Read the May 2019 Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Read the May 2019 Newsletter PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOFTHE DESERT BETTS FOUNTAIN PRINTING HUMANE BORDERS PROOFMay 2019 BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOFHUMANE BORDERS, INC. BETTSARIZONA OPENGIS FOR DECEASED PRINTING P.O. Box 20724, Tucson, Arizona 85726 humaneborders.info [email protected] PROOFwww.humaneborders.org BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING Page 1 PROOF BETTS PRINTING Page 2 FROM THE CHAIR – REFLECTING BACK AND LOOKING FORWARD Dinah Bear PROOF BETTSGreetings PRINTING in this new year. on the work that we do at Humane Borders. To date, we Many of us live with different ways of marking “new years.” We have different calendars have not experienced direct impacts. We continue to receive for diverse religious faiths, calendars that mark time in fiscal support from the landowners and managers on which our years, and school calendar years. At Humane Borders, it stations are located, and we have received all of our federal PROOF BETTSmight bePRINTING said that spring is the beginning of our new year, as permits. There have been concerns raised about the efficiency marked by our annual Blessing of the Fleet event (See story and effects of our stations in the west desert areas of southern “Humane Borders 7th Annual Blessing of the Fleet”). Even Arizona in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and as we enjoy the astonishing beauty of the desert in spring, we Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, both in terms of the PROOF BETTSknow thatPRINTING the hot days of summer are almost upon us and is stations themselves and as compared to Border Patrol rescue the most important time for us to be out in the field. beacons located in these areas. Questions include the level of usage and the placement of the stations south of an especially As a nonprofit charitable institution, we were blessed dangerous wilderness area. We are committed to taking a last year with a tremendous amount of support, both in hard and honest look at these questions over the summer and PROOF BETTSterms of PRINTINGvolunteers and donations. We appreciate this so very will keep you informed. much! Many people were especially motivated by what they read in the news about the inhumane treatment of migrants As has always been the case, we continue to see and asylum seekers. A good number of Humane Borders significant fluctuations in water usage along various routes. PROOF BETTSvolunteers PRINTING also volunteer their time working with and on Sometimes stations go unused for weeks or months, only behalf of people released by immigration authorities into the to see high usage just at the point where people start to Tucson community. This work began back in 2014 with the conclude that the station is not in a good location. It’s always Truck 9 increase in numbers of people from the Central American been hard to predict usage and it is even harder now. Where countries of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador coming we are unequivocally providing more water is on the south PROOF BETTSto the UnitedPRINTING States to seek asylum, most frequently to escape side of the border. We have been leaving water in Sasabe, the horrendous gang violence occurring in those countries. Sonora for many years, but Humane Borders is additionally As a community, Tucson has turned out in force to make sure furnishing water at two shelters in Sonoyta, Sonora as well that people are not turned out on the streets but are treated as assisting with the provision of groceries at one of them PROOF BETTShumanely PRINTING and with respect. (see story, “Helping at Migrant Shelters in Mexico”). Thanks to a generous donor in Tennessee and magnanimous donors in Tucson, we now have two new Finally, we are delighted trucks –a new water service truck replacing a 2006 truck that to welcome Anne Lowe and PROOF BETTShad finally PRINTING and completely broken down, and a pickup truck Mike Monroe to our Board of for use by our operations manager. As many of you know, Directors, as well as our new these vehicles were badly needed, and so we at Humane part-time staff person, Rebecca Borders are very thankful to welcome “Truck 9” and “Truck Fowler, whose experience PROOF BETTS10” into PRINTINGour fleet. For a dip into nostalgia, do read Stephen and interest in humanitarian Saltonstall’s “paean” to our retired Truck 5, otherwise known assistance goes far beyond the as “Sal.” administrative responsibilities that she has assumed. I’m sure I speak for all of us when I say we’d trade all PROOF BETTSthe increased PRINTING support in a minute if we could wave a magic Thank you for taking this wand and change the circumstances that make our work journey with us and for your necessary. Sadly, those circumstances seem to get worse by continued support. the week and certainly more confusing. It’s hard to keep track PROOF BETTSof all thePRINTING policy changes that get proposed or promulgated In gratitude, Truck 10 and then overturned as violations of law by the courts. You Dinah Bear may be wondering if these events have had any direct effects PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING PROOF BETTS PRINTING Page 3 Page 4 SHELTER STORY – HELPING AT MIGRANTPROOF SHELTERS IN MEXICOBETTS PRINTING the cooking. There are separate dorm rooms for women Dinah Bear and men, as well as a good cooking area and yard area. The PROOF BETTSsecond shelter,PRINTING called Casa de Los Migrantes, is much larger and was housing roughly 90 migrants in tents and cinder block buildings. Our observations there included everything from the need for better management of trash, to a puppy who needed some medical attention (which we obtained that PROOF BETTSafternoon PRINTING at a local veterinarian clinic at no cost to Humane Borders). One of the most revealing experiences was a PROOF BETTSconversation PRINTING we had with a migrant we’ll call Roberto, who told us that he planned to cross the border in a few days outside of an official border crossing. When we explained the dangers of crossing, it became clear that he had no idea how far he would have to walk or how much water he would PROOF BETTShave to carry.PRINTING In fact, the area that Roberto was undertaking Kitchen Area, San Pedro Shelter to cross is the single most dangerous region of the Arizona border. The area is so hostile to human life that hundreds of pioneers died in the area in the 19th century as they tried to PROOF BETTSmake theirPRINTING way to the California gold rush. Starkly beautiful, the area provides scant shade from soaring temperatures that reach as high as 120 during summer months between May and October. If a migrant tries to walk north in a straight line and is able to continue north of the area where we have PROOF BETTSwater stations,PRINTING he or she will still have to traverse the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge wilderness area where water stations are not permitted, and would then have to continue onto the desolate expanse of the Barry M. Goldwater live PROOF BETTSbombing PRINTING range, a combined area of some eighty-six miles in total. Ajo HB Volunteer Doug Schnare services water station at San Pedro Migrant Shelter, Sonoyta, Sonora. Since at least 2002, Humane Borders has distributed One of several themes that has emerged in the past two years Deaths, began bringing supplies and medical support to the warning posters in Mexico to educate people on the hazards from the current administration is “Keep them in Mexico.” PROOFshelter but could not keep up with the demand BETTS for water. of crossing PRINTING and to try to discourage them from making the Not surprisingly, the result has been an increase in the need Humane Borders stepped up, installing a water station journey. Following our conversation, we revised our warning for migrant shelters in communities on the south side of the and replenishing the water on weekly runs. During 2018, poster to provide more detail about how long it takes to walk U.S.-Mexico border. When there has been need for life-saving the shelter was moved to a better location and a second to Phoenix from that Lukeville/Sonoyta (18 days) and how water, Humane Borders has always been quick to respond PROOFshelter was established in Sonoyta with theBETTS help of a church. much waterPRINTING would have to be carried to survive (54 gallons). with the provision of humanitarian aid at different sites along That shelter also needed a reliable water supply, which we Those posters are going to both shelters and we hope this the border in Sonora, Mexico. provided. Later, we learned that there was also a need for information will be taken into serious consideration as regular contributions for groceries at the second shelter, and migrants make critical decisions about what to do and where In the fall of 2017, one of our volunteers in Ajo we are now providing a monthly stipend for that purpose. to go. identified such a need upon hearing of a bad situation at a PROOF BETTS PRINTING make-shift migrant shelter in Sonoyta, Sonora, right across Rebecca Fowler and I visited both of these shelters the border from Lukeville south of Organ Pipe Cactus in April of this year, and it was a very interesting and National Monument and Ajo, Arizona. At the time, about worthwhile experience for both us.
Recommended publications
  • SONORA LONGITUD DE LA RED FEDERAL PAVIMENTADA : 1,566.35 CARRETERA TIPO TRAMO O RAMAL LONGITUD (Km) DE TRONCAL RAMAL EQUIVALENTE RED ATENDIDA
    DIRECCION GENERAL DE CONSERVACION DE CARRETERAS DIRECCION DE PLANEACION Y EVALUACION LONGITUD DE LA INFRAESTRUCTURA CARRETERA FEDERAL SONORA LONGITUD DE LA RED FEDERAL PAVIMENTADA : 1,566.35 CARRETERA TIPO TRAMO O RAMAL LONGITUD (km) DE TRONCAL RAMAL EQUIVALENTE RED ATENDIDA Janos-Agua Prieta (R-2) B Lím. de Edos. Chih./Son.-Agua Prieta 82.00 85.50 B Paso por Agua Prieta 0.90 1.80 Agua Prieta-Imuris (R-2) B Agua Prieta-Imuris 12/ 162.40 201.65 S Ramal a Naco 14.70 14.70 S Cananea 1.10 2.10 Santa Ana-Sonoyta (R-2) C Santa Ana-Coborca 8/ 31.00 62.00 C Caborca-Sonoyta 149.70 151.40 C Santa Ana - Sonoyta (gaza) 1.00 Sonoyta-Mexicali (R-2) C Sonoyta-San Luis Río Colorado 195.80 195.80 C Sn. Luis Río Colorado-Lím. de Edos. Son./B.C. 7.90 18.20 Sonoyta-Puerto Peñasco (R-8) S Sonoyta-Puerto Peñasco 7/ 93.40 93.40 S Sonoyta-Puerta de México 3.30 3.30 S Aeropuerto de Puerto Peñasco 0.10 0.10 Hermosillo-Moctezuma (R-14) S Hermosillo-Moctezuma 165.00 170.74 S Libramiento Moctezuma 1.80 1.80 Cd. Obregón-Hermosillo (R-15) B Cd. Obregón- (T. Empalme) Guaymas 1/ 8.30 8.90 C Guaymas-Hermosillo 11/ Aeropuerto de Cd. Obregón 2/ B Enlace de Entr. Empalme (gaza) 3/ 0.50 Aeropuerto de Guaymas 4/ C Enlace de Entr. El Valiente (gaza) 3/ 0.48 S Periférico Sur de Hermosillo 9/ B Aeropuerto de Hermosillo 0.50 0.50 S Periférico Oriente de Hermosillo 10/ Hermosillo-Nogales (R-15) C Magdalena-Nogales 80.42 165.70 B Alterna de Magdalena (incluye paso) 6/ 10.20 10.68 S Ramal a Carbo 10.00 10.00 S Ramal a Benjamín Hill 2.00 2.00 S Ramal a San Ignacio 3.80 3.80 S Aeropuerto de Nogales 0.20 0.20 B Libramiento de Nogales 6.70 6.70 Ramal a San Carlos 5/ Hermosillo-Chihuahua (R-16) B Hermosillo-Lím.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona-Sonora Environmental Strategic Plan 2017-2021
    Arizona-Sonora Environmental Strategic Plan 2017-2021 PROJECTS FOR BUILDING THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE ECONOMY IN THE ARIZONA-SONORA BORDER REGION 2 ARIZONA-SONORA ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures Letter from Agency Directors 06 Executive Summary 08 Environmental Context of the Arizona-Sonora Region 10 Strategic Plans of Arizona and Sonora Agencies and Potential Synergies 12 The Arizona-Sonora Environmental Strategic Plan Process 13 Implementing the Arizona-Sonora Environmental Strategic Plan 15 Economic Competitiveness and the Environment in the Arizona-Sonora Border Region 21 Strategic Environmental Projects 2017-2021 21 Overview of Strategic Arizona-Sonora Environmental Projects 22 Water Projects 26 Air Projects 29 Waste Management Projects 32 Wildlife Projects 33 Additional Projects for Future Consideration 33 Water Projects/Prioritization 36 Air Projects/Prioritization 37 Waste Management Projects/Prioritization 38 Wildlife Projects/Prioritization ARIZONA-SONORA ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2021 5 LETTER FROM AGENCY DIRECTORS LIST OF FIGURES 08 Figure 1: The U.S.-Mexico Border Zone 09 Figure 2: Border environmental concerns identified by CEDES/ADEQ Dear Colleagues, Friends and Neighbors, 10 Figure 4: CEDES Strategic Areas Overview, 2016-2021 We present to you this first Arizona-Sonora Environmental Strategic Plan for 2017-2021. In June 2016, the Environment and Water Committee of the Arizona-Mexico Commission/Comisión So- Figure 5: ADEQ Strategic Plan Overview 11 nora-Arizona agreed to produce this plan in order to enhance synergies and maximize the effec- tive use of resources. This plan is the latest effort in a long history of cross-border collaboration 12 Figure 6: Overview of Strategic Plan Development Process, 2016 involving bilateral, federal, state and local agencies, as well as the private sector and non-gov- ernmental organizations in Arizona and Sonora.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona (Washington: National Park Service Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation, 1969), Pp
    --A I? historic resource study september 1977 • / ' ' ^. :, : .. .. _. ;IENVER SERVICE CENTER , RANCH OF MICROGRAPHICS i. iBRARY COPY ► ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1 ^ORGAN PIPE CACTUS 1 NAT I ONAL MONUMENT / ARIZONA I N PLE4SE RETWN W. TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CENTER 1 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE I HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY I ORGAN PIPE CACTUS NATIONAL MONUMENT I ARIZONA I I I I by I Jerome A. Greene I I I I DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE i I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DENVER, COLORADO I . September 1977 1 I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I 1 I . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I Many individuals and institutions have contributed to the completion of this report. I must thank the entire staff at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monu- ment for their gracious assistance during my visits to the area. Superintendent I Ray Martinez, Jr., made available to me all the pertinent records and documents at the park headquarters. Park Aide Jesus V. Jerez accompanied me to the many diverse resource sites throughout the park. His good humor and deep knowledge I of the area helped to broaden my own appreciation for the desert country and its history. I must also acknowledge the help received in the location and use of park library materials from Supervisory Park Ranger Dan Jaramillo, Resource Management Specialist Terry Peters, Park Technicians Ernest H. Mayer, Carl I Douhan, and Kathy Liska, and Clerk Typist Melva Cormack. All of these people shared insights and gave fully of their time and assistance to insure the success I of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nogales
    Mexico 2019 Crime & Safety Report: Nogales This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Consulate General in Nogales, Mexico. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Mexico at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution due to crime. Reconsider travel to the State of Sonora due to crime. Overall Crime and Safety Situation The U.S. Consulate General in Nogales does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The American Citizens’ Services unit (ACS) cannot recommend a particular individual or location, and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Mexico-specific webpage for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. The Nogales consular district is the northern part of the state of Sonora, extending 600 miles from Agua Prieta in eastern Sonora, to San Luis Rio Colorado in western Sonora, and about 60 miles south of the U.S.-Mexico border. Crime Threats There is serious risk from crime in Nogales. Although in 2018, the overall level of crime in Sonora increased, crime levels in all but one category in northern Sonora decreased. Drug cartel-related (narco-related) violence continues to dominate as the motive behind many of the homicides and violent crimes in the Nogales district. The majority of cartel-related violence has occurred in other cities, such as Caborca, Magdalena, Altar, and Sonoyta.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonorensis 2014
    Sonorensis ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM 2014 REFLECTIONS Sonorensis ON OUR Desert Rivers ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM 2014 INTRODUCTION Linda M. Brewer ASDM Press Editor Volume 34, Number 1 Winter 2014 The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum In the arid West, water wars and water negotiations are Co-founded in 1952 by both notorious and vitally consequential to people and Arthur N. Pack and William H. Carr wildlife. Water is tied to almost every resource we use or Craig Ivanyi reap—plumbing systems, crops, mineral extraction, electri- Executive Director cal generation, digital communications, etc.—as well as to Debra Colodner Director, Conservation Education trees and other vegetation that cleanse the air, organisms and Science Department that recycle dead organic matter into substrates for new Nancy Serensky Pierstorff Jay Brennan Tom life, and a full ecosystem that provides natural resources Production Manager for us and other living beings. Especially in arid lands, riv- Kim Franklin ers are veins of ecological gold, with an impact far beyond Managing Editor Contents the ground they cover. About half of all breeding birds in Linda Brewer the southwestern United States depend on the narrow Contributing Editor 1-2 Introduction ribbons that are riparian corridors, which represent just 1 Martina Clary Linda M. Brewer percent of the land. In the Sonoran Desert, 85 percent of Design and Production wildlife species depend on surface water or an associated Sonorensis is published as a benefit to the 3-8 The Colorado riparian habitat in some phase of their life cycle. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum membership as Kerry Schwartz In this issue of Sonorensis, we tell the story of our a resource for furthering understanding of the rivers, because the story of rivers in the Sonoran Desert Sonoran Desert Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Hiking Trails at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument
    National Park Service Organ Pipe Cactus U.S. Department of the Interior Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument Guide to Hiking Trails To Ajo Visitor Center to Why To Why 22 mi CABEZA PRIETA 35 km 86 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Why to Tucson 120 mi d Monument Entrance a a 193 km ñ Wayside ro e K L ua G rt ka ro ved di e tch w o d W le r ash r p a W m rd i e as n u h u Bates Well C 85 TOHONO G Ch er O 17mi R io J n 28km O i A W L ORGAN PIPE CACTUS E E R H Montezumas Head T BATES O’ODHAM A 3634ft V W la mo Ajo Mountains W 1108m A MOUNTAINS a as h G s Wayside R L h A F S L Kino Peak S O E 3197ft C A N Y 974m Y 6 O A N Alamo Canyon J Y NATIONAL MONUMENT O E Campground L L INDIAN R A A V A LAM N O G CA N E Y S a O n sh N a W Cr CIPRIANO istobal ash W 7 HILLS jita ARCH ua CANYON RESER VA TION Ag Mt Ajo 4808ft 1466m PU Tillotson Peak ER 3374ft TO 1028m 8 gate BULL Pinkley N B PASTURE L Peak o A r (pit toilets) (pit toilets) Q 3145ft t e Estes Canyon- U N h I 959m iv S T C r D TN Bull Pasture Trails O Tillotson Peak D IABLO M B O A P n u Wayside i 21mi Q e ta U r n 34km I to u T o O Bla M nc M o T one-way H N Diaz Spire S D o one-way National Monument Boundary j I Twin Diaz Peak L r A 3892ft L L i A Peaks v 4024ft S 1186m 2615ft e 1227m SENITA A 797m Reserva de la Bisfera El Pinacate y B BASIN RA Gran Desierto deQuitobaquito Altar See detail Kris Eggle Visitor Center map below S PL O 1670ft A N 509m North I O N Y T S A 5 ON Victoria O Y M Mine TA T N S 5mi V 8km A 0 1 5 Kilometers LL EY Rio 0 1 5 Miles Son oy ta S I 2 E Lower Colorado Valley Community R R A A Creosote bush/ Bursage Lukeville D Sonoyta to Puerto Peñasco E (port of entry) 62 mi 8 S Mixed scrub 100 km A Sonoyta Rio N T Picnic area A So 2 n o Saltbush yta UNITED STATES R Self-guiding trail O Sonoyta to Caborca S 93 mi A Wheelchair-accessible 149 km MEXICO Arizona Upland Community Wheelchair-accessible Mixed cactus/ campground Palo verde (40-foot RV limit) Primitive campground Public road — Hiking trail Historical site Jojoba/Evergreen graded dirt, 25- scrubland foot vehicle limit 1.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Rocky Point Mexico (Puerto Penasco)
    History of Rocky Point Mexico (Puerto Penasco) Current 'Original' human arrival & habitation in the Northern & Southern 'Americas' pre-date current held beliefs of the 'Native Indians' by thousands of years. The discovery of human remains 'Kennewick Man' with almost European (Caucasiod) characteristics & tools that are far different than any ever found at Indian excavations are now being documented from the U.S. to Chile in South America. Still no link between 'Kennewick Man' and any existing human race on earth has been found. It is believed that first inhabitants came in small groups from across the Pacific & Atlantic oceans. The recent finds are so controversial that the U.S. Government seized the human remains found in the United States, and have denied even the Smithsonian Institute access or research of them. Later, during and after the last ice age small Asian (Mongoloid) groups speaking vastly different languages passed through what is now Russia & China crossing over the 'land/ice' bridge (often just huge floating sheets of ice) between what is now Russia & Alaska. The vast difference in languages suggests they were from vastly different cultures. These 'migrants' pursued food sources, wider hunting ranges, open/uncrowded lands to settle into, and continued migrating for thousands of years through what is now Alaska, Canada, United States, Mexico, and South America. The groups sometimes discovered as they traveled south that this 'new' land did not always support such groups. From this 'splintering off' may have occurred. Approximately 20,000 years ago in the 'Ajo Valley' and continuing to Puerto Peñasco nomadic tribes& their more adventurous members started a 'trading zone' along these routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arizona-Sonora Border: Line, Region, Magnet, and Filter
    The Arizona-Sonora Border: Line, Region, Magnet, and Filter james S. Griffith The Arizona-Sonora border was established country illegally de alambre- "through the wire." as a result of the Gadsden Purchase of 1853. It One who does this is an alambrista- a "wireist." runs through desert and mountain country, There are more sophisticated techniques as well. from the western Chihuahuan Desert over by In 1990, customs officials discovered an elabo­ New Mexico through a zone of grassland and rate tunnel leading from a warehouse in Agua oak-covered hills to the classic Sonoran Desert Prieta to a similar structure in Douglas, Arizona. west of Nogales. The land gets more and more Hydraulic equipment had been installed at arid as one travels west, and the western third of either end, and the whole set-up was capable of the border is essentially devoid of human habita­ handling considerable quantities of goods. At tion. It is this stretch of the border, once a major least three corridos have been written and circu­ road to the Colorado River, that has earned and lated about "el TuneI." kept the title, El Camino del Diablo, "The Devil's The fence serves other, more localized pur­ Highway." poses from time to time. During the 1980s, an There are six ports of en try on the Arizona­ international volleyball game was regularly held Sonora border. From east to west these paired near Naco. Each team played in its own country, towns are: Douglas/ Agua Prieta, Naco/ Naco, with the chain-link fence serving as the net.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF HISTORY of SONORA (Vers
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF SONORA (Vers. 14 May 2019) © Richard C. Brusca topographically, ecologically, and biologically NOTE: Being but a brief overview, this essay cannot diverse. It is the most common gateway state do justice to Sonora’s long and colorful history; but it for visitors to the Sea of Cortez (Gulf of hopefully provides a condensed introduction to this California). Its population is about three million. marvelous state. Readers with a serious interest in Sonora should consult the fine histories and The origin of the name “Sonora” is geographies of the region, many of which are cited in unclear. The first record of the name is probably the References section. The topic of Spanish colonial that of explorer Francisco Vásquez de history has a rich literature in particular, and no Coronado, who passed through the region in attempt has been made to include all of those 1540 and called part of the area the Valle de La citations in the References (although the most targeted and comprehensive treatments are Sonora. Francisco de Ibarra also traveled included). Also see my “Bibliography on the Gulf of through the area in 1567 and referred to the California” at www.rickbrusca.com. All photographs Valles de la Señora. by R.C. Brusca, unless otherwise noted. This is a draft chapter for a planned book on the Sea of Cortez; Four major river systems occur in the state the most current version of this draft can be of Sonora, to empty into the Sea of Cortez: the downloaded at Río Colorado, Río Yaqui, Río Mayo, and http://rickbrusca.com/http___www.rickbrusca.com_ind massive Río Fuerte.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distributional Survey of the Birds of Sonora, Mexico
    No. 21 Birds of Sonora, México 43 Ibis ordii (not of Bonaparte) Baird, 1858, 685 (Santa Cruza); 1859, 24 (Santa Cruza). — Brewer, 1844, 99, in text (Santa Cruz). Status uncertain. Detected at widely separated freshwater localities in spring, summer, and fall, but not so far found to breed. Recorded from Santa Cruz in June, 1855, and Cachuta on October 5, 1890. Additional localities are Colonia Independencia in the Colorado delta, where common on May 5, 1937; Tesia on the lower Mayo River, common in late June, 1937 (van Rossem notes); in the U.S. National Museum catalogue are records of nine specimens taken by Mearns and Holzner on the San Ber­ nardino River on the boundary line, August 2, 1892, and October 4 and 5, 1893; noted “by thousands” in the lower Yaqui River valley west of Cuidad Obregón, November 24, 1944 (Sheffler notes); Huey (1942, p. 363) noted several in migration at Quitovaquita on the boundary (though on the Arizona side) April 11 and 12, 1939- AJaia aJaJa (Linnaeus) Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., ed. 10, 1, 1758, 140 (in America australi = Brazil). Ajaia ajaja van Rossem and Hachisuka, 1937a, 327 (Mayo River valley; Tobari Bay; Guaymas). Ajaja [sic] ajaja Dawson, 1923, 1932 (Guaymas). Fairly common in summer in coastal lagoons from Guaymas southward. Reported at one inland point, the lower Mayo River valley near Tesia. Additional localities are Agiabampo, where common in mid May, 1937 (van Rossem notes), and Kino Bay in “September” (Nat. Hist. Mus.) The latter instance is possibly that of a seasonal wanderer.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoyta Mud Turtle Species Status Assessment V2 9-31-17 LITERATURE CITED
    Sonoyta Mud Turtle Species Status Assessment V2 9-31-17 LITERATURE CITED Akins, C.M., and T.R. Jones. 2010. Kinosternon Sonoriense (Sonoran Mud Turtle) Predation. Herpetological Review 41:485–486. Archer, S.R. and K.I. Predick. 2008. Climate change and ecosystems of the southwestern United States. Rangelands 30:23–28. Bennett, P.S., and M.R. Kunzmann. 1989. A history of the Quitobaquito Resource Management Area, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument. Cooperative Park Studies Unit, University of Arizona, Technical Report 26. 77pp. Bolster, B.C. 1990. Five year status report for desert pupfish, Cyprinodon macularius macularius. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Endangered Species Project, Rancho Cordova, CA. Breshears, D. D., N. S. Cobb, P. M. Rich, K. P. Price, C. D. Allen, R. G. Balice, W. H. Romme, J. H. Kastens, M. L. Floyd, J. Belnap, J. J. Anderson, O. B. Myers, and C. W. Meyers. 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA (PNAS) 102(42):15144–48. Brown, B. 1991. Land use trends surrounding Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument. Technical Report 39, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, School of Renewable Natural Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson. 65pp. Brusca, R.C. 2017. A brief geologic history of northwestern Mexico. Version date 23 April 2017. Unpublished Report. 99pp. Carroll, C., R. J. Fredrickson, , and R.C. Lacy. 2012. Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf. Conservation Biology 28:76–86. Carruth, R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontline Defenders Mexico ENGLISH V2.Indd
    DEFENDERS BEYOND BORDERS: MIGRANT RIGHTS DEFENDERS UNDER ATTACK IN CENTRAL AMERICA, MEXICO & THE UNITED STATES September 2019 Research: Front Line Defenders, Red TDT, LIS-Justicia en Movimiento, Prami Universidad Iberoamericana Cuidad de Mexico Editorial Work & Translation: Alex Mensing Cover Photo: Erin Kilbride - Front Line Defenders Map Design: Andrea Lopez Romero Report Design: Colin Brennan Front Line Defenders, PRAMI and Red TDT express immense gratitude to the human rights defenders who took time, effort and risks to speak with the researchers of this report. The authors also thank Alex Mensing for his editorial work and translation, and Margarita Nuñez for her research, analysis and collaboration Table of Contents I. Introduction 5-11 Summary Acronyms Context II. Migrant Rights Defenders’ Work 12-15 a. On the Ground Accompaniment & Shelter Coordination b. Humanitarian Assistance c. Desert Aid & Rescue d. Human Rights Education & Community Mobilisation e. Asylum-Seeker Accompaniment & Observations at US Ports of Entryand Mexico’s Regularisation Offices and Detention Centres f. Legal Representation g. Research and Advocacy III. Risks / Threats 16-35 a. Arrest & Detention b. Deportation & Threats of Deportation c. Detention & Trial d. Defamation & Subsequent Threats e. Surveillance, Intimidation and Attacks on Shelters, Offices, and Community Gathering Spaces f. Criminal Networks, Nationalist Militias, Non-state Armed Actors IV. Final Observations 36-39 - Intergovernmental Coordination - Criminalisation of HRDs Helping Migrants Through Legal Immigration Processes - Terrorism Rhetoric - Risks of Militarisation and Increasing Border Security - Identities V. Recommendations 40-42 Migrant Rights Defenders September 2019 “In the 1990s, there were 12 Customs and Border Patrol agents in our community. Now there’s 400. The militarisation of the border went from being a background thing to the dominant issue shaping our lives.
    [Show full text]