DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan, 2012-2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan, 2012-2022 Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan, 2012-2022 prepared for the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico Sites Southwest Parsons Brinckerhoff September 2012 Final Draft Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Overall Approach ............................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Modifications ............................................................................................................. 2 Summary of Updated Fees ............................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 10 Legal Framework ........................................................................................................................... 10 Alternative Methodologies ........................................................................................................... 11 Role of the Capital Plan ................................................................................................................ 12 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................................ 13 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 13 Background .................................................................................................................................... 14 Existing Population and Housing ............................................................................................... 15 Existing Nonresidential Development ....................................................................................... 17 Housing Projections ...................................................................................................................... 21 Population Projections ................................................................................................................. 22 Nonresidential Projections ........................................................................................................... 23 ROADS ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 25 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 25 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 28 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 32 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 35 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 36 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 39 PARKS ................................................................................................................................................ 41 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 41 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 42 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 42 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 43 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 44 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 47 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 47 OPEN SPACE ................................................................................................................................... 50 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 50 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 50 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 50 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 50 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 54 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 56 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 56 TRAILS ............................................................................................................................................... 59 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 59 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 59 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 59 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 59 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 61 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 62 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 63 FIRE .................................................................................................................................................... 65 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 65 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 65 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 65 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 69 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 71 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 72 POLICE .............................................................................................................................................. 73 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 73 Service Units ................................................................................................................................... 73 Cost per Service Unit .................................................................................................................... 74 Net Cost per Service Unit ............................................................................................................ 76 Potential Impact Fee Schedule .................................................................................................... 78 Capital Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 79 DRAINAGE ...................................................................................................................................... 81 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................. 81 Capital Plan ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page/Ladson (8Je591) : Excavation of an Early Holocene Occupation Site
    PAGE/LADSON (8JE591): EXCAVATION OF AN EARLY HOLOCENE OCCUPATION SITE IN THE AUCILLA RIVER, FLORIDA By BRINNEN S. CARTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ' r Copyright 2003 by Brinnen S. Carter This document is dedicated to my dead father, Brinly Stewart Carter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who deserve the largest measure of thanks for their patience and support. On the intellectual side, S. David Webb and James (Jim) Dunbar are first and foremost. The Florida Department of State Special Category grants, National Geographic grants, and numerous private donations of money, time, and equipment, to the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, lead by Drs. Webb and Milanich paid for the fieldwork. Grants and salary from the Aucilla River Prehistory Project and discussions with Jim Dunbar have been important in directing the work that follows. Discussions with David Anderson (modeling Paleoindian/Early Archaic American Indian bands and macrobands), Albert Goodyear (tool technology and chronology), Jerald Milanich (hypothesis generation and testing), Louis Tesar (overall Florida Paleoindian site distribution and nature) have also contributed to the quality of work. One could hardly ask for a better archaeology faculty than the University of Florida's for understanding the breadth of New World Archaeology. The archaeology faculty of Florida State University—and especially Rochelle Marrinan—helped me keep my dignity while completing the dissertation. Teaching at FSU added notches to my resume and gave me a better understanding of the pressures under which university-based researchers work.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
    OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Author TRC Environmental Corporation Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PD00024 by TRC Environmental Corporation 4155 Shackleford Road Suite 225 Norcross, Georgia 30093 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and TRC Environmental Corporation. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endoresements or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, at a charge of $15.00, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-008. The report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Perspective on the Volg (PDF)
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint A North American perspective on the Volgu Biface Cache from Upper Paleolithic France and its relationship to the “Solutrean Hypothesis” for Clovis origins J. David Kilby Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The “Solutrean hypothesis” for the origins of the North American Clovis Culture posits that early North American Volgu colonizers were direct descendants of European populations that migrated across the North Atlantic during the Clovis European Upper Paleolithic. The evidential basis for this model rests largely on proposed technological and Solutrean behavioral similarities shared by the North American Clovis archaeological culture and the French and Iberian Cache Solutrean archaeological culture. The caching of stone tools by both cultures is one of the specific behavioral correlates put forth by proponents in support of the hypothesis. While more than two dozen Clovis caches have been identified, Volgu is the only Solutrean cache identified at this time. Volgu consists of at least 15 exquisitely manufactured bifacial stone tools interpreted as an artifact cache or ritual deposit, and the artifacts themselves have long been considered exemplary of the most refined Solutrean bifacial technology. This paper reports the results of applying methods developed for the comparative analysis of the relatively more abundant caches of Clovis materials in North America to this apparently singular Solutrean cache. In addition to providing a window into Solutrean technology and perhaps into Upper Paleolithic ritual behavior, this comparison of Clovis and Solutrean assemblages serves to test one of the tangible archaeological implications of the “Solutrean hypoth- esis” by evaluating the technological and behavioral equivalence of Solutrean and Clovis artifact caching.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff ubP lications Institute of 2005 Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C. Goodyear University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, 2005, pages 103-112. http://csfa.tamu.edu/ © 2005 by Center for the Study of the First Americans This Book Chapter is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty & Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis A Peopling of the Americas Publication Evidence for Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C. Goodyear is believed that they sufficiently meet these criteria and thus con- stitute evidence. Truth is the daughter of time. –John Trapp, 17th-century Puritan writer Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Pennsylvania Abstract The most long-standing case for archaeological evidence of pre- Over the past 25 years, a number of archaeological sites in east- Clovis (earlier than 11,500 RCYBP) humans in the eastern United ern North America have manifested evidence of human occupa- States is the famous Meadowcroft Rockshelter, located about 48 tions dating earlier than 11,500 RCYBP. These sites include km southwest of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Figure 1). Meadowcroft Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Penn.; Cactus Hill, Va.; Saltville-2, Va.; Rockshelter is within the Cross Creek drainage, a tributary of the and Topper, S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey of the Chesapeake Bay Shorelines Associated with Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 2003 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Historic Resources Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Author: Darrin L. Lowery Chesapeake Bay Watershed Archaeological Research Foundation 5264 Blackwalnut Point Road, P.O. Box 180 Tilghman, MD 21671 2003 ii ABSTRACT This report summarizes the results of an archaeological survey conducted along the Atlantic shorelines of both Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia. Accomack and Northampton Counties represent the southernmost extension of the Delmarva Peninsula. The study area encompasses all of the lands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and shorelines associated with the back barrier island bays. A shoreline survey was conducted along the Atlantic Ocean to gauge the erosion threat to the archaeological resources situated along the shoreline. Archaeological sites along shorelines are subjected to numerous natural processes which hinder site visibility and limit archaeological interpretations. Summaries of these natural processes are presented in this report. The primary goal of the project was to locate, identify, and record any archaeological sites or remains along the Atlantic seashore that are threatened by shoreline erosion. The project also served as a test of a prehistoric site predictive/settlement model that has been utilized during other archaeological surveys along the Chesapeake Bay shorelines and within the interior sections of the Delmarva Peninsula. The prehistoric site predictive/settlement model is presented in detail using archaeological examples from Maryland and Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
    [Show full text]
  • OSL Ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic Components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 7 (2016) 94–103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. K. Rodrigues a,⁎, W.J. Rink b,M.B.Collinsc,T.J.Williamsc, A. Keen-Zebert d,G.I.Lόpez e a Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, United States b School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States d Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89503, United States e Luminescence Dating Laboratory, CENIEH (Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos 09002, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Gault Site, Texas, U.S.A., affords a near-complete regional prehistoric sequence from an ~2 m-thick alluvial Received 31 August 2015 sedimentary interval. Age estimates on Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components were obtained using Received in revised form 10 March 2016 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of silt-sized quartz grains. The luminescence characteristics of Accepted 11 March 2016 the quartz are favorable, showing normal equivalent dose distributions and no evidence of incomplete zeroing. Available online 12 April 2016 The artifacts span Clovis to Archaic forms, and their ages are generally in excellent agreement with independent radiocarbon ages from five other Texas sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Anderson 2005 Paleo
    Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis A Peopling of the Americas Publication Pleistocene Human Occupation of the Southeastern United States: Research Directions for the Early 21st Century David G. Anderson 1993a; Ellis et al. 1998; Goodyear 1999a; Lepper and Meltzer 1991; Mason 1962; Morse et al. 1996; Williams and Stoltman 1965). In this paper, rather than repeat this existing informa- tion, I look at the state of current research and offer suggestions Abstract about what we should be doing to better understand the initial Paleoindian research effort in the Southeast and beyond in the years human occupation of the region. These suggestions are intended to come should be directed, as much as possible, to primary data to guide and not straitjacket or constrain research in the South- collection, both through fieldwork and laboratory analyses; absolute east in years to come. I have no doubt that exciting discoveries and relative dating of artifacts and assemblages; the use of calibrated will occur and that new models and approaches will be devel- or calendar dates; the increasing adoption of multidisciplinary re- oped that are completely unanticipated here. That is as it should search approaches; the development of well-grounded models; and be, and is, after all, what makes archaeology such an exciting the full publication of the results of current and past fieldwork. The field. Just as we often don’t know what we will find when we dig, reward structure of the archaeological profession, in academia and so too are we frequently surprised at where our analyses and beyond, should be refocused to emphasize the production of compre- modeling take us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Anthropologist
    THE FLORIDA ANTHROPOLOGIST Volume 60 Number 1 March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS From the Editors 3 Temporal Problems and Alternatives Toward the Establishment of Paleoindian Site Chronologies in Florida 5 and the Adjacent Coastal Southeast. James S. Dunbar Summer Pentoaya: Locating a Prominent Ais Indian Town along the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. 21 J. F. Lanham and Alan Brech A Preliminary Review and Bibliography of Human Skeletal Remains Curated by the Palm Beach Museum 39 of Natural History. Peter Ferdinando BOOK REVIEWS Grantham: Creation Myths and Legends of the Creek Indians. Jim Pepe 51 Mason: The Archaeology of Ocmulgee Old Fields, Macon, Georgia. Rochelle Marrinan 52 About the Authors 55 Cover: The Florida Anthropological Society 60th Anniversary Logo by James W. Hunter III. Published by the FLORIDA ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. ISSN 0015-3893 TEMPORAL PROBLEMS AND ALTERNATIVES TOWARDS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PALEOINDIAN SITE CHRONOLOGIES IN FLORIDA AND THE ADJACENT COASTAL SOUTHEAST JAMES s. dUNBAR Senior Archaeologist, Public Lands Archaeology Program, Bureau of Archaeological Research, 1001 de Soto Park Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32301 Email: [email protected] Introduction Since its development, radiocarbon dating (Libby et al. Several Paleoindian sites have been identified in Florida 1949) has been the preferred method of placing archaeological that have yielded diagnostic artifacts and preserved faunal sites in temporal context (Dasovich 1996, Morlan 2004). bone, but have not been radiometrically dated. There have However, the radiocarbon method has been largely ineffective been limitations to and new developments with the radiocarbon in determining the age of Paleoindian sites east of the technique (both standard radiometric and Accelerator Mass Mississippi River due to the general absence of preserved Spectrometry AMS) that may or may not preclude its use in organic material capable of yielding dates (Ellis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • View SFCC Course Learning Outcomes
    Spokane Falls Community College COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES Prefix and Course Number: ANTH& 210 Course Title: Indians of North America Version Date: Winter 2016 Course Learning Outcomes Upon successful completion of the course, the student will be able to: 1. Identify and evaluate the different perspectives of events and trends related to pre-historic and contemporary North American cultures. 2. Describe the relationships between indigenous social systems and the ecosystems in which they participate. 3. Explain the social, political, and economic conditions that led to tribes, First Nations, and other forms of social and political organizations in native communities. 4. Apply an anthropological lens to describe the diversity of social, political, economic, and religious systems of pre-historic and contemporary Native American cultures. ANTH& 210 COURSE OUTLINE I. Introduction to Anthropology A. What is Anthropology? B. Four-field approach C. Understanding and Applying an Anthropological Lens to Research Topics II. Introduction to Indians of North America A. A comparison of early studies and contemporary anthropological research of Indians of North America B. Defining a Cultural Area ill. American Indian Diversity from Pre-history to Colonization A. Stone tool technologies - Taxonomic Indicator of Paleo -Indian Cultures B. Peopling of the Americas 1. Archaeological evidence 2. Biological evidence 3. Linguistic anthropological evidence C. Pre-Clovis (Suggested Sites: Meadowcroft, Cactus Hill, Paisl ey Cave) 1. Archaeological evidence for environmental adaptations 2. Archaeological evidence for worldview 3. Archaeological evidence for trade D. Clovis 1. Archaeological evidence for environmental adaptations 2. Archaeological evidence for worldview 3. Archaeological evidence for trade 4. Archaeological evidence for rituals E.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE 6.3 Significant Archaeological Sites in North America Older Than 5,000 Years
    TABLE 6.3 Significant Archaeological Sites in North America Older than 5,000 Years Site Name Description Bluefish Located in present-day Yukon Territory, Bluefish Caves is significant because it provides Caves evidence of people in Beringia during the last ice age. The site contains artifacts made of stone and bone as well as butchered animal remains. Most archaeologists accept dates between 15,000 and 12,000 years ago, although some suggest dates in the range of 25,000 years ago. Cactus Hill This site is located in Virginia. It is widely accepted as being older than 12,000 years, but the precise antiquity is uncertain. Some suggest that the site may be as old as 19,000 to 17,000 years, but these dates are contested. Gault This site, located in Texas, was a Clovis camp and was likely first occupied more than 12,000 years ago. The assemblage includes more than one million artifacts, includ- ing several hundred thousand that are more than 9,000 years old. The site is particularly significant for showing the diversity of diet, which, contrary to popular belief, indicates that mammoths and other large game were only a small part of the Clovis diet. The site is also significant in providing what may be the oldest art in North America, in the form of more than 100 incised stones. Meadowcroft Meadowcroft Rockshelter, located in Pennsylvania, is widely considered to contain depos- its that are at least 12,000 years old. Some suggest the deposits may be as old as 19,000 years, but these dates are contested.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Spring 2020
    Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Spring 2020 Week 2: Paleoindian Arrival The Clovis culture, traditionally dated 11,500-11,000 14C years BP has long been recognized as the earliest well-documented occupation of North America. At the same time, the question of whether “pre- Clovis” cultures existed has for decades been one of the most hotly debated questions in American archaeology. Here we will discuss the questions of when and how the South was first colonized. Currently there are a handful of sites in the South (and nearby) for which claims of pre-Clovis antiquity have been made. These readings offer a sampling of what we know about these sites. The general readings (which everyone must read) provide an overview of some allegedly pre-Clovis sites. The supplemental readings (which will be divided among the class participants) give additional details on these sites. Anderson, David G., and Kenneth E. Sassaman (2012). Pioneers and Colonists of the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. In Recent Developments in Southeastern Archaeology: From Colonization to Complexity, pp. 36-65. SAA Press, Washington, D.C. Goodyear, Albert C. (2005). Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States. In Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, edited by R. Bonnichsen, B. Lepper, D. Stanford, M. Waters, pp. 103-112. Texas A&M University Press. Clausen, C. J., A. D. Cohen, Cesare Emiliani, J. A. Holman, J. J. Stipp (1979). Little Salt Spring, Florida. Science 203:609-614. [Focus on the earliest occupation.] Waters, Michael R., et al. (2011). The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the Origins of Clovis at the Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians of Virginia (Pre-1600 with Notes on Historic Tribes) Virginia History Series #1-09 © 2009
    Indians of Virginia (Pre-1600 With Notes on Historic Tribes) Virginia History Series #1-09 © 2009 1 Pre-Historic Times in 3 Periods (14,000 B.P.- 1,600 A.D.): Paleoindian Pre-Clovis (14,000 BP – 9,500 B.C.) Clovis (9,500 – 8,000 B.C.) Archaic Early (8,000 -6,000 B.C.) Middle (6,000 – 2,500 B.C.) Late (2,500 – 1,200 B.C.) Woodland Early (1,200 – 500 B.C.) Middle (500 B.C. – 900 A.D.) Late (900 – 1,600 A.D.) Mississippian Culture (Influence of) Tribes of Virginia 2 Alternate Hypotheses about Pre-historic Migration Routes taken by Paleo- Indians from Asia or Europe into North America: (1) From Asia by Water along the Northern Pacific or across the land bridge from Asia thru Alaska/Canada; or (2) From Europe on the edge of the ice pack along the North Atlantic Coast to the Temperate Lands below the Laurentide Ice Sheet. 3 Coming to America (The “Land Bridge” Hypothesis from Asia to North America thru Alaska) * * Before Present 4 Migrations into North and Central America from Asia via Alaska 5 The “Solutrean” Hypothesis of Pre-historic Migration into North America The Solutrean hypothesis claims similarities between the Solutrean point- making industry in France and the later Clovis culture / Clovis points of North America, and suggests that people with Solutrean tool technology may have crossed the Ice Age Atlantic by moving along the pack ice edge, using survival skills similar to that of modern Eskimo people. The migrants arrived in northeastern North America and served as the donor culture for what eventually developed into Clovis tool-making technology.
    [Show full text]