The Case for Meek for STV in Scotland David Hill number of active votes. This reduced quota
[email protected] then applies to all candidates, and those already elected get new surpluses to be transferred. Abstract Those who support any particular version of Using the votes in the STV a voting procedure, rather than an alternative elections for local government in version, are always under a slight disadvantage Glasgow in 2007, this paper argues in trying to prove their point, in that if short that the voters’ wishes would have simple examples are presented showing their been better met, in two wards, if preferred method to be superior, they are told Meek’s method had been specified that those examples are too artificial and that for making the count. The results in real votes are quite different. While it is true the other 19 wards would not have that we must never take such artificial examples been changed. too seriously, they nevertheless can be useful in showing where and how things can go wrong in Keywords: Glasgow, Gregory method, rival systems. If, on the other hand, real results Meek method, Scotland, STV, WIGM are presented, the information is usually voluminous, making it difficult to show in detail what is happening. What is more, real 1 Introduction voting patterns are, quite often, regarded as confidential information, not to be published, Articles about STV in Scotland by Curtice [2] while such result sheets as are published are and by Gilmour [3] are both informative and useless for detailed analysis. interesting, but it is disappointing that neither In the present instance the data for the 21 of them gives any indication of how and why wards for local government within the City of the particular form of STV now used in Glasgow in 2007 have been published in full Scotland, the Weighted Inclusive Gregory [1] and, as those results are public knowledge, Method, known as WIGM [7], was chosen.