DOCSLIB.ORG

County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe Subfamily Family Superfamily Shelby County Acronicta clarescens Guenee, 1852 Clear Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Acronicta inclara J E Smith, 1900 Unclear Dagger Moth (None) Acronictinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Amorpha juglandis (J E Smith, 1797) Walnut Sphinx Moth Smerinthini Sphinginae Sphingidae Bombycoidea Shelby County Anagrapha falcifera (Kirby, 1837) Celery Looper Moth Plusiini Plusiinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Anavitrinella pampinaria (Geunee, 1857) Common Gray Boarmiini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Apantesis phalerata (Harris, 1841) Harnessed Tiger Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Argyrotaenia velutinana (Walker, 1863) Red Banded Leafroller Moth Archipini Tortricinae Tortricidae Tortricoidea Shelby County Atteva aurea (Fitch, 1856) Ailanthus Webworm Moth (None) Attevinae Yponomeutidae Yponomeutoidea Shelby County Caenurgina erechtea (Cramer, 1780) Forage Looper Moth Euclidiini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Condica vecors (Guenee, 1852) Dusky Groundling Condicini Condicinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Dargida rubripennis (Grote and Robinson, 1870) The Pink-streak Hadenini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Elophila obliteralis (Walker, 1859) Nymphulini Acentropinae Crambidae Pyraloidea Shelby County Erastria coloraria (Fabricius, 1798) Broad-lined Erastra Caberini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Eucosma heathiana Kearfott, 1907 Eucosmini Olethreutinae Tortricidae Tortricoidea Shelby County Gluphisia septentrionis Walker, 1855 Common Gluphisia Moth Dicranurini Notodontinae Notodontidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Haematopis grataria (Fabricius, 1798) Chickweed Geometer Timandrini Sterrhinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Heterophleps refusaria (Walker, 1861) Three-patched Bigwing Lobophorini Larentiinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Heterophleps triguttaria Herrich-Schaffer, 1854 Three-spotted Fillip Lobophorini Larentiinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Hyles lineata (Fabricius, 1775) White-Lined Sphinx Moth Macroglossini Macroglossinae Sphingidae Bombycoidea Shelby County Hyphantria cunea (Drury, 1773) Fall Webworm Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Idia americalis (Guenee, 1854) American Idia Moth Herminiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Iridopsis defectaria (Guenee, 1875) Brown Shaded Gray Moth Boarmiini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Isturgia dislocaria Pack, 1876 Pale-viened Enconista Macariini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Lacinipolia renigera (Stephens, 1820) Bristly Cutworm Moth Eriopygini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Leucania linda Franclemont, 1952 Linda Wainscot Moth Leucaniini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Lomographa vestaliata (Guenee, 1857) White Spring Moth Baptini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Macaria aemulataria (Walker, 1861) Common Angle Macariini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Maliattha synochitis (Grote and Robinson, 1868) Black-dotted Maliattha Eustrotiinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Ogdocconta cinereola (Guenee, 1852) Common Pinkband Condicini Condicinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Orthonama obstipata (Fabricius, 1794) The Gem Xanthorhoini Larentiinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Palpita magniferalis (Walker, 1861) Spilomelini Pyraustinae Crambidae Pyraloidea Shelby County Palthis angulalis (Hubner, 1796) Dark-spotted Palthis Moth Herminiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Perispasta caeculalis Zeller, 1875 Pyraustini Pyraustinae Crambidae Pyraloidea Shelby County Pero ancetaria (Hubner, 1806) Hubner's Pero Azelinini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Phalaenophana pyramusalis (Walker, 1859) Dark-banded Owlet Moth Herminiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Pseudeustrotia carneola (Guenee, 1852) Pink-barred Pseudeustrotia Pseudeustrotiini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Pyrrharctia isabella (J E Smith, 1797) Isabella Tiger Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Rivula propinqualis Guenee, 1854 Spotted Grass Moth Rivulinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Schinia rivulosa (Guenee, 1852) Ragweed Flower Moth Heliothinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Page 1 of 2 Shelby County Scopula inductata (Guenee, 1857) Soft-lined Wave Scopulini Sterrhinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Sphecodina abbottii (Swainson, 1821) Abbott's Sphinx Moth Macroglossini Macroglossinae Sphingidae Bombycoidea Shelby County Sphingicampa bicolor (Harris, 1841) Honey Locust Moth Caratocampinae Saturniidae Bombycoidea Shelby County Trichoplusia ni (Hubner, 1800-03) Cabbage Looper Moth Argyrogrammatini Plusiinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Shelby County Venusia comptaria (Walker, 1860) Brown-shaded Carpet Asthenini Larentiinae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Xanthotype attenuaria Swett, 1918 Angeronini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Shelby County Xestia dolosa Franclemont, 1980 Greater Black-Lettered Dart Noctuini Noctuinae Noctuidae Noctuoidea Page 2 of 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Forum Herbulot 2018. Integrative Taxonomy, a Multidisciplinary Approach to Answer Compli- Cated Taxonomic Questions
    SPIXIANA 42 2 291-320 München, Dezember 2019 ISSN 0341-8391 Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer compli- cated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018) Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei (eds) Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds) 2019. Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2): 291- 320. The tenth International Congress of FORUM HERBULOT on “Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions” took place in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS), from 11.- 16.06.2018, with 77 participants and 52 scientific presentations. The proceedings provide short information on the meeting and the abstracts of the oral presenta- tions. Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Short report and results Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. 2019. Short report and results. Pp. 291-292 in: Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds). Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2). Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Mu- nich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] The meeting was organized by an organization The conference started with a lecture on the ground- team of the ‘Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde breaking effects of “Willi Hennig and the synthesis of Stuttgart’ (SMNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of the Tolman Bridge Area (2000-2011)
    LEPIDOPTERA OF THE TOLMAN BRIDGE AREA, ALBERTA, 2000-2011 Charles Bird, 8 March 2012 Box 22, Erskine, AB T0C 1G0 [email protected] The present paper includes a number of redeterminations and additions to the information in earlier reports. It also follows the up-to-date order and taxonomy of Pohl et al. (2010), rather than that of Hodges et al. (1983). Brian Scholtens, Greg Pohl and Jean-François Landry collecting moths at a sheet illuminated by a mercury vapor (MV) light, Tolman Bridge, 24 July 2003, during the 2003 Olds meetings of the Lepidopterist’s Society (C.D. Bird image). Tolman Bridge, is located in the valley of the Red Deer River, 18 km (10 miles) east of the town of Trochu. The bridge and adjoining Park land are in the north half of section 14, range 22, township 34, west of the Fourth Meridian. The coordinates at the bridge are 51.503N and 113.009W. The elevation ranges from around 600 m at the river to 800 m or so near the top of the river breaks. In a Natural Area Inspection Report dated 25 June 1982 and in the 1989 Trochu 82 P/14, 1:50,000 topographic map, the land southwest of the bridge was designated as the “Tolman Bridge Municipal Park” while that southeast of the bridge was referred to as the “Tolman Bridge Recreation Area”. In an Alberta, Department of the Environment, Parks and Protected Areas Division paper dated 9 May 2000, the areas on both sides of the river are included in “Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park”.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
    INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Ennominae) Based on Skeleton-Muscular Anatomy of the Male Genitalia
    ISSN 1026-051X (print edition) Number 420: 1-13 ISSN 2713-2196 (online edition) December 2020 https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.420.1 http://zoobank.org/References/F8FBF14B-6855-47F5-A997-C2EF7933CF45 NEW CONTRIBUTION INTO CONCEPT OF THE TRIBE DEVENILIINI (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE, ENNOMINAE) BASED ON SKELETON-MUSCULAR ANATOMY OF THE MALE GENITALIA E. A. Beljaev Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. Skeleton-muscular anatomy of the male genitalia of Devenilia corearia (Leech, 1891), Synegia ichinosawana (Matsumura, 1925), Platycerota incertaria (Leech, 1891), Lomographa bimaculata (Fabricius, 1775), and Cabera pusaria (Linnaeus, 1758) is described. Probable synapomorphies of Deveniliini, its generic composition and relations to Baptini and Caberini are discussed. Presumably, Deveniliini is separate lineage of ennomies, basal to Baptini and Caberini. Key words: geometrid moth, Geometridae, Ennominae, Deveniliini, Baptini, Caberini, skeleton-muscular anatomy, phylogeny. Е. А. Беляев. Новый вклад в концепцию трибы Deveniliini (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Ennominae) на основе скелетно-мышечной анатомии гениталий самцов // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2020. N 420. С. 1-13. Резюме. Описана скелетно-мышечная анатомия гениталий самцов Devenilia corearia (Leech, 1891), Synegia ichinosawana (Matsumura, 1925), Platycerota incertaria (Leech, 1891), Lomographa bimaculata (Fabricius, 1775) и Cabera 1 pusaria (Linnaeus,1758). Обсуждаются возможные синапоморфии трибы Deve- niliini, ее родовой состав и отношения с Baptini и Caberini. Предположительно, Deveniliini являются отдельной ветвью энномин, базальной для Baptini и Caberini. INTRODUCTION Tribe Deveniliini was established based on the unique features in the male genitalia musculature of the enigmatic East Asian species, the Devenilia corearia (Leech, 1891), the type and single member of the genus Devenilia Wehrli, 1937 (Beljaev, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Tribal Composition of Southern Ennominae
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 2003 Band/Volume: 026 Autor(en)/Author(s): Krüger Martin Artikel/Article: Out of Africa repeated? On the tribal composition of southern Ennominae and the origin of Geometridae 198 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at Out of Africa repeated? On the tribal composition of southern Ennominae and the origin of Geometridae Martin Krüger Krüger, M. (2003): Out of Africa repeated? On the tribal composition of southern Ennominae and the origin of Geometridae. - Spixiana 26/3: 198 Dr. Martin Krüger, Transvaal Museum, NFl, Pretoria, RSA; e-mail: [email protected] The tribal composition of the ennomine faunas of The fossil record for the Geometroidea dates the former Gondwanan provinces of southern Afri- back to the early Cenozoic only, making vicariance ca, Australia and the Neotropical Region, as well as an unlikely explanation for the wide distribution of of the geologically much younger Island of Borneo many tribes in the southern hemisphere, given that as a Surrogate for the Oriental Region, was com- the Gondwanan landmasses were well separated pared. The total fauna is represented by 20 tribes by the late Cretaceous. Conversely, with some no- and a total of 4725 species. Fifteen tribes each have table exceptions, Geometridae have limited powers been recorded from southern Africa and Borneo, 14 of dispersal. Dispersal alone therefore remains equal- from Australia, and 8 from the Neotropical Region. ly unsatisfactory at present to account for the distri- Most tribes have a surprisingly wide distribution: butions described.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner S Guide to Moths of the Midwest Geometers
    0LGZHVW5HJLRQ86$ %HJLQQHU V*XLGHWR0RWKVRIWKH0LGZHVW*HRPHWHUV $QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH ,OOLQRLV1DWXUH3UHVHUYH&RPPLVVLRQ Photos: Angella Moorehouse ([email protected]). Produced by: Angella Moorehouse with the assistance of Alicia Diaz, Field Museum. Identification assistance provided by: multiple sources (inaturalist.org; bugguide.net) )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHRULJLQDOZRUN LVQRWSHUPLWWHG >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>@YHUVLRQ $ERXWWKH%(*,11(5¶6027+62)7+(0,':(67*8,'(6 Most photos were taken in west-central and central Illinois; a fewDUH from eastern Iowa and north-central Wisconsin. Nearly all were posted to identification websites: BugGuide.netDQG iNaturalist.org. Identification help was provided by Aaron Hunt, Steve Nanz, John and Jane Balaban, Chris Grinter, Frank Hitchell, Jason Dombroskie, William H. Taft, Jim Wiker,DQGTerry Harrison as well as others contributing to the websites. Attempts were made to obtain expert verifications for all photos to the field identification level, however, there will be errors. Please contact the author with all corrections Additional assistance was provided by longtime Lepidoptera survey partner, Susan Hargrove. The intention of these guides is to provide the means to compare photographs of living specimens of related moths from the Midwest to aid the citizen scientists with identification in the field for Bio Blitz, Moth-ers Day, and other night lighting events. A taxonomic list to all the species featured is provided at the end along with some field identification tips. :(%6,7(63529,',1*,'(17,),&$7,21,1)250$7,21 BugGuide.net LNaturalist.org Mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu Insectsofiowa.org centralillinoisinsects.org/weblog/resources/ :+,&+027+*8,'(7286( The moths were split into 6 groups for the purposes of creating smaller guides focusing on similar features of 1 or more superfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Isbn #: 0-921631-13-8
    TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION Occasional Publication # 25 - 93 Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera Encountered in Ontario in 1992 ISBN #: 0-921631-13-8 BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1992 BY ALAN J. HANKS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS MAY 1993 CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1992 SEASON 5 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 6 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 7 4.1 The Galium Sphinx Nectaring - RA. Layberry 7 4.2 The Giant Swallowtail in Carleton County - RA. Layberry 7 4.3 The Gray Hairstreak at its Northern Limits - RA. Layberry 8 4.4 Partial List ofMoths Collected at Zurich, Ontario - Q.F. Hess 9 4.5 Habitat Restoration at St. Williams and The Pinery - K. Stead 11 4.6 Rearing Notes for Northumberland County - W.J.D. Eberlie 13 4.7 The Mottled Dusky Wing in Ontario - W. Lamond 14 4.8 List ofButterflies Observed at the Metro Zoo in 1992 - T. Mason 15 4.9 The Tiger Swallowtail in Ontario - Q.F. Hess 17 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 18 6. 1992 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES 20 Hesperiidae 20 Papilionidae 32 Pieridae 35 Lycaenidae 39 Libytheidae 49 Nymphalidae 50 Apaturidae 62 Satyridae 63 Danaidae 67 7. 1992 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO MOTHS 68 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 89 8. PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS 102 1. INTRODUCTION This is Occasional Publication # 25-93 ofthe Toronto Entomologists' Association. It is based on data selected from reports for 1992 (or as otherwise indicated) for the Province of Ontario (Canada) as contributed by members and non members ofthe Association as listed below: R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen File for County Lists 2-20-2014.Xlsx
    County Genus Species Species Author Common Name Tribe Subfamily Family Superfamily Monona County Amorpha juglandis (J E Smith, 1797) Walnut Sphinx Moth Smerinthini Sphinginae Sphingidae Bombycoidea Monona County Antispila cornifoliella Clemens, 1860 Heliozelini Heliozelinae Heliozelidae Incurvarioidea Monona County Apoda y-inversum Packard, 1864 Yellow-collared Slug Moth (None) Limacodinae Limacodidae Zygaenoidea Monona County Aristotelia rubidella (Clemens, 1860) Gelechiini Gelechiinae Gelechiidae Gelechioidea Monona County Caenurgina erechtea (Cramer, 1780) Forage Looper Moth Euclidiini Erebinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Monona County Cameraria ostryarella (Chambers, 1871) Lithocolletinae Gracillariidae Gracillarioidea Monona County Dolichomia binodulalis (Zeller, 1872) Pink-fringed Dolichimia Moth Pyralini Pyralinae Pyralidae Pyraloidea Monona County Erastria coloraria (Fabricius, 1798) Broad-lined Erastra Caberini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Monona County Erastria cruentaria (Hubner, 1799) Thin-lined Erastria Moth Caberini Ennominae Geometridae Geometroidea Monona County Estigmene acrea (Drury, 1773) Salt Marsh Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Monona County Grammia virguncula (Kirby, 1837) Little Virgin Tiger Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Monona County Haploa confusa (Lyman, 1887) Confused Haploa Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Monona County Haploa lecontei (Guerin & Meneville, 1832) Leconte's Haploa Moth Arctiini Arctiinae Erebidae Noctuoidea Monona County Hemileuca nevadensis Stretch, 1872 Nevada
    [Show full text]
  • Siloam Springs State Park
    SILOAM SPRINGS STATE PARK ADAMS / BROWN COUNTIES, ILLINOIS AN INSECT SURVEY FOR ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FUNDED BY THE SMALL GAME GRANT FY1999 JUNE, 2000 A report of research by VERNON L. LA GESSE And JAMES R.WIKER Adjunct Research Associates Zoology Department Illinois State Museum Springfield, Illinois 217-525-1410 [email protected] I Siloam Springs State Park, Adams/Brown County, Illinois Insect Survey 1997-2000 Introduction Approximately 2000 species of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) occur in Illinois. These species are important to the ecosystem because of their association with the flora of this area. The larval stages are primary plant consumers, and the adult forms are pollinators. In addition, they are a common food resource for many species of birds, mammals and other arthropods. Many species, especially those restricted by host plant requirements, serve as indirect indicators of habitat quality (LaGesse et al. 1996). With the current interest in land management and maintaining plant and animal diversity, a formal insect survey was conducted . During the growing season of 1997 through 1999, 15 diurnal and 9 nocturnal surveys for Lepidoptera were performed over a three-year period by the senior author. Materials and Methods Prairies (mesic to dry), oak- hickory woodlands, oak barrens stream/creek edges and the lake communities were sampled at Siloam Springs State Park . Insects were sampled by various methods. Sampling included capture and release of species easily identified and preservation of voucher representatives to confirm identification of species . All voucher specimens will be deposited with the author's collection or the Illinois State Museum (ISM), Springfield, Illinois .
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory
    Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory New York Natural Heritage Program Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory Established in 1985, the New York Natural Heritage NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an Program (NYNHP) is a program of the State University of online tool for invasive species reporting and data New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry management. (SUNY ESF). Our mission is to facilitate conservation of NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable rare animals, rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We online resources: Conservation Guides include the accomplish this mission by combining thorough field biology, identification, habitat, and management of many inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and the of New York’s rare species and natural community most comprehensive database on New York's distinctive types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and biodiversity to deliver the highest quality information for communities in a specified area of interest. natural resource planning, protection, and management. The program is an active participant in the The Program is funded by grants and contracts from NatureServe Network – an international network of government agencies whose missions involve natural biodiversity data centers overseen by a Washington D.C. resource management, private organizations involved in based non-profit organization. There are currently land protection and stewardship, and both government and Natural Heritage Programs or Conservation Data private organizations interested in advancing the Centers in all 50 states and several interstate regions. conservation of biodiversity. There are also 10 programs in Canada, and many NY Natural Heritage is housed within NYS DEC’s participating organizations across 12 Latin and South Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources.
    [Show full text]