Aberrant Transposition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aberrant Transposition Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press PERSPECTIVE Too many ends: aberrant transposition Clifford F. Weil1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA A recent study by Zhang and colleagues published in the However, an alternative mechanism for mediating March 15, 2009, issue of Genes & Development (pp. 755– rearrangement is that transposition mechanisms are di- 765) demonstrates that maize Ac/Ds transposons medi- rectly responsible for the breakage and eventual rejoining ate translocations and other rearrangements through of the DNA in these rearrangements, with the idea that aberrant execution of the normal transposition process. some form of aberrant transposition had occurred. Some Ac transposase uses one end from each of two neigh- recent work, including a paper published in the March 15, boring elements in these events, which may happen 2009, issue of Genes & Development (Zhang et al. 2009), more commonly than previously thought. In genomes has also been examining mechanistic roles for how trans- where there can be many transposon ends scattered posons may mediate rearranging genomes all by them- across all the chromosomes, such mistakes can have selves, simply as a by-product of their normal function. important consequences. Transposases and transposon ends The dynamic nature of genomes is now an accepted fact For eukaryotic transposons that move via DNA inter- of biology, with transposon movement and rearrange- mediates (Type II elements), there are often subtle differ- ment of chromosomes taught even to high school biology ences between the sequences at each end of a transposon classes. Translocations, inversions, and duplications have that distinguish them and, in some instances, transposase been important genetic tools in a wide range of organ- enzymes bind each of them differentially (for review, see isms for almost a century. In many cases, these rearrange- Kunze and Weil 2002). A typical transposition event has ments arise spontaneously after double-stranded breaks transposase complexes bound to a ‘‘left’’ end and a ‘‘right’’ in DNA, and a significant cause of these breaks is trans- end of the same mobile element (Fig. 1A). This defines the position by mobile DNA elements. boundaries of the element, and the two ends synapse and One of the earliest observations McClintock (1948) act together in transposition. Ordinarily, the transposase made in her discovery of transposable elements was that, cuts the ends of the transposon, freeing the transposon to in addition to their movement, these elements had the be joined to some new insertion site. As the transposon ability to cause cytologically detectable chromosome inserts at its new location, staggered, single-stranded rearrangement. Once molecular tools were well estab- nicks in the target are created, the transposon is joined lished, papers began to emerge in both the plant and to the protruding ends of the new site, and the gaps are animal transposon literature clearly placing transposons filled in to create a short duplication of the target site at chromosomal rearrangement break points. More re- sequence adjacent to both ends of the transposon. This cently, similar rearrangements have been reported among characteristic target site duplication (TSD) immediately fungal transposons as well (Hua-Van et al. 2002). flanking the insertion site differs in length depending on The high copy number of transposons and their distri- the transposon family. It is likely, though not yet dem- bution throughout the genome suggest that one mecha- onstrated, that transposase molecules holding the ends nism for these rearrangements is recombination. In the of the transposon in a specific configuration when it larger context of genome evolution, a great deal of in- attempts to reinsert are responsible for just how far apart terest has long been placed on the role of repetitive DNA the single-strand nicks are and, therefore, how large the elements such as transposons (for a recent review, see TSDs are. Typically, the site from which the transposon Bennetzen 2005). These sequences permit unequal cross- was excised is repaired either by nonhomologous end- over, establish blocks of tightly linked genes that become joining (NHEJ) or by using a homologous and unbroken inherited as groups, and may even establish centromeres DNA such as a sister chromatid or homologous chromo- and telomeres (Carbon and Clarke 1990; Richards et al. some as a template (for review, see Kunze and Weil 2002). 1991). Transposons propagate by transposing and it is thus vital to their survival that individual elements are recog- [Keywords: V(D)J recombination; chromosome rearrangements; hAT nizable as such to the enzyme that moves them. How- elements; transposition] ever, given that many transposons exist in copy numbers 1Correspondence. E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (765) 496-2926. ranging up to tens of thousands, there are large numbers Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1801309. of element ends at various places throughout the 1032 GENES & DEVELOPMENT 23:1032–1036 Ó 2009 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/09; www.genesdev.org Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Aberrant transposition Figure 1. Ac/Ds transposition, right and wrong. (A) Diagram of a single transposon moving. Different ends of the element are indicated as filled and open triangles, transposase molecules are shown as open ovals, and target site and TSDs are indicated as vertical rectangles. Transposase molecules bound at the two ends, indicated by dotted circles, interact to facilitate transposition. Upon reinsertion, a new TSD is created. Note that the transposon can reinsert in either orientation (filled triangle at left, as shown, or filled triangle at right). Excision site is repaired by error-prone, NHEJ of TSDs, indicated by X. (B) Aberrant transposition in a genome with numerous transposons and partial transposons. Each insertion has its own TSD, represented by different vertical rectangles. Three chromosomes are shown as a heavy line, a dashed line, and a thin solid line, each with its centromere. Transposase binds at numerous ends throughout the genome, and interaction can occur between two ends (dotted circles) that are not part of the same transposon. Transposition events and repair of excision sites can lead to translocations (shown); ‘‘reinsertion’’ in the opposite orientation (filled triangle on the right), would be a dicentric chromosome (CEN2/CEN3) and an acentric fragment. genomes and in all possible orientations and distances involves either transposition of only one end of a trans- relative to one another. Defining a single element (one poson instead of both (seen for the Ac relative in snap- left end and one right end in the correct relative orienta- dragon, Tam3) (Hudson et al. 1990), or the combined use tions) can thus be a challenge. of two transposon ends that each belongs to separate transposons (Doring et al. 1985, 1989; Ralston et al. 1989; English et al. 1993, 1995; Weil and Wessler 1993; Zhang When transposases make mistakes and Peterson 1999, 2004; Huang and Dooner 2008). Initial binding of transposase to one transposon end as Without postulating any change in the mechanisms of compared with the other end of the same element proves cutting and rejoining, these alternative scenarios explain to be surprisingly independent. As a result, as much as many of the rearrangements seen. Note that there are two 20% of the time, transposase bound to an end from one DNA joining events in the process—insertion of the element can interact with transposase bound to an end of ‘‘transposon’’ at its new location and repair of the ‘‘exci- a second, nearby element, leading to an aberrant trans- sion site’’ the transposon has left—and both provide position event (Fig. 1B). However, in such cases what is opportunity to form novel chromosomes or initiate being ‘‘excised’’ and ‘‘reinserted’’ is not a typical trans- bridge–breakage–fusion cycles that can lead to further poson at all but a region of chromosomal DNA. Depend- rearrangements. For example, transposase bound to one ing on what is to be reinserted and where, rearrangements end of an Ac element and to a partial or ‘‘fractured’’ Ac such as duplications, deficiencies, inversions, and trans- >30 kb away and in the same relative orientation also locations can result. Indeed, this same sort of interaction causes chromosome breakage, even though the trans- between ends of different transposons and aberrant trans- posons are likely to be on the same sister chromatid position lies at the heart of the chromosome breakage (Ralston et al. 1989). Similarly, for two Ds elements near that allowed McClintock (1948) to recognize the element each other and in the same relative orientation, trans- she named Dissociation (Ds) when she first described posase-dependent deletions of all the sequences between transposable elements. The molecular explanation of the the transposons suggest that such events occur by the dicentric chromosome leading to the bridge–breakage– formation of large ‘‘macrotransposons’’ that carry with fusion cycles that identified Ds proved to be the cell them all the chromosomal DNA between the mobile repairing an ‘‘excision’’ event that involved two different element ends, similar to the compound transposons elements, each on different sister chromatids (English flanked by IS elements observed in bacterial systems et al. 1993; Weil and Wessler 1993). Repair of the (Klein et al. 1988; Dowe et al. 1990). The closer together ‘‘excision site’’ by NHEJ fuses the sister chromatids. the individual elements are, the more likely they are to When the centromeres attached to these sister chroma- move in concert as a macrotransposon (Dooner and tids go to separate poles at the next mitosis, an anaphase Belachew 1991). Dooner and coworkers (Huang and bridge is formed. Dooner 2008) confirmed recently that one such macro- This proves to be only the tip of a proverbial iceberg of transposon in maize both excises and reinserts, and found rearrangements these elements can produce.
Recommended publications
  • "Evolutionary Emergence of Genes Through Retrotransposition"
    Evolutionary Emergence of Advanced article Genes Through Article Contents . Introduction Retrotransposition . Gene Alteration Following Retrotransposon Insertion . Retrotransposon Recruitment by Host Genome . Retrotransposon-mediated Gene Duplication Richard Cordaux, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France . Conclusion Mark A Batzer, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020783 Louisiana, USA Variation in the number of genes among species indicates that new genes are continuously generated over evolutionary times. Evidence is accumulating that transposable elements, including retrotransposons (which account for about 90% of all transposable elements inserted in primate genomes), are potent mediators of new gene origination. Retrotransposons have fostered genetic innovation during human and primate evolution through: (i) alteration of structure and/or expression of pre-existing genes following their insertion, (ii) recruitment (or domestication) of their coding sequence by the host genome and (iii) their ability to mediate gene duplication via ectopic recombination, sequence transduction and gene retrotransposition. Introduction genes, respectively, and de novo origination from previ- ously noncoding genomic sequence. Genome sequencing Variation in the number of genes among species indicates projects have also highlighted that new gene structures can that new genes are continuously generated over evolution- arise as a result of the activity of transposable elements ary times. Although the emergence of new genes and (TEs), which are mobile genetic units or ‘jumping genes’ functions is of central importance to the evolution of that have been bombarding the genomes of most species species, studies on the formation of genetic innovations during evolution. For example, there are over three million have only recently become possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Pogo, a Separate Superfamily of IS630-Tc1-Mariner
    Gao et al. Mobile DNA (2020) 11:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-020-00220-0 RESEARCH Open Access Evolution of pogo, a separate superfamily of IS630-Tc1-mariner transposons, revealing recurrent domestication events in vertebrates Bo Gao, Yali Wang, Mohamed Diaby, Wencheng Zong, Dan Shen, Saisai Wang, Cai Chen, Xiaoyan Wang and Chengyi Song* Abstracts Background: Tc1/mariner and Zator, as two superfamilies of IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm) group, have been well-defined. However, the molecular evolution and domestication of pogo transposons, once designated as an important family of the Tc1/mariner superfamily, are still poorly understood. Results: Here, phylogenetic analysis show that pogo transposases, together with Tc1/mariner,DD34E/Gambol,and Zator transposases form four distinct monophyletic clades with high bootstrap supports (> = 74%), suggesting that they are separate superfamilies of ITm group. The pogo superfamily represents high diversity with six distinct families (Passer, Tigger, pogoR, Lemi, Mover,andFot/Fot-like) and wide distribution with an expansion spanning across all the kingdoms of eukaryotes. It shows widespread occurrences in animals and fungi, but restricted taxonomic distribution in land plants. It has invaded almost all lineages of animals—even mammals—and has been domesticated repeatedly in vertebrates, with 12 genes, including centromere-associated protein B (CENPB), CENPB DNA-binding domain containing 1 (CENPBD1), Jrk helix–turn–helix protein (JRK), JRK like (JRKL), pogo transposable element derived with KRAB domain (POGK), and with ZNF domain (POGZ), and Tigger transposable element-derived 2 to 7 (TIGD2–7), deduced as originating from this superfamily. Two of them (JRKL and TIGD2) seem to have been co-domesticated, and the others represent independent domestication events.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrotransposon Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element1 (LINE1) Is
    The Japanese Society of Developmental Biologists Develop. Growth Differ. (2012) 54, 673–685 doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01368.x Original Article Retrotransposon long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) is activated during salamander limb regeneration Wei Zhu,1 Dwight Kuo,2 Jason Nathanson,3 Akira Satoh,4,5 Gerald M. Pao,1 Gene W. Yeo,3 Susan V. Bryant,5 S. Randal Voss,6 David M. Gardiner5*and Tony Hunter1* 1Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory and Laboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, Departments of 2Bioengineering and 3Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA; 4Okayama University, R.C.I.S. Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan; 5Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, and 6Department of Biology and Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA Salamanders possess an extraordinary capacity for tissue and organ regeneration when compared to mam- mals. In our effort to characterize the unique transcriptional fingerprint emerging during the early phase of sala- mander limb regeneration, we identified transcriptional activation of some germline-specific genes within the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) that is indicative of cellular reprogramming of differentiated cells into a germline-like state. In this work, we focus on one of these genes, the long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon, which is usually active in germ cells and silent in most of the somatic tissues in other organisms. LINE-1 was found to be dramatically upregulated during regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review On the Population Dynamics of Junk: A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements Yann Bourgeois and Stéphane Boissinot * New York University Abu Dhabi, P.O. 129188 Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 April 2019; Accepted: 21 May 2019; Published: 30 May 2019 Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) play an important role in shaping genomic organization and structure, and may cause dramatic changes in phenotypes. Despite the genetic load they may impose on their host and their importance in microevolutionary processes such as adaptation and speciation, the number of population genetics studies focused on TEs has been rather limited so far compared to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here, we review the current knowledge about the dynamics of transposable elements at recent evolutionary time scales, and discuss the mechanisms that condition their abundance and frequency. We first discuss non-adaptive mechanisms such as purifying selection and the variable rates of transposition and elimination, and then focus on positive and balancing selection, to finally conclude on the potential role of TEs in causing genomic incompatibilities and eventually speciation. We also suggest possible ways to better model TEs dynamics in a population genomics context by incorporating recent advances in TEs into the rich information provided by SNPs about the demography, selection, and intrinsic properties of genomes. Keywords: transposable elements; population genetics; selection; drift; coevolution 1. Introduction Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive DNA sequences that are ubiquitous in the living world and have the ability to replicate and multiply within genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Organization/ Human
    Genome Organization/ Secondary article Human Article Contents . Introduction David H Kass, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA . Sequence Complexity Mark A Batzer, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA . Single-copy Sequences . Repetitive Sequences . The human nuclear genome is a highly complex arrangement of two sets of 23 Macrosatellites, Minisatellites and Microsatellites . chromosomes, or DNA molecules. There are various types of DNA sequences and Gene Families . chromosomal arrangements, including single-copy protein-encoding genes, repetitive Gene Superfamilies . sequences and spacer DNA. Transposable Elements . Pseudogenes . Mitochondrial Genome Introduction . Genome Evolution . Acknowledgements The human nuclear genome contains 3000 million base pairs (bp) of DNA, of which only an estimated 3% possess protein-encoding sequences. As shown in Figure 1, the DNA sequences of the eukaryotic genome can be classified sequences such as the ribosomal RNA genes. Repetitive into several types, including single-copy protein-encoding sequences with no known function include the various genes, DNA that is present in more than one copy highly repeated satellite families, and the dispersed, (repetitive sequences) and intergenic (spacer) DNA. The moderately repeated transposable element families. The most complex of these are the repetitive sequences, some of remainder of the genome consists of spacer DNA, which is which are functional and some of which are without simply a broad category of undefined DNA sequences. function. Functional repetitive sequences are classified into The human nuclear genome consists of 23 pairs of dispersed and/or tandemly repeated gene families that chromosomes, or 46 DNA molecules, of differing sizes either encode proteins (and may include noncoding (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Transposable Element Annotation and Their Classification in the Light of Functional Genomics
    The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics -what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine? Peter Arensburger, Benoit Piegu, Yves Bigot To cite this version: Peter Arensburger, Benoit Piegu, Yves Bigot. The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from thefables of Jean de la Fontaine?. Mobile Genetic Elements, Taylor & Francis, 2016, 6 (6), pp.e1256852. 10.1080/2159256X.2016.1256852. hal-02385838 HAL Id: hal-02385838 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02385838 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine? Peter Arensburger1, Benoît Piégu2, and Yves Bigot2 1 Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768 - United States of America. 2 Physiologie de la reproduction et des Comportements, UMR INRA-CNRS 7247, PRC, 37380 Nouzilly – France Corresponding author address: Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768 - United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Horizontal Transfers of Four DNA Transposons in Invertebrates and Bats Zhou Tang1†, Hua-Hao Zhang2†, Ke Huang3, Xiao-Gu Zhang2, Min-Jin Han1 and Ze Zhang1*
    Tang et al. Mobile DNA (2015) 6:3 DOI 10.1186/s13100-014-0033-1 RESEARCH Open Access Repeated horizontal transfers of four DNA transposons in invertebrates and bats Zhou Tang1†, Hua-Hao Zhang2†, Ke Huang3, Xiao-Gu Zhang2, Min-Jin Han1 and Ze Zhang1* Abstract Background: Horizontal transfer (HT) of transposable elements (TEs) into a new genome is considered as an important force to drive genome variation and biological innovation. However, most of the HT of DNA transposons previously described occurred between closely related species or insects. Results: In this study, we carried out a detailed analysis of four DNA transposons, which were found in the first sequenced twisted-wing parasite, Mengenilla moldrzyki. Through the homology-based strategy, these transposons were also identified in other insects, freshwater planarian, hydrozoans, and bats. The phylogenetic distribution of these transposons was discontinuous, and they showed extremely high sequence identities (>87%) over their entire length in spite of their hosts diverging more than 300 million years ago (Mya). Additionally, phylogenies and comparisons of transposons versus orthologous gene identities demonstrated that these transposons have transferred into their hosts by independent HTs. Conclusions: Here, we provided the first documented example of HT of CACTA transposons, which have been so far extensively studied in plants. Our results demonstrated that bats had continuously acquired new DNA elements via HT. This implies that predation on a large quantity of insects might increase bat exposure to HT. In addition, parasite-host interaction might facilitate exchanging of their genetic materials. Keywords: Horizontal transfer, CACTA transposons, Mammals, Recent activity Background or isolated species.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Duplication History Under a Stochastic Model for Tandem Repeats Farzad Farnoud1* , Moshe Schwartz2 and Jehoshua Bruck3
    Farnoud et al. BMC Bioinformatics (2019) 20:64 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2603-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Estimation of duplication history under a stochastic model for tandem repeats Farzad Farnoud1* , Moshe Schwartz2 and Jehoshua Bruck3 Abstract Background: Tandem repeat sequences are common in the genomes of many organisms and are known to cause important phenomena such as gene silencing and rapid morphological changes. Due to the presence of multiple copies of the same pattern in tandem repeats and their high variability, they contain a wealth of information about the mutations that have led to their formation. The ability to extract this information can enhance our understanding of evolutionary mechanisms. Results: We present a stochastic model for the formation of tandem repeats via tandem duplication and substitution mutations. Based on the analysis of this model, we develop a method for estimating the relative mutation rates of duplications and substitutions, as well as the total number of mutations, in the history of a tandem repeat sequence. We validate our estimation method via Monte Carlo simulation and show that it outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm for discovering the duplication history. We also apply our method to tandem repeat sequences in the human genome, where it demonstrates the different behaviors of micro- and mini-satellites and can be used to compare mutation rates across chromosomes. It is observed that chromosomes that exhibit the highest mutation activity in tandem repeat regions are the same as those thought to have the highest overall mutation rates. However, unlike previous works that rely on comparing human and chimpanzee genomes to measure mutation rates, the proposed method allows us to find chromosomes with the highest mutation activity based on a single genome, in essence by comparing (approximate) copies of the pattern in tandem repeats.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Comparison of Closely Related Giant Viruses Supports an Accordion-Like Model of Evolution
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 16 June 2015 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00593 Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution Jonathan Filée * Laboratoire Evolution, Génome, Comportement, Ecologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 9191, IRD UMR 247, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France Genome gigantism occurs so far in Phycodnaviridae and Mimiviridae (order Megavirales). Origin and evolution of these Giant Viruses (GVs) remain open questions. Interestingly, availability of a collection of closely related GV genomes enabling genomic comparisons offer the opportunity to better understand the different evolutionary forces acting on these genomes. Whole genome alignment for five groups of viruses belonging to the Mimiviridae and Phycodnaviridae families show that there is no trend of genome expansion or general tendency of genome contraction. Instead, GV genomes accumulated genomic mutations over the time with gene gains compensating the Edited by: different losses. In addition, each lineage displays specific patterns of genome evolution. Bernard La Scola, Mimiviridae (megaviruses and mimiviruses) and Chlorella Phycodnaviruses evolved Aix Marseille Université, France mainly by duplications and losses of genes belonging to large paralogous families Reviewed by: (including movements of diverse mobiles genetic elements), whereas Micromonas and Dahlene N. Fusco, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA Ostreococcus Phycodnaviruses derive most of their genetic novelties thought lateral Philippe Colson, gene transfers. Taken together, these data support an accordion-like model of evolution Aix-Marseille Université, France in which GV genomes have undergone successive steps of gene gain and gene loss, *Correspondence: Jonathan Filée, accrediting the hypothesis that genome gigantism appears early, before the diversification Laboratoire Evolution, Génome, of the different GV lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Repeatmaskedgenomes
    Kojima Mobile DNA (2018) 9:2 DOI 10.1186/s13100-017-0107-y REVIEW Open Access Human transposable elements in Repbase: genomic footprints from fish to humans Kenji K. Kojima1,2 Abstract Repbase is a comprehensive database of eukaryotic transposable elements (TEs) and repeat sequences, containing over 1300 human repeat sequences. Recent analyses of these repeat sequences have accumulated evidences for their contribution to human evolution through becoming functional elements, such as protein-coding regions or binding sites of transcriptional regulators. However, resolving the origins of repeat sequences is a challenge, due to their age, divergence, and degradation. Ancient repeats have been continuously classified as TEs by finding similar TEs from other organisms. Here, the most comprehensive picture of human repeat sequences is presented. The human genome contains traces of 10 clades (L1, CR1, L2, Crack, RTE, RTEX, R4, Vingi, Tx1 and Penelope) of non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons (long interspersed elements, LINEs), 3 types (SINE1/7SL, SINE2/tRNA, and SINE3/5S) of short interspersed elements (SINEs), 1 composite retrotransposon (SVA) family, 5 classes (ERV1, ERV2, ERV3, Gypsy and DIRS) of LTR retrotransposons, and 12 superfamilies (Crypton, Ginger1, Harbinger, hAT, Helitron, Kolobok, Mariner, Merlin, MuDR, P, piggyBac and Transib) of DNA transposons. These TE footprints demonstrate an evolutionary continuum of the human genome. Keywords: Human repeat, Transposable elements, Repbase, Non-LTR retrotransposons, LTR retrotransposons, DNA transposons, SINE, Crypton, MER, UCON Background contrast, MER4 was revealed to be comprised of LTRs of Repbase and conserved noncoding elements endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) [1]. Right now, Repbase Repbase is now one of the most comprehensive data- keeps MER1 to MER136, some of which are further bases of eukaryotic transposable elements and repeats divided into several subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrachromosomal Element Capture and the Evolution of Multiple Replication Origins in Archaeal Chromosomes
    Extrachromosomal element capture and the evolution of multiple replication origins in archaeal chromosomes Nicholas P. Robinson† and Stephen D. Bell† Medical Research Council Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison Medical Research Council Research Center, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, United Kingdom Edited by Carl R. Woese, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved February 15, 2007 (received for review January 9, 2007) In all three domains of life, DNA replication begins at specialized Orc2–6 act to recruit MCM to origins of replication in a reaction loci termed replication origins. In bacteria, replication initiates from that absolutely requires an additional factor, Cdt1 (6). Although a single, clearly defined site. In contrast, eukaryotic organisms archaea possess orthologs of Orc1, Cdc6, and MCM, no archaeal exploit a multitude of replication origins, dividing their genomes homolog of Cdt1 has yet been identified. into an array of short contiguous units. Recently, the multiple In the current work, we reveal that Aeropyrum pernix has at replication origin paradigm has also been demonstrated within the least two replication origins, indicating that the multiple repli- archaeal domain of life, with the discovery that the hyperthermo- cation origin paradigm is not restricted to the Sulfolobus genus. philic archaeon Sulfolobus has three replication origins. However, Comparison of the A. pernix and Sulfolobus origins reveals a clear the evolutionary mechanism driving the progression from single to relationship between these loci. Further, analyses of the gene multiple origin usage remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that order and identity in the environment of the origins provides Aeropyrum pernix, a distant relative of Sulfolobus, has two origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA Duplication, Recombination, and Introgression During Interspecific Hybridization
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mitochondrial DNA duplication, recombination, and introgression during interspecifc hybridization Silvia Bágeľová Poláková1,5, Žaneta Lichtner1, Tomáš Szemes2,3,4, Martina Smolejová1 & Pavol Sulo1* mtDNA recombination events in yeasts are known, but altered mitochondrial genomes were not completed. Therefore, we analyzed recombined mtDNAs in six Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces paradoxus hybrids in detail. Assembled molecules contain mostly segments with variable length introgressed to other mtDNA. All recombination sites are in the vicinity of the mobile elements, introns in cox1, cob genes and free standing ORF1, ORF4. The transplaced regions involve co-converted proximal exon regions. Thus, these selfsh elements are benefcial to the host if the mother molecule is challenged with another molecule for transmission to the progeny. They trigger mtDNA recombination ensuring the transfer of adjacent regions, into the progeny of recombinant molecules. The recombination of the large segments may result in mitotically stable duplication of several genes. Hybrids between Saccharomyces species occur frequently in nature as a number of hybrids have been reported among wine and beer strains1–6. Most lager beer strains are hybrids between S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus, combining the ability to produce ethanol with cryotolerance 6–8. Some S. cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii strains are associated with beer, but most of them are associated with wine, where they provide unique favor8,9. S. eubayanus and S. uvarum hybrids have been associated with sparkling wine, cider fermentation, and, in some cases, with the production of of-favors in breweries 8,10,11. Interspecifc hybrids among Saccharomyces species can also be readily obtained in the laboratory 9,12–14.
    [Show full text]