The DEVELOPMENT of NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The DEVELOPMENT of NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES (frU-l^nAj 7H~^ ■ CITY DOCUMENTS Municipal Register 1915, Mayor's Address to the Council Annual Reports, Etc. FOR THE YEAR 1914. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD MASSACHUSETTS OLD DARTMOUTH HISTORICAL SKETCHES No. 42. Being the proceedings of the Old Dartmouth Historical Society, held in their building, Water Street, New Bedford, Massachusetts, on April 19. 1915. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES. Presented by Robert C. P. Coggeshall. PURCHASE STREET PUMPING STATION, 1870. THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES. R. C. P. COGGESHALL A supply of good water was a a well of delicious water which exist ed in Rose Alley in 1815 and which factor always considered by our supplied that neighborhood. The town ancestors, in determining a location pump in City Hall square and the for permanent settlement. Good inverted cannon fountain on Rodman spring water was always preferred, street at Water street, were liberally patronized and gave satisfaction to but if not found, shallow wells were their users. sunk from which water was obtained At the opening of the last century by buckets raised by poles or pulleys the science of delivering wholesome, liberal, and reliable supplies of water or by long balance poles. to congested districts was little under The accumulation of organic mat stood. The appliances and methods ter, due to increase in population, necessary to accomplish this result gradually polluted such waters. This had not then been developed. The was especially true In congested dis average well was unsatisfactory. It tricts, where such supplies also be might be dry when needed, or unsafe came insufficient. In every commun for domestic use at other times. The ity the waters of certain wells were growing agitation for more water pnd preferred because they were thought that of better quality was making it to be superior in quality. Citizens self felt. Private water supply com would sometimes reject the water of panies began to organize to Improve their own wells, and travel long dis conditions. It later developed that tances to obtain the better water. the majority of these enterprises were Certain wells were known as "tea based more upon the health of the water wells" because it was thought investors' pocketbooks than upon any that better tea could be brewed anxiety concerning the physical well- therefrom. being of their patrons. Such com New York had its famous "Tea panies were content to do as little as Water Pump Garden" situated at possible. Their plants were crudely what is now the junction of Chatharr. constructed and clumsily operated. and Roosevelt streets. This was a The nearest supply was taken in pref famous resort in Revolutionary times, erence to going a longer distance to where tea and stronger beverages get something better. Their capacity could be obtained. The streets in its was limited at beet and growing tree vicinity were often obstructed by the roots completely filling the log pipes vehicles of the rich and fastidious, would cut off the supply. The cus waiting their turn at the pump. The tomers were dissatisfied and constant place finally became so congested that friction between company and taker the New York common council in became rampant, generally result 1797 ordered "the spout of the pump ing In a short life for the com to be sufficiently raised and length pany. ened to permit pedestrians to pass I am now going to relate the story beneath It." of the Manhattan Company of New In the early days of our own city, York City. Its promoters induced the certain wells came to have a good citizens of that city to believe that repute. Leonard B. Ellis has told of their whole concern was to supply 4 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES. them with pure and wholesome water, granted the comjiany to invest all while all the time they were inwardly surplus capital in other directions. conniving to accomplish something The eighth clause of the charter, very different. which attracted but little attention at Until very recently anyone happen the time, was really the most impor ing to pass the northwest corner of tant one. It reads as follows: Reed and Centre streets in the city of "And be it further enacted, that it New York could observe through the shall, and may be lawful for the said windows of the building located there, company to employ all such surplus a large cast-iron water tank which capital, as may belong or accrue to was supplied with water from a large the said company, in the purchase of well beneath, by means of a steam public or other stock, or in any other pump. This interesting relic has monied transactions or operations existed for over one hundred years, not inconsistent with the constitution and its former use is practically for and laws of this State, or of the gotten by everyone except the owners, United States, for the sole benefit of the Manhattan Water Company. Due the said company." to a curious legal fiction, that com Availing itself of the powers con pany must continue to maintain the veyed by the above clause, the Man semblance of a water plant In order to hattan Company formed a powerful keep its charter, which is an exceed bank, which was the real object of the ingly valuable document since under Incorporators. Only enough was done a "Joker" clause it has built up the in the matter of introducing water great Bank of the Manhattan Com necessary to hold the charter. pany of New York City. The tank was It is evident that the legislature ex removed last June (1914), but the pected the Manhattan Company to Water Company will continue the obtain an ample and satisfactory maintenance of pump and well. simply from the Bronx River or some The granting of this charter to the other stream from the wording of the Manhattan Company establishing a charter which grants the Company the water supply to the City of New York right "to erect dams, or other works was an historic event and thereby across, or upon any stream or streams, hangs a tale. of water, river or rivers, or any other Corporate Banking in New York place or places, where they shall City began with the organization of judge proper for the purpose of rais the Bank of New York by Alexander ing such stream or streams, or turn Hamilton in 1784. For fifteen years ing the course thereof, or of making this hank, together with the New York use of such streams, rivers, or places branch of the first Bank of the United for constructing or working of any States, were the only hanks doing necessary engines, or to construct, dig business in cither the City or State of or cause to be opened any canals or New York. With Hamilton and the trenches whatsoever for conducting of Federalists in control of the legisla such stream or streams or any other ture, new bank charters were un quantity of water from any source or obtainable. This monopoly of hank sources that they may see fit." ing facilities in the City and State was Instead of obtaining an ample sup of great strategic value to the political ply from the Bronx or some other narty in control, and naturally aroused stream or streams the Manhattan jealousy and resentment among the Company proceeded to sink a series members of the opposition whoso of large wells at the location stated at leader was Aaron Burr. the beginning of this story. At that In 1798, New York City suffered time this was a thickly populated lo from a severe yellow fever epidemic cation totally unfit to produce whole which was attributed to the poor some and pure water. The water was water supply. Upon the assembling pumped from these wells into a Tes- of the legislature in 1799 an associa ervoir located on Chambeirs street tion of individuals, among whom from whence it was distributed in Aaron Burr was the moving spirit, hollow logs of small bore generally applied for a charter for the purpose through the city south of City Hall. of "supplying the City of New York The company laid about 25 miles of with pure and wholesome water." pine log pipe of different sizes and With a capital of J2, 000, 000, the supplied about 2,000 houses. project was an ambitious one for t herewith present to you a sample those days. Burr used his influence section of one of these log pipes. This as a member of the assembly in per was rescued from a street in lower suading that body to feel that as there New York some years ago by Andrew was a great uncertainty as to the Snow of South Dartmouth, who was probable cost of the (ptfjposed water then living In New York and by him works system, perralsi*on). should be presented to the speaker. DEVELOPMENT OP NEW BEDFORD WATER SUPPLIES. 6 The quality of the water was ex "For the purpose of conducting the ceedingly poor and caused constant water from the southwest part of the irritation and complaint. Cartoons is village of Bedford through the most sued at the time indicate that "Pure convenient streets to the four cor Manhattan" and very muddy and un ners, so-called, and from thence to inviting water were regarded as syn such parts of the village as shall be onymous terms. The citizens of New thought best. Do agree to take the York endured this nuisance for over number of shares as set against our thirty years, during which time con names, and no more.
Recommended publications
  • Find It and Fix It Stormwater Program in the Charles and Mystic River Watersheds
    FIND IT AND FIX IT STORMWATER PROGRAM IN THE CHARLES AND MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHEDS FINAL REPORT JUNE 2005 - AUGUST 2008 October 29, 2008 SUBMITTED TO: MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, 9TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02114 SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 190 PARK ROAD 20 ACADEMY STREET, SUITE 203 WESTON, MA 02493 ARLINGTON, MA 02476 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 Organization of Report ................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROGRAM BACKGROUND............................................................................................ 9 1.1 Charles River.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Program Study Area................................................................................................ 9 1.1.2 Water Quality Issues............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watertown-Cambridge Greenway Lighting Study
    CAMBRIDGE WATERTOWN GREENWAY PROPOSED LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS KLEINFELDER PROJECT #: 20170208.010A JUNE 22, 2017 Copyright 2017 Kleinfelder All Rights Reserved ONLY THE CLIENT OR ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES MAY USE THIS DOCUMENT AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT FOR WHICH THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED. 20160744.001A/FISR24209 Page i of iii July 30, 2015 © 2015 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: Bill Deignan Transportation Program Manager Cambridge Community Development Department 344 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02139 CAMBRIDGE WATERTOWN GREENWAY PROPOSED LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared by: Michael Newhouse Biologist, Wetland Scientist Reviewed by: David B. Tompkins, PWS, CWB® Senior Principal Professional KLEINFELDER 300 Westage Business Center, Suite 407 Fishkill, New York 12524 Phone: 845.231.2500 Fax: 845.897.2636 June 22, 2017 Kleinfelder Project No. 20170208.010A 20170208.010A/FIS17R61603 Page i of ii June 21, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................1 2 METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................1 2.1 DESKTOP ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources and the Urban Environment, Lower Charles River Watershed, Massachusetts, 1630–2005
    Water Resources and the Urban Environment, Lower Charles River Watershed, Massachusetts, 1630–2005 By Peter K. Weiskel, Lora K. Barlow and Tomas W. Smieszek In cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Circular 1280 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Weiskel, P.K., Barlow, L.K., Smieszek, T.W., 2005, Water resources and the urban environment, lower Charles River watershed, Massachusetts, 1630–2005: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1280, 46 p. iii Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………………… 2 Previous Investigations ………………………………………………………………… 2 Landscape History …………………………………………………………………………… 11 Bedrock Geology ………………………………………………………………………… 11 Surficial Geology …………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 1 - 5
    2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • Charted Lakes List
    LAKE LIST United States and Canada Bull Shoals, Marion (AR), HD Powell, Coconino (AZ), HD Gull, Mono Baxter (AR), Taney (MO), Garfield (UT), Kane (UT), San H. V. Eastman, Madera Ozark (MO) Juan (UT) Harry L. Englebright, Yuba, Chanute, Sharp Saguaro, Maricopa HD Nevada Chicot, Chicot HD Soldier Annex, Coconino Havasu, Mohave (AZ), La Paz HD UNITED STATES Coronado, Saline St. Clair, Pinal (AZ), San Bernardino (CA) Cortez, Garland Sunrise, Apache Hell Hole Reservoir, Placer Cox Creek, Grant Theodore Roosevelt, Gila HD Henshaw, San Diego HD ALABAMA Crown, Izard Topock Marsh, Mohave Hensley, Madera Dardanelle, Pope HD Upper Mary, Coconino Huntington, Fresno De Gray, Clark HD Icehouse Reservior, El Dorado Bankhead, Tuscaloosa HD Indian Creek Reservoir, Barbour County, Barbour De Queen, Sevier CALIFORNIA Alpine Big Creek, Mobile HD DeSoto, Garland Diamond, Izard Indian Valley Reservoir, Lake Catoma, Cullman Isabella, Kern HD Cedar Creek, Franklin Erling, Lafayette Almaden Reservoir, Santa Jackson Meadows Reservoir, Clay County, Clay Fayetteville, Washington Clara Sierra, Nevada Demopolis, Marengo HD Gillham, Howard Almanor, Plumas HD Jenkinson, El Dorado Gantt, Covington HD Greers Ferry, Cleburne HD Amador, Amador HD Greeson, Pike HD Jennings, San Diego Guntersville, Marshall HD Antelope, Plumas Hamilton, Garland HD Kaweah, Tulare HD H. Neely Henry, Calhoun, St. HD Arrowhead, Crow Wing HD Lake of the Pines, Nevada Clair, Etowah Hinkle, Scott Barrett, San Diego Lewiston, Trinity Holt Reservoir, Tuscaloosa HD Maumelle, Pulaski HD Bear Reservoir,
    [Show full text]
  • Community Preservation Act 5-Year Plan 2021–2025 Watertown-Ma.Gov/Cpc Table of Contents
    Community Preservation Act 5-Year Plan 2021–2025 watertown-ma.gov/cpc Table of Contents PG 1 Letter to Watertown 2 Watertown: Community Overview 4 What is the Community Preservation Act? 6 Allowable Spending Purposes 7 The CPA in Watertown 8 CPA Fund Activity Whitney Hill 9 Membership and Role of the CPC ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 11 CPA Application Process Prepared by: Community Preservation Committee 12 CPC Planning Process With appreciation and thanks to: The Watertown Community who contributed 14 Values, Guiding Principles & Priorities their time and feedback by participating in our Public Forum, Community-Wide Survey, Watertown CPA Engagement Website, 15 Open Space Stakeholder Focus Groups, and Q&A Webinar. Department of Community Development and Planning, with particular thanks to 22 Recreation Gideon Schreiber, Senior Planner Larry Field, Senior Planner 28 Community Housing Leo Martin, Conservation Commission Chair Community Preservation Coalition 37 Historic Preservation Stuart Saginor, Executive Director Chase Mack, Communication Director Design, Paper Trace Studio 48 A Little Bit About Us Photos, Leo Martin, Maria R, Rose, Susan T. Steele, Marcia Ciro, 50 Acronyms Our Commonwealth—Massachusetts JM Goldson LLC for assistance with community outreach and planning 51 Key Definitions 11/2019 through 8/2020 Watertown Community Preservation Committee Watertown Town Hall, 126 Main Street Watertown, MA 02472, 617-715-8620 watertown-ma.gov/cpc Adopted June 3, 2021 CPC Plan 2021–2025 i Letter to Watertown February 2021 Dear Watertown, As you may know, in 2016, the Watertown community voted to adopt the Community Preservation Act (CPA) and in 2018, the Town passed an ordinance establishing the Community Preservation Committee (CPC).
    [Show full text]
  • Massdot Is Committed to Improving the Quality of Stormwater Runoff from Its Highways
    MassDOT is committed to improving the quality of stormwater runoff from its highways. Through the “Impaired Waters Program,” MassDOT addresses stormwater runoff from its roadways draining to impaired water bodies as part of compliance with the NPDES Phase II Small MS4 General Permit. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to the maximum extent practicable through two methods: retrofit projects and programmed projects. Retrofit projects are tracked within the MassDOT Impaired Waters Program Database, while programmed projects are tracked through this Water Quality Data Form (WQDF). The goal of the WQDF is to raise awareness of the necessity to implement stormwater BMPs during programmed projects and to capture information about stormwater BMPs that are implemented. There are two WQDFs required as part of each programmed project. One is specific to the 25% design stage, and the other is specific to the 75% design stage. Please download the latest version of the WQDF from the MassDOT website. Please fill out the tab titled “75% Design Form,” and check the box at the bottom of the form to ensure that all questions have been answered adequately. Please submit this form in Excel format only and name your file with the convention WQDF25_projectnumber.xlsm. Submit the form to your MassDOT project manager as part of the project's electronic submittal. An interactive web map is available to aid in filling out the WQDF. It is available at http://mass.gov/massdot/map/wqdf. If MassDOT has requested that the form be revised and resubmitted, resubmit the form using the naming convention WQDF75_projectnumber_rev.xlsm.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Watertown • Open Space Recreation Plan
    TOWN OF WATERTOWN • OPEN SPACE And RECREATION PLAN 2005 Update Department of Community Development & Planning Watertown, Massachusetts Final Edition Watertown Open Space Plan 2005 - 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Final Edition 2 Watertown Open Space Plan 2005 - 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................3 TABLE OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................................................5 SECTION 1 - PLAN SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................6 SECTION 2 - INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................7 A. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................7 B. PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ........................................................................7 SECTION 3 - COMMUNITY SETTING ..................................................................................................................9 A. REGIONAL CONTEXT .............................................................................................................................9 B. COMMUNITY HISTORY.........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 1.77 MB, for Final Phosphorus TMDL Report for the Lower Charles River Basin
    Final – Nutrient TMDL Development for the Lower Charles River Basin, Massachusetts Final Total Maximum Daily Load for Nutrients In the Lower Charles River Basin, Massachusetts CN 301.0 Prepared by: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 627 Main Street Worcester Massachusetts & United States Environmental Protection Agency, New England Region 1 Congress Street Boston, Massachusetts With Support from: Tetra Tech, Inc. 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340 Fairfax, VA 22030 June 2007 i Final – Nutrient TMDL Development for the Lower Charles River Basin, Massachusetts Acknowledgements This TMDL study was developed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the New England Region of the United Sates Environmental Protection Agency with support from Tetra Tech, Inc. in Fairfax, Virginia and Numeric Environmental Services in Beverly Farms, Massachusetts under EPA contract. A hydrodynamic and water quality model for the Lower Charles River used for this TMDL was developed by Tetra Tech, Inc. in Fairfax, Virginia and Numeric Environmental Services in Beverly Farms, Massachusetts under EPA contract. Model calibration and TMDL development were also supported by the Charles River Watershed Association through grants from the EPA and from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. EPA Region 1 support was provided by Mr. Mark Voorhees. Completion of this study depended on the generous informational and data support from various groups. Special acknowledgement is made to the following people and groups/organizations for the development of the TMDL model and TMDL: The Model Expert Review Panel: for their expert advice, technical guidance and reviews during development of the TMDL water quality model: Dr. Steven Chapra Tufts University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/2020 Reporting Cycle -- Draft for Public Comment
    Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/2020 Reporting Cycle -- Draft for Public Comment CN 505.0 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Kathleen A. Theoharides, Secretary Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Martin Suuberg, Commissioner Bureau of Water Resources Kathleen Baskin, Assistant Commissioner NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY This report is available at the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s (MassDEP) website: https://www.mass.gov/total-maximum-daily-loads-tmdls. Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/2020 Reporting Cycle -- Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program CN: 505.0 April 2021 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 8 New Bond Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01606 (This page intentionally left blank) Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 MASSACHUSETTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Shores of Boston Island, 50 Miles for Doug's 50Ththe Shores Of
    Kendall Brook LEXINGTON LEXINGTON Mystic Wharf Branch right-of-way could be BEAVER 60 Fresh Pond 117 rail trail in Charlestown BEAVER TRAPELO RD Payson Park Reservoir Stony Brook Lyman Pond Hobbs Brook WARREN BELMONT LYMAN Clematis Brook 95 GROVE HURON Beaver Brook BELMONT 60 3 PROSPECT FAIRFAX RD Kendall Brook ARLINGTON LEXINGTON LEXINGTON 117 SOUTH MOODY 20 16 TheThe ShoresShores ofof BostonBostonBACON Island,Island, 5050 MilesMiles forfor Doug'sDoug's 50th50th The Shores of117 Boston Island,HIGHLAND 50 Miles for Doug's 50th 20 WalthamWaltham BELMONT BRATTLE ELM BEAVER 60 Fresh Pond 117 Bikepath currently COMMON 26 20 BEAVER 2626 ends at Pleasant St. TRAPELO RD Payson Park Reservoir Stony Brook Lyman Pond Mag 14.00 Hobbs Brook WARREN BELMONT Charles River LYMAN Clematis Brook 95 PINE Watertown GROVE HURONFri Sep 07 01:00 2001 WatertownWatertownBELMONT Half of Cambridge Parkway Beaver Brook LEXINGTON 16 RIVER GROVE was grassed over with a NEWTON 60 Scale 1:50,000 (at center) Bridge St. to Farwell St. 3 26 path in the 1980's 26 PROSPECT FAIRFAX RD MAPLE portion of river bikepath ARLINGTON 20 117 SOUTH MOODY 20 PLEASANT 20 16 BACON M B T A RAILROAD 117 to be built in 2002 HIGHLAND 5000 Feet 20 SPRING BELMONT Stony Brook WalthamWaltham PLEASANT 16 BRATTLE ELM Charles River COOLIDGE Bikepath currently HIGH ARSENAL COMMON GREENOUGH 20 Charles River 2626 ends at Pleasant St. CALIFORNIA Charles SawinsRiver Bikepath Pond SUMMER MOODY CRESCENT ARSENALwill extend to 10 miles 1000 Meters SOUTH Charles River PINE WatertownWatertown 20 Sawing River 95 16LEXINGTON GALEN 16 WESTERN RIVER GROVE NEWTON Bridge St.
    [Show full text]
  • Watertown Comprehensive Plan Town of Watertown, MA
    Watertown Comprehensive Plan Town of Watertown, MA Adopted June 23, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TOWN COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mark Sideris, Council President AND PLANNING STAFF Stephen Corbett, Council Vice President Steven Magoon, Director Susan Falkoff, Councilor at large Gideon Schreiber, Senior Planner Anthony Palomba, Councilor at large Andrea Adams, Senior Planner Aaron Dushku, Councilor at large Ingrid Marchesano, Clerk Angeline Kounelis, District A Councilor CONSULTANT Cecilia Lenk, District B Councilor Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc. Vincent Piccirilli, District C Councilor Ken Schwartz, AICP Ken Woodland, District D Councilor Ralph Wilmer, FAICP PLANNING BOARD Geoffrey Morrison-Logan John B. Hawes Jr., Chairman Renee Guo, AICP Jeffrey W. Brown Matthew Chase, PE, PTOE Linda Tuttle-Barletta Rita Walsh Fergal Brennock Neal Corbett TOWN MANAGER Michael J. Driscoll Watertown Comprehensive Plan Watertown, Massachusetts Prepared for Town of Watertown, Massachusetts Prepared by Adopted June 23, 2015 Watertown Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Vision Statement 1 Background 42 2. Land Use 5 Existing Conditions 45 Introduction 5 Future Conditions 55 Baseline Assessment 6 Goals 56 Purpose 6 Recommendations 57 Historic Land Use Patterns 7 4. Housing 65 Existing Land Use 10 Introduction 65 Neighborhoods 11 Baseline Assessment 66 Watertown's Squares and Corridors 12 Demographics 66 Zoning Regulations vs. Future Land Use 25 Housing Characteristics 68 Goals 31 Housing Market Conditions 70 Recommendations 32 Housing Affordability 72 3. Transportation, Circulation, and Parking 39 Chapter 40B Inventory 73 Goals 74 Introduction 39 Recommendations 75 Baseline Assessment 42 Regional Context 42 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 5. Economic Development 79 Charles River 100 Introduction 79 Watertown-Cambridge Greenway 102 Baseline Assessment 82 Open Space and Recreation Needs 102 Labor Force Characteristics 82 Goals 104 Institutions Supporting Local Recommendations 105 and Regional Economic Development 83 7.
    [Show full text]