HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES Effective Negotiation Procedures to Delimit, Demarcate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES Effective Negotiation Procedures to Delimit, Demarcate HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES Effective Negotiation Procedures to Delimit, Demarcate and Resolve Disputes over Boundaries PHOTO CREDIT: PARLEY PHOTO NOVEMBER 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech. This publication was produced by Tetra Tech for review by the United States Agency for International Development by Christopher Moore of CDR Associates with contributions from Greg Kitt and the staff of Parley on surveys and significant fieldwork on Liberian boundary harmonization activities, through the USAID/Liberia Land Governance Support Activity Project, Contract No: AID-OAA-I-12-00032, Task Order No: AID-669-TO-15-00003. This report was prepared by: Tetra Tech 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont 05401 USA Telephone: (802) 658-3890 Fax: (802) 495-0282 E-Mail: [email protected] Tetra Tech Contacts: Mark Marquardt, Chief of Party [email protected] Megan Huth, Project Manager [email protected] David Felson, Deputy Project Manager [email protected] HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES Effective Negotiation Procedures to Delimit, Demarcate and Resolve Disputes over Boundaries NOVEMBER 2016 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ACNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of colleagues made valuable contributions to the development of this document. First, we would like to thank a number of staff members of Parley including Nyahn Flomo for coordinating field work on boundary issues, David Lamah and Prince Williams for developing the study design and conducting field interviews in twelve Liberian communities; and Miatta Konah and Rebecca Secklo for piloting a boundary harmonization training programs in six communities. We would also like to thank Emiko Guthe of Tetra Tech for her contribution on technical assistance and technologies for boundary delineation and demarcation. Finally we would like to thank Tzili Mor, My-Lan Dodd and Justine Uvuza of Landesa, for conducting a gender review of the document. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. I ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 FOCUS OF THE REPORT ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 BOUNDARIES ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY................................................................................... 9 1.2.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................ 9 2.0 BOUNDARY HARMONIZATION ................................................................................................ 11 2.1 TWELVE PRINCIPLES FOR SUCCESSFUL BOUNDARY HARMONIZATION & NEGOTIATIONS ... ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES – POSITIONAL AND INTEREST-BASED PROCESSES .................... 14 2.3 PREPARING FOR BOUNDARY HARMONIZATION NEGOTIATIONS ................................................. 18 2.4 MAPPING COMMUNITY BOUNDARIES .......................................................................................................... 29 2.5 COORDINATION WITH NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES AND THEIR NEGOTIATION TEAMS . ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 2.6 WALKING THE LAND TO IDENTIFY WHERE COMMUNITIES AGREE, HAVE QUESTIONS OR DISAGREE OVER BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................... 42 2.7 NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS ON BOUNDARIES ..................................................................................... 43 2.8 CONFIRMING NEGOTIATED BOUNDARIES WITH COMMUNITIES ................................................... 48 2.9 DEMARCATING NEGOTIATED BOUNDARIES CONFIRMED BY COMMUNITIES .......................... 52 2.10 FORMALIZING COMMUNITY BOUNDARIES ................................................................................................ 53 2.11 SECURING LEGAL RECOGNITION OF COMMUNITY LAND BY THE GOVERNMENT ................ 56 3.0 ISSUES THAT MAY CAUSE BOUNDARY DISPUTES AND POTENTIAL NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES TO RESOLVE THEM ............................................................................................. 57 3.1 ISSUES THAT MAY CAUSE DISPUTES AND RESOLUTION STRATEGIES .................................................. 57 4.0 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR BOUNDARY DELINEATION AND DEMARCATION ................................................................................................................... 75 4.1 SIMPLE MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES AND APPROACHES FOR MAPPING COMMUNITY LAND ......... 75 4.2 SURVEYORS AND SURVEYS ....................................................................................................................................... 76 4.3 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS (GPS) ................................................................................................................ 78 5.0 PROMOTING VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE WITH BOUNDARY AGREEMENTS............... 79 5.1 DOCUMENTATION AND REGISTRATION .......................................................................................................... 79 5.2 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 79 5.3 ISSUE OR COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ...................................................................................... 79 6.0 PROCEDURES TO RESOLVE BOUNDARY ISSUES WHEN VOLUNTARY UNASSISTED AGREEMENTS ARE DIFFICULT OR NOT POSSIBLE .............................................................. 82 6.1 HELP TO REACH VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS .................................................................................................. 82 6.2 ADVICE ON POTENTIAL SETTLEMENTS OR AGREEMENTS ......................................................................... 85 6.3 NON-BINDING OR BINDING THIRD-PARTY DECISION MAKING ........................................................... 86 APPENDIX A: STATUTORY DOCUMENTS ON LAND OWNERSHIP IN LIBERIA ....................... 90 APPENDIX B: FIELD NOTES ON COMMUNITY BOUNDARIES, INTER-COMMUNITY BOUNDARY DISPUTES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS EFFORTS IN TWELVE COMMUNITIES IN LIBERIA ......................................................................................................... 92 LGSA HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES REPORT I ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution BATNA Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement CBO Community Based Organization CDR Collaborative Dispute Resolution CFDC Community Forest Development Committee CHC Community Health Committee CLMDA Community Land Development Management Association FDA Forest Development Authority GIS Geographic Information Systems GPS Global Positioning System ICC Interim Coordinating Committee ILTF Interim Land Task Force INGO International Nongovernmental Organization LC Land Commission LCC Land Coordination Center LGC Land Governing Committee LGSA Land Governance Support Activity Project MOU Memorandum of Understanding NGO Nongovernmental Organization NRC Norwegian Refugee Council PROSPER People, Rules and Organizations Supporting the Protection of Ecosystem Resources SDI Sustainable Development Initiative USAID United States Agency for International Development WATNA Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement LGSA HARMONIZING BOUNDARIES REPORT II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report on Harmonizing Boundaries: Effective Negotiation Procedures for Delimiting, Demarcating and Resolving Boundary Disputes provides information that can be used by individuals, families, clans, communities, towns/villages and political entities to delineate and demarcate boundaries. While prepared as a contribution toward implementation of Liberia’s new Land Policy and Land Rights Act, the latter of which is currently a bill that details procedures for legal recognition of customary land rights, procedures in the report can be used in a variety of contexts and countries where parties want to harmonize either internal or external boundaries. In April 2016, the LGSA recommended to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Liberia’s Interim Land Task Force (ILTF) that an activity be initiated to assist the Government of Liberia and customary communities identify boundaries between
Recommended publications
  • Liberia BULLETIN Bimonthly Published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia
    LibeRIA BULLETIN Bimonthly published by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - Liberia 1 October 2004 Vol. 1, Issue No. 4 Voluntary Repatriation Started October 1, 2004 The inaugural convoys of 77 Liberian refugees from Sierra Leone and 97 from Ghana arrived to Liberia on October 1, 2004, which marked the commencement of the UNHCR voluntary repatriation. Only two weeks prior to the beginning of the repatriation, the County Resettlement Assessment Committee (CRAC) pro- claimed four counties safe for return – Grand Cape Mount, Bomi, Gbarpolu and Margibi. The first group of refugees from Sierra Leone is returning to their homes in Grand Cape Mount. UNHCR is only facilitating re- turns to safe areas. Upon arrival, returnees have the option to spend a couple of nights in transit centers (TC) before returning to their areas of origin. At the TC, they received water, cooked meals, health care, as well as a two-months resettlement ration and a Non- Signing of Tripartite Agreement with Guinea Food Items (NFI) package. With the signing of the Tripartite Agreements, which took place in Accra, Ghana, on September 22, 2004 with the Ghanian government and in Monrovia, Liberia, on September 27, 2004 with the governments of Si- erra Leone, Guinea and Cote d’Ivorie, binding agree- ment has been established between UNHCR, asylum countries and Liberia. WFP and UNHCR held a regional meeting on Septem- ber 27, 2004 in Monrovia and discussed repatriation plans for Liberian refugees and IDPs. WFP explained that despite the current food pipeline constraints, the repatriation of refugees remains a priority for the Country Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Ebola Sitrep No. 50
    Liberia Ebola SitRep no. 91 Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Aug 14, 2014 Cases National Lofa County Lofa Grand Bassa Grand Bong County Bomi County Bomi Sinoe County Sinoe Grand Gedeh Grand Nimba County Nimba Margibi County Margibi RiverCess County RiverCess River Gee County River Grand Cape Mount Grand County Montserrado New Cases New Case/s (Suspected) 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 New Case/s (Probable) 20 0 0 0 1 0 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 New case/s (confirmed) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total suspected cases 182 4 44 8 0 0 61 13 44 6 1 0 1 Total probable cases 441 28 25 1 3 0 247 2 130 5 0 0 0 Total confirmed cases 187 9 14 6 4 0 101 2 43 7 0 1 0 Total Number of Confirmed Cases of Sierra Leonean Nationality 12 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Number of Confirmed Cases of Guinean Nationality 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative (confirmed, probable, suspected) cases 810 41 83 15 7 0 409 17 217 18 1 1 1 Outbreak Overview: Case Counts Reported 300 Confirmed 250 Probable Suspect 200 150 100 50 0 Aug 10-16: Reported Deaths 35 Confirmed 30 Probable Suspect 25 20 15 10 5 0 Cases among HCWs County County County Bassa Gedeh County County County County National Lofa Grand Grand Bong County Bomi Sinoe Grand Grand Nimba Margibi RiverCess River Gee County River Grand Cape Mount Grand Montserrado Newly Reported Cases in HCW on 14th Aug 2014 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Cumulative cases among HCW 90 4 24 3 3 0 16 4 35 1 0 0 0 Newly Reported deaths in HCW on 14th Aug 2014 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Cumulative deaths among HCW 39 4 4 0 0 0 13 0 18 0 0 0 0 Isolation and Discharges County County County Bassa Gedeh County County County County National Lofa Grand Grand Bong County Bomi Sinoe Grand Grand Nimba Margibi RiverCess River Gee County River Grand Cape Mount Grand Montserrado New Admission on Aug 14 2014 22 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 8 0 0 0 0 Total no.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Two Systems of Surveillance Operating in Burundi at Present
    LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2017 1 LIVELIHOOD ZONING ACTIVITY IN LIBERIA - UPDATE A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM NETWORK (FEWS NET) April 2017 This publication was prepared by Stephen Browne and Amadou Diop for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), in collaboration with the Liberian Ministry of Agriculture, USAID Liberia, WFP, and FAO. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Page 2 of 60 Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Background and Introduction......................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 8 National Livelihood Zone Map .......................................................................................................12 National Seasonal Calendar ..........................................................................................................13 Timeline of Shocks and Hazards ....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Humanitarian Edition Issue
    http://www.usaid.gov/ https://www.internews.org/ http://www.healthcommcapacity.org/ Humanitaritan Newsletter Information Saves Lives Issue #8 - April 25 - May 1 Citizens’ Feedback http://on.fb.me/1NM9DKthttps://www.facebook.com/internewsliberia?fref=ts/internewsliberia Welcome to the Internews Newsletter for humanitarian responders in Liberia. This newsletter is created with the intent to support the work of Ebola responders in connecting with the local population and understanding their information needs. Internews welcomes feedback, comments and suggestions from all organizations receiving this newsletter and invites you to forward, share and re-post this newsletter as widely as possible. ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION Citizens are asking why health workers in Lofa The residents would like to know the difference between the routine vaccine and the County have rolled out the routine vaccine at this time Ebola vaccine. of the year. They fear it is the Ebola vaccine, referring Gbarpolu to an Ebola outbreak in their county at the same time In Nimba County, the people are reporting that an NGO called Crusaders last year. Lofa for Peace and the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare are now using local languages to educate traditional chiefs, paramount rulers and traditional elders on the differences between routine and Ebola vaccines. Nimba People are saying that health workers in Fuamah district have trained a team of volunteers within Residents in River Cess are reporting that the health Bong County, who would move into all communities, ministry has been organizing awareness campaigns in their educating people on the differences between the county on the differences between the Ebola and routine Ebola and routine vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Liberia 2017 Annual Integrated Disease
    REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA 2017 ANNUAL INTEGRATED DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE (IDSR) Preventing and Controlling BULLETIN Public Health Threats JANUARY – DECEMBER 2017 39 3 Disease Humanitarian Outbreaks Events Division of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology National Public Health Institute of Liberia Table of Contents EDITORIAL……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 I. OVERVIEW OF IDSR IN LIBERIA………………………………………………………………………………………………... 3 II. IDSR PERFORMANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 A. Reporting Coverage…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….3 B. Selected IDSR Performance Indicators…………………………………………………………………………………………6 C. National IDSR Supervision………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 D. IDSR Immediately Reportable Diseases/Events………………………………………………………………………………9 E. IDSR Monthly Reportable Diseases/Conditions………………………………………………………………………………10 III. OUTBREAKS AND HUMANITARIAN EVENTS………………………………………………………………………………… 11 A. Introduction……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………11 B. Measles……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 C. Lassa fever…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14 D. Human Monkeypox……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..17 E. Meningococcal Disease…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...21 F. Floods/Mudslides…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...22 G. Chemical Spills………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………23 IV. DISEASES/CONDITIONS OF PUBLIC HEALTH IMPORTANCE…………………………………………………………….. 24 V. PUBLIC HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Bomi County Development Agenda 2008
    Bomi County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia 2008 – 2012 Bomi County Development Agenda VISION STATEMENT The people of Bomi envisage a County with good governance and rule of law, reconciliation, peace and stability, advancement in social, economic, political, cultural and human development, active participation of youth and women, rapid industrialization, provision of electricity, increased job opportunities and improvement of the standard of living of all citizens and residents. Republic of Liberia Prepared by the County Development Committee, in collaboration with the Ministries of Planning and Economic Affairs and Internal Affairs. Supported by the UN County Support Team project, funded by the Swedish Government and UNDP. Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS........! iii FOREWORD..........................................................................! iv PREFACE!!............................................................................. vi BOMI COUNTY OFFICIALS....................................................! vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................! ix PART 1 - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1.!Introduction................................................................................................! 1 1.2 !History........................................................................................................! 1 1.3.!Geography..................................................................................................! 1 1.4.!Demography...............................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia
    United Nations S/2011/757 Security Council Distr.: General 7 December 2011 Original: English Letter dated 30 November 2011 from the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia, and in accordance with paragraph 6 (f) of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010), I have the honour to submit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia. I would appreciate it if the present letter, together with its enclosure, could be brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Nawaf Salam Chairman Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia 11-60582 (E) 141211 *1160582* S/2011/757 Enclosure Letter dated 18 November 2011 from the Panel of Experts on Liberia addressed to the Chairman of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia The members of the Panel of Experts on Liberia have the honour to transmit the final report of the Panel, prepared pursuant to paragraph 6 of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010). (Signed) Christian Dietrich (Coordinator) (Signed) Augusta Muchai (Signed) Caspar Fithen 2 11-60582 S/2011/757 Final report of the Panel of Experts on Liberia submitted pursuant to paragraph 6 (f) of Security Council resolution 1961 (2010) Summary Arms embargo The Panel of Experts identified one significant arms embargo violation committed by Liberian mercenaries and Ivorian combatants in River Gee County in May 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Diversity: a Study of Livelihoods and Forest Landscapes in Liberia
    Understanding Diversity: A Study of Livelihoods and Forest Landscapes in Liberia Aiah Lebbie, Robert Fisher, Francis Odoom, Wollor Topor, Joe Flomo and Garvoie Kardoh Cover photo: Approaching Zangar (Photo: R. Fisher) Understanding Diversity: A Study of Livelihoods and Forest Landscapes in Liberia Aiah Lebbie, Robert Fisher, Francis Odoom, Wollor Topor, Joe Flomo and Garvoie Kardoh (With the assistance of Lawrence Greene, Michael Fofanah, Boima Johnson, Tennema Coleman, Weedor Lamine, Hurlormah Worllarwulu) September 2009 Report prepared for Livelihoods and Landscape Strategy Forest Conservation Programme IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature) 1 This study was undertaken for the Livelihoods and Landscape Strategy (LLS) of the Forest Conservation Programme, IUCN (The International Union for Conservation of Nature). LLS is supported with funding from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DGIS). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 4 Foreword 5 Glossary 7 Abstract 8 Chapter 1. Introduction 9 Chapter 2. Methodology 14 Chapter 3. Zangar 17 Chapter 4. Sembehun 26 Chapter 5. Garpu Town 35 Chapter 6. Goll’s Town 43 Chapter 7. Kilima Bendu 49 Chapter 8. Zaewordamai 55 Chapter 9. Gohn’s Town 61 Chapter 10. Analysis and Conclusions 67 References 72 Appendix 1. The Benefits of Community Participation and Involvement of the University of Liberia in the Study 74 Appendix 2. Comparative Tables Summarizing Aspects of Community Data 75 Appendix 3. Summary of Forest Categories and Natural Resource Management in all Case Study Landscapes 76 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been possible without the support of many people who assisted in many different ways. We would like to thank the Honorable John T.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of the Presidential Press SECRETARY
    OFFICE OF THE Presidential Press SECRETARY Ministry of State for Presidential Affairs Executive Mansion Republic of Liberia Cell: 0776961441 Sam Mannah Email: [email protected] President George Manneh Weah has made additional appointments in Government pending confirmation by the Liberian Senate where applicable. Nimba County Nominations Name Position Hon. Peter Sarkpa Kangbay Assistant Superintendent for Development Hon. Reginald Mehn County Inspector Hon. Saye M. Musa Assistant Superintendent for Fiscal Affairs Hon. Samuel M. Yealue Statutory District Superintendent, Gbehlay Geh Statutory District Hon. Aubrey Wehyee Statutory District Superintendent, Tapita Statutory District Hon. Arthur G. Sahn Statutory District Superintendent, Seclapea Statutory District Hon. Zephaniah Gbahn Statutory District Superintendent, Zoe Geh Statutory District Hon. Jeremiah B. Yangean City Mayor, Seclapea City Hon. Amos G. Suah City Mayor, Ganta City Hon. Memma Kamara City Mayor, Senniquellie City Hon. Philip Flomo City Mayor, Karnplay City Hon. Angie Dopoe City Mayor, Bahn City Hon. Sarah Mendoabor City Mayor, Tapita City Hon. John D. D. Wehyee District Commissioner, Doe Administrative District Hon. Amos S. Gbartu District Commissioner, Bain-Garr Administrative District Department of Public Affairs web: www.emansion.gov.lr OFFICE OF THE Presidential Press SECRETARY Ministry of State for Presidential Affairs Executive Mansion Republic of Liberia Cell: 0776961441 Sam Mannah Email: [email protected] Hon. Sam Karnue District Commissioner, Yarpea Mah Administrative District Hon. Kaymah Kuoh District Commissioner Wee-Gbeh Administrative District Hon. Yealu W. Yealu District Commissioner, Senniquellie Mah District Hon. Ramcy Mengor District Commissioner, Leewehpea Administrative District Hon. Janathan S. Dehkruah District Commissioner, Boe & Quella Administrative District Hon. Emmanuel Zuah District Commissioner, Buu-Yao Administrative District Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final report October 2019-March 2020 Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties 2 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The Link NCA in Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, Rural Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe Counties was commissioned by the Liberian Wash Consortium and funded by Irish Aid. The study was conducted by Link NCA Analyst, Grace Heymsfield, under the supervision of Lenka Blanárová, Senior Nutrition Assessment Coordinator, Action Against Hunger UK, and the study’s focal points: Tom Health (Action Against Hunger France WASH Technical Adviser) and Michael Slewion Doe (Consortium Coordinator), with valuable contributions from the pool of Technical Advisors at Action Against Hunger, France, namely Fabienne Rousseau, Xuan Phan and Janis Differt; Tekar Jallah-Bundor, Action Against Hunger Liberia Nutrition and Health Program Manager, and Mohamed Takoy, Action Against Hunger Liberia Country Representative. The Link NCA team wishes to express their thanks to all those who have contributed to this study and/or facilitated its development, in particular the qualitative and quantitative study teams for their expertise and sense of humor.1 A special thank you to: • G. Tarnue Brooks, Action Against Hunger M&E Officer, for his constant encouragement and immense support co-managing the Risk Factor Survey; • Two additional team members who ‘Linked’ both stages of the study, propelling the study forward with their qualitative and quantitative experience: Paul Sahr Johnson & Joseph N. Davis- Qualitative Research Assistants, Quantitative Supervisors; To Dr. Annette Brima- Davis, Director, Nutrition Division, and Mameni Linga Morli, National SUN Focal Point, for their support of the study, as well as the Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Montserrado, Rivercess, and Sinoe County Health Teams, for their tireless efforts and partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Cape Mount CDA
    Grand Cape Mount County Development Agenda Republic of Liberia 2008 – 2012 Grand Cape Mount County Development Agenda VISION STATEMENT: By 2027, we the People of Cape Mount County envisage a County with improved infrastructure and access to basic services including good health care, quality education, good road network, and electricity; an industrialized agricultural economy; and a peaceful and secure environment for all, where women are respected and fully empowered to contribute to growth and development. The People envision working together with commitment and dedication to develop their full economic, social and cultural potential, for a fuller and richer life for all, regardless of tribe, sex, religion or politics. Republic of Liberia Prepared by the County Development Committee, in collaboration with the Ministries of Planning and Economic Affairs and Internal Affairs. Supported by the UN County Support Team project, funded by the Swedish Government and UNDP. Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS.........! iii FOREWORD..........................................................................! iv PREFACE..............................................................................! vi GRAND CAPE MOUNT COUNTY OFFICIALS............................! vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................! ix PART 1 - INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................! 1 1.2 History........................................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capital Mapping and Accounting in Liberia: Understanding the Contribution of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services to Liberia’S Sustainable Development
    Authors/analysts: Rachel Neugarten, Mahbubul Alam, Natalia Acero Martinez, Miroslav Honzak, Daniel Juhn, Kellee Koenig, Trond Larsen, Kevin Moull, Ana Maria Rodriguez, Timothy Max Wright Contributions from: Liam Walsh, Jessica Donovan, Peter Mulbah, Jim Valenza, Kim Reuter, Rosimeiry Portela, Tim Noviello, Shelly Wade, David Hole, Manuel Peralvo, Jess Silver, and Jessica Junker Acknowledgements: This project was funded by a generous gift from Gordon and Betty Moore. We are grateful for the support and expertise provided by our collaborators at the Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia, Jeremiah Sokan and Anyaa Vohiri and for the support from the Gaborone Declaration for Sustainability in Africa (GDSA) Secretariat, and from the Natural Capital Project. Data provided by Liberia’s Forestry Development Authority (FDA), Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS), and Liberian Hydrological Services (LHS), the Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. 1 “Natural capital –our ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources– underpins economies, societies and individual well-being. The values of its myriad benefits are, however, often overlooked or poorly understood. They are rarely taken fully into account through economic signals in markets, or in day-to- day decisions by business and citizens, nor indeed reflected adequately in the accounts of society. The steady loss of forests, soils, wetlands and coral reefs is closely tied to this economic invisibility. So, too, are the losses of species and of productive assets like fisheries, driven partly by ignoring values beyond the immediate and private” - Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, President of Liberia, at the Summit for Sustainability in Africa, Botswana, 2012 Suggested citation: Conservation International.
    [Show full text]