An example of how to build conservation evidence from case studies:Fire and raking to enhance Pulsatilla vernalis populations Annelie Sandström, Brita M. Svensson and Per Milberg Journal Article N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication: Annelie Sandström, Brita M. Svensson and Per Milberg, An example of how to build conservation evidence from case studies:Fire and raking to enhance Pulsatilla vernalis populations, Journal for Nature Conservation, 2017. 36 pp.58-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.02.005 Copyright: Elsevier http://www.elsevier.com/ Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-134651 An example of how to build conservation evidence from case studies: fire and raking to enhance Pulsatilla vernalis populations Anneli Sandströma, Brita M. Svenssona, Per Milbergb a Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden b IFM Biology, Conservation Ecology Group, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Corresponding author: Per Milberg, IFM Biology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden;
[email protected]; +46 70 51 73 100 1 Abstract Can data collected by practitioners during practical conservation work be used as decision support? To find out, we used unpublished data from attempts to enhance populations of the vascular plant Pulsatilla vernalis in Sweden. About half of the 50 located cases had generated data useful for metaanalysis. We could show that burning had a positive effect while mechanical disturbance had negligible effects on number of plants in short-term follow-ups.