1 DRAFT CHAPTER – PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE the Ongoing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 DRAFT CHAPTER – PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE the Ongoing DRAFT CHAPTER – PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE The Ongoing Afterlife of Captain John Smith Richard Welsh, 2013 John Smith’s memory has degenerated into a slideshow of mythic images. His distance in time – 150 years before George Washington – and short career on the continent, his lack of prideful descendants, and his de facto excommunication by the early masters of Virginia, have all had their effects. The first generations of Virginians were also less inclined to publish histories of any sort, than their New England cousins who generated a rich stream of sermons, histories, and other documents in their intensely self-examining quest for spiritual and moral improvement, and sense of mission for the future. But this is only part of the story. The more revealing part, for understanding the processes of history, is that Smith in his afterlife took on the same role as Smith living: an exemplar of successful republican principles, and a lightning rod for controversy whenever conflict over those principles got stormy. His name and adventures became a tool, which four centuries of ill-use have worn down pretty badly. Sometimes the myths were cartoonish simplifications of the reality. At other times, his republican credentials were used to the fully opposite purpose, transmuting him into an image of his gentleman-opponents to glorify the new gentry of the plantation slavery system. Typical of the first, is his famous anti-aristocratic admonition that “he who will not work, will not eat.” This demand was indeed a crucial feature of Smith’s leadership in Virginia and message back in England; but popular usage, cartoon-like, has falsified the meaning by attributing the idea to Smith himself, thus ripping both it and him out of the larger anti-oligarchic movement that had already embraced this Puritan-highlighted command of St. Paul’s. The second, more nefarious myth, is the romantic goo that sticks to Smith’s rescue by Pocahontas. Disney Studios might have added the modern “meta-narrative” disease of self- referential flippancy in 1995, but could hardly pervert reality more than the romance-mills of the previous two centuries had already. One of the more sober versions: John Smith, the fearless captain Of the mighty days of old, With the beard and swarthy forehead, And the bearing free and bold! Our own dear Pocahontas! The Virgin Queen of the West – With the heart of a Christian hero In a timid maiden’s breast! You have heard the moving story Of the days of long ago, How the tender girlish bosom Shrunk not from the deadly blow; 1 How the valiant son of England, In the woodland drear and wild, Was saved from the savage war-club By the courage of a child. And now in the light of glory The noble figures stand – The founder of Virginia, And the pride of the Southern land!1 Both types of falsehood have perpetuated the stereotype that Smith was a founding hero of “Virginia,” whereas “New England” was created by “Puritans” or “Pilgrims” – when Smith, and his networks, Puritan and otherwise, were parents and godparents to both, and both were strands of the same fabric prior to the general, though not universal, destruction of republican impulses in the southern slave economy. Not surprisingly, this particular falsehood – of Smith the “Southerner” or “Cavalier” – loomed large in the buildup to the U.S. Civil War, and for decades thereafter. Let us now effect the good man’s real rescue; for he can still do us good service. Smith in the later seventeenth century In his lifetime, Smith faced repeated brushoffs and sneers by his political and social “betters”; an abortive legal frameup; near-execution; public mockery; and one or two possible assassination attempts. He could also claim the loyalty of his former fellow soldiers, seamen, and colonists; widespread respect for his military accomplishments; and the sustained friendship and support of Puritan and high-level literary and scientific networks over the last two decades of his life, which afforded him working and living quarters, publishing collaboration and patronage, and public commendations in his defense. But in England these faded in time, especially as official attitudes towards colonization itself degenerated into imperial exploitation (as with the Navigation Acts beginning 1651), and as his friends and promoters died out. Even in his life, the high-praise reviews that introduced his later books were, nearly to a one, of a defensive form: don’t worry, your worthy achievements and wonderful proposals will outlive the pervasive malice. In America they did. In England, it was mainly the slanders that lived on. Typical of his enemies were the more highborn of his fellow council members in Virginia, George Percy and Edward Maria Wingfield. It was Percy, younger brother to the imprisoned (and quite different) ninth Earl of Northumberland, who simply had to “keep a continual and daily table for gentlemen of fashion” at early Jamestown while the colony went hungry. In his own “True Relation” of the colony’s early history, written in part to justify his fatally incompetent leadership (and distaste at subordination to Smith), Percy wrote Smith off as “an ambitious, unworthy, and vainglorious fellow, attempting to take all men’s authorities from them.” Wingfield, scion of another old aristocratic family intermarried with the noble Veres, 1 From “A Dream of the Cavaliers,” published in Harper’s New Monthly Magazine for January, 1861, quoted by Abrams (Abrams, Pilgrims and Pocahontas, 233–34. 2 made clear that “though we were equal here” (in Virginia), “if he were in England I should think scorn his name should be my companion.”2 The tar that stuck longest, however, was the cynical slur that Smith's exploits were all made up – that he was simply a stereotypical braggart soldier. Along these lines, a verse parody of his career saw print, shortly before his death in 1631, entitled “The Legend of Captain Jones,”3 running to seventy pages of doggerel, and republished many times over the next few decades. (This may have been the trigger that prompted his friends to urge writing of his autobiography.) A generation later, Thomas Fuller included Smith in his 1662 The History of the Worthies of England, a common anecdotal source for later historians of much early biography (very entertaining, and abundantly fictitious). No favors done here, as Fuller made the line official, “such his perils, preservations, dangers, deliverances, they seem to most men above belief, to some beyond truth”; and most suspicious because “he alone is herald to proclaim and publish them” (if one ignored the multiple printed sources). Smith’s memory was further trivialized in 1684, as his now storybook-like heroic combats were woven into jolly banquet festivities, to extoll the virtues of the “Ancient and Renowned Families of Smiths.” This was on the occasion of a London Lord Mayor’s Pageant, the incumbent being a Smith. The frivolity could have been countered by an honest and well researched biography that was written the following year, but this was left in Latin, and never published until the manuscript’s rediscovery and translation into English in 1957, nearly 300 years later.4 It was different in America, though not always better. Initially, Smith’s memory not only remained, but grew, embedding itself in American understanding of the deepening political and cultural rift with the not very loving mother country. That memory was resurrected, and significantly amplified, by native Virginian Robert Beverley, in his History and Present State of Virginia, published in London in 1705. 1705: Smith revived to oppose British imperial policy Beverley was a leading political figure in the colony, whose father, Major Robert Beverley, had been instrumental both in defeating the internal danger of the 1676 Bacon Rebellion, and in resisting the related attempts of the restored Stuart monarchy to suppress the republican impulses and economic development of Virginia along with all the other English colonies. The elder Beverley had eventually achieved the backhand honor of being forbidden from holding public office by order of King James II, though his supporters in Virginia found ways to circumvent this.5 2 Percy, True Relation, 8189.; Wingfield, “A Discourse of Virginia per Edward Maria Wingfield.” 189, 199. This appears to be the correct reading of the somewhat garbled text, when comparing the two paraphrases of the incident that Wingfield reports. 3 [CITE Legend of Capt Jones] 4 Wharton, The Life of John Smith, English Soldier. 5 CITE [probably Lemay, Bio or other or both] 3 The younger Robert Beverley, like his father, was a leading member of the House of Burgesses, Virginia’s legislative assembly, holding its office of clerk, along with other colonial government positions. He wrote his popular book on a trip to England, where he had sailed in 1703, nominally to appeal a legal decision, but clearly travelling with another agenda as well. This was a particularly heated moment of confrontation for control over the government of newly reigning Queen Anne. Anne had come to the throne in 1702, after the deaths of her sister, Queen Mary II, and Mary’s husband King William III (William of Orange, the Dutch beneficiary of England’s 1688 “Glorious Revolution”). The battle had been joined, between the ascendant “Venetian party” associated with John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough and his ally Lord Treasurer Sidney Godolphin, and their republican opponents led by Secretary of State Robert Harley, and writer Jonathan Swift, both allies of philosopher-scientist-statesman Gottfried Leibniz. (Friends of Leibniz were also instrumental in recruiting German settlers to William Penn’s American colony.) It was a battle that spanned the Atlantic, and included as an important element the fundamental question of colonial policy: economic development, or imperial exploitation of an enforced, quasi-feudal backwardness? An even more critical mission to England, of related purpose, had concluded just eleven years prior to Beverley’s trip, when Increase Mather returned to Massachusetts after four years of intense and only partly successful wrangling for a new charter for that commonwealth.
Recommended publications
  • Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the first permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. Preliminary Events 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. Early Settlement Years 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery - left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester. One of the First Chapters of the Commonwealth of Virginia
    Library of Congress Gloucester. One of the first chapters of the Commonwealth of Virginia HISTORY ....OF.... Gloucester County, Virginia, AND ITS FAMILIES. West, Johnston & Co., Richmond, Va. 1893. GLOUCESTER. 396/293 ONE OF THE FIRST CHAPTERS OF The Commonwealth of Virginia. ILLUSTRATED. BY SALLY NELSON ROBINS. THE PHOTOGRAPHS WERE TAKEN BY MISS BLANCHE DIMMOCK, OF SHERWOOD. WHERE THE TIDE ROLLS, AND THE BOISTEROUS BAY KNOCKS AT VIRGINIA'S DOOR. When one attempts the early history of a colonial county he is overcome by a feeling of helplessness. A few early records, a legend or two, stand like silent watch-towers, around which he must weave his own suppositions, the hearsays of his childhood, and a warrantable induction from existing facts. This sketch applies to Gloucester and its dear people, who from one border line to the other are my brethren. To them all without exception—to the road-side farmer who hoes his stumpy corn-field; to the jolly fisherman, whose conch-shell trumpet heralds fish along Gloucester. One of the first chapters of the Commonwealth of Virginia http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbcb.16559 Library of Congress the highway; to the judge upon his bench and the parson in his pulpit, and to Gloucester's sons and daughters scattered far and near—I dedicate this sketch. Chesapeake bay, in boisterous friendliness, knocks at Gloucester's south-eastern door; the capricious “Mock Jack” hugs its eastern border, sending inland the landlocked North, the broad-sweeping Ware, and the beautiful Severn; while the York, but a lesser bay, born of the Chesapeake, washes it south-westerly, cutting it apart from York county and James City.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations
    The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of the Ohio State University By Sarah McBee The Ohio State University at Mansfield June 2009 Project Advisor: Professor Heather Tanner, Department of History Introduction Reevaluating Jamestown On an unexceptional day in December about four hundred years ago, three small ships embarked from an English dock and began the long and treacherous voyage across the Atlantic. The passengers on board envisioned their goals – wealth and discovery, glory and destiny. The promise of a new life hung tantalizingly ahead of them. When they arrived in their new world in May of the next year, they did not know that they were to begin the journey of a nation that would eventually become the United States of America. This summary sounds almost ridiculously idealistic – dream-driven achievers setting out to start over and build for themselves a better world. To the average American citizen, this story appears to be the classic description of the Pilgrims coming to the new world in 1620 seeking religious freedom. But what would the same average American citizen say to the fact that this deceptively idealistic story actually took place almost fourteen years earlier at Jamestown, Virginia? The unfortunate truth is that most people do not know the story of the Jamestown colony, established in 1607.1 Even when people have heard of Jamestown, often it is with a negative connotation. Common knowledge marginally recognizes Jamestown as the colony that predates the Separatists in New England by more than a dozen years, and as the first permanent English settlement in America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the fi rst permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. PRELIMINARY EVENTS 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. EARLY SETTLEMENT YEARS 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery – left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections of the Virginia Historical Society, in Which Are Also Many Other MSS
    Ml: Gc 975.5 V823C V.7 1219029 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00826 8341 COLLECTIONS Virginia Historical Society. New Series. VOL. VII. WM. ELLIS JONES, PRINTER, RICHMOND, VA. ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE VirginiaCompany of London, I 6 I 9— I 624, PREPARED FROM THE RECORDS IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS BY CONWAY ROBINSON, AND EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY R. A. BROCK, Corresponding Secretary and Librarian of the Society. VOL. I. Richmond, Virginia. PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY. MDCCCLXXXVIII. /^^ .H 1219029 INTRODUCTION. The essential value of the Proceedings of the Virginia Com- pany of London, towards a due knowledge of the planting of the first of the American Commonwealths, is patent. Although highly useful excerpts from them have been presented by the zealous and indefatigable investigator, Rev. Edward D. Neill, D. D., in his publications illustrative of the early history of Virginia, it is believed that the abstracts now offered will prove an acceptable aggrandizement of his labors, and inasmuch as they were prepared by a scholar of singular discernment— the late eminent jurist, Conway Robinson, whose professional works are held in prime authority and as of enduring worth— it may be hoped, with confidence, that they are comprehensive as to all desirable details. The Virginia Historical Society is greatly indebted to Mr. Robinson for a signal devotion to its interests, which only ceased with his life. He was one of its founders, on December 29th, his removal to Wash- 1831 ; its first treasurer; from 1835 until ington, D. C, in 1869, a member of its " Standing," or Executive Committee, serving for a greater portion of the period as chair- man, and subsequently and continuously as vice-president of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693
    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited
    Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited FREDERIC W. GLEACH Cornell University The story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith is one that all school­ children in the United States seem to learn early on, and one that has served as the basis for plays, epic poems, and romance novels as well as historical studies. The lyrics of Peggy Lee's hit song Fever exemplify these popular treatments: Captain Smith and Pocahontas Had a very mad affair. When her daddy tried to kill him She said, 'Daddy, oh don't you dare — He gives me fever ... with his kisses, Fever when he holds me tight; Fever — I'm his Mrs. Daddy won't you treat him right.' (Lee et al 1958) The incident referred to here, Pocahontas's rescue of Smith from death at the orders of her father, the paramount chief Powhatan, was originally recorded by the only European present — Smith himself. While the factu- ality of Smith's account has been questioned since the mid-19th century, recent textual analysis by Lemay (1992) supports the more widely held opinion that it most likely occurred as Smith reported. Other recent studies have employed methods and models imported from literary criticism, gen­ erally to demonstrate the nature of English colonial and historical modes of apprehending otherness.1 While my work may be easily contrasted to these approaches, two re­ cent studies must be mentioned which have employed understandings and methods similar to my own. Kidwell (1992:99-101) used Pocahontas as an example in her discussion of "Indian Women as Cultural Mediators", 1ln addition to the comments of participants in the Algonquian Conference I have had the benefit of discussion with members of the Department of Anthropol­ ogy of Cornell University, where I presented some of these ideas in a departmental colloquium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Germination of a Free Press: a Dissident Print Culture and the Stamp Act in Colonial Virginia
    The Germination of a Free Press: A Dissident Print Culture and the Stamp Act in Colonial Virginia by Roger P. Mellen April, 2006 Roger P. Mellen 2 2/10/06 Acknowledgments The modern electronic world has made crucial primary documents and other sources instantly available through the Internet, yet research still requires the help of many archivists and librarians. This author would like to recognize a special debt to a few experts who have gone beyond the requirements of their job to help: Rosemarie Zagarri, Professor of History at George Mason University, and my dissertation advisor. Del Moore, Reference Librarian at the John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Library at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. J. Jefferson Looney, Editor, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Retirement Series, Thomas Jefferson Foundation, for verifying the Thomas Jefferson letter to Isaiah Thomas does not exist, locating the actual letter, and a variety of other help. Thomas Knoles, Curator of Manuscripts, American Antiquarian Society for assistance in attempting to locate the supposed letter from Thomas Jefferson to Isaiah Thomas. Martha King, Associate Editor, Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Princeton University, for general research suggestions and for help analyzing Jefferson's handwriting. Mariam Touba, Reference Librarian, New York Historical Society for help tracking down the origin of a rare Virginia Gazette, and possible Jefferson connection. Kim Nusco, Reference Librarian, Massachusetts Historical Society, for assistance in tracking down an obscure letter from former Lieutenant Governor Alexander Spotswood. Olga Tsapina, Curator of American Historical Manuscripts, Huntington Library, San Marino, CA for promptly sending me a copy of Landon Carter's letter to Joseph Royle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adventures of Captain John Smith, Pocahontas, and a Sundial Sara J
    The Adventures of Captain John Smith, Pocahontas, and a Sundial Sara J. Schechner (Cambridge MA) Let me tell you a tale of intrigue and ingenuity, savagery and foreign shores, sex and scientific instruments. No, it is not “Desperate Housewives,” or “CSI,” but the “Adventures of Captain John Smith, Pocahontas, and a Sundial.”1 As our story opens in 1607, we find Captain John Smith paddling upstream through the Virginia wilderness, when he is ambushed by Indians, held prisoner, and repeatedly threatened with death. His life is spared first by the intervention of his magnetic compass, whose spinning needle fascinates his captors, and then by Pocahontas, the chief’s sexy daughter. At least that is how recent movies and popular writing tell the story.2 But in fact the most famous compass in American history was more than a compass – it was a pocket sundial – and the Indian princess was no seductress, but a mere child of nine or ten years, playing her part in a shaming ritual. So let us look again at the legend, as told by John Smith himself, in order to understand what his instrument meant to him. Who was John Smith?3 When Smith (1580-1631) arrived on American shores at the age of twenty-seven, he was a seasoned adventurer who had served Lord Willoughby in Europe, had sailed the Mediterranean in a merchant vessel, and had fought for the Dutch against Spain and the Austrians against the Turks. In Transylvania, he had been captured and sold as a slave to a Turk. The Turk had sent Smith as a gift to his girlfriend in Istanbul, but Smith escaped and fled through Russia and Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 4 Contact 1607 to 1614 Final
    Article 4 The Contact Period – Arrival of first colonists thru the starving time The Powhatan Tribes had been inhabiting the shores of the James River for several centuries when the sun rose on May 13, 1607. On this day the lives of these Indians and many others changed forever. This is the day that 104 English colonists landed at Jamestown Island with the intent of creating a permanent settlement in the New World. This article will provide the reader with insights into the establishment of Jamestown and a brief window into the precarious nature of its existence for its first several years. There were four primary reasons that King James I of England chartered the Virginia Company to go forth and explore the New World. The Crown and the Company investors hoped to find the elusive all-water route to the Orient and all of its treasures; to convert the indigenous population of the New World to Christianity; to find gold for England’s treasury; and finally to export raw and manufactured goods for investor profit. None of these goals were ever really met as the Indians resisted proselytizing, manufacturing projects were clearly not lucrative, and there was no gold for the taking. The Virginia Company charter of 1606 granted the investors an area of 100 miles along the coastline and 100 miles inland. This area included what we now know as Governor’s Land at the mouth of the Chickahominy River. The charter was revised in 1609 giving the Virginia Company 200 miles of coastline north and south of the mouth of the James River and all the land east and west from sea to sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson and the Origins of Newspaper Competition in Pre
    Thomas Jefferson and the Origins of Newspaper Competition in Pre- Revolutionary Virginia Original research paper submitted to The History Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 2007 AEJMC Convention Roger P. Mellen George Mason University June 2007 Thomas Jefferson and the Origins of Newspaper Competition in Pre-Revolutionary Virginia “Until the beginning of our revolutionary dispute, we had but one press, and that having the whole business of the government, and no competitor for public favor, nothing disagreeable to the governor could be got into it. We procured Rind to come from Maryland to publish a free paper.” Thomas Jefferson1 Great changes came to the printing business in Virginia in 1765. About the time that Parliament passed the Stamp Act, a second printer was encouraged to open another shop in Williamsburg, marking the beginnings of competition in that field. This was an important watershed for the culture and government of the colony, for it signified a shift in the power structure. Control of public messages began to relocate from the royal government to the consumer marketplace. This was a transformation that had a major impact on civic discourse in the colony. Despite such significance, the motivations behind this change and the relevance of it have often been misunderstood. For example, it is widely accepted that Thomas Jefferson was responsible for bringing such print competition to Virginia. This connection has been constantly repeated by historians, as has early print historian Isaiah Thomas’s contention that Jefferson confirmed this in a letter written specifically from the former president to Thomas.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE NO. Z-0006-2007. PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT WHEREAS, In
    0 RESOLUTION CASE NO. Z-0006-2007. PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT WHEREAS, in accordance with§ 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 24-15 of the James City County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing was advertised, and a hearing scheduled on Zoning Case No. Z-0006-2007, for rezoning 13,011.642 acres from A-1, General Agricultural; R-1, Limited Residential; R-2, General Residential; R-4, Residential Planned Community; R-8, Rural Residential; B-1, General Business; LB, Limited Business; M-1, Limited Business Industrial; M-2, General Industrial; PUD, Planned Unit Development; and MU, Mixed Use to PL, Public Land; and WHEREAS, the properties are located at the following James City County Real Estate Tax Map No. and addresses: 1. JCC Tax Map No. 5610100002, 1801 Treasure Island Road 2. JCC Tax Map No. 4520100002, 3501 Centerville Road 3. JCC Tax Map No. 4520100001, None 4. JCC Tax Map No. 5610100001, 541 Neck-0-Land 5. JCC Tax Map No. 5510100001, 1368 Colonial Parkway 6. JCC Tax Map No. 4930100002, None 7. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300036,4764 Captain John Smith c 8. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300037,2001 Back River lane 9. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300038, 2005 Back River Lane 10. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300039, 2009 Back River Lane 11. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300040,2013 Back River Lane 12. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300041, 2015 Back River Lane 13. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300042, 2019 Back River Lane 14. JCC Tax Map No. 5510300043, 2023 Back River Lane 15. JCC Tax Map No.
    [Show full text]