DOCSLIB.ORG

PHYLOGEOGRAPHY and GENETIC STRUCTURING of MOOSE (ALCES ALCES) POPULATIONS in ONTARIO, CANADA a Dissertation Submitted to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY and GENETIC STRUCTURING of MOOSE (ALCES ALCES) POPULATIONS in ONTARIO, CANADA a Dissertation Submitted to The PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND GENETIC STRUCTURING OF MOOSE (ALCES ALCES) POPULATIONS IN ONTARIO, CANADA A Dissertation Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Glynis N. R. Price 2016 Environmental and Life Sciences Ph.D. Graduate Program May 2016 Abstract Phylogeography and Genetic Structuring of Moose (Alces alces) populations in Ontario, Canada Glynis N. R. Price Moose are an iconic species, known for their large size and impressive antlers. Eight subspecies are classified in circumpolar regions of the planet - four in North America. Two subspecies are similar in shape and size, the north-western moose (Alces alces andersoni) and the eastern moose (Alces alces americana). It was previously believed that these two subspecies meet in northern Ontario. Earlier genetic population studies used a small number of samples from Ontario, primarily in broad studies covering all of North America. A comprehensive genetic study of moose populations in Ontario has not previously been conducted. We examined the genetic diversity and population structure at 10 polymorphic loci using 776 samples from Ontario, as well as outgroups from representative populations – Manitoba/Cape Breton, representing A. a. andersoni, and New Brunswick/Nova Scotia, representing A. a. americana. Results indicated three genetic populations in the province, in north-western Ontario, north-eastern Ontario and south-central Ontario. RST values, compared against both FST and Jost’s D values for phylogenetic analyses, indicated no phylogenetic pattern which suggests no subspeciation present in the province. ii Population movement patterns in Ontario were studied. Gene flow was estimated using genetic and spatial data. Isolation by distance was only seen within the first distance class of 100 kilometres and then not seen again at further distances, indicating that moose display philopatry. There were very few migrants travelling across the province, with a greater number moving gradually north and west, towards better habitat and food sources. A forensic database in the form of an allele frequency table was created. Three loci showed very low levels of heterozygosity across all three populations. Probability of identity was calculated for the three populations and quantified. Samples with known geographic origins were run against the database to test for sensitivity, with identification of origin occurring at an accuracy level between 87 and 100%. Within Ontario, there are not two different subspecies, as previously believed, but two different populations of the same subspecies meeting in northern Ontario. The genetic data does not support previous research performed in Ontario. The sample sizes in our research also provide a more comprehensive view of the entire province not seen in any previous studies. The comprehensive research enabled the building of a reliable forensic database that can be used for both management and forensic purposes for the entire province. Keywords: Moose, Ontario, phylogeography, subspecies, genetic diversity, Alces alces, migration, forensic database iii Preface This dissertation is written in article format. Chapters 2-4 are in preparation for peer- reviewed journals. Experimental design, analyses, and manuscript preparation were all carried out by the Ph.D. candidate. Dr. Cornelya Klutsch helped with the DAPC analyses. iv Acknowledgements “I can no other answer make but thanks, and thanks, and ever thanks.” William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night, Act 3, Scene 3 I am grateful to many people for supporting me through this journey. First, I would like to thank my supervisory committee, Jeff Bowman and Dennis Murray. Thanks to my supervisors: Barry Saville, for helping me finish my thesis; Paul Wilson, for providing me with this opportunity and for his financial contributions; and Marie-Josée Fortin, for her support, valuable feedback and courage along the way. Thanks to all of my funders, along with the many hunters and MNRF conservation officers who enthusiastically provided me with the numerous samples. I would also like to thank Cornelya Klutsch for her help with some of my statistical analyses. I would like to thank my parents for their endless support, patience, editing skills and understanding. It has been quite the journey, and they have made the entire trip with me. Thanks to Glen Hawkins and Joseph Warren for their interest and advice. A huge thankyou to Linda Cardwell for her support, as well as being a conscientious advocate for her students. I also want to acknowledge the Happy PhD Club: Eunice, Megan and Andrea - the final piece of our puzzle is now in place. To Karen McQuade Smith, Lindsay Thompson and Sharon Beaucage-Johnson - thanks to all of you for lending me your ears and giving me some great suggestions. There are many others to whom I owe thanks for their support over the years: to Brandie Bugiak for always being there, letting me vent and helping me laugh. Thanks to Mandy Juby-Livings and Bill Juby for v providing distractions and encouragement, both in person and across the country, and to my sisters, Adrienne and Megan, and my extended family and friends. Finally, a huge thankyou to Derek Winterhalt, for being my resident supporter, my sounding board, an avid fan of “Meese” . and for keeping me grounded. vi Funders NSERC Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Trent University vii Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ..................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. v Funders ................................................................................................................................... vii List of Commonly used Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................... x List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1: General Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 References .......................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2 - Genetic structure of moose (Alces alces) in Ontario, Canada ....................... 16 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 16 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 17 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 20 Results................................................................................................................................. 23 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 26 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 29 References .......................................................................................................................... 31 Figure Legend ..................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 3 – Spatial and genetic structure of moose (Alces alces) populations in Ontario, Canada: Implications for Management................................................................................. 42 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 42 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 43 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 50 Results................................................................................................................................. 53 Discussion and Conclusions.............................................................................................. 54 References .......................................................................................................................... 58 Figure Legend ..................................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 4 – Resolution of regional populations of moose (Alces alces) in Ontario - formation of forensic genetic database ................................................................................ 70 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 70 Introduction ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7.9 Vegetation 7.9.1 Regional Setting
    VICTORY NICKEL INC. 7.9 Vegetation This subsection summarizes the 2007 and 2008 vegetation survey programs completed at and surrounding the Minago Project site. URS Canada Inc. (URS, 2008d) conducted a detailed vegetation survey on the Minago Project site in 2007 and Roche Consulting Group (Roche, 2008a) conducted a vegetation survey along a 24.4 km stretch on Highway 6, just south of the site’s main entrance and along a potential railway siding near Ponton, Manitoba. Prior to a detailed description of the vegetation survey methodology and results, characteristics of regional and local settings are summarized below in terms of ecozone and ecoregion. 7.9.1 Regional Setting – Ecozone Regionally, the Minago Project Site is located within the Boreal Plains ecozone (URS, 2008d). This ecozone is a wide band that extends from the Peace River area of northeast British Columbia to the southeast corner of Manitoba. This zone is located immediately south of and is distinctly different from the Boreal Shield ecozone, which is bedrock controlled. The Boreal Plains ecozone is not bedrock controlled and contains fewer lakes. The dominant coniferous species in this ecozone are white and black spruce, jack pine and tamarack. Deciduous species consist predominantly of white birch, trembling aspen and balsam poplar, particularly in transition zones to the prairie grasslands to the south. Black spruce and tamarack are more abundant along the northern transition zone to the Boreal Shield ecozone. 7.9.2 Local Setting – Ecoregion The Minago Project Area including the Site occupies approximately 2,428 hectares, west of Highway 6, and is located within the Mid-Boreal Lowland ecoregion of the northern section of the Manitoba Plain (URS, 2008d).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology and Management of Moose in North America
    THE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE IN NORTH AMERICA Douglas H. PIMLOTT Department of Lands and Forests, Maple, Ontario, Canada Concepts of the status, productivity and management of North American moose (Alces alces) have changed greatly during the past decade. The rapidity of the change is illustrated by the published record. TUFTS (1951) questioned, « Is the moose headed for extinc­ tion ? » and discussed the then current belief that moose populations had seriously declined across much of the continent. Five years later, PETERSON (1955: 217) stated, « It appears almost inevitable that the days of unlimited hunting for moose must soon pass from most of North America. » He also suggested (1955 : 216) that a kill of 12 to 25 per cent of the adult population is the highest that would permit the maintenance of the breeding population. Four years later, I showed (PIMLOTT, 1959a) that moose in Newfoundland could sustain a kill of twice the magnitude suggested by Peterson. I also suggested (PIMLOTT, 1959b) that the North American moose kill could be very greatly increased-in spite of progressive liberalization of hunting regulations over much of Canada and a marked increase in annual kill. It is not realistic to assume that the status of the species has changed, within the decade, from threatened extinction to annual harvests of approximately 40,000 and potential harvests of two to three times that number. Although moose populations have increased in some areas since 1950, there is little doubt that the changed think­ ing about moose management is more the result of the increase in knowledge than of any other factor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Vulnerability of Habitats and Priority Species
    Climate Change and Biodiversity in Maine: A Summary of Vulnerability of Habitats and Priority Species Andrew Whitman Phillip deMaynadier Barbara Vickery Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences ME Department of Inland Fisheries and The Nature Conservancy Andrew Cutko Wildlife Sally Stockwell ME Department of Agriculture, Conservation, Steve Walker Maine Audubon and Forestry Maine Coast Heritage Trust Robert Houston U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Introduction As we watch temperatures climb and experience extremes in weather, it is clear that climate change has become a tangible threat to Maine’s ecosystems. Long-term research has shown that Maine’s wildlife are already responding to climate change.1 We will likely lose some of Maine’s native wildlife and observe permanent changes to their habitats in the coming decades. By 2100, average temperatures may increase 3° to 13°F. In response, the predicted northward shift of species ranges has begun. Rising temperatures will allow pests such as Winter Moose Tick (Dermacentor albipictus) and Hemlock Wooly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) to become more common, potentially harming native wildlife and their habitats. Drought may occur more frequently and impact all habitats, especially wetlands. Sea level will likely rise three to six feet and will flood coastal marshes and beaches. Recognizing these challenges, a team of Maine scientists assessed the vulnerability of wildlife and habitats to a changing climate and then identified general strategies to reduce their vulnerability.2 Other states have taken this first step as they aim to update their state wildlife action plans (SWAPs) by 2015. States originally created SWAPs to set conservation priorities and obtain additional federal funding for wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • High Conservation Value Forest Assessment Update – 2015 to 2020 1
    HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FOREST ASSESSMENT UPDATE 2015 – 2020 FSC ® Certification Period Port Hawkesbury Paper LP Liscomb River Large Landscape HCV Guysborough, Nova Scotia © Tree Top Images March 2015 Authors: Andrea Doucette, Port Hawkesbury Paper LP Chris Miller, Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society High Conservation Value Forest Assessment Update – 2015 to 2020 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A High Conservation Value Forest (HCV) assessment initially undertaken for the Port Hawkesbury Paper mill in 2010 (at that time called NewPage Port Hawkesbury) in accordance with Principle 9 of the Forest Stewardship Council ® (FSC) Maritimes Standard was updated for the 2015-2020 FSC certification period to ensure original HCV’s are still relevant and new HCV’s are captured for the next 5-year period. This re-assessment resulted in the following HCV designations: HCV Category HCV Value CATEGORY 1 – BIODIVERSITY Question 1: Species at Risk Boreal Felt Lichen Occurrences Roseate Tern Habitat Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat Wood Turtle Habitat American Marten Habitat Mainland Moose Habitat Canada Lynx Habitat Rusty Blackbird Habitat New Jersey Rush Habitat Eastern White Cedar Frosted Glass-Whiskers Occurrences Vole Ears Lichen Occurrences Blue Felt Lichen Occurrences Black Ash Olive-sided Flycatcher Habitat Eastern Whip-poor-will Habitat Eastern Wood Peewee Habitat Canada Warbler Habitat Question 2: Endemic Species None identified Question 3: Seasonal Concentration of Species PHP Watersheds Cold-water streams for salmon and trout Question 4: Regionally Significant
    [Show full text]
  • The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks Peter Aagaard The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Aagaard, Peter, "The Rewilding of New York's North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines and the Adirondacks" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1064. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1064 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REWILDING OF NEW YORK‟S NORTH COUNTRY: BEAVERS, MOOSE, CANINES AND THE ADIRONDACKS By Peter Miles Aagaard Bachelor of Arts, State University of New York College at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY, 2005 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Dan Flores, Chair Department of History Dr. Jeffrey Wiltse Department of History Dr. Paul R. Krausman Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences ii Aagaard, Peter, M.A., May 2008 History The Rewilding of New York‟s North Country: Beavers, Moose, Canines, and the Adirondacks Chairperson: Dan Flores This project examines the restoration histories of beavers (Castor canadensis), moose (Alces alces americana), and wild canines (Canis spp.) within the Adirondack Highlands of northern New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose – Preparing for the Future an Action Plan for the Moose
    Wildlife Stewardship SERIES IV NOVEMBER 2009 Moose – Preparing for the Future An Action Plan for the Moose 0$&.( ) 1= 2 ,( 1 0 2 , 2 7 8 $ , 1 7 & $ 2 , 1 6 6 6 $ In cooperation with the Ministry of Environment TM 287),77(56 Workshop Recommendations 1. Communicating the habitat needs of moose to other resource ministries and users through land-use plans will ensure a holistic approach to wildlife management. 2. Adjusting moose management in response to increased hunter access due to logging is important for sustainability and balanced age-class structures. 3. A commitment to the North American Wildlife Conservation Model would improve moose management in BC. The model outlines management principles and stipulates that law and science should be the foundation for wildlife management. 4. Improved harvest data collection from First Nations and resident recreational hunters would enhance the foundation guiding wildlife management decisions. 5. Including spike-fork moose in the annual allowable harvest (AAH) will improve moose management in BC. 6. Hunting regulations should reflect the increased percentage of yearling spike- fork moose. 7. There are other sources of funding for population surveys available to the Ministry of Environment. Guide outfitters can play an important role as the “on the ground” surveyors of animal populations. 8. Collaborative efforts between the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, and Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) to improve education, signage, and fencing (with overpasses or underpasses) at high collision locations would reduce vehicle/moose collisions. 9. Working collaboratively with the University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC), the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure can encourage railway companies to take preventative measures to reduce train/moose collisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose (Alces Alces) Browse Enhancement and Sustainable Forestry As a Rural Development Tool in the Sub-Arctic Boreal Forest Region of Alaska
    Moose (Alces alces) browse enhancement and sustainable forestry as a rural development tool in the sub-Arctic boreal forest region of Alaska Item Type Other Authors Cain, Bruce David Download date 08/10/2021 00:41:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9759 MOOSE (Alces alces) BROWSE ENHANCEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY AS A RURAL DEVELOPMENT TOOL IN THE SUB-ARCTIC BOREAL FOREST REGION OF ALASKA AN APPLIED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS RURAL DEVELOPMENT By Bruce David Cain, B.A., A.A. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2014 Abstract This project studies indigenous and western moose browse management issues in the sub-arctic boreal forest and how this topic relates to rural development. Chapter one explains the methodology of the project. Chapter two describes how moose browse and biomass management support rural development and investigates productivity potential of combining moose browse management with sustainable forestry and biomass production. Chapter three investigates landscape and habitat management principles from a customary and traditional practice versus a scientific approach. It looks at management models in the following territories: Alaska, Canada, Continental US, Mongolia/Russia and Scandinavia. Chapter four investigates indigenous wildlife management systems and other indigenous wildlife policy issues. Chapter five is a selected annotated bibliography. The project has a focus on the Ahtna region of central Alaska and recognizes the implications of these issues for this region. i In Memoriam Walter Charley was a man who inspired many across cultural and technical boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk in Nova Scotia IDENTIFICATION & INFORMATION GUIDE
    Species at Risk in Nova Scotia IDENTIFICATION & INFORMATION GUIDE Species at Risk in Nova Scotia IDENTIFICATION & INFORMATION GUIDE This guide was created for folks in Nova Scotia, like Harold and © Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute (MTRI), 2008. Diane, who want to learn more about the endangered species that Species at Risk in Nova Scotia - Identification & Information Guide live on the land around them: All rights reserved. This product is not to be sold or reproduced without permission from MTRI. Major funding for this initiative “Surveying for species at risk is an exciting adventure…because we was provided by Parks Canada's Priority Investment Fund for Species at Risk Recovery are looking for the most rare and fascinating creatures in Nova Scotia. When we find one we observe and appreciate it, but do our This guide is printed in Canada on FSC certified post consumer recycled paper. best not to disturb it…this way we can help a lot while having as little impact as possible" This field guide is also available online! - Harold & Diane Clapp Visit www.speciesatrisk.ca to view, download, or print an electronic version of this guide (online you can zoom in on the high resolution photos to see more detail). Since the status of species changes over time, as does our knowledge about them, we will provide web updates that reflect new information as it becomes available. DESIGN: TODD Graphic, www.toddgraphic.ns.ca N O N N I K C M R E F I N N E J i © Some Faces of the Species at Risk Community ii TOM HERMAN (ACADIA) BRENNAN CAVERHILL (PC) &
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends of Moose Populations and Hunting Opportunity in the Western United States
    STATUS AND TRENDS OF MOOSE POPULATIONS AND HUNTING OPPORTUNITY IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES M. Steven Nadeau1, Nicholas J. DeCesare2, Douglas G. Brimeyer3, Eric J. Bergman4, Richard B. Harris5, Kent R. Hersey6, Kari K. Huebner7, Patrick E. Matthews8, and Timothy P. Thomas9 1Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 600 S. Walnut, Boise, Idaho 83709, USA; 2Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 3201 Spurgin Road, Missoula, Montana 59804, USA; 3Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Box 67, Jackson, Wyoming 83001, USA; 4Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 W. Prospect Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA; 5Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capital Way North, Olympia, Washington 98504, USA; 6Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Box 146301, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114, USA; 7Nevada Department of Wildlife, 60 Youth Center Road, Elko, Nevada, 89801; 8Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 65495 Alder Slope Road, Enterprise, Oregon 97828, USA; 9Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Box 6249, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, USA. ABSTRACT: We review the state of knowledge of moose (Alces alces shirasi) in the western US with respect to the species’ range, population monitoring and management, vegetative associations, licensed hunting opportunity and hunter harvest success, and hypothesized limiting factors. Most moose monitoring programs in this region rely on a mixture of aerial surveys of various formats and hunter harvest statistics. However, given the many challenges of funding and collecting rigorous aerial survey data for small and widespread moose populations, biologists in many western states are currently exploring other potential avenues for future population monitoring. In 2015, a total of 2,263 hunting permits were offered among 6 states, with 1,811 moose harvested and an average success rate per permit-holder of 80%.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends of Moose Populations and Hunting Opportunity in the Western United States
    STATUS AND TRENDS OF MOOSE POPULATIONS AND HUNTING OPPORTUNITY IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES M. Steven Nadeau1, Nicholas J. DeCesare2, Douglas G. Brimeyer3, Eric J. Bergman4, Richard B. Harris5, Kent R. Hersey6, Kari K. Huebner7, Patrick E. Matthews8, and Timothy P. Thomas9 1Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 600 S. Walnut, Boise, Idaho 83709, USA; 2Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 3201 Spurgin Road, Missoula, Montana 59804, USA; 3Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Box 67, Jackson, Wyoming 83001, USA; 4Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 W. Prospect Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA; 5Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capital Way North, Olympia, Washington 98504, USA; 6Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Box 146301, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114, USA; 7Nevada Department of Wildlife, 60 Youth Center Road, Elko, Nevada, 89801; 8Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 65495 Alder Slope Road, Enterprise, Oregon 97828, USA; 9Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Box 6249, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, USA. ABSTRACT: We review the state of knowledge of moose (Alces alces shirasi) in the western US with respect to the species’ range, population monitoring and management, vegetative associations, licensed hunting opportunity and hunter harvest success, and hypothesized limiting factors. Most moose monitoring programs in this region rely on a mixture of aerial surveys of various formats and hunter harvest statistics. However, given the many challenges of funding and collecting rigorous aerial survey data for small and widespread moose populations, biologists in many western states are currently exploring other potential avenues for future population monitoring. In 2015, a total of 2,263 hunting permits were offered among 6 states, with 1,811 moose harvested and an average success rate per permit-holder of 80%.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Moose (Alces Alces Americana) in Mainland Nova Scotia
    Recovery Plan for Moose in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 Nova Scotia Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan Series Recovery Plan for Moose (Alces alces americana ) in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 Recovery Plan for Moose in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 Recommended citation: Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. 2007. Recovery Plan for Moose (Alces alces Americana) in Mainland Nova Scotia. Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources Species Recovery and Conservation webpage. (http://www.gov.ns.ca/natr/wildlife/biodiv/species_recovery.htm#moose) Cover illustration: From 1936 Nova Scotia Department of Lands & Forests Annual Report Recovery Plan for Moose in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 Recovery Plan for Moose (Alces alces americana) in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 Recovery of this species is considered technically or biologically feasible at this time. Recovery Plan for Moose in Mainland Nova Scotia March 2007 RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS Government of Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Nova Scotia Mainland Moose Recovery Team provided much of the information which is the grounding and basis for the contents of this recovery plan. A list of members and their affiliations is found in Section 4. Special thanks to the Mersey Tobeatic Research Institute for their help in completing this recovery plan. In particular, thanks to Crystal Doggett, the coordinating author. PREFACE This recovery plan has been prepared by the responsible jurisdiction, the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the Nova Scotia Mainland Moose Recovery Team. The recovery plan defines the recovery goal, objectives, strategies, and actions that are deemed necessary to protect, conserve, and recover mainland moose in Nova Scotia.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the U.S
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE U.S. POPULATION OF NORTHWESTERN MOOSE (ALCES ALCES ANDERSONI) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT JULY 9, 2015 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY HONOR THE EARTH NOTICE OF PETITION Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity (Center) is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center is supported by more than 900,000 members and activists throughout the United States. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species and the effective implementation of the Endangered Species Act. Honor the Earth is a Native-led organization, established by Winona LaDuke and Indigo Girls Amy Ray and Emily Saliers. Our mission is to create awareness and support for Native environmental issues and to develop needed financial and political resources for the survival of sustainable Native communities. Honor the Earth develops these resources by using music, the arts, the media, and Indigenous wisdom to ask people to recognize our joint dependency on the Earth and be a voice for those not heard. ii Submitted this 9th day of July, 2015 Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]