Canada's Export Market Development for Agricultural Products

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canada's Export Market Development for Agricultural Products CAN4DA'S EXPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. (foreign AgriCUltur,al'. ~~~~~mi-C Reporot). _f. Omero Sabatini. W?1sh1ngtbn, DC: E?onomic Researc-h Ser:vice. M~y (HAL Call No. A281.9/J[g8F) ___~ ________' _/_"______' ,:"""'.......L...­ 8 1.0 :: 111112. IIp·5 W 1~~3.2 W u.: ~~ IIIII~ t ~ 2.0 111111.25 1~111.4 ~ 1.6 ' CANADA'S Export Market Development for Agricultural TR\.~GENCY REAOING ROOM Products JUl 7 1915 Sw Room 50s 500 l2th St., o'e 20250 Washington, . A'? ;:mer'" ,l;fr,lIj 'M • m5l~ gi' !Eif U.S. Deportment Economic Foreign of Agriculture Research Agricultural Service Economic Report No. 107 ,'. , {j' I- Q ; CANADA I S EXPORT MARKET DEVELOPplEHT FOR AGRICUTIrURAL PRODUCTS. Foreign Demand and o Competition Division, Economic Research Service, Foreign Agricultural Economic Report No. 107. .; o " ABSTRACT In the late 1960 I S Canada I s exports of wheat and share of the world vrheat market declined. Canada began a program of crop diversification away from wheat and toward barley and rapeseed. To improve Canada's international market position and to facilitate the switch in farm proiluGtion, the Federal Goverrunent began a large-scale, well-financed program for the development of foreign markets for agricultural products. In January 1972, Canada launched a cost-sharing Grain;] and Oilseeds Marketing Incentive Program, which can receive Federal allocations of up to C$7 million per year and which operates in cooperation with industry associations, trading companies, agencies, universities, and simila:-o organi:Gdtions. International demar.d for grain and o:ilseed.s bas b<"en st.rong , I since this program was put into effect, e.nd so far, emphasis has been on developing long­ term projects and building up the infrastructure for foreign market penetration. In 1973, the Government set up another cost·.sharing program covering virtually all other farm products, with Goverr.ment allocations (If up to C$3 million per year. In the past few years, Provincial ~overnments, quasi-governmental marketing boards, and private organizatiDns have alsq stepped up their programs for foreign market developm\~mt or initiaLed new ones. Ttie combined funds made available by these groupg for the promotion of farm exports amount to several million dollars per year. Canada's increased activity in world markets is creating greater competition for U~S. exports. Canada has been particularly successful in expanding its axports of grai.ns, oilseeds, and pork to coun­ tries in East Asia. Key Wor1s: Canada; Foreign market development; Agricultural exports; Foreign ~nmpetition; Grain exports; Oilseed exports. ,; May 1975 Washing-hon, D.C. 20250 " I ott ~'i Ii .. It ~~. :'11 , ...-_*ullik' Q'A: It",' ='1 \1, - "'*" I I PREFACE This report reviews Canada's programs and institutions for the promotion of agricul­ tural exports. It seeks to: (1) ident{fy activities and organizations that have been most successful in expanding Canadian farm exports to established markets, opening up new outlets for Canadian farm products, and/or making inroads into traditional U.S. markets; and (2) to point out the kind of eompetition that Canada's export promotion activity is likely to generate in the future for U.S. exporters of farm products. The author is indebted to numerous officials of the Canadian Government and various other organizations who provided helpful information and assistance. Contacts with most of these officials were established through the courtesy of Garry Benoit, Assistant Commercial Secretary (Agriculture) of the Canadian Embassy in Washington. William J. Mills, former U.S. Assistant Agricultural Attache, Ottawa, was especially cooperative and supplied much of the source material. Reed E. Friend, Leader, Developed Countries Program Area, Foreign Demand and Competition Division, Economic Research Service, pr?vided overall direction and supervision. :& Ii F ,,r; I, t !: Ii [: "'", r: I t~ ~ f eI' l'~ f '0 i Il {j EXPLANATORY NOTES The metric system was occasionally used. The e~uivalents of the units used are: 1 metric ton = 2,204.6 pounds; and 1 kilogram (kg.) = 2.2046 pounds. Weights equivalents of 1 bushel are as follows: Wheat, 60 lbs., or 27.22 kgs.; barley, 48 Ibs., or 21.77 kgs.; oats (Canadian bushel), 34 Ibs., or 15.42 kgs.; rye 56 Ibs., or 25.40 kgs.; flaxseed, 56 Ibs., or 25.40 kgs.; rapeseed, 50 Ibs., or 22.';8 kgs.; and soybeans, 60 lbs., or 27.22 kgs. Split years (e. g., 1973/74), unless otherwise noted, refer to the Canad,ian marketing year, which starts on August 1 and ends on July 31. Both U.S. and Canadian dollars were used. From May 1962 through May 1970, the fixed rate of exchange was C$l = US$0.925. The fixed relationship was ended in May 19'70. Since then, the annual average rate of exchange has been as rollows: 1970, C$l = uS$1.o4; 1971, C$l = US$1.01; 1972, C$l = US$.99; 1973, C$l = US$l. ii c. ,)~' ~/..*' ~c,_'_____.___._...._"_._~_~"_"~~_'~_~_"--"""<)~~__ -'-~A>lt 1 ~ ~t CONTENTS ~" ! o Page 1\~ Ii ~ SUMMARY .vii 11 INTRODUCTION 1 I CANADIAN FARM PRODUCTION AND EXB,QRTS. • • '" 2 11 Farm Production and Its Relationship to the World Market. 2 ff Canadian Farm Exports . 4 ~ Composition of Exports •..... 4 jl 6 Patterns of Trade and Competition with U.S. Products. hH Exports by Commodity... 6 l' Exports by Country.... 12 t The Importance of Foreign Trade to Canadian Agriculture; Canada's Stake ft in Trade Liberalization . 16 k ~ . ~[, EXPORT PROMOTION AND FOREIGN ~\1A.RKET DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. 18 Scope and Changing Aspects (If Canadian Farm Exports Promotion ,. 18 i " The Institutional Framework ':,1 ............... 22 ' : PROGRAMS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNL.1ENT AND QUASI-GOVERNMENT NATIONAL AND f INTERPROVINCIAL ORGANIZATIONS. • . 22 Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce. .' " 22 Market Development Fund for Agricultural Products 23 Grains and Oilseed~ Marketing Incentive Program 24 Agricultural and Foods Products Market Development Assistance Program 25 Trade Fairs and Missions and Other Traditional Programs of IT&C 26 Trade Fairs and Missions..... 26 Other Services.......... 28 Program for Export Market Development 29 The Canadian Wheat Board . • . 31 Ce.nadian International Grains Institute 34 Canada Grains Council . 35 Department of Agriculture . 38 National Marketing Agencies . 39 Credit Programs For Promotion of Exports to Developing and Communist Countries. 40 Improvement of Grain Handling and Transportation Facilities 43 PROGRAMS OF THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS. 45 Alberta . 45 Manitoba... 4'7 Ontario ... 48 Other Provinces 49 Interprovincial Cooperation 49 PROGRAMS OF OTHER SELECTED ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGED IN EXPORT PROMOTION. 50 Rapeseed Association of Canada. 50 Rapeseed Production in Canada . 50 General Approach to Rapeseed Export Promotion 51 The Japanese Market . 53 Other Foreign Markets 5'7 The Canadian Market . 59 iii o o Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers' Marketing Board. 62 Hog Marketing Organizations . 65 Fruit and Vegetable Organizations . 68 Other Organizations. .. ... , 70 Ontario Bean Producers' Marketing Board 70 Western Grain Cooperatives .... 71 Canadian Seed Growers Association (CSGA) 72 Cattle Associations • . 72 Palliser Wheat Growers' Association ... 73 FOREIGN INVESTMENT FOR PURPOSES OF FARM EXPORT PROMOTION. n Canadian Investment Overseas. '. 73 Foreign Investment in Canada. • . 74 Government Aid to Investment for Trade. 75 PROBABLE IMPACT OF CANADIAN EXPORT PROMOTION PROGRAMS ON U.S. TRADE 75 SELECTED REFERENCES 79 \::-.: iv ~t<I'iA';;'&.:J..i'triee!e"#'S.... ~:.,il ' , ! i l TABLES Exports of principal Canadian agricultural products, 1963-73. .. , . 5 1­ J 2. Canadian, U.S., and total world wheat exports, by major areas of ( destination and Canadian and U.S. percentages of' the market, 1962/63-1971/72, 7 I 3. Exports of Canadian 'wheat, by destination, quantity and value, average (i ! 1963-67, and annual 1968-73 .. , ...............•..• 4. Exports of Canad.ian barley, by destination, quantity and value, average 1963-67, and annual 1968-73 ....... , ............. 10 5. World exports of barley by principal countries of origin and Canadian, \ U. S., and Fl'ench share of the total, 1960/61-1973/74. '.' . .. :,' 11 6. Exports of Canadian rapeseed by destination, quantity and v0'+ue, average 1963-67, and annual 1968-73 ...................... 13 7. Exports of Canadian flaxseed by destination, quantity and value, average 1963-67 ;;"and 1968-73. • . "'" . 14 8. Percent distribution of Canadian a6ricultural exports by principal country of destination~ averages 1945-49 to 1965-69 and annual 1970-72. ; . 15 9· Cans,dian and U.S. exports of wheat and wheat flour in terms of wheat, excluding donations, to specified countries, 1967/68-1971/72.. , . 41 54 10. Japanese production and imports of principal oilcrop~ 1960-73 . 11. Japanese production of edible vegetable oils and vegetable oil meal and cake, 1960-73 . • . .. " . 56 12. Supply and disposition of rapeseed meal and production of mixed feed in Japan, 1968-73.................... 58 13. Canadian crushings of rapeseed and soybeans; production of soybean and rapeseed oil; and imports of U.S. soybeans and soybean oil; 1960-73 60 14. Canadian production of deodorized vegetable oil for use in the manufacture of margarine, salad, and shortening oil, 1966-73.. 61 63 15. Canadian exports of unmanufactured tobacco, 1963-73 66 16. Canadian hog production and trade, 1963-73. 17. Japanese imports of pork (fresh or frozen) 'by principal sources, fiscal years 1971-73. ., . 69 \; J' t Ii ti I F "~: I .'r f ¥. ~ !; ~ H b ~ ;~ H t" v , ~-:-------~ ".. -----<"~-,'- ,,-_. , ... ~ , -, SUMMARY () j, During theicJ~ast 4 or 5 years, Canada has implemented a significant program for pro­ moting farm e~~6rts. Funding is generous, and the Government and other organizations are determined to provide all the' financial support needed to assure success. Canada is a ~ajor world exporter of wheat, barley, rapeseed, linseed (flaxseed), and tobacco. It also ships sizable amounts of red meat to the United States and Japan.
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Wheat
    Canadian Wheat By: J. E. Dexter1, K.R. Preston1 and N. J. Woodbeck2 Chapter 6: Future of flour a compendium of flour improvement, 2006, pg - 43-62 Edited by Lutz Popper, Wermer Schafer and Walter Freund. Agrimedia, Bergen. Dunne, Germany. 1 Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, 1404-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada 2 Canadian Grain Commission, Industry Services, 900-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada Introduction The vast majority of Canadian wheat is produced in western Canada (Manitoba and provinces to the west). A high proportion of western Canadian wheat is exported, and it is marketed in a highly regulated fashion. As soon as western Canadian wheat is delivered by producers to a grain elevator the wheat becomes the property of the Canadian Wheat Board, which is a single desk seller for western Canadian wheat. Approval for registration into any of the eight classes of wheat in western Canada is based on merit according to disease resistance, agronomic performance and processing quality. Wheat is also produced in eastern Canada, primarily in southern Ontario. Eastern Canadian wheat is also registered on the basis of merit, although processing quality models are not quite as strictly defined as for western Canada. There is no single desk seller for eastern Canadian wheat. Eastern Canadian wheat is marketed by private trading companies and the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board. Approximately 50% of eastern Canadian wheat disappears domestically. The Canadian Grain Commission (CGC), a Department within Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada (AAFC), oversees quality assurance of Canadian grains, oilseeds, pulses and special crops.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–19 Edition) § 180.409
    § 180.409 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–19 Edition) dimethylphenyl)-N-(methoxyacetyl) al- Commodity Parts per anine methyl ester] and its metabolites million containing the 2,6-dimethylaniline Cattle, fat ............................................................... 0.02 moiety, and N-(2-hydroxy methyl-6- Cattle, meat byproducts ........................................ 0.02 methyl)-N-(methoxyacetyl)-alanine Corn, field, grain .................................................... 8.0 Corn, pop, grain ..................................................... 8.0 methylester, each expressed as Goat, fat ................................................................. 0.02 metalaxyl, in or on the following raw Goat, meat byproducts .......................................... 0.02 agricultural commodity: Grain, aspirated fractions ...................................... 20.0 Hog, fat .................................................................. 0.02 Hog, meat byproducts ........................................... 0.02 Commodity Parts per Horse, fat ............................................................... 0.02 million Horse, meat byproducts ........................................ 0.02 Poultry, fat ............................................................. 0.02 Papaya ................................................................... 0.1 Sheep, fat .............................................................. 0.02 Sheep, meat byproducts ....................................... 0.02 (d) Indirect or inadvertent tolerances. Sorghum, grain, grain
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Wheat Board, Warburtons, and the Creative
    The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re- constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history by André J. R. Magnan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by André Magnan 2010. Abstract Title: The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re-constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history Author: André J. R. Magnan Submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto, 2010. This dissertation traces the historical transformation of the Canada-UK commodity chain for wheat-bread as a lens on processes of local and global change in agrofood relations. During the 1990s, the Canadian Wheat Board (Canada‟s monopoly wheat seller) and Warburtons, a British bakery, pioneered an innovative identity- preserved sourcing relationship that ties contracted prairie farmers to consumers of premium bread in the UK. Emblematic of the increasing importance of quality claims, traceability, and private standards in the reorganization of agrifood supply chains, I argue that the changes of the 1990s cannot be understood outside of historical legacies giving shape to unique institutions for regulating agrofood relations on the Canadian prairies and in the UK food sector. I trace the rise, fall, and re-invention of the Canada-UK commodity chain across successive food regimes, examining the changing significance of wheat- bread, inter-state relations between Canada, the UK, and the US, and public and private forms of agrofood regulation over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Farmers Fight the Logic of Market Choice in GM Wheat
    Let the Market Decide? Canadian Farmers Fight the Logic of Market Choice in GM Wheat Emily Eaton1 University of Regina: Department of Geography Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the controversy that surrounded Monsanto’s attempt to commercialize genetically engineered Roundup Ready (RR) wheat in Canada in the early 2000s. Specifically, the paper interrogates the argument made by RR wheat proponents that the fate of RR wheat should be decided in the marketplace according to individual choice. To counter the common-sense notion of the right of consumers and producers to market choice, anti-RR wheat activists, led by agricultural producers, advanced notions of collective action. They argued that markets offered a very narrow set of choices and that once introduced into agricultural systems, RR wheat threatened already existing agronomic practices and export markets. The paper argues that the “let the markets decide” approach denies the common positionality of farmers as producers of food and forecloses a politics of production. Similarly, in the realm of consumption, agency beyond individual self-interest is rendered unthinkable. Keywords: market choice, subjectivity, neoliberalism, genetic modification 1 Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Canadian farmers fight the logic of market choice in GM wheat 108 Introduction [T]here’s a lot of debate on how much benefit local farmers have had ... in using [GM] Canola for example. Saskatchewan farmers, well they’ve readily adopted that technology right? And they have the choice. They don’t have to pay for that seed, they don’t have to use that technology, but they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Grains Fact Sheet
    whole grains Fact sheet what is whole grain? To understand the term “whole grain,” let’s start with a few Bran: protects basics. the seed •Fiber •B vitamins A grain is really a seed from any number of cereal plants •Trace Minerals (such as wheat or barley). A grain kernel has 3 parts—the germ, bran, and endosperm— and each of them contains unique nutrients and vitamins. Germ: nutrient To make flour, grain is milled (or ground)… storehouse •B Vitamins Endosperm: •Vitamin E …when the bran and germ are extracted and only the provides endosperm is milled, that makes white flour. •Trace Minerals energy •Antioxidants •Carbohydrates •Healthy Fats •Protein …when all 3 of parts of the kernel are milled, that makes •Some B Vitamins whole grain flour, also referred to as whole wheat flour. Whole grains not only retain more B vitamins, minerals like iron and zinc, protein and carbohydrates, they also deliver antioxidants, phytonutrients, and beneficial fiber. When it comes to good stuff for you, they can even compete with fruits and vegetables! the whole grains council The Whole Grain Council (WGC) has defined whole grain as having “100% of the original kernel, and therefore all the nutrients and vitamins, must be present to qualify as whole grain.” To identify products that contain significant sources of whole grains, look for the WGC stamp printed on the bags, boxes, or containers of those food items that qualify. whole grains Fact sheet what do the doctors say? • Have 3 servings of whole grains per day, or at least 48 grams per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wheat Bran in Breadmaking'
    (Dubois 1978, Shogren et al 1981) and introducing gritty textures GOULD, J. M., JASBERG, B. K., DEXTER, L., HSU, J. T., LEWIS, (Pomeranz et al 1976, Prentice and D'Appolonia 1977). This is in S. M., and FAHEY, G. C., Jr. 1989. High-fiber, noncaloric flour contrast with the partially delignified, extensively hydrated substitute for baked foods. Properties of alkaline peroxide-treated wheat straw. Cereal Chem. 66:201-205. structure of AHP-treated lignocellulose that softens and integrates JASBERG, B. K., GOULD, J. M., WARNER, K., and NAVICKIS, L. L. readily into the starch-gluten matrix with apparently minimal 1989a. High-fiber, noncaloric flour substitute for baked foods. Effects of interruption of matrix continuity (Jasberg et al 1989a). alkaline peroxide-treated lignocellulose on dough properties. Cereal Chem. 66:205-209. LITERATURE CITED JASBERG, B. K., GOULD, J. M., and WARNER, K. 1989b. High-fiber, noncaloric flour substitute for baked foods. Use of alkaline peroxide- COTE, G. L., and ROBYT, J. F. 1983. The formation of alpha-D-(1-3) treated lignocellulose in chocolate cake. Cereal Chem. 66:209-213. branch linkages by an exocellular glucansucrase from Leuconostoc POMERANZ, Y., SHOGREN, M. D., and FINNEY, K. F. 1976. White mesenteroides NRRL B-742. Carbohydr. Res. 119:141-156. wheat bran and brewer's spent grains in high-fiber bread. Baker's Dig. DeFOUW, D. F., ZABIK, M. E., UEBERSAX, M. A., AGUILERA, J. M., 50(6):35-38. and LUSAS, E. 1982. Use of unheated and heat-treated navy bean hulls PRENTICE, N., and D'APPOLONIA, B. L. 1977. High-fiber bread as a source of dietary fiber in spice-flavored layer cakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gluten-Free Diet Guide for Families
    Gluten-Free Diet Guide for Families PO Box 6 Flourtown, PA 19031 215-233-0808 215-233-3918 (Fax) www.CeliacHealth.org www.CDHNF.org www.NASPGHAN.org Support for this CDHNF/ NASPGHAN Gluten-Free Diet Guide was provided by the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research view the gluten-free diet and any other specific nutritional needs of your child. The registered dietitian will be able to help you contact local support groups and direct you to reliable web sites. WHAT IS GLUTEN? Gluten is the general name for one of the proteins found in wheat, rye, and barley. It is the substance in flour that forms the structure of dough, the “glue” that holds the product TABLE OF CONTENTS together and is also the leavening ingredient. When these proteins are present in the diet of someone with CD, they Introduction . 2 become toxic and cause damage to the intestine. This damage leads to decreased absorption of essential nutri- What can the celiac patient eat? . 3 ents and, if left untreated, can lead to nutrient deficiency How do I start . 3 and subsequent disease (i.e. iron deficiency anemia, de- creased bone density, unintentional weight loss, folate and Gluten-Free Shopping List . 4 vitamin B12 deficiency). Life goes on! . 6 WHERE IS GLUTEN FOUND? Once the diet has started . 7 Food/grains Resources . 8 The grains containing gluten include wheat, rye, barley, and all their derivatives (see Table 1 for a listing of grains to be avoided). These grains are used in such items as breads, Introduction cereals, pasta, pizza, cakes, pies, and cookies and as add- ed ingredients to many processed food items.
    [Show full text]
  • Torrefaction of Oat Straw to Use As Solid Biofuel, an Additive to Organic Fertilizers for Agriculture Purposes and Activated Carbon – TGA Analysis, Kinetics
    E3S Web of Conferences 154, 02004 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015402004 ICoRES 2019 Torrefaction of oat straw to use as solid biofuel, an additive to organic fertilizers for agriculture purposes and activated carbon – TGA analysis, kinetics Szymon Szufa1, Maciej Dzikuć2 ,Łukasz Adrian3, Piotr Piersa4, Zdzisława Romanowska- Duda5, Wiktoria Lewandowska 6, Marta Marcza7, Artur Błaszczuk8, Arkadiusz Piwowar9 1 Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Wolczanska 213, 90-924 Lodz,, Poland, [email protected] 2 University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management, ul. Licealna 9, 65-246 Zielona Góra, Poland, [email protected] 3 University of Kardynal Stefan Wyszyński, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Science, Dewajtis 5, 01-815 Warszawa, Poland, [email protected] 4 Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Wolczanska 213, 90-924 Lodz,, Poland, [email protected] 5 Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha str. 12/16, 90-131 Łódź, Poland, [email protected] 6 University of Lodz, Chemical Faculty, Tamka 13, 91-403 Łódź, Poland, [email protected] 7 AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30- 059 Krakow, Poland, [email protected] 8 Czestochowa University of Technology, Institute of Advanced Energy Technologies, Dabrowskiego 73, 42-200, Czestochowa, Poland, [email protected] 9 Wroclaw University of Economics, Faculty of Engineering and Economics, Komandorska 118/120 , 53-345 Wrocław, Poland, [email protected] Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Storage of Wet Corn Co-Products Manual
    Storage of Wet Corn Co-Products 1st Edition • May 2008 A joint project of the Nebraska Corn Board and the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Storage of Wet Corn Co-Products A joint project of the Nebraska Corn Board and the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Agricultural Research Division University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension For more information or to request additional copies of this manual, contact the Nebraska Corn Board at 1-800-632-6761 or e-mail [email protected] Brought to you by Nebraska corn producers through their corn checkoff dollars— expanding demand for Nebraska corn and value-added corn products. STORAGE OF WET CORN CO-PRODUCTS By G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein, R. Rasby, A. Stalker, B. Plugge, D. Bauer, D. Mark, D. Adams, J. Benton, M. Greenquist, B. Nuttleman, L. Kovarik, M. Peterson, J. Waterbury and M. Wilken Opportunities For Storage Three types of distillers grains can be produced that vary in moisture content. Ethanol plants may dry some or all of their distillers grains to produce dry distillers grains plus solubles (DDGS; 90% dry matter [DM]). However, many plants that have a market for wet distillers locally (i.e., Nebraska) may choose not to dry their distillers grains due to cost advantages. Wet distillers grains plus solubles (WDGS) is 30-35% DM. Modified wet distillers grains plus solubles (MWDGS) is 42-50% DM. It is important to note that plants may vary from one another in DM percentage, and may vary both within and across days for the moisture (i.e., DM) percentage.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiber Information Sheet Your Doctor Has Recommended That You Follow A
    Fiber Information Sheet Your doctor has recommended that you follow a high fiber diet. The addition of fiber to your diet can make an enormous difference in your bowel control and regularity. Fiber helps people whether they lose stool or have trouble with constipation. Fiber works by bulking the stool and keeping it formed, yet making the movement soft and easy to pass. Fiber helps keep moisture within the stool so that neither diarrhea nor hard stool occurs. Fiber makes the bowels work more regularly, but it is not a laxative. An additional bonus from eating a high fiber diet is that your risk of cancer is reduced, too. Most of us eat some high fiber foods already, but nearly all of us do not eat the necessary amount. For example, a slice of whole wheat bread contains only about 10% of the daily recommended amount of fiber. This means if you are relying on only whole wheat bread to meet the recommended fiber requirements, you would need to eat between 10-18 slices every day! Please note that fiber is NOT in any meat or dairy product. It is only found in grains, vegetables and fruits. The recommended daily fiber intake is 20-25 grams. Foods having high fiber content include: Fiber One Cereal, ½ cup 13.0 g Pinto beans, ¾ cup 10.4 g Wheat bran cereal, 1 oz 10.0 g Kidney beans, ¾ cup 9.3 g All Bran Cereal, ½ cup 6.0 g Oat Bran Cereal, hot, 1 oz 4.0 g Banana, 1medium 3.8 g Canned pears, ½ cup 3.7 g 3 prunes or ¼ cup raisins 3.5 g Whole Wheat Total, 1 cup 3.0 g Carrots, ½ cup 3.2 g Apple, small 2.8 g Broccoli, ½ cup 2.8 g Cauliflower, ½ cup 2.6 g Oatmeal, 1 oz 2.5 g Whole Wheat Toast 2.0 g Cheerios, 1 1/3 cup 2.0 g Baked potato with skin 2.0 g Corn, ½ cup 1.9 g Popcorn, 3 cups 1.9 g Orange, medium 1.9 g Granola bar 1.0 g Lettuce, ½ cup 0.9 g If you don’t think that you can get enough fiber through your everyday diet, there are many good fiber supplements you can take along with eating your high fiber diet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Defatted Rice Bran with Emphasis on Bioconversion Strategies
    fermentation Review Valorising Agro-industrial Wastes within the Circular Bioeconomy Concept: the Case of Defatted Rice Bran with Emphasis on Bioconversion Strategies Maria Alexandri *, José Pablo López-Gómez , Agata Olszewska-Widdrat and Joachim Venus * Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, Department of Bioengineering, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany; [email protected] (J.P.L.-G.); [email protected] (A.O.-W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (J.V.) Received: 17 February 2020; Accepted: 20 April 2020; Published: 22 April 2020 Abstract: The numerous environmental problems caused by the extensive use of fossil resources have led to the formation of the circular bioeconomy concept. Renewable resources will constitute the cornerstone of this new, sustainable model, with biomass presenting a huge potential for the production of fuels and chemicals. In this context, waste and by-product streams from the food industry will be treated not as “wastes” but as resources. Rice production generates various by-product streams which currently are highly unexploited, leading to environmental problems especially in the countries that are the main producers. The main by-product streams include the straw, the husks, and the rice bran. Among these streams, rice bran finds applications in the food industry and cosmetics, mainly due to its high oil content. The high demand for rice bran oil generates huge amounts of defatted rice bran (DRB), the main by-product of the oil extraction process. The sustainable utilisation of this by-product has been a topic of research, either as a food additive or via its bioconversion into value-added products and chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Straw Mulching
    STRAW MULCHING What is it? The application of straw as a protective Hand Punching: cover over seeded areas to reduce erosion and aid in A spade or shovel is used to punch straw revegetation or over bare soils that will be landscaped into the slope until all areas have straw standing later to reduce erosion. perpendicularly to the slope and embedded at least 4 inches into the slope. It should be punched about 12 When is it used? inches apart. This method is used on slopes which have been seeded and have high potential for erosion. It Roller Punching: requires some type of anchoring by matting, crimping A roller equipped with straight studs not less or other methods to prevent blowing or washing than 6 inches long, from 4 - 6 inches wide and away. approximately one inch thick is rolled over the slope. Straw mulch forms a loose layer when applied over a loose soil surface. To protect the mulch from wind drifting and being moved by water, Crimper Punching: it must be covered with a netting such as plastic or Like roller punching, the crimper has punched into the soil with a spade or roller, or by serrated disk blades about 4 - 8 inches apart which spraying it with a tacking agent. The mulch should force straw mulch into the soil. Crimping should be cover the entire seed or bare area. The mulch should done in two directions with the final pass across the extend into existing vegetation or be stabilized on all slope. sides to prevent wind or water damage which may start at the edges.
    [Show full text]