Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning EIS CHAPTER 8: URBAN DESIGN and VISUAL RESOURCES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning EIS CHAPTER 8: URBAN DESIGN and VISUAL RESOURCES Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning EIS CHAPTER 8: URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES A. INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an assessment of the potential impacts on urban design and visual resources that could result from the proposed action. As described in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” the proposed action includes zoning map and zoning text amendments, street demapping, and park mapping in an area spanning 184 blocks in the Greenpoint and Williamsburg sections of Brooklyn. The proposed action would result in substantial amounts of new above-ground development by 2013 with urban design characteristics different from those currently attributed to the project area and located within areas containing resources of visual significance. Given the above conditions, an analysis of urban design and visual resources is therefore appropriate as per the guidelines of the CEQR Technical Manual. For purposes of analysis, the urban design and visual resources study area is coterminous with the study area used for the analysis in Chapter 2, “Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy,” delineated by a ½-mile radius around the proposed action area. Together, the urban design components and visual resources of an area define the distinctive identity of a neighborhood. As stipulated by CEQR, the analysis of urban design will assess the effects of the proposed action on those attributes that constitute the physical appearance of buildings and streets in the study area. These attributes include building bulk, use, and type; building arrangement; block form and street pattern; streetscape elements; street hierarchy; and natural features. The concept of bulk is created by the size of a building and the way it is massed on a site. Height, length, and width define a building’s size; volume, shape, setbacks, lot coverage, and density define its mass. The analysis of visual resources provided in this chapter will assess the effects of the proposed action on the study area’s visual resources, which are its unique or important public view corridors, vistas, or natural or built features. Waterfront views, public parks, landmarked structures, landmarked districts, and natural resources are examples of visual resources. As per the guidelines of CEQR, only views of visual resources from public and publicly accessible locations will be assessed. The proposed action would alter the urban design of the study area, yielding significant, but not adverse, changes along the waterfront and nearby upland areas. The introduction of medium-density residential uses along the waterfront would result in appreciable differences in building bulk, height, and scale when compared to the low-density structures and open lots of varied condition that are presently characteristic of the industrial waterfront and that are expected to remain in the future without the proposed action. The introduction of new parkland, a waterfront promenade,streetscape improvements, and ground-floor retail use that would accompany development would extend corridors of activity from upland areas to the currently desolate waterfront, fundamentally transforming the way in which the waterfront spaces are used and how they connect to upland areas. Zoning changes in the upland areas would maintain existing trends of nonconforming use but are not anticipated to significantly alter the streetscapes, given proposed contextual zoning controls which would require new buildings to maintain streetwalls and similar height to existing structures. Waterfront zoning would also ensure a sensitive transition of bulk and scale as the waterfront areas interface with the upland neighborhoods. 8-1 Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning EIS Chapter 8: Urban Design and Visual Resources The proposed action is also not expected create a significant adverse impact upon visual resources as it is anticipated to improve the visual quality of the proposed action area through the replacement of dilapidated, and often vacant, lots and structures with new and more active uses. The proposed Waterfront Access Plan (WAP), which is included in the proposed action, would maintain, improve, and open additional significant visual and access corridors to the waterfront. Although the addition of new buildings along the waterfront would preclude skyward views at certain vantage points, the development controls of waterfront zoning and the proposed zoning text changes would provide new and unencumbered public views and vantage points for pedestrians at the water’s edge, where closed streets and lots along the waterfront do not allow public access today. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS Urban Design Overview The primary study area is contiguous with the proposed action area, an approximately 184-block area bounded roughly by the East River, the Williamsburg Bridge, the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, and McGuinness Boulevard. For the assessment of urban design, the proposed action area has been divided into three sub-areas: the waterfront, Upland Greenpoint, and Upland Williamsburg, as shown in Figure 8-1. The secondary study area, which extends a half-mile radius from the proposed action area, contains all or part of 612 blocks that span Greenpoint and Williamsburg. The secondary study area has been roughly divided into six sub-areas: Central Greenpoint, Northeast Greenpoint, the Williamsburg waterfront, Northside, Southside/South Williamsburg, and Eastern Williamsburg. These areas are identified in Figure 8-2. The secondary study area is comprised of several grids of blocks that intersect or change orientation at features such as elevated roadways, service roads, parks, and large industrial/manufacturing or residential complexes. The majority of the blocks in the secondary study area are rectangular in form, while blocks that have tapered to triangular or trapezoidal forms often appear when grids meet or are reoriented around features such as parks or bridges. Lots are also typically rectangular, and buildings in the study area are generally oriented parallel to street lines. Figure 8-3 illustrates the street hierarchy in the study area, which includes the BQE (I-278), a federal interstate highway; several major north-south and east-west avenues, many of which connect with the BQE; and a system of smaller one-way local streets, running roughly east-west. Though mapped, many streets connecting to the East River waterfront are blocked by fences or street closures created at and around industrial properties, which often span several blocks. Elevated roadways, including a segment of McGuinness Boulevard, the Williamsburg Bridge, and the BQE, slash through the urban fabric of the study area, creating punctuations between neighborhoods with their large size and their accompanying service roads, which generally contain light-industrial and automotive-oriented uses. The urban form of the proposed action area varies widely and can be correlated to building’s original use and proximity to the historically industrial waterfront. Buildings formerly or currently catering to industrial and manufacturing uses are concentrated in areas within roughly two blocks of the East River 8-2 K E E V R A C R E N K W E E AV O M ICK T VAR W E N VA Figure 8-1 TVARICK ST S AV ER T R RT V T V A S O T P N E V S E GA E L A R S T T O K T A M M O S A W S N C G T T N H Y A O W S R G S T N N DAM S A VA C T E E D T M A V E T A O N S S N A I S G L J G A S T R S T O N V T S L O M A T R D T L E U S R I S I N O E S T K D S S I O E O V E L C R A K M R E T T D E E C L N N D B R T S T P R H A P T B V S G M R M R E A R A A E S B R S T T G O V O I I E J N BO U A R G L T APO LO ST A S O R I Y K O R V O W S G H I T R L E D M E C V C F S E S Y E R I I V A A O N M N A M D A V R G T R B S I E R MO HIT A B W O D E E H M T K S N T E K HAUSMA S B N EE T I R E R O C T E N H OW T N L A T E C V W E S N V A M A V N A T E A O OIS G N EV I B DE R N MORG I O MORGAN AV AN AV A H P H S N S ´ T U S E V E A V L LI SE O E OI BEV F R DE G SUTTON ST SUTTON ST T V L Feet S P A ICK T W T H R T H S T V GRANDPARENTS AV S U S B KING L D AV T E S AN KINGSLA S N D A D AV S V R S Y E D D T A N N T L P N R V N N V S I O A A T O S N E A A O A S L S T T P A C S S A Y S R E W D R G R N K D R G D M O U N M J G E O A E N C R ST E O I MONITO R MONITOR ST MONIT L H O K R ST P K W A B L M H A BUSHWICK AV E I J T R R R E H K O E V V V O M C N S I H A A A N R T S U V N E RY N HENRY ST N HENRY ST K A H N ST R C A V I G W Y H E S S A L U G B A I S W G N E A R A P C N L D X K N E E O E E R R RUSSELL ST S UMBOLDT ST HUMBOLOT ST HUMBOLDT ST C RUSSELL ST H E N T E L S S E A H E E T W U M R V Q E - A B LDT ST N HUMBOLDT ST UMBO R H R Y V E E L A K H K S E O N D T V V E T T K L O A S A B M AVE OF PUERTO RICO T S R S V T VIA VESPUCCI GV RAHAM AV T GRAHAM AV I T T T S T S A T B S A S E S A T L E S E E I S T E S S T R E I T S T T N N T S L L T S S N I O U T EE N L N S O I Y T S S N S S S O M M S O U E S P B A O L R S S E G L R R O U R L R R T E B D T S E O E C N M T I E K R E D E S T I R M S O E J E N L O S S N R K R H K G O A O C N E S L U W H I O A T V R N T A H I N _ S T C O O E O O L I C A E C E Y R O E R E A O 0 W O K O A C E B A S S M F V M M J P M 3 D J N T M G W M S J C AV B HAM W A E W GR V MANHATTAN AV MANHATTAN AV N A ST N O ND TA 250 V MO T IA AT A PROVOST ST D H E ECKFORD ST AN W G M 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 D E I ST A L E T T W P E N S N S T T T S T N N T E NARD ST S L O T S LE LEONARD ST LEONARD ST T L ONARD T S T S A O S T B O S S Y S R N S S N E N S H M K E N T T IN W O E A A U D E L O C I G N P E R C V E M R Y P G X D E R U A E A R E U A N
Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York
    BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: Tina Fortugno, RPA Zachary J. Davis, RPA Deborah Van Steen The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) is seeking discretionary actions in order to facilitate the redevelopment of a nine-block area known as Broadway Triangle, located in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The Proposed Action includes zoning map amendments to generally rezone the existing M1-2 Manufacturing District to Residential and Commercial Districts; zoning text amendments to establish Inclusionary Housing in the proposed R6A and R7A zoning districts; the disposition of City-owned properties; Urban Development Action Area Projects designation; the modification of an Urban Renewal Plan; and City Acquisition through eminent domain. The Project Area encompasses approximately 31 acres and is generally bounded by Flushing Avenue to the south, Throop Avenue to the east, Lynch Street to the north, and Union Avenue, Walton Street, and Harrison Avenue to the west. As part of this action, the HPD is undertaking an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project. Consideration for cultural resources, including both archaeological and historic architectural resources, must be undertaken as part of the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) process.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Guide to the Department of Youth and Community Development Will Be Updating This Guide Regularly
    NYC2015 Youth Guide to The Department of Youth and Community Development will be updating this guide regularly. Please check back with us to see the latest additions. Have a safe and fun Summer! For additional information please call Youth Connect at 1.800.246.4646 T H E C I T Y O F N EW Y O RK O FFI CE O F T H E M AYOR N EW Y O RK , NY 10007 Summer 2015 Dear Friends: I am delighted to share with you the 2015 edition of the New York City Youth Guide to Summer Fun. There is no season quite like summer in the City! Across the five boroughs, there are endless opportunities for creation, relaxation and learning, and thanks to the efforts of the Department of Youth and Community Development and its partners, this guide will help neighbors and visitors from all walks of life savor the full flavor of the city and plan their family’s fun in the sun. Whether hitting the beach or watching an outdoor movie, dancing under the stars or enjoying a puppet show, exploring the zoo or sketching the skyline, attending library read-alouds or playing chess, New Yorkers are sure to make lasting memories this July and August as they discover a newfound appreciation for their diverse and vibrant home. My administration is committed to ensuring that all 8.5 million New Yorkers can enjoy and contribute to the creative energy of our city. This terrific resource not only helps us achieve that important goal, but also sustains our status as a hub of culture and entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2018 There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn Sara Martucci The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2642 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THERE’S NOTHING HERE: TENURE, ATTACHMENT, AND CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF GENTRIFYING WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN by SARA MARTUCCI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 SARA MARTUCCI All Rights Reserved ii There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn by Sara Martucci This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Professor Philip Kasinitz Chair of Examining Committee Date Professor Lynn Chancer Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Professor John Mollenkopf Professor Jason Patch Professor Sharon Zukin THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn by Sara Martucci Depending on the audience, the term “gentrification” conjures images of pristine condos, fancy restaurants, dive bars full of hipsters, or eviction notices.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Council of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation
    New York State Council of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Letter from the Chair 1 State Council of Parks Members 3 Priorities for 2008 4 NYS Parks and Historic Sites Overview 5 2008-09 FY Budget Recommendations 7 Capital Investment Needs 9 Achievements of Parks & Historic Site in 2007 13 State Board of Historic Preservation 19 Statewide Initiatives 20 Appendix 21 2007 ANNUAL REPORT Eliot Spitzer Governor Carol Ash Commissioner New York State Council of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Lucy R. Waletzky, M.D. State Council Chair November 2007 1 Dear Governor Spitzer: Greetings from the State Council of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The Council comprises the Chairs of the eleven Regional Park Commissions, the Chair of the State Board for Historic Preservation, and the Commissioners of State Parks and Environmental Conservation. We are very happy to submit to you the State Council of Parks’ 2007 Annual Report. The report describes the State Council’s priorities for 2008, highlights the Office of Parks, Recre- ation and Historic Preservation’s achievements over the past year, and sets forth recommenda- tions for improving the stewardship of New York’s 213 State Parks and Historic Sites which have nearly 60 million yearly visitors. While New York’s State parks face many challenges and opportunities, one issue is paramount: the state park system has suffered from decades of underinvestment, with the result that the parks have developed a $650 million backlog of urgent capital projects. These include health and safety concerns (outdated sewage treatment, water supply, and electrical systems; improperly closed landfills; underground tanks; and aging dams); pressing rehabilitation needs (deteriorated campgrounds, bathhouses, swimming pools, recreation facilities, historic structures, nature centers, roads, bridges, and boat launches); provision of public access to newly acquired parks; and natural resource stewardship projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarren Park Uart­ View All Monuments in NYC Parks, As Well As Temporary Public Art Installations on Our NYC Public Art Map and Guide I Map)
    BOARD MEETING AFFIRMATION OF NEW MEMBERS Chairperson Ms. Fuller requested the new members to come forward to be affirmed. Mr. Solomon Green, Ms. Dana Rachlin, Mr. Michael Gary Schlesinger ROLL CALL Chairperson Ms. Fuller requested District Manager Mr. Esposito to call the roll. He informed the Chairperson that there were 39 members present, a sufficient quorum to call the meeting to order. MOMENT OF SILENCE Chairperson Ms. Fuller called for a moment of silence dedicated to Mr. Weidberg and his family, for the passing of Mr. Weidberg’s brother. ELECTIONS At 8:00 PM, Chairperson Ms. Fuller announced that it was time for elections. She requested the Elections Committee members [Ms. Barros; Ms. Foster; Mr. Torres] to come forward. Ballots were distributed and collected. The meeting continued while the Elections Committee convened in the other room to count the ballots. The committee reported the following regarding the elections: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE POSITION CANDIDATE TALLY OF VOTES Chairperson Dealice Fuller 38 votes __________________________________________________________________________________ First Vice Chairperson Simon Weiser 23 votes. Karen Nieves 14 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Second Vice Chairperson Del Teague 38 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Third Vice Chairperson Stephen J. Weidberg 38 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Financial Secretary Maria Viera
    [Show full text]
  • LPC Designation Report for South Village Historic District
    South Village Historic District Designation Report December 17, 2013 Cover Photographs: 200 and 202 Bleecker Street (c. 1825-26); streetscape along LaGuardia Place with 510 LaGuardia Place in the foreground (1871-72, Henry Fernbach); 149 Bleecker Street (c. 1831); Mills House No. 1, 156 Bleecker Street (1896-97, Ernest Flagg); 508 LaGuardia Place (1891, Brunner & Tryon); 177 to 171 Bleecker Street (1887-88, Alexander I. Finkle); 500 LaGuardia Place (1870, Samuel Lynch). Christopher D. Brazee, December 2013 South Village Historic District Designation Report Essay prepared by Christopher D. Brazee, Cynthia Danza, Gale Harris, Virginia Kurshan. Jennifer L. Most, Theresa C. Noonan, Matthew A. Postal, Donald G. Presa, and Jay Shockley Architects’ and Builders’ Appendix prepared by Marianne S. Percival Building Profiles prepared by Christopher D. Brazee, Jennifer L. Most, and Marianne S. Percival, with additional research by Jay Shockley Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS SOUTH VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP .............................................. FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 SOUTH
    [Show full text]
  • F. J. Berlenbach House Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission May 11, 2004, Designation List 352 LP-2152 F. J. Berlenbach House, 174 Meserole Street, Borough of Brooklyn. Built 1887; architect: F.J. Berlenbach, Jr.; builder: F. J. Berlenbach. Landmark Site: Borough of Brooklyn Tax Map Block 3053, Lot 13. On April 20, 2004, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of F.J. Berlenbach House and the related landmark site. The public hearing was duly advertised with the provisions of law. Three witnesses testified in favor of the proposed designation, including representatives of the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Historic Districts Council, and the Municipal Arts Society. There were no speakers in opposition to the proposed designation. The Commission held previous public hearings on the proposed designation on November 10, 1981 (LP-1263), June 12, 1984 (LP- 1503), and July 10, 1990 (LP-1791). Summary Located in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn, the Berlenbach House is an extraordinary Queen Anne- style survivor from the last decades of the nineteenth century. The three-story frame building was constructed in 1887 by local carpenter Franz J. Berlenbach, a German immigrant, from plans drawn by his son, F.J., Jr., a young architect who had recently opened a design office nearby. The Berlenbach family occupied the house until 1899. The great wave of immigration that New York City experienced in the 1850s brought a large number of German immigrants to Williamsburg. Its population in the late nineteenth century was almost exclusively German. While most of the older wood-frame buildings in this section of Brooklyn have been resurfaced with new materials, this house not only retains its original clapboard siding, but features inventive wood carving.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn Staten Island Queens Manhattan Bronx
    2011 ONE PRIZE: NYC 6 BORO projection Clean Tech Blue Network & Clean Tech Master Plan Blue Network Hub Not only does each Blue Network Hub serve as a stop for electric passenger Site Reflective Piers The existing grid of New York City is projected out onto the water through the establishment of the ferries and water taxis, but each location is also connected through a rapid Primary Ferry Route modular pier system. This projection serves as a physical extension of the grid as well as a visual transit lane for electric shuttle buses and electric cars. Each Hub is equipped extension of the city’s identity into its 6th borough, the water. Secondary Ferry Route with several charging stations for electric cars, as well as bike shares, bike city Bicycle Monorail garages and access to the bicyle monorails. Parks, Habitat, Wetland Green Transit Hubs attract individuals out to, and beyond, the water’s edge through the use of varying degrees of transportation. These include electric passenger ferries, water taxis, bike shares, electric car shares, electric shuttle buses, and bicycle monorail. ic ca ctr r c e it self l y Bronx e Sound View Park The interactive pier system integrated into each Blue Network Transit Hub and Barretto Point Park Clean Tech Expo location encourage participants to interact with one another collective while partaking in the activities and exhibits that each site has to offer. Randalls Island Park Harlem River The new pier system provides additional habitat for existing ecosystems, allowing for the Goodwill Park future projection of wildlife and vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Board No. 1
    COMMUNITY BOARD NO. 1 N 435 GRAHAM AVENUE - BROOKLYN, NY 11211 PHONE: (718) 389-0009 FAX: (718) 389-0098 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nyc.gov/brooklyncbl IIOX ERIC L. AOAMS BROOKLYN BOROUGH PRESIDENT greenpo,nt - -w1lllClmsburg $11',JON WEISER DEALICE FULLER HON. STEPHEN T. LE VIN FIRST VICE.-CHA!RM,\N CHAIRPERSON COUNCILMEMBER, 33'" CD DEL TEAGUE SECOND V!CE,.CHAJRP~RSO~ GERALD A. ESPOSITO HO!\". ANTONIO REYNOSO DISTRICT MANAGER COUNCILMEMBER, 3~" CD STEPHEN J. WEIDBF.KG TI-ORD VICE-CHAJR.\MN MA.WA VIERA FINANCIAL SECRETARY SONIA JGLESUS COMBINED PUBLIC HEARING RF.CORJ)Th'G SECRETARY AND BOARD MEETING PD/LIP A.. CAPONEGRO 1'1E.'\IBER,AT•LARClE SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 211 AINSLIE STREET PUBLIC HEARING ROLL CALL Chairperson Ms. Dealice Fuller requested District Manager Mr. Esposito to call the roll. District Manager Mr. Esposito conducted the roll call and announced that there were 26 members present, a sufficient number for a quorum. Chairperson Ms. Fuller noted the quorum and opened the board meeting. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Chauperson Ms. Fuller asked for a motion to approve the agenda. Ms. Kaminski made a motion to approve the agenda as written. The motion seconded by Mr. Caponegro. The motion was unanimously carried. UNENCLOSED SIDEWALK CAFE: SJD 220 CORP., DBA BREAD BROTHER BAGEL CAFE, 220 BUSHWICK A VENUE, BROOKLYN, NY 11206-4459 (Application# 2052885-DCA) 3 Tables; 6 CIWRS (RENEWAL) - Applicant did not appear. The item was referred to the SLA Review & DCA Committee for further review. UNENCLOSED SIDEWALK CAFE: GRAND ENDEAVORS INC., DBA CLEM'S, 264 GRAND STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11211 (Application# 1145629-DCA) 5 Tables, 20 Chairs (RENEWAL) Applicant did not appear.
    [Show full text]
  • These Are a Few of Our Favorite Things!
    Hello, BAA Parents! We are looking forward to seeing you very soon! New York City is an exciting place to live. The city is a different experience for everyone who lives here. Whenever we have friends visit, we never know what kind of "New York" activities to do, since we're not tourists! Since we know many of you will have a lot of time to kill here in NYC, we asked our staff how they would spend an obligation-free day off in the city and where they like to go. Our answers are below. As you plan for your stay in New York, we thought this might be helpful. Please feel free to contact any of us with questions! At the bottom of this e-mail, please find information about getting around in the city. The subway is your friend! THESE ARE A FEW OF OUR FAVORITE THINGS! Rachel Brown ([email protected]) If you had a day off with no obligations, how would you spend it? Relaxing on the beach in Coney Island in Brooklyn (take the subway!) with my friends family, listening to music and playing awesome summer games including something with water pistols. Favorite restaurant for dinner: Patzeria Family & Friends on 48th and 8th- Great Italian Food and very reasonable prices right in Midtown!!! Favorite place to grab a coffee: I am obsessed with Dunkin Donuts- lame I know but I love their iced coffee! Favorite Broadway show: Everyone should see The Play That Goes Wrong. It's not a musical and is now playing at New World Stages (so technically off-Broadway now) but my tummy and face hurt from laughing so hard- old fashion Shtick comedy and just so much fun! Favorite place to shop: La Duca Shoes of course (mostly window shop :)) Favorite neighborhood to walk around: Along the Hudson River on the West Side down in the Village around Christopher Street.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Financing
    NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Financing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to the provisions of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that the New York City Housing Development Corporation (the “Corporation”) is contemplating the issuance of one or more issues or series of bonds pursuant to plans of financing (the “Bonds”) in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5,610,583,920 in order to (i) provide a portion of the funds for the financing, refinancing, acquisition, rehabilitation and/or new construction of the residential developments described below (the “Developments”); and (ii) pay related costs including, without limitation, reserve amounts and costs of issuance of the Bonds for the Developments. The Bonds will not constitute a debt or obligation of the City or State of New York. The Corporation will conduct a hearing at 10:00 am on July 10, 2020 to receive comments from the general public on the proposed financing plans for the Developments and the Bonds. Due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, such public hearing shall be conducted remotely, through the use of telephone conference. Interested members of the public are invited to participate, and individuals will have an opportunity to make brief statements by dialing into the teleconference using the toll-free number 1-844-740-1264 and by entering the access code 160 007 3949. The hearing will also be accessible as a free-to-join webinar accessible through the world wide web address: https://nychdc.webex.com/nychdc/j.php?MTID=maa0f937f2cb92c9d75f02f5be931c531 and entering the passcode “TEFRA2020”.
    [Show full text]