of the Prior Parity Bonds and any future Additional Parity Indebtedness. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS-- Existing Liens on Gross Revenues.” That security interest is intended to be prior to any security interest in, lien on or pledge of the Gross Revenues. However, in addition to the limitations discussed above, that security interest may be subject to or limited by other factors, including without limitation statutory liens, rights arising in favor of the United States of America or any agency thereof (including federal tax liens or other federal liens existing in the future), and rights of third parties in any Gross Revenues, including any Gross Revenues converted to cash and not in the possession of the Trustee.
Potential Environmental Risks
There are potential risks relating to environmental liability associated with the ownership of any property. If hazardous substances are found on property, owners and operators of such property may be held liable for costs of cleanup and other liabilities relating to such hazardous substances. In addition, liens arising as a result of liabilities relating to hazardous 9
substances may take priority over all other liens. The University has not undertaken any current environmental review of the sites upon which the projects are located or to be located.
Construction of Improvements
The University is financing the construction of the Improvements with a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds. No assurances can be given that the cost of the construction of the Improvements will be for an amount equal to or less than the amount available from bond proceeds. See “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS--The Financed Facilities”.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Official Statement (particularly, but not limited to, the information contained under the captions “INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS,” “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION--Management Discussion of Financial Results” and “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION--The Fiscal Year 2017 Budget”) contains statements relating to future results that are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Official Statement, the words “estimate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement is subject to uncertainty and risks that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Inevitably, some assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements will not be realized or unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, investors should be aware that there are likely to be differences between forward-looking statements and actual results; those differences could be material.
Secondary Market
There is no guarantee that a secondary trading market will develop for the Bonds. Consequently, prospective purchasers should be prepared to hold their Bonds to maturity.
10
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Sources and Uses of Funds
The estimated sources and uses of the bond proceeds and other funds are shown in the following table.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Sources of Funds Par Amount of Bonds ...... $ Net Original Issue Discount/Premium on Bonds ...... $ Total ...... $
Uses of Funds Deposit to Bond Interest Fund ...... $ Deposit to Issuance Expense Fund (1) ...... $ Deposit to Project Fund Accounts ...... $ Total ...... $
(1) Includes Underwriter’s discount, legal fees, rating agency fees and other costs.
Source: The Underwriter.
The Financed Facilities
The total cost of the Improvements is expected to be approximately $143,000,000, which will be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance the projects described below, and such other campus improvements as the University may determine.
First time/First year Residence Hall – A portion of the proceeds will be used to acquire, construct and equip a new 500-bed residence hall facility for first year/first time University students. The facility will be in the vicinity of the existing on-campus residence hall facilities and in close proximity to the Driscoll Student Center. The program places an emphasis on community building, with dedicated common space for groups of 20 students. The facility will be designed without a dedicated dining hall in anticipation that the Driscoll Student Center renovation and expansion project (as described below) will offer centralized dining for all on- campus residents. Construction is expected to begin December 2018 and be completed May 2020, in time for the start of the 2020-21 school year.
Community Commons – A portion of the proceeds will be used for the demolition, renovation and expansion of the Driscoll Student Center to become a community commons. The Driscoll Student Center was last renovated (including a newly-constructed portion of the Driscoll Student Center) in the early 1980’s. Since the last renovation, total enrollments have increased significantly, resulting in a need to update and expand the facility for student organizations, retail operations and student services professional staff offices. Additionally, a significant component of the project will be the construction of a centralized dining facility containing a variety of food
11
choices. It is the belief of the University that construction of this type of dining facility will benefit campus life by encouraging faculty, staff, students and neighboring communities to share meals together. The Community Commons is also planned to improve and provide: (i) navigation of student services and support; (ii) information regarding culturally relevant spaces and programs; and (iii) support networks for social engagement outside the classroom. Phase I construction is expected to begin in April 2018 and be completed by June 2019 and Phase II construction is expected to begin in December 2018 and be completed by July 2020.
Career Achievement Center – The University intends to use a portion of the bond proceeds to expand its Career Advancement & Global Alumni Services center (the “Career Achievement Center”). The Career Achievement Center will serve as the University’s global network hub, providing a central destination for students, families, alumni and the prospective employers of University students. The University’s Career Achievement Center plans to provide students with opportunities to be mentored in professional and career exploration, in addition to information and support regarding internships, research positions, and study abroad opportunities. Construction is expected to begin August 2018 and be completed in November 2019.
Construction Management – The University anticipates using a construction manager/general contractor (“CM/GC”) method to deliver the projects within the construction budgets contemplated. This method allows the University to be an active participant with the architect of record during the design phase of the Improvements and the construction manager to act as consultant during the design process to offer constructability and pricing feedback on design options. This method also allows the construction manager to lock down subcontractor trades and pricing before a project goes under contract. A design-bid-build method of delivery will be considered as an alternative to general and subcontractor pricing subject to supply- demand competition in the commercial marketplace. Under either method of delivery, the University will use a guaranteed maximum price construction agreement to ensure that each project is likely to be delivered on budget.
12
THE BONDS
The description and summaries of various documents set forth below do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive, and reference is made to each document for the complete details of all terms and conditions. Copies of the Indenture are available for inspection from the sources listed in “INTRODUCTION--Additional Information.” See also “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
Payment of Principal and Interest; Record Date
The Bonds will be dated as of their date of delivery and will mature and bear interest as set forth on the inside cover of this Official Statement. The Bonds will be issuable in fully registered form and will initially be registered in the name of “Cede & Co.,” as nominee for DTC, as securities depository for the Bonds. Purchases by Beneficial Owners of the Bonds are to be made in book-entry only form in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof. Interest on the Bonds is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 of each year (collectively, the “Interest Payment Dates”), commencing September 1, 2017. Interest on the Bonds will be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days of 12 months of 30 days each until payment of principal has been made or provided for, payable on each Interest Payment Date, except that the Bonds which are reissued upon transfer, exchange or other replacement will bear interest from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, or if no interest has been paid, from the date of the Bonds.
The principal or redemption price of the Bonds will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon surrender thereof at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee or at the principal office of its successor in trust. Interest will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America to the registered owners of the Bonds (initially Cede & Co.) as shown on the registration books kept by the Trustee as of the close of business on the applicable record dates described below. Payments to Beneficial Owners are to be made as described below in “Book-Entry Only Form.” Except in the case of overdue interest, the record date for interest due will be the fifteenth day of the month preceding each Interest Payment Date. Interest which is due and payable on any Interest Payment Date, but cannot be paid on such date from available sources, ceases to be payable to the registered owners otherwise entitled thereto as of such date. At such time as sufficient funds are available for the payment of such overdue interest, the Trustee is required to establish a special payment date and a Special Record Date in respect thereof. The Trustee is required to mail a notice specifying each date so established to each registered owner of the Bonds, such notice to be mailed at least 10 days prior to the Special Record Date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, payments of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be made directly to DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., by the Trustee, so long as DTC or Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Bonds. Disbursement of such payments to DTC’s Participants is the responsibility of DTC, and disbursements of such payments to the Beneficial Owners is the responsibility of DTC’s Participants and the Indirect Participants, as more fully described herein. See “Book-Entry Only System” below.
13
Redemption Provisions
Optional Prior Redemption. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on and before March 1, 2027*, are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on or after March 1, 2028*, are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity by the Authority upon the direction of the University on and after March 1, 2027*, as a whole or in part at any time, at a price equal to the principal amount of each Series 2017A Bond redeemed and accrued interest to the redemption date.
The Series 2017B Taxable Bonds maturing on and before March 1, 2027*, are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The Series 2017B Taxable Bonds maturing on or after March 1, 2028*, are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity by the Authority upon the direction of the University on and after March 1, 2027*, as a whole or in part at any time, at a price equal to the principal amount of each Series 2017B Taxable Bond redeemed and accrued interest to the redemption date.
Sinking Fund Redemption. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2040*, March 1, 2043* and on March 1, 2047*, are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the redemption date.
As and for a sinking fund for the redemption of Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2040,* there shall be deposited into the Bond Principal Fund and Bond Interest Fund on March 1, 2038 and on March 1, 2039, a sum which is sufficient to redeem (after credit as provided in the Indenture) the following principal amount of the Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2040, and accrued interest to the redemption date:
March 1 Principal Amount of the Year* to be Redeemed* 2038 $6,775,000 2039 7,115,000 2040 (maturity) 7,470,000
* Preliminary, subject to change. 14
As and for a sinking fund for the redemption of Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2043*, there shall be deposited into the Bond Principal Fund and Bond Interest Fund on March 1, 2041 and on March 1, 2042, a sum which is sufficient to redeem (after credit as provided in the Indenture) the following principal amount of the Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2043, and accrued interest to the redemption date:
March 1 Principal Amount of the Year* to be Redeemed* 2041 $7,845,000 2042 8,235,000 2043 (maturity) 8,645,000
As and for a sinking fund for the redemption of Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2047,* there shall be deposited into the Bond Principal Fund and Bond Interest Fund on March 1, 2044, and on each March 1 thereafter, to and including March 1, 2046, a sum which is sufficient to redeem (after credit as provided in the Indenture) the following principal amount of the Series 2017A Bonds maturing on March 1, 2047, and accrued interest to the redemption date:
March 1 Principal Amount of the Year* to be Redeemed* 2044 $9,080,000 2045 9,440,000 2046 9,820,000 2047 (maturity) 10,210,000
Not more than forty-five days nor less than thirty days prior to the sinking fund redemption date for the Bonds then subject to redemption, the Trustee will proceed to select for redemption (by lot in such manner as the Trustee may determine) from all Outstanding Bonds then subject to redemption a principal amount of Bonds then subject to redemption equal to the aggregate principal amount of Bonds then subject to redemption which are redeemable with the required sinking fund payment, and will call such Bond for redemption from the sinking fund on the next March 1, and give notice of such call.
At the option of the University to be exercised by delivery of a written certificate to the Trustee and the Authority not less than forty-five days next preceding any sinking fund redemption date for the Bonds then subject to redemption, it may (i) deliver to the Trustee for cancellation Bonds then subject to redemption in an aggregate principal amount desired by the University or (ii) specify a principal amount of Bonds of such then subject to redemption which prior to said date have been redeemed (otherwise than through the operation of the sinking fund) and cancelled by the Trustee and not previously applied as a credit against any sinking fund redemption obligation. Each Bond so delivered or previously redeemed will be credited by the Trustee at 100% of the principal amount thereof against the obligation of the Authority on such sinking fund redemption date and any excess shall be so credited against future sinking fund
* Preliminary, subject to change. 15
redemption obligations with respect to Bonds then subject to redemption as specified by the University. In the event the University chooses to avail itself of the provisions of clause (i) of the first sentence of this paragraph, the certificate required by the first sentence of this paragraph will be accompanied by the Bonds then subject to redemption to be cancelled.
Extraordinary Prior Redemption. The Bonds are redeemable upon the direction of the University in whole on any date from and to the extent of funds on deposit under the Indenture and available for this purpose at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of each Bond redeemed and accrued interest to the redemption date upon the occurrence of any of the following events:
(a) The Facilities shall have been damaged or destroyed in whole or in part to such extent that, as expressed in a Consulting Architect’s Certificate filed with the Trustee, (i) the Facilities cannot reasonably be restored within a period of six consecutive months to the condition thereof immediately preceding such damage or destruction, or (ii) the University is thereby prevented from carrying on its normal operations for a period of six consecutive months, or (iii) the cost of restoration thereof would exceed the Net Proceeds of insurance carried thereon pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.3 of the Loan Agreement.
(b) Title to, or the temporary use of, all or any substantial part of the Facilities shall have been taken under the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental authority, or person, firm, or corporation acting under governmental authority.
(c) As a result of any changes in the Constitution of the State of Colorado or the Constitution of the United States of America or of legislative or administrative action (whether state or federal or by final decree, judgment or order of any court or administrative body whether state or federal entered after the contest thereof by the University in good faith), the Loan Agreement shall have become void or unenforceable or impossible of performance in accordance with the intent and purposes of the parties as expressed in the Loan Agreement, or unreasonable burdens or excessive liabilities shall have been imposed on the University in respect to the Facilities, including, without limitation, federal, state or other ad valorem, property, income, or other taxes not being imposed on the date of the Loan Agreement.
(d) Following the sale or the transfer of the use or management of the Facilities financed with the proceeds of the Series 2017A Bonds or a portion thereof to a Person who is not an Exempt Person if the University shall have received an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that the failure to redeem the Series 2017A Bonds could result in the interest on the Series 2017A Bonds becoming includible in the gross income of the holders thereof for federal income tax purposes.
The Bonds are also redeemable in part by the Authority upon the direction of the University on any date at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of each Bond redeemed and accrued interest to the redemption date in the manner and upon compliance with the provisions the Loan Agreement or if an event in subsection (d) above has occurred. Only Net Proceeds of insurance or a condemnation award shall be used for a partial redemption of Bonds pursuant to subsections (a) or (b) above. 16
Redemption Procedures. In the case of every redemption, the Trustee will cause notice of such redemption to be given at least 30 days prior to the redemption date, by first-class mail, to the Authority and the owners of the Bonds designated for redemption in whole or in part, at their addresses as they last appear upon the registration records. However, failure to give such notice, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of any proceedings for the redemption of such Bonds. On the redemption date, the principal amount of each Bond to be redeemed, together with the accrued interest thereon to such date shall become due and payable; and from and after such date, notice having been given and deposit having been made in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture, no further interest shall accrue on any of such Bonds.
Each notice of redemption shall specify the date fixed for redemption, the series, the redemption price, the place or places of payment, that payment will be made upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds to be redeemed, that interest accrued to the date fixed for redemption will be paid as specified in said notice, and that on and after said date interest thereon will cease to accrue. If less than all the Outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed, the notice of redemption shall specify the numbers of the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed.
Notwithstanding the provisions described above, any notice of redemption may contain a statement that the redemption is conditioned upon the receipt by the Trustee of funds on or before the date fixed for redemption sufficient to pay the redemption price of the Bonds so called for redemption, and that if such funds are not available, such redemption shall be cancelled by written notice to the owners of the Bonds called for redemption in the same manner as the original redemption notice was mailed.
Book-Entry Only System
The Bonds will be available only in book-entry form in the principal amount of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. DTC will act as the initial securities depository for the Bonds. The ownership of one fully registered Bond for each series, maturity and interest rate as set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. See Appendix C-Book-Entry Only System.
SO LONG AS CEDE & CO., AS NOMINEE OF DTC, IS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE BONDS, REFERENCES IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO THE REGISTERED OWNERS OF THE BONDS WILL MEAN CEDE & CO. AND WILL NOT MEAN THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS.
None of the Authority, the University or the Trustee will have any responsibility or obligation to DTC’s Direct Participants or Indirect Participants (each as defined in Appendix C), or the persons for whom they act as nominees, with respect to the payments to or the providing of notice for the Direct Participants, the Indirect Participants or the beneficial owners of the Bonds as further described in Appendix C to this Official Statement.
17
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
The following table sets forth, as of the date of this Official Statement, the debt service requirements for the Bonds in each fiscal year, the combined annual debt service on the Prior Parity Bonds and the total debt service to be paid in each fiscal year on the Bonds and the Prior Parity Bonds. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS – Existing Liens on Gross Revenues.”
Debt Service Requirements (1) The Bonds Fiscal Year Combined Debt Service Principal* Interest Debt Service Ending on Prior Parity Bonds June 30 2018 $11,123,209 - 2019 11,263,688 - 2020 11,258,512 - 2021 11,256,874 3,685,000 2022 11,258,509 1,625,000 2023 11,303,090 1,755,000 2024 10,128,643 1,815,000 2025 10,129,031 1,960,000 2026 10,130,343 2,120,000 2027 10,126,606 2,285,000 2028 2,978,481 2,910,000 2029 2,977,387 3,015,000 2030 2,981,537 3,125,000 2031 3,018,250 4,815,000 2032 3,020,000 5,055,000 2033 3,020,750 5,310,000 2034 3,015,250 5,575,000 2035 3,013,500 5,850,000 2036 - 6,145,000 2037 - 6,450,000 2038 - 6,775,000 2039 - 7,115,000 2040 - 7,470,000 2041 - 7,845,000 2042 - 8,235,000 2043 - 8,645,000 2044 - 9,080,000 2045 - 9,440,000 2046 - 9,820,000 2047 - 10,210,000 Total $132,003,667 $148,130,000
(1) Totals may not add due to rounding. * Preliminary, subject to change.
Source: The Underwriter.
18
SECURITY FOR THE BONDS
The description and summaries of various documents set forth below do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive, and reference is made to each document for the complete details of all terms and conditions. Copies of the Loan Agreement and the Indenture are available for inspection from the sources listed in “INTRODUCTION--Additional Information.” See also “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
Existing Liens on Gross Revenues
The Bonds will be issued on a parity with and will be payable from the same revenues as the Prior Parity Bonds and any additional obligations of the University issued with a parity lien on Gross Revenues. The owners of the Prior Parity Bonds are equally and ratably secured by the pledge and security interest granted by the University in its Gross Revenues to the owners of the Bonds. Prior Parity Bonds include the Authority’s: (i) Refunding Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Series 2007, currently outstanding in the principal amount of $39,920,000; (ii) Refunding Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Series 2008, currently outstanding in the principal amount of $2,535,000; (iii) Refunding Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Series 2013, currently outstanding in the principal amount of $22,270,000; (iv) Refunding Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Series 2014A, currently outstanding in the principal amount of $26,185,000; and (v) Refunding Revenue Bonds (University of Denver Project) Series 2014B, currently outstanding in the principal amount of $9,265,000.
Additional Indebtedness Limitations and Expendable Resources Tests
The University has entered into separate loan agreements with the Authority in connection with each series of the Prior Parity Bonds (the “Prior Loan Agreements”). All of the Prior Loan Agreements contain tests limiting the issuance of Additional Parity Indebtedness and certain other obligations. In addition, one Prior Loan Agreement (entered into in 2007) provides that the University may not incur Additional Parity Indebtedness, unless the University can certify that the “Expendable Resources Ratio” is not less than .75x, based upon the most recent fiscal year for which audited financial statements are available. Expendable Resources are defined as all of the University’s (i) unrestricted net assets and temporarily restricted net assets, less (ii) the number derived by subtracting: (A) outstanding long term debt from (B) net property, plant and equipment, all as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These additional debt tests will continue to govern the issuance of Additional Parity Indebtedness and certain other obligations until such time as none of the Prior Parity Bonds containing these tests remain outstanding or until the owners of 66 and two-thirds percent in aggregate principal amount of each affected series of Prior Parity Bonds agree to amend the Prior Loan Agreements. See “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
Historical Net Income Available for Debt Service; Pro-Forma Debt Service Coverage Ratio
The following table shows the Net Income Available for Debt Service for each of the five Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2012 through June 30, 2016, the estimated Maximum Annual Debt Service on the Bonds, and the pro-forma Debt Service Coverage Ratio on the Bonds for that period, calculated in accordance with the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the Loan
19
Agreement, “Debt Service Coverage Ratio” means the ratio for the period in question of Net Income Available for Debt Service to the estimated Maximum Annual Debt Service.
Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, “Net Income Available for Debt Service” means, as to any period of time, the excess of all operating revenues of the University (excluding income from Irrevocable Deposits) over operating expenses (inclusive of payments to pension, retirement, health and hospitalization funds), excluding from such expenses depreciation, amortization, interest expense with respect to Bonds and Long-Term Additional Parity Indebtedness and expenses relating to gifts, donations, pledges, grants, legacies, bequests, devises and contributions heretofore or hereafter made to the extent specifically restricted by the donor to a particular purpose inconsistent with their use for payment of debt service on Indebtedness or operation and maintenance expenses (“Restricted Gifts”) to the extent of the income on such Restricted Gifts, all as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (as in effect on the date of calculation or, in the case of audited financial statements, as of the date of the relevant report thereon) consistently applied, and also excluding from revenues Restricted Gifts and the income derived therefrom; provided that no determination thereof shall take into account any gain or loss resulting from either the extinguishment of Indebtedness or the sale, exchange or other disposition of capital assets not in the ordinary course of business.
Net Income Available for Debt Service and Pro-Forma Debt Service Coverage
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Revenues: $382,408,974 $382,318,576 $403,934,232 $420,579,515 $430,194,085 Less: Expenditures (1) 330,884,335 338,570,053 339,504,492 350,360,311 368,712,432 Net Income Available for Debt Service (1) $51,524,639 $43,748,523 $64,429,740 $70,219,204 $61,481,653
Maximum Annual Debt Service on the Prior Parity Bonds and the Bonds (2) $19,622,911* $19,622,911* $19,622,911* $19,622,911* $19,622,911* Pro Forma Coverage 2.62x 2.23x 3.28x 3.58x 3.13x
* Estimated, subject to change. (1) Calculated in accordance with the definition of “Net Income Available For Debt Service.” See the definition on the prior page and in Appendix B - DEFINITIONS. Generally, pursuant to that definition, expenses do not include debt service payments or expenditures from Designated Funds which represent amounts transferred by the Board of Trustees from unrestricted current funds in one year for specific future operating purposes. See “FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE UNIVERSITY--Financial Statements.” (2) Represents the estimated combined Maximum Annual Debt Service requirements of the Outstanding Prior Parity Bonds and the Bonds as estimated by the University’s Municipal Advisor. See “DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS.”
Source: University Office of Financial Affairs.
The Loan Agreement
Under the Loan Agreement, the Authority agrees to issue the Bonds and to lend the proceeds thereof to the University to finance the cost of the Project, and the University is unconditionally obligated to repay the loan in amounts sufficient, together with available funds held under the Indenture, to provide for the timely payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due (whether by maturity or acceleration) and to perform certain other obligations set forth therein. Among other things, the University will covenant (i) to maintain its status as an organization exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Tax Code, as 20
amended and (ii) to operate that portion of the Facilities which constitute educational facilities for University purposes. For further discussion of the provisions of the Loan Agreement, see “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
The Authority will assign certain of its rights and interests in the Loan Agreement, including certain of its rights to receive certain payments thereunder, and certain of its rights and interests in the Gross Revenues to the Trustee for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds under the Indenture. For further discussion of the provisions of the Loan Agreement, see “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS – Additional Indebtedness and Expendable Resources Tests.” See also “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
In addition to the covenants contained in the Loan Agreement, the University is bound by covenants contained in loan agreements executed in connection with the issuance of the Prior Parity Bonds (the “Prior Loan Agreements”). One Prior Loan Agreement executed in 2007 contains a covenant that requires the expendable resource calculation to be equal at least 0.75x of outstanding principal amount of its long-term debt. See “THE LOAN AGREEMENT” in Appendix B hereto.
The Indenture
The Bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Indenture and will be equally and ratably secured thereby and by an assignment of certain of the Authority’s rights under the Loan Agreement. The Indenture provides that all Bonds issued thereunder shall be limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from and secured solely by certain payments made by the University under the Loan Agreement, the Gross Revenues and the Funds (other than the Rebate Fund) established under the Indenture. As security for its obligations under the Indenture, the Authority will assign to the Trustee certain payments of the University received or receivable by the Authority pursuant to the Loan Agreement, certain of its rights and interests in the Gross Revenues and its rights and interests in all Funds (other than the Rebate Fund) held by the Trustee under the Indenture and all income derived from the investment of such funds. Neither the Owners of the Bonds nor the Trustee will have any mortgage lien on any of the Facilities. See “THE UNIVERSITY--Facilities” and “THE INDENTURE” in Appendix B hereto.
21
THE AUTHORITY
The Authority, created in 1981, is an independent public body politic and corporate constituting a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State. The Authority is not an agency of state government and is not subject to administrative direction by any department, commission, board or agency of the State. The Authority is authorized by the Act to provide financing for educational institutions and cultural institutions and to acquire, construct, reconstruct, repair, alter, improve, extend, own, lease and dispose of properties to the end that the Authority may be able to promote the welfare of the people of the State.
The Authority has offered and plans to offer other obligations from time to time to finance other educational facilities and cultural institutions with respect to facilities located in Colorado and, subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements, other states. The Authority has financed facilities for institutions that compete with the University and may do so in the future. Such obligations have been and will be issued pursuant to and secured by instruments separate and apart from the Indenture.
The Authority has not prepared or assisted in the preparation of this Official Statement except for statements relating to the Authority under the sections captioned “INTRODUCTION--The Authority,” “THE AUTHORITY” and “LEGAL MATTERS--Absence of Litigation - The Authority” and, except for those sections, the Authority is not responsible for any statements made in this Official Statement. Except for the execution and delivery of documents required to effect the issuance of the Bonds, the Authority has not otherwise assisted in the public offer, sale or distribution of the Bonds. Accordingly, except as specified above, the Authority disclaims responsibility for the disclosures set forth in this Official Statement or otherwise made in connection with the offer, sale and distribution of the Bonds.
The Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority payable solely from the payments made by the University under the Loan Agreement and from the moneys and securities held by the Trustee under the Indenture. Neither the Authority nor its directors, officers, employees or agents are personally liable with respect to the Bonds. Accordingly, no financial information with respect to the Authority or its directors or officers has been included in this Official Statement.
22
THE UNIVERSITY
Organization
The University, located in Denver, Colorado, is one of the oldest and largest independent institutions of higher education in the Rocky Mountain region. Colorado Seminary is the legal entity which owns and operates the University and its properties. Colorado Seminary and the University of Denver are most commonly referred to as the “University of Denver” and are collectively referred to herein as the “University.” The Colorado Seminary was incorporated in 1864 pursuant to an act of the Council and House of Representatives of Colorado Territory for the purpose of founding, directing and maintaining an institution of learning. The founders of the Colorado Seminary were members of the Methodist Episcopal Church (now known as the United Methodist Church). While the Colorado Seminary maintains its relationship with the United Methodist Church, the legislative charter of the Colorado Seminary provides that “[n]o test of religious faith shall ever be applied as a condition of admission.”
The Colorado Seminary was reorganized in 1880, at which time the University was incorporated as the degree-granting body. The function of the University, as a corporate entity distinct from the Colorado Seminary, is limited strictly to the conferral of academic degrees. The Members of the Board of Trustees of the Colorado Seminary also serve as the Members of the Board of Trustees of the University.
Accreditation
The University has been accredited by the North Central Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools (“NCA”) since 1914. The NCA reaccreditation team last visited the campus on June 20, 2011. The NCA reaccreditation was granted for the maximum period (ten years) before the next university-wide review. Accordingly, the University’s next reaccreditation review is scheduled for 2021. The NCA accreditation team commented upon many aspects of the University. The team favorably cited the University’s attention to student learning, the excellent campus physical environment, and the prominence of the study abroad in the undergraduate curriculum. The University’s vision, values, mission, and goals receive strong support from faculty, staff and students and are central to the University’s planning and programming. It also noted the University benefits from the commitment of a highly involved Board of Trustees. In addition to the NCA accreditation, various schools and colleges within the University currently are recognized by specialized accrediting organizations.
Board of Trustees
Pursuant to the legislative charter of the University, the University’s Board of Trustees is empowered to perform such acts as may be necessary and proper for carrying into effect the objectives of the University and to adopt all proper rules and regulations for the government of the conduct of teachers and pupils and the management of all affairs pertaining to the University.
The University’s charter and Bylaws provide that the Board of Trustees shall consist of 28 members, divided into four classes of seven members each, appointed for four-year terms, with the terms of the several classes to expire in successive years. Members of the Board of Trustees (each a “trustee”) are appointed, following nomination by the Board of Trustees, by 23
the Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church. Currently, there are five vacant positions on the Board of Trustees.
The name, year of original appointment, expiration date of current term and principal business affiliation of each of the trustees, the title of the office held by certain trustees and the Executive Committee members are set forth below. Per the January 2013 Bylaw amendments, trustees are appointed to the balance of the class they joined, plus up to three four- year terms (which means, as applied prospectively, their appointments may be as long as 15 years, depending on which class the trustee joined).
24
Expiration of Current Year of Term Name Appointment (June) Principal Business Affiliation and Address (or Home) Founder, President & CEO, Stonebridge Companies, Englewood, Navin Dimond 2013 2017 Colorado
Margot Gilbert Frank 2001 2017 Lewis D. and John J. Gilbert Foundation, Denver, Colorado
Chairman, President & CEO, Anacostia & Pacific Company, Inc., Peter A. Gilbertson 2009 2017 Chicago, Illinois
Scott J. Reiman 1998 2017 President, Hexagon Investments, Denver, Colorado
Douglas G. Scrivner 2008 2017 Retired General Counsel – Accenture (Los Altos Hills, California)
Edward T. Anderson 2011 2018 Partner, North Bridge Venture Partners, Boston, Massachusetts
President Emerita, University of Michigan; President, Association of Mary Sue Coleman 2015 2018 American Universities, Washington D.C. President & CEO, North American Corporation of Illinois, Chicago, John A. Miller 2008 2018 Illinois Private Investor, Director, Calpine Corp., Medtronic Inc. and US Denise M. O'Leary 2013 2018 Airways Inc. (Cherry Hills Village, Colorado)
Joseph W. Saunders 2014 2018 Former Chairman and CEO Visa Inc. (San Francisco, California)
Otto Tschudi 1991 2018 Managing Director, Stifel Nicolas Weisel, San Francisco, California
Joy S. Burns 1981 2019 President, D.C. Burns Realty & Trust Co., Denver, Colorado
Craig Harrison 2015 2019 Managing Director, Arrowhead Partners LLC, Denver, Colorado
Brandon Johnson 2016 2019 Principal, Johnson Financial Group, LLC, Denver, Colorado
John W. Low 1987 2019 Attorney/Member, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Denver, Colorado
Trygve E. Myhren 1996 2019 President, Myhren Media, Inc., Denver, Colorado
Clara Villarosa 1996 2019 Founder - Retired, Hue-man Bookstore (New York, New York)
Former Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (Corrales, Katherine Archuleta 2016 2020 New Mexico)
Kevin C. Gallagher 2004 2020 President and CEO, Gallagher Industries LP, Denver, Colorado
Professor, Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, James R. Griesemer 2012 2020 Denver, Colorado Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, Johns Manville, Mary K. Rhinehart 2016 2020 Denver, Colorado
Catherine C. Shopneck 2006 2020 Principal, South Woods Financial LLC, Denver, Colorado
Frederick T. Waldeck 1989 2020 Managing Director, Tishman Speyer, New York, New York
25
Conflicts of Interest. Several of the trustees from time to time have entered into transactions directly or indirectly with the University which give rise to potential conflicts of interest. Members of the Board of Trustees are required to complete a Conflicts of Interest questionnaire annually in connection with the external audit of the University’s financial statements. Conflicts, if any, are reviewed by the Chair of the Board of Trustees. John W. Low, a trustee, is a member in the firm of Sherman & Howard L.L.C., which is acting as Bond Counsel and special counsel to the University in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Sherman & Howard L.L.C. also serves as the Authority’s General Counsel. James R. Griesemer, a trustee, is a faculty member in the Daniels College of Business. Scott Reiman, a trustee, purchased a parcel of real estate that had previously been donated to the University. The transaction was supported by fair market appraisals. Kevin Gallagher is on the Board of Directors of UMB Financial Corporation, the parent company of UMB Bank, n.a., the Trustee of the University’s outstanding bonds and the purchaser of the University’s outstanding Series 2014A and B Bonds.
In addition, other trustees or members of their families have in the past and may in the future engage in arms-length transactions with the University in the normal course of business which may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. Trustees do not participate in voting on matters related to those in which they have conflicts of interest.
Administration
The following paragraphs describe the executive level personnel who are responsible for the financial operation and general administration of the University.
Rebecca Chopp, Chancellor. The chief executive and administrative officer of the University is the Chancellor, selected and appointed by the Board of Trustees for such term and upon such conditions as the Board may authorize, and is directly responsible to the Board for the administrative functions of the University. Dr. Chopp became Chancellor in September 2014 and is leading the implementation of DU IMPACT 2025, a strategic plan focused on the 21st-century transformation of knowledge, the holistic education of students, and the University’s engagement in local and global organizations and communities. A visionary leader, Dr. Chopp emphasizes the importance of developing the University as an international and inclusive global community. Previously, Dr. Chopp was President of Swarthmore College and Colgate University. She also served as Provost and Executive Vice President for academic affairs at Emory University and as a Dean at Yale University. Dr. Chopp is a widely published author and editor, including six books and more than 50 articles. Dr. Chopp received her B.A. from Kansas Wesleyan University; her M.Div. from St Paul School of Theology; and her Ph.D. from the University of Chicago.
Among her duties, the Chancellor of the University appoints the Provost and the Vice Chancellors, who have such duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by the Chancellor. The Vice Chancellors may be removed by the Chancellor after consultation with the Chair of the Board of Trustees and the chair of the relevant committees. The Vice Chancellor for Financial Affairs, however, shall be appointed by the Chancellor after consultation with, and concurrence of, the Chair of the Board and the chair of the Finance and Budget Committee, and may be removed by the Chancellor, subject, however, to the prior approval of the Chair of the Board of Trustees.
26
Gregg Kvistad, Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor. The Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor is the chief academic officer and second-in-command to the Chancellor. Dr. Kvistad, formerly Dean of the Division of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, became the Provost in June 2006 after having served as Interim Provost since July 2005. As the officer ultimately responsible for the internal administration of the academic community, the Provost’s duties include academic planning and policy, preparation of the University’s annual budget, faculty development, and certain campus operations. Dr. Kvistad served as Interim Chancellor in August 2014. He is now responsible for implementation of DU IMPACT 2025. Dr. Kvistad joined the University’s political science faculty in 1984, chaired that department for six years and was Dean of the Division for seven years. Dr. Kvistad received his B.A. from the University of Minnesota and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley. In April 2017, the Chancellor announced Dr. Kvistad’s decision to step down from his position as Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor at the end of the 2017-2018 academic year.
Craig Woody, Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs and Treasurer. Mr. Woody is responsible to the Chancellor for the following offices and departments: Controller’s Office, Campus Safety, Student Financial Services, Facilities Planning, Shared Services and Management and Risk Management. As Treasurer, Mr. Woody is responsible for overseeing the University’s working capital, daily cash management and endowment investments and for managing long-term debt. He came to the University as Controller in 1984 and was appointed Vice Chancellor in January 1995. Prior to joining the University, Mr. Woody worked in the audit department of the accounting firm KPMG. He earned a bachelor’s in accounting from the University of Iowa and a master’s degree in accounting from the Daniels College of Business at the University of Denver.
Armin Afsahi, Vice Chancellor for Advancement. Mr. Afsahi became Vice Chancellor in July 2015. His role is to inspire the vision and provide the leadership for the University’s philanthropy programs and global engagement. As the chief development officer, he builds strong relationships with key University leaders as well as alumni, parents and friends of the University. Mr. Afsahi has expertise spanning creative alumni engagement strategies, innovative and highly effective fundraising strategies, and leadership of comprehensive campaigns raising in excess of $1 billion. He has over 25 years of private and public sector experience in institutional advancement, business development, strategic planning, marketing and operations. For 10 years before coming to the University, he was a senior advancement executive for prestigious institutions including the University of California, San Diego and Georgetown University. Mr. Afsahi has a B.A. from UC-San Diego and a MBA in finance and strategic management from University of San Diego.
Margaret (Peg) Bradley-Doppes, Vice Chancellor for Athletics and Recreation. Ms. Doppes became the Vice Chancellor for Athletics and Recreation in July 2005. She has more than three decades of experience in NCAA Division I programs, where she has served as head coach for 11 years and as an athletics administrator for more than 25 years. She was the Director of Athletics at the University of North Carolina Wilmington from 1999 to 2004. Ms. Doppes holds an M.A. in health and physical education from Miami University, Ohio. Ms. Doppes is responsible for leading the University’s athletics and recreation programs at the NCAA I level. She oversees all varsity sports, club sports and a recreation program that serve students, alumni and families in the Denver community.
27
Paul Chan, Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs and General Counsel. Mr. Chan became what was previously known as University Counsel in July 1997. He is responsible for day-to-day legal matters of the University and oversees the Office of Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs. Prior to joining the University, Mr. Chan served as Administrative Counsel (Managing Attorney) for the Colorado Attorney General’s Office for five years and was Assistant Attorney General from 1986 to 1992. Mr. Chan earned his B.A. from the University of Denver and his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.
Andrew Cullen, Associate Vice Chancellor for Finance, Controller, and Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Cullen is responsible for the daily operations of accounting and budget operations for the University. As Assistant Treasurer, he works with the University Treasurer on managing the University’s working capital, endowment investments and long-term debt. Prior to joining the University, Mr. Cullen served as the Associate Vice President for the Office of Planning, Budget & Analysis at the University of New Mexico. In this role, he oversaw the prioritization, development and implementation of the University’s operating and capital budgets and the development of the University Innovate ABQ economic development initiative. With more than 20 years of experience with strategy and planning, Mr. Cullen brings to the University important skills and experience that make him an effective collaborator and partner. He earned both his bachelor’s degree in finance & accounting and a master’s degree in landscape architecture from the University of New Mexico.
David Greenberg, Vice Chancellor for Institutional Partnerships. Mr. Greenberg became Vice Chancellor in 2010 and is responsible for collaborating with academic institutions, industry, government and NGOs to create and expand programs that strengthen the strategic mission of the University of Denver. He plays a leadership role in implementing the University’s strategic plan, especially with respect to external partnerships and collaboration. Before coming to the University, Mr. Greenberg shaped efforts to create the Denver School of Science and Technology and was first board chair of DSST schools. Mr. Greenberg has a distinguished career in consulting and was managing partner for 18 years of the Denver-based firm GBSM. Greenberg holds a B.A. from Columbia University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Don Harris, Vice Chancellor for University Technology Services and Chief Information Officer. Dr. Harris ensures that technology serves to bridge the University’s diverse academic community and encourage greater collaboration, which is critical to achieving the goals outlined in DU IMPACT 2025. Dr. Harris leads the IT enterprise in implementing innovative technological solutions that advance the University’s objectives for teaching and learning, research and community outreach. Dr. Harris most recently served as the founding CIO and strategic advisor for a new graduate research university in Education City, Doha, Qatar. Prior to that, Dr. Harris was CIO at the University of Oregon, as well as Emory University. He has more than 30 years of IT experience in higher education, including 10 years as a faculty member in information systems. Dr. Harris holds a master’s and a bachelor of arts degree from Biola University and a PhD from Claremont Graduate University.
Laura Maresca, Vice Chancellor for Human Resources. Prior to her appointment in December 2016 as Interim Vice Chancellor, Ms. Maresca joined the University in 2015 as Director of Equal Opportunity. She is a seasoned attorney and human resources professional who has spent her career specializing in employment law and managing, investigating and working to resolve employment conflict. Ms. Maresca has been involved in all aspects of the employment
28
relationship, including serving as a chief human resources officer. Ms. Maresca serves the University in this interim capacity while a national search for a new Vice Chancellor is conducted. Ms. Maresca is an alumna of the Sturm College of Law at the University of Denver.
Liliana Rodriguez, Vice Chancellor for Campus Life and Inclusive Excellence. Dr. Rodriguez was hired in July 2015 as the University’s first Vice Chancellor-level student affairs administrator. Dr. Rodriguez leads the University’s efforts to redesign the student experience in light of the needs and opportunities of the 21st century. She also oversees the work of more than 130 full-and part-time staff in 16 departments, including academic advising, disability services, housing, and career services. Prior to coming to Denver, she served as Associate Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Development at Swarthmore College, and director of the multicultural Davis Center at Williams College. Dr. Rodriguez earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology from Williams College, and a master’s degree and doctorate in psychology from University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Frank Tuitt, Senior Advisor to the Chancellor and Provost on Diversity and Inclusion. Dr. Tuitt was appointed to this new role in 2015 and serves on the Chancellor’s senior staff. Dr. Tuitt oversees implementation of a variety of recommendations related to diversity and inclusion; oversees an external review on diversity efforts across the University; and helped create the Chancellor's Diversity and Equity Advisory Committee, which he supports. He provides counsel to the Chancellor’s entire senior staff. Dr. Tuitt previously directed the University’s Center for Multicultural Excellence. He is on the higher education faculty in the University’s Morgridge College of Education. Dr. Tuitt holds a B.A. from Connecticut College, and a M.Ed. and Ed.D. from Harvard University.
Tom Willoughby, Vice Chancellor for Enrollment. Mr. Willoughby joined the University in July 2004. He is responsible for managing a comprehensive enrollment and financial aid strategy for the University’s undergraduate and select graduate programs. The staffs of the Office of Admission and Student Financial Aid also report directly to the Vice Chancellor for Enrollment. Prior to joining the University, Mr. Willoughby served as Vice President of Admission and Financial Aid at Drake University. Mr. Willoughby earned a bachelor’s in Psychology from the University of Dubuque and a master’s in Counseling from Loras College. Mr. Willoughby will be retiring from his position at the end of the 2016-2017 academic year.
Renell Wynn, Vice Chancellor for Communications and Marketing. Ms. Wynn is responsible for setting the University’s narrative in support of the Chancellor’s vision and the University’s strategic plan. Ms. Wynn is responsible for all centralized branding, as well as communication for internal and external audiences. She coordinates communications and marketing efforts across the various academic units to ensure consistency of message and brand across the University. Before coming to the University in August 2016, Ms. Wynn served for nearly four years as Vice President for Communications and Marketing at George Mason University. She held leadership positions at The College of William and Mary, Florida State University and Mississippi Valley State University. Ms. Wynn has communications and marketing experience in the for-profit and not-for-profit arenas as well. She has a B.A. from Spelman College, and an MBA from William Woods University.
Other senior administrative officers of the University include the Deans of the various colleges and graduate schools and several associate vice chancellors. Deans report to the Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor. 29
Strategic Planning Overseen by the Chancellor and Provost
During the first year of Chancellor Rebecca Chopp’s tenure at the University, she and Provost Gregg Kvistad commenced a strategic planning exercise reflecting a two-pronged approach – one, engaging the community to address pressing needs and review various reports completed during the prior year, and two, identifying three to six strategic recommendations for the University has a whole. The result of the year-long effort involved over 2,500 people contributing ideas resulting in DU IMPACT 2025, which was approved by the Board of Trustees in January 2016. DU IMPACT 2025 is designed to position the University to lead through three Transformative Directions and through a fourth to guide its future as an intentional community that integrates research, teaching and engagement for the public good. The four Transformative Directions identified are as follows:
(i) Students Learning and Leading in a Diverse and Global 21st Century
(ii) Discovery and Design in an Age of Collaboration
(iii) Engagement and Empowerment in Denver and the Rocky Mountain West
(iv) One DU
A more thorough description of DU IMPACT 2025 can be found at http://impact.du.edu/; provided, however, such website and any links to other web pages therein are not incorporated herein by this reference and is not part of this Official Statement.
Academic Programs
The University offers a variety of bachelor, master and doctoral degree programs and is classified as a doctoral degree-granting institution according to the Carnegie classification of post - secondary institutions. All academic programs are under the aegis of the Provost. An Undergraduate Council reviews and recommends on matters pertaining to undergraduate education, and a Graduate Council performs a similar role with respect to graduate programs.
Undergraduate and graduate degrees in a range of traditional arts and sciences disciplines, as well as selected interdisciplinary programs, are offered through Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences, Natural Sciences & Mathematics, and the Ritchie School of Engineering & Computer Science. Undergraduate and master’s level degrees in an array of business majors are offered through the Daniels College of Business, including Professional and Executive MBA programs. University College offers a Bachelor of Arts Completion Program that may be completed entirely online or on campus, or a hybrid thereof, with majors in communication arts, global studies, leadership and organization studies, environmental studies, global commerce and transportation, and information technology. Separate graduate colleges and schools, coordinated through the Office of Graduate Studies under the Provost’s Office, offer a range of additional graduate programs. These units include, for example, the Sturm College of Law (offering J.D., Master of Science in Legal Administration, and Master of Science in Legal Studies degrees), the Graduate School of International Studies (offering MA and PhD programs), the Graduate School of Social Work (offering MSW and PhD programs), the Morgridge College of Education (offering teacher and school administration certification programs and MA, EdS, EdDPhD
30
degree programs) and the Graduate School of Professional Psychology (offering a PsyD program).
Through its Morgridge College of Education, the University also operates the Fisher Early Learning Center serving children ages 6 weeks to 4 years and the Ricks Center, an elementary and middle school.
There also are interdivisional graduate degree programs, such as the Graduate Tax Program offered through the Sturm College of Law and the Daniels College of Business, and dual degree programs, such as the MA in International Studies and MSW offered through the Korbel School of International Studies and the Graduate School of Social Work. In addition, the University offers a joint doctoral degree program in the study of religion with the Iliff School of Theology, a separate institution whose campus adjoins that of the University.
On April 21, 2017, the University entered into an agreement with 2U, Inc., a public company, to offer on-line graduate degree programs in its Master of Business Administration and Master of Social Work. 2U, Inc., will provide advisory and marketing support, as well as a technology platform for the programs. The University will retain control of admission and financial aid decisions, its faculty, and the curriculum. Students will begin on- line classes in winter of 2018. The University believes that the on-line programs will enhance brand identification to its existing on-campus degree offerings. The University also offers all of its programs in University College in both the on-line and on-campus modes. The University College on-line program is not part of the 2U, Inc., agreement.
31
The University currently offers the following degree programs:
UNDERGRADUATE GRADUATE Bachelor of Arts (BA) Master of Accountancy (MACC) Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) Master of Applied Science (MAS) Bachelor of Music (BM) Master of Arts (MA) Bachelor of Science (BS) Master of Business Administration (MBA) Bachelor of Science in Accounting (BSACC) Master of Fine Arts (MFA) Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (BSBA) Master of Laws (LLM) Bachelor of Science in Chemistry (BSCH) Master of Liberal Studies (MLS) Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCPE) Master of Library and Information Services (MLIS) Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE) Master of Music (MM) Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering (BSME) Master of Professional Studies (MPS) Master of Public Policy (MPP) Master of Resources Law Studies (MRLS) Master of Science (MS) Master of Study in Law (MSL) Master of Social Work (MSW) Master of Taxation (MT) Educational Specialist (EDS) Doctor of Education (EDD) Juris Doctor (JD) Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) Professional Science, Masters (PSM)
Enrollment
Total University enrollment (headcount) at the end of the fall 2016 term was 12,217, comprised of 5,638 traditional undergraduates, 55 Women's College undergraduates, 5,862 graduate students, 61 bachelor completion undergraduates in University College and 601 non-collegiate students (in the Fisher Early Learning Center, Ricks Center, and English Language Center).
There are some differing patterns within and across the various components of the overall student population. Traditional undergraduate students represent approximately 46% of the total headcount. However, because it is almost completely composed of full-time students, this group accounts for over 52% of the academic year full-time equivalent enrollment of the University. Undergraduate enrollments have grown in recent years, both from growth in numbers of new students and an improvement in persistence rates. Although individual years have fluctuated slightly, first-time freshmen enrollments have increased from 1,203 in fall 2012 to 1,400 in fall 2016.
Graduate enrollment dropped from 6,262 for fall 2012 to 5,862 for fall 2016. Within the overall graduate population there are three general categories of programs: (1) disciplinary and interdisciplinary programs in arts and sciences (7.4% of the graduate students headcount); (2) the programs of the graduate professional schools (approximately 67.4% of graduate headcount enrollment); and (3) the degree and non-degree outreach programs of the University College (approximately 25.2% of the graduate student headcount).
The Sturm College of Law in 2008 implemented an initiative to intentionally and strategically shrink enrollments, while adding faculty members in order to intensify the academic 32
experience in the school. The Daniels College of Business has implemented a secondary acceptance policy for undergraduates, in which students who are admitted to the University must be separately admitted to the business school programs. The enrollment depicted in the tables below illustrate how the size of enrollment has been shrinking in accordance with these two strategic plans.
Enrollment in programs in Graduate Studies (Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, and Natural Sciences & Mathematics) has declined 12.8% from the fall of 2012 to the fall of 2016. The number of students enrolled in the University's graduate professional schools (Engineering and Computer Science, Business, Law, Tax, Education, Professional Psychology, Josef Korbel School of International Studies and Social Work) has decreased from 4,355 in the fall of 2012 to 3,953 for fall 2016. Engineering and Computer Science, Business, and Law saw the most dramatic decreases while Education, Professional Psychology and Social Work saw the most significant increases. The University's longer-range goal is to achieve overall stable enrollment through effective marketing and strategic use of financial aid and strategic growth in certain graduate units with capacity.
Traditional undergraduate enrollments for the fall of 2016 increased slightly (66 students) between 2015 and 2016. Overall traditional undergraduate enrollment for fall 2016 is 5,638, compared to 5,028 in fall of 2012. First-time, first-year students in the fall of 2016 numbered 1,400, compared to 1,426 in the fall of 2015. Transfer students numbered 137, a decrease from 176 a year ago.
The University has been, and will continue to be, heavily dependent on revenues from student tuition and fees for its general operating funds, and hence for its financial well- being. For example, net tuition and fee revenues account for approximately 73% of the University's Fiscal Year 2017 budgeted operating revenues.
The following table contains enrollment census data for the past five academic years appears.
33
Historical Fall-Term Enrollment by Home Unit (Headcount)(1)
FALL OF COLLEGIATE PROGRAMS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Division of Arts & Humanities Undergraduate Programs 669 659 553 543 511 Graduate Programs 161 158 161 176 177 Total 830 817 714 719 688 Division of Social Sciences Undergraduate Programs 1,024 1,094 1,115 1,183 1,169 Graduate Programs 177 175 167 151 114 Total 1,201 1,269 1,282 1,334 1,283 Division of Natural Sciences & Mathematics Undergraduate Programs 811 904 926 936 907 Graduate Programs 156 133 149 151 140 Total 967 1,037 1,075 1,087 1,047 School of Engineering & Computer Science Undergraduate Programs 294 353 477 544 575 Graduate Programs 226 191 191 164 147 Total 520 544 668 708 722 Daniels College of Business Undergraduate Programs 1,124 1,138 1,218 1,285 1,554 Graduate Programs 1,016 968 915 786 744 Total 2,140 2,106 2,133 2,071 2,298 College of Law Juris Doctor Program 887 885 858 809 776 Master's Program 102 85 89 79 99 Total 989 970 947 888 875 Graduate Tax Program (2) Graduate Program 159 154 135 120 115 Total 159 154 135 120 115 College of Education Graduate Program 808 849 831 865 868 Total 808 849 831 865 868 Graduate School of Professional Psychology Graduate Program 255 249 256 271 302 Total 255 249 256 271 302 Graduate School of International Studies Undergraduate Programs 324 322 327 339 373 Graduate Programs 435 453 440 436 401 Total 759 775 767 775 774 Graduate School of Social Work Graduate Program 467 503 509 508 501 Total 467 503 509 508 501
Table Continued on the following page.
34
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 University College Undergraduate Programs 112 100 88 69 61 Graduate Programs 1,264 1,314 1,342 1,413 1,383 Intermodal Transportation Inst. 35 32 39 37 33 Total 1,411 1,446 1,469 1,519 1,477 The Women's College (3) Undergraduate Programs 254 205 165 117 55 Total 254 205 165 117 55 Other Undergraduate Students (4) Undeclared – General 303 209 271 211 168 Undeclared - Business Interest 467 522 490 513 365 Non-degree Students 12 11 14 18 16 Total 782 742 775 742 549 Other Graduate Students (4) DU / Iliff Joint Program 93 83 64 57 50 Graduate Studies Non-degree Students 21 29 19 16 12 Total 114 112 83 73 62
Subtotal of Collegiate Programs 11,656 11,778 11,809 11,797 11,616
PRE-COLLEGIATE PROGRAMS Community Outreach Programs ---- - English Language Center 241 222 247 235 191 University Based Schools Fisher Early Learning Center 211 197 198 187 187 Ricks Center for Gifted Children (pre-school-8th) 232 229 235 223 223 Total 443 426 433 410 410 Subtotal of Non-Collegiate Programs 684 648 680 645 601 TOTAL UNIVERSITY ENROLLMENT 12,340 12,426 12,489 12,442 12,217
(1) Headcount data taken at the end of the fall quarter for 2012 through 2016. (2) This program is being moved to the College of Law. (3) The Women’s College degree granting program has been discontinued; the 55 remaining students in the Fiscal Year 2016 numbers represent the “teach out”, or remaining students graduating from the program. (4) Once students declare a major, they are counted in the division where that major resides. Undergraduate Studies students who have not yet declared a major and non-degree students enrolled in traditional undergraduate courses are counted as “Other Undergraduate Studies” students in census enrollment reports.
Sources: Profiles 2012-2016; Office of Institutional Research.
Enrollment data specific to traditional first-time freshmen and new undergraduate transfer students enrolled at the University for the past five academic years are presented below.
Traditional Undergraduate New Enrollment - Headcount
Fall of the Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 First Time Freshmen (1) 1,203 1,399 1,425 1,426 1,400 New Transfers 181 182 191 176 137 Total New Enrollment 1,384 1,581 1,616 1,602 1,537
(1) Includes only first-time freshman enrollments.
Source: Profiles 2012-2016; Office of Institutional Research.
35
Admission
Undergraduate. The University’s admission program represents a systematic effort to attract students who will be able to benefit from the University’s academic programs and environment. The admission program includes annual research designed to determine the characteristics and opinions of high school students, and of the University’s faculty and students, to identify the perceived strengths and attractions of the University. The University has full-time recruiting offices in Illinois and New England.
The University has experienced increased competition for freshmen students, and accordingly, implemented a successful strategy of increasing applications and admitted students sufficient to increase enrollments (from 1,215 in 2012 to 1,400 in 2016) while improving academic quality of the matriculated class as evidenced by average ACT and SAT test scores as illustrated in the “Historical College Entrance Exam Scores” table below.
Admission activity data for traditional new freshmen and undergraduate transfer applicants to the University for fall 2012 through fall 2016 appear below.
Historical Admission Activity Data
Freshman Class Percent of Percent of Those Year Applications Admitted Enrolled Applicants Admitted Admitted Who Enrolled 2012 11,443 7,740 1,215 68% 16% 2013 13,735 10,539 1,399 77 13 2014 13,693 10,479 1,425 77 14 2015 15,036 10,940 1,426 73 13 2016 14,933 10,866 1,400 73 13
Transfer Student Percent of Percent of Those Year Applications Admitted Enrolled Applicants Admitted Admitted Who Enrolled 2012 746 470 195 63% 41% 2013 701 504 181 72 36 2014 654 472 194 72 41 2015 584 490 176 84 36 2016 584 447 137 77 31
Source: Profiles 2012-2016; the Office of Institutional Research.
High school rank and performance on standardized college entrance examinations are usual indicators of undergraduate student selectivity. Included in the following table is information for the five years shown on applicant test scores (University average and national average) on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (“SAT”) and the American College Test (“ACT”). Verbal scores are indicated with a “V;” math scores are indicated with an “M.”
36
Historical College Entrance Exam Scores
University Average National Average Year SAT ACT SAT ACT 2012 593V/612M 27 496V/514M 21 2013 595V/612M 28 496V/514M 21 2014 597V/611M 28 496V/513M 21 2015 606V/616M 28 495V/511M 21 2016 601V/605M 28 494V/508M 21
Source: Profiles 2012-2016; Office of Institutional Research.
College of Law. Applications for the Juris Doctor program of the Sturm College of Law have decreased from 2,455 in fall 2012 to 2,163 in fall 2016. In 2016, approximately 53.1% of the applicants were admitted and approximately 21.5% of the admitted applicants enrolled in the University.
Other Traditional Graduate Programs. Applications for admission into the University’s traditional graduate programs, excluding Law, have ranged over the last five years from 8,538 in fall 2012 to 7,430 in fall 2016. In 2016, approximately 63.8% of the applicants were admitted, and approximately 44.8% of the admitted applicants enrolled in the University. Graduate enrollment at the University is affected by several factors including, but not limited to, changing employment trends, government research funding and changes in financial aid policies.
Preliminary admissions information for fall 2017. While fall 2017 admissions and enrollment data have not yet been finalized as of the date of this Official Statement, preliminary admissions and enrollment information have been received by the University. Admission activity data for traditional new freshmen and undergraduate transfer applicants to the University for fall 2017, dated as of information compiled by the University on April 24, 2017 versus the same timeframe for fall 2016, appears below.
37
Preliminary Admission Activity Data, Fall 2017 Versus Year Ago – As of May 10, 2017
Freshman Class Expected to Percent of Percent of Those Year Applications Admitted Enroll Applicants Admitted Admitted Who Enrolled 2016 14,863 10,828 1,439 73% 13% 2017 14,211 11,543 1,582 81% 14%
Transfer Student Expected to Percent of Percent of Those Year Applications Admitted Enroll Applicants Admitted Admitted Who Enrolled 2016 390 277 64 71% 23% 2017 395 290 82 73% 28%
Source: The Office of Institutional Research.
Included in the following table is preliminary fall 2017 information on applicant test scores (University averages) on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (“SAT”) and the American College Test (“ACT”).
Preliminary Fall 2017 College Entrance Exam Scores Versus Year Ago – As of May 10, 2017
University Average Year SAT ACT 2016 1235 28 2017 1213 28
Source: Office of Institutional Research.
Additionally, preliminary data as of May 10, 2017 indicates 1,899 graduate students will enroll in fall 2017. As of May 10, 2016, preliminary data showed that 1,769 graduate students were expected to enroll in fall 2016.
Financial Aid
General. Student financial aid includes scholarships and grants-in-aid, tuition waivers, graduate assistantships and/or traineeships, loans, and/or part-time employment. During the 2015-16 academic year, approximately 42.8% of the financial aid awarded the University’s students came from federal programs (of that amount, approximately $121.4 million came from the federal Stafford lending program). Approximately 0.6% came from State programs. Approximately 47.7% was provided from the University’s current unrestricted funds and 4.2% from restricted University sources (gifts and endowed scholarships). Awards made to individual students from independent external sources of grants and loans (e.g. Boettcher scholarships) account for the final 4.7%.
Overall annual financial aid from all sources for University students increased from $271.0 million during academic year 2011-12 to $307.1 million in academic year 2015-16. Federal aid during this period decreased by 7.6% from $142.4 million to $131.5 million. University aid from current unrestricted funds and from restricted funds increased from academic 38
year 2011-12 to academic year 2015-16 by 39.2% from $114.4 million to $159.2 million. The University cannot predict whether similar patterns will occur in the future, although it is actively raising private donations to further bolster University aid.
In the fall of 2016, almost 84.7% of the University’s undergraduate students relied on some form of financial aid (including specific educational loan programs and/or financial aid employment programs), and approximately 74.8% of the students in the University’s graduate and professional degree programs received financial aid (again, including educational loan programs and/or financial aid employment programs).
There can be no assurance that the current amounts of Federal and State financial aid to students attending the University will be available in the future at the same levels and under the same terms and conditions as presently apply. The Federal Perkins Loan Program for graduate students ended as of October 1, 2016 and the Federal Perkins Loan program ends for undergraduate students as of October 1, 2017. The 2016-17 Perkins Loan disbursements are approximately $1.8 million, which is less than 0.6% of the total aid that students receive, but the University is actively looking at strategies to replace this loss of funding.
Institutional Profile - Tuition
The University’s rate (tuition and mandatory fees) for full-time students in traditional programs for the 2016-17 academic year is $46,422, an increase of 4.9% over the prior year. This figure includes $45,288 of tuition and $1,134 in mandatory activity, health center and technology fees. The Board of Trustees approved in September 2016 a tuition increase of approximately 4.9% for the 2017-18 academic year. The University’s various nontraditional academic programs have differential (usually lower) tuition rates which have increased at rates similar to those for traditional programs.
There are six doctoral degree granting institutions in the State. The University of Denver is fifth in size, and is the only one of the six operated under independent, non-public auspices. The five public doctoral granting institutions are: the University of Colorado-Boulder in Boulder (which offers the only law school program in the State other than the University’s); Colorado State University in Fort Collins; the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center in Aurora; the University of Northern Colorado in Greeley; and the Colorado School of Mines in Golden. Colorado University-Colorado Springs also offers a doctorate degree in Electrical Engineering through a coordinated degree program with CU-Boulder. In addition, there are two traditional private institutions in Colorado, other than the University, that offer baccalaureate degrees – Colorado College in Colorado Springs, and Regis University in Denver. Regis University also offers masters degrees.
General tuition and fee rates for full-time students at the University and at the seven degree granting institutions listed above are as follows for the 2016-17 academic year:
39
Comparison of General Tuition and Fee Rates - Colorado Institutions
In-State Out-of-State University of Denver $46,422 $46,422 University of Colorado - Boulder 11,531 35,079 Colorado State University 11,052 28,346 University of Colorado - Denver/Health Sciences Center 9,228 24,924 University of Northern Colorado 8,888 20,474 Colorado School of Mines 17,842 36,172 The Colorado College 50,892 50,892 Regis University 34,450 34,450
The University’s full-time tuition and mandatory fee rates (as set forth below) compares to the current academic year tuition rate and mandatory fees at the universities listed below, which the University has identified as “peer” institutions.
Comparison of Tuition and Fee Rates - Peer Institutions
Peer Institution In-State Out-of-State University of Denver $46,422 $46,422 American University 44,853 44,853 Boston University 50,240 50,240 George Washington University 51,950 51,950 Gonzaga University 39,730 39,730 Santa Clara University 47,112 47,112 Southern Methodist University 50,358 50,358 Syracuse University 45,022 45,022 Texas Christian University 42,670 42,670 Tulane University of Louisiana 51,010 51,010 University of Miami 47,004 47,004 University of Puget Sound 46,552 46,552 University of San Diego 46,140 46,140 University of Southern California 52,283 52,283 University of Vermont 17,300 40,364
Faculty
Over the past four years, 70 full-time faculty have been added, for a total of 741 as of fall 2016. Faculty increases are designed to keep enrollment gains and the number of faculty in alignment with projected student enrollments across the various academic units. Future increases in faculty are probable if enrollment increases and if necessary to meet various University initiatives currently planned or underway.
Major emphasis is placed on faculty quality through the hiring process as replacements are sought for retiring and terminating faculty. Faculty quality is judged based on a variety of factors, including teaching, terminal degrees in the field and the quality and volume of scholarly work in the field. In addition to hiring criteria, the University has established a faculty 40
development program for continuing faculty. Both objective and subjective measures point to the University's success in achieving its faculty quality objectives.
Tenure for faculty members typically is granted or denied by the University after a multi-year trial period and a detailed merit review in accordance with policies pertaining thereto, although occasionally tenure is granted upon employment. Once granted tenure, a faculty member is generally assured continued employment until he or she chooses to retire, subject to termination for specified cause, conditions threatening financial exigency or discontinuance of an academic unit. While tenure imposes certain continuing financial obligations on the University, the resulting liability cannot be ascertained at this time.
The following table sets forth full-time faculty tenure trends over the last five years.
Full-Time Faculty and Tenure Trends
Fiscal Year Faculty Appointment 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Not-Tenure Track 264 270 276 277 273 Tenure Track 129 128 121 115 125 Tenured 341 353 352 349 358 Grand Total 734 751 749 741 756
Tenure Track & Tenured 64.03% 64.05% 63.15% 62.62% 63.89%
Source: Profiles 2011-2015; Office of Institutional Research. Note: In 2015, the University of Denver implemented a new rank and series structure for appointed faculty. Lecturers and instructors were moved to a new teaching and professor structure and assigned the rank of assistant professor, associate professor, or professor. These faculty are not tenure-track but continue to be reported in headcounts of appointed instructional faculty.
Full-time faculty members holding terminal degrees in their respective fields of study was 90% in Fiscal Year 2015-16.
The University calculates a student/faculty ratio based on full-time student and faculty equivalents. Adjunct faculty and graduate teaching assistants are included with appointed faculty in the calculation. As stated in the University’s Profiles 2012-2016, the student/faculty ratio for the University as of the fall quarter of each of the five years shown are as follows:
Historical Student/Faculty Ratios
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 11:1 11:1 11:1 11:1 11:1
Employees
Excluding faculty, the University had 1,672 employees as of fall 2016. Of these employees, 1,090 were full-time salaried professionals and 582 were classified hourly employees.
41
At present, 229 custodial and maintenance workers employed by the University are represented by a labor union (Local 1572, State Council No. 76 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO) under a collective bargaining agreement which passed by membership vote on December 15, 2016 and is effective January 1, 2017 to December 25, 2017.
The University has never experienced any strikes, work stoppages or slowdowns by its unionized employees. The University believes that its relations with its employees are satisfactory.
Retirement Plans and Other Post-retirement Benefits
Retirement benefits are provided for full-time and part-time appointed employees by a contributory retirement plan (the “Plan”) with participants having fully vested interests in total contributions. Administrators, faculty members and staff-appointed employees are eligible after completing one year of service. At present, participants may contribute 4% of their base salary (subject to limits established by the Tax Code) and the University contributes an amount equal to twice that of the employee, up to 8% of such base salary. For the Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, the University contributed approximately $11,142,000 and $11,568,000, respectively, to the Plan. The University has timely made all required contributions to the various funding vehicles selected by the participants. For more detailed information concerning the University’s retirement plan, see Note 9 to the University’s financial statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement.
The University also sponsors a defined benefit healthcare plan (the “Healthcare Plan”) that provides post-retirement medical benefits to full-time employees who have worked 10 years and attained age 55 while in service with the University if hired prior to January 1, 1992, or full-time employees who have worked 20 years and attained age 55 while in service with the University if hired after December 31, 1991. Participants receive $60 per month toward the cost of postretirement medical costs. At June 30, 2016, the Healthcare Plan covered 210 retirees, with an additional 2,386 active employees potentially eligible for coverage. Effective June 30, 2007, Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 158 (“FASB 158”) requires balance sheet recognition of the net asset or liability for the over- or under-funded status of the postretirement benefit plans and recognition of changes in the funded status in the year in which changes occur. For more detailed information concerning the University’s Healthcare Plan and related obligations, see Note 10 to the University’s financial statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement.
Facilities
The University's facilities are generally discussed in this section. Investors should be aware that not all of the facilities described below constitute “Facilities” as defined in the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement generally defines “Facilities” to include only the buildings located on the “Land” (see Appendix B hereto for a definition of “Facilities,” “Land” and “Building”). Essentially, the Land encompasses the core part of the University Park Campus, with certain small exclusions that do not include any academic buildings.
University Park Campus. The University currently maintains substantially all of its operations on its University Park Campus in Denver, Colorado. 42
The University Park Campus is comprised of more than 125 acres located in an urban residential neighborhood eight miles southeast of downtown Denver and houses almost all of the University's academic programs and administrative offices. The campus is served by a transit station located on the Regional Transportation District's light rail line. Approximately 85 buildings are located on the University Park Campus, the oldest of which was erected in approximately 1890 and the most recent of which was completed in 2016. The foothills of the Rocky Mountains are one-half hour to the west by car.
Since 1997, the University has invested more than $645 million in buildings and structures built to Millennium specifications. Those specifications include long lasting design as well as inherent energy saving features. These buildings represent over 1.7 million of the 3.7 million square feet of campus space (excluding rental properties, parking structures and leased Greek housing). Approximately $127 million of the construction portfolio has been funded with bond proceeds. Gifts and internal sources, including proceeds from the 2003 sale of the University's former Park Hill Campus, have funded the remainder of the capital construction.
Through the University Technology Services Division (“UTS”), the University provides a comprehensive, service oriented, technology environment. Users have access to wired and wireless connectivity throughout campus including: public areas, classrooms, residence halls and many outdoor spaces. The UTS Help Center, centrally located in the Anderson Academic Commons, provides technical assistance to students, faculty and staff seven days a week. UTS also provides: computer networking operations, telecommunications support, information security, website services and academic research support. A student technology fee of $4 per credit hour, implemented in the fall of 1998, generates approximately $1.58 million annually. These funds are used to enhance existing and future technology needs.
General descriptions of certain University facilities and programs follow.
Academic and Classroom Space. Academic and Classroom space make up 51% of the campus Net Assignable Square Footage. The classrooms available in the fall of 2016 totaled 193 classrooms. On average, the total utilization of these classrooms were 31.8 hours per week. The University utilizes the guidelines set by the Colorado Department of Higher Education as a resource for comparing classroom performance with state and national standards. The University exceeded the goal of 30 hours per week for classroom utilization.
Housing. Students are encouraged to live in the University's residence halls throughout their enrollment at the University, and there is a requirement that 1st and 2nd year students to live in one of the halls (or a fraternity or sorority house) if their home residence is outside a commuting range. During Fiscal Year 2016, approximately 56% of all undergraduate students, principally freshman and sophomores, lived in on-campus residential quarters owned by the University. Currently, five conventional residence halls house students in furnished double occupancy rooms and/or suites, with meal service provided in three dining facilities. The University's six apartment halls offer on-campus apartment living for single undergraduate students who are 3rd and 4th year students. These apartments include a living room, a private bath, one or two bedrooms and a kitchen. For Fiscal Year 2016, the overall occupancy rate in the University's residential quarters was 97%. During fall 2016, the University worked with Brailsford and Dunlavey, Inc., a program management advisory firm, to complete a housing 43
study including a market study, peer analysis and a report that concluded a latent demand exists for 1,266 beds of undergraduate and graduate housing. It is the University’s belief that construction of the new 500-bed residence hall will fill a portion of this need.
Research and Special Facilities. The sponsored research activities of the University are divided into three categories - academic research, other sponsored agreements and sponsored instruction. In Fiscal Year 2016 sponsored research agreements focused primarily on child and family welfare and mental health counseling, early childhood education, biophysics and biomechanics, robotics, international forecasting and peace building. These activities are administered by the Associate Provost for Research. Direct expenditures charged to sponsored agreements has not dropped below $20 million annually for funded research since 2012. The three-year average for research expenditures has grown consistently since 2008, with Fiscal Year 2016 marking the highest year in University history, exceeding $25 million. Fiscal year 2017 is forecasted is to exceed Fiscal Year 2016’s record and is projected to approach $27 million.
A number of special facilities of the University are available to the students for educational and research-oriented programs. Special facilities include the Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, located on the fifth floor of the Engineering and Computer Science Building. This facility provides state-of-the-art wet Biosafety Lab Level 2 facilities for a variety of wet lab activities. The building also houses a recently completed vivarium to support the growing animal care and use program on campus. The fourth floor of the Engineering and Computer Science Building houses the human dynamics lab (moved from the Ritchie Center) and a human movement analysis facility. Other unique facilities include: the Chamberlin Observatory with its 20-inch refracting telescope; the Meyer-Womble Observatory, located at 14,148 feet above sea level on the Summit of Mt. Evans, Colorado, equipped with dual-aperture 28.5-inch optical and infrared telescopes used for high-altitude astronomy; and two research stations located in the Rocky Mountains used for biological and cosmic ray studies.
Libraries. The University Libraries system includes the Main Library in the Anderson Academic Commons, the Bonfils-Stanton Music Library in the Newman Center for the Performing Arts, the Westminster Law Library, located in the Frank H. Ricketson Jr. Law Building, and the Hampden Center, which houses off-site storage. Combined, the library’s collection is comprised of approximately 2.5 million physical volumes, and about 2 million electronic journals and books.
The Anderson Academic Commons is a Leadership in Energy and Environmental (“LEED”) Silver-certified, 154,223 square foot building that includes the University of Denver’s Main Library, a variety of academic support services, and the Front Porch Café. This facility is three floors and provides student accommodations including study carrels, fireside seating, reservable group study rooms equipped with white boards and flat screens, and designated silent study areas. The facility also includes a special events room, power-equipped seating, dedicated exhibit display walls and cabinets, and sustainable practices and programming.
The Bonfils-Stanton Music Library, located in the Lamont School of Music, provides music scores, audio and video recordings, and books and journals on music and musicology. A specially equipped room allows for listening to or viewing recordings of music and performance.
44
The Westminster Law Library, located in the Frank H. Ricketson Jr. Law Building, houses approximately 420,000 books and volumes. This library maintains its space and collection primarily to support the research and educational needs of the faculty and students of the Sturm College of Law.
The Hampden Center is a 53,000 square-foot off-site facility where approximately 2 million print holdings are stored, which supplements a collection of about 600,000 print items housed in the Anderson Academic Commons. Students and patrons request items from the Hampden Center using the library catalog, and the solicited materials are delivered to campus.
NCAA Division I Athletics. The University is a participant in NCAA Division I Athletics. The University's athletics facilities include the Daniel L. Ritchie Center for Sports and Wellness Center, which serves as the home for many of the University's varsity athletic teams as well as club sports, intramural sports, the Coors Fitness Center, many community recreation programs, University events, and commercial, community and charitable events. Other athletics facilities include a lacrosse stadium and a soccer stadium, each of which provide seating for 2,000 fans, a sports fields site, a tennis pavilion, a 14,000 square-foot strength and conditioning center, and the Highlands Ranch Golf Club, which serves as the official home course of the University's golf teams. Recently, the University’s Hockey and Men’s Lacrosse teams have experienced significant achievements, each winning the NCAA Division I National Championship in 2017 and 2015, respectively. The University’s ski team and women’s gymnastics team are also consistently nationally ranked.
Capital Planning and Maintenance Planning
Capital Planning. The University is undertaking a formal long-term capital planning effort as part of a Campus Master Plan process spurred by the release of DU IMPACT 2025. The University is receiving advice from a professional firm regarding the Campus Master Plan which will be developed in early 2017. A detailed draft addressing the Campus Master Plan is due in the fall of 2017 for the Board of Trustees’ review and approval. The University expects that this plan will expand upon the previous 2002 and 2007 updates of its comprehensive Land Use Plan, and that the Campus Master Plan will guide the long-term physical development of campus buildings and grounds. In general, all capital projects are considered by the Board both on a case-by-case basis, as well as within the framework of University priorities identified within the long range capital planning documents. DU IMPACT 2025 identifies four strategic recommendations, referred to as Transformative Directions, one of which incorporates the enhancement and expansion of the University’s learning environment and student experience. The University categorizes the construction and renovation of campus improvements being financed by the bond proceeds as within these Transformative Directions.
In spring 2007, the University completed the initial Integrated Facilities Plan, which resulted from a comprehensive assessment of its entire physical plant. The comprehensive assessment was undertaken to determine the nature, timing and estimated costs of deferred maintenance and desirable renewal and replacement of its existing buildings and systems. From Fiscal Years 2007 through 2016, approximately $92 million was spent on these projects. The University currently intends to fund selected projects over the next five years subject to the availability of budgeted and one-time resources. The Integrated Facilities Plan is continually updated and now extends through Fiscal Year 2021. 45
Under the Integrated Facilities Plan, the Associate Vice Chancellor of Facilities Management annually will submit a plan which includes projects for (1) core infrastructure which will be funded from the following year's operating budget and year-end funds earmarked by the University, and (2) program-related improvements to be funded by one-time unit gainsharing (described below in “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION - Management Discussion of Financial Results”). The University currently expects that the combination of budgeted and one-time funds will be sufficient to meet or exceed the anticipated deferred maintenance needs given the extent of new construction completed over the last decade and the specific knowledge acquired in the comprehensive assessment.
Maintenance Planning. The University has provided for renewal and replacement of plant by dedicating a material portion of year-end surpluses to facilities and infrastructure needs.
Risk Management Activities
University Insurance Coverage. The University has in effect under its present policies to July 1, 2017: (i) property insurance coverage with a limit of $700 million, subject to a per-loss deductible of $250,000 per occurrence; (ii) comprehensive general liability coverage with a limit of $1 million per occurrence and $3 million in the aggregate, subject to a $100,000 deductible; (iii) umbrella insurance coverage with an aggregate limit of $25 million; (iv) an excess liability policy with coverage of $25 million and three additional excess liability policies with another $25 million each in coverage; (v) automobile liability insurance coverage for bodily injury and property damage with a limit of $1 million combined per occurrence with a $2,000 comprehensive deductible and a $25,000 liability deductible; (vi) educators legal liability with a per claim and aggregate limit of $15 million, subject to a deductible of $150,000 per claim; (vii) Side A directors (including Trustees) and officers (including the Chancellor and Vice Chancellors) insurance coverage (as defined herein) with an aggregate limit of $10 million; (viii) workers’ compensation coverage in the amount required by applicable State law with a $15,000 per injury retention; and (ix) various other perils with varying limits of liability, including healthcare professional liability, licensed professional liability, crime and fiduciary coverage, foreign liability, fine arts, multimedia liability, pollution liability and remediation, security/kidnap risk, travel evacuation and repatriation, and volunteer accident. The umbrella and excess liability coverages described above extend to the general liability, automobile and foreign coverages. The Side A directors and officers coverage is a separate category of policy coverage that cannot be depleted by claims under basic policy limits or by bankruptcy. The Side A coverage is dedicated only to pay four excess liability policies for trustees and officers in excess of $100 million and the educator’s legal liability policy of $15 million.
The University believes that its insurance portfolio adequately protects its property and operations. This is confirmed annually by the University’s insurance broker, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (“Gallagher”). Gallagher most recently reviewed the adequacy of coverage for the 2016- 2017 period, and its April 12, 2017 written report included the following conclusion: “The University of Denver’s Property and Casualty Insurance Program is comprehensive and broad in scope compared to standard insurance programs of like kind and quality. Retentions and Deductibles appear prudent based on the University’s size and loss history.”
46
Enterprise Risk Management. The University’s Business and Financial Affairs Division, which covers many University business operations, has a division-wide enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, which is integrated with its balanced scorecard program. The ERM program is based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) principles and higher education best practices. Business and Financial Affairs departments have targets established concerning key strategic and operations objectives. This information is reviewed semi-annually by the Vice Chancellor of Business and Financial Affairs in discussions with department leadership. In addition, the division is divided into two “environments” – Financial and Physical – that report annually to the University’s Chancellor and Provost on their key strategic initiatives and risks. As part of the reporting process, the Chancellor and Provost meet with the areas to hear a brief presentation and discuss key information from the reports.
Under the leadership of the Vice Chancellor of Business and Financial Affairs, the University is taking steps toward an organization-wide ERM program. This has been discussed at Audit Committee meetings and with University senior leadership. As part of this effort, the Vice Chancellor and the University’s Director of Enterprise Risk Management will serve as members of the University’s DU IMPACT 2025 Resource Group, which will allow for application of ERM principles in evaluating potential risks associated with strategic initiatives.
Finally, the University includes compliance with laws and regulations as part of its ERM program. Day-to-day responsibility for managing the compliance program rests with the University’s ERM Specialist. However, responsibility for compliance with about 300 compliance risks rests with the units. Compliance Liaisons, representing over 30 units throughout the University, are a critical component for ensuring compliance with the laws. This partnership has resulted in continuous improvement in the University’s compliance efforts.
The ERM Specialist works with Compliance Liaisons to assess risks on a four- year cycle. In evaluating risks, the University uses a scoring methodology based on a risk assessment toolkit developed by the National Association of College and University Business Officers in partnership with Crowe Horwath, LLP, one of largest public accounting and consulting firms in the United States. The control scoring evaluates the extent that compliance with a law or regulation has been documented, evaluated, corroborated, and tested.
University Contracts and Agreements
The University is a party to numerous contracts and agreements. According to the University, there are no contracts or agreements currently in effect to which the University is a party the breach or violation of which would have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the University.
Zoning
In 2010 the University of Denver’s campus was zoned as a single zone lot with a campus master planned – educational institution designation (“CMP-EI”) as part of the City’s Blue Print Denver effort. The new zoning designation supplanted agreements made in 2002 in relation to rezoning for the Chambers Center for the Advancement of Women and the subsequent Land Use Agreement with the City and County of Denver that was also executed in 2002. The 2002 Agreement required the University to construct specific traffic improvements, mitigate off- 47
campus parking impact, supply adequate on-campus parking, and follow specified procedures for managing traffic and parking for large campus events. These requirements have largely been met either due to the new zoning designation where parking inventory is concerned, or through improved operational efficiency since 2002. Additionally, the 2002 agreement required that the University not seek rezoning for 10 years and not develop property on the western perimeter of the University that was designated R-2 Multi-Unit Dwellings, Low Density zoning (“R-2”). The R-2 zoning was reclassified via Blue Print Denver to Urban Row House 2.5 stories (“R-RH- 2.5”). The University sold all of its holdings in that zone district to a private developer who is currently constructing row houses that meet the intended zoning designation. Additionally, the University imposed a restrictive covenant requiring its approval of design elevations for this and future development for the properties it sold. Finally, University has imposed a restrictive covenant on certain property (equal to approximately one-half of a City block) limiting its use of that property to outdoor recreational purposes for a period of ten years (which period has expired) and thereafter limiting its use to designated uses, primarily for single unit dwellings and university or college uses.
As a result of the many changes occurring on the University’s perimeter and the single zone lots CMP-EI rezoning, the University is currently undertaking a new master planning process which will not only update the 2002 Land Use Plan, but also cast a wider net to consider the University’s relationship with its immediate residential and commercial surroundings with the intention of making the area a local destination. While the planning effort is scheduled to complete during 2017, future development is likely to continue into the foreseeable future. The University refers to this area of future development as the “DU District.”
48
UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Introduction
The Bonds are payable in accordance with the terms of the Indenture from revenues consisting of payments made by the University. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS.”
The following financial information applies generally to the financial activity of the University and makes reference to revenues to be applied to the University’s operations and maintenance expenses, capital expenditures and debt service repayment requirements without necessarily segregating such uses.
Sources of Revenues
The University derives its revenues from a variety of sources including student tuition and fees, federal and state grants and contracts, auxiliary enterprises of the University such as the bookstores, dining halls and residence halls, private gifts and grants, income from the University’s Endowment Fund and other sources. Set forth below are descriptions of these various sources of revenues and their relative significance to the University’s overall financial activities.
Tuition and Fees. The University’s largest source of revenue is tuition and fees, including tuition charges, health services fees and other fees. For Fiscal Year 2017, net tuition and fees are budgeted to account for 73% of total unrestricted revenues. The major portion of tuition and fee revenue consists of tuition.
The University uses separate methods of assessing tuition at the College of Law and its nontraditional graduate and undergraduate programs. Classes at the College of Law are conducted on the semester system, and all other courses are on the quarter system. Tuition per credit hour for the College of Law is $1,547 per credit hour for Fiscal Year 2016-17. Tuition rates for the University’s nontraditional programs vary, but generally range from $590 to $1,290 per credit hour for Fiscal Year 2016-17. See “THE UNIVERSITY – Institutional Profile – Tuition.”
The University also assesses a student fee, a health fee and a technology fee in its traditional programs. In addition, students living in the University’s residence halls pay room charges and board charges which ranged from $5,772 (triple occupancy) to $7,854 (suite, double occupancy) for the 2016-2017 school year.
The University reserves the right to revise its tuition and fees from time to time, as determined by the Board of Trustees. Although the University has been able to raise its tuition and fees without adversely affecting its enrollment, there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. Future economic and other conditions may affect the University’s ability to increase or maintain its tuition and fees.
Gifts, Grants and Bequests. The University actively solicits gifts and bequests from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, and private foundations for both current operating purposes and capital needs. Comprehensive development programs, including efforts to raise capital funds, have been in existence for a number of years and have been successfully expanded 49
in recent years. The University also conducts fundraising campaigns from time to time; the most recent being the “Ascend” campaign that began in 2007 (public phase in 2010) and ran until the University’s sesquicentennial in 2014.
The University has intentionally been de-emphasizing the dependence on unrestricted giving in the budget development process over the past five years. Greater emphasis has been added to the “capital” giving effort, which prioritizes larger-scale donations. Academic departments, athletics and the library have also become more involved with the fundraising efforts. Individual fundraisers have been added to the staffs of these areas.
The following table sets forth information for the past five fiscal years regarding the amount and general purpose of gifts, private foundation grants and bequests, including pledges, received by the University through its annual fundraising efforts:
Total Development Activity (Restricted and Unrestricted)
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014(1) 2015 2016 Unrestricted $ 1,659,368 $ 2,124,412 $ 2,141,559 $ 8,440,884 $ 2,112,444 Donor Designated 48,487,458 53,225,291 58,723,088 28,363,381 29,796,537 TOTAL $50,146,826 $55,349,703 $60,864,647 $36,804,265 $31,908,981
Source: University Office of Financial Affairs.
(1) The Ascend Campaign ended in Fiscal Year 2014, which represented a high achieving mark for the Campaign and the 5-year trend.
There can be no assurance that the amount of gifts, grants and bequests received by the University will remain stable or increase in the future. Future economic conditions and actions by the federal government, including changes in the Federal income tax and estate tax laws affecting the treatment of such contributions, may affect the level of giving in the future.
Endowment Income. The schedule below summarizes changes in Endowment Fund balances, estimated unrealized appreciation, annualized earnings and earnings rates (based on assets at June 30) for each of the fiscal years of the University as indicated. The following summary should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto appearing in Appendix A hereto. The following table is for informational purposes only; the University’s true endowment corpus is not pledged to the payment of the Bonds. Quasi- endowment, however is pledged to the payment of the Bonds.
50
Endowment Fund Summary (in thousands)(1)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Market Value, Beginning of Year $345,213 $373,396 $403,467 $467,253 $632,761 Gifts 23,617 13,850 11,710 14,109 11,356 Gain (Loss) on investments 4,063 21,881 48,109 19,454 (21,767)(2) Transfer to (from) Quasi-Endowment (8,935) (9,177) (12,183) (14,419) (16,379) Other 9,437 3,516 16,151 146,364(3) 1,397 Market Value, End of Year $373,395 $403,467 $467,253 $632,761 $607,368 Total Return 2.6% 7.5% 13.2% 5.3% -2.3%
(1) Based on assets at June 30, for the fiscal years shown. (2) There was a market-wide loss in Fiscal Year 2016; the National Association of College and University Business Officers reported an approximate 2.1% loss for all endowments participating in the annual survey. (3) Other 2015 additions to endowment include a $99.4 million transfer from operating fund and a $25.6 million transfer from plant fund to create a quasi-endowment for financial aid.
Source: University Office of Financial Affairs.
The market value of the University’s endowment was $628.5 million at June 30, 2016. Over the past five years, $74.6 million of new gifts have been added to the endowment. The University currently distributes 4.5% of a 12 quarter trailing average of the Endowment’s market value. For Fiscal Year 2015-16 (approximately $189.6 million was considered institutional or unrestricted funds available as part of the University’s overall spendable revenues, and $24.6 million was distributed to certain University departments for use in accordance with the original donor restrictions.
Effective August 29, 2016 the University selected Investure LLC (“Investure”) to provide investment management services for the Endowment. Investure’s responsibilities include developing investment objectives and guidelines, determining an appropriate allocation of assets, monitoring money managers, managing fixed income assets and cash, monitoring and reporting investment performance and assisting with the selection of custodians.
As of February 28, 2017 the Investure managed pool of Endowment funds was approximately $588 million, allocated in proportion to the following asset classes:
Global Equity 53% Alternative Equity 30% Private Equity 8% Fixed Income 6% Cash & Miscellaneous 3%
As other legacy investments become eligible to liquidate, these funds will be transferred to Investure for investment under the terms of their agreement with the University.
Auxiliary Revenues. Another major category of unrestricted current fund revenues is revenues of the University’s auxiliary enterprises. Auxiliary enterprises include the
51
University’s housing system, food service, bookstore, health services and student center activities. Revenues from the University’s housing system, food service and bookstore are generally sufficient to cover the cost of these operations; revenues from health services, athletics and student center activities are, as at most universities, insufficient to cover the cost of these operations and other operating revenues are needed to pay the balance of the costs. Effective March 1, 2012, the University outsourced bookstore operations to a private operator.
Grant and Contract Revenues. Unrestricted grant and contract revenues represent payments by sponsors to cover the indirect costs of specific projects. Restricted grant and contract revenues represent payments made by sponsors to cover the direct costs of specific projects.
Other Revenues. Other revenue sources include interest income, certain rental revenues, traffic fines and other sources.
Financial Statements
The University’s financial accounts are maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and traditional concepts employed among institutions of higher education.
The University’s external financial statement format allows for depreciation, capitalization of bond principal payments, and gains and losses on long term investments to be accounted for outside of the basic operating activities. The University defines amounts transferred at the election of the Board of Trustees from unrestricted operating funds for future operating purposes defined by the deans and division heads as “designated funds.” The Board of Trustees may elect to return any balance of designated funds to unrestricted operating funds.
The University’s audited financial statements for the years ending June 30, 2016 and 2015 are attached to this Official Statement as Appendix A. The Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees and the Executive Committee have accepted these financial statements.
Summary of Certain Historical Financial Information
The table below sets forth a five-year history of the Statement of Activities for the University’s Operating Fund (including changes in unrestricted net assets, net changes in temporarily restricted net assets and changes in net assets from the beginning of the year to the end of the year) presented in accordance with GAAP. This information in the table has been excerpted from the University’s audited financial report for the years ended June 30, 2012 through 2016. The financial information in the table should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes appearing in Appendix A hereto.
52
Statement of Activities - Changes in Net Assets for Operating Fund Only (In Thousands)(1)
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, Revenues and Gains 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Tuition and Fees $372,175 $387,595 $409,692 $433,464 $444,343 Less discount (institutional scholarships) 95,100 108,467 114,933 127,480 136,883 277,075 279,128 294,759 305,984 307,460 Less allowance (non-institutional scholarships) 10,018 10,469 11,897 12,751 14,865 Net tuition and fees 267,057 268,659 282,862 293,233 292,595 Private Gifts 1,659 870 774 979 588 Grants and Contracts 23,255 26,225 25,358 25,713 29,364 Endowment income 266 317 846 156 2,410 Other investment income 4,183 1,112 1,056 920 1,140 Net appreciation on endowment 366 357 451 557 3,557 Net appreciation (depreciation) on other investments (271) 934 1,456 (232) (1,130) Sales and services of educational activities 11,869 12,689 12,883 14,505 14,983 Sales and services of auxiliary enterprise 30,449 26,193 26,943 34,111 35,506 Other sources 19,863 19,917 20,476 20,781 21,000 Total unrestricted revenues and gains 358,695 357,272 373,105 390,723 400,013 Net Assets Released From Restriction (2) 24,146 25,666 29,834 30,378 30,993 Total unrestricted revenues, gains and other support 382,841 382,938 402,939 421,101 431,006
Expenses Education and general Instruction 135,640 141,103 147,102 148,338 152,857 Research 12,640 14,694 14,554 13,070 13,851 Public service 5,881 7,193 4,232 5,840 8,230 Academic support 62,215 64,003 63,203 63,637 68,014 Student services 44,191 45,385 44,394 47,047 49,733 Institutional support 44,415 45,428 44,941 50,493 52,229 Total educational and general expenses 304,982 317,806 318,426 328,425 344,914 Auxiliary Enterprises 28,846 23,791 24,645 25,864 27,547 Total Expenses 333,827 341,596 343,071 354,289 372,460 Transfers among unrestricted net assets 43,809 40,585 53,010 130,722 35,436 Total expenses and transfers 377,636 382,181 396,081 485,011 407,896
Increase/(decrease) in unrestricted net assets (4) 5,204 757 6,857 (63,910) 23,110 Increase/(decrease) in temporarily restricted net assets (1,149) 2,815 7,427 (23,208) (811) (3)(4) Increase/(decrease) in net assets 4,055 (2,058) 14,285 (87,118) 22,299
Net Assets at beginning of year (1) 136,517 140,572 138,514 152,798 65,680 Net assets at end of year (1) $140,572 $138,514 $152,798 $65,680 $87,979
(1) Reflects the change in net assets as stated in the University’s Operating Fund (including unrestricted net assets and temporarily restricted net assets). Reflects implementation of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 958 Not-for-Profit Entities, Subtopics 605 Revenue Recognition & 205 Presentation of Financial Statements. (2) Represents amounts originally recorded in Temporarily Restricted Net Assets whose restrictions have been met. (3) Includes private gifts, endowment appreciation and income, and investment appreciation and income whose purposes are temporarily restricted. Also includes assets released from restrictions and reclassification of temporarily restricted assets. (4) Fiscal Year 2015 includes transfer of $99.4 million of net assets from operation to board-designated endowment.
Source: Derived from the University’s Audited Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2012-2016.
53
Management Discussion of Financial Results
In its ongoing effort to ensure the incorporation of best practices, the University has contracted with the Huron Consulting Group Inc. (“Huron”), a management consulting company offering services to the higher education industry, to: (i) evaluate academic budget and finance functions; and (ii) provide a review of the University’s approach to resource management, allocation and planning. The University believes that opportunities exist to more fully integrate the budget development process with the financial management process. Specifically, it plans to emphasize the creation of a more discernable connection between the accountability of operating and capital resources and the DU IMPACT 2025 strategic plan.
Huron will also evaluate the University’s modified Responsibility Center Management (“RCM”) model and recommend enhancements that better incentivize institutional collaboration on the development of new initiatives to generate positive net margins in support of institutional strategies. Finally, Huron will gain a better understanding of current technologies used by the University’s financial analysts, budget officers and leadership, and will share options for more efficient technologies in support of these work functions. The University believes that in light of the current higher education environment, this reevaluation of the budget processes, which ultimately drive financial performance, is critical. The University remains committed to increasing undergraduate and graduate student enrollments through the use of incremental increases in tuition revenues and endowment earnings, the latter being used for student aid. By supplementing student aid in this regard, the University is aggressively addressing college affordability, especially for underrepresented populations that might otherwise not be able to attend the University.
The University continues to increase its Advancement Staff full-time employees in anticipation of a major fundraising campaign. As competition for high-performing students increases, it is important that the University be able to offer student aid packages that compare favorably to its peers. Student scholarships and awards will continue to be a prominent area of focus for the University over the next several years. Additionally, communication strategies which highlight the University’s prominent faculties and programs will be given priority in funding decisions. Investments in technology will also receive priority funding as the University continues to streamline business processes and reporting functionality.
In recent years, the University has placed a focus on expanding its research portfolio. To that end, the University viewed Fiscal Year 2016 as highly successful with respect to research and scholarship. Research and Sponsored Program expenditures reached $25.5 million, the highest in fifteen years. The number of unique faculty with external support rose from 138 to 152. More than $800,000 was distributed through internal grant programs, and the associate provost invested over $300,000 to divisions for research infrastructure needs. The University closed Fiscal Year 2016 with its 26th consecutive operating surplus.
The trend of operating surpluses reflects the University’s intent to apply sound business practices to distinctive academic programs. In fiscal year 1990-91, the University implemented a decentralized form of responsibility with regard to budgeting and accounting. Under this model, deans and division directors are actively involved in the development of their budgets and are held accountable for the results. The principal incentive within the system involves “gainsharing” favorable variations from budget with the various units of the University. Under the gainsharing policy, units are allowed to carry forward all of their expenditure savings 54
and one-half of favorable revenue variations. Accumulated balances may be used by individual units for discrete, non-recurring, mission-related expenditures, generally at no greater than one- third of the total amount accumulated by the unit in any given year. Through Fiscal Year 2016, approximately $217.6 million has been transferred to the designated gainsharing accounts from the annual operating surpluses. As of June 30, 2016, accumulated gainsharing and other designated net assets exceeded $53.4 million, representing an important source of liquidity to the University to invest in strategic initiative and/or to cushion enrollment fluctuations.
The forecast of Fiscal Year 2016-17 financial results through March 31, 2017 are comparable to Fiscal Year 2015-16 results year-over-year, with a total year-end forecasted operating margin of approximately $33 million and $36 million, respectively. Overall tuition for Fiscal Year 2017 is below budget by approximately $1.55 million, or one-third of one-percent, but ahead of Fiscal Year 2016 by $6.4 million. Scattered amongst several schools and colleges, forecast revenue shortfalls are being fully absorbed by expenditure reductions and/or through the use of gain-share reserves. Tuition discount, budgeted at 37%, is forecast to come in under budget, with the most recent forecast being 36.94%. Positive variations from labor costs, and specifically vacancy savings, are trending consistent to prior years and major non-compensation expenditure drivers such as healthcare and utilities costs are projected to end the fiscal year under budget.
Executive Management meets monthly to review financial activity (specifically tuition forecasts by school and college) and expenditure savings and adjusts budget expectations for the upcoming fiscal year accordingly. The development of the Fiscal Year 2018 budget (subject to the Board of Trustees’ approval, which occurs annually in June) reflects these discussions, with investments made to bolster operations in Engineering and Computer Science, the Graduate School of Social Work, the Graduate School of Professional Psychology and Education. Conversely, in the spirit of the University’s modified Responsibility Center Management, revenue reductions because of enrollment declines will negatively affect the School of International Studies, the College of Business and the College of Law.
As a basis of developing its budget, the University also projects annual enrollments at levels with a high probability of achievement. Generally, actual enrollment levels exceed projected levels, creating favorable variations to the budget which are then gainshared, as described above. The University also limits the growth of expenditure budgets to less than the rate of growth in predictable revenue sources, principally tuition. This has been made possible due to up-front participation from deans and directors, combined with high levels of accountability and effective incentives for actual results.
Given the importance of the projects to be funded with the Bonds, the University has invested considerable time to develop programs for each facility. In the case of the First time/First year Residence Hall, the University contracted with Brailsford & Dunlavey to perform a market study, which revealed a shortage of approximately 1,200 beds over the existing inventory of 2,563. Additionally, a financial pro-forma confirmed the ability to pay debt service with rates in line with current bed rates. In the case of the Community Commons and Career Achievement Center, University personnel visited peer institutions who have built similar facilities, with space programs modified to accommodate the University’s student population. These exercises have provided comfort that the facilities will serve the program needs of occupants and the University’s community for years to come.
55
Finally, operating surpluses have also been used to fund major renovations and capital improvement projects, as well as the bolstering of plant reserves. From fiscal year 1990- 91 through Fiscal Year 2015-2016, approximately $182.1 million has been transferred to Plant Fund reserves for such projects. In Fiscal Year 2016, over $9.6 million was transferred to plant fund reserves and facility infrastructure deferred maintenance projects. Another $12.2 million was transferred to fund gainshare commitment (as described above) and to fund several designated reserves for 2018 initiatives. This practice has continued in an effort to properly maintain facilities and avoid costly emergency repairs.
During Fiscal Year 2018, the University anticipates expending $16.4 million of expendable resources for a new administrative office building on land it owns and operates on the University Park campus (but outside the “Land” as described in the Loan Agreement). See “THE UNIVERSITY--Facilities”. The University also anticipates expending $9.9 million of expendable resources to fund certain one-time projects related to the implementation of DU IMPACT 2025. As of June 30, 2016, expendable resources included $87.9 million of net assets within “Operations” and $189.6 million in board-designated endowments included among “Long-term Investments.” Given that a $33 million Operating Margin Surplus is forecast for Fiscal Year 2017 and that year to date performance in the Consolidated Endowment Fund is positive, the University anticipates that year end balances as of June 30, 2017 will not be materially affected by this transaction.
A variety of factors may affect the University’s financial condition in the future and the University’s historic financial results may not be consistent with its future financial results. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the University’s ability to recruit and retain students; the University’s oversight of its finances; the University’s ability to control expenditures; the University’s ability to maintain or increase rates for tuition and other fees without affecting enrollments; the investment of the University’s endowment and other funds; the ability of the University to solicit and obtain gifts and bequests; governmental assistance for student financial aid; and grants and contracts from governmental bodies, agencies and others.
The University has delivered a portfolio of more than twenty discrete projects totaling in excess of $640 million over the last two decades and believes that it has the experience to design, bid, permit and construct each of the projects to be funded by the Bonds both on-time and on-budget.
56
Current Funds Unrestricted(1)
Fiscal Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Excess of revenues over expenditures and mandatory transfers (or operating surplus) $27,941,402 $21,908,479 $37,928,882 $39,165,901 $36,075,250
Transfers: Plant Funds (6,403,000) (7,960,000) (15,429,655) (8,645,000) (9,647,386) Designated Funds (Gainsharing) (10,250,000) (8,450,000) (11,100,000) (13,800,000) (12,200,000) Other Transfers *FTN (10,743,000) (4,942,000) (10,781,439) (16,192,680) (13,703,594)
Net Increase in fund balance $ 545,402 $ 556,479 $ 617,788 $ 528,221 $ 524,270
(1) See “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION--Summary of Certain Historical Financial Information” above for a history of the results in the Operating Fund.
Source: University’s Office of Financial Affairs.
Budget Process
Annual budget requests are formulated by the various schools and departments under the supervision of the Provost, working under the direction of the Chancellor and with the Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs. In the fall, the administration develops in conjunction with the academic deans and administrative managers, proposed guidelines for the upcoming budget, including revenue projections based upon enrollment levels, tuition rates, housing charges, salary rates, capital expenditures and other financial and policy considerations. The guidelines receive approval of the Finance and Budget Committee and the Board of Trustees during the winter. Subsequently, the various schools and departments submit annual budget requests, through their respective deans and administrative managers to the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs. After review, primarily for consistency with the approved guidelines, the budget is adopted by the Board of Trustees in the spring of the ensuing calendar year.
The monitoring and control of the budget, after its adoption by the Board of Trustees, is the ultimate responsibility of the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs who reports to the Budget and Finance Committee, the Executive Committee and the Board of Trustees at periodic intervals during the fiscal year. The budget development and monitoring processes utilize a responsibility reporting technique wherein the budgeting and monthly accounting activities correspond to the University’s organizational structure of decision making and authority. Information for budget development is gathered at the lowest operational levels of the University and is then aggregated up the organizational structure at each level (e.g., department, school, division, university). Monthly and year-to-date reports of actual activities compared to plan are presented to the responsible individual with the requirement that variations from plan be explained to the Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs and corrective action, if necessary, be undertaken. This review is the basis of the Vice Chancellor’s and Chancellor’s periodic reporting to the Finance and Budget Committee, the Executive Committee and the Board of Trustees. 57
The Fiscal Year 2017 Budget
Budget. The Board of Trustees adopted the budget for Fiscal Year 2016-17 in June 2016. The Unrestricted Operating Fund had budgeted operating net revenues of $434,635,000 and budgeted expenditures of $434,635,000 (including $15.0 million of transfers to other funds that in the prior year were recorded below the operating margin subtotal) resulting in a budgeted operating margin of $0. Accordingly, budgeted revenues and expenditures represent an increase by the equal amount over the approved Fiscal Year 2016 budget.
Net tuition increases are $12,584,000. For a discussion of tuition increases and the basis for budgeting enrollment figures, see “UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION - Sources of Revenues.” Employee compensation represents the single largest budgeted expenditure. This category has increased by $17,905,000 (to $270,130,000) over the Fiscal Year 2016 budget. Total compensation, expressed as a percent of revenues, is 62.2%, an increase from the 60.9% from the previous fiscal year budget. The University currently expects a flat operating margin for Fiscal Year 2017.
The Fiscal Year 2017 budget capitalized on the continued increase in undergraduate student enrollment to offset continued declines, planned and unplanned, in graduate enrollments, specifically in the Sturm College of Law and the Daniels College of Business. The overall tuition volume change from all types of tuition, net unfunded aid, was a decline of $1.85 million. In January 2016, the Board of Trustees approved a 4.9% tuition rate increase for the fall of 2016. Fiscal Year 2017 is the second year of a three year plan to increase tuition close to 5% per year. The tuition rate increase provided the majority of new revenue in Fiscal Year 2016-17, or $14.4 million, net of unfunded aid. The rate increase provided 70.6% of the total increase in institutional revenue between the Fiscal Year 2016 budget and the Fiscal Year 2017 budget. The University’s dependence on strong traditional undergraduate enrollments continues to increase. Of the new revenue from tuition, net of unfunded aid, 93.6% is coming from traditional undergraduate academic year tuition. The multiple year tuition rate increase plan is coupled with an intentional focus on expanding financial aid for all students, both undergraduate and graduate. The decision at the end of Fiscal Year 2015 to move $125 million in unrestricted net assets into a quasi‐endowment allowed for the expenditure of $2.5 million in earnings from the quasi‐endowment to undergraduate financial aid in Fiscal Year 2017.
The investment strategy for Fiscal Year 2017 incorporated reallocations across units and investments reflecting the University’s priorities. Such investment strategies included:
• A two-year evaluation of existing infrastructure reserve balances and transfers to plant fund reserves in the base budget. In Fiscal Year 2017, $3.3 million in infrastructure transfers to plant reserves were reallocated to fund investments in other areas. The University’s plan is to rebuild such transfers in future years to what the University determines to be a more prudent level;
• A sizing and expense reduction in the Sturm College of Law, which continued in Fiscal Year 2016-17; and
• Institutional reserves being built into base budgets over multiple years for specific initiatives (including Renew DU, the Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, and the
58
expanded engineering and computer science program) being allocated from central reserves into the financial divisions overseeing these initiatives.
The Fiscal Year 2017 budget continues to shift the University from a risk-averse planning model toward a budget structure to fulfill the aspirations of DU IMPACT 2025, as described below. The University believes this initiative will allow it to become a model for higher education to serve its students in newer and more innovative ways.
Budget Process. The Fiscal Year 2017 budget was shaped by the University’s DU IMPACT 2025 strategic plan. Investments focused on the directions identified in the plan and on providing resources to implement and sustain these initiatives. Implementation will be a multi‐ year process, as will funding initiatives that fulfill the aspirations of the strategic plan. The University is working to challenge the existing budget structure to evolve in ways that support innovation, collaboration, and interdisciplinary work through responsibility-centered management. Through this initiative, year‐end outcomes are a shared responsibility between management at the unit level and central oversight. It is the University’s intent that incentives within the current model encourage people to be thoughtful and careful in the management of resources under their control, as they share in positive outcomes. A few specific impediments to academic integration across units were addressed in the Fiscal Year 2017 proposed budget. Such changes include:
• In recent years, master’s programs in the Daniels College of Business have charged for every credit hour with no flat rate. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017, all master’s programs, with the exception of the Executive MBA, will revert to the traditional flat rate billing structure in which a student only pays for the first 12 credit hours, and the hours beyond the first 12 are free. This is the billing structure used by all other quarter‐based, traditional graduate programs.
• The Graduate Tax Program is also moving from a non‐traditional program with a unique credit hour rate to the traditional quarter flat rate billing structure. The program will also be moved into the Sturm College of Law’s financial division as one of the multiple master’s programs offered. As a result, Graduate Tax will no longer be a stand‐alone financial division.
• The Public Policy Program and the Institute for Public Policy Studies have moved out of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences and Centers and Institutes to become part of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies. The University believes this integration will allow for more expanded and collaborative academic offerings.
• The Josef Korbel School of International Studies will have transitioned the majority of its graduate course per-credit hours from five to four by Fiscal Year 2018. This will match the most common credit hour course format in other graduate schools.
Additional reorganizations across units include:
i. The Center for Multicultural Excellence (“CME”) is no longer a stand‐alone division. The student services and support functions provided by CME are now part of Campus Life and Inclusive Excellence. The academic and institution‐wide functions are now in the Office of the Provost and the Office of the Chancellor.
59
The University believes this reorganization will allow for expanded program development across the University. ii. The Career Center was previously housed in Campus Life. The new strategic directions identified for University Advancement and Alumni Relations support the move of the Career Center to that division. This will allow for a full integration of career services for existing students and University alumni. Alumni will be encouraged to access career services throughout their professional careers and be able to contribute more directly to internship and career opportunities for current students. iii. The Office of Research and Sponsored Programs’ (the “ORSP”) administrative staff, which previously reported to the University Controller’s Office, will now report directly to the Associate Provost for Research. This reporting line change provides a more complete integration of faculty resources and needs into the organization and functioning of ORSP. iv. As work continues to maximize all institutional resources dedicated to advancement and alumni relations, four academic units moved an existing development position and position funding into University Advancement. It is the belief of the University that it will continue to see a more unified advancement effort at the University in the future.
60
LEGAL MATTERS
Absence of Litigation - The Authority
There is not now pending or, to the knowledge of the Authority, threatened against the Authority, any litigation restraining or enjoining the issuance or delivery of the Bonds or questioning or affecting the validity of the Bonds or the proceedings or authority under which they are to be issued. There is no litigation pending or, to the Authority’s knowledge, threatened against the Authority which in any manner questions the right of the Authority to enter into the Agreement with the University or to secure the Bonds in the manner provided in the Indenture.
Absence of Litigation - The University
The University, like other similar institutions, is subject to a variety of suits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The University has advised that no litigation or proceedings are pending or, to its knowledge, threatened against the University except litigation in which the probable recoveries and the estimated costs and expenses of defense, in the opinion of the Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs and General Counsel, will be entirely within applicable insurance policy limits (subject to applicable deductibles) or will not have a material adverse effect on the operation or condition, financial or otherwise, of the University.
There is no litigation or proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting the University that challenges the validity of the Loan Agreement or the validity of the transactions contemplated by this Official Statement.
Approval of Legal Proceedings
The approving opinion of Sherman & Howard L.L.C., as bond counsel, will be delivered with the Bonds. A form of the bond counsel opinion is attached to this Official Statement as Appendix E. Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Denver, Colorado, has also acted as special counsel to the University in connection with this Official Statement. Certain legal matters, including the status of the University as qualifying as exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Tax Code, will be passed on for the University by its counsel, Hoffman, Crews, Nies, Waggener & Foster LLP. Bond counsel will rely upon that opinion in delivering its approving opinion. See Appendix E. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Authority by its general counsel, Sherman & Howard L.L.C. Certain legal matters will be passed on for the Underwriter by its counsel, Kutak Rock LLP, Denver, Colorado. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds will be qualified as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments by limitations imposed by bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or other similar laws and by legal and equitable principles affecting the rights of creditors.
61
TAX MATTERS
Series 2017A Bonds
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming continuous compliance with certain covenants described below, interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excluded from gross income under federal income tax laws pursuant to the Tax Code, and interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excluded from alternative minimum taxable income as defined in Section 55(b)(2) of the Tax Code except that such interest is required to be included in calculating the “adjusted current earnings” adjustment applicable to corporations for purposes of computing the alternative minimum taxable income of corporations as described below. Pursuant to State laws in effect on the date of delivery of the Bonds, the Bonds, the transfer thereof and the income therefrom are exempt from all taxation and assessments in the State.
The Tax Code imposes several requirements which must be met with respect to the Series 2017A Bonds in order for the interest thereon to be excluded from gross income, alternative minimum taxable income (except to the extent of the aforementioned adjustment applicable to corporations). Certain of these requirements must be met on a continuous basis throughout the term of the Series 2017A Bonds. These requirements include: (a) limitations as to the use of proceeds of the Series 2017A Bonds; (b) limitations on the extent to which proceeds of the Series 2017A Bonds may be invested in higher yielding investments; and (c) a provision, subject to certain limited exceptions, that requires all investment earnings on the proceeds of the Series 2017A Bonds above the yield on the Series 2017A Bonds to be paid to the United States Treasury. The University will covenant and represent in the Loan Agreement that it will take all steps to comply with the requirements of the Tax Code and Colorado law (in effect on the date of delivery of the Series 2017A Bonds) to the extent necessary to maintain the exclusion of interest on the Series 2017A Bonds from gross income and alternative minimum taxable income (except to the extent of the aforementioned adjustment applicable to corporations) under such federal income tax laws and Colorado taxable income and Colorado alternative minimum taxable income under such Colorado income tax laws. Bond Counsel’s opinion as to the exclusion of interest on the Series 2017A Bonds from gross income and alternative minimum taxable income (to the extent described above) is rendered in reliance on these covenants, and assumes continuous compliance therewith. The failure or inability of the University to comply with these requirements could cause the interest on the Series 2017A Bonds to be included in gross income or alternative minimum taxable income, or both, from the date of issuance. Bond Counsel’s opinion also is rendered in reliance upon certifications of the University and other certifications furnished to Bond Counsel. Bond Counsel has not undertaken to verify such certifications by independent investigation.
Section 55 of the Tax Code contains a 20% alternative minimum tax on the alternative minimum taxable income of corporations. Under the Tax Code, 75% of the excess of a corporation’s “adjusted current earnings” over the corporation’s alternative minimum taxable income (determined without regard to this adjustment and the alternative minimum tax net operating loss deduction) is included in the corporation’s alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax applicable to the corporation. “Adjusted current earnings” includes interest on the Series 2017A Bonds.
The Tax Code contains numerous provisions which may affect an investor’s decision to purchase the Series 2017A Bonds. Owners of the Series 2017A Bonds should be 62
aware that the ownership of tax-exempt obligations by particular persons and entities, including, without limitation, financial institutions, insurance companies, recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred or continued indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt obligations, foreign corporations doing business in the United States and certain “subchapter S” corporations may result in adverse federal and Colorado tax consequences. Under section 3406 of the Tax Code, backup withholding may be imposed on payments on the Series 2017A Bonds made to any owner who fails to provide certain required information, including an accurate taxpayer identification number, to certain persons required to collect such information pursuant to the Tax Code. Backup withholding may also be applied if the owner underreports “reportable payments” (including interest and dividends) as defined in Section 3406, or fails to provide a certificate that the owner is not subject to backup withholding in circumstances where such a certificate is required by the Tax Code. Certain of the Series 2017A Bonds may be sold at a premium, representing a difference between the original offering price of those Series 2017A Bonds and the principal amount thereof payable at maturity. Under certain circumstances, an initial owner of such bonds (if any) may realize a taxable gain upon their disposition, even though such bonds are sold or redeemed for an amount equal to the owner’s acquisition cost. Bond Counsel’s opinion relates only to the exclusion of interest on the Series 2017A Bonds from gross income, alternative minimum taxable income and Colorado taxation as described above and will state that no opinion is expressed regarding other federal or Colorado tax consequences arising from the receipt or accrual of interest on or ownership of the Series 2017A Bonds. Owners of the Series 2017A Bonds should consult their own tax advisors as to the applicability of these consequences.
The opinions expressed by Bond Counsel are based on existing law as of the delivery date of the Bonds. No opinion is expressed as of any subsequent date nor is any opinion expressed with respect to any pending or proposed legislation. Amendments to the federal and or state tax laws may be pending now or could be proposed in the future that, if enacted into law, could adversely affect the value of the Bonds, the exclusion of interest on the Series 2017A Bonds from gross income, alternative minimum taxable income, Colorado taxation, or any combination thereof from the date of issuance of the Series 2017A Bonds or any other date, the tax value of that exclusion for different classes of taxpayers from time to time, or that could result in other adverse tax consequences. In addition, future court actions or regulatory decisions could affect the tax treatment or market value of the Bonds. Owners of the Bonds are advised to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to such matters.
The Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) has an ongoing program of auditing tax-exempt obligations to determine whether, in the view of the Service, interest on such tax- exempt obligations is includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. No assurances can be given as to whether or not the Service will commence an audit of the Series 2017A Bonds. If an audit is commenced, the market value of the Series 2017A Bonds may be adversely affected. Under current audit procedures, the Service will treat the Authority as the taxpayer and the Owners may have no right to participate in such procedures. The University has covenanted in the Loan Agreement not to take any action that would cause the interest on the Series 2017A Bonds to lose its exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes or lose its exclusion from alternative minimum taxable income except to the extent described above for the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. None of the University, the Authority, the Financial Advisors, the Underwriters or Bond Counsel or Special Counsel is responsible for
63
paying or reimbursing any Registered Owner or Beneficial Owner for any audit or litigation costs relating to the Series 2017A Bonds.
Series 2017B Bonds
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2017B Bonds is included in gross income pursuant to the Tax Code. Pursuant to State laws in effect on the date of delivery of the 2017B Bonds, the transfer thereof and the income therefrom are exempt from all taxation and assessments in the State.
The Tax Code contains numerous provisions, including provisions related to the imposition of additional taxes, which may affect an investor’s decision to purchase the 2017B Bonds. Further, under Section 3406 of the Tax Code, backup withholding may be imposed on payments on the 2017B Bonds in certain situations including: (i) an owner who fails to provide certain required information to certain persons required to collect such information; (ii) the owner underreports “reportable payments” (including interest and dividends) as defined in Section 3406; or (iii) an owner fails to provide a certificate that the owner is not subject to backup withholding when such a certificate is required by the Tax Code.
The opinions expressed by Bond Counsel are based on existing law as of the delivery date of the 2017B Bonds. No opinion is expressed as of any subsequent date nor is any opinion expressed with respect to pending or proposed legislation. Amendments to the federal or state tax laws may be pending now or could be proposed in the future that, if enacted into law, could adversely affect the value of the 2017B Bonds. In addition, future court actions or regulatory decisions could affect the market value of the 2017B Bonds. Owners of the 2017B Bonds are advised to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to such matters.
Any tax advice concerning the Bonds, interest on the Bonds or any other federal income tax issues associated with the Bonds, express or implicit in the provisions of this Official Statement, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. This document supports the promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters addressed herein. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The financial statements of the University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) included in this Official Statement as Appendix A, for June 30, 2015 and 2016, have been audited by CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, independent certified public accountants to the extent and for the periods indicated in their report thereon.
RATINGS
Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings have assigned the Bonds the ratings shown on the cover page of this Official Statement.
Such ratings reflect only the views of the rating agencies, and there is no assurance that the ratings will continue for any given period of time or any rating will not be 64
revised downward or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in their respective judgments, circumstances so warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of one or both ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds. Other than the University’s obligations under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, neither the Authority nor the University has undertaken any responsibility to bring to the attention of the owners of the Bonds any proposed change in or withdrawal of a rating once it is received or to oppose any such proposed revision.
UNDERWRITING
General. RBC Capital Markets LLC, on behalf of itself and as representative of Wells Fargo Securities, (the “Underwriters”) has agreed to purchase the Bonds from the Authority pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement at a purchase price of $______(representing the par amount of the Bonds, plus net original issue premium of $______, and less Underwriter’s discount of $______). The Underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the Bonds if any are taken. The Bond Purchase Agreement provides that the obligations of the Underwriters are subject to certain conditions. The Underwriters intend to offer the Bonds to the public at the offering prices appearing on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. After the initial public offering, the public offering price may be varied from time to time by the Underwriters.
The Underwriters and their respective affiliates are full-service financial institutions engaged in various activities that may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, municipal advisory, brokerage, and asset management. In the ordinary course of business, the Underwriters and their respective affiliates may actively trade debt and, if applicable, equity securities (or related derivative securities) and provide financial instruments (which may include bank loans, credit support or interest rate swaps). The Underwriters and their respective affiliates may engage in transactions for their own accounts involving the securities and instruments made the subject of this securities offering or other offering of the Issuer and/or Borrower. The Underwriters and their respective affiliates may make a market in credit default swaps with respect to municipal securities in the future. The Underwriters and their respective affiliates may also communicate independent investment recommendations, market color or trading ideas and publish independent research views in respect of this securities offering or other offerings of the Issuer and/or Borrower.
Wells Fargo Securities Trade Name Disclosure. Wells Fargo Securities is the trade name for certain securities-related capital markets and investment banking services of Wells Fargo & Company and its subsidiaries, including Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, which conducts its municipal securities sales, trading and underwriting operations through the Wells Fargo Bank, NA Municipal Products Group, a separately identifiable department of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a municipal securities dealer pursuant to Section 15B(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, acting through its Municipal Products Group ("WFBNA"), one of the underwriters of the Bonds, has entered into an agreement (the "WFA Distribution Agreement") with its affiliate, Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (which uses the trade name “Wells Fargo Advisors”) ("WFA"), for the distribution of certain municipal securities offerings, including the Bonds. Pursuant to the WFA Distribution Agreement, WFBNA will share a portion of its underwriting or remarketing agent compensation, as applicable, with
65
respect to the Bonds with WFA. WFBNA has also entered into an agreement (the “WFSLLC Distribution Agreement”) with its affiliate Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“WFSLLC”), for the distribution of municipal securities offerings, including the Bonds. Pursuant to the WFSLLC Distribution Agreement, WFBNA pays a portion of WFSLLC’s expenses based on its municipal securities transactions. WFBNA, WFSLLC, and WFA are each wholly-owned subsidiaries of Wells Fargo & Company.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, acting through its Municipal Products Group ("WFBNA"), one of the underwriters of the Bonds, has entered into an agreement (the "WFA Distribution Agreement") with its affiliate, Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (which uses the trade name “Wells Fargo Advisors”) ("WFA"), for the distribution of certain municipal securities offerings, including the Bonds. Pursuant to the WFA Distribution Agreement, WFBNA will share a portion of its underwriting or remarketing agent compensation, as applicable, with respect to the Bonds with WFA. WFBNA has also entered into an agreement (the “WFSLLC Distribution Agreement”) with its affiliate Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“WFSLLC”), for the distribution of municipal securities offerings, including the Bonds. Pursuant to the WFSLLC Distribution Agreement, WFBNA pays a portion of WFSLLC’s expenses based on its municipal securities transactions. WFBNA, WFSLLC, and WFA are each wholly-owned subsidiaries of Wells Fargo & Company.
MUNICIPAL ADVISOR
North Slope Capital Advisors, Denver, Colorado, is acting as municipal advisor to the University with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. As the University’s municipal advisor, North Slope has assisted in the preparation of this Official Statement and in other matters relating to the planning, structure, rating and issuance of the Bonds. In its role of municipal advisor to the University, North Slope has not undertaken to make an independent verification of or to assume responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Official Statement.
66
CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The undersigned official of the University hereby confirms and certifies that the execution and delivery of this Official Statement and its use in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds have been duly authorized by the Board of Trustees.
COLORADO SEMINARY
By: Vice Chancellor for Business and Financial Affairs
67
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
APPENDIX A
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015 (WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT THEREON)
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY)
Financial Statements
June 30, 2016 and 2015
(With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY)
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditors’ Report 1
Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Position, June 30, 2016 3
Statement of Financial Position, June 30, 2015 4
Statement of Activities, Year ended June 30, 2016 5
Statement of Activities, Year ended June 30, 2015 6
Statements of Cash Flows, Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 7
Notes to Financial Statements 8 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP CLAconnect.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Trustees University of Denver Denver, Colorado
Report on Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) (the University), which comprise the statements of financial position as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the University’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.