DOCSLIB.ORG

MONTHLY SITUATION REPORT October 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Country Office for Afghanistan P.O.Box 5, Shah Mahmood Ghazi Watt Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 20 2101994,+93 70 279691 Fax:+87 376 1660 769; Email: [email protected] MONTHLY SITUATION REPORT October 2002 General Developments in Drugs and Crime The 2002/2003 planting season has started in the eastern zone of Afghanistan. Some farmers have already cultivated poppy on their land. According to the UNODC Liaison Office in Kandahar, the coalition forces seized around 80 kg of opium after searching houses in the Khakrez district of Kandahar province. Governmental Developments New Drug Control Structure of the Afghan Transitional Authority (ATA): On 7 October, the National Security Adviser, Dr. Zalmai Rassoul, was named by President Karzai to lead the government’s efforts on drug control and to give direction to the national narcotics policy. The Decree by the president stated that the National Security Adviser of the Afghan Transitional Authority (ATA) will be responsible for all activities related to the prevention of drug cultivation, production, consumption and trafficking. All national and international organizations working in the drug control field were asked to coordinate their activities with the office of the National Security Adviser. A Counter Narcotics Department (CND) was established within the National Security Council (NSC) to coordinate the drug control efforts. Mr. Mirwais Yasini was appointed as the Director of CND. It is envisaged that the NSC will have a coordinating and monitoring role for drug control activities of the government, and specific activities in each sector will be done by relevant ministries. The CND will have the role of the executive office for drug control of the NSC. It is also envisaged that an inter-ministerial committee will be established at the NSC, consisting of relevant ministers and several governors, with overall responsibility to determine the policies and strategies of the government in the area of drug control. Programmatic Update of UNODC Kabul Project AFG/G 24: Capacity Building for Drug Control On 17 October, with the support of UNODC and the UK Government, the ATA held a second drug control coordination meeting in Kabul. The meeting was well attended by representatives of UN agencies and NGOs, heads of diplomatic missions, ministers and other high-level officials of ATA. Ambassador Brahimi, the SRSG for Afghanistan, delivered an opening statement. The meeting was co-chaired by the Acting Foreign Minister, Minister of Rural Rehabilitation and Development, Minister of Justice, Minister of Interior, Deputy Minister of Public Health and Director of Counter Narcotics Department (CND) of the National Secuirty Council (NSC). In preparation for that meeting, the relevant ministries with support from NSC, the UK Government, UNAMA and UNODC Kabul had organized working groups to prepare implementation plans and to identify the activities undertaken or planned for each sector. Working groups were established in five thematic areas of drug control and were headed by the following Government institutions of the ATA: · Alternative Livelihoods: Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD). · Judicial Reform: Ministry of Justice (MoJ) · Demand Reduction: Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) · Law Enforcement: Ministry of Interior (MoI) · Institution Building: Counter Narcotics Department (CND) of the National Security Council (NSC). The drug awareness campaign begun in September has, thus far, covered 15 of 22 districts in Nangarhar province. The objective of the campaign is to inform the communities about the Government’s ban on opium poppy cultivation and the fact that there will not be any compensation for opium poppy eradication next year. Project AFG/G 38: Strengthening Counter Narcotics Law Enforcement Capacity: The Terms of Reference of the National Project Coordinator were drafted and the position announced. In addition, UNODC Kabul and Tashkent assisted in having two Afghan generals attend the INCB sponsored meeting in Tashkent, 17-19 October. UNODC-Kabul has been asked to prepare a project idea for the establishment of an interdiction unit within the Counter Narcotics Police Department of the Ministry of Interior. The project idea was developed and it was included in the Transitional Assistance Programme for Afghanistan (TAPA) for funding. It was also shared with UNODC Headquarters in Vienna. Project AFG/F55: Drug Demand Reduction Information, Advice and Training Service for Afghan Women in Refugee Camps in Baluchistan and North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakistan: The two female staff teams continued to develop a drug demand reduction information, advice and training service for Afghan women in refugee camps in the North West Frontier Province and Baluchistan in Pakistan. Preparations were made for a 2-day training and evaluation workshop for two the eight female fieldworkers, to be held in Quetta. Drug abuse prevention information material as developed for Afghan refugee women and will be printed in both Dari and Pashto. The project facilitated the field visit of the Representative of UNODC Kabul and the Director of CND to drug treatment facilities in the Peshawar area. Project AFG/G26: Drug Demand Reduction Information, Advice and Training Service for Afghanistan: The project acted as Secretariat to the Ministry of Public Health in establishing a Working Group on Demand Reduction that prepared the draft DR action plan and Report of the Working Group for the second National Drug Coordination Meeting held on 17 October. Demand reduction action plans and business plans were also prepared for UNODC’s submissions to TAPA and the Ministry of Finance. A draft project document for Capacity Building for Demand Reduction in Afghanistan was prepared and submitted to HQ. Meetings were held with the Drug Dependency Treatment Centre in the Mental Health Hospital and Nejat, a community-based drug treatment NGO, as the first step in developing a referral system for drug addicts in Kabul. Candidates for the NPO post were interviewed and Mr. Mohammad Naim was selected; he took up his post on 1 November. AFG/F98: Monitoring of Opium Production in Afghanistan: The data entry of the Helmand GPS Survey was completed. Six hundred copies of the Annual Opium Poppy Survey were printed and will be distributed to all government agencies, diplomatic missions, international organizations, NGOs and news agencies. Other Matters Mission reports: The representative fielded a mission to Vienna to participate in the UNODC major donors meeting. He was accompanied by the Director of CND who used that opportunity to meet with ambassadors to the drug control programme. On 29 October, upon their return from Vienna, the Representative of UNODC Kabul and the Director of CND fielded a mission to Peshawar and Jalalabad. In Peshawar, they visited the UNODC drug demand reduction project for Afghan Refugees in Peshawar, Pakistan. In Jalalabad, they discussed drug control issues with the provincial authorities, initiated a close working relationship between UNODC Liaison Office in Jalalabad and the new authorities of Nangarhar DCCU, and visited the drug awareness campaign project funded by UNODC in Nangarhar province. In a meeting between the Representative of UNODC Kabul, the Director of CND and the head of NDCCU, it was agreed that: · UNODC would share its Liaison Office in Jalalabad with NDCCU. · The Terms of Reference of DCCUs will be reviewed by the CND in Kabul and a meeting of heads of DCCUs (Nangarhar and Kandahar established by UNODC in 1997 and Helmand and Heart by the Taliban in 2000) would be convened in Kabul to agree on the new Terms of Reference, the number of people needed for each office and qualifications of the DCCU staff. Contribution to the Transitional Assistance Programme for Afghanistan (TAPA): According to a format provided by UNAMA, the ongoing and pipeline projects of UNODC Kabul were included in TAPA for funding in 2003. Also, as requested by the government, business plans for UNODC projects for 2002 and 2003 were prepared and submitted to the government through UNAMA. The plans will be reviewed in a joint meeting of the Representative of UNODC, Deputy SRSG (Pillar II), the National Security Adviser, the Director of CND and three Government Ministers (Finance, Planning and Reconstruction). Strengthening of UNODC Kabul: The Executive Director of UNODC has appointed Dr. Adam C. Bouloukos as Programme Management Officer of UNODC Kabul. Dr. Bouloukos will take up his post on 5 November and will act as Deputy to the Representative .
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Boundaries II

    Beyond Boundaries II

    Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II Pakistan - Afghanistan Track 1.5 and II cc Connecting People Building Peace Promoting Cooperation 1 Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II Pakistan – Afghanistan Track 1.5 and II Connecting People Building Peace Promoting Cooperation 2 Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II ©Center for Research and Security Studies 2018 All rights reserved This publication can be ordered from CRSS Islamabad office. All CRSS publications are also available free of cost for digital download from the CRSS website. 14-M, Ali Plaza, 2nd Floor, F-8 Markaz, Islamabad, Pakistan. Tel: +92-51-8314801-03 Fax: +92-51-8314804 www.crss.pk 3 Beyond Boundaries II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................... 5 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 9 3. CONTEXTUALIZING BEYOND BOUNDARIES................................................... 11 4. FIRST MEETING OF THE PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ........ 56 5. SECOND MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE .......... 72 6. THIRD MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE .............. 95 7. FOURTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ........ 126 8. FIFTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS/TRADE ........................................................................................ 149 9. SIXTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ............ 170 10. UNIVERSITY
  • Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001

    Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001

    Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’s Posture toward Afghanistan since 2001 Since the terrorist at- tacks of September 11, 2001, Pakistan has pursued a seemingly incongruous course of action in Afghanistan. It has participated in the U.S. and interna- tional intervention in Afghanistan both by allying itself with the military cam- paign against the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaida and by serving as the primary transit route for international military forces and matériel into Afghanistan.1 At the same time, the Pakistani security establishment has permitted much of the Afghan Taliban’s political leadership and many of its military command- ers to visit or reside in Pakistani urban centers. Why has Pakistan adopted this posture of Afghan Taliban accommodation despite its nominal participa- tion in the Afghanistan intervention and its public commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan?2 This incongruence is all the more puzzling in light of the expansion of insurgent violence directed against Islamabad by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a coalition of militant organizations that are independent of the Afghan Taliban but that nonetheless possess social and po- litical links with Afghan cadres of the Taliban movement. With violence against Pakistan growing increasingly indiscriminate and costly, it remains un- clear why Islamabad has opted to accommodate the Afghan Taliban through- out the post-2001 period. Despite a considerable body of academic and journalistic literature on Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan since 2001, the subject of Pakistani accommodation of the Afghan Taliban remains largely unaddressed. Much of the existing literature identiªes Pakistan’s security competition with India as the exclusive or predominant driver of Pakistani policy vis-à-vis the Afghan Khalid Homayun Nadiri is a Ph.D.
  • Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-Establishment of Permanent Government Institutions

    Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-Establishment of Permanent Government Institutions

    AGREEMENT ON PROVISIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN AFGHANISTAN PENDING THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS The participants in the UN Talks on Afghanistan, In the presence of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan, Determined to end the tragic conflict in Afghanistan and promote national reconciliation, lasting peace, stability and respect for human rights in the country, Reaffirming the independence, national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Afghanistan, Acknowledging the right of the people of Afghanistan to freely determine their own political future in accordance with the principles of Islam, democracy, pluralism and social justice, Expressing their appreciation to the Afghan mujahidin who, over the years, have defended the independence, territorial integrity and national unity of the country and have played a major role in the struggle against terrorism and oppression, and whose sacrifice has now made them both heroes of jihad and champions of peace, stability and reconstruction of their beloved homeland, Afghanistan, Aware that the unstable situation in Afghanistan requires the implementation of emergency interim arrangements and expressing their deep appreciation to His Excellency Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani for his readiness to transfer power to an interim authority which is to be established pursuant to this agreement, Recognizing the need to ensure broad representation in these interim arrangements of all segments of the Afghan population, including groups that have not been
  • Final Agenda Citpax Oct 2007

    Final Agenda Citpax Oct 2007

    The Evolution of PRT Models: Towards the Pre-eminence of the Civilian Dimension? Meeting between Afghan Civil Society, PRT and International Organisations Representatives AGENDA Madrid 16 - 17 October 2007 Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales Plaza de la Marina Española, 9 Sponsored by With the support of Tuesday, 16 October 2007 9:00 – 9:30 Welcome remarks: Bernardino León, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Spain Juan Pablo de Laiglesia, Secretary General, Spanish Agency for International Cooperation (AECI) 10:00 – 14:00 The role of Civil Society consultation processes and fora in the PRT strategic and operational planning: short term and medium term prospects Introductory interventions: Fahim Hakim, Vice-President, Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) Kanishka Nawabi, Managing Director Cooperation for Peace and Unity (CPAU), Afghanistan Discussants: Hakan Abaci, former civilian coordinator of the Turkish PRT in Wardak Chair of the session: Clare Lockhart, Director, State Effectiveness Initiative o How can CS contribute to the work of PRTs? Are the existing civil society consultation fora effective? To what extent do PRT master plans reflect CS recommendations and therefore meet the expectations of the local population? o Wrap up session, conclusions and proposals. 14:00 - 15:30 Lunch 15:30 – 19:00 The civilian role of PRTs: towards a specialised delivery platform for the development and implementation of ANDS (Afghan National Development Strategy) Pilar 1 (Political and Security) Introductory remarks: Bernardo Álvarez del Manzano, Commander of Operations Command, Spain Aziz Rafiee, Managing Director, Afghan Civil Society Forum (ACSF) Discussants: Gavin Buchan, former Political Director, Kandahar PRT; current Special Advisor to DG International Security Policy, Department of National Defence, Canada Colonel Norton, Head of UK PRT in Helmand Chair of the session: Jawed Ludin, Afghan Ambassador to Norway and former Chief of Staff to President Karzai o Short term vs.
  • Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy

    Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy

    Order Code RL32686 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy Updated January 25, 2006 Christopher M. Blanchard Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Afghanistan: Narcotics and U.S. Policy Summary Opium poppy cultivation and drug trafficking have become significant factors in Afghanistan’s fragile political and economic order over the last 25 years. In 2005, Afghanistan remained the source of 87% of the world’s illicit opium, in spite of ongoing efforts by the Afghan government, the United States, and their international partners to combat poppy cultivation and drug trafficking. U.N. officials estimate that in-country illicit profits from the 2005 opium poppy crop were equivalent in value to 50% of the country’s legitimate GDP, sustaining fears that Afghanistan’s economic recovery continues to be underwritten by drug profits. Across Afghanistan, regional militia commanders, criminal organizations, and corrupt government officials have exploited opium production and drug trafficking as reliable sources of revenue and patronage, which has perpetuated the threat these groups pose to the country’s fragile internal security and the legitimacy of its embryonic democratic government. The trafficking of Afghan drugs also appears to provide financial and logistical support to a range of extremist groups that continue to operate in and around Afghanistan, including remnants of the Taliban regime and some Al Qaeda operatives. Although coalition forces may be less frequently relying on figures involved with narcotics for intelligence and security support, many observers have warned that drug related corruption among appointed and newly elected Afghan officials may create new political obstacles to further progress.
  • Afghanistan Assessment

    Afghanistan Assessment

    AFGHANISTAN COUNTRY REPORT April 2005 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Afghanistan April 2005 CONTENTS 1 Scope Of Document 1.1 - 1.12 2 Geography General 2.1 – 2.2 Languages/Main ethnic groups/Religions 2.3 - 2.5 3.Economy 3.1 - 3.8 4 History Overview to December 2001 4.1 Post Taliban 4.2 – 4.13 January 2004 – December 2004 4.14 – 4.59 January 2005 onwards 4.60 – 4.66 5.State Structures The Constitution 5.1 - 5.8 The Constitutional Loya Jirga 5.9 – 5.13 Citizenship and Nationality 5.14 – 5.16 Political System Overview 5.17 – 5.26 Elections: - General 5.27 – 5.29 - Presidential Election 5.30 – 5.40 - Presidential Election Results 5.41 – 5.42 - Lead up to Parliamentary Elections 5.43 – 5.47 Political Situation in Herat 5.48 – 5.50 Judiciary 5.51 – 5.64 Land Court 5.65 – 5.66 Legal Rights/Detention 5.67 - 5.83 Death Penalty 5.84 - 5.86 Internal Security Developments following 11 September 2001 5.87 - 5.90 Security Sector Reform (SSR) 5.91 - 5.94 General security situation 5.95 – 5.112 Security situation in different regions: - Kabul 5.113 – 5.116 - Central 5.117 - South and Southeast 5.118 - 5.122 - North 5.123 – 5.124 Internal Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Provincial Reconstruction 5.125 – 5.150 Teams (PRTs) Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Programme (DDR) 5.151 – 5.166 National Security Directorate (Amniat) 5.167 – 5.170 Army 5.171 – 5.174 Police 5.175 – 5.184 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.185 - 5.208 Military Service 5.209 - 5.212 Medical Services
  • Det Udenrigspolitiske Nævn, Forsvarsudvalget, Udenrigsudvalget 2010-11 UPN Alm

    Det Udenrigspolitiske Nævn, Forsvarsudvalget, Udenrigsudvalget 2010-11 UPN Alm

    Det Udenrigspolitiske Nævn, Forsvarsudvalget, Udenrigsudvalget 2010-11 UPN alm. del Bilag 56, FOU alm. del Bilag 54, URU alm. del Bilag 65 Offentligt The Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs have the pleasure of inviting you to a seminar on: Afghanistan: Perspectives for a Peaceful Solution Tuesday, 11 January 2011, 14.45-17.00 Danish Institute for International Studies Main Auditorium Strandgade 71, ground floor, 1401 Copenhagen K Background Afghanistan is facing a number of key challenges: The transition of security responsibilities from foreign forces to the Afghan National Security Forces, and at some stage the exit of foreign forces; a likely reconciliation and reintegration process with insurgents and the political consequences of that; the need for progress in governance and development; the relationship with its neighbors. All at the backdrop of a prolonged conflict, that has had dire human and developmental consequences for Afghanistan and has framed international relations for the last ten years. The debate on Afghanistan has become more and more polarized with those calling for a rapid exit of foreign troops arguing that the present military involvement is part of the problem rather than the solution; and those stating that international involvement (also military) in Afghanistan is a key requirement for peace and stability in the country, region and globally. What, in the view of the government of Afghanistan, are the perspectives for continued international involvement, the possible political solutions, and the overall benefit of the present international involvement in Afghanistan? And what can the international community in turn expect from the Afghan government in areas such as governance and development? Dr.
  • Politics and Governance in Afghanistan: the Case of Nangarhar

    Politics and Governance in Afghanistan: the Case of Nangarhar

    Uzbekistan Tajikistan n Researching livelihoods and China Turkmenistan Tu Nangarhar Kabul Afghanistan Iran Pakistan Politics and Governance in Arabian Sea Afghanistan: the Case of Nangarhar Province Working Paper 16 Ashley Jackson June 2014 Funded by the EC About us Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) aims to generate a stronger evidence base on how people in conflict-affected situations (CAS) make a living, access basic services like health care, education and water, and perceive and engage with governance at local and national levels. Providing better access to basic services, social protection and support to livelihoods matters for the human welfare of people affected by conflict, the achievement of development targets such as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and international efforts at peace- and state-building. At the centre of SLRC’s research are three core themes, developed over the course of an intensive one-year inception phase: § State legitimacy: experiences, perceptions and expectations of the state and local governance in conflict-affected situations § State capacity: building effective states that deliver services and social protection in conflict- affected situations § Livelihood trajectories and economic activity in conflict-affected situations The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) is the lead organisation. SLRC partners include the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), the Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) in Sri Lanka, Feinstein International Center (FIC, Tufts University), Focus1000
  • International Counter Narcotics Conference on Afghanistan 8-9 February 2004

    International Counter Narcotics Conference on Afghanistan 8-9 February 2004

    International Counter Narcotics Conference on Afghanistan 8-9 February 2004 Contents: Introduction Background Plenary Session and General Debate Thematic Discussion Conclusions Appendices - Agenda - Action Plans Law Enforcement: Action Plan Counter Narcotics Judicial Reform: Action Plan Alternative Livelihoods: Action Plan Drug Demand Reduction: Action Plan Public Awareness: Action Plan - Main Conference Speeches Speech by H.E. President Hamid Karzai Speech by Dr. Zalmei Rassoul Speech by Mr. Mir Wais Yasini Speech by Gov. Pashtun Speech by Mr. Ghulam Speech by H.E. Mr. Antonio Maria Costa Speech of Ms. Rosalind Marsden on behalf of Mr. Bill Rammell INTRODUCTION On Feb 8 and 9 2004, in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan in Kabul, the Government of the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan, United Kingdom (UK) and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) co-hosted an International Counter Narcotics Conference on Afghanistan. President Karzai addressed the Conference of over 300 participants with a strong condemnation of the drugs trade and expressed his Government’s determination for decisive action against it. This was the first time that Afghans had gathered at such a high level and in such large numbers to discuss the issue of illicit drugs and the implementation of the Afghan National Drug Control Strategy. Reflecting a true sense of Afghan ownership of this issue ---which the Conference aimed to promote--- following address by President Karzai, the National Security Advisor and the Director of Counter Narcotics Directorate (CND), several Afghan Ministers along with the Governor of Kandahar and a village elder from Nangarhar shared their experiences and perspectives.
  • Afghanistan October 2003

    Afghanistan October 2003

    AFGHANISTAN COUNTRY REPORT October 2003 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Afghanistan October 2003 CONTENTS 1 Scope Of Document 1.1 - 1.4 2 Geography 2.1 - 2.5 General 2.1 Languages 2.2 - 2.5 3.Economy 3.1 - 3.6 4 History 4.1 - 4.94 1992-1994: Mujahidin Government 4.1 - 4.4 Emergence of the Taliban 4.5 - 4.8 February 1995-June 1996 4.9 - 4.10 September 1996-June 1997 4.11 - 4.18 August 1997-December 1999 4.19 - 4.33 January 2000 - December 2000 4.34 - 4.39 January 2001 - December 2001 4.40 - 4.58 January 2002 – December 2002 4.59 - 4.79 January 2003 onwards 4.80 - 4.94 5.State Structures 5.1 - 5.137 The Constitution 5.1 - 5.4 Citizenship and Nationality 5.5 - 5.7 Political System 5.8 - 5.24 -Interim Administration 5.8 - 5.10 -The Emergency Loya Jirga and Transitional Administration 5.11 - 5.17 -Elections 5.18 - 5.19 -Situation in Herat 5.20 - 5.21 -1996 - 22 December 2001 5.22 - 5.24 Judiciary 5.25 - 5.37 -Current Position 5.25 - 5.35 -1996 - 22 December 2001 5.36 - 5.37 Legal Rights/Detention 5.38 - 5.53 -Current Situation 5.38 - 5.45 -1996 - 22 December 2001 5.46 - 5.48 Death Penalty 5.49 - 5.53 -Current Situation 5.49 - 5.51 -1996 – 22 December 2001 5.52 - 5.53 Internal Security 5.54 - 5.94 -Current Situation 5.54 - 5.73 -National Security Directorate 5.74 - 5.76 -Accountability Department 5.77 -Army 5.78 - 5.80 -Police 5.81 - 5.84 -1996 - 22 December 2001 5.85 - 5.91 -Religious Police 5.92 - 5.94 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.95 - 5.110 -Current Situation 5.95 -
  • Understanding Ethnic-Electoral Dynamics: How Ethnic Politics Affect Electoral Laws and Election Outcomes in Afghanistan

    Understanding Ethnic-Electoral Dynamics: How Ethnic Politics Affect Electoral Laws and Election Outcomes in Afghanistan

    MOBASHER 4/18/2016 3:11 PM UNDERSTANDING ETHNIC-ELECTORAL DYNAMICS: HOW ETHNIC POLITICS AFFECT ELECTORAL LAWS AND ELECTION OUTCOMES IN AFGHANISTAN *Mohammad Bashir Mobasher After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, Afghanistan began transitioning toward democracy. The democratization, which began with the Bonn Agreement, was very promising for all ethnic groups in Afghanistan. The Bonn Agreement provided that Afghanistan must establish “broad based, gender sensitive, multi- ethnic and fully representative government.”1 As a part of this agreement, Afghanistan adopted a new Constitution in 2004, which established elections as the foundation for representative government and guaranteed that the elections be inclusive, fair, and representative of all groups and regions. Despite this progress in the laws, Afghanistan has not been able to reduce ethnic tensions. In fact, this article shows that ethnic tensions tend to intensify during elections, a result that belies the vision of the Bonn Agreement. After presenting a statistical and qualitative analysis of voting practices across three presidential elections and 26 provinces, this article makes several observations about the role of ethnicity in Afghan presidential elections. These observations are: (1) people of an ethnic community are more likely to vote for a candidate of their own ethnic group; (2) voters from one ethnic group are likely to vote for a candidate from another ethnic group only when they do not have a candidate of their own; (3) cross ethnic voting is more likely to occur in blocs and in exchange for patronage to the elites of voting groups; and (4) candidates and ethno-political elites tend to prioritize their electoral campaigns by ethnic mobilization, manipulation of laws and political bargains rather than by policy development in order to generate votes.
  • The 2014 Presidential Elections in Afghanistan Written by Darren Atkinson

    The 2014 Presidential Elections in Afghanistan Written by Darren Atkinson

    Democracy as Theatre: The 2014 Presidential Elections in Afghanistan Written by Darren Atkinson This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Democracy as Theatre: The 2014 Presidential Elections in Afghanistan https://www.e-ir.info/2014/08/12/democracy-as-theatre-the-2014-presidential-elections-in-afghanistan/ DARREN ATKINSON, AUG 12 2014 Saturday, June 14th 2014, saw voting take place in the second round election run-off between the final two candidates for President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan: Dr. Abdullah Abdullah and Dr. Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai. In the first round, neither had been able to secure the required 50%, so a run-off was required. The second round results were initially counted and Ghani was said to have won with 56.44% of the votes, with Abdullah taking 43.56%. After allegations of irregularities, including ballot box stuffing (referred to as “stuffed sheep” in recordings released by Abdullah’s camp), the US Secretary of State John Kerry brokered a deal that would see 100% of the votes recounted in order to find an outright winner and a form of power-sharing to be established once the recount had been conducted. At the time of writing, we are still awaiting the outcome of the recount. Election coverage initially provided an optimistic, if cautious, counterpoint to the regular negative media attention paid to Afghanistan. Successful administering of democratic elections and a peaceful “transfer of power” was seen to highlight the potential for a future of peace and political progress.