DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Management of Natural Resources with a Focus on Water and Agriculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Management of Natural Resources with a Focus on Water and Agriculture Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture Study - Final Report Science and Technology Options Assessment Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture Study - Final Report IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096/LOT3/C1/SC7 May 2013 PE 488.826 STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The STOA project ‘Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture’ was carried out by the Institute for European Environmental Policy, BIO Intelligence Service and the Ecologic Institute. AUTHORS Jana Poláková, Project Leader, IEEP Andrew Farmer, IEEP Sandra Berman, BIO Intelligence Service Sandra Naumann, Ecologic Institute Ana Frelih-Larsen, Ecologic Institute Johanna von Toggenburg, Ecologic Institute STOA RESEARCH ADMINISTRATOR Lieve Van Woensel Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value DG Internal Policies European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - RMD 00J012 B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION: Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact STOA please write to: [email protected] This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/ DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Manuscript completed in May 2013. Brussels, © European Union, 2013. ISBN 978-92-823-4515-3 DOI 10.2861/27324 CAT BA-03-13-180-EN-C ii Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture Abstract Water is a key natural resource targeted within resource efficiency policy of the European Union, as well as globally. This study has focussed on research, technologies and options for sustainable water use and water efficiency; agricultural land management with soil and water benefits; and measures within the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to address sustainable management of water and soil resources. Six key areas for improvement have been identified: (1) The legislative framework currently in place to protect Europe’s waters needs to be implemented fully and effectively as well as adequately enforced; (2) Water priorities that have been articulated at the EU level need to be more fully integrated and well implemented within the sectoral policies at EU, national and regional levels; (3) Water losses should be reduced and water savings and efficiency should be increased, in particular in agriculture and water scarce areas; (4) Land and soil management approaches aimed at combating soil erosion, preventing loss of soil organic matter, sequestering soil carbon and improving water retention are critical for long-term sustainability of farming and healthy ecosystems and should be promoted at all levels; (5) EU funds, including CAP, allocated to water priorities should be used in an efficient and effective way; and (6) improved data and decision support tools relating to water and soils are essential for making informed decisions that support sustainable management of water and soil. iii STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The report should be cited as follows: Poláková, J; Berman, S; Naumann, S; Frelih-Larsen, A; von Toggenburg, J; Farmer, A (2013) 'Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture'. Report Prepared for the STOA Panel of the European Parliament. Contract IP/A/STOA/FWC/2008-096/LOT3/C1/SC7. Institute for European Environmental Policy, BIO Intelligence Service, Ecologic Institute. Corresponding author: Jana Poláková, IEEP ([email protected]). Acknowledgments The authors would like to express many thanks to a number of people. They would like to thank: Kaley Hart; Kristof Geeraerts; Henrietta Menadue, Urška Trunk and Daniel Kieve (IEEP); Shailendra Mudgal; Linda Johansson, Sarah Lockwood, and Katherine Salès (BIO Intelligence Service); Ulf Stein, Elizabeth Dooley and McKenna Davis (Ecologic Institute). Technical and policy expert panel for their advice and valuable comments: Antonia Andugar and Tania Runge (COPA-COGECA) Ariel Brunner (Birdlife Europe) Bernhard Osterburg (Thünen Institute) Claire McCamphill (European Commission, DG Environment) Clément Jaubertie (Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable development and Energy, France) David Zetland (University of Wageningen) Faycal Bouraoui (JRC) Gábor Kolossváry (Ministry of Rural Development, Hungary) Henk Westhoek and Koen Overmars (PBL Netherlands) Catalina Radu (National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania) Lars O. Hansen and Thomas F. Mortensen (Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Denmark) Nigel Boatman (Food and Environment Research Agency, Defra, UK) Peter Kristensen (EEA) Renée L'Herr and Krzysztof Sulima (European Commission, DG Agriculture) Ville Keskisarja (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland) Institute for European Environmental Policy Quai au Foin/Hooikaai 55 B- 1000 Brussels Tel: +32 (0) 2738 7482 BIO Intelligence Service S.A.S 20-22 Villa Deshayes 75014 PARIS Tel : +33 (0) 1 53 90 11 80 Ecologic Institute Pfalzburger Strasse 43/44 10717 Berlin Tel. +49 (30) 86880-0 The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) is an independent not-for-profit institute. IEEP undertakes work for external sponsors in a range of policy areas. We also have our own research programmes and produce the Manual of European Environmental Policy (http://www.europeanenvironmentalpolicy.eu). For further information about IEEP, see our website at http://www.ieep.eu or contact any staff member. iv Sustainable management of natural resources with a focus on water and agriculture TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF BOXES .................................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................VII LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. VIII ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................... IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................X OPTIONS BRIEF............................................................................................................................. XVII A. Options for sustainable water use and improved water efficiency ........................xviii B. Options for land management with water and soil benefits ..................................... xix C. Options for improved water and soil management through the CAP measures... xix 1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ....................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives, themes and scope............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Structure of the report ........................................................................................................ 3 2 SETTING THE SCENE: KEY WATER CHALLENGES IN THE EU .................................... 4 2.1 Policy context....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Water use in the EU ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Water challenges in EU agriculture.................................................................................. 5 3 SUSTAINABLE WATER USE AND IMPROVED WATER EFFICIENCY........................... 9 3.1 Overview of EU scientific research on sustainable water use and water efficiency . 9 3.2 Innovative technologies and options for improving EU water management.......... 11 3.3 Good policy practices on water management in the EU ............................................. 21 3.4 Water pricing: EU policy instruments and their implementation ............................. 29 3.5 Recommended options..................................................................................................... 37 4 AGRICULTURAL LAND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE OUTCOMES FOR SOILS ............................................................................. 42 4.1 Management actions for improved water availability ................................................ 42 4.2 Management actions for improved functions of soils ................................................. 43 4.3 Need for public support................................................................................................... 52 4.4 Recommended options..................................................................................................... 53 5 CAP MEASURES FOR IMPROVED WATER AND SOIL MANAGEMENT.................... 58 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 58 5.2 CAP Pillar 2 measures...................................................................................................... 60 5.3 CAP Pillar 1 measures.....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Farmland Investments and Water Rights: the Legal Regimes at Stake
    Farmland Investments and Water Rights: The legal regimes at stake Makane Moïse Mbengue Susanna Waltman May 2015 www.iisd.org/gsi www.iisd.org © 2015 The International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, and management of natural and social capital, as well as the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas. We report on international negotiations and disseminate knowledge gained through collaborative projects, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries, better networks spanning the North and the South, and better global connections among researchers, practitioners, citizens and policy-makers. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies,
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Technology on U.S. Cropland and Rangeland Productivity Advisory Panel
    l-'" of nc/:\!IOIOO _.. _­ ... u"' "'"'" ... _ -'-- Impacts of Technology on U.S. Cropland w, in'... ' .....7 and Rangeland Productivity August 1982 NTIS order #PB83-125013 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600596 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword This Nation’s impressive agricultural success is the product of many factors: abundant resources of land and water, a favorable climate, and a history of resource- ful farmers and technological innovation, We meet not only our own needs but supply a substantial portion of the agricultural products used elsewhere in the world. As demand increases, so must agricultural productivity, Part of the necessary growth may come from farming additional acreage. But most of the increase will depend on intensifying production with improved agricultural technologies. The question is, however, whether farmland and rangeland resources can sustain such inten- sive use. Land is a renewable resource, though one that is highly susceptible to degrada- tion by erosion, salinization, compaction, ground water depletion, and other proc- esses. When such processes are not adequately managed, land productivity can be mined like a nonrenewable resource. But this need not occur. For most agricul- tural land, various conservation options are available, Traditionally, however, farm- ers and ranchers have viewed many of the conservation technologies as uneconom- ical. Must conservation and production always be opposed, or can technology be used to help meet both goals? This report describes the major processes degrading land productivity, assesses whether productivity is sustainable using current agricultural technologies, reviews a range of new technologies with potentials to maintain productivity and profitability simultaneously, and presents a series of options for congressional consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Biodiversity in Arable Farmland by Means of Indicators: an Overview
    AGRONOMIE – ENVIRONNEMENT Assessing biodiversity in arable farmland by means of indicators: an overview Christian BOCKSTALLER Abstract: Maintaining biodiversity is one of the key issues of sustainable agriculture. It is ¸ Francoise LASSERRE-JOULIN now stated that innovation to enhance biodiversity in arable land requires operational Sophie SLEZACK-DESCHAUMES assessment tools like indicators. The goal of the article is to provide an overview of Severine PIUTTI available indicators. Besides measured indicators and simple indicators based on Jean VILLERD management data, we focus on predictive indicators derived from operational models Bernard AMIAUD and adapted to ex ante assessment in innovative cropping design. The possibility of use Sylvain PLANTUREUX for each indicator type is discussed. Key words: environmental assessment, indicator, model, validation, biodiversity, INRA, UMR 1121 ecosystemic services Nancy-Universite - INRA, IFR 110, Nancy-Colmar, BP 20507, 68021 Colmar France <[email protected]> Maintaining biodiversity is one of the intensification, among them extensifica- Indicators can be basic variables (e.g. key issues of sustainable development, tion and even suppression of chemical amount of input) or simple combination and agriculture is highly concerned in input like in organic farming (Hole et al., of these variables (balance, ratio) as well this perspective. The term was first 2005), reconsideration of field margin as field measurements, the former being suggested in 1985 at a conference on management to enhance semi-natural also called ‘‘indirect’’ and the latter biological diversity in the USA and was area of farmland (Marshall and Moonen, ‘‘direct’’ indicator regarding biodiver- popularized since the Rio Conference in 2002). It is now stated that this process of sity (Burel et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: the Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts
    sustainability Editorial Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: The Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts Fernando A. L. Pacheco CQVR – Chemistry Research Centre, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados Ap. 1013, Vila Real 5001-801, Portugal; [email protected] Received: 3 February 2020; Accepted: 4 February 2020; Published: 6 February 2020 Abstract: Sustainability is a utopia of societies, that could be achieved by a harmonious balance between socio-economic development and environmental protection, including the sustainable exploitation of natural resources. The present Special Issue addresses a multiplicity of realities that confirm a deviation from this utopia in the real world, as well as the concerns of researchers. These scholars point to measures that could help lead the damaged environment to a better status. The studies were focused on sustainable use of soils and water, as well as on land use or occupation changes that can negatively affect the quality of those resources. Some other studies attempt to assess (un)sustainability in specific regions through holistic approaches, like the land carrying capacity, the green gross domestic product or the eco-security models. Overall, the special issue provides a panoramic view of competing interests for land and the consequences for the environment derived therefrom. Keywords: water resources; soil; land use change; conflicts; environmental degradation; sustainability Competition for land is a worldwide problem affecting developed as well as developing countries, because the economic growth of activity sectors often requires the expansion of occupied land, sometimes to places that overlap different sectors. Besides the social tension and conflicts eventually caused by the competing interests for land, the environmental problems they can trigger and sustain cannot be overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Coal Mining on Agriculture in the Delmas, Ogies and Leandra Districts a Focus on Maize Production
    0 Evaluating the impact of coal mining on agriculture in the Delmas, Ogies and Leandra districts A focus on maize production A report by BFAP Compiled for the Maize Trust May 2012 1 Table of Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 An overview of agriculture in Mpumalanga .............................................................................. 8 Cash crop production ..................................................................................................... 8 Arable land potentials for Mpumalanga ........................................................................ 9 Current mining and prospecting ................................................................................... 10 Pilot study area ............................................................................................................. 12 Economic impact of mining on agriculture ............................................................................. 14 Potential loss in maize production ............................................................................... 14 Potential loss in soybean production............................................................................ 16 Economic impact on livestock production ................................................................... 18 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater Resources in West Asia, Central Asia and North Africa
    IUCN-WESCANA Water Publication The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater Resources in West Asia, Central Asia and North Africa The 3rd IUCN World Conservation Congress Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand, November 17-25, 2004 IUCN Regional Office for West/Central Asia and North Africa Kuwait Foundation For The Advancement of Sciences The World Conservation Union 1 2 3 The Conservation and Sustainable Use of Freshwater Resources in West Asia, Central Asia and North Africa The 3rd IUCN World Conservation Congress Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand, November 17-25, 2004 IUCN Regional Office for West/Central Asia and North Africa Kuwait Foundation 2 For The Advancement of Sciences The World Conservation Union 3 4 5 Table of Contents The demand for freshwater resources and the role of indigenous people in the conservation of wetland biodiversity Mehran Niazi.................................................................................. 8 Managing water ecosystems for sustainability and productivity in North Africa Chedly Rais................................................................................... 17 Market role in the conservation of freshwater biodiversity in West Asia Abdul Majeed..................................................................... 20 Water-ecological problems of the Syrdarya river delta V.A. Dukhovny, N.K. Kipshakbaev,I.B. Ruziev, T.I. Budnikova, and V.G. Prikhodko............................................... 26 Fresh water biodiversity conservation: The case of the Aral Sea E. Kreuzberg-Mukhina, N. Gorelkin, A. Kreuzberg V. Talskykh, E. Bykova, V. Aparin, I. Mirabdullaev, and R. Toryannikova............................................. 32 Water scarcity in the WESCANA Region: Threat or prospect for peace? Odeh Al-Jayyousi ......................................................................... 48 4 5 6 7 Summary The IUCN-WESCANA Water Publication – The Conservation and Sustainable Use Of Freshwater Resources in West Asia, Central Asia and North Africa - is the first publication of the IUCN-WESCANA Office, Amman-Jordan.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating On-Farm Biodiversity: a Comparison of Assessment Methods
    sustainability Article Evaluating On-Farm Biodiversity: A Comparison of Assessment Methods Vanessa Gabel 1,2,*, Robert Home 1 , Sibylle Stöckli 1, Matthias Meier 1, Matthias Stolze 1 and Ulrich Köpke 2 1 Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland; robert.home@fibl.org (R.H.); sibylle.stoeckli@fibl.org (S.S.); matthias.meier@fibl.org (M.M.); matthias.stolze@fibl.org (M.S.) 2 Institute of Organic Agriculture, University of Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: vanessa.gabel@fibl.ch; Tel.: +41-(0)62-8650414 Received: 27 November 2018; Accepted: 13 December 2018; Published: 17 December 2018 Abstract: Strategies to stop the loss of biodiversity in agriculture areas will be more successful if farmers have the means to understand changes in biodiversity on their farms and to assess the effectiveness of biodiversity promoting measures. There are several methods to assess on-farm biodiversity but it may be difficult to select the most appropriate method for a farmer’s individual circumstances. This study aims to evaluate the usability and usefulness of four biodiversity assessment methods that are available to farmers in Switzerland. All four methods were applied to five case study farms, which were ranked according to the results. None of the methods were able to provide an exact statement on the current biodiversity status of the farms, but each method could provide an indication, or approximation, of one or more aspects of biodiversity. However, the results also showed that it is possible to generate different statements on the state of biodiversity on the same farms by using different biodiversity assessment methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Environment State and Outlook 2020
    05. Land and soil 2 Land and soil © Kayhan Guc, Sustainably Yours/EEA 3 par A PART 2 Key messages • Land and its soils are the • Land recycling accounts for only • European policy aims to develop foundation for producing food, feed 13 % of urban developments in the EU. the bioeconomy but while new uses and other ecosystem services such as The EU 2050 target of no net land take for biomass and increasing food regulating water quality and quantity. is unlikely to be met unless annual and fodder consumption require Ecosystem services related to land use rates of land take are further reduced increasing agricultural output, land are critical for Europe’s economy and and/or land recycling is increased. for agricultural use has decreased. quality of life. Competition for land and This leads to growing pressures on intensive land use affects the condition • Soil degradation is not well the available agricultural land and soil of soils and ecosystems, altering their monitored, and often hidden, but it is resources which are exacerbated by capacity to provide these services. It widespread and diverse. Intensive land the impacts of climate change. also reduces landscape and species management leads to negative impacts diversity. on soil biodiversity, which is the key • The lack of a comprehensive driver of terrestrial ecosystems’ carbon and coherent policy framework for • Land take and soil sealing continue, and nutrient cycling. There is increasing protecting Europe’s land and soil predominantly at the expense evidence that land and soil degradation resources is a key gap that reduces the of agricultural land, reducing its have major economic consequences, effectiveness of the existing incentives production potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Water Conservation and Management Strategies
    Long‐Term Water Conservation and Management Strategies April 2016 As the state’s focus begins to transition from the State Water Resources Control Board’s 2015 emergency regulation to a long‐term water management vision for California’s future, the Squaw Valley Public Service District strongly believes that any long‐term policy should recognize investments in drought‐resilience, emphasize ongoing water‐use efficiency, and leave local management discretion to local water agencies. With the public’s support, local water agencies have invested nearly $20 billion in the past 20 years to build and prudently manage diverse water supply portfolios to meet their customers’ needs and provide reliable supplies during times of drought. Local water supply investments since the 1990s include everything from water recycling to local and regional water storage to desalination of brackish groundwater and ocean water. These types of investments have added nearly 5 million acre‐feet of local and regional water supply across the state. Local water supply investments are widely credited with keeping California’s economy intact throughout the current multiyear drought. The emergency drought regulation adopted in May 2015 and extended in February 2016 by the State Water Resources Control Board largely overlooked local water supply investments and required local urban water suppliers to impose mandatory water use restrictions even where local water supply conditions did not warrant such stringent restrictions. As the state’s focus transitions from the emergency regulation to a potential long‐term policy on conservation, the state’s policy should emphasize local investments in drought resiliency and ongoing water use efficiency and leave discretion with local water agencies to choose appropriate management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Ecological Knowledge on Characteristics, Conservation and Management of Soil in Tribal Communities of Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve, India
    Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Traditional ecological knowledge on characteristics, conservation and management of soil in tribal communities of Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve, India C. P. Kala Ecosystem & Environment Management Indian Institute of Forest Management, Nehru Nagar, Bhopal - 462 003 Madhya Pradesh, INDIA Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The problem of soil degradation has made the farmers to devise some indigenous practices and systems of land use since antiquity in order to maintain and restore the quality of land, which remains operational even today to maintain sustainable crop production. The present study, therefore, deals with the traditional ecological knowledge on soil characteristics and fertility along with the conservation and management of soil by the tribal communities in the Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR) of India. Traditionally, the farmers in the study villages of PBR have classified the soil types mainly on the basis of soil texture, soil colour and its water retaining capacity. The study documented a total of 16 soil types, as classified by the villagers such as Bhurbhuria, Chikti, Kadialtori, Kamkaltori, Potini, Chikni, Kasai, Dadra and Barrimitti. Besides crop production, the soil was used for construction of house and pots, whitewashing and painting purposes. For conservation and management of soil, the farmers have adopted various traditional practices, which include crop rotation, burning of residues, planting forestry species, applying farmyard manure, and making land boundary. The study reflects that the traditional soil conservation and management practices in PBR are well knitted and interwoven with the cultures, belief systems and available resources. Keywords: Traditional knowledge, soil classification, soil conservation, tribal communities, Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Degradation
    SPM4 Land degradation Coordinating Lead Authors: Lennart Olsson (Sweden), Humberto Barbosa (Brazil) Lead Authors: Suruchi Bhadwal (India), Annette Cowie (Australia), Kenel Delusca (Haiti), Dulce Flores-Renteria (Mexico), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Esteban Jobbagy (Argentina), Werner Kurz (Canada), Diqiang Li (China), Denis Jean Sonwa (Cameroon), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors: Timothy Crews (The United States of America), Martin Dallimer (United Kingdom), Joris Eekhout (The Netherlands), Karlheinz Erb (Italy), Eamon Haughey (Ireland), Richard Houghton (The United States of America), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Francis X. Johnson (The United States of America), Woo-Kyun Lee (The Republic of Korea), John Morton (United Kingdom), Felipe Garcia Oliva (Mexico), Jan Petzold (Germany), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), Florence Renou-Wilson (Ireland), Anna Tengberg (Sweden), Louis Verchot (Colombia/ The United States of America), Katharine Vincent (South Africa) Review Editors: José Manuel Moreno (Spain), Carolina Vera (Argentina) Chapter Scientist: Aliyu Salisu Barau (Nigeria) This chapter should be cited as: Olsson, L., H. Barbosa, S. Bhadwal, A. Cowie, K. Delusca, D. Flores-Renteria, K. Hermans, E. Jobbagy, W. Kurz, D. Li, D.J. Sonwa, L. Stringer, 2019: Land Degradation. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources, Spring 1999
    NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION TASK FORCE REPORT PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The views expressed in this report are those of the Task Force members and were not the subject of endorsement by the full Council. Many of the federal officials who serve on the Council also serve on the Council’s Task Forces and participated actively in developing the Task Force’s recommendations, but those recommendations do not necessarily reflect Administration policy. PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES To obtain copies of this Report, please contact: President’s Council on Sustainable Development 730 Jackson Place, NW Washington, D.C. 20503 1-800-363-3732 (202) 408-5296 Website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/PCSD TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP CO-CHAIRS Richard Barth, Chairman, President, and CEO, Ciba-Geigy Corporation James R. Lyons, Undersecretary for Natural Resources and the Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture Theodore Strong, Executive Director, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission MEMBERS Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior James Baker, Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Carol Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A.D. Correll, Chairman and CEO, Georgia-Pacific Corporation Fred D. Krupp, Executive Director, Environmental Defense Fund Michele Perrault, International Vice President, Sierra Club John C. Sawhill, President and CEO, The Nature Conservancy PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ii INTRODUCTION. 1 CHAPTER 1:TASK FORCE APPROACH. 5 The Role of the Watershed.
    [Show full text]