DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index STRENGTHENING STRENGTHENING CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY GLOBALLY GLOBALLY 2017 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND EURASIA 21st EDITION - SEPTEMBER 2018 2017 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND EURASIA 21st EDITION - SEPTEMBER 2018 Developed by: United States Agency for International Development Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance In Partnership With: FHI 360 International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) Acknowledgment: This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-LA-17-00003. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the panelists and other project researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or FHI 360. Cover Photo: Social Weekend’s Hackathon gathers 300 people to develop public benefit ideas (February 2017). The Hackathon was organized by Social Weekend - the largest contest of projects to attract motivated professionals from different fields to develop ideas useful to society. Photo Credit: USAID/Belarus TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2017 CSO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX Albania ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Armenia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Azerbaijan ................................................................................................................................................................................ 29 Belarus ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) ........................................................................................................................................ 47 Bulgaria ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Croatia ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 64 Czech Republic ...................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Estonia ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 81 Georgia ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 89 Hungary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 96 Kosovo .................................................................................................................................................................................... 106 Latvia ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 114 Lithuania ................................................................................................................................................................................. 123 Macedonia ............................................................................................................................................................................. 133 Moldova ................................................................................................................................................................................. 142 Montenegro ......................................................................................................................................................................... 151 Poland ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 160 Romania ................................................................................................................................................................................. 170 Russia ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 179 Serbia ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 191 Slovakia ................................................................................................................................................................................... 201 Slovenia .................................................................................................................................................................................. 210 Ukraine ................................................................................................................................................................................... 219 ANNEX A: CSO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 229 ANNEX B: STATISTICAL DATA ....................................................................................................................... 249 ANNEX C: REGIONAL MAP ............................................................................................................................ 252 The 2017 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia D The 2017 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia INTRODUCTION The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is pleased to present the twenty-first edition of the CSO Sustainability Index (CSOSI) for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, covering developments in 2017. In 2017, USAID reaffirmed its commitment to working with a diverse array of partners, including civil society, to advance the principles of self-reliance and locally-sustained development. The CSOSI provides a comprehensive assessment of the capacity of civil society to serve as both a short-term partner in implementing development solutions and a long-term actor in ensuring development outcomes are sustained. The CSOSI empowers local civil society to collectively assess not only the environment in which they are operating, but also their own capacities to advocate, operate sustainably and communicate with citizens. Allowing local civil society to self- identify their development challenges is the first step in promoting resiliency and long-term self-reliance. This year’s Index reports on the state of CSO sectors in twenty-four countries in the region, from the Baltics in the north to the Caucasus in the south, and the Visegrad countries in the west to Russia, which stretches east to the Pacific Ocean. It addresses both advances and setbacks in seven key components or “dimensions” of the sustainability of the civil society sector: legal environment, organizational capacity, financial viability, advocacy, service provision, sectoral infrastructure, and public image. The Index is intended to be a useful source of information for local CSOs, governments, donors, academics, and others who want to better understand and monitor key aspects of sustainability in the CSO sector. The Index’s methodology relies on CSO practitioners and researchers, who in each country form an expert panel to assess and rate these dimensions of CSO sustainability during the year. The panel agrees on a score for each dimension, which can range from 1 (most developed) to 7 (most challenged). The dimension scores are then averaged to produce an overall sustainability score for the CSO sector of a given country. A DC-based Editorial Committee composed of technical and regional experts reviews each panel’s scores and the corresponding narrative reports, with the aim of maintaining consistent approaches and standards so as to facilitate cross-country comparisons. Further details about the methodology used to calculate scores and produce narrative reports are provided in Annex A. The CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia complements similar publications covering other regions: the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Trydiy FMO 2016.Indd
    ISSN 2219-2085 БЕЛОРУССКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ТРУДЫ ФАКУЛЬТЕТА МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ Научный сборник Основан в 2010 году Выпуск VII МИНСК БГУ 2016 УДК 3(062.522)(082) Представлены научные статьи ведущих ученых факультета международных отношений Бело- русского государственного университета, в которых рассматриваются международные отношения и внешняя политика, международное право, мировые экономические процессы, межкультурная ком- муникация. Редакционная коллегия : доктор исторических наук, профессор В. Г. Шадурский (главный редактор); доктор исторических наук, доцент Л. М. Гайдукевич; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. А. Розанов; доктор исторических наук, профессор В. Е. Снапковский; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. А. Челядинский; доктор исторических наук, профессор А. В. Шарапо; кандидат исторических наук, доцент В. А. Острога; кандидат исторических наук, доцент А. В. Русакович; кандидат исторических наук А. В. Селиванов; доктор юридических наук, профессор С. А. Балашенко; доктор юридических наук, профессор Ю. П. Бровка; доктор юридических наук, профессор М. Ф. Чудаков; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Е. В. Бабкина; кандидат юридических наук, доцент А. Е. Вашкевич; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Е. Б. Леанович; кандидат юридических наук, доцент Ю. А. Лепешков; доктор экономических наук, доцент Е. Л. Давыденко; доктор экономических наук, профессор А. В. Данильченко; доктор экономических наук, профессор С. Ю. Солодовников; доктор экономических наук, профессор А. Е. Дайнеко; кандидат экономических наук, доцент
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Monitoring of Human Rights Center “Viasna” Concerning Tortures and Facts of Other Kinds of Inhumane Treatment Towards Citizens of Belarus
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2004 PREAMBLE: CONCLUSIONS AND GENERALIZATIONS In 2004 the political situation in Belarus was distinguished by further worsening of the situation of human rights and the relations between the state and individuals. Regular and deliberate human rights violations became a necessary condition for the strengthening of the unlimited dictatorial power – infringements of human rights served as the funda¬ment for authoritarianism and were a favorable environment for the development of totalitarianism. One of the main factors that influenced the public and political situation in Belarus in 2004 was the Parliamentary election and the nationwide referendum concerning the possibility to prolong Aliaksandr Luka¬shenka’s presidential powers. The need for the liquidation of the cons¬ti¬tutional restriction of the number of possible presidential terms defined the state policy and influenced it in all circles of public life. This factor ma¬nifested in the sphere of human rights with the aggravation of the rep¬ressions against political opponents and prosecution of opposition-mindedness, enforcement of new discriminative legal acts, further limitation of the freedom of the press, violation of the liberty of peaceful assemblies and associations and other obstacles for the enjoyment of personal liberties by citizens of Belarus. Citizens of Belarus were deprived of the right to take part in the state government with the assistance of elected representatives. The election to the Chamber of Representatives wasn’t free and democratic. It was conducted according to the scenario that was prepared by the authorities in complete conformity with the “wishes” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Observation Guide
    ELECTION OBSERVATION GUIDE Prepared by the Republican Liberal Youth Organization «Civil Forum» on the basis of reports of its own observers What? Where? When? November 12 - 17, 2019 - date of elections (including early elections) in the House of Representatives of the 7th convocation of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus Based on the elections, 110 deputies were elected in the Lower House of the Belarusian Parliament "Civil Forum" in the elections The authorities recognized the elections «Civil Forum» participated in 2 components as valid. OSCE did not recognize in the parliamentary elections: election results Candidates for deputies. The organization nominated 1 candidate for deputy, the head of the largest media community of the Mogilev region (Mogilev Live) Alexander Irkho. The candidate was not elected to parliament. In addition, 12 independent candidates were trained at the organization’s trainings. - Observers: more than 20 observers from Civil Forum worked in polling stations in 4 cities of the country 77,22% , 3% more than in 2016 Turnout 11 representatives of the Communist Party 6 - from the Republican Party of Labor and Justice 2 - from the Patriotic Party 1 - from the Agrarian Party 1 - from the Liberal Democratic Party Parties in Parliament 89 - non-party Not a single candidate from independent forces or opposition parties has been elected Mogilev Central District №85, polling station №25 Reported offences: 1. Observers did not see 50% of the vote count. 2. The doors of the counting room were not closed during the procedure. After 20:00, strangers entered the hall. 3. Members of the commission stacked ballots in different piles, but they did not provide access to them for observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 No. 159 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was The community came together during per, who has been selected by the Ken- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- that flood, and I know they will once tucky Family Medicine as the State’s pore (Mr. MCGOVERN). again unite to tackle this tremendous top, young doctor. She is a native of f challenge. Russell County and a graduate of the Casey County is a resilient commu- University of Kentucky College of Med- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO nity where people look out for each icine. For the past 3 years, she has TEMPORE other and help their neighbors in times practiced medicine in Russell County. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- of need. As they continue to weather Dr. Cooper will receive the award at a fore the House the following commu- this challenge, I would like to encour- ceremony in Louisville on September nication from the Speaker: age anyone in or around Casey County 25. WASHINGTON, DC, to reach out to my office for any as- Mr. Speaker, I join with everyone in September 15, 2020. sistance they may need moving for- Russell County and throughout the I hereby appoint the Honorable JAMES P. ward. Commonwealth in honoring her on this MCGOVERN to act as Speaker pro tempore on HONORING TOMMY WILLETT outstanding statewide achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Reversing Privatization and Re-Nationalizing Pensions in Hungary
    ESS – Extension of Social Security Reversing Privatization and Re-Nationalizing Pensions in Hungary Dorottya Szikra ESS – Working Paper No. 66 Social Protection Department INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2018 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ISSN 1020-9581; 1020-959X (web pdf) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary Must Provide Space for Civil Society
    Hungary must provide space for civil society No. 1-2016 Hungarian authorities have orchestrated a crack-down on human rights groups unprecedented since the end of the communist era. Alongside Russia, Uganda, Ecuador and China, Hungary sticks out as the only member country of the European Union which puts undue pressure on human rights groups. Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has repeated a Putin-inspired idea of monitoring foreign-funded civil society organizations, described by state authorities as “agents of foreign powers”. This Policy Paper argues that Hungary should reconsider its policies, which are hurting not only the country’s international image, but also have negative consequences at home. Worldwide, the trend is well-known: A large number of countries pass restrictive laws and make the operations of civil society organisations difficult. Over the past three years, more than 60 countries have introduced legislation that place restrictions on non-governmental and civil society organisations. 1 More surprising is that a member state of the EU is entering the club of states that restrict the space of civil society. In the same speech in which Prime Minister Orbán described foreign-funded organizations as foreign agents, he made it clear that the government is now openly embracing the characteristics of an illiberal state. 2 A democratic state does not necessarily have to be liberal, according to the Prime Minister. Liberal values, in particular a concept of freedom which implies that the individual can do whatever s-/he wants, as long as s-/he does not infringe on the freedom of others, “today incorporate corruption, sex and violence”.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS I 1960-2013
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2013 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2013 Klaus Armingeon, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2013 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institu- tional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Hand- lungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member coun- tries for the period of 1960 to 2013. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time- series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Com- position 1960-2013”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and eco- nomic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ESCTD Report
    ECONOMICS AND SECURITY COMMITTEE (ESC) Sub-Committee on Transition and Development (ESCTD) BELARUS: POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND DIPLOMATIC CHALLENGES Preliminary Draft Report Michal SZCZERBA (Poland) Rapporteur 019 ESCTD 21 E | Original: English | 16 April 2020 Founded in 1955, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly acts as a consultative interparliamentary organisation which is institutionally separate from NATO. This working document only represents the views of the Rapporteur until it has been adopted by the Economics and Security Committee. It is based on information from publicly available sources or NATO PA meetings – which are all unclassified. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: THE EMERGENCE OF A BELARUSIAN STATE .................................. 1 II. A HYBRID AND HIGHLY POLITICISED ECONOMIC MODEL .......................................... 2 III. BELARUSIAN IDENTITY ................................................................................................... 3 IV. THE 2020 ELECTIONS ..................................................................................................... 4 V. THE BELARUSIAN POLITICAL OPPOSITION, MASS DEMONSTRATIONS AND THE LEADING ROLE PLAYED BY WOMEN ..................................................................... 5 VI. GEOPOLITICS, THE BELARUSIAN DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT AND RUSSIA .............. 8 VII. THE ENERGY CARD AND THE UNION STATE ............................................................... 9 VIII. RUSSIA AND THE 2020 BELARUSIAN PROTESTS ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS III 1990-2012
    Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET III 1990-2012 Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012 is a collection of political and institutional data. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for a group of 36 OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period 1990-20121. The data are primarily from the data set created at the University of Berne, Institute of Political Science and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation: The Comparative Political Data Set I (CPDS I). However, the present data set differs in several aspects from the CPDS I dataset. Compared to CPDS I Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus (Greek part), Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia have been added. The present data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time series analyses. The data set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD. For trade union membership, excellent data for European trade unions is provided by Jelle Visser (2013). When using the data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. This data set is to be cited as: Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler. 2014. Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Last updated: 2014-09-30 1 Data for former communist countries begin in 1990 for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Lativa and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Hungary
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 11 April 2010 OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Report Warsaw 9 August 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................. 2 III. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................... 3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK........................................................................................................................ 3 A. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 3 B. SUFFRAGE ................................................................................................................................................. 4 C. SECRECY OF THE VOTE ........................................................................................................................... 5 V. ELECTORAL SYSTEM............................................................................................................................. 5 A. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 5 B. EQUALITY OF THE VOTE .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Krisztina Hetyesi
    AALBORG UNIVERSITY If you come to Hungary… Hungarian Civil Society Initiatives in the wake of the influx of refugees Krisztina Hetyési Master Thesis, Global Refugee Studies, Department of Political Science, Fall 2016 Supervisor: Michael Alexander Ulfstjerne Abstract In 2015, an unexpected influx of migrants arrived in Hungary which resulted in various measures by the government and the mainly negative discourse on the migrants in the Hungarian media. However, despite the Government’s anti-immigration campaign, a small segment of the Hungarian society understood the need of these people and joined forces to provide aid. Facebook-based volunteer grassroots groups emerged and provided street-based social aid which was – unlike in many other European countries – a fairly new phenomenon in Hungary. This thesis analyses the emergence and nature of these volunteer-based grassroots groups in Hungary, as well as their operation, motivations, and relation to other stakeholders. As a method, this thesis uses case study and document analysis together with several theories. The collected data consists of online sources, such as information collected from web pages and Facebook pages of the grassroots groups and online newspaper articles. The data from documents is organized into major themes, categories, and case examples through content analysis followed by thematic analysis, which implies a careful, more focused re-reading, review, and interpretation of the data. The analysis consists of three parts. The first part examines the organizational structure and positioning of the grassroots groups by applying the New Social Movements (NSMs) approach. The second part investigates the underlying motivational drivers of volunteers to engage in providing street-based assistance to migrants by applying a modified multifactor model, the Volunteer Motivation Inventory (VMI).
    [Show full text]